defa14a
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant þ |
|
|
|
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|
|
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission |
o
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
|
Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-11(c) or §240.14a-12 |
SM&A
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the
offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing
by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the
date of its filing. |
|
1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
4) |
|
Date Filed: |
1
SM&A, a Delaware corporation, hosted its Q1 2008 Earnings Conference Call on Thursday, May 8, 2008.
The following are prepared remarks related to this conference call.
2
SM&A
Q1 Conference Call Script
May 8, 2008
Delivered by:
Cathy McCarthy
Jim Eckstaedt
Kevin Reiners
Peter Pace, General USMC (retired)
Joe Diaz
Joe Diaz:
Thank you for joining us to review the financial results of SM&A. for the first quarter ended March
31, 2008.
With us on the call today are:
|
|
Ms. Cathy McCarthy, president and chief executive officer; |
|
|
|
Mr. Jim Eckstaedt, executive vice president finance and chief financial officer; |
|
|
|
Mr. Kevin Reiners, executive vice president of operations; |
|
|
|
Peter Pace, General USMC (ret.), president and CEO of Strategic Advisors |
At the conclusion of todays prepared remarks we will open the call for a question and answer
session.
If anyone participating on todays call does not have a full-text copy of the release, you can
retrieve it off the companys website at www.smawins.com or numerous financial websites on the
Internet.
3
Before we begin with prepared remarks, we submit for the record the following statement:
All stockholders of SM&A are advised to read the definitive proxy statement and other documents
related to the solicitation of proxies by SM&A for use at the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders
of SM&A. They contain important information regarding the election of directors and other matters.
The definitive proxy statement and form of proxy have been mailed to stockholders of record of
SM&A along with other relevant documents. They are available at no charge on the SECs website at
http://www.sec.gov In addition, SM&A will provide copies of the definitive proxy statement without
charge upon request.
Some statements made in this news release refer to future actions, strategies, or results that
involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Any number of factors could cause actual results to
differ materially from expectations, including a shift in demand for SM&As Competition Management
and Program services; fluctuations in the size, timing, and duration of client engagements; delays,
cancellations, or shifts in emphasis for competitive procurement activities; declines in future
defense, information technology, homeland security, new systems, and research and development
expenditures, and other risk factors listed in SM&As SEC reports, including the report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Actual results may differ materially from those
expressed or implied. The company does not undertake any duty to update forward-looking statements.
4
With that said, I would like to turn the call over to Ms. Cathy McCarthy, president and chief
executive officer of SM&A. Cathy.
Cathy McCarthy:
Id like to thank all of you participating on todays call. All of us at SM&A appreciate your
continued interest in the Company and we look forward to the opportunity to communicate with you,
particularly during this important period of the Companys history.
As many of you know, we are currently involved in a proxy contest leading up to our Annual
Shareholders Meeting on May 23rd. We do not believe this is a proper forum in which to
comment on the current status of the matter, and we will be focusing our remarks on the financial
results of the first quarter ended March 31, 2008 and providing you with an overview of our
strategic business plan.
We have prepared a slide presentation that provides selected strategic data that will be presented
during this conference call. We encourage you to access that presentation at our corporate website,
www.smawins.com, and by clicking on the Investor Relations tab.
Getting down to business, the Board of Directors and this management team are in the process of
transforming SM&A from a small proposal consulting firm into a leading
5
Project Lifecycle Consulting Company. Within this transformation we have three overriding goals:
First, to provide our clients products and services to enable their success in the pursuit,
proposal, and performance phases. Second, to create shareholder value by increasing revenue,
earnings per share and free cash flow at a greater rate than revenue growth; and Third, to
establish a company environment that values and establishes SM&A as an employer of choice.
As SM&As historical performance indicates, relying solely on our traditional Competition
Management business, where we exclusively help our clients to win large competitive procurements
contracts, leads to a business with limited market visibility and revenue predictability.
Our goal is to more fully develop our Program Services capabilities, in order to become the leading
provider of turnkey consulting services and to partner with our clients to PURSUE, WIN AND
SUCCESSFULLY EXECUTE on large competitive procurement contracts. Our mission will be to support our
clients every step along the way to successfully complete projects on time and on budget for
however many years the length of the procurement contract calls for.
