United States Securities and exchange commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

[X]Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the securities exchange act of 1934.

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2013

or

[ ]Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from __________________ to _________________         

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes [ ]  No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act.  Yes [ ]  No  [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:  (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X]  No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes [X]  No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of a “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]   Accelerated filer [X]  

Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of AMERCO common stock held by non-affiliates on September 30, 2012 (AMERCO’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $510,020,982. The aggregate market value was computed using the closing price for the common stock trading on NASDAQ on September 28, 2012 (the last business day of AMERCO’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter). Shares held by AMERCO’s executive officers, directors and persons owning directly or indirectly more than 5% of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from the preceding number because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

19,607,788 shares of AMERCO Common Stock, $0.25 par value, were outstanding at May 30, 2013.

Documents incorporated by reference: portions of AMERCO’s definitive proxy statement for the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders, to be filed within 120 days after AMERCO’s fiscal year ended March 31, 2013, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part i

Item 1. Business

Company Overview

We are North America’s largest “do-it-yourself” moving and storage operator through our subsidiary    U-Haul International, Inc. (“U-Haul”). U-Haul is synonymous with “do-it-yourself” moving and storage and is a leader in supplying products and services to help people move and store their household and commercial goods. Our primary service objective is to provide a better and better product or service to more and more people at a lower and lower cost. Unless the context otherwise requires, the term “AMERCO,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refers to AMERCO, a Nevada Corporation, and all of its legal subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis.

We were founded in 1945 as a sole proprietorship under the name "U-Haul Trailer Rental Company" and have rented trailers ever since. Starting in 1959, we rented trucks on a one-way and in-town basis exclusively through independent U-Haul dealers. In 1974, we began developing our network of U-Haul managed retail centers, through which we rent our trucks and trailers, self-storage rooms and portable storage boxes and sell moving and self-storage products and services to complement our independent dealer network.

We rent our distinctive orange and white U-Haul trucks and trailers as well as offer self-storage rooms through a network of approximately 1,490 Company operated retail moving centers and approximately 16,400 independent U-Haul dealers. We also sell U-Haul brand boxes, tape and other moving and self-storage products and services to “do-it-yourself” moving and storage customers at all of our distribution outlets and through our eMove® web site.

We believe U-Haul is the most convenient supplier of products and services addressing the needs of North America’s “do-it-yourself” moving and storage market. Our broad geographic coverage throughout the United States and Canada and our extensive selection of U-Haul brand moving equipment rentals, self-storage rooms and related moving and storage products and services provide our customers with convenient “one-stop” shopping.

Since 1945 U-Haul has incorporated sustainable practices into its everyday operations. We believe that our basic business premise of equipment sharing helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduces the need for total large capacity vehicles. We continue to look for ways to reduce waste within our business and are dedicated to manufacturing reusable components and recyclable products. We believe that our commitment to sustainability, through our products and services and everyday operations has helped us to reduce our impact on the environment.

Through Repwest Insurance Company (“Repwest”), our property and casualty insurance subsidiary, we manage the property, liability and related insurance claims processing for U-Haul. Oxford Life Insurance Company (“Oxford”), our life insurance subsidiary, sells life insurance, Medicare supplement insurance, annuities and other related products to non U-Haul customers.

Available Information

AMERCO and U-Haul are each incorporated in Nevada. U-Haul’s internet address is uhaul.com. On AMERCO’s investor relations web site, amerco.com, we post the following filings as soon as practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”): our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statement related to our annual meeting of stockholders, and any amendments to those reports or statements filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We also use our investor relations web site as a means of disclosing material non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. All such filings on our web site are available free of charge. Additionally, you will find these materials on the SEC’s website at sec.gov.

Products and Rental Equipment

Our customers are primarily “do-it-yourself” household movers. U-Haul moving equipment is specifically designed, engineered and manufactured for the “do-it-yourself” household mover. These “do-it-yourself” movers include individuals and families moving their belongings from one home to another, college students moving their belongings, vacationers and sports enthusiasts needing extra space or having special towing needs, people trying to save on home furniture and home appliance delivery costs, and “do-it-yourself” home remodeling and gardening enthusiasts who need to transport materials.

As of March 31, 2013, our rental fleet consisted of approximately 112,000 trucks, 90,000 trailers and 34,000 towing devices. This equipment and our U-Haul brand of self-moving products and services are available through our network of managed retail moving centers and independent U-Haul dealers. Independent U-Haul dealers receive rental equipment from the Company, act as rental agents and are paid a commission based on gross revenues generated from their U-Haul rentals.

Our rental truck chassis are manufactured by domestic and foreign truck manufacturers. These chassis are joined with the U-Haul designed and manufactured van boxes primarily at U-Haul operated manufacturing and assembly facilities strategically located throughout the United States. U-Haul rental trucks feature our proprietary Lowest DeckSM, which provides our customers with extra ease of loading. The loading ramps on our trucks are the widest in the industry, which reduce the effort needed to move belongings. Our trucks are fitted with convenient, padded rub rails with tie downs on every interior wall. Our Gentle Ride SuspensionSM helps our customers safely move delicate and prized possessions. Also, the engineers at our U-Haul Technical Center determined that the softest ride in our trucks was at the front of the van box. Consequently, we designed the part of the van box that hangs over the front cab of the truck to be the location for our customers to place their most fragile items during their move. We call this area Mom’s AtticSM.

Our distinctive trailers are also manufactured at these same U-Haul operated manufacturing and assembly facilities. These trailers are well suited to the low profile of many of today’s newly manufactured automobiles. Our engineering staff is committed to making our trailers easy to tow, safe, aerodynamic and fuel efficient.

To provide our self-move customers with added value, our rental trucks and trailers are designed with fuel efficiency in mind. Many of our newer trucks are fitted with fuel economy gauges, another tool that assists our customers in conserving fuel. To help make our rental equipment more reliable, we routinely perform extensive preventive maintenance and repairs.

We also provide customers with equipment to transport their vehicle. We provide two towing options; auto transport, in which all four wheels are off the ground and a tow dolly, in which the front wheels of the towed vehicle are off the ground.

To help our customers load their boxes and larger household appliances and furniture, we offer several accessory rental items. Our utility dolly has a lightweight design and is easy to maneuver. Another rental accessory is our four wheel dolly, which provides a large, flat surface for moving dressers, wall units, pianos and other large household items. U-Haul appliance dollies provide the leverage needed to move refrigerators, freezers, washers and dryers easily and safely. These utility, furniture and appliance dollies, along with the low decks and the wide loading ramps on U-Haul trucks and trailers, are designed for easy loading and unloading of our customers’ belongings.

The total package U-Haul offers the “do-it-yourself” household mover doesn’t end with trucks, trailers and accessory rental items. Our moving supplies include a wide array of affordably priced U-Haul brand boxes, tape and packing materials. We also provide specialty boxes for dishes, computers and sensitive electronic equipment, as well as tape, security locks, and packing supplies. U-Haul brand boxes are specifically sized to make loading easier.

We believe that U-Haul is North America’s largest seller and installer of hitches and towing systems. In addition to towing U-Haul equipment, these hitching and towing systems can tow jet skis, motorcycles, boats, campers and horse trailers. Our hitches, ball mounts, and hitch balls undergo stringent testing requirements. Each year, more than one million customers visit our locations for expertise on complete towing systems, trailer rentals and the latest in towing accessories.

U-Haul has one of North America’s largest propane refilling networks, with over 1,080 locations providing this convenient service. We employ trained, certified personnel to refill all propane cylinders and alternative fuel vehicles. Our network of propane dispensing locations is one of the largest automobile alternative refueling networks in North America.

Our self-storage business was a natural outgrowth of our self-moving operations. Conveniently located U-Haul self-storage rental facilities provide clean, dry and secure space for storage of household and commercial goods. Storage units range in size from 6 square feet to over 1,000 square feet. We operate over 1,180 self-storage locations in North America, with nearly 445,000 rentable rooms comprising 40.0 million square feet of rentable storage space. Our self-storage centers feature a wide array of security measures, ranging from electronic property access control gates to individually alarmed storage units. At many centers, we offer climate controlled storage rooms to protect temperature sensitive goods such as video tapes, albums, photographs and precious wood furniture.

Another extension of our strategy to make “do-it-yourself” moving and storage easier is our U-Box® program.  A storage container is delivered to a location of our customer’s choosing either by Company personnel or by the customers themselves through the use of a U-Box trailer. This option provides the customer with the greatest scheduling convenience. Once the container is filled it can be stored at the customer’s location, or taken to any of our company operated locations, a participating independent dealer, or moved to a location of the customer’s choice.

Additionally, we offer moving and storage protection packages such as Safemove and Safetow. These programs provide moving and towing customers with a damage waiver, cargo protection and medical and life insurance coverage. Safestor provides protection for storage customers from loss on their goods in storage. For our customers who desire additional coverage over and above the standard Safemove protection, we also offer our Super Safemove product. This package provides the rental customer with a layer of primary liability protection.

We believe that our eMove® web site, eMove.com, is the largest network of customers and independent businesses in the self-moving and self-storage industry. The eMove network consists of channels where customers, businesses and service providers transact business. The eMove Moving Help marketplace connects “do-it-yourself” movers with independent service providers to assist movers in packing, loading, unloading, cleaning, driving and performing other services. Thousands of independent service providers participate in the eMove network.

Through the eMove Storage Affiliate Program, independent storage businesses can join the world’s largest self-storage reservation system. Self-storage customers making a reservation through eMove can access all of the U-Haul self-storage centers and all of our independent storage affiliate partners for even greater convenience to meet their self-storage needs.

Description of Operating Segments

AMERCO’s three reportable segments are:

•            Moving and Storage, comprised of AMERCO, U-Haul, and Real Estate and the subsidiaries of U-Haul and Real Estate,

•            Property and Casualty Insurance, comprised of Repwest and its subsidiaries and ARCOA, and

•            Life Insurance, comprised of Oxford and its subsidiaries.

Financial information for each of our operating segments is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as part of Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Moving and Storage Operating Segments

Our Moving and Storage operating segment consists of the rental of trucks, trailers, portable storage boxes, specialty rental items and self-storage spaces primarily to the household mover as well as sales of moving supplies, towing accessories and propane. Operations are conducted under the registered trade name U-Haul® throughout the United States and Canada.

Net revenue from our Moving and Storage operating segment was approximately 89.1%, 85.8% and 87.7% of consolidated net revenue in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

During fiscal 2013, the Company placed approximately 20,800 new trucks in service. These additions and replacements to the fleet were a combination of U-Haul manufactured vehicles and purchases. Typically as new trucks are added to the fleet the Company removes older trucks from the fleet. The total number of rental trucks in the fleet increased during fiscal 2013 as the pace of new additions was slightly greater than those trucks removed for retirement and sale.

