N-CSRS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05597
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036 |
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
|
|
|
Randy Takian
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036 |
|
|
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-296-6990
Date of fiscal year end: May 31, 2009
Date of reporting period: November 30, 2008
Item 1 Report to Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Welcome,
Shareholder:
In
this report, youll learn about how your investment in
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
performed during the semiannual period. We will provide an
overview of the market conditions, and discuss some of the
factors that affected performance during the reporting period.
In addition, this report includes the Funds financial
statements and a list of Fund investments.
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily
come to pass. There is no assurance that the Fund will achieve
its investment objective. The Fund is subject to market risk,
which is the possibility that market values of securities owned
by the Fund will decline and, therefore, the value of the
Funds shares may be less than what you paid for them.
Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Fund.
Income earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
Fund Report
For the six months ended November 30, 2008
Market
Conditions
The broad financial markets were highly volatile throughout the
reporting period as the credit crisis intensified, the housing
market continued to decline, and the economy slid into
recession. In early September 2008, investor confidence
plummeted and the markets began a downward spiral following the
governments takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the
bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. In the weeks that followed,
several other financial institutions were forced into mergers,
rescued by government loans, or failed altogether as the value
of their assets severely eroded. The credit markets became
paralyzed as banks refused to lend while investors fled risk
assets in favor of Treasury securities. In an effort to unlock
the credit markets the federal government interceded with
various supportive measures including a $700 billion
bailout plan. As of the end of the reporting period, however,
these measures had seemingly done little to improve investor
confidence.
The municipal bond market had already been under pressure for
several months prior to September, due in part to the credit
rating downgrades of various monoline bond insurers and the
deterioration of the auction rate and variable rate markets. The
failure of Lehman Brothers, however, prompted a wave of forced
selling in the municipal market as leveraged buyers, mutual
funds and brokerage firms began deleveraging, putting
significant pressure on prices, severely eroding liquidity, and
creating a technical demand/supply imbalance in the market. As a
result, municipal yields rose, particularly on the long end of
the yield curve, far exceeding those of comparable Treasuries by
the end of the period. For the six-month reporting period,
yields on
30-year AAA
rated municipal bonds rose from 4.53 percent to
5.38 percent and the
30-year
municipal-to-Treasury
ratio, which measures the relative attractiveness of the two
sectors, increased from 96 percent to 155 percent,
indicating that municipals underperformed Treasuries while
becoming relatively cheaper. As would be expected in the
risk-averse and volatile environment, higher-quality municipal
bonds outperformed lower-quality issues. Over the course of the
period, high-yield municipal credit spreads widened from 276
basis points to 497 basis points.
Performance
Analysis
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2008, the net
asset value (NAV) of Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust (OIA) decreased from $7.38 to $5.80 per
share. Based on the NAV change (as of the last business day of
the Period) plus reinvestment of tax-free dividends totaling
$0.2325 per share, the Funds total NAV return was
−18.70 percent. OIAs value on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) moved from $7.87 to $5.46 per share during
the same period. Based on this change plus reinvestment of
dividends, the Funds total market return was
−28.10 percent. OIAs NYSE market price was at a
5.86 percent discount to its NAV. During the fiscal period,
the Fund purchased and retired 29,201 shares of common stock at
a weighted average market discount of 19.98 percent. Past
performance is no guarantee of future results.
The November dividend was $0.03875 per share. The dividend
reflects the current level of the Funds net investment
income. OIAs level of undistributed net investment income
was $0.034 per share on
2
November 30, 2008 versus
$0.047 per share six months
earlier.1
The Funds emphasis on high-yield municipals bonds, which
represented more than two-thirds of portfolio assets, held back
performance during the period as the increasingly risk-averse
environment led this sector of the market to lag the
high-quality sector. Other detractors from performance included
continued weakness in the tobacco bond sector and underweighted
exposures to the utility and transportation sectors, both of
which performed relatively well during the period.
Other investments, however, helped enhance the Funds
performance during the period. Strong security selection within
the life care (CCRC) sector, of which the Fund had an overweight
allocation, was additive to returns. The Funds lack of
airline bond investments within the industrial development
revenue/pollution control revenue (IDR/PCR) sector was
particularly advantageous as rising fuel costs have put
considerable pressure on the airline industry. Lastly, the
Funds pre-refunded holdings helped boost returns. These
highly-rated, short-term securities benefited from the
outperformance of the short end of the municipal yield curve and
the high-quality sector of the market.
The Funds duration* was relatively unchanged during the
review period, remaining neutral to slightly longer, and
therefore had little impact on performance. Sector exposure was
relatively unchanged as well. The Funds investments
remained well-diversified across a broad range of sectors, the
largest weightings of which were in the life care, hospital, and
special tax districts sectors as of the end of the period.
The Funds procedure for reinvesting all dividends and
distributions in common shares is through purchases in the open
market. This method helps support the market value of the
Funds shares. In addition, we would like to remind you
that the Trustees have approved a share repurchase program
whereby the Fund may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price
not above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at
the time of purchase.
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is
no guarantee of future results, and current performance may be
lower or higher than the figures shown. Investment return, net
asset value and common share market price will fluctuate and
Fund shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will
continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in
such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future.
1 Income
earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be subject to
the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
* A measure of the sensitivity of a bonds price to
changes in interest rates, expressed in years. Each year of
duration represents an expected 1 percent change in the
price of a bond for every 1 percent change in interest
rates. The longer a bonds duration, the greater the effect
of interest-rate movements on its price. Typically, funds with
shorter durations perform better in rising-interest-rate
environments, while funds with longer durations perform better
when rates decline.
3
|
|
|
|
|
TOP FIVE SECTORS as of 11/30/08
|
|
|
Life Care
|
|
|
24
|
.3%
|
Special Tax Districts
|
|
|
15
|
.7
|
Hospital
|
|
|
14
|
.3
|
IDR/PCR**
|
|
|
8
|
.9
|
Mortgage-Single Family
|
|
|
7
|
.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM CREDIT ANALYSIS as of 11/30/08
|
|
|
Aaa/AAA
|
|
|
6
|
.6%
|
Aa/AA
|
|
|
7
|
.3
|
A/A
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
Baa/BBB
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
Ba/BB or Less
|
|
|
9
|
.3
|
NR
|
|
|
63
|
.3
|
|
|
|
** |
|
Industrial Development
Revenue/Pollution Control Revenue. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS BY STATE CLASSIFICATION as of
11/30/08
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
17
|
.6
|
%
|
Missouri
|
|
|
7
|
.7
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
7
|
.4
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
6
|
.8
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
6
|
.4
|
|
California
|
|
|
5
|
.9
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
New York
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
4
|
.0
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
2
|
.9
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
2
|
.5
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
2
|
.4
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
2
|
.0
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
2
|
.0
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
1
|
.7
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
1
|
.6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
1
|
.6
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
1
|
.6
|
%
|
Nevada
|
|
|
1
|
.6
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
1
|
.5
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
1
|
.2
|
|
North Dakota
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
1
|
.0
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
1
|
.0
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
1
|
.0
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
0
|
.7
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
0
|
.5
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
0
|
.5
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
0
|
.4
|
|
Mississipi
|
|
|
0
|
.3
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
0
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Investments
|
|
|
103
|
.6
|
|
Liability for Floating Rate Note Obligations
|
|
|
(5
|
.3
|
)
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
100
|
.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to change daily. Provided for informational purposes
only and should not be deemed a recommendation to buy or sell
the securities mentioned or securities in the sectors shown
above. Top five sectors are as a percentage of total investments
and long-term credit analysis are as a percentage of total
long-term investments. Summary of investments by state
classification are as a percentage of net assets.
