e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
August 26,
2011
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to
Commission File Number
1-13873
STEELCASE INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-0819050
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. employer identification
no.)
|
901 44th Street SE
Grand Rapids, Michigan
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
49508
(Zip
Code)
|
(Registrants telephone
number, including area code)
(616) 247-2710
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
As of September 29, 2011, Steelcase Inc. had
87,594,019 shares of Class A Common Stock and
42,574,992 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.
STEELCASE INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 26, 2011
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
STEELCASE INC.
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
700.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,339.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
487.9
|
|
|
|
|
417.5
|
|
|
|
|
934.2
|
|
|
|
|
796.3
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
201.2
|
|
|
|
|
170.6
|
|
|
|
|
384.3
|
|
|
|
|
332.1
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
174.9
|
|
|
|
|
162.8
|
|
|
|
|
343.1
|
|
|
|
|
324.7
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(9.1
|
)
|
Investment income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared and paid per common share
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
1
STEELCASE INC.
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $24.0 and $23.1
|
|
|
|
322.9
|
|
|
|
|
271.0
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
137.5
|
|
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
|
58.0
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
|
742.9
|
|
|
|
|
1,012.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
of $1,220.7 and $1,228.1
|
|
|
|
345.9
|
|
|
|
|
345.8
|
|
Company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
222.2
|
|
|
|
|
223.1
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
136.8
|
|
|
|
|
132.2
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
178.8
|
|
|
|
|
174.8
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
100.7
|
|
|
|
|
86.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$
|
1,747.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
$
|
221.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
195.0
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
|
120.3
|
|
|
|
|
136.3
|
|
Employee benefit obligations
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
140.9
|
|
|
|
|
134.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
|
505.0
|
|
|
|
|
736.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
|
290.1
|
|
|
|
|
291.3
|
|
Employee benefit plan obligations
|
|
|
|
166.4
|
|
|
|
|
170.0
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
78.8
|
|
|
|
|
80.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
|
535.3
|
|
|
|
|
541.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
|
1,040.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,278.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
652.5
|
|
|
|
|
649.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
707.1
|
|
|
|
|
718.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
|
$
|
1,747.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2
STEELCASE INC.
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
Changes in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions
and deconsolidations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable
|
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(41.8
|
)
|
Employee compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
(19.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
Purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
(158.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Liquidations of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
456.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Acquisition, net of divestiture
|
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
258.7
|
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
(253.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(23.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
(293.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) for interim financial information and with
the instructions in Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals and adjustments) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements
have been included. Results for interim periods should not be
considered indicative of results to be expected for a full year.
Reference should be made to the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2011
(Form 10-K).
The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 25,
2011 was derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet
included in our
Form 10-K.
As used in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
(Report), unless otherwise expressly stated or the
context otherwise requires, all references to
Steelcase, we, our,
Company and similar references are to Steelcase Inc.
and its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is
maintained. Unless the context otherwise indicates, reference to
a year relates to the fiscal year, ended in February of the year
indicated, rather than a calendar year. Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3
and Q4 reference the first, second, third and fourth quarter,
respectively, of the fiscal year indicated. All amounts are in
millions, except share and per share data, data presented as a
percentage or as otherwise indicated.
As of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we
realigned our reportable segments for financial reporting
purposes primarily as a result of organizational changes to
strengthen our position as a globally integrated enterprise. The
accompanying segment data for all prior periods has been
reclassified to reflect these realignments. See Note 9 for
additional information regarding our reportable segments.
|
|
2.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS
|
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) amended Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 350, Intangibles Goodwill and
Other. This amendment is intended to reduce the cost and
complexity of the annual goodwill impairment test by providing
entities an option to perform a qualitative assessment to
determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. The
amended provisions are effective for reporting periods beginning
on or after December 15, 2011 (the first quarter of fiscal
2013 for the Company). However, early adoption is permitted if
an entitys financial statements for the most recent annual
or interim period have not yet been issued. This amendment
impacts testing steps only, and therefore adoption will not have
an impact on the Companys consolidated financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2011, the FASB amended
ASC 715-80,
Compensation Retirement Benefits
Multiemployer Plans. This amendment is intended to provide
more information about an employers financial obligations
to a multiemployer pension plan and, therefore, help financial
statement users better understand the financial health of all of
the significant plans in which the employer participates. The
amended provisions are effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2011 (the first quarter of fiscal 2013 for the
Company). Early adoption is permitted and retrospective
application is required. This amendment impacts disclosures
only, and therefore adoption will not have an impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In June 2011, the FASB amended ASC 220, Comprehensive
Income. This amendment was issued to enhance comparability
between entities that report under GAAP and International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and to provide
a more consistent method of presenting non-owner transactions
that
4
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
affect an entitys equity. The amendment requires companies
to present the components of net income and other comprehensive
income either as one continuous statement or as two separate but
consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to report other
comprehensive income and its components as part of the statement
of changes in shareholders equity. The amended provisions
are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
years, beginning after December 15, 2011 (the first quarter
of fiscal 2013 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted,
and full retrospective application is required. This amendment
impacts presentation and disclosure only, and therefore adoption
will not have an impact on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2011, the FASB amended ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures. This amendment provides a
consistent definition of fair value and ensures that the fair
value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar
between GAAP and IFRS. The amendment clarifies the application
of existing fair value measurements and disclosures, and changes
certain principles or requirements for fair value measurements
and disclosures. These provisions are effective for reporting
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 (the first
quarter of fiscal 2013 for the Company), applied prospectively.