Within our truck and trailer rental operation we are focused on expanding our independent dealer network to provide added convenience for our customers. U-Haul maximizes vehicle utilization by effective distribution of the truck and trailer fleets among the approximately 1,490 Company operated centers and approximately 16,400 independent dealers. Utilizing its proprietary reservations management system, the Company’s centers and dealers electronically report their inventory in real-time, which facilitates matching equipment to customer demand. Approximately 54% of all U-Move rental revenue originates from the Company operated centers.

At our owned and operated retail centers we are implementing new initiatives to improve customer service. These initiatives include improving management of our rental equipment to provide our retail centers with the right type of rental equipment, at the right time and at the most convenient location for our customers, effective marketing of our broad line of self-moving related products and services, maintaining longer hours of operation to provide more convenience to our customers, and enhancing our ability to properly staff locations during our peak hours of operations by attracting and retaining “moonlighters” (part-time U-Haul employees with full-time jobs elsewhere) during our peak hours of operation.

Our self-moving related products and services, such as boxes, pads and insurance, help our customers have a better moving experience and help them to protect their belongings from potential damage during the moving process. We are committed to providing a complete line of products selected with the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage customer in mind.

Our self-storage business operations consist of the rental of self-storage rooms, portable storage boxes, sales of self-storage related products, the facilitation of sales of services, and the management of self-storage facilities owned by others.

U-Haul is one of the largest North American operators of self-storage and has been a leader in the self-storage industry since 1974. U-Haul operates nearly 445,000 storage rooms, comprising 40.0 million square feet of storage space with locations in 49 states and 10 Canadian provinces. U-Haul’s owned and managed self-storage facility locations range in size up to 171,200 square feet of storage space, with individual storage units in sizes ranging from 6 square feet to over 1,000 square feet.

The primary market for storage rooms is the storage of household goods. We believe that our self-storage services provide a competitive advantage through such things as Max Security, an electronic system that monitors the storage facility 24 hours a day, climate control, individually alarmed rooms, extended hours access, and an internet-based customer reservation and account management system.

eMove is an online marketplace that connects consumers to independent Moving Help™ service providers and thousands of independent Self-Storage Affiliates. Our network of customer-rated affiliates provides pack and load help, cleaning help, self-storage and similar services all over North America. Our goal is to further utilize our web-based technology platform to increase service to consumers and businesses in the moving and storage market.

Our Moving and Storage operating segment business is seasonal and, traditionally, our results of operations and cash flows fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Historically, revenues have been stronger in the first and second fiscal quarters due to the overall increase in moving activity during the spring and summer months. The fourth fiscal quarter is generally our weakest, due to a greater potential for adverse weather conditions.

Property and Casualty Insurance Operating Segment

Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment provides loss adjusting and claims handling for U-Haul through regional offices across North America. Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment also underwrites components of the Safemove, Safetow, Super Safemove and Safestore protection packages to U-Haul customers. We continue to focus on increasing the penetration of these products into the moving and storage market. The business plan for the Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment includes offering property and casualty products in other U-Haul related programs.

Net revenue from our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment was approximately 1.9%, 1.6% and 1.7% of consolidated net revenue in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Life Insurance Operating Segment

Our Life Insurance operating segment provides life and health insurance products primarily to the senior market through the direct writing and reinsuring of life insurance, Medicare supplement and annuity policies.

Net revenue from our Life Insurance operating segment was approximately 9.0%, 12.6% and 10.6% of consolidated net revenue in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Employees

As of March 31, 2013 and 2012, we employed over 21,600 people and 20,100 people, respectively throughout North America with approximately 98% of these employees working within our Moving and Storage operating segment and approximately 55% and 54%, respectively of these employees work on a part-time basis.

Sales and Marketing

We promote U-Haul brand awareness through direct and co-marketing arrangements. Our direct marketing activities consist of web based advertising, print and yellow pages as well as trade events, movie cameos of our rental fleet and boxes, and industry and consumer communications. Our rental equipment is our best form of advertisement. We support our independent U-Haul dealers through advertising of U-Haul moving and self-storage rentals, products and services.

Our marketing plan focuses on maintaining our leadership position in the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage industry by continually improving the ease of use and efficiency of our rental equipment, by providing added convenience to our retail centers through independent U-Haul dealers, and by expanding the capabilities of our eMove web sites.

A significant driver of U-Haul’s rental transaction volume is our utilization of an online reservation and sales system, through uhaul.com, eMove.com and our 24-hour 1-800-GO-U-HAUL telephone reservations system. These points of contact are prominently featured and are a major driver of customer lead sources.

Competition

Moving and Storage Operating Segment

The truck rental industry is highly competitive and includes a number of significant national, regional and local competitors. Generally speaking, we consider there to be two distinct users of rental trucks: commercial and “do-it-yourself” residential users. We primarily focus on the “do-it-yourself” residential user. Within this segment, we believe the principal competitive factors are convenience of rental locations, availability of quality rental moving equipment, breadth of essential products and services, and total cost to the user. Our major national competitors in both the In-Town and one-way moving equipment rental market are Avis Budget Group, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing. Additionally, we have numerous small local competitors throughout North America who compete with us in the In-Town market.

The self-storage market is large and very fragmented. We believe the principal competitive factors in this industry are convenience of storage rental locations, cleanliness, security and price. Our largest competitors in the self-storage market are Public Storage Inc., Extra Space Storage, Inc., and Sovran Self-Storage Inc.

Insurance Operating Segments

The insurance industry is highly competitive. In addition, the marketplace includes financial services firms offering both insurance and financial products. Some of the insurance companies are owned by stockholders and others are owned by policyholders. Many competitors have been in business for a longer period of time or possess substantially greater financial resources and broader product portfolios than our insurance companies. We compete in the insurance business based upon price, product design, and services rendered to agents and policyholders.

Recent Developments

Financial Strength Ratings

In May 2013, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating of B++ (Good) for Oxford and its outlook remains positive.

Repwest maintained a B (Fair) financial strength rating with a stable outlook.

Financial Data of Segment and Geographic Areas

For financial data of our segments and geographic areas please see Note 22, Financial Information by Geographic Area and Note 22A, Consolidating Financial Information by Industry Segment to our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), contains “forward-looking statements” regarding future events and our future results of operations. We may make additional written or oral forward-looking statements from time to time in filings with the SEC or otherwise. We believe such forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the safe-harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, earnings or loss, estimates of capital expenditures, plans for future operations, products or services, financing needs and plans, our perceptions of our legal positions and anticipated outcomes of government investigations and pending litigation against us, liquidity, goals and strategies, plans for new business, storage occupancy, growth rate assumptions, pricing, costs, and access to capital and leasing markets as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which we cannot accurately predict or quantify. Factors that could significantly affect results include, without limitation, the risk factors enumerated at the end of this section, as well as the following: our ability to operate pursuant to the terms of its credit facilities; our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operations; the costs and availability of financing; our ability to execute our business plan; our ability to attract, motivate and retain key employees; general economic conditions; fluctuations in our costs to maintain and update our fleet and facilities; our ability to refinance our debt; changes in government regulations, particularly environmental regulations; our credit ratings; the availability of credit; changes in demand for our products; changes in the general domestic economy; the degree and nature of our competition; the resolution of pending litigation against us; changes in accounting standards and other factors described in this Annual Report or the other documents we file with the SEC. The above factors, the following disclosures, as well as other statements in this Annual Report and in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, could contribute to or cause such risks or uncertainties, or could cause our stock price to fluctuate dramatically. Consequently, the forward-looking statements should not be regarded as representations or warranties by us that such matters will be realized. We assume no obligation to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements, whether in response to new information, unforeseen events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following discussion of risk factors should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.  These risk factors may be important in understanding this Annual Report or elsewhere.

We operate in a highly competitive industry.

The truck rental industry is highly competitive and includes a number of significant national, regional and local competitors. We believe the principal competitive factors in this industry are convenience of rental locations, availability of quality rental moving equipment, breadth of essential services and products and total cost. Financial results for the Company can be adversely impacted by aggressive pricing from our competitors. Some of our competitors may have greater financial resources than we have. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain existing rental prices or implement price increases. Moreover, if our competitors reduce prices and we are not able or willing to do so as well, we may lose rental volume, which would likely have a materially adverse affect on our results of operations.

The self-storage industry is large and highly fragmented. We believe the principal competitive factors in this industry are convenience of storage rental locations, cleanliness, security and price. Competition in the market areas in which we operate is significant and affects the occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses of our facilities. Competition might cause us to experience a decrease in occupancy levels, limit our ability to raise rental rates or require us to offer discounted rates that would have a material affect on results of operations and financial condition. Entry into the self-storage business may be accomplished through the acquisition of existing facilities by persons or institutions with the required initial capital. Development of new self-storage facilities is more difficult however, due to land use, zoning, environmental and other regulatory requirements. The self-storage industry has in the past experienced overbuilding in response to perceived increases in demand. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully compete in existing markets or expand into new markets.

We are highly leveraged.

As of March 31, 2013, we had total debt outstanding of $1,661.8 million and total undiscounted lease commitments of $236.6 million. Although we believe, based on existing information, that additional leverage can be supported by our operations and revenues, our existing debt could impact us in the following ways among other considerations:

•            require us to allocate a considerable portion of cash flows from operations to debt service payments;

•            limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

•            limit our ability to obtain additional financing; and

•            place us at a disadvantage compared to our competitors who may have less debt.

Our ability to make payments on our debt depends upon our ability to maintain and improve our operating performance and generate cash flow. To some extent, this is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to service our debt and meet our other cash needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. If we must sell our assets, it may negatively affect our ability to generate revenue. In addition, we may incur additional debt that would exacerbate the risks associated with our indebtedness.

Economic conditions, including those related to the credit markets, may adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.

Over the last several years, the United States economy has undergone a period of slowdown and unprecedented volatility, which resulted in a recession.  It is difficult to gauge the general economic conditions we will face this year.  Consumer and commercial spending is generally affected by the health of the economy, which places some of the factors affecting the success of our business beyond our control. Our industries, although not as traditionally cyclical as some, could experience significant downturns in connection with general economic conditions. In times of declining consumer spending we may be driven, along with our competitors, to reduce pricing which would have a negative impact on gross profit.  We cannot predict if another downturn, or sustained lack of recovery, in the economy may occur which could result in reduced revenues and working capital.

