Edgar Filing: CENTURY ALUMINUM CO

form10q_cenx2q09.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______.

Commission file number 0-27918

Century Aluminum Company

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware (State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	13-3070826 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
2511 Garden Road Building A, Suite 200 Monterey, California (Address of principal executive offices)	93940 (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (831) 642-9300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).* o Yes o No

* - The registrant is not currently required to submit interactive data files.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer	x	Accelerated Filer	o
Non-Accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	o	Smaller Reporting Company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

The registrant had 74,160,449 shares of common stock outstanding at July 31, 2009.

Table of contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements	1
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	38
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	51
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	53
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	54
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	54
Item 6. Exhibit Index	55
SIGNATURES	56

Table of contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
	June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008
ASSETS
Cash	$	230,031		$	129,400
Restricted cash		865			865
Short-term investments		—			13,686
Accounts receivable — net		34,609			60,859
Due from affiliates		14,063			39,062
Inventories		126,832			138,111
Prepaid and other current assets		19,901			99,861
Deferred taxes — current portion		—			32,290
Total current assets		426,301			514,134
Property, plant and equipment — net		1,319,899			1,340,037
Intangible asset — net		24,453			32,527
Due from affiliates – less current portion		7,599			7,599
Other assets		89,905			141,061
TOTAL	$	1,868,157		$	2,035,358
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable, trade	$	66,344		$	102,143
Due to affiliates		64,023			70,957
Accrued and other current liabilities		61,262			58,777
Accrued employee benefits costs — current portion		12,070			12,070
Convertible senior notes		156,704			152,700
Industrial revenue bonds		7,815			7,815
Total current liabilities		368,218			404,462
Senior unsecured notes payable		250,000			250,000
Revolving credit facility		—			25,000
Accrued pension benefits costs — less current portion		45,307			50,008
Accrued postretirement benefits costs — less current portion		161,803			219,539
Other liabilities		41,757			33,464
Deferred taxes		65,252			71,805
Total noncurrent liabilities		564,119			649,816
CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (NOTE 14)
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock (one cent par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; 153,491 and 155,787 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)		2			2
Common stock (one cent par value, 195,000,000 shares authorized and 74,158,900 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009; 100,000,000 shares authorized and 49,052,692 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008)		742			491
Additional paid-in capital		2,378,436			2,272,128
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(67,257	)		(137,208	)
Accumulated deficit		(1,376,103	)		(1,154,333	)
Total shareholders’ equity		935,820			981,080
TOTAL	$	1,868,157		$	2,035,358

See notes to consolidated financial statements

- 1 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
NET SALES:
Third-party customers	$	140,097		$	420,032		$	310,511		$	776,925
Related parties		49,056			125,165			103,229			239,414
		189,153			545,197			413,740			1,016,339
Cost of goods sold		194,380			388,973			491,328			764,120
Gross profit (loss)		(5,227	)		156,224			(77,588	)		252,219
Other operating expenses – curtailment costs		9,166			—			33,498			—
Selling, general and administrative expenses		11,271			13,851			21,391			32,717
Operating income (loss)		(25,664	)		142,373			(132,477	)		219,502
Interest expense		(7,977	)		(7,990	)		(16,019	)		(16,022	)
Interest income		352			2,291			1,076			4,814
Interest income – affiliates		144			—			286			—
Net loss on forward contracts		(3,268	)		(203,784	)		(6,870	)		(652,092	)
Other income (expense) - net		586			306			344			(227	)
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of joint ventures		(35,827	)		(66,804	)		(153,660	)		(444,025	)
Income tax benefit (expense)		(2,573	)		57,744			1,523			196,635
Loss before equity in earnings of joint ventures		(38,400	)		(9,060	)		(152,137	)		(247,390	)
Equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures		(68,746	)		5,566			(69,633	)		9,959
Net loss	$	(107,146	)	$	(3,494	)	$	(221,770	)	$	(237,431	)

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and Diluted	$	(1.45	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(3.20	)	$	(5.78	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic and Diluted		74,143			41,143			69,402			41,092

See notes to consolidated financial statements

- 2 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(221,770	)	$	(237,431	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Unrealized net loss on forward contracts		2,514			536,650
Accrued plant curtailment costs		21,051			—
Depreciation and amortization		40,063			41,860
Debt discount amortization		4,004			3,729
Lower of cost or market inventory adjustment		(38,187	)		—
Deferred income taxes		25,030			(195,874	)
Pension and other post retirement benefits		7,495			8,513
Stock-based compensation		1,269			11,658
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		—			(657	)
Equity investment impairment		73,234			—
Undistributed earnings of joint ventures		(3,601	)		(9,959	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable – net		26,250			(1,042	)
Purchase of short-term trading securities		—			(97,532	)
Sale of short-term trading securities		13,686			345,764
Due from affiliates		24,999			(6,595	)
Inventories		31,140			(30,212	)
Prepaid and other current assets		77,891			(20,821	)
Accounts payable, trade		(24,768	)		16,693
Due to affiliates		(11,435	)		7,726
Accrued and other current liabilities		(7,109	)		(5,544	)
Other – net		4,916			(2,113	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		46,672			364,813

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment		(11,927	)		(14,956	)
Nordural expansion		(12,132	)		(32,648	)
Investments in and advances to joint ventures		(1,023	)		(27,621	)
Restricted and other cash deposits		—			(1,898	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(25,082	)		(77,123	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments under revolving credit facility		(25,000	)		—
Excess tax benefits from shared-based compensation		—			657
Issuance of common stock – net		104,041			2,335
Net cash provided by financing activities		79,041			2,992
NET CHANGE IN CASH		100,631			290,682
Cash, beginning of the period		129,400			60,962
Cash, end of the period	$	230,031		$	351,644

See notes to consolidated financial statements

- 3 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the

Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(UNAUDITED)

General

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Century Aluminum Company should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. In management’s opinion, the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, that are necessary for a fair presentation of financial results for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the first six months of 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. Throughout this Form 10-Q, and unless expressly stated otherwise or as the context otherwise requires, "Century Aluminum," "Century," "we," "us," "our" and "ours" refer to Century Aluminum Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

2.	Management’s Plans

We have incurred losses each year since 2005 and had an accumulated deficit of $1,376,103 as of June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, we sustained net losses available to common stockholders of $221,770 and $895,187 (as adjusted for the adoption of FSP APB 14-1, see Note 4), respectively. Our financial position and liquidity have been and may continue to be materially adversely affected by low aluminum prices as compared to our cost of production. If primary aluminum prices are consistent with levels recently forecasted by industry analysts, we would expect such liquidity would be sufficient to fund our operations through mid to late 2011.

Our principal sources of liquidity are available cash, cash flow from operations and available borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We will continue to explore alternative or supplementary financing arrangements to the revolving credit facility. Our principal uses of cash are operating costs, payments of principal and interest on our outstanding debt, the funding of capital expenditures and investments in related businesses, working capital and other general corporate requirements.

3.	Equity Investment Impairment

In August 2009, we signed an agreement to transfer our 50% interest in joint ventures at Gramercy Alumina LLC (“Gramercy”) and St. Ann Bauxite Limited (“SABL”) to certain subsidiaries of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, "Noranda"). As a result, we undertook an evaluation to determine the impact, if any, on the carrying amount of the equity investments in the joint venture assets as of June 30, 2009. We concluded that the terms of the asset transfer agreement provided indications of an impairment of the equity investments in the joint ventures. As a result, we performed an impairment analysis to determine the appropriate carrying amount of these assets as of June 30, 2009. Based on the impairment analysis, we recorded a $73,234 impairment loss in the three months ended June 30, 2009. The $73,234 loss consisted of the following amounts:

	Beginning balance			Impairment gain (loss)			Ending balance
Equity investments in Gramercy and SABL, equity in the earnings of Gramercy and SABL and intercompany profit elimination	$	95,892		$	(74,783	)	$	21,109
Pension and OPEB obligations for Gramercy and SABL		(1,549	)		1,549			—
Total	$	94,343		$	(73,234	)	$	21,109

- 4 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

The impairment loss was recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in equity in earnings (losses) of joint ventures. On the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the impairment of the equity investments was recorded in other assets. The pension and OPEB obligations of the equity investments were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.