This amendment is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Earnings per share is computed using the two-class method. The
two-class method determines earnings per share of common stock
and participating securities according to dividends or dividend
equivalents and their respective participation rights in
undistributed earnings. Participating securities include
performance units and restricted stock units in which the
participants have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents during the performance period. Basic
earnings per share of participating securities is the same as
basic earnings per share of common stock for all periods
presented. However, participating securities impacted
year-to-date
2012 diluted earnings per share by one cent. Diluted earnings
per share includes the effects of options and certain
performance shares and performance units in which the
participants have forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend
equivalents during the performance period. However, for both the
three and six months ended August 26, 2011, diluted
earnings per share does not reflect the effects of options
totaling 2.3 million, because their effect would have been
anti-dilutive. Similarly, for the three and six months ended
August 27, 2010, diluted
5
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
earnings per share does not reflect the effects of anti-dilutive
options and certain performance units totaling 3.3 million
and 3.8 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Computation of Earnings per Share
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding for basic earnings
per share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
130.9
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
131.4
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock-based compensation (in millions)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding for diluted
earnings per share (in millions)
|
|
|
|
131.3
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
131.8
|
|
|
|
|
132.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shares outstanding at period end (in millions)
|
|
|
|
130.2
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
130.2
|
|
|
|
|
133.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss)
and all changes to shareholders equity except those due to
investments by, and distributions to, shareholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26, 2011
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26, 2011
|
|
|
|
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Before Tax
|
|
|
|
Tax (Expense)
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
Comprehensive Income (loss)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Tax Amount
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments, net
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
Derivative adjustments
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments reflect the impact of
the changes in certain foreign currency values (principally the
euro, pound sterling and Canadian dollar) relative to the
U.S. dollar. As of August 26, 2011, approximately 31%
of our assets were denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar, the majority of which were denominated in
euros.
The carrying amounts for many of our financial instruments,
including cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes
receivable, accounts and notes payable, short-term borrowings
and certain other liabilities, approximate their fair value due
to their relatively short maturities. Our short-term
investments, foreign exchange forward contracts and long-term
investments are measured at fair value on the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Our total debt is carried at cost and was $292.7 and $546.8 as
of August 26, 2011 and February 25, 2011,
respectively. The fair value of our total debt is measured using
a discounted cash flow analysis based on current market interest
rates for similar types of instruments and was approximately
$285 and $555 as of August 26, 2011 and February 25,
2011, respectively.
7
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We periodically use derivative financial instruments to manage
exposures to movements in interest rates and foreign exchange
rates. The use of these financial instruments modifies the
exposure of these risks with the intention to reduce our risk of
short-term volatility. We do not use derivatives for speculative
or trading purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26, 2011
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
U.S. agency debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
109.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
176.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
U.S. agency debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254.9
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
U.S. government debt securities
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Canadian asset-backed commercial paper restructuring notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
203.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
292.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
513.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy for any period presented. Below is a
roll-forward of assets and liabilities measured at fair value
using Level 3 inputs for the six months ended
August 26, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paper
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Rate
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
Roll-Forward of Fair Value Using Level 3 Inputs
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Balance as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on investments
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of August 26, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
other-than-temporary
impairments recognized on our auction rate securities during the
six months ended August 26, 2011 were recognized in
Investment income (loss) on the Condensed Consolidated
Statement of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
$
|
60.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
55.0
|
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
|
79.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159.9
|
|
|
|
|
148.0
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(20.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
137.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The portion of inventories determined by the LIFO method
aggregated $55.8 as of August 26, 2011 and $45.5 as of
February 25, 2011.
9
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS AND LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Range
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Debt Obligations
|
|
|
as of August 26, 2011
|
|
|
Maturity Range
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
U.S. dollar obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes due August 2011
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.9
|
|
Senior notes due February 2021
|
|
|
6.375%
|
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
|
|
|
249.9
|
|
Revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.35%
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
|
43.1
|
|
Capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
6.0%-6.5%
|
|
|
|
2012-2015
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292.3
|
|
|
|
|
543.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities
|
|
|
6.0%
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings and long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
292.7
|
|
|
|
|
546.8
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
290.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
291.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2011, we repaid $250.0 of senior notes.
The annual maturities of short-term borrowings and long-term
debt for each of the following five years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending in February
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
2012
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
2016 and thereafter
|
|
|
|
282.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
292.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Q1 2012, we awarded a target of 485,845 performance units to
our executive officers. These performance units are earned after
a three-year performance period, from 2012 through 2014, based
on our total shareholder return relative to a comparison group
of companies. The number of units that may be earned can range
from 0% to 200% of the target amount, therefore the maximum
number of performance units that can be issued under the award
is 971,690. For this award, a dividend equivalent is calculated
based on the actual number of units earned at the end of the
performance period, equal to the dividends that would have been
payable on the earned units had they been held during the entire
performance period as Class A Common Stock. At the end of
the performance period, the dividend equivalents are paid in the
form of cash or Class A Common Stock at the discretion of
the Board of Directors. The award will be forfeited if a
participant leaves our company for reasons other than
retirement, disability or death or if the participant engages in
any competition with us, as defined in the plan and determined
by the Administrative Committee in its discretion. If a change
in control occurs at least six months following the award date,
the target award will be deemed to be earned and a pro rata
number of units will be vested and paid based upon the length of
time within the performance period
10
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
which has elapsed prior to the effective date of the change in
control. The fair value of the performance units awarded was
calculated on the grant date using the Monte Carlo simulation
model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 Awards
|
|
|
2011 Awards
|
|
|
2010 Awards
|
Three-year risk-free interest rate (1)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Expected term
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Estimated volatility (2)
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
%
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per unit
|
|
|
$
|
16.57
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.14
|
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the U.S. government bond benchmark on the grant date. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the historical price volatility of the Companys
common stock for the three-year period preceding the grant date. |
The total performance units expense and associated tax benefit
for all outstanding awards for the three and six months ended
August 26, 2011 and August 27, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
Performance Units
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
Expense
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
The performance units activity for the six months ended
August 26, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Maximum Number of Nonvested Units
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value per Unit (2)
|
|
Nonvested as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
3,024,000
|
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
971,690
|
|
|
|
|
8.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested as of August 26, 2011 (1)
|
|
|
|
3,995,690
|
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Total nonvested units include 390,500 units, which
represents the 25% portion of the awards granted in 2011 and
2010 which are not subject to performance conditions. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value per unit presented in this table assumes the
awards are at maximum. |
As of August 26, 2011, there is $5.8 of remaining
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance
units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock and Restricted Stock Units
|
For the six months ended August 26, 2011, we awarded
269,805 restricted stock units (RSUs), of which
252,655 were to our executive officers in Q1 2012. These RSUs
have restrictions on transfer which lapse approximately three
years after the date of grant, at which time RSUs are issued as
unrestricted shares of Class A Common Stock. These awards
are subject to forfeiture if a participant leaves our company
for reasons other than retirement, disability, death or
termination by us without cause prior to the vesting date.