Securities are classified by sectors that represent broad
groupings of related industries. Morgan Stanley is a
full-service securities firm engaged in securities trading and
brokerage activities, investment banking, research and analysis,
financing and financial advisory services. Rating allocation
based upon ratings as issued by Standard and Poors and
Moodys, respectively
4
For
More Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Morgan Stanley fund provides a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within
60 days of the end of the funds second and fourth
fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports
are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on
Form N-CSRS
and
Form N-CSR,
respectively. Morgan Stanley also delivers the semiannual and
annual reports to fund shareholders and makes these reports
available on its public web site, www.morganstanley.com. Each
Morgan Stanley fund also files a complete schedule of portfolio
holdings with the SEC for the funds first and third fiscal
quarters on
Form N-Q.
Morgan Stanley does not deliver the reports for the first and
third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports
posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. You may, however,
obtain the
Form N-Q
filings (as well as the
Form N-CSR
and N-CSRS filings) by accessing the SECs web site,
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also review and copy them at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation
of the SECs public reference room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You can also request
copies of these materials, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at the SECs
e-mail
address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the public reference
section of the SEC, Washington, DC
20549-0102.
5
Investment Advisory Agreement
Approval
Nature,
Extent and Quality of Services
The Board reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the
investment advisory services provided by the Investment Adviser
(as defined herein) under the advisory agreement, including
portfolio management, investment research and fixed income
securities trading. The Board also reviewed and considered the
nature and extent of the non-advisory, administrative services
provided by the Funds Administrator (as defined herein)
under the administration agreement, including accounting,
clerical, bookkeeping, compliance, business management and
planning, and the provision of supplies, office space and
utilities at the Investment Advisers expense. (The
Investment Adviser and the Administrator together are referred
to as the Adviser and the advisory and
administration agreements together are referred to as the
Management Agreement.) The Board also compared the
nature of the services provided by the Adviser with similar
services provided by non-affiliated advisers as reported to the
Board by Lipper Inc. (Lipper).
The Board reviewed and considered the qualifications of the
portfolio managers, the senior administrative managers and other
key personnel of the Adviser who provide the administrative and
investment advisory services to the Fund. The Board determined
that the Advisers portfolio managers and key personnel are
well qualified by education and/or training and experience to
perform the services in an efficient and professional manner.
The Board concluded that the nature and extent of the advisory
and administrative services provided were necessary and
appropriate for the conduct of the business and investment
activities of the Fund. The Board also concluded that the
overall quality of the advisory and administrative services was
satisfactory.
Performance
Relative to Comparable Funds Managed by Other Advisers
On a regular basis, the Board reviews the performance of all
funds in the Morgan Stanley Fund Complex, including the
Fund, compared to their peers, paying specific attention to the
underperforming funds. In addition, the Board specifically
reviewed the Funds performance for the one-, three- and
five-year periods ended December 31, 2007, as shown in a
report provided by Lipper (the Lipper Report),
compared to the performance of comparable funds selected by
Lipper (the performance peer group). The Board also
discussed with the Adviser the performance goals and the actual
results achieved in managing the Fund. The Board concluded that
the Funds performance was competitive with that of its
performance peer group.
Fees
Relative to Other Proprietary Funds Managed by the Adviser with
Comparable Investment Strategies
The Board reviewed the advisory and administrative fee
(together, the management fee) rate paid by the Fund
under the Management Agreement. The Board noted that the
management fee rate was comparable to
6
the management fee rates charged by the Adviser to other
proprietary funds it manages with investment strategies
comparable to those of the Fund.
Fees
and Expenses Relative to Comparable Funds Managed by Other
Advisers
The Board reviewed the management fee rate and total expense
ratio of the Fund as compared to the average management fee rate
and average total expense ratio for funds, selected by Lipper
(the expense peer group), managed by other advisers
with investment strategies comparable to those of the Fund, as
shown in the Lipper Report. The Board concluded that the
Funds management fee rate and total expense ratio were
competitive with those of its expense peer group.
Breakpoints
and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed the structure of the Funds management
fee schedule under the Management Agreement and noted that it
does not include any breakpoints. The Board considered that the
Fund is a closed-end fund and, therefore, that the Funds
assets are not likely to grow with new sales or grow
significantly as a result of capital appreciation. The Board
concluded that economies of scale for the Fund were not a factor
that needed to be considered at the present time.
Profitability
of Adviser and Affiliates
The Board considered information concerning the costs incurred
and profits realized by the Adviser and affiliates during the
last year from their relationship with the Fund and during the
last two years from their relationship with the Morgan Stanley
Fund Complex and reviewed with the Adviser the cost
allocation methodology used to determine the profitability of
the Adviser and affiliates. Based on its review of the
information it received, the Board concluded that the profits
earned by the Adviser and affiliates were not excessive in light
of the advisory, administrative and other services provided to
the Fund.
Fall-Out
Benefits
The Board considered so-called fall-out benefits
derived by the Adviser and affiliates from their relationship
with the Fund and the Morgan Stanley Fund Complex, such as
float benefits derived from handling of checks for
purchases and sales of Fund shares, through a broker-dealer
affiliate of the Adviser. The Board also considered that, from
time to time, the Adviser may, directly or indirectly, effect
trades on behalf of certain Morgan Stanley Funds through various
electronic communications networks or other alternative trading
systems in which the Advisers affiliates have ownership
interests and/or board seats. The Board concluded that the
fall-out benefits were relatively small.
7
Soft
Dollar Benefits
The Board considered whether the Adviser realizes any benefits
from commissions paid to brokers who execute securities
transactions for the Fund (soft dollars). The Board
noted that the Fund invests only in fixed income securities,
which do not generate soft dollars.
Adviser
Financially Sound and Financially Capable of Meeting the
Funds Needs
The Board considered whether the Adviser is financially sound
and has the resources necessary to perform its obligations under
the Management Agreement. The Board concluded that the Adviser
has the financial resources necessary to fulfill its obligations
under the Management Agreement.
Historical
Relationship Between the Fund and the Adviser
The Board also reviewed and considered the historical
relationship between the Fund and the Adviser, including the
organizational structure of the Adviser, the policies and
procedures formulated and adopted by the Adviser for managing
the Funds operations and the Boards confidence in
the competence and integrity of the senior managers and key
personnel of the Adviser. The Board concluded that it is
beneficial for the Fund to continue its relationship with the
Adviser.
Other
Factors and Current Trends
The Board considered the controls and procedures adopted and
implemented by the Adviser and monitored by the Funds
Chief Compliance Officer and concluded that the conduct of
business by the Adviser indicates a good faith effort on its
part to adhere to high ethical standards in the conduct of the
Funds business.
General
Conclusion
After considering and weighing all of the above factors, the
Board concluded that it would be in the best interest of the
Fund and its shareholders to approve renewal of the Management
Agreement for another year.
