e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended April 4, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-10317
LSI CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
94-2712976 |
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(408) 433-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company.) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As
of May 7, 2010, there were 653,615,274 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.01 par value,
outstanding.
LSI CORPORATION
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended April 4, 2010
INDEX
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words
estimate, plan, intend, expect, anticipate, believe and similar words are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe our expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking
statements. We have described in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors a number of factors that could
cause our actual results to differ from our projections or estimates. Except where otherwise
indicated, the statements made in this report are made as of the date we filed this report with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date. We
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the information in this report, except as may otherwise
be required by law.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LSI CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
843,379 |
|
|
$ |
778,291 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
172,157 |
|
|
|
183,781 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $7,602 and $9,902, respectively |
|
|
298,565 |
|
|
|
338,961 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
185,776 |
|
|
|
169,335 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
124,445 |
|
|
|
115,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,624,322 |
|
|
|
1,585,452 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
215,368 |
|
|
|
218,972 |
|
Identified intangible assets, net |
|
|
699,007 |
|
|
|
739,244 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
188,698 |
|
|
|
188,698 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
223,127 |
|
|
|
235,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,950,522 |
|
|
$ |
2,967,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
200,234 |
|
|
$ |
213,008 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
101,913 |
|
|
|
77,281 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
207,258 |
|
|
|
214,096 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
859,405 |
|
|
|
854,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, post-retirement and other benefits |
|
|
451,571 |
|
|
|
455,134 |
|
Income taxes payable non-current |
|
|
78,017 |
|
|
|
103,047 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
89,346 |
|
|
|
94,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations and other liabilities |
|
|
618,934 |
|
|
|
652,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value: 2,000 shares authorized; none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value: 1,300,000 shares authorized; 653,867 and
656,484 shares outstanding, respectively |
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
6,565 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
6,135,036 |
|
|
|
6,142,674 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(4,385,974 |
) |
|
|
(4,408,494 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(283,418 |
) |
|
|
(279,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,472,183 |
|
|
|
1,461,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,950,522 |
|
|
$ |
2,967,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
LSI CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
637,182 |
|
|
$ |
482,279 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
365,937 |
|
|
|
312,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
271,245 |
|
|
|
170,072 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
166,872 |
|
|
|
155,284 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
86,332 |
|
|
|
83,757 |
|
Restructuring of operations and other items, net |
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
25,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations |
|
|
16,421 |
|
|
|
(94,174 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,894 |
) |
|
|
(7,236 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
(8,807 |
) |
|
|
5,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) before income taxes |
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
(95,547 |
) |
(Benefit)/provision for income taxes |
|
|
(18,800 |
) |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
22,520 |
|
|
$ |
(103,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
656,528 |
|
|
|
648,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
664,315 |
|
|
|
648,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
LSI CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
22,520 |
|
|
$ |
(103,547 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
67,017 |
|
|
|
65,079 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
16,431 |
|
|
|
17,990 |
|
Non-cash restructuring of operations and other items, net |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Write-down of equity securities |
|
|
11,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange gain |
|
|
(2,215 |
) |
|
|
(12,384 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
40,396 |
|
|
|
30,690 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(16,441 |
) |
|
|
19,340 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(8,095 |
) |
|
|
32,443 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(8,547 |
) |
|
|
(63,535 |
) |
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(16,979 |
) |
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
|
105,778 |
|
|
|
(9,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities and sales of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
11,254 |
|
|
|
35,882 |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
Purchases of property, equipment and software |
|
|
(27,276 |
) |
|
|
(25,463 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities |
|
|
(16,000 |
) |
|
|
5,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of common stock |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Purchase of common stock under repurchase program |
|
|
(26,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(22,573 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,117 |
) |
|
|
(2,366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
65,088 |
|
|
|
(6,796 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
778,291 |
|
|
|
829,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
843,379 |
|
|
$ |
822,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
LSI CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
For financial reporting purposes, LSI Corporation (LSI or the Company) reports on a 13- or
14-week quarter with a year ending December 31. The first quarter of 2010 and 2009 consisted of
approximately 13 weeks each and ended on April 4, 2010 and on April 5, 2009, respectively. The
results of operations for the quarter ended April 4, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates.
In managements opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and
restructuring of operations and other items, net, as discussed in Note 3), necessary to state
fairly the financial information included herein. While the Company believes that the disclosures
are adequate to make the information not misleading, these financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Pronouncements not yet Effective:
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance on
multiple-deliverable arrangements to address how to separate deliverables and how to measure and
allocate arrangement consideration. This guidance requires vendors to develop the best estimate of
selling price for each deliverable and allocate the arrangement consideration using this selling
price. This guidance also expands the disclosure requirements to include both quantitative and
qualitative information. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2010.
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its results of
operations and financial position.
In October 2009, the FASB issued guidance that clarifies that tangible products containing
software components and non-software components that function together to deliver a products
essential functionality will be considered non-software deliverables and will be scoped out of the
software revenue recognition guidance. This guidance is effective for the fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this
guidance on its results of operations and financial position.
Pronouncements Adopted during the First Quarter of 2010:
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that amends the consolidation rules related to variable
interest entities. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is
based on, among other things, an entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance. This
guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the
variable interest entity. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2009. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2010. The adoption did not impact
the Companys results of operations or financial position.
In January 2010, the FASB issued guidance that expands the interim and annual disclosure
requirements of fair value measurements, including information about the movement of assets between
levels 1 and 2 of the three-tier fair value hierarchy established under fair value measurement
guidance. Separate disclosure is required for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the
reconciliation for fair value measurements for level 3 assets. Except for the detailed disclosure
in the level 3 reconciliation, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010, all the other disclosures under this guidance are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2009. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2010.
6
Note 2 Stock-Based Compensation and Common Stock
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to the Companys stock
options, the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) and restricted stock unit awards. Stock-based
compensation costs capitalized to inventory and software for the three months ended April 4, 2010
and April 5, 2009 were not significant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Stock-Based Compensation Expense Included In: |
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
1,712 |
|
|
$ |
2,013 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
7,898 |
|
|
|
7,862 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
6,821 |
|
|
|
8,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
16,431 |
|
|
$ |
17,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair value of stock-based awards, less expected forfeitures, is amortized over
each awards vesting period on a straight-line basis.
Stock Options:
The fair value of each option grant is estimated as of the date of grant using a reduced form
calibrated binominal lattice model (the lattice model). The lattice model requires the use of
historical data for employee exercise behavior and the use of the assumptions outlined in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
April 5, 2009 |
Weighted-average estimated grant date fair value per share |
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
Weighted-average assumptions in calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected life (years) |
|
|
4.28 |
|
|
|
4.29 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Volatility |
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
The expected life of employee stock options represents the weighted-average period the stock
options are expected to remain outstanding and is a derived output of the lattice model. The
expected life of employee stock options is affected by all of the underlying assumptions and
calibration of the Companys model.
The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon observed interest rates of constant
maturity U.S. Treasury securities appropriate for the term of the Companys employee stock options.
The Company used an equally weighted combination of historical and implied volatilities as of
the grant date. The historical volatility is the standard deviation of the daily stock returns for
LSI from the date of the initial public offering of its common stock in 1983. For the implied
volatilities, the Company uses near-the-money exchange-traded call options, as stock options are
call options that are granted at-the-money. The historical and implied volatilities are annualized
and equally weighted to determine the volatilities as of the grant date. Management believes that
the equally weighted combination of historical and implied volatilities is more representative of
future stock price trends than sole use of historical or implied volatilities.
The lattice model assumes that employees exercise behavior is a function of the options
remaining vested life and the extent to which the option is in-the-money. The lattice model
estimates the probability of exercise as a function of these two variables based on the entire
history of exercises and cancellations for all past option grants made by the Company since its
initial public offering.
Because stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to
vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Forfeitures are estimated based on historical experience.
7
The following table summarizes changes in stock options outstanding during the three month
period ended April 4, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
91,526 |
|
|
$ |
9.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
|
6,926 |
|
|
|
5.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(917 |
) |
|
|
3.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options canceled |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
46.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at April 4, 2010 |
|
|
96,089 |
|
|
$ |
9.03 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
$ |
82,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at April 4, 2010 |
|
|
57,334 |
|
|
$ |
11.72 |
|
|
|
2.94 |
|
|
$ |
24,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes additional information related to the Companys stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
Proceeds received from the exercise of stock options |
|
$ |
3,635 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
As of April 4, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock
options, net of estimated forfeitures, was $63.2 million and is expected to be recognized over the
next 2.5 years on a weighted-average basis.
The Companys determination of fair value of stock options on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as a number of highly complex
and subjective assumptions. The Company uses third-party consultants to assist in developing the
assumptions used in, as well as calibrating, the lattice model. The Company is responsible for
determining the assumptions used in estimating the fair value of its stock options.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
Compensation expense for the Companys ESPP is calculated using the fair value of the
employees purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model. Under the ESPP, rights to purchase shares
are only granted during the second and fourth quarters of each year.
Restricted Stock Awards:
Service-based:
The following table summarizes changes in service-based restricted stock units outstanding
during the three months ended April 4, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
2,986 |
|
Granted |
|
|
5,481 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(774 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units at April 4, 2010 |
|
|
7,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
The cost of service-based restricted stock unit awards is determined using the fair value of
the Companys common stock on the date of grant. The vesting requirements for these restricted
stock units are determined at the time of grant and require that the employees remain employed by
the Company. As of April 4, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to these
restricted stock units, net of estimated forfeitures, was $43.1 million and is expected to be
recognized over the next 3.1 years on a weighted-average basis. The fair value of these shares
vested during the three months ended April 4, 2010 was $4.3 million.
8
Performance-based:
The following table summarizes changes in performance-based restricted stock units outstanding
during the three months ended April 4, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Unvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
3,046 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units at April 4, 2010 |
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended April 4, 2010, the Company granted performance-based restricted
stock units. The vesting of these performance-based restricted stock units is contingent upon the
Company meeting certain performance criteria and the employees continuing service to the Company.
As of April 4, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to performance-based
restricted stock units was $11.3 million and if the contingencies are fully met, is expected to be
recognized over the next 1 to 3 years.
Common Stock
Stock Repurchase Program:
On March 17, 2010, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock
repurchase program of up to $250.0 million of the Companys common stock. The repurchases are
expected to be funded from available cash and short-term investments. During the three months ended
April 4, 2010, the Company repurchased 4.0 million shares for $26.2 million in cash. The
repurchased shares were retired immediately after the repurchases were complete. Retirement of the
repurchased shares is recorded as a reduction of common stock and additional paid-in capital. As of
April 4, 2010, $223.8 million remained available under this stock repurchase program.
Note 3 Restructuring of Operations and Other Items
For the three months ended April 4, 2010, the Company recorded charges of $1.6 million in
restructuring of operations and other items, net, consisting of $1.4 million in charges for
restructuring of operations and $0.2 million in charges for other items. Of these charges, $1.3
million and $0.3 million were recorded in the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems
segment, respectively. For a discussion of the 2009 restructuring actions, see Note 2 to the
financial statements included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Restructuring
The $1.4 million in charges resulted from the following:
|
|
|
A charge of $0.9 million primarily for the change in time value of accruals for
previously accrued facility lease exit costs; and |
|
|
|
|
A charge of $0.5 million for severance and termination benefits for employees. |
The following table summarizes the activities affecting the restructuring reserves for the
three months ended April 4, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
During |
|
|
During |
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Q1 2010 |
|
|
Q1 2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease terminations (a) |
|
$ |
40,397 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
(7,540 |
) |
|
$ |
33,703 |
|
Payments to employees for severance and related benefits (b) |
|
|
4,905 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
(2,919 |
) |
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
45,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,371 |
|
|
$ |
(10,459 |
) |
|
$ |
36,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The amount utilized represents cash payments. The balance remaining is expected to be paid
during the remaining terms of the leases, which extend through 2013 and includes accruals for
a licensing agreement that is no longer being used by the Company. |
|
(b) |
|
The majority of the balance remaining for severance is expected to be paid by the third
quarter of 2010. |
Note 4 Benefit Obligations
The Company has pension plans covering substantially all former Agere Systems Inc. (Agere)
U.S. employees, excluding management employees hired after June 30, 2003. Retirement benefits are
offered under defined benefit pension plans, which include a management plan and a represented
plan, and are based on an adjusted career-average-pay, dollar-per-month formula or on a
cash-balance program. The cash-balance program provides for annual company contributions based on a
participants age and
9
compensation and interest on existing balances and covers employees of certain companies
acquired by Agere since 1996 and management employees hired after January 1, 1999 and before July
1, 2003. The Company also has a non-qualified supplemental pension plan in the U.S. that
principally provides benefits based on compensation in excess of amounts that can be considered
under a tax qualified plan. The Company also provides post-retirement life insurance coverage for
former Agere employees under a group life insurance plan. The Company provided post-retirement
medical benefits for former Agere employees until December 31, 2008. Participants in the
cash-balance program and management employees hired after June 30, 2003 are not covered under the
post-retirement life insurance. The Company also has pension plans covering certain international
employees.
Effective April 6, 2009, the Company froze the U.S. defined benefit pension plans.
Participants in the adjusted career-average-pay program will not earn any future service accruals
after that date. Participants in the cash-balance program will not earn any future service
accruals, but will continue to earn 4% interest per year on their cash-balance accounts.
The following table sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit cost/(credit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Post-retirement |
|
|
Pension |
|
|
Post-retirement |
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
17,617 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
18,271 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(17,823 |
) |
|
|
(1,148 |
) |
|
|
(19,212 |
) |
|
|
(1,219 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss/(gain) recognized |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefit cost/(credit) |
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
$ |
(520 |
) |
|
$ |
(480 |
) |
|
$ |
(594 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended April 4, 2010, the Company contributed $3.3 million to its
pension plans. The Company expects to contribute an additional $27.9 million to its pension plans
for the remainder of 2010. The Company does not expect to contribute to its post-retirement benefit
plan during the year ending December 31, 2010.
Note 5 Balance Sheet Details
Inventories
Inventories at the end of each period were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
33,981 |
|
|
$ |
24,038 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
33,502 |
|
|
|
19,090 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
118,293 |
|
|
|
126,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
185,776 |
|
|
$ |
169,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
The following table reflects the carrying value of the convertible notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Conversion |
|
|
April 4, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Price |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
4% Convertible Subordinated Notes current portion |
|
May 15, 2010 |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
13.4200 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 4, 2010, the estimated fair value of these notes was $351.3 million based upon quoted market information.
10
Note 6 Cash Equivalents and Investments
The following tables summarize the Companys cash equivalents and investments measured at fair
value as of April 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of April 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money-market funds* |
|
$ |
694,826 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
694,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale debt securities: ** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127,359 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
127,359 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,568 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,157 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments in equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable available-for-sale equity securities*** |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money-market funds* |
|
$ |
631,073 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
631,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale debt securities:** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
138,282 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
138,282 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,644 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,781 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments in equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable available-for-sale equity securities*** |
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The fair value of the money-market funds is valued using unadjusted
prices in active markets. |
|
** |
|
The fair value of the short-term investments in debt securities is valued using the market
approach and the income approach and is classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy. These investments are traded less frequently than Level 1 securities and are
valued using inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets in active markets and
inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset, such as interest rates,
yield curves, prepayment speeds, collateral performance, broker/dealer quotes and indices
that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. |
|
*** |
|
The fair value of the marketable equity securities is valued using quoted market prices in
active markets and is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. |
The following table summarizes certain non-marketable equity securities measured and recorded
at fair value on a non-recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
Losses for Three |
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
Fair Value Measured Using |
|
|
Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,900 |
|
|
$ |
11,600 |
|
The Company does not estimate the fair value for non-marketable equity securities unless there
are identified events or changes in circumstances that may have a significant adverse effect on the
investment. The valuation of non-marketable equity securities is based on recent financing
activities of the investees, movements in equity value, venture capital markets, the investees
capital structure, liquidation preferences of the investees capital and other economic variables.
During the three months ended April 4, 2010, the Company identified changes in circumstances which
had an adverse effect on certain non-marketable equity securities and recorded other than temporary
impairment charges of $11.6 million. These charges were recognized as a component of interest
income and other, net, in the statements of operations. As of April 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the
aggregate carrying value of the Companys non-marketable equity securities was $45.0 million and
$56.6 million, respectively. There were no impairment charges for non-marketable equity securities
for the three months ended April 5, 2009.
11
Investments in Available-for-Sale Securities
The following tables summarize the Companys available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss* |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
120,201 |
|
|
$ |
7,959 |
|
|
$ |
(801 |
) |
|
$ |
127,359 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
39,230 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,568 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
4,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt securities |
|
$ |
163,489 |
|
|
$ |
9,475 |
|
|
$ |
(807 |
) |
|
$ |
172,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
956 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As of April 4, 2010, there were 24 investments in an unrealized loss position. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
132,210 |
|
|
$ |
7,141 |
|
|
$ |
(1,069 |
) |
|
$ |
138,282 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
39,033 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,644 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
4,736 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
4,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt securities |
|
$ |
175,979 |
|
|
$ |
8,927 |
|
|
$ |
(1,125 |
) |
|
$ |
183,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
1,294 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
The following tables summarize the gross unrealized losses and fair values of the Companys
short-term investments that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than and
greater than 12 months, aggregated by investment category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
2,831 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
5,324 |
|
|
$ |
(779 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
5,324 |
|
|
$ |
(779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater than 12 Months |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Unrealized Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
9,126 |
|
|
$ |
(1,037 |
) |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
10,434 |
|
|
$ |
(1,093 |
) |
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no impairment charges for available-for-sale debt or equity securities for the
three months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009. There were no other than temporary impairment
losses recorded in other comprehensive income for the three months ended April 4, 2010.
Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities as of April 4, 2010 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
29,984 |
|
Due in 1-5 years |
|
|
21,948 |
|
Due in 5-10 years |
|
|
10,230 |
|
Due after 10 years |
|
|
109,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
172,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
12
The maturities of asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities were allocated based on
contractual principal maturities assuming no prepayments.
Note 7 Derivative Instruments
The Company has foreign subsidiaries that operate and sell the Companys products in various
global markets. As a result, the Company is exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
The Company utilizes forward contracts to manage its exposure associated with net asset and
liability positions denominated in non-functional currencies and to reduce the volatility of
earnings and cash flows related to forecasted foreign currency transactions. The Company does not
hold derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Cash-Flow Hedges
The Company enters into forward contracts that are designated as foreign currency cash-flow
hedges of selected forecasted payments denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. These
forward contracts generally mature within 12 months. The Company evaluates and calculates the
effectiveness of each hedge at least quarterly. Changes in fair value attributable to changes in
time value are excluded from the assessment of effectiveness and are recognized in interest income
and other, net. The effective portion of the forward contracts gain or loss is recorded in other
comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged expense is
recognized within the same line item on the statements of operations as the impact of the hedged
transaction. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss is reported in earnings immediately. As of
April 4, 2010, the total notional value of the Companys outstanding forward contracts, designated
as foreign currency cash-flow hedges for forecasted Euro, Pound Sterling and Indian Rupee payment
transactions, was $28.6 million. For the three months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009, the after-tax effect of foreign exchange
forward contract derivatives on other comprehensive income was not material.
Other Foreign-Currency Hedges
The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts that are used to hedge certain
foreign-currency-denominated assets or liabilities that do not qualify for hedge accounting. These
forward contracts generally mature within three months. Changes in fair value of these hedges are
recorded immediately in earnings to offset the changes in fair value of the assets or liabilities
being hedged. As of April 4, 2010, the total notional value of the Companys outstanding forward
contracts, not designated as hedges under hedge accounting, to buy Japanese Yen, Euro, Pound
Sterling, Canadian Dollar, Korean Won and Indian Rupee was $136.1 million and to sell Singapore
Dollar and Israeli Shekel was $24.7 million. For the three months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009, losses related to other foreign-currency
hedges recognized in interest income and other, net, were $5.8 million and $16.8 million, respectively.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
As of April 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of derivative instruments included in the
balance sheets was not material.
13
Note 8 Reconciliation of Basic and Diluted Income/(Loss) per Share
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in the
computation of basic and diluted per share amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Income* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
(Loss)* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
22,520 |
|
|
|
656,528 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(103,547 |
) |
|
|
648,459 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
Stock options, employee stock purchase rights and
restricted stock unit awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
22,520 |
|
|
|
664,315 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(103,547 |
) |
|
|
648,459 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
Numerator |
|
+ |
|
Denominator |
14
The following table summarizes the weighted-average common share equivalents that were
excluded from the computation of diluted shares because their inclusion would have an antidilutive
effect on net income/(loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
Anti-dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
69,225 |
|
|
|
91,512 |
|
Restricted stock unit awards |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
5,309 |
|
Convertible notes |
|
|
26,080 |
|
|
|
41,950 |
|
Note 9 Segment and Geographic Information
The Company operates in two reportable segments the Semiconductor segment and the Storage
Systems segment. The Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the Chief Operating Decision
Maker (CODM.) The CODM allocates resources to and assesses the performance of each segment using
information about its revenue and operating income or loss before interest and taxes.
Summary of Operations by Segment
The following is a summary of operations by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
416,489 |
|
|
$ |
325,034 |
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
220,693 |
|
|
|
157,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
637,182 |
|
|
$ |
482,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
(2,969 |
) |
|
$ |
(80,095 |
) |
Storage Systems |
|
|
19,390 |
|
|
|
(14,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,421 |
|
|
$ |
(94,174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about Geographic Areas
Revenues from domestic operations were $155.6 million, representing 24.4% of consolidated
revenues, for the three months ended April 4, 2010, as compared to $107.7 million, representing
22.3% of consolidated revenues, for the three months ended April 5, 2009.
Goodwill
As of April 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the goodwill balance was $188.7 million, which was all
included in the Storage Systems segment.
15
Note 10 Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
Comprehensive income or loss is defined as a change in equity of a company during a period
from transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from
investments by owners and distributions to owners. The following table summarizes the changes in
the total comprehensive income or loss, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income/(loss) |
|
$ |
22,520 |
|
|
$ |
(103,547 |
) |
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
(2,642 |
) |
Net unrealized loss on cash-flow hedges |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(4,002 |
) |
|
|
(15,101 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost and net actuarial loss/(gain) |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
18,743 |
|
|
$ |
(121,512 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 Income Taxes
During the three months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009, the Company recorded an income
tax benefit of $18.8 million and a provision of $8.0 million, respectively. For the three months
ended April 4, 2010, the Company recorded a reversal of $27.9 million in liabilities, which
includes previously unrecognized tax benefits of $12.2 million and interest and penalties of $15.7
million, as a result of the expiration of various statutes of limitations in multiple
jurisdictions. For the three months ended April 5, 2009, the Company recorded a reversal of $29.8
million in liabilities, which includes previously unrecognized tax benefits of $15.7 million and
interest and penalties of $14.1 million, because of the expiration of various statutes of
limitations. The Company also recorded an increase of $32.9 million in liabilities, which includes
previously unrecognized tax benefits of $25.0 million and interest and penalties of $7.9 million,
because of re-measurements of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods based on new
information.
The income or loss from certain jurisdictions has been excluded from the overall estimation of
the annual rate because of the anticipated annual pre-tax losses in those jurisdictions for which
tax benefits are not realizable or cannot be recognized in the current year. Excluding certain
foreign jurisdictions, management believes that it is more likely than not that the future benefit
of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Note 12 Related Party Transactions
A member of the Companys board of directors is also a member of the board of directors of
Seagate Technology. The Company sells semiconductors used in storage product applications to
Seagate Technology for prices comparable to those charged to an unrelated third party. The Company
also purchases drives used in its storage systems from Seagate Technology for prices comparable to
those paid to other vendors for similar products. Revenues from sales to Seagate Technology were
$96.1 million and $80.0 million for the three months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009,
respectively. Purchases from Seagate Technology were $11.6 million and $10.8 million for the three
months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009, respectively. The Company had accounts receivable
from Seagate Technology of $57.9 million and $53.6 million as of April 4, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively.
The Company has an equity interest in a joint venture, Silicon Manufacturing Partners Pte Ltd.
(SMP), with GLOBALFOUNDRIES, a manufacturing foundry for integrated circuits. SMP operates an
integrated circuit manufacturing facility in Singapore. The Company owns a 51% equity interest in
this joint venture, and GLOBALFOUNDRIES owns the remaining 49% equity interest. The Companys 51%
interest in SMP is accounted for under the equity method because the Company is effectively
precluded from unilaterally taking any significant action in the management of SMP due to
GLOBALFOUNDRIES significant participatory rights under the joint venture agreement. Because of
GLOBALFOUNDRIES approval rights, the Company cannot make any significant decisions regarding SMP
without GLOBALFOUNDRIES approval, despite the 51% equity interest. In addition, the General
Manager, who is responsible for the day-to-day management of SMP, is appointed by GLOBALFOUNDRIES,
and GLOBALFOUNDRIES provides day-to-day operational support to SMP.
The Company purchased $12.0 million and $11.1 million of inventory from SMP for the three
months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009, respectively. As of April 4, 2010 and December 31,
2009, the amounts of inventory on hand that were purchased from SMP were $4.9 million and $4.1
million, respectively, and the amounts payable to SMP were $4.1 million and $3.8 million,
respectively.
16
Note 13 Commitments, Contingencies and Legal Matters
Purchase Commitments
The Company maintains purchase commitments with certain suppliers, primarily for raw
materials and manufacturing services and for some non-production items. Purchase commitments for
inventory materials are generally restricted to a forecasted time horizon as mutually agreed upon
between the parties. This forecasted time-horizon can vary for different suppliers. As of April 4,
2010, the total purchase commitments were $532.6 million, which are due through 2012.
The Company has a take-or-pay agreement with SMP under which it has agreed to purchase 51% of
the managed wafer capacity from SMPs integrated circuit manufacturing facility, and
GLOBALFOUNDRIES agreed to purchase the remaining 49% of the managed wafer capacity. SMP determines
its managed wafer capacity each year based on forecasts provided by the Company and
GLOBALFOUNDRIES. If the Company fails to purchase its required commitments, it will be required to
pay SMP for the fixed costs associated with the unpurchased wafers. GLOBALFOUNDRIES is similarly
obligated with respect to the wafers allotted to it. The agreement may be terminated by either
party upon two years written notice. The agreement may also be terminated for material breach,
bankruptcy or insolvency.
Guarantees
Product Warranties:
The Company warrants finished goods against defects in material and workmanship under normal
use and service for periods of one to five years. A liability for estimated future costs under
product warranties is recorded when products are shipped.
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in product warranties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
13,831 |
|
Accruals for warranties issued during the period |
|
|
2,951 |
|
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates) |
|
|
694 |
|
Settlements made during the period (in cash or in kind) |
|
|
(3,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 4, 2010 |
|
$ |
13,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit:
As of April 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding obligations relating to
standby letters of credit of $4.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Standby letters of credit
are financial guarantees provided by third parties for leases, claims from litigation and certain
self-insured risks. If the guarantees are called, the Company must reimburse the provider of the
guarantee. The fair value of the letters of credit approximates the contract amount, and they
generally have one-year terms.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of April 4, 2010, the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits was $152.3 million, of which
the Company expects to pay $8.2 million within one year. Accordingly, this amount has been recorded
in other current liabilities. For the remaining balance, the Company is unable to make a reasonably
reliable estimate as to when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur. For the three
months ended April 4, 2010, the Company recorded a reversal of $27.9 million in liabilities, which
includes previously unrecognized tax benefits of $12.2 million and interest and penalties of $15.7
million, because of the expiration of various statutes of limitations in multiple jurisdictions. It
is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease
in the next 12 months. Such changes could occur based on the normal expiration of various statutes
of limitations or the possible conclusion of ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions around the
world. If those events occur within the next 12 months, the Company estimates that, in addition to
the $8.2 million discussed above, unrecognized tax benefits, plus accrued interest and penalties,
could decrease by an amount of up to $12.0 million.
Indemnifications
The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be obligated to
indemnify the other party. Typically, these obligations arise in connection with contracts and
license agreements or the sale of assets, under which the Company
customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a breach of
warranties, representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold, validity
of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and
17
certain income
tax-related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is typically subject to
the other party making a claim to and cooperating with the Company pursuant to the procedures
specified in the particular contract. This usually allows the Company to challenge the other
partys claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or covenants, to
control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other party.
Further, the Companys obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of activity
(typically to replace or correct the products or terminate the agreement with a refund to the other
party), duration and/or amounts. In some instances, the Company may have recourse against third
parties covering certain payments made by the Company.
Legal Matters
On December 6, 2006, Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA Inc. (Sony Ericsson) filed a
lawsuit against Agere in Wake County Superior Court in North Carolina, alleging unfair and
deceptive trade practices, fraud and negligent misrepresentation in connection with Ageres
engagement with Sony Ericsson to develop a wireless data card for personal computers. The complaint
claims an unspecified amount of damages and seeks compensatory damages, treble damages and
attorneys fees. On February 13, 2007, Agere filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue. On
August 27, 2007, the court granted Ageres motion to dismiss for improper venue. Sony Ericsson
appealed that ruling. On March 3, 2009, the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed the lower
courts ruling. On October 22, 2007, Sony Ericsson filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the
State of New York, New York County against LSI, raising substantially the same allegations and
seeking substantially the same relief as the North Carolina proceeding. In January 2010, Sony
Ericsson amended its complaint by adding claims for fraudulent concealment and gross negligence.
On March 23, 2007, CIF Licensing, LLC, d/b/a GE Licensing (GE) filed a lawsuit against Agere
in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting that Agere products
infringe patents in a portfolio of patents GE acquired from Motorola. GE has asserted that four of
the patents cover inventions relating to modems. GE is seeking monetary damages. Agere believes it
has a number of defenses to the infringement claims in this action, including laches, exhaustion
and its belief that it has a license to the patents. The court postponed hearing motions based on
these defenses until after the trial, and did not allow Agere to present evidence on these defenses
at trial. On February 17, 2009, the jury in this case returned a verdict finding that three of the
four patents were invalid and that Agere products infringed the one patent found to be valid and
awarding GE $7.6 million for infringement of that patent. The jury also found Ageres infringement
was willful, which means that the judge could increase the amount of damages up to three times its
original amount. The court has not scheduled hearings on Ageres post-trial motions related to its
defenses. One of these motions seeks to have a mis-trial declared based on Ageres belief that GE
withheld evidence in discovery, which affected Ageres ability to present evidence at trial. The
court has appointed a special master to investigate this matter. If the jurys verdict is entered
by the court, Agere would also expect to be required to pay interest from the date of infringing
sales. If the verdict is entered, LSI intends to appeal the matter. On February 17, 2010, the court
issued an order granting GEs summary judgment motions seeking to bar Ageres defenses of laches,
exhaustion, and license and denying Ageres summary judgment motions concerning the same defenses.
With respect to Ageres exhaustion defense, the court denied Ageres summary judgment motion, but
ruled that Agere has leave to renew its motion in the form of a post-trial motion. Agere is seeking
clarification regarding the courts order, which Agere believes is inconsistent with the courts
prior decisions regarding Ageres ability to assert these defenses.
In April 2008, LSI filed an action with the International Trade Commission (ITC)
seeking from the United States the exclusion of products produced by 23 companies. Qimonda AG, one
of these companies, filed a lawsuit against LSI in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia (Richmond Division) on November 12, 2008, alleging that LSIs products
infringe seven of Qimondas patents. Qimonda is seeking monetary damages, treble damages and costs,
expenses and attorneys fees due to alleged willfulness, interest, and temporary and permanent
injunctive relief for all the patents in the suit. On November 20, 2008, Qimonda filed an ITC
action against LSI and Seagate alleging that multiple LSI products infringe the same seven patents,
and seeking an injunction against sales of infringing products. Subsequently, Qimonda dropped from
the ITC proceeding its claims relating to three of the patents. A hearing on Qimondas ITC claims
was held before an administrative law judge in June 2009. On October 14, 2009, the judge issued an
initial determination, in which he found that a domestic industry did not exist in the U.S. for any
of the four patents asserted by Qimonda. The judge also found that three of the four patents were
not infringed and that the one patent found to be infringed was invalid. On January 29, 2010, the
ITC issued a notice terminating the investigation against LSI and Seagate with a finding of no
violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Based on this notice, an injunction from the
ITC is not available to Qimonda at this time. On March 29, 2010, Qimonda filed a notice of appeal
with the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit appealing rulings related to two of the four
asserted patents. Qimonda has stated that insolvency proceedings for it opened on April 1, 2009.
In addition to the foregoing, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to other litigation
matters and claims in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe, based on
currently available facts and circumstances, that the final outcome of these other
18
matters, taken
individually or as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations or financial position. However, the pending unsettled lawsuits may involve complex
questions of fact and law and may require the expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of
other resources to defend. From time to time, the Company may enter into confidential discussions
regarding the potential settlement of such lawsuits. However, there can be no assurance that any
such discussions will occur or will result in a settlement. Moreover, the settlement of any pending
litigation could require the Company to incur substantial costs and, in the case of the settlement
of any intellectual property proceeding against the Company, may require the Company to obtain a
license to a third-partys intellectual property that could require royalty payments in the future
and the Company to grant a license to certain of its intellectual property to a third party under a
cross-license agreement. The results of litigation are inherently uncertain, and material adverse
outcomes are possible.
The Company believes the amounts provided in its financial statements, which are not material,
are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. However, because such matters are
subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable and there can be no
assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities from the matters
described above will not exceed the amounts reflected in the Companys financial statements or will
not have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the other
sections of this Form 10-Q, including Part 1, Item 1. Financial Statements.
Where more than one significant factor contributed to changes in results from year to year, we
have quantified these factors throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations where practicable and material to understanding the discussion.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop and market complex, high-performance storage and networking semiconductors
and storage systems. We provide silicon-to-system solutions that are used at the core of products
that create, store, consume and transport digital information. We offer a broad portfolio of
capabilities including custom and standard product integrated circuits used in hard disk drives,
solid state drives, high-speed communication systems, computer servers, storage systems and
personal computers. We also offer external storage systems, storage systems software, redundant
array of independent disks, or RAID, adapters for computer servers and RAID software applications.
We operate in two segments the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment.
Our Semiconductor segment designs, develops and markets highly complex integrated circuits for
storage and networking applications. These solutions include both custom solutions and standard
products. We design custom solutions for a specific application defined by the customer. We develop
standard products for market applications that we define and sell to multiple customers. We sell
our integrated circuits for storage applications principally to makers of hard disk drives, solid
state drives and computer servers. We sell our integrated circuits for networking applications
principally to makers of devices used in computer and telecommunications networks and, to a lesser
extent, to makers of personal computers. We also generate revenue by licensing other entities to
use our intellectual property.
Our Storage Systems segment designs and sells enterprise storage systems and storage
software applications that enable storage area networks. We also offer RAID adapters for computer
servers and associated software for attaching storage devices to computer servers. We sell our
storage systems and storage solutions primarily to original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, who
resell these products to end customers under their own brand name.
Our revenues depend on market demand for these types of products and our ability to compete in
highly competitive markets. We face competition not only from makers of products similar to ours,
but also from competing technologies. For example, we see the development of solid state drives,
based on flash memory rather than the spinning platters used in hard disk drives, as a long-term
potential competitor to certain types of hard disk drives and have begun focusing development
efforts in that area.
The U.S. and global economies have experienced a significant downturn driven by a financial
and credit crisis that could continue to challenge those economies for some period of time. In
2009, we took a number of actions to reduce our expenses, including a
corporate-level restructuring designed to increase synergies across our Semiconductor segment,
reductions in our global workforce, temporary and permanent reductions in employee
compensation-related expenses and reductions in discretionary spending. While we
19
have reduced a
number of expenses in response to the economic downturn, we have also tried to limit the impact of
the reductions on our research and development efforts in order to attempt to maintain a continuing
flow of new products. In early 2010, we began restoring the employee compensation-related expenses
that we reduced on a temporary basis in 2009. We continue to monitor demand and may seek to adjust
our cost structure further.
Our revenues for the three months ended April 4, 2010 were $637.2 million, an increase of
$154.9 million, or 32.1%, as compared to $482.3 million for the three months ended April 5, 2009.
The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in unit sales of semiconductors used in
storage and networking product applications and an increase in unit sales of storage systems and
RAID adapters reflecting a recovery from the market weakness we experienced during the three months
ended April 5, 2009.
We reported net income of $22.5 million, or $0.03 per diluted share, for the three months
ended April 4, 2010, as compared to a net loss of $103.5 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, for
the three months ended April 5, 2009. During the three months ended April 4, 2010, we recorded
restructuring of operations and other items, net of $1.6 million, as compared to $25.2 million for
the three months ended April 5, 2009. For the three months ended April 4, 2010, we recorded an
income tax benefit of $18.8 million, as compared to an income tax provision of $8.0 million for the
three months ended April 5, 2009. The $18.8 million benefit for income taxes was primarily the
result of the reversal of certain liabilities due to the expiration of various statutes of
limitations in foreign jurisdictions.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $1,015.5 million as of April 4, 2010,
as compared to $962.1 million as of December 31, 2009. For the three months ended April 4, 2010, we
generated $105.8 million in cash from operating activities, as compared to $9.8 million used in
operating activities for the three months ended April 5, 2009. We expect to repay $350 million of
our outstanding 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due on May 15, 2010 from our current available
cash and cash equivalents.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues
The following table summarizes our revenues by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
416.5 |
|
|
$ |
325.0 |
|
Storage Systems segment |
|
|
220.7 |
|
|
|
157.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
637.2 |
|
|
$ |
482.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended April 4, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009:
Total consolidated revenue for the three months ended April 4, 2010 increased by $154.9
million, or 32.1% as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009.
Semiconductor Segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased by $91.5 million, or 28.2%, for the three
months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was
primarily attributable to an increase in unit sales due to increased demand for semiconductors used
in storage and networking product applications reflecting a recovery from the market weakness we
experienced during the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was partially offset by
decreased revenues from the licensing of intellectual property.
Storage Systems Segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased by $63.4 million, or 40.3%, for the three
months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was
attributable to increases in unit sales of our entry-level and mid-range storage systems, related
premium software features, and our server RAID adapters and software reflecting a recovery from the
market weakness we experienced during the three months ended April 5, 2009 and, to a lesser extent,
the acquisition of the 3ware RAID storage adapter business in April 2009.
20
Significant Customers:
The following table provides information about our significant customers, each of whom
accounted for 10% or more of consolidated revenues or 10% or more of either segments revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
Semiconductor segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Percentage of Semiconductor segment revenues |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
Storage Systems segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Percentage of Storage Systems segment revenues |
|
|
47%, 15 |
% |
|
|
43%, 14%, 12 |
% |
Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
19%, 15 |
% |
|
|
17%, 15 |
% |
Revenues by Geography
The following table summarizes our revenues by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
North America * |
|
$ |
155.6 |
|
|
$ |
107.7 |
|
Asia ** |
|
|
332.7 |
|
|
|
244.9 |
|
Europe and the Middle East |
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
637.2 |
|
|
$ |
482.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Primarily the United States. |
|
** |
|
Including Japan. |
Three months ended April 4, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009:
Revenues in North America, Asia and Europe and the Middle East increased 44.5%, 35.9% and
14.8%, respectively, for the three months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended
April 5, 2009. These increases reflect what we believe to be a recovery across all our geographic
areas from the market weakness we experienced during the three months ended April 5, 2009. The
increase in North America was primarily attributable to increased unit sales of storage systems,
server RAID adapters, and semiconductors used in storage product applications, offset in part by
decreased unit sales of our networking product applications that we no longer invest in, and
decreased revenues from the licensing of intellectual property. The increase in Asia was primarily
attributable to increased unit sales of semiconductors used in storage and networking product
applications and increased unit sales for our server RAID adapters. The increase in Europe and the
Middle East was primarily attributable to increased unit sales of semiconductors used in storage
and networking product applications.
Gross Profit Margin
The following table summarizes our gross profit margins by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
186.5 |
|
|
$ |
124.6 |
|
Percentage of Semiconductor segment revenues |
|
|
44.8 |
% |
|
|
38.3 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
84.7 |
|
|
$ |
45.5 |
|
Percentage of Storage Systems segment revenues |
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
271.2 |
|
|
$ |
170.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
42.6 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
21
Three months ended April 4, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009:
Consolidated gross profit as a percentage of total revenues, or gross margin, increased to
42.6% for the three months ended April 4, 2010 from 35.3% for the three months ended April 5, 2009.
Semiconductor Segment:
Gross margins for the Semiconductor segment increased to 44.8% for the three months ended
April 4, 2010 from 38.3% for the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was primarily
attributable to higher overall absorption of fixed costs as a result of the 28.2% increase in
segment revenues.
Storage Systems Segment:
Gross margins for the Storage Systems segment increased to 38.4% for the three months ended
April 4, 2010 from 28.9% for the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was primarily
attributable to a favorable shift in product mix resulting from higher demand for our mid-range
storage systems, related premium software and server RAID adapters, which all have higher margins.
In addition, the higher revenues enabled us to better absorb our fixed costs, which also improved
gross margins.
Research and Development
The following table summarizes our research and development, or R&D, expenses by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
130.0 |
|
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
Percentage of Semiconductor segment revenues |
|
|
31.2 |
% |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
36.9 |
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
Percentage of Storage Systems segment revenues |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
166.9 |
|
|
$ |
155.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
Three months ended April 4, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009:
Consolidated R&D expenses increased by $11.6 million, or 7.5%, for the three months ended
April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009.
Semiconductor Segment:
R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased by $7.0 million, or 5.7%, for the three
months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was
primarily attributable to restoring certain employee compensation-related expenses that we reduced
on a temporary basis in 2009. R&D expenses as a percentage of segment revenues for the
Semiconductor segment decreased from 37.8% for the three months ended April 5, 2009 to 31.2% for
the three months ended April 4, 2010 primarily as a result of the increase in revenues.
Storage Systems Segment:
R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased by $4.6 million, or 14.2%, for the
three months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase
was primarily attributable to higher compensation-related expenditures associated with the 3ware
RAID storage adapter business acquisition in April 2009 and the ONStor business acquisition in July
2009, and the restoration of certain employee compensation-related expenses that we reduced
temporarily in 2009. R&D expenses as a percentage of segment revenues for the Storage Systems
segment decreased from 20.5% for the three months ended April 5, 2009 to 16.7% for the three months
ended April 4, 2010 primarily as a result of the increase in revenues.
22
Selling, General and Administrative
The following table summarizes our selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, expenses by
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
58.2 |
|
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
Percentage of Semiconductor segment revenues |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
Percentage of Storage Systems segment revenues |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
86.3 |
|
|
$ |
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
17.4 |
% |
Three months ended April 4, 2010 compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009:
Consolidated SG&A expenses increased by $2.5 million, or 3.0%, for the three months ended
April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009.
Semiconductor Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased by $1.7 million, or 3.0%, for the three
months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase was
primarily attributable to the restoration of certain employee compensation-related expenses that we
reduced temporarily in 2009. SG&A expenses as a percentage of segment revenues for the
Semiconductor segment decreased from 17.4% for the three months ended April 5, 2009 to 14.0% for
the three months ended April 4, 2010, primarily as a result of the increase in revenues.
Storage Systems Segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased by $0.8 million, or 2.9%, for the
three months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009. The increase
was primarily attributable to higher compensation-related expenditures associated with the 3ware
RAID storage adapter business acquisition in April 2009 and the ONStor business acquisition in July
2009, and the restoration of certain employee compensation-related expenses that we reduced
temporarily in 2009, offset in part by the reversal of excess 2009 sales commission accruals. SG&A
expenses as a percentage of segment revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased from 17.4%
for the three months ended April 5, 2009 to 12.7% for the three months ended April 4, 2010
primarily as a result of the increase in revenues.
Restructuring of Operations and Other Items, net
For the three months ended April 4, 2010, we recorded charges of $1.6 million in restructuring
of operations and other items, net, consisting of $1.4 million in charges for restructuring of
operations and $0.2 million in charges for other items. Of these charges, $1.3 million and $0.3
million were recorded in the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems segment, respectively.
As a result of the restructuring actions taken since the beginning of 2010, we expect to
realize operating expense savings of approximately $1.4 million per quarter beginning in the second
quarter of 2010.
For the three months ended April 5, 2009, we recorded charges of $25.2 million in
restructuring of operations and other items, net, consisting of $19.3 million in charges for
restructuring of operations and $5.9 million in charges for other items. The $25.2 million of
charges were all recorded in the Semiconductor segment.
See Note 3 to our financial statements in Item 1 for more information about the restructuring
charges recorded during the first quarter of 2010.
Interest (Expense) or Income and Other, net
The following table summarizes our interest expense and components of interest income and
other, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 4, 2010 |
|
|
April 5, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(12.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased by $3.3 million for the three months ended April 4, 2010 as
compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009 as a result of the redemption of our 6.5%
Convertible Subordinated Notes in June 2009.
Interest Income and Other, net:
Interest income decreased by $2.8 million for the three months ended April 4, 2010 as compared
to the three months ended April 5, 2009 primarily as a result of lower interest rates and, to a
lesser extent, lower cash balances during the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period of
2009.
Other expense, net, increased by $11.9 million for the three months ended April 4, 2010 as
compared to the three months ended April 5, 2009 primarily as a result of other than temporary
impairment charges of $11.6 million for certain non-marketable equity securities.
Provision for Income Taxes
During the three months ended April 4, 2010 and April 5, 2009, we recorded an income tax
benefit of $18.8 million and a provision of $8.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended
April 4, 2010, we recorded a reversal of $27.9 million in liabilities, which includes previously
unrecognized tax benefits of $12.2 million and interest and penalties of $15.7 million, as a result
of the expiration of various statutes of limitations in multiple jurisdictions. For the three
months ended April 5, 2009, we recorded a reversal of $29.8 million in liabilities, which includes
previously unrecognized tax benefits of $15.7 million and interest and penalties of $14.1 million,
because of the expiration of various statutes of limitations. We also recorded an increase of $32.9
million in liabilities, which includes previously unrecognized tax benefits of $25.0 million and
interest and penalties of $7.9 million, because of re-measurements of uncertain tax positions taken
in prior periods based on new information.
We have excluded the income or loss from certain jurisdictions from the overall estimation of
the annual rate because of the anticipated annual pre-tax losses in those jurisdictions for which
tax benefits are not realizable or cannot be recognized in the current year. Excluding certain
foreign jurisdictions, management believes that it is more likely than not that the future benefit
of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, net increased to $1,015.5 million as of
April 4, 2010 from $962.1 million as of December 31, 2009. The increase was mainly due to cash
inflows generated from operating activities, offset in part by cash outflows for investing and
financing activities as described below.
Working Capital
Working capital increased by $33.8 million to $764.9 million as of April 4, 2010 from $731.1
million as of December 31, 2009. The increase was attributable to the following:
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, net, increased by $53.4 million; |
|
|
|
|
Inventories increased by $16.4 million primarily as a result of an increase in inventory
purchases to meet expected customer demand in the second quarter of 2010; |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable decreased by $12.8 million primarily as a result of the timing of the
receipt of invoices and payments; |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by $9.4 million primarily due to an
increase in prepaid software maintenance contracts, other prepaid expenses and non-trade
receivables; and |
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities decreased by $6.8 million primarily attributable to the
utilization of restructuring reserves and |
24
|
|
|
payments of liabilities, offset in part by an increase in accruals for interest on our
convertible notes as the interest payment date approaches in May 2010 and other accruals
related to operations of the business. |
These increases in working capital were offset in part by the following:
|
|
|
Accounts receivable decreased by $40.4 million primarily as a result of improved
collections; and |
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits increased by $24.6 million primarily as a result of
timing differences in payment of salaries and benefits, and performance-based compensation
accruals which we reduced temporarily in 2009. |
Working capital decreased by $51.5 million to $950.4 million at April 5, 2009 from $1,001.9
million at December 31, 2008. The decrease was attributable to the following:
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $45.3 million; |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable decreased by $30.7 million primarily as a result of lower revenues in
the first quarter of 2009 than in the fourth quarter of 2008; |
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities increased by $25.5 million primarily as a result of increases
in accruals for interest on our convertible notes as the interest payment dates approached,
increases in liabilities with third-party manufacturers and other accruals related to
operations of the business, offset in part by the utilization of restructuring reserves; |
|
|
|
|
Inventories declined by $19.3 million primarily as a result of the usage of inventories
during the first quarter of 2009, reflecting our continued focus on supply chain management;
and |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased by $19.0 million primarily as a result
of decreases in other receivables and tax-related receivables. |
These decreases in working capital were offset in part by the following:
|
|
|
Accounts payable decreased by $65.0 million primarily as a result of lower purchases
following the global economic downturn and the timing of invoice receipts and payments; |
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits decreased by $22.1 million primarily as a result of
timing differences in the payment of salaries, benefits and performance-based compensation; |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable decreased by $0.7 million because of the timing of income tax
payments made and the income tax provision recorded during the first quarter of 2009; and |
|
|
|
|
Current portion of the long-term debt decreased $0.5 million as a result of the
amortization of accrued debt premium. |
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
During the three months ended April 4, 2010, we generated $105.8 million of cash from
operating activities as the result of the following:
|
|
|
Net income adjusted for non-cash items, including depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense. The non-cash items and other non-operating adjustments are
quantified in the statements of cash flows included in Item 1; offset by |
|
|
|
A net decrease of $9.7 million in assets and liabilities, including changes in working
capital components from December 31, 2009 to April 4, 2010, as discussed above. |
During the three months ended April 5, 2009, cash used in operating activities was $9.8
million as the result of the following:
|
|
|
Net loss adjusted for non-cash transactions, including depreciation, amortization and
stock-based compensation expense. The non-cash items and other non-operating adjustments are
quantified in the statements of cash flows included in Item 1; offset by |
25
|
|
|
A net increase of $22.8 million in assets and liabilities, including changes in working
capital components from December 31, 2008 to April 5, 2009, as discussed above. |
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended April 4, 2010 was $16.0 million.
The primary investing activities were as follows:
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software, net of proceeds from sales; and |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale debt securities. |
Cash provided by investing activities for the three months ended April 5, 2009 was $5.4
million. The primary investing activities were as follows:
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and sales of available-for-sale debt securities and equity
securities, net of purchases; and |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software, net of proceeds from sales. |
We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $55 million in 2010. In recent years, we
have reduced our level of capital expenditures as a result of our focus on establishing strategic
supplier alliances with foundry semiconductor manufacturers and with third-party assembly and test
operations, which enables us to have access to advanced manufacturing capacity while reducing our
capital spending requirements.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities for the three months ended April 4, 2010 was $22.6 million,
as compared to one thousand dollars provided by financing activities for the three months ended
April 5, 2009. The primary financing activities during the three months ended April 4, 2010 were
the use of $26.2 million to purchase our common stock, offset in part by the proceeds from
issuances of common stock under our employee stock plans. On March 17, 2010, we announced that our
Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $250.0 million of our common
stock.
It is our policy to reinvest our earnings, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends
to stockholders in the foreseeable future.
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments are our primary source of liquidity. We
believe that our existing liquid resources and cash generated from operations will be adequate to
meet our operating and capital requirements and other obligations for more than the next 12 months,
including repayment of our outstanding convertible subordinated notes as they mature on May 15,
2010. We may find it desirable to obtain additional debt or equity financing or seek to refinance
our existing convertible notes. Such financing may not be available to us at all or on acceptable
terms if we determine that it would be desirable to obtain additional financing.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of April 4, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
Less Than 1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
After 5 Years |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Convertible subordinated notes |
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
Interest payments on
convertible subordinated
notes |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
68.6 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.4 |
|
Purchase commitments |
|
|
450.2 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532.6 |
|
Unrecognized tax positions
plus interest and penalties |
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.0 |
** |
|
|
86.2 |
|
Pension contributions |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
911.9 |
|
|
$ |
135.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
78.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,141.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
We have pension plans covering substantially all former Agere U.S. employees, excluding
management employees hired after June 30, 2003. We also have pension plans covering certain
international employees. Although additional future contributions will be required, the amount
and timing of these contributions will be affected by actuarial assumptions, the actual rate
of return on plan assets, the level of market interest rates, and the amount of voluntary
contributions to the plans. The amount shown in the table represents our planned contributions
to our pension plans for the remainder of 2010. Because any contributions for 2011 and later
will depend on the value of the plan assets in the future and thus are uncertain, we have not
included any amounts for 2011 and beyond in the above table. |
|
** |
|
Represents the non-current tax payable obligation. We are unable to make a reasonably
reliable estimate as to when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur. |
26
Convertible Subordinated Notes
As of April 4, 2010, we had outstanding $350.0 million of 4% Convertible Subordinated Notes
due on May 15, 2010. Interest on these notes is payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each
year. These notes are subordinated to all existing and future senior debt and are convertible at
the holders option into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of approximately $13.42
per share at any time prior to maturity. We cannot elect to redeem these notes prior to maturity.
Each holder of these notes has the right to cause us to repurchase all of such holders convertible
notes at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest upon the occurrence
of any fundamental change, which includes a transaction or an event such as an exchange offer,
liquidation, tender offer, consolidation, certain mergers or combinations. We expect to repay these
notes on May 15, 2010 from our current available cash and cash equivalents.
Fluctuations in our stock price affect the prices of our outstanding convertible securities
and the likelihood of the convertible securities being converted into equity. We believe that our
current cash position and expected future operating cash flows will be adequate to redeem these
notes.
Operating Lease Obligations
We lease real estate, certain non-manufacturing equipment and software under non-cancelable
operating leases.
Purchase Commitments
We maintain purchase commitments with certain suppliers primarily for raw materials and
manufacturing services and for some non-production items. Purchase commitments for inventory
materials are generally restricted to a forecasted time horizon as mutually agreed upon between the
parties. This forecasted time horizon can vary for different suppliers.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of April 4, 2010, the amount of the unrecognized tax benefits was $152.3 million, of which
we expect to pay $8.2 million within one year. Accordingly, this amount has been recorded in other
current liabilities. For the remaining balance, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable
estimate as to when cash settlement with a taxing authority may occur. For the three months ended
April 4, 2010, we recorded a reversal of $27.9 million in liabilities, which includes previously
unrecognized tax benefits of $12.2 million and interest and penalties of $15.7 million, because of
the expiration of various statutes of limitations. It is reasonably possible that the total amount
of unrecognized tax benefits will increase or decrease in the next 12 months. Such changes could
occur based on the normal expiration of various statutes of limitations or the possible conclusion
of ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions around the world. If those events occur within the
next 12 months, we estimate that, in addition to the $8.2 million discussed above, unrecognized tax
benefits, plus accrued interest and penalties, could decrease by an amount of up to $12.0 million.
Standby Letters of Credit
As of April 4, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had outstanding obligations relating to standby
letters of credit of $4.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively. Standby letters of credit are
financial guarantees provided by third parties for leases, claims from litigations and certain
self-insured risks. If the guarantees are called, we must reimburse the provider of the guarantee.
The fair value of the letters of credit approximates the contract amount, and they generally have
one-year terms.
27
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no significant changes in the critical accounting estimates and significant
accounting policies during the three months ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the discussion in
Part II, Item 7 and in Note 1 to our financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The information contained in Note 1 to our financial statements in Item 1 under the heading
Recent Accounting Pronouncements is incorporated by reference into this Item 2.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in the market risk disclosures during the three months
ended April 4, 2010 as compared to the discussion in Part II, Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Securities and Exchange Commission
defines the term disclosure controls and procedures to mean a companys controls and other
procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange
Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required or necessary
disclosures. Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded, based on the
evaluation of the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures by our management with
the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the
period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for this
purpose.
Changes in Internal Control: During the first quarter of 2010, we did not make any change in
our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected or is reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
This information is included under the caption Legal Matters in Note 13 to our financial
statements in Item 1 of Part I.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Set forth below are risks and uncertainties, many of which are discussed in greater detail in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, that, if they were to occur,
could materially adversely affect our business or that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements in this report and other
public statements we make:
|
|
|
We depend on a small number of customers. The loss of, or a significant reduction in
revenue from, any of these customers would harm our results of operations. |
|
|
|
If we fail to keep pace with technological advances, or if we pursue technologies that
do not become commercially accepted, customers may not buy our products and our results of
operations may be harmed. |
|
|
|
|
We operate in intensely competitive markets, and our failure to compete effectively
would harm our results of operations. |
28
|
|
|
Customer orders and ordering patterns can change quickly, making it difficult for us to
predict our revenues and making it possible that our actual revenues may vary materially
from our expectations, which could harm our results of operations and stock price. |
|
|
|
|
A prolonged economic downturn could have a material negative impact on our results of
operations and financial condition. |
As a result of the global economic downturn that began in late 2008, we experienced
significant revenue declines in late 2008 and early 2009. While our revenues have improved from the
levels we experienced in late 2008 and early 2009, we believe it is still possible that the
economic downturn could further negatively affect our business. If the economic downturn worsens, it could
negatively affect our business in several ways, including resulting in lower demand for our
products and causing potential disruptions at customers or suppliers that might encounter financial
difficulties.
We have defined benefit pension plans under which we are obligated to make future payments to
participants. We have set aside funds to meet our anticipated obligations under these plans and
have invested them principally in equity and fixed income securities. The value of these securities
declined significantly in late 2008 and early 2009 and has not fully recovered. At December 31,
2009, our projected benefit obligations under our pension plans exceeded the value of the assets of
those plans by approximately $455 million. As of April 4, 2010, U.S. law provides that we must make
contributions to the pension plans during the remainder of 2010 of at least $27.9 million. We may
be required to make additional contributions to the plans in later years if the value of the plan
assets does not increase, and these amounts could be significantly larger than the required
contributions in 2010. We may also choose to make additional, voluntary contributions to the plans.
At April 4, 2010 we had contractual purchase commitments with suppliers, primarily for raw
materials and manufacturing services and for some non-production items, of approximately $532.6
million. If our actual revenues in the future are lower than our current expectations, we may not
meet all of our buying commitments. As a result, it is possible that we will have to make
penalty-type payments under these contracts, even though we are not obtaining any products that we
can sell.
While we believe we currently have sufficient cash and short term investments to fund our
operations for the near term, we may find it desirable to obtain additional debt or equity
financing or seek to refinance our existing convertible notes in the event of a prolonged or
worsening downturn. Financing may not be available to us at all or on acceptable terms if we
determine that it would be desirable to obtain additional financing. Moreover, any future equity or
convertible debt financing may decrease the percentage of equity ownership of existing stockholders
and may result in dilution, depending on the price at which the equity is sold or the debt is
converted.
|
|
|
We depend on outside suppliers to manufacture, assemble, package and test our products;
accordingly, any failure to secure and maintain sufficient manufacturing capacity or to
maintain the quality of our products could harm our business and results of operations. |
We believe that semiconductor foundry capacity is currently tight compared to industry
forecasts of demand. We have been working with our foundry partners and currently believe that we
will be able to meet our anticipated demand for semiconductor products for the rest of 2010. Based
on current capacity forecasts, and depending on which product applications are involved, we may,
however, have difficulty obtaining capacity if we experience demand for semiconductors that is
significantly in excess of our current forecasts. If we experience increased demand that we are not
able to meet, we would miss opportunities for additional revenue and could experience a negative
impact on our relationships with affected customers.
|
|
|
Failure to qualify our semiconductor products or our suppliers manufacturing lines with
key customers could harm our business and results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Any defects in our products could harm our reputation, customer relationships and
results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims and litigation, which
could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling our products. |
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to protect or assert our intellectual property rights, our business and
results of operations may be harmed. |
29
|
|
|
We are exposed to legal, business, political and economic risks associated with our
international operations. |
|
|
|
|
We use indirect channels of product distribution over which we have limited control. |
|
|
|
|
We may engage in acquisitions and strategic alliances, which may not be successful and
could harm our business and operating results. |
|
|
|
|
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical, which may cause our operating results to
fluctuate. |
|
|
|
|
Our failure to attract, retain and motivate key employees could harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our operations and our suppliers operations are subject to natural disasters and other
events outside of our control that may disrupt our business and harm our operating results. |
|
|
|
|
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that could impose
substantial costs on us and may harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
Our blank check preferred stock and Delaware law contain provisions that may inhibit
potential acquisition bids, which may harm our stock price, discourage merger offers or
prevent changes in our management. |
|
|
|
|
Class action litigation due to stock price volatility or other factors could cause us to
incur substantial costs and divert our managements attention and resources. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table contains information about our purchases of our common stock during the
quarter ended April 4, 2010.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Dollar Value of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
|
Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Paid per Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
|
the Programs |
|
January 1 January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
February 1 February 28, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
March 1 April 4, 2010 |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.55 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
223,792,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.55 |
|
|
|
4,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
223,792,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 17, 2010, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of
up to $250 million of our common stock. The purchases reported in the table above were made
pursuant to this authorization.
Item 6. Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index, which follows the signature page to this report.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSI CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: May 11, 2010 |
By |
/s/ Bryon Look
|
|
|
|
Bryon Look |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Administrative Officer |
|
|
|
31
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1 |
|
2003 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted
Stock Units (Revenue and non-GAAP operating income performance tests)
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form
8-K filed February 17, 2010) |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 |
32