See Note 22 Subsequent Events for additional information about the joint venture asset transfer transaction.

4.	FSP APB 14-1 Adoption

FSP APB 14-1 “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (the “FSP”) fundamentally changes the accounting for certain convertible debt instruments. Issuers of convertible debt instruments that are affected by the FSP must separately account for the liability and equity components of the convertible debt instruments in a manner that reflects the entity’s hypothetical nonconvertible borrowing rate. The FSP requires the retrospective application of these changes to our financial statements back to the date of issuance of our 1.75% convertible senior notes with a cumulative effect adjustment recognized as of the beginning of the first period presented. The FSP was effective for Century Aluminum on January 1, 2009.

The FSP applies to our 1.75% convertible senior notes issued in 2004 (the “Convertible Notes”). The holders of our Convertible Notes may convert at any time at an initial conversion rate of 32.743 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes, equivalent to a conversion price of $30.5409 per share of common stock. Upon conversion, we would deliver cash up to the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be converted and, at our election, cash, common stock or a combination thereof for any conversion obligation in excess of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes to be converted. We did not enter into any derivative transactions in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes. Currently, the if-converted value of the Convertible Notes is significantly less than the principal balance of the Convertible Notes.

We applied the guidance in the FSP to measure the fair value of the liability component of the Convertible Notes using a discounted cash flow model. We assessed the expected life of the liability component to be seven years or through August 2011 (based on the noteholder’s put option in August 2011) and applied a hypothetical nonconvertible borrowing rate (7.25%) which was based on yields of similarly rated nonconvertible instruments issued in August 2004. We determined the carrying amount of the equity component by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the Convertible Notes. The tax effect of the temporary basis difference associated with the liability component of the Convertible Notes is recorded as an adjustment to additional paid in capital as proscribed by the FSP.

In 2004, we capitalized approximately $6,000 of transaction costs related to the issuance of the Convertible Notes. We amortize these capitalized financing fees to interest expense over the expected life of the Convertible Notes. The FSP requires the allocation of these capitalized financing fees to the liability and equity components and accounting for the allocated fees as either debt issuance costs or equity issuance costs.

- 5 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

The adoption of the FSP resulted in the following amounts recognized in our financial statements:

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008

Principal of the liability component of 1.75% convertible senior notes	$	175,000		$	175,000
Unamortized debt discount		(18,296	)		(22,300	)
Net carrying amount of liability component of 1.75% convertible senior notes	$	156,704		$	152,700

Net carrying amount of equity component of 1.75% convertible senior notes (net of $18,261 taxes and $1,799 issuance costs)	$	32,114		$	32,114

Interest expense related to the 1.75% convertible senior notes:
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Contractual interest coupon	$	766		$	766		$	1,532		$	1,532
Amortization of the debt discount on the liability component		2,014			1,875			4,004			3,729
Total	$	2,780			2,641		$	5,536		$	5,261

Effective interest rate for the liability component for the period		6.35	%		6.04	%		6.33	%		6.01	%

The estimated amortization expense for the debt discount for the 1.75% convertible senior notes through the remaining expected life (August 2011) is as follows:

		Six months ending December 31, 2009				2010				2011
Estimated debt discount amortization expense		$	4,149			$	8,755			$	5,392

The adoption of the FSP requires the retrospective application to all periods presented as of the beginning of the first period presented. As of January 1, 2009, the FSP was adopted and comparative financial statements of prior years have been adjusted to apply the FSP retrospectively. The line items for the 2008 financial statements which are affected by the change in accounting principle are indicated below.

- 6 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	December 31, 2008
	As Reported			Effect of change			As Adjusted
ASSETS
Total current assets	$	514,134		$	—		$	514,134
Property, plant and equipment — net		1,340,037			—			1,340,037
Intangible asset — net		32,527			—			32,527
Due from affiliates – less current portion		7,599			—			7,599
Other assets		141,802			(741	)		141,061
TOTAL	$	2,036,099		$	(741	)	$	2,035,358
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable, trade	$	102,143		$	—		$	102,143
Due to affiliates		70,957			—			70,957
Accrued and other current liabilities		58,777			—			58,777
Accrued employee benefits costs — current portion		12,070			—			12,070
Convertible senior notes		175,000			(22,300	)		152,700
Industrial revenue bonds		7,815			—			7,815
Total current liabilities		426,762			(22,300	)		404,462
Total noncurrent liabilities		649,816			—			649,816
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock		2			—			2
Common stock		491			—			491
Additional paid-in capital		2,240,014			32,114			2,272,128
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(137,208	)		—			(137,208	)
Accumulated deficit		(1,143,778	)		(10,555	)		(1,154,333	)
Total shareholders’ equity		959,521			21,559			981,080
TOTAL	$	2,036,099		$	(741	)	$	2,035,358

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	Three months ended June 30, 2008
	As Reported			Effect of change			As Adjusted

Net sales	$	545,197		$	—		$	545,197
Cost of goods sold		388,973			—			388,973
Gross profit		156,224			—			156,224
Selling, general and administrative expenses		13,851			—			13,851
Operating income		142,373			—			142,373
Interest expense		(6,180	)		(1,810	)		(7,990	)
Interest income		2,291			—			2,291
Net loss on forward contracts		(203,784	)		—			(203,784	)
Other income - net		306			—			306
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of joint ventures		(64,994	)		(1,810	)		(66,804	)
Income tax benefit		57,087			657			57,744
Loss before equity in earnings of joint ventures		(7,907	)		(1,153	)		(9,060	)
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		5,566			—			5,566
Net loss	$	(2,341	)	$	(1,153	)	$	(3,494	)

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and Diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.08	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic and Diluted (in thousands)		41,143			41,143			41,143

- 7 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	Six months ended June 30, 2008
	As Reported			Effect of change			As Adjusted

Net sales	$	1,016,339		$	—		$	1,016,339
Cost of goods sold		764,120			—			764,120
Gross profit		252,219			—			252,219
Selling, general and administrative expenses		32,717			—			32,717
Operating income		219,502			—			219,502
Interest expense		(12,423	)		(3,599	)		(16,022	)
Interest income		4,814			—			4,814
Net loss on forward contracts		(652,092	)		—			(652,092	)
Other expense - net		(227	)		—			(227	)
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of joint ventures		(440,426	)		(3,599	)		(444,025	)
Income tax benefit		195,330			1,305			196,635
Loss before equity in earnings of joint ventures		(245,096	)		(2,294	)		(247,390	)
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		9,959			—			9,959
Net loss	$	(235,137	)	$	(2,294	)	$	(237,431	)

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic and Diluted	$	(5.72	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(5.78	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic and Diluted (in thousands)		41,092			41,092			41,092

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	Six months ended June 30, 2008
	As Reported			Effect of change			As Adjusted
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(235,137	)	$	(2,294	)	$	(237,431	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Unrealized net loss on forward contracts		536,650			—			536,650
Depreciation and amortization		41,860			—			41,860
Debt discount amortization		—			3,729			3,729
Deferred income taxes		(194,569	)		(1,305	)		(195,874	)
Pension and other post retirement benefits		8,513			—			8,513
Stock-based compensation		11,658			—			11,658
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		(657	)		—			(657	)
Undistributed earnings of joint ventures		(9,959	)		—			(9,959	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable – net		(1,042	)		—			(1,042	)
Purchase of short-term trading securities		(97,532	)		—			(97,532	)
Sale of short-term trading securities		345,764			—			345,764
Due from affiliates		(6,595	)		—			(6,595	)
Inventories		(30,212	)		—			(30,212	)
Prepaid and other current assets		(20,821	)		—			(20,821	)
Accounts payable, trade		16,693			—			16,693
Due to affiliates		7,726			—			7,726
Accrued and other current liabilities		(5,544	)		—			(5,544	)
Other – net		(1,983	)		(130	)		(2,113	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		364,813			—			364,813

Net cash used in investing activities		(77,123	)		—			(77,123	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		2,992			—			2,992
NET CHANGE IN CASH		290,682			—			290,682
Cash, beginning of the period		60,962			—			60,962
Cash, end of the period	$	351,644		$	—		$	351,644

- 8 -

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Table of contents

As the result of the accounting change, our accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2008, increased $13,684 from $245,462 to $259,146.

