(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The information furnished herewith reflects all adjustments, which are in the opinion of management necessary to a fair statement of the results for the period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although the Company believes the disclosures which are made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's latest annual report on Form 10-K. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have not been audited by a firm of certified public accountants.

It is the Company's policy to reclassify amounts in the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Note B - New Accounting Standards

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141(R), "Business Combinations". SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 141(R) on its consolidated financial statements but does not expect it to have a material effect.

In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51." SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial statements but does not expect it to have a material effect.

Note C - Statement of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Contributions

The Company expects to contribute $900,000 to its Pension Plan and $84,334 to its other Post Retirement Benefit Plan in fiscal year 2009. A total of $52,018 has been paid for the first six months of this fiscal year.

Note E - Rate Case

On March 27, 2009, Corning Natural Gas Corporation, the Staff of the New York Department of Public Service, the Village of Bath Electric, Gas and Water Systems and multiple intervenors (representing large industrial customers in the Company's service area) entered into and filed with the New York Public Service Commission ("NYPSC") a settlement agreement (the "Joint Proposal") in the Company's current gas rate case, Case 08-G-1137. The Joint Proposal, if adopted by the Commission, would, starting in September 2009 raise delivery base rates by $972,794. The Joint Proposal includes the establishment of a Merchant Function Charge ("MFC") for the commodity-related costs of natural gas service. The MFC is applicable to Corning SC 1, Corning SC 2, Corning SC 5, Bath SC 1, Hammondsport SC 1 and Hammondsport SC 2. These commodity-related costs will be collected via an MFC surcharge in addition to the delivery base rate increase proposed in the Joint Proposal. The total revenue requirement to be collected through the MFC surcharge would be $523,938. The three major components of the amount moved from delivery base rates to the MCF surcharge are $161,975 for the commodity portion of uncollectible expense, $123,449 in supply procurement expense, and $238,514 in records and collections expense. In addition, the carrying costs for gas storage will be calculated at the customer capital rate determined by the NYPSC annually; 80% of the carrying costs will be collected via the MFC surcharge and the balance (20%) via the Delivery Rate Adjustment. The Joint Proposal reflects the Signatory Parties' acknowledgment that most of the storage asset is used to serve firm sales customers; but a portion is used to balance the Corning system, which is a benefit to all customers. Accordingly, the Joint Proposal allocates 80% of the storage inventory component to firm sales customers and 20% to all customers (including firm sales customers). If approved by the Commission, the Joint Proposal would also establish a process to adjust rates in September 2010 for new capital expenditures and property taxes, as well as establishing a "revenue decoupling mechanism", intended to encourage conservation, and a sharing formula for "producer revenues", the revenues derived from service provided to natural gas producers in the Corning area. The Joint Proposal also continues certain infrastructure and safety mandates. There can be no guarantee that the Commission will adopt the Joint Proposal as proposed or at all.

Note F - Financing Activities

On May 7, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with M & T Bank to provide for a $6.0 million note for the purpose of retiring a $3.1 million first mortgage and an unsecured senior note in the amount of $1.5 million. The remaining proceeds were used to fund construction projects related to furnishing natural gas within the Company's service area. This note was converted to a long term loan on October 16, 2008, with an interest rate of 5.96%. This rate decreased to 5.05% in November 2008. In October 2008, we obtained $1.0 million of financing in a form of Demand Note from M&T Bank to help with the cost of our new construction. Interest on this loan is payable on the monthly basis at the rate equal to 1% above the Prime Rate. The initial interest rate on this loan was 5.5% and was 4.25% at the end of March of 2009.

Note G - Director Compensation

On April 1, 2008, the board of directors agreed to increase the compensation for all board members from 50 shares of our restricted common stock for each quarter of service as a director to 150 shares of our restricted common stock for each quarter of service as a director. The shares awarded will become unrestricted upon a director leaving the board. Directors who also serve as officers of Corning are not compensated for their service as directors. In fiscal 2009, directors were issued compensatory shares for service from January 2007 through May 2008.　 Directors have not yet been issued compensatory shares for service after May 2008.　 Information regarding shares of restricted stock awarded to directors in fiscal 2009 is summarized below.

We are also recognizing in this quarter 100 shares, valued at $15.35 a share, that were paid to Robert J. Pollock for two consecutive quarters for service to the Board of Directors, January 2007 through May 2007.

Note H - Fair Value Measurements

The Company has determined the fair value of certain assets through application of SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements".

Fair value of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at March 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

Gains and losses included in earning for the periods reported in investment income as follows:

Financial assets and liabilities valued using level 1 inputs are based on unadjusted quoted market prices within active market.

Note I - Stock Options

On November 5, 2007, the Board of Directors granted stock options to the Company President and Chief Executive Officer totaling 75,000 shares. 25,000 of the stock options were vested immediately and 25,000 additional options vest on each of the 1^st and 2^nd anniversary of the grant date. The Company is recognizing $29,157 quarterly, a total of $116,628 expense for the year, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model for the 25,000 shares that vested on November 5, 2008.