Should credit markets in the United States tighten or if interest rates increase significantly we may not be able to refinance existing debt or find additional financing on favorable terms, if at all.  If one or more of the financial institutions that support our existing credit facilities fails, we may not be able to find a replacement, which would negatively impact our ability to borrow under credit facilities.  While we believe that we have adequate sources of liquidity to meet our anticipated requirement for working capital, debt servicing and capital expenditures through fiscal 2014, if our operating results were to worsen significantly and our cash flows or capital resources prove inadequate, or if interest rates increase significantly, we could face liquidity problems that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our fleet rotation program can be adversely affected by financial market conditions.

To meet the needs of our customers, U-Haul maintains a large fleet of rental equipment. Our rental truck fleet rotation program is funded internally through operations and externally from debt and lease financing. Our ability to fund our routine fleet rotation program could be adversely affected if financial market conditions limit the general availability of external financing. This could lead us to operate trucks longer than initially planned and/or reducing the size of the fleet, either of which could materially and negatively affect our results of operations.

Another important aspect of our fleet rotation program is the sale of used rental equipment. The sale of used equipment provides us with funds that can be used to purchase new equipment. Conditions may arise that could lead to the decrease in resale values for our used equipment. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial results, which would result in losses on the sale of equipment and decreases in cash flows from the sales of equipment.

We obtain our rental trucks from a limited number of manufacturers.

In recent years, we have purchased the majority of our rental trucks from Ford Motor Company and General Motors Corporation. Our fleet can be negatively affected by issues our manufacturers may face within their own supply chain. Also, it is possible that our suppliers may face financial difficulties or organizational changes which could negatively impact their ability to accept future orders or fulfill existing orders and we may, at some point, be forced to purchase from other manufacturers. The cost of acquiring new rental trucks could increase materially and negatively affect our ability to rotate new equipment into the fleet. Although we believe that we could contract with alternative manufacturers for our rental trucks, we cannot guarantee or predict how long that would take or if such a decision would result in material cost increases. Ultimately, termination of or changes to our existing relationship with these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations for an indefinite period of time.

We may not be able to effectively hedge against interest rate changes in our variable debt.

In certain instances, the Company seeks to manage its exposure to interest rate risk through the use of hedging instruments including interest rate swap agreements and forward swaps. We enter into these arrangements with counterparties that are significant financial institutions with whom we generally have other financial arrangements. We are exposed to credit risk should these counterparties not be able to perform on their obligations. Additionally, a failure on our part to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We are required to record these financial instruments at their fair value. Changes in interest rates can significantly impact the valuation of the instruments resulting in non-cash changes to our financial position.

We are controlled by a small contingent of stockholders.

As of March 31, 2013, Edward J. Shoen, President and Chairman of the Board of AMERCO, James P. Shoen, a director of AMERCO, and Mark V. Shoen collectively are the beneficial owners of 9,139,018 shares (approximately 46.6%) of the outstanding common stock of AMERCO. In addition, Edward J. Shoen, James P. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen, Rosmarie T. Donovan (Trustee of the Shoen Irrevocable Trusts) and David L. Holmes (Successor Trustee of the Irrevocable “C” Trusts) (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”) are parties to a stockholder agreement dated June 30, 2006 in which the Reporting Persons agreed to vote as one as provided in this agreement (the “Stockholder Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Stockholder Agreement, a collective 10,897,741 shares (approximately 55.6%) of the Company’s common stock are voted at the direction of a majority in interest of the Reporting Persons.  For additional information, refer to the Schedule 13Ds filed on July 13, 2006, March 9, 2007, June 26, 2009 and on May 1, 2013 with the SEC. In addition, 1,450,205 shares (approximately 7.4%) of the outstanding common stock of AMERCO are held by our Employee Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Trust.

As a result of their stock ownership and the Stockholder Agreement, Edward J. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen and James P. Shoen are in a position to significantly influence our business affairs and policies of the Company, including the approval of significant transactions, the election of the members of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) and other matters submitted to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that the interests of the Reporting Persons will not conflict with the interests of our other stockholders. Furthermore, as a result of the Reporting Persons’ voting power, the Company is a “controlled company” as defined in the Nasdaq Listing Rules and, therefore avails itself or may avail itself of certain exemptions under Nasdaq rules, including exemptions from the rules that require us to have (i) a majority of independent directors on the Board; (ii) independent director oversight of executive officer compensation; and (iii) independent director oversight of director nominations.

We bear certain risks related to our notes receivable from SAC Holdings.

At March 31, 2013, we held $72.4 million of notes receivable from SAC Holdings, which consist of junior unsecured notes. SAC Holdings is highly leveraged with significant indebtedness to others. If SAC Holdings is unable to meet its obligations to its senior lenders, it could trigger a default of its obligations to us. In such an event of default, we could suffer a loss to the extent the value of the underlying collateral of SAC Holdings is inadequate to repay SAC Holdings senior lenders and our junior unsecured notes.  We cannot assure you that SAC Holdings will not default on its loans to its senior lenders or that the value of SAC Holdings assets upon liquidation would be sufficient to repay us in full.

Our quarterly results of operations fluctuate due to seasonality and other factors associated with our industry.

Our business is seasonal and our results of operations and cash flows fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter. Historically, revenues have been stronger in the first and second fiscal quarters due to the overall increase in moving activity during the spring and summer months. The fourth fiscal quarter is generally weakest, due to a greater potential for adverse weather conditions and other factors that are not necessarily seasonal. As a result, our operating results for any given quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating results for an entire year.

Our operations subject us to numerous environmental regulations and the possibility that environmental liability in the future could adversely affect our operations.

Compliance with environmental requirements of federal, state and local governments significantly affects our business. Among other things, these requirements regulate the discharge of materials into the air, land and water and govern the use and disposal of hazardous substances. Under environmental laws or common law principles, we can be held liable for hazardous substances that are found on real property we have owned or operated. We are aware of issues regarding hazardous substances on some of our real estate and we have put in place a remediation plan at each site where we believe such a plan is necessary. See Note 19, Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We regularly make capital and operating expenditures to stay in compliance with environmental laws. In particular, we have managed a testing and removal program since 1988 for our underground storage tanks.  Despite these compliance efforts, we believe that the risk of environmental liability is part of the nature of our business.

Environmental laws and regulations are complex, change frequently and could become more stringent in the future. We cannot assure you that future compliance with these regulations, future environmental liabilities, the cost of defending environmental claims, conducting any environmental remediation or generally resolving liabilities caused by us or related third parties will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and changes in existing regulations or violations of existing or future regulations could have a material adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Our truck and trailer rental business is subject to regulation by various federal, state and foreign governmental entities. Specifically, the U.S. Department of Transportation and various state and federal agencies exercise broad powers over our motor carrier operations, safety, and the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of waste materials. In addition, our storage business is also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. The failure to adhere to these laws and regulations may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent such property or to use the property as collateral for future borrowings. Compliance with changing regulations could substantially impair real property and equipment productivity and increase our costs. In addition, the Federal government may institute some regulation that limits carbon emissions by setting a maximum amount of carbon entities can emit without penalty. This would likely affect everyone who uses fossil fuels and would disproportionately affect users in the highway transportation industries. While there are too many variables at this time to assess the impact of the various proposed federal and state regulations that could affect carbon emissions, many experts believe these proposed rules could significantly affect the way companies operate in their industries.

Our ability to attract and retain qualified employees, and changes in laws or other labor issues could adversely affect our business and our results of operations.

The success of our business is predicated upon our workforce providing excellent customer service. Our ability to attract and retain this employee base may be inhibited due to prevailing wage rates, benefit costs and the adoption of new or revised employment and labor laws and regulations. Should this occur we may be unable to provide service in certain areas or we may experience significantly increased costs of labor that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are highly dependent upon our automated systems and the Internet for managing our business.

Our information systems are largely Internet-based, including our point-of-sale reservation system and telephone systems. While our reliance on this technology lowers our cost of providing service and expands our abilities to serve, it exposes us to various risks including natural and man-made disasters. We have put into place backup systems and alternative procedures to mitigate this risk.  However, disruptions or breaches in any portion of these systems could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. 

A.M. Best financial strength ratings are crucial to our life insurance business.

In May 2013, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating for Oxford, Christian Fidelity Life Insurance Company (“CFLIC”), North American Insurance Company (“NAI”) of B++. Oxford’s and CFLIC’s outlook remains positive, whereas NAI’s outlook was stable. Financial strength ratings are important external factors that can affect the success of Oxford’s business plans. Accordingly, if Oxford’s ratings, relative to its competitors, are not maintained or do not continue to improve, Oxford may not be able to retain and attract business as currently planned, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We may incur losses due to our reinsurers’ or counterparties’ failure to perform under existing contracts or we may be unable to secure sufficient reinsurance or hedging protection in the future.

We use reinsurance and derivative contracts to mitigate our risk of loss in various circumstances; primarily at Repwest and for our Moving and Storage operating segment. These agreements do not release us from our primary obligations and therefore we remain ultimately responsible for these potential costs. We cannot provide assurance that these reinsurers or counterparties will fulfill their obligations. Their inability or unwillingness to make payments to us under the terms of the contracts may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.

At December 31, 2012, Repwest reported $1.7 million of reinsurance recoverables, net of allowances and $176.4 million of reserves and liabilities ceded to reinsurers. Of this, Repwest’s largest exposure to a single reinsurer was $72.1 million.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

We have no unresolved staff comments at March 31, 2013.

Item 2. Properties

The Company, through its legal subsidiaries, owns property, plant and equipment that are utilized in the manufacturing, repair and rental of U-Haul equipment and storage space, as well as providing office space for us. Such facilities exist throughout the United States and Canada. We also manage storage facilities owned by others. We operate approximately 1,490 U-Haul retail centers of which 481 are managed for other owners, and operates 11 manufacturing and assembly facilities. We also operate 150 fixed-site repair facilities located throughout the United States and Canada. These facilities are used primarily for the benefit of our Moving and Storage operating segment.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Shoen

In September 2002, Paul F. Shoen filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, captioned Paul F. Shoen vs. SAC Holding Corporation et al., CV 02-05602, seeking damages and equitable relief on behalf of AMERCO from SAC Holdings and certain current and former members of the AMERCO Board of Directors, including Edward J. Shoen, Mark V. Shoen and James P. Shoen as Defendants. AMERCO is named as a nominal Defendant in the case. The complaint alleges breach of fiduciary duty, self-dealing, usurpation of corporate opportunities, wrongful interference with prospective economic advantage and unjust enrichment and seeks the unwinding of sales of self-storage properties by subsidiaries of AMERCO to SAC prior to the filing of the complaint. The complaint seeks a declaration that such transfers are void as well as unspecified damages. In October 2002, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss the complaint. Also in October 2002, Ron Belec filed a derivative action in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, captioned Ron Belec vs. William E. Carty, et al., CV 02-06331 and in January 2003, M.S. Management Company, Inc. filed a derivative action in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Washoe County, captioned M.S. Management Company, Inc. vs. William E. Carty, et al., CV 03-00386. Two additional derivative suits were also filed against these parties. Each of these suits is substantially similar to the Paul F. Shoen case. The Court consolidated the five cases and thereafter dismissed these actions in May 2003, concluding that the AMERCO Board of Directors had the requisite level of independence required in order to have these claims resolved by the Board. Plaintiffs appealed this decision and, in July 2006, the Nevada Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and remanded the case to the trial court for proceedings consistent with its ruling, allowing the Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint and plead in addition to substantive claims, demand futility.

