e424b3
Filed
Pursuant to Rule 424(B)(3)
Registration
Number 333-175398
PROPOSED MERGER YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG (Allied
World) and Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
(Transatlantic) have agreed to a merger of
equals business combination of the two companies pursuant
to the terms of an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
June 12, 2011 (the merger agreement). Pursuant
to the terms of the merger agreement, GO Sub, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World (Merger
Sub), will merge with and into Transatlantic (the
merger), with Transatlantic surviving as a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World. Upon completion of the
merger, Allied World will be the parent company of Transatlantic
and Allied Worlds name will be changed to
TransAllied Group Holdings, AG.
Upon completion of the merger, Transatlantic stockholders will
be entitled to receive 0.88 registered shares
(Namenaktien) of Allied World (Allied World
shares) for each share of Transatlantic common stock, par
value $1.00 per share (Transatlantic common stock),
that they own immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger (the exchange ratio), together with cash in
lieu of Allied World fractional shares. This exchange ratio is
fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect stock price changes
prior to the closing of the merger. Based on the closing price
of Allied World shares on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the
NYSE) on June 10, 2011, the last trading day
before public announcement of the merger, the exchange ratio
represented approximately $51.10 in value for each share of
Transatlantic common stock. Based on the closing price of Allied
World shares on the NYSE on August 18, 2011, the latest
practicable trading day before the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the exchange ratio represented
approximately $45.29 in value for each share of Transatlantic
common stock. Allied World shareholders will continue to own
their existing Allied World shares after the merger. Allied
World shares are currently traded on the NYSE under the symbol
AWH, and Transatlantic common stock is currently
traded on the NYSE under the symbol TRH. We urge
you to obtain current market quotations of Allied World shares
and Transatlantic common stock.
Based on the estimated number of Allied World shares and
Transatlantic common stock that will be outstanding immediately
prior to the closing of the merger, we estimate that, on a fully
diluted basis, upon such closing, former Allied World
shareholders will own approximately 42% of the combined company
and former Transatlantic stockholders will own approximately 58%
of the combined company.
Allied World and Transatlantic will each hold a meeting of their
respective shareholders (the Special Shareholder
Meetings) in connection with the merger. At the
extraordinary general meeting of Allied World shareholders, (the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting), Allied
World shareholders will be asked to vote on proposals to
increase the ordinary share capital, conditional share capital
and authorized share capital of Allied World, a proposal to
approve the issuance of Allied World shares to Transatlantic
stockholders, a proposal to amend the Allied World Articles of
Association to change Allied Worlds name to
TransAllied Group Holdings, AG, a proposal to elect
directors to the combined companys board of directors upon
completion of the merger, and certain other related proposals.
At the special meeting of Transatlantic stockholders (the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting),
Transatlantic stockholders will be asked to vote on the adoption
of the merger agreement and certain other related proposals.
We cannot complete the merger unless the holders of each
companys shares approve the proposals related to the
merger. Your vote is very important, regardless of the number
of shares you own. Whether or not you expect to attend either
Special Shareholder Meeting in person, please submit a proxy to
vote your shares as promptly as possible so that your shares may
be represented and voted at the Allied World or Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting, as applicable.
The Allied World board of directors has unanimously approved
the merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby are in the best
interests of Allied World. The Allied World board of directors
unanimously recommends that the Allied World shareholders vote
(i) FOR the proposals to increase the ordinary
share capital, (ii) FOR the proposal to issue
shares of Allied World in the merger, (iii) FOR
the proposal to amend Allied Worlds
Articles of Association to change the companys name,
(iv) FOR the proposal to elect directors to the
combined companys board of directors,
(v) FOR the proposal to effect a capital
reduction to allow for the payment of a dividend to the combined
companys shareholders after the completion of the merger
and (vi) FOR the proposal to approve the fourth
amendment and restatement of the Allied World Third Amended and
Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan.
The Transatlantic board of directors has unanimously approved
the merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby are in the best
interests of Transatlantic and its stockholders. The
Transatlantic board of directors unanimously recommends that
Transatlantic stockholders vote (i) FOR the
proposal to adopt the merger agreement,
(ii) FOR the proposal to approve adjournment of
the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies and
(iii) FOR the proposal to approve, on an
advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation that may be paid
or become payable to Transatlantics named executive
officers in connection with the merger and the agreements and
understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid
or become payable.
The obligations of Allied World and Transatlantic to complete
the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of several
conditions. The accompanying joint proxy statement/prospectus
contains detailed information about Allied World, Transatlantic,
the meetings, the merger agreement and the merger. You should
read this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and in its
entirety before voting, including the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 22.
We look forward to the successful combination of Allied World
and Transatlantic.
Sincerely,
|
|
|
Scott A. Carmilani
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
|
|
Richard S. Press Chairman of the Board of Directors Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
|
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the
securities to be issued under this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or determined if this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation
to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated August 19,
2011 and is first being mailed to the holders of shares of
Allied World and Transatlantic on or about August 19, 2011.
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY
HOLDINGS, AG
Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar
Zug, Switzerland
NOTICE OF SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER
MEETING
TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
August 19, 2011
To the Shareholders of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
AG:
We are pleased to invite you to attend the extraordinary general
meeting of shareholders of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, AG (Allied World), a Swiss corporation,
which will be held at Allied Worlds corporate
headquarters, Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar, Zug, Switzerland, on
September 20, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. local time, for the
following purposes (the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting):
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to increase Allied
Worlds ordinary share capital pursuant to
article 3a(a) of the Articles of Association of Allied
World, a copy of which is included as Annex D to the joint
proxy statement/prospectus of which this notice forms a part
(the Allied World Articles), by up to CHF
887,860,538 (equaling USD 1,156,882,281) to up to CHF
1,472,939,677.4 (equaling USD 1,919,240,400) to permit the
issuance of Allied World registered shares (Namenaktien)
(Allied World shares) to Transatlantic Holdings,
Inc. (Transatlantic) stockholders pursuant to, and
only in connection with, the merger as contemplated by the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 12, 2011, as
it may be amended from time to time, by and among Allied World,
Transatlantic and GO Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World (the
merger agreement), a copy of which is included as
Annex A to the joint proxy statement/prospectus of which
this notice forms a part, including the exclusion of all
preferential subscription rights to which Allied World
shareholders may be entitled; the contributions for the new
registered shares are paid by converting existing reserves
(Kapitalreserven) into share capital;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to increase Allied
Worlds conditional share capital pursuant to
article 5(a) of the Allied World Articles by up to
CHF 76,894,774 (equaling USD 100,193,891) to up to
CHF 138,634,774 (equaling USD 180,641,111), only in
connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to increase Allied
Worlds authorized share capital pursuant to
article 6(a) of the Allied World Articles by up to
CHF 177,572,113.5 (equaling USD 231,376,463.9) to up
to CHF 294,587,935.5 (equaling USD 383,848,080), only
in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to issue Allied World
shares to Transatlantic stockholders pursuant to the merger and
as contemplated by the merger agreement as required by New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) rules;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to amend article 1 of
the Allied World Articles to change Allied Worlds name to
TransAllied Group Holdings, AG
(TransAllied) immediately following, and conditioned
upon, the completion of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
to elect (x) three Class II directors to hold office
commencing upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2012,
(y) four Class III directors to hold office commencing
upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2013 and
(z) four Class I directors to hold office commencing
upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2014.
|
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of each of the proposals described above.
In addition, there are two additional proposals, the approval of
the second proposal is conditioned upon the approval of the
proposals set forth above:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to effect a capital
reduction to allow for the payment of a dividend to the combined
companys shareholders after the completion of the merger;
and
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to amend and restate the
Allied World Third Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan), the form of which
is included as Annex E to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus of which this notice forms a part, to,
among other things, increase the number of shares reserved for
issuance under the Stock Incentive Plan and extend the Stock
Incentive Plans termination date, effective upon the
completion of the merger.
|
Allied World will transact no other business at the meeting
except such business as may properly be brought before the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. Please refer to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus of which this notice forms a part for
further information with respect to the business to be
transacted at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting.
The Allied World board of directors has unanimously approved the
merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, the
issuance of the Allied World shares to Transatlantic
stockholders pursuant to the merger and the amendment of the
Allied World Articles, are in the best interests of Allied
World. The Allied World board of directors unanimously
recommends that Allied World shareholders vote FOR
each of the proposals set forth above.
The Allied World board of directors has fixed the close of
business on July 22, 2011 as the record date for
determination of Allied World shareholders entitled to receive
notice of, and to vote at, the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only
holders of record of Allied World shares at the close of
business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of,
and to vote at, the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting.
The approval of each of the proposals to increase the share
capital of Allied World requires the approval of at least
662/3%
of the votes represented at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting and a majority of the nominal value of the Allied World
shares represented at such meeting, where holders of at least
50% of the total outstanding Allied World shares are represented
and voting and who are entitled to vote on such proposal. The
approval of the proposals to issue the Allied World shares
pursuant to the merger and to amend and restate the Stock
Incentive Plan in order to increase the shares reserved for
issuance thereunder requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of shares entitled to vote on the proposal and
present in person or represented by proxy at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting; provided that the total votes cast
on each such proposal represent over 50% of the outstanding
Allied World shares entitled to vote on such proposal (whereby
abstentions will be treated as votes cast for purposes of such
proposal and will have the effect of votes against
such proposals, and broker
non-votes
will not be treated as votes cast for purposes of such
proposal). The approval of the proposals to amend the Allied
World Articles to change Allied Worlds name to
TransAllied Group Holdings, AG following the
completion of the merger, to elect the directors as described
above and to approve a capital reduction to allow for payment of
a dividend to the combined company shareholders after the
completion of the merger, require a majority of the votes cast
in favor of such proposals at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting (whereby abstentions and broker non-votes
will not be treated as votes cast for purposes of such proposal)
where holders of at least 50% of the total outstanding Allied
World shares are represented and voting and who are entitled to
vote on such proposals.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you expect to
attend in person, we urge you to submit a proxy to vote your
shares as promptly as possible by signing and returning the
enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided, so
that your shares may be represented and voted at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting. If your shares are held in an
Allied World plan or in the name of a bank, brokerage firm or
other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting
instruction card furnished by the plan trustee or administrator,
or record holder, as appropriate.
The enclosed joint proxy statement/prospectus provides a
detailed description of the merger and the merger agreement. We
urge you to read the joint proxy statement/prospectus of which
this notice forms a part, including any documents incorporated
by reference, and the Annexes carefully and in their entirety.
If you
have any questions concerning the merger or this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, would like additional copies or need help
voting your Allied World shares, please contact Allied
Worlds proxy solicitor:
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
105 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
(800) 322-2885
or
(212) 929-5500
(collect)
E-mail:
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
By Order of the Board of Directors of
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG,
Wesley D. Dupont
Corporate Secretary
TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.
80 Pine Street
New York, NY 10005
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 20, 2011
August 19, 2011
To the Stockholders of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.:
We are pleased to invite you to attend the special meeting of
stockholders of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
(Transatlantic), a Delaware corporation, which will
be held at The Down Town Association, 60 Pine Street, New York,
New York, on September 20, 2011, at 8:00 a.m. local
time, for the following purposes (the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting):
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on the proposal to adopt the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of June 12, 2011, as it may be
amended from time to time (the merger agreement), by
and among Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
(Allied World), Transatlantic and GO Sub, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Allied World, a copy of which is included as Annex A to
the joint proxy statement/prospectus of which this notice forms
a part;
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon the proposal to adjourn the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, if necessary or
appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not
sufficient votes to approve the foregoing proposal; and
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote on a proposal, on an advisory (non-binding)
basis, to approve the compensation that may be paid or become
payable to Transatlantics named executive officers in
connection with the merger, and the agreements and
understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid
or become payable, as described in the section entitled
The Merger Interests of Transatlantics
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Golden Parachute Compensation.
|
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
Transatlantic will transact no other business at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting except such business
as may properly be brought before the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting or any adjournment or postponements thereof.
Please refer to the joint proxy statement/prospectus of which
this notice forms a part for further information with respect to
the business to be transacted at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting.
The Transatlantic board of directors has unanimously approved
the merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger,
are advisable and in the best interests of Transatlantic and its
stockholders. The Transatlantic board of directors
unanimously recommends that Transatlantic stockholders vote
FOR each of the proposals set forth above.
The Transatlantic board of directors has fixed the close of
business on July 22, 2011 as the record date for
determination of Transatlantic stockholders entitled to receive
notice of, and to vote at, the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof. Only
holders of record of Transatlantic common stock
(Transatlantic common stock) at the close of
business on the record date are entitled to receive notice of,
and to vote at, the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. A
list of the names of Transatlantic stockholders of record will
be available for ten days prior to the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting for any purpose germane to the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting between the regular business hours
of 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., local time, at
Transatlantics headquarters, 80 Pine Street,
New York, NY. The Transatlantic stockholder list will also be
available at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting
during the whole time thereof for examination by any stockholder
present at such meeting.
Adoption of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Transatlantic common stock entitled to vote thereon. Approval of
the proposal to adjourn the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, for the purpose of
soliciting additional proxies requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the shares of Transatlantic common
stock entitled to vote and present in person or represented by
proxy, whether or not a quorum is present. Approval, on an
advisory (non-binding) basis, of the compensation that may be
paid or become payable to Transatlantics named executive
officers in connection with the merger, and the agreements and
understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid
or become payable, requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the shares of Transatlantic common stock
present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote
thereon.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you expect to
attend the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting in person,
we urge you to submit a proxy to vote your shares as promptly as
possible by either: (1) logging onto
http://proxy.georgeson.com and following the instructions on
your proxy card; (2) dialing 1-877-456-7915 and listening
for further directions; or (3) signing and returning the
enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided, so
that your shares may be represented and voted at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. If your shares are
held in the name of a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee,
please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card
furnished by the record holder, as appropriate.
The enclosed joint proxy statement/prospectus provides a
detailed description of the merger and the merger agreement. We
urge you to read the joint proxy statement/prospectus of which
this notice forms a part, including any documents incorporated
by reference, and the Annexes carefully and in their entirety.
If you have any questions concerning the merger or this joint
proxy statement/prospectus, would like additional copies or need
help voting your shares of Transatlantic common stock, please
contact Transatlantics proxy solicitor:
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street
New York, NY 10038
(888) 613-9817
(Banks and brokers please call:
(212) 440-9800)
E-mail:
transatlantic@georgeson.com
By Order of the Board of Directors of
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.,
Amy M. Cinquegrana
Secretary
ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important
business and financial information about Allied World and
Transatlantic from other documents that are not included in or
delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
information is available to you without charge upon your
request. You can obtain the documents incorporated by reference
into this joint proxy statement/prospectus free of charge by
requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate
company at the following addresses and telephone numbers:
|
|
|
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
|
|
Georgeson Inc.
|
105 Madison Avenue
|
|
199 Water Street
|
New York, NY 10016
|
|
New York, NY 10038
|
(800)
322-2885
|
|
(888) 613-9817
|
or
|
|
(Banks and brokers please call: (212) 440-9800)
|
(212)
929-5500
(collect)
|
|
E-mail: transatlantic@georgeson.com
|
E-mail: proxy@mackenziepartners.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
|
|
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
|
Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar
|
|
80 Pine Street
|
Zug, Switzerland
|
|
New York, NY 10005
|
Attn.: Corporate Secretary
|
|
Attn.: Investor Relations
|
(441)
278-5400
|
|
(212) 365-2200
|
Investors may also consult Allied Worlds or
Transatlantics website for more information concerning the
merger described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Allied Worlds website is
www.awac.com. Transatlantics website is
www.transre.com. Information included on these websites
is not incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
If you would like to request any documents, please do so by
September 15, 2011 in order to receive them before the
meetings.
For a more detailed description of the information incorporated
by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and how
you may obtain it, see Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 188.
ABOUT
THIS JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus, which forms part of a
registration statement on
Form S-4
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) by Allied World, constitutes a prospectus of
Allied World under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended (the Securities Act), with respect to the
Allied World registered shares (the Allied World
shares) to be issued to the Transatlantic stockholders
pursuant to the merger. This joint proxy statement/prospectus
also constitutes a joint proxy statement for both Allied World
and Transatlantic under Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
It also constitutes a notice of meeting with respect to the
extraordinary general meeting of Allied World shareholders (the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting) and a
notice of meeting with respect to the special meeting of
Transatlantic stockholders (the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting).
You should rely only on the information contained in or
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. No one has been authorized to provide you
with information that is different from that contained in, or
incorporated by reference into, this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is
dated August 19, 2011. You should not assume that the
information contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
is accurate as of any date other than that date. You should not
assume that the information incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate as of any date
other than the date of the incorporated document. Neither our
mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to Allied World
shareholders or Transatlantic stockholders nor the issuance by
Allied World of Allied World shares pursuant to the merger will
create any implication to the contrary.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an
offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any
securities, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction
to or from any person to whom it is unlawful to make any such
offer or solicitation. Information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus regarding Allied World has been provided by
Allied World and information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus regarding Transatlantic has been provided
by Transatlantic.
All references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to
Allied World refer to Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, AG, a Swiss corporation, and/or its consolidated
subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise; all
references in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to
Transatlantic refer to Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation, and/or its consolidated subsidiaries,
unless the context requires otherwise; all references to
Merger Sub refer to GO Sub, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World
formed for the sole purpose of effecting the merger; unless
otherwise indicated or as the context requires, all references
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus to we,
our and us refer to Allied World and
Transatlantic collectively; and, unless otherwise indicated or
as the context requires, all references to the merger
agreement refer to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
as of June 12, 2011, as it may be amended from time to
time, by and among Allied World, Transatlantic and Merger Sub, a
copy of which is included as Annex A to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Allied World, following completion of the
merger, is sometimes referred to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as TransAllied or the
combined company. Also, in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, $ and USD refer to
U.S. dollars and CHF refers to Swiss francs; all
metrics reported in U.S. dollars that are based on Swiss francs
(for example share capital amounts of Allied World) assume an
exchange ratio of USD 1.303 to CHF 1.00, the exchange rate
prevailing on August 12, 2011. Local time means
the local time in Switzerland with respect to the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting and related matters, and the local
time in New York City with respect to the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting and related matters.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
|
B-1
|
|
|
|
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
D-1
|
|
|
|
|
E-1
|
|
ii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS
The following are some questions that you, as a shareholder of
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG (an Allied
World shareholder) or a stockholder of Transatlantic
Holdings, Inc. (a Transatlantic stockholder), may
have regarding the merger and the other matters being considered
at the contemplated meetings and the answers to those questions.
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG (Allied
World) and Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
(Transatlantic) urge you to carefully read the
remainder of this joint proxy statement/prospectus because the
information in this section does not provide all the information
that might be important to you with respect to the merger and
the other matters being considered at the Special Shareholder
Meetings. Additional important information is also contained in
the Annexes to, and the documents incorporated by reference
into, this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World and Transatlantic have agreed to a strategic
business combination pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement that is described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. A copy of the merger agreement is included
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex A. |
|
|
|
In order to complete the merger, among other things: |
|
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders must approve the proposal
to increase Allied Worlds ordinary share capital pursuant
to article 3a(a) of the Articles of Association of Allied
World Assurance Company Holdings, AG (the Allied World
Articles), by up to CHF 887,860,538 (equaling USD
1,156,882,281) to up to CHF 1,472,939,677.4 (equaling USD
1,919,240,400) to permit the issuance of registered shares
(Namenaktien) of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
AG (Allied World shares) to Transatlantic
stockholders pursuant to, and only in connection with, the
merger as contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
exclusion of all preferential subscription rights to which
Allied World shareholders may be entitled (the
article 3 share capital increase
proposal); the contributions for the new registered shares
are paid by converting existing reserves
(Kapitalreserven) into share capital;
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders must approve the proposal
to increase Allied Worlds conditional share capital
pursuant to article 5(a) of the Allied World Articles by up
to CHF 76,894,774 (equaling USD 100,193,891) to up to CHF
138,634,774 (equaling USD 180,641,111), only in connection with
the completion of the merger (the
article 5 share capital increase proposal);
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders must approve the proposal
to increase Allied Worlds authorized share capital
pursuant to article 6(a) of the Allied World Articles by up
to CHF 177,572,113.5 (equaling USD 231,376,463.9) to up to CHF
294,587,935.5 (equaling USD 383,848,080), only in connection
with the merger (the article 6 share capital
increase proposal and, together with the
article 3 share capital increase proposal and the
article 5 share capital increase proposal, the
share capital increase proposals);
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders must approve the proposal
to issue Allied World shares to Transatlantic stockholders
pursuant to the merger and as contemplated by the merger
agreement as required by NYSE rules (the NYSE share
issuance proposal);
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders must approve the proposal
to amend the Allied World Articles to change Allied Worlds
name to TransAllied Group Holdings, AG (Allied World
and Transatlantic after the merger, TransAllied or
the combined company) immediately following, and
conditioned upon, the completion of the merger (the name
change proposal);
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders must approve the proposal
to elect (x) three Class II directors to hold office
commencing upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds annual general meeting of shareholders
(Annual Shareholder Meeting) in 2012, (y) four
Class III directors to hold office commencing upon the
completion of the merger and ending upon TransAllieds
Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2013 and (z) four
Class I directors to hold office commencing upon the
completion
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
of the merger and ending upon TransAllieds Annual
Shareholder Meeting in 2014 (the election of directors
proposal); and |
|
|
|
Transatlantic stockholders must approve the proposal
to adopt the merger agreement (the adoption of the merger
agreement proposal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, Allied World is soliciting proxies from its
shareholders with respect to two additional proposals, the
approval of the second proposal is conditioned upon the
completion of the merger; however, completion of the merger is
not conditioned upon receipt of either of these approvals: |
|
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders are being asked to
consider and vote upon the proposal to effect a capital
reduction to allow for the payment of a dividend to the combined
companys shareholders after the completion of the merger
(the capital reduction proposal); and
|
|
|
|
Allied World shareholders are being asked to
consider and vote on the proposal to amend and restate the
Allied World Third Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan), the form of which
is included as Annex E to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, to, among other things, increase the
number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan and to
extend the Plans termination date, effective upon the
completion of the merger (the Stock Incentive Plan
proposal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, Transatlantic is soliciting proxies from its
stockholders with respect to two additional proposals;
completion of the merger is not conditioned upon receipt of
these approvals: |
|
|
|
|
|
Transatlantic stockholders are being asked to
consider and vote upon the proposal to adjourn the special
meeting of Transatlantic stockholders (the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting), if necessary or appropriate,
to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes
to approve the adoption of the merger agreement proposal (the
adjournment proposal); and
|
|
|
|
Transatlantic stockholders are being asked to
consider and vote on a proposal, on an advisory (non-binding)
basis, to approve the compensation that may be paid or become
payable to Transatlantics named executive officers in
connection with the merger, and the agreements and
understandings pursuant to which such compensation may be paid
or become payable, as described in the section entitled
The Merger Interests of Transatlantics
Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
Golden Parachute Compensation (the golden parachute
proposal).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allied World and Transatlantic will hold separate meetings of
the holders of their shares to obtain these approvals. This
joint proxy statement/prospectus, including its Annexes,
contains and incorporates by reference important information
about Allied World and Transatlantic, the merger and the
meetings of the holders of shares of Allied World and
Transatlantic. You should read all the available information
carefully and in its entirety. |
|
Q: |
|
What will I receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: If the merger is
completed, Allied World shareholders will not receive any merger
consideration and will continue to hold the shares of Allied
World which they currently hold. The share capital of Allied
World consists of the outstanding Allied World shares and
non-voting participation certificates (Allied World
non-voting shares). |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: If the merger is
completed, holders of Transatlantic common stock will receive
0.88 Allied World shares for each share of Transatlantic common
stock they hold at the effective time of the merger.
Transatlantic stockholders will not receive any Allied World
fractional shares in the merger. Instead, Allied World will pay
cash in lieu of any Allied World fractional shares that a
Transatlantic stockholder would otherwise have been entitled to
receive. |
|
|
|
Following the merger, the combined companys common shares
will be traded on the NYSE under the symbol TAG. |
iv
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the value of the merger consideration? |
|
A: |
|
Because Allied World will issue 0.88 Allied World shares in
exchange for each share of Transatlantic common stock, the value
of the merger consideration that Transatlantic stockholders
receive will depend on the price of Allied World shares at the
effective time of the merger. That price will not be known at
the time of the Special Shareholder Meetings and may be more or
less than the current price or the price at the time of the
meetings. We urge you to obtain current market quotations of
Allied World shares and Transatlantic common stock. |
|
Q: |
|
When and where will the meetings be held? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: The extraordinary
general meeting of Allied World shareholders (the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting) will be held at Allied
Worlds corporate headquarters, Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar,
Zug, Switzerland, on September 20, 2011, at 2:00 p.m.
local time. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: The Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting will be held at The Down Town
Association, 60 Pine Street, New York, New York, on
September 20, 2011, at 8:00 a.m. local time. |
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: The Allied World
board of directors has set July 22, 2011 (the Allied
World record date) as the record date for the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting. Only holders of record of Allied
World shares as of the close of business on the Allied World
record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting or any adjournment or
postponement of the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting.
Holders of Allied World non-voting shares will receive this
joint proxy statement/prospectus but are not entitled to
participate in or vote at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting. As of the Allied World record date, there were
38,077,329 Allied World shares and 43,860 Allied World
non-voting shares outstanding. Beneficial owners of Allied World
shares and shareholders registered in the Allied World share
register with Allied World shares at the close of business on
the Allied World record date are entitled to vote at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting, except as provided below. If
you ask to be registered as a shareholder of record with respect
to your Allied World shares in Allied Worlds share
register and become a shareholder of record for those shares (as
opposed to a beneficial holder of shares held in street
name) after the Allied World record date, but on or before
September 1, 2011, and want to vote those shares at the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting, you will need for
identification purposes to obtain a proxy from the registered
voting rights record holder of those shares as of the Allied
World record date to vote your shares in person at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting. Alternatively, you may also
obtain the proxy materials by contacting the Corporate
Secretary, attention: Wesley D. Dupont, at Allied World
Assurance Company Holdings, AG, Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar, Zug,
Switzerland, or via
e-mail at
secretary@awac.com. If you are a record holder of Allied World
shares (as opposed to a beneficial holder of shares held in
street name) on the record date but sell your Allied
World shares prior to September 1, 2011 you will not be
entitled to vote those shares at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: The Transatlantic
board of directors has set July 22, 2011 (the
Transatlantic record date) as the record date for
the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. Only holders of
record of outstanding shares of Transatlantic common stock as of
the close of business on the Transatlantic record date are
entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. As of the
Transatlantic record date, there were 62,488,896 shares of
Transatlantic common stock outstanding. |
|
|
|
Setting of Record Date: Following the
execution of, and in accordance with, the merger agreement,
Allied World and Transatlantic prepared and filed the
registration statement containing the preliminary joint proxy
statement/prospectus with the SEC on July 8, 2011 and
promptly engaged in discussions regarding the setting of the
record date for the Special Shareholder Meetings. After
consulting with their respective proxy solicitors, on the
afternoon of July 12, 2011, the companies fixed
July 22, 2011 as the record date for the Special
Shareholder Meetings, as noted above, and notified the NYSE at
such time, thereby providing ten days to make inquiry of brokers
in accordance with Rule 402.05 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual. SEC
Rule 14a-13(a)(3)
requires that companies give 20 business days advance
notice |
v
|
|
|
|
|
of the record date to brokers, dealers, voting trustees, banks,
associations and other entities that exercise fiduciary powers
in nominee names or otherwise (collectively, nominee
holders). On July 13, 2011, Allied Worlds proxy
solicitor, MacKenzie Partners, Inc., gave the notifications
required by
Rule 14a-13(a)(3);
Transatlantics proxy solicitor, Georgeson Inc., similarly
gave the notifications required by
Rule 14a-13(a)(3)
on July 12, 2011. The companies notices were sent
fewer than 20 business days prior to the record date, which did
not comply with
Rule 14a-13(a)(3),
although the companies have confirmed that 100% of the nominee
holders were notified of the record date prior to the record
date. Since the purpose of
Rule 14a-13(a)(3)
is to ensure that nominee holders are provided sufficient notice
to permit timely distribution of proxy or other meeting
materials to all beneficial owners of shares held through
nominee holders, the companies believe that this purpose has
been satisfied notwithstanding the shortened notice period. |
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum at the meetings? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: A quorum is
required to transact business at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting. Without giving effect to the limitation on
voting rights described below, the quorum required at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting is that two or more persons
present in person and representing in person or by proxy
throughout the meeting more than 50% of the total issued and
outstanding Allied World shares are present throughout the
meeting. The Allied World board of directors or chairman of the
Allied World board of directors may postpone the meeting with
sufficient factual reason, provided that notice of postponement
is given to the shareholders in the same form as the invitation
before the time for such meeting. A new notice is then required
to hold the postponed meeting. Under Swiss law, a general
meeting of shareholders for which a notice of meeting has been
duly published may not be adjourned without publishing a new
notice of meeting. |
|
|
|
Abstentions will be included in the calculation of the number of
Allied World shares represented at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum
has been achieved. Under NYSE rules, if brokers do not have
discretion to vote on any of the proposals at a
shareholders meeting, broker non-votes will not count
toward the calculation of a quorum. As each of the proposals to
be voted on at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting are
considered non-routine under NYSE rules, brokers do
not have discretion to vote on such proposals and, as such,
broker non-votes will not be included in the calculation of the
number of Allied World shares represented at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting for purposes of determining whether
a quorum has been achieved. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: Stockholders who
hold shares representing at least a majority of the aggregate
voting power of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote
at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting must be present
in person or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting. The Transatlantic stockholders, by a majority vote at
the meeting by the holders of Transatlantic common stock
entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy, whether or
not a quorum is present, may adjourn the meeting to another time
or place without further notice unless the adjournment is for
more than 30 days or, if after the adjournment, a new
record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which case a
notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each
stockholder of record entitled to vote at the adjourned meeting. |
|
|
|
Abstentions will be included in the calculation of the number of
shares of Transatlantic common stock represented at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting for purposes of
determining whether a quorum has been achieved. Under NYSE
rules, if brokers do not have discretion to vote on any of the
proposals at a stockholders meeting, broker non-votes will
not count toward the calculation of a quorum. As each of the
proposals to be voted on at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting are considered non-routine under
NYSE rules, brokers do not have discretion to vote on such
proposals and, as such, broker non-votes will not be included in
the calculation of the number of shares of Transatlantic common
stock represented at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been
achieved. |
vi
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders. The manner in which
your shares may be voted depends on how your shares are held. If
you are a shareholder of record of Allied World, meaning that
your Allied World shares are represented by certificates or book
entries in your name so that you appear as a shareholder of
record in Allied Worlds share register maintained by its
transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer &
Trust Company, a proxy card for voting these shares will be
included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. You may
direct how your shares are to be voted by completing, signing
and returning the proxy card in the enclosed envelope. You may
also vote your Allied World shares in person at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
|
|
If you hold Allied World shares in street name
through a bank or brokerage firm, you may instead receive from
your bank or brokerage firm a voting instruction form with the
joint proxy statement/prospectus that you may use to instruct
them on how your shares are to be voted. As with a proxy card,
you may direct how your shares are to be voted by completing,
signing and returning the voting instructions form in the
envelope provided. Many banks and brokerage firms have arranged
for internet or telephonic voting of shares and provide
instructions for using those services on the voting instruction
form. If you want to vote your Allied World shares in person at
the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting, you must obtain a
proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee giving you
the right to vote your Allied World shares at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders. If you are a
stockholder of record of Transatlantic as of the close of
business on the Transatlantic record date, you may vote in
person by attending the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting or, to ensure your shares are represented at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, you may authorize a
proxy to vote by: |
|
|
|
logging onto http://proxy.georgeson.com/ and
following the instructions on your proxy card to vote via the
internet anytime up to 11:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
September 19, 2011 and following the instructions provided
on that site;
|
|
|
|
dialing 1-877-456-7915 and listening for further
directions to vote by telephone anytime up to 11:00 p.m.,
Eastern Time, on September 19, 2011 and following the
instructions provided in the recorded message; or
|
|
|
|
signing and returning the accompanying proxy card in
the enclosed postage-paid envelope. Transatlantic stockholders
of record may submit their proxies through the mail by
completing their proxy card, and signing, dating and returning
it in the enclosed, pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. To be
valid, a returned proxy card must be signed and dated.
|
|
|
|
If you hold Transatlantic common stock in street
name through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee,
please follow the voting instructions provided by your bank,
brokerage firm or other nominee to ensure that your shares of
Transatlantic common stock are represented at the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting. If you want to vote your
Transatlantic common stock in person at the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting, you must obtain a proxy from your
bank, brokerage firm or other nominee giving you the right to
vote your Transatlantic common stock at the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How many votes do I have? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: Holders of Allied
World shares are entitled to one vote per Allied World share
owned as of the close of business on the Allied World record
date, unless you own controlled shares that
constitute 10% or more of the issued Allied World shares as of
the close of business on the Allied World record date, in which
case your voting rights with respect to those controlled shares
will be limited, in the aggregate, to a voting power of
approximately 10% pursuant to a formula specified in
article 14 of the Allied World Articles. The Allied World
Articles define controlled shares generally to include all
shares of Allied World directly, indirectly or constructively
owned or beneficially owned by any person or group of persons.
As of the close of business on the Allied World record date,
there were 38,077,329 Allied World shares outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting. |
vii
|
|
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: Holders of
Transatlantic common stock are entitled to one vote for each
share owned as of the close of business on the Transatlantic
record date. However, to satisfy the requirements of New York
State Insurance regulators, on June 1, 2009, Davis Selected
Advisors, L.P. (Davis Advisors) entered into an
agreement with Transatlantic whereby Davis Advisors agreed to
vote the number of shares of Transatlantic common stock owned by
Davis Advisors in excess of 9.9% of Transatlantics
outstanding shares in a manner proportionate to the vote of the
owners of the shares (excluding Davis Advisors, stockholders
beneficially owning more than 10% of Transatlantics
outstanding shares, and directors and officers of Transatlantic)
voting on such matters. As of the close of business on the
Transatlantic record date, there were 62,488,896 shares of
Transatlantic common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at
the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve each proposal? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: Approval of each of
the following proposals require the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the votes represented at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting and a majority of the nominal value of the Allied World
shares represented at such meeting, where holders of at least
50% of the total outstanding Allied World shares are represented
and voting and who are entitled to vote on such proposal:
(i) the article 3 share capital increase
proposal, (ii) the article 5 share capital
increase proposal and (iii) the article 6 share
capital increase proposal. Abstentions will be considered votes
represented at the meeting and will thus have the same effect as
votes AGAINST these proposals. Broker non-votes
will not be considered shares represented at the meeting and
will have no effect on these proposals. |
|
|
|
The approval of the NYSE share issuance proposal and the Stock
Incentive Plan proposal requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote on the proposal
and present in person or represented by proxy at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting, provided that the total votes
cast on this proposal represent over 50% of the outstanding
Allied World shares entitled to vote on such proposal. Votes
for, votes against and abstentions count
as votes cast, while broker non-votes do not count as votes cast
for this purpose. All outstanding Allied World shares count as
shares entitled to vote. Thus, the total sum of votes
for, plus votes against, plus
abstentions, which we refer to as the NYSE votes
cast, must be greater than 50% of the total outstanding
Allied World shares. The number of votes for the
proposal must be greater than 50% of the NYSE votes cast. |
|
|
|
Approval of each of the following proposals requires a majority
of the votes cast voting in favor of such proposal at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting where holders of at least 50%
of the total outstanding Allied World shares are represented and
voting and who are entitled to vote on such proposal:
(i) the name change proposal, (ii) the election of
directors proposal and (iii) the capital reduction proposal.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be considered votes
cast and will have no effect on these proposals, assuming a
quorum is present. |
|
|
|
Because the proposals to be voted on by the Allied World
shareholders at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting are
all non-routine matters, if a bank or brokerage firm
holds your shares you are urged to instruct your bank or
brokerage firm on how to vote your shares to ensure your shares
are voted on each of the proposals to be brought before the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: The adoption of
the merger agreement proposal requires the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
Transatlantic common stock entitled to vote thereon. Failures to
vote, votes to abstain and broker non-votes, if any, will have
the effect of a vote AGAINST the adoption of the
merger agreement proposal. |
|
|
|
Approval of the adjournment proposal requires the affirmative
vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Transatlantic
common stock entitled to vote and present in person or
represented by proxy, whether or not a quorum is present.
Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the adjournment proposal. Failures to vote
and broker non-votes, if any, will not be voted, but this will
not have an effect on the adjournment proposal. |
|
|
|
Approval of the golden parachute proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Transatlantic common stock present in person or represented by
proxy and entitled to vote |
viii
|
|
|
|
|
thereon, assuming a quorum is present. Abstentions will have the
same effect as a vote AGAINST the golden parachute
proposal. Failures to vote and broker non-votes, if any, will
not be voted, but this will not have an effect on the golden
parachute proposal, assuming a quorum is present. |
|
Q: |
|
My shares are held in street name by my bank,
brokerage firm or other nominee. Will my bank, brokerage firm or
other nominee automatically vote my shares for me? |
|
A: |
|
No. If your shares are held in the name of a bank,
brokerage firm or other nominee, you are considered the
beneficial holder of the shares held for you in what
is known as street name. You are not the
record holder of such shares. If this is the case,
this joint proxy statement/prospectus has been forwarded to you
by your bank, broker or other nominee. As the beneficial holder,
unless your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee has
discretionary authority over your shares, you generally have the
right to direct your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee as to
how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting
instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on
which your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee does not have
discretionary authority, including certain matters to be
considered at the Special Shareholder Meetings. This is often
called a broker non-vote. You should provide your
bank, broker or other nominee with instructions as to how to
vote your Allied World shares and Transatlantic common stock, as
applicable. |
|
|
|
Please follow the voting instructions provided by your bank,
broker or other nominee so that it may vote your shares on your
behalf. Please note that you may not vote shares held in street
name by returning a proxy card directly to Allied World or
Transatlantic or by voting in person at your meeting unless you
first obtain a proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other
nominee. |
|
Q: |
|
How does the Allied World board of directors recommend that
Allied World shareholders vote? |
|
A: |
|
The Allied World board of directors has unanimously determined
that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable and in
the best interests of Allied World. The Allied World board of
directors unanimously recommends that the Allied World
shareholders vote (i) FOR the share capital
increase proposals, (ii) FOR the NYSE share
issuance proposal, (iii) FOR the name change
proposal, (iv) FOR the election of directors
proposal, (v) FOR the capital reduction proposal and
(vi) FOR the Stock Incentive Plan proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
How does the Transatlantic board of directors recommend that
Transatlantic stockholders vote? |
|
A: |
|
The Transatlantic board of directors has unanimously determined
that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable and in
the best interests of Transatlantic and its stockholders. The
Transatlantic board of directors unanimously recommends that
Transatlantic stockholders vote (i) FOR the
adoption of the merger agreement proposal,
(ii) FOR the adjournment proposal and
(iii) FOR the golden parachute proposal. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen if I return my proxy card without indicating
how to vote? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: If you properly
complete and sign your proxy card but do not indicate how your
Allied World shares should be voted on a matter, the Allied
World shares represented by your proxy will be voted as the
Allied World board of directors recommends and, therefore,
FOR the proposals brought before the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: If you properly
complete and sign your proxy card but do not indicate how your
shares of Transatlantic common stock should be voted on a
matter, the shares of Transatlantic common stock represented by
your proxy will be voted as the Transatlantic board of directors
recommends and, therefore, FOR the proposals brought
before the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I appoint and vote via the independent proxy if I am
an Allied World shareholder of record? |
|
A: |
|
If you are an Allied World shareholder of record as of the
Allied World record date, under Swiss law you may authorize the
independent proxy, Mr. Paul Buergi, of Buis Buergi AG,
Muehlebachstrasse 7, P.O Box 672, CH-8024, Zurich, Switzerland,
with full rights of substitution, to vote your Allied World
shares on your behalf instead of using the enclosed proxy card.
If you authorize the independent proxy to vote your |
ix
|
|
|
|
|
shares without giving instructions, your shares will be voted in
accordance with the recommendations of the Allied World board of
directors with regard to the items listed in the notice of
meeting. If new agenda items (other than those in the notice of
meeting) or new proposals or motions with respect to those
agenda items set forth in the notice of meeting are being put
forth before the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting, the
independent proxy will, in the absence of other specific
instructions, vote in accordance with the recommendations of the
Allied World board of directors. An optional form of proxy card
that may be used by the independent proxy to vote your Allied
World shares is included with this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Proxy cards authorizing the independent
proxy to vote your shares must be sent directly to the
independent proxy, arriving no later than 12:00 p.m., local
time, September 13, 2011. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy after I have returned
a proxy or voting instruction card? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. |
|
|
|
If you are the holder of record of Allied World
shares: If you are the holder of record of Allied
World shares, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at
any time before your proxy is voted at your meeting. You can do
this in one of the following ways: |
|
|
|
you can provide the Allied World corporate secretary
with written notice of revocation, by voting in person at the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting or by executing a
later-dated proxy card; provided, however, that the action is
taken in sufficient time to permit the necessary examination and
tabulation of the subsequent proxy or revocation before the vote
is taken; or
|
|
|
|
if you have granted your proxy to the independent
proxy, you can provide Mr. Paul Buergi, of Buis Buergi AG,
Muehlebachstrasse 7, P.O. Box 672, CH-8024, Zurich,
Switzerland, with written notice of revocation, by voting in
person at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting or by
executing a later-dated independent proxy card. Revocation of,
or changes to, proxies issued to the independent proxy must be
received by the independent proxy by 12:00 p.m., local
time, on September 13, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Attendance at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting by an
Allied World shareholder who has executed and delivered a proxy
card to Allied World shall not in and of itself constitute a
revocation of such proxy. Only your vote at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting will revoke your proxy. |
|
|
|
If you hold Allied World shares in street
name: If your Allied World shares are held
in street name, you must obtain a proxy from your bank,
brokerage firm or other nominee giving you the right to vote
your Allied World shares at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting. |
|
|
|
If you are the holder of record of Transatlantic common
stock: If you are the holder of record of
Transatlantic common stock, you can change your vote or revoke
your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at your
meeting. You can do this in one of the following ways: |
|
|
|
you can grant a new, valid proxy bearing a later
date (including by telephone or via the internet);
|
|
|
|
you can send a signed notice of revocation; or
|
|
|
|
you can attend the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting and vote in person, which will automatically cancel any
proxy previously given, or you may revoke your proxy in person.
Simply attending the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting
without voting will not revoke any proxy that you have
previously given or change your vote.
|
|
|
|
If you choose either of the first two methods, your notice of
revocation or your new proxy must be received by Transatlantic
no later than the beginning of the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting. If you have submitted a proxy for your
shares by telephone or via the internet, you may revoke your
prior telephone or internet proxy by any manner described above. |
|
|
|
If you hold shares of Transatlantic common stock in
street name: If your shares of
Transatlantic common stock are held in street name, you must
contact your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee to change
your vote. |
x
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the merger to U.S. holders of Allied World shares? |
|
A: |
|
No gain or loss will be recognized by Allied World shareholders
as a consequence of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the merger to U.S. holders of Transatlantic common stock? |
|
A: |
|
The receipt of Allied World shares (and cash, if any, received
in lieu of fractional shares) in exchange for shares of
Transatlantic common stock pursuant to the merger agreement will
be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect the merger to be completed? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World and Transatlantic hope to complete the merger as
soon as reasonably possible and expect the closing of the merger
to occur in the fourth quarter of 2011. However, the merger is
subject to various regulatory clearances and the satisfaction or
waiver of other conditions, and it is possible that factors
outside the control of Allied World and Transatlantic could
result in the merger being completed at an earlier time, a later
time or not at all. There may be a substantial amount of time
between the Special Shareholder Meetings and the completion of
the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Do I need to do anything with my shares other than voting for
the proposals at the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World Shareholders: If you are an
Allied World shareholder, after the merger is completed, you are
not required to take any action with respect to your Allied
World shares. |
|
|
|
Transatlantic Stockholders: If you are a
Transatlantic stockholder, after the merger is completed, each
share of Transatlantic common stock you hold will be converted
automatically into the right to receive 0.88 Allied World shares
together with cash in lieu of any fractional Allied World
shares, as applicable. You will receive instructions at that
time regarding exchanging your shares of Transatlantic common
stock for Allied World shares. You do not need to take any
action at this time. Please do not send your Transatlantic
stock certificates with your proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
Are holders of shares entitled to appraisal rights? |
|
A: |
|
No. Neither the Allied World shareholders, under Swiss law,
nor the Transatlantic stockholders, under Delaware law, are
entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I sell my shares of Transatlantic common
stock before the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The record date for the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting is earlier than the date of the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting and the date that the merger is expected to
be completed. If you transfer your shares of Transatlantic
common stock after the Transatlantic record date but before the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, you will retain your
right to vote at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting,
but will have transferred the right to receive the merger
consideration in the merger. In order to receive the merger
consideration, you must hold your shares through the effective
date of the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I hold shares in both Allied World and
Transatlantic? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a holder of shares of both Allied World and
Transatlantic you will receive two separate packages of proxy
materials. A vote cast as an Allied World shareholder will not
count as a vote cast as a Transatlantic stockholder, and a vote
cast as a Transatlantic stockholder will not count as a vote
cast as an Allied World shareholder. Therefore, please
separately submit a proxy for your Allied World shares and your
Transatlantic common stock. |
xi
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A: |
|
Allied World shareholders or Transatlantic stockholders who have
questions about the merger, the other matters to be voted on at
the Special Shareholder Meetings, how to submit a proxy or
desire additional copies of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or additional proxy cards should contact: |
|
|
|
If you are an Allied World shareholder:
|
|
If you are a Transatlantic stockholder:
|
|
|
|
MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
105 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10016
(800) 322-2885
or
(212) 929-5500
(collect)
E-mail:
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
|
|
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street
New York, NY 10038
(888) 613-9817
(Banks and brokers please call: (212) 440-9800)
E-mail: transatlantic@georgeson.com
|
|
|
|
or
|
|
or
|
|
|
|
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar
Zug, Switzerland
Attn.: Corporate Secretary
(441) 278-5400
|
|
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
80 Pine Street
New York, NY 10005
Attn.: Investor Relations
(212) 365-2200
|
xii
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and may not contain all
the information that is important to you with respect to the
merger and the other matters being considered at the Special
Shareholder Meetings. Allied World and Transatlantic urge you to
read the remainder of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
carefully, including the attached Annexes, and the other
documents to which we have referred you. See also the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 188. We have included page references in
this summary to direct you to a more complete description of the
topics presented below.
The
Companies
Allied
World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG is a holding company
incorporated in Switzerland. Allied World, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Allied World Assurance
Company, Ltd, Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited,
Allied World Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited, Allied
World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., Allied World National
Assurance Company, Darwin National Assurance Company, and Darwin
Select Insurance Company and its branch offices, is a specialty
insurance and reinsurance company that underwrites a diversified
portfolio of property and casualty lines of business through
offices located in Bermuda, Hong Kong, Ireland, Singapore,
Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Allied
World has nine offices in the United States and has become
licensed in Canada, as well. Since its formation in 2001, Allied
World has focused primarily on the direct insurance markets.
Allied World offers its clients and producers significant
capacity in both direct property and casualty insurance markets
as well as the reinsurance market. Allied World is the ultimate
parent company of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd,
the former publicly-traded Bermuda holding company, and its
subsidiaries as a result of a redomestication effected on
December 1, 2010 pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under
Bermuda law.
Allied World shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. (NYSE) under the symbol AWH.
Following the merger, common shares of the combined company,
TransAllied Group Holdings, AG, will be traded on the NYSE under
the symbol TAG.
The principal executive offices of Allied World are located at
Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar, Zug, Switzerland and its telephone
number is
41-41-768-1080.
Transatlantic
Holdings, Inc.
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. is a holding company incorporated
in the State of Delaware. Transatlantic, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, Transatlantic Reinsurance
Company®
(TRC), Trans Re Zurich Reinsurance Company Ltd.,
acquired by TRC in 1996, and Putnam Reinsurance Company
(Putnam) (contributed by Transatlantic to TRC in
1995), offers reinsurance capacity for a full range of property
and casualty products, directly and through brokers, to
insurance and reinsurance companies, in both the domestic and
international markets on both a treaty and facultative basis.
One or both of TRC and Putnam is licensed, accredited,
authorized or can serve as a reinsurer in 50 states and the
District of Columbia in the United States and in Puerto Rico and
Guam. Through its international locations, Transatlantic has
operations worldwide, including Bermuda, Canada, seven locations
in Europe, three locations in Central and South America, two
locations in Asia (excluding Japan), and one location in each of
Japan, Australia and Africa. TRC is licensed in Bermuda, Canada,
Japan, the United Kingdom, the Dominican Republic, the Hong Kong
Special Administrative Region, the Peoples Republic of
China and Australia. Transatlantic was originally formed in 1986
under the name PREINCO Holdings, Inc. as a holding company for
Putnam. Transatlantics name was changed to Transatlantic
Holdings, Inc. on April 18, 1990 following the acquisition
on April 17, 1990 of all of the common stock of TRC in
exchange for shares of common stock of Transatlantic.
Transatlantics common stock is traded on the NYSE under
the symbol TRH.
1
The principal executive offices of Transatlantic are located at
80 Pine Street, New York, New York 10005 and its telephone
number is
212-365-2200.
GO Sub,
LLC
GO Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World
(Merger Sub), is a Delaware limited liability
company, which was initially incorporated on June 2, 2011
as a corporation and subsequently converted to a limited
liability company on June 10, 2011, and was formed for the
sole purpose of effecting the merger. In the merger, Merger Sub
will be merged with and into Transatlantic, with Transatlantic
surviving as a
wholly-owned
subsidiary of Allied World.
The
Merger
A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Allied World and
Transatlantic encourage you to read the entire merger agreement
carefully because it is the principal document governing the
merger. For more information on the merger agreement, see the
section entitled The Merger Agreement beginning on
page 110.
Effects
of the Merger (see page 43)
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, a
copy of which is included as Annex A to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, at the effective time of the merger,
Merger Sub will be merged with and into Transatlantic, with
Transatlantic surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Allied World. Upon completion of the merger, Allied World
will be the parent company of Transatlantic, and Allied
Worlds name will be changed to TransAllied Group Holdings,
AG.
Merger
Consideration (see page 110)
Transatlantic stockholders will be entitled to receive 0.88
Allied World shares for each share of Transatlantic common stock
they hold at the effective time of the merger (the
exchange ratio) and cash in lieu of any Allied World
fractional shares. The exchange ratio is fixed and will not be
adjusted for changes in the market value of Transatlantic common
stock or Allied World shares. As a result, the implied value of
the consideration to Transatlantic stockholders will fluctuate
between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and
the effective date of the merger. Based on the closing price of
Allied World shares on the NYSE on June 10, 2011, the last
trading day before public announcement of the merger, the
exchange ratio represented approximately $51.10 in value for
each share of Transatlantic common stock. Based on the closing
price of Allied World shares on the NYSE on August 18,
2011, the latest practicable trading day before the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange ratio represented
approximately $45.29 in value for each share of Transatlantic
common stock.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (see
page 148)
The receipt of Allied World shares in exchange for shares of
Transatlantic common stock pursuant to the merger will be a
taxable transaction for U.S federal income tax purposes. In
general, a U.S. holder that receives Allied World shares in
exchange for shares of Transatlantic common stock pursuant to
the merger will recognize capital gain or loss for U.S federal
income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference, if
any, between (i) the sum of the fair market value of the
Allied World shares received as of the effective time of the
merger and the amount of cash, if any, received in lieu of
fractional Allied World shares and (ii) the holders
adjusted tax basis in the shares of Transatlantic common stock
exchanged for the Allied World shares pursuant to the merger. No
gain or loss will be recognized by Allied World shareholders.
For further information regarding the U.S. federal income
tax consequences of the merger, see the section entitled
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
beginning on page 148.
2
Recommendations
of the Board of Directors of Allied World (see
page 63)
After careful consideration, the Allied World board of directors
unanimously approved the merger agreement and determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the merger, the issuance of Allied World shares to
Transatlantic stockholders pursuant to the merger agreement and
the amendment of the Allied World Articles, are in the best
interests of Allied World. For more information regarding the
factors considered by the Allied World board of directors in
reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and the
transactions thereby contemplated, see the section entitled
The Merger Allied Worlds Reasons for the
Merger; Recommendations of the Allied World board of
directors. The Allied World board of directors
unanimously recommends that the Allied World shareholders vote
(i) FOR the share capital increase proposals,
(ii) FOR the NYSE share issuance proposal,
(iii) FOR the name change proposal,
(iv) FOR the election of directors proposal,
(v) FOR the capital reduction proposal and
(vi) FOR the Stock Incentive Plan proposal.
Recommendations
of the Board of Directors of Transatlantic (see
page 76)
After careful consideration, the Transatlantic board of
directors unanimously approved the merger agreement and
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger, are advisable and in
the best interests of Transatlantic and its stockholders. For
more information regarding the factors considered by the
Transatlantic board of directors in reaching its decision to
approve the merger agreement and the merger, see the section
entitled The Merger Transatlantics
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendations of the Transatlantic
Board of Directors. The Transatlantic board of
directors unanimously recommends that Transatlantic stockholders
vote (i) FOR the adoption of the merger
agreement proposal, (ii) FOR the adjournment
proposal and (iii) FOR the golden parachute
proposal.
Opinion
of Allied Worlds Financial Advisor (see
page 65)
Allied World engaged Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
(Deutsche Bank) to act as its financial advisor in
connection with the merger. At the June 12, 2011 meeting of
the Allied World board of directors, Deutsche Bank rendered an
oral and written opinion to the board of directors of Allied
World to the effect that, based upon and subject to the
assumptions, limitations, qualifications and conditions set
forth in the opinion, as of the date of such opinion, the
exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Allied World.
The full text of the written opinion of Deutsche Bank, dated
June 12, 2011, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations, qualifications and conditions of the review
undertaken by Deutsche Bank in connection with the opinion, is
included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex B and is incorporated by reference herein. Allied
World shareholders are urged to read Deutsche Banks
opinion carefully and in its entirety. Deutsche Bank provided
its opinion to Allied Worlds board of directors in
connection with and for the purposes of its evaluation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Deutsche
Banks opinion relates only to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to Allied World,
and does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of Allied
World shares as to how any such holder should vote with respect
to the proposals to be considered at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting or any other matter. In addition, Deutsche
Bank was not requested to opine as to, and its opinion does not
in any manner address, the merits of Allied Worlds
underlying business decision to proceed with or effect the
merger or the relative merits of the merger as compared to any
alternative transactions or business strategies. See also
The Merger Opinion of Allied Worlds
Financial Advisor.
Opinion
of Transatlantics Financial Advisor (see
page 80)
Moelis & Company LLC (Moelis) delivered
its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in writing,
that based upon and subject to the conditions and limitations
set forth in its written opinion, as of June 12, 2011, the
exchange ratio set forth in the merger agreement was fair, from
a financial point of view, to the holders of Transatlantic
common stock.
3
The full text of the written opinion of Moelis, dated
June 12, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with its opinion, is attached to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C. The
summary of Moelis opinion contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus describes the material analyses underlying
Moelis opinion, but does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by Moelis in connection
with its opinion, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the full text of the opinion. Moelis provided its opinion for
the information and assistance of the Transatlantic board of
directors in connection with its consideration of the merger.
Moelis opinion is limited solely to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the exchange ratio set forth in the
merger agreement to the holders of Transatlantic common stock as
of the date of the opinion and does not constitute a
recommendation to any holder of Transatlantic common stock as to
how such Transatlantic stockholder should vote with respect to
the merger or any other matter. In addition, Moelis was not
requested to opine as to, and its opinion does not in any manner
address, Transatlantics underlying business decision to
effect the merger or the relative merits of the merger as
compared to any alternative business strategies or transactions
that might be available to Transatlantic. See also The
Merger Opinion of Transatlantics Financial
Advisor.
Interests
of Allied Worlds Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger (see page 90)
Executive officers and members of the Allied World board of
directors have interests in the merger that may be different
from, or in addition to, the interests of Allied World
shareholders generally.
These interests include rights of executive officers under
employment agreements with Allied World, rights under a
supplemental executive retirement plan, under new waiver or
retention agreements, as applicable, that are expected to be
entered into prior to the consummation of the merger and rights
to indemnification and directors and officers
liability insurance that will survive completion of the merger.
For more information concerning these interests, please see the
discussion under the captions The
Merger Interests of Allied Worlds Directors and
Executive Officers in the Merger.
The Allied World board of directors was aware of these interests
and considered them, among other matters, in approving the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement and in recommending that you vote to approve the share
capital increase proposals, the NYSE share issuance proposal,
the name change proposal, the election of directors proposal,
the capital reduction proposal and the Stock Incentive Plan
proposal.
Interests
of Transatlantics Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger (see page 97)
Executive officers and members of the Transatlantic board of
directors have interests in the merger that may be different
from, or in addition to, the interests of Transatlantic
stockholders generally.
Additionally, as detailed below under The
Merger Board of Directors and Management
Following the Merger, certain of Transatlantics
executive officers and members of the Transatlantic board of
directors will continue to serve as officers or directors of the
combined company upon completion of the merger. Specifically,
Mr. Richard S. Press, the current non-executive chairman of
the Transatlantic board of directors, will be the non-executive
chairman of the board of directors of the combined company and
Mr. Michael C. Sapnar, the current Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of Transatlantic, will be appointed
to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of Global
Reinsurance of the combined company.
While Transatlantic has various compensation and benefits
arrangements that provide for double trigger
payments (i.e., payments upon certain termination events in
proximity to a change in control), the merger will
not constitute a change in control for purposes of
such arrangements. However, Transatlantic has approved the form
of retention agreements that have been offered to certain
executives, providing for the grant of restricted stock units
(or in the event that there are not enough share reserves,
phantom stock awards) that will vest if the employment of such
executives is maintained through the applicable vesting dates
(or in certain instances of termination prior to such dates).
4
In general, outstanding options to acquire Transatlantic common
stock and compensatory stock awards denominated in shares of
Transatlantic common stock will be converted into options to
acquire TransAllied shares and compensatory stock awards
denominated in TransAllied shares. The equity holdings of
Transatlantics directors and executive officers will be
treated in the same manner as the equity holdings of all other
equity holders provided, however, that pursuant to the merger
agreement, any independent Transatlantic or Allied World
director who ceases to be a member of the reconstituted
TransAllied board prior to the end of his or her term shall have
immediate vesting of all of his or her unvested Allied World
stock-based awards. For additional information regarding the
interests of Transatlantic directors and executive officers in
the merger, please see the section entitled The
Merger Interests of Transatlantics Directors
and Executive Officers in the Merger on page 97.
The Transatlantic board of directors was aware of these
interests and considered them, among other matters, in approving
the merger agreement and in recommending that you vote for the
adoption of the merger agreement proposal, the adjournment
proposal and the golden parachute proposal.
Board of
Directors and Management Following the Merger (see
page 100)
Immediately following the effective time of the merger, assuming
the receipt of the resignation letters of all current directors
of Allied World and of shareholder approval of the election of
directors proposal as described herein, the board of directors
of the combined company will consist of 11 members including:
(i) four independent Transatlantic directors: Stephen P.
Bradley, Ian H. Chippendale, John G. Foos and
John L. McCarthy; (ii) Richard S. Press (the
current non-executive chairman of the Transatlantic board of
directors); (iii) Michael C. Sapnar (the current Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Transatlantic);
(iv) four of the following current independent Allied World
directors, who will be identified to shareholders at or prior to
the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting: Barbara T.
Alexander, James F. Duffy, Bart Friedman, Scott Hunter, Mark R.
Patterson, Patrick de Saint-Aignan and
Samuel J. Weinhoff; and (v) Scott A. Carmilani
(the current President and Chief Executive Officer of Allied
World). The 11 members of the board of directors of the combined
company will be divided into three classes of directors as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Class II (to hold office commencing upon the completion of
the merger and ending upon TransAllieds Annual Shareholder
Meeting in 2012): Ian H. Chippendale, John L. McCarthy and one
current independent Allied World director;
|
|
|
|
Class III (to hold office commencing upon the completion of
the merger and ending upon TransAllieds Annual Shareholder
Meeting in 2013): Stephen P. Bradley, John G. Foos and two
current independent Allied World directors; and
|
|
|
|
Class I (to hold office commencing upon the completion of
the merger and ending upon TransAllieds Annual Shareholder
Meeting in 2014): Scott A. Carmilani, Richard S. Press, Michael
C. Sapnar, and one current independent Allied World director.
|
Immediately following the effective time of the merger,
Mr. Carmilani will serve as President and Chief Executive
Officer of the combined company. Mr. Press will be elected
as non-executive chairman of the board of directors of the
combined company (the TransAllied board). Effective
on the first anniversary of the closing date of the merger,
Mr. Press will cease to serve as non-executive chairman and
shall remain on the TransAllied board as a director until the
second anniversary of the closing date of the merger, at which
time he has agreed to retire from the TransAllied board (subject
to his earlier resignation or retirement). Mr. Sapnar will
be appointed to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer
of Global Reinsurance of the combined company.
The foregoing director elections and officer appointments are
conditioned upon completion of the merger. In the event that the
merger is not completed, the foregoing director elections and
officer appointments will not take effect.
With respect to the election of the four current independent
Allied World directors to the combined companys board of
directors, shareholders are being asked to vote for,
against or to abstain from voting on,
each of the seven Allied World director nominees who are
currently Allied World independent directors: Barbara T.
Alexander, James F. Duffy, Bart Friedman, Scott Hunter, Mark R.
Patterson, Patrick de Saint-
5
Aignan and Samuel J. Weinhoff. At or prior to the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting, three of these seven director
nominees will withdraw as nominees and the four remaining
director nominees will be identified to shareholders. If any
such remaining director nominee receives a majority of the votes
cast voting in favor of their election, where holders of at
least 50% of the total outstanding Allied World shares are
represented and voting and who are entitled to vote on such
proposal, such director nominee will be elected to serve as a
member of the TransAllied board, to serve in the Class as
designated by the Allied World board of directors at or prior to
the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting. If any such
remaining director nominee does not receive the requisite
shareholder votes, such nominee will not be elected to the
TransAllied board and the election of directors proposal (which
is a condition to the closing of the merger, subject to waiver
by the parties) will fail.
The appointments of Messrs. Carmilani, Press and Sapnar,
among other matters, will be reflected in the amended and
restated organizational regulations of TransAllied (the
TransAllied organizational regulations), which will
take effect only upon completion of the merger, and, for a
period of one year following the closing date, any resolution to
revise, modify or delete such provisions will require a majority
of at least eight of the votes cast by the TransAllied board.
Treatment
of Transatlantic Stock Options and Other Stock-Based Awards and
Programs (see page 106)
Prior to the effective time of the merger, the Allied World
board of directors (or, if appropriate, the committee thereof
administering the Allied World stock plans) will adopt
resolutions or take other actions as may be required to effect
the below actions with respect to the Transatlantic stock
options and stock-based awards.
Stock Options. Upon completion of the merger,
each outstanding option to purchase shares of Transatlantic
common stock will be converted pursuant to the merger agreement
into a stock option to purchase Allied World shares on the same
terms and conditions as were in effect immediately prior to the
completion of the merger based on the exchange ratio.
Stock-Based Awards. Upon completion of the
merger, each outstanding stock-based award of Transatlantic will
be converted into Allied World shares or other compensatory
awards denominated in Allied World shares subject to a risk of
forfeiture to, or the right to repurchase by, Allied World, with
the same terms and conditions as were applicable under such
Transatlantic stock-based awards, and each holder of
Transatlantic stock-based awards shall be entitled to receive a
number of converted Transatlantic stock-based awards equal to
the product of the number of Transatlantic stock-based awards
held by such holder and the exchange ratio.
Each of Allied World and Transatlantic will use the existing
performance goals to determine performance awards through fiscal
year 2011. Thereafter, following the closing of the merger,
TransAllieds Compensation Committee will make a decision
regarding the performance awards for the 2012 fiscal year and
thereafter.
Regulatory
Clearances Required for the Merger (see page 103)
Allied World and Transatlantic have each agreed to take actions
in order to obtain regulatory clearances required to consummate
the merger. Regulatory clearances include expiration or
termination of the required waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder (the HSR Act),
following required notifications and review by the Antitrust
Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the
Antitrust Division) or the Federal Trade Commission
(the FTC). The parties filed the required
notifications with the Antitrust Division and the FTC on
July 1, 2011 and early termination of the waiting period
was granted effective July 11, 2011.
In addition to those filings required by the HSR Act, certain
insurance regulatory filings will also be required to consummate
the merger. State insurance laws in the United States generally
require that, prior to the acquisition of an insurance company,
the acquiring party must obtain approval from the insurance
commissioner of the insurance companys state of domicile,
and the parties have and will make the required filings in
accordance with such laws. In addition, applications or
notifications have been or will be filed with
6
various insurance regulatory authorities outside of the United
States in connection with the changes in control that may be
deemed to occur as a result of the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement.
Allied World and Transatlantic also expect to file notices with
insurance regulators and antitrust and competition authorities
in certain other jurisdictions. While Allied World and
Transatlantic expect to obtain all required regulatory
clearances, we cannot assure you that these regulatory
clearances will be obtained or that the granting of these
regulatory clearances will not involve the imposition of
additional conditions on the completion of the merger, including
the requirement to divest assets, or require changes to the
terms of the merger agreement. These conditions or changes could
result in the conditions to the merger not being satisfied.
Amended
and Restated Articles of Association of Allied World (see
page 130)
The Allied World board of directors proposes to the Allied World
shareholders, subject to completion of the merger, to amend the
Allied World Articles to change Allied Worlds name to
TransAllied Group Holdings, AG. The form of the
Articles of Association of TransAllied (the TransAllied
Articles) is included in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex D. The adoption of the
TransAllied Articles by the Allied World shareholders is a
condition to completion of the merger. In the event this
proposal is approved by Allied World shareholders, but the
merger is not completed, the TransAllied Articles will not
become effective.
Expected
Timing of the Merger
Allied World and Transatlantic currently expect the closing of
the merger to occur in the fourth quarter of 2011. However, the
merger is subject to various regulatory clearances and the
satisfaction or waiver of other conditions as described in the
merger agreement, and it is possible that factors outside the
control of Allied World and Transatlantic could result in the
merger being completed at an earlier time, a later time or not
at all.
Conditions
to Completion of the Merger (see page 121)
The obligations of Allied World and Transatlantic to complete
the merger are subject to the satisfaction of the following
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
approval by the Allied World shareholders of (i) the share
capital increase proposals, (ii) the NYSE share issuance
proposal and (iii) the name change proposal;
|
|
|
|
approval by the Transatlantic stockholders of the adoption of
the merger agreement proposal;
|
|
|
|
authorization of the listing of the Allied World shares to be
issued in the merger on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance;
|
|
|
|
the waiting period (and any extension thereof) applicable to the
merger under the HSR Act having expired or been earlier
terminated;
|
|
|
|
obtaining any necessary approvals of the applicable insurance
regulatory authorities in New York, Bermuda and Switzerland;
|
|
|
|
receipt of other requisite regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
|
all consents and approvals of, and filings with, governmental
agencies having been made, obtained and in full force, other
than those that would not reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on Allied World and Transatlantic after
giving effect to the merger;
|
|
|
|
effectiveness of the registration statement of which this joint
proxy statement/prospectus forms a part and the absence of a
stop order or proceedings threatened or initiated by the SEC for
that purpose;
|
|
|
|
absence of any order, injunction, decree, statute, rule or
regulation by a court or other governmental entity that makes
illegal or prohibits the completion of the merger or the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
approval by the Allied World shareholders of the election of
directors proposal and execution of a written consent of the
TransAllied board approving certain committee and officer
appointments;
|
|
|
|
a ruling from the Swiss Commercial Register having been
obtained; and
|
|
|
|
the purchase by Allied World, following receipt of the requisite
Allied World and Transatlantic shareholder approvals, of
45,000 shares of Transatlantic common stock having been
completed.
|
In addition, each of Allied Worlds and
Transatlantics obligations to effect the merger is subject
to the satisfaction or waiver of the following additional
conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of each party, other than the
representations related to the shares issued and outstanding or
reserved for issuance, the necessary corporate power and
authority to execute and deliver the merger agreement, and the
brokers and finders fees, will be true and correct
(without giving effect to any materiality qualifications
contained in such representations and warranties) as of the date
of the merger agreement and as of the closing date (other than
those representations and warranties that were made only as of a
specified date, which need only be true and correct as of such
specified date), except where the failure of such
representations and warranties to be so true and correct
(without giving effect to any limitation as to
materiality or to material adverse effect set forth
therein), individually or in the aggregate, has not had, and
would not reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse
effect on such party;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of each party relating to the
shares issued and outstanding or reserved for issuance, the
necessary corporate power and authority to execute and deliver
the merger agreement, and the brokers and finders fees,
will be true and correct in all material respects as of the date
of the merger agreement and as of the closing date (except to
the extent such representations or warranties were made as of an
earlier date, in which case, as of such earlier date);
|
|
|
|
each party having performed or complied with, in all material
respects, all its obligations under the merger agreement at or
prior to the effective time of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
receipt of a certificate executed by each partys chief
executive officer or chief financial officer as to the
satisfaction of the conditions described in the preceding three
bullet points.
|
See the section entitled The Merger Agreement
Conditions to Completion of the Merger for a further
discussion of the conditions to closing of the merger.
No
Solicitation of Alternative Proposals (see
page 115)
The merger agreement precludes Allied World and Transatlantic
from soliciting or engaging in discussions or negotiations with
a third party with respect to a proposal for a competing
transaction, including the acquisition of a significant interest
in Allied Worlds or Transatlantics common stock or
assets. However, if Allied World or Transatlantic receives an
unsolicited proposal from a third party for a competing
transaction that Allied Worlds or Transatlantics
board of directors, as applicable, among other things,
determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside
legal advisors and financial advisors) (i) is reasonably
likely to lead to a proposal that is superior to the merger and
(ii) the failure to enter discussions regarding such
proposal would result in a breach of its fiduciary obligations
under applicable law, Allied World or Transatlantic, as
applicable, may, subject to certain conditions, furnish
non-public information to and enter into discussions with, and
only with, that third party regarding such competing transaction.
See the section entitled The Merger Agreement
No Solicitation of Alternative Proposals for a further
discussion of each partys covenant not to solicit
alternative acquisition proposals.
8
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (see page 122)
Generally, the merger agreement may be terminated and the merger
may be abandoned at any time prior to the completion of the
merger (except as specified below, including after the required
Allied World shareholder approvals or Transatlantic stockholder
approvals are obtained):
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of Allied World and
Transatlantic; or
|
|
|
|
by either party, if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a governmental entity issues a final and nonappealable order,
decree or ruling or takes any other action (including the
failure to have taken an action) having the effect of
permanently enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the merger or the
other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the required approval by the shareholders of Allied World or the
stockholders of Transatlantic has not been obtained at the
respective Special Shareholder Meeting (or at any adjournment or
postponement thereof);
|
|
|
|
the merger has not been completed on or before January 31,
2012 (the end date), subject to extension by the
mutual agreement of Allied World and Transatlantic;
|
|
|
|
the other party has breached any of its agreements or
representations in the merger agreement, in a way that the
conditions to such non-breaching partys obligation to
complete the merger would not then be satisfied and such breach
is either incurable or not cured by the end date; or
|
|
|
|
prior to obtaining the requisite stockholder approval, the board
of directors of the other party changes its recommendation that
its stockholders vote in favor of the merger and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
See the section entitled The Merger Agreement
Termination of the Merger Agreement for a further
discussion of the rights of each of Allied World and
Transatlantic to terminate the merger agreement.
Expenses
and Termination Fees; Liability for Breach (see
page 123)
Generally, all fees and expenses incurred in connection with the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement will be paid by the party incurring those expenses,
subject to the specific exceptions discussed in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus whereby Allied World or Transatlantic, as
the case may be, may be required to pay a termination fee of
$115 million or $35 million
and/or the
reimbursement of expenses up to a maximum amount of
$35 million.
See the section entitled The Merger Agreement
Expenses and Termination Fees; Liability for Breach for a
further discussion of the circumstances under which such
termination fees
and/or
expense reimbursement will be required to be paid.
Accounting
Treatment (see page 150)
Allied World and Transatlantic each prepare its financial
statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and
any statutory accounting principles prescribed or permitted by
the domiciliary state insurance department of the applicable
subsidiary (SAP). The merger will be accounted for
using the acquisition method of accounting. Transatlantic will
be the accounting acquirer.
See the section entitled Accounting Treatment for a
further discussion of the accounting treatment of the
transaction.
No
Appraisal Rights (see page 107)
Neither the holders of Allied World shares, under Swiss law, nor
the holders of shares of Transatlantic common stock, under
Delaware law, are entitled to appraisal rights in connection
with the merger.
9
See the section entitled The Merger No
Appraisal Rights for a further discussion of the appraisal
rights in connection with the merger.
Comparison
of Stockholder Rights and Corporate Governance Matters (see
page 173)
Transatlantic stockholders, whose rights are currently governed
by the Transatlantic restated certificate of incorporation (the
Transatlantic charter), the Transatlantic amended
and restated by-laws (the Transatlantic bylaws) and
Delaware law, will, upon completion of the merger, become
shareholders of the combined company and their rights will be
governed by the TransAllied Articles, the TransAllied
organizational regulations and Swiss law. As a result,
Transatlantic stockholders will have different rights once they
become shareholders of the combined company due to differences
between the governing documents of Transatlantic and
TransAllied, and differences between Delaware and Swiss law.