11
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The total restricted stock and RSUs expense and associated tax
benefit for all outstanding awards for the three and six months
ended August 26, 2011 and August 27, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
Restricted Stock and RSUs
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
Expense
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
The restricted stock and RSUs activity for the six months ended
August 26, 2011 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Nonvested Shares/Units
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
per Share/Unit
|
|
Nonvested as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
|
496,151
|
|
|
|
|
499,717
|
|
|
|
|
7.71
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,805
|
|
|
|
|
269,805
|
|
|
|
|
10.86
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
(3,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
(17,566
|
)
|
|
|
|
12.26
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
(8,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
8.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested as of August 26, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743,456
|
|
|
|
|
743,456
|
|
|
|
|
8.73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of August 26, 2011, there is $3.3 of remaining
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested RSUs. That
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period
of 2.5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
Grant Date Fair Value per Share/Unit
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value per unit of RSUs granted
during the six months ended August 26, 2011 and
August 27, 2010
|
|
|
$
|
10.86
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the end of Q1 2012, we realigned our reportable segments
for financial reporting purposes primarily as a result of
organizational changes to strengthen our position as a globally
integrated enterprise. The organizational changes consisted of
the realignment of the reporting structure for the Steelcase
brand in North America, Latin America and the region of Europe,
the Middle East and Africa (EMEA).
As a result of these changes, our reportable segments were
realigned to reflect the organizational structure used by the
Chief Executive Officer for making operating and investment
decisions and assessing performance. Our reportable segments now
consist of (1) the Americas segment, (2) the EMEA
segment and (3) the Other category. Unallocated corporate
expenses are reported as Corporate.
The Americas segment serves customers in the U.S., Canada and
Latin America with a portfolio of integrated architecture,
furniture and technology products marketed to corporate,
government, healthcare, education and retail customers through
the Steelcase, Turnstone, Details and Nurture by Steelcase
brands. In addition, the Coalesse operating segment has been
aggregated with the Americas.
The EMEA segment serves customers in Europe, the Middle East and
Africa primarily under the Steelcase brand, with an emphasis on
freestanding furniture systems, storage and seating solutions.
The Other category includes Asia Pacific, PolyVision and
Designtex. IDEO was included in the Other category through Q3
2011, but due to the ownership transition, our remaining 20%
share of IDEO income has been recorded as a non-operating item
since Q4 2011. Asia Pacific serves customers in
12
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Asia and Australia primarily under the Steelcase brand with an
emphasis on freestanding furniture systems, storage and seating
solutions. PolyVision designs and manufactures visual
communication products, such as static and interactive
electronic whiteboards which are sold into the primary and
secondary education markets around the world. Designtex designs
and sells surface materials including textiles and wall
coverings which are specified by architects and designers
directly to end-use customers primarily in North America.
Revenue and operating income (loss) for the three and six months
ended August 26, 2011 and August 27, 2010 and total
assets as of August 26, 2011 and February 25, 2011 by
segment are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Reportable Segment Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
$
|
485.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
369.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
894.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
701.8
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
121.8
|
|
|
|
|
287.7
|
|
|
|
|
232.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
|
108.4
|
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
|
|
|
207.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
700.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,339.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Reportable Segment Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
$
|
764.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
682.0
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
368.0
|
|
|
|
|
351.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
204.2
|
|
|
|
|
212.0
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
410.5
|
|
|
|
|
751.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,747.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,996.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
DIVESTITURES,
ACQUISITIONS AND OWNERSHIP TRANSITIONS
|
|
|
|
Divestiture of
PolyVision Division
|
In Q2 2012, we completed the sale of PolyVisions remaining
low margin whiteboard fabrication business in Europe to a third
party for proceeds totaling $2.3. The transaction included the
sale of PolyVision SAS (France) and PolyVision A/S (Denmark) and
resulted in a loss of $1.1 recorded in Restructuring costs
on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
13
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For
year-to-date
2012 and the year ended February 25, 2011 and the interim
periods therein, our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations included the following related to PolyVision SAS and
PolyVision A/S:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.6
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.1
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
In Q1 2012, Office Environments of New England, LLC
(OENE), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Steelcase Inc.,
acquired substantially all the assets of bkm Total Office
(BKM) for cash consideration of approximately $18.7.
OENE and BKM, both authorized Steelcase dealers, have combined
to create a regional enterprise supporting workplace needs that
will offer a broadened portfolio of products and services and
expanded geographical coverage in New England. As a result of
the preliminary purchase price allocation, we recorded goodwill
of $2.3. The combined dealers are included in the Americas
segment. We expect to finalize the allocation of the purchase
price to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed when we obtain information sufficient to complete the
formal valuation of intangible assets and working capital
adjustments, but in any case, within one year after acquisition.
The purchase of BKM did not have a material impact on our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
IDEO Ownership
Transition
|
In Q4 2011, certain members of the management of IDEO purchased
a controlling interest in IDEO pursuant to an agreement entered
into during 2008. We retained a 20% equity interest in IDEO, and
we expect to continue our collaborative relationship after this
transition. In Q4 2011, we deconsolidated the operations of IDEO
and recorded our share of IDEOs earnings as equity in
earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures in Other income,
net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
For the year ended February 25, 2011 and the interim
periods therein, our Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations included the following related to IDEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
103.4
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
47.1
|
|
Operating income (1)
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Operating income did not include variable compensation expense
of approximately $7 earned by IDEO management in 2011 related to
a contingent stock bonus program that was recognized and applied
toward the purchase price in Q4 2011. |
14
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
RESTRUCTURING
ACTIVITIES
|
In Q2 2012, we announced the closure of our Morocco
manufacturing facility within our EMEA segment, and we incurred
$5.8 of employee termination costs and $0.1 of business exit and
other related costs.
In Q2 2012, we completed the sale of PolyVisions remaining
low margin whiteboard fabrication business in Europe to a third
party which resulted in a loss of $1.1 recorded in the Other
category.
In Q4 2011, we announced the planned closure of three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our
ongoing efforts to improve the fitness of our business and
strengthen the Companys long-term competitiveness. We are
in the process of moving production within these facilities to
other Steelcase locations in North America and expect the
manufacturing consolidation to continue through fiscal year
2013. We currently estimate the cash restructuring costs
associated with these actions will be approximately $40, with
approximately $30 related to workforce reductions and
approximately $10 related to costs associated with manufacturing
consolidation and production moves. During the three and six
months ended August 26, 2011, we accrued restructuring
costs of $4.9 and $12.1, respectively. During 2011, we incurred
restructuring costs of $10.1 related to these plant closures.
These costs primarily related to workforce reductions and were
recorded within the Americas segment.