In November 2006, the Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. In December 2006, the Defendants filed motions to dismiss, based on various legal theories. In March 2007, the Court denied AMERCO’s motion to dismiss regarding the issue of demand futility, stating that “Plaintiffs have satisfied the heightened pleading requirements of demand futility by showing a majority of the members of the AMERCO Board of Directors were interested parties in the SAC transactions.” The Court heard oral argument on the remainder of the Defendants’ motions to dismiss, including the motion (“Goldwasser Motion”) based on the fact that the subject matter of the lawsuit had been settled and dismissed in earlier litigation known as Goldwasser v. Shoen, C.V.N.-94-00810-ECR (D.Nev), Washoe County, Nevada. In addition, in September and October 2007, the Defendants filed Motions for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternative Summary Judgment, based on the fact that the stockholders of the Company had ratified the underlying transactions at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders of AMERCO. In December 2007, the Court denied this motion. This ruling does not preclude a renewed motion for summary judgment after discovery and further proceedings on these issues. On April 7, 2008, the litigation was dismissed, on the basis of the Goldwasser Motion. On May 8, 2008, the Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of such dismissal to the Nevada Supreme Court (the “Court”). On May 20, 2008, AMERCO filed a cross appeal relating to the denial of its Motion to Dismiss in regard to demand futility.

On May 12, 2011, the Nevada Supreme Court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded the case for further proceedings.  First, the Court ruled that the Goldwasser settlement did not release claims that arose after the agreement and, therefore, reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the Complaint on that ground. Second, the Court affirmed the district court’s determination that the in pari delicto defense is available in a derivative suit and reversed and remanded to the district court to determine if the defense applies to this matter.  Third, the Court remanded to the district court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine whether demand upon the AMERCO Board was, in fact, futile.  Fourth, the Court invited AMERCO to seek a ruling from the district court as to the legal effect of the AMERCO Shareholders’ 2008 ratification of the underlying AMERCO/SAC transactions. 

Last, as to individual claims for relief, the Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty of loyalty claims as to all defendants except Mark Shoen.  The Court affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the breach of fiduciary duty: ultra vires Acts claim as to all defendants. The Court reversed the district court’s dismissal of aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment claims against the SAC entities.  The Court reversed the trial court’s dismissal of the claim for wrongful interference with prospective economic advantage as to all defendants.

On remand, on July 22, 2011, AMERCO filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based upon the Shareholder’s Ratification of the SAC transactions. In addition, on August 29, 2011, certain defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claim for Wrongful Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage. On August 31, 2011, the trial court held a status conference and entered an order setting forth the briefing schedule for the two motions. On December 23, 2011, the trial court denied AMERCO’s motion for summary judgment and certain defendants’ motion to dismiss. The court set a discovery schedule on the limited issue of demand futility.  A four day evidentiary hearing on demand futility was scheduled to begin on August 20, 2012.

On August 6, 2012, Max Belec and Glenbrook Capital Limited Partnership, voluntarily dismissed their complaint with prejudice. On August 20, 2012, the remaining plaintiffs, Paul Shoen and Alan Kahn, dismissed their complaint with prejudice. AMERCO paid none of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees or costs. In return, AMERCO released plaintiffs from further related litigation based on plaintiffs’ conduct in this litigation. Moreover, Paul Shoen, Alan Kahn, Grover Wickersham and numerous individuals and entities related to Paul Shoen and Grover Wickersham agreed to sell all of their AMERCO securities in the open market and not sue AMERCO or any of the other defendants for 20 years. If the plaintiffs or the related parties breach this agreement, Paul Shoen will be responsible for $5,000,000 in liquidated damages. The parties filed a final Mutual Release Agreement with the Court on October 16, 2012, thereby terminating the case in its entirety, with prejudice.

Environmental

Compliance with environmental requirements of federal, state and local governments may significantly affect the operation of Real Estate’s business. Among other things, these requirements regulate the discharge of materials into the air, land and water and govern the use and disposal of hazardous substances. Real Estate is aware of issues regarding hazardous substances on some of its properties. Real Estate regularly makes capital and operating expenditures to stay in compliance with environmental laws and has put in place a remedial plan at each site where it believes such a plan is necessary. Since 1988, Real Estate has managed a testing and removal program for underground storage tanks.

Based upon the information currently available to Real Estate, compliance with the environmental laws and its share of the costs of investigation and cleanup of known hazardous waste sites are not expected to result in a material adverse effect on AMERCO’s financial position or results of operations.

Other

The Company is named as a defendant in various other litigation and claims arising out of the normal course of business. In management’s opinion, none of these other matters will individually have a material effect on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Part ii

Item 5.Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

As of May 30, 2013, there were approximately 3,500 holders of record of our common stock. We derived the number of our stockholders using internal stock ledgers and utilizing Mellon Investor Services Stockholder listings. AMERCO’s common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “UHAL”.

The following table sets forth the high and the low sales price of the common stock of AMERCO for the periods indicated:

Dividends

AMERCO does not have a formal dividend policy. The Board periodically considers the advisability of declaring and paying dividends to common stockholders in light of existing circumstances. Any past payments of dividends, special or otherwise, is not an indication of a trend on future payments, if any.

On November 7, 2012, the Company declared a special cash dividend on its Common Stock of $5.00 per share to holders of record on November 19, 2012. The dividend was paid on November 30, 2012.

On December 7, 2011, the Company declared a special cash dividend on its Common Stock of $1.00 per share to holders of record on December 23, 2011. The dividend was paid on January 3, 2012.

See Note 21, Statutory Financial Information of Insurance Subsidiaries of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain statutory restrictions on the ability of the insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to AMERCO.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock for the period March 31, 2008 through March 31, 2013 with the cumulative total return on the Dow Jones US Total Market and the Dow Jones US Transportation Average. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on March 31, 2008 in the Company’s common stock and in each of the comparison indices. The graph reflects the value of the investment based on the closing price of the common stock trading on NASDAQ on March 31, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On December 3, 2008, the Board authorized us, using management’s discretion, to buy back shares from former employees who were participants in our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”). To be eligible for consideration, the employee’s ESOP account balance(s) must be valued at more than $1,000 at the then-prevailing market prices but have less than 100 shares. No such shares have been purchased.

On June 1, 2011, we redeemed all 6,100,000 shares of our issued and outstanding Series A 8½% Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) at a redemption price of $25 per share plus accrued dividends through that date.  Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260 - Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”), for earnings per share purposes, we recognized the deficit of the carrying amount of the Series A Preferred over the consideration paid to redeem the shares. 

The Series A Preferred was recorded in our Additional Paid-In Capital account, net of original issue costs at $146.3 million prior to the redemption. We paid $152.5 million to redeem the shares on June 1, 2011 of which $7.7 million was paid to our insurance subsidiaries in exchange for their holdings. The difference between what was paid to redeem the shares less their carrying amount on our balance sheet, reduced by our insurance subsidiaries holdings was $5.9 million. This amount was recognized as a reduction to our earnings available to our common shareholders for the purposes of computing earnings per share for fiscal 2012.

From January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2011, our insurance subsidiaries purchased 308,300 shares of Series A Preferred on the open market for $7.2 million. Pursuant to ASC 260 for earnings per share purposes, we recognize the excess or deficit of the carrying amount of the Series A Preferred over the fair value of the consideration paid. For fiscal 2011, this resulted in a $0.2 million charge to net earnings as the amount paid by the insurance companies exceeded the carrying value, net of a prorated portion of original issue costs of the preferred stock.

Item 6.Selected Financial Data

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the MD&A, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes in this Annual Report.

Listed below is selected financial data for AMERCO and consolidated subsidiaries for each of the last five years:

Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We begin this MD&A with the overall strategy of AMERCO, followed by a description of and strategy related to, our operating segments to give the reader an overview of the goals of our businesses and the direction in which our businesses and products are moving. We then discuss our critical accounting policies and estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results. Next, we discuss our results of operations for fiscal 2013 compared with fiscal 2012, and for fiscal 2012 compared with fiscal 2011 which are followed by an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows, and a discussion of our financial commitments in the sections entitled Liquidity and Capital Resources and Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments. We conclude this MD&A by discussing our outlook for fiscal 2014.

This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the other sections of this Annual Report, including Item 1: Business, Item 6: Selected Financial Data and Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The various sections of this MD&A contain a number of forward-looking statements, as discussed under the caption, Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward-Looking Statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this Annual Report and particularly under the section Item 1A: Risk Factors. Our actual results may differ materially from these forward-looking statements.

AMERCO has a fiscal year that ends on the 31st of March for each year that is referenced. Our insurance company subsidiaries have fiscal years that end on the 31st of December for each year that is referenced. They have been consolidated on that basis. Our insurance companies’ financial reporting processes conform to calendar year reporting as required by state insurance departments. Management believes that consolidating their calendar year into our fiscal year financial statements does not materially affect the presentation of financial position or results of operations. We disclose all material events, if any, occurring during the intervening period. Consequently, all references to our insurance subsidiaries’ years 2012, 2011 and 2010 correspond to fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 for AMERCO.

Overall Strategy

Our overall strategy is to maintain our leadership position in the North American “do-it-yourself” moving and storage industry. We accomplish this by providing a seamless and integrated supply chain to the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage market. As part of executing this strategy, we leverage the brand recognition of U-Haul with our full line of moving and self-storage related products and services and the convenience of our broad geographic presence.

Our primary focus is to provide our customers with a wide selection of moving rental equipment, convenient self-storage rental facilities and related moving and self-storage products and services. We are able to expand our distribution and improve customer service by increasing the amount of moving equipment and storage rooms and portable storage boxes available for rent, expanding the number of independent dealers in our network and expanding and taking advantage of our eMove capabilities.

Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment is focused on providing and administering property and casualty insurance to U-Haul and its customers, its independent dealers and affiliates. 

Our Life Insurance operating segment is focused on long-term capital growth through direct writing and reinsuring of life, Medicare supplement and annuity products in the senior marketplace.

Description of Operating Segments

AMERCO’s three reportable segments are:

•            Moving and Storage, comprised of AMERCO, U-Haul, and Real Estate and the subsidiaries of U-Haul and Real Estate,

•            Property and Casualty Insurance, comprised of Repwest and its subsidiaries and ARCOA,

•            Life Insurance, comprised of Oxford and its subsidiaries.