Independent industry analysts estimate that the annual Competition Management market totals
approximately $1.5 to $2 billion. Various industry analysts estimate the Program Services market to
be anywhere from 4 to 10 times as large as the Competition Management market. We believe that
Program Services provides a unique market
6
opportunity that is significantly larger than our flagship Competition Management business and
provides a significantly higher degree of market visibility and revenue predictability. Going
forward, we believe these market dynamics will dramatically benefit our business, our shareholders
and our employees.
Pursuing this comprehensive Project Lifecycle Consulting approach will generate a larger number of
opportunities in a substantially larger range of market segments that can drive sustained revenue
growth and profitability for years to come.
This is a transformational process that requires a significant investment of time, resources and
personal dedication. Moving this company to a position where it can successfully compete in a
rapidly changing market environment cannot happen overnight, or by employing status quo operating
strategies. Without this transformation, sustainable shareholder value cannot, and will not, be
achieved. We are dedicated to becoming the leader of this emerging industry by providing
leading-edge services that can only be found at SM&A to win and successfully deliver on competitive
procurement projects.
We have a great deal of confidence in the abilities of our employees to implement the strategies
that we are putting in place. We are extremely optimistic about the future of our company. We
believe its best years are ahead.
Overall, demand for both Competition Management and Program Services remains high.
Many factors are influencing demand for our Competition Management offering. From
7
an SM&A perspective the following factors are influencing Federal Procurement activity:
|
|
|
The on-going war on terrorism |
|
|
|
|
Program performance difficulties |
|
|
|
|
Pending change in the Administration |
These factors have resulted in changing trends within our Competition Management business. These
trends include:
|
|
|
Increases in Information related procurements which support agencies such as
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) |
|
|
|
|
Increases in Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) procurement actions, which
allow customers greater flexibility |
|
|
|
|
Reductions in large Platform or Large Systems procurements |
|
|
|
|
Transformational Communication Satellite Program (TSAT), US Tanker, and Global
Positioning System III are examples of large programs which occurred in 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Less large program procurements in 2008 |
|
|
|
|
A slow down in Federal decision making which is delaying various procurements |
These same factors are shaping our activities and experiences within Program Services
|
|
|
Increases in opportunities from clients who have larger contracts than usual which
is creating program performance issues |
|
|
|
|
Pressure to continue existing developments and follow-on platform purchases
|
8
Within Program Services, the most significant factor affecting our business is the relative newness
of our offerings and the SM&A branding within our clients. As clients better understand our
capability, new opportunities resulting in greater demand than supply.
Lastly, the overall strategy of selling and deploying against a Life Cycle model is being received
favorably and has created new opportunities which SM&A had not been afforded in previous years.
With that, let me turn the call over to Jim Eckstaedt, our executive vice president and chief
financial officer for a review of the numbers. Jim.
Jim Eckstaedt:
Thank you, Cathy, and good afternoon, everyone. As Cathy mentioned, I would like to start with the
review of our financial performance for the first quarter of 2008. We reported revenue of $25.4
million during the first quarter, an increase of 7.6% from 2007. Revenues from our Competition
Management business were $13.3 million or 52% of total revenues, while Program Services were $12.1
million or 48% of total revenues. First quarter net income was $500,000, or $0.03 per diluted
share, compared with $1.5 million or $0.08 per diluted share in the prior year.
During the quarter, the Company incurred expenses of $1.1 million related to the previously
disclosed company-wide offsite training conference; $876,000 from the earn-out expense previously
disclosed to the principal of an acquired business, PPI; and
9
$60,000 related to the on-going proxy contest. Excluding these various charges, non-GAAP diluted
earnings per share on a tax adjusted basis would have been $0.09 for the quarter. In an effort to
be transparent, weve provided reconciliation of SG&A and EPS for you in our press release.
The revenues for our Competition Management business were $13.3 million compared with $14.4 million
in the first quarter of 2007 and $12.5 million in the immediately preceding quarter. Revenues for
the quarter in Competition Management were derived from 92 proposals equating to $145,000 per
proposal. This compares favorably to 88 proposals in the fourth quarter of 2007 where we averaged
$142,000 per proposal and compared to 111 proposals during the first quarter of 2007 where we
averaged $129,000 per proposal. Competition Management revenues represented 52% of total revenues
for the quarter, compared with 61% of total revenues in the prior year. Importantly, the company
continued to recognize WIN incentives in this segment totaling $226,000 versus no WIN incentives a
year ago.