These differences are described in detail under the section
entitled Comparison of Rights of TransAllied Shareholders
and Transatlantic Stockholders.
Listing
of Allied World Shares; De-listing and Deregistration of Shares
of Transatlantic Common Stock (see page 107)
It is a condition to the completion of the merger that the
Allied World shares to be issued to Transatlantic stockholders
pursuant to the merger be authorized for listing on the NYSE at
the effective time of the merger. Upon completion of the merger,
shares of Transatlantic common stock currently listed on the
NYSE will cease to be listed on the NYSE and will subsequently
be deregistered under the Exchange Act.
See the sections entitled The Merger Listing
of Allied World Shares and The Merger
De-listing and Deregistration of Transatlantic Common
Stock for a further discussion of the listing of Allied
World shares and de-listing of Transatlantic common stock in
connection with the merger.
The
Combined Companys Share Repurchase Program Post-Merger
(see page 109)
Allied World has a share repurchase program that had an
aggregate of $200.8 million of available capacity at
June 30, 2011. Following the completion of the merger, the
combined company intends to reevaluate its share repurchase
program as part of its year-end review and in preparation for
its Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2012. See the section entitled
The Merger The Combined Companys Share
Repurchase Program Post-Merger on page 109.
The
Meetings
The
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting (see
page 31)
The Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting will be held at
Allied Worlds corporate headquarters, Lindenstrasse 8,
6340 Baar, Zug, Switzerland, on September 20, 2011, at
2:00 p.m. local time. The Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting is being held to consider and vote on:
|
|
|
|
|
the proposal to increase Allied Worlds ordinary share
capital pursuant to article 3a(a) of the Allied World
Articles by up to CHF 887,860,538 (equaling
USD 1,156,882,281) to up to CHF 1,472,939,677.4
(equaling USD 1,919,240,400) to permit the issuance of
Allied World shares to Transatlantic stockholders pursuant to,
and only in connection with, the merger as contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the exclusion of all preferential
subscription rights to which Allied World shareholders may be
entitled, referred to herein as the
article 3 share capital increase proposal;
the contributions for the new registered shares are paid by
converting existing reserves (Kapitalreserven) into share
capital;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to increase Allied Worlds conditional share
capital pursuant to article 5(a) of the Allied World Articles by
up to CHF 76,894,774 (equaling USD 100,193,891) to up
to CHF 138,634,774 (equaling USD 180,641,111), only in
connection with the merger, referred to herein as the
article 5 share capital increase proposal;
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
the proposal to increase Allied Worlds authorized share
capital pursuant to article 6(a) of the Allied World Articles by
up to CHF 177,572,113.5 (equaling USD 231,376,463.9)
to up to CHF 294,587,935.5 (equaling USD 383,848,080),
only in connection with the merger, referred to herein as the
article 6 share capital increase proposal
and, together with the article 3 share capital
increase proposal and the article 5 share capital
increase proposal, the share capital increase
proposals;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to issue Allied World shares to Transatlantic
stockholders pursuant to the merger and as contemplated by the
merger agreement as required by NYSE rules, referred to herein
as the NYSE share issuance proposal;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to amend article 1 of the Allied World
Articles to change Allied Worlds name to TransAllied
Group Holdings, AG immediately following, and conditioned
upon, the completion of the merger, referred to herein as the
name change proposal;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to elect (x) three Class II directors to
hold office commencing upon the completion of the merger and
ending upon TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in
2012, (y) four Class III directors to hold office
commencing upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2013 and
(z) four Class I directors to hold office commencing
upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2014, referred
to herein as the election of directors proposal;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to effect a capital reduction to allow for the
payment of a dividend to the combined companys
shareholders after the completion of the merger, referred to
herein as the capital reduction proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the proposal to amend and restate the Stock Incentive Plan, the
form of which is included as Annex E to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus, as required by NYSE rules, to, among other
things, increase the number of shares reserved for issuance
under the Stock Incentive Plan and to extend the Plans
termination date effective upon the completion of the merger,
referred to herein as the Stock Incentive Plan
proposal.
|
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of the share capital increase proposals, the NYSE share
issuance proposal, the name change proposal and the election of
directors proposal.
Only holders of record of outstanding Allied World shares as of
the close of business on July 22, 2011, the Allied World
record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof. At the close of business on the Allied
World record date, 38,077,329 Allied World shares were issued
and outstanding, approximately 1.9% of which were owned and
entitled to be voted by Allied World directors and executive
officers and their affiliates. We currently expect that Allied
Worlds directors and executive officers will vote their
Allied World shares in favor of each of the proposals to be
considered and voted upon at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting, although none of them has entered into any
agreement obligating him or her to do so.
You may cast one vote for each Allied World share you own.
Approval of each of the following proposals requires the
affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the votes represented at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting and a majority of the nominal value of the Allied World
shares represented at such meeting, where holders of at least
50% of the total outstanding Allied World shares are represented
and voting and who are entitled to vote on such proposal:
(i) the article 3 share capital increase
proposal, (ii) the article 5 share capital
increase proposal and (iii) the article 6 share
capital increase proposal. The NYSE share issuance proposal and
the Stock Incentive Plan proposal require the affirmative vote
of the holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote on the
proposal and present in person or represented by proxy at the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting; provided that the
total votes cast on each such proposal represent over 50% of the
outstanding shares of Allied World shares entitled to vote on
such proposal. Each of the following approvals requires a
majority of the votes cast voting in favor of such proposal at
the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting where holders of at
least 50% of the total outstanding Allied World shares are
represented and voting and who are entitled to vote on such
proposal: (i) the name change proposal, (ii) the
election of directors proposal and (iii) the capital reduction
proposal.
11
The
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting (see
page 37)
The Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting is scheduled to be
held at The Down Town Association, 60 Pine Street, New York, New
York, on September 20, 2011 at 8:00 a.m. local time.
The Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting is being held in
order to consider and vote on:
|
|
|
|
|
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, which is further
described in the sections entitled The Merger and
The Merger Agreement, beginning on pages 43 and
110, respectively, referred to herein as the adoption of
the merger agreement proposal;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to adjourn the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional
proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the
foregoing proposal, referred to herein as the adjournment
proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the proposal, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, to approve the
compensation that may be paid or become payable to
Transatlantics named executive officers in connection with
the merger, and the agreements and understandings pursuant to
which such compensation may be paid or become payable as
described in the section entitled The Merger
Interests of Transatlantics Directors and Executive
Officers in the Merger Golden Parachute
Compensation, referred to herein as the golden
parachute proposal.
|
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of the adoption of the merger agreement proposal.
Only holders of record of Transatlantic common stock at the
close of business on July 22, 2011, the Transatlantic
record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof. At the close of business on the
Transatlantic record date, 62,488,896 shares of
Transatlantic common stock were issued and outstanding,
approximately 0.35% of which were held by Transatlantics
directors and executive officers. We currently expect that
Transatlantics directors and executive officers will vote
their shares in favor of each of the proposals to be considered
and voted upon at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting,
although no director or executive officer has entered into any
agreement obligating him or her to do so.
You may cast one vote for each share of Transatlantic common
stock you own. The approval of the adoption of the merger
agreement proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the outstanding shares of Transatlantic common
stock entitled to vote thereon. The approval of the adjournment
proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares of Transatlantic common stock entitled to
vote and present in person or by proxy, whether or not a quorum
is present. The Transatlantic stockholders may so adjourn the
meeting to another time or place without further notice unless
the adjournment is for more than 30 days or if after the
adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned
meeting, in which case a notice of the adjourned meeting shall
be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the
adjourned meeting. The approval of the golden parachute proposal
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the shares of Transatlantic common stock present in person or
represented by proxy and entitled to vote thereon, assuming a
quorum is present.
12
Summary
Historical Consolidated Financial Data
Summary
Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Allied World
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial data of Allied World. This data is derived from Allied
Worlds Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and the unaudited quarterly financial statements
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
which in the opinion of management include all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the unaudited
interim periods. This selected financial data should be read in
conjunction with Allied Worlds Consolidated Financial
Statements and related Notes included elsewhere in Allied
Worlds Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and Allied
Worlds quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, each of which is
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 188.
Statement
of Operations Data of Allied World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts and ratios)
|
|
|
Summary Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,080.3
|
|
|
$
|
998.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,758.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,696.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,445.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,505.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,659.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
876.7
|
|
|
$
|
803.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,392.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,321.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,107.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,153.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,306.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
690.2
|
|
|
$
|
677.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,359.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,316.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,117.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,159.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,252.0
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
102.6
|
|
|
|
134.5
|
|
|
|
244.1
|
|
|
|
300.7
|
|
|
|
308.8
|
|
|
|
297.9
|
|
|
|
244.4
|
|
Net realized investment gains (losses)
|
|
|
109.3
|
|
|
|
172.4
|
|
|
|
285.6
|
|
|
|
126.4
|
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
Net impairment charges recognized in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(49.6
|
)
|
|
|
(212.9
|
)
|
|
|
(44.6
|
)
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
540.3
|
|
|
|
420.9
|
|
|
|
707.9
|
|
|
|
604.1
|
|
|
|
641.1
|
|
|
|
682.3
|
|
|
|
739.1
|
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
81.1
|
|
|
|
78.7
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
148.9
|
|
|
|
112.6
|
|
|
|
119.0
|
|
|
|
141.5
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
135.2
|
|
|
|
131.5
|
|
|
|
286.5
|
|
|
|
248.6
|
|
|
|
185.9
|
|
|
|
141.6
|
|
|
|
106.1
|
|
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
|
|
|
37.8
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
102.4
|
|
|
$
|
317.7
|
|
|
$
|
665.0
|
|
|
$
|
606.9
|
|
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
|
$
|
469.2
|
|
|
$
|
442.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
6.34
|
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
|
$
|
12.26
|
|
|
$
|
3.75
|
|
|
$
|
7.84
|
|
|
$
|
8.09
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
13.32
|
|
|
|
11.67
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
7.53
|
|
|
|
7.75
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
38,061,724
|
|
|
|
50,123,945
|
|
|
|
46,491,279
|
|
|
|
49,503,438
|
|
|
|
48,936,912
|
|
|
|
59,846,987
|
|
|
|
54,746,613
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
39,873,418
|
|
|
|
53,086,708
|
|
|
|
49,913,317
|
|
|
|
51,992,674
|
|
|
|
51,147,215
|
|
|
|
62,331,165
|
|
|
|
57,115,172
|
|
Dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
On August 5, 2011 Allied World distributed the first of its
quarterly dividends, as approved by the shareholders at its 2011
annual general shareholder meeting on May 5, 2011. |
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Selected Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio(1)
|
|
|
78.3
|
%
|
|
|
62.1
|
%
|
|
|
52.1
|
%
|
|
|
45.9
|
%
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
Acquisition cost ratio(2)
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
General and administrative expense ratio(3)
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Expense ratio(4)
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
Combined ratio(5)
|
|
|
109.6
|
|
|
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
84.9
|
|
|
|
76.1
|
|
|
|
84.1
|
|
|
|
81.3
|
|
|
|
78.8
|
|
Balance
Sheet Data of Allied World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
740.8
|
|
|
$
|
442.7
|
|
|
$
|
757.0
|
|
|
$
|
292.2
|
|
|
$
|
655.8
|
|
|
$
|
202.6
|
|
|
$
|
366.8
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
|
7,502.8
|
|
|
|
7,420.6
|
|
|
|
7,183.6
|
|
|
|
7,156.3
|
|
|
|
6,157.1
|
|
|
|
6,029.3
|
|
|
|
5,440.3
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
1,014.0
|
|
|
|
932.4
|
|
|
|
927.6
|
|
|
|
920.0
|
|
|
|
888.3
|
|
|
|
682.8
|
|
|
|
689.1
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,857.1
|
|
|
|
10,214.4
|
|
|
|
10,427.6
|
|
|
|
9,653.2
|
|
|
|
9,022.5
|
|
|
|
7,899.1
|
|
|
|
7,620.6
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
5,251.3
|
|
|
|
4,920.4
|
|
|
|
4,879.2
|
|
|
|
4,761.8
|
|
|
|
4,576.8
|
|
|
|
3,919.8
|
|
|
|
3,637.0
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
1,184.7
|
|
|
|
1,070.0
|
|
|
|
962.2
|
|
|
|
928.6
|
|
|
|
930.4
|
|
|
|
811.1
|
|
|
|
813.8
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
797.8
|
|
|
|
499.0
|
|
|
|
797.7
|
|
|
|
498.9
|
|
|
|
742.5
|
|
|
|
498.7
|
|
|
|
498.6
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,044.4
|
|
|
|
3,468.5
|
|
|
|
3,075.8
|
|
|
|
3,213.3
|
|
|
|
2,416.9
|
|
|
|
2,239.8
|
|
|
|
2,220.1
|
|
Book value per common share(6)
|
|
$
|
80.23
|
|
|
$
|
70.20
|
|
|
$
|
80.75
|
|
|
$
|
64.61
|
|
|
$
|
49.29
|
|
|
$
|
45.95
|
|
|
$
|
36.82
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated by dividing net losses and loss expenses by net
premiums earned. |
|
(2) |
|
Calculated by dividing acquisition costs by net premiums earned. |
|
(3) |
|
Calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses by
net premiums earned. |
|
(4) |
|
Calculated by combining the acquisition cost ratio and the
general and administrative expense ratio. |
|
(5) |
|
Calculated by combining the loss ratio, acquisition cost ratio
and general and administrative expense ratio. |
|
(6) |
|
Book value per common share is total shareholders equity
divided by common shares outstanding. |
14
Summary
Historical Consolidated Financial Data of
Transatlantic
The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated
financial data of Transatlantic. This data is derived from
Transatlantics Consolidated Financial Statements as of and
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and the unaudited quarterly financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, which in the opinion of management include all
adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for
the unaudited interim periods. This selected financial data
should be read in conjunction with Transatlantics
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included
elsewhere in Transatlantics Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and
Transatlantics quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, each of which is
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 188.
Statement
of Operations Data of Transatlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts and ratios)
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
2,040,472
|
|
|
$
|
1,973,888
|
|
|
$
|
3,881,693
|
|
|
$
|
3,986,101
|
|
|
$
|
4,108,092
|
|
|
$
|
3,952,899
|
|
|
$
|
3,633,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
1,911,758
|
|
|
$
|
1,966,347
|
|
|
$
|
3,858,620
|
|
|
$
|
4,039,082
|
|
|
$
|
4,067,389
|
|
|
$
|
3,902,669
|
|
|
$
|
3,604,094
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
(1,850,178
|
)
|
|
|
(1,437,867
|
)
|
|
|
(2,681,774
|
)
|
|
|
(2,679,171
|
)
|
|
|
(2,907,227
|
)
|
|
|
(2,638,033
|
)
|
|
|
(2,462,666
|
)
|
Net commissions
|
|
|
(481,202
|
)
|
|
|
(473,341
|
)
|
|
|
(932,820
|
)
|
|
|
(927,918
|
)
|
|
|
(980,626
|
)
|
|
|
(980,121
|
)
|
|
|
(903,666
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
43,420
|
|
|
|
(2,615
|
)
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
(12,406
|
)
|
|
|
6,956
|
|
|
|
16,901
|
|
|
|
13,471
|
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
(77,326
|
)
|
|
|
(88,828
|
)
|
|
|
(177,624
|
)
|
|
|
(158,181
|
)
|
|
|
(131,555
|
)
|
|
|
(115,760
|
)
|
|
|
(102,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting (loss) profit(1)
|
|
|
(453,528
|
)
|
|
|
(36,304
|
)
|
|
|
69,300
|
|
|
|
261,406
|
|
|
|
54,937
|
|
|
|
185,656
|
|
|
|
148,894
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
226,348
|
|
|
|
228,384
|
|
|
|
473,547
|
|
|
|
467,402
|
|
|
|
440,451
|
|
|
|
469,772
|
|
|
|
434,540
|
|
Realized net capital gains (losses)(2)
|
|
|
54,646
|
|
|
|
6,388
|
|
|
|
30,101
|
|
|
|
(70,641
|
)
|
|
|
(435,541
|
)
|
|
|
9,389
|
|
|
|
10,862
|
|
(Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(1,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
9,869
|
|
|
|
10,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on senior notes
|
|
|
(33,587
|
)
|
|
|
(34,142
|
)
|
|
|
(68,272
|
)
|
|
|
(43,454
|
)
|
|
|
(43,359
|
)
|
|
|
(43,421
|
)
|
|
|
(43,405
|
)
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
(18,725
|
)
|
|
|
(14,651
|
)
|
|
|
(31,773
|
)
|
|
|
(28,549
|
)
|
|
|
(23,515
|
)
|
|
|
(25,644
|
)
|
|
|
(10,983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(226,025
|
)
|
|
|
149,675
|
|
|
|
472,788
|
|
|
|
596,033
|
|
|
|
3,223
|
|
|
|
595,752
|
|
|
|
539,908
|
|
Income (taxes) benefits
|
|
|
116,755
|
|
|
|
(23,290
|
)
|
|
|
(70,587
|
)
|
|
|
(118,371
|
)
|
|
|
99,031
|
|
|
|
(108,611
|
)
|
|
|
(111,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(109,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
126,385
|
|
|
$
|
402,201
|
|
|
$
|
477,662
|
|
|
$
|
102,254
|
|
|
$
|
487,141
|
|
|
$
|
428,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.94
|
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
|
$
|
7.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.54
|
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
|
|
$
|
6.49
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
|
|
6.19
|
|
|
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
7.31
|
|
|
|
6.46
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
62,430
|
|
|
|
65,085
|
|
|
|
64,092
|
|
|
|
66,381
|
|
|
|
66,270
|
|
|
|
66,124
|
|
|
|
65,955
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
62,430
|
|
|
|
65,785
|
|
|
|
64,930
|
|
|
|
66,802
|
|
|
|
66,722
|
|
|
|
66,654
|
|
|
|
66,266
|
|
Ratios:(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
73.1
|
%
|
|
|
69.5
|
%
|
|
|
66.3
|
%
|
|
|
71.5
|
%
|
|
|
67.6
|
%
|
|
|
68.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission ratio
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
23.9
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
Other underwriting expense ratio
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting expense ratio
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
123.7
|
%
|
|
|
101.8
|
%
|
|
|
98.2
|
%
|
|
|
93.5
|
%
|
|
|
98.6
|
%
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
95.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Balance
Sheet Data of Transatlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
13,510,673
|
|
|
$
|
12,301,043
|
|
|
$
|
12,972,739
|
|
|
$
|
12,315,395
|
|
|
$
|
10,229,557
|
|
|
$
|
12,500,540
|
|
|
$
|
11,130,832
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
341,673
|
|
|
|
327,530
|
|
|
|
284,491
|
|
|
|
195,723
|
|
|
|
288,920
|
|
|
|
255,432
|
|
|
|
205,264
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
16,706,353
|
|
|
|
15,249,845
|
|
|
|
15,705,354
|
|
|
|
14,943,659
|
|
|
|
13,376,938
|
|
|
|
15,484,327
|
|
|
|
14,268,464
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
9,950,709
|
|
|
|
8,789,300
|
|
|
|
9,020,610
|
|
|
|
8,609,105
|
|
|
|
8,124,482
|
|
|
|
7,926,261
|
|
|
|
7,467,949
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
1,349,101
|
|
|
|
1,183,155
|
|
|
|
1,212,535
|
|
|
|
1,187,526
|
|
|
|
1,220,133
|
|
|
|
1,226,647
|
|
|
|
1,144,022
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
1,005,785
|
|
|
|
1,033,298
|
|
|
|
1,030,511
|
|
|
|
1,033,087
|
|
|
|
722,243
|
|
|
|
746,930
|
|
|
|
746,633
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
4,233,932
|
|
|
|
4,049,606
|
|
|
|
4,284,459
|
|
|
|
4,034,380
|
|
|
|
3,198,220
|
|
|
|
3,349,042
|
|
|
|
2,958,270
|
|
Book value per common share(4)
|
|
$
|
67.76
|
|
|
$
|
63.53
|
|
|
$
|
68.83
|
|
|
$
|
60.77
|
|
|
$
|
48.19
|
|
|
$
|
50.56
|
|
|
$
|
44.80
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes pre-tax net catastrophe (costs) of ($612) million
in the first six months of 2011, ($157) million in the
first six months of 2010, ($202) million in the full year
2010, $6 million in the full year 2009, ($170) million
in the full year 2008, ($55) million in the full year 2007
and ($29) million in the full year 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes
other-than-temporary
impairment write-downs charged to earnings of ($3) million
in the first six months of 2011, ($6) million in the first
six months of 2010, ($8) million in the full year 2010,
($83) million in the full year 2009, ($318) million in
the full year 2008, ($27) million in the full year 2007 and
($1) million in the full year 2006. |
|
(3) |
|
The loss ratio represents the absolute value of net losses and
loss adjustment expenses incurred expressed as a percentage of
net premiums earned. The underwriting expense ratio represents
the sum of the commission ratio and the other underwriting
expense ratio. The commission ratio represents the absolute
value of the sum of net commission and the (decrease) increase
in deferred policy acquisition costs expressed as a percentage
of net premiums earned. The other underwriting expense ratio
represents the absolute value of other underwriting expenses
expressed as a percentage of net premiums earned. The combined
ratio represents the sum of the loss ratio and the underwriting
expense ratio. |
|
(4) |
|
Book value per common share is stockholders equity divided
by common shares outstanding. |
16
Summary
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated
Financial Information of Allied World and
Transatlantic
The following table presents selected unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial information about the combined
companys consolidated balance sheet and statements of
operations, after giving effect to the merger. The information
under Selected Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations Data in the table below gives effect to the
merger as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2010,
the beginning of the earliest period presented. The information
under Selected Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet Data in the table below assumes the merger had been
consummated on June 30, 2011. This unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial information was prepared using
the acquisition method of accounting, with Transatlantic
considered the accounting acquirer of Allied World. See
Accounting Treatment on page 150.
In addition, the selected unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information includes adjustments that are
preliminary and may be revised. There can be no assurance that
such revisions will not result in material changes. The selected
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial information
is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not
necessarily indicative of results that actually would have
occurred or that may occur in the future had the merger been
completed on the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily
indicative of the future operating results or financial position
of the combined company.
The information presented below should be read in conjunction
with the historical consolidated financial statements of Allied
World and Transatlantic including the related notes, filed by
each of them with the SEC, and with the pro forma condensed
consolidated financial information of Allied World and
Transatlantic, including the related notes, appearing elsewhere
in this document. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 188 and Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Information
beginning on page 151.
17
Selected
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
As of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
21,013,438
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
|
1,130,588
|
|
Insurance and reinsurance assets
|
|
|
3,898,627
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
276,711
|
|
All other assets
|
|
|
896,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
27,216,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
15,140,076
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
2,524,851
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
1,883,870
|
|
All other liabilities
|
|
|
675,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
20,224,002
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
6,992,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
27,216,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Selected
Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Data
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and Year Ended
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except shares outstanding and per share
data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
$
|
2,917,146
|
|
|
$
|
5,274,148
|
|
Increase in net unearned premiums
|
|
|
(315,205
|
)
|
|
|
(55,980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
2,601,941
|
|
|
|
5,218,168
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
326,538
|
|
|
|
712,918
|
|
Realized net capital gains
|
|
|
163,158
|
|
|
|
315,101
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(1,179
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
3,090,458
|
|
|
|
6,246,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
2,390,443
|
|
|
|
3,389,657
|
|
Acquisition costs
|
|
|
518,835
|
|
|
|
1,089,411
|
|
Other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
210,084
|
|
|
|
464,018
|
|
Interest on senior notes
|
|
|
53,805
|
|
|
|
94,407
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
21,663
|
|
|
|
147,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
3,194,830
|
|
|
|
5,184,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(104,372
|
)
|
|
|
1,061,340
|
|
Income taxes (benefits)
|
|
|
(103,399
|
)
|
|
|
97,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(973
|
)
|
|
$
|
963,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
8.95
|
|
Dividends per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
93,158,177
|
|
|
|
103,049,946
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
93,158,177
|
|
|
|
107,731,481
|
|
19
Unaudited
Comparative Per Share Data
Presented below are Allied Worlds and Transatlantics
historical per share data for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 and unaudited pro
forma consolidated per share data for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010.
This information should be read together with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes of Allied World and
Transatlantic that are incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and with the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial data included under
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial
Information beginning on page 151. The pro forma
information is presented for illustrative purposes only and is
not necessarily indicative of the operating results or financial
position that would have occurred if the merger had been
completed as of the beginning of the periods presented, nor is
it necessarily indicative of the future operating results or
financial position of the combined company. The historical basic
and diluted book value per share is computed by dividing total
stockholders equity by the number of basic and diluted
shares of common stock outstanding, respectively, at the end of
the period. The pro forma net income (loss) per share of the
combined company is computed by dividing the pro forma net
income (loss) by the pro forma weighted average number of shares
outstanding. The pro forma basic and diluted book value per
share of the combined company is computed by dividing total pro
forma stockholders equity by the pro forma number of basic
and diluted shares of common stock outstanding, respectively, at
the end of the period. The Transatlantic unaudited pro forma
equivalent per share financial information is computed by
multiplying the Allied World unaudited pro forma consolidated
per share amounts by the exchange ratio (0.88 Allied World
shares for each share of Transatlantic common stock).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Allied World Historical
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.69
|
|
|
$
|
14.30
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.57
|
|
|
$
|
13.32
|
|
Book value per common share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
80.23
|
|
|
$
|
80.75
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
76.68
|
|
|
$
|
74.29
|
|
Transatlantic Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.28
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
Book value per common share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
67.76
|
|
|
$
|
68.83
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
66.84
|
|
|
$
|
67.68
|
|
Allied World Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Amounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
9.35
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.95
|
|
Book value per common share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
75.11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
72.78
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Transatlantic Unaudited Pro Forma Equivalent Per Share
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
8.23
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.87
|
|
Book value per common share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
66.10
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
64.04
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Not applicable. |
|
(2) |
|
As of period end. |
20
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus and the documents
incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus contain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are not limited to
historical facts, but reflect Allied Worlds and
Transatlantics current beliefs, expectations or intentions
regarding future events. These statements include in general
forward-looking statements both with respect to Allied World and
Transatlantic and the insurance and reinsurance industry.
Statements that are not historical facts, including statements
that use terms such as anticipates,
believes, expects, intends,
plans, projects, seeks and
will and that relate to our plans and objectives for
future operations, are forward-looking statements. In light of
the risks and uncertainties inherent in all forward-looking
statements, the inclusion of such statements in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus should not be considered as a
representation by us or any other person that our objectives or
plans will be achieved. These forward-looking statements
include, without limitation, Allied Worlds and
Transatlantics expectations with respect to the synergies,
costs and other anticipated financial impacts of the proposed
transaction; future financial and operating results of the
combined company; the combined companys plans, objectives,
expectations and intentions with respect to future operations
and services; approval of the proposed transaction by
stockholders and by governmental regulatory authorities; the
satisfaction of the closing conditions to the proposed
transaction; and the timing of the completion of the proposed
transaction.
All forward-looking statements involve significant risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements, many of
which are generally outside the control of Allied World and
Transatlantic and are difficult to predict. These risks and
uncertainties also include those set forth under Risk
Factors, beginning on page 22, as well as, among
others, risks and uncertainties relating to: any event, change
or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of
the merger agreement; the inability to obtain
Transatlantics or Allied Worlds shareholder approval
or the failure to satisfy other conditions to completion of the
merger, including receipt of regulatory approvals; risks that
the proposed transaction disrupts each companys current
plans and operations; the ability to retain key personnel; the
ability to realize the benefits of the merger; the amount of the
costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the merger; pricing
and policy term trends; increased competition; the impact of
acts of terrorism and acts of war; greater frequency or severity
of unpredictable catastrophic events; negative rating agency
actions; the adequacy of each partys loss reserves; Allied
World or its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
becoming subject to significant income taxes in the United
States or elsewhere; changes in regulations or tax laws; changes
in the availability, cost or quality of reinsurance or
retrocessional coverage; adverse general economic conditions;
and judicial, legislative, political and other governmental
developments, as well as managements response to these
factors, and other factors identified in each companys
filings with the SEC. Allied World and Transatlantic caution
that the foregoing list of factors is not exclusive.
Additional information concerning these and other risk factors
is contained in Allied Worlds and Transatlantics
most recently filed Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
subsequent Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and other SEC filings. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements concerning Allied World,
Transatlantic, the proposed transaction or other matters and
attributable to Allied World or Transatlantic or any person
acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by the cautionary statements above. You are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which
speak only to the date they are made. Allied World and
Transatlantic are under no obligation (and expressly disclaim
any such obligation) to update or revise any forward-looking
statement that may be made from time to time, whether as a
result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
21
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included and
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus,
including the matters addressed in the section entitled
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,
you should carefully consider the following risks before
deciding whether to vote for the adoption of the merger
agreement proposal, the adjournment proposal and the golden
parachute proposal, in the case of Transatlantic stockholders,
or for the share capital increase proposals, the NYSE share
issuance proposal, the name change proposal, the election of
directors proposal, the capital reduction proposal and the Stock
Incentive Plan proposal, in the case of Allied World
shareholders. In addition, you should read and consider the
risks associated with each of the businesses of Allied World and
Transatlantic because these risks will also affect the combined
company. These risks can be found in the Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 for each of
Allied World and Transatlantic, as such risks may be updated or
supplemented in each companys subsequently filed Quarterly
Reports on
Form 10-Q
or Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
which are incorporated by reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You should also read and consider the
other information in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus
and the other documents incorporated by reference in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. See the section entitled Where
You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 188.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Merger
The
exchange ratio is fixed and will not be adjusted in the event of
any change in either Allied Worlds or Transatlantics
stock price.
Upon closing of the merger, each share of Transatlantic common
stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.88 Allied
World shares. This exchange ratio is fixed in the merger
agreement and will not be adjusted for changes in the market
price of either Allied World shares or Transatlantic common
stock between the date of signing the merger agreement and
completion of the merger. Changes in the price of Allied World
shares prior to the completion of the merger will affect the
market value of Allied World shares that Transatlantic
stockholders will receive on the effective date of the merger.
Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors (many
of which are beyond Allied Worlds or Transatlantics
control), including the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in Allied Worlds and Transatlantics
respective businesses, operations and prospects, or the market
assessments thereof;
|
|
|
|
market assessments of the likelihood that the merger will be
completed, including related considerations regarding regulatory
approvals of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
general market and economic conditions and other factors
generally affecting the price of Allied World shares and
Transatlantic common stock.
|
The price of Allied World shares at the closing of the merger
may vary from the price on the date the merger agreement was
executed, on the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and on the date of the Special Shareholder Meetings of Allied
World and Transatlantic. As a result, the market value
represented by the exchange ratio will also vary. For example,
based on the range of closing prices of Allied World shares
during the period from June 10, 2011, the last trading date
before public announcement of the merger, through
August 18, 2011, the last practicable trading date before
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the exchange
ratio represented a market value ranging from a low of $43.59 to
a high of $51.10 for each share of Transatlantic common stock.
Because
the merger will be completed after the Special Shareholder
Meetings, at the time of your Special Shareholder Meeting, you
will not know the exact market value of the Allied World shares
that Transatlantic stockholders will receive upon completion of
the merger.
If the price of Allied World shares decreases between the time
of the meetings and the effective time of the merger,
Transatlantic stockholders will receive Allied World shares that
have a market value that is less than the market value of such
shares at the time of the meetings. Therefore, because the
exchange ratio is fixed, stockholders cannot be sure at the time
of the meetings of the market value of the consideration that
will be paid to Transatlantic stockholders upon completion of
the merger.
22
Actions
by Validus may negatively impact Transatlantics ability to
consummate the merger and may cause disruption to
Transatlantics ongoing business.
On July 12, 2011, Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) delivered an unsolicited offer to
Transatlantic to combine Transatlantic and Validus, with Validus
acquiring all the outstanding common shares of Transatlantic
(the Validus Proposal). On July 19, 2011, after
consultation with its independent financial and legal advisors,
the Transatlantic board of directors concluded that the Validus
Proposal did not constitute a Superior Proposal
under the merger agreement between Allied World and
Transatlantic and the Transatlantic board of directors
reaffirmed its recommendation of, and its declaration of
advisability with respect to, the merger agreement between
Allied World and Transatlantic. However, the Board also
determined on that date that the Validus Proposal is reasonably
likely to lead to a Superior Proposal and that the
failure to enter into discussions regarding the Validus Proposal
would result in a breach of its fiduciary duties under
applicable law. As a result, the Transatlantic board of
directors offered to engage in discussions and exchange
information with Validus, subject to, and in accordance with the
merger agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic,
providing Allied World with three business days notice and
obtaining from Validus a confidentiality agreement with terms
substantially similar and not less favorable to Transatlantic,
in the aggregate, than those contained in the confidentiality
agreement with Allied World. Validus refused to enter into the
confidentiality agreement provided by Transatlantic, and
instead, on July 20, 2011, Validus filed with the SEC a
preliminary proxy statement on Schedule 14A soliciting
proxies from Transatlantic stockholders to vote against the
merger and, on July 25, 2011, Validus commenced the Validus
exchange offer. In addition, on August 10, 2011, Validus
filed a complaint against Transatlantic, members of the
Transatlantic board of directors, Allied World and Merger Sub
alleging certain breaches of fiduciary duty. It is unclear what
additional actions Validus may take to further its proposal and
prevent the merger from occurring. Even if ultimately
unsuccessful, actions taken by Validus could cause disruption in
Transatlantics business and could negatively impact the
expected timing of the consummation of the merger. In addition,
there is a risk that Transatlantics stockholders may vote
against proposals relating to the merger as a result of
Validuss actions and that, consequently, the required
stockholder vote may not be obtained. In that case, it is
possible that Transatlantic may decide not to enter into a
transaction with Validus or any other party.
The
merger is subject to a number of conditions, including certain
governmental and regulatory conditions that may not be
satisfied, or may not be completed on a timely basis, or at all.
Failure to complete the transactions could have material and
adverse effects on Allied World and Transatlantic.
Completion of the merger is conditioned upon, among other
matters, the receipt of certain governmental authorizations,
consents, orders or other approvals, including the approval of
antitrust authorities in the United Kingdom and Germany,
and the approval of insurance regulators in Bermuda, Switzerland
and New York. In deciding whether to grant antitrust,
insurance or other regulatory clearances, the relevant
governmental entities will consider the effect of the merger
within their relevant jurisdictions. The governmental agencies
from which Allied World and Transatlantic will seek the
approvals have broad discretion in administering the governing
regulations. The terms and conditions of the approvals that are
granted may impose requirements, limitations or costs or place
restrictions on the conduct of the combined companys
business. There can be no assurance that regulators will not
impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions and that
such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions will not
have the effect of delaying completion of the merger or imposing
additional material costs on, or materially limiting the
revenues of, the combined company following the merger. In
addition, neither Allied World nor Transatlantic can provide
assurances that any such conditions, terms, obligations or
restrictions will not result in the delay or abandonment of the
merger. For a more detailed description of the regulatory review
process, see the section entitled The Merger
Regulatory Clearances Required for the Merger beginning on
page 103.
If the merger is not completed on a timely basis, or at all,
Allied Worlds and Transatlantics respective ongoing
businesses may be adversely affected. Additionally, in the event
the merger is not completed, Allied World and Transatlantic will
be subject to a number of risks without realizing any of the
benefits of having completed the merger, including (i) the
payment of certain fees and costs relating to the merger, such
as legal, accounting, financial advisor and printing fees,
(ii) the potential decline in the market price of Allied
Worlds and Transatlantics shares, (iii) the
risk that the parties may not find a party willing to enter into
a merger agreement on terms equivalent to or more attractive
than the terms set forth in the merger agreement and
(iv) the loss of time and resources.
23
Uncertainties
associated with the merger, the Validus exchange offer and the
Berkshire Proposal may cause a loss of management personnel and
other key employees which could adversely affect the future
business, operations and financial results of the combined
company.
Whether or not the merger is completed, the announcement and
pendency of the merger, the Validus exchange offer and the
Berkshire Proposal (as discussed in the section entitled
The Merger Background of the Merger)
could disrupt the businesses of Allied World and Transatlantic.
Allied World and Transatlantic are dependent on the experience
and industry knowledge of their senior management and other key
employees to execute their business plans. The combined
companys success after the merger will depend in part upon
the ability of Allied World and Transatlantic to retain key
management personnel and other key employees. Current and
prospective employees of Allied World and Transatlantic may
experience uncertainty about their roles within the combined
company following the merger, which may have an adverse effect
on the ability of each of Allied World and Transatlantic to
attract or retain key management and other key personnel.
Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the combined company
will be able to attract or retain key management personnel and
other key employees of Allied World and Transatlantic to the
same extent that such companies have previously been able to
attract or retain employees. In addition, the combined company
might not be able to locate suitable replacements for any such
key employees who leave the combined company or offer employment
to potential replacements on reasonable terms.
