arc_def14a-120109.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by Registrant      [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant      [   ]

Check the appropriate box:

[   ]      Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ]      Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]      Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ]      Definitive Additional Materials
[   ]      Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-12
 
ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]      No fee required.

[   ]      Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) and 0-11.

(1) 
Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:
(2) 
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4) 
Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:
Total proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:
(5) 
Total fee paid:

[   ]      Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[   ]      Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) andidentify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filingby registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) 
Amount Previously Paid:
(2) 
Form Schedule or Registration No.:
(3) 
Filing Party:
(4) 
Date Filed:
 

ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
10601 West 48th Avenue
I-70 Frontage Road North
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660
(303) 421-4063

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to be held December 16, 2009.

The Annual Meeting of the shareholders of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held on December 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard time) at the offices of Carret Asset Management, LLC, 40 West 57th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY, 10019 for the following purposes:

1. 
To elect a Board of Directors consisting of five directors;

2. 
To consider and vote upon a proposal recommended by the Board of Directors to ratifythe selection of Hein & Associates LLP to serve as our certified independentaccountants for the year ending December 31, 2009; and

3. 
To transact any other business that properly may come before the Annual Meeting.

Only the shareholders of record as shown on the transfer books at the close of business on November 24, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 16, 2009:

Our notice of annual meeting and proxy statement and our annual report are available on the Internet at http://www.arcwireless.net.

All shareholders, regardless of whether they expect to attend the meeting in person, are requested to complete, date, sign and return promptly the enclosed form of proxy in the accompanying envelope. The person executing the proxy may revoke it by filing with the Secretary of the Company an instrument of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by electing to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

ALL SHAREHOLDERS ARE EXTENDED A CORDIAL INVITATION TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING

By Order of the Board of Directors:
Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Jason T. Young
Chief Executive Officer
November 24, 2009


 
PROXY STATEMENT

ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
10601 West 48th Avenue
I-70 Frontage Road North
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660
(303) 421-4063

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS to be held
December 16, 2009

SOLICITATION AND REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES

This Proxy Statement is provided in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc., a Utah corporation (the “Company”), to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard time) at the offices of Carret Asset Management, LLC, 40 West 57th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY, 10019 or at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. We anticipate that this Proxy Statement and the accompanying form of proxy will be first mailed or given to shareholders on or about December 3, 2009.

The shares represented by all proxies that are properly executed and submitted will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on the proxies. Unless otherwise directed, the shares represented by proxies will be voted: (i) FOR each of the five nominees for director whose names are set forth on the proxy card; (ii) FOR the ratification of the selection of Hein & Associates LLP as our independent certified accountants for the year ending December 31, 2009; and (iii) FOR any other business that properly may come before the Annual Meeting.

A shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by delivering written notice of revocation to our Secretary, by substituting a new proxy executed at a later date, or by requesting, in person at the Annual Meeting, that the proxy be returned. Shareholders do not have dissenters' rights of appraisal for any action proposed to be taken at the Annual Meeting.

The solicitation of proxies by the Company is to be made principally by mail; however, following the initial solicitation, further solicitations may be made by telephone or oral communication with shareholders. Our officers, directors and employees may solicit proxies, but these persons will not receive compensation for that solicitation other than their regular compensation. Arrangements also will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to beneficial owners of the shares held of record by those persons. We may reimburse those persons for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in so doing. We will pay all expenses involved in preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement and the enclosed material.

THE ANNUAL MEETING OF ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.

Time, Place and Date

The Annual Meeting will be held on December 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard time) at the offices of Carret Asset Management, LLC, 40 West 57th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY, 10019.

1

Purpose

At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal (i) to elect a Board of Directors consisting of five directors; (ii) to ratify the selection of Hein & Associates LLP to serve as the Company's certified independent accountants for the year ending December 31, 2009; and (iii) to transact any other business that properly may come before the Annual Meeting.

VOTING SECURITIES

The close of business on November 24, 2009 has been fixed as the record date for the determination of holders of record of the Company's common stock, $.0005 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, 3,091,350 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Each share, unless otherwise set forth herein, is entitled to one vote. A majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, represented either in person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum at any meeting of the shareholders. If sufficient votes for approval of the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting have not been received prior to the meeting date, we intend to postpone or adjourn the Annual Meeting in order to solicit additional votes. The form of proxy we are soliciting requests authority for the proxies, in their discretion, to vote the shareholders' shares with respect to a postponement or adjournment of the Annual Meeting. At any postponed or adjourned meeting, we will vote any proxies received in the same manner described in this Proxy Statement with respect to the original meeting.

VOTING PROCEDURES

Votes at the Annual Meeting are counted by an inspector of election. Shares of stock present in person or represented by proxy, including abstentions (shares that do not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented for shareholder approval), and broker “non-votes,” are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting. A broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other nominee, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor, from the holder of record, to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. At any postponed or adjourned meeting, we will vote any proxies received in the same manner described in this Proxy Statement with respect to the original Annual Meeting.

In the election of directors (the “Election of Directors Proposal”), the five director candidates having the highest number of votes cast in favor of their election will be elected to the Board of Directors. In addition, a plurality of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for the ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent auditors (the “Independent Auditor Proposal”).

Only votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” the Election of Directors Proposal and the Independent Auditor Proposal will affect the outcome. Abstentions are not counted for purposes of the Election of Directors Proposal or the Independent Auditor Proposal.

2

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The number of shares beneficially owned includes shares of Common Stock with respect to which the persons named below have either investment or voting power. A person is also deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if that person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of that security within 60 days through the exercise of an option or through the conversion of another security. Except as noted, each beneficial owner has sole investment and voting power with respect to the Common Stock.

Common Stock not outstanding that is subject to options or other convertible securities or rights is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of Common Stock beneficially owned by the person holding such options or other convertible securities or rights, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of Common Stock beneficially owned by any other person.

The following table summarizes certain information as of November 23, 2009, except as noted below, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each director, by all executive officers and directors as a group, and by each other person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock. As of November 23, 2009, 3,091,350 shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned (1)
 
Percent of Class
 
Randall P. Marx
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
167,165(5)
5.4%
     
Steven C. Olson
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
17,751(3)
 
*
     
Paul J. Rini
7376 Johnnycake Rd
Mentor, Ohio 44060
438,132(6)
14.17%
     
Jason Young
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
575,763(2)(7)
18.63%
 
Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc.
40 West 57th Street, 20th Floor
New York, NY  10019
575,763(4)(7)
18.63%
     
Viktor Nemeth
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
0
*
 
3

     
Marco Vega
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
0
*
     
Javier Baz
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
0
*
     
Amit Chatwani
ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601 West 48th Ave.
Wheat Ridge, CO  80033
0
*
     
All officers and directors as a group (6 persons)
593,514(2)(3)(7)
19.20%

* Less than one percent.