See Note 1, Basis of Presentation, Note 22, Financial Information by Geographic Area and Note 22A, Consolidating Financial Information by Industry Segment of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report.

Moving and Storage Operating Segment

Our Moving and Storage operating segment consists of the rental of trucks, trailers, portable moving and storage boxes, specialty rental items and self-storage spaces primarily to the household mover as well as sales of moving supplies, towing accessories and propane. Operations are conducted under the registered trade name U-Haul® throughout the United States and Canada.

With respect to our truck, trailer, specialty rental items and self-storage rental business, we are focused on expanding our dealer network, which provides added convenience for our customers and expanding the selection and availability of rental equipment to satisfy the needs of our customers.

U-Haul brand self-moving related products and services, such as boxes, pads and tape allow our customers to, among other things; protect their belongings from potential damage during the moving process. We are committed to providing a complete line of products selected with the “do-it-yourself” moving and storage customer in mind.

eMove is an online marketplace that connects consumers to independent Moving Help® service providers and thousands of independent Self-Storage Affiliates. Our network of customer rated affiliates and service providers furnish pack and load help, cleaning help, self-storage and similar services, all over North America. Our goal is to further utilize our web-based technology platform to increase service to consumers and businesses in the moving and storage market.

Since 1945 U-Haul has incorporated sustainable practices into its everyday operations. We believe that our basic business premise of equipment sharing helps reduce greenhouse gas emissions and reduces the need for total large capacity vehicles. We continue to look for ways to reduce waste within our business and are dedicated to manufacturing reusable components and recyclable products. We believe that our commitment to sustainability, through our products and services and everyday operations has helped us to reduce our impact on the environment.

Property and Casualty Insurance Operating Segment

Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment provides loss adjusting and claims handling for U-Haul through regional offices across North America. Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment also underwrites components of the Safemove, Safetow, Super Safemove and Safestor protection packages to U-Haul customers. We continue to focus on increasing the penetration of these products into the moving and storage market. The business plan for our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment includes offering property and casualty products in other U-Haul related programs.

Life Insurance Operating Segment

Our Life Insurance operating segment provides life and health insurance products primarily to the senior market through the direct writing and reinsuring of life insurance, Medicare supplement and annuity policies.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies can have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. Note 3, Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report summarizes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Certain accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments and assumptions, often as a result of the need to estimate matters that are inherently uncertain.

In the following pages we have set forth, with a detailed description, the accounting policies that we deem most critical to us and that require management’s most difficult and subjective judgments. These estimates are based on historical experience, observance of trends in particular areas, information and valuations available from outside sources and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions; such differences may be material.

We also have other policies that we consider key accounting policies, such as revenue recognition; however, these policies do not meet the definition of critical accounting estimates, because they do not generally require us to make estimates or judgments that are difficult or subjective. The accounting policies that we deem most critical to us, and involve the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments include the following:

Principles of Consolidation

We apply ASC 810 - Consolidation (“ASC 810”) in our principles of consolidation. ASC 810 addresses arrangements where a company does not hold a majority of the voting or similar interests of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). A company is required to consolidate a VIE if it has determined it is the primary beneficiary. ASC 810 also addresses the policy when a company owns a majority of the voting or similar rights and exercises effective control.

As promulgated by ASC 810, a VIE is not self-supportive due to having one or both of the following conditions: (i) it has an insufficient amount of equity for it to finance its activities without receiving additional subordinated financial support or (ii) its owners do not hold the typical risks and rights of equity owners. This determination is made upon the creation of a variable interest and is re-assessed on an on-going basis should certain changes in the operations of a VIE, or its relationship with the primary beneficiary trigger a reconsideration under the provisions of ASC 810. After a triggering event occurs the facts and circumstances are utilized in determining whether or not a company is a VIE, which other company(s) have a variable interest in the entity, and whether or not the company’s interest is such that it is the primary beneficiary.

We will continue to monitor our relationships with the other entities regarding who is the primary beneficiary, which could change based on facts and circumstances of any reconsideration events.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013 SAC Holding II fully repaid the $75.0 million outstanding principal balance on its junior note with AMERCO. Pursuant to ASC 810-10-35-4, we considered this a redetermination event which resulted in AMERCO no longer having a variable interest in SAC Holding II. Further, we determined that the repayment of the junior note had no impact on the existing individual operating entity management agreements thereby affirming our finding that these agreements do not constitute variable interests due to the presence of contractual ‘kick-out’ rights. As a result, the reconsideration event had no effect on the consolidation analysis, and thus we have no basis under ASC 810 to consolidate SAC Holding II.

Recoverability of Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Interest expense incurred during the initial construction of buildings and rental equipment is considered part of cost. Depreciation is computed for financial reporting purposes using the straight-line or an accelerated method based on a declining balance formula over the following estimated useful lives: rental equipment 2-20 years and buildings and non-rental equipment 3-55 years. We follow the deferral method of accounting based on ASC 908 - Airlines for major overhauls in which engine and transmission overhauls are currently capitalized and amortized over three years. Routine maintenance costs are charged to operating expense as they are incurred. Gains and losses on dispositions of property, plant and equipment are netted against depreciation expense when realized. Equipment depreciation is recognized in amounts expected to result in the recovery of estimated residual values upon disposal, i.e., minimize gains or losses. In determining the depreciation rate, historical disposal experience, holding periods and trends in the market for vehicles are reviewed.

We regularly perform reviews to determine whether facts and circumstances exist which indicate that the carrying amount of assets, including estimates of residual value, may not be recoverable or that the useful life of assets are shorter or longer than originally estimated. Reductions in residual values (i.e., the price at which we ultimately expect to dispose of revenue earning equipment) or useful lives will result in an increase in depreciation expense over the life of the equipment. Reviews are performed based on vehicle class, generally subcategories of trucks and trailers. We assess the recoverability of our assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their estimated remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. We consider factors such as current and expected future market price trends on used vehicles and the expected life of vehicles included in the fleet. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. If asset residual values are determined to be recoverable, but the useful lives are shorter or longer than originally estimated, the net book value of the assets is depreciated over the newly determined remaining useful lives.

Management determined that additions to the fleet resulting from purchases should be depreciated on an accelerated method based upon a declining formula. Under the declining balances method (2.4 times declining balance), the book value of a rental truck is reduced approximately 16%, 13%, 11%, 9%, 8%, 7%, and 6% during years one through seven, respectively and then reduced on a straight line basis to a salvage value of 20% by the end of year fifteen. Beginning in October 2012, rental equipment subject to this depreciation schedule will be depreciated to a salvage value of 15%. This change had an immaterial effect on our current financial statements. Comparatively, a standard straight line approach would reduce the book value by approximately 5.7% per year over the life of the truck. For the affected equipment, the accelerated depreciation was $57.0 million, $54.6 million and $44.8 million greater than what it would have been if calculated under a straight line approach for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Although we intend to sell our used vehicles for prices approximating book value, the extent to which we realize a gain or loss on the sale of used vehicles is dependent upon various factors including but not limited to, the general state of the used vehicle market, the age and condition of the vehicle at the time of its disposal and the depreciation rates with respect to the vehicle. We typically sell our used vehicles at our sales centers throughout North America, on our web site at uhaul.com/trucksales or by phone at 1-866-404-0355. Additionally, we sell a large portion of our pickup and cargo van fleet at automobile dealer auctions.

Insurance Reserves

Liabilities for life insurance and certain annuity and health policies are established to meet the estimated future obligations of policies in force, and are based on mortality, morbidity and withdrawal assumptions from recognized actuarial tables which contain margins for adverse deviation. In addition, liabilities for health, disability and other policies include estimates of payments to be made on insurance claims for reported losses and estimates of losses incurred, but not yet reported. Liabilities for annuity contracts consist of contract account balances that accrue to the benefit of the policyholders.

Insurance reserves for our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment and U-Haul take into account losses incurred based upon actuarial estimates and are management’s best approximation of future payments.  These estimates are based upon past claims experience and current claim trends as well as social and economic conditions such as changes in legal theories and inflation.  These reserves consist of case reserves for reported losses and a provision for losses incurred but not reported (“IBNR”), both reduced by applicable reinsurance recoverables, resulting in a net liability.

Due to the nature of the underlying risks and high degree of uncertainty associated with the determination of the liability for future policy benefits and claims, the amounts to be ultimately paid to settle these liabilities cannot be precisely determined and may vary significantly from the estimated liability, especially for long-tailed casualty lines of business such as excess workers’ compensation.  As a result of the long-tailed nature of the excess workers’ compensation policies written by Repwest during 1983 through 2002, and similar policies assumed by Repwest during 2001 through 2003, it may take a number of years for claims to be fully reported and finally settled.

On a regular basis insurance reserve adequacy is reviewed by management to determine if existing assumptions need to be updated. In determining the assumptions for calculating workers’ compensation reserves, management considers multiple factors including the following:

•            Claimant longevity

•            Cost trends associated with claimant treatments

•            Changes in ceding entity and third party administrator reporting practices

•            Changes in environmental factors including legal and regulatory

•            Current conditions affecting claim settlements

•            Future economic conditions including inflation

Significant variables that led to the third quarter of fiscal 2012 reserve strengthening were cost trends associated with claimant treatments, changes related to ceding entity and third party administrator reporting practices, projected longevity of claimants terms and assumptions for future claim settlements.

As part of this latest review, the Company has reserved each claim based upon the accumulation of current claim costs projected through the claimants’ life expectancy, and then adjusted for applicable reinsurance arrangements.  Management reviews each claim bi-annually to determine if the estimated life-time claim costs have increased and then adjusts the reserve estimate accordingly at that time.  We have factored in an estimate of what the potential cost increases could be in our IBNR liability.  We have not assumed settlement of the existing claims in calculating the reserve amount, unless it is in the final stages of completion.

Continued increases in claim costs, including medical inflation and new treatments and medications could lead to future adverse development resulting in additional reserve strengthening.  Conversely, settlement of existing claims or if injured workers return to work or expire prematurely, could lead to future positive development.

Impairment of Investments

Investments are evaluated pursuant to guidance contained in ASC 320 - Investments - Debt and Equity Securities to determine if and when a decline in market value below amortized cost is other-than-temporary. Management makes certain assumptions or judgments in its assessment including but not limited to: ability and intent to hold the security, quoted market prices, dealer quotes or discounted cash flows, industry factors, financial factors, and issuer specific information such as credit strength. Other-than-temporary impairment in value is recognized in the current period operating results. We recognized other-than-temporary impairments of $0.1 million and $0.8 million for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. There were no write downs in fiscal 2013.