5.	Curtailment of Operations – Ravenswood and Hawesville

On December 17, 2008, our subsidiary, Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc. (“CAWV”), issued a conditional Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN”) notice at its Ravenswood, West Virginia smelter (“Ravenswood”) related to a curtailment of plant operations in 60 days. This facility employed approximately 684 persons. Simultaneously with the issuance of the WARN, CAWV began the immediate curtailment of one of its four potlines which was completed by December 20, 2008. In December 2008, we incurred curtailment costs of $1,667 for this partial curtailment at CAWV. These costs were included in cost of goods sold.

On February 4, 2009, we announced the curtailment of the remaining plant operations at Ravenswood. Layoffs for the majority of Ravenswood's employees were completed by February 20, 2009. The decision to curtail the operations was due to the relatively high operating cost at Ravenswood and the depressed global price for primary aluminum.

On March 3, 2009, our subsidiary, Century Aluminum of Kentucky, announced the curtailment of one potline at its Hawesville, Kentucky aluminum smelter (“Hawesville”). Hawesville has production capacity of approximately 244,000 metric tons per year of primary aluminum from five potlines. The potline curtailment was completed in March 2009. The action reduced primary aluminum production by approximately 4,370 metric tons per month and impacted approximately 120 employees.

We incurred curtailment charges of $9,166 and $33,498 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, which are reported in the “Other operating expenses” line item in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The majority of the curtailment charges related to Ravenswood. The components of the curtailment costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are as follows:

	Three months ended			Six months ended
	June 30, 2009			June 30, 2009
Severance/employee-related cost	$	(127	)	$	24,463
Alumina contract – spot sales net (gains) losses		(2,614	)		717
Alumina contract amendment cost		6,000			6,000
Power/other contract termination costs		—			6,332
Ongoing site costs		6,749			8,338
Gross expense		10,008			45,850
Pension plan curtailment adjustment		(5	)		2,478
OPEB plan curtailment adjustment		(837	)		(14,830	)
Net expense	$	9,166		$	33,498

Cash expenditure forecasts and cash payments to date

	Total gross cash expenditure forecast		Approximate cash payments through June 30, 2009
Curtailment of operations at Ravenswood and Kentucky (24 months)	$	33,000	$	11,490
Ongoing idling costs at Ravenswood (24 months)	$	32,000	$	6,888
Contract termination costs (1)	$	14,000	$	9,972

(1)	This estimate is based on realized losses to date and $6,000 in payments to St. Ann Bauxite Ltd. in compensation for the reduced bauxite sales related to alumina and bauxite contract amendments (of which $1,500 has been paid as of June 30, 2009).

- 9 -

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Table of contents

6.	Equity Offering

February 2009 Offering

In February 2009, we completed a public offering of 24,500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $4.50 per share, raising $110,250 before offering costs. The offering costs were approximately $6,209, representing underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

Glencore International AG (together with its subsidiaries, “Glencore”) purchased 13,242,250 shares of common stock in the February 2009 offering. We agreed with Glencore to amend the terms of our Standstill and Governance Agreement with Glencore to increase the percentage of our voting securities that Glencore could acquire and vote prior to April 7, 2009, in connection with Glencore’s purchase of common stock in this offering. As of June 30, 2009, we believe that Glencore beneficially owned, through its common stock, approximately 38.1% of our issued and outstanding common stock and, through its ownership of common and preferred stock, an overall 48.7% economic ownership of Century.

We intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock for general corporate purposes, including repayment of debt.

7.	Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments

SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This pronouncement applies to a broad range of other existing accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” Under SFAS No. 157, fair value is an exit price and that exit price should reflect all the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Short-term Investments. Our short-term investments consist of tax-exempt municipal bonds. The market value of these investments is based upon their quoted market price in markets that are not actively traded.

Derivatives. Our derivative contracts have included natural gas forward financial purchase contracts, foreign currency forward contracts, primary aluminum forward physical delivery and financial sales contracts, the Ravenswood power contract and a short-term power contract for Hawesville. We measure the fair value of these contracts based on the quoted future market prices at the reporting date in their respective principal markets for all available periods. We discount the expected cash flows from these contracts using a risk-adjusted discount rate. The primary aluminum forward physical delivery contracts that are accounted for as derivatives are marked-to-market using the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) spot and forward market for primary aluminum and the U.S. Midwest Premium. Because there is no quoted futures market price for the U.S. Midwest premium component of the market price for primary aluminum, it is necessary for management to estimate the U.S. Midwest premium based on the historical U.S. Midwest premium. Prior to the termination of the primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts in July 2008, the term of one of these contracts extended beyond the quoted LME futures market. We estimated the fair value of that contract by making certain assumptions about future market prices of primary aluminum beyond the quoted LME market prices in 2013. These future market assumptions were significant to the fair value measurements. The Ravenswood power contract derivative is valued based in part on the LME forward market. The short-term power contract at Hawesville is valued based on forward power market prices and the expected term of the contract. See the Note 22 Subsequent Events for the impact of the new Hawesville power contract transaction.

- 10 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Fluctuations in the market prices for our primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts had a significant impact on gains and losses from forward contracts included in our financial statements from period to period. Unrealized gains and losses for these primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts were included in net loss on forward contracts. Our natural gas forward financial purchase contracts and foreign currency forward contracts are derivative contracts and qualify for cash flow hedge treatment under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivatives.” The effective portion of these contracts is recorded in other comprehensive income. The realized gains or losses on these hedges are recorded in the statement of operations when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portions of these hedges are recognized immediately in the statement of operations. We have no foreign currency forwards or options outstanding at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008. We settled our foreign currency forward contracts in October 2008.

Fair Value of Derivative Assets and Liabilities
	Balance sheet location	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
DERIVATIVE ASSETS:
Power contracts	Prepaid and other assets	$	49		$	2,202
TOTAL DERIVATIVE ASSETS		$	49		$	2,202

DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES:
Natural gas forward financial contracts	Accrued and other current liabilities	$	(2,051	)	$	(10,130	)
Power contracts	Accrued and other current liabilities		(480	)		—
Aluminum sales premium contracts – current portion	Accrued and other current liabilities		(1,069	)		(1,256	)
Aluminum sales premium contracts – less current portion	Other liabilities		(593	)		(503	)
TOTAL DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES		$	(4,193	)	$	(11,889	)

Derivatives in SFAS 133 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:
	Three months ended June 30, 2009
	Amount of loss recognized in OCI on derivative, net of tax (effective portion)			Loss reclassified from OCI to income on derivatives (effective portion)				Loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion)
	Amount			Location	Amount			Location	Amount

Natural gas forward financial contracts	$	(2,051	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(4,634	)		$	—

Foreign currency forwards (1)	$	(2,163	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(2,181	)	Net loss on forward contracts	$	(94	)

	Six months ended June 30, 2009
	Amount of loss recognized in OCI on derivative, net of tax (effective portion)			Loss reclassified from OCI to income on derivatives (effective portion)				Loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion)
	Amount			Location	Amount			Location		Amount

Natural gas forward financial contracts	$	(2,051	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(13,377	)		—	$	—

Foreign currency forwards (1)	$	(2,163	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(4,706	)	Net loss on forward contracts		$	(1,701	)

(1)	We have no foreign currency forwards or options outstanding at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008. We settled our foreign currency forward contracts in October 2008.

- 11 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Natural Gas

To mitigate the volatility of the natural gas markets, we enter into fixed-price forward financial purchase contracts, accounted for as cash flow hedges, which settle in cash in the period corresponding to the intended usage of natural gas. These forward contracts, which are designated as cash flow hedges and qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS No.133, have maturities through November 2009. The critical terms of the contracts essentially match those of the underlying exposure.

The effective portion of the forward contracts gain or loss is reported in other comprehensive income, and the ineffective portion is reported currently in earnings. Each month, when we settle the natural gas forward contracts, the realized gain or loss on our cash flow hedges are recognized in income as part of our cost of goods sold.