Several
lawsuits have been filed against Allied World and Transatlantic
challenging the merger, and an adverse ruling may prevent the
merger from being completed.
Allied World and Transatlantic, as well as the members of the
Transatlantic board of directors, have been named as defendants
in several lawsuits brought by Validus and purported
shareholders of Transatlantic challenging the merger and
seeking, among other things, injunctive relief to enjoin the
defendants from completing the merger on the
agreed-upon
terms. See The Merger Litigation Related to
the Merger beginning on page 108 for more information
about the lawsuits that have been filed related to the merger.
One of the conditions to the closing of the merger is that no
order, injunction, decree or other legal restraint or
prohibition shall be in effect that prevents completion of the
merger. Consequently, if a settlement or other resolution is not
reached in the lawsuits referenced above and the plaintiffs
secure injunctive or other relief prohibiting, delaying or
otherwise adversely affecting Allied World and
Transatlantics ability to complete the merger, then such
injunctive or other relief may prevent the merger from becoming
effective within the expected timeframe or at all.
The
merger agreement contains provisions that could discourage a
potential competing acquiror of either Allied World or
Transatlantic.
The merger agreement contains no shop provisions
that, subject to limited exceptions, restrict each of Allied
Worlds and Transatlantics ability to solicit,
initiate, or knowingly encourage and facilitate competing
third-party proposals for the acquisition of its companys
shares or assets. Further, even if the Allied World board of
directors or the Transatlantic board of directors, respectively,
withdraws or qualifies its recommendation with respect to the
merger, Allied World or Transatlantic, as the case may be, will
still be required to submit each of their merger-related
proposals to a vote at their shareholder meeting. In addition,
the other party generally has an opportunity to offer to modify
the terms of the merger in response to any competing acquisition
proposals before the board of directors of the company that has
received a third-party proposal may withdraw or qualify its
recommendation with respect to the merger. In some
circumstances, upon termination of the merger agreement, one of
the parties will be required to pay a termination fee of
$115 million or $35 million to the other party,
and/or an
expense reimbursement up to a maximum of $35 million. See
The Merger Agreement No Solicitation of
Alternative Proposals beginning on page 115,
The Merger Agreement Termination of the Merger
Agreement beginning on page 122 and The Merger
Agreement Expenses and Termination Fees; Liability
for Breach beginning on page 123.
These provisions could discourage a potential third-party
acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all or a
significant portion of Allied World or Transatlantic from
considering or proposing that acquisition, at a higher per share
cash or market value than the market value proposed to be
received or realized in the merger or might result in a
potential third-party acquiror proposing to pay a lower price to
the shareholders than it
24
might otherwise have proposed to pay because of the added
expense of the termination fee
and/or
expense reimbursement that may become payable in certain
circumstances.
The
fairness opinions delivered by Deutsche Bank and Moelis will not
reflect changes in circumstances between signing the merger
agreement and the completion of the merger.
Neither the Allied World board of directors nor the
Transatlantic board of directors has obtained an updated
fairness opinion as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus from Deutsche Bank, Allied Worlds
financial advisor, or Moelis, Transatlantics financial
advisor.
Changes in the operations and prospects of Allied World or
Transatlantic, general market and economic conditions and other
factors that may be beyond their control, and on which the
fairness opinions were based, may alter the value of Allied
World or Transatlantic or the prices of Allied World shares or
Transatlantic common stock by the time the merger is completed.
The opinions do not speak as of the time the merger will be
completed or as of any date other than the dates of such
opinions. Because neither company anticipates asking its
financial advisor to update its opinion, these opinions only
address the fairness of the exchange ratio or merger
consideration, from a financial point of view, at the time the
merger agreement was executed. The opinions are included as
Annexes B and C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
For a description of the opinions and a summary of the material
financial analyses in connection with rendering such opinions,
please refer to The Merger Opinion of Allied
Worlds Financial Advisors beginning on page 65
and The Merger Opinion of Transatlantics
Financial Advisor beginning on page 80.
The
merger will be taxable to Transatlantic
stockholders.
The receipt of Allied World shares (and cash, if any, received
in lieu of Allied World fractional shares) by U.S. holders
in exchange for shares of Transatlantic common stock pursuant to
the merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. For a description of the tax consequences
of the merger, please refer to Material U.S. Federal
Income Tax Consequences beginning on page 148.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Combined Company Following the
Merger
Although
Allied World and Transatlantic expect to realize certain
benefits as a result of the merger, there is the possibility
that the combined company may be unable to integrate
successfully the businesses of Allied World and Transatlantic in
order to realize the anticipated benefits of the
merger.
The merger involves the combination of two companies that
currently operate as independent public companies. The combined
company will be required to devote significant management
attention and resources to integrating the business practices
and operations of Allied World and Transatlantic. Due to legal
restrictions, Allied World and Transatlantic have been able to
conduct only limited planning regarding the integration of the
two companies after completion of the merger and have not yet
determined the exact nature of how the businesses and operations
of the two companies will be combined thereafter. Potential
difficulties the combined company may encounter as part of the
integration process include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to successfully combine the businesses in a manner
that permits the combined company to achieve the full synergies
anticipated to result from the merger;
|
|
|
|
complexities associated with managing the combined businesses,
including the challenge of integrating complex systems,
technology, networks and other assets of each company in a
seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers,
suppliers, brokers, employees and other constituencies;
|
|
|
|
the costs of integration and compliance and the possibility that
the full benefits anticipated to result from the merger will not
be realized;
|
|
|
|
any delay in the integration of management teams, strategies,
operations, products and services;
|
|
|
|
diversion of the attention of each companys management as
a result of the merger;
|
|
|
|
differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and
management philosophies that may delay successful integration;
|
|
|
|
the ability to retain key employees;
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to create and enforce uniform standards, controls,
procedures, policies and information systems;
|
|
|
|
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses
or delays associated with the merger, including one-time cash
costs to integrate the companies beyond current
estimates; and
|
|
|
|
the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, each
companys ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in
standards, controls, procedures and policies,
|
any of which could adversely affect each companys ability
to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, brokers,
employees and other constituencies or Allied Worlds and
Transatlantics ability to achieve the anticipated benefits
of the merger or could reduce each companys earnings or
otherwise adversely affect the business and financial results of
the combined company.
Current
Allied World shareholders and Transatlantic stockholders will
have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the merger
and will exercise less influence over management.
Current Allied World shareholders have the right to vote in the
election of the Allied World board of directors and on other
matters affecting Allied World. Current Transatlantic
stockholders have the right to vote in the election of the
Transatlantic board of directors and on other matters affecting
Transatlantic. Immediately after the merger is completed, it is
expected that, on a fully diluted basis, current Allied World
shareholders will own approximately 42% of the combined company
and current Transatlantic stockholders will own approximately
58% of the combined company. As a result of the merger, current
Allied World shareholders and current Transatlantic stockholders
will have less influence on the management and policies of the
combined company than they now have on the management and
policies of Allied World and Transatlantic, respectively.
Additionally, the Allied World Articles impose voting
restrictions on holders of 10% or more of the total combined
voting power of Allied World issued shares such that these
shareholders voting power is reduced to less than 10% of
the total voting power.
The
future results of the combined company will suffer if the
combined company does not effectively manage its expanded
operations following the merger.
Following the merger, the size of the business of the combined
company will increase significantly beyond the current size of
either Allied Worlds or Transatlantics business. The
combined companys future success depends, in part, upon
its ability to manage this expanded business, which will pose
substantial challenges for management, including challenges
related to the management and monitoring of new global
operations and associated increased costs and complexity. There
can be no assurances that the combined company will be
successful or that it will realize the expected operating
efficiencies, cost savings, revenue enhancements and other
benefits currently anticipated from the merger.
The
financial analyses and forecasts considered by Allied World and
Transatlantic and their respective financial advisors may not be
realized, which may adversely affect the market price of Allied
World shares following the merger.
In performing their financial analyses and rendering their
opinions regarding the fairness, from a financial point of view,
of the exchange ratio set forth in the merger agreement, each of
the respective financial advisors to Allied World and
Transatlantic independently reviewed and relied on, among other
things, internal stand-alone and pro forma financial analyses
and forecasts as separately provided to each respective
financial advisor by Allied World or Transatlantic. See the
sections entitled The Merger Certain Allied
World Prospective Financial Information and The
Merger Certain Transatlantic Prospective Financial
Information. The financial advisor of Transatlantic,
Moelis, assumed, at the direction of the board of directors of
Transatlantic, that such financial information was reasonably
prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available
estimates and judgments of the management of Allied World and
Transatlantic as to the future performance of their respective
companies and that such future financial results will be
achieved at the times and in the amounts projected by management
of Allied World and Transatlantic. These analyses and forecasts
were prepared by, or as directed by, the managements of Allied
World and Transatlantic and were also considered by the Allied
World board of directors and the Transatlantic board of
directors. None of these analyses or forecasts were prepared
with a view towards public disclosure or compliance with the
published guidelines of
26
the SEC, GAAP, SAP, international financial reporting standards
(IFRS) or the guidelines established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and
presentation of financial forecasts. These projections are
inherently based on various estimates and assumptions that are
subject to the judgment of those preparing them. These
projections are also subject to significant economic,
competitive, industry and other uncertainties and contingencies,
all of which are difficult or impossible to predict and many of
which are beyond the control of Allied World and Transatlantic.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Allied Worlds
or Transatlantics financial condition or results of
operations will be consistent with those set forth in such
analyses and forecasts. Significantly worse financial results
could have a material adverse effect on the market price of
TransAllied shares following the merger.
The
combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses
related to the merger and the integration of the
companies.
The combined company is expected to incur substantial expenses
in connection with the merger and the integration of Allied
World and Transatlantic. There are a large number of processes,
policies, procedures, operations, technologies and systems that
must be integrated. While Allied World and Transatlantic have
assumed that a certain level of expenses would be incurred,
there are many factors beyond their control that could affect
the total amount or the timing of the integration expenses.
Moreover, many of the expenses that will be incurred are, by
their nature, difficult to estimate accurately. These expenses
could, particularly in the near term, exceed the savings that
the combined company expects to achieve from the elimination of
duplicative expenses and the realization of economies of scale
and cost savings. These integration expenses likely will result
in the combined company taking significant charges against
earnings following the completion of the merger, and the amount
and timing of such charges are uncertain at present.
There
can be no assurance that the merger will not result in a ratings
downgrade of Allied Worlds or Transatlantics
insurance or reinsurance operating companies, which may result
in an adverse effect on the business, financial condition and
operating results.
Ratings with respect to claims paying ability and financial
strength are important factors in establishing the competitive
position of insurance and reinsurance companies and will also
impact the cost and availability of capital to an insurance and
reinsurance holding company. The combined operations of Allied
World and Transatlantic will compete with other insurance and
reinsurance companies, financial intermediaries and financial
institutions on the basis of a number of factors, including the
ratings assigned by internationally-recognized rating
organizations. Ratings will represent an important consideration
in maintaining customer confidence in the combined company and
in its ability to market insurance and reinsurance products.
Rating organizations regularly analyze the financial performance
and condition of insurers. Any ratings downgrade, or the
potential for a ratings downgrade, of Allied World,
Transatlantic, the combined company or any of their insurance or
reinsurance subsidiaries could adversely affect their ability to
market and distribute products and services, which could have an
adverse effect on Allied Worlds, Transatlantics or
the combined companys, as applicable, business, financial
condition and operating results. There is a risk that Allied
World and/or
Transatlantic is subject to being downgraded, and there can be
no assurance that the ratings of the combined companys
insurance and reinsurance operating companies will not be
downgraded, following the merger.
Ratings are not in any way a measure of protection afforded to
investors and should not be relied upon in making an investment
or voting decision.
The
occurrence of severe catastrophic events may cause the combined
companys financial results to be volatile and may affect
the financial results of the combined company differently than
such an event would have affected the financial results of
either Allied World or Transatlantic on a stand-alone
basis.
Because the combined company will, among other things,
underwrite property catastrophe insurance and reinsurance and
have large aggregate exposures to natural and man-made
disasters, management expects that the combined companys
loss experience generally will include infrequent events of
great severity. Consequently, the occurrence of losses from
catastrophic events is likely to cause substantial volatility in
the combined companys financial results. In addition,
because catastrophes are an inherent risk of the combined
companys business, a major event or series of events can
be expected to occur from time to time and to have a material
adverse effect on the combined companys financial
condition and results of operations, possibly to
27
the extent of eliminating the combined companys
shareholders equity. Upon completion of the merger, the
combined companys exposure to natural and man-made
disasters will be different from the exposure of either Allied
World or Transatlantic prior to the completion of the merger.
Accordingly, the merger may exacerbate the exposure described
above.
Transatlantic
and Allied Worlds counterparties may acquire certain
rights upon the merger, which could negatively affect the
combined company following the merger.
Transatlantic and Allied World are each party to numerous
contracts, agreements, licenses, permits, authorizations and
other arrangements that contain provisions giving counterparties
certain rights (including, in some cases, termination rights) in
the event of a change in control of Transatlantic or
its subsidiaries or Allied World or its subsidiaries, as
applicable. The definition of change in control
varies from contract to contract, ranging from a narrow to a
broad definition, and in some cases, the change in
control provisions may be implicated by the merger. If a
change in control occurs, cedents may be permitted to cancel
contracts on a cut-off or run-off basis, and Transatlantic or
Allied World, as applicable, may be required to provide
collateral to secure premium and reserve balances or may be
required to cancel and commute a contract, subject to an
agreement between the parties that may be settled in
arbitration. If a contract is cancelled on a cut-off basis,
Transatlantic or Allied World, as applicable, may be required to
return unearned premiums, net of commissions. In addition,
contracts may provide a ceding company with multiple options,
such as collateralization or commutation, that would be
triggered by a change in control. Collateral requirements may
take the form of trust agreements or be funded by securities
held or letters of credit. Upon commutation, the amount to be
paid to settle the liability for gross loss reserves would
typically consider a discount to the financial statement loss
reserve value, reflecting the time value of money resident in
the ultimate settlement of such loss reserves. In certain
instances, contracts contain dual triggers, such as a change in
control and a ratings downgrade, both of which must be satisfied
for the contractual right to be exercisable.
Whether a ceding company would have cancellation rights in
connection with the merger depends upon the language of its
agreement with Transatlantic or Allied World, as applicable.
Whether a ceding company exercises any cancellation rights it
has would depend on, among other factors, such ceding
companys views with respect to the financial strength and
business reputation of the combined company, the extent to which
such ceding company currently has reinsurance coverage with the
combined companys affiliates, the prevailing market
conditions, the pricing and availability of replacement
reinsurance coverage and the combined companys ratings
following the merger. Transatlantic and Allied World cannot
presently predict the effects, if any, if the merger is deemed
to constitute a change in control under certain of their
respective contracts and other arrangements, including the
extent to which cancellation rights would be exercised, if at
all, nor the effect on the combined companys financial
condition, results of operations, or cash flows, but such effect
could be material.
Some
of the executive officers and directors of Allied World and
Transatlantic have interests in seeing the merger completed that
are different from, or in addition to, those of the other Allied
World and Transatlantic stockholders. Therefore, some of the
executive officers and directors of Allied World may have a
conflict of interest in recommending the proposals being voted
on at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting and some of
the executive officers and directors of Transatlantic may have a
conflict of interest in recommending the proposals being voted
on at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting.
Certain of the executive officers of Allied World and
Transatlantic have arrangements that provide them with interests
in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those
of stockholders of Allied World and Transatlantic generally.
These interests include, among others, ownership interests in
the combined company, continued service as an executive officer
of the combined company, payments and equity grants, and the
accelerated vesting of certain equity awards
and/or
certain severance benefits, in connection with the merger. These
interests may influence the executive officers of Allied World
to support or approve the proposals to be presented at the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting
and/or the
executive officers of Transatlantic to support or approve the
proposals to be presented at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting.
28
In addition, certain directors of Allied World and Transatlantic
may have interests in the merger that are different from, or in
addition to, those of stockholders of Allied World and
Transatlantic generally, including ownership interests and
equity grants in the combined company and continued service as a
director of the combined company. These interests may influence
the directors of Allied World and Transatlantic to support or
approve the proposals to be presented at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting
and/or the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting.
See The Merger Interests of Allied
Worlds Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger beginning on page 90 and The
Merger Interests of Transatlantics Directors
and Executive Officers in the Merger beginning on
page 97 for a more detailed description of these interests.
The
Allied World shares to be received by Transatlantic stockholders
as a result of the merger will have different rights from the
shares of Transatlantic common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, Transatlantic stockholders will
become shareholders of TransAllied, and their rights as
shareholders will be governed by the TransAllied Articles, the
TransAllied organizational resolutions and Swiss law. The rights
associated with Transatlantic common stock are different from
the rights associated with Allied World shares. See
Comparison of Rights of TransAllied Shareholders and
Transatlantic Stockholders beginning on page 173.
Other
Risk Factors of Allied World and Transatlantic
Allied Worlds and Transatlantics businesses are and
will be subject to the risks described above. In addition,
Allied World and Transatlantic are, and will continue to be,
subject to the risks described in Allied Worlds and
Transatlantics Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as updated by
subsequent Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
all of which are filed with the SEC and incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See
Where You Can Find More Information beginning on
page 188 for the location of information incorporated by
reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
29
THE
COMPANIES
Allied
World Assurance Company Holdings, AG
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG is a holding company
incorporated in Switzerland. Allied World, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Allied World Assurance
Company, Ltd, Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited,
Allied World Assurance Company (Reinsurance) Limited, Allied
World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., Allied World National
Assurance Company, Darwin National Assurance Company and Darwin
Select Insurance Company and its branch offices, is a specialty
insurance and reinsurance company that underwrites a diversified
portfolio of property and casualty lines of business through
offices located in Bermuda, Hong Kong, Ireland, Singapore,
Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Allied
World has nine offices in the United States and has become
licensed in Canada as well. Since its formation in 2001, Allied
World has focused primarily on the direct insurance markets.
Allied World offers its clients and producers significant
capacity in both direct property and casualty insurance markets
as well as the reinsurance market. Allied World is the ultimate
parent company of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd,
the former publicly-traded Bermuda holding company, and its
subsidiaries as a result of a redomestication effected on
December 1, 2010, pursuant to a scheme of arrangement under
Bermuda law.
Allied World shares are traded on the NYSE under the symbol
AWH. Following the merger, the combined
companys common shares will be traded on the NYSE under
the symbol TAG.
The principal executive offices of Allied World are located at
Lindenstrasse 8, 6340 Baar, Zug, Switzerland and its telephone
number is
41-41-768-1080.
Additional information about Allied World and its subsidiaries
is included in documents incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information on page 188.
Transatlantic
Holdings, Inc.
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. is a holding company incorporated
in the State of Delaware. Transatlantic, through its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, TRC, Trans Re Zurich Reinsurance
Company Ltd., acquired by TRC in 1996, and Putnam (contributed
by Transatlantic to TRC in 1995), offers reinsurance capacity
for a full range of property and casualty products, directly and
through brokers, to insurance and reinsurance companies, in both
the domestic and international markets on both a treaty and
facultative basis. One or both of TRC and Putnam is licensed,
accredited, authorized or can serve as a reinsurer in
50 states and the District of Columbia in the United States
and in Puerto Rico and Guam. Through its international
locations, Transatlantic has operations worldwide, including
Bermuda, Canada, seven locations in Europe, three locations in
Central and South America, two locations in Asia (excluding
Japan), and one location in each of Japan, Australia and Africa.
TRC is licensed in Bermuda, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom,
the Dominican Republic, the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region, the Peoples Republic of China and Australia.
Transatlantic was originally formed in 1986 under the name
PREINCO Holdings, Inc. as a holding company for Putnam.
Transatlantics name was changed to Transatlantic Holdings,
Inc. on April 18, 1990 following the acquisition on
April 17, 1990 of all of the common stock of TRC in
exchange for shares of common stock of Transatlantic.
Transatlantics common stock is traded on the NYSE under
the symbol TRH.
The principal executive offices of Transatlantic are located at
80 Pine Street, New York, New York 10005 and its telephone
number is
(212) 365-2200.
Additional information about Transatlantic and its subsidiaries
is included in documents incorporated by reference into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information on page 188.
GO Sub,
LLC
GO Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World and a
Delaware limited liability company, which was initially
incorporated on June 2, 2011 as a corporation, and
subsequently converted to a limited liability company on
June 10, 2011, and was formed for the sole purpose of
effecting the merger. In the merger, Merger Sub will be merged
with and into Transatlantic, with Transatlantic surviving as a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Allied World.
30
THE
ALLIED WORLD SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to
the shareholders of Allied World as part of a solicitation of
proxies by the Allied World board of directors for use at the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting to be held at the time
and place specified below, and at any properly convened meeting
following an adjournment or postponement thereof. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus provides shareholders of Allied World
with the information they need to know to be able to vote or
instruct their vote to be cast at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting.
Date,
Time and Place
The Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting will be held at
Allied Worlds corporate headquarters, Lindenstrasse 8,
6340 Baar, Zug, Switzerland, on September 20, 2011, at
2:00 p.m. local time.
Purpose
of the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting
At the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting, Allied World
shareholders will be asked to consider and vote on:
|
|
|
|
|
the proposal to increase Allied Worlds ordinary share
capital pursuant to article 3a(a) of the Allied World
Articles by up to CHF 887,860,538 (equaling USD 1,156,882,281)
to up to CHF 1,472,939,677.4 (equaling USD 1,919,240,400)
to permit the issuance of Allied World shares to Transatlantic
stockholders pursuant to, and only in connection with, the
merger as contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
exclusion of all preferential subscription rights to which
Allied World shareholders may be entitled; the contributions for
the new registered shares are paid by converting existing
reserves (Kapitalreserven) into share capital;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to increase Allied Worlds conditional share
capital pursuant to article 5(a) of the Allied World Articles by
up to CHF 76,894,774 (equaling USD 100,193,891) to up to
CHF 138,634,774 (equaling USD 180,641,111), only in connection
with the merger;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to increase Allied Worlds authorized share
capital pursuant to article 6(a) of the Allied World Articles by
up to CHF 177,572,113.5 (equaling USD 231,376,463.9) to up to
CHF 294,587,935.5 (equaling USD 383,848,080), only in connection
with the merger;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to issue Allied World shares to Transatlantic
stockholders pursuant to the merger and as contemplated by the
merger agreement as required by NYSE rules;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to amend article 1 of the Allied World
Articles to change Allied Worlds name to TransAllied
Group Holdings, AG immediately following, and conditioned
upon, the completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to elect (x) three Class II directors to
hold office commencing upon the completion of the merger and
ending upon TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in
2012, (y) four Class III directors to hold office
commencing upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2013 and
(z) four Class I directors to hold office commencing
upon the completion of the merger and ending upon
TransAllieds Annual Shareholder Meeting in 2014;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to effect a capital reduction to allow for the
payment of a dividend to the combined companys
shareholders after the completion of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the proposal to amend and restate the Stock Incentive Plan, as
required by NYSE rules, to, among other things, increase the
number of shares reserved for issuance under the Stock Incentive
Plan and to extend the Stock Incentive Plans termination
date effective upon the completion of the merger.
|
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of the share capital increase proposals, the NYSE share
issuance proposal, the name change proposal, and the election of
directors proposal.
31
Recommendations
of the Board of Directors of Allied World
The Allied World board of directors unanimously approved the
merger agreement and the amendment to the Allied World Articles
and determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, including the merger, the issuance of the
Allied World shares to Transatlantic stockholders pursuant to
the merger and the adoption of the amendment to the Allied World
Articles, are in the best interests of Allied World.
The Allied World board of directors unanimously recommends
that the Allied World shareholders vote FOR each of
the proposals set forth above. See the section entitled
The Merger Allied Worlds Reasons for the
Merger; Recommendations of the Allied World Board of
Directors beginning on page 63 for a more detailed
discussion of the Allied World board of directors
recommendation.
Allied
World Record Date; Shareholders Entitled to Vote
Only Allied World shareholders of record at the close of
business on July 22, 2011, the Allied World record date,
are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting.
At the close of business on the Allied World record date, there
were 38,077,329 Allied World shares issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting. Holders of Allied World shares will have one vote for
each Allied World share they owned on the Allied World record
date, in person or by a properly executed and delivered proxy
with respect to the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting,
unless such shareholders own controlled shares that
constitute 10% or more of the issued Allied World shares, in
which case the voting rights with respect to those
controlled shares will be limited, in the aggregate,
to a voting power of approximately 10% pursuant to a formula
specified in article 14 of the Allied World Articles. The
Allied World Articles define controlled shares
generally to include all shares of Allied World directly,
indirectly or constructively owned or beneficially owned by any
person or group of persons. The share capital of Allied World
consists of the outstanding Allied World shares and Allied World
non-voting shares.
Voting by
Allied Worlds Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on the Allied World record date,
directors and executive officers of Allied World and their
affiliates were entitled to vote 713,214 Allied World
shares, or approximately 1.9% of the Allied World shares
outstanding on that date. We currently expect that Allied
Worlds directors and executive officers will vote their
shares in favor of each of the proposals to be considered and
voted upon at the Special Shareholder Meeting, although none of
them has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so.
Quorum
In order to transact business at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting, a quorum is required. Two or more persons
present in person and representing in person or by proxy
throughout the meeting more than 50% of the total issued and
outstanding Allied World shares registered in Allied
Worlds share register constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting. The Allied World board of directors or chairman of the
Allied World board of directors may postpone the meeting with
sufficient factual reason, provided that notice of postponement
is given to the shareholders in the same form as the invitation
before the time for such meeting. A new notice is then required
to hold the postponed meeting. Under Swiss law, a general
meeting of shareholders for which a notice of meeting has been
duly published may not be adjourned without publishing a new
notice of meeting.
Abstentions (Allied World shares for which proxies have been
received but for which the holders have abstained from voting)
will be counted toward the presence of a quorum at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting. Under NYSE rules, if brokers
do not have discretion to vote on any of the proposals at a
shareholders meeting, broker non-votes will not count
toward the calculation of a quorum. As each of the proposals to
be voted on at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting are
considered non-routine under NYSE rules, brokers do
not have discretion to vote on such proposals and, as such
broker non-votes will not
32
be included in the calculation of the number of Allied World
shares represented at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been
achieved.
Required
Vote; Failures to Vote, Abstentions, Broker Non-Votes
Approval of each of the following proposals requires the
affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the votes represented at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting and a majority of the nominal value of the Allied World
shares represented at such meeting, where holders of at least
50% of the total outstanding Allied World shares are represented
and voting and who are entitled to vote on such proposal:
(i) the article 3 share capital increase
proposal, (ii) the article 5 share capital
increase proposal and (iii) the article 6 share
capital increase proposal. Abstentions will be considered votes
represented at the meeting and will thus have the same effect as
votes AGAINST these proposals. Broker non-votes will
not be considered shares represented at the meeting and will
have no effect on these proposals.
The approval of the NYSE share issuance proposal and the Stock
Incentive Plan proposal requires the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of shares entitled to vote on the proposal
and present in person or represented by proxy at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting, provided that the total votes
cast on this proposal represent over 50% of the outstanding
Allied World shares entitled to vote on this proposal; provided
further that the approval of the NYSE share issuance proposal is
conditioned upon the approval of the share capital increase
proposals, as provided above. Votes for, votes
against and abstentions count as votes cast, while
broker non-votes do not count as votes cast for this purpose.
All outstanding Allied World shares count as shares entitled to
vote. Thus, the total sum of votes for, plus votes
against, plus abstentions, which we refer to as the
NYSE votes cast, must be greater than 50% of the
total outstanding Allied World shares. The number of votes
for the proposal must be greater than 50% of the
NYSE votes cast.
Each of the following approvals requires a majority of the votes
cast voting in favor of such proposal at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting where holders of at least 50% of the
total outstanding Allied World shares are represented and voting
and who are entitled to vote on such proposal: (i) the name
change proposal, (ii) the election of directors proposal
and (iii) the capital reduction proposal. Abstentions and broker
non-votes will not be considered votes cast and will have no
effect on these proposals, assuming a quorum is present.
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of the share capital increase proposals, the NYSE share
issuance proposal, the name change proposal and the election of
directors proposal.
Voting of
Proxies by Holders of Record
If you are a holder of record of Allied World shares, a proxy
card is enclosed for your use. Allied World requests that you
submit a proxy by signing the accompanying proxy and returning
it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. When the
accompanying proxy is returned properly executed, the Allied
World shares represented by it will be voted at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof in accordance with the instructions contained in the
proxy.
If a proxy is returned without an indication as to how the
Allied World shares represented are to be voted with regard to a
particular proposal, the Allied World shares represented by the
proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the
Allied World board of directors and, therefore, FOR
each of the proposals to be considered and voted upon at such
meeting. As of the date hereof, management has no knowledge of
any business that will be presented for consideration at the
Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting and that would be
required to be set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus or the related proxy card other than the
matters set forth in Allied Worlds Notice of Special
Shareholder Meeting. If any other matter is properly presented
at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting for
consideration, it is intended that the persons named in the
enclosed form of proxy and acting thereunder will vote in
accordance with their best judgment on such matter.
Voting by
Independent Proxy
If you are an Allied World shareholder of record as of the
Allied World record date, under Swiss law you may authorize the
independent proxy, Mr. Paul Buergi, of Buis Buergi AG,
Muehlebachstrasse 7, P.O. Box 672,
33
CH-8024, Zurich, Switzerland, with full rights of substitution,
to vote your Allied World shares on your behalf instead of using
the enclosed proxy card. If you authorize the independent proxy
to vote your shares without giving instructions, your shares
will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of the
Allied World board of directors with regard to the items listed
in the notice of meeting. If new agenda items (other than those
in the notice of meeting) or new proposals or motions with
respect to those agenda items set forth in the notice of meeting
are being put forth before the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting, the independent proxy will, in the absence of other
specific instructions, vote in accordance with the
recommendations of the Allied World board of directors. An
optional form of proxy card that may be used by the independent
proxy to vote your Allied World shares is included with this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Proxy cards authorizing the
independent proxy to vote your shares must be sent directly to
the independent proxy, arriving no later than 12:00 p.m.,
local time, September 13, 2011.
Your vote is important. Accordingly, please sign, date and
return the enclosed proxy card whether or not you plan to attend
the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting in person.
Shares Held
in Street Name
If you hold your Allied World shares in a stock brokerage
account or if your shares are held by a bank or other nominee
(that is, in street name), you must provide the record holder of
your shares with instructions on how to vote your shares. Please
follow the voting instructions provided by your bank, brokerage
firm or other nominee. Please note that you may not vote Allied
World shares held in street name by returning a proxy card
directly to Allied World or by voting in person at the Allied
World Special Shareholder Meeting unless you have a legal
proxy, which you must obtain from your bank, brokerage
firm or other nominee. Further, brokers who hold Allied World
shares on behalf of their customers may not give a proxy to
Allied World to vote those Allied World shares without specific
instructions from their customers.
If you are an Allied World shareholder and you do not instruct
your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee on how to vote your
shares your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, as
applicable, may not vote your Allied World shares on any of the
proposals to be considered and voted upon at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting as all such matters are deemed
non-routine matters. See Admission to the
Special Shareholder Meeting below for further information
regarding voting your shares that are held in street
name.
Revocation
of Proxies
If you are the record holder of Allied World shares, you can
change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before your
proxy is voted at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting.
You can do this by:
|
|
|
|
|
timely delivering a new, valid proxy by mail as described on the
proxy card; or
|
|
|
|
attending the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting and
voting in person, which will automatically cancel any proxy
previously given, or you can revoke your proxy in person. Simply
attending the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting without
voting will not revoke any proxy that you have previously given
or change your vote.
|
A registered Allied World shareholder may revoke a proxy by any
of these methods, regardless of the method used to deliver the
shareholders previous proxy.
Please note that if your shares are held in street
name through a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, you
may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to
your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee in accordance with
its established procedures. If your Allied World shares are held
in the name of a bank, brokerage firm or other nominee and you
decide to change your vote by attending the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting and voting in person, your vote in person at
the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting will not be
effective unless you have obtained and present an executed proxy
issued in your name from the record holder (your bank, brokerage
firm or other nominee).
34
Tabulation
of Votes
A representative from Baker & McKenzie Zurich will act as
the inspector of elections and will be responsible for
tabulating the votes cast by proxy (which will have been
certified by Allied Worlds independent transfer agent) or
in person at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting. Under
Swiss law, Allied World is responsible for determining whether
or not a quorum is present and the final voting results.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Allied World is soliciting proxies for the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting. In accordance with the merger agreement,
Allied World and Transatlantic will share equally all fees and
expenses in relation to the printing, filing and distribution of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Allied World will pay all
of its other costs of soliciting proxies. In addition to
solicitation by use of mails, proxies may be solicited by Allied
World directors, officers and employees in person or by
telephone or other means of communication. These individuals
will not be additionally compensated, but may be reimbursed for
out-of-pocket
expenses associated with this solicitation.
Allied World has engaged MacKenzie Partners, Inc.
(MacKenzie Partners) to assist in the solicitation
of proxies for the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting.
Allied World estimates that it will pay MacKenzie Partners a fee
of approximately $15,000. Allied World will also reimburse
MacKenzie Partners for reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses and will indemnify MacKenzie Partners and its
affiliates against certain claims, liabilities, losses, damages
and expenses. Allied World will make arrangements with brokerage
houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy
solicitation materials to beneficial owners of shares held of
record by them. Allied World will also reimburse these brokerage
houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their
reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding the proxy materials.
Adjournments
The Allied World board of directors or chairman of the Allied
World board of directors may postpone the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting with sufficient factual reason, provided
that notice of postponement is given to the shareholders in the
same form as the invitation before the time for such meeting. A
new notice is then required to hold the postponed meeting. Under
Swiss law, a general meeting of shareholders for which a notice
of meeting has been duly published may not be adjourned without
publishing a new notice of meeting.
Organizational
Matters Required by Swiss Law with respect to the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting
Admission
to the Special Shareholder Meeting
Shareholders who are registered in Allied Worlds share
register on the Allied World record date will receive this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and proxy cards from MacKenzie
Partners, Allied Worlds proxy solicitor. Beneficial owners
of Allied World shares will receive instructions from their
bank, brokerage firm or other nominee acting as shareholder of
record to indicate how they wish their shares to be voted.
Beneficial owners who wish to vote in person at the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting are requested to obtain a power of
attorney from their bank, brokerage firm or other nominee that
authorizes them to vote the shares held by them on their behalf.
In addition, you must bring to the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting an account statement or letter from your
bank, brokerage firm or other nominee indicating that you are
the owner of the Allied World shares. Shareholders of record
registered in Allied Worlds share register are entitled to
participate in and vote at the Allied World Special Shareholder
Meeting.
Each share is entitled to one vote. The exercise of voting
rights is subject to the voting restrictions set out in the
Allied World Articles, a summary of which is contained in the
section entitled Questions and Answers How
many votes do I have?
35
Granting
a Proxy
If you are an Allied World shareholder of record and do not wish
to attend the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting, you have
the right to grant a proxy directly to the Allied World officers
named in the proxy card. In addition, under Swiss corporate law
you can: (i) appoint Mr. Paul Buergi, of Buis Buergi
AG, Muehlebachstrasse 7, P.O Box 672, CH-8024, Zurich,
Switzerland, as the independent proxy, with full rights of
substitution, with the corresponding proxy card; or
(ii) grant a written proxy to any person who need not be an
Allied World shareholder. Please see Question and
Answers How do I vote? and Questions and
Answers How do I appoint and vote via the independent
proxy if I am an Allied World shareholder of record?
elsewhere in the joint proxy statement/prospectus for more
information on appointing the independent proxy. Proxies issued
to the independent proxy must be received no later than 12:00
p.m., local time, on September 13, 2011.
Registered Allied World shareholders who have appointed an
Allied World officer or the independent proxy as a proxy may not
vote in person at the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting
or send a proxy of their choice to the meeting, unless they
revoke or change their proxies. Revocations to the independent
proxy must be received by him or her by no later than 12:00
p.m., local time, on September 13, 2011.
With regard to the items listed on the agenda and without any
explicit instructions to the contrary, the Allied World officer
acting as proxy and the independent proxy will vote according to
the recommendations of the Allied World board of directors. If
new agenda items (other than those on the agenda) or new
proposals or motions regarding agenda items set out in the
invitation to the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting are
being put forth before the meeting, the Allied World officer
acting as proxy and the independent proxy will vote in
accordance with the recommendation of the Allied World board of
directors in the absence of other specific instructions.
Beneficial owners who have not obtained a power of attorney
from their bank, brokerage firm or other nominee are not
entitled to participate in or vote at the Allied World Special
Shareholder Meeting.
Proxy
Holders of Deposited Shares
Proxy holders of deposited shares in accordance with Swiss
corporate law are kindly asked to inform Allied World of the
number of shares they represent as soon as possible, but prior
to the date of the Allied World Special Shareholder Meeting, at
Allied Worlds corporate headquarters.