 
(1)
“Beneficial ownership” is defined in the regulations promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as having or sharing, directly or indirectly (1) voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting, or (2) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition, of shares of the common stock of an issuer. The definition of beneficial ownership includes shares underlying options or warrants to purchase common stock, or other securities convertible into common stock, that currently are exercisable or convertible or that will become exercisable or convertible within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power.
 
(2)
Consists of 575,763 shares beneficially owned by the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. Mr. Young is deemed to share voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned by the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc.
  
(3)
Consists of 1,751 shares in Mr. Olson's ARC Wireless 401(k) account and options to purchase 16,000 shares at $5.41 per share until September 21, 2017, granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan which are currently exercisable.
 
(4)
Consists of 575,763 shares beneficially owned by Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. Mr. Young, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, serves as a representative of Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. and he holds voting and investment power over these shares.
 
(5)
Includes 163,816 shares directly held by Randall Marx, the Company's former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, 1,980 shares in his ARC Wireless 401(k) account, 800 shares held by his spouse's IRA and 570 shares owned beneficially through a 50% ownership of an LLC. This does not include 2,170 shares owned by the Harold and Theora Marx Living Trust, of which Mr. Marx's father is the trustee, as Mr. Marx disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. This also does not include 3,100 shares owned by Warren E. Spencer Living Trust, of which Mr. Marx's mother-in-law is trustee, as Mr. Marx disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares.
 
(6)
Consists of shares owned by Mr. Paul J. Rini as reported on April 30, 2009.
 
(7)
The shares owned by Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. are included three times in the table in accordance with the rules governing disclosure of beneficial ownership. In addition to being shown as owned by Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc., these same shares are included as being beneficially owned by Jason Young and by all officers and directors as a group.

4

 
PROPOSAL 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

At the Annual Meeting, the shareholders will elect five directors to serve as our Board of Directors. Each director will be elected to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders. The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares represented at the meeting is required to elect each director. Cumulative voting is not permitted in the election of directors. Each record holder of stock shall be entitled to vote in the election of directors and shall have as many votes for each of the shares owned by him or her as there are directors to be elected and for whose election he or she has the right to vote. As a result, a shareholder may vote all of his or her shares for each nominee, but may not cumulate the votes to vote more than the total number of shares owned for any one nominee. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the person named in the accompanying proxy shall vote the shares represented by that proxy for the persons named below as the Board's nominees for directors. Each of the nominees currently is a director of the Company.

Each of the nominees has consented to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve on the Board of Directors if elected. It is not anticipated that any of the nominees will become unable or unwilling to accept his nomination or election, but, if that should occur, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend.

The following table sets forth, with respect to each nominee for director, the nominee's age, his position(s) and office(s) with the Company, the expiration of his term as a director, and the year in which he first became a director. Individual background information concerning each of the nominees follows the table. For additional information concerning the nominees, including stock ownership and compensation, see “Executive Compensation,” “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” and “Certain Transactions with Management and Principal Shareholders.”

 Name
Age
Position with the Company
Expiration of Term as Director
Initial Date as Director
Jason T. Young
31
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Next Annual Meeting
Appointed to the Board October 2008
Viktor Nemeth
34
Director
Chairman of the Audit Committee Chairman of the Compensation Committee
Next Annual Meeting
Appointed to the Board: November 2008
Marco Vega
40
Director
Next Annual Meeting
Appointed to the Board: November 2008
Javier Baz
56
Director
Audit Committee Member Compensation Committee Member
Next Annual Meeting
Appointed to the Board: January 2009
Amit Chatwani
27
Director
Audit Committee Member Compensation Committee Member
Next Annual Meeting
Appointed to the Board: January 2009

5

Jason Young. Mr. Young became a Director in October 2008, and he became Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in November 2008. Since 2005, Mr. Young has been a Managing Director at Quadrant Management, Inc., where he is responsible for making investments in US and emerging market companies, where he frequently serves in active Management or Director level roles. He has been an Investment Committee Member of the Carret Global India Fund of Hedge Funds since 2005. In 2008 Mr. Young became a member of the Investment Committee of the Vanterra Advantage Fund. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Young worked for Merrill Lynch in the Investment Banking Group and later in the Global Principal Investment Group. In 1999, he was an Analyst at Helicon Capital Management, a hedge fund and private equity investment firm. He holds a BA in International Economics from UCLA. Because of his employment with Quadrant Management, Inc., which is under common control with the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc., Mr. Young is deemed to be under control of the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc.

Viktor Nemeth. Mr. Nemeth became a Director in November 2008, and he currently serves on the Company's Audit Committee and the Company's Compensation Committee. Between January 2008 and October 2008, Mr. Nemeth served as the Chief Revenue Officer of Bid4Spots.com, Inc., an entity that hosts weekly online auctions of radio airtime to allow advertisers and broadcasters to transact unsold airtime. From March 2000 through December 2007, Mr. Nemeth worked for Yahoo Inc. and predecessor companies Overture Services and GoTo.com in a variety of corporate development, business development, and sales & marketing roles. Mr. Nemeth holds a BA in Business-Economics with a Minor in Accounting from UCLA.
 
Marco Vega. Mr. Vega became a Director in November 2008. Since March 2003, Mr. Vega has been the Chief Operating Officer of Carret Asset Management, LLC, where he is responsible for the accounting, operations and compliance functions of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registered investment advisor. Mr. Vega formerly served as the President of Carret Securities LLC, and he now serves on the Board of Advisors to Brean Murray Carret & Co., LLC, a boutique investment bank. Mr. Vega frequently serves in active management-or director-level roles. Because of his employment by Carret Asset Management, LLC, which is under common control with the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc., Mr. Vega is deemed to be under control of the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. Mr. Vega holds a BS in accounting and an MBA from St. John's University.

Javier Baz.  Mr. Baz became a Director in January of 2009.  Mr. Baz is currently a private investor.  From 2005 to 2006, he was a Director and later Chairman of Lifeline Therapeutics.  From January of 1994 through March 2004, Mr. Baz was responsible for several business areas at Trust Company of the West, a Los Angeles, California based investment management firm. Among his responsibilities he was chief investment officer and group head of the firm’s Private Client Services Group, a unit with $7 billion in clients’ assets under management. He also was the chief investment officer for Trust Company of the West’s publicly traded fixed income and equity strategies investing outside of the United States in Europe, Japan, Asia Pacific and Latin America. From 1995 through 2001 Mr. Baz chaired the Trust Company of the West’s committee responsible for overseeing regional allocation of emerging markets and international equity strategies. Before joining Trust Company of the West in 1994, Mr. Baz established Condor Asset Management in Greenwich, Connecticut as a broker-dealer and asset management firm, and worked with Merrill Lynch, First Boston International, McKinsey & Co., and the Mexico City branch of Citibank N.A. Mr. Baz has a bachelor of science degree in economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania (which he received in 1976) and a masters of business administration from the Kellogg School at Northwestern University (which he received in 1981).
 