The revenues for our Program Services of $12.1 million, an increase of 31.5% compared with $9.2
million in the first quarter of 2007 and $11.6 million in the immediately preceding quarter.
Revenues from PPI and PMA contributed a total of $3.8 million during the first quarter, of which
$2.0 million is considered non-organic. As you may recall, we acquired PPI on February 10, 2007,
while we acquired PMA in September 2007. During the first quarter of 2007, PPI contributed $1.1
million in revenues. Revenues for the quarter in Program Services were derived from 71 projects
equating to
10
$171,000 per project. This compares favorably to 65 projects during the quarter a year ago and 83
projects in the immediately preceding quarter. The $171,000 per project during the quarter
compared favorably to $142,000 per project in the first quarter of 2007 and $139,000 during the
fourth quarter of 2007. Program Services revenues represented 48% of total revenues for the
quarter, compared with 39% of total revenues in the prior year. The shift in revenues from
Competition Management to Program Services as an increasingly larger percent of our overall
revenues is in line with our strategic plan of diversifying our offerings in the much larger
Program Services area to offset the traditionally unpredictable Competition Management business.
Revenue by market vertical showed Aerospace & Defense clients contributing $19.5 million or 77% of
total revenues, while non-A&D contributed 23% or $5.9 million. This compares to an 84% A&D, 16%
non-A&D breakdown during the first quarter of 2007. Again, the shift towards a more balanced mix
by market vertical is in line with our strategic plan of greater diversification.
During the quarter our top five clients accounted for 73% of our total revenue, compared with 68% a
year ago.
Our gross margin was 38.3% versus 39.0% a year ago. The decrease in gross margin is primarily
attributed to teaming arrangements with certain clients and investments with certain clients to WIN
post award Program Service engagements.
11
SG&A expenses were $9.0 million in the quarter. As previously discussed, included in the SG&A
expense was $1.1 million related to a company-wide off-site training conference held every other
year, $876,000 related to an earn-out expense by the principal of PPI and $60,000 associated with
the current on-going proxy contest. Stock-based compensation expense totaled $421,000 compared with
$400,000 a year ago. Excluding the aforementioned expenses, non-GAAP operating SG&A expenses were
$6.5 million, or 25.6% of first quarter 2008 revenue comparing favorably with 25.8% on an operating
basis in the immediately preceding quarter and compared to 24.5% on an operating basis in the first
quarter of 2007. Again, we have provided a reconciliation in the press release. Also included in
SG&A during the quarter was approximately $500,000 related to the establishment of our Strategic
Advisors subsidiary.
During the quarter the Company purchased 241,200 shares of its stock in the open market at a total
cost of $1.0 million, or an average price of $4.29 per share. The Company purchased close to the
daily maximum volume limit under SEC rules during the quarter. We continue to have approximately
$4.8 million remaining in the share repurchase authorization. Furthermore, the Board of Directors
is committed to effectively deploying cash and has reaffirmed its approval to repurchase shares of
SM&A.
Turning to the balance sheet. Cash and investments at the end of March totaled $10.7 million.
Accounts receivable were $22.4 million. DSOs were 80 days compared to 69 days at December 31,
2007. The increase in DSOs is due to certain contracts billed based upon contractual terms and
the results of our regular billing cycle. These two
12
items account for 6 DSO days and bring us near our historic average of 74 days. Capital
expenditures in the quarter were approximately $117,000. Cash was used during the quarter
included $1.0 million for repurchase of shares of SM&A, earn-out payments to the principle of PPI
for $3.7 million and $500,000 for the company-wide training conference, and $1.4 million in
estimated tax payments.
GUIDANCE
As it relates to guidance for the full year 2008, we are reiterating our expectation of revenue
growth of approximately 10% in 2008 over the $98.3 million reported in 2007. We anticipate earnings
per share for 2008 to be approximately $0.36 per share, which does include proxy costs. After
coming in as CFO in January and collectively as a management team having an additional quarter to
analyze SG&A spending based on the stabilization of our business following a year of management
transitions, we believe that we can decrease SG&A as a percent of revenue by approximately one-half
of a percentage point, which accounts for the increase from the previously announced $0.34.
Furthermore with our results for the first quarter of 2008 reported today, EPS for the remaining
three quarters of fiscal 2008 is estimated to be $0.33.