Admission
Office
The admission office opens on the day of the Allied World
Special Shareholder Meeting at 1:00 p.m. local time. Allied
World shareholders of record attending the meeting are kindly
asked to present their proxy card as proof of admission at the
entrance.
36
THE
TRANSATLANTIC SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to
the stockholders of Transatlantic as part of a solicitation of
proxies by the Transatlantic board of directors for use at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting to be held at the time
and place specified below, and at any properly convened meeting
following an adjournment or postponement thereof. This joint
proxy statement/prospectus provides stockholders of
Transatlantic with the information they need to know to be able
to vote or instruct their vote to be cast at the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting.
Date,
Time and Place
The Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting is scheduled to be
held at The Down Town Association, 60 Pine Street,
New York, New York, on September 20, 2011, at
8:00 a.m. local time.
Purpose
of the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting
At the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, Transatlantic
stockholders will be asked to consider and vote on:
|
|
|
|
|
the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, which is further
described in the sections entitled The Merger and
The Merger Agreement, beginning on pages 43 and
110, respectively;
|
|
|
|
the proposal to adjourn the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional
proxies if there are not sufficient votes to approve the
foregoing proposal; and
|
|
|
|
the proposal, on an advisory basis (non-binding), to approve the
compensation that may be paid or become payable to
Transatlantics named executive officers in connection with
the merger, and the agreements and understandings pursuant to
which such compensation may be paid or become payable, as
described below in the section entitled
Advisory Vote on the Golden Parachute
Compensation Arrangements for Transatlantics Named
Executive Officers.
|
Completion of the merger is conditioned on, among other things,
approval of the adoption of the merger agreement proposal.
Advisory
Vote on the Golden Parachute Compensation Arrangements for
Transatlantics Named Executive Officers
Recently adopted Section 14A of the Exchange Act requires
that Transatlantic provide its stockholders with the opportunity
to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the
golden parachute compensation arrangements for
Transatlantics named executive officers, as disclosed in
the section entitled The Merger Interests of
Transatlantic Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger Golden Parachute Compensation beginning
on page 98.
In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, in this
proposal Transatlantic stockholders are being asked to
approve the following non-binding resolution at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Transatlantic approve,
on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation to be paid
by Transatlantic to Transatlantics named executive
officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger
with Allied World, as disclosed in the Golden Parachute
Compensation Table and related notes and narrative disclosure in
the section of the joint proxy statement/prospectus for the
Merger entitled The Merger Interests of
Transatlantics Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger Golden Parachute Compensation.
Approval of this proposal is not a condition to completion of
the merger, and the vote with respect to this proposal is
advisory only. Accordingly, the vote will not be binding on
Transatlantic or Allied World, or the board of directors or the
compensation committee of Transatlantic or Allied World.
37
Recommendations
of the Board of Directors of Transatlantic
The Transatlantic board of directors has unanimously approved
the merger agreement and has determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, including
the merger, are advisable and in the best interests of
Transatlantic and its stockholders.
The Transatlantic board of directors unanimously recommends
that Transatlantic stockholders vote FOR each of the
proposals set forth above. See the section entitled The
Merger Transatlantics Reasons for the Merger;
Recommendations of the Transatlantic Board of Directors
beginning on page 76 for a more detailed discussion of the
Transatlantic board of directors recommendation.
Transatlantic
Record Date; Stockholders Entitled to Vote
Only holders of record of Transatlantic common stock at the
close of business on July 22, 2011, the Transatlantic
record date, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting or any adjournments or
postponements thereof.
At the close of business on the Transatlantic record date,
62,488,896 shares of Transatlantic common stock were issued and
outstanding and held by 275 holders of record. Holders of record
of Transatlantic common stock on the Transatlantic record date
are entitled to one vote per share at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting on each proposal. However, to satisfy the
requirements of New York State Insurance regulators, on
June 1, 2009, Davis Advisors entered into an agreement with
Transatlantic whereby Davis Advisors agreed to vote the number
of shares of Transatlantic common stock owned by Davis Advisors
in excess of 9.9% of Transatlantics outstanding shares in
a manner proportionate to the vote of the owners of the shares
(excluding Davis Advisors, stockholders beneficially owning more
than 10% of Transatlantics outstanding shares, and
directors and officers of Transatlantic) voting on such matters.
A list of stockholders of Transatlantic will be available for
review for any purpose germane to the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting at Transatlantics headquarters, at 80
Pine Street, New York, New York, during regular business hours
for a period of 10 days before the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting. The list will also be available at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting during the whole time
thereof for examination by any stockholder of record present at
the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting.
Voting by
Transatlantics Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on the Transatlantic record date,
directors and executive officers of Transatlantic and their
affiliates were entitled to vote 221,521 shares of
Transatlantic common stock, or approximately 0.35% of the shares
of Transatlantic common stock outstanding on that date, which
represents approximately 0.7% of the votes required for the
approval of the adoption of the merger agreement proposal. We
currently expect that Transatlantics directors and
executive officers will vote their shares in favor of each of
the proposals to be considered and voted upon at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, although none of them
has entered into any agreement obligating them to do so.
Quorum
No business may be transacted at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting unless a quorum is present. Attendance in
person or by proxy at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting of holders of record of a majority of the aggregate
voting power of the outstanding shares of Transatlantic common
stock entitled to vote at the meeting will constitute a quorum.
If a quorum is not present, or if fewer shares of Transatlantic
common stock are voted in favor of the proposal to adopt the
merger agreement than the number required for its adoption, the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting may be adjourned to
allow additional time for obtaining additional proxies or votes.
At any subsequent reconvening of the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting, all proxies will be voted in the same
manner as they would have been voted at the original convening
of the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, except for any
proxies that have been effectively revoked or withdrawn prior to
the subsequent meeting.
38
Abstentions (shares of Transatlantic common stock for which
proxies have been received but for which the holders have
abstained from voting) will be included in the calculation of
the number of shares of Transatlantic common stock represented
at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting for purposes of
determining whether a quorum has been achieved. Under NYSE
rules, if brokers do not have discretion to vote on any of the
proposals at a stockholders meeting, broker non-votes will
not count toward the calculation of a quorum. As each of the
proposals to be voted on at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting are considered non-routine under
NYSE rules, brokers do not have discretion to vote on such
proposals and, as such broker non-votes will not be included in
the calculation of the number of shares of Transatlantic common
stock represented at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum has been
achieved.
Required
Vote
The approval of the adoption of the merger agreement proposal
requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Transatlantic common stock entitled to
vote thereon. Failures to vote, votes to abstain and broker
non-votes, if any, will have the effect of a vote
AGAINST the proposal.
The approval of the adjournment proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Transatlantic common stock entitled to vote and present in
person or by proxy, whether or not a quorum is present. The
Transatlantic stockholders may so adjourn the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting to another time or place without
further notice unless the adjournment is for more than
30 days or if after the adjournment a new record date is
fixed for the adjourned meeting, in which case a notice of the
adjourned meeting shall be given to each Transatlantic
stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting.
Abstaining will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST the proposal. Failures to vote and broker
non-votes, if any, will not be voted, but this will not have an
effect on the adjournment proposal.
The approval of the golden parachute proposal requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
Transatlantic common stock present in person or represented by
proxy and entitled to vote thereon, assuming a quorum is
present. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote
AGAINST the proposal. Failures to vote and broker
non-votes, if any, will not be voted, but this will not have an
effect on the proposal, assuming a quorum is present.
Failures
to Vote, Broker Non-Votes and Abstentions
Under the rules of the NYSE, banks, brokerage firm or other
nominees holding shares of record may vote those shares in their
discretion on certain routine proposals when they do not receive
timely voting instructions from the beneficial holders. A
broker non-vote occurs under these NYSE rules when a
bank, brokerage firm or other nominee holding shares of record
is not permitted to vote on a non-routine matter without
instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares and no
instruction is given.
In accordance with these NYSE rules, banks, brokers and other
nominees who hold shares of Transatlantic common stock in
street name for their customers, but do not have
discretionary authority to vote the shares, may not exercise
their voting discretion with respect to the adoption of the
merger agreement proposal, the adjournment proposal or the
golden parachute proposal. Accordingly, if banks, brokers or
other nominees do not receive specific voting instructions from
the beneficial owner of such shares, they may not vote such
shares with respect to the adoption of the merger agreement
proposal, the adjournment proposal or the golden parachute
proposal. For shares of Transatlantic common stock held in
street name, only shares of Transatlantic common
stock affirmatively voted FOR the adoption of the
merger agreement proposal, the adjournment proposal and the
golden parachute proposal will be counted as affirmative votes
therefor.
Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes, if any, will
have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the adoption
of the merger agreement proposal. Abstentions will have the same
effect as a vote AGAINST the adjournment proposal.
Failures to vote and broker non-votes, if any, will have no
effect on the approval of the adjournment proposal. Abstentions
will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the
golden parachute proposal. Failures to vote and broker
non-votes, if any, will not be voted, but this will not have an
effect on the golden parachute proposal, assuming a quorum is
present.
39
Voting at
the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting
Whether or not you plan to attend the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting, please vote your shares. If you are a
registered or record holder, which means your shares
are registered in your name with American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company LLC,
Transatlantics transfer agent and registrar, you may vote
in person at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting or by
proxy. If your shares are held in street name, which
means your shares are held of record in an account with a bank,
brokerage firm or other nominee, you must follow the
instructions from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee in
order to vote.
Voting in
Person
If you plan to attend the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot
at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. Please note,
however, that if your shares are held in street
name, and you wish to vote at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting, you must bring to the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting a proxy executed in your favor from the
record holder (your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee) of
the shares authorizing you to vote at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting.
In addition, if you are a registered Transatlantic stockholder,
please be prepared to provide proper identification, such as a
drivers license, in order to be admitted to the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. If you hold your
shares in street name, you will need to provide
proof of ownership, such as a recent account statement or letter
from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee, along with
proper identification.
Voting by
Proxy
If you are a holder of record, a proxy card is enclosed for your
use. Transatlantic requests that you submit a proxy by:
|
|
|
|
|
logging onto http://proxy.georgeson.com/ and following the
instructions on your proxy card to vote via the internet anytime
up to 11:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on September 19, 2011 and
following the instructions provided on that site;
|
|
|
|
dialing
1-877-456-7915
and listening for further directions to vote by telephone
anytime up to 11:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on
September 19, 2011 and following the instructions provided
in the recorded message; or
|
|
|
|
signing and returning the accompanying proxy card in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope. Transatlantic stockholders of
record may submit their proxies through the mail by completing
their proxy card, and signing, dating and returning it in the
enclosed, pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. To be valid, a
returned proxy card must be signed and dated.
|
You should vote your proxy in advance of the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting even if you plan to attend the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. You can always change
your vote at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting.
If you hold your shares of Transatlantic common stock in a stock
brokerage account or if your shares are held by a bank or other
nominee (that is, in street name), you must provide the record
holder of your shares with instructions on how to vote your
shares. Please follow the voting instructions provided by your
bank, brokerage firm or other nominee. Please note that you may
not vote shares of Transatlantic common stock held in street
name by returning a proxy card directly to Transatlantic or by
voting in person at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting unless you have a legal proxy, which you
must obtain from your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee.
Further, brokers who hold shares of Transatlantic common stock
on behalf of their customers may not give a proxy to
Transatlantic to vote those shares without specific instructions
from their customers.
If you are a Transatlantic stockholder and you do not instruct
your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee on how to vote your
shares your bank, brokerage firm broker or other nominee, as
applicable, may not vote
40
your shares on any of the proposals to be considered and voted
upon at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting as all
such matters are deemed non-routine matters pursuant
to applicable NYSE rules.
How
Proxies Are Counted
All shares of Transatlantic common stock represented by properly
executed proxies received in time for the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting will be voted at the meeting in the manner
specified by the stockholders giving those proxies. Properly
executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be
voted FOR the adoption of the merger agreement
proposal, the adjournment proposal and the golden parachute
proposal.
Only shares of Transatlantic common stock affirmatively voted
for the applicable proposal, and properly executed proxies that
do not contain voting instructions, will be counted as favorable
votes for adoption of the merger agreement proposal, the
adjournment proposal and the golden parachute proposal.
Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes, if any, will
have the same effect as votes AGAINST the adoption
of the merger agreement proposal. Abstentions will have the same
effect as a vote AGAINST the adjournment proposal.
Failures to vote and broker non-votes, if any, will have no
effect on the approval of the adjournment proposal. Abstentions
will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the
golden parachute proposal. Failures to vote and broker
non-votes, if any, will not be voted, but this will not have an
effect on the golden parachute proposal, assuming a quorum is
present.
Revocation
of Proxies
If you are the record holder of shares of Transatlantic common
stock, you can change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time
before your proxy is voted at the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting. You can do this by:
|
|
|
|
|
timely delivering a new, valid proxy bearing a later date by
submitting instructions via the internet, by telephone or by
mail as described on the proxy card;
|
|
|
|
timely delivering a signed written notice of revocation to the
Secretary of Transatlantic; or
|
|
|
|
attending the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting and
voting in person, which will automatically cancel any proxy
previously given, or you can revoke your proxy in person. Simply
attending the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting without
voting will not revoke any proxy that you have previously given
or change your vote.
|
A registered Transatlantic stockholder may revoke a proxy by any
of these methods, regardless of the method used to deliver the
Transatlantic stockholders previous proxy.
Written notices of revocation and other communications with
respect to the revocation of proxies should be addressed as
follows:
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
80 Pine Street
New York, New York 10005
Attention: Secretary
Please note that if your shares of Transatlantic common stock
are held in street name through a bank, brokerage
firm or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting
new voting instructions to your bank, brokerage firm or other
nominee in accordance with its established procedures. If your
shares are held in the name of a bank, brokerage firm or other
nominee and you decide to change your vote by attending the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting and voting in person,
your vote in person at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting will not be effective unless you have obtained and
present an executed proxy issued in your name from the record
holder (your bank, brokerage firm or other nominee).
41
Tabulation
of Votes
Transatlantic has appointed American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company LLC to serve as the Inspector of Election for
the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company LLC will independently
tabulate affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.
Solicitation
of Proxies
Transatlantic is soliciting proxies for the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting from its stockholders. In accordance
with the merger agreement, Transatlantic and Allied World will
share equally all fees and expenses in relation to the printing,
filing and distribution of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Transatlantic will pay all of its other
costs of soliciting proxies. In addition to solicitation by use
of the mails, proxies may be solicited by Transatlantics
directors, officers and employees in person or by telephone or
other means of communication. These persons will not receive
additional compensation, but may be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses in connection with this solicitation.
Transatlantic has engaged Georgeson Inc. to assist in the
solicitation of proxies for the Transatlantic Special
Shareholder Meeting. Transatlantic estimates that it will pay
Georgeson Inc. a fee of approximately $16,000 for proxy
solicitation services. Transatlantic will also reimburse
Georgeson Inc. for reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses and will indemnify Georgeson Inc. and its affiliates
against certain claims, liabilities, losses, damages and
expenses. Transatlantic will make arrangements with brokerage
houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward proxy
solicitation materials to beneficial owners of shares of
Transatlantic common stock held of record by them. Transatlantic
will also reimburse these brokerage houses, custodians, nominees
and fiduciaries for their reasonable expenses incurred in
forwarding the proxy materials.
Adjournments
Any adjournment of the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting
may be made from time to time by the Transatlantic stockholders,
by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares
of Transatlantic common stock entitled to vote and present in
person or by proxy, whether or not a quorum is present, without
further notice other than by an announcement made at the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting. If a quorum is not
present at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting, or if
a quorum is present at the Transatlantic Special Shareholder
Meeting but there are not sufficient votes at the time of the
Transatlantic Special Shareholder Meeting to approve the
adoption of the merger agreement proposal, then Transatlantic
stockholders may be asked to vote to adjourn the Transatlantic
Special Shareholder Meeting so as to permit the further
solicitation of proxies.
42
THE
MERGER
Effects
of the Merger
At the effective time of the merger, Merger Sub, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Allied World that was formed for the sole purpose
of effecting the merger, will merge with and into Transatlantic.
Transatlantic will survive the merger and become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Allied World. Upon completion of the merger,
Allied World will be the parent company of Transatlantic, and
Allied Worlds name will be changed to TransAllied Group
Holdings, AG.
In the merger, each outstanding share of Transatlantic common
stock (other than shares owned by Transatlantic, Allied World or
Merger Sub, which shares will be cancelled) will be converted
into the right to receive 0.88 Allied World shares, together
with cash paid in lieu of fractional shares. This exchange ratio
is fixed and will not be adjusted to reflect share price changes
prior to the closing of the merger. Allied World shareholders
will continue to hold their existing Allied World shares.
Background
of the Merger
Background
of the Merger
From 1990, when Transatlantic became a public company, until
June 2009, American International Group, Inc. (together with its
subsidiaries, AIG) owned a controlling interest in
Transatlantics outstanding common stock. In the second
half of 2008, AIG experienced an unprecedented strain on its
liquidity. This strain led to a series of transactions with the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the U.S. Department of
the Treasury. On September 29, 2008, AIG, which then owned
approximately 59% of Transatlantics outstanding common
stock, filed an amendment to its Schedule 13D relating to
Transatlantic stating, among other things, that AIG is
exploring all strategic alternatives in connection with the
potential disposition or other monetization of its
. . . interest in [Transatlantic]. A
special committee of directors of Transatlantic that were
independent of management and of AIG (the Special
Committee) comprised of Messrs. Richard S. Press, Ian
H. Chippendale and John G. Foos was subsequently formed to
evaluate proposals received from AIG relating to the possible
disposition of, or other transactions involving, AIGs
ownership interest in Transatlantic as well as any related
business combination transactions involving Transatlantics
outstanding shares. Although several parties initially indicated
possible interest in a transaction involving
Transatlantics outstanding shares, these initial
indications did not proceed past preliminary proposals,
execution of confidentiality and standstill agreements and
exchanges of non-public information. On June 10, 2009, AIG
disposed of 29,900,000 of its shares of Transatlantics
common stock in a secondary public offering, reducing its
ownership in Transatlantic from approximately 59% to
approximately 14%. Subsequently, AIG disposed of its remaining
8,500,000 shares of Transatlantic common stock in a
secondary public offering (in which Transatlantic repurchased
2,000,000 of such shares) on March 15, 2010.
The board of directors and management of Allied World regularly
review and evaluate potential strategic transactions, including
business combinations, as part of their ongoing oversight and
management of Allied Worlds business and in furtherance of
Allied Worlds goal to increase its competitive positioning
within the market. In the years leading up to the present
transaction, Allied World, with the assistance of its respective
legal and financial advisors, reviewed and analyzed potential
strategic transactions with several companies within the
insurance and reinsurance industry, but ultimately determined
that a transaction with such companies at the relevant times was
not strategically optimal. During this time, Allied World also
engaged in a review of potential opportunities for smaller
acquisitions as well as organic growth, and executed on certain
of these initiatives. In October 2008, Allied World acquired
Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc., a specialty
U.S. casualty insurer focused on small account primary and
healthcare business, to expand Allied Worlds
U.S. insurance platform. As part of the strategy to grow
its U.S. insurance and reinsurance platforms, Allied World
also made investments in 2008 and 2009 to hire additional
underwriting teams and support staff and build out its
infrastructure. In 2010, Allied World established a syndicate at
Lloyds of London to further expand its underwriting
activities.
43
Since AIGs June 2009 secondary offering, the Transatlantic
board of directors and senior management have regularly reviewed
and assessed strategic alternatives available to enhance
stockholder value, including possible business combination
transactions. In February 2010, Transatlantic selected Moelis to
act as its financial advisor in connection with a review of
strategic alternatives, based upon, among other things, the fact
that Moelis is an internationally recognized investment banking
firm that has substantial experience in merger and acquisition
transactions. In October 2010, the Transatlantic board of
directors disbanded the Special Committee (since AIG was no
longer a significant stockholder of Transatlantic) and
established a new strategy committee of the board of directors
(the Strategy Committee), comprised of
Messrs. Press, Chippendale, Foos and Stephen P. Bradley,
each of whom are independent, to oversee Transatlantics
review of strategic alternatives. From time to time since
AIGs June 2009 offering, at the direction of the board of
directors of Transatlantic and the Strategy Committee,
Transatlantics senior management engaged in preliminary
discussions regarding possible business combination transactions
with a number of insurance and reinsurance companies including
Validus Holdings, Ltd. (Validus). Until the
negotiations described below, these discussions did not proceed
past preliminary proposals, execution of confidentiality and
standstill agreements and limited exchanges of non-public
information.
During 2010, Allied World engaged in strategic discussions with
certain insurance and reinsurance companies, including a
potential business combination and two strategic acquisitions in
Canada and Europe. In each case, Allied World determined that
the transaction valuations sought did not provide adequate value
to Allied World and its shareholders.
During the period from February 11, 2011 to March 11,
2011, Robert F. Orlich, the Chief Executive Officer of
Transatlantic,
and/or
Michael C. Sapnar, the current Chief Operating Officer of
Transatlantic, engaged in very preliminary discussions with
Scott A. Carmilani, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Allied World, concerning the possibility of a strategic business
combination transaction involving the two companies. On
March 11, 2011, Mr. Carmilani met with
Messrs. Orlich and Sapnar to discuss the possibility of the
companies entering into a mutual confidentiality agreement, as
well as the engagement of financial advisors by both companies,
in connection with a potential transaction. The individuals also
had very preliminary discussions regarding possible senior
management roles at the combined company.
On March 13, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met
by teleconference with members of Allied Worlds senior
management in attendance, during which Mr. Carmilani
reported on his initial conversations with Messrs. Orlich
and Sapnar. At the meeting, the Allied World board of directors
requested Allied Worlds senior management team to engage
in further discussions with Transatlantic regarding the
possibility of a strategic business combination involving the
two companies and to report back to the board following such
discussions. The Allied World board of directors also requested
the retention of Deutsche Bank as Allied Worlds financial
advisor in connection with the review of the possible
transaction, based upon, among other things, the fact that
Deutsche Bank is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm that has substantial experience in merger and
acquisition transactions and the high-quality service that
Deutsche Bank provides. Shortly thereafter, representatives of
Allied Worlds senior management approached representatives
of Deutsche Bank to discuss whether Deutsche Bank would be
available to assist Allied World in connection with evaluating
the proposed transaction, and Deutsche Bank was then selected to
serve as the companys financial advisor.
On March 16, 2011, in connection with the regularly
scheduled March 17, 2011 Transatlantic board of directors
meeting, the Strategy Committee held a meeting (at which all of
Transatlantics directors were in attendance) to discuss
Messrs. Orlich and Sapnars conversations with
Mr. Carmilani and the benefits of a potential strategic
combination transaction between the companies. Members of
Transatlantics senior management and representatives from
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Transatlantics
outside legal counsel (Gibson Dunn), and Moelis
participated in this meeting. Representatives of Moelis reviewed
with the directors recent M&A activity in the property and
casualty insurance and reinsurance industry and provided an
overview of potential business combination partners, including
Allied World. Mr. Orlich described managements views
as to the business and strategic benefits of a potential
strategic combination transaction with Allied World, including
the increased size and capital position of the combined
companies, the combination of strong primary insurance and
reinsurance businesses, and certain expected synergies.
Mr. Orlich also noted that
44
Transatlantic and Allied World each had strong and complementary
underwriting and risk management cultures and that Transatlantic
has been conducting insurance and reinsurance business with
Allied World for many years and has had very positive
experiences with Allied World. Following this discussion, the
Strategy Committee authorized Transatlantics senior
management to continue its preliminary discussions with Allied
World and to enter into a mutual confidentiality and standstill
agreement.
On March 22, 2011, representatives of Transatlantics
senior management approached representatives of Goldman,
Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs) to discuss
whether Goldman Sachs would be available to assist Transatlantic
in connection with the proposed transaction.
On March 27, 2011, Transatlantic and Allied World entered
into a mutual confidentiality and standstill agreement, and both
parties and their advisors began due diligence.
On March 27, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met
by teleconference with members of Allied Worlds senior
management in attendance. At the meeting, Allied Worlds
senior management updated the board as to the companys
review of a possible transaction with Transatlantic and the
status of its discussions with Transatlantic. Allied
Worlds management indicated that the company had entered
into a mutual confidentiality and standstill agreement with
Transatlantic and would immediately commence its due diligence
review of Transatlantic.
Starting on March 27, 2011 and continuing until the
execution of the merger agreement on June 12, 2011, the
management teams of Transatlantic and Allied World, together
with their respective financial, actuarial, tax and legal
advisors, performed extensive due diligence on each other
through a series of meetings, telephonic discussions and a
review of both public and non-public information.
Beginning in late March 2011, members of Allied Worlds
senior management team, together with Allied Worlds
financial and legal advisors, discussed with members of Allied
Worlds board of directors at varying times the status of
ongoing due diligence and discussions with Transatlantic. In
particular, Mr. Carmilani provided continuous updates to
Allied Worlds lead independent director regarding the
negotiations regarding key transaction terms such as price and
governance matters and the status of due diligence, which were
in turn reported to other members of the board; met in person
with the co-chairs of the Allied World audit committee to
discuss items related to financial statements (including
differences in accounting methodologies between Allied World and
Transatlantic, differences in auditors and integration matters
related thereto), independent auditors and the internal audit
function in connection with a possible transaction; discussed
compensation matters with the chairman of Allied Worlds
compensation committee; analyzed issues relating to the
potential combined companys investment portfolio with the
chairman of Allied Worlds investment committee; and
engaged in individual discussions with directors from time to
time regarding structuring, governance, valuation and other
issues related to the potential transaction.
On April 4, 2011, Transatlantic and Allied World, together
with their financial and legal advisors, had a telephonic
organizational meeting to discuss the process and timeline for a
proposed transaction, including, among other things, due
diligence matters, tax issues, regulatory issues, rating
agencies, antitrust issues and capital management.
On April 6, 2011, members of Transatlantics senior
management met with members of Allied Worlds senior
management and discussed a potential strategic combination
transaction and various issues related thereto, including, among
other things, the potential business and strategic benefits of a
combination, a potential deal structure, due diligence matters,
proposed timeline and cultural issues. The parties did not
discuss the exchange ratio in a potential transaction at this
meeting.
Following the meeting on April 6, 2011, the Strategy
Committee held a telephonic meeting (at which additional
Transatlantic directors were in attendance), attended by members
of Transatlantics senior management and representatives of
Gibson Dunn. At this meeting, members of management updated the
Strategy Committee regarding additional discussions that had
occurred with Allied World, including with respect to due
diligence matters. Transatlantics management noted that
Transatlantic wished to engage PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(PWC), Transatlantics auditors, to assist with
certain tax due diligence matters. Messrs. Foos, Press and
John. L. McCarthy, constituting all the members of
Transatlantics audit committee, authorized
45
management to engage PWC as Transatlantics tax advisor in
connection with a possible transaction with Allied World.
Transatlantics senior management also informed the
Strategy Committee that Transatlantic had retained an
internationally-recognized consulting firm to perform an
independent review of Allied Worlds loss reserves in
addition to the due diligence review being performed by
Transatlantics actuaries. Members of management and
representatives of Gibson Dunn reviewed with the Strategy
Committee the rationale for entering into, and the proposed
terms of, an exclusivity agreement with Allied World.
Representatives of Gibson Dunn discussed with the directors the
applicable legal standards in the context of considering a
strategic combination transaction of the type being proposed.
Following a discussion, the Strategy Committee authorized
Transatlantics management to enter into a
30-day
exclusivity agreement with Allied World. In addition,
Transatlantics board of directors had requested that
representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis describe any recent
prior relationships between their respective firms and Allied
World. After consideration and discussion, Transatlantics
board of directors then selected Goldman Sachs and Moelis to act
as Transatlantics independent financial advisors in
connection with the proposed strategic combination transaction
based upon, among other things, the fact that they are
internationally recognized investment banking firms that have
substantial experience in transactions similar to the proposed
strategic combination transaction and the high quality of
service that both firms had provided to Transatlantic in the
past. The Transatlantic board of directors also determined to
seek a fairness opinion from Moelis in connection with the
potential transaction with Allied World because, among other
things, Moelis had no prior relationships with Allied World.
On April 8, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met
by teleconference with members of Allied Worlds senior
management in attendance, during which management reviewed
certain aspects of the possible transaction with Transatlantic,
including governance matters, the diligence proposed to be
completed with respect to Transatlantics loss reserves and
deal structures. Allied Worlds senior management stated
that the company had retained an internationally-recognized
consulting firm to perform an independent review of
Transatlantics loss reserves in addition to the due
diligence review being performed by Allied Worlds
actuaries. Allied Worlds senior management reported that
the company was negotiating a mutual exclusivity agreement with
Transatlantic in connection with the possible transaction and
reviewed the rationale for entering into such agreement as well
as its proposed terms. Following this informational call, the
directors requested that Allied Worlds senior management
and advisors continue their discussions with Transatlantic.
Also on April 8, 2011, Mr. Carmilani met with
Messrs. Orlich and Sapnar to discuss certain governance
matters in connection with a possible business combination
involving the companies.
On April 11, 2011, Transatlantic and Allied World entered
into a
30-day
mutual exclusivity agreement.
On April 14, 2011 and April 15, 2011, representatives
of Transatlantic and Allied World senior management, together
with their respective financial and legal advisors, met at
Deutsche Banks offices in New York City to conduct mutual
due diligence and discuss various aspects of the businesses
conducted by each of Transatlantic and Allied World.
Starting in mid-April through late May, Transatlantic and Allied
World, together with their respective advisors, evaluated a
variety of possible transaction structures for a merger of
equals transaction and jointly determined that merging
Transatlantic into a subsidiary of Allied World, with Allied
World surviving as the publicly-traded parent company,
represented the most desirable structure for the potential
transaction.
During April 2011 and through the execution of the merger
agreement on June 12, 2011, members of Allied Worlds
senior management team, together with Allied Worlds
financial and legal advisors, continued to provide updates to
members of Allied Worlds board of directors regarding the
ongoing discussions with Transatlantic.
From April 18, 2011 through April 26, 2011,
representatives of Allied Worlds senior management met
with representatives of Deutsche Bank and Allied Worlds
outside legal counsel, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
(Willkie Farr), to discuss due diligence matters,
financial projections, valuation matters, potential corporate
structures and other legal issues regarding the potential
transaction with Transatlantic.
On April 18, 2011 and April 25, 2011, the Strategy
Committee held telephonic meetings (at which additional
Transatlantic directors were in attendance), attended by members
of Transatlantics management,
46
and representatives of Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs and Moelis, at
which they received updates regarding the status of discussions
with Allied World. At the April 25, 2011 meeting,
representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis reviewed with the
directors, among other things, certain preliminary financial
analyses of Transatlantic and Allied World and discussed certain
considerations with respect to the exchange ratio in a potential
stock-for-stock
transaction with Allied World, including various sources of
value that may affect the exchange ratio, and the possibility of
using alternative structures, such as contingent value rights.
Representatives of Gibson Dunn then provided the directors with
a summary of the terms of a draft merger agreement. Following a
discussion, the Strategy Committee authorized Goldman Sachs and
Moelis to commence valuation discussions with Deutsche Bank and
authorized Gibson Dunn to distribute the draft merger agreement
to Allied Worlds legal advisors.
On April 25, 2011, representatives of Goldman Sachs and
Moelis contacted representatives of Deutsche Bank to discuss
certain valuation issues and informed them that Transatlantic
would not be willing to enter into a transaction based on a
market-to-market
valuation of the two companies and would expect the transaction
to be based on
book-to-book
valuation, with appropriate adjustments for reserves, goodwill
and litigation matters. Allied Worlds financial advisors
indicated that Allied World was not contemplating a transaction
based on a
market-to-market
valuation but that it would not be willing to enter into a
transaction based on a tangible
book-to-tangible
book valuation of the two companies.
On April 26, 2011, representatives of Gibson Dunn
distributed a draft merger agreement to Willkie Farr. From
April 26, 2011 and continuing until the execution of the
merger agreement, representatives of Allied World,
Transatlantic, Willkie Farr and Gibson Dunn discussed the
provisions of the merger agreement, including the
representations and warranties, covenants (including the
non-solicitation covenant), termination rights, termination fees
and the expense reimbursement provisions.
On April 27, 2011, Mr. Press and Mr. Carmilani
met and discussed the status of the proposed transaction between
Transatlantic and Allied World, including certain governance
issues that would need to be addressed for the combined company.
Mr. Press and Mr. Carmilani discussed
Mr. Orlichs desire to retire at the closing of the
proposed strategic combination transaction (if the parties in
fact proceeded to execute an agreement and consummate a
transaction) and the need to agree on the composition of the
board and management positions for the combined company.
On May 2, 2011, representatives of Allied Worlds
senior management team met with representatives of
Transatlantics senior management team and discussed due
diligence matters and various aspects regarding the structure of
the proposed transaction. In addition, Allied World communicated
to representatives of Goldman Sachs a proposal that the combined
companys board of directors consist of 12 members,
comprised of six former Transatlantic directors, five former
independent Allied World directors and Mr. Carmilani. Later
that same day, the Strategy Committee held a telephonic meeting
(at which additional Transatlantic directors were in
attendance), attended by members of Transatlantics
management and representatives of Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs and
Moelis. At the meeting, members of Transatlantics
management and advisors provided the directors with an update
regarding the status of discussions with Allied World.
Mr. Orlich and the other members of management described to
the directors the progress that had occurred to date.
Representatives of Goldman Sachs described the communication
they had received from Allied Worlds advisors earlier in
the day. The Transatlantic directors also discussed the
desirability of having an in person meeting between certain of
the Transatlantic directors and senior management and certain
members of the Allied World board of directors and senior
management. Following the discussion, the Strategy Committee
authorized Goldman Sachs and Moelis to inform Deutsche Bank of
Transatlantics views with regard to the board composition
of the combined company in light of the fact that the former
Transatlantic stockholders would own a majority of the shares of
the combined company, specifically, the importance of having an
11 member board of directors comprised of six former
Transatlantic directors and five former Allied World directors,
with the board to be chaired by a current Transatlantic director.
On May 3, 2011, representatives of Allied World and
Transatlantic held a telephonic meeting to discuss the status of
each companys due diligence review and loss reserve
matters.
47
On May 5, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met
with representatives of Allied Worlds senior management
and representatives of Deutsche Bank as part of its regularly
scheduled board meeting in Zug, Switzerland. At the meeting,
representatives of Allied World and representatives of Deutsche
Bank had extensive discussions regarding the benefits of the
potential business combination transaction with Transatlantic,
including financial and strategic rationales and potential
synergies. Representatives of Deutsche Bank discussed various
financial and valuation analyses of the transaction, including
the exchange ratio based on
book-to-book
and tangible
book-to-book
values, and reviewed recent merger of equal transaction
valuations and governance metrics. Representatives of Allied
Worlds senior management provided the directors with a
substantive update on their discussions with Transatlantic and
its advisors regarding the governance of the combined company,
including the potential senior management team, board and
committee compositions and the chairmanship. Allied Worlds
senior management also discussed the status of its due diligence
review to date and reviewed certain terms of the draft merger
agreement that Transatlantic had provided to Allied World.
Allied Worlds management noted that it wished to engage
Deloitte & Touche Ltd., Allied Worlds
independent auditors, to assist with certain financial and
accounting due diligence matters. Allied Worlds audit
committee thereafter authorized management to engage
Deloitte & Touche Ltd. as its advisor in connection
with a possible transaction with Transatlantic. Following this
meeting, the directors authorized Allied Worlds management
and advisors to continue negotiations with Transatlantic.
On May 5, 2011, Allied World held its 2011 annual ordinary
general meeting of shareholders at which the Allied World
shareholders elected the Class I directors up for election,
approved the payment of dividends in the form of a par value
reduction and approved certain other matters.
On May 6, 2011, representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis
had a meeting with representatives of Deutsche Bank to discuss
valuation and governance issues with respect to the proposed
transaction. Deutsche Bank relayed to Transatlantics
financial advisors Allied Worlds views regarding board and
committee composition, chairmanship and valuation. At this
meeting, representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis discussed
with representatives of Deutsche Bank the idea of setting up an
in person meeting between certain directors and members of
senior management of Transatlantic and Allied World.
On May 8, 2011 and May 10, 2011, the Strategy
Committee held telephonic meetings (at which additional
Transatlantic directors were in attendance), attended by members
of Transatlantics management and representatives of Gibson
Dunn, Goldman Sachs and Moelis. Representatives of Goldman Sachs
and Moelis and members of Transatlantics management
provided the directors with updates regarding their
conversations with Allied World and its advisors. At the
May 8, 2011 meeting, representatives of Goldman Sachs and
Moelis reviewed with the directors, among other things, certain
preliminary financial analyses of Transatlantic and Allied
World. Following a discussion at the May 8, 2011 meeting,
the Strategy Committee requested that Goldman Sachs and Moelis
arrange for an in person meeting on May 12, 2011 between
certain Transatlantic directors and members of senior management
and certain Allied World directors and members of senior
management.