8
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal
Bonds (103.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
Colbert County Northwest Health Care Authority,
Alabama, Helen Keller Hospital Ser 2003
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
%
|
|
06/01/27
|
|
|
|
$
|
784,190
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Cullman Medical Park South, Medical ClinicBoard of the City
Ser 1993 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
02/15/23
|
|
|
|
|
349,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,133,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona (2.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority
Water & Wastewater Ser 2007 (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.55
|
|
|
12/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
570,456
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Constellation
Schools Ser 2008
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
957,828
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Pinal County Electrical District # 4 Ser 2008
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
319,864
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Scottsdale
Healthcare Ser 2008 A
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
09/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
473,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,321,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (5.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Gold County
Settlement Funding Corp Ser 2006
|
|
|
0
|
.0
|
|
|
06/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
167,588
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
California Municipal Finance Authority Educational Facility,
Ser 2008
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
07/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
256,855
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Thomas
Jefferson School Ser 2008 A
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
10/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
322,452
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority
California Baptist University Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
11/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
615,890
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
Daughters of Charity Health Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
07/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
355,146
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
Daly City Housing Development Finance Agency, Franciscan Mobile
Home Park Third Tier Refg Ser 2007 C
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
12/15/47
|
|
|
|
|
702,838
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Asset Backed
Ser 2007 A-1
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
06/01/47
|
|
|
|
|
2,260,960
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Quechan Indian Tribe FT Yuma Indian Reservation Ser 2008
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
625,992
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
San Diego County, San Diego Natural History Museum (COPs)
|
|
|
5
|
.70
|
|
|
02/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
725,690
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Santa Ana, Unified School District Community Facilities,
District #
2004-1,
California, Central Park Ser 2005
|
|
|
5
|
.10
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
634,560
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
Silicon Valley Tobbaco Securitization Authority, Santa Clara
Tobacco Securitization Corp Ser 2007 C
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/56
|
|
|
|
|
87,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,755,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado (4.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Christian Living
Communities Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
610,030
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, 1998 Ser B-3
|
|
|
6
|
.35
|
|
|
11/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
302,425
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Copperleaf Metropolitan District # 2, Colorado,
Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.95
|
|
|
12/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
622,890
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
9
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
Elk Valley Public Improvement Corporation, Ser 2001 A
|
|
|
7
|
.35
|
%
|
|
09/01/31
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,681,700
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Northwest Metropolitan District #3, Colorado, Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,326,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,543,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut (1.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Georgetown Special Taxing District, Ser 2006 A (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
10/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
1,170,160
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Mashantucket (Western) Pequot Tribe, Special 1997 Ser B (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
09/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
709,740
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,879,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of
Columbia (0.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, District of
Columbia & Virginia, CaterAir International Corp
Ser 1991 (AMT) (c)
|
|
|
10
|
.125
|
|
|
09/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
252,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida (17.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Alachua County Florida Industrial Development Revenue, North
Florida Retirement Village Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
11/15/17
|
|
|
|
|
398,380
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Alachua County Florida Industrial Development Revenue, North
Florida Retirement Village Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
11/15/36
|
|
|
|
|
541,744
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
Beacon Lakes, Community Development District,
Ser 2003 A
|
|
|
6
|
.90
|
|
|
05/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,398,945
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
Bellalago Educational Facilities Benefits District, Bellalago
Charter School Ser 2004 B
|
|
|
5
|
.80
|
|
|
05/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
698,012
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
Brevard County Fla Health Facilities Authority, Buena Vida
Estates, Inc Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
492,296
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
Broward County Professional Sports Facilities, Civic Arena Refg
Ser 2006 A (AMBAC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
2,835,826
|
|
|
2,780
|
|
|
Escambia County, Pensacola Care Development Centers Ser 1989
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
2,783,502
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
Escambia County, Pensacola Care Development Centers
Ser 1989 A
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
645,813
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Fiddlers Creek Community Developement District #1
Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
650,360
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Fountainbleau Lakes Community Developement District
Ser 2007 B (b)
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/15
|
|
|
|
|
410,405
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Grand Bay At Doral Community Development District
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
446,040
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Lee County Florida Industrial Development Authority
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.375
|
|
|
06/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
607,760
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Miami Beach Health Facilities
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
420,110
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, Parking Garage
Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
05/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
653,220
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Orange County Florida Health Facilities Authority, Orlando
Lutheran Towers Inc, Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
1,311,800
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, Orlando Lutheran
Towers Inc Ser 2005
|
|
|
5
|
.70
|
|
|
07/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
354,045
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, Westminister
Community Care Services Inc Ser 1999
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
04/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
801,180
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Pinellas County Health Facilities Authority, Florida, Oaks of
Clearwater Ser 2004
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
06/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
848,360
|
|
|
965
|
|
|
Renaissance Commons Community Development District, 2005
Ser A
|
|
|
5
|
.60
|
|
|
05/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
617,687
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
South Miami Health Facilities Authority, Baptist Health South
Florida Obligated Group Ser 2007 (a)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/15/32
|
|
|
|
|
2,364,133
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
10
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
Split Pine Community Developement District, Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
%
|
|
05/01/39
|
|
|
|
$
|
305,080
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Tolomato Community Developement District, Special Assessment
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.55
|
|
|
05/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
472,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,056,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia (1.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Atlanta Eastside Ser 2005 B
|
|
|
5
|
.60
|
|
|
01/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
1,409,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawaii (3.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Kahala Nui
Ser 2003 A
|
|
|
8
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/33
|
|
|
|
|
926,700
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Hawaii Department of Budget & Finance, Kuakini Health
2002 Ser A
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
07/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
1,687,940
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
Hawaii Ser 2008 DK (a)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
1,231,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,846,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
Idaho Health Facilites Authority Revenue -Valley Vista Care Corp
Refg Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
11/15/27
|
|
|
|
|
714,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois (6.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Bolingbrook Sales Tax Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
01/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
812,380
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Chicago Lake Shore East Ser 2002
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
12/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
1,613,939
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare
Ser 2008 A
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
788,770
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Landing at Plymouth
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
681,570
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Luther Oaks Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
08/15/39
|
|
|
|
|
683,180
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Montgomery Place Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
05/15/38
|
|
|
|
|
1,071,988
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
Lincolnshire, Service Area #1-Sedgebrook Ser 2004
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
03/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
531,527
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Village of Hampshire, Kane County Special Service Area # 18
Crown Development Tamms Farm Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
03/01/44
|
|
|
|
|
307,100
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
Will-Kankakee Regional Development Authority, Senior Estates
Supportive Living Ser 2007 (AMT)
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/42
|
|
|
|
|
522,704
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Yorkville Special Service Area #2006-113,
Cannonball/Beecher Road Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
03/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
692,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,706,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa (1.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
Jefferson County Iowa Hospital Revenue, Jefferson County
Hospital Project Ser C
|
|
|
5
|
.95
|
|
|
08/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
544,617
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Bethany Life Communities Refg
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.55
|
|
|
11/01/41
|
|
|
|
|
625,430
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority Health Care Facilities, Madrid Homes
Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.90
|
|
|
11/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
501,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,671,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
Olathe, Catholic Care Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/38
|
|
|
|
|
626,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
Lakeshore Villages Master Community Development District,
Special Assessment Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/17
|
|
|
|
|
650,751
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
11
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
600
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Lake Charles Memorial
Hospital Refg Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
%
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
$
|
443,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,094,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland (1.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Marlyland Economic Development Corporation, Chesapeake Bay
Conference Center Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
570,560
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities
Authority, Washington Christian Academy Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
493,360
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Our Lady of
Good Counsel High School Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
352,400
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Maryland State Health & Higher Educational Facilities
Authority, King Farm Presbyterian Community 2007 Ser A
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
457,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,873,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts (2.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Loomis Communities
Ser 1999 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
07/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
1,246,725
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, New England Center for
Children Ser 1998
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
11/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,022
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities
Authority, The Learning Center for Deaf Children
Ser 1999 C
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