We had the following outstanding forward financial purchase contracts to hedge forecasted transactions:

	June 30, 2009	December 31, 2008
Natural gas forward financial contracts (in thousands of MMBTU)	760	3,340

Foreign Currency

We are exposed to foreign currency risk due to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to the euro, the Icelandic krona (“ISK”) and the Chinese yuan. The labor costs, maintenance costs and other local services at the Nordural facility at Grundartangi, Iceland (“Grundartangi”) are denominated in ISK and a portion of its anode costs are denominated in euros. As a result, an increase or decrease in the value of those currencies relative to the U.S. dollar would affect Grundartangi’s operating margins. In addition, we expect to incur capital expenditures for the construction of a primary aluminum facility in Helguvik, Iceland (the “Helguvik project”), although we are currently evaluating the Helguvik project’s cost, scope and schedule in light of the global credit crisis and weakening commodity prices. A significant portion of the capital expenditures for the Helguvik project are forecasted to be denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar with a significant portion in ISK.

We manage our foreign currency exposure by entering into foreign currency forward contracts when management deems such transactions appropriate. During 2008, we purchased foreign currency forward contracts to hedge our foreign currency risk in the ISK associated with a portion of the forecasted operating costs payable in ISK at Grundartangi and for a portion of the forecasted capital expenditures payable in ISK for the Helguvik project. These forward contracts were designated as cash flow hedges, qualified for hedge accounting under SFAS No.133 and had maturities through September 2009. The critical terms of the contracts essentially matched those of the underlying exposure. The effective portion of the forward contracts gain or loss was reported in other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion was reported currently in earnings.

Each month, when we settled the foreign currency forward contracts, the realized gain or loss on our cash flow hedges for Grundartangi operating costs was recognized in income as part of our cost of goods sold. The realized gain or loss for our cash flow hedges for the Helguvik capital expenditures were accumulated in other comprehensive income and will be reclassified to earnings when the project is completed as part of the depreciation expense of the capital assets.

In October 2008, following the appreciable devaluation of the ISK versus the U.S. dollar, we reached an agreement with our counterparties and settled the remaining forward contracts that extended through September 2009.

- 12 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

We recognized losses of approximately $94 and $1,701 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, (none in three and six months ended June 30, 2008) on the ineffective portions of the forward contracts for the forecasted Helguvik capital expenditures. These losses are recorded in net loss on forward contracts in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The ineffective portion of these forward contracts represents forward contract positions in excess of the revised forecast schedule of Helguvik capital expenditures.

The foreign currency forward and natural gas forward financial purchase contracts are subject to counterparty credit risk. However, we only enter into forward financial contracts with counterparties we determine to be creditworthy at the time of entering into the contract. Due to the fact that we are currently in a liability position for almost all of our forward contracts, our counterparty risk is very minimal at this time. If any counterparty failed to perform according to the terms of the contract, the impact would be limited to the difference between the contract price and the market price applied to the contract volume on the date of settlement.

As of June 30, 2009, an accumulated other comprehensive loss of $6,373 is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the next 12-month period.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133:
	Gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative
		Three months ended June 30, 2009			Six months ended June 30, 2009
	Location	Amount			Amount

Power contracts	Net loss on forward contracts	$	(431	)	$	(2,547	)

Aluminum sales premium contracts	Related party sales		872			1,676
Aluminum sales premium contracts	Net loss on forward contracts		(514	)		(392	)

Power

We are party to a power supply agreement at Ravenswood that contains LME-based pricing provisions that are an embedded derivative. The embedded derivative does not qualify for cash flow hedge treatment and is marked to market quarterly. Based on our expected power usage over the remaining term of the contract, gains and losses associated with the embedded derivative are recorded in net loss on forward contracts in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. We have recorded a derivative asset of $49 and $2,202 for the embedded derivative at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

In April 2009, we amended a short-term power contract at Hawesville. As a result of the amendment, the power contract qualified as a derivative and was marked-to-market at June 30, 2009. The short-term power contract at Hawesville was valued based on forward power market prices and the expected term of the contract. We recorded, in accrued and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, a derivative liability of $480 for the derivative at June 30, 2009.

- 13 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Aluminum sales premium contracts

The Glencore Metal Agreement I is a physical delivery contract for 50,000 mtpy of primary aluminum through December 31, 2009 with variable, LME-based pricing. We account for the Glencore Metal Agreement I as a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133. We have not designated the Glencore Metal Agreement I as “normal” because it replaced and was a substitute for a significant portion of a sales contract which did not qualify for this designation. Because the Glencore Metal Agreement I is variably priced, we do not expect significant variability in its fair value, other than changes that might result from the absence of the U.S. Midwest premium. Gains and losses on the derivative are based on, (1) the difference between a contracted U.S. Midwest premium and the actual U.S. Midwest premium at settlement, and (2) the difference between a contracted U.S. Midwest premium and a forecast of the U.S. Midwest premium for future periods. Settlements are recorded in related party sales. Unrealized gains (losses) based on forecasted U.S. Midwest premiums are recorded in net loss on forward contracts on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Glencore Metal Agreement II is a physical delivery contract for 20,400 mtpy of primary aluminum through December 31, 2013 with variable, LME-based pricing. Under the Glencore Metal Agreement II, pricing is based on market prices, adjusted by a negotiated U.S. Midwest premium with a cap and a floor as applied to the current U.S. Midwest premium. We account for the Glencore Metal Agreement II as a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133. Gains and losses on the derivative are based on the difference between the contracted U.S. Midwest premium and actual and forecasted U.S. Midwest premiums. Settlements are recorded in related party sales. Unrealized gains (losses) based on forecasted U.S. Midwest premiums are recorded in net loss on forward contracts on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

We had the following outstanding forward contracts that were entered into that were not designated as hedging instruments:

	June 30, 2009	December 31, 2008
Power contracts (in megawatt hours ("MWH")) (1)	26,840	1,066,000
Aluminum sales contract premiums (metric tons) (2)	118,093	152,000

(1)

Amount includes approximately 23,000 MWH for expected usage under a Hawesville power contract that was amended in the second quarter of 2009 which required mark-to-market accounting as a result of the amendments. We mark the Ravenswood power contract to market based on our expected usage during the remaining term of the contract. This contract term is dependent on the outcome of a pending rate case. We expect the outcome of the rate case to be completed around September 2009.

(2)

Represents the remaining physical deliveries under our Glencore Metal Agreements I and II.

Fair Value Measurements

The following table sets forth by level within the SFAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. As required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and the placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

- 14 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Recurring Fair Value Measurements	As of June 30, 2009
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3			Total
ASSETS:
Derivative assets	$	—		$	—	$	49		$	49

LIABILITIES:
Derivative liabilities	$	(2,051	)	$	—	$	(2,142	)	$	(4,193	)

Recurring Fair Value Measurements	As of December 31, 2008
	Level 1			Level 2		Level 3			Total
ASSETS:
Short-term investments	$	—		$	13,686	$	—		$	13,686
Derivative assets		—			—		2,202			2,202
TOTAL	$	—		$	13,686	$	2,202		$	15,888

LIABILITIES:
Derivative liabilities	$	(10,130	)	$	—	$	(1,759	)	$	(11,889	)

Change in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements during the three months ended June 30,
	Derivative liabilities/assets
	2009			2008
Beginning balance April 1,	$	(1,339	)	$	(1,477,113	)
Total loss (realized/unrealized) included in earnings		(3,159	)		(203,720	)
Settlements		2,405			66,612
Ending balance, June 30	$	(2,093	)	$	(1,614,221	)

Amount of total loss included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses relating to assets and liabilities held at June 30,	$	(2,911	)	$	(140,719	)

Change in Level 3 Fair Value Measurements during the six months ended June 30,
	Derivative liabilities/assets
	2009			2008
Beginning balance January 1,	$	443		$	(1,070,290	)
Total loss (realized/unrealized) included in earnings		(5,105	)		(651,958	)
Settlements		2,569			108,027
Ending balance, June 30,	$	(2,093	)	$	(1,614,221	)

Amount of total loss included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized losses relating to assets and liabilities held at June 30,	$	(4,681	)	$	(536,725	)

The net loss on our derivative liabilities is recorded in our statement of operations under Net loss on forward contracts. In 2009, our Level 3 derivative liabilities are included in our Accrued and other liabilities and Other liabilities line items of our consolidated balance sheet. In 2008, our Level 3 derivative liabilities are included in our Due to affiliates, Accrued and other liabilities, Due to affiliates – less current portion and Other liabilities line items of our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Our metals, natural gas and foreign currency risk management activities are subject to the control and direction of senior management. These activities are regularly reported to our board of directors.