On May 9, 2011, Mr. Press and Mr. Carmilani
discussed the possible composition of the combined
companys board as between Allied World and Transatlantic
directors as well as senior management positions for the
combined company.
On May 12, 2011, Messrs. Press, Chippendale, Foos and
Sapnar met in New York City with Messrs. Carmilani, Bart
Friedman, Mark R. Patterson and Sam Weinhoff, all directors of
Allied World, to discuss the proposed transaction, including
board and committee composition and the chairmanship of the
combined company. The participants also discussed their
respective views as to the strategic direction of the combined
company.
On May 13, 2011, Mr. Press met with Mr. Carmilani
in New York City to discuss certain matters in connection with
the proposed strategic combination transaction, including board
and committee composition and senior management positions for
the combined company.
48
Also on May 13, 2011, representatives of Transatlantic and
Allied World, together with their legal advisors, participated
in a conference call to discuss, among other things, certain
matters with respect to the proposed transaction and the draft
merger agreement.
On May 14, 2011 and May 15, 2011, at the direction of
the Strategy Committee, representatives of Goldman Sachs and
Moelis had numerous conversations with representatives of
Deutsche Bank regarding valuation and governance matters
(including with respect to board and committee composition) with
respect to the proposed strategic combination transaction.
Representatives of Deutsche Bank communicated Allied
Worlds views regarding governance and certain other
economic issues.
On May 16, 2011, the Strategy Committee held a telephonic
meeting (at which additional Transatlantic directors were in
attendance), attended by members of Transatlantics
management, and representatives of Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs
and Moelis, to discuss Allied Worlds most recent
communications and Transatlantics response and to provide
direction to Goldman Sachs and Moelis. The Strategy Committee
also unanimously approved a motion to add John L. McCarthy to
the Strategy Committee.
On May 17, 2011, representatives of Goldman Sachs and
Moelis informed Deutsche Bank of Transatlantics position
with respect to governance of the combined company and certain
valuation issues. Later that same day, Allied World delivered a
proposal to Transatlantic setting forth certain terms of a
possible business combination transaction. Specifically, Allied
Worlds proposal included, among other things, (i) an
exchange ratio of 0.87 Allied World shares per share of
Transatlantic common stock, (ii) an 11 member board of
directors comprised of six former Transatlantic directors and
five former Allied World directors, which would be chaired by a
current, independent Transatlantic director for a period of one
year after the closing of the proposed transaction, at which
time such director would retire from the board, and (iii) a
proposed senior management team for the combined company. The
Allied World proposal also indicated that the combined
companys nominating and corporate governance committee
would undertake a search to identify an individual (who could
not be a current member of the Transatlantic or Allied World
board of directors) with substantial industry expertise to serve
as an independent, non-executive chairman upon the one-year
anniversary of the closing of the proposed transaction.
On May 18, 2011, after discussions among the directors,
senior management and Transatlantics advisors,
Transatlantic responded to Allied Worlds May 17, 2011
proposal with a counter-proposal regarding valuation and
governance issues. The counter-proposal included, among other
things, (i) a $1.00 cash dividend per share of
Transatlantic common stock to be paid immediately prior to the
closing of the proposed transaction and an exchange ratio of
0.875 Allied World shares per share of Transatlantic common
stock and (ii) that the current Transatlantic chairman
would serve as chairman of the combined companys board of
directors until the second shareholders meeting
post-closing, at which time the board would elect a successor
chair with a two-thirds vote, which successor chair could be
from among its members, but could not be a member of either
Allied Worlds or Transatlantics management team.
From the period following delivery of the May
18th
proposal, Allied World, Transatlantic and their respective
financial advisors engaged in discussions and negotiations
regarding the proposal.
On May 20, 2011, Allied World delivered its best and final
written offer to Transatlantic providing for, among other
things, (i) an exchange ratio of 0.88 Allied World shares
per share of Transatlantic common stock, (ii) an 11 member
board of directors of the combined company to be comprised of
six former Transatlantic directors and five former Allied World
directors, (iii) six committees of the combined
companys board of directors, each to be comprised of two
former Transatlantic directors and two former Allied World
directors, (iv) the nominating and corporate governance,
investment and executive committees to be chaired by former
Allied World directors and the audit, compensation and
enterprise risk committees to be chaired by former Transatlantic
directors, (v) the current chairman of the Transatlantic
board of directors to act as chairman of the combined company
for one year post-closing of the merger and then retire from the
board, to be succeeded by an independent director (who could not
be a current member of the Transatlantic or Allied World board
of directors) with substantial industry expertise, and
(vi) certain proposals with respect to senior management
and location of the combined company.
49
On May 20, 2011, the Strategy Committee held a telephonic
meeting (at which additional Transatlantic directors were in
attendance), attended by members of Transatlantics
management, and representatives from Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs
and Moelis, to discuss Allied Worlds latest proposal. At
the meeting, representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis
reviewed with the directors, among other things, a preliminary
financial analysis of the proposed transaction on the terms
proposed in the letter received from Allied World on
May 20, 2011 as well as an analysis of Transatlantics
stand-alone plan. Also at the meeting, in light of the proposal
that upon the one-year anniversary of the closing of the
proposed transaction, a new independent, non-executive chairman
of the combined company be appointed, the directors discussed
their desire to have six former Transatlantic directors serve on
the combined companys board for two years following the
closing (absent earlier retirements or resignations and subject
to re-election) and, accordingly, authorized representatives of
Goldman Sachs and Moelis to ask if Allied World would agree that
Transatlantics current chairman remain on the board of
directors of the combined company for an additional year after
resigning as non-executive chairman of the combined company.
Representatives of Allied World replied that they would agree to
consider this possibility, pending successful negotiation of
other transaction terms.
On May 20, 2011, Transatlantic publicly announced that
Mr. Sapnar had been appointed as Executive Vice President
and Chief Operating Officer of Transatlantic, that
Mr. Thomas R. Tizzio, a director of Transatlantic, had
notified the Transatlantic board of directors that he would not
stand for re-election at the upcoming Transatlantic annual
stockholders meeting for personal reasons and that the
Transatlantic board of directors intended to fill the vacancy on
the Board with Mr. Sapnar, effective following the annual
meeting of stockholders.
On May 23, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met by
teleconference with members of Allied Worlds senior
management in attendance. At the meeting, Allied Worlds
senior management updated the board as to the current status of
its discussions with Transatlantic, including the terms of
Allied Worlds May 20th proposal described above, and
managements current views regarding price and governance
matters in the possible transaction. Allied Worlds
management also provided a summary of its key due diligence
findings to date and an outline of open due diligence items.
On May 24, 2011, the Strategy Committee held a telephonic
meeting (at which additional Transatlantic directors were in
attendance), attended by members of Transatlantics
management, and representatives from Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs
and Moelis. Goldman Sachs and Moelis reported on the status of
their discussions with Deutsche Bank, in particular, that
Deutsche Bank reaffirmed that the May 20, 2011 proposal
from Allied World was their best and final offer. The Strategy
Committee decided to discuss Allied Worlds proposal at the
May 26, 2011 regularly scheduled Transatlantic board of
directors meeting.
On May 26, 2011, Transatlantic held its annual meeting of
stockholders at which time the Transatlantic stockholders
elected all of Transatlantics nominees for director,
ratified the selection of PWC as Transatlantics
independent registered public accounting firm for 2011,
approved, on an advisory and non-binding basis, the compensation
of executives disclosed in the proxy statement related to the
May 26, 2011 stockholder meeting, and approved, on an
advisory and non-binding basis, holding future advisory votes on
executive compensation annually.
Also on May 26, 2011, Transatlantic held a regularly
scheduled meeting of its board of directors at which the
directors discussed, among other things, the proposal received
from Allied World on May 20, 2011 and the substance of
subsequent discussions between Goldman Sachs, Moelis and
Deutsche Bank. Representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis
presented to the directors certain preliminary financial
analyses of the financial terms of the Allied World proposal
from May 20, 2011. The preliminary financial analyses were
prepared by Goldman Sachs and Moelis after consultation with
Transatlantics management. Representatives of Gibson Dunn
reviewed with the directors the applicable legal standards in
the context of considering a strategic combination transaction
of the type being proposed and a comparison of Delaware and
Swiss corporate law. At this meeting, the Transatlantic board of
directors formally appointed Mr. Sapnar to the
Transatlantic board of directors. Following a discussion, the
directors authorized Transatlantics management and
advisors to continue negotiations with Allied World.
50
On May 27, 2011, Transatlantic and Allied World executed an
amendment to the exclusivity agreement (which had expired on
May 11, 2011), extending its term until June 15, 2011.
Commencing on May 27, 2011 and continuing until execution
of the merger agreement on June 12, 2011, both parties and
their advisors, including Gibson Dunn, Willkie Farr,
Lenz & Staehelin (Transatlantics outside Swiss
legal counsel) and Baker & McKenzie (Allied
Worlds outside Swiss legal counsel), negotiated the terms
of the definitive merger agreement, completed their due
diligence efforts, participated in numerous meetings and
conference calls to coordinate joint presentations to rating
agencies and investors, and finalized the terms and structure of
the proposed transaction. During this period, the parties and
their counsel negotiated, among other things, the amount of the
termination fees and expense reimbursement, including whether
such fees should be the same or different for Transatlantic and
Allied World, the circumstances in which the termination fees
would be payable, the terms and scope of the representations,
warranties and covenants (including the non-solicitation
covenant) of the parties, and the circumstances under which the
proposed merger could be terminated. The parties negotiated each
of these provisions on an arms length basis, with the
advice of their respective outside legal counsel, taking into
consideration all of the facts and circumstances surrounding the
transaction. In addition, in negotiating these provisions, the
parties considered the terms and conditions of similar
transactions of this type.
On May 28, 2011, Transatlantic and Allied World formally
engaged Sidley Austin LLP (Sidley Austin) as legal
counsel on a concurrent basis to coordinate insurance regulatory
filings and approvals in connection with the proposed
transaction. Given Sidley Austins historic relationship
with Transatlantic, Transatlantic and Allied World agreed that
Sidley Austin would also continue to represent Transatlantic as
insurance counsel in connection with the proposed transaction.
Between June 1, 2011 and June 10, 2011,
representatives of Transatlantic and Allied World held various
discussions with rating agencies and insurance regulators to
notify them of the proposed business combination transaction.
On June 3, 2011, Mr. Orlich received an unsolicited
telephone call from Edward J. Noonan, the chief executive
officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Validus,
regarding a possible business combination transaction between
Transatlantic and Validus. Subsequently, on June 7, 2011,
Validus delivered a letter (the Validus Indication of
Interest Letter) to Transatlantic expressing an interest
in discussing a potential business combination transaction,
which letter did not contain any economic or other specific
terms for a proposed transaction. Following discussions among
the directors, Transatlantics management and
Transatlantics advisors, the board of directors determined
to continue its negotiations with Allied World and to discuss
the Validus Indication of Interest Letter at the June 12,
2011 Transatlantic board of directors special meeting.
On June 3, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met by
teleconference with members of Allied Worlds senior
management in attendance during which management updated the
board on the progress of its discussions with Transatlantic,
reviewed Allied Worlds recent meetings with the rating
agencies with regard to the possible transaction with
Transatlantic and provided updates with respect to investment
portfolios, a Swiss tax ruling, the review of
Transatlantics loss reserves being performed by an
independent consulting firm (including the status of such
review), outstanding due diligence items and proposed timing in
connection with the possible transaction. Management also
reviewed its preliminary strategies for communicating the
transaction to public, staff and investors.
During the week of June 6, 2011, the parties and their
counsel finalized the terms of the proposed merger agreement,
including, among other things, the representations and
warranties, covenants (including the non-solicitation covenant),
termination rights, termination fees and the expense
reimbursement provisions.
On June 10, 2011, the Allied World board of directors met
by teleconference with members of Allied Worlds senior
management in attendance, during which management provided an
update on its negotiations with Transatlantic and its advisors
since the last informational call, discussed legal matters, deal
structure, the progress in the loss reserves review, due
diligence and other financial matters related to the proposed
transaction and reviewed feedback received from the rating
agencies. Allied Worlds senior management also reported
that Transatlantic had received the Validus Indication of
Interest Letter expressing Validuss interest
51
in discussing a potential business combination transaction with
Transatlantic. After a discussion of the Validus Indication of
Interest Letter, the Allied World board of directors requested
that senior management continue to negotiate and finalize the
proposed transaction with Transatlantic.
On June 12, 2011, the Allied World board of directors held
a board meeting in New York City. Members of Allied Worlds
management, as well as representatives from Willkie Farr,
Deutsche Bank and Baker & McKenzie, were present at
the meeting. Representatives of Allied Worlds management
provided an extensive overview of the proposed strategic
combination transaction with Transatlantic and reviewed with the
board the potential benefits of a business combination with
Transatlantic, including the financial and strategic rationale
and the potential synergies. Management also reviewed with the
board financial and governance data from selected merger of
equal transactions and provided a final update of the
companys due diligence review of Transatlantic. Management
reported that negotiations regarding the merger agreement had
been substantially finalized. Representatives of
Baker & McKenzie reviewed in detail with the board
certain materials previously distributed setting forth the
applicable legal standards in the context of considering a
strategic combination transaction of the type being proposed,
which was followed by a presentation by representatives of
Willkie Farr regarding the final terms of the merger agreement
and a comparison of certain aspects of Delaware and Swiss
corporate law. Representatives of Deutsche Bank then presented
to the board various financial analyses of the proposed merger
as further described below under Opinion of
Allied Worlds Financial Advisor. In connection with
the deliberation by the Allied World board, Deutsche Bank
delivered to the Allied World board its written opinion, to the
effect that, as of June 12, 2011 and based upon and subject
to the assumptions, procedures, factors, qualifications and
limitations set forth in such opinion, the exchange ratio
pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial
point of view, to Allied World, as more fully described below
under Opinion of Allied Worlds Financial
Advisor. Following these discussions, the Allied World
board unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the
merger, were advisable and in the best interests of Allied World
and voted unanimously to approve the merger agreement.
On June 12, 2011, the Transatlantic board of directors met
telephonically. Members of Transatlantics management, as
well as representatives from Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs, Moelis
and PWC, were present at the meeting. Representatives of
Transatlantics management and Gibson Dunn provided an
overview of further developments relating to the proposed
strategic combination transaction with Allied World, including
that negotiations regarding the merger agreement had been
substantially finalized and that the Allied World board of
directors had unanimously approved the merger agreement.
Representatives of Gibson Dunn then reviewed with the directors
the applicable legal standards in the context of considering a
strategic combination transaction of the type being proposed and
the final terms of the merger agreement. Representatives from
PWC reviewed with the directors the tax implications of the
proposed transaction with respect to Transatlantic, its
stockholders and the combined company following consummation of
the merger. Members of Transatlantics management reviewed
with the board the potential benefits of a business combination
with Allied World, including the financial and strategic
rationale and the potential synergies. Representatives of
Transatlantics financial advisors then reviewed certain
publicly available information regarding Validus and analyses of
hypothetical business combination transactions with Validus. The
directors and management discussed in detail the Validus
Indication of Interest Letter, including (i) the fact that,
in the past, preliminary discussions with Validus regarding a
business combination had never advanced and (ii) that
pursuing a transaction with Validus would likely have an adverse
effect on Allied Worlds willingness to proceed with the
proposed transaction on the economic and other terms that had
been agreed to. The directors and management also discussed the
fact that a business combination with Validus would not deliver
the strategic benefits that could be achieved with the proposed
strategic combination with Allied World, including, but not
limited to, (i) the higher contribution to revenues and
earnings from primary insurance, (ii) a greater focus on
specialty insurance and reinsurance markets, (iii) the high
probability of the combined company maintaining
Transatlantics current credit ratings, and (iv) the
benefit of Allied Worlds domicile as compared to
Validuss. Representatives of Moelis then presented to the
board various financial analyses of the proposed merger as
further described below under Opinion of
Transatlantics Financial Advisor. In connection with
the deliberation by the Transatlantic board, Moelis delivered to
the Transatlantic board its oral opinion, which was subsequently
confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated June 12,
2011, to the effect that, as of such date
52
and based upon and subject to the assumptions, procedures,
factors, qualifications and limitations set forth in such
written opinion, the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger
agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of shares of Transatlantics common stock, as more
fully described below under Opinion of
Transatlantics Financial Advisor. Following these
discussions, the Transatlantic board unanimously determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement, including the merger, were advisable and in
the best interests of Transatlantic and its stockholders and
voted unanimously to approve the merger agreement.
Following the respective board meetings of Allied World and
Transatlantic on June 12, 2011, all agreements were
finalized and the merger agreement was then executed by
Transatlantic, Allied World and Merger Sub. Later that day,
Transatlantic and Allied World issued a joint press release
announcing the proposed transaction.
On July 8, 2011, Allied World filed a preliminary
S-4/joint
proxy statement with the SEC.
On July 12, 2011, Mr. Orlich received an unsolicited
telephone call from Mr. Noonan. Mr. Noonan spoke to
Mr. Orlich and stated that Validus would be making a
proposal to acquire Transatlantic in a merger pursuant to which
Transatlantic stockholders would receive 1.5564 Validus voting
common shares in the merger and $8.00 per share in cash pursuant
to a one-time special dividend (the Transatlantic
Dividend) from Transatlantic (immediately prior to closing
of the merger) for each share of Transatlantic common stock they
own. Mr. Noonan also noted that Validus preferred to work
cooperatively with Transatlantic to complete a consensual
transaction, but was prepared to take the Validus offer directly
to Transatlantic stockholders if necessary.
Subsequently on July 12, 2011, the Transatlantic board of
directors received an unsolicited proposal letter from Validus
to acquire all of the outstanding shares of Transatlantic common
stock (the Validus Proposal). Pursuant to the
Validus Proposal, Transatlantic stockholders would receive
1.5564 Validus voting common shares in the merger and $8.00 per
share in cash pursuant to a one-time special dividend from
Transatlantic (immediately prior to the closing of the merger)
for each share of Transatlantic common stock they own. The
Validus Proposal was set forth in a proposal letter, accompanied
by a draft merger agreement (the Validus merger
agreement). The full text of the proposal letter is set
forth below:
July 12, 2011
Board of Directors of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
c/o Richard
S. Press, Chairman
c/o Robert
F. Orlich, President and Chief Executive Officer
80 Pine Street
New York, New York 10005
|
|
|
|
Re:
|
Superior Proposal by Validus Holdings, Ltd. to Transatlantic
Holdings, Inc.
|
Dear Sirs:
On behalf of Validus, I am pleased to submit this proposal to
combine the businesses of Validus and Transatlantic through a
merger in which Validus would acquire all of the outstanding
stock of Transatlantic. Pursuant to our proposal, Transatlantic
stockholders would receive 1.5564 Validus voting common shares
in the merger and $8.00 per share in cash pursuant to a one-time
special dividend from Transatlantic immediately prior to closing
of the merger for each share of Transatlantic common stock they
own. This combination, which is highly compelling from both a
strategic and financial perspective, would create superior value
for our respective shareholders.
Based on our closing stock price on July 12, 2011, the
proposed transaction provides Transatlantic stockholders with
total consideration of $55.95 per share of Transatlantic common
stock based on the Validus closing price on July 12, 2011,
which represents a 27.1% premium to Transatlantics closing
price on June 10, 2011, the last trading day prior to the
announcement of the proposed acquisition of
53
Transatlantic by Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, AG.
Our proposal also represents a 12.1% premium over the value of
stock consideration to be paid to Transatlantic stockholders as
part of the proposed acquisition of Transatlantic by Allied
World based on the closing prices of Allied World and Validus
shares on July 12, 2011. Additionally, our proposed
transaction is structured to be tax-free to Transatlantic
stockholders with respect to the Validus voting common shares
they receive in the merger. The Allied World acquisition of
Transatlantic is a fully-taxable transaction and does not
include a cash component to pay taxes. Based on recent public
statements by a number of significant Transatlantic
stockholders, we believe that Transatlantic stockholders would
welcome and support our proposed tax-free transaction, which
provides higher value, both currently and in the long-term, to
Transatlantic stockholders than Transatlantics proposed
acquisition by Allied World.
Our Board of Directors and senior management have great
respect for Transatlantic and its business. As you know from our
previous outreaches to you and past discussions, including our
recent conversation on June 3rd and our letter dated
June 7th, Validus has been interested in exploring a
mutually beneficial business combination with Transatlantic for
some time. We continue to believe in the compelling logic of a
transaction between Transatlantic and Validus. Each of us has
established superb reputations with our respective brokers and
ceding companies in the markets we serve. The Flaspöler
2010 Broker Report rated Transatlantic #3 and
Validus #7 for Best Overall reinsurer and
Validus #4 and Transatlantic #7 for Best
Overall Property Catastrophe. These parallel
reputations for excellent service, creativity and underwriting
consistency, when combined with the enhanced capital strength
and worldwide scope of a combined Validus and Transatlantic,
would afford us the opportunity to execute a transaction that
would be mutually beneficial to our respective shareholders and
customers, and more attractive than the proposed acquisition of
Transatlantic by Allied World.
We believe that our proposal clearly constitutes a
Superior Proposal under the terms of the proposed
Allied World merger agreement for the compelling reasons set
forth below:
1. Superior Value. Our proposal of 1.5564
Validus voting common shares in the merger and $8.00 in cash
pursuant to a pre-closing dividend for each share of
Transatlantic common stock, which represents total consideration
of $55.95 per share of Transatlantic common stock based on the
Validus closing price on July 12, 2011, delivers a
significantly higher value to Transatlantic stockholders than
does the proposed acquisition of Transatlantic by Allied World.
As noted above, as of such date, our proposal represents a 27.1%
premium to Transatlantics closing price on June 10,
2011, the last trading day prior to the announcement of the
proposed acquisition of Transatlantic by Allied World, and a
12.1% premium over the value of stock consideration to be paid
to Transatlantic stockholders in the proposed acquisition of
Transatlantic by Allied World based on the closing prices of
Allied World and Transatlantic shares on July 12, 2011. Our
proposal also delivers greater certainty of value because it
includes a meaningful pre-closing cash dividend payable to
Transatlantic stockholders in contrast to the all-stock Allied
World offer.
2. Tax-Free Treatment. In addition to the
meaningful premium and cash consideration, the proposed
transaction with Validus is structured to be tax-free to
Transatlantic stockholders with respect to the Validus voting
common shares they receive in the merger (unlike the
fully-taxable proposed acquisition of Transatlantic by Allied
World).
3. Relative Ownership. Upon consummation of
the proposed transaction, Transatlantic stockholders would own
approximately 48% of Validus outstanding common shares on
a fully-diluted
basis.1
1 Fully
diluted shares calculated using treasury stock method.
54
4. Superior Currency. Validus voting
common shares have superior performance and liquidity
characteristics compared to Allied Worlds stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
Allied World
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Since Validus IPO(a)
|
|
+55%
|
|
+24%
|
Market Cap as of 6/10/11
|
|
$3.0 billion
|
|
$2.2 billion
|
Average Daily Trading Volume (3 month)(b)
|
|
$27.6 million
|
|
$14.6 million
|
Average Daily Trading Volume (6 month)(c)
|
|
$22.4 million
|
|
$13.4 million
|
Price/As-Reported Diluted Book (Unaffected)(d)
|
|
0.97x
|
|
0.78x
|
Price/As-Reported Diluted Book (Current)(d)
|
|
0.98x
|
|
0.76x
|
Dividend Yield as of 6/10/11 (Unaffected)
|
|
3.3%(e)
|
|
2.6%(f)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Including dividends. Based on the closing prices on
June 10, 2011 and July 24, 2007. Source: SNL. |
|
(b) |
|
Three months prior to June 12, 2011, date of announcement
of proposed Allied World acquisition of Transatlantic. Source:
Bloomberg. |
|
(c) |
|
Six months prior to June 12, 2011, date of announcement of
proposed Allied World acquisition of Transatlantic. Source:
Bloomberg. |
|
(d) |
|
Based on March 31, 2011 GAAP diluted book value per share.
Unaffected price/as-reported diluted book value measured prior
to June 12, 2011 announcement of proposed Allied World
acquisition of Transatlantic. Current is as of closing prices of
Validus and Allied World stock on July 12, 2011. |
|
(e) |
|
Based on $0.25 per share quarterly dividend, as announced
May 5, 2011. |
|
(f) |
|
Based on $0.375 per share quarterly dividend, as disclosed in
Allied World
Form 8-K
dated June 15, 2011. |
Moreover, Validus has maintained a premium valuation on a
diluted book value per share multiple basis relative to its
peers over the past two years, including Allied World. Our
commitment to transparency and shareholder value creation has
allowed us to build a long-term institutional shareholder base,
even as our initial investors have reduced their ownership in
Validus.
5. Robust Long-Term Prospects. We believe
that a combined Validus and Transatlantic would be a superior
company to Allied World following its acquisition of
Transatlantic:
Strategic Fit:
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of Validus strong positions in Bermuda
and London and Transatlantics operations in the United
States, continental Europe and Asia would produce a rare example
of a complementary business fit with minimal overlap.
|
|
|
|
This combination will produce a well-diversified company that
will be a global leader in reinsurance.
|
|
|
|
This combination will solidify Validus leadership in
property catastrophe, with pro forma managed catastrophe
premiums of over
$1 billion,2
while remaining within Validus historical risk
appetite. Validus has significant experience assimilating
catastrophe portfolios, most recently its acquisition of IPC
Holdings, Ltd. in 2009.
|
|
|
|
Finally, we believe that there is a natural division of
expertise among our key executives in line with our
complementary businesses.
|
2 Based
on property catastrophe gross premiums written for Validus and
net premiums written for Transatlantic in 2010. Pro forma for
Validus ($572 million), Transatlantic ($431 million)
and AlphaCat Re 2011 ($43 million).
55
|
|
|
|
|
Size and Market Position: This combination
would create a geographically diversified company with a top six
reinsurance industry position on a pro forma
basis,3
and makes the combined company meaningfully larger than many
of the companies considered to be in our mutual peer group. Our
merged companies would have gross premiums written over the last
twelve months of approximately $6.1 billion as of
March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As the level of capital required to support risk will
continue to rise globally, we believe that size will become an
even more important competitive advantage in the reinsurance
market. The recent renewals at June 1 and July 1, 2011
reinforced this belief as Validus was able to significantly
outperform market rate levels which we believe was a
result of our size, superior analytics and our ability to
structure private transactions at better than market terms,
while not increasing our overall risk levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Structural Flexibility: Given
jurisdiction, size and market position benefits, a combined
Validus and Transatlantic would have significant structural
flexibility, including its ability to optimally deploy capital
globally in different jurisdictions, e.g., through targeted
growth initiatives
and/or
capital management.
|
|
|
|
Global, Committed Leader in
Reinsurance: Validus has a superior business
plan for the combined company that will drive earnings by
capturing the best priced segments of the reinsurance market. A
combined Validus / Transatlantic would derive a
majority of its premiums from short-tail lines and 17% of
premiums written from property catastrophe (compared to 10% for
Allied
World / Transatlantic).4
Validus believes this business mix allows for optimal cycle
management as the attractive pricing in short tail reinsurance
will allow the combined company to better position itself for
the eventual upturn in long tail lines. Validus also intends to
fortify Transatlantics reserve position through a planned
$500 million pre-tax reserve strengthening.
|
We have reviewed the Allied World merger agreement and would
be prepared to enter into a merger agreement with Transatlantic
that includes substantially similar non-price terms and
conditions as the Allied World merger agreement. We are also
open to discussing an increase to the size of Validus
Board of Directors to add representation from the Transatlantic
Board of Directors. In order to facilitate your review of our
proposal, we have delivered to you a draft merger agreement.
Additionally, we expect that the proposed transaction with
Validus would be subject to customary closing conditions,
including the receipt of domestic and foreign antitrust and
insurance regulatory approvals and consents in the United States
and other relevant jurisdictions. Based upon discussions with
our advisors, we anticipate that all necessary approvals and
consents can be completed in a timely manner and will involve no
undue delay in comparison to Transatlantics proposed
acquisition by Allied World.
Validus expects that the pre-closing special dividend would
be financed entirely by new indebtedness incurred by
Transatlantic. As such, Validus has received a highly confident
letter from J.P. Morgan Securities LLC in connection with
the arrangement of the full amount of financing required for the
Transatlantic pre-closing special dividend.
Validus has completed two large acquisitions since 2007, and
has a proven track record of assimilating and enhancing the
performance of businesses that it acquires to create additional
value for shareholders. As such, we are confident that we will
be able to successfully integrate Transatlantics and
Validus businesses in a manner that will quickly maximize
the benefits of the transaction for our respective
shareholders.
Given the importance of our proposal to our respective
shareholders, we feel it appropriate to make this letter public.
We believe that our proposal presents a compelling opportunity
for both our companies
3 Ranked
by 2009 net premiums written and excluding the Lloyds
market per Standard & Poors Global Reinsurance
Highlights 2010.
4 Based
on gross premiums written for Validus and net premiums written
for Transatlantic in 2010.
56
and our respective shareholders, and look forward to the
Transatlantic Board of Directors response by July 19,
2011. We are confident that, after the Transatlantic Board of
Directors has considered our proposal, it will agree that our
terms are considerably more attractive to Transatlantic
stockholders than the proposed acquisition of Transatlantic by
Allied World and that our proposal constitutes, or is reasonably
likely to lead to, a Superior Proposal under the
terms of Transatlantics merger agreement with Allied
World.
We understand that, after the Transatlantic Board of
Directors has made this determination and provided the
appropriate notice to Allied World under the merger agreement,
it can authorize Transatlantics management to enter into
discussions with us and provide information to us. We are
prepared to immediately enter into a mutually acceptable
confidentiality agreement, and we would be pleased to provide
Transatlantic with a proposed confidentiality agreement.
We understand that the terms of Transatlantics merger
agreement with Allied World do not currently permit
Transatlantic to terminate the merger agreement in order to
accept a Superior Proposal, but rather Transatlantic
has committed to bring the proposed acquisition of Transatlantic
by Allied World to a stockholder vote. We are prepared to
communicate the benefits of our proposal as compared to Allied
Worlds proposed acquisition of Transatlantic directly to
Transatlantic stockholders. In addition, while we would prefer
to work cooperatively with the Transatlantic Board of Directors
to complete a consensual transaction, we are prepared to take
our proposal directly to Transatlantic stockholders if
necessary.
We have already reviewed Transatlantics publicly
available information and would welcome the opportunity to
review the due diligence information that Transatlantic
previously provided to Allied World. We are also prepared to
give Transatlantic and its representatives access to
Validus non-public information for purposes of the
Transatlantic Board of Directors due diligence review of
us.
Our Board of Directors has unanimously approved the
submission of this proposal. Of course, any definitive
transaction between Validus and Transatlantic would be subject
to the final approval of our Board of Directors, and the
issuance of Validus voting common shares contemplated by our
proposal will require the approval of our shareholders. We do
not anticipate any difficulty in obtaining the required
approvals and are prepared to move forward promptly at an
appropriate time to seek these approvals.
This letter does not create or constitute any legally binding
obligation by Validus regarding the proposed transaction, and,
other than any confidentiality agreement to be entered into with
Transatlantic, there will be no legally binding agreement
between us regarding the proposed transaction unless and until a
definitive merger agreement is executed by Transatlantic and
Validus.
We believe that time is of the essence, and we, our financial
advisors, Greenhill & Co., LLC and J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, and our legal advisor, Skadden, Arps, Slate,
Meagher & Flom LLP, are prepared to move forward
expeditiously with our proposal to pursue this transaction. We
believe that our proposal presents a compelling opportunity for
both companies and our respective shareholders, and we look
forward to receiving your response by July 19, 2011.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Enclosure
On July 13, 2011, Transatlantic issued a press release
announcing that it had received the Validus Proposal and that
the Transatlantic board of directors would carefully consider
and evaluate the Validus Proposal in due course and would inform
Transatlantic stockholders of its position. Transatlantic also
advised
57
stockholders to not take any action at the time and to await the
recommendation of the Transatlantic board of directors.
On July 14, 2011, the Transatlantic board of directors met
telephonically to discuss the Validus Proposal. Members of
Transatlantics management, as well as representatives of
Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs, Moelis and PWC were present at the
meeting. At the meeting, the Transatlantic board of directors
asked the representatives of Goldman Sachs to describe any
current or recent prior relationships with Validus. During the
meeting, representatives of Goldman Sachs disclosed that Goldman
Sachs has provided certain investment banking services to
Validus and its affiliates from time to time, for which Goldman
Sachs investment banking division has received
compensation, and that funds managed by affiliates of Goldman
Sachs currently own less than 7% of the non-voting shares of
Validus. Goldman Sachs, in accordance with its internal
policies, had confirmed that such services and interests did not
present a conflict of interest that would preclude Goldman Sachs
from representing the Transatlantic board of directors in
connection with its consideration of the Validus offer.
Representatives of Gibson Dunn then reviewed with the directors
the applicable legal standards in the context of considering the
Validus Proposal and the terms of the merger agreement between
Allied World and Transatlantic. Representatives of Gibson Dunn
also discussed the principal terms of the draft Validus merger
agreement and the material differences from the merger agreement
between Allied World and Transatlantic, including that the draft
Validus merger agreement provided for (i) a closing
condition that counsel to each of Transatlantic and Validus
provide certain tax opinions, (ii) a closing condition that
the Transatlantic Dividend be declared and paid and (iii) a
financing covenant that Transatlantic use its reasonable best
efforts to obtain financing to fund payment of the Transatlantic
Dividend. Members of management then discussed with the
directors certain operational and financial aspects of the
Validus Proposal. Representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis
then provided the directors with their preliminary analysis
regarding certain financial metrics with respect to the Validus
Proposal. The Transatlantic board of directors then discussed
the Validus Proposal and requested that its legal and financial
advisors continue to evaluate the Validus Proposal so that the
directors could be fully informed prior to making any
determinations with respect thereto.
On July 17, 2011, Validus delivered to the Transatlantic
board of directors certain supplemental materials describing,
among other things, its view as to the merits of the Validus
Proposal. Shortly thereafter, Validus issued a press release and
publicly disseminated its supplemental materials.
On July 18, 2011, the Transatlantic board of directors met
telephonically, along with members of Transatlantics
management and representatives of Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs,
Moelis, and Richards, Layton & Finger,
Transatlantics Delaware legal counsel. Representatives of
Gibson Dunn reviewed with the directors Transatlantics
obligations pursuant to the merger agreement between Allied
World and Transatlantic and also described the applicable legal
standards in connection with the matters being considered by the
board of directors at the meeting. Representatives of Goldman
Sachs and Moelis then reviewed with the directors certain
preliminary financial analyses of the terms of the Validus
Proposal as compared to the terms of the proposed transaction
with Allied World. Following a discussion, the Transatlantic
board of directors determined that the Validus Proposal did not
constitute a Superior Proposal under the terms of
the merger agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic. The
Transatlantic board of directors further determined that the
Validus Proposal was reasonably likely to lead to a Superior
Proposal and that the failure to enter into discussions
regarding the Validus Proposal would result in a breach of its
fiduciary duties under applicable law. As a result, the
Transatlantic board determined that Transatlantic should offer
to engage in discussions and exchange information with Validus,
subject to, in accordance with the merger agreement between
Allied World and Transatlantic, (i) providing Allied World
with three business days notice of Transatlantics
intent to furnish information to and enter into discussions with
Validus and (ii) obtaining from Validus an executed
confidentiality agreement containing terms that are
substantially similar, and not less favorable, to Transatlantic,
in the aggregate, than those contained in the confidentiality
agreement between Transatlantic and Allied World. The
Transatlantic board of directors also reaffirmed its
recommendation of, and its declaration of advisability with
respect to, the merger agreement between Allied World and
Transatlantic. Finally, representatives of Gibson Dunn and
Goldman Sachs made a presentation to the Transatlantic board of
directors regarding Transatlantics profile with respect to
unsolicited offers and a stockholder rights plan. The
Transatlantic board of directors then discussed with its
advisors the terms, timing and pros and cons of
58
adopting such a rights plan in light of the Validus Proposal.
Transatlantic issued a press release announcing its
determinations with respect to the Validus Proposal on
July 19, 2011.
On July 20, 2011, Transatlantic disseminated supplemental
materials setting forth certain information regarding the
Validus Proposal and the merger agreement between Allied World
and Transatlantic.
Also on July 20, 2011, Validus filed a preliminary proxy
statement on Schedule 14A soliciting proxies from
Transatlantic stockholders to vote against the adoption of the
merger agreement proposal, the adjournment proposal and the
golden parachute proposal.