748,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,272,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan (2.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Dearborn Mich Economic Dev Corp Rev
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/28
|
|
|
|
|
412,200
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
Detroit Sewerage Disposal, Senior Lien Refg Ser 2001 C-2
(FGIC Insd) (a)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
1,185,007
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Asset Backed
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/48
|
|
|
|
|
1,268,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,865,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota (1.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Minneapolis Health Care Systems
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/32
|
|
|
|
|
580,980
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
North Oaks Senior Housing Revenue Presbyterian Homes Ser
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
10/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
527,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,108,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi (0.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Mississippi Business Finance Corp., Pollution Control Revenue
Refg Ser 1998
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
04/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
318,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri (7.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Branson Hills Community Improvement District Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
04/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
538,613
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Branson Regional Airport Transportation Development District
Ser 2007 B (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
07/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
326,480
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Des Peres, West County Center Ser 2002
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
04/15/20
|
|
|
|
|
1,693,520
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
12
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
3,850
|
|
|
Fenton, Gravois Bluffs Redevelopment Ser 2001 A
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
%
|
|
10/01/11
|
|
(d)
|
|
$
|
4,386,073
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Kansas City Industrial Development Agency, Bishop Spencer 2004
Ser A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
01/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,110,390
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
St Louis County Industrial Development Authority, St Andrews
Resources for Seniors Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
12/01/41
|
|
|
|
|
549,525
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
St Louis County, Montana, Development Authority Health
Facilitites Ranken Jordan Project
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/22
|
|
|
|
|
157,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,761,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada (1.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Henderson, Local Improvement District #T-18, Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
235,058
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
Mesquite Nevada Special Improvement District #07-01 Local
Improvement- Anthem at Mesquite Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
790,094
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Nevada Department of Business & Industry, Las Vegas
Monorail 2nd Tier Ser 2000
|
|
|
7
|
.375
|
|
|
01/01/40
|
|
|
|
|
231,490
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Sparks, Local Improvement District # 3 Legends at Sparks
Marina Ser 2008
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
09/01/20
|
|
|
|
|
518,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,775,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
Hampshire (4.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,895
|
|
|
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority, Single Family
Residential 1983 Ser B
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/15
|
|
|
|
|
4,749,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey (4.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Franciscan Oaks
Ser 1997
|
|
|
5
|
.70
|
|
|
10/01/17
|
|
|
|
|
841,850
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Lions Gate
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
498,378
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Seashore Gardens
Living Center Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.375
|
|
|
11/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
436,184
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, The Presbyterian Home
at Montgomery Ser 2001 A
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
11/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
749,700
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, United Methodist
Homes of New Jersey Ser 1998
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
07/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
1,279,260
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Raritan
Bay Medical Center Ser 1994
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
1,662,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,467,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York (4.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Brookhaven Industrial Development Agency, Woodcrest Estates
Ser 1998 A (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
12/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
2,288,730
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
Mount Vernon Industrial Development Agency, Meadowview at the
Wartburg Ser 1999
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/09
|
|
|
|
|
233,816
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, 7 World Trade
Center LLC Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
03/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,197,504
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp, National Sports Museum,
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
02/15/19
|
|
|
|
|
119,400
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
13
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, Medford Hamlet
Ser 2006
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
%
|
|
01/01/39
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,051,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,890,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
Carolina (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission Healthcare Facilities,
Pennybyrn Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
10/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
271,708
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission Healthcare Facilities,
Southminster Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
10/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
343,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North
Dakota (1.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Grand Forks 4000 Valley Square Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
941,970
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Ward County, Trinity Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
333,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,275,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio (2.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Asse t Backed
Ser 2007 A-2
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
06/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
1,267,129
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Centerville Health Care, Bethany Lutheran Village Continuing
Care Facility, Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
404,304
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
Cuyahoga County Ohio Health Care and Independent Living
Facilities, Eliza Jennings Senior Care Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
05/15/27
|
|
|
|
|
599,905
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Tuscarawas County Ohio Hospitals Facilities, Twin City Hospital
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.35
|
|
|
11/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
322,299
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
Zanesville-Muskingum County Port Authority, Ohio, Anchor Glass
Container Corp Ser 1989 B (AMT)
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/08
|
|
|
|
|
75,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,668,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma (0.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
Chickasaw Nation Health Systems Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
499,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania (7.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, West Penn
Allegheny Health Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.375
|
|
|
11/15/40
|
|
|
|
|
1,285,148
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Bucks County Industrial Development Authority, Anns Choice
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
01/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
1,132,230
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Chester County Health & Education Facilities
Authority, Jenners Pond Inc Ser 2002
|
|
|
7
|
.625
|
|
|
07/01/12
|
|
(d)
|
|
|
1,183,740
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Fulton County Industrial Development Authority, Fulton County
Medical Center Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
07/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
353,775
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Harrisburg Authority, Pennsylvania, Harrisburg University of
Science & Technology Ser 2007 B
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
693,570
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, Whitemarsh
Community Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
02/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
658,230
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Reliant
Energy Inc Ser 2001 A (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
12/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
624,210
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Housing Financial Agency
Ser 2007-100A
(AMT)
|
|
|
5
|
.10
|
|
|
10/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
1,783,719
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
14
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
Washington County, Victory Centre/Tanger Outlet Redevelopment
Authority Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.45
|
%
|
|
07/01/35
|
|
|
|
$
|
674,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,389,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South
Carolina (2.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
Myrtle Beach, Air Force Base Redevelopment Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
11/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
790,863
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Authority,
Lutheran Homes Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
05/01/42
|
|
|
|
|
633,340
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs Economic Development Woodlands
At Furman Project Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
427,538
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, Wesley
Commons Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
10/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
469,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,321,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee (1.6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Johnson City Health & Educational Facilities
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
558,512
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Shelby County Health, Educational & Housing Facilities
Board, Trezevant Manor Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
327,770
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Shelby County Health, Educational & Housing Facilities
Board, Village at Germantown Ser 2003 A
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
615,998
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Shelby County Health, Educational & Housing Facilities
Board, Village at Germantown Ser 2006
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
360,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,863,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas (6.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Austin Convention Enterprises Inc, Convention Center Hotel
Ser 2006 B
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
1,349,800
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Brazos River Authority, Texas Utilities Electric Co Refg
Ser 1999 A (AMT)
|
|
|
7
|
.70
|
|
|
04/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
689,520
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Decatur Hospital Authority, Texas, Wise Regional Health
Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
7
|
.125
|
|
|
09/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
833,410
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
HFDC Central Texas Inc, Legacy at Willow Bend,
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
11/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
809,138
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Lubbock, Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas,
Carillon Senior Lifecare Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
773,530
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs 2007
Ser B (AMT) (a)
|
|
|
5
|
.15
|
|
|
09/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
2,822,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,278,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah (0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Emery County Utah Enviromental Impt
|
|
|
6
|
.15
|
|
|
09/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
758,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia (1.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Peninsula Ports Authority of Virginia, Baptist Homes
Ser 2006 C
|
|
|
5
|
.40
|
|
|
12/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
1,309,000
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
Peninsula Town Center Community Development Authority
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.45
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
506,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,815,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Washington Housing Finance Commission, Skyline at First Hill
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
01/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
632,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
15
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
of Investments - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
West
Virginia (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Thomas Health System,
Inc. Ser 2008
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
%
|
|
10/01/38
|
|
|
|
$
|
609,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt Municipal
Bonds (Cost $154,211,325)
|
|
|
|
|
117,821,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate Note and Dealer
Trusts Obligations Related to Securities Held (−5.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,030
|
)
|
|
Notes with interest rates ranging from 0.93% to 1.53% at
November 30, 2008 and contractual maturities of collateral
ranging from 09/01/23 to 08/15/32
(See Note 1D) (e) (Cost $(6,030,000))
|
|
|
|
|
(6,030,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Investments
(Cost $148,181,325)
|
|
98.3%
|
|
|
|
|
111,791,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets in Excess of
Liabilities
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
1,939,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
$
|
113,731,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMT
|
|
Alternative Minimum Tax.
|
COPs
|
|
Certificates of Participation.
|
(a)
|
|
Underlying security related to inverse floater entered into
by the Fund.
|
(b)
|
|
Resale is restricted to qualified institutional investors.
|
(c)
|
|
Joint exemption.
|
(d)
|
|
Prerefunded to call date shown.
|
(e)
|
|
Floating rate note obligations related to securities held.
The interest rates shown reflect the rates in effect at
November 30, 2008.
|
(f)
|
|
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes
approximates the aggregate cost for book purposes. The aggregate
gross unrealized appreciation is $894,207 and the aggregate
gross unrealized depreciation is $37,313,526 resulting in net
unrealized depreciation of $36,419,319.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond Insurance:
|
AMBAC
|
|
AMBAC Assurance Corporation.
|
FGIC
|
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company.
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
16
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements
Statement
of Assets and Liabilities
November 30, 2008
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value
(cost $148,181,325)
|
|
|
$117,821,150
|
|
Receivable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2,734,766
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
24,678
|
|
Dividends from affiliate
|
|
|
121
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
7,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
120,588,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate note and dealer trust obligations
|
|
|
6,030,000
|
|
Payable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
48,034
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
7,695
|
|
Transfer agent fee
|
|
|
5,532
|
|
Payable to bank
|
|
|
652,184
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
113,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
6,856,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
$113,731,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in-capital
|
|
|
$173,587,326
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(36,390,175
|
)
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
676,451
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss
|
|
|
(24,142,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
$113,731,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share
19,620,474 shares outstanding (unlimited shares
authorized of $.01 par value)
|
|
|
$5.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
17
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statement
of Operations
For the six months ended
November 30, 2008 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income:
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
5,004,491
|
|
Dividends from affiliate
|
|
|
25,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income
|
|
|
5,029,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
338,425
|
|
Interest and residual trust expenses
|
|
|
226,935
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
54,148
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
29,852
|
|
Shareholder reports and notices
|
|
|
25,080
|
|
Registration fees
|
|
|
11,283
|
|
Transfer agent fees and expenses
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
4,356
|
|
Custodian fees
|
|
|
3,026
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
714,807
|
|
Less: expense offset
|
|
|
(861
|
)
|
Less: rebate from Morgan Stanley affiliated cash sweep (Note 3)
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Expenses
|
|
|
713,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
4,316,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Loss:
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
(1,437,038
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation
|
|
|
(29,376,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(30,813,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease
|
|
$
|
(26,497,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
18
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statements
of Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE SIX
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
|
MONTHS ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
|
NOVEMBER 30, 2008
|
|
MAY 31, 2008
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
4,316,153
|
|
|
$
|
8,960,686
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
(1,437,038
|
)
|
|
|
(2,376,388
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation
|
|
|
(29,376,356
|
)
|
|
|
(14,729,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease
|
|
|
(26,497,241
|
)
|
|
|
(8,145,444
|
)
|
Dividends to shareholders from net investment income
|
|
|
(4,566,287
|
)
|
|
|
(9,638,541
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease from transactions in shares of beneficial interest
|
|
|
(165,626
|
)
|
|
|
(257,624
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease
|
|
|
(31,229,154
|
)
|
|
|
(18,041,609
|
)
|
Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
144,960,193
|
|
|
|
163,001,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period
(Including accumulated undistributed net investment
income of $676,451 and $926,585, respectively)
|
|
$
|
113,731,039
|
|
|
$
|
144,960,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
19
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statement
of Cash Flows
For the six months ended
November 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in cash:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from operations
|
|
$
|
(26,497,241
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from
operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized loss on investments
|
|
|
1,437,038
|
|
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments
|
|
|
29,376,356
|
|
Amortization of premium
|
|
|
29,090
|
|
Accretion of discount
|
|
|
(190,853
|
)
|
Cost of purchases of investments
|
|
|
(10,178,466
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investments
|
|
|
18,558,114
|
|
Net sale of short-term investments
|
|
|
575,169
|
|
Decrease in interest receivables and other assets
|
|
|
227,072
|
|
Decrease in accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
(47,350
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Adjustments
|
|
|
39,786,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating
Activities
|
|
|
13,288,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Used for Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased shares
|
|
|
(165,626
|
)
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(4,566,287
|
)
|
Net repayments of and proceeds from floating rate note
obligations
|
|
|
(8,670,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used for Financing
Activities
|
|
|
(13,401,913
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash
|
|
|
(112,984
|
)
|
Cash at the Beginning of the Period
|
|
|
112,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the End of the Period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash
Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest
|
|
$
|
226,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
20
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited)
1.
Organization and Accounting Policies
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust (the
Fund) is registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, closed-end management
investment company. The Funds investment objective is to
provide a high level of current income which is exempt from
federal income tax. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts
business trust on June 22, 1988 and commenced operations on
September 19, 1988.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. Valuation of
Investments (1) portfolio securities are
valued by an outside independent pricing service approved by the
Trustees. The pricing service uses both a computerized grid
matrix of tax-exempt securities and evaluations by its staff, in
each case based on information concerning market transactions
and quotations from dealers which reflect the mean between the
last reported bid and asked price. The portfolio securities are
thus valued by reference to a combination of transactions and
quotations for the same or other securities believed to be
comparable in quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, call
provisions, trading characteristics and other features deemed to
be relevant. The Trustees believe that timely and reliable
market quotations are generally not readily available for
purposes of valuing tax-exempt securities and that the
valuations supplied by the pricing service are more likely to
approximate the fair value of such securities; (2) futures
are valued at the latest sale price on the commodities exchange
on which they trade unless it is determined that such price does
not reflect their market value, in which case they will be
valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under
procedures established by and under the supervision of the
Funds Trustees; (3) interest rate swaps are
marked-to-market
daily based upon quotations from market makers;
(4) investments in open-end mutual funds, including the
Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds, are valued at the
net asset value as of the close of each business day; and
(5) short-term debt securities having a maturity date of
more than sixty days at time of purchase are valued on a
mark-to-market
basis until sixty days prior to maturity and thereafter at
amortized cost based on their value on the 61st day. Short-term
debt securities having a maturity date of sixty days or less at
the time of purchase are valued at amortized cost.
B. Accounting for
Investments Security transactions are
accounted for on the trade date (date the order to buy or sell
is executed). Realized gains and losses on security transactions
are determined by the identified cost method. Discounts are
accreted and premiums are amortized over the life of the
respective securities and are included in interest income.
Interest income is accrued daily except where collection is not
expected.
C. Futures Contracts
A futures contract is an agreement between two parties to
buy and sell financial instruments or contracts based on
financial indices at a set price on a future date. Upon entering
into such a
21
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
contract, the Fund is required to pledge to the broker cash,
U.S. Government securities or other liquid portfolio securities
equal to the minimum initial margin requirements of the
applicable futures exchange. Pursuant to the contract, the Fund
agrees to receive from or pay to the broker an amount of cash
equal to the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract.
Such receipts or payments known as variation margin are recorded
by the Fund as unrealized gains and losses. Upon closing of the
contract, the Fund realizes a gain or loss equal to the
difference between the value of the contract at the time it was
opened and the value at the time it was closed.
D. Floating Rate Note and
Dealer Trusts Obligations Related to Securities Held
The Fund enters into transactions in which it transfers
to Dealer Trusts (Dealer Trusts), fixed rate bonds
in exchange for cash and residual interests in the Dealer
Trusts assets and cash flows, which are in the form of
inverse floating rate investments. The Dealer Trusts fund the
purchases of the fixed rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes
to third parties and allowing the Fund to retain residual
interest in the bonds. The Fund enters into shortfall agreements
with the Dealer Trusts which commit the Fund to pay the Dealer
Trusts, in certain circumstances, the difference between the
liquidation value of the fixed rate bonds held by the Dealer
Trusts and the liquidation value of the floating rate notes held
by third parties, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash
flows. The residual interests held by the Fund (inverse floating
rate investments) include the right of the Trust (1) to
cause the holders of the floating rate notes to tender their
notes at par at the next interest rate reset date, and
(2) to transfer the municipal bond from the Dealer Trusts
to the Fund, thereby collapsing the Dealer Trusts. The Fund
accounts for the transfer of bonds to the Dealer Trusts as
secured borrowings, with the securities transferred remaining in
the Funds investment assets, and the related floating rate
notes reflected as Trust liabilities under the caption
floating rate note and dealer trusts obligations on
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund records the
interest income from the fixed rate bonds under the caption
interest and records the expenses related to
floating rate note obligations and any administrative expenses
of the Dealer Trusts under the caption interest and
residual trust expenses on the Statement of Operations.
The floating rate notes issued by the Dealer Trusts have
interest rates that reset weekly and the floating rate note
holders have the option to tender their notes to the Dealer
Trusts for redemption at par at each reset date. At
November 30, 2008, Fund investments with a value of
$10,439,229 are held by the Dealer Trusts and serve as
collateral for the $6,030,000, in floating rate note obligations
outstanding at that date. The range of contractual maturities of
the floating rate note obligations and interest rates in effect
at November 30, 2008 are presented in the Portfolio of
Investments.
E. Interest Rate Swaps
Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of commitments
to pay and receive interest based on a notional principal
amount. Net periodic interest payments to be received or paid
are accrued daily and are recorded as realized gains or losses
in the Statement of Operations. The Fund may pay or receive cash
to collateralize interest rate swap contracts. This cash
collateral is recorded as asset/
22
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
liabilities on the Funds books. Any cash received may be
invested in Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds.
F. Federal Income Tax
Policy It is the Funds policy to comply
with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue
Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to
distribute substantially all of its taxable and non taxable
income to its shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax
provision is required. The Fund files tax returns with the U.S.
Internal Revenue Service, New York State and New York City. The
Fund adopted the provisions of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48
(FIN 48) Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes on November 29, 2007. FIN 48 sets
forth a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of
the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a
tax return. The implementation of FIN 48 did not result in
any unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial
statements. If applicable, the Fund recognizes interest accrued
related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and
penalties in other expenses in the Statement of Operations. Each
of the tax years in the four year period ended May 31,
2008, remains subject to examination by taxing authorities.
The Fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the
opinion of the issuer, is free from federal income tax. There is
no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
will agree with this opinion. In the event the IRS determines
that the issuer does not comply with relevant tax requirements,
interest payments from a security could become federally taxable.
G. Dividends and Distributions to
Shareholders Dividends and distributions to
shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
H. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
2.
Investment Advisory/Administration Agreements
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Investment Advisors Inc. (the Investment Advisor),
the Fund pays an advisory fee, calculated weekly and payable
monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.50% to the Funds
weekly net assets.
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Services Company Inc. (the Administrator), an
affiliate of the Investment Advisor, the Fund pays an
administration fee, calculated weekly and payable monthly, by
applying the annual rate of 0.08% to the Funds weekly net
assets.
23
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
Under an agreement between the Administrator and State Street
Bank and Trust Company (State Street), State
Street provides certain administrative services to the Fund. For
such services, the Administrator pays State Street a portion of
the fee the Administrator receives from the Fund.
3.
Security Transactions and Transactions with Affiliates
The Fund invests in Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity
Funds-Tax-Exempt Portfolio Institutional Class, an
open-end management investment company managed by an affiliate
of the Investment Adviser. Investment advisory fees paid by the
Fund are reduced by an amount equal to the advisory and
administrative service fees paid by Morgan Stanley Institutional
Liquidity Funds-Tax-Exempt Portfolio Institutional
Class with respect to assets invested by the Fund in Morgan
Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds-Tax-Exempt
Portfolio Institutional Class. For the six months
ended November 30, 2008, advisory fees paid were reduced by
$401 relating to the Funds investment in Morgan Stanley
Institutional Liquidity Funds-Tax-Exempt Portfolio
Institutional Class. Income distributions earned by the Fund are
recorded as dividends from affiliate in the
Statement of Operations and totaled $25,207 for the six months
ended November 30, 2008. During the six months ended
November 30, 2008, cost of purchases and sales of
investments in Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity
Funds-Tax-Exempt Portfolio Institutional Class
aggregated $16,335,035 and $16,335,035, respectively.
The cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio
securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months
ended November 30, 2008 aggregated $9,599,130 and
$18,271,033, respectively. Included in the aforementioned
transactions are purchases and sales of $1,287,564 and
$1,008,120, respectively with other Morgan Stanley funds,
including a realized gain of $8,120.
The Fund has an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension
plan covering certain independent Trustees of the Fund who will
have served as independent Trustees for at least five years at
the time of retirement. Benefits under this plan are based on
factors which include years of service and compensation. The
Trustees voted to close the plan to new participants and
eliminate the future benefits growth due to increases to
compensation after July 31, 2003. Aggregate pension costs
for the six months ended November 30, 2008, included in
Trustees fees and expenses in the Statement of Operations
amounted to $3,001. At November 30, 2008, the Fund had an
accrued pension liability of $60,592 which is included in
accrued expenses in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Fund has an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan (the
Compensation Plan) which allows each independent
Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or
she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees. Each eligible
Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts
credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more
of the Morgan Stanley funds that are offered as investment
options under the Compensation Plan. Appreciation/depreciation
and distributions received from these
24
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
investments are recorded with an offsetting increase/decrease in
the deferred compensation obligation and do not affect the net
asset value of the Fund.
4.
Dividends
On October 14, 2008, the Fund declared the following
dividends from net investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
RECORD
|
|
PAYABLE
|
PER SHARE
|
|
DATE
|
|
DATE
|
$0.03875
|
|
December 19, 2008
|
|
December 26, 2008
|
5.