In Q1 2011, we announced a project to reorganize our European
manufacturing operations on the basis of specialized
competencies. This project is now substantially complete, and
total restructuring costs approximated $20. The majority of
these costs related to workforce reductions and some additional
costs for manufacturing consolidation and production moves
within the EMEA segment. For the six months ended
August 26, 2011, the restructuring costs primarily related
to contingencies associated with a former plant in France, which
was sold in Q4 2010.
Restructuring costs are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Restructuring Costs
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
$
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
STEELCASE INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Below is a summary of the net additions, payments and
adjustments to the restructuring reserve balance for the six
months ended August 26, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Exits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce
|
|
|
|
and Related
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Reserve
|
|
|
Reductions
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Reserve balance as of February 25, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
27.0
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
(23.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.3
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance as of August 26, 2011
|
|
|
$
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The workforce reductions reserve balance as of August 26,
2011 primarily relates to the employee termination costs related
to the Q1 2011 and Q4 2011 announcements.
On September 20, 2011, the French Legislature enacted a tax
law change affecting the utilization of net operating losses.
Under the new law, net operating loss utilization in any
particular period will be limited to 60% of the amount by which
net income exceeds 1 million euros. This law change will
extend the period of time required to utilize our French net
operating losses, however, net operating losses will continue to
have an indefinite carryover period. We are currently evaluating
the impact of the tax law change and related considerations, but
we do not expect it to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements.
16
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations:
|
This managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended February 25, 2011. Reference to a
year relates to the fiscal year, ended in February of the year
indicated, rather than the calendar year, unless indicated by a
specific date. Additionally, Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 reference the
first, second, third and fourth quarter, respectively, of the
fiscal year indicated.
Year-to-date
references the six months ended for the fiscal year indicated.
All amounts are in millions, except share and per share data,
data presented as a percentage or as otherwise indicated.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
This item contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. A
non-GAAP financial measure is defined as a numerical
measure of a companys financial performance that excludes
or includes amounts so as to be different than the most directly
comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with
GAAP in the consolidated statements of operations, balance
sheets or statements of cash flows of the company. Pursuant to
the requirements of Regulation G, we have provided a
reconciliation below of non-GAAP financial measures to the most
directly comparable GAAP financial measure.
The non-GAAP financial measures used are: (1) organic
revenue growth (decline), which represents the change in revenue
over the prior year excluding currency translation effects and
the impacts of the IDEO ownership transition and a recent dealer
acquisition, and (2) adjusted operating income (loss),
which represents operating income (loss) excluding restructuring
costs. These measures are presented because management uses this
information to monitor and evaluate financial results and
trends. Therefore, management believes this information is also
useful for investors.
17
Financial
Summary
Results of
Operations
As of the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, we
realigned our reportable segments for financial reporting
purposes primarily as a result of the previously announced
organizational changes to strengthen our position as a globally
integrated enterprise. Thus, our reportable segments now consist
of (1) the Americas segment, (2) the EMEA segment and
(3) the Other category. The accompanying segment data for
all prior periods has been reclassified to reflect these
realignments. See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements and Business Segment Review in
this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for further information on
our reportable business segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
700.5
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,339.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
487.9
|
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
|
417.5
|
|
|
|
69.6
|
|
|
|
|
934.2
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
|
|
|
796.3
|
|
|
|
69.7
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
201.2
|
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
|
170.6
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
384.3
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
|
332.1
|
|
|
|
29.1
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
174.9
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
162.8
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
|
343.1
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
|
324.7
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Interest expense, investment income (loss) and other income
(expense), net
|
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic Revenue Growth Consolidated
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Q2 2011 revenue
|
|
|
$
|
369.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
121.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
108.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
599.8
|
|
IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects*
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2011 revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
371.6
|
|
|
|
|
136.8
|
|
|
|
|
75.4
|
|
|
|
|
583.8
|
|
Q2 2012 revenue
|
|
|
|
485.7
|
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
|
700.5
|
|
Dealer acquisition
|
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 2012 revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
467.7
|
|
|
|
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
|
682.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline)
|
|
|
$
|
96.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth (decline) %
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-Date 2012 Organic Revenue Growth
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
|
EMEA
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Year-to-date
2011 revenue
|
|
|
$
|
701.8
|
|
|
|
$
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
207.3
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,141.6
|
|
IDEO ownership transition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
Currency translation effects **
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-date
2011 revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
705.8
|
|
|
|
|
255.5
|
|
|
|
|
139.3
|
|
|
|
|
1,100.6
|
|
Year-to-date
2012 revenue
|
|
|
|
894.2
|
|
|
|
|
287.7
|
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
|
|
|
1,339.9
|
|
Dealer acquisition
|
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-date
2012 revenue, adjusted
|
|
|
|
871.2
|
|
|
|
|
287.7
|
|
|
|
|
158.0
|
|
|
|
|
1,316.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth
|
|
|
$
|
165.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
$
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
216.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organic revenue growth %
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Currency translation effects represent the estimated net effect
of translating Q2 2011 foreign currency revenues using the
average exchange rates during Q2 2012. |
|
** |
|
Currency translation effects represent the estimated net effect
of translating Q2 2011 and Q1 2011 foreign currency revenues
using the average exchange rates during Q2 2012 and Q1 2012,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Income to
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income
|
|
|
$
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
In Q2 2012, we experienced 17% organic revenue growth compared
to the prior year, which represents the sixth consecutive
quarter of
year-over-year
organic revenue growth following the recent financial crisis.
The growth is generally consistent with or better than global
trends in our industry. Companies have been increasing corporate
spending thus far in the economic recovery, leveraging the
strength of their cash positions, even though white collar
employment and new construction (traditional industry drivers)
have been slow to regain momentum. While the broader economic
recovery remains challenged by a variety of headwinds, many of
our customers have deferred spending during a decade in which
various forces have had exponential consequences on their work
environments. We have been conducting research and launching new
products, applications and experiences over the past several
years to address these forces, some of which include
globalization trends, miniaturization of technology, mobility of
workers, increased collaboration and multi-generations at work.
We believe staying invested in these growth initiatives during
the worst of the recession helped us establish a strong
foundation for revenue growth as our customers begin to increase
spending.
|
|
|
Q2 2012
Compared to Q2 2011
|
We recorded Q2 2012 net income of $11.9 compared to net
income of $2.8 in Q2 2011. The increase in net income was driven
by higher operating income in the Americas segment, partially
offset by lower operating income in EMEA and the Other category.