On July 23, 2011, following the expiration of a three
business days notice period under the merger agreement,
Transatlantic delivered a draft of a confidentiality agreement
with terms (including a standstill) substantially similar, and
not less favorable, to Transatlantic, in the aggregate, than
those contained in the confidentiality agreement between
Transatlantic and Allied World, as required pursuant to the
merger agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic. Later
on July 23, 2011, in-house legal counsel to Transatlantic
and representatives of Gibson Dunn spoke via telephone to
in-house legal counsel to Validus and a representative of
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
(Skadden), outside legal counsel to Validus, to
discuss the draft of the confidentiality agreement delivered by
Transatlantic earlier that day. On this call, legal counsel to
Validus indicated that Validus would not execute a
confidentiality agreement with a standstill provision as
requested by Transatlantic pursuant to the terms of the merger
agreement. Later that same day, a representative from Skadden
delivered to Transatlantic and Gibson Dunn a markup of the draft
confidentiality agreement with, among other changes, the
standstill deleted. As required under the merger agreement
between Allied World and Transatlantic, a copy of such markup
was delivered to Allied World and Willkie Farr. On July 24,
2011, a representative of Gibson Dunn communicated to a
representative of Skadden and in-house counsel to Validus that
Transatlantic was continuing to review the markup of the
confidentiality agreement and expected to respond reasonably
soon.
Subsequently on July 25, 2011, prior to receiving a
response from Transatlantic or Gibson Dunn regarding the Validus
markup of the confidentiality agreement, Validus sent a letter
to the Transatlantic board of directors informing them that
Validus was commencing an exchange offer that morning for all of
the outstanding shares of common stock of Transatlantic pursuant
to which Transatlantic stockholders would receive 1.5564 Validus
voting common shares and $8.00 in cash for each share of
Transatlantic common stock they own (the Validus exchange
offer). The letter also indicated that Validus intended to
continue soliciting Transatlantic stockholders to vote against
the transaction with Allied World. Validus also issued a press
release containing the foregoing letter and announcing the
commencement of an exchange offer and filed a prospectus/offer
to exchange with the SEC.
Also on July 25, 2011, Transatlantic issued a press release
stating that, consistent with its fiduciary duties and in
consultation with its independent financial and legal advisors,
the Transatlantic board of directors would carefully review and
evaluate the Validus exchange offer and advised
Transatlantics stockholders to take no action pending the
review of the Validus exchange offer by Transatlantics
board of directors. The press release also announced that
Transatlantic intends to make the position of the Transatlantic
board of directors with respect to the Validus exchange offer
available to stockholders in a solicitation/recommendation
statement on
Schedule 14D-9,
to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the
press release, Transatlantic stated that its board of directors
reaffirmed its recommendation of, and declaration of
advisability with respect to, the merger agreement between
Allied World and Transatlantic.
Also on July 25, 2011, a representative of Willkie Farr
informed a representative of Gibson Dunn that (i) the
markup of the Validus confidentiality agreement provided by
Skadden did not conform to the provisions of the merger
agreement and (ii) Allied World would not waive any of the
provisions in the merger agreement with respect thereto and
reserved all of its rights in all respects should Transatlantic
proceed to accept the markup of the confidentiality agreement.
On July 26, 2011, the Transatlantic board of directors met
telephonically, along with members of Transatlantics
management and representatives of Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs,
and Moelis. Representatives of Gibson Dunn described the
applicable legal standards in connection with the matters being
considered by
59
the Transatlantic board of directors at the meeting and then
reviewed with the directors the principal terms of the Validus
exchange offer as set forth in the Validus prospectus/offer to
exchange. Representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis then
reviewed with the directors certain financial analyses with
respect to the Validus exchange offer as compared to the merger
agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic and also
reviewed certain financial metrics with respect to both Validus
and Allied World. Following a discussion, the Transatlantic
board of directors unanimously voted to recommend that
Transatlantic stockholders reject the Validus exchange offer and
reaffirmed its recommendation of, and declaration of
advisability with respect to, the merger agreement between
Allied World and Transatlantic. Thereafter, representatives of
Gibson Dunn discussed with the Transatlantic board of directors
the principal terms of a stockholder rights plan that
Transatlantic could consider adopting. The Transatlantic board
of directors then discussed with its advisors the terms, timing
and pros and cons of adopting the stockholder rights plan in
light of Validuss filings with the SEC as they relate to
the Validus Proposal, proxy solicitation and Validus exchange
offer. Representatives of Gibson Dunn then discussed with the
Transatlantic board of directors certain proposed amendments to
the Transatlantic bylaws related to the conduct of stockholder
meetings. The directors then discussed with representatives of
Gibson Dunn the investigation of potential claims against
Validus for violations of U.S. securities and other laws in
connection with the Validus exchange offer and proxy
solicitation. Following a discussion, the Transatlantic board
of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan, which has a one
year term and a 10% beneficial ownership threshold, to encourage
the fair and equal treatment of Transatlantic stockholders in
connection with any initiative to acquire effective control of
Transatlantic and to reduce the likelihood that any person,
including Validus, would gain control of Transatlantic by open
market accumulation or otherwise without paying a control
premium for all common stock. The Transatlantic board of
directors also approved certain amendments to the Transatlantic
bylaws relating to the conduct of stockholder meetings, which
would enable the Transatlantic board of directors to postpone,
adjourn or recess a stockholder meeting to give stockholders
sufficient time to consider new information released immediately
prior to a meeting. Finally, the Transatlantic board of
directors approved the commencement of litigation, as
appropriate, against Validus.
On July 28, 2011, Transatlantic filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission a
Schedule 14D-9
solicitation/recommendation statement recommending that the
Transatlantic stockholders reject the Validus exchange offer.
Also on July 28, 2011, Transatlantic issued a press release
relating to the determinations made at the July 26, 2011
meeting of the Transatlantic board of directors. Additionally,
on July 28, 2011, Transatlantic filed a lawsuit against
Validus in the United States District Court for the District of
Delaware, alleging that Validus had violated certain securities
laws by making materially false
and/or
misleading statements in the Validus exchange offer and proxy
solicitation materials filed with the SEC.
On July 31, 2011, the Transatlantic board of directors met
telephonically to discuss the progress of the merger with Allied
World, as well as recent events surrounding Validuss
exchange offer. A representative of Gibson Dunn discussed with
the directors certain legal matters relating to these events.
On August 2, 2011, Validus announced that it had obtained
amendments to its applicable credit facilities necessary for
satisfying a condition to the Validus exchange offer.
On August 3, 2011, Validus filed with the SEC a preliminary
proxy statement with respect to a special meeting of Validus
shareholders at which Validus will seek the approval of the
issuance of Validus voting common shares in connection with the
Validus exchange offer or other acquisition transaction
involving Transatlantic.
On August 4, 2011, at Transatlantics request, Messrs.
Orlich and Sapnar met with Messrs. Noonan and Consolino to
discuss Transatlantics request that Validus enter into a
mutual confidentiality agreement, on the terms required under
the merger agreement.
On August 4, 2011, Mr. Orlich received a telephone
call from Ajit Jain, head of Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance
Group (together with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its affiliates,
Berkshire) regarding a possible business combination
between Transatlantic and Berkshire. Subsequently, on
August 5, 2011, Berkshire delivered a letter (the
Berkshire Indication of Interest Letter) to
Transatlantic expressing an interest in
60
acquiring Transatlantic for $52.00 per share (the
Berkshire Proposal). The full text of the Berkshire
Indication of Interest Letter is set forth below:
August 5, 2011
Mr. Robert Orlich
President & CEO
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.
80 Pine Street
New York, NY 10005
Dear Bob:
As you can imagine, subsequent to our telephone conversation
yesterday, I have been watching the screen all morning. With
your stock trading at $45.83, I have to believe that you will
find our offer to buy all of Transatlantic shares outstanding at
$52.00 per share to be an attractive offer. As such, I am now
writing to formally inform you of National Indemnitys
commitment to do so at $52.00 per share under customary terms
for a stock purchase agreement of a publicly traded company to
be agreed (but not subject to any due diligence review or
financing condition of any nature). This commitment is subject
to:
|
|
|
|
|
A formal response from you no later than the close of
business, Monday, August 8, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Should you decide to accept this offer, your agreement that
should the deal not close for any reasons that are under your
control by December 31, 2011, a
break-up fee
of $75.0 million would be paid to us.
|
|
|
|
Your commitment that until the deal closes, you will continue
to manage the affairs of the company in a manner that is
consistent with how you have managed it historically.
|
I have deliberately tried to be brief and to the point. I
will be happy to discuss any details that you would like at your
convenience. I can be reached at [number withheld] (work),
[number withheld] (cell) or [number withheld] (home).
Regards,
/s/ Ajit Jain
Ajit Jain
AJ/bw
On August 5, 2011, at Skaddens request,
representatives of Gibson Dunn met with representatives of
Skadden to discuss the draft confidentiality agreement provided
by Transatlantic to Validus and Skadden on July 23, 2011.
Also on August 5, 2011, Allied World filed Amendment
No. 1 to the joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC.
On August 7, 2011, Transatlantic issued a press release
announcing that it had received the Berkshire Indication of
Interest Letter and that the Transatlantic board of directors
would carefully consider and evaluate the Berkshire Proposal and
would inform Transatlantics stockholders of its position.
Transatlantic also advised its stockholders not to take any
action at that time and to await the recommendation of the
Transatlantic board of directors. The Transatlantic board of
directors also reaffirmed its recommendation of, and its
declaration of advisability with respect to, the merger
agreement.
On the morning of August 8, 2011, the Transatlantic board
of directors met telephonically to discuss the Berkshire
Proposal and other recent developments. Members of
Transatlantics management, as well as representatives of
Gibson Dunn, Goldman Sachs, Moelis and Richards,
Layton & Finger were present at the meeting. At the
meeting, the Transatlantic board of directors asked the
representatives of Goldman Sachs and Moelis to describe any
current or recent prior relationships with Berkshire.
Representatives of Goldman Sachs disclosed that Goldman Sachs
had provided certain investment banking services to Berkshire
and its affiliates from time to time for which the investment
banking division of Goldman Sachs had received and may receive
compensation. Representatives of Goldman Sachs also disclosed
that on October 1, 2008, affiliates of
61
Berkshire purchased from The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
50,000 shares of 10% Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
Series G (the Preferred Stock) of The Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. (aggregate liquidation preference
$5,000,000,000) and warrants to purchase 43,578,260 shares
of common stock of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. at an exercise
price of $115 per share. On April 18, 2011, The Goldman
Sachs Group, Inc. redeemed in full the Preferred Stock held by
Berkshire and certain of its subsidiaries. Goldman Sachs, in
accordance with its internal policies, had confirmed that it
believed such services and interests did not present a conflict
of interest that would preclude Goldman Sachs from representing
the Transatlantic board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the Berkshire Proposal. Moelis confirmed to the
Transatlantic board of directors that Moelis is not currently
engaged, and has not in the prior two years been engaged, to
provide services to Berkshire. Representatives of Gibson Dunn
and Richards, Layton & Finger reviewed with the
directors the applicable legal standards in the context of
considering the Berkshire Proposal. Representatives of Goldman
Sachs and Moelis then provided the directors with their
preliminary analysis regarding certain financial metrics with
respect to the Berkshire Proposal and certain other matters.
After extensive discussion, the Transatlantic board of directors
then decided to adjourn the meeting in order to consider further
the issues discussed.
Later on August 8, 2011, the Transatlantic board of
directors reconvened telephonically. Members of
Transatlantics management, as well as representatives of
Gibson Dunn and Richards, Layton & Finger were present
at the meeting. Following a discussion, the Transatlantic board
of directors determined that the Berkshire Proposal did not
constitute a Superior Proposal under the terms of
the merger agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic. The
Transatlantic board of directors further determined that the
Berkshire Proposal was reasonably likely to lead to a
Superior Proposal and that the failure to enter into
discussions regarding the Berkshire Proposal would result in a
breach of its fiduciary duties under applicable law. As a
result, the Transatlantic board of directors determined that
Transatlantic should offer to engage in discussions and exchange
information with Berkshire, subject to, and in accordance with
the merger agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic,
(i) providing Allied World with three business days
notice of Transatlantics intent to furnish information to
and enter into discussions with Berkshire and
(ii) obtaining from Berkshire an executed confidentiality
agreement containing terms that are substantially similar, and
no less favorable, to Transatlantic, in the aggregate, than
those contained in the confidentiality agreement between
Transatlantic and Allied World. The Transatlantic board of
directors also reaffirmed its recommendation of, and its
declaration of advisability with respect to, the merger
agreement between Allied World and Transatlantic. Transatlantic
issued a press release announcing the Transatlantic board of
directors determinations after the close of the market on
August 8, 2011. Also on August 8, 2011, Transatlantic
filed with the SEC an amended
Schedule 14D-9
solicitation/recommendation statement.
On August 10, 2011, Allied World filed Amendment No. 2
to the joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC.
On August 10, 2011, Validus delivered a letter to the
Transatlantic board of directors stating that it was providing a
one-way confidentiality agreement to Transatlantic that did not
contain a standstill provision and that would permit
Transatlantic to review non-public information regarding
Validus. Also on August 10, 2011, Validus filed a complaint
against Transatlantic, the members of the Transatlantic board of
directors, Allied World and Merger Sub in the Delaware Court of
Chancery alleging, among other things, that the members of the
Transatlantic board of directors breached their fiduciary duties
in connection with the Validus acquisition proposal and that
Allied World and Merger Sub aided and abetted these alleged
breaches.
On the evening of August 11 and on August 12, 2011,
representatives of Gibson Dunn and in-house counsel to Berkshire
negotiated the terms of a proposed confidentiality agreement
(including a standstill provision) between Transatlantic and
Berkshire (the Berkshire Confidentiality Agreement).
On August 12, 2011, the Transatlantic board of directors
met telephonically, along with members of Transatlantics
management and representatives of Gibson Dunn, to review and
consider the Berkshire Confidentiality Agreement and the one-way
confidentiality agreement provided by Validus. Representatives
of Gibson Dunn discussed with the directors the terms of the
one-way confidentiality agreement provided by Validus and the
terms of the Berkshire Confidentiality Agreement, in each case
in light of the applicable legal standards and
Transatlantics obligations under the merger agreement with
Allied World. At this meeting, the
62
Transatlantic board of directors considered that entering into
the one-way confidentiality agreement provided by Validus could
expose Transatlantic to the risk of liability for breach of the
merger agreement with Allied World because it did not contain
terms that were substantially similar to, and not less favorable
to Transatlantic, in the aggregate, than those contained in the
confidentiality agreement between Transatlantic and Allied World
and was not otherwise permissible under such merger agreement,
and therefore determined to take no action with respect to the
one-way confidentiality agreement. After further discussion at
the meeting, the board of directors determined in good faith
that the Berkshire Confidentiality Agreement contains terms that
were substantially similar to, and not less favorable to
Transatlantic, in the aggregate, than those contained in the
confidentiality agreement between Transatlantic and Allied
World. The Transatlantic board of directors therefore authorized
management to enter into the Berkshire Confidentiality
Agreement. Subsequent to the Transatlantic board of
directors determination, Transatlantic and Berkshire
entered into the Berkshire Confidentiality Agreement. Also on
August 12, 2011, Transatlantic issued a press release
announcing that it had entered into the Berkshire
Confidentiality Agreement and commenced discussions with
Berkshire.
On August 15, 2011, Allied World filed Amendment No. 3
to the joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC.
Commencing on August 12, 2011 and continuing through the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, representatives
of Transatlantic have engaged in discussions, and exchanged
information, with representatives of Berkshire.
Allied
Worlds Reasons for the Merger; Recommendations of the
Allied World Board of Directors
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement and
recommend approval of both the issuance of Allied World shares
to Transatlantic stockholders pursuant to the merger and the
adoption of Allied Worlds amended Articles of Association,
the Allied World board of directors consulted with Allied
Worlds management, as well as with Allied Worlds
legal and financial advisors, and also considered a number of
factors that the Allied World board of directors viewed as
supporting its decisions, including, but not limited to, the
following:
the potential to create a leading specialty focused
insurance and reinsurance company with a global reach;
the potential for revenue growth and synergies to
generate additional free cash flow available for investment and
expansion opportunities;
that although no assurance can be given that any
level of operating and structural synergies would be achieved
following the completion of the merger, management estimated
that the combination of Allied World and Transatlantic would
create $80 million of annual gross savings with the
combined company realizing approximately 60% of those savings on
an annualized run-rate (after-tax) basis in the first year
following the closing of the merger in the principal areas of
reduced public company costs, consolidated corporate governance,
reduced labor, shared platform costs and structural flexibility
in allocation of capital;
that the greater scale, scope and reach of the
combined company, including its enhanced business mix diversity
and expanded European and Asian presence, should make it a more
attractive partner for potential customers with both national
and international businesses and help to enhance brand
recognition;
the fact that the merger will create a company with
a greater size and economies of scale, enabling it to have
incremental excess capital, greater capital flexibility, ability
to respond to competitive pressures, greater diversification
opportunities and an increased opportunity to compete profitably;
that although no assurance can be given on any level
of reaction by any independent rating agency, the pro forma
independent rating agency capital adequacy models of the
combined company, generate increased quantitative capital
adequacy scores and, potentially improved debt and financial
strength ratings for the combined company;
|
|
|
|
|
the combination of the businesses through the merger will result
in greater product offerings and improved market positions;
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
the combination of the strong and experienced management teams
from Allied World and Transatlantic will add significant value
to the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the addition of a global reinsurance platform will provide
Allied World with access to a profitable business segment that
will allow Allied World to better serve its customers;
|
|
|
|
the significant role in the combined company to be played by
members of management and the current board of directors of
Allied World, including Scott A. Carmilani, Allied Worlds
current Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (who
will continue as the combined companys President and Chief
Executive Officer), and other Allied World employees, which the
Allied World board of directors believed would enhance the
prospects of the combined company after completion of the merger
for the benefit of Allied World shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
the financial analyses presented by Deutsche Bank to the Allied
World board of directors described below under
Opinion of Allied Worlds Financial
Advisor, and the opinion of Deutsche Bank rendered to the
Allied World board of directors that, as of the date such merger
agreement was signed, based upon and subject to the factors and
assumptions set forth in its written opinion. See
Opinion of Allied Worlds Financial
Advisor.
|
In addition to considering the factors described above, the
Allied World board of directors also considered the following
factors:
|
|
|
|
|
its knowledge of Allied Worlds business, operations,
financial condition, earnings and prospects and of
Transatlantics business, operations, financial condition,
earnings and prospects, taking into account the results of
Allied Worlds due diligence review of Transatlantic;
|
|
|
|
the integration risks, resulting from similar cultures focused
on underwriting discipline and risk management, the overlap in
use of information systems, limited business overlap and the
proven integration track record of Allied World;
|
|
|
|
the anticipated market capitalization, liquidity and capital
structure of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
the projected financial results of Allied World as a standalone
company and the ability of Allied World to achieve strategic
goals previously established by the Allied World board of
directors;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the exchange ratio of 0.88 Allied World shares for
each share of Transatlantic common stock is fixed, which the
Allied World board of directors believed was consistent with
market practice for mergers of this type and with the strategic
purpose of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and the
likelihood of completing the merger on the anticipated schedule.
|
The Allied World board of directors weighed the foregoing
against a number of potentially negative factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of Allied Worlds business
during the period between execution of the merger agreement and
the consummation of the merger, including the inability to
repurchase shares;
|
|
|
|
the potential effect of the merger on Allied Worlds
overall business, including its relationships with customers,
employees, suppliers and regulators;
|
|
|
|
the challenges inherent in combining the businesses, operations
and workforces of two companies, including the potential for
(i) unforeseen difficulties in integrating operations and
systems, (ii) the possible distraction of management
attention for an extended period of time and
(iii) difficulties in assimilating employees;
|
|
|
|
the substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the
merger, including the costs of integrating the businesses of
Allied World and Transatlantic and the transaction expenses
arising from the merger;
|
|
|
|
the risk that governmental entities may oppose or refuse to
approve the merger or impose conditions on Allied World
and/or
Transatlantic prior to approving the merger that may adversely
impact the ability
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
of the combined company to realize synergies that are projected
to occur in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that, despite the combined efforts of Allied World and
Transatlantic prior to the consummation of the merger, the
combined company may lose key personnel;
|
|
|
|
the possibility of merger arbitrage activity as a result of the
stock price premium being paid;
|
|
|
|
the risk that Transatlantics loss reserves may prove to be
inadequate;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the combined company, with increased policies and
geographic coverage, will have a level of volatility higher than
Allied Worlds after the merger as a result of additional
catastrophe risk exposure;
|
|
|
|
the risk of not capturing all of the anticipated operational and
structural synergies between Allied World and Transatlantic and
the risk that other anticipated benefits may not be
realized; and
|
|
|
|
the risks of the type and nature described under the heading
Risk Factors, and the matters described under the
heading Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements.
|
This discussion of the information and factors considered by the
Allied World board of directors in reaching its conclusions and
recommendation includes the material factors considered by the
board, but is not intended to be exhaustive. In view of the wide
variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation
of the merger and the complexity of these matters, the Allied
World board of directors did not find it practicable, and did
not attempt, to quantify, rank or assign any relative or
specific weights to the various factors that it considered in
reaching its determination to approve the merger agreement and
to recommend that Allied World shareholders vote in favor of the
share capital increase proposals, the NYSE share issuance
proposal, the name change proposal, the election of directors
proposal, the capital reduction proposal and the Stock Incentive
Plan proposal. The Allied World board of directors conducted an
overall analysis of the factors described above, including
through discussions with, and questioning of, Allied
Worlds management and outside legal and financial advisors
regarding certain of the matters described above. In considering
the factors described above, individual members of the Allied
World board of directors may have given differing weights to
different factors.
The Allied World board of directors unanimously approved the
merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are
advisable and in the best interests of Allied World. The Allied
World board of directors unanimously recommends that Allied
World shareholders vote FOR the proposals set forth
herein.
Opinion
of Allied Worlds Financial Advisor
Opinion
of Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
Allied World engaged Deutsche Bank pursuant to a letter
agreement dated June 2, 2011, to act as its financial
advisor in connection with the merger. At the meeting of the
Allied World board of directors on June 12, 2011, Deutsche
Bank rendered an oral and written opinion, to the Allied World
board of directors to the effect that, based upon and subject to
the assumptions, limitations, qualifications and conditions set
forth in the opinion, as of the date of such opinion, the
exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Allied World.
The full text of the written opinion of Deutsche Bank, dated
June 12, 2011, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, matters considered, and limitations,
qualifications and conditions of the review undertaken by
Deutsche Bank in connection with the opinion, is attached as
Annex B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is
incorporated herein by reference. Allied World shareholders are
urged to read Deutsche Banks opinion carefully and in its
entirety. Deutsche Bank expressed no opinion as to the merits of
the underlying decision by Allied World to engage in the merger
or the relative merits of the merger as compared to any
alternative transactions or business strategies, nor did
65
Deutsche Bank express an opinion as to how any holder of
Allied World shares should vote with respect to the merger.
In connection with Deutsche Banks role as financial
advisor to Allied World, and in arriving at its opinion,
Deutsche Bank reviewed certain publicly available financial and
other information concerning Allied World and Transatlantic,
including certain statutory statements filed by the insurance
subsidiaries of both Allied World and Transatlantic. Deutsche
Bank also reviewed certain internal analyses, financial
forecasts and other information relating to Allied World and
Transatlantic prepared by management of Allied World and
Transatlantic, respectively, and certain analyses relating to
Transatlantic prepared by management of Allied World. Deutsche
Bank also reviewed certain reports regarding
Transatlantics reserves for losses and loss adjustment
expenses prepared for Allied World by third party actuaries.
Deutsche Bank also held discussions with certain senior officers
and other representatives and advisors of Allied World and
Transatlantic regarding the businesses and prospects of Allied
World, Transatlantic and the combined company, including certain
cost savings and operating synergies jointly projected by the
managements of Allied World and Transatlantic to result from the
merger. In addition, Deutsche Bank:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for both the
Allied World shares and the Transatlantic common stock;
|
|
|
|
to the extent publicly available, compared certain financial and
stock market information for Allied World and Transatlantic with
similar information for certain other companies it considered
relevant whose securities are publicly traded;
|
|
|
|
to the extent publicly available, reviewed the financial terms
of certain recent business combinations which it deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the merger agreement, dated June 10,
2011; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other studies and analyses and considered such
other factors as it deemed appropriate.
|
Deutsche Bank did not assume responsibility for independent
verification of, and did not independently verify, any
information, whether publicly available or furnished to it,
concerning Allied World or Transatlantic, including, without
limitation, any financial information considered in connection
with the rendering of its opinion. Accordingly, for purposes of
its opinion, Deutsche Bank, with the permission of the Allied
World board of directors, assumed and relied upon the accuracy
and completeness of all such information. Deutsche Bank did not
conduct a physical inspection of any of the properties or
assets, and did not prepare or obtain any independent evaluation
or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (including,
without limitation, any contingent, derivative or
off-balance-sheet assets and liabilities), of Allied World or
Transatlantic or any of their respective subsidiaries, nor did
Deutsche Bank evaluate the solvency or fair value of Allied
World or Transatlantic under any state or federal law relating
to bankruptcy, insolvency or similar matters. With respect to
the financial forecasts, including, without limitation, the
analyses and forecasts of the amount and timing of certain cost
savings, operating efficiencies, revenue effects, financial
synergies and other strategic benefits projected by Allied World
to be achieved as a result of the merger (collectively, the
Synergies), made available to Deutsche Bank and used
in its analyses, Deutsche Bank assumed, with the permission of
the Allied World board of directors, that they had been
reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently
available estimates and judgments of the managements of Allied
World and Transatlantic, as applicable, as to the matters
covered thereby. In rendering its opinion, Deutsche Bank
expressed no view as to the reasonableness of such forecasts and
projections, including, without limitation, the Synergies, or
the assumptions on which they were based. Deutsche Banks
opinion was necessarily based upon economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to it as of, the date of the opinion. Deutsche Bank expressly
disclaimed any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of
any change in any fact or matter affecting its opinion of which
it becomes aware after the date of its opinion.
For purposes of rendering its opinion, Deutsche Bank assumed,
with the permission of the Allied World board of directors,
that, in all respects material to its analysis, the merger would
be consummated in accordance with its terms, without any
material waiver, modification or amendment of any term,
condition or agreement. Deutsche Bank also assumed that all
material governmental, regulatory, contractual or other
66
approvals and consents required in connection with the
consummation of the merger would be obtained and that in
connection with obtaining any necessary governmental,
regulatory, contractual or other approvals and consents, no
material restrictions, terms or conditions would be imposed.
Deutsche Bank is not a legal, regulatory, tax or accounting
expert and Deutsche Bank relied on the assessments made by
Allied World and its advisors with respect to such issues. In
particular, Deutsche Bank assumed, with the permission of the
Allied World board of directors, that Transatlantic will be the
accounting acquirer in the merger. Deutsche Bank is also not an
expert in the evaluation of reserves for losses and loss
adjustment expenses and was not requested to, and did not, make
any actuarial determinations or evaluations or attempt to
evaluate actuarial assumptions. Deutsche Bank made no analysis
of, and did not express any view with respect to, the adequacy
of Allied Worlds or Transatlantics loss and loss
adjustment expense reserves. Representatives of Allied World
informed Deutsche Bank, and Deutsche Bank has further assumed,
that the final terms of the merger agreement would not differ
materially from the terms set forth in the drafts it reviewed.
The Deutsche Bank opinion was approved and authorized for
issuance by a fairness opinion review committee and was
addressed to, and for the use and benefit of, the Allied World
board of directors in connection with and for the purposes of
its evaluation of the merger and is not a recommendation to the
shareholders of Allied World as to how they should vote with
respect to the merger, the amendment of Allied Worlds
Articles or the issuance of Allied World shares in the merger,
in each case as contemplated by the merger agreement. The
Deutsche Bank opinion was limited to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the exchange ratio to Allied World
and did not address any other terms of the merger or the merger
agreement, is subject to the assumptions, limitations,
qualifications and other conditions contained therein and is
necessarily based on the economic, market and other conditions,
and information made available to Deutsche Bank, as of the date
of the opinion. Deutsche Bank was not asked to, and its opinion
did not, address the fairness of the merger, or any
consideration received in connection therewith, to the holders
of any other class of securities, creditors or other
constituencies of Allied World, nor did it address the fairness
of the contemplated benefits of the merger. Deutsche Bank did
not express any view or opinion as to the underlying decision by
Allied World to engage in the merger or the relative merits of
the merger as compared to any alternative transactions or
business strategies. In addition, Deutsche Bank did not express
any view or opinion as to the fairness, financial or otherwise,
of the amount or nature of any compensation payable to or to be
received by any of the officers, directors, or employees of any
parties to the merger, or any class of such persons, relative to
the exchange ratio. The Deutsche Bank opinion did not in any
manner address the prices at which the Allied World shares or
any other securities would trade following the announcement or
consummation of the merger.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
contained in the presentation that was made by Deutsche Bank to
the Allied World board of directors on June 12, 2011 and
that were used by Deutsche Bank in connection with rendering its
opinion described above. The following summary, however, does
not purport to be a complete description of the financial
analyses performed by Deutsche Bank, nor does the order in which
the analyses are described represent the relative importance or
weight given to the analyses by Deutsche Bank. Some of the
summaries of the financial analyses include information
presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together
with the full text of each summary and are alone not a complete
description of Deutsche Banks financial analyses. Except
as otherwise noted, the following quantitative information, to
the extent that it is based on market data, is based on market
data as it existed on or before June 10, 2011, and is not
necessarily indicative of current market conditions.
67
Historical
Multiples Trends
Deutsche Bank reviewed and analyzed the average multiples of the
price per share to book value per share for each of Allied World
and Transatlantic over historical time periods prior to
June 10, 2011. The results of this analysis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Multiples of Price
|
|
|
to Book Value
|
|
|
Allied World
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
Current (as of June 10, 2011)
|
|
|
0.78
|
x
|
|
|
0.69
|
x
|
10-day
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
1-month
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
3-month
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
6-month
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
1-year
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
2-year
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
5-year
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
Historical
Exchange Ratio Analysis
Deutsche Bank calculated, reviewed and analyzed the average
historical exchange ratios implied by dividing the daily closing
prices of Transatlantics common stock over Allied
Worlds shares, over historical periods prior to
June 10, 2011. The results of this analysis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Exchange Ratios
|
|
Current (as of June 10, 2011)
|
|
|
0.76
|
x
|
10-day
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
1-month
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
3-month
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
6-month
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
1-year
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
2-year
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
In addition, Deutsche Bank reviewed the range of exchange ratios
over the 52-week period prior to June 10, 2011. Deutsche
Bank found that the exchange ratio ranged from 0.74x to 1.07x
over that period. Deutsche Bank noted that the exchange ratio of
0.88x fell within that range.
Trading
Range Analysis
Deutsche Bank reviewed the 52-week trading range of Allied World
shares and Transatlantics common stock measured as of
June 10, 2011. Deutsche Bank found that the price per share
of Allied Worlds shares over that period ranged from $45
to $65 and that Transatlantics common stock over that
period ranged from $44 to $54. Based on the foregoing, Deutsche
Bank calculated an implied exchange ratio range of 0.68 to 1.21x
shares of Allied World to be issued in exchange for one share of
Transatlantic common stock. The low exchange ratio represents
the ratio of the lowest Transatlantic value per share and the
highest Allied World value per share over the 52-week period
considered. The high exchange ratio represents the ratio of the
highest Transatlantic value per share and the lowest Allied
World value per share over the 52-week period considered.
Deutsche Bank noted that the exchange ratio of 0.88x fell within
that range.
Contribution
Analysis
Based upon the exchange ratio of 0.88 Allied World shares per
share of Transatlantic common stock to be effected in the merger
and the closing price of $58.07 per Allied World share on
June 10, 2011, Deutsche Bank calculated that the pro forma
fully diluted ownership of Allied World and Transatlantic
shareholders in the combined company was approximately 42% and
58%, respectively. Deutsche Bank then compared such pro forma
fully diluted ownership percentages of Allied World and
Transatlantic shareholders to Allied Worlds and
Transatlantics respective relative contributions to the
combined company based upon current fully
68
diluted market capitalization for each company on a stand-alone
basis as of June 10, 2011, total assets, shareholders
equity and shareholders tangible equity for each company
on a stand-alone basis as of March 31, 2011, as well as
each companys relative contribution to actual after-tax
operating income for 2010 and estimated after-tax operating
income for 2011, 2011 (normalized for a catastrophe loss ratio
of 5%), 2012 and 2013 based upon estimates prepared by the
management of Allied World and Transatlantic for their
respective companies. The results of these calculations are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative Contribution
|
|
|
Allied World
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
Financial metrics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current fully diluted market capitalization (as of 6/10/11)
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
Total assets (as of 3/31/2011)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Shareholders equity (as of 3/31/2011)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Shareholders tangible equity (as of 3/31/2011)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
2010 Actual after-tax operating income
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
2011 Estimated after-tax operating income
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
2011 Estimated after-tax operating income normalized
cat losses
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
2012 Estimated after-tax operating income
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
2013 Estimated after-tax operating income
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
In addition to noting the relative pro forma ownership
percentages for holders of Allied World shares and Transatlantic
common stock described above, Deutsche Bank noted that the board
of directors of the combined company would consist of
11 directors, five appointed by Allied World and six
appointed by Transatlantic and that such relative ownership
amounts and board composition are consistent with precedent
mergers of equals.
Implied
Exchange Ratio Analysis
Deutsche Bank assessed the fairness of the exchange ratio by
deriving values for each of Allied World and Transatlantic using
several valuation methodologies, including an analysis of
comparable companies using valuation multiples from selected
publicly-traded companies, and dividend discount analysis, each
of which is described in more detail in the summaries set forth
below. Each of these methodologies was used to generate implied
per share valuation ranges on a fully-diluted common share
basis. The implied per share valuation ranges were used to
assess the exchange ratio implied by each methodology.
The following table outlines the ranges of approximate implied
values per Allied World share and shares of Transatlantic common
stock and the implied exchange ratios derived using each of
these methodologies. With respect to any given range of exchange
ratios, the low exchange ratio represents the ratio of the
lowest Transatlantic value per share and the highest Allied
World value per share, and the high exchange ratio represents
the ratio of the highest Transatlantic value per share and the
lowest Allied World value per share. The table should be read
together with the more detailed summary of each of the valuation
analyses set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Implied
|
|
|
Implied
|
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
|
|
Allied World
|
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Multiple Valuation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price/3/31/2011 Book Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
56-$71
|
|
|
$
|
45-$64
|
|
|
|
0.63x-1.15
|
x
|
Price/3/31/2011 Tangible Book Value Per Share
|
|
|
53-66
|
|
|
|
45-67
|
|
|
|
0.67-1.26
|
|
Price/2012 Estimated After-Tax Operating Earnings
|
|
|
61-76
|
|
|
|
43-71
|
|
|
|
0.56-1.17
|
|
Dividend Discount Analysis (Price/Book Value)
|
|
|
70-86
|
|
|
|
57-76
|
|
|
|
0.67-1.10
|
|
Dividend Discount Analysis (Price/Earnings)
|
|
|
68-85
|
|
|
|
56-70
|
|
|
|
0.66-1.03
|
|
Deutsche Bank noted that the exchange ratio of 0.88x fell within
each of the above implied exchange ratio ranges.
69
Comparable
Companies Analysis Allied World
Deutsche Bank reviewed and compared certain financial
information and commonly used valuation measurements for Allied
World to corresponding financial information and measurements
for the following selected companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Markel Corporation
|
|
|
|
The Navigators Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
RLI Corp.
|
|
|
|
W.R. Berkley Corporation
|
Although none of the selected companies is either identical or
directly comparable to Allied World, the companies included were
chosen because they are publicly traded companies with
operations that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered
similar to certain operations of Allied World. Accordingly, the
analysis of publicly traded comparable companies was not simply
mathematical. Rather, it involved complex considerations and
qualitative judgments, reflected in Deutsche Banks
opinion, concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of the selected companies and other factors that
could affect the public trading value of such companies.
With respect to each of the selected companies and Allied World,
Deutsche Bank calculated the following trading multiples:
|
|
|
|
|
the multiple of price to book value per share, which we refer to
as P/B;
|
|
|
|
the multiple of price to tangible book value per share, which we
refer to as P/B Tangible; and
|
|
|
|
the multiple of price to estimated operating earnings per share,
which we refer to as P/E, for 2012.
|
Deutsche Bank did not use the multiple of price to estimated
operating earnings per share for 2011 because it believed
extraordinary catastrophe losses in the first quarter of 2011
(including Japan, New Zealand and Australia losses) resulted in
estimated operating earnings for 2011 being non-representative
of potential future financial performance with disproportionate
impact on each comparable company.
The trading multiples of Allied World and the selected companies
were calculated using the closing prices of the Allied World
shares and the common stock of the selected companies on
June 10, 2011 and were based upon the most recent publicly
available information, Allied Worlds managements
estimates and
70
analysts consensus earnings estimates for 2012 provided by
CapitalIQ. The results of these analyses are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/B
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
|
P/B
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
P/E
|
|
|
Allied World
|
|
|
0.78
|
x
|
|
|
0.88
|
x
|
|
|
7.6
|
x
|
Selected Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Markel Corporation
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
|
The Navigators Group, Inc.
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
RLI Corp.