In summary to our guidance expectations, we expect gross margins to be between 39% and 40%. SG&A
expenses including stock-based compensation and excluding the full effect for the additional
earn-out expense related to the PPI acquisition is estimated at 27% of revenue. We continue to
forecast the full year impact of the earn-out expense
13
related to the PPI acquisition to be approximately $2.0 million. Also, costs associated with the
proxy contest, which is included in the SG&A percentage of 27% is estimated to be in the range of
$450,000 to $500,000. Excluding the full effect for the earn-out expense, stock-based compensation
and proxy contest costs, operating SG&A is estimated to be approximately 25% of revenue. On a
non-GAAP adjusted basis, this would equate to $0.49 earnings per fully diluted share.
I would now like to turn the call back to Cathy McCarthy.
Cathy McCarthy:
Thank you Jim. I would now like to turn to briefing you on our Strategic Plan. At the end of 2006
and into 2007 Kevin Reiners and I began the implementation of a plan to diversify our portfolio of
products through a program services roadmap that Kevin developed and began to roll out with the
development of our Milestone Success product offering in 2006 leading to the acquisition of PPI and
PMA in 2007. When I returned to the company in July 2007 I had three major priorities 1. To do
everything I and the board could do to retain top talent, 2) Build out my leadership team with the
best talent available which resulted in my promoting Kevin Reiners to EVP of Operations and the
hiring of both Anna Aguirre our SVP HR and Jim Eckstaedt, our EVP/CFO. We currently have one
additional opening in our executive leadership team, that of EVP of Sales, however the on-going
proxy event has dramatically delayed our progress on that front.
14
Additionally, and most importantly I wanted to formalize and expand on the strategic direction we
had commenced before I left the company in mid-2007. My goal was to formalize the strategy into a
fully implementable strategic plan approved by the board and to be shared with employees and
clients.
We had participation in this plan with a cross section of our thought leaders in the company in the
areas of strategy, competition management & program services. We had the opportunity to share our
plan with Alnoldo Hax, the Sloan Profeswsor of Management at the Sloan School of Management at MIT.
He is the author of the Delta Model an organizing framework to develop strategy. Dr. Hax worked
with us extensively on client segmentation and client lock-in; and CRA international provided us
extensive market information and the results of interviews with our clients, our board, and our
management team.
During Sept, October and November of 2007 we had extensive planning session resulting in a fully,
detailed, documented plan which included a strategy for revenue growth, financial targets and
investment priorities. I have asked Kevin Reiners to share excerpts of this plan with you today;
and I have invited General Peter Pace to discuss the progress achieved on the Strategic Advisors
front. Lets start with Kevin.
REINERS COMMENTS / PACE COMMENTS
Cathy McCarthy:
15
Thank you Kevin and General Pace. At this point I would like to comment on our current stock
price. We believe the stock is trading at its current levels for 6 reasons:
|
1. |
|
The market in general today is a very difficult environment and any companies that
miss analyst expectations have been harshly punished by the market especially Micro-cap
and small cap firms |
|
|
2. |
|
On the day we announced our 2008 guidance, 3 of the major indicies , the Russell
2000, the S&P 500, and the Nasdaq Composite Index were down 5% on average for the three
days immediately following our earnings release. |
|
|
3. |
|
Based on our progress in 2007, by mid-year 2007 our analysts had already built into
their forecast a continuation of our 2007 growth in revenue and EPS. |
|
|
4. |
|
Our initial guidance in March of 10% revenue growth and $0.34 EPS was obviously a
disappointment to us and the market; however, this guidance is a direct result of all the
disruptions in our sales and leadership team throughout 2007 leading to a weakened
short-term pipeline and reduced tenured Account Executives calling on clients by year end. |
|
|
5. |
|
The accounting treatment of PPI which although understood by our investors, has
obviously applied downward pressure (from a non-operational expense). |
16
|
6. |
|
And lastly the status of this proxy contest has already destroyed value, both in cost
and distraction. |
We look forward to the completion of this distracting proxy action at our Annual Shareholders
Meeting on May 23rd in order to reinvigorate the trading volume in our stock.
Before we open the call for your questions, Id like to announce that one of leading proxy advisory
firms has ruled in favor of the current board and management team in the on-going proxy contest. We
are extremely pleased with this development.
As I mentioned early in my prepared remarks, this is not the proper forum to discuss the proxy
contest and we intend to address only questions relating to the results of the quarter, our
guidance and the strategic direction of the Company.
With that, Ill open the call for your questions. Operator.
17