- 15 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

8.	Earnings Per Share

The following table provides a reconciliation of the computation of the basic and diluted earnings per share:

	For the three months ended June 30,
	2009								2008
	Loss			Shares (000)		Per-Share			Loss			Shares (000)		Per-Share
Net loss	$	(107,146	)		74,143	$	(1.45	)	$	(3,494	)		41,143	$	(0.08	)
Amount allocated to common shareholders (1)		100	%							100	%
Basic and Diluted EPS:
Loss allocable to common shareholders	$	(107,146	)		74,143	$	(1.45	)	$	(3,494	)		41,143	$	(0.08	)

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2009								2008
	Loss			Shares (000)		Per-Share			Loss			Shares (000)		Per-Share
Net loss	$	(221,770	)		69,402	$	(3.20	)	$	(237,431	)		41,092	$	(5.78	)
Amount allocated to common shareholders (1)		100	%							100	%
Basic and Diluted EPS:
Loss allocable to common shareholders	$	(221,770	)		69,402	$	(3.20	)	$	(237,431	)		41,092	$	(5.78	)

(1)

We have not allocated the net loss allocable to common shareholders between common and preferred shareholders, as the holders of our preferred shares do not have a contractual obligation to share in the loss. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, there was no preferred stock outstanding.

Impact of issuance of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on EPS

In July 2008, we issued 160,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (convertible into 16,000,000 common shares) as a portion of the consideration for the termination of primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts with Glencore. The preferred stock has similar characteristics of a “participating security” as described by SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share” and EITF 03-6, “Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128.” In accordance with the guidance in SFAS No. 128 and EITF 03-6, we calculated basic EPS using the Two-Class Method, allocating undistributed income to our preferred shareholder consistent with their participation rights, and diluted EPS using the If-Converted Method.

EITF 03-6 does not require the presentation of basic and diluted EPS for securities other than common stock and the EPS amounts, as presented, only pertain to our common stock.

The Two-Class Method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for common shares and participating securities according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and the participation rights in undistributed earnings. Our preferred stock is a non-cumulative perpetual participating convertible preferred stock with no set dividend preferences. The dividend rights of our preferred shareholder are equal to our common shareholders, as if it held the number of common shares into which its shares of preferred stock are convertible as of the record date. The liquidation rights of the preferred stock mirror their dividend rights, in that the preferred stock ranks in parity to the common stock in respect of liquidation preference and would be entitled to share ratably with common stock holders in the distribution of assets in a liquidation (as though the preferred stock holders held the number of shares of common stock into which their shares of preferred stock were convertible). The preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $0.01 per share.

- 16 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

The holders of our convertible preferred stock do not have a contractual obligation to share in the losses of Century. Thus, in periods where we report net losses, we will not allocate the net losses to the convertible preferred stock for the computation of basic or diluted EPS.

Options to purchase 692,075 and 429,768 shares of common stock were outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, all options, service-based stock and shares to be issued upon the assumed conversion of our convertible debt were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because of their antidilutive effect on earnings per share. The average price for our common stock in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was below the conversion price of our 1.75% convertible senior notes.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, all options, service-based stock, and shares to be issued upon the assumed conversion of our convertible debt were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS because of their antidilutive effect on earnings per share. Based on the average price for our common stock in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, we would have been required to issue approximately 3,277,000 and 3,034,000 shares upon an assumed conversion of our convertible debt.

Service-based stock for which vesting is based upon continued service is not considered issued and outstanding shares of common stock until vested. However, the service-based stock is considered a common stock equivalent and, therefore, the weighted average service-based stock is included, using the treasury stock method, in common shares outstanding for diluted earnings per share computations if they have a dilutive effect on earnings per share. There were approximately 503,000 and 77,000 unvested shares of service-based stock outstanding at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our goal-based performance share units are not considered common stock equivalents until it becomes probable that performance goals will be obtained.

9.	Shareholders’ Equity

Common Stock

In May 2009, our shareholders approved an amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to increase the total number of authorized shares of our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, to 195,000,000.

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock Conversions

In July 2008, we issued 160,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. All shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are held by Glencore and were issued in connection with the termination of primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts with Glencore on July 7, 2008. The issuance of common stock under our stock incentive programs triggers anti-dilution provisions of the preferred stock and results in the automatic conversion of shares of preferred stock into shares of common stock.

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock:	2009
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2008	155,787
Automatic conversions during the six months ended June 30, 2009	(2,296)
Total shares outstanding at June 30, 2009	153,491

- 17 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

10.	Income Taxes

As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had total unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest) of $21,300 and $21,600, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and net of federal benefit) that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, are $15,700 and $15,200.

We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. As of June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008, we had approximately $4,500 and $3,400, respectively, of accrued interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits.

We do not expect any significant change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

Our federal income tax returns beginning in 2005 are subject to examination. Material state and local income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2002. West Virginia completed an income tax examination for 2003 through 2005 with no changes. The majority of our other state returns beginning in 2003 are subject to examination. Our Icelandic tax returns are subject to examination and income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2001.

During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we received a federal income tax refund of $79,724 related to a carryback of a portion of the December 31, 2008 taxable loss to tax years ended December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2007. Additionally, we received a $10,094 federal income tax refund related to overpayments of December 31, 2008 estimated tax payments.

11.	Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Raw materials	$	19,172	$	19,664
Work-in-process		15,682		16,133
Finished goods		17,727		8,203
Operating and other supplies		74,251		94,111
Inventories	$	126,832	$	138,111

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, using the first-in, first-out method (“FIFO”). Due to the curtailment of our Ravenswood operations in February 2009, approximately $18,326 of items that were classified as inventory at December 31, 2008 are not expected to be consumed within one year and have been reclassified to Other assets.

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the market value of our inventory was less than its FIFO value by $10,447 and $55,867, respectively.

- 18 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

12.	Goodwill and Intangible Asset

In December 2008, we tested our goodwill for impairment and recorded a $94,844 impairment loss. As of January 1, 2009, we have no goodwill.

The intangible asset consists of the power contract acquired in connection with our acquisition of the Hawesville facility (“Hawesville”). The contract value is being amortized over its term using a method that results in annual amortization equal to the percentage of a given year’s expected gross annual benefit to the total as applied to the total recorded value of the power contract. As of June 30, 2009, the gross carrying amount of the intangible asset was $155,986 with accumulated amortization of $131,533.

For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, amortization expense for the intangible asset totaled $4,037 and $3,769, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, amortization expense for the intangible asset totaled $8,074 and $7,538, respectively. For the years ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, the estimated aggregate amortization expense for the intangible asset will be approximately $16,149 and $16,378, respectively. The intangible asset is reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” whenever events or circumstances indicate that its net carrying amount may not be recoverable.

In July 2009, we terminated the existing power contracts at Hawesville and entered into a new power agreement. See Note 22 Subsequent Events for additional information about this transaction.

13.

Debt

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Debt classified as current liabilities:
1.75% convertible senior notes due 2024, interest payable semiannually, net of debt discount of $18,296 and $22,300, respectively (1)(2)(3)(4)	$	156,704	$	152,700
Hancock County industrial revenue bonds due 2028, interest payable quarterly (variable interest rates (not to exceed 12%))(1)		7,815		7,815
Debt classified as non-current liabilities:
7.5% senior unsecured notes payable due 2014, interest payable semiannually (3)(5)		250,000		250,000
Revolving credit facility (6)		—		25,000
Total debt	$	414,519	$	435,515

- 19 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

(1)	The 1.75% convertible senior notes are classified as current because they are convertible at any time by the holder. The IRBs are classified as current liabilities because they are remarketed weekly and could be required to be repaid upon demand if there is a failed remarketing. The IRB interest rate at June 30, 2009 was 0.65%.
(2)	The 1.75% convertible senior notes are convertible at any time by the holder at an initial conversion rate of 32.7430 shares of Century common stock per one thousand dollars of principal amount of convertible senior notes, subject to adjustments for certain events. The initial conversion rate is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $30.5409 per share of Century common stock. Upon conversion of a 1.75% convertible senior note, the holder of such convertible note shall receive cash up to the principal amount of the 1.75% convertible senior note and, at our election, either cash or Century common stock, or a combination thereof, for the 1.75% convertible senior notes conversion value in excess of such principal amount, if any. We may redeem some or all of the notes on or after August 6, 2009 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. Holders of the 1.75% convertible senior notes may require us to purchase for cash all or part of the notes on each of August 1, 2011, August 1, 2014 and August 1, 2019 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.
(3)	The obligations of Century pursuant to the notes are unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by all of our existing domestic restricted subsidiaries. The indentures governing these obligations contain customary covenants, including limitations on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, sell assets or stock of certain subsidiaries and purchase or redeem capital stock.
(4)	Amounts reflect the adoption and retrospective application of FSP APB 14-1 as of January 1, 2009. This pronouncement changes the accounting treatment for certain convertible debt instruments requiring the segregation of these instruments into a liability and equity component. These amounts represent the fair value of the liability component. See Note 4 Adoption of FSP APB 14-1 for additional information.
(5)	On or after August 15, 2009, we may redeem any of the senior notes, in whole or in part, at an initial redemption price equal to 103.75% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The redemption price will decline each year after 2009 and will be 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, beginning on August 15, 2012.
(6)	Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are, at our option, at the LIBOR rate or bank base rate, plus or minus in each case an applicable margin. The revolving line of credit is subject to customary covenants, including limitations on capital expenditures, additional indebtedness, affiliate transactions, liens, guarantees, mergers and acquisitions, dividends, distributions, capital redemptions and investments.

We have a $100,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of banks that will mature September 19, 2010. Our obligations under the Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries (other than Century Aluminum Holdings, Inc., Century Louisiana, Inc., and Nordural US LLC) and secured by a first priority security interest in all accounts receivable and inventory belonging to Century and our subsidiary borrowers. The availability of funds under the Credit Facility is subject to a $15,000 reserve and limited by a specified borrowing base consisting of certain eligible accounts receivable and inventory. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are, at our option, at the LIBOR rate or bank base rate, plus or minus in each case an applicable margin. The Credit Facility is subject to customary covenants, including limitations on capital expenditures, additional indebtedness, affiliate transactions, liens, guarantees, mergers and acquisitions, dividends, distributions, capital redemptions and investments. We could issue up to a maximum of $25,000 in letters of credit under the Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2009, we had letters of credit totaling $11,451 outstanding. Any outstanding letters of credit reduce our borrowing availability on a dollar-for-dollar basis. We had no outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, we had additional borrowing availability of $33,871 under the Credit Facility. We pay a commitment fee for the unused portion of the line.

- 20 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

The curtailment of our Ravenswood facility in February 2009 and one line at Hawesville in March 2009 resulted in lower eligible accounts receivable and inventory balances included in the borrowing base calculation and lowered the availability of funds under the Credit Facility. See Note 5 Curtailment of Operations - Ravenswood and Hawesville for additional information.

14.	Contingencies and Commitments

Environmental Contingencies

We believe our current environmental liabilities do not have, and are not likely to have, a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. However, there can be no assurance that future requirements or conditions at currently or formerly owned or operated properties will not result in liabilities which may have a material adverse effect.

Century Aluminum of West Virginia, Inc. continues to perform remedial measures at our Ravenswood, West Virginia facility (“Ravenswood”) pursuant to an order issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) in 1994 (the “3008(h) Order”). CAWV also conducted a RCRA facility investigation (“RFI”) under the 3008(h) Order evaluating other areas at Ravenswood that may have contamination requiring remediation. The RFI has been approved by appropriate agencies. CAWV has completed interim remediation measures at two sites identified in the RFI, and we believe no further remediation will be required. A Corrective Measures Study, which will formally document the conclusion of these activities, is being completed with the EPA. EPA approval of the Corrective Measures Study is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2009. We believe a significant portion of the contamination on the two sites identified in the RFI is attributable to the operations of third parties and is their financial responsibility.

Prior to our purchase of Hawesville, the EPA issued a final Record of Decision (“ROD”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act. By agreement, Southwire, the former owner and operator is to perform all obligations under the ROD. Century Aluminum of Kentucky General Partnership (“Century Kentucky”) has agreed to operate and maintain the ground water treatment system required under the ROD on behalf of Southwire, and Southwire will reimburse Century Kentucky for any expense that exceeds $400 annually.

We are a party to an EPA Administrative Order on Consent (the “Order”) pursuant to which other past and present owners of an alumina refining facility at St. Croix, Virgin Islands have agreed to carry out a Hydrocarbon Recovery Plan to remove and manage hydrocarbons floating on groundwater underlying the facility. Pursuant to the Hydrocarbon Recovery Plan, recovered hydrocarbons and groundwater are delivered to the adjacent petroleum refinery where they are received and managed. In connection with the sale of the facility by Lockheed Martin Corporation (“Lockheed”), to one of our affiliates, Virgin Islands Alumina Corporation (“Vialco”), in 1989, Lockheed, Vialco and Century entered into the Lockheed–Vialco Asset Purchase Agreement. The indemnity provisions contained in the Lockheed-Vialco Asset Purchase Agreement allocate responsibility for certain environmental matters. For qualifying claims, Vialco is allocated responsibility for the first $1,000, Lockheed Martin is allocated the second $1,000, and the parties share equal responsibility for additional amounts, up to $30,000. Lockheed, has tendered indemnity and defense of the above matter to Vialco. We have likewise tendered indemnity to Lockheed. Management does not believe Vialco’s liability under the Order or its indemnity to Lockheed will require material payments. Through June 30, 2009, we have expended approximately $800 on the Hydrocarbon Recovery Plan. We expect the future potential payments under this indemnification to comply with the Order will be approximately $500, which may be offset in part by sales of recoverable hydrocarbons.

- 21 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

In May 2005, we and Vialco were among several defendants listed in a lawsuit filed by the Commissioner of the Department of Planning and Natural Resources, in his capacity as Trustee for Natural Resources of the United States Virgin Islands. The complaint alleges damages to natural resources caused by alleged releases from the alumina refinery facility at St. Croix and the adjacent petroleum refinery. The primary cause of action is pursuant to the natural resource damage provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, but various ancillary Territorial law causes of action were included as well. We and Lockheed have each tendered indemnity and defense of the case to the other pursuant to the terms of the Lockheed-Vialco Asset Purchase Agreement. The complaint seeks unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorney fees. On July 15, 2009, we and Vialco and other defendants filed motions for summary judgment on the issue of the applicability of the statute of limitations. The parties are currently engaged in the discovery process.

In December 2006, Vialco and the two succeeding owners of the alumina facility were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed by the Commissioner of the Department of Planning and Natural Resources of the United States Virgin Islands. The complaint alleges the defendants failed to take certain actions specified in a Coastal Zone management permit issued to Vialco in October 1994, and alleges violations of territorial water pollution control laws during the various defendants’ periods of ownership. The complaint seeks statutory and other unspecified monetary penalties for the alleged violations. Vialco filed its answer to the complaint asserting factual and affirmative defenses. The parties are currently engaged in the discovery process.

We intend to defend both Vialco lawsuits vigorously and to assert all applicable defenses. Pursuant to the terms of the asset purchase agreement between Vialco and the purchaser of the facility in 1995, the purchaser assumed responsibility for all costs and other liabilities associated with the bauxite waste disposal facilities, including pre-closure and post-closure liabilities. At this time, it not practicable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions or to estimate a range of possible damage awards.

In July 2006, we were named as a defendant, together with certain affiliates of Alcan Inc., in a lawsuit brought by Alcoa Inc. seeking to determine responsibility for certain environmental indemnity obligations related to the sale of a cast aluminum plate manufacturing facility located in Vernon, California, which we purchased from Alcoa Inc. in December 1998, and sold to Alcan Rolled Products-Ravenswood LLC (formerly Pechiney Rolled Products, LLC) in July 1999. The complaint also seeks costs and attorney fees. At this time, it is not practicable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions or to estimate a range of possible damage awards.

It is our policy to accrue for costs associated with environmental assessments and remedial efforts when it becomes probable that a liability has been incurred and the costs can be reasonably estimated. The aggregate environmental-related accrued liabilities were $1,007 and $848 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. All accrued amounts have been recorded without giving effect to any possible future recoveries. With respect to costs for ongoing environmental compliance, including maintenance and monitoring, such costs are expensed as incurred.

Because of the issues and uncertainties described above, and our inability to predict the requirements of future environmental laws, there can be no assurance that future capital expenditures and costs for environmental compliance will not have a material adverse effect on our future financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. Based upon all available information, management does not believe that the outcome of these environmental matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Legal Contingencies

We have pending against us or may be subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings related primarily to employment, commercial, environmental, shareholder, safety and health matters. Although it is not presently possible to determine the outcome of these matters, management believes their ultimate disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

- 22 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

In March 2009, four purported stockholder class actions were filed against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The actions are entitled Petzschke v. Century Aluminum Co., et al., Abrams v. Century Aluminum Co., et al., McClellan v. Century Aluminum Co., et al., and Hilyard v. Century Aluminum Co., et al. These cases allege that we improperly accounted for cash flows associated with the termination of certain forward financial sales contracts which accounting allegedly resulted in artificial inflation of our stock price and investor losses. These actions seek certification as a class action, rescission of our February 2009 common stock offering, unspecified compensatory damages, including interest thereon, costs and expenses and counsel fees. Management intends to vigorously defend these actions, but at the date of this report, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions or to estimate a range of possible damage awards.

Power Commitments

Hawesville purchases substantially all of its power from Kenergy Corp. (“Kenergy”), a retail electric member cooperative of the Big Rivers Electrical Corporation (“Big Rivers”), under a power supply contract that expires at the end of 2010. Under this contract, approximately all of Hawesville’s current power requirements (four operating potlines) are at fixed prices. We acquire the power requirements for Hawesville’s fifth potline (currently idled) through a combination of short-term fixed-price contracts and deliveries at the spot market rates.

We have reached an agreement with Big Rivers and Kenergy on a proposal that would replace the existing power supply contracts. The contract will provide all of Hawesville’s power requirements through 2023 at cost-based pricing. The transaction closed in July 2009, see Note 22 Subsequent Events for additional information about this contract.

Appalachian Power Company (“APCo”) supplies all of Ravenswood’s power requirements under an agreement at prices set forth in published tariffs, which are subject to change. Under the special rate contract, Ravenswood may be excused from or may defer the payment of the increase in the tariff rate if aluminum prices as quoted on the LME fall below pre-determined levels. We are reviewing options to extend the term of the existing agreement that establishes an LME based cap on the tariff rates. In March 2009, APCo filed a request for a rate increases to recover unrecovered fuel costs and to cover the increased cost of fuel and purchased power as well as capital improvements. In its filings, APCo has attributed approximately $16,000 of the unrecovered fuel costs to Ravenswood and has proposed to recover this amount over a 5 year period. We believe that Ravenswood paid all amounts required under the special rate contract and any additional recovery from Ravenswood is inappropriate. The West Virginia Public Service Commission (the “PSC”) indicated that it would make a decision by the end of September and that any increase would be effective by December 2009. At this time, it is not practicable to predict the outcome of this rate case or its impact on Ravenswood.

Mt. Holly purchases all of its power from the South Carolina Public Service Authority at rates established by published schedules. Mt. Holly’s current power contract expires December 31, 2015. Power delivered through 2010 will be priced as set forth in currently published schedules, subject to adjustments for fuel costs. Rates for the period 2011 through 2015 will be as provided under then-applicable schedules. Mt. Holly is subject to significant demand charges if it fails to take all of the power provided under its power contract through 2015.

Grundartangi purchases power from Landsvirkjun, HS Orka hf and Orkuveita Reykjavikur (“OR”) under long-term contracts due to expire between 2019 and 2029. The power delivered to Grundartangi is priced at a rate based on the LME price for primary aluminum, is paid in U.S. dollars and is from hydroelectric and geothermal sources. All power commitments for power delivered to Grundartangi are provided on an 85% take or pay basis.

- 23 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Nordural Helguvik has signed electrical power supply agreements with HS Orka hf and OR, for the proposed Helguvik smelter. Under the agreements, power will be supplied to the proposed Helguvik facility in four 90,000 mtpy stages, beginning with an initial phase of up to 160 megawatts (“MW”). HS Orka hf will provide up to 150 MW in this initial stage, and OR will supply up to 47.5 MW. Electricity delivery for this first phase is targeted to begin in late 2011. The agreements which are subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions provide for additional power, as available, to support a complete potline of 360,000 mtpy.

Labor Commitments

Approximately 79% of our U.S. based work force is represented by the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union (the “USWA”). We have agreed with our Ravenswood plant employees represented by the USWA to extend the current labor agreement through August 31, 2010 (that labor agreement was due to expire on May 31, 2009). For additional information about Ravenswood operations see Note 5 Curtailment of Operations – Ravenswood and Hawesville. Our Hawesville, Kentucky, plant employees represented by the USWA are under a collective bargaining agreement that will expire on March 31, 2010. The agreement covers the hourly workers at the Hawesville plant.

Approximately 84% of Grundartangi’s work force is represented by five labor unions under an agreement that expires on December 31, 2009.

Other Commitments

On April 21, 2009, we agreed with Glencore to amend two alumina purchase agreements, dated April 14, 2008 and April 26, 2006, respectively (collectively, the “Amendments”).

The Amendments reduce the amount of alumina Glencore will supply to Century from 330,000 metric tons to 110,368 metric tons in 2009 and from 290,000 metric tons to 229,632 metric tons in 2010, for an overall alumina supply reduction of 280,000 metric tons.

In conjunction with these alumina supply reductions, St. Ann Bauxite Limited (“SABL”), a joint venture owned 50% by Century Aluminum Company, agreed to reduce the amount of bauxite it will supply Glencore in 2009 by 775,000 dry metric tons, 650,000 dry metric tons being cancelled and 125,000 dry metric tons being deferred to 2010. As part of this transaction, we have agreed to pay SABL $6,000 in compensation for the reduced bauxite sales. Payments will be made in monthly installments through December 2009.

15.	Forward Delivery Contracts and Financial Instruments

As a producer of primary aluminum, we are exposed to fluctuating raw material and primary aluminum prices. We enter into fixed and market priced contracts for the sale of primary aluminum and the purchase of raw materials in future periods.

- 24 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Forward Physical Delivery Agreements

Primary Aluminum Sales Contracts

Contract	Customer	Volume	Term	Pricing
Alcan Metal Agreement (1)	Alcan	14 million pounds per month	May 1, 2009	Variable, based on U.S. Midwest market
Glencore Metal Agreement I (2)	Glencore	50,000 mtpy	Through December 31, 2009	Variable, LME-based
Glencore Metal Agreement II (3)	Glencore	20,400 mtpy	Through December 31, 2013	Variable, based on U.S. Midwest market
Southwire Metal Agreement (4)	Southwire	240 million pounds per year (high conductivity molten aluminum)	Through March 31, 2011	Variable, based on U.S. Midwest market
Southwire Metal Agreement	Southwire	60 million pounds per year (standard-grade molten aluminum)	Through December 31, 2010	Variable, based on U.S. Midwest market

(1)	Alcan and CAWV agreed to terminate all remaining obligations under the Alcan Metal Agreement. CAWV agreed to pay Alcan $623 to settle the remaining delivery obligations.
(2)	We account for the Glencore Metal Agreement I as a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133. We have not designated the Glencore Metal Agreement I as “normal” because it replaced and substituted for a significant portion of a sales contract which did not qualify for this designation. Because the Glencore Metal Agreement I is variably priced, we do not expect significant variability in its fair value, other than changes that might result from the absence of the U.S. Midwest premium.
(3)	We account for the Glencore Metal Agreement II as a derivative instrument under SFAS No. 133. Under the Glencore Metal Agreement II, pricing is based on then-current market prices, adjusted by a negotiated U.S. Midwest premium with a cap and a floor as applied to the current U.S. Midwest premium.
(4)	The Southwire Metal Agreement will automatically renew for additional five-year terms, unless either party provides 12 months notice that it has elected not to renew.