We are also in the process of making capital investments to improve our infrastructure including upgrading our distribution system through replacement of distribution mains and customer service lines. The Company has designated seven miles of bare steel pipe and 400 bare steel services for replacement during the calendar year of 2009 in addition to replacing and/or upgrading portions of two major supply pipelines. Additionally the Company will continue on its goal to end the calendar year with 10 or less repairable leaks remaining on our books.

Our key performance indicators are net income, stockholders' equity and the safety of our system. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 net income was slightly lower than the same period in 2008, primarily because of a loss on our investment account partly offset by a decrease in interest expense. Higher earnings for the six month period in 2009 were primarily the result of a rate increase that went in to effect December 17, 2007. As a regulated utility company, stockholders' equity is an important performance indicator. The New York Public Service Commission ("NYPSC") allows us to earn a just and reasonable return on stockholders' equity. Stockholders' equity is therefore a precursor of future earnings potential. For the 2009 fiscal year to date, stockholders' equity increased by $868,908 due to an increase in retained earnings. We currently plan to continue our focus on building stockholders' equity. Safety and efficiency indicators include leak repair, main and service replacements and customer service metrics. With regards to the safety indicators that are tracked in 2009 the Company continued its effort to improve the gas system. For the second fiscal quarter of 2009 we repaired 14 leaks, replaced 114 bare steel services and replaced 2,073 feet of bare steel main.

Utility operating revenue increased $169,138 in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period last year and $1,514,395 in the six months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the prior year, again due to our rate increase approved by the NYPSC, that went into effect in December 2007, and higher gas cost.

Margin percentage increased 0.07% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the same period last year primarily because of local production revenues. Our margin percentage decreased 1.54% for the six months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2008 mainly due to higher storage gas withdrawal cost and volumes.

Net income decreased slightly to $813,514 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $838,520 for the same period last year mainly due to a loss of $199,383 on realized gains (losses) plus interest and dividend income earned on investments compared to a gain of $27,595 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, offset in part by a decrease in interest expense of$143,118 for the same period. Earnings increased $84,713 for the six months ended March 31, 2009 over the six months ended March 31, 2008. We believe the increase is primarily attributable to our rate increase, approved by the NYPSC, which went into effect in December 2007.

Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation and amortization; gain on sale of securities and deferred income taxes. Over or under recovered gas costs significantly impact cash flow. In addition, there are significant year-to-year changes in regulatory assets that impact cash flow.

Capital expenditures are the principal use of internally generated cash flow. Capital expenditures have historically exceeded $1.0 million annually and have increased significantly due to an infrastructure investment mandate in our December 2007 rate order. In the first six months of fiscal year 2009 alone we have invested $2.6 million to improve our infrastructure, including upgrading our distribution system through replacing mains and customer service lines as well as two major expansion projects.

We have $10.2 million in long term debt outstanding. We repaid $324,525 in the first six months of 2009 consistent with the requirements of our debt instruments and refinancing activities. On May 7, 2008, we entered into a credit agreement with M & T Bank to provide for a $6.0 million note for the purpose of retiring a $3.1 million first mortgage and an unsecured senior note in the amount of $1.5 million. The remaining proceeds were used to fund construction projects related to furnishing natural gas within the Company's service area. This note was converted to a long term loan on October 16, 2008, with an interest rate of 5.96%. Great West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, the holder of the Company's $4.7 million 7.9% Senior Notes dated as of September 1, 1997, believes that the refinancing with M&T Bank may breach the negative covenants contained in the 1997 note agreement. As a result, Great West claims that the note holders are entitled to share in the security interest the Company has granted to M&T Bank. Great West is currently in discussion with the Company.

During the first half of 2009 we mainly withdrew gas from storage and by March 31, 2009, had a balance of $1,003,606 worth of gas in storage. We have entered into an asset management arrangement effective July 1, 2008, with Atmos Energy Marketing, LLC and we anticipate that we will have sufficient gas to supply our customers for the current year.

We have no off balance sheet arrangements.

In September 2008, we refinanced a line of credit and a term loan with banks in order to increase our credit limit and decrease interest expense. The limit on the line of credit was increased from $7.0 million to $8.0 million. The interest rate on the line of credit is 30 days LIBOR plus 1.35 basis points. The interest rate on this loan will be adjusted monthly and was 1.85% at March 31, 2009. We believe we are in compliance with the financial covenants in these debt instruments as of March 31, 2009.

In October 2008, we obtained $1.0 million of financing in a form of Demand Note from M&T Bank to help with the cost of our new construction. Interest on this loan is payable on the monthly basis at the rate equal to 1% above the prime rate. The initial interest rate on this loan was 5.5% and was 4.25% as of March 31, 2009.

Energy Efficiency

On June 23, 2008, the NYPSC　issued an order in Case 07-M-0548 Proceeding on Motion of the Commission Regarding an Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard ("EEPS"). In that order, as amended on July 3, 2008, the NYPSC determined that a Gas System Benefits Charge ("GSBC") should be established for New York gas utilities that have 14,000 customers or more. As such, Corning was required to establish a GSBC effective October 1, 2008 and collect from its customers $148,647 annually until December 31, 2011. One quarter of the annual amount was collected from October to December of 2008. These funds will be used for NYPSC approved energy efficiency initiatives in the Corning franchise area. Once the NYPSC approves the Company's plan, the funds collected will be disbursed and reconciled to energy efficiency expenditures annually. Any over or under collection will be included in the GSBC rate determination for the following year. The additional revenues collected through the GSBC will not impact income from operations. The Company's plan was approved in Case 08-G-1010 dated April 7, 2009.

On August 22, 2008, in Case 06-G-0064 the NYPSC denied our request filed on January 12, 2007 for deferral of interest cost in excess of the amount allowed in rates for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. The deferral request was $573,183. The Company on September 14, 2008 petitioned for re-hearing of the Commission decision in Case 06-G-0064 on the grounds that the Commission erred in its conclusion the interest expense was neither incremental nor extraordinary and therefore did not qualify for deferral and recovery under current Commission guidelines. Action by the Commission on the Company's re-hearing request is still pending and is unknown at this time.

The Virgil Town Board granted the Company a franchise to provide natural gas service to the town of Virgil, New York on March 12, 2009.　　The Town of Virgil is the home of a ski resort/recreation complex.　　The Company has a contract to provide gas transportation to the complex.　 The Company filed Case 09-G-0252, a petition seeking approval of the Virgil Franchise, with the NYPSC on March 20, 2009. That petition is currently pending.

On March 13, 2009, the NYPSC in Case 07-G-0772 lifted the prohibition on the payment of dividends on the Company's common stock. The Company has declared a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share, and paid the first quarter on April 15, 2009, to shareholders of record as of March 31, 2009.

Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. It is increasingly important to understand that the application of generally accepted accounting principles involve certain assumptions, judgments and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Thus, the application of these principles can result in varying results from company to company. The most significant principles that impact us are discussed below.

We record revenues from residential and commercial customers based on meters read on a cycle basis throughout each month, while certain large industrial and utility customers' meters are read at the end of each month. We do not accrue revenue for gas delivered but not yet billed. We do not currently anticipate adopting unbilled revenue recognition and we do not believe it would have a material impact on our financial results. Our tariffs contain mechanisms that provide for the recovery of the cost of gas applicable to firm customers, which includes estimates. Under these mechanisms, we periodically adjust our rates to reflect increases and decreases in the cost of gas. Annually, we reconcile the difference between the total gas costs collected from customers and the cost of gas. We defer any excess or deficiency and subsequently either recover it from, or refund it to, customers over the following twelve-month period. To the extent estimates are inaccurate; a regulatory asset on the balance sheet is increased or decreased.

All of our business is subject to regulation. Our regulated utility records the results of its regulated activities in accordance with SFAS No.71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation", which results in differences in the application of generally accepted accounting principles between regulated and non-regulated businesses. SFAS No. 71 requires the recording of regulatory assets and liabilities for certain transactions that would have been treated as revenue and expense in non-regulated businesses. In certain circumstances, SFAS No. 71 allows entities whose rates are determined by third-party regulators to defer costs as "regulatory" assets in the balance sheet to the extent that the entity expects to recover these costs in future rates. Management believes that currently available facts support the continued application of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory assets and liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the regulatory environment.

The amounts reported in our financial statements related to pension and other post-retirement benefits are determined on an actuarial basis, therefore certain assumptions are required to calculate those amounts. These assumptions include the discount rate, the expected return on plan assets, the rate of compensation increase and, for other post-retirement benefits, the expected annual rate of increase in per capita cost of covered medical and prescription benefits. Changes in actuarial assumptions and actuarial experience could have a material impact on the amount of pension and post-retirement benefit costs and funding requirements. However, we expect to recover our entire net periodic pension and other post-retirement benefit costs attributed to employees in our utility segment in accordance with the applicable NYPSC authorization. For financial reporting purposes, the difference between the amounts of such costs as determined under applicable accounting principles is recorded as either a regulatory asset or liability.

This report contains statements which, to the extent they are not recitations of historical facts, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act). In this respect, the words "estimate", "project", "anticipate", "expect", "intend", "believe" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All such forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Reform Act. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be achieved. As forward looking statements, these statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expected results. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements. Factors that could cause results to differ materially from our management's expectations include, but are not limited to, those listed under Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of our Form 10-K, in addition to:

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of March 2009, the Company's management, with the participation of the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon the Company's evaluation, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of March 31, 2009.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that was conducted during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company's management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We did not become a party to or settle any legal proceedings in the quarter ended March 31, 2009.

Please refer to the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 for disclosure relating to certain risk factors applicable to the Company. The Company has no material changes to the risk factor disclosure contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008.

None

None

None

None

10.1* Atmos agreement

10.2* First Amendment to Employment Agreement between Michael I. German and the Company dated

December 31, 2008

10.3* Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Plan

31.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and President pursuant to 17 CFR Section 240.13a-14

31.2* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer pursuant to 17 CFR Section 240.13a-14

32.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

____________

* Filed or furnished herewith

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CORNING NATURAL GAS CORPORATION

Date: May 12, 2009 ________________________________________

Date: May 12, 2009 ________________________________________