Shares of Beneficial Interest
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAID IN
|
|
|
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
|
EXCESS OF
|
|
|
SHARES
|
|
OF SHARES
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
Balance, May 31, 2007
|
|
|
19,685,043
|
|
|
$
|
196,850
|
|
|
$
|
173,817,507
|
|
Shares repurchased (weighted average discount 4.70%)+++
|
|
|
(35,368
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
(252,270
|
)
|
Reclassification due to permanent book/tax differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,781
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, May 31, 2008
|
|
|
19,649,675
|
|
|
|
196,496
|
|
|
|
173,556,456
|
|
Shares repurchased (weighted average discount 19.98%)+++
|
|
|
(29,201
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(165,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2008
|
|
|
19,620,474
|
|
|
$
|
196,204
|
|
|
$
|
173,391,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustees have approved a share repurchase program whereby
the Fund may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price not
above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at the
time of purchase.
|
|
|
|
+++
|
|
The Trustees have voted to retire
the shares purchased.
|
6.
Expense Offset
The expense offset represents a reduction of the fees and
expenses for interest earned on cash balances maintained by the
Fund with the transfer agent and custodian.
7.
Purposes of and Risks Relating to Certain Financial Instruments
The Fund may invest a portion of its assets in inverse floating
rate instruments, either through outright purchases of inverse
floating rate securities or through the transfer of bonds to a
Dealer Trusts in exchange for cash and residual interests in the
Dealer Trusts (See Note 1D). These investments are
typically used by the Fund in seeking to enhance the yield of
the portfolio. These instruments typically involve greater risks
than a fixed rate municipal bond. In particular, these
instruments are acquired through leverage or may have leverage
embedded in them and therefore involve many of the risks
associated with leverage. Leverage is a speculative technique
that may expose the Fund to greater risk and increased costs.
Leverage may cause
25
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
the Funds net asset value to be more volatile than if it
had not been leveraged because leverage tends to magnify the
effect of any increases or decreases in the value of the
Funds portfolio securities. The use of leverage may also
cause the Fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it may not
be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations
with respect to inverse floating rate instruments.
To hedge against adverse interest rate changes, the Fund may
invest in financial futures contracts or municipal bond index
futures contracts (futures contracts). These futures
contracts involve elements of market risk in excess of the
amount reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The
Fund bears the risk of an unfavorable change in the value of the
underlying securities. Risks may also arise upon entering into
these contracts from the potential inability of the
counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts.
The Fund may enter into interest rate swaps and may purchase or
sell interest rate caps, floors and collars. The Fund expects to
enter into these transactions primarily to manage interest rate
risk, hedge portfolio positions and preserve a return or spread
on a particular investment or portion of its portfolio. The Fund
may also enter into these transactions to protect against any
increase in the price of securities the Fund anticipates
purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swap transactions are
subject to market risk, risk of default by the other party to
the transaction, risk of imperfect correlation and manager risk.
Such risks may exceed the related amounts shown in the Statement
of Assets and Liabilities.
The Fund may enter into credit default swaps for hedging
purposes to add leverage to its portfolio or to gain exposure to
a credit in which the Fund may otherwise invest. Credit default
swaps may involve greater risks than if a Fund had invested in
the issuer directly. Credit default swaps are subject to general
market risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. If the Fund is a
buyer and no credit event occurs, it will lose the sum of the
periodic payments. In addition, if the Fund is a seller and a
credit event occurs, the value of the referenced obligation
received by the Fund coupled with the periodic payments
previously received may be less than the maximum payout amount
it pays to the buyer, resulting in a loss to the Fund.
8.
Federal Income Tax Status
The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment
income and net realized capital gains are determined in
accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ
from generally accepted accounting principles. These
book/tax differences are either considered temporary
or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are
permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the
capital accounts based on their federal tax-basis treatment;
temporary differences do not require reclassification. Dividends
and distributions which exceed net investment income and net
realized capital gains for tax purposes are reported as
distributions of
paid-in-capital.
26
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
As of May 31, 2008, the Fund had temporary book/tax
differences primarily attributable to post-October losses
(capital losses incurred after October 31 within the taxable
year which are deemed to arise on the first business day of the
Funds next taxable year) and book amortization of
discounts on debt securities.
9.
Fair Valuation Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157), effective December 1, 2007. In
accordance with FAS 157, fair value is defined as the price
that the Fund would receive to sell an investment or pay to
transfer a liability in a timely transaction with an independent
buyer in the principal market, or in the absence of a principal
market the most advantageous market for the investment or
liability. FAS 157 establishes a three-tier hierarchy to
distinguish between (1) inputs that reflect the assumptions
market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability
developed based on market data obtained from sources independent
of the reporting entity (observable inputs) and (2) inputs
that reflect the reporting entitys own assumptions about
the assumptions market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability developed based on the best information
available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs) and to
establish classification of fair value measurements for
disclosure purposes. Various inputs are used in determining the
value of the Funds investments. The inputs are summarized
in the three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 quoted prices in active markets for
identical investments
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including the Funds own assumptions in determining the
fair value of investments)
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of
November 30, 2008 in valuing the Funds investments
carried at value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT
NOVEMBER 30, 2008 USING
|
|
|
|
|
QUOTED PRICES IN
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVE MARKET FOR
|
|
OTHER OBSERVABLE
|
|
UNOBSERVABLE
|
|
|
|
|
IDENTICAL ASSETS
|
|
INPUTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
(LEVEL 1)
|
|
(LEVEL 2)
|
|
(LEVEL 3)
|
Investments in Securities
|
|
$
|
111,791,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$111,791,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Notes
to Financial Statements - November 30, 2008
(unaudited) continued
10.
Accounting Pronouncement
On March 19, 2008, FASB released Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 161).
SFAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives
and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures
about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative
instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. The application of
SFAS 161 is required for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal
years. At this time, management is evaluating the implications
of SFAS 161 and its impact on the Funds financial
statements has not yet been determined.
28
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Financial
Highlights
Selected ratios and per share data for a share of beneficial
interest outstanding throughout each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE SIX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MONTHS ENDED
|
|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY
31,
|
|
|
NOVEMBER 30, 2008
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of the period
|
|
|
$7.38
|
|
|
|
|
$8.28
|
|
|
|
|
$8.02
|
|
|
|
|
$8.00
|
|
|
|
|
$7.67
|
|
|
|
|
$7.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment
income(1)
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(1.57
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.87
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from investment operations
|
|
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less dividends from net investment income
|
|
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of acquring treasury
shares(1)
|
|
|
0.00
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period
|
|
|
$5.80
|
|
|
|
|
$7.38
|
|
|
|
|
$8.28
|
|
|
|
|
$8.02
|
|
|
|
|
$8.00
|
|
|
|
|
$7.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value, end of period
|
|
|
$5.46
|
|
|
|
|
$7.87
|
|
|
|
|
$9.68
|
|
|
|
|
$8.76
|
|
|
|
|
$7.97
|
|
|
|
|
$7.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Return(2)
|
|
|
(28.10
|
)
|
%(6)
|
|
|
(13.64
|
)
|
%
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
%
|
|
|
17.04
|
|
%
|
|
|
20.12
|
|
%
|
|
|
(2.34
|
)
|
%
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses (before expense offset)
|
|
|
1.05%(3
|
)(7)
|
|
|
|
0.95%(3
|
)(4)
|
|
|
|
0.80%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
%
|
Total expenses (before expense offset, exclusive of interest and
residual trust expenses)
|
|
|
0.72%(3
|
)(7)
|
|
|
|
0.72%(3
|
)(4)
|
|
|
|
0.72%(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
%
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
6.36%(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
%
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
%
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
%
|
|
|
6.76
|
|
%
|
|
|
6.63
|
|
%
|
Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period, in thousands
|
|
|
$113,731
|
|
|
|
|
$144,960
|
|
|
|
|
$163,002
|
|
|
|
|
$157,928
|
|
|
|
|
$157,594
|
|
|
|
|
$156,265
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
7%(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The per share amounts were
computed using an average number of shares outstanding during
the period. |
(2) |
|
Total return is based upon the
current market value on the last day of each period reported.