In addition, Q2 2012 net income included interest expense
associated with the issuance of senior notes in Q4 2011 as well
as variable life company owned life insurance (COLI)
losses compared to variable life COLI income in the prior year.
Revenue for Q2 2012 was $700.5 compared to $599.8 in Q2 2011,
representing organic revenue growth of 17% after adjusting for
the IDEO ownership transition, a recent dealer acquisition and
currency translation effects. We realized organic revenue growth
of 26% in the Americas and 7% in the Other category. However, we
experienced a decline in organic revenue in our EMEA segment of
2%. The organic revenue growth in the Americas benefited from a
strong beginning backlog and current quarter
19
orders which grew 11% compared to the prior year. In constant
currency, Q2 2012 orders in the EMEA segment grew 3% over the
prior year.
Operating income grew to $25.4 in Q2 2012 compared to $6.5 in
the prior year. Q2 2012 adjusted operating income of $37.7
represented an improvement of $18.2 compared to the prior year,
primarily due to operating leverage from organic revenue growth.
The
year-over-year
comparison was negatively impacted by higher commodity costs of
approximately $11 and the impact of deconsolidating IDEO.
Cost of sales remained steady at 69.7% of revenue in Q2 2012
compared to 69.6% in Q2 2011. Excluding the impact of
deconsolidating IDEO, cost of sales decreased 60 basis
points. Higher absorption of fixed costs associated with the
organic revenue growth in the quarter was largely offset by
higher commodity costs.
Operating expenses increased by $12.1 in Q2 2012 compared to Q2
2011. Prior year operating expenses included $11.3 related to
IDEO, which has since been deconsolidated. Aside from this item,
operating expenses included an $11.8 increase in variable
compensation (including expenses associated with our EVA-based
bonus programs and the Steelcase Inc. Retirement Plan), $4.6 due
to currency translation effects and $3.7 of operating expense
related to a dealer acquired in Q1 2012.
We recorded restructuring costs of $12.3 in Q2 2012 compared to
$13.0 in Q2 2011. In Q2 2012, we recorded $5.9 related to the
Morocco plant closure that took place during the quarter, $4.9
associated with the North America plant closures announced in Q4
2011 and $1.1 associated with the divestiture of a small
division at PolyVision during Q2 2012.
Q2 2012 income tax expense included a benefit of $2.0 for
miscellaneous discrete tax items, the majority of which related
to the divestiture of a small division of PolyVision. Excluding
discrete items, income tax expense recorded for Q2 2012 reflects
an estimated annual effective tax rate of 35%.
|
|
|
Year-to-Date
2012 Compared to
Year-to-Date
2011
|
We recorded
year-to-date
2012 net income of $19.4 compared to a
year-to-date
2011 net loss of $8.3.
Year-to-date
2012 results were affected by the same factors as Q2 2012 as
well as lower income tax expense, as the prior year included a
charge of $11.4 resulting from U.S. healthcare reform
legislation.
Year-to-date
2012 revenue increased $198.3 or 17.4% compared to
year-to-date
2011, representing organic revenue growth of 20% after adjusting
for the IDEO ownership transition, dealer acquisition and
currency translation effects. The organic revenue growth was
broad-based, with growth of 23% in the Americas segment, 13% in
the EMEA segment and 13% in the Other category.
Year-to-date
operating income grew to $40.4 in the current year versus $5.1
in the prior year. The $35.3 improvement in
year-to-date
2012 adjusted operating income was driven by similar items
affecting Q2 2012.
Year-to-date
2012 cost of sales remained flat at 69.7% in comparison to
year-to-date
2011. Excluding the impact of deconsolidating IDEO, cost of
sales decreased 100 basis points. Higher absorption of
fixed costs associated with the organic revenue growth was
largely offset by higher commodity costs of $20.
Year-to-date
2012 operating expenses increased $18.4 compared to the same
period last year but decreased as a percentage of sales to 25.6%
from 28.5%. Prior year operating expenses included $23.4 related
to IDEO. Aside from this item, operating expenses included a
$23.1 increase in variable compensation, $7.3 due to currency
translation effects and $4.8 of operating expense related to a
dealer acquired in Q1 2012.
We recorded
year-to-date
2012 restructuring costs of $22.2 compared to $15.5 for
year-to-date
2011. The
year-to-date
amount includes $12.1 associated with the North America plant
closures announced in Q4 2011, $5.9 related to the Morocco plant
closure and $1.1 associated with the divestiture of a small
division at PolyVision.
20
Year-to-date
2012 income tax expense included a benefit of $2.0 for
miscellaneous discrete tax items, the majority of which related
to the divestiture of a small division of PolyVision. Excluding
discrete items, income tax expense recorded for
year-to-date
2012 reflects an estimated annual effective tax rate of 35%.
Year-to-date
2011 income tax expense included a charge of $11.4 resulting
from U.S. healthcare reform legislation.
Interest Expense,
Investment Income (Loss) and Other Income (Expense),
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Interest Expense, Investment Income (Loss) and
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
$
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(9.1
|
)
|
Investment income (loss)
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated ventures
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Miscellaneous, net
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense, investment income (loss) and other
income (expense), net
|
|
|
$
|
(10.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense for Q2 and
year-to-date
2012 included $3.6 and $7.7, respectively, associated with $250
of senior notes which matured and were repaid in Q2 2012. The Q2
and
year-to-date
2012 change in investment income (loss) was primarily driven by
losses from variable life COLI policies. The Q2 and
year-to-date
2012 change in miscellaneous, net was due to a $2.2 reserve
recovery in conjunction with the liquidation of an
unconsolidated joint venture in Q2 2011.
Business Segment
Review
See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding our business
segments.
Americas
The Americas segment serves customers in the U.S., Canada and
Latin America with a portfolio of integrated architecture,
furniture and technology products marketed to corporate,
government, healthcare, education and retail customers through
the Steelcase, Coalesse, Turnstone, Details and Nurture by
Steelcase brands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data Americas
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
485.7
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
369.6
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
894.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
701.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
337.1
|
|
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
|
262.7
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
|
624.6
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
|
499.7
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
143.4
|
|
|
|
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
|
|
|
257.1
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
|
198.8
|
|
|
|
28.3
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
100.6
|
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
|
87.0
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
|
193.2
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
169.5
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income Americas
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
63.9
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income
|
|
|
$
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income in the Americas increased by $25.5 in Q2 2012
compared to the same period last year. Adjusted operating income
increased by $28.1 in Q2 2012 compared to Q2 2011, due to
operating leverage from organic revenue growth, offset in part
by $8 of higher commodity costs. The $43.8 improvement in
year-to-date
2012 adjusted operating income was due to operating leverage
from organic growth which was partially offset by $15 of higher
commodity costs.