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
W.R. Berkley Corporation
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
Based in part on the trading multiples described above, Deutsche
Bank selected certain reference ranges of multiples and
calculated corresponding ranges of implied equity values per
Allied World share as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank applied multiples of price to book value per share
ranging from 0.75x to 0.95x to the book value per Allied World
share as of March 31, 2011;
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank applied multiples of price to tangible book value
per share ranging from 0.80x to 1.00x to the tangible book value
per Allied World share as of March 31, 2011; and
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank applied multiples of price to estimated after-tax
operating earnings ranging from 8.0x to 10.0x to the estimated
after-tax operating earnings of Allied World for 2012 based on
the Allied World estimates.
|
The ranges of approximate implied equity values per Allied World
share resulting from the foregoing calculations, which are the
same as the ranges of implied equity values per share used in
the Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis discussed above, are
presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Implied
|
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Price/Book Value Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/11 Book Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
57 - $71
|
|
3/31/11 Tangible Book Value Per Share
|
|
|
53 - 66
|
|
Price/2012 Estimated After-Tax Operating Earnings
|
|
|
61 - 76
|
|
Comparable
Companies Analysis Transatlantic
Deutsche Bank reviewed and compared certain financial
information and commonly used valuation measurements for
Transatlantic to corresponding financial information and
measurements for the following selected companies.
|
|
|
|
|
ACE Limited
|
|
|
|
Everest Re Group, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Münchener Rückversicherungs AG (Munich Re)
|
|
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.
|
|
|
|
RenaissanceRe Ltd.
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
SCOR SE
|
|
|
|
Swiss Reinsurance Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
XL Capital plc
|
Although none of the selected companies is either identical or
directly comparable to Transatlantic, the companies included
were chosen because they are publicly traded companies with
operations that, for purposes of analysis, may be considered
similar to certain operations of Transatlantic. Accordingly, the
analysis of publicly traded comparable companies was not simply
mathematical. Rather, it involved complex considerations and
qualitative judgments, reflected in Deutsche Banks
opinion, concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of the selected companies and other factors that
could affect the public trading value of such companies.
With respect to each of the selected companies and
Transatlantic, Deutsche Bank calculated the following trading
multiples:
|
|
|
|
|
the multiple of price to book value per share, which we refer to
as P/B;
|
|
|
|
the multiple of price to tangible book value per share, which we
refer to as P/B Tangible; and
|
|
|
|
the multiple of price to estimated operating earnings per share,
which we refer to as P/E, for 2012.
|
Deutsche Bank did not use the multiple of price to estimated
operating earnings per share for 2011 because it believed
extraordinary catastrophe losses in the first quarter of 2011
(including Japan, New Zealand and Australia losses) resulted in
estimated operating earnings for 2011 being non-representative
of potential future financial performance with disproportionate
impact on each comparable company.
The trading multiples of Transatlantic and the selected
companies were calculated using the closing prices of the
Transatlantic common stock and the common stock of the selected
companies on June 10, 2011 and were based upon the most
recent publicly available information, Transatlantics
management estimates and analysts consensus earnings
estimates for 2012 provided by CapitalIQ. The results of these
analyses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P/B
|
|
|
2012E
|
|
|
|
P/B
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
|
P/E
|
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
0.69
|
x
|
|
|
0.69
|
x
|
|
|
6.2
|
x
|
Selected Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACE Limited
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
Everest Re Group, Ltd.
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Münchener Rückversicherungs AG (Munich Re)
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
RenaissanceRe Ltd.
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
SCOR SE
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Swiss Reinsurance Co. Ltd.
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
XL Capital plc
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
Based in part on the trading multiples described above, Deutsche
Bank selected certain reference ranges of multiples and
calculated corresponding ranges of implied equity values per
share of Transatlantic common stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank applied multiples of price to book value per share
ranging from 0.70x to 1.00x to the book value per share of
Transatlantic common stock as of March 31, 2011;
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank applied multiples of price to tangible book value
per share ranging from 0.70x to 1.05x to the tangible book value
per share of Transatlantic common stock as of March 31,
2011; and
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank applied multiples of price to estimated after-tax
operating earnings ranging from 6.0x to 10.0x to the estimated
after-tax operating earnings of Transatlantic for 2012 based on
the Transatlantic estimates.
|
The ranges of approximate implied equity values per share of
Transatlantic common stock resulting from the foregoing
calculations, which are the same as the ranges of implied equity
values per share used in the Implied Exchange Ratio Analysis
discussed above, are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Implied
|
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Price/Book Value Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
3/31/11 Book Value Per Share
|
|
$
|
45 - $64
|
|
3/31/11 Tangible Book Value Per Share
|
|
|
45 - 67
|
|
Price/2012 Estimated After-Tax Operating Earnings
|
|
|
43 - 71
|
|
Dividend
Discount Analysis Allied World
Based on the Allied World estimates, Deutsche Bank performed a
dividend discount analysis to determine a range of implied
present values per Allied World share, assuming Allied World
continued to operate as a standalone company. The values were
determined by adding the present value of the estimated free
cash flow per share for the nine months ended December 31,
2011 and for the years 2012 through 2015 and the present value
of the estimated terminal value per Allied World share as of the
end of 2015. Deutsche Bank calculated a range of present equity
values for Allied World as the sum of (1) the present value
of the estimated cash flow per share for the nine months ended
December 31, 2011 and for the years 2012 through 2015 using
discount rates ranging from 8.5% to 10.5%, which were chosen by
Deutsche Bank based upon an analysis of the cost of equity of
Allied World, and (2) the present value of illustrative
terminal value per share derived by applying a range of price to
book value multiples and price to earnings multiples to Allied
Worlds estimated shareholders equity and net income
and applying discount rates ranging from 8.5% to 10.5% to such
terminal values. For the terminal value based on price to book
value multiples, Deutsche Bank applied multiples ranging from
0.90x to 1.10x to Allied Worlds estimated
shareholders equity for 2015. Based on the above analysis,
Deutsche Bank determined a range of present values per Allied
World share of approximately $70 to $86. For the terminal value
based on price to earnings multiples, Deutsche Bank applied
multiples ranging from 8.0x to 10.0x to Allied Worlds
estimated net income for 2015. Based on the above analysis,
Deutsche Bank determined a range of present values per Allied
World share of approximately $68 to $85. Deutsche Bank selected
the terminal value multiples used in this analysis based upon
the current and historical trading values and multiples of
Allied World and the selected companies discussed in the
Comparable Companies Analysis above.
Dividend
Discount Analysis Transatlantic
Based on the Transatlantic estimates, Deutsche Bank performed a
dividend discount analysis to determine a range of implied
present values per share of Transatlantic common stock, assuming
Transatlantic continued to operate as a standalone company. The
values were determined by adding the present value of the
estimated free cash flow per share for the nine months ended
December 31, 2011 and for the years 2012 through 2015 and
the present value of the estimated terminal value per share of
Transatlantic common stock as of the end of 2015. Deutsche Bank
calculated a range of present equity values for Transatlantic as
the sum of (1) the present value of the estimated cash flow
per share for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 and
for the years 2012 through 2015 using discount rates ranging
from 9% to 11%, which were chosen by Deutsche Bank based upon an
analysis of the cost of equity of Transatlantic, and
(2) the present value of illustrative terminal value per
share derived by applying a range of price to book value
multiples and price to earnings multiples to
Transatlantics estimated shareholders equity and net
income and applying discount rates ranging from 9% to 11% to
such terminal values. For the terminal value based on price to
book value multiples, Deutsche Bank applied multiples ranging
from 0.85x to 1.15x to Transatlantics estimated
shareholders equity for 2015. Based on the above analysis,
Deutsche Bank determined a range of present values per share of
Transatlantic common stock of approximately $57 to $76. For the
terminal value based on price to earnings multiples,
73
Deutsche Bank applied multiples ranging from 8.0x to 10.0x to
Transatlantics estimated net income for 2015. Based on the
above analysis, Deutsche Bank determined a range of present
values per share of Transatlantic common stock of approximately
$56 to $70. Deutsche Bank selected the terminal value multiples
used in this analysis based upon the current and historical
trading values and multiples of the selected companies discussed
in the Comparable Companies Analysis above.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process
involving the application of subjective business judgment in
determining the most appropriate and relevant methods of
financial analysis and the application of those methods to the
particular circumstances and, therefore, is not readily
susceptible to summary description. Deutsche Bank believes that
its analyses must be considered as a whole and that considering
any portion of such analyses and of the factors considered
without considering all analyses and factors could create a
misleading view of the process underlying the opinion. In
arriving at its fairness determination, Deutsche Bank did not
assign specific weights to any particular analyses.
In conducting its analyses and arriving at its opinion, Deutsche
Bank utilized a variety of generally accepted valuation methods.
The analyses were prepared solely for the purpose of enabling
Deutsche Bank to provide its opinion to the Allied World board
of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view,
to Allied World of the exchange ratio described above as of the
date of its opinion and do not purport to be appraisals or
necessarily reflect the prices at which businesses or securities
actually may be sold, which are inherently subject to
uncertainty. In connection with its analyses, Deutsche Bank
made, and was provided by the management of Allied World with,
numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance,
general business and economic conditions and other matters, many
of which are beyond the control of Deutsche Bank, Transatlantic
or Allied World. Analyses based on estimates or forecasts of
future results are not necessarily indicative of actual past or
future values or results, which may be significantly more or
less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Because such
analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon
numerous factors or events beyond the control of Transatlantic,
Allied World or their respective advisors, none of
Transatlantic, Allied World, Deutsche Bank nor any other person
assumes responsibility if future results or actual values are
materially different from these forecasts or assumptions.
The terms of the merger, including the exchange ratio, were
determined through arms-length negotiations between Allied
World and Transatlantic and were approved by the Allied World
board of directors. Representatives of Deutsche Bank provided
advice to Allied World during these negotiations. Deutsche Bank,
however, did not recommend any specific exchange ratio to Allied
World or its board of directors or that any specific exchange
ratio constituted the only appropriate exchange ratio for the
merger. The decision to enter into the merger was solely that of
the Allied World board of directors. As described above, the
opinion and presentation of Deutsche Bank to the Allied World
board of directors were only one of a number of factors taken
into consideration by the Allied World board of directors in
making its determination to approve the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated by it, including the merger.
Allied World selected Deutsche Bank as its financial advisors in
connection with the merger based on Deutsche Banks
qualifications, expertise, reputation and experience in mergers
and acquisitions. Pursuant to the engagement letter dated
June 2, 2011 between Allied World and Deutsche Bank, Allied
World agreed to pay Deutsche Bank (i) a fee (an
Opinion Fee) equal to $2.5 million payable upon
the delivery of its opinion (or upon Deutsche Bank advising
Allied World that it was unable to render an opinion) and
(ii) in the event the merger is consummated, a fee equal to
$14.5 million payable at the time of closing less the
amount of any Opinion Fee previously paid. If the merger is not
completed and Allied World receives a
break-up
fee, lock-up
option, topping fee or other termination fee or other similar
payment, Deutsche Bank is entitled to receive a fee equal to
$5 million. Allied World has also agreed to reimburse
Deutsche Bank for reasonable fees and disbursements of Deutsche
Banks counsel and Deutsche Banks reasonable travel
and other
out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in connection with the merger or otherwise
arising out of the retention of Deutsche Bank under the
engagement letter. Allied World has also agreed to indemnify
Deutsche Bank and certain related persons to the full extent
lawful against certain liabilities, including certain
liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws arising
out of its engagement or the merger.
74
Deutsche Bank is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm experienced in providing advice in connection with
mergers and acquisitions and related transactions. Deutsche Bank
is an affiliate of Deutsche Bank AG, which, together with its
affiliates, we refer to as the Deutsche Bank Group.
One or more members of the Deutsche Bank Group have, from time
to time, provided investment banking, commercial banking
(including extension of credit) and other financial services to
Allied World, Transatlantic or their respective affiliates for
which it has received compensation. A member of the Deutsche
Bank Group acted as a
joint-lead
manager in a public offering of senior notes by Allied World in
November 2010 for which it received aggregate fees of $150,000.
A member of the Deutsche Bank Group is also acting as a lender
of Allied Worlds senior credit facility for which it has
received aggregate fees of $20,000 and is acting as an asset
manager for certain investment portfolios of Transatlantic for
which it received aggregate fees of approximately $75,000 during
the first quarter of 2011. The Deutsche Bank Group may also
provide investment and commercial banking services to Allied
World, Transatlantic or their respective affiliates in the
future, for which the Deutsche Bank Group would expect to
receive compensation. In the ordinary course of business,
members of the Deutsche Bank Group may actively trade in the
securities and other instruments and obligations of Allied World
and Transatlantic (or their respective affiliates) for their own
accounts and for the accounts of their customers. Accordingly,
the Deutsche Bank Group may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities, instruments and obligations. In
addition, as of June 12, 2011, Deutsche Bank and affiliates
owned approximately 250,000 shares of Transatlantic common
stock.
Certain
Allied World Prospective Financial Information
Allied World does not as a matter of course make public
long-term forecasts as to future performance or other
prospective financial information beyond the current fiscal
year, and Allied World is especially wary of making forecasts or
projections for extended periods due to the unpredictability of
the underlying assumptions and estimates. However, as part of
the due diligence review of Allied World in connection with the
merger, Allied Worlds management prepared and provided to
Transatlantic and Goldman Sachs, as well as to Deutsche Bank and
Moelis, in connection with their respective evaluation of the
fairness of the merger consideration, certain non-public,
internal financial forecasts regarding Allied Worlds
projected future operations for the 2011 through 2015 fiscal
years. Allied World has included below a summary of these
forecasts for the purpose of providing shareholders and
investors access to certain non-public information that was
furnished to third parties and such information may not be
appropriate for other purposes. These forecasts were also
considered by the Allied World board of directors for purposes
of evaluating the merger. The Allied World board of directors
also considered non-public, financial forecasts prepared by
Transatlantic regarding Transatlantics anticipated future
operations for the 2011 through 2015 fiscal years for purposes
of evaluating Transatlantic and the merger. See The
Merger Certain Transatlantic Prospective Financial
Information beginning on page 89 for more information
about the forecasts prepared by Transatlantic.
The Allied World internal financial forecasts were not prepared
with a view toward public disclosure, nor were they prepared
with a view toward compliance with published guidelines of the
SEC, SAP or the guidelines established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation
of financial forecasts or generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. Deloitte & Touche
Ltd. has not examined, compiled or performed any procedures with
respect to the accompanying prospective financial information
and, accordingly, Deloitte & Touche Ltd. does not
express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect
thereto. The Deloitte & Touche Ltd. reports
incorporated by reference in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relate only to Allied Worlds
historical financial information. They do not extend to the
prospective financial information and should not be read to do
so. The summary of these internal financial forecasts included
below is not being included to influence your decision whether
to vote for the merger and the transactions contemplated in
connection with the merger, but because these internal financial
forecasts were provided by Allied World to Transatlantic and
Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs and Moelis.
While presented with numeric specificity, these internal
financial forecasts were based on numerous variables and
assumptions (including, but not limited to, those related to
industry performance and competition and general business,
economic, market and financial conditions and additional matters
specific to Allied Worlds businesses) that are inherently
subjective and uncertain and are beyond the control of Allied
Worlds
75
management. Important factors that may affect actual results and
cause these internal financial forecasts to not be achieved
include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties
relating to Allied Worlds business (including its ability
to achieve strategic goals, objectives and targets over
applicable periods), industry performance, general business and
economic conditions and other factors described in the
Risk Factors section of Allied Worlds Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
as updated by subsequent Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K
all of which are filed with the SEC and incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
These internal financial forecasts also reflect numerous
variables, expectations and assumptions available at the time
they were prepared as to certain business decisions that are
subject to change. As a result, actual results may differ
materially from those contained in these internal financial
forecasts. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the
forecasted results summarized below will be realized.
The inclusion of a summary of these internal financial forecasts
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus should not be regarded
as an indication that any of Allied World, Transatlantic or
their respective affiliates, advisors or representatives
considered these internal financial forecasts to be predictive
of actual future events, and these internal financial forecasts
should not be relied upon as such nor should the information
contained in these internal financial forecasts be considered
appropriate for other purposes. None of Allied World,
Transatlantic or their respective affiliates, advisors,
officers, directors or representatives can give you any
assurance that actual results will not differ materially from
these internal financial forecasts, and none of them undertakes
any obligation to update or otherwise revise or reconcile these
internal financial forecasts to reflect circumstances existing
after the date these internal financial forecasts were generated
or to reflect the occurrence of future events, even in the event
that any or all of the assumptions underlying these forecasts
are shown to be in error. Since the forecasts cover multiple
years, such information by its nature becomes less meaningful
and predictive with each successive year. Allied World does not
intend to make publicly available any update or other revision
to these internal financial forecasts.
None of Allied World or its affiliates, advisors, officers,
directors or representatives has made or makes any
representation to any shareholder or other person regarding
Allied Worlds ultimate performance compared to the
information contained in these internal financial forecasts or
that the forecasted results will be achieved. Allied World has
made no representation to Transatlantic, in the merger agreement
or otherwise, concerning these internal financial forecasts. The
below forecasts do not give effect to the merger. Allied World
urges all shareholders to review Allied Worlds most recent
SEC filings for a description of Allied Worlds reported
financial results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
(All dollar amounts in millions of dollars)
|
|
|
Net Premiums Written
|
|
$
|
1,586
|
|
|
$
|
1,817
|
|
|
$
|
2,015
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
393
|
|
Loss Ratio
|
|
|
69.1
|
%
|
|
|
62.6
|
%
|
|
|
62.5
|
%
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
Combined Ratio
|
|
|
99.5
|
%
|
|
|
92.4
|
%
|
|
|
91.3
|
%
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
|
|
92.1
|
%
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
3,002
|
|
|
$
|
3,197
|
|
|
$
|
3,504
|
|
|
$
|
3,841
|
|
|
$
|
4,215
|
|
Transatlantics
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendations of the Transatlantic
Board of Directors
In approving the merger agreement and recommending its adoption
by Transatlantic stockholders, Transatlantics board of
directors considered a number of factors and a substantial
amount of information presented by and reviewed and discussed
with Transatlantics management and legal and financial
advisors, and considered numerous factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the merger has the potential to
create a leading, diversified, specialty focused reinsurance and
insurance company with a global reach and a local presence in
key markets, based upon, among other things, the fact that the
combined company would have 39 locations with local
underwriters, would combine a leading specialty reinsurance
brand (including with respect to directors and officers, errors
and omissions and medical malpractice reinsurance) with a
leading specialty
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
insurance brand (including with respect to professional
liability and healthcare insurance), and would have a diverse
portfolio between reinsurance and insurance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the combined company would have a
strengthened balance sheet with $8.5 billion of total
capital;
|
|
|
|
although no assurance can be given on the reaction of any
independent rating agency, managements belief that the
combined company would be able to maintain the financial
strength ratings of Transatlantic, especially at S&P, which
has significant value to Transatlantics business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
managements belief that the combination would diversify
risk, which should allow the combined company to weather
cyclical conditions, reduce volatility of earnings and deliver
more stable results under a wider range of market conditions and
economic environments while creating a foundation for future
growth, based upon, among other things, the fact that the
combined company would have both a significant insurance and
reinsurance business, and would have greater diversification
with respect to (i) duration of risk, (ii) premiums and reserves
by lines of business and geography and (iii) catastrophe
exposures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Transatlantic would gain multiple platforms,
including European Union based operating subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
Transatlantic board of directors belief, based upon
discussions with Transatlantics management and after a
thorough review of Transatlantics strategic alternatives,
that the merger would provide greater value to the Transatlantic
stockholders within a shorter timeframe than other potential
strategic alternatives available to Transatlantic, including the
continued operation of Transatlantic as a standalone company,
based on, among other things, the fact that the combined company
would have greater flexibility to allocate capital in a more
efficient manner, increased financial strength and scale, and
meaningful incremental combined excess capital;
|
|
|
|
managements belief that property catastrophe exposure of
the combined company would remain below its respective stated
tolerances, allowing for future growth;
|
|
|
|
although no assurance can be given that any level of operating
and structural synergies would be achieved following the
completion of the merger, managements estimate, consistent
with Allied Worlds managements estimate, that the
combination of Transatlantic and Allied World would create
$80 million of annual gross savings, with the combined
company realizing approximately 60% of these savings on an
annualized run-rate (after-tax) basis in the first year
following the closing of the merger, in part, to more efficient
allocation of capital and cost savings;
|
|
|
|
the fact that, with a Swiss domicile, the combined company
should have greater capital flexibility;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Transatlantic stockholders immediately prior to
the merger would hold approximately 58% of the voting power of
the combined company on a fully diluted basis immediately
following completion of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the fixed exchange ratio of 0.88 Allied World shares for each
share of Transatlantic common stock, which represented a premium
of 16% to the closing price of Transatlantic common stock, based
on the closing price of Allied World shares on June 10,
2011 (the last trading day before public announcement of the
merger);
|
|
|
|
the complementary nature of Transatlantics and Allied
Worlds businesses and cultures, including the fact that
the two companies have complementary lines of business (for
example, with respect to medical malpractice and healthcare,
Transatlantic has a focus on physicians and Allied World has a
focus on hospitals and other facilities), and that both
companies have strong underwriting and risk management cultures;
|
|
|
|
the view of the Transatlantic board of directors that there will
be limited integration risk due to the similar cultures of
Transatlantic and Allied World with respect to underwriting
discipline and risk management, common information technology
systems, and limited business overlap;
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
the structure of the transaction as a merger of equals,
including the provisions in the merger agreement that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the combined companys board of directors would initially
be comprised of 11 members, six of which would be designated by
Transatlantic;
|
|
|
|
the combined companys board committee assignments would be
split evenly between designees from the Transatlantic board of
directors and designees from the Allied World board of directors;
|
|
|
|
Mr. Press would initially be the non-executive chairman of
the board of directors of the combined company;
|
|
|
|
Mr. Sapnar would be appointed as the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Global Reinsurance of the combined
company; and
|
|
|
|
the remaining members of management of the combined company
would be drawn from the two companies on a fair and equitable
basis with a roughly equal number of people coming from each;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the expectation of the Transatlantic board of directors that the
integration of the two companies will be completed in a timely
and efficient manner with minimal disruption to customers and
employees;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the combined company would have a highly
experienced management team with extensive industry experience
in the most significant facets of the insurance and reinsurance
industry. See the section entitled Executive
Officers Following the Merger beginning on page 102;
|
|
|
|
the Transatlantic board of directors knowledge of
Transatlantics business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects as a standalone company, as well as
Allied Worlds business, financial condition, results of
operations and prospects, taking into account the results of
Transatlantics due diligence review of Allied World;
|
|
|
|
the strong commitment on the part of both parties to complete
the merger pursuant to their respective obligations under the
terms of the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger agreement allows the Transatlantic
board of directors to change or withdraw its recommendation
regarding the merger proposal if a superior proposal is received
from a third party or in response to certain material
developments or changes in circumstances, if in either case the
Transatlantic board of directors determines that a failure to
change its recommendation would result in a breach of its
fiduciary duties under applicable law, subject to the payment of
a termination fee upon termination under certain circumstances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Transatlantic board of directors belief, after
consultation with its internal and outside legal counsel, that
the transactions are likely to receive necessary regulatory
approvals in a relatively timely manner without material adverse
conditions, which increases the likelihood the transactions will
be consummated; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the financial analyses presented by Moelis to the Transatlantic
board of directors described below under
Opinion of Transatlantics Financial
Advisor and the opinion of Moelis, delivered orally at the
Transatlantic board of directors meeting on June 12,
2011, and subsequently confirmed in writing by delivery of a
written opinion dated the same date, to the effect that, as of
that date and based upon and subject to the assumptions,
procedures, factors, qualifications and limitations set forth in
such written opinion, the exchange ratio pursuant to the merger
agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Transatlantic common stock. See
Opinion of Transatlantics Financial
Advisor.
|
The Transatlantic board of directors also weighed the factors
described above against a number of risks and other factors
identified in its deliberations as weighing negatively against
the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of Transatlantics business
during the period between execution of the merger agreement and
the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
the substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the
merger, including the substantial cash and other costs of
integrating the businesses of Transatlantic and Allied World, as
well as the transaction expenses arising from the merger;
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that forecasts of future results of operations and
synergies are necessarily estimates based on assumptions, and
that for these and other reasons there is a risk of not
capturing anticipated operational synergies and cost savings
between Transatlantic and Allied World and the risk that other
anticipated benefits might not be realized;
|
|
|
|
the potential effect of the merger on Transatlantics
business and relationships with employees, customers, suppliers,
brokers, regulators and the communities in which it operates;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the transaction would be taxable to
Transatlantics stockholders that are U.S. holders for
U.S. federal income tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
the risk that governmental entities may not approve the merger
or may impose conditions on Transatlantic or Allied World in
order to gain approval for the merger that may adversely impact
the ability of the combined company to realize the synergies
that are projected to occur in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the merger may not be completed, or that
completion may be unduly delayed, for reasons beyond the control
of Transatlantic
and/or
Allied World;
|
|
|
|
the potential that the termination fee provisions of the merger
agreement could have the effect of discouraging a bona fide
alternative acquisition proposal for Transatlantic;
|
|
|
|
the merger agreements requirement that the Transatlantic
board of directors call and hold a meeting of Transatlantic
stockholders to vote upon the merger, regardless of whether or
not the Transatlantic board of directors has withdrawn or
adversely modified its recommendation to the Transatlantic
stockholders regarding the merger in response to a superior
proposal or certain material developments or changes in
circumstances;
|
|
|
|
potential withholding taxes associated with reallocating capital
among different jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
the risk that Allied Worlds loss reserves may prove to be
inadequate;
|
|
|
|
the challenges of combining Transatlantics business with
Allied Worlds business, including technical, accounting
and other challenges, and the risk of diverting management
resources for an extended period of time to accomplish this
combination;
|
|
|
|
the loss of key personnel could delay or prevent the combined
entity from fully implementing its business strategy and,
consequently, significantly and negatively affect its business;
|
|
|
|
risks of the type and nature described in the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 22 and
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
beginning on page 21; and
|
|
|
|
the fact that Transatlantics directors and executive
officers have interests in the merger that may be different
from, or in addition to, those of Transatlantic stockholders.
See the section entitled The Merger Interests
of Transatlantics Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger beginning on page 97.
|
This discussion of the information and factors considered by the
Transatlantic board of directors in reaching its conclusions and
recommendation includes the material factors considered by the
Transatlantic board of directors, but is not intended to be
exhaustive. In view of the wide variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity
of these matters, the Transatlantic board of directors did not
find it practicable, and did not attempt, to quantify, rank or
assign any relative or specific weights to the various factors
that it considered in reaching its determination to approve the
merger agreement and to recommend that Transatlantic
stockholders vote in favor of the adoption of the merger
agreement proposal. The Transatlantic board of directors
conducted an overall analysis of the factors described above,
including through discussions with, and questioning of,
Transatlantics management and outside legal and financial
advisors regarding certain of the matters described above. In
considering the factors described above, individual members of
the Transatlantic board of directors may have given differing
weights to different factors.
79
The Transatlantic board of directors unanimously approved the
merger agreement and determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, are
advisable and in the best interests of Transatlantic and its
stockholders. The Transatlantic board of directors unanimously
recommends that Transatlantic stockholders vote FOR
the adoption of the merger agreement proposal.
Opinion
of Transatlantics Financial Advisor
Opinion
of Moelis & Company LLC
In connection with the merger, on June 12, 2011, Moelis
delivered its oral opinion, which was subsequently confirmed in
writing, that based upon and subject to the conditions and
limitations set forth in its written opinion, as of
June 12, 2011, the exchange ratio set forth in the merger
agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Transatlantic common stock.
The full text of Moelis written opinion, dated
June 12, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C and is
incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by
reference. Holders of Transatlantic common stock are urged to
read Moelis written opinion and this section carefully and
in their entirety. The following summary describes the material
analyses underlying Moelis opinion, but does not purport
to be a complete description of the analyses performed by Moelis
in connection with its opinion. Moelis opinion is limited
solely to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the
exchange ratio set forth in the merger agreement to the holders
of Transatlantic common stock as of the date of the opinion and
does not address Transatlantics underlying business
decision to effect the merger or the relative merits of the
merger as compared to any alternative business strategies or
transactions that might be available to Transatlantic.
Moelis opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any
stockholder of Transatlantic as to how such stockholder should
vote with respect to the merger or any other matter.
Moelis opinion was approved by a Moelis fairness opinion
committee.
In arriving at its opinion, Moelis, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available business and financial
information relating to Transatlantic and Allied World that
Moelis deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal information relating to the business,
including financial forecasts, earnings, cash flow, assets,
liabilities and prospects of Transatlantic, furnished to Moelis
by Transatlantic;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain internal information relating to the business,
including financial forecasts, earnings, cash flow, assets,
liabilities and prospects of Allied World, furnished to Moelis
by Allied World;
|
|
|
|
conducted discussions with members of senior management and
representatives of Transatlantic and Allied World concerning the
matters described in the foregoing, as well as their respective
businesses and prospects before and after giving effect to the
merger;
|
|
|
|
reviewed publicly available financial and stock market data,
including valuation multiples, for Transatlantic and Allied
World and compared them with those of certain other companies in
lines of business that Moelis deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the proposed financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that Moelis deemed
relevant;
|
|
|
|
reviewed a draft of the merger agreement, dated June 11,
2011;
|
|
|
|
participated in certain discussions and negotiations among
representatives of Transatlantic and Allied World and their
financial and legal advisors; and
|
|
|
|
conducted such other financial studies and analyses and took
into account such other information as Moelis deemed appropriate.
|
80
In connection with Moelis review, it did not assume any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
financial, legal, regulatory, tax, accounting and other
information supplied to, discussed with, or reviewed by Moelis
for the purpose of its opinion and has, with the consent of the
board of directors of Transatlantic, relied on such information
being complete and accurate in all material respects. In
addition, with the consent of the Transatlantic board of
directors, Moelis did not make any independent evaluation or
appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities (contingent,
derivative, off-balance-sheet, or otherwise) of Transatlantic or
Allied World, nor was Moelis furnished with any such evaluation
or appraisal. Moelis is not an expert in the evaluation of
reserves for insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses, and
did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of
reserves of Transatlantic or Allied World. In that regard,
Moelis did not make an analysis of, and expressed no opinion as
to, the adequacy of the loss and loss adjustment expense
reserves of, the value of redundant reserves to, or the ability
to achieve reserve releases by, Transatlantic or Allied World.
Moelis was not requested, and did not undertake, to make any
independent valuation of Transatlantics pending
arbitration matters concerning AIG and certain of its
subsidiaries, and for purposes of Moelis analysis, at the
direction of the Transatlantic board of directors, Moelis
assumed that Transatlantic will obtain a recovery in the amount
and at the time estimated by Transatlantic management. In
addition, with respect to the forecasted financial information
referred to above, Moelis assumed, at the direction of the
Transatlantic board of directors, that such financial
information was reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the
best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Transatlantic and Allied World as to the future
performance of their respective companies and that such future
financial results will be achieved at the times and in the
amounts projected by management of Transatlantic and Allied
World.
Moelis opinion is necessarily based on economic, monetary,
market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information
made available to Moelis as of, the date thereof. Moelis
assumed, with the consent of the Transatlantic board of
directors, that all governmental, regulatory or other consents
and approvals necessary for the completion of the merger will be
obtained without the imposition of any delay, limitation,
restriction, divestiture or condition that would have an adverse
effect on Transatlantic or Allied World or on the expected
benefits of the merger. Subsequent developments may affect
Moelis opinion but Moelis does not have any obligation to
update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. Moelis opinion
does not constitute legal, tax or accounting advice.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
presented by representatives of Moelis to the Transatlantic
board of directors at its meeting held on June 12, 2011, in
connection with the delivery of the oral opinion at that meeting
and Moelis subsequent written opinion.
Some of the summaries of financial analyses below include
information presented in tabular format. In order to fully
understand Moelis analyses, the tables must be read
together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the analyses. Considering
the data described below without considering the full narrative
description of the financial analyses, including the
methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of Moelis analyses.
The analyses performed by Moelis include analyses based upon
forecasts of future results, which results might be
significantly more or less favorable than those upon which
Moelis analyses were based. The analyses do not purport to
be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which Transatlantic
common stock might trade at any time following the announcement
of the merger. Because the analyses are inherently subject to
uncertainty, being based upon numerous factors and events,
including, without limitation, factors relating to general
economic and competitive conditions beyond the control of the
parties or their respective advisors, neither Moelis nor any
other person assumes responsibility if future results or actual
values are materially different from those contemplated below.
Dividend
Discount Model Analysis
Moelis conducted a dividend discount model analysis for
Transatlantic and Allied World. A dividend discount model
analysis is a method of evaluating the equity value of a company
using estimates of the future dividends to stockholders
generated by a company and taking into consideration the time
value of money with respect to those future dividends by
calculating their present value. Present
value refers to the current
81
value of future dividends to stockholders paid by such company
and is obtained by discounting those future dividends back to
the present using a discount rate that takes into account
macro-economic assumptions, estimates of risk, the opportunity
cost of capital, and other appropriate factors.
Based on estimates provided by Transatlantic management as to
the maximum amount of possible dividends that can be paid out by
Transatlantic and estimates provided by Allied World management
as to the maximum amount of possible dividends that can be paid
out by Allied World, in each case, during fiscal years
(FYs) 2011 through 2015 (assuming no capital is
returned through share repurchases and, in the case of
Transatlantic, adjusted for its first quarter 2011 dividend and
the potential tax-effected full recovery from pending
arbitration with American International Group, Inc. and certain
of its subsidiaries and, in the case of Allied World, adjusted
for its first quarter 2011 share repurchase and purchase of
founder warrants), Moelis discounted the applicable amounts to
present values using a range of discount rates from 8.8% to
10.8% for Transatlantic, and 9.3% to 11.3% for Allied World,
both of which were chosen by Moelis based upon an analysis of
the cost of equity of Transatlantic and Allied World. Moelis
also calculated a range of terminal values for Transatlantic and
Allied World at the end of the
5-year
period ending FY 2015 by applying, in the case of Transatlantic,
a terminal book value multiple ranging from 0.70x to 1.00x and
Transatlantics projected FY 2015 book value as provided by
Transatlantic management, and, in the case of Allied World, a
terminal book value multiple ranging from 0.80x to 1.10x and
Allied Worlds projected FY 2015 book value as provided by
Allied World management, and discounting the terminal value
using a range of discount rates from 8.8% to 10.8% for
Transatlantic, and 9.3% to 11.3% for Allied World.
Terminal value refers to the capitalized value of
all future dividends to stockholders paid by a company for
periods beyond the final forecast period.
Using, in the case of Transatlantic, a terminal book value
multiple ranging from 0.75x to 0.95x and Transatlantics
projected FY 2015 book value as provided by Transatlantic
management, and, in the case of Allied World, a terminal book
value multiple ranging from 0.85x to 1.05x and Allied
Worlds projected FY 2015 book value as provided by Allied
World management, and discounting the maximum amounts of
possible dividends that can be paid out by each of Transatlantic
and Allied World, in each case, during FYs 2011 through 2015 and
the respective terminal values, using a range of discount rates
from 9.3% to 10.3% for Transatlantic, and 9.8% to 10.8% for
Allied World, Moelis calculated a low and high implied equity
value per share for Transatlantic of $59.00 per share and $70.75
per share and for Allied World of $65.46 per share and $78.67
per share.
Moelis then calculated (1) the ratio of the lowest implied
equity value per share for Transatlantic to the highest implied
equity value per share for Allied World, and (2) the ratio
of the highest implied equity value per share for Transatlantic
to the lowest implied equity value per share for Allied World to
derive an implied exchange ratio range as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Exchange
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Highest Transatlantic equity value per share to lowest Allied
World equity value per share
|
|
|
0.750
|
x
|
Lowest Transatlantic equity value per share to highest Allied
World equity value per share
|
|
|
1.081
|
x
|
Selected
Public Companies Analysis
Moelis performed a selected public companies analysis by
comparing certain financial information of Transatlantic and
Allied World with corresponding financial information of
selected public companies. Although none of the selected
companies is directly comparable to Transatlantic or Allied
World, Moelis selected reinsurance
and/or
insurance companies with similar operations to Transatlantic and
Allied World, and then used publicly available information
regarding these companies to conduct a selected public companies
analysis. The companies Moelis selected are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
ACE Limited;
|
|
|
|
Alterra Capital Holdings Limited;
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited;
|
|
|
|
AXIS Capital Holdings Limited;
|
|
|
|
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
EverestRe Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited;
|
|
|
|
Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
Validus Holdings, Ltd.; and
|
|
|
|
XL Capital Ltd.
|
From such list of 14 companies, Moelis then selected those
that predominately write reinsurance (excluding those that write
property casualty reinsurance) as Transatlantics core
selected companies, which are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
EverestRe Group Ltd.;
|
|
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.; and
|
|
|
|
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
|
From the list of 14 companies, Moelis selected those that
write both direct insurance and reinsurance as Allied
Worlds core selected companies, which are the following: