UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q/A

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017  

OR

For the transition period from                to               

Commission File Number: 001-32401

 

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

(708) 430-7500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, no par, outstanding at February 20, 2018 was 16,662,386

 

 

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FORM 10-Q INDEX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

1

---

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Manitex International, Inc. (the “Company”) is filing this amendment (this “Amendment” or “Form 10-Q/A”) to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2017, which was originally filed on August 3, 2017 (the “Original Form 10-Q” or the “Original Filing”). This Amendment includes restated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

The corrections contained in these restated financial statements, which we refer to herein as the “Restatement,” were prepared following an independent review by the Audit Committee (the “Audit Committee”) of the Company’s Board of Directors into certain accounting matters, which is further described herein.

Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment does not reflect events occurring after the date of the Original Filing and does not modify or update disclosures contained in the Original Filing.  Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Filing and with our filings with the SEC made subsequent to the Original Filing.

Background

As previously described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2017, in 2016 the Company sold 39 cranes for total sales revenues of approximately $15 million to a single broker customer in a series of transactions (the “Transactions”) that were each structured as a customary “bill and hold” arrangement. The revenue for the Transactions was originally recognized in 2016. Ten of these units that were sold for an aggregate value of approximately $3 million were returned during 2016 (and were subsequently sold to other customers), such that for 2016, a net of 29 cranes were sold for approximately $12 million. In addition, the Company made various payments to the broker and its wholly-owned subsidiary that were expensed in 2016 and 2017. Furthermore, the debt taken on by the broker customer to purchase the cranes was effectively guaranteed by the Company pursuant to certain related agreements. In connection with its review of its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company became aware that the prior accounting treatment for the Transactions was not correct. Specifically, the Company has concluded that the relationship with the Broker and its wholly-owned subsidiary qualified as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and should therefore have resulted in a different accounting treatment resulting in the debt of the VIE being reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company has concluded that the revenue recognition criteria for 2016 sales were not met and payments to the Broker were not expenses of the Company. In addition, disclosures were incomplete.

In connection with the foregoing matters, on November 2, 2017, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, in consultation with the Company’s management and UHY LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, determined that the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2016, year ended December 31, 2016 and quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2017 included in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for such periods and together with all three, six and nine-month financial information contained therein (collectively, the “Non-Reliance Periods”) can no longer be relied upon.

Description of the Restatement related to SVW

The following describes the impact of corrections that affect the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.  Information concerning the impact of these corrections on the Company’s results for the year ended December 31, 2016 is discussed in the Company’s amended Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Effect of Recording SVW Debt

As disclosed in Note 13, SVW has five notes outstanding with five financial institutions, each of which was effectively guaranteed by the Company. At June 30, 2017 the value of these notes totaled $9.5 million, net of debt issuance costs of $.3 million. Given SVW’s treatment as a VIE, and the fact that the Company effectively guaranteed it, this debt has been consolidated into the restated financial statement.

Effect of Recording Sales to Third Party

Recognizing sales when SVW related inventory was sold to third parties.

2

---

Effect of Recording Crane Rentals

Income on the rental of SVW related inventory to third parties has been recorded as revenues for the corresponding periods.

Effect of Treating Funds Sent to SVW’s Wholly-Owned Subsidiary as Advances

During the three months ended June 30, 2017 there were no payments that the Company had originally classified as expenses paid to SVW’s wholly-owned subsidiary.  Given SVW’s treatment as a VIE prior payments have been reclassified as intercompany advances.

Recording of Payments Made by SVW to Lenders

The balance sheet table in Note 2, Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements, shows the impact of payments made in connection with the aforementioned SVW debt.

Cumulative Income Tax Effect

This includes the impact on the income taxes for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the discontinued operations and SVW restatements discussed above.

Description of the Restatement not related to SVW

Other

The Company disclosed a partial residual value guarantee to support a customer’s financing of equipment purchased from the Company that was previously not disclosed (see Note 15). A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future date if certain conditions are met by the customer. The Company has issued partial residual guarantees that have maximum exposure of approximately $1.6 million.  The Company, however, does not have any reason to believe that any exposure from such a guarantee is either probable or estimable at this time, as such, no liability has been recorded. The Company’s liability from its guarantees may be affected by economic conditions in used equipment markets at the time of loss.

This also includes minor rounding and reclassification adjustments not included in previous categories.

Effect of Reclassifying ASV to Discontinued Operations

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company owned a 51% interest in ASV Holdings, Ins., which was formerly known as A.S.V., LLC (“ASV Holdings”).  On May 11, 2017, in anticipation of an initial public offering, ASV Holdings converted from an LLC to a C-Corporation and the Company’s 51% interest was converted to 4,080,000 common shares of ASV Holdings.  On May 17, 2017, in connection within its initial public offering, ASV Holdings sold 1,800,000 of its own shares and the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of ASV Holdings common stock.  The Company held a 21.2% interest in ASV Holdings, but no longer has a controlling interest in ASV Holdings.  ASV Holdings was deconsolidated during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and is recorded as an equity investment starting with quarter ended June 30, 2017.  Since this 10-Q/A is being filed after the above described events, prior period financial statements included in this 10-Q/A have been restated to reflect ASV Holdings as a discontinued operation.

Additional entries not related to SVW

Adjustments were made to: reverse a sale transaction, adjust a deferred gain, increase an inventory reserve and to record additional rent expense and other corrections and reclassifications. These adjustments were identified in prior periods but were immaterial for recording at that time. As the Company has identified the restatement adjustments for recording in prior periods, management made the determination that it would also record these previously passed adjustments as part of the restatement of the financial statements.

See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements which details the impact of the restatement on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2017 and the Consolidated Statement of Operations, and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

3

---

Internal Control and Disclosure Controls Considerations

Our Chief Executive Officer has determined that there were deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that constitute material weaknesses, as defined by SEC regulations, at June 30, 2017, with respect to procedures for:

Accordingly, our Chief Executive Officer has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by SEC regulations, were not effective at June 30, 2017, as discussed in Part I, Item 4 of this Form 10-Q/A.

 

4

---

PART 1—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1—Financial Statements

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

5

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

6

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

7

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

8

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

1. Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2017 and the related Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (as restated) and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (restated) have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, except for the effects of the restatement described in Note 2 below) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the interim periods.  Interim results may not be indicative of results to be realized for the entire year.  The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 (as restated).  The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016 (as restated) was derived from our audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).  Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial statement presentation.  

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Manitex International, Inc. and subsidiaries in which it has a greater than 50% voting interest (collectively, the “Company”).  All significant intercompany accounts, profits and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  

The Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions and operates as a single business segment.  Operating activities are conducted through the following wholly-owned subsidiaries: Manitex, Inc. (“Manitex”), Badger Equipment Company (“Badger”), PM Group S.pA. and Subsidiaries (“PM Group”), Manitex Valla S.r.l (“Valla”), Sabre Manufacturing, LLC (“Sabre”), Crane and Machinery, Inc. (“C&M”), and Crane and Machinery Leasing, Inc. (“C&M Leasing”).  The operations of SVW Crane & Equipment Company together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Rental Consulting Service Company (collectively “SVW”), has been determined to be a variable interest entity (“VIE”) that needs to be consolidated with the Company’s financial results.

 

Consolidated Variable Interest Entity

Even though it has no ownership interest in SVW Crane & Equipment Company (together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Rental Consulting Service Company, “SVW”), the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact SVW’s economic performance. Additionally, the Company was the primary beneficiary of the SVW relationship. SVW obtained third party financing, which was effectively guaranteed by the Company, on specific cranes the Company manufactured and remitted the loan proceeds to the Company. Other than its business transactions described herein, SVW had no other substantial business operations. The Company has determined that SVW is a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) that under current accounting guidance needs to consolidate in the Company’s financial results.

Non-Cash Transactions

 

Supplemental and non-cash transactions information for the periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

 

 

9

---

Discontinued Operations

ASV

ASV is located in Grand Rapids, Minnesota and manufactures a line of high quality compact track and skid steer loaders. The products are used in site clearing, general construction, forestry, golf course maintenance and landscaping industries, with general construction being the largest.  

Prior to the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company owned a 51% interest in ASV Holdings, Inc., which was formerly known as A.S.V., LLC (“ASV Holdings”).  On May 11, 2017, in anticipation of an initial public offering, ASV Holdings converted from an LLC to a C-Corporation and the Company’s 51% interest was converted to 4,080,000 common shares of ASV Holdings.  On May 17, 2017, in connection within its initial public offering, ASV Holdings sold 1,800,000 of its own shares and the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of ASV Holdings common stock.  As of June 30, 2017, the Company held a 21.2% interest in ASV Holdings, but no longer has a controlling interest in ASV holdings.  ASV Holdings was deconsolidated during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and is recorded as an equity investment starting with quarter ended June 30, 2017.  Periods ending before June 30, 2017 reflected ASV as discontinued operations. Subsequent to June 30, 2017, the Company sold additional shares in ASV. See Note 18, Discontinued Operations, for additional discussion of the accounting treatment of the Company’s investment in ASV after the sale of the additional shares.

Sales of Subsidiaries

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company sold two of its wholly owned subsidiaries: CVS Ferrari, S.r.L (“CVS”) and Manitex Liftking ULC (“Manitex Liftking” or “Liftking”).  CVS was sold on December 22, 2016 and Liftking was sold on September 30, 2016, and each are presented as a discontinued operation.  

Change in Reporting Segments

In the 10-Q for quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 filed on May 4, 2017, the Company previously reported its operations in three segments: the Lifting Equipment segment, the ASV segment and the Equipment Distribution segment.  Since 2015, the Company has sought to redefine itself strategically and operationally, including through a series of divestitures.  As stated above, ASV Holdings is reported as a discontinued operation and as such is no longer a reporting segment.

 

C&M and C&M Leasing’s primary business is facilitation of sale of products manufactured by the Company.  Further, the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) reviewed C&M and C&M Leasing operations only to determine their impact on the entire Company. As such, the Company has now concluded it is not appropriate to reflect C&M and C&M Leasing as a separate reportable segment and, therefore, operates in a single business segment.

 

 

Note 2. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements

The Company has restated its quarterly Consolidated Statements of Operations, Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and the Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.  In addition, the Company has restated the Balance Sheets for the periods ended June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Background

As previously described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2017, in 2016 the Company sold 39 cranes for total sales revenues of approximately $15 million to a single broker customer in a series of transactions (the “Transactions”) that were each structured as a customary “bill and hold” arrangement. The revenue for the Transactions was originally recognized in 2016. Ten of these units that were sold for an aggregate value of approximately $3 million were returned during 2016 (and were subsequently sold to other customers), such that for 2016, a net of 29 cranes were sold for approximately $12 million. In addition, the Company made various payments that were expensed in 2016 and 2017 to the broker and its wholly-owned subsidiary. Furthermore, the debt taken on by the Broker customer to purchase the cranes was affectively guaranteed by the Company pursuant to certain related agreements. In connection with its review of its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company became aware that the prior accounting treatment for the transactions was not correct. Specifically, the Company has concluded that the relationship with the Broker and its wholly-owned subsidiary qualified as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and should therefore have resulted in a different accounting treatment. The Company has concluded that the revenue recognition criteria for 2016 sales were not met and payments to the Broker were not expenses of the Company.  In addition, disclosures were incomplete.  

10

---

Description of the Restatement related to SVW

The following describes the impact of corrections that affect the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.  Information concerning 2016 impact is discussed in the Company’s amended 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Effect of Recording SVW Debt

As disclosed in Note 13, SVW has five notes outstanding with five financial institutions, each of which was effectively guaranteed by the Company. At June 30, 2017 the value of these notes totaled $9.5 million, net of debt issuance costs of $.3 million. Given SVW’s treatment as a VIE, and the fact that the Company effectively guaranteed it, this debt has been consolidated into the restated financial statement (column D).

Effect of Recording Sales to Third Party

Recognizing sales when SVW related inventory was sold to third parties.

(Balance Sheet – Column C, Statement of Operations – Column M)

Effect of Recording Crane Rentals

Income on the rental of SVW related inventory to third parties has been recorded as revenues for the corresponding.

(Balance Sheet – Column H, Statement of Operations – Column Q)

Effect of Treating Funds Sent to SVW’s Wholly-Owned Subsidiary as Advances

During the three months ended June 30, 2017 there were no payments that the Company had originally classified as expenses paid to SVW’s wholly-owned subsidiary.  Given SVW’s treatment as a VIE these payments have been reclassified as intercompany advances.  (Balance Sheet – Column E, Statement of Operations – Column N)

Recording of Payments Made by SVW to Lenders

This includes the impact of payments made in connection with the aforementioned SVW debt. (Balance Sheet – Column F, Statement of Operations – Column O)

Cumulative Income Tax Effect

This includes the impact on the income taxes for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the discontinued operations and SVW restatements discussed above. (Balance Sheet – Column G, Statement of Operations – Column P)

Description of the Restatement not related to SVW

Other

The Company disclosed a partial residual value guarantee to support a customer’s financing of equipment purchased from the Company that was previously not disclosed (see Note 15). A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future date if certain conditions are met by the customer. The Company has issued partial residual guarantees that have maximum exposure of approximately $1.6 million.  The Company, however, does not have any reason to believe that any exposure from such a guarantee is either probable or estimable at this time, as such, no liability has been recorded. The Company’s liability from its guarantees may be affected by economic conditions in used equipment markets at the time of loss.

This includes minor rounding and reclassification adjustments not included in previous categories.

(Balance Sheet – Column I, Statement of Operations – Column S)

 

11

---

Effect of Reclassifying ASV to Discontinued Operations

 

During the three and six month period ended June 30, 2016, the Company owned a 51% interest in ASV Holdings, Ins., which was formerly known as A.S.V., LLC (“ASV Holdings”).  On May 11, 2017, in anticipation of an initial public offering, ASV Holdings converted from an LLC to a C-Corporation and the Company’s 51% interest was converted to 4,080,000 common shares of ASV Holdings.  On May 17, 2017, in connection within its initial public offering, ASV Holdings sold 1,800,000 of its own shares and the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of ASV Holdings common stock.  The Company held a 21.2% interest in ASV Holdings, but no longer has a controlling interest in ASV holdings.  ASV Holdings was deconsolidated during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and is recorded as an equity investment starting with quarter ended June 30, 2017.  Since this 10-Q/A is being filed after the above described events, prior period financial statements included in this 10-Q/A have been restated to reflect ASV Holdings as a discontinued operation.

Additional entries not related to SVW

 

Adjustments were made to:  reverse a sale transaction, adjust a deferred gain, increase an inventory reserve and to record additional rent expense and other corrections and reclassifications not related to SVW. These adjustments were identified in prior periods but were immaterial for recording at that time. As the Company has identified the restatement adjustments for recording in prior periods, management made the determination that it would also record these previously passed adjustments as part of the restatement of the financial statements. (Balance Sheet – Column J, Statement of Operations – Column R, Statement of Cash Flows – Column X)

See the Company’s Amended Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the table that shows the impact that the restatement had on the Company’s Balance Sheet for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The following tables reflect adjustments (restatements) to correct errors identified in connection with the Company’s review of its financial results for the quarters ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

 

12

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2017

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

13

---

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

14

---

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

15

---

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

16

---

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(unaudited)

 

 

17

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

18

---

 

19

---

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2016

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

 

20

---

 

3. Significant Accounting Policies

Principals of Consolidation

The Company consolidates all entities that we control by ownership of a majority voting interest. Additionally, there are situations in which consolidation is required even though the usual condition of consolidation (ownership of a majority voting interest) does not apply. Generally, this occurs when an entity holds an interest in another business enterprise that was achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests, which results in a disproportionate relationship between such entity's voting interests in, and its exposure to the economic risks and potential rewards of, the other business enterprise. This disproportionate relationship results in what is known as a variable interest, and the entity in which we have this interest is referred to as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”).  An enterprise must consolidate a VIE if it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary has both (1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Although the Company does not have an ownership interest in S.V.W. Equipment & Crane Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Rental Consulting Services Corporation (collectively “SVW”), the Company has the power to direct the activities of SVW that most significantly impact its economic performance and is absorbing the losses.  As such, the Company has determined that SVW is a VIE that requires consolidation.  SVW has obtained financing and has remitted the proceeds to the Company using inventory (cranes) owned by the Company as collateral.  The finance companies that hold the loans have a perfected security interest in the inventory and therefore have recourse against this specific inventory. Furthermore, the debt taken on by the SVW was effectively guaranteed by the Company pursuant to certain related agreements.

The Company eliminates from the Company’s financial results all significant intercompany transactions, including the intercompany transactions with consolidated VIEs.  

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts the Company’s customers are invoiced and do not bear interest. Accounts receivable is reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The Company’s estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts related to trade receivables includes evaluation of specific accounts where the Company has information that the customer may have an inability to meet its financial obligations. The Company had allowances for doubtful accounts of $63 and $7 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

Guarantees

 

The Company has issued residual guarantees to financial institutions related to a customer financing of equipment purchased by the customer.  The Company must assess the probability of losses if the fair market value is less than the guaranteed residual value.

 

21

---

The Company has issued residual guarantees that have maximum exposure of approximately $1.6 million.  The Company, however, does not have any reason to believe that any exposure from such a guarantee is either probable or estimable at this time, as such, no liability has been recorded. The Company’s ability to recover any losses incurred under the guarantees may be affected by economic conditions in used equipment markets at the time of loss.

 

The Company records a liability for the estimated fair value of guarantees issued pursuant to ASC 460.  The Company recognizes a loss under a guarantee when its obligation to make payment under the guarantee is probable and the amount of the loss can be estimated. 

Inventory Valuation

Inventory consists of stock materials and equipment stated at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or net realizable value. All equipment classified as inventory is available for sale. The Company records excess and obsolete inventory reserves. The estimated reserve is based upon specific identification of excess or obsolete inventories. Selling, general and administrative expenses are expensed as incurred and are not capitalized as a component of inventory.

Accrued Warranties

Warranty costs are accrued at the time revenue is recognized. The Company’s products are typically sold with a warranty covering defects that arise during a fixed period of time. The specific warranty offered is a function of customer expectations and competitive forces. The Equipment Distribution segment does not accrue for warranty costs at the time of sales, as they are reimbursed by the manufacturers for any warranty that they provide to their customers.

A liability for estimated warranty claims is accrued at the time of sale. The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience. Historical warranty experience is, however, reviewed by management. The current provision may be adjusted to take into account unusual or non-recurring events in the past or anticipated changes in future warranty claims. Adjustments to the initial warranty accrual are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Warranty reserves are reviewed to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue and related costs are recognized when title passes and risk of loss passes to our customers which generally occurs upon shipment depending upon the terms of the contract.  Under certain contracts with our customers title passes to the customers when the units are completed. The units are segregated from our inventory and identified as belonging to the customer, the customer is notified that the units are complete and awaiting pick up or delivery as specified by the customer before income is recognized. Additionally, the customer is requested to sign an “Invoice Authorization Form” which acknowledges the contract terms and acknowledges that the customer has economic ownership and control over the unit. It also acknowledges that we are going to invoice the unit per terms of the contract. The Company insures any custodial risk that it may retain.

For FOB contracts, customers may be invoiced prior to the time customers take physical possession. Revenue is recognized in such cases only when the customer has a fixed commitment to purchase the units, the units have been completed, tested and made available to the customer for pickup or delivery, and the customer has authorized in writing that we hold the units for pickup or delivery at a time specified by the customer. In such cases, the units are invoiced under our customary billing terms, title to the units and risks of ownership pass to the customer upon invoicing, the units are segregated from our inventory and identified as belonging to the customer and we have no further obligations under the order. The Company insures any custodial risk that it may retain.

In addition, our policy requires in all instances certain minimum criteria be met in order to recognize revenue, specifically:

22

---

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The Company enters into derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate risk related to certain foreign term loans. Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date the contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at the end of each reporting period. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in current earnings immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging instrument, in which case the effective portion of the gain or loss is recognized and is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedging instrument affects earnings (date of sale). The Company’s interest rate swap contracts are held by the PM Group and are intended to manage the exposure to interest rate risk related to certain term loans that PM Group has with certain financial institutions in Italy. These contracts have been determined not to be hedge instruments under ASC 815-10.

 

Litigation Claims

In determining whether liabilities should be recorded for pending litigation claims, the Company must assess the allegations and the likelihood that it will successfully defend itself. When the Company believes it is probable that it will not prevail in a particular matter, it will then make an estimate of the amount of liability based, in part, on the advice of legal counsel.

Income Taxes

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of U.S. and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments as necessary. The effective tax rate is based upon the Company’s anticipated earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions.

 

Accounting for Equity Investments

The Company is accounting for its 21.2% investment in ASV Holdings under the equity method of accounting.  Under the equity method, the Company’s share of the net income (loss) of ASV Holdings is recognized as income (loss) in the Company’s statement of operations and added to the investment account, and dividends received from ASV Holdings are treated as a reduction of the investment account.  ASV Holdings’ earnings are recorded on a one quarter lag as ASV Holdings may not report earnings in time to be included in the Company’s financial statements for any given reporting period.  

On May 17, 2017, the Company’s investment in ASV Holdings exceeded the proportional share of ASV Holdings’ net assets. Under current applicable guidance, assets and liabilities of the investee (ASV Holdings) are valued at fair market value on the date of the investment.   The Company investment, however, is not adjusted for the difference between the Company’s proportional share of the net assets and the fair value of the assets that existed on the date that the investment was made.   The differences are accounted for on a memo basis.  The differences can be either of temporary nature or permanent differences.  Adjustment to inventory and identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are temporary differences.  Fair market adjustments to land and goodwill are examples of permanent differences.  Differences related to temporary items are amortized over their lives.  Earnings recognized are the proportional share of investee’s income for the period adjusted for reversal of any timing differences or additional amortization related to the memo fair market adjustments of identifiable intangible assets that have finite lives.  

Comprehensive Income

Reporting “Comprehensive Income” requires reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income includes, in addition to net earnings, other items that are reported as direct adjustments to stockholder’s equity. Currently, the comprehensive income adjustment required for the Company consists of a foreign currency translation adjustment, which is the result of consolidating its foreign subsidiaries.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period consolidated financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.

  

 

23

---

4. Financial Instruments—Forward Currency Exchange Contracts and Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by ASC 820-10, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is summary of items that the Company measures at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820-10 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

 

Fair value of the forward currency contracts are determined on the last day of each reporting period using observable inputs, which are supplied to the Company by the foreign currency trading operation of its bank and are Level 2 items.

 

 

5. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company’s risk management objective is to use the most efficient and effective methods available to us to minimize, eliminate, reduce or transfer the risks which are associated with fluctuation of exchange rates between the Euro, Chilean Peso and the U.S. dollar.

24

---

Forward Currency Contracts

When the Company receives a significant order in a currency other than the operating unit’s functional currency, management may evaluate different options that are available to mitigate future currency exchange risks. The decision to hedge future sales is not automatic and is decided case by case. The Company only uses hedge instruments to hedge firm existing sales orders and not estimated exposure, when management determines that exchange risks exceed desired risk tolerance levels. The forward currency contracts used to hedge future sales are designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815-10 provided certain criteria are met.   For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (date of sale). Gains or losses on cash flow hedges when recognized into income are included in net revenues. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. The Company expects minimal ineffectiveness as the Company has hedged only firm sales orders and has not hedged estimated exposures.  As of June 30, 2017, the Company had no outstanding forward currency contracts that were in place to hedge future sales. Therefore, there are currently no unrealized pre-tax gains or losses which will reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings during the next 12 months.  

At times, the Company enters into forward currency exchange contracts in relationship such that the exchange gains and losses on the assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the reporting units’ functional currency would be offset by the changes in the market value of the forward currency exchange contracts it holds. The forward currency exchange contracts that the Company has to offset existing assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the reporting units’ functional currency have been determined not to be considered a hedge under ASC 815-10. The Company records at the balance sheet date the forward currency exchange contracts at its market value with any associated gain or loss being recorded in current earnings. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses related to forward currency contracts are included in current earnings and are reflected in the Statement of Income in the other income (expense) section on the line titled foreign currency transaction gains (losses). Items denominated in a currency other than a reporting unit functional currency include certain intercompany receivables due from the Company’s Italian subsidiaries and accounts receivable and accounts payable of our Italian subsidiaries and their subsidiaries

PM Group has an intercompany receivable denominated in Euros from its Chilean subsidiary.  At June 30, 2017, the Company had entered into a forward currency exchange contract that matures on August 2, 2017.  Under the contract the Company is obligated to sell 1,500,000 Chilean pesos for 2,084 euros. The purpose of the forward contract is to mitigate the income effect related to this intercompany receivable that results with a change in exchange rate between the Euro and the Chilean peso.

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

A contract was signed by PM Group, for an original notional amount of € 482 (€ 516 at June 30, 2017), maturing on October 1, 2020 with interest paid monthly.   PM pays interest at a rate of 3.90% and receives from the counterparties interest at the “Euribor” rate for the period in question if greater than 0.90%.    

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had the following forward currency contracts and interest rate swaps:

 

 

The following table provides the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments that are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

25

---

Total derivatives NOT designated as a hedge instrument

 

 

The following tables provide the effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

The counterparty to each of the currency exchange forward contracts is a major financial institution with credit ratings of investment grade or better and no collateral is required. Management continues to monitor counterparty risk and believes the risk of incurring losses on derivative contracts related to credit risk is unlikely.

 

 

26

---

6. Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of convertible debt and restricted stock units. Details of the calculations are as follows:

 

 

 

There are 194,350 and 230,374 restricted stock units which are anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the average number of diluted shares shown above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.   There are 267,276 and 268,048 restricted stock units which are anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the average number of diluted shares shown above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

27

---

7. Equity

Stock issued to employees and Directors

The Company issued shares of common stock to employees and Directors as restricted stock units issued under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan vested. Upon issuance entries were recorded to increase common stock and decrease paid in capital for the amounts shown below. The following is a summary of stock issuances that occurred during the period:

 

 

On June 1, 2017, the Company paid a portion of employees’ bonuses in stock. This resulted in an issuance of 4,493 shares with an aggregate value of $32.

Stock Repurchase

The Company purchases shares of Common Stock from certain employees at the closing share price on the date of purchase. The stock is purchased from the employees to satisfy employees’ withholding tax obligations related to stock issuances described above.    The below table summarized shares repurchased from employees during the current year through June 30, 2017:

 

 

Equity was decreased by $129, the aggregated value of the shares reflected in the table above.

2004 Equity Incentive Plan

In 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and subsequently amended and restated the plan on September 13, 2007, May 28, 2009, June 5, 2013 and June 2, 2016. The maximum number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan is 1,329,364 shares. The total number of shares reserved for issuance however, can be adjusted to reflect certain corporate transactions or changes in the Company’s capital structure. The Company’s employees and members of the board of directors who are not our employees or employees of our affiliates are eligible to participate in the plan. The plan is administered by a committee of the board comprised of members who are outside directors. The plan provides that the committee has the authority to, among other things, select plan participants, determine the type and amount of awards, determine award terms, fix all other conditions of any awards, interpret the plan and any plan awards. Under the plan, the committee can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, except Directors may not be granted stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance units. During any calendar year, participants are limited in the number of grants they may receive under the plan. In any year, an individual may not receive options for more than 15,000 shares, stock appreciation rights with respect to more than 20,000 shares, more than 20,000 shares of restricted stock and/or an award for more than 10,000 performance shares or restricted stock units or performance units. The plan requires that the exercise price for stock options and stock appreciation rights be not less than fair market value of the Company’s common stock on date of grant.

Restricted stock units are subject to the same conditions as the restricted stock awards except the restricted stock units will not have voting rights and the common stock will not be issued until the vesting criteria are satisfied.

28

---

The following table contains information regarding restricted stock units:

 

 

The value of the restricted stock is being charged to compensation expense over the vesting period. Compensation expense includes expense related to restricted stock units of $96 and $280 for the three and $357 and $565 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  Additional compensation expense related to restricted stock units will be $325, $407 and $156 for the remainder of 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

At the Market Program

On January 23, 2017, Manitex International Inc. entered into a Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement (“Sales Agreement”) with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (“Cantor”) pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock, no par value per share, having an aggregate offering price up to $20,000 through Cantor.  The Company thought it prudent to put a mechanism in place by which supplemental liquidity can be provided to address working capital requirements or other capital requirements that may arise in conjunction with production requirements.  Under the program, the Company’s stock is issued at the current market price and the Company pays a 7% commission to Cantor.

The following table contains information regarding stock issued under the program:

 

 

 

8. New Accounting Pronouncements

 

Recently Issued Pronouncements – Not Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, if any. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2020, with early adoption permitted in 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

 

29

---

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date”, which amends ASU 2014-09.  As a result, the effective date is the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value and options that currently exist for market value be eliminated. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things, require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” (“ASU 2016-05”). ASU 2016-05 provides guidance clarifying that novation of a derivative contract (i.e. a change in counterparty) in a hedge accounting relationship does not, in and of itself, require designation of that hedge accounting relationship. The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” (“ASU 2016-06”). ASU 2016-06 simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call or put options by clarifying that an exercise contingency does not need to be evaluated to determine whether it relates to interest rates and credit risk in an embedded derivative analysis. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 further clarifies principal and agent relationships within ASU 2014-09. Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 is intended to simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment awards. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted the guidance for the year ended December 31, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

30

---

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”).  The amendments in ASU 2016-10 are expected to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance on identifying promised goods or services in contracts with customers and to improve the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance related to the entity's intellectual property.  Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” (“ASU 2016-15”).  ASU 2016-15 reduces the existing diversity in practice in financial reporting by clarifying existing principles in ASC 230, “Statement of Cash Flows,” and provides specific guidance on certain cash flow classification issues.  The effective date for ASU 2016-15 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company made an election to use the “Cumulative Earning Approach” to classify distributions received from equity investments.  The Company may also incur material debt prepayment costs, which will be classified as a financing outflow in accordance with the new standard. This guidance will be adopted by the Company on a retrospective basis. Other than the aforementioned examples (which may have a future impact), the adoption of this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018, did not have an impact on the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows.

 

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory,” (“ASU 2016-16”).  ASU 2016-16 requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory) when the transfer occurs. This is a change from existing GAAP which prohibits recognition of current and deferred income taxes until the asset is sold to a third party.  The effective date for ASU 2016-16 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance in ascertaining whether a collection of assets and activities is considered a business. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, with prospective application. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.   The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted

 

Except as noted above, the guidance issued by the FASB during the current year is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

9. Inventory

The components of inventory are as follows:

 

 

The Company has established reserves for obsolete and excess inventory of $2,130 and $1,886 as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

 

 

31

---

10.  Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

 

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $570 and $1,180 for the three months, and $1,512 and $2,120 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Changes in goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are as follows:

 

 

 

11. Accrued Expenses

 

 

 

32

---

12. Accrued Warranty

The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience. Historical warranty experience is, however, reviewed by management. The current provision may be adjusted to take into account unusual or non-recurring events in the past or anticipated changes in future warranty claims. Adjustments to the initial warranty accrual are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Warranty reserves are reviewed to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.

 

 

 

13. Credit Facilities and Debt

 

U.S.  Credit Facilities

At June 30, 2017, the Company and its U.S. subsidiaries have a Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, (the “Loan Agreement”) with The Private Bank and Trust Company (“Private Bank”).  The Loan Agreement provides a revolving credit facility with a maturity date of July 20, 2019.   The aggregate amount of the facility is $25,000.

 

The maximum borrowing available to the Company under the Loan Agreement is limited to: (1) 85% of eligible receivables; plus (2) 50% of eligible inventory valued at the lower of cost or market subject to a $17,500 limit; plus (3) 80% of eligible used equipment, as defined, valued at the lower of cost or market subject to a $2,000 limit.  At June 30, 2017, the maximum the Company could borrow based on available collateral was capped at $25,000.  At June 30, 2017, the Company had borrowed $13,235 under this facility. Effective June 1, 2017, the Company’s collateral is subject to a $5,000 reserve until the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio exceeds 1.10 to 1.00.  The indebtedness under the Loan Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets, except for the certain assets of the Company’s subsidiaries.

 

The Loan Agreement provides that the Company can opt to pay interest on the revolving credit at either a base rate plus a spread, or a LIBOR rate plus a spread.  The base rate spread ranges from 0.25% to 1.00% depending on the Senior Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Loan Agreement).  The LIBOR spread ranges from 2.25% to 3.00% also depending on the Senior Leverage Ratio.  At June 30, 2017, the base rate and LIBOR spreads were 1.00% and 3.00%, respectively.  Funds borrowed under the LIBOR option can be borrowed for periods of one, two, or three months and are limited to four LIBOR contracts outstanding at any time.

 

The underlying reference rate for our base rated borrowings at June 30, 2017 was 4.25%.  At June 30, 2017, the Company had two outstanding advances with interest tied to LIBOR.  The contracts had an underlying LIBOR rate of 1.0756%.  In addition, Private Bank assesses a 0.50% unused line fee that is payable monthly.

 

The Loan Agreement subjects the Company and its domestic subsidiaries to a quarterly EBITDA covenant (as defined).  The quarterly EBITDA covenant (as defined) are $(1,000) for the quarter ended at March 31, 2017, $0 for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, and $2,000 for all quarters starting with  the quarter ended September 30, 2017 through the end of the agreement. Additionally, the Company and its domestic subsidiaries are subject to a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 1.05 to 1.00 measured on an annual basis beginning December 31, 2017, followed by a Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of 1.15 to 1.00 measured quarterly starting March 31, 2018 (based on a trailing twelve month basis) through the term of the agreement.  The Loan Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including covenants that limit or restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness, grant liens, merge or consolidate, dispose of assets, make investments, make acquisitions, pay dividends or make distributions, repurchase stock, in each case subject to customary exceptions for a credit facility of this size.  

 

The Loan Agreement has a Letter of Credit facility of $3,000, which is fully reserved against availability.

 

33

---

Note Payable—Bank

At June 30, 2017, the Company has a $183 term note payable to a bank. The Company is required to make eleven monthly payments of $37 that began on January 30, 2017. The note dated January 18, 2017 had an original principal amount of $400 and an annual interest rate of 2.75%. Proceeds from the note were used to pay annual premiums for certain insurance policies carried by the Company. The holder of the note has a security interest in the insurance policies it financed and has the right upon default to cancel these policies and receive any unearned premiums.

Notes Payable – SVW

At June 30, 2017, SVW has five loans outstanding with four financial institutions.  The Company is not a loan party, but has included the debt associated with these loans in its consolidated financial statements as SVW was determined to be a VIE that requires consolidation (see Note 3).  SVW obtained financing using cranes that are included in the Company’s inventory as collateral because of SVW's status as a VIE.  The funds borrowed by SVW have been remitted to the Company.  The finance companies that hold the loans have a perfected security interest in the inventory and therefore have recourse against this specific inventory.  For accounting purposes, the Company did not recognize a sale and continues to include these cranes in its inventory.  However, the finance companies has taken legal title to the cranes used as collateral for the borrowings.   The Company has entered into agreements to repurchase the cranes from the lenders in the event that SVW defaults on any of these loans. Additionally, the SVW debt was also effectively guaranteed by the Company pursuant to certain related agreements.

 

The following table summarizes the principal terms of the borrowings:

 

 

The June 30, 2017, balances on the above table total $9,816.  Total SVW debt shown on include in the balance sheet is $9,548 the difference represents deferred finance costs of $268 which is netted against the gross debt.  

34

---

PM Group Short-Term Working Capital Borrowings

At June 30, 2017, PM Group had established demand credit and overdraft facilities with seven Italian banks and six banks in South America. Under the facilities, PM Group can borrow up to approximately €23,279 ($26,564) for advances against invoices, and letter of credit and bank overdrafts. Interest on the Italian working capital facilities is charged at the 3-month or 6-month Euribor plus 200 basis points, while interest on overdraft facilities is charged at the 3-month Euribor plus 350 basis points. Interest on the South American facilities is charged at a flat rate of points for advances on invoices ranging from 9%-24%.

At June 30, 2017, the Italian banks had advanced PM Group €19,812 ($22,607), at variable interest rates, which currently range from 1.42% to 1.67%. At June 30, 2017, the South American banks had advanced PM Group €871 ($994). Total short-term borrowings for PM Group were €20,683 ($23,601) at June 30, 2017.

PM Group Term Loans

At June 30, 2017, PM Group has a €10,825 ($12,352) (net of debt issuance costs) term loan with two Italian banks, BPER and Unicredit. The term loan is split into three separate notes and is secured by PM Group’s common stock.  Debt issuance costs offset against these term loans totaled €375 ($428) at June 30, 2017.

The first note has an outstanding principal balance of €3,578 ($4,083), which is net of unamortized debt issuance costs of €329 ($375),  is charged interest at the 6-month Euribor plus 236 basis points, effective rate of 2.09% at June 30, 2017. The note is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2017 and ending December 2021. The second note has an outstanding principal balance of €4,394 ($5,013), is charged interest at the 6-month Euribor plus 286 basis points, effective rate of 2.59% at June 30, 2017. The note is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2017 and ending December 2021. The third note has an outstanding principal balance of €2,853 ($3,256) and is non-interest bearing. The note is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2016 and ending December 2017 with a final balloon payment of €2,500 in March 2022.

An adjustment in the purchase accounting to value the non-interest bearing debt at its fair market value was made. At January 15, 2015 it was determined that the fair value of the debt was €1,460 or $1,561 less than the book value. This reduction is not reflected in the above descriptions of PM debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the debt and being charged to interest expense. As of June 30, 2017 the remaining balance was €705 or $804 and has been offset to the debt.

 

PM Group is subject to certain financial covenants as defined by the debt restructuring agreement with BPER and Unicredit including maintaining (1) Net debt to EBITDA, (2) Net debt to equity, and (3) EBITDA to net financial charges ratios. The covenants are measured on a semi-annual basis.

At June 30, 2017, PM Group has unsecured borrowings with four Italian banks totaling €13,015 ($14,851). Interest on the unsecured notes is charged at the 3-month Euribor plus 250 basis points, effective rate of 2.17% at June 30, 2017. Principal payments are due on a semi-annual basis beginning June 2019 and ending December 2021. Accrued interest on these borrowings through the date of acquisition at January 15, 2015, totaled €358 ($409) and is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2019 and ending December 2019.

At June 30, 2017, Autogru PM RO, a subsidiary of PM Group, has two notes. The first note is payable in 60 monthly principal installments of €8 ($9), plus interest at the 1-month Euribor plus 300 basis points, effective rate of 3.00% at June 30, 2017, maturing October 2020. At June 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance of the note was €339 ($387). The second new note is payable in one installment in September 2017 is charged interest at the 1-month Euribor plus 250 basis points, effective rate of 2.50% at June 30, 2017.  At June 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance of the note was €440 ($502).

At June 30, 2017, PM has an interest rate swap with a fair market value that was a liability of €6 or $7 which has been included in debt.

PM Debt Restructuring

On March 6, 2018, PM Group and Oil & Steel S.p.A. (PM Group’s subsidiary) entered into a Debt Restructuring Agreement (the “Restructuring Agreement”) with Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena S.p.A., Banca Nazionale del Lavoro S.p.A., BPER Banca S.p.A., Cassa di Risparmio in Bologna S.p.A. and Unicredit S.p.A. (collectively the “Lenders”), and Loan Agency Services S.r.l. (the “Agent”). The Restructuring Agreement, which replaces the previous debt restructuring agreement with the Lenders entered into in 2014, provides for, among other things:

 

35

---

 

Valla Short-Term Working Capital Borrowings

At June 30, 2017, Valla had established demand credit and overdraft facilities with three Italian banks. Under the facilities, Valla can borrow up to approximately €1,343 ($1,532) for advances against orders, invoices and bank overdrafts. Interest on the Italian working capital facilities is charged at a flat percentage rate for advances on invoices and orders ranging from 4.50% - 4.75%. At June 30, 2017, the Italian banks had advanced Valla €542 ($618).

Valla Term Loans

At June 30, 2017, Valla has a term loan with Carisbo.  The note is payable in quarterly principal installments of €8 ($9), plus interest at the 3-month Euribor plus 470 basis points, effective rate of 4.37% at June30, 2017. The note matures on January 2021. At June 30, 2017, the outstanding principal balance of the note was €110 ($126).

 

Capital leases

Georgetown facility

The Company leases it Georgetown facility under a capital lease that expires on April 30, 2028.  The monthly rent is currently $64 and is increased by 3% annually on September 1 during the term of the lease.   At June 30, 2017, the outstanding capital lease obligation is $5,256.

 

Winona facility

The Company has a lease which expired on February 1, 2017, that includes a one year extension through February 1, 2018, at the option of the Company.  The Company exercised its option to extend the lease.  The lease provides for monthly lease payments of $2 for its Winona, Minnesota facility. The Company has an option to purchase the facility for $500 by giving notice to the landlord of its intent to purchase the facility. The Company has chosen to exercise the purchase option effective July 26, 2017. At June 30, 2017, the Company has outstanding capital lease obligation of $497 which is the amount of the purchase option.

Equipment

The Company has entered into a lease agreement with a bank pursuant to which the Company is permitted to borrow 100% of the cost of new equipment with 60 months repayment periods. At the conclusion of the lease period, for each piece of equipment the Company is required to purchase that piece of leased equipment for one dollar.

The equipment, which is acquired in ordinary course of the Company’s business, is available for sale and rental prior to sale.

Under the lease agreement the Company can elect to exercise an early buyout option at any time, and pay the bank the present value of the remaining rental payments discounted by a specified Index Rate established at the time of leasing. The early buyout option results in a prepayment penalty which progressively decreases during the term of the lease. Alternatively, under the like-kind provisions in the agreement, the Company can elect to replace or substitute different equipment in place of equipment subject to the early buyout without incurring a penalty.

36

---

The following is a summary of amounts financed under equipment capital lease agreements:

 

 

As of June 30, 2017, the Company has  additional capital leases with total capitalized lease obligations of $20.

 

 

14. Convertible Notes

Related Party

On December 19, 2014, the Company issued a subordinated convertible debenture with a $7,500 face amount payable to Terex, a related party. The convertible debenture, is subordinated, carries a 5% per annum coupon, and is convertible into Company common stock at a conversion price of $13.65 per share or a total of 549,451 shares, subject to customary adjustment provisions. The debenture has a December 19, 2020 maturity date.

From and after the third anniversary of the original issuance date, the Company may redeem the convertible debenture in full (but not in part) at any time that the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock equals at least 130% of the Conversion Price (as defined in the debenture) for at least 20 of any 30 consecutive trading days. Following an election by the holder to convert the debenture into common stock of the Company in accordance with the terms of the debenture, the Company has the discretion to deliver to the holder either (i) shares of common stock, (ii) a cash payment, or (iii) a combination of cash and stock.

In accounting for the issuance of the note, the Company separated the note into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the estimated fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the face value of the Note as a whole. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount (“debt discount”) is amortized to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest method with an effective interest rate of 7.5 percent per annum. The equity component is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

On December 19, 2014, the components of the note were as follows:

 

 

Additionally, in connection with the transaction a $321 deferred tax liability was established and was recorded as a deduction to paid in capital. The deferred tax liability was recognized as the excess of the principal amount being amortized and charged to interest expenses that is not tax deductible.

As of June 30, 2017, the note had a remaining principal balance of $6,932 and an unamortized discount of $568. The difference between current unamortized discount and the $893 initially recorded represents $325 of amortization of excess discount.

Perella Notes

On January 7, 2015, the Company entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Perella Note Purchase Agreement”) with MI Convert Holdings LLC (which is owned by investment funds constituting part of the Perella Weinberg Partners Asset Based Value Strategy) and Invemed Associates LLC (together, the “Investors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue $15,000 in aggregate principal amount of convertible notes due January 7, 2021 (the “Perella Notes”) to the Investors. The Notes are subordinated, carry a 6.50% per annum coupon, and are convertible, at the holder’s option, into shares of Company common stock, based on an initial conversion price of $15.00 per share, subject to customary adjustments. Following an election by the holder to convert the debenture into common stock of the Company in accordance with the terms of the debenture, the Company has the discretion to deliver to the holder either (i) shares of common stock, (ii) a cash payment, or (iii) a combination of cash and stock.  Upon the occurrence of certain fundamental corporate changes, the Perella Notes are redeemable at the option of the holders of the Perella Notes. The Perella Notes are not redeemable at the Company’s option prior to the maturity date, and the payment of principal is subject to acceleration upon an event of default. The issuance of the Perella Notes by the Company was made in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided by Rule 506 and Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

37

---

In connection with the issuance of the Perella Notes, on January 7, 2015, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with the Investors (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company agreed to register the resale of the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Perella Notes. The Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 to register the shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which was declared effective on February 23, 2015.

In accounting for the issuance of the note, the Company separated the note into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the estimated fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the face value of the Note as a whole. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount (“debt discount”) is amortized to interest expense over the term of the note using the effective interest method with an effective interest rate of 7.5 percent per annum. The equity component is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.

On January 7, 2015, the components of the note were as follows:

 

 

Additionally, in connection with the transaction a $257 deferred tax liability was established and was recorded as a deduction to paid in capital. The deferred tax liability was recognized as the excess of the principal amount being amortized and charged to interest expenses is not tax deductible.

As of June 30, 2017, the note had a remaining principal balance of $14,546 and an unamortized discount of $454. The difference between current unamortized discount and the $714 initially recorded represents $260 of amortization of excess discount. Debt issuance costs offset against this note totaled $343 at June 30, 2017.

 

 

15. Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including product liability, employment related issues, and workers’ compensation matters which have arisen in the normal course of operations. The Company has product liability insurance with self- insurance retention limits that range from $50 to $500.

The Company has been named as a defendant in several multi-defendant asbestos related product liability lawsuits. In certain instances, the Company is indemnified by a former owner of the product line in question. In the remaining cases the plaintiff has, to date, not been able to establish any exposure by the plaintiff to the Company’s products. The Company is uninsured with respect to these claims but believes that it will not incur any material liability with respect to these claims.

When it is probable that a loss has been incurred and possible to make a reasonable estimate of the Company’s liability with respect to such matters, a provision is recorded for the amount of such estimate or the minimum amount of a range of estimates when it is not possible to estimate the amount within the range that is most likely to occur. The Company established reserves for several PM lawsuits in conjunction with the accounting for this acquisition.

Additionally, beginning on December 31, 2011, the Company’s workers’ compensation insurance policy has per claim deductible of $250 and aggregates of $1,000, $1,150, $1,325, $1,875 $1,575 and $1,575 for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 policy years, respectively. The Company is fully insured for any amount on any individual claim that exceeds the deductible and for any additional amounts of all claims once the aggregate is reached. The Company currently has several workers’ compensation claims related to injuries that occurred after December 31, 2011 and therefore are subject to a deductible. The Company does not believe that the contingencies associated with these worker compensation claims in aggregate will have a material adverse effect on the Company.

38

---

On May 5, 2011, Company entered into two separate settlement agreements with two plaintiffs. As of June 30, 2017, the Company has a remaining obligation under the agreements to pay the plaintiffs an aggregate of $1,330 without interest in 14 annual installments of $95 on or before May 22 of each year. On, February 3, 2016, the Company entered into another legal settlement with a single plaintiff for €640 ($730). The liability had been fully accrued and resulted in no gain or loss. The Company has paid €560 ($639). As of June 30, 2017 the Company has a remaining obligation under the agreement to pay the plaintiff €80 ($91) without interest in monthly installments of €20 ($23). The Company has recorded a liability for the net present value of the liability. The difference between the net present value and the total pay

It is reasonably possible that the “Estimated Reserve for Product Liability Claims” may change within the next 12 months. A change in estimate could occur if a case is settled for more or less than anticipated, or if additional information becomes known to the Company.

 

 

Residual Value Guarantees

The Company issued residual value guarantees to support a customer’s financing of equipment purchased from the Company. A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future date.  The Company has issued partially residual guarantees that have maximum of exposure of approximately $1.6 million.  The Company, however, does not have any reason to believe that any exposure from such a guarantee is either probable or estimable at this time, as such, no liability has been recorded. The Company’s ability to recover any losses incurred under the guarantees may be affected by economic conditions in used equipment markets at the time of loss.

 

16. Transactions between the Company and Related Parties

In the course of conducting its business, the Company has entered into certain related party transactions.

On December 16, 2014, the Company, BGI USA Inc. (“BGI”), Movedesign SRL and R & S Advisory S.r.l., entered into an operating agreement (the “Operating Agreement”) for Lift Ventures LLC (“Lift Ventures”), a joint venture entity. The purposes for which Lift Ventures is organized are the manufacturing and selling of certain products and components, including the Schaeff line of electric forklifts and certain LiftKing products. Pursuant to the Operating Agreement, the Company was granted a 25% equity stake in Lift Ventures in exchange for the contribution of certain inventory and a license of certain intellectual property related to the Company’s products.  

As a result of the sale, in the third quarter 2016, of the Company's Liftking subsidiary, Lift Ventures LLC will no longer have the right to sell Schaeff and Liftking products in the future.  Additionally, as a result of certain financial difficulties experienced by the partner, who was to contribute design services, it will not be able to provide such services.  As a result of these events, the Company had determined that its investment in Lift Ventures has become impaired and wrote off its entire investment in Lift Ventures LLC in third quarter of 2016.

The Company, through its subsidiaries, purchases and sells parts to BGI USA, Inc. (“BGI”) including its subsidiary SL Industries, Ltd (“SL”). BGI is a distributor of assembly parts used to manufacture various lifting equipment. SL Industries, Ltd is a Bulgarian subsidiary of BGI that manufactures fabricated and welded components used to manufacture various lifting equipment. The Company’s former President of Manufacturing Operations is the majority owner of BGI.

The Company through its former Manitex Liftking subsidiary provided parts and services to LiftMaster, Ltd (“LiftMaster”) or purchased parts or services from LiftMaster. LiftMaster is a rental company that rents and services rough terrain forklifts. LiftMaster is owned by an individual who was a Vice President of Manitex Liftking ULC during the period that the Company owned this subsidiary and a relative of his.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had an accounts receivable of $13 and $28 from BGI and SL, respectively, and accounts payable of   $1,547, $130 and $126 to BGI, SL and Terex, respectively.  As of December 31, 2016 the Company had an accounts receivable of $47 and $22 from SL and Lift Ventures, respectively and accounts payable of $471, $749, $7 and $940 to SL, Lift Ventures, BGI and Terex, respectively.

39

---

The following is a summary of the amounts attributable to certain related party transactions as described in the footnotes to the table, for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

At June 30, 2017, the Company had a receivable of $174 from ASV Holdings and a payable to ASV Holdings of $46.

 

Notes Payable to Terex

The Company has the following notes payable to Terex:

 

 

See Note 13 for additional details regarding the above convertible note.

 

On March 4, 2016, CVS and Terex Operations Italy S.R.L. (“TOI”) entered into an agreement whereby TOI acquired certain inventories and intellectual property related to CVS’ terminal tractor line.  The transaction totaled €2,839 ($3,119) inclusive of VAT taxes and resulted in a gain of €1,987 ($2,212).  This gain was included in other income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations when the March 31, 2016 10-Q was filed.  It has subsequently been reclassed to discontinued operations.

 

 

 

40

---

17. Income Taxes

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded an income tax (benefit) of $(36), which included a discrete income tax provision of $21. The calculation of the overall income tax benefit primarily consists of anticipated federal, state and local, and foreign taxes.  For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recorded an income tax expense of $43 which consisted primarily of anticipated federal, state and local, and foreign taxes.

 

The Company recorded an income tax provision (benefit) of $135 and $(267) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The calculation of the overall income tax provision primarily consists of a foreign tax benefit and an income tax provision resulting from state and local taxes, and an increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was an income tax benefit of 3.0% compared to an income tax expense of 0.8% in the comparable prior period.  The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the mix of domestic and foreign earnings, state and local income taxes, and an income tax provision resulting from the increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of U.S. and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments for changes in estimate as necessary. The 2017 estimated annual effective tax rate inclusive of a valuation allowance is based upon the Company’s anticipated earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions.

 

The Company’s total unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016 were approximately $741 and $715 which, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. Included in the unrecognized tax benefits is a liability for the PM Group’s potential IRES and IRAP audit adjustments for the tax years 2009 – 2013.   In July 2017, the Company received notification from the Internal Revenue Service that its tax return for the year ended December 31, 2015 has been selected for examination. While it is often difficult to predict the outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, the Company believes its liability at June 30, 2017 for unrecognized tax benefits is adequate. Favorable resolution of an unrecognized tax benefit could be recognized as a reduction in tax provision and effective tax rate in the period of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit could increase the tax provision and effective tax rate and may require the use of cash in the period of resolution.

 

 

18. Discontinued Operations

 

The Company completed the sale of Liftking, CVS and a partial interest in ASV Holdings on September 30, 2016, December 22, 2016 and May 17, 2017, respectively.

 

 

Sale of Partial Interest in ASV Holdings

 

ASV is located in Grand Rapids, Minnesota manufactures a line of high quality compact track and skid steer loaders. The products are used in site clearing, general construction, forestry, golf course maintenance and landscaping industries, with general construction being the largest.  ASV’s financial results are included in the Company’s consolidated results as a discontinued operation beginning on December 20, 2014.

 

On May 17, 2017, the Company and ASV Holdings completed the previously announced underwritten initial public offering (the “Offering”) of 3,800,000 shares of ASV Holdings’ common stock, including 2,000,000 shares sold by the Company. The Company received proceeds net of commissions of $13,020 from the Offering.  Additionally, the Company had legal and other expense associated with transaction of $128.  In conjunction with the sale, the Company recognized a pre-tax loss of $1,133 and recognized a $25 tax benefit.

Prior to the Offering, the Company owned 51.0% of the outstanding shares of ASV Holdings’ common stock. As a result of the Offering, as of May 17, 2017, the Company owned 21.2% of the outstanding shares of ASV Holdings’ common stock. Because the Company’s ownership interest has decreased below 50%, it no longer has a controlling financial interest in ASV Holdings and deconsolidated ASV Holdings from the financial statements and results of operations of the Company, effective May 17, 2017, in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 810-10-40, Derecognition.

41

---

Following the sale of the above referenced shares, the Company had significant continuing involvement with ASV in the form of an equity investment (21.2% ownership in ASV).  At the time of the above transaction, the Company’s planned to hold the remaining shares it owned in ASV for an indefinite period.   Although the Company had no plans to sell additional shares, the sale of additional shares in the future remained an option.   If the Company were to sell more than 117,600 shares, the Company would cease to account for its investment in ASV as an Equity Investment.

 

Over the period from February 26-28, 2018, the Company sold an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of ASV Holdings, Inc. in privately-negotiated transactions with institutional purchasers.  All such shares were sold for $7.00 per share.  Following such sale transactions, the Company owns an aggregate of 1,080,000 shares of ASV Holdings, Inc., which equates to the Company owning approximately 11.0% percent of ASV.  After this transaction, the investment in ASV Holdings, Inc. will no longer be accounted for under the equity method.

 

The following is the detail of major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations that were summarized on the Company’s Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016.

 

 

 

42

---

The following is the detail of major line items that constitute (loss) income from discontinued operations:

 

 

 

19. Subsequent Event

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts was enacted into law.  The new tax legislation represents a fundamental and dramatic shift in US taxation.  The new legislation contains several key tax provisions that will impact the Company including the reduction of the corporate income tax rate to 21% effective January 1, 2018.  The new legislation also includes a variety of other changes including a one-time repatriation tax on accumulated foreign earnings that were previously tax deferred, a limitation on the tax deductibility of interest expense, acceleration of business asset expensing, etc.   The lower corporate income tax rate will require us to remeasure our US deferred tax assets, valuation allowance and deferred tax liabilities.  ASC 740 requires us to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment. However, the SEC staff issued SAB 118 which will allow us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period which is similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations.  We will continue to assess the impact of the recently enacted tax law on our business, deferred tax amounts and consolidated financial statements, and will reflect the provisional impact of the tax law change in the fourth quarter of 2017.

 

The Company’s total unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were approximately $741 and $741, which, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. Included in the unrecognized tax benefits is a liability for the PM Group’s potential IRES and IRAP audit adjustments for the tax years 2009-2013. As of December 31, 2017, the Italy IRES and IRAP audit is closed through 2012. The settlement with the taxing authorities is expected to reduce unrecognized tax benefits by approximately $456. The impact of the settlement on the Company’s effective tax rate is expected to be minimal. Depending on the final resolution of the PM Group’s audits, the ultimate tax liability could be higher or lower than the unrecognized tax benefits provided for in the consolidated financial statements.

 

See Note 17 for additional discussion of income taxes.

 

SEC Inquiry

The Company has received an informal inquiry from the SEC requesting certain information in connection with the Company’s previously announced restatement of prior financial statements and is complying with such request.

 

Non-Compliance Letter from NASDAQ

 

On November 13, 2017, the Company received a letter notice from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) stating that because the Company had not yet filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017, the Company was no longer in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) for continued listing. Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) requires listed companies to timely file all required period financial reports with the SEC. The 119 Notice has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Company is working to regain compliance with the Nasdaq listing rules as expeditiously as possible.

43

---

Sale of Additional ASV Shares

 

Over the period from February 26-28, 2018, the Company sold an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of ASV Holdings, Inc. in privately-negotiated transactions with institutional purchasers.  All such shares were sold for $7.00 per share.  Following such sale transactions, the Company owns an aggregate of 1,080,000 shares of ASV Holdings, Inc., which equates to the Company owning approximately 11.0% percent of ASV.  After this transaction, the investment in ASV Holdings, Inc. will no longer be accounted for under the equity method.

PM Debt Restructuring

On March 6, 2018, PM Group and Oil & Steel S.p.A. (PM Group’s subsidiary) entered into a Debt Restructuring Agreement (the “Restructuring Agreement”) with Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena S.p.A., Banca Nazionale del Lavoro S.p.A., BPER Banca S.p.A., Cassa di Risparmio in Bologna S.p.A. and Unicredit S.p.A. (collectively the “Lenders”), and Loan Agency Services S.r.l. (the “Agent”). The Restructuring Agreement, which replaces the previous debt restructuring agreement with the Lenders entered into in 2014, provides for, among other things:

 

 

Bank Amendment No. 6

On July 20, 2016, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (as amended, the “Loan Agreement”) with The Private Bank and Trust Company, now known as CIBC Bank USA (“CIBC”). The Loan Agreement provides the Company with a revolving credit facility, which has a maturity date of July 20, 2019. The Loan Agreement was subsequently amended by a First Amendment dated as of August 2, 2016, a Second Amendment dated as of September 30, 2016, a Third Amendment dated as of November 8, 2016, a Fourth Amendment dated February 10, 2017 and a Fifth Amendment dated April 26, 2017.  On March 9, 2018, the parties to the Loan Agreement entered into a sixth amendment to the Loan Agreement (the “Sixth Amendment”). The main modifications to the Loan Agreement resulting from the Sixth Amendment are as follows:

 

 

44

---

Promissory Note Waivers

Pursuant to a Common Stock and Convertible Debenture Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Terex Corporation (“Terex”), dated as of October 29, 2014, the Company previously issued a Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note dated December 19, 2014 to Terex, which note remains outstanding as of the date hereof.  In addition, the Company, MI Convert Holdings LLC and Invemed Associates LLC (together, the “Holders”) are parties to both a Note Purchase Agreement and a Registration Rights Agreement, each dated as of January 7, 2015, pursuant to which the Holders purchased certain notes from the Company.  Each of the foregoing agreements included obligations on the part of the Company to timely file with the SEC its reports that are required to be filed pursuant to the Exchange Act.  The Company has obtained waivers from each of Terex and the Holders with respect to any breaches, defaults or events of default that may have been or may be triggered in connection with (i) the Company’s failure to timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017, and (ii) the amendment by the Company of its previously-filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017.

 

 

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A contains forward-looking statements and are intended to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements relate to, among other things, the Company’s expectations, beliefs, intentions, future strategies, future events or future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation: (1) projections of revenue, earnings, capital structure and other financial items, (2) statements of our plans and objectives, (3) statements regarding the capabilities and capacities of our business operations, (4) statements of expected future economic conditions and the effect on us and on our customers, (5) expected benefits of our cost reduction measures, and (6) assumptions underlying statements regarding us or our business. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These statements are only predictions. Our actual results may differ materially from information contained in these forward looking-statements for many reasons, including, without limitation, those described below and in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors”:

 

45

---

The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. If any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results may vary significantly from what we projected. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim, any obligation to update this forward-looking information, except as required under applicable law. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto of the Company appearing elsewhere within this Form 10-Q/A.

Overview of Restatement

The Company has restated its quarterly Consolidated Statements of Operations, Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and the Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.  In addition, the Company has restated the Balance Sheets for periods ended June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

In connection with its review of its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company became aware that the prior accounting treatment for transactions with S.V.W. Equipment Crane Company (“SVW”) was not correct. The Audit Committee initiated an internal investigation and engaged outside legal counsel to assist in the investigation.  The Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors has completed its investigation.

The Company has concluded that the relationship with SVW qualified as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and should therefore have resulted in the consolidation of SVW. Accordingly, the Company has concluded that the recording of sales to SVW in 2016 did not meet the revenue recognition criteria and sales should be deferred to match the final delivery dates to the end dealer customers. Additionally, funds were sent to SVW to fund payments and expenses related to financing obtained by SVW.  The transferred funds were generally recorded as an expense by the Company in 2016 and during the first and second quarters in 2017.  It has been determined that funds sent to SVW were not expenses of the Company and should have been treated as advances. Furthermore, the debt taken on by SVW to finance the cranes manufactured by the Company was effectively guaranteed by the Company pursuant to certain related agreements. As stated above, the relationship with SVW is a VIE and SVW’s debt needs to be reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.  As SVW’s debt has been consolidated, the payments made by SVW to the various finance companies have also been reflected as normal debts payments with an allocation between principal and interest expense.

Description of the Restatement related to SVW

The following describes the impact of corrections that affect the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.  Information concerning 2016 impact is discussed in the Company’s amended 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Effect of Recording SVW Debt

As disclosed in Note 13, SVW has five notes outstanding with five financial institutions, each of which was effectively guaranteed by the Company. At June 30, 2017 the value of these notes totaled $9.5 million, net of debt issuance costs of $.3 million. Given SVW’s treatment as a VIE, and the fact that the Company effectively guaranteed it, this debt has been consolidated into the restated financial statements.

Effect of Recording Sales to Third Party

Recognizing sales when SVW related inventory was sold to third party.

46

---

Effect of Recording Crane Rentals

Income on the rental of SVW related inventory to third parties has been recorded as revenues for the corresponding periods.

Effect of Treating Funds Sent to SVW’s Wholly-Owned Subsidiary as Advances

During the three months ended June 30, 2017 there were no payments that the Company had originally classified as expenses paid to SVW’s wholly-owned subsidiary.  Given SVW’s treatment as a VIE these payments have been reclassified as intercompany advances.

Recording of Payments Made by SVW to Lenders

The balance sheet table in Note 2. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements shows the impact of payments made in connection with the aforementioned SVW debt.

Cumulative Income Tax Effect

This includes the impact on the income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the discontinued operations and SVW restatements discussed above.

Description of the Restatement not related to SVW

Other

The Company disclosed a partial residual value guarantee to support a customer’s financing of equipment purchased from the Company that was previously not disclosed (see Note 15). A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future date if certain conditions are met by the customer. The Company has issued partially residual guarantees that have maximum exposure of approximately $1.6 million.  The Company, however, does not have any reason to believe that any exposure from such a guarantee is either probable or estimable at this time and accordingly, no liability has been recorded. The Company’s liability from its guarantees may be affected by economic conditions in used equipment markets at the time of loss.

This includes minor rounding and reclassification adjustments not included in previous categories.

 

Effect of Reclassifying ASV to Discontinued Operations

 

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company owned a 51% interest in ASV Holdings, Ins., which was formerly known as A.S.V., LLC (“ASV Holdings”).  On May 11, 2017, in anticipation of an initial public offering, ASV Holdings converted from an LLC to a C-Corporation and the Company’s 51% interest was converted to 4,080,000 common shares of ASV Holdings.  On May 17, 2017, in connection within its initial public offering, ASV Holdings sold 1,800,000 of its own shares and the Company sold 2,000,000 shares of ASV Holdings common stock.  The Company held a 21.2% interest in ASV Holdings, but no longer has a controlling interest in ASV holdings.  ASV Holdings was deconsolidated during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and is recorded as an equity investment starting with quarter ended June 30, 2017.  Since this 10-Q/A is being filed after the above described events, prior period financial statements included in this 10-Q/A have been restated to reflect ASV Holdings as a discontinued operation.

Additional entries not related to SVW

 

Adjustments were made to:  reverse a sale transaction, adjust a deferred gain, increase an inventory reserve and to record additional rent expense.  These adjustments were identified in prior periods but were immaterial for recording at that time. As the Company has identified the restatement adjustments for recording in prior periods, management made the determination that it would also record these previously passed adjustments as part of the restatement of the financial statements.

OVERVIEW

The Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions. The Company operates in a single business segment. The Company designs, manufactures and distributes a diverse group of products that serve different functions and are used in a variety of industries

Through its Manitex, Inc. subsidiary, it markets a comprehensive line of boom trucks, truck cranes and sign cranes. Manitex’s boom trucks and crane products are primarily used for industrial projects, energy exploration and infrastructure development, including, roads, bridges and commercial construction.

Badger Equipment Company (“Badger”) is a manufacturer of specialized rough terrain cranes and material handling products. Badger primarily serves the needs of the construction, municipality and railroad industries.

47

---

PM Group S.p.A. (“PM”) is a leading Italian manufacturer of truck mounted hydraulic knuckle boom cranes with a 50-year history of technology and innovation, and a product range spanning more than 50 models. Its largest subsidiary, Oil & Steel (“O&S”), is a manufacturer of truck-mounted aerial platforms with a diverse product line and an international client base.

Our Valla product line of industrial cranes is a full range of precision pick and carry cranes using electric, diesel, and hybrid power options. Its cranes offer wheeled or tracked, and fixed or swing boom configurations, with special applications designed specifically to meet the needs of its customers. These products are sold internationally through dealers and into the rental distribution channel.

Sabre Manufacturing, LLC, which is located in Knox, Indiana, manufactures a comprehensive line of specialized mobile tanks for liquid and solid storage and containment solutions with capacities from 8,000 to 21,000 gallons. Its mobile tanks are sold to specialized independent tank rental companies and through the Company’s existing dealer network. The tanks are used in a variety of end markets such as petrochemical, waste management and oil and gas drilling.  

 

Crane and Machinery, Inc. (“C&M”) is a distributor of the Company’s products as well as Terex’s rough terrain and truck cranes.  Crane and Machinery Leasing, Inc. (“C&M Leasing”) rents equipment manufactured by the Company as well limited amount of equipment manufactured by third parties.  Although C&M is a distributor of Terex rough terrain and truck cranes, C&M’s primary business is the distribution of products manufactured by the Company.  C&M Leasing’s primary business is the facilitation of sales of products manufactured by the Company through its rent to own program.  As C&M and C&M Leasing’s primary business is the facilitation of Company manufactured product sales, discrete financial information is not available.  

 

Consolidated Variable Interest Entity

Even though it has no ownership interest in SVW Crane & Equipment Company (together with its wholly owned subsidiary, Rental Consulting Service Company, “SVW”), the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact SVW’s economic performance. Additionally, the Company was the primary beneficiary of the SVW relationship. SVW obtained third party financing, which was effectively guaranteed by the Company, on specific cranes the Company manufactured and remitted the loan proceeds to the Company. Other than its business transactions described herein, SVW had no other substantial business operations. The Company has determined that SVW is a Variable Interest Entity (”VIE”) that under current accounting guidance needs to consolidate in the Company’s financial results.

Economic Conditions

In 2014, the Company saw a decline in orders for cranes with higher lifting capacities that serve niche markets, including the North American energy sector slowdown from prior years, largely as a result of the fall in oil prices. In 2015, the Company aggressively pursued other markets for its boom trucks including the tree industry, utility industry, and the general construction markets.  This focus offset and mitigated the impact of the energy market decline. While oil prices continued to decline and the U.S. oil rig count dropped from 1,600 in January 2015 to just over 500 at end of the year we noted that the energy companies began selling excess equipment into our other markets. This combined impact lower energy market sales combined with the selling off of excess equipment resulted in a significant decrease in boom truck revenues during the year.

In 2016, we noted that this selloff of excess equipment continued through much of the year. This selloff dampened demand for new equipment in both the energy market and the other markets we serve with our boom trucks.  We did note that oil prices did begin to increase and by the beginning of June were approaching $50 per barrel.  Additionally, the oil rig count began to increase again and by year end totaled 525 oil rigs. Late in the year, orders received began to increase and included orders for a number of cranes in a multitude of markets that the Company serves.   We are hopeful that this trend will gain momentum in 2017 as we continue to focus our efforts into the tree, utility, general construction, energy and other industries.

The market for PM knuckle boom cranes, and ASV compact track loaders and skid steer loaders, have not been significantly affected by the decrease in oil prices.  The markets for these products have been more stable.  The North American market for knuckle boom cranes is growing. PM currently has a small share of the market for knuckle boom cranes in North America. The Company has started to manufacture knuckle boom cranes on a limited basis in the United States and is marketing them through the Company’s current distribution channels. The Company currently has a strong presence in North America for its boom trucks. The Company believes that it can significantly increase the Company’s share for knuckle boom cranes in North America. The Company believes this is an immediate opportunity that will continue to grow over time.

At the end of the quarter, the Company backlog was $47.6 million, including orders from PM that now comprise 22% of the total backlog at June 30, 2017.

 

48

---

Factors Affecting Revenues and Gross Profit

The Company derives most of its revenue from purchase orders from dealers and distributors. The demand for the Company’s products depends upon the general economic conditions of the markets in which the Company competes. The Company’s sales depend in part upon its customers’ replacement or repair cycles. Adverse economic conditions, including a decrease in commodity prices, may cause customers to forego or postpone new purchases in favor of repairing existing machinery.

Gross profit varies from period to period. Factors that affect gross profit include product mix, production levels and cost of raw materials. Margins tend to increase when production is skewed towards larger capacity cranes.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Net loss from continuing operations for the three month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016  

For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company had a net loss from continuing operations of $1.5 million and 5.2 million, respectively.

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the net loss from continuing operations of $1.5 million consisted of revenue of $52.1 million, cost of sales of $42.6 million, research and development costs of $0.6 million, SG&A expenses of $8.6 million, interest expense of $1.6 million, a foreign currency loss of $0.3 million and other income of $0.1 million.

For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the net loss from continuing operations of 5.2 million consisted of revenue of $45.7 million, cost of sales of $37.6 million, research and development costs of $0.7 million, SG&A expenses of $9.5 million, interest expense of $1.8 million, interest expense related to write off of debt issuance costs of $1.4, foreign currency transaction loss of $0.4 million, and other income of $0.6 million. 

Net revenues and gross profit —For the three months ended June 30, 2017, net revenues and gross profit were $52.1 million and $9.4 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percent of revenues was 18.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2017. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, net revenues and gross profit were $45.7 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percent of revenues was 17.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Net revenues increased $6.3 million or 13.8% to $52.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $45.7 million for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in revenue was primarily due to Manitex straight mast cranes.  The increase is due to an improvement in market conditions addressed above under the heading “Economic Conditions”.

Our gross profit increased $1.2 million to $9.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $8.2 million for the comparable period in 2016. The increase in gross profit is primarily attributable to an increase in revenues, as disclosed above. An improvement of 0.3% in gross profit as a percent of revenues also contributed to the increase in gross profit. The improvement in the gross profit percent is primarily due to increased margins for straight mast cranes partially offset by decreases in our other product lines.  Boom truck margins were favorably impacted by an increase in production volume.        

Research and development —Research and development was $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $0.7 million for the same period in 2016.  Research and development expenditures were relatively consistent with the prior period. The Company’s research and development spending continues to reflect our continued commitment to develop and introduce new products that give the Company a competitive advantage.

Selling, general and administrative expense —Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $8.6 million compared to $9.5 million for the comparable period in 2016, a decrease of $0.9 million. The decreases are primarily related to the Company’s continued cost cutting programs.  

Operating income (loss) —For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had operating income of $0.2 million compared with an operating loss of $2.1 million for the comparable 2016 period. Operating income increased primarily due to changes in revenue, cost of sales and operating expenses explained above.

Interest expense —Interest expense was $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $3.2 million for the comparable period in 2016, a decrease of $1.6 million.  A non-recurring expense in 2016 of $1.4 million accounts for the majority of the decrease.  The non-recurring charge was the result of expensing deferred financing costs when debt was refinanced.

49

---

The remaining decrease of $0.2 million is attributable to a decrease in outstanding borrowing.  A lower interest rate on refinanced debt also contributed to the decrease in interest expense.  As the majority of the Company’s debt is variable interest rate debt, the modest increases in market interest rates including LIBOR and the U.S. prime rates partially offset other interest decreases.

Foreign currency transaction losses —For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had foreign currency losses of $0.3 million compared to $0.4 million for the comparable period in 2016.  As previously stated, the Company attempts to purchase forward currency exchange contracts such that the exchange gains and losses on the assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the reporting units’ functional currency will be offset by the changes in the market value of the forward currency exchange contracts it holds. A substantial portion of the loses relate to changes in the Argentinian peso.  The Company has not been able to identify a strategy to effectively hedge the currency risks related to the Argentinian peso.  

Other income— For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had other income of $0.1 million compared to other income of $0.6 million for the comparable 2016 period.  The Company had other income in 2016 primarily as the fair market value of a contingent liability associated with the PM acquisition was reduced based on revaluation that used updated information.

         

Income tax — For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company recorded an income tax provision (benefit) of $(36) and $43 thousand, respectively. The calculation of the overall income tax provision primarily consists of a foreign tax benefit and an income tax provision resulting from state and local taxes, and an increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

The effective tax rate for three months ended June 30, 2017 was an income tax benefit of 3.0% compared to an income tax provision of 0.8% in the comparable prior period. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2017 differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the mix of domestic and foreign earnings, state and local income taxes, and an income tax provision resulting from the increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of U.S. and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments for changes in estimate as necessary. The 2017 estimated annual effective tax rate inclusive of a valuation allowance is based upon the Company’s anticipated earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions.

             

 

Net loss from continuing operations —For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company had a net loss of $1.5 million compared to $5.2 million, respectively. The change is explained above.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Net loss from continuing operations for the six month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company had net losses of $4.9 million and $7.9 million, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 the net loss of $4.9 million consisted of revenue of $92.2 million, cost of sales of $75.4 million, research and development costs of $1.3 million, SG&A expenses of $17.5 million, interest expense of $2.8 million, foreign currency transaction loss of $0.3 million, other income of $0.3 million and income tax expense of $0.1 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the net loss of $7.9 million consisted of revenue of $93.0 million, cost of sales of $76.1 million, research and development costs of $1.5 million, SG&A expenses of $18.5 million, interest expense of $3.3 million, interest expense related to write off of debt issuance costs of $1.4 foreign currency transaction loss of $0.9 million, other income of $0.6 million, loss of $0.1 million in a non-marketable equity investment and income tax benefit of $0.3 million.

Net revenues and gross profit —For the six months ended June 30, 2017, net revenues and gross profit were $92.2 million and $16.8 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percent of revenues was 18.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, net revenues and gross profit were $93.0 million and $16.9 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percent of revenues was 18.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Net revenues decreased $0.8 million or 0.9% to $92.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $93.0 million for the comparable period in 2016.  The decrease is entirely attributed to a decrease in revenues during the first quarter as second quarter revenues were up by $6.3 million.

50

---

The decrease in first quarter revenues was the result of not being able to increase production levels fast enough to react to an increase in orders received.  In December 2016, orders began increasing for almost all product lines, but were exceptionally pronounced for the Manitex straight mast cranes.  These orders significantly increased backlog, but due to the timing of the orders, production was not able to convert these orders into revenues during the first quarter due in part to the unavailability of chassis needed to mount the cranes.

Our gross profit percent remained the same at  18.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017  and June 30, 2016, respectively. 

Research and development —Research and development was $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $1.5 million for the same period in 2016.  Research and development expenditures were relatively consistent with the prior period. The Company’s research and development spending continues to reflect our continued commitment to develop and introduce new products that give the Company a competitive advantage.

Selling, general and administrative expense —Selling, general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $17.5 million compared to $18.5 million for the comparable period in 2016, a decrease of $1.0 million.  The decrease in selling and general and administrative expense is entirely attributed to a decrease in expenses in the second quarter.  Expense for the first quarter 2017 includes expenses of $0.5 million incurred in connection with our participation at the 2017 ConExpo trade show. The ConExpo show, which is held every three years, was held in Las Vegas in March of this year. The additional expenses related for the ConExpo show were fully offset by other cost reductions in the first quarter.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months decreased $1.5 million when ConExpo expenses are excluded. The decrease is primarily related to the Company’s continued cost reduction programs.  

Operating loss —For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company had operating loss of $2.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively.  The decrease in the operating loss is principally attributed to a decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of approximately $1.0 million, as the small decrease in gross profit was offset by lower research and development spending.

Interest expense —Interest expense was $2.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to $4.7 million for the comparable period in 2016, a decrease of $1.9 million. A non-recurring expense in 2016 of $1.4 million accounts for the majority of the decrease.  The non-recurring charge was the result of expensing deferred financing costs when debt was refinanced.

The remaining decrease of $0.5 million is attributable to a decrease in outstanding borrowing.  A lower interest rate on refinanced debt also contributed to the decrease in interest expense.  As the majority of the Company’s debt is variable interest rate debt, the modest increases in market interest rates including LIBOR and the U.S. prime rates partially offset other interest decreases.   

Foreign currency transaction losses —For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company had a foreign currency loss of $0.3 million compared to $0.9 million loss for the comparable period in 2016.  As previously stated, the Company attempts to purchase forward currency exchange contracts such that the exchange gains and losses on the assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than the reporting units’ functional currency will be offset by the changes in the market value of the forward currency exchange contracts it holds.

The loss for 2016 period includes the recognition of deferred loss of $0.2 million related to an intercompany receivable.  The loss had been previously deferred in other comprehensive income as there was an intercompany receivable that was not expected to be repaid.  The repayment of the receivable resulted in the recognition of the previously deferred loss.  The remaining losses for 2016 and the losses for 2017 are largely the result of changes in the Argentinian peso.  The Company has not been able to identify a strategy to effectively hedge the currency risks related to the Argentinian peso.            

Income tax — For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company recorded an income tax provision (benefit) of $135 and ($267) thousand, respectively. The calculation of the overall income tax provision primarily consists of a foreign tax benefit and an income tax provision resulting from state and local taxes, and an increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangible assets.

 

The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was an income tax provision of 3.26% compared to an income tax benefit of 3.26% in the comparable prior period.  The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2017 differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the mix of domestic and foreign earnings, state and local taxes, and an income tax provision resulting from the increase in deferred tax liabilities related to indefinite-lived intangibles. 

 

51

---

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of U.S. and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments for changes in estimate as necessary. The 2017 estimated annual effective tax rate inclusive of a valuation allowance is based upon the Company’s anticipated earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions.

 

 

Other income— For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company had other income of $0.3 and $0.6 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, other income is the result of revaluing a contingent acquisition liability related to an option to acquire certain PM bank debt.  For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company had other income as the fair market value of a contingent liability associated with the PM acquisition was reduced based on revaluation that used updated information

 

Net loss from continuing operations —For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 the Company had a net loss of $4.9 and $7.9 million, respectively.  The change is explained above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash were $3.8 million at June 30, 2017 compared to $5.3 million at December 31, 2016. In addition, the Company has a U.S. revolving credit facility with a maturity date of July 20, 2019. At June 30, 2017 the Company had approximately $11.8 million available to borrow under its revolving credit facility.    

  

At June 30, 2017, the PM Group had established working capital facilities with seven Italian and six South American banks. Under these facilities, the PM Group can borrow $26.6 million against orders, invoices and letters of credit. At June 30, 2017, the PM Group had received advances of $23.6 million. Future advances are dependent on having available collateral.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, total debt decreased by $3.6 million to $102.7 million at June 30, 2017 from $106.3 million at December 31, 2016.

The following is a summary of the net decrease in our indebtedness from December 31, 2016 to June 30, 2017:

 

 

52

---

Outstanding borrowings

The following is a summary of our outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2017:

(In millions)

 

 

Future availability under credit facilities

As stated above, the Company had cash of $3.8 million and approximately $11.8 million available to borrow under its credit facility at June 30, 2017.  

The PM Group has their own working capital facilities. As stated above, any future advances against the Italian facilities are dependent on having available collateral. Additionally, the Company is permitted to make limited advances to the Italian operations if needed under the Company’s credit facilities.

The Company needs cash to fund normal working capital needs and to make scheduled debt payments as shown in the above table.  The U.S. credit facilities are asset based. The maximum the Company may borrow under either facility is the lower of the credit line or the available collateral, as defined in the credit agreements. Collateral under the agreements consists of stated percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventory.

53

---

Under the collateral formulas in the credit facilities accounts receivable collateral is equal to a stated percent of eligible accounts receivable (generally 85%), while inventory collateral is equal to a stated percent of eligible inventory (generally 50%) and caps total borrowing against our inventory.  If our revenues were to increase significantly in the future, the provision limiting borrowing against accounts receivable and inventory may result in additional cash constraints. If this were to occur, we would attempt to negotiate higher inventory caps with our banks.  There is, however, no assurance that the banks would agree to increase the caps.

The Company expects cash flows from operations and existing availability under the current revolving credit facilities will be adequate to fund future operations. If in the future, we were to determine that additional funding is necessary, we believe that it would be available. There is, however, no assurance that such financing will be available or, if available, on acceptable terms.

We will likely need to raise additional capital through debt or equity financings to fund any future acquisitions. There is no assurance that such financing will be available or, if available, on acceptable terms.

2017

Operating activities consumed $2.8 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2017 comprised of net loss of $5.5 million, non-cash items that totaled $3.8 million and changes in assets and liabilities related to continuing operations consumed $4.8 million. Additionally, discontinued operations generated $3.7 million of cash in the quarter.    The principal non-cash items that generated cash are depreciation and amortization of $2.7 million, share based compensation of $0.4 million, amortization of deferred financing costs of $0.2 million, amortization of debt discounts of $0.3 million, loss on disposal of assets of $0.2 million offset by decrease in inventory reserves of $0.2 million, a change in deferred income taxes of $0.2 million, the gains on revaluation of a contingent acquisition liability of $0.3 million and a gain on interest rate swaps of $0.4 million.

The change in assets and liabilities related to continuing operations consumed $4.8 million.  The changes in assets and liabilities had the following impact on cash flows: accounts receivable consumed $10.3 million, inventory generated $1.4 million,   accounts payable generated $4.5 million, accrued expenses consumed  $0.3 million, other current liabilities generated $0.2 million, and other long-term liabilities consumed $0.3 million.  The increase in accounts receivable and accounts payable are the result of an increase in sales as compared to the first quarter of 2017 and expected revenue growth, respectively. The decrease in inventory is principally attributed to the sale of SVW inventory to third parties. The fluctuation in the remaining assets and liabilities are within a range that would normally be expected to occur.

Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017 generated $12.3 million of cash.  The Company received $12.9 million in net proceeds from the sale of its partial interest in ASV Holdings. The Company used $0.5 million of cash to purchase machinery and equipment.

Financing activities consumed $11.1 million in cash for the six months ended June 30, 2017.  Cash was generated from increases in borrowing under PM’s working capital facilities of $3.2 million, the receipt of proceeds of $2.4 related a stock offering and $0.8 million in new debt.  The cash generated was more than offset by a decrease in borrowings under the Company’s revolving credit facilities of $6.7 million, notes payments of $4.9 million, the repurchase of $0.1 million of stock from employees to satisfy employees’ tax withhold upon vesting of restricted shares and the payment of $0.7 million under capital lease obligations. Discontinued operations financing activities consumed an additional $5.1 million.

2016

Operating activities consumed $10.9 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2016 comprised of net loss of $0.1 million, non-cash items that totaled $3.1 million and changes in assets and liabilities related to continuing operations consumed $8.5 million. Additionally, discontinued operations consumed $5.3 million. The principal non-cash items  that generated cash are depreciation and amortization of $3.7 million, and inventory reserves of $0.3 million, write down of goodwill of $0.3, amortization of debt discounts of $0.3 million, share based compensation of $0.6 million and amortization of deferred financing costs of $1.8 million offset by the gain of $0.4 million on the mark to market revaluation of interest rate swaps,  a changed in deferred taxes of $0.3 million and $0.9 million gain on the revaluation of a contingent acquisition liability.

The change in assets and liabilities related to continuing operations consumed $8.2 million.  The changes in assets and liabilities had the following impact on cash flows: accounts receivable generated $2.3 million, inventory consumed $5.3 million, prepaid expenses consumed  $2.4 million, other assets generated $0.2 million, accounts payable consumed $2.0 million, accrued expenses consumed $2.0 million, other current liabilities generated $0.7 million, and other long-term liabilities consumed $0.1 million.

54

---

The decrease in accounts receivable is due a decrease in revenue which was partially offset as the collections of large receivable had been delayed.  This receivable was fully collected. The increase is in inventory is due holding the additional SVW inventory.  Prepaid expenses increased primarily because it includes an expected income tax refund related to loss carryback filing.   A significant portion of the decrease in accrued expenses is attributed to lower accruals for employee related expenses including accrued bonuses.  The fluctuations in the remaining assets and liabilities are within a range that would normally be expected to occur and in part are due to lower revenues.

Investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 generated $1.0 million of cash. Discontinued operations provided $1.6 million. The Company used $0.7 million of cash to purchase machinery and equipment and generated $0.2 million from the sale of equipment.

Financing activities generated $10.2 million in cash for the six months ended June 30, 2016.  Cash was generated by increases in borrowing under the revolving credit facilities of $0.9 million, and the working capital facilities of $3.9 million and by $4.1 million from a sales and lease back transaction.  Additionally, the Company borrowed $3.8 million. $0.7 million was borrowed to finance a portion of our 2016 insurance premiums.  Other financing activities related to continuing operations consumed $5.3 million, which include debt payments (including capital lease payments) of $4.8 million, and the payment of $0.4 million for fees and costs associated with financing.  Discontinued operations provided by financing activities totaled $2.9 million. Cash provided by discontinued operations include an additional contribution of $2.5 million to ASV by the non-controlling member.

Related Party Transactions

For a description of the Company’s related party transactions, please see Note 16 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements entitled “Transactions between the Company and Related Parties.”

Critical Accounting Policies

See Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q/A, for a discussion of the Company’s other critical accounting policies.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Recently Issued Pronouncements – Not Adopted

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment,” (“ASU 2017-04”). ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Instead, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, if any. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2020, with early adoption permitted in 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date”, which amends ASU 2014-09.  As a result, the effective date is the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

55

---

 

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value and options that currently exist for market value be eliminated. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 on a prospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things, require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” (“ASU 2016-05”). ASU 2016-05 provides guidance clarifying that novation of a derivative contract (i.e. a change in counterparty) in a hedge accounting relationship does not, in and of itself, require designation of that hedge accounting relationship. The Company adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” (“ASU 2016-06”). ASU 2016-06 simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call or put options by clarifying that an exercise contingency does not need to be evaluated to determine whether it relates to interest rates and credit risk in an embedded derivative analysis. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 further clarifies principal and agent relationships within ASU 2014-09. Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 is intended to simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment awards. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company has adopted the guidance for the year ended December 31, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” (“ASU 2016-10”).  The amendments in ASU 2016-10 are expected to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance on identifying promised goods or services in contracts with customers and to improve the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance related to the entity's intellectual property.  Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018 on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,” (“ASU 2016-15”).  ASU 2016-15 reduces the existing diversity in practice in financial reporting by clarifying existing principles in ASC 230, “Statement of Cash Flows,” and provides specific guidance on certain cash flow classification issues.  The effective date for ASU 2016-15 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company made an election to use the “Cumulative Earning Approach” to classify distributions received from equity investments.  Other than the aforementioned election (which may have a future impact), the adoption of this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018, did not have an impact on the Company’s Statement of Cash Flows.

56

---

 

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Intra-Entity Transfer of Assets Other than Inventory,” (“ASU 2016-16”).  ASU 2016-16 requires recognition of current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of any asset (excluding inventory) when the transfer occurs. This is a change from existing GAAP which prohibits recognition of current and deferred income taxes until the asset is sold to a third party.  The effective date for ASU 2016-16 will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted.  The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the operating results when adopted.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” (“ASU 2017-01”). ASU 2017-01 provides guidance in ascertaining whether a collection of assets and activities is considered a business. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, with prospective application. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.   The Company has adopted this guidance during the quarter ended March 31, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the operating results when adopted.

 

Except as noted above, the guidance issued by the FASB during the current year is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Private Bank has issued 3 standby letters of credit at June 30, 2017.  The first standby letter of credit is $0.625 million in favor of an insurance carrier to secure obligations which may arise in connection with future deductibles payments that may be incurred under Company’s workers’ compensation insurance policies.  The second standby letter of credit is $0.02 million in favor of a governmental agency to secure obligations which may arise in connection with workers’ compensation claims.  The third standby letter of credit is $0.15 million in favor of a customer to secure a commercial contract.

The Company has issued partial residual value guarantees to support a customer’s financing. A residual value guarantee involves a guarantee that a piece of equipment will have a minimum fair market value at a future date.  The Company has issued partially residual guarantees that have maximum exposure of approximately $1.6 million.  The Company, however, does not have any reason to believe that any exposure from such a guarantee is either probable or estimable at this time, as such, no liability has been recorded.

 

See Note 15 – “Legal Proceedings and other Contingencies” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our guarantees.

 

 

Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s market risk disclosures have not materially changed since the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A was filed. The Company’s quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are incorporated by reference from Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Item 4—Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Vice President of Financial Reporting (principal financial officer), and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of June 30, 2017.  The Company’s evaluation has identified certain material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting as further described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016. Based on the evaluation of these material weaknesses, the Company has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2017 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Based on a number of factors, including the completion of the Audit Committee’s internal investigation, our internal review that identified revisions to our previously issued financial statements, and efforts to remediate the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting described below we believe the consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods, presented, in conformity with GAAP.

57

---

The effectiveness of any system of controls and procedures is subject to certain limitations, and, as a result, there can be no assurance that our controls and procedures will detect all errors or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system will be attained.

Internal Control and Disclosure Controls Considerations

As previously described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2017, in 2016 the Company sold 39 cranes for total sales revenues of approximately $15 million to a single broker customer in a series of transactions (the “Transactions”) that were each structured as a customary “bill and hold” arrangement. The revenue for the Transactions was originally recognized in 2016. Ten of these units that were sold for an aggregate value of approximately $3 million were returned during 2016 (and were subsequently sold to other customers), such that for 2016, a net of 29 cranes were sold for approximately $12 million. In addition, the Company made various payments to the broker and its wholly-owned subsidiary that were expensed in 2016 and 2017. Furthermore, the debt taken on by the broker customer to purchase the cranes was effectively guaranteed by the Company pursuant to certain related agreements. In connection with its review of its financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company became aware that the prior accounting treatment for the Transactions was not correct. Specifically, the Company has concluded that the relationship with the Broker and its wholly-owned subsidiary qualified as a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) and should therefore have resulted in a different accounting treatment resulting in the debt of the VIE being reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company has concluded that the revenue recognition criteria for 2016 sales were not met and payments to the Broker were not expenses of the Company. In addition, disclosures were incomplete.

In connection with the foregoing matters, on November 2, 2017, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, in consultation with the Company’s management and UHY LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, determined that the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the quarters ended March 31, June 30 and September 30, 2016, year ended December 31, 2016 and quarters ended March 31 and June 30, 2017 included in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for such periods and together with all three, six and nine-month financial information contained therein (collectively, the “Non-Reliance Periods”) can no longer be relied upon.

Our Chief Executive Officer has determined that there were deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that constitute material weaknesses, as defined by SEC regulations, at June 30, 2017, with respect to procedures for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accordingly, our Chief Executive Officer has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by SEC regulations, were not effective at June 30, 2017, as discussed in Part I, Item 4 of this Form 10-Q/A.

 

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1—Legal Proceedings

The information set forth in Note 15 (Legal Proceedings and Other Contingencies) to the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I.  Item 1 “Financial Statements” of this Form 10-Q/A is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A—Risk Factors

As of the date of this filing, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed for the year ended December 31, 2016.

58

---

Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The Company’s credit agreement with Private Bank directly restricts the Company’s ability to declare or pay dividends without Private Bank’s consent. In addition, pursuant to the Company’s credit agreement with Private Bank and other lenders, the Company must maintain as specified in the agreements certain fixed coverage ratios and debt to EBITDA ratios.

ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

 

Item 3—Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4—Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5—Other Information

 

None

 

Item 6—Exhibits

See the Exhibit Index set forth below for a list of exhibits included with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.

 

 

59

---

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

 

 

60

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

April 3, 2018

 

April 3, 2018

 

 

 

61