6

Amit Chatwani.  Mr. Chatwani became a Director in January of 2009.  Since October 2007, Mr. Chatwani has served as Chief Executive Officer of One Part Beverages, LLC, an entity he founded that bottles and markets a unique brand of spirits.  Between January 2006 and December 2008, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Aural New York, LLC, a consumer electronics company he founded, which sold its products both online and in specialty retailers across the country.  Mr. Chatwani is the founder and Creative Director of Leveraged Sellout, LLC, an entertainment property involved in the online, print, and film spaces.  He is also a published author.  From 2004-2006, Mr. Chatwani was an internal strategy consultant for the I.B.M. Corporation.  He graduated with honors in Computer Science from Princeton University.
 
Required Vote

The five director candidates having the highest number of votes cast in favor of their election will be elected to the Board of Directors.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE FIVE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Information regarding Mr. Jason Young as an officer and director of the Company is set forth in the table above pertaining to the nominees for election of directors.

Other Executive Officers

Name
Age
Position with the Company
Initial Date as Officer
Steven C. Olson
52
Chief Technology Officer
2001

Steven C. Olson. Mr. Olson serves as our Chief Technology Officer. Prior to joining the Company in August 2001, Mr. Olson was employed at Ball Aerospace for 14 years, including the last five years as Director of Engineering for Ball's Wireless Communications Solutions Division. In this capacity Mr. Olson led the development of new technologies, resulting in industry leading antenna solutions for the wireless communications market. Before the Ball Wireless Communications unit was formed, Mr. Olson developed Ball's high performance, low cost AirBASE(R) antenna technology, specifically for use in its future commercial wireless business. He received his Bachelors and Masters of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Utah in 1984 and 1985, respectively.

7

Each of our officers serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. There are no family relationships among our officers and directors.

Board Meetings

The Board of Directors met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and each director participated in at least 75% of the meetings. The Board of Directors does not maintain a formal policy regarding the manner in which shareholders may communicate with the Board.  The Board intends to adopt such a formal policy during the first quarter of 2010.

The Company encourages each member of the Board of Directors to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, but does not require any member to do so. None of the directors attended the Company’s last Annual Meeting of Shareholders, held on December 16, 2008.

Board Independence

We are currently subject to corporate governance standards defining the independence of our directors imposed by the NASDAQ Capital Market's requirements for independent directors (Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC). Under this definition, we have determined that prior to their resignation in November 2008, Sigmund A. Balaban, Robert E. Wade and Dr. Donald A. Huebner qualified as independent directors. On November 12, 2008, the Company's Board elected Viktor Nemeth and Marco Vega to serve on the Board of Directors and on January 21, 2009 Mr. Javier Baz and Amit Chatwani were elected to serve on the Board of Directors. Mr. Nemeth, Mr. Baz and Mr. Chatwani qualify as independent directors in accordance with the standards imposed by the NASDAQ Capital Market's requirements for independent directors (Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC).

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

Until their resignations in November 2008, the audit committee consisted of three independent directors, Mr. Sigmund A. Balaban, who was chairman of the committee, Mr. Robert E. Wade and Dr. Donald A. Huebner. On January 21, 2009 Mr. Viktor Nemeth was designated to serve as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. On January 21, 2009 Mr. Javier Baz and Mr. Amit Chatwani were elected to the Board of Directors and were appointed to serve on the Audit Committee. The responsibilities of the audit committee include overseeing our financial reporting process, reporting the results of the Committee’s activities to the board, retaining and ensuring the independence of our auditors, approving services to be provided by our auditors, reviewing our periodic filings with the independent auditors prior to filing, and reviewing and responding to any matters raised by the independent auditors in their management letter. The Audit Committee met two times during fiscal 2008, which was attended by all committee members.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Prior to their resignations on November 12, 2008, the former board of directors had determined that at least one member of the audit committee, who was also independent, Mr. Sigmund A. Balaban, was an audit committee financial expert prior to his resignation in November 2008. Mr. Javier Baz has been designated to be the new audit committee financial expert.

8

Audit Committee Charter

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee will review and assess the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter annually.

Audit Committee Report

Management is responsible for the Company's internal controls and financial reporting process. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company's financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and to issue a report thereon. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and to engage and discharge the Company's auditors. It is not our duty or our responsibility to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures. We may not be, and we may not represent ourselves to be or to serve as, accountants or auditors by profession or experts in the fields of accounting or auditing. Therefore, we have relied, without independent verification, on management's representation that the financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and on the representations of the independent auditors included in the report on the Company's financial statements. Our oversight does not provide us with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our considerations and discussions with management and the independent auditors do not assure that the Company's financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, that the audit of the Company's financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, or that the Company's independent accountants are in fact “independent.”

In this context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions separately with management and the independent accountants. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company's financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the financial statements with management and the independent accountants. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent accountants matters required to be discussed by the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit Committees, as currently in effect.

The Company's independent accountants also provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosure required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees. The Committee discussed with the independent accountants that firm's independence and considered whether the non-audit services provided by the independent accountants are compatible with maintaining its independence.

Based on the Audit Committee's discussion with management and the independent accountants, and the Audit Committee's review of the representations of management and the report of the independent accounts to the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

9

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors:

Viktor Nemeth, Chairman
Javier Baz
Amit Chatwani


Compensation Committee
 
The Board of Directors currently has a Compensation Committee.  Until their resignations in November 2008, this committee consisted of Mr. Robert E. Wade, the chairman of the Compensation Committee, Dr. Donald A. Huebner and Mr. Sigmund A. Balaban. On January 21, 2009 Mr. Viktor Nemeth was designated to serve as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. On January 21, 2009 Mr. Javier Baz and Mr. Amit Chatwani were elected to the Board of Directors and were appointed to serve on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee has a charter which is located on the Company’s website at www.arcwireless.net. The Compensation Committee held one formal meeting during fiscal 2008, which was attended by all committee members.

Nominating Committee: Nominating Policies and Procedures

The Company does not currently have a standing nominating committee of the Board of Directors because it believes that the nominating functions should be conducted by the full Board of Directors.

On June 30, 2008 the Board of Directors amended and restated its Policies and Procedures for Nominations of Director Candidates (the “Nomination Policies”), which are attached hereto as Appendix A, that have been in effect since January 1, 2009. Director nominations are made to the Board of Directors by independent directors, constituting a majority of the Board of Directors’ independent directors, in a vote in which only independent directors vote. It is the policy of the Board of Directors that each candidate recommended for nomination and election to the Board (each, a “Nominee”), regardless of whether such Nominee is recommended by a shareholder of the Company, the Board or any other person, shall be approved by a majority of the independent directors of the Board.

In general, the Board believes that certain minimum qualifications must be met by each Nominee for the Board, as well as meeting the applicable independence standards required by the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and federal securities laws. The Board believes that Nominees must reflect a Board that is comprised of directors (i) a majority of whom are independent (as determined under the aforementioned SEC director qualification standards); (ii) who are of high integrity; (iii) who have qualifications that will increase the overall effectiveness of the Board; and (iv) who meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or financial expertise with respect to Audit Committee members. In evaluating the qualifications of the Nominees, the Board considers many factors, including issues of leadership ability, career success, character, judgment, independence, background, age, expertise, diversity and breadth of experience, length of service, other commitments and the like. The Board evaluates such factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weight or priority to any of these factors. Also, the Board considers the suitability of each Nominee, including the current members of the Board, in light of the current size and composition of the Board.

10

Unless and until otherwise subsequently determined by the Board, the number of directors of the Company at any time shall be the number of directors that the Board nominated for election at the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders, increased by the number of directors, if any, that the Board appointed subsequent to the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders and also increased by the number of directors, if any, whose term as a director did not expire at the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders.

The Board shall consider recommendations for Nominees to the Board from shareholders (an “Eligible Shareholder”) holding a minimum of $2,000 in market value, or 1%, of the Company's voting common stock, which stock is held through the date of the meeting electing directors, and which Eligible Shareholder complies with the nomination notice procedures set forth in the Nomination Policies. Nominees recommended by Eligible Shareholders (hereinafter referred to as “Shareholder Candidates”) will be evaluated by the Board on the same basis as Nominees that may be identified by the Board, management or, if the Board permits, a search firm.

For a Shareholder Candidate to be considered by the Board, the Eligible Shareholder and the Shareholder Candidate must comply with the procedures set forth in the Nomination Policies. Recommendations for Shareholder Candidate(s) to the Board of Directors from an Eligible Shareholder must be directed in writing to ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc., Attn: Executive Vice-President, at the Company's principal offices at 10601 West 48th Avenue, I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660. The specific recommendations should include the information set forth in the Nomination Policies, which are attached hereto as Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference.

For a recommendation of a Shareholder Candidate to be properly brought before the Board by an Eligible Shareholder, the Eligible Shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, an Eligible Shareholder’s notice must be delivered to the Corporate Secretary not less than one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the first (1st) anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. In the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than thirty (30) days or delayed by more than sixty (60) days from the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, the notice by the Eligible Shareholder must be delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the sixtieth (60th) day prior to such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made.  

The Secretary of the Corporation will provide a copy of the Nominating Policies and Procedures upon a request in writing from the Eligible Shareholder.
 
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of ours. We believe that during the year ended December 31, 2008, our officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements. In making these statements, we have relied upon the written representation of our directors and officers and our review of the monthly statements of changes filed with us by our officers and directors.

Code of Ethics

The Company endeavors to adhere to provide assurances to outside investors and interested parties that the Company's officers, directors, and employees adhere to a reasonably responsible code of ethics and as such, we have adopted a Code of Ethics, which was amended on November 7, 2006, that applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Company. The Code is posted on the Company’s website at www.arcwireless.net/investor_relations.

11

Corporate Governance Documents

On the Company’s Corporate Governance Web site at www.arcwireless.net/investor_relations, shareholders can access the Company’s Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, and Code of Ethics for members of the Board of Directors and officers. Copies of these documents are available to shareholders without charge upon request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s principal address.
 
 
12

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the aspects of our compensation programs and explains our compensation philosophy, policies, and practices, with respect to our named executive officers, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, executive vice-president, and chief technology officer, which we collectively refer to as our named executive officers, or NEOs.   

Oversight of Executive Compensation Program

The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors oversees our executive compensation programs. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an “independent director” as defined by the federal securities laws and in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.  The Compensation Committee met 3 times during 2008, and works closely with executive management, primarily our chief executive officer (“CEO”), in assessing compensation levels. The Compensation Committee is empowered to advise management and make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the compensation and other employment benefits of executive officers and key employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee also administers the Company's compensation plans for executive officers and employees.

The Compensation Committee regularly reviews the Company’s compensation programs to ensure that remuneration levels and incentive opportunities are competitive and reflect performance. Factors taken into account in assessing the compensation of individual officers include the officer’s performance and contribution to the Company, experience, strategic impact, external equity or market value, internal equity or fairness, and retention priority.  The various components of the compensation programs for executive officers are discussed below in Elements of Executive Compensation Program.  

Objectives of Executive Compensation and What the Programs are Designed to Reward

The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to integrate compensation with the achievement of our short-term and long-term business objectives and to assist us in attracting, motivating and retaining the highest quality executive officers and rewarding them for superior performance. Different programs are geared to short-term and longer-term performance with the goal of increasing stockholder value over the long term.

We believe that the compensation of our executive officers should reflect their success in attaining key operating objectives, such as growth or maintenance of market position, development of new products and marketplaces, meeting established goals for operating earnings and earnings per share, maintenance and development of customer relationships and long-term competitive advantage. We also believe that executive compensation should reflect achievement of individual goals established for specific executive officers, as well as specific achievements by such individuals over the course of the year such as development of specific products or customer relationships or agreements or executing or integrating acquisitions and strategic arrangements. We believe that the performance of the executives in managing our Company, considered in light of general economic and specific Company, industry and competitive conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation. We also believe that their compensation should not generally be based on the short-term performance of our stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, but rather that the price of our stock will, in the long-term, reflect our operating performance, and ultimately, the management of the Company by our executives.

13

Compensation Consultants

In determining competitive levels of compensation, the Compensation Committee considers publicly available information regarding the compensation of executive officers of other comparable U.S. investor-owned companies. The Compensation Committee also considers recommendations made by the CEO regarding compensation for other NEOs and key employees.

Elements of Executive Compensation Program

Compensation elements include:

 
·
base salary;
 
·
annual cash or equity incentive awards;
 
·
long-term equity incentive compensation; and
 
·
other health, welfare and pension benefits.

Base Salary

Base salary is designed to provide competitive levels of base compensation to our executives based on their experience, duties and scope of responsibilities.  We pay base salaries because it provides a base compensation that is required to recruit and retain executives of the quality that we must employ to ensure the success of our Company.  Our executive base salaries are typically adjusted in accordance with the NEO’s employment agreement on an annual basis.  

Annual Cash or Equity Incentive Awards

Annual incentive compensation is designed to provide competitive levels of compensation based on experience, duties and scope of responsibilities.  Incentive awards are influenced by the Company’s profitability and achievement of planned profitability, as well as other factors. The Compensation Committee uses the annual incentive compensation to motivate and reward the NEOs for the achievement and over-performance of our critical financial and strategic goals.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

Long-term equity awards were granted to our executives from our 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan, (“1997 Plan”) until September 2007, when the shareholders of the Company approved the new 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The Compensation Committee granted awards under the 1997 Plan and the 2007 Plan in order to align the interests of the NEOs with our stockholders, and to motivate and reward the NEOs to increase the stockholder value of the Company over the long term. The Compensation Committee does not have a regular schedule for awarding equity-based compensation and the timing of such awards is subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee but generally is awarded as part of entering into employment agreements. We do not backdate options or grant options retroactively or stock options with a so-called “reload” feature. In addition, we do not plan to coordinate grants of options so that they are made before the announcement of favorable information, or after the announcement of unfavorable information.

14

Compensation paid to each executive officer, including a stock bonus, was based on the Compensation Committee’s review and consideration of aggregate levels of compensation paid to executives of comparable companies and the individual qualitative contributions and performance of each executive officer. In 2007, the Compensation Committee issued a stock option award of 40,000 shares to Steve C. Olson, our Chief Technology Officer under the 2007 Plan.  No stock options were issued in 2008.

Other Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits

Health and Welfare Benefits

All full-time employees, including our NEOs, may participate in our health and welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental and vision care coverage, disability insurance, and life insurance. We provide these benefits to meet the health and welfare needs of employees and their families.

Retirement Benefits

Our employees, including the NEO’s, are eligible to participate in our 401(k) contributory defined contribution plan (“401(k) Plan”). Each employee may make before-tax contributions of up to 25% of their base salary up to current Internal Revenue Service limits. We provide this plan to help our employees save some amount of their cash compensation for retirement in a tax efficient manner. The Company may make discretionary matching contributions, however in 2006 the Company did not provide participants with a matching contribution. Commencing January 1, 2007, the Company amended its 401(k) Plan to make a Safe Harbor Contribution of 3% of a participant’s cash compensation.

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not currently provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health coverage for our executives or employees, although we may consider such benefits in the future. In addition, we do not provide any nonqualified defined contribution or other deferred compensation plans, although we may consider such benefits in the future.

Employment Agreements and Other Post-Employment Payments

All of our NEOs were parties to employment agreements until their resignations in November 2008, which provided for salaries and certain bonus payments as well as rights to certain payments upon termination for cause. These employment agreements also had change of control provisions that would require payments in the event of termination of employment, which are described in greater detail below. Only one NEO, Mr. Steve Olson, is still party to an agreement which provides for salaries and certain bonus payments as well as rights to certain payments upon termination for cause. Mr. Jason T. Young, is not party to an employment agreement and has no current compensation arrangement with the Company

These employment agreements also have change of control provisions that would require payments in the event of termination of employment, which are described in greater detail below.

15

Tax Implications of Executive Compensation

We do not currently intend to award compensation that would result in a limitation on the deductibility of a portion of such compensation pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, other than awards that may be exercised under the 1997 Plan or be made under the 2007 Plan; however, we may in the future decide to authorize other compensation in excess of the limits of Section 162(m) if it determines that such compensation is in the best interests of the Company.

Although deductibility of compensation is preferred, tax deductibility is not a primary objective of our compensation programs. We believe that achieving our compensation objectives set forth above is more important than the benefit of tax deductibility and we reserve the right to maintain flexibility in how we compensate our executive officers that may result in limiting the deductibility of amounts of compensation from time to time.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management and, based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included herein and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Viktor Nemeth
Javier Baz
Amit Chatwani


16

Summary Compensation Table for 2008

 
Name and Principal Position
 
Year
 
Salary
($)
 
Bonus
($)
 
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
 
Option
Awards
($)(3)
 
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
 
All Other Compensation
($)(4)
 
Total
($)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Jason T. Young, Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary (1)
2008
6,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,000
                   
Randall P. Marx, former Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
2008
2007
2006
287,000
250,000
245,000
-
25,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
328,000
     8,250
-
615,000
283,250
245,000
                   
Monty R. Lamirato, former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
2008
2007
2006
154,000
160,000
155,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
115,000
     4,800
-
269,000
164,800
155,000
                   
Steven C. Olson, Chief Technology Officer
2008
2007
2006
215,000
200,000
175,000
-
7,500
-
-
-
-
-
6,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,225
-
215,000
219,725
175,000
                   
Richard A. Anderson, former Executive Vice President
2008
2007
110,000
120,000
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
120,000
     3,750
230,000
123,750
                   
Gregory E. Raskin, former President (2)
 
2006
 
321,000
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
108,000
 
-
 
-
 
429,000
 
 
(1)
Mr. Young was appointed as a director in October 2008 and was appointed as the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer in November 2008. Mr. Young received no compensation as an employee during 2008; he received $6,000 for his services as a director during 2008.  The Company may compensate Mr. Young in the future.
 
(2)
Mr. Gregory E. Raskin resigned effective October 31, 2006, in connection with the sale of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Winncom Technologies Inc. Under Mr. Raskin’s employment agreement, he was eligible to receive a cash bonus based upon certain pre-determined net-income objectives.  As a result of meeting these objectives, Mr. Raskin earned $108,000 as a cash bonus during fiscal year 2006.
 
(3)
The amounts in columns (e) and (f) reflect the dollar amounts recognized in each of 2007 and 2006 for financial statement reporting purposes in accordance with FAS 123R with respect to stock awards and stock options granted in each such year, and the dollar amount required to be recognized in each such year in accordance with FAS 123R. These options were granted pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan described above.
 
(4)
The amounts in the column titled “All Other Compensation” for 2008 include accrued severance obligations for Randall P. Marx, Monty R. Lamirato, and Richard A. Anderson, who resigned in November 2008.
 
17

Grants of Plan-Based Awards
 
 
Name and Principal Position
 
Grant Date
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units4
(#)
 
All Other
Option Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
 
Exercise or Base Price of
Option Awards
($/Sh)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Awards
($)
Threshold
$
Target
$
Maximum
$
Jason T. Young, Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
                 
Randall P. Marx, Former Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
                 
Monty R. Lamirato, Former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
                 
Steven C. Olson, Chief Technology Officer
9/21/07
-
-
-
-
40,000(1)
$5.40
$134,000

(1) These options we granted pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.

There were no stock Equity Incentive Plan awards granted to the executive officers with respect to the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 other than those noted above. In addition, no options were exercised by the executive officers during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

18

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information on outstanding option and stock awards held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2008, including the number of shares underlying both exercisable and unexercisable portions of each stock option as well as the exercise price and the expiration date of each outstanding option.
 
 
Option Awards
Stock Awards
 
Name
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(1)
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of
Shares
or Units
of Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(2)(3)
Market Value
of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
(#)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not
Vested
($)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
Jason T. Young
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Steven C. Olson
16,000 (a)
24,000(a)
-
$5.40
9/21/2017
  -
-
-
-
 
(a)
These options were granted pursuant to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The options vests at a rate of 20% per year with vesting dates of 12/31/07, 12/31/08, 12/31/09, 12/31/10, 12/31/11. These total 40,000 options are reported in the Summary Compensation and the Grant of Plan Based Awards Table.

No options were exercised and no stock vested in 2006.

Director Compensation for the Year Ended December 31, 2008

The table below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to directors for the year ended December 31, 2008:

Director Compensation for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
 
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Name(1)
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
Stock Awards
($) (2)
Option Awards
($)(3)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total ($)
Randall P. Marx (1)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sigmund A. Balaban (4)
26,000
-
-
-
-
-
26,000
Robert E. Wade(4)
24,000
2,000
-
-
-
-
26,000
Donald A. Huebner (4)
11,000
-
-
-
-
-
11,000
Jason T. Young (5)
6,000
-
-
-
-
-
6,000
Viktor Nemeth(6)
5,000
-
-
-
-
-
5,000
Marco Vega (6)
3,000
-
-
-
-
-
3,000

(1)
Randall P. Marx was the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and thus received no compensation for his services as a director. Mr. Marx resigned on November 18, 2008. The compensation received by Mr. Marx as an employee of the Company is shown in the Summary Compensation Table.
 
19

(2)
Reflects the dollar amount recognized and expensed for financial statement reporting purposes for the year ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with FAS 123R, and thus may include amounts from awards granted in and prior to 2008. For Mr. Wade, the amount represents the Director fees earned that were paid by issuance of common stock at fair market value rather than cash.
(3)
Reflects the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the year ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with FAS 123R, and thus includes amounts from options granted in and prior to 2008.
(4)
Mr. Marx, Mr. Balaban, Mr. Wade and Mr. Huebner resigned as directors in November 2008.
(5)
Mr. Young was appointed as a director in October 2008 and was appointed as the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer in November 2008. Mr. Young receives no compensation as an employee.
(6)
Mr. Nemeth and Mr. Vega were appointed as directors in November 2008.
 
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
 
No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or former officer of the Company or had any material relationship or transactions with the Company and no officer of the Company sits on the compensation committee or other body that has the power to establish the compensation of any member of the Compensation Committee.
 
2007 Stock Incentive Plan

The following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of the 2007 Plan and its operation.

Shares Available for Issuance

The 2007 Plan provides that no more than 300,000 shares of our common stock may be issued for awards. If there is any change in the Company’s common stock by reason of any stock exchange, merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization, stock dividend, reclassification, split-up, combination of shares or otherwise, then the Board, or any Option Committee, shall make proportionate adjustments to the maximum number and kind of securities (i) available for issuance under the 2007 Plan; (ii) available for issuance as incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options; (iii) that may be subject to awards received by any participant; (iv) that may be subject to different types of awards; (v) that are subject to any outstanding award; and (vi) the price of each security.

The 2007 Plan provides that shares covered by an award will not count against the shares available for issuance under the 2007 Plan until they are actually issued and delivered to a participant.  If an award granted under the 2007 Plan lapses, expires, terminates or is forfeited, surrendered or canceled without having been fully exercised or without the issuance of all the shares subject to the award, the shares covered by such award will again be available for use under the 2007 Plan.

Eligibility

Awards may be made to any employee, officer, director of the Company and its related companies or other persons who provide services to the Company and its related companies.

20

Administration

The 2007 Plan is administered by the Option Committee, which shall consist of the Board or a committee of the Board as the Board may from time to time designate.

Types of Awards

Stock Options. The Option Committee may grant, either incentive stock options, which comply with Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or nonqualified stock options. The Option Committee sets option exercise prices and terms, except that the exercise price of an incentive stock option may be no less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. At the time of grant, the Option Committee in its sole discretion will determine when stock options are exercisable and when they expire, except that the term of a stock option cannot exceed ten years.

Restricted Stock Awards. The Option Committee may grant awards of restricted stock under the 2007 Plan. These shares may be subject to restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions as determined by the Option Committee. As a condition to a grant of an award of restricted stock, the Option Committee may require or permit a participant to elect that any cash dividends paid on a share of Restricted Stock be automatically reinvested in additional shares of restricted stock or applied to the purchase of additional awards under the 2007 Plan. Unless otherwise determined by the Option Committee, stock distributed in connection with a stock split or stock dividend, and other property distributed as a dividend, shall be subject to restrictions and a risk of forfeiture to the same extent as restricted stock with respect to which such stock or other property has been distributed.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The Option Committee may grant awards of Restricted Stock Units under the 2007 Plan. A “Restricted Stock Unit” is a grant valued in terms of common stock, but common stock is not issued at the time of grant. After participants who receive awards of Restricted Stock Units satisfy applicable vesting requirements, the Company will distribute shares or the cash equivalent of the number of shares used to value the Unit. If the participant does not meet the requirements prior to the end of the vesting period, the Units will be forfeited to the Company. Vesting requirements may be met by the passage of time or by either Company or individual performance. Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such restrictions (which may include a risk of forfeiture) as determined by the Option Committee, which restrictions may lapse at the expiration of the deferral period or at other times determined by the Option Committee.

Amendment and Termination of the 2007 Plan

The Board of Directors or the Option Committee may amend, alter or discontinue the 2007 Plan, except that if any applicable statute, rule or regulation requires shareholder approval with respect to any amendment of the 2007 Plan, then to the extent so required, shareholder approval will be obtained. No amendment may impair the right of a participant under an outstanding agreement. The 2007 Plan will terminate on August 2, 2017.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of the material United States federal income tax consequences to us and to recipients of certain awards under the 2007 Plan. The summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code and the U.S. Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder in effect as of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of which may change with retroactive effect. The summary is not intended to be a complete analysis or discussion of all potential tax consequences that may be important to recipients of awards under the 2007 Plan.

21

Nonqualified Stock Options. A recipient will not have any income at the time a nonqualified stock option is granted, nor will the Company be entitled to a deduction at that time.  When a nonqualified stock option is exercised, the recipient generally will recognize ordinary income (whether the option price is paid in cash or by surrender of shares of Company stock), in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares to which the option exercise pertains over the option price.

Incentive Stock Options. A recipient will not have any income at the time an incentive stock option (“ISO”) is granted.  Furthermore, a recipient will not have regular taxable income at the time the ISO is exercised. However, the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over the option price will be a preference item that could create an alternative minimum tax liability for the recipient. If a recipient disposes of the shares acquired on exercise of an ISO after the later of two years after the grant of the ISO or one year after exercise of the ISO, the gain recognized by the recipient (i.e., the excess of the proceeds received over the option price), if any, will be long-term capital gain eligible for favorable tax rates under the Internal Revenue Code. Conversely, if the recipient disposes of the shares within two years of the grant of the ISO or within one year of exercise of the ISO, the disposition will generally be a “disqualifying disposition”, and the recipient will recognize ordinary income in the year of the disqualifying disposition equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise over the option price and (ii) the excess of the amount received for the shares over the option price. The balance of the gain or loss, if any, will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on how long the shares were held.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units. With respect to a grant of restricted stock or Restricted Stock Units, the participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of vesting or payout equal to the fair market value (on the vesting or payout date) of the shares or cash received minus any amount paid. For restricted stock only, a participant instead may elect to be taxed at the time of grant.

The Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an award under the 2007 Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a participant at the time the participant recognizes such income, provided that the deduction is not disallowed by Section 162(m) or otherwise limited by the Internal Revenue Code.

In 2007, options to purchase a total of 40,000 shares were granted to an officer at an exercise price of $5.40. No options were granted to directors in 2007 from the 2007 Plan and no options were granted in 2008 under the 2007 Plan.

1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan

In November 1997, the Board of Directors approved our 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan (the “1997 Plan”). Pursuant to the 1997 Plan, options were authorized to be granted to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of our common stock to key employees, directors, and other persons who have or are contributing to our success. On November 9, 2004, the shareholders approved amendments to the 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan to allow for an aggregate of 200,000 options to be granted under the 1997 Plan. The options granted pursuant to the 1997 Plan could have been incentive options qualifying for beneficial tax treatment for the recipient or they could have been non-qualified options. The 1997 Plan was administered by an option committee that determined the terms of the options subject to the requirements of the 1997 Plan, except that the option committee did not administer the 1997 Plan with respect to automatic grants of options to our directors who were not our employees.  The option committee could have been the entire Board or a committee of the Board. The 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan expired in November 2007.

22

Through May 24, 2000, directors who were not also our employees (“Outside Directors”) automatically received options to purchase 5,000 shares pursuant to the 1997 Plan at the time of their election as an Outside Director. These Outside Directors options were not exercisable at the time of grant. Options to purchase 1,000 shares became exercisable for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended by each Outside Director on or after the date of grant of the options to that Outside Director, but in no event earlier than six months following the date of grant. The exercise price for options granted to Outside Directors was equal to the closing price per share of our common stock on the date of grant. All options granted to Outside Directors expired five years after the date of grant. On the date that all of an Outside Director’s options became exercisable, options to purchase an additional 5,000 shares, which were exercisable no earlier than six months from the date of grant, were automatically granted to that Outside Director. On May 24, 2000, the Board of Directors voted to (1) decrease the amount of options automatically granted to Outside Directors from 5,000 to 500 options, and (2) decrease the amount of exercisable options from 1,000 to 100 per meeting. The term of the Outside Director option granted in the future was lowered from five years to two years. The other terms of the Outside Director options did not change. On July 5, 2002, the Board of Directors voted to (1) increase the amount of options automatically granted to Outside Directors from 500 to 2,500 options, and (2) increase the amount of exercisable options from 100 to 500 per meeting. The other terms of the Outside Director options did not change.

The Company granted a total of 7,500 options to Outside Directors under the 1997 Plan during 2007 at exercise prices ranging from $4.80 to $5.47 per share. The Company granted a total of 5,000 options to Outside Directors under the 1997 Plan during 2006 at an exercise price of $6.50 per share. The Company granted a total of 5,000 options to Outside Directors under the 1997 Plan during 2005 at exercise prices ranging from $5.50 to $7.50 per share.

As of December 31, 2008, there were 6,000 exercisable options outstanding related to the grants to former Outside Directors. These options expired February 12, 2009.

In addition to Outside Directors grants, the Board of Directors may grant incentive options to our key employees pursuant to the 1997 Plan. In 2007 and 2006, the Board did not grant any options to employees under the 1997 Plan. In 2005, the Board granted a total of 2,000 options under the Plan to employees with an exercise price of $7.50. These options expired in 2008.

Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements

Effective February 1, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an employment agreement between the Company and Randall P. Marx, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), effective as of January 31, 2008. The employment agreement was recommended to the Board by the Compensation Committee. The agreement provided for annual compensation of $250,000 in 2007, $275,000 in 2008, and $300,000 in 2009. On November 18, 2008 Mr. Marx resigned his position as CEO. In connection with Mr. Marx’s resignation, on November 18, 2008, the Company and Mr. Marx reached an agreement for compensation of Mr. Marx that would replace the compensation and other benefits to which Mr. Marx could be entitled under his January 31, 2008 employment agreement with the Company. Pursuant to this new agreement, Mr. Marx will be compensated $327,500 through December 31, 2009 as payment in full for his salary and accrued vacation, and he will receive health benefits from the Company through December 31, 2009. Under the terms of this agreement, Mr. Marx is not entitled to receive any other compensation or benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled under his January 31, 2008 employment agreement. Mr. Marx also agreed to provide telephonic consulting services to the Company.

23

Effective November 1, 2007, the Company entered into a two year employment agreement with Mr. Monty R. Lamirato as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, which position he had served in since June 2001. The agreement provided for annual compensation of $165,000 in the first year and $175,000 in the second year. On November 26, 2008, Monty R. Lamirato, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, resigned from his positions with the Company. In connection with Mr. Lamirato’s resignation, Mr. Lamirato and the Company executed a separation agreement pursuant to which Mr. Lamirato was paid $115,000 through May 26, 2009 for all compensation and other benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled under his November 7, 2007 employment agreement. Under the terms of this agreement, Mr. Lamirato agreed to provide consulting services to the Company through October 31, 2009.

Effective November 1, 2007, the Company entered into a three year employment agreement with Mr. Richard A. Anderson, as the Company’s Executive Vice President. The agreement provided for annual compensation of $125,000. On November 26, 2008, Richard L. Anderson, the Company’s Executive Vice President, resigned from his position with the Company. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Anderson and the Company executed a separation agreement pursuant to which Mr. Anderson was paid $120,000 through May 26, 2009, and received health benefits from the Company through June 30, 2009, both as payment for all compensation and other benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled under his November 7, 2007 employment agreement. Mr. Anderson also agreed to provide consulting services to the Company through December 31, 2009.

Effective November 1, 2007, the Company entered into a five year employment agreement with Mr. Steven C. Olson, as President and Chief Technology Officer of the Company’s Wireless Communications Solutions Division. Mr. Olson has been with the Company since 2001. The agreement provides for annual base compensation of $200,000 in 2007, increasing annually to $245,000 in 2011. Mr. Olson shall also be entitled to bonuses ranging from $5,000 to $100,000 annually contingent upon the Wireless Communications Solutions Division achieving certain net income targets. Mr. Olson earned a bonus of $7,500 for 2007. We previously entered into a written employment agreement with Mr. Olson, effective August 22, 2004. The employment agreement was for the period August 22, 2004 through August 22, 2007 at an annual base salary of $175,000. Mr. Olson also was eligible to earn bonuses, upon achieving certain gross margin objectives, over the term of the agreement. Mr. Olson did not receive a bonus in 2006. Mr. Olson also received options to purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $6.00 per share from August 22, 2004 through August 22, 2007. Mr. Olson also received options to purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock on August 21, 2007. These options vest at a rate of 20% per year with vesting dates of 12/31/07, 12/31/08, 12/31/09, 12/31/10, and 12/31/11.

The following tables show the potential payments upon termination or a change of control of the Company for each of the named executive officers.

Scenario
Mr. Olson
If early retirement occurred at December 31, 2009
-
If termination for cause occurred at December 31, 2009
-
If termination without cause occurred at December 31, 2009
$225,000
If “termination for Good Reason” occurred at December 31, 2009 (1)
$225,000
If death or disability occurred as of December 31, 2009
-

(1)           The provisions governing “Good Reason” are described in Mr. Olson’s Employment Agreement, which has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2007.  Such Form 8-K, and the Exhibits thereto, are incorporated herein by reference thereto.  Such Form 8-K and Mr. Olson’s Employment Agreement are publicly available at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s website www.sec.gov.

24

We have no compensatory plan or arrangement that results or will result from the resignation, retirement, or any other termination of an executive officer’s employment with us or from a change-in-control or a change in an executive officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control, except that the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan and 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan provides for vesting of all outstanding options in the event of the occurrence of a change-in-control.

Certain Transactions with Management and Principal Shareholders

We do not employ specific written procedures for the review, approval or ratification of related party transactions involving our directors, officers and employees or their family members, but we consider such transactions on a case-by-case basis.
 
On January 23, 2009 we entered into a financial advisory engagement (the “Agreement”) with Quadrant Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”). Quadrant Management, Inc. is under common control with Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc., an entity that beneficially owns 575,763, or 18.63%, of the Company's common stock. Mr. Young, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, has been a Managing Director at Quadrant Management, Inc. since 2005, where he is responsible for making investments in US and emerging market companies, and where he frequently serves in active management- or director-level roles.
 
Pursuant to the Agreement, the Advisor will provide to ARC financial advisory and business consulting services, including restructuring services.
 
In consideration for the restructuring services provided by the Advisor since November 2008 and for the ongoing services to be provided, ARC will pay the following: 1) an initial cash fee of $250,000 upon signing the Agreement; 2) an annual fee of the greater of (i) $250,000, or (ii) 20% of any increase in reported earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization after adjusting for one-time and non-recurring items (“EBITDA”) for the current financial year over preceding year, or (iii) 20% of reported EBITDA for the current financial year; and 3) all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Advisor in performing services under the Agreement.
 
The Agreement will expire on December 31, 2013.

Except as set forth herein, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and during the interim period since the end of fiscal year 2008, there were no transactions between the Company and its directors, executive officers or known holders of greater than five percent of the Company's Common Stock in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

25

PROPOSAL NO. 2: TO RATIFY THE SELECTION OF HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP AS
HE COMPANY'S CERTIFIED INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and its Audit Committee recommends that the shareholders vote in favor of ratifying the selection of the certified public accounting firm of Hein & Associates LLP of Denver, Colorado as the auditors who will continue to audit financial statements, review tax returns, and perform other accounting and consulting services for the year ending December 31, 2009 or until the Board of Directors, in its discretion, replaces them. Hein & Associates LLP also audited our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.

An affirmative vote of the plurality of shares represented at the meeting is necessary to ratify the selection of auditors. There is no legal requirement for submitting this proposal to the shareholders; however, the Board of Directors believes it is of sufficient importance to seek ratification. Whether the proposal is ratified or defeated, the Board of Directors may reconsider, at its discretion, its selection of Hein & Associates LLP. Representatives of Hein & Associates LLP will not be present at the Annual Meeting.

Audit Fees

The Audit Committee reviews and determines whether specific projects or expenditures with our independent registered public accounting firm (auditor), Hein & Associates LLP potentially affect their independence. The Audit Committee’s policy requires that all services the Company's independent registered public accounting firm (auditor) may provide to the Company, including audit services and permitted audit-related services, be pre-approved in advance by the Audit Committee. In the event that an audit or non-audit service requires approval prior to the next scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee, the auditor must contact the Chairman of the Audit Committee to obtain such approval. Any approval will be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
 
Audit Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us by Hein & Associates LLP for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
 
   
2008
   
2007
   
2006
 
Audit fees
    $99,420  (1)     $78,000  (1)     $140,000  (1)
Audit-related fees
    --  (2)     --  (2)     --  (2)
Tax fees
    18,000  (3)     22,000  (3)     14,000  (3)
All other fees
    --       --       --  
Total audit and non-audit fees
    $117,420       $100,000       $154,000  
 
(1)
Includes fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the first three quarters of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 and related U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission registration statements.

(2)
Includes fees billed for professional services rendered in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, in connection with acquisition planning and due diligence.

(3)
Includes fees billed for professional services rendered in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, in connection with tax compliance (including U.S. federal and state returns) and tax consulting.
 
 
26

Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees

During fiscal year 2008, Hein & Associates LLP did not bill any fees for the professional services described in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

All Other Fees

During fiscal year 2008, there were no other fees billed for services rendered by Hein & Associates LLP other than the services described above.

The Board of Directors has considered whether the provision of the services covered in this section is compatible with maintaining Hein & Associates LLP’s independence and believes that it is.

Required Vote

Ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of common stock voting in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. If the shareholders should not ratify the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP, the Board will reconsider the appointment.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP AS THE
COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 2009.

PROPOSAL 3: OTHER BUSINESS

The Board of Directors of the Company is not aware of any other matters that are to be presented at the Annual Meeting, and it has not been advised that any other person will present any other matters for consideration at the meeting. Nevertheless, if other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the shareholders present, or the persons, if any, authorized by a valid proxy to vote on their behalf, shall vote on such matters in accordance with their judgment.

RESOLUTIONS PROPOSED BY INDIVIDUAL SHAREHOLDERS;
DISCRETIONARY AUTHORITY TO VOTE PROXIES

In order to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to our next annual meeting of shareholders following the end of our 2009 fiscal year, proposals by individual shareholders must be received by us no later than August 18, 2010.

27

In addition, the proxy solicited by the Board of Directors for the next annual meeting of shareholders will confer discretionary authority on any shareholder proposal presented at that