Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
to
.
Commission File Number: 1-32225
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-0833098 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
100 Crescent Court, Suite 1600
Dallas, Texas 75201-6915
(Address of principal executive offices)
(214) 871-3555
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of the registrants outstanding common units at April 22, 2011 was 22,078,509.
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
INDEX
- 2 -
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of the federal securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included
in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, those under Results of Operations and
Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Part I are forward-looking statements. Forward looking
statements use words such as anticipate, project, expect, plan, goal, forecast,
intend, could, believe, may, and similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and
objectives for future operations. These statements are based on our beliefs and assumptions and
those of our general partner using currently available information and expectations as of the date
hereof, are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties.
Although we and our general partner believe that such expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can give assurance
that our expectations will prove to be correct. Such statements are subject to a variety of risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if
underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those
anticipated, estimated, projected or expected. Certain factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from results anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but
are not limited to:
|
|
|
risks and uncertainties with respect to the actual quantities of petroleum products and
crude oil shipped on our pipelines and/or terminalled in our terminals; |
|
|
|
the economic viability of Holly Corporation, Alon USA, Inc. and our other customers; |
|
|
|
the demand for refined petroleum products in markets we serve; |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully purchase and integrate additional operations in the future; |
|
|
|
our ability to complete previously announced or contemplated acquisitions; |
|
|
|
the availability and cost of additional debt and equity financing; |
|
|
|
the possibility of reductions in production or shutdowns at refineries utilizing our
pipeline and terminal facilities; |
|
|
|
the effects of current and future government regulations and policies; |
|
|
|
our operational efficiency in carrying out routine operations and capital construction
projects; |
|
|
|
the possibility of terrorist attacks and the consequences of any such attacks; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
other financial, operational and legal risks and uncertainties detailed from time to
time in our Securities and Exchange Commission filings. |
Cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from our expectations are set forth in this Form 10-Q, including without limitation, the
forward-looking statements that are referred to above. When considering forward-looking
statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements set forth in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 in Risk Factors and in this
Form 10-Q in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q and all subsequent written
or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date made and, other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly
update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise.
- 3 -
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except unit data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
Accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
|
3,102 |
|
|
|
3,544 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
20,373 |
|
|
|
18,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,475 |
|
|
|
22,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
25,523 |
|
|
|
23,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and equipment, net |
|
|
440,523 |
|
|
|
434,950 |
|
Transportation agreements, net |
|
|
106,753 |
|
|
|
108,489 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
49,109 |
|
|
|
49,109 |
|
Investment in SLC Pipeline |
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
|
25,437 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
652,150 |
|
|
$ |
643,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
$ |
5,991 |
|
|
$ |
6,347 |
|
Affiliates |
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
3,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,325 |
|
|
|
10,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
7,517 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
9,333 |
|
|
|
10,437 |
|
Accrued property taxes |
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
24,016 |
|
|
|
31,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
514,733 |
|
|
|
491,648 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
9,511 |
|
|
|
10,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unitholders (22,078,509 units issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010) |
|
|
265,087 |
|
|
|
271,649 |
|
General partner interest (2% interest) |
|
|
(152,454 |
) |
|
|
(152,251 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(8,743 |
) |
|
|
(10,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity |
|
|
103,890 |
|
|
|
109,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
$ |
652,150 |
|
|
$ |
643,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 4 -
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
34,107 |
|
|
$ |
33,597 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,017 |
|
|
|
40,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
12,796 |
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,799 |
|
|
|
22,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,218 |
|
|
|
17,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of SLC Pipeline |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,549 |
) |
|
|
(7,544 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,821 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
15,397 |
|
|
|
10,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income tax |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
15,169 |
|
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less general partner interest in net income, including incentive
distributions |
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
11,607 |
|
|
$ |
8,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners per unit interest in earnings basic and diluted: |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding |
|
|
22,079 |
|
|
|
22,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 5 -
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
Equity in earnings of SLC Pipeline, net of distributions |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
Change in fair value interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Amortization of restricted and performance units |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
(Increase) decrease in current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable trade |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Accounts receivable affiliates |
|
|
(1,409 |
) |
|
|
(2,081 |
) |
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,195 |
|
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable trade |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
(499 |
) |
Accounts payable affiliates |
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
(5,976 |
) |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
1,108 |
|
Accrued property taxes |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
15,222 |
|
|
|
18,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to properties and equipment |
|
|
(11,475 |
) |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
Acquisition of assets from Holly Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(11,475 |
) |
|
|
(39,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under credit agreement |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
Repayments of credit agreement borrowings |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(68,000 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,540 |
|
Distributions to HEP unitholders |
|
|
(22,205 |
) |
|
|
(20,506 |
) |
Purchase price in excess of transferred basis in assets acquired from
Holly Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,766 |
) |
Purchase of units for restricted grants |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
(3,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
|
|
34,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase for the period |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
14,101 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
16,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 6 -
Holly Energy Partners, L.P.
Consolidated Statement of Partners Equity
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
271,649 |
|
|
$ |
(152,251 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,026 |
) |
|
$ |
109,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to HEP unitholders |
|
|
(18,648 |
) |
|
|
(3,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,205 |
) |
Purchase of units for restricted grants |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
Amortization of restricted and
performance units |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
670 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
11,815 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,169 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
11,815 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
16,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
265,087 |
|
|
$ |
(152,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,743 |
) |
|
$ |
103,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 7 -
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Description of Business and Presentation of Financial Statements
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (HEP) together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is a publicly held
master limited partnership, currently 34% owned (including the 2% general partner interest) by
Holly Corporation (Holly) and its subsidiaries. We commenced operations on July 13, 2004 upon
the completion of our initial public offering. In these consolidated financial statements, the
words we, our, ours and us refer to HEP unless the context otherwise indicates.
We operate in one business segment the operation of petroleum product and crude oil pipelines and
terminals, tankage and loading rack facilities.
We own and operate petroleum product and crude oil pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading rack
facilities that support Hollys refining and marketing operations in west Texas, New Mexico, Utah,
Oklahoma, Idaho and Arizona. We also own and operate refined product pipelines and terminals,
located primarily in Texas, that service Alon USA, Inc.s (Alon) refinery in Big Spring, Texas.
Additionally, we own a 25% joint venture interest in a 95-mile intrastate crude oil pipeline system
(the SLC Pipeline) that serves refineries in the Salt Lake City area.
We generate revenues by charging tariffs for transporting petroleum products and crude oil through
our pipelines, by charging fees for terminalling refined products and other hydrocarbons and
storing and providing other services at our storage tanks and terminals. We do not take ownership
of products that we transport, terminal or store, and therefore, we are not directly exposed to
changes in commodity prices.
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared without audit, pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The
interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are
necessary for a fair presentation of our results for the interim periods. Such adjustments are
considered to be of a normal recurring nature. Although certain notes and other information
required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted,
we believe that the disclosures in these consolidated financial statements are adequate to make the
information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Results of operations for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that will be realized
for the year ending December 31, 2011.
On the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the year ended December 31, 2010, we have reclassified $10.3
in partners equity from the general partner interest to our common unitholders and have revised
the corresponding equity balances at December 31, 2010 in the Consolidated Statement of Partners
Equity. This amount represents general partner incentive distributions paid in 2010 that were
incorrectly classified as common unit distributions.
Note 2: Acquisitions
2010 Acquisitions
Tulsa East / Lovington Storage Asset Transaction
On March 31, 2010, we acquired from Holly certain storage assets for $88.6 million consisting of
hydrocarbon storage tanks having approximately 2 million barrels of storage capacity, a rail
loading rack and a truck unloading rack located at Hollys Tulsa refinery east facility.
Also, as part of this same transaction, we acquired Hollys asphalt loading rack facility located
at its Navajo refinery facility in Lovington, New Mexico for $4.4 million.
- 8 -
We are a consolidated variable interest entity of Holly. In accounting for these acquisitions from
Holly, we recorded total property and equipment at Hollys cost basis of $37.2 million and the
purchase price in excess of Hollys basis in the assets of $55.8 million as a decrease to our
partners equity.
Note 3: Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts
payable, debt and an interest rate swap. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturity of
these instruments.
Our debt consists of borrowings outstanding under our $275 million revolving credit agreement (the
Credit Agreement), our 6.25% senior notes due 2015 (the 6.25% Senior Notes) and our 8.25%
senior notes due 2018 (the 8.25% Senior Notes). The $182 million carrying amount of borrowings
outstanding under the Credit Agreement approximates fair value as interest rates are reset
frequently using current rates. The estimated fair values of our 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25%
Senior Notes were $185 million and $160.5 million, respectively, at March 31, 2011. These fair
value estimates are based on market quotes provided from a third-party bank. See Note 7 for
additional information on these instruments.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value measurements are derived using inputs (assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing an asset or liability) including assumptions about risk. GAAP categorizes inputs used in
fair value measurements into three broad levels as follows:
|
|
|
(Level 1) Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
(Level 2) Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, similar assets and liabilities
in markets that are not active or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
|
(Level 3) Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and
that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes
valuation techniques that involve significant unobservable inputs. |
We have an interest rate swap that is measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 2
inputs that as of March 31, 2011 represented a liability having a fair value of $8.7 million. With
respect to this instrument, fair value is based on the net present value of expected future cash
flows related to both variable and fixed rate legs of our interest rate swap agreement. Our
measurement is computed using the forward London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) yield curve, a
market-based observable input. See Note 7 for additional information on our interest rate swap.
Note 4: Properties and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines and terminals |
|
$ |
509,064 |
|
|
$ |
507,260 |
|
Land and right of way |
|
|
25,271 |
|
|
|
25,264 |
|
Other |
|
|
15,018 |
|
|
|
14,591 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
25,799 |
|
|
|
16,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,152 |
|
|
|
563,716 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
134,629 |
|
|
|
128,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
440,523 |
|
|
$ |
434,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We capitalized $0.2 million and $0.1 million in interest related to major construction
projects during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
- 9 -
Note 5: Transportation Agreements
Our transportation agreements consist of the following:
|
|
|
The Alon pipelines and terminals agreement (the Alon PTA) represents a portion of the
total purchase price of the Alon assets acquired in 2005 that was allocated based on an
estimated fair value derived under an income approach. This asset is being amortized over
30 years ending 2035, the 15-year initial term of the Alon PTA plus the expected 15-year
extension period. |
|
|
|
The Holly crude pipelines and tankage agreement (the Holly CPTA) represents a portion
of the total purchase price of certain crude pipelines and tankage assets acquired from
Holly in 2008 (at which time we were not a consolidated variable interest entity of Holly)
that was allocated using a fair value based on the agreements expected contribution to our
future earnings under an income approach. This asset is being amortized over 15 years
ending 2023, the 15-year term of the Holly CPTA. |
The carrying amounts of our transportation agreements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alon transportation agreement |
|
$ |
59,933 |
|
|
$ |
59,933 |
|
Holly crude pipelines and tankage agreement |
|
|
74,231 |
|
|
|
74,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,164 |
|
|
|
134,164 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
27,411 |
|
|
|
25,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
106,753 |
|
|
$ |
108,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have additional transportation agreements with Holly that relate to assets contributed to
us or acquired from Holly consisting of pipeline, terminal and tankage assets. These transactions
occurred while we were a consolidated variable interest entity of Holly, therefore, our basis in
these agreements does not reflect a step-up in basis to fair value.
In addition, we have an agreement to provide transportation and storage services to Holly via our
Tulsa logistics and storage assets acquired from Sinclair. Since this agreement is with Holly and
not between Sinclair and us, there is no purchase price allocation attributable to this agreement.
Note 6: Employees, Retirement and Incentive Plans
Employees who provide direct services to us are employed by Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C., a
Holly subsidiary. Their costs, including salaries, bonuses, payroll taxes, benefits and other
direct costs are charged to us monthly in accordance with an omnibus agreement that we have with
Holly. These employees participate in the retirement and benefit plans of Holly. Our share of
retirement and benefit plan costs was $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010.
We have adopted an incentive plan (Long-Term Incentive Plan) for employees, consultants and
non-employee directors who perform services for us. The Long-Term Incentive Plan consists of four
components: restricted units, performance units, unit options and unit appreciation rights.
As of March 31, 2011, we have two types of equity-based compensation, which are described below.
The compensation cost charged against income for these plans was $0.7 million and $1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We currently purchase units in the
open market instead of issuing new units for settlement of restricted unit grants. At March 31,
2011, 350,000 units were authorized to be granted under the equity-based compensation plans, of
which 63,027 had not yet been granted.
- 10 -
Restricted Units
Under our Long-Term Incentive Plan, we grant restricted units to selected employees and directors
who perform services for us, with vesting generally over a period of one to five years. Although
full ownership of the units does not transfer to the recipients until the units vest, the
recipients have distribution and voting rights on these units from the date of grant. The fair
value of each restricted unit award is measured at the market price as of the date of grant and is
amortized over the vesting period.
A summary of restricted unit activity and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2011 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Value |
|
Restricted Units |
|
Grants |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Term |
|
|
($000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 (nonvested) |
|
|
47,295 |
|
|
$ |
37.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
20,924 |
|
|
|
59.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vesting and transfer of full ownership to recipients |
|
|
(24,055 |
) |
|
|
41.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7,802 |
) |
|
|
43.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 (nonvested) |
|
|
36,362 |
|
|
$ |
46.24 |
|
|
1.2 years |
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted units that were vested and transferred to recipients during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were $1 million and $1.3 million, respectively. As of March
31, 2011, there was $1.1 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested
restricted unit grants. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.2 years.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we paid $0.4 million for the purchase of our common
units in the open market for the recipients of our restricted unit grants.
Performance Units
Under our Long-Term Incentive Plan, we grant performance units to selected executives who perform
services for us. Performance units granted in 2011 and 2010 are payable based upon the growth in
our distributable cash flow per common unit over the performance period, and vest over a period of
three years. Performance units granted in 2009 are payable based upon the growth in distributions
on our common units during the requisite period, and vest over a period of three years. As of
March 31, 2011, estimated share payouts for outstanding nonvested performance unit awards ranged
from 110% to 120%.
We granted 12,113 performance units to certain officers in March 2011. These units will vest over
a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2013 and are payable in HEP common units. The
number of units actually earned will be based on the growth of our distributable cash flow per
common unit over the performance period, and can range from 50% to 150% of the number of
performance units granted. The fair value of these performance units is based on the grant date
closing unit price of $59.65 and will apply to the number of units ultimately awarded.
A summary of performance unit activity and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2011 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable |
|
Performance Units |
|
In Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 (nonvested) |
|
|
59,415 |
|
Granted |
|
|
12,113 |
|
Vesting and transfer of common units to recipients |
|
|
(14,337 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2011 (nonvested) |
|
|
57,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
- 11 -
The fair value of performance units vested and transferred to recipients during the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Based on the
weighted average fair value at March 31, 2011 of $36.72, there was $1.4 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance units. That cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
Note 7: Debt
Credit Agreement
We have a $275 million Credit Agreement that is available to fund capital expenditures,
investments, acquisitions, distribution payments and working capital and for general partnership
purposes. It is also available to fund letters of credit up to a $50 million sub-limit and to fund
distributions to unitholders up to a $30 million sub-limit. In February 2011, we amended our
previous credit agreement (expiring in August 2011), slightly, reducing the size of the credit
facility from $300 million to $275 million. The size was reduced based on managements review of
past and forecasted utilization of the facility. The Credit Agreement expires in February 2016;
however, in the event that the 6.25% Senior Notes are not repurchased, refinanced, extended or
repaid prior to September 1, 2014, the Credit Agreement shall expire on that date.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we received advances totaling $30 million and repaid $7
million, resulting in net borrowings of $23 million under the Credit Agreement and an outstanding
balance of $182 million at March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, we had no working capital
borrowings.
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are collateralized by substantially all of our assets.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., our general
partner, and guaranteed by our material, wholly-owned subsidiaries. Any recourse to HEP Logistics
Holdings, L.P. would be limited to the extent of its assets, which other than its investment in us,
are not significant.
We may prepay all loans at any time without penalty, except for payment of certain breakage and
related costs.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement bears interest, at our option, at either (a) the reference
rate as announced by the administrative agent plus an applicable margin (ranging from 1.00% to
2.00%) or (b) at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin (ranging from 2.00% to 3.00%). In
each case, the applicable margin is based upon the ratio of our funded debt (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as
defined in the Credit Agreement). We incur a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Credit
Agreement at an annual rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% based upon the ratio of our funded debt
to EBITDA for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters.
The Credit Agreement imposes certain requirements on us which we are subject to and currently in
compliance with, including: a prohibition against distribution to unitholders if, before or after
the distribution, a potential default or an event of default as defined in the agreement would
occur; limitations on our ability to incur debt, make loans, acquire other companies, change the
nature of our business, enter a merger or consolidation, or sell assets; and covenants that require
maintenance of a specified EBITDA to interest expense ratio, total debt to EBITDA ratio and senior
debt to EBITDA ratio. If an event of default exists under the Credit Agreement, the lenders will
be able to accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise other rights and remedies.
Senior Notes
In March 2010, we issued $150 million in aggregate principal amount outstanding of 8.25% Senior
Notes maturing March 15, 2018. A portion of the $147.5 million in net proceeds received was used
to fund our $93 million purchase of the Tulsa and Lovington storage assets from Holly on March 31,
2010. Additionally, we used a portion to repay $42 million in outstanding Credit Agreement
borrowings, with the remaining proceeds available for general partnership purposes, including
working capital and capital
expenditures.
- 12 -
Our 6.25% Senior Notes having an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $185 million mature
March 1, 2015 and are registered with the SEC. The 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25% Senior Notes
(collectively, the Senior Notes) are unsecured and have certain restrictive covenants, which we
are subject to and currently in compliance with, including limitations on our ability to incur
additional indebtedness, make investments, sell assets, incur certain liens, pay distributions,
enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter into mergers. At any time when the Senior Notes
are rated investment grade by both Moodys and Standard & Poors and no default or event of default
exists, we will not be subject to many of the foregoing covenants. Additionally, we have certain
redemption rights under the Senior Notes.
Indebtedness under the Senior Notes is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., our general
partner, and guaranteed by our wholly-owned subsidiaries. However, any recourse to HEP Logistics
Holdings, L.P. would be limited to the extent of its assets, which other than its investment in us,
are not significant.
The carrying amounts of our debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
182,000 |
|
|
$ |
159,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(1,489 |
) |
|
|
(1,584 |
) |
Unamortized premium dedesignated fair value hedge |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,868 |
|
|
|
184,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.25% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(2,135 |
) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,865 |
|
|
|
147,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
514,733 |
|
|
$ |
491,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Risk Management
We use interest rate swaps (derivative instruments) to manage our exposure to interest rate risk.
As of March 31, 2011, we have an interest rate swap that hedges our exposure to the cash flow risk
caused by the effects of LIBOR changes on a $155 million Credit Agreement advance. This interest
rate swap effectively converts $155 million of LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt having an
interest rate of 3.74% plus an applicable margin, currently 2.50%, which equals an effective
interest rate of 6.24% as of March 31, 2011. This swap contract matures in February 2013.
We have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. Based on our assessment of
effectiveness using the change in variable cash flows method, we have determined that this interest
rate swap is effective in offsetting the variability in interest payments on $155 million of our
variable rate debt resulting from changes in LIBOR. Under hedge accounting, we adjust our cash
flow hedge on a quarterly basis to its fair value with the offsetting fair value adjustment to
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Also on a quarterly basis, we measure hedge effectiveness by
comparing the present value of the cumulative change in the expected future interest to be paid or
received on the variable leg of our swap against the expected future interest payments on $155
million of our variable rate debt. Any ineffectiveness is reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to interest expense. To date, we have had no ineffectiveness on our cash flow
hedge.
- 13 -
Additional information on our interest rate swap is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Offsetting |
|
Offsetting |
|
Derivative Instrument |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap designated as cash flow hedging instrument: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
($155 million of LIBOR based debt interest)
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
|
$ |
8,743 |
|
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
8,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap designated as cash flow hedging instrument: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
($155 million of LIBOR based debt interest)
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
|
$ |
10,026 |
|
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
10,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense and Other Debt Information
Interest expense consists of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Interest on outstanding debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement, net of interest on interest rate swap |
|
$ |
2,365 |
|
|
$ |
2,472 |
|
6.25% Senior Notes, net of interest on interest rate swaps |
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
8.25% Senior Notes |
|
|
3,094 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
Net fair value adjustments to interest rate swaps (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Net amortization of discount and deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Commitment fees |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest incurred |
|
|
8,753 |
|
|
|
7,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less capitalized interest |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense |
|
$ |
8,549 |
|
|
$ |
7,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest (2) |
|
$ |
14,439 |
|
|
$ |
10,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents fair value adjustments to interest rate swap agreements settled during the
first quarter of 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Net of cash received under previous interest rate swap agreements of $1.9 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2010. |
Note 8: Significant Customers
All revenues are domestic revenues, of which 96% are currently generated from our two largest
customers: Holly and Alon. The vast majority of our revenues are derived from activities
conducted in the southwest United States.
The following table presents the percentage of total revenues generated by each of these customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Holly |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
Alon |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
- 14 -
Note 9: Related Party Transactions
Holly Agreements
We serve Hollys refineries in New Mexico, Utah and Oklahoma under the following long-term pipeline
and terminal, tankage and throughput agreements:
|
|
|
Holly PTA (pipelines and terminals throughput agreement expiring in 2019 that relates to
assets contributed to us by Holly upon our initial public offering in 2004); |
|
|
|
Holly IPA (intermediate pipelines throughput agreement expiring in 2024 that relates to
assets acquired from Holly in 2005 and 2009); |
|
|
|
Holly CPTA (crude pipelines and tankage throughput agreement expiring in 2023 that
relates to assets acquired from Holly in 2008); |
|
|
|
Holly PTTA (pipeline, tankage and loading rack throughput agreement expiring in 2024
that relates to the Tulsa east facilities acquired from Sinclair in 2009 and from Holly in
March 2010); |
|
|
|
Holly RPA (pipeline throughput agreement expiring in 2024 that relates to the Roadrunner
Pipeline acquired from Holly in 2009); |
|
|
|
Holly ETA (equipment and throughput agreement expiring in 2024 that relates to the Tulsa
west facilities acquired from Holly in 2009); |
|
|
|
Holly NPA (natural gas pipeline throughput agreement expiring in 2024); and |
|
|
|
Holly ATA (asphalt loading rack throughput agreement expiring in 2025 that relates to
the Lovington rack facility acquired from Holly in March 2010). |
Under these agreements, Holly agreed to transport, store and throughput volumes of refined product
and crude oil on our pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that result in
minimum annual payments to us. These minimum annual payments or revenues are subject to annual
tariff rate adjustments on July 1, based on the Producer Price Index (PPI) or Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) index. As of March 31, 2011, these agreements with Holly will
result in minimum annualized payments to us of $133 million.
If Holly fails to meet its minimum volume commitments under the agreements in any quarter, it will
be required to pay us in cash the amount of any shortfall by the last day of the month following
the end of the quarter. A shortfall payment under the Holly PTA and Holly IPA may be applied as a
credit in the following four quarters after minimum obligations are met.
Under certain provisions of an omnibus agreement we have with Holly (the Omnibus Agreement) we
pay Holly an annual administrative fee for the provision by Holly or its affiliates of various
general and administrative services to us, currently $2.3 million. This fee does not include the
salaries of pipeline and terminal personnel or the cost of their employee benefits, which are
charged to us separately by Holly. Also, we reimburse Holly and its affiliates for direct expenses
they incur on our behalf.
Related party transactions with Holly are as follows:
|
|
Revenues received from Holly were $34.1 million and $33.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
|
Holly charged general and administrative services under the Omnibus Agreement of $0.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. |
|
|
We reimbursed Holly for costs of employees supporting our operations of $5 million and $4.2
million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
|
We distributed $9.7 million and $8.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, respectively, to Holly as regular distributions on its common units, and general partner
interest, including general partner incentive distributions. |
|
|
Accounts receivable from Holly were $20.4 million and $19 million at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. |
- 15 -
|
|
Accounts payable to Holly were $4.3 million and $3.9 million at March 31, 2011 and December
31, 2010, respectively. |
|
|
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 include $1.1 million of shortfalls
billed under the Holly IPA in 2010, as Holly did not exceed its minimum volume commitment in
any of the subsequent four quarters. Deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets at
March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, includes $3.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively,
relating to the Holly IPA. It is possible that Holly may not exceed its minimum obligations
under the Holly IPA to allow Holly to receive credit for any of the $3.8 million deferred at
March 31, 2011. |
|
|
We acquired certain storage assets and an asphalt loading rack facility from Holly in March
2010. See Note 2 for a description of this transaction. |
Note 10: Partners Equity
Holly currently holds 7,290,000 of our common units and the 2% general partner interest, which
together constitutes a 34% ownership interest in us.
In May 2010, all of the conditions necessary to end the subordination period for the 937,500 Class
B subordinated units originally issued to Alon in connection with our acquisition of assets from
Alon in 2005 were met and the units were converted into our common units on a one-for-one basis.
These subordinated units were not publicly traded.
Under our registration statement filed with the SEC using a shelf registration process, we
currently have the ability to raise $860 million through security offerings, through one or more
prospectus supplements that would describe, among other things, the specific amounts, prices and
terms of any securities offered and how the proceeds would be used. Any proceeds from the sale of
securities would be used for general business purposes, which may include, among other things,
funding acquisitions of assets or businesses, working capital, capital expenditures, investments in
subsidiaries, the retirement of existing debt and/or the repurchase of common units or other
securities.
Allocations of Net Income
Net income attributable to Holly Energy Partners, L.P. is allocated between limited partners and
the general partner interest in accordance with the provisions of the partnership agreement. HEP
net income allocated to the general partner includes incentive distributions that are declared
subsequent to quarter end. After the amount of incentive distributions is allocated to the general
partner, the remaining net income attributable to HEP is allocated to the partners based on their
weighted-average ownership percentage during the period.
The following table presents the allocation of the general partner interest in net income for the
periods presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
General partner interest in net income |
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
169 |
|
General partner incentive distribution |
|
|
3,325 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general partner interest in net income attributable to HEP |
|
$ |
3,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Distributions
Our general partner, HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., is entitled to incentive distributions if the
amount we distribute with respect to any quarter exceeds specified target levels.
- 16 -
On April 27, 2011, we announced our cash distribution for the first quarter of 2011 of $0.855 per
unit. The
distribution is payable on all common and general partner units and will be paid May 13, 2011 to
all unitholders of record on May 6, 2011.
The following table presents the allocation of our regular quarterly cash distributions to the
general and limited partners for the periods in which they apply. Our distributions are declared
subsequent to quarter end; therefore, the amounts presented do not reflect distributions paid
during the periods presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data) |
|
General partner interest |
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
418 |
|
General partner incentive distribution |
|
|
3,325 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general partner distribution |
|
|
3,778 |
|
|
|
2,895 |
|
Limited partner distribution |
|
|
18,877 |
|
|
|
17,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total regular quarterly cash distribution |
|
$ |
22,655 |
|
|
$ |
20,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distribution per unit applicable to
limited partners |
|
$ |
0.855 |
|
|
$ |
0.815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a master limited partnership, we distribute our available cash, which historically has
exceeded our net income because depreciation and amortization expense represents a non-cash charge
against income. The result is a decline in our equity since our regular quarterly distributions
have exceeded our quarterly net income. Additionally, if the assets contributed and acquired from
Holly had occurred while we were not a consolidated variable interest entity of Holly, our
acquisition cost in excess of Hollys historical basis in the transferred assets of $218 million
would have been recorded in our financial statements as increases to our properties and equipment
and intangible assets instead of decreases to our partners equity.
Comprehensive Income
We have other comprehensive income resulting from fair value adjustments to our cash flow hedge.
Our comprehensive income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge |
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to HEP unitholders |
|
$ |
16,452 |
|
|
$ |
9,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11: Supplemental Guarantor/Non-Guarantor Financial Information
Obligations of Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (Parent) under the 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25% Senior
Notes have been jointly and severally guaranteed by each of its direct and indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries (Guarantor Subsidiaries). These guarantees are full and unconditional.
The following financial information presents condensed consolidating balance sheets, statements of
income, and statements of cash flows of the Parent and the Guarantor Subsidiaries. The information
has been presented as if the Parent accounted for its ownership in the Guarantor Subsidiaries using
the equity method of accounting.
- 17 -
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,475 |
|
Intercompany accounts receivable (payable) |
|
|
(127,271 |
) |
|
|
127,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(127,058 |
) |
|
|
152,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,523 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
564,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(564,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transportation agreements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,753 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,109 |
|
Investment in SLC Pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,802 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
438,737 |
|
|
$ |
777,999 |
|
|
$ |
(564,586 |
) |
|
$ |
652,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,325 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,325 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
Accrued property taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
21,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
332,733 |
|
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514,733 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,511 |
|
Partners equity |
|
|
103,890 |
|
|
|
564,586 |
|
|
|
(564,586 |
) |
|
|
103,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
$ |
438,737 |
|
|
$ |
777,999 |
|
|
$ |
(564,586 |
) |
|
$ |
652,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
401 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,508 |
|
Intercompany accounts receivable (payable) |
|
|
(92,230 |
) |
|
|
92,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(91,993 |
) |
|
|
115,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,950 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
541,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(541,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transportation agreements, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,489 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,109 |
|
Investment in SLC Pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,437 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,261 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
450,530 |
|
|
$ |
734,005 |
|
|
$ |
(541,262 |
) |
|
$ |
643,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,238 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,238 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
7,498 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,517 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,437 |
|
Accrued property taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
8,509 |
|
|
|
22,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
332,649 |
|
|
|
158,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491,648 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,809 |
|
Partners equity |
|
|
109,372 |
|
|
|
541,262 |
|
|
|
(541,262 |
) |
|
|
109,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
$ |
450,530 |
|
|
$ |
734,005 |
|
|
$ |
(541,262 |
) |
|
$ |
643,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 18 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,107 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34,107 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,796 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,640 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
21,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
23,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
22,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of SLC Pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
740 |
|
Interest income (expense) |
|
|
(6,122 |
) |
|
|
(2,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,549 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,920 |
|
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
(22,042 |
) |
|
|
(7,821 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
15,169 |
|
|
|
22,270 |
|
|
|
(22,042 |
) |
|
|
15,397 |
|
State income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
$ |
22,042 |
|
|
$ |
(22,042 |
) |
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,597 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,597 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
21,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
|
|
19,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
|
|
17,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of SLC Pipeline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
481 |
|
Interest income (expense) |
|
|
(4,982 |
) |
|
|
(2,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,541 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,503 |
|
|
|
(2,085 |
) |
|
|
(17,485 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
17,579 |
|
|
|
(17,485 |
) |
|
|
10,796 |
|
State income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
|
$ |
17,485 |
|
|
$ |
(17,485 |
) |
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 19 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2011 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
22,604 |
|
|
$ |
(7,382 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to properties and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under credit agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
Distributions to HEP unitholders |
|
|
(22,205 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,205 |
) |
Purchase of units for restricted grants |
|
|
(399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,604 |
) |
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2010 |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
(69,523 |
) |
|
$ |
88,246 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to properties and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
Acquisition of assets from Holly Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net repayments under credit agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of senior notes |
|
|
147,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,540 |
|
Distributions to HEP unitholders |
|
|
(20,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,506 |
) |
Purchase price in excess of transferred basis
in assets
acquired from Holly Corporation |
|
|
(55,766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,766 |
) |
Purchase of units for restricted grants |
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,523 |
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,101 |
|
Beginning of period |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
16,607 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 20 -
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
This Item 2, including but not limited to the sections on Results of Operations and
Liquidity and Capital Resources, contains forward-looking statements. See Forward-Looking
Statements at the beginning of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In this document,
the words we, our, ours and us refer to HEP and its consolidated subsidiaries or to HEP or
an individual subsidiary and not to any other person.
OVERVIEW
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership. We own and operate petroleum
product and crude oil pipeline and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that support Holly
Corporations (Holly) refining and marketing operations in west Texas, New Mexico, Utah,
Oklahoma, Idaho and Arizona. Holly and its subsidiaries currently own a 34% interest in us
including the 2% general partnership interest. We also own and operate refined product pipelines
and terminals, located primarily in Texas, that service Alons (Alon) Big Spring refinery in Big
Spring, Texas. Additionally, we own a 25% joint venture interest in the SLC Pipeline (the SLC
Pipeline), a 95-mile intrastate crude oil pipeline system that serves refineries in the Salt Lake
City area.
We generate revenues by charging tariffs for transporting petroleum products and crude oil through
our pipelines, by charging fees for terminalling refined products and other hydrocarbons and
storing and providing other services at our storage tanks and terminals. We do not take ownership
of products that we transport, terminal or store, and therefore, we are not directly exposed to
changes in commodity prices.
2010 Acquisitions
Tulsa East / Lovington Storage Asset Transaction
On March 31, 2010, we acquired from Holly certain storage assets for $93 million, consisting of
hydrocarbon storage tanks having approximately 2 million barrels of storage capacity, a rail
loading rack and a truck unloading rack located at Hollys Tulsa refinery east facility and an
asphalt loading rack facility located at Hollys Navajo refinery facility in Lovington, New Mexico.
Agreements with Holly Corporation and Alon
We serve Hollys refineries in New Mexico, Utah and Oklahoma under the following long-term pipeline
and terminal, tankage and throughput agreements:
|
|
|
Holly PTA (pipelines and terminals throughput agreement expiring in 2019 that relates to
assets contributed to us by Holly upon our initial public offering in 2004); |
|
|
|
Holly IPA (intermediate pipelines throughput agreement expiring in 2024 that relates to
assets acquired from Holly in 2005 and 2009); |
|
|
|
Holly CPTA (crude pipelines and tankage throughput agreement expiring in 2023 that
relates to assets acquired from Holly in 2008); |
|
|
|
Holly PTTA (pipeline, tankage and loading rack throughput agreement expiring in 2024
that relates to the Tulsa east facilities acquired from Sinclair in 2009 and from Holly in
March 2010); |
|
|
|
Holly RPA (pipeline throughput agreement expiring in 2024 that relates to the Roadrunner
Pipeline acquired from Holly in 2009); |
|
|
|
Holly ETA (equipment and throughput agreement expiring in 2024 that relates to the Tulsa
west facilities acquired from Holly in 2009); |
|
|
|
Holly NPA (natural gas pipeline throughput agreement expiring in 2024); and |
|
|
|
Holly ATA (asphalt loading rack throughput agreement expiring in 2025 that relates to
the Lovington rack facility acquired from Holly in March 2010). |
- 21 -
Under these agreements, Holly agreed to transport, store and throughput volumes of refined product
and crude oil on our pipelines and terminal, tankage and loading rack facilities that result in
minimum annual payments to us. These minimum annual payments or revenues are subject to annual
tariff rate adjustments on July 1, based on the Producer Price Index (PPI) or Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC) index. As of March 31, 2011, these agreements with Holly will
result in minimum annualized payments to us of $133 million.
We also have a pipelines and terminals agreement with Alon expiring in 2020 under which Alon has
agreed to transport on our pipelines and throughput through our terminals volumes of refined
products that result in a minimum level of annual revenue that is also subject to annual tariff
rate adjustments.
We have a capacity lease agreement with Alon under which we lease Alon space on our Orla to El Paso
pipeline for the shipment of up to 17,500 barrels of refined product per day. The terms under this
agreement expire beginning in 2012 through 2018.
As of March 31, 2011, contractual minimums under our long-term service agreements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Annualized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment |
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement |
|
(In millions) |
|
|
Year of Maturity |
|
Contract Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holly PTA |
|
$ |
43.7 |
|
|
2019 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly IPA |
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
2024 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly CPTA |
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
2023 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly PTTA |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
2024 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly RPA |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
2024 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly ETA |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
2024 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly ATA |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
2025 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Holly NPA |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
2024 |
|
Minimum revenue commitment |
Alon PTA |
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
2020 |
|
Minimum volume commitment |
Alon capacity lease |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
Various |
|
Capacity lease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
162.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant reduction in revenues under these agreements would have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
Under certain provisions of an omnibus agreement (Omnibus Agreement) that we have with Holly, we
pay Holly an annual administrative fee, currently $2.3 million, for the provision by Holly or its
affiliates of various general and administrative services to us. This fee does not include the
salaries of pipeline and terminal personnel or the cost of their employee benefits, which are
separately charged to us by Holly. We also reimburse Holly and its affiliates for direct expenses
they incur on our behalf.
- 22 -
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Income, Distributable Cash Flow and Volumes
The following tables present income, distributable cash flow and volume information for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
from |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per unit data) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates refined product pipelines |
|
$ |
9,858 |
|
|
$ |
11,480 |
|
|
$ |
(1,622 |
) |
Affiliates intermediate pipelines |
|
|
4,633 |
|
|
|
5,792 |
|
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
Affiliates crude pipelines |
|
|
9,321 |
|
|
|
9,405 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,812 |
|
|
|
26,677 |
|
|
|
(2,865 |
) |
Third parties refined product pipelines |
|
|
9,155 |
|
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,967 |
|
|
|
32,081 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Terminals and loading racks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
|
10,295 |
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
3,375 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,050 |
|
|
|
8,615 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
45,017 |
|
|
|
40,696 |
|
|
|
4,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
12,796 |
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,799 |
|
|
|
22,833 |
|
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,218 |
|
|
|
17,863 |
|
|
|
5,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of SLC Pipeline |
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Interest expense, including amortization |
|
|
(8,549 |
) |
|
|
(7,544 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,821 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
15,397 |
|
|
|
10,796 |
|
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income tax |
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
15,169 |
|
|
|
10,702 |
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less general partner interest in net income, including incentive distributions (1) |
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
11,607 |
|
|
$ |
8,056 |
|
|
$ |
3,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners earnings per unit basic and diluted (1) |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partners units outstanding |
|
|
22,079 |
|
|
|
22,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (2) |
|
$ |
31,586 |
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
$ |
6,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable cash flow (3) |
|
$ |
20,772 |
|
|
$ |
20,159 |
|
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes (bpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates refined product pipelines |
|
|
77,218 |
|
|
|
93,382 |
|
|
|
(16,164 |
) |
Affiliates intermediate pipelines |
|
|
68,617 |
|
|
|
79,118 |
|
|
|
(10,501 |
) |
Affiliates crude pipelines |
|
|
136,257 |
|
|
|
134,889 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
282,092 |
|
|
|
307,389 |
|
|
|
(25,297 |
) |
Third parties refined product pipelines |
|
|
48,528 |
|
|
|
30,835 |
|
|
|
17,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330,620 |
|
|
|
338,224 |
|
|
|
(7,604 |
) |
Terminals and loading racks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates |
|
|
157,932 |
|
|
|
163,796 |
|
|
|
(5,864 |
) |
Third parties |
|
|
40,356 |
|
|
|
34,843 |
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,288 |
|
|
|
198,639 |
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total for pipelines and terminal assets (bpd) |
|
|
528,908 |
|
|
|
536,863 |
|
|
|
(7,955 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 23 -
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income is allocated between limited partners and the general partner interest in
accordance with the provisions of the partnership agreement. Net income allocated to the
general partner includes incentive distributions declared subsequent to quarter end. Net
income attributable to the limited partners is divided by the weighted average limited
partner units outstanding in computing the limited partners per unit interest in net
income. |
|
(2) |
|
EBITDA is calculated as net income plus (i) interest expense, net of interest income,
(ii) state income tax and (iii) depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation
based upon U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). However, the amounts
included in the EBITDA calculation are derived from amounts included in our consolidated
financial statements. EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or
operating income, as an indication of our operating performance or as an alternative to
operating cash flow as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to
similarly titled measures of other companies. EBITDA is presented here because it is a
widely used financial indicator used by investors and analysts to measure performance.
EBITDA also is used by our management for internal analysis and as a basis for compliance
with financial covenants. |
Set forth below is our calculation of EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (subtract): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,259 |
|
|
|
5,886 |
|
Amortization of discount and deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Increase in interest expense change in fair value of
interest rate swaps and swap settlement costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
State income tax |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
31,586 |
|
|
$ |
25,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Distributable cash flow is not a calculation based upon GAAP. However, the
amounts included in the calculation are derived from amounts separately presented in our
consolidated financial statements, with the exception of equity in excess cash flows over
earnings of SLC Pipeline, and maintenance capital expenditures. Distributable cash flow
should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income or operating
income as an indication of our operating performance or as an alternative to operating cash
flow as a measure of liquidity. Distributable cash flow is not necessarily comparable to
similarly titled measures of other companies. Distributable cash flow is presented here
because it is a widely accepted financial indicator used by investors to compare
partnership performance. It is also used by management for internal analysis and for our
performance units. We believe that this measure provides investors an enhanced perspective
of the operating performance of our assets and the cash our business is generating. |
- 24 -
Set forth below is our calculation of distributable cash flow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
15,169 |
|
|
$ |
10,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (subtract): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,640 |
|
|
|
7,210 |
|
Amortization of discount and deferred debt issuance costs |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in interest expense change in fair value of
interest rate swaps and swap settlement costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,464 |
|
Equity in excess cash flows over earnings of SLC Pipeline |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue |
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
1,108 |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures* |
|
|
(1,229 |
) |
|
|
(697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable cash flow |
|
$ |
20,772 |
|
|
$ |
20,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Maintenance capital expenditures are capital expenditures made to replace
partially or fully depreciated assets in order to maintain the existing operating
capacity of our assets and to extend their useful lives. Maintenance capital
expenditures include expenditures required to maintain equipment reliability, tankage
and pipeline integrity, safety and to address environmental regulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance Sheet Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,502 |
|
|
$ |
403 |
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
|
$ |
(7,758 |
) |
Total assets |
|
$ |
652,150 |
|
|
$ |
643,273 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
514,733 |
|
|
$ |
491,648 |
|
Partners equity (4) |
|
$ |
103,890 |
|
|
$ |
109,372 |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
As a master limited partnership, we distribute our available cash, which historically
has exceeded our net income because depreciation and amortization expense represents a
non-cash charge against income. The result is a decline in partners equity since our
regular quarterly distributions have exceeded our quarterly net income. Additionally, if
the assets contributed and acquired from Holly had occurred while we were not a
consolidated variable interest entity of Holly, our acquisition cost in excess of Hollys
historical basis in the transferred assets of $218 million would have been recorded in our
financial statements as increases to our properties and equipment and intangible assets
instead of decreases to our partners equity. |
- 25 -
Results of Operations Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared with Three Months Ended March
31, 2010
Summary
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $15.2 million, a $4.5 million increase
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase in overall earnings is due
principally to earnings attributable to our March 2010 asset acquisitions and an increase in
previously deferred revenue realized.
Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 include the recognition of $3.6 million of prior
shortfalls billed to shippers in 2010 as they did not meet their minimum volume commitments in any
of the subsequent four quarters. Revenues of $2.5 million relating to deficiency payments
associated with certain guaranteed shipping contracts were deferred during the three months ended
March 31, 2011. Such deferred revenue will be recognized in earnings either as payment for
shipments in excess of guaranteed levels or in 2012 when shipping rights expire unused after a
twelve-month period.
Revenues
Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $45 million, a $4.3 million increase
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This is due principally to revenues
attributable to our March 2010 asset acquisitions and a $1.1 million increase in previously
deferred revenue realized. Overall pipeline shipments were down slightly from the first quarter of
2010, reflecting an 8% decrease in affiliate pipeline shipments that were offset significantly by
an increase in third-party pipeline shipments.
Related-party pipeline and throughput volumes were down during the current year first quarter
as a result of downtime at Hollys Navajo refinery following a plant-wide power outage in late
January and a delay in the process of restoring production to planned operating levels during
February as a result of inclement weather. Also, production levels at the Navajo refinery were
also down during the first quarter of 2010 as a result of planned project work.
Revenues from our refined product pipelines were $19 million, an increase of $2.1 million
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase is due principally to a $1.7
million increase in previously deferred revenue realized. Volumes shipped on our refined product
pipelines averaged 125.7 thousand barrels per day (mbpd) compared to 124.2 mbpd for the same
period last year.
Revenues from our intermediate pipelines were $4.6 million, a decrease of $1.2
million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This includes a $0.6
million decrease in previously deferred revenue realized. Shipments on our intermediate
product pipeline system decreased to an average of 68.6 mbpd compared to 79.1 mbpd for the same
period last year.
Revenues from our crude pipelines were $9.3 million, a decrease of $0.1 million compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2010. Volumes on our crude pipelines averaged 136.3 mbpd compared to
134.9 mbpd for the same period last year.
Revenues from terminal, tankage and loading rack fees were $12.1 million, an increase of
$3.4 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase is due primarily to
$3.5 million in revenues attributable to our Tulsa storage and rack facilities acquired from Holly
in March 2010. Refined products terminalled in our facilities decreased to an average of
198.3 mbpd compared to 198.6 mbpd for the same period last year.
Operations Expense
Operations expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased by $0.3 million compared to
the three months ended March 31, 2010. This decrease was due principally to lower maintenance
costs incurred during the current year.
- 26 -
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased by $0.4 million
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This was due to increased depreciation
attributable to our March 2010 asset acquisitions and capital projects.
General and Administrative
General and administrative costs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 decreased by $1.2
million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 which included professional fees and
costs incurred as a result of our asset acquisitions from Holly.
Equity in Earnings of SLC Pipeline
Our equity in earnings of the SLC Pipeline was $0.7 million and $0.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 totaled $8.5 million, an increase of $1
million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase reflects interest on our
8.25% senior notes issued in March 2010. Additionally, interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 include fair value adjustments of $1.5 million attributable to interest rate swaps
settled in the first quarter of 2010. Excluding the effects of the 2010 fair value adjustments, our
aggregate effective interest rate was 6.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
5.7% for 2010.
State Income Tax
We recorded state income taxes of $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are solely attributable to the Texas margin tax.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, we received advances totaling $30 million and repaid $7
million, resulting in net borrowings of $23 million under our $275 million senior secured revolving
credit facility (the Credit Agreement) and an outstanding balance of $182 million at March 31,
2011. As of March 31, 2011, we had no working capital borrowings.
The Credit Agreement is available to fund capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions,
distribution payments and working capital and for general partnership purposes. It is also
available to fund letters of credit up to a $50 million sub-limit and to fund distributions to
unitholders up to a $30 million sub-limit.
In March 2010, we issued $150 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.25% senior notes maturing
March 15, 2018 (the 8.25% Senior Notes). A portion of the $147.5 million in net proceeds
received was used to fund our $93 million purchase of the Tulsa and Lovington storage assets from
Holly on March 31, 2010. Additionally, we used a portion to repay $42 million in outstanding
Credit Agreement borrowings, with the remaining proceeds available for general partnership
purposes, including working capital and capital expenditures. In addition, we have outstanding
$185 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% senior notes maturing March 1, 2015 (the 6.25%
Senior Notes) that are registered with the SEC.
Under our registration statement filed with the SEC using a shelf registration process, we
currently have the ability to raise $860 million through security offerings, through one or more
prospectus supplements that would describe, among other things, the specific amounts, prices and
terms of any securities offered and how the proceeds would be used. Any proceeds from the sale of
securities would be used for general business purposes, which may include, among other things,
funding acquisitions of assets or
businesses, working capital, capital expenditures, investments in subsidiaries, the retirement of
existing debt and/or the repurchase of common units or other securities.
- 27 -
We believe our current cash balances, future internally generated funds and funds available under
the Credit Agreement will provide sufficient resources to meet our working capital liquidity needs
for the foreseeable future.
In February 2011 we paid regular quarterly cash distributions of $0.845 on all units in an
aggregate amount of $22.2 million. Included in these distributions were $3.1 million of incentive
distribution payments to the general partner.
Cash and cash equivalents increased by $1.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
The cash flows provided by operating activities of $15.2 million exceeded the combined cash flows
used for investing and financing activities of $11.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
Working capital increased by $9.3 million to $1.5 million during the three months ended March 31,
2011.
Cash Flows Operating Activities
Cash flows from operating activities decreased by $3.5 million from $18.7 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 to $15.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This
decrease is due principally to interest payments attributable to the 8.25% Senior Notes.
Our major shippers are obligated to make deficiency payments to us if they do not meet their
minimum volume shipping obligations. Under certain agreements with these shippers, they have the
right to recapture these amounts if future volumes exceed minimum levels. We billed $3.6 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2010 related to shortfalls that subsequently expired
without recapture and were recognized as revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Another $2.5 million is included in our accounts receivable at March 31, 2011 related to shortfalls
that occurred during the first quarter of 2011.
Cash Flows Investing Activities
Cash flows used for investing activities decreased by $27.6 million from $39.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 to $11.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we invested $11.5 million and $1.9 million
in additions to properties and equipment, respectively. Additionally in March 2010, we acquired
storage assets from Holly for $37.2 million.
Cash Flows Financing Activities
Cash flows used for financing activities were $2.6 million compared to cash provided by financing
activities of $34.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of $37.1 million.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received $30 million and repaid $7 million in
advances under the Credit Agreement, we paid $22.2 million in regular quarterly cash distributions
to our general and limited partners, paid $3 million in financing costs to amend our previous
credit agreement and paid $0.4 million for the purchase of common units for recipients of our
restricted unit incentive grants. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we received $33
million and repaid $68 million in advances under the Credit Agreement. We also received $147.5
million in net proceeds upon the issuance of the 8.25% Senior Notes. Additionally during the three
months ended March 31, 2010, we paid $20.5 million in regular quarterly cash distributions to our
general and limited partners, paid $55.8 million in excess of Hollys transferred basis in the
storage assets acquired in March 2010 and paid $1.7 million for the purchase of common units for
recipients of restricted grants.
Capital Requirements
Our pipeline and terminalling operations are capital intensive, requiring investments to maintain,
expand, upgrade or enhance existing operations and to meet environmental and operational
regulations. Our capital requirements consist of maintenance capital expenditures and expansion
capital expenditures.
Repair and maintenance expenses associated with existing assets that are minor in nature and do not
extend the useful life of existing assets are charged to operating expenses as incurred.
- 28 -
Each year the HLS board of directors approves our annual capital budget, which specifies capital
projects that our management is authorized to undertake. Additionally, at times when conditions
warrant or as new opportunities arise, special projects may be approved. The funds allocated for a
particular capital project may be expended over a period in excess of a year, depending on the time
required to complete the project. Therefore, our planned capital expenditures for a given year
consist of expenditures approved for capital projects included in the current years capital budget
as well as, in certain cases, expenditures approved for capital projects in capital budgets for
prior years. The 2011 capital budget is comprised of $5.8 million for maintenance capital
expenditures and $20.1 million for expansion capital expenditures.
We are currently constructing five interconnecting pipelines between Hollys Tulsa east and west
refining facilities. The project is expected to cost approximately $35 million with completion in
the summer of 2011. We are currently negotiating terms for a long-term agreement with Holly to
transfer intermediate products via these pipelines that will commence upon completion of the
project. In the event that we are unable to obtain such an agreement, Holly will reimburse us for
the cost of the pipelines.
We have an option agreement with Holly, granting us an option to purchase Hollys 75% equity
interest in UNEV Pipeline, LLC (UNEV Pipeline), a joint venture pipeline currently under
construction that will be capable of transporting refined petroleum products from Salt Lake City,
Utah to Las Vegas, Nevada. Under this agreement, we have an option to purchase Hollys equity
interest in the UNEV Pipeline, effective for a 180-day period commencing when the UNEV Pipeline
becomes operational, at a purchase price equal to Hollys investment in the joint venture pipeline,
plus interest at 7% per annum. The initial capacity of the pipeline will be 62,000 bpd, with the
capacity for further expansion to 120,000 bpd. The current total construction cost of the pipeline
project including terminals is expected to be approximately in the $340 million range. This
includes the construction of ethanol blending and storage facilities at the Cedar City terminal.
Hollys share of this estimated cost is the $255 million range and is exclusive of the 7% per annum
interest cost under our option to purchase Hollys 75% interest in the UNEV Pipeline. The pipeline
is in the final construction phase and is expected to be mechanically complete in the third quarter
of 2011.
We expect that our currently planned sustaining and maintenance capital expenditures as well as
expenditures for acquisitions and capital development projects such as the UNEV Pipeline described
above, will be funded with existing cash generated by operations, the sale of additional limited
partner common units, the issuance of debt securities and advances under our Credit Agreement, or a
combination thereof. With volatility and uncertainty at times in the credit and equity markets,
there may be limits on our ability to issue new debt or equity financing. Additionally, due to
pricing movements in the debt and equity markets, we may not be able to issue new debt and equity
securities at acceptable pricing. Without additional capital beyond amounts available under the
Credit Agreement, our ability to fund some of these capital projects may be limited, especially the
UNEV Pipeline. We are not obligated to purchase the UNEV Pipeline nor are we subject to any fees
or penalties if HLS board of directors decides not to proceed with this opportunity.
Credit Agreement
We have a $275 million Credit Agreement that is available to fund capital expenditures,
investments, acquisitions, distribution payments and working capital and for general partnership
purposes. It is also available to fund letters of credit up to a $50 million sub-limit and to fund
distributions to unitholders up to a $30 million sub-limit. In February 2011, we amended our
previous credit agreement (expiring in August 2011), slightly, reducing the size of the credit
facility from $300 million to $275 million. The size was reduced based on managements review of
past and forecasted utilization of the facility. The Credit Agreement expires in February 2016;
however, in the event that the 6.25% Senior Notes are not repurchased, refinanced, extended or
repaid prior to September 1, 2014, the Credit Agreement shall expire on that date.
- 29 -
Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are collateralized by substantially all of our assets.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., our general
partner, and guaranteed by our material, wholly-owned subsidiaries. Any recourse to HEP Logistics
Holdings, L.P. would be limited to the extent of its assets, which other than its investment in us,
are not significant.
We may prepay all loans at any time without penalty, except for payment of certain breakage and
related costs.
Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement bears interest, at our option, at either (a) the reference
rate as announced by the administrative agent plus an applicable margin (ranging from 1.00% to
2.00%) or (b) at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus an applicable
margin (ranging from 2.00% to 3.00%). In each case, the applicable margin is based upon the ratio
of our funded debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization, as defined in the Credit Agreement). We incur a commitment fee on
the unused portion of the Credit Agreement at an annual rate ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% based
upon the ratio of our funded debt to EBITDA for the four most recently completed fiscal quarters.
The Credit Agreement imposes certain requirements on us including: a prohibition against
distribution to unitholders if, before or after the distribution, a potential default or an event
of default as defined in the agreement would occur; limitations on our ability to incur debt, make
loans, acquire other companies, change the nature of our business, enter a merger or consolidation,
or sell assets; and covenants that require maintenance of a specified EBITDA to interest expense
ratio, total debt to EBITDA ratio and senior debt to EBITDA ratio. If an event of default exists
under the agreement, the lenders will be able to accelerate the maturity of the debt and exercise
other rights and remedies.
Senior Notes
The 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25% Senior Notes (collectively, the Senior Notes) are unsecured
and impose certain restrictive covenants which we are subject to and currently in compliance with,
including limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, sell
assets, incur certain liens, pay distributions, enter into transactions with affiliates, and enter
into mergers. At any time when the Senior Notes are rated investment grade by both Moodys and
Standard & Poors and no default or event of default exists, we will not be subject to many of the
foregoing covenants. Additionally, we have certain redemption rights under the Senior Notes.
Indebtedness under the Senior Notes is recourse to HEP Logistics Holdings, L.P., our general
partner, and guaranteed by our wholly-owned subsidiaries. However, any recourse to HEP Logistics
Holdings, L.P. would be limited to the extent of its assets, which other than its investment in us,
are not significant.
The carrying amounts of our long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Credit Agreement |
|
$ |
182,000 |
|
|
$ |
159,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
185,000 |
|
|
|
185,000 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(1,489 |
) |
|
|
(1,584 |
) |
Unamortized premium dedesignated fair value hedge |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,868 |
|
|
|
184,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.25% Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(2,135 |
) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,865 |
|
|
|
147,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
514,733 |
|
|
$ |
491,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Risk Management for a discussion of our interest rate swap.
- 30 -
Contractual Obligations
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we had net borrowings of $23 million resulting in
$182 million of borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement at March 31, 2011.
There were no other significant changes to our long-term contractual obligations during this
period.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent years and did not have a material
impact on our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
A substantial majority of our revenues are generated under long-term contracts that provide for
increases in our rates and minimum revenue guarantees annually for increases in the PPI.
Historically, the PPI has increased an average of 3% annually over the past 5 calendar years. This
is no indication that PPI increases will be realized in the near future. Furthermore, certain of
our long-term contracts have provisions that limit the level of annual PPI percentage rate
increases.
Environmental Matters
Our operation of pipelines, terminals, and associated facilities in connection with the
transportation and storage of refined products and crude oil is subject to stringent and complex
federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the
environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. As with the industry
generally, compliance with existing and anticipated laws and regulations increases our overall cost
of business, including our capital costs to construct, maintain, and upgrade equipment and
facilities. While these laws and regulations affect our maintenance capital expenditures and net
income, we believe that they do not affect our competitive position in that the operations of our
competitors are similarly affected. We believe that our operations are in substantial compliance
with applicable environmental laws and regulations. However, these laws and regulations, and the
interpretation or enforcement thereof, are subject to frequent change by regulatory authorities,
and we are unable to predict the ongoing cost to us of complying with these laws and regulations or
the future impact of these laws and regulations on our operations. Violation of environmental
laws, regulations, and permits can result in the imposition of significant administrative, civil
and criminal penalties, injunctions, and construction bans or delays. A discharge of hydrocarbons
or hazardous substances into the environment could, to the extent the event is not insured, subject
us to substantial expense, including both the cost to comply with applicable laws and regulations
and claims made by employees, neighboring landowners and other third parties for personal injury
and property damage.
Under the Omnibus Agreement, Holly agreed to indemnify us up to certain aggregate amounts for any
environmental noncompliance and remediation liabilities associated with assets transferred to us
and occurring or existing prior to the date of such transfers. The transfers that are covered by
the agreement include the refined product pipelines, terminals and tanks transferred by Hollys
subsidiaries in connection with our initial public offering in July 2004, the intermediate
pipelines acquired in July 2005, the crude pipelines and tankage assets acquired in 2008, and the
asphalt loading rack facility acquired in March 2010. The Omnibus Agreement provides environmental
indemnification of up to $15 million for the assets transferred to us, other than the crude
pipelines and tankage assets, plus an additional $2.5 million for the intermediate pipelines
acquired in July 2005. Except as described below, Hollys indemnification obligations described
above will remain in effect for an asset for ten years following the date it is transferred to us.
The Omnibus Agreement also provides an additional $7.5 million of indemnification through 2023 for
environmental noncompliance and remediation liabilities specific to the crude pipelines and tankage
assets. Hollys indemnification obligations described above do not apply to (i) the Tulsa west
loading racks acquired in August 2009, (ii) the 16-inch intermediate pipeline acquired in June
2009, (iii) the Roadrunner Pipeline, (iv) the Beeson Pipeline, (v) the logistics and storage assets
acquired from Sinclair in December 2009, or (vi) the Tulsa east storage tanks and loading racks
acquired in March 2010.
- 31 -
Under provisions of the Holly ETA and Holly PTTA, Holly will indemnify us for environmental
liabilities arising from our pre-ownership operations of the Tulsa west loading rack facilities
acquired from Holly in
August 2009, the Tulsa logistics and storage assets acquired from Sinclair in December 2009 and the
Tulsa east storage tanks and loading racks acquired from Holly in March 2010. Additionally, Holly
agreed to indemnify us for any liabilities arising from Hollys operation of the loading racks
under the Holly ETA.
We have an environmental agreement with Alon with respect to pre-closing environmental costs and
liabilities relating to the pipelines and terminals acquired from Alon in 2005, under which Alon
will indemnify us through 2015, subject to a $100,000 deductible and a $20 million maximum
liability cap.
There are environmental remediation projects that are currently in progress that relate to certain
assets acquired from Holly. Certain of these projects were underway prior to our purchase and
represent liabilities of Holly Corporation as the obligation for future remediation activities was
retained by Holly. At March 31, 2011, we have an accrual of $0.3 million that relates to
environmental clean-up projects for which we have assumed liability. The remaining projects,
including assessment and monitoring activities, are covered under the Holly environmental
indemnification discussed above and represent liabilities of Holly Corporation.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as
of the date of the financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We
consider the following policies to be the most critical to understanding the judgments that are
involved and the uncertainties that could impact our results of operations, financial condition and
cash flows
Our significant accounting policies are described in Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Operations Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Certain critical accounting policies that materially
affect the amounts recorded in our consolidated financial statements include revenue recognition,
assessing the possible impairment of certain long-lived assets and assessing contingent liabilities
for probable losses. There have been no changes to these policies in 2011. We consider these
policies to be the most critical to understanding the judgments that are involved and the
uncertainties that could impact our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
RISK MANAGEMENT
We use interest rate swaps (derivative instruments) to manage our exposure to interest rate risk.
As of March 31, 2011, we have an interest rate swap that hedges our exposure to the cash flow risk
caused by the effects of LIBOR changes on a $155 million Credit Agreement advance. This interest
rate swap effectively converts our $155 million LIBOR based debt to fixed rate debt having an
interest rate of 3.74% plus an applicable margin currently 2.50%, which equals an effective
interest rate of 6.24% as of March 31, 2011. This swap contract matures in February 2013.
We have designated this interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. Based on our assessment of
effectiveness using the change in variable cash flows method, we have determined that this interest
rate swap is effective in offsetting the variability in interest payments on $155 million of our
variable rate debt resulting from changes in LIBOR. Under hedge accounting, we adjust our cash
flow hedge on a quarterly basis to its fair value with the offsetting fair value adjustment to
accumulated other comprehensive loss. Also on a quarterly basis, we measure hedge effectiveness by
comparing the present value of the cumulative change in the expected future interest to be paid or
received on the variable leg of our swap against the expected future interest payments on $155
million of our variable rate debt. Any ineffectiveness is reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to interest expense. To date, we have had no ineffectiveness on our cash flow
hedge.
- 32 -
Additional information on our interest rate swap is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Offsetting |
|
Offsetting |
|
Derivative Instrument |
|
Location |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Balance |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap designated as cash flow hedging instrument: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
($155 million of LIBOR based debt interest)
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
|
$ |
8,743 |
|
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
8,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap designated as cash flow hedging instrument: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable-to-fixed interest rate swap contract
($155 million of LIBOR based debt interest)
|
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
|
$ |
10,026 |
|
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
10,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We review publicly available information on our counterparty in order to review and monitor
its financial stability and assess its ongoing ability to honor its commitments under the interest
rate swap contract. This counterparty is a large financial institution. Furthermore, we have not
experienced, nor do we expect to experience, any difficulty in the counterparty honoring its
respective commitment.
The market risk inherent in our debt positions is the potential change arising from increases or
decreases in interest rates as discussed below.
At March 31, 2011, we had an outstanding principal balance on our 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25%
Senior Notes of $185 million and $150 million, respectively. A change in interest rates would
generally affect the fair value of the Senior Notes, but not our earnings or cash flows. At March
31, 2011, the fair value of our 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25% Senior Notes were $185 million and
$160.5 million, respectively. We estimate a hypothetical 10% change in the yield-to-maturity
applicable to the 6.25% Senior Notes and 8.25% Senior Notes at March 31, 2011 would result in a
change of approximately $4 million and $6 million, respectively, in the fair value of the
underlying notes.
For the variable rate Credit Agreement, changes in interest rates would affect cash flows, but not
the fair value. At March 31, 2011, borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement were $182
million. By means of our cash flow hedge, we have effectively converted the variable rate on $155
million of outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 6.24%.
At March 31, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents included highly liquid investments with a maturity
of three months or less at the time of purchase. Due to the short-term nature of our cash and cash
equivalents, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would not have a material effect on the
fair market value of our portfolio. Since we have the ability to liquidate this portfolio, we do
not expect our operating results or cash flows to be materially affected by the effect of a sudden
change in market interest rates on our investment portfolio.
Our operations are subject to normal hazards of operations, including fire, explosion and
weather-related perils. We maintain various insurance coverages, including business interruption
insurance, subject to certain deductibles. We are not fully insured against certain risks because
such risks are not fully insurable, coverage is unavailable, or premium costs, in our judgment, do
not justify such expenditures.
We have a risk management oversight committee that is made up of members from our senior
management. This committee monitors our risk environment and provides direction for activities to
mitigate, to an acceptable level, identified risks that may adversely affect the achievement of our
goals.
- 33 -
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices. See Risk
Management under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for a discussion of market risk exposures that we have with respect to our cash and
cash equivalents and long-term debt. We utilize derivative instruments to hedge our interest rate
exposure, also discussed under Risk Management.
Since we do not own products shipped on our pipelines or terminalled at our terminal facilities, we
do not have market risks associated with commodity prices.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated, as required by Rule
13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), our disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end
of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Our disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information we are required to
disclose in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Based upon the evaluation, our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of March 31, 2011.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial
reporting.
- 34 -
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
We are a party to various legal and regulatory proceedings, none of which we believe will have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The Exhibit Index on page 37 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q lists the exhibits that are
filed or furnished, as applicable, as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
- 35 -
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HOLLY ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
HEP LOGISTICS HOLDINGS, L.P. |
|
|
|
|
its General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
HOLLY LOGISTIC SERVICES, L.L.C. |
|
|
|
|
its General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: April 29, 2011
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bruce R. Shaw
Bruce R. Shaw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott C. Surplus
Scott C. Surplus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
- 36 -
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated February 14, 2011, among Holly
Energy Partners Operating, L.P., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and
an issuing bank, Union Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, BBVA Compass Bank and U.S. Bank
N.A., as co-documentation agents, and certain other lenders (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of Registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated February 18, 2011, File No.
1-32225). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
* |
|
Form of Holly Energy Partners, L.P. Indemnification Agreement to be entered into
with officers and directors of Holly Logistic Services, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated February 18, 2011, File No.
1-32225). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
* |
|
Holly Energy Partners, L.P. Change in Control Agreement Policy (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated February 18,
2011, File No. 1-32225). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
* |
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of
Registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated February 18, 2011, File No. 1-32225). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
Second Amendment to Tulsa Refinery Interconnects Term Sheet dated March 31, 2011
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrants Form 8-K Current Report dated
March 31, 2011, File No. 1-32225). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
+ |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
+ |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
+ |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
++ |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
++ |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
++ |
|
Furnished herewith. |
|
* |
|
Constitutes management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements. |
- 37 -