Dividends are assumed to be reinvested at the prices obtained
under the Funds dividend reinvestment plan. Total return
does not reflect brokerage commissions. |
(3) |
|
Reflects rebate of certain Fund
expenses in connection with the investments in Morgan Stanley
Institutional Liquidity Funds-Tax-Exempt Portfolio
Institutional Class during the period. The rebate had an effect
of less than 0.005%. |
(4) |
|
Does not reflect the effect of
expense offset of 0.01%. |
(5) |
|
Includes anti-dilutive effect of
acquiring treasury shares of less than $0.01. |
(6) |
|
Not annualized. |
(7) |
|
Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial
Statements
29
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Morgan
Stanley Advisor Closed-End Funds
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy
(unaudited)
We are required by federal law to provide you with a copy of our
Privacy Policy annually.
The following Policy applies to current and former individual
investors in Morgan Stanley Advisor closed-end funds. This
Policy is not applicable to partnerships, corporations, trusts
or other non-individual clients or account holders. Please note
that we may amend this Policy at any time, and will inform you
of any changes to this Policy as required by law.
We
Respect Your Privacy
We appreciate that you have provided us with your personal
financial information. We strive to maintain the privacy of such
information while we help you achieve your financial objectives.
This Policy describes what non-public personal information we
collect about you, why we collect it, and when we may share it
with others. We hope this Policy will help you understand how we
collect and share non-public personal information that we gather
about you. Throughout this Policy, we refer to the non-public
information that personally identifies you or your accounts as
personal information.
|
|
1.
|
What
Personal Information Do We Collect About You?
|
To serve you better and manage our business, it is important
that we collect and maintain accurate information about you. We
may obtain this information from applications and other forms
you submit to us, from your dealings with us, from consumer
reporting agencies, from our Web sites and from third parties
and other sources.
For
example:
|
|
|
We may collect information such as your name, address, e-mail
address, telephone/fax numbers, assets, income and investment
objectives through applications and other forms you submit to us.
|
|
|
We may obtain information about account balances, your use of
account(s) and the types of products and services you prefer to
receive from us through your dealings and transactions with us
and other sources.
|
|
|
We may obtain information about your creditworthiness and credit
history from consumer reporting agencies.
|
|
|
We may collect background information from and through
third-party vendors to verify representations you have made and
to comply with various regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
If you interact with us through our public and private Web
sites, we may collect information that you provide directly
through online communications (such as an e-mail address). We
may also collect information about your Internet service
provider, your domain name, your computers operating
system and Web browser, your use of our Web sites and your
product and service preferences, through the use
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
30
Morgan Stanley
Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
Morgan
Stanley Advisor Closed-End Funds
An Important Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
of cookies. Cookies recognize your
computer each time you return to one of our sites, and help to
improve our sites content and personalize your experience
on our sites by, for example, suggesting offerings that may
interest you. Please consult the Terms of Use of these sites for
more details on our use of cookies.
|
|
|
2.
|
When
Do We Disclose Personal Information We Collect About
You?
|
To provide you with the products and services you request, to
serve you better and to manage our business, we may disclose
personal information we collect about you to our affiliated
companies and to non-affiliated third parties as required or
permitted by law.
A. Information We Disclose
to Our Affiliated Companies. We do not
disclose personal information that we collect about you to our
affiliated companies except to enable them to provide services
on our behalf or as otherwise required or permitted by law.
B. Information We Disclose
to Third Parties. We do not disclose
personal information that we collect about you to non-affiliated
third parties except to enable them to provide services on our
behalf, to perform joint marketing agreements with other
financial institutions, or as otherwise required or permitted by
law. For example, some instances where we may disclose
information about you to non-affiliated third parties include:
for servicing and processing transactions, to offer our own
products and services, to protect against fraud, for
institutional risk control, to respond to judicial process or to
perform services on our behalf. When we share personal
information with these companies, they are required to limit
their use of personal information to the particular purpose for
which it was shared and they are not allowed to share personal
information with others except to fulfill that limited purpose.
|
|
3.
|
How
Do We Protect the Security and Confidentiality of Personal
Information We Collect About You?
|
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural security
measures to help safeguard the personal information we collect
about you. We have internal policies governing the proper
handling of client information. Third parties that provide
support or marketing services on our behalf may also receive
personal information, and we require them to adhere to
confidentiality standards with respect to such information.
See Notes to Financial
Statements
31
Trustees
Michael Bozic
Kathleen A. Dennis
James F. Higgins
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson
Joseph J. Kearns
Michael F. Klein
Michael E. Nugent
W. Allen Reed
Fergus Reid
Officers
Chairperson of the
Board
Randy Takian
President
and Principal
Executive Officer
Kevin Klingert
Vice President
Amy R. Doberman
Vice President
Carsten Otto
Chief Compliance
Officer
Stefanie V. Chang Yu
Vice President
Francis J. Smith
Treasurer
and Chief Financial
Officer
Mary E. Mullin
Secretary
Transfer
Agent
Computershare
Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Two World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281
Legal
Counsel
31 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019
Counsel to the
Independent Trustees
Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Investment
Adviser
Morgan
Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10036
(c)
2009 Morgan Stanley
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
Morgan
Stanley
Municipal
Income Opportunities Trust
NYSE:
OIA
Semiannual
Report
November 30, 2008
OIASAN
IU09-00075P-Y11/08
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 6.
(a) Refer to Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Applicable only to reports covering periods ending on or after December 31, 2005.
Item 9. Closed-End Fund Repurchases
REGISTRANT PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units) |
|
of Shares (or |
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Units) that May |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
(b) Average |
|
Announced |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Units) |
|
Price Paid per |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share (or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
or Programs |
September 1,
2008
September 30, 2008
|
|
5,000 |
|
6.3437 |
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
October 1,
2008
October 31, 2008
|
|
24,201 |
|
5.5808 |
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Total
|
|
29,201 |
|
5.9623 |
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Trusts/Funds principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded
that the Trusts/Funds disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Trust/Fund in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, based upon such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report.
2
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a) Code of Ethics Not applicable for semiannual reports.
(b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the registrant are attached hereto as part of EX-99.CERT.
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
|
|
|
/s/ Randy Takian
Randy Takian
|
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
January 20, 2009 |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald E. Robison |
|
|
Principal Executive Officer |
|
|
January 20, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francis Smith
Francis Smith
|
|
|
Principal Financial Officer |
|
|
January 20, 2009 |
|
|
4