Income Taxes

Our tax returns are periodically reviewed by various taxing authorities. The final outcome of these audits may cause changes that could materially impact our financial results.

AMERCO files a consolidated tax return with all of its legal subsidiaries.

Fair Values

Fair values of cash equivalents approximate carrying value due to the short period of time to maturity. Fair values of short term investments, investments available-for-sale, long term investments, mortgage loans and notes on real estate, and interest rate swap contracts are based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes or discounted cash flows. Fair values of trade receivables approximate their recorded value.

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of temporary cash investments, trade receivables, reinsurance recoverables and notes receivable. Limited credit risk exists on trade receivables due to the diversity of our customer base and their dispersion across broad geographic markets. We place our temporary cash investments with financial institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one financial institution.

We have mortgage receivables, which potentially expose us to credit risk. The portfolio of notes is principally collateralized by self-storage facilities and commercial properties. We have not experienced any material losses related to the notes from individual or groups of notes in any particular industry or geographic area. The estimated fair values were determined using the discounted cash flow method and using interest rates currently offered for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings.

The carrying amount of long term debt and short term borrowings are estimated to approximate fair value as the actual interest rate is consistent with the rate estimated to be currently available for debt of similar term and remaining maturity.

Other investments including short term investments are substantially current or bear reasonable interest rates. As a result, the carrying values of these financial instruments approximate fair value.

Subsequent Events

Our management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after March 31, 2013, the date of our most recent balance sheet date, through the date our financial statements were issued. We do not believe any other subsequent events have occurred that would require further disclosure or adjustment to our financial statements other than those stated below.

Financial Strength Ratings

In May 2013, A.M. Best affirmed the financial strength rating of B++ (Good) for Oxford and its outlook remains positive.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, an amendment to FASB ASC Topic 220. The update requires disclosure of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is required to present either on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts not reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. This ASU is effective prospectively for the Company’s fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2012. We do not believe the adoption of this will have a material impact on our financial statements.

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-26, Financial Services – Insurance (Topic 944) (“ASU 2010-26”) which amended FASB ASC 944-30 to provide further guidance regarding the capitalization of costs relating to the acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts. Specifically, only qualifying costs associated with successful contract acquisitions are permitted to be deferred. We adopted ASU 2010-26 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and it resulted in a $1.7 million reduction in beginning retained earnings on our financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) (“ASU 2011-04”). This pronouncement was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted ASU 2011-04 in the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Intangibles – Goodwill and Others (Topic 350) (“ASU 2012-02”) which allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test of an indefinite-lived intangible asset.  Per the terms of ASU 2012-02, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on qualitative assessment, that it is not more likely than not, the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. We adopted ASU 2012-02 in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or the SEC that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, these ASU’s entail technical corrections to existing guidance or affect guidance related to specialized industries or entities and therefore will have minimal, if any, impact on our financial position or results of operations upon adoption.

AMERCO and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Fiscal 2013 Compared with Fiscal 2012

Listed below, on a consolidated basis, are revenues for our major product lines for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012:

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $89.3 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012. Growth in In-Town and one-way transactions was the most significant factor influencing the growth in revenues during fiscal 2013.  Truck, trailers and towing devices all experienced transaction and revenue growth as compared to fiscal 2012.  We believe the improvement in revenue occurred in conjunction with growth in our independent dealer network, expansion of company operated locations and an increase in the number of trucks and trailers in the fleet.  Our focus continues to be on improving the rental experience for our customers through the availability of equipment, convenient access to rental locations and ease of the rental process.  

Self-storage revenues increased $18.3 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012.  Average monthly occupancy for fiscal 2013 increased by 1.6 million square feet compared to the same period last year.  These occupancy gains have come from a combination of improvements at existing locations as well as the acquisition of new facilities.  Over the last twelve months we have added approximately 2.1 million net rentable square feet.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $7.3 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012.  Increases were recognized from the sale of moving supplies as well as towing accessories and installation.

Property management fees increased $1.1 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012. The calculation of these fees is largely based upon revenues collected at the facilities managed by the Company.  As these underlying revenues increase, the fees we collect for management services increase as well.

Life insurance premiums decreased $99.4 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012.  During fiscal 2012 we purchased a block of life insurance policies which resulted in the recording of $83.4 million of premium upon acquisition; fiscal 2013 did not include a similar acquisition.

Property and casualty insurance premiums increased $1.7 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012 primarily from policies sold in conjunction with U-Haul rental transactions. As moving transactions have increased this year so have the related premiums.

Net investment and interest income increased $9.4 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012.  Realized gains from mortgage loans held for investment were approximately $13.2 million.  The Life Insurance operating segment reported additional interest income resulting from a larger invested asset portfolio.  Partially offsetting this was a decrease resulting from the first quarter of fiscal 2013 SAC Holdings repayment to AMERCO of $127.3 million for notes and interest outstanding. These notes carried interest rates of 9% and the loss of this yield caused an $11.0 million decline in interest income for fiscal 2013. 

Other revenue increased $19.0 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012 primarily from the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box program.

As a result of the items mentioned above, revenues for AMERCO and its consolidated entities were $2,558.6 million for fiscal 2013 as compared with $2,512.0 million for fiscal 2012.

Listed below are revenues and earnings (loss) from operations at each of our operating segments for fiscal 2013 and 2012. The insurance companies’ years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.

Total costs and expenses decreased $36.6 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Our Life Insurance operating segment accounted for $88.6 million of the decrease primarily due to the decline in business acquisitions. Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment accounted for $45.0 million of the decrease. The third quarter of fiscal 2012 included $48.3 million of charges related to excess workers’ compensation reserves and reinsurance contracts; these charges did not recur in fiscal 2013.

Total costs and expenses at the Moving and Storage operating segment increased $95.9 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Operating expenses increased $74.9 million primarily from spending on personnel, accruals for liability costs, legal expense, property taxes and operating costs associated with the U-Box program. Commission expenses increased in relation to the associated revenues. Cost of sales declined due to a reduction in the price of propane combined with a reduction in the volume purchased. Depreciation expense, net, increased $29.1 million while lease expense decreased $14.8 million as a result of the Company’s shift in financing new equipment on the balance sheet versus through operating leases.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $499.2 million for fiscal 2013, compared with $416.0 million for fiscal 2012.

Interest expense for fiscal 2013 was $90.7 million, compared with $90.4 million for fiscal 2012 due to an increase in average borrowings partially offset by a decrease in average borrowing costs.

Income tax expense was $143.8 million for fiscal 2013, compared with $120.3 million for fiscal 2012. The increase was due to higher pretax earnings for fiscal 2013.

Dividends accrued or paid on our Series A Preferred were $2.9 million for fiscal 2012. There were no payments made or accrued in fiscal 2013. All of the Series A Preferred stock was redeemed on June 1, 2011; therefore, no dividends were accrued in fiscal 2013. Fiscal 2012 included a $5.9 million non-recurring charge related to the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock.

As a result of the above mentioned items, earnings available to common shareholders were $264.7 million for fiscal 2013, compared with $196.5 million for fiscal 2012.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share for fiscal 2013 were $13.56, compared with $10.09 for fiscal 2012.

The weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted were 19,518,779 for fiscal 2013, compared with 19,476,187 for fiscal 2012.

Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011

Listed below, on a consolidated basis, are revenues for our major product lines for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011:

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $131.2 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011.  The largest contributor to the revenue improvement was the increase in both In-Town and one-way moving transactions across both our truck and trailer fleets.  We believe the growth in the number of transactions was influenced by our continuing customer service enhancements which allowed us to better serve the existing customer base combined with an increase in overall demand for our services.  We were also better able to serve our customers through an increase in the amount of equipment in our fleet throughout the year.  Other factors that contributed to the revenue improvement included an increase in our average revenue per transaction and utilization of the fleet.  Factors which contribute to changes in revenue per transaction include the mix of equipment type rented and rental rates charged.

Self-storage revenues increased $13.7 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 due primarily to an increase in the number of rooms rented combined with a modest improvement in overall rates per occupied square foot.  The average amount of occupied square feet increased by approximately 10% for fiscal 2012 compared to the same period last year.  A portion of this improvement comes from the additional capacity added to the portfolio; total net rentable square feet increased by 1.4 million over the last twelve months.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $8.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. Increases were recognized in the sale of propane and towing accessories/installation with the majority of the improvement coming from the sales of moving supplies.

Life insurance premiums increased $70.6 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily from entering into a new reinsurance agreement for a block of life insurance policies combined with increased Medicare supplement premiums from last year’s acquisition.

Property and casualty insurance premiums increased $1.9 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 due to increases in Safestor and Safemove which resulted from the increase in equipment rental transactions and self storage rentals.

Net investment and interest income increased $10.8 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily due to an increased asset base at the Life Insurance operating segment combined with improved yields across all three segments due to the investment of excess cash balances.

Other revenue increased $23.0 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily due to the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box program.

As a result of the items mentioned above, revenues for AMERCO and its consolidated subsidiaries were $2,512.0 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $2,251.4 million for fiscal 2011.

Listed below are revenues and earnings (loss) from operations at each of our operating segments for fiscal 2012 and 2011. The insurance companies’ years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.

Total costs and expenses increased $222.4 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011. The Life Insurance operating segment accounted for $74.6 million of the increase primarily due to entering into the new reinsurance agreement. The Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment accounted for $46.0 million of the increase largely due to the reserve increases associated with their closed block of workers’ compensation policies.

Operating expenses for the Moving and Storage operating segment increased $101.5 million due largely to spending on personnel, rental equipment maintenance and operating costs associated with the U-Box program.  Cost of sales and commission expenses increased in relation to the associated revenues.  Depreciation expense, before gains on the disposal of equipment, increased $17.5 million while lease expense decreased $19.6 million.  Over the last several years the Company has decreased its use of operating leases for funding new equipment acquisitions and increased its use of term loans and securitizations, which are the primary causes of the decrease in lease expense and increase in depreciation expense.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $416.0 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $377.7 million for fiscal 2011.

Interest expense for fiscal 2012 was $90.4 million, compared with $88.4 million for fiscal 2011 due to an increase in average borrowings partially offset by a decrease in average borrowing costs.

Income tax expense was $120.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $105.7 million for fiscal 2011. The increase was due to higher pretax earnings for fiscal 2012.

Dividends paid or accrued on our Series A Preferred were $2.9 million and $12.4 million for fiscal 2012 and 2011, respectively. Fiscal 2012 included a $5.9 million non-recurring charge related to the redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock. All of our Series A Preferred stock was redeemed on June 1, 2011; therefore, no dividends were accrued with respect to the Series A Preferred for the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2012. 

As a result of the above mentioned items, earnings available to common shareholders were $196.5 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $171.0 million for fiscal 2011.