Tolling Contracts

Contract	Customer	Volume	Term	Pricing
Billiton Tolling Agreement (1)	BHP Billiton	130,000 mtpy	Through December 31, 2013	LME-based
Glencore Toll Agreement (1)(2)	Glencore	90,000 mtpy	Through July 31, 2016	LME-based
Glencore Toll Agreement (1)	Glencore	40,000 mtpy	Through December 31, 2014	LME-based
Billiton Tolling Agreement	BHP Billiton	9,900 mtpy	Through December 31, 2009	LME-based

(1)

Grundartangi’s tolling revenues include a premium based on the European Union (“EU”) import duty for primary aluminum. In May 2007, the EU members reduced the EU import duty for primary aluminum from six percent to three percent and agreed to review the new duty after three years. This decrease in the EU import duty for primary aluminum negatively impacts Grundartangi’s revenues and further decreases would also have a negative impact on Grundartangi’s revenues, but it is not expected to have a material effect on our financial position and results of operations.

(2)

Glencore assigned 50% of its tolling rights under this agreement to Hydro Aluminum through December 31, 2010.

Apart from the Glencore Metal Agreement I, Glencore Metal Agreement II and Southwire Metal Agreement, we had forward delivery contracts to sell 40,207 metric tons and 84,047 metric tons of primary aluminum at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Of these forward delivery contracts, we had fixed price commitments to sell 1,231 metric tons and 330 metric tons of primary aluminum at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, of which 319 metric tons were with Glencore at December 31, 2008 (none were with Glencore at June 30, 2009).

- 25 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Financial Sales Agreements

Historically, to mitigate the volatility in our unpriced forward delivery contracts, we have entered into primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts, which settle in cash in the period corresponding to the intended delivery dates of the forward delivery contracts.

All of the outstanding primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts were settled in July 2008 in a termination transaction with Glencore. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, we had no primary aluminum forward financial sales contracts outstanding. We had no forward financial contracts to purchase aluminum at June 30, 2009 or December 31, 2008.

Forwards and Financial Purchase Agreements

We are party to various forward financial and physical delivery contracts that are accounted for under SFAS No. 133. See Note 7 Fair Value Measurements and Derivative Instruments for additional information about these instruments.

16.	Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	Six months ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	11,085	$	11,035
Income tax		106		3,475

Cash received for:
Interest		1,564		4,840
Income tax refunds (1)		91,041		—

(1)	See Note 10 Income Taxes for more information.

Non-cash Activities

Due to the curtailment of our Ravenswood operations in February 2009, we reclassified certain inventory items into other assets. As a result, there was an $18,326 non-cash change in the inventory and other asset account balances due to this reclassification.

In the first quarter of 2009, we issued 354,320 shares of common stock as part of our performance share program to satisfy a $694 performance share liability to certain key employees.

In the first quarter of 2008, we issued 58,990 shares of common stock as part of our performance share program to satisfy a $3,692 performance share liability to certain key employees.

- 26 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

17.	Asset Retirement Obligations

Our asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) consist primarily of costs associated with the disposal of spent pot liner used in the reduction cells of our domestic facilities. As a result of the temporary curtailment of our operations at our Ravenswood facility, we have suspended the disposal of spent potliner. During the curtailment, we will continue to accrete the existing ARO liabilities, but we will not incur any additional ARO liabilities at this location until we resume operations.

The reconciliation of the changes in the asset retirement obligations is presented below:

	Six months ended June 30, 2009			Year ended December 31, 2008
Beginning balance, ARO liability	$	14,337		$	13,586
Additional ARO liability incurred		448			2,140
ARO liabilities settled		(559	)		(2,464	)
Accretion expense		558			1,075
Ending balance, ARO liability	$	14,784		$	14,337

Certain conditional AROs related to the disposal costs of fixed assets at our primary aluminum facilities have not been recorded because they have an indeterminate settlement date. These conditional AROs will be initially recognized in the period in which sufficient information exists to estimate their fair value.

18.	Comprehensive Loss and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive Loss:
	Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008

Net loss	$	(221,770	)	$	(237,431	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized loss on financial instruments, net of $0 and $(670) tax of, respectively		(5,323	)		1,394
Net losses on cash flow hedges reclassified to income, net of tax of $0 and $(3,021), respectively		13,402			6,059
Net loss on foreign currency cash flow hedges reclassified to income, net of tax of $(706) and $54, respectively		5,701			(246	)
Defined benefit pension and other postemployment benefit plans:
Net curtailment gain arising during the period, net of $0 tax		56,124			—
Amortization of net loss during the period, net of $(294) and $209 tax, respectively		673			(508	)
Amortization of prior service cost during the period, net of $949 and $(629) tax, respectively		(2,174	)		1,530
Change in equity investee other comprehensive income, net of $0 tax		1,549			—
Other Comprehensive Income:		69,952			8,229
Comprehensive loss	$	(151,818	)	$	(229,202	)

- 27 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:
	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Unrealized loss on financial instruments, net of $409 and $784 tax benefit, respectively	$	(4,213	)	$	(17,506	)
Defined benefit plan liabilities, net of $26,366 and $26,534 tax benefit, respectively		(55,825	)		(114,032	)
Equity in investee other comprehensive income (1)		(7,219	)		(5,670	)
	$	(67,257	)	$	(137,208	)

(1)	Includes our equity in the other comprehensive income of Gramercy Alumina LLC, St. Ann Bauxite Ltd and Mt. Holly Aluminum Company. Their other comprehensive income consists primarily of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.

19.	Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

	Pension Benefits
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Service cost	$	650		$	1,028		$	1,485		$	2,056
Interest cost		1,620			1,550			3,223			3,101
Expected return on plan assets		(1,077	)		(1,893	)		(2,181	)		(3,787	)
Amortization of prior service cost		32			182			93			364
Amortization of net loss		501			129			1,135			258
Curtailment		(25	)		—			2,576			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,701		$	996		$	6,331		$	1,992

	Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Service cost	$	728		$	1,642		$	2,242		$	3,283
Interest cost		2,728			3,104			5,713			6,208
Expected return on plan assets		—			—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		(415	)		(540	)		(837	)		(1,081	)
Amortization of net loss		340			950			1,435			1,901
Curtailment		(663	)		—			(14,975	)		—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	2,718		$	5,156		$	(6,422	)	$	10,311

- 28 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

20.	Recently Issued Accounting Standards

SFAS No. 165. In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events,” which provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events. Historically, management has relied on guidance from generally accepted auditing standards on assessing and disclosing subsequent events. SFAS No. 165 incorporates this guidance on subsequent events in the accounting literature and is directed specifically to management and their responsibilities for preparing an entity’s financial statements. This standard clarifies management’s responsibility to evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Management must perform its assessments for both interim and annual financial reporting periods.

SFAS No. 165 is effective prospectively for Century beginning in the interim period ending June 30, 2009. This pronouncement will not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

FSP FAS 132(R)-1. In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets” (the “FSP”). The FSP amends SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This guidance is intended to ensure that an employer meets the objectives of the disclosures about plan assets in an employer’s defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan to provide users of financial statements with an understanding of the following: (1) how investment allocation decisions are made; (2) the major categories of plan assets; (3) the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets; (4) the effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs on change in plan assets, and; (5) significant concentrations of risk within the plan assets. The FSP becomes effective for Century on December 31, 2009. The FSP only requires enhanced disclosures, and therefore we have determined that the adoption of the FSP will not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

21.	Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

Our 7.5% Senior Notes due 2014 and 1.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2024 are guaranteed by each of our material existing and future domestic subsidiaries, except for Nordural US LLC. Each subsidiary guarantor is 100% owned by Century. All guarantees are full and unconditional; and all guarantees are joint and several. These notes are not guaranteed by our foreign subsidiaries (such subsidiaries and Nordural US LLC, collectively the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”).

The following summarized condensed consolidating balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 and the condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 present separate results for Century, the guarantor subsidiaries, the non-guarantor subsidiaries, consolidating adjustments and total consolidated amounts.

This summarized condensed consolidating financial information may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations or financial position had Century, the guarantor subsidiaries or the non-guarantor subsidiaries operated as independent entities.

- 29 -

Table of contents

CENTURY ALUMINUM COMPANY

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements - continued

(UNAUDITED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

As of June 30, 2009

Combined Guarantor Subsidiaries

Combined Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries

The Company

Reclassifications and Eliminations

Consolidated

Assets:

Cash

—

81,678