The Americas revenue represented 69.3% of consolidated revenue
in Q2 2012. Revenue for Q2 2012 was $485.7 compared to
$369.6 in Q2 2011, representing organic revenue growth of 26%
after adjusting for a dealer acquisition and currency
translation effects. The organic revenue growth in the Americas
benefited from a strong beginning backlog and current quarter
orders which grew 11% compared to the prior year.
Year-to-date
2012 organic revenue growth was $165.4 or 23%. Revenue growth in
Q2 2012 is categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Product categories Revenue growth rates were
strongest in the Technology category. Seating and Details also
showed strength relative to the other product categories, and
Turnstone was in line with the average. Slightly below average,
but still showing strong double digit revenue growth, were
Architectural Solutions, Furniture and Wood.
|
|
|
|
Vertical markets Revenue growth rates were
broad-based across almost all vertical markets with notable
strength in the Information Technology,
Technical / Professional, Manufacturing, Energy and
Retail sectors. Healthcare, Education and Financial Services
were in line with the average, and Federal Government was not
too far behind. The only vertical market that did not experience
growth was State and Local Government.
|
|
|
|
Geographic regions Nearly all regions
reported double-digit growth rates compared to the prior year.
|
|
|
|
Contract type Project business led the way in
terms of revenue growth, but marketing and
day-to-day
business showed double digit gains as well.
|
Cost of sales decreased to 69.4% of revenue in Q2 2012 compared
to 71.1% of revenue in Q2 2011. The decrease was due to
higher absorption of fixed costs associated with revenue growth,
partially offset by higher commodity costs.
Year-to-date
2012 cost of sales improved by 130 basis points and was
affected by the same factors as Q2 2012 results.
Operating expenses increased by $13.6 in Q2 2012 compared to the
same period last year. The increase was driven by increased
variable compensation costs and operating expenses of $3.7
related to a dealer that we acquired.
Year-to-date
2012 operating expenses also increased due to variable
compensation of $8.1 and operating expenses related to the
dealer acquisition of $4.8.
Restructuring costs of $5.2 in Q2 2012 and
$12.5 year-to-date
2012 primarily related to workforce reductions associated with
the North American manufacturing consolidation announced in Q4
2011.
22
EMEA
The EMEA segment serves customers in Europe, the Middle East and
Africa primarily under the Steelcase brand, with an emphasis on
freestanding furniture systems, storage and seating solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data EMEA
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
133.8
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
121.8
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
287.7
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
97.4
|
|
|
|
|
72.8
|
|
|
|
|
88.6
|
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
|
206.2
|
|
|
|
71.7
|
|
|
|
|
169.7
|
|
|
|
73.0
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
|
73.7
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
|
72.0
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
$
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Loss to Adjusted
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Operating Loss EMEA
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
$
|
(13.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.3
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(13.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(19.0
|
)
|
|
|
(8.2
|
)%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating loss
|
|
|
$
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
$
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The operating loss recorded in the EMEA segment was $13.8 in Q2
2012 compared to $11.3 in Q2 2011. The adjusted operating
loss recorded in Q2 2012 was $7.9 compared to $1.7 in the same
period of the prior year. The decline in performance was driven
by a number of factors, including lower volume, low price yield
relative to higher commodity costs of $3 and higher operating
costs. The
year-to-date
2012 operating loss of $13.9 was an improvement of $5.1 over the
year-to-date
2011 operating loss of $19.0, and the
year-to-date
2012 adjusted operating loss of $5.3 was an improvement over the
year-to-date
2011 operating loss of $9.2. The improvement was driven
primarily by operating leverage from organic revenue growth in
Q1 2012, offset in part by higher commodity costs and other
operating costs.
EMEA revenue represented 19.1% of consolidated revenue in Q2
2012. Revenue for Q2 2012 was $133.8 compared to $121.8 in Q2
2011. After adjusting for favorable currency translation effects
of $15, the organic revenue decline was $3.0 as strength in
Germany and Northern Europe was offset by declines in Spain,
France and the rest of EMEA.
Year-to-date
2012 organic revenue growth was $32.2 or 13%.
Cost of sales was 72.8% of revenue in Q2 2012 compared to 72.7%
of revenue in Q2 2011. Costs of sales was primarily impacted by
higher commodity costs in the current period.
Year-to-date
2012 cost of sales decreased to 71.7% of sales, a 130 basis
point improvement compared to
year-to-date
2011. The improvement was mainly due to higher absorption of
fixed costs associated with the
year-to-date
organic revenue growth and benefits from previous restructuring
activities.
Q2 2012 operating expenses increased by $9.4 and
year-to-date
2012 operating expenses increased by $14.8. For Q2 2012 and
year-to date 2012, these increases were primarily due to
currency translation effects of $4.2 and $6.9, respectively, and
higher operating costs.
Restructuring costs of $5.9 incurred in Q2 2012 relate to the
closure of our Morocco manufacturing facility which we announced
in the current quarter. These costs primarily relate to employee
termination costs.
Other
The Other category includes Asia Pacific, PolyVision and
Designtex. Asia Pacific serves customers in Asia and Australia
primarily under the Steelcase brand with an emphasis on
freestanding furniture systems, storage and seating solutions.
PolyVision designs and manufactures visual communication
23
products, such as static and interactive electronic whiteboards
which are sold into the primary and secondary education markets
around the world. Designtex designs and sells surface materials
including textiles and wall coverings which are specified by
architects and designers directly to end-use customers through a
direct sales force. IDEO was consolidated in the Other category
through Q3 2011, but due to the ownership transition, our
remaining 20% share of IDEO income has been recorded as a
non-operating item since Q4 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Statement of Operations Data Other
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
81.0
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
108.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
158.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
207.3
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
|
|
|
66.2
|
|
|
|
61.1
|
|
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
|
|
|
126.9
|
|
|
|
61.2
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
|
70.4
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Income to
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Income Other
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
%
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating income
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Other category reported operating income of $0.9 in Q2 2012
which represents a decrease of $6.2 compared to operating income
of $7.1 in Q2 2011, which included $3.3 from IDEO.
Year-to-date
2012 operating income of $3.5 declined from
year-to-date
2011 operating income of $8.3, which included $8.1 from IDEO.
Operating income decreased due to the IDEO ownership transition,
as well as lower revenues from PolyVision.
Q2 2012 revenue decreased by $27.4 or 25.3% and
year-to-date
2012 revenue decreased $49.3 or 23.8%. Excluding the decrease in
revenue due to the IDEO ownership transition, organic revenue
growth was $5.6 or 7% for Q2 2012 and $18.7 or 13% for
year-to-date
2012, driven by strength in the Asia Pacific region. Reductions
in funding by state and local governments in the
U.S. significantly affected the technology investments made
by schools, which negatively impacted PolyVisions revenue
in Q2 2012.
Cost of sales as a percent of revenue increased by
480 basis points in Q2 2012 compared to Q2 2011. After
adjusting for the deconsolidation of IDEO, cost of sales
increased by 360 basis points, primarily due to higher
commodity costs and lower absorption of fixed costs at
PolyVision. After adjusting for the deconsolidation of IDEO,
year-to-date
cost of sales increased by 110 basis points, due to similar
factors impacting the quarter.
Q2 2012 operating expenses decreased by $8.8 compared to Q2
2011, and
year-to-date
2012 operating expenses decreased by $20.4 compared to
year-to-date
2011. The Q2 2011 and
year-to-date
2011 periods included $11.3 and $23.4, respectively, of
operating expense related to IDEO.
Corporate
Approximately 80% of corporate expenses are charged to the
operating segments as part of a corporate allocation.
Unallocated portions of these expenses are considered general
corporate costs and are reported as Corporate. Corporate costs
include unallocated portions of executive costs and
24
shared service functions such as information technology, human
resources, finance, legal, research and development and
corporate facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
August 27,
|
Statement of Operations Data Corporate
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
$
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Reconciliation of Operating Loss to
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Adjusted Operating Loss Corporate
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
$
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
Add: Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted operating loss
|
|
|
$
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses have remained relatively stable as increases
in variable compensation have been offset by decreases in the
value of our deferred compensation plans.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
Based on current business conditions, we target a minimum of
$100 in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments to
fund
day-to-day
operations, to provide available liquidity for investments in
growth initiatives and as a cushion against economic volatility.
Our actual cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as we plan for
and manage certain seasonal disbursements, particularly the
annual payment of accrued variable compensation and retirement
plan contributions in Q1 of each fiscal year, when applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
February 25,
|
|
Primary Liquidity Sources
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
142.2
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
350.8
|
|
Variable life company-owned life insurance
|
|
|
|
109.7
|
|
|
|
|
110.3
|
|
Availability under credit facilities
|
|
|
|
173.5
|
|
|
|
|
165.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liquidity
|
|
|
$
|
439.1
|
|
|
|
$
|
769.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of August 26, 2011, we held a total of $155.9 in cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Of our total
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments,
approximately 60% was located in the U.S. and the remaining
40% was located outside of the U.S., primarily in Asia Pacific,
France and Canada. The majority of our short-term investments
were located in the U.S. and maintained in a managed
investment portfolio which primarily consists of
U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government agency and corporate
debt instruments.
Our investments in COLI policies are recorded at their net cash
surrender value. We consider our investments in variable life
COLI policies to be primarily a source of corporate liquidity,
and our investments in whole life COLI policies represent an
additional potential source of liquidity, as their designation
to fund employee benefit plan obligations can be changed at any
time. We believe the financial strength of the issuing insurance
companies associated with our variable and whole life COLI
policies are sufficient to meet their obligations to us.
Availability under credit facilities may be reduced by the use
of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments for
purposes other than the repayment of debt as a result of
constraints related to our maximum leverage ratio covenant. See
Liquidity Facilities for more information.
25
The following table summarizes our statements of cash flows for
the six months ended August 26, 2011 and August 27,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Cash Flow Data
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
258.7
|
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
(293.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
(11.9
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
(37.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
(26.9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
142.2
|
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Cash Flow Data Operating Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Changes in cash surrender value of COLI
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
Changes in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
Changes in accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable
|
|
|
|
(22.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
(41.8
|
)
|
Changes in employee compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
(19.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
(14.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
$
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in net cash used in operating activities in 2012
compared to the cash provided by operating activities in 2011
was primarily due to higher variable compensation payments, plus
Q1 2011 included the receipt of a U.S. income tax refund of
approximately $20.
Cash provided by
(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Cash Flow Data Investing Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
$
|
(29.0
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(16.6
|
)
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
|
(158.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
Liquidations of investments
|
|
|
|
456.4
|
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Acquisition, net of divestiture
|
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
$
|
258.7
|
|
|
|
$
|
(25.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures in 2012 were primarily related to
investments in product development in the Americas and EMEA,
spending on corporate facilities related to campus consolidation
in the Americas and progress payments totaling $8.7 towards a
replacement aircraft. In Q2 2012 purchases and liquidations of
investments activity increased due to our use of the proceeds
from the debt issuance in Q4 2011. In Q1 2012, we acquired a
dealership for cash consideration of approximately $18.7. In
Q2 2012, we completed the sale of a small PolyVision
division to a third party for proceeds totaling $2.3. See
Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements
for additional information.
26
Cash used in
financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
August 26,
|
|
|
|
August 27,
|
|
Cash Flow Data Financing Activities
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
$
|
(253.2
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
Common stock repurchases
|
|
|
|
(23.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
$
|
(293.5
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(11.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In August 2011, we repaid $250.0 of senior subordinated notes at
face value.
We paid dividends of $0.06 per common share during Q1 2012 and
Q2 2012 and $0.04 per common share during Q1 2011 and Q2 2011.
On September 21, 2011, our Board of Directors declared a
dividend of $0.06 per common share to be paid in Q3 2012.
As of the end of Q2 2012, we had $177.8 of remaining
availability under the $250 share repurchase program
approved by our Board of Directors in Q4 2008. We have no
outstanding share repurchase commitments.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
During Q2 2012, no material change in our off-balance sheet
arrangements occurred.
Contractual
Obligations
During Q2 2012, no material change in our contractual
obligations occurred.
Liquidity
Facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity Facilities
|
|
|
August 26, 2011
|
|
Global committed bank facility
|
|
|
$
|
125.0
|
|
Various uncommitted lines
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit lines available
|
|
|
|
173.5
|
|
Less: Borrowings outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available capacity
|
|
|
$
|
173.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our $125 global committed, syndicated credit facility expires in
Q4 2013. As of August 26, 2011, there were no borrowings
outstanding under the facility. The facility requires us to
satisfy financial covenants including a maximum leverage ratio
covenant and a minimum interest coverage ratio covenant.
Additionally, the facility requires us to comply with certain
other terms and conditions, including a restricted payment
covenant which establishes a maximum level of dividends
and/or other
equity-related distributions or payments (such as share
repurchases) we may make in a fiscal year. As of August 26,
2011, we were in compliance with all covenants under the
facility.
The various uncommitted lines may be changed or cancelled by the
banks at any time. There were no outstanding borrowings on
uncommitted facilities as of August 26, 2011. In addition,
we have a revolving letter of credit agreement for $15.5 of
which $14.7 was utilized primarily related to our reserve for
self-insured workers compensation claim costs as of
August 26, 2011. There were no draws on our standby letters
of credit during
year-to-date
2012 or 2011.
Total consolidated debt as of August 26, 2011 was $292.7.
Our debt primarily consists of $249.9 in term notes due in 2021
with an effective interest rate of 6.6%. In addition, we have a
$41.9 term loan due in 2017 at a floating interest rate based on
30-day LIBOR
plus 3.35%. The term notes are unsecured, the term loan is
secured by our two corporate aircraft, and both the term notes
and the term loan contain no financial covenants and are not
cross-defaulted to other debt facilities.
27
Liquidity
Outlook
Our current cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances, cash generated from future operations, funds available
from COLI and funds available under our credit facilities are
expected to be sufficient to finance our known or foreseeable
liquidity needs. We believe the timing, strength and continuity
of the economic recovery in various geographies and markets
around the world remain uncertain which may continue to
challenge our level of cash generation from operations. We
continue to maintain a conservative approach to liquidity and
maintain flexibility over significant uses of cash including our
capital expenditures and discretionary operating expenses.
We expect capital expenditures to total approximately $70 in
2012 compared to $46 in 2011. In addition, we expect capital
expenditures in 2012 to include progress payments associated
with a replacement corporate aircraft totaling $20 and
approximately $10 in spending on corporate facilities as a
result of campus consolidation in Western Michigan. We closely
manage capital spending to ensure we are making investments that
we believe will sustain our business and preserve our ability to
introduce innovative new products.
In Q4 2011, we announced the planned closure of three additional
manufacturing facilities in North America as part of our
ongoing efforts to improve the fitness of our business and
strengthen the Companys long-term competitiveness. We
currently estimate the cash restructuring costs associated with
these actions will be approximately $40, with approximately $30
related to workforce reductions and approximately $10 related to
costs associated with manufacturing consolidation and production
moves. See Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information.
In Q2 2012, we announced the closure of our Morocco
manufacturing facility within our EMEA segment, and we incurred
$5.8 of employee termination costs and $0.1 of business exit and
other related costs.
On September 21, 2011, we announced a quarterly dividend on
our common stock of $0.06 per share, or $7.9 to be paid in Q3
2012. Future dividends will be subject to approval by our Board
of Directors.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
During Q2 2012, there have been no changes in the items that we
have identified as critical accounting estimates.
Recently Issued
Accounting Standards
See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Forward-looking
Statements
From time to time, in written and oral statements, we discuss
our expectations regarding future events and our plans and
objectives for future operations. These forward-looking
statements generally are accompanied by words such as
anticipate, believe, could,
estimate, expect, forecast,
intend, may, possible,
potential, predict, project,
or other similar words, phrases or expressions. Forward-looking
statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to vary from our expectations because
of factors such as, but not limited to, competitive and general
economic conditions domestically and internationally; acts of
terrorism, war, governmental action, natural disasters and other
Force Majeure events; changes in the legal and regulatory
environment; our restructuring activities; changes in raw
materials and commodity costs; currency fluctuations; changes in
customer demand; and the other risks and contingencies detailed
in this Report, our most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. We undertake no obligation to update, amend, or
clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise.
28
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk:
|
The nature of market risks (i.e., the risk of loss arising from
adverse changes in market rates and prices) faced by us as of
August 26, 2011 is the same as disclosed in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended February 25, 2011. We are exposed to
market risks from foreign currency exchange, interest rates,
commodity prices and fixed income and equity prices, which could
affect our operating results, financial position and cash flows.
Foreign Exchange
Risk
During Q2 2012, no material change in foreign exchange risk
occurred.
Interest Rate
Risk
During Q2 2012, no material change in interest rate risk
occurred.
Fixed Income and
Equity Price Risk
During Q2 2012, no material change in fixed income and equity
price risk occurred.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures:
|
(a) Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our management, under the supervision
and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
or 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)), as of August 26, 2011. Based on
such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that as of August 26, 2011, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective in
(1) recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a
timely basis, information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and
(2) ensuring that information required to be disclosed by
us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during our second fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
29
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:
|
Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities
The following is a summary of share repurchase activity during
Q2 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as
|
|
|
|
that May Yet be
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
|
Paid per Share
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
|
|
or Programs (1)
|
|
5/28/11 7/1/11
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
189.4
|
|
7/2/11 7/29/11
|
|
|
|
803,860
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.73
|
|
|
|
|
803,860
|
|
|
|
|
180.8
|
|
7/30/11 8/26/11
|
|
|
|
294,941
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.15
|
|
|
|
|
294,941
|
|
|
|
|
177.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
1,099,571
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In December 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share
repurchase program permitting the repurchase of up to $250 of
shares of our common stock. This program has no specific
expiration date. |
|
(2) |
|
770 of these shares were repurchased to satisfy
participants tax withholding obligations upon the vesting
of restricted stock and restricted stock unit grants, pursuant
to the terms of our Incentive Compensation Plan. |
See Exhibit Index.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STEELCASE INC.
Mark T. Mossing
Corporate Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: September 30, 2011
31
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
Description
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
Second Restated Articles of Incorporation of Steelcase Inc., as
amended(1)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
Amended By-Laws of Steelcase Inc., as amended(2)
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
Certification of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
Certification of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Filed as exhibit 3.1 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on July 15, 2011 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
(2) |
|
Filed as exhibit 3.2 to the Companys
Form 8-K,
as filed with the Commission on July 15, 2011 and
incorporated herein by reference. |
32