Basic and diluted earnings per common share for fiscal 2012 were $10.09, compared with $8.80 for fiscal 2011.

The weighted average common shares outstanding basic and diluted were 19,476,187 for fiscal 2012, compared with 19,432,781 for fiscal 2011.

Moving and Storage

Fiscal 2013 Compared with Fiscal 2012

Listed below are revenues for the major product lines at our Moving and Storage operating segment for fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012:

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $89.1 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Growth in In-Town and one-way transactions was the single largest driver of growth in revenues during fiscal 2013.  Truck, trailers and towing devices all experienced transaction and revenue growth as compared to fiscal 2012.  We believe the improvement in revenue occurred in conjunction with growth in our independent dealer network, expansion of company operated locations and an increase in the number of trucks and trailers in the fleet.  Our focus continues to be on improving the rental experience for our customers through the availability of equipment, convenient access to rental locations and ease of the rental process.

Self-storage revenues increased $18.3 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012.  Average monthly occupancy for fiscal 2013 increased by 1.6 million square feet compared to the same period last year.  These occupancy gains have come from a combination of improvements at existing locations as well as the acquisition of new facilities.  Over the last twelve months we have added approximately 2.1 million net rentable square feet.

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $7.3 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.  We earned increases from the sale of moving supplies as well as towing accessories and installation.

Property management fees increased $1.1 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.  The calculation of these fees is largely based upon revenues collected at the facilities managed by the Company.  As these underlying revenues increase, the fees we collect for management services increase as well.

Net investment and interest income decreased $8.5 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, SAC Holdings repaid AMERCO $127.3 million for notes and interest outstanding. These notes carried interest rates of 9% and the loss of this yield caused an $11.0 million decline in interest income for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.  This decline was partially offset by gains from mortgage loans held for investment at the Moving and Storage operating segment.

Other revenue increased $18.2 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 primarily from the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box program.

The Company owns and manages self-storage facilities. Self-storage revenues reported in the consolidated financial statements represent Company-owned locations only. Self-storage data for our owned storage locations follows:

Total costs and expenses increased $95.9 million for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Operating expenses increased $74.9 million primarily from spending on personnel, accruals for liability costs, legal expense, property taxes and operating costs associated with the U-Box program. Commission expenses increased in relation to the associated revenues. Cost of sales declined due to a reduction in the price of propane combined with a reduction in the volume purchased. Depreciation expense, net, increased $29.1 million while lease expense decreased $14.8 million as a result of the Company’s shift in financing new equipment on the balance sheet versus through operating leases.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2013 Hurricane Sandy struck the Northeastern portion of the United States interrupting business at approximately 100 stores. All of these stores were operational within a few days, but for the most part, required some additional time to reach full operational strength. We estimated losses related to destroyed rental equipment of approximately $0.8 million and this was recorded as an expense in the third quarter. We maintain property and business interruption insurance coverage with independent third parties to mitigate the financial impact of these types of catastrophic events. Our insurance deductible is $0.3 million and this was recorded as an expense in the third quarter.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations for the Moving and Storage operating segment before consolidation of the equity in the earnings of the insurance subsidiaries increased to $462.3 million for fiscal 2013 as compared with $432.8 million for fiscal 2012.

Equity in the earnings of AMERCO’s insurance subsidiaries increased $34.6 million for fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012 as a result of the reserve strengthening at the Property and Casualty Insurance segment in the prior year.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $486.6 million for fiscal 2013, compared with $422.4 million for fiscal 2012.

Fiscal 2012 Compared with Fiscal 2011

Listed below are revenues for the major product lines at our Moving and Storage operating segment for fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011:

Self-moving equipment rental revenues increased $130.9 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011.  The largest contributor to the revenue improvement was the increase in both In-Town and one-way moving transactions across both our truck and trailer fleets.  We believe the growth in the number of transactions was influenced by our continuing customer service enhancements which allowed us to better serve the existing customer base combined with an increase in overall demand for our services.  We were also better able to serve our customers through an increase in the amount of equipment in our fleet throughout the year. Other factors that contributed to the revenue improvement included an increase in our average revenue per transaction and utilization of the fleet.  Factors which contribute to changes in revenue per transaction include the mix of equipment type rented and rental rates charged.

Self-storage revenues increased $13.7 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 due primarily to an increase in the number of rooms rented combined with a modest improvement in overall rates per occupied square foot.  The average amount of occupied square feet increased by approximately 10% for fiscal 2012 compared to fiscal 2011.  A portion of this improvement comes from the additional capacity added to the portfolio; total net rentable square feet increased by 1.4 million over the last twelve months.      

Sales of self-moving and self-storage products and services increased $8.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011.  Increases were recognized in the sale of propane and towing accessories and installation with the majority of the improvement coming from the sales of moving supplies.

Other revenue increased $23.7 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 primarily from the expansion of new business initiatives including our U-Box program.

The Company owns and manages self-storage facilities. Self-storage revenues reported in the consolidated financial statements represent Company-owned locations only. Self-storage data for our owned storage locations follows:

Total costs and expenses increased $101.5 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011.  Operating expenses increased $69.8 million due largely to spending on personnel, rental equipment maintenance and operating costs associated with the U-Box program.  Cost of sales and commission expenses increased in relation to the associated revenues.  Depreciation expense, before gains on the disposal of equipment, increased $17.5 million while lease expense decreased $19.6 million.  Over the last several years the Company has decreased its use of leases for funding new equipment acquisitions and increased its use of term loans and securitizations, which are the primary causes of the decrease in lease expense and increase in depreciation expense.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations for the Moving and Storage operating segment before consolidation of the equity in the earnings of the insurance subsidiaries, increased to $432.8 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $355.2 million for the fiscal 2011.

Equity in the earnings of AMERCO’s insurance subsidiaries decreased $25.3 million for fiscal 2012, compared with fiscal 2011 as a result of the reserve strengthening at the Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, earnings from operations increased to $422.4 million for fiscal 2012, compared with $370.1 million for fiscal 2011.

Property and Casualty Insurance

2012 Compared with 2011

Net premiums were $34.3 million and $32.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. A significant portion of Repwest’s premiums are from policies sold in conjunction with U-Haul rental transactions. The increase corresponded with the increased moving and storage transactions at U-Haul.

Net investment income was $13.9 million and $10.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase was due to $4.6 million of gains on mortgage loans offset by a $0.8 million decrease in real estate income.

Net operating expenses were $18.0 million and $13.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. The increase was primarily due to a $4.1 million write-off for reinsurance deemed uncollectible combined with $0.7 million in legal fees related to this transaction.

Benefits and losses incurred were $16.0 million and $65.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to reserve strengthening in 2011 on terminated workers’ compensation programs originally written or reinsured between 1983 and 2003. Losses in this line of business increased $53.8 million of which $48.3 million was recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings (loss) from operations were $14.2 million and ($36.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Property and Casualty Insurance

2011 Compared with 2010

Net premiums were $32.6 million and $30.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. A portion of Repwest’s premiums are from policies sold in conjunction with U-Haul rental transactions. The increase corresponded with the increased moving and storage transactions at U-Haul.

Net investment income was $10.0 million and $8.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was due to $1.0 million of gains on assets disposed and higher returns from assets invested in mortgage loans.

Net operating expenses were $13.3 million and $15.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. The decrease was due to a $1.1 million payment related to an excess workers’ compensation treaty payment in 2010 with no similar expense in 2011 and a $1.2 million decrease in net loss adjusting expense in 2011.

Benefits and losses incurred were $65.7 million and $17.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was primarily due to reserve strengthening on terminated workers’ compensation programs originally written or reinsured between 1983 and 2003. Losses in this line of business increased $53.8 million of which $48.3 million was recognized in the third quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company determined that claims have been developing much more adversely than previously anticipated. A combination of issues including medical inflation, additional treatments, longer claim terms and underestimation of claims costs by third party administrators and reinsurers contributed to these adjustments. These updated assumptions led to the revision in the Company’s loss assumptions for this business.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings (loss) from operations were ($36.4) million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Life Insurance

2012 Compared with 2011

Net premiums were $178.1 million and $277.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the third quarter of 2011 Oxford entered into a coinsurance arrangement for a block of whole life insurance policies resulting in a one-time increase in premiums of $83.5 million due to the transfer of liabilities.  Medicare supplement premiums decreased by $9.5 million compared to the prior year while premiums from other products including life insurance decreased $6.5 million.  New business activity in 2012 shifted more towards annuity policies with sales of these products accounted for as deposits on the balance sheet instead of premium income.  Annuity deposits increased by $258.5 million compared to 2011.

Net investment income was $50.9 million and $38.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. There was an increase of $13.8 million of investment income due to a larger invested asset base and gains on matured mortgage loans purchased at discounts. This was offset by a decrease in realized gains recognized on investments of $0.9 million.

Net operating expenses were $26.5 million and $28.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The variance was due to a reduced Medicare supplement and single premium whole life commissions resulting from a decline in the Medicare supplement policy base along with lower new sales of the life product.

Benefits and losses incurred were $164.7 million and $254.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the third quarter of 2011 Oxford entered into the coinsurance arrangement for the block of whole life insurance policies resulting in a one-time increase in benefits of $83.5 million due to the transfer of liabilities. Medicare supplement benefits decreased by $9.9 million from a reduction of policies in-force and improved benefit ratios.  As a result of the growth in annuity deposits, interest credited to policyholders increased $3.2 million.

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), sales inducement asset (“SIA”) and the value of business acquired (“VOBA”) was $17.4 million and $13.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.  This was primarily due to amortization related to increased annuity sales and in-force life insurance policies. 

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings from operations were $23.0 million and $20.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Life Insurance

2011 Compared with 2010

Net premiums were $277.6 million and $207.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  During 2011 we entered in a coinsurance arrangement for a block of whole life policies resulting in a one-time increase in premiums of $83.5 million due to the transfer of liabilities.  Likewise, 2010 included a $30.8 million increase in premiums related to a coinsurance agreement entered into for a block of final expense whole life policies acquired.  Medicare supplement premiums increased $27.1 million, of which $32.6 million was attributable to the 2010 acquisition of a block of existing policies.  This was offset by policy terminations which exceeded rate increases on existing business.  Other life insurance premiums and annuitizations accounted for a decrease of $9.1 million during the year.

Net investment income was $38.1 million and $30.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was due to an additional $2.9 million in gains on the sale of securities and increased income due to a larger invested asset base.

Net operating expenses were $28.9 million and $29.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. An increase in general administrative and commission expense related to current year annuity sales and last year’s Medicare supplement acquisition was offset by a reduction in life insurance commissions.

Benefits and losses incurred were $254.4 million and $183.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. There was a net increase of $52.7 million in Life benefits due to the transfer of liabilities for the coinsurance of new blocks of business during both quarters ending December 31, 2011 and 2010.  Medicare supplement benefits increased $24.1 million. An increase of $31.1 million was due to the acquisition of last year’s Medicare supplement block of business, which was partially offset by a reduction of $7.0 million in benefits on the existing business. All other business had a net decrease in benefits of $4.9 million for the year.

Amortization of DAC and VOBA was $13.8 million and $9.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Approximately $1.2 million of the increase was due to additional annuity DAC amortization resulting from realized capital gains recognized during the year. An additional $1.5 million was from the acquisition of last year’s Medicare supplement and final expense policies. The remaining increase was spread across various life insurance and annuity products.

As a result of the above mentioned changes in revenues and expenses, pretax earnings from operations were $20.1 million and $17.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We believe our current capital structure is a positive factor that will enable us to pursue our operational plans and goals and provide us with sufficient liquidity for the foreseeable future. The majority of our obligations currently in place mature between fiscal years 2016 and 2019. However, since there are many factors which could affect our liquidity, including some which are beyond our control, there is no assurance that future cash flows and liquidity resources will be sufficient to meet our outstanding debt obligations and our other future capital needs.

At March 31, 2013, cash and cash equivalents totaled $463.7 million, compared with $357.2 million on March 31, 2012. The assets of our insurance subsidiaries are generally unavailable to fulfill the obligations of non-insurance operations (AMERCO, U-Haul and Real Estate). As of March 31, 2013 (or as otherwise indicated), cash and cash equivalents, other financial assets (receivables, short-term investments, other investments, fixed maturities, and related party assets) and debt obligations of each operating segment were:

At March 31, 2013, our Moving and Storage segment had cash available under existing credit facilities of $116.0 million.

A summary of our consolidated cash flows for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011 is shown in the table below:

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $8.3 million in fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012 primarily due to a $132.5 million increase in net federal income tax payments combined with a $133.0 million decline in the Life Insurance segment from reduced business acquisition activity.  This is offset by the repayment of $127.3 million of the notes and interest receivables with SAC Holdings and from increased revenues at the Moving and Storage segment.  

Net cash used in investing activities increased $130.1 million in fiscal 2013, compared with fiscal 2012.  The largest portion of this change came from the Life Insurance segment as funds from new annuity sales led to a net $142.5 increase in net cash used for investing.   For our Moving and Storage operating segment, cash received from entering into leases related to the acquisition of new equipment is reported net of the related cash used for the purchases of property, plant and equipment.  New equipment leases funded in fiscal 2013 compared to fiscal 2012 increased $99.7 million, while cash used to purchase new rental equipment for fiscal 2013 increased $95.2 million compared to the same period last year. Cash provided from the sales of property, plant and equipment, primarily used trucks increased $51.8 million.

Net cash provided by financing activities increased $270.5 million in fiscal 2013, as compared with fiscal 2012. Net annuity deposits at the Life Insurance operating segment increased $284.0 million in fiscal 2013 compared to the same period last year. This was reduced by the Moving and Storage segment through a net increase in debt repayments as compared to new borrowings. Fiscal 2013 included $97.4 million of cash used to pay the Common Stock dividend, while fiscal 2012 included $152.0 million of cash used to redeem the Series A Preferred.

Liquidity and Capital Resources and Requirements of Our Operating Segments

Moving and Storage

To meet the needs of our customers, U-Haul maintains a large fleet of rental equipment. Capital expenditures have primarily reflected new rental equipment acquisitions and the buyouts of existing fleet from leases. The capital to fund these expenditures has historically been obtained internally from operations and the sale of used equipment and externally from debt and lease financing. In the future, we anticipate that our internally generated funds will be used to service the existing debt and fund operations. U-Haul estimates that during fiscal 2014 the Company will reinvest in its truck and trailer rental fleet approximately $300 million, net of equipment sales and excluding any lease buyouts. For fiscal 2013, the Company invested, net of sales, approximately $391 million before any lease buyouts in its truck and trailer fleet. Fleet investments in fiscal 2014 and beyond will be dependent upon several factors including availability of capital, the truck rental environment and the used-truck sales market. We anticipate that the fiscal 2014 investments will be funded largely through debt financing, external lease financing and cash from operations. Management considers several factors including cost and tax consequences when selecting a method to fund capital expenditures. Our allocation between debt and lease financing can change from year to year based upon financial market conditions which may alter the cost or availability of financing options.

Real Estate has traditionally financed the acquisition of self-storage properties to support U-Haul's growth through debt financing and funds from operations and sales. The Company’s plan for the expansion of owned storage properties includes the acquisition of existing self-storage locations from third parties, the acquisition and development of bare land, and the acquisition and redevelopment of existing buildings not currently used for self-storage. The Company is funding these development projects through construction loans and internally generated funds. For fiscal 2013, the Company invested nearly $170 million in real estate acquisitions, new construction and renovation and repair. For fiscal 2014, the timing of new projects will be dependent upon several factors including the entitlement process, availability of capital, weather, and the identification and successful acquisition of target properties. U-Haul's growth plan in self-storage also includes the expansion of the eMove program, which does not require significant capital.

Net capital expenditures (purchases of property, plant and equipment less proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment and lease proceeds) were $435.3 million, $420.9 million and $300.0 million for fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The components of our net capital expenditures are provided in the following table:

The Moving and Storage operating segment continues to hold significant cash and has access to additional liquidity. Management may invest these funds in our existing operations, expand our product lines or pursue external opportunities in the self-moving and storage market place, or reduce existing indebtedness where possible.

Property and Casualty Insurance

State insurance regulations restrict the amount of dividends that can be paid to stockholders of insurance companies. As a result, our Property and Casualty Insurance’s operating segment assets are generally not available to satisfy the claims of AMERCO or its legal subsidiaries.

The Company believes that stockholders equity at the Property and Casualty operating segment remains sufficient and we do not believe that its ability to pay ordinary dividends to AMERCO will be restricted per state regulations.

Stockholder’s equity was $136.9 million, $123.8 million, and $154.6 million at December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The increase in 2012 compared with 2011 resulted from net earnings of $9.3 million and an increase in other comprehensive income of $2.3 million, along with a capital contribution to ARCOA of $1.5 million. Our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment does not use debt or equity issues to increase capital and therefore has no direct exposure to capital market conditions other than through its investment portfolio.

Life Insurance

The Life Insurance operating segment manages its financial assets to meet policyholder and other obligations including investment contract withdrawals. Life Insurance’s operating segment net deposits for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $269.8 million. State insurance regulations restrict the amount of dividends that can be paid to stockholders of insurance companies. As a result, Life Insurance’s operating segment funds are generally not available to satisfy the claims of AMERCO or its legal subsidiaries.

Life Insurance’s stockholder’s equity was $242.7 million, $215.8 million, and $188.7 million at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in 2012 compared with 2011 resulted from earnings of $15.0 million, an increase in other comprehensive income of $13.6 million and a decrease to beginning retained earnings of $1.7 million in relation to the adoption of ASU 2010-26. Life Insurance operating segment does not use debt or equity issues to increase capital and therefore has no direct exposure to capital market conditions other than through its investment portfolio.

Cash Provided (Used) from Operating Activities by Operating Segments

Moving and Storage

Net cash provided by operating activities was $665.6 million, $536.9 million and $471.0 million in fiscal 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase was primarily due to repayments of $127.3 million of the notes and interest receivables in the first quarter with SAC Holdings and from increased revenues partially offset by a $132.5 million increase in net federal income tax payments. 

Property and Casualty Insurance

Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.3 million, $4.7 million, and $4.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The decrease was due to a $4.9 million increase in benefit payments.

Our Property and Casualty Insurance’s operating segment cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment portfolios amounted to $45.2 million, $44.1 million, and $76.2 million at December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. This balance reflects funds in transition from maturity proceeds to long term investments. Management believes this level of liquid assets, combined with budgeted cash flow, is adequate to meet foreseeable cash needs. Capital and operating budgets allow our Property and Casualty Insurance operating segment to schedule cash needs in accordance with investment and underwriting proceeds.

Life Insurance

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities was ($4.4) million, $128.6 million and $98.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease in cash provided was attributable to a cash settlement on the assumption reinsurance transaction as of September 2011. Increased commissions on higher sales of new annuity products in 2012 caused an additional decrease in cash flow from operations.

In addition to cash flows from operating activities and financing activities, a substantial amount of liquid funds are available through our Life Insurance’s operating segment short-term portfolio. At December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments amounted to $34.6 million, $54.1 million and $53.6 million, respectively. Management believes that the overall sources of liquidity are adequate to meet foreseeable cash needs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources - Summary

We believe we have the financial resources needed to meet our business plans including our working capital needs. The Company continues to hold significant cash and has access to existing credit facilities and additional liquidity to meet our anticipated capital expenditure requirements for investment in our rental fleet, rental equipment and storage acquisitions and build outs.

Our borrowing strategy is primarily focused on asset-backed financing and rental equipment operating leases. As part of this strategy, we seek to ladder maturities and hedge floating rate loans through the use of interest rate swaps. While each of these loans typically contains provisions governing the amount that can be borrowed in relation to specific assets, the overall structure is flexible with no limits on overall Company borrowings. Management feels it has adequate liquidity between cash and cash equivalents and unused borrowing capacity in existing credit facilities to meet the current and expected needs of the Company over the next several years. At March 31, 2013, we had cash availability under existing credit facilities of $116.0 million. It is possible that circumstances beyond our control could alter the ability of the financial institutions to lend us the unused lines of credit. We believe that there are additional opportunities for leverage in our existing capital structure. For a more detailed discussion of our long-term debt and borrowing capacity, please see Note 9, Borrowings of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets and are measured and classified based upon a three tiered approach to valuation. ASC 820 requires that financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value be classified and disclosed in a Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 category. For more information, please see Note 16, Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 

The available-for-sale securities held by the Company are recorded at fair value. These values are determined primarily from actively traded markets where prices are based either on direct market quotes or observed transactions. Liquidity is a factor considered during the determination of the fair value of these securities. Market price quotes may not be readily available for certain securities or the market for them has slowed or ceased. In situations where the market is determined to be illiquid, fair value is determined based upon limited available information and other factors including expected cash flows. At March 31, 2013, we had $1.2 million of available-for-sale assets classified in Level 3.

The interest rate swaps held by the Company as hedges against interest rate risk for our variable rate debt are recorded at fair value. These values are determined using pricing valuation models which include broker quotes for which significant inputs are observable. They include adjustments for counterparty credit quality and other deal-specific factors, where appropriate and are classified as Level 2.

Disclosures about Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following table provides contractual commitments and contingencies as of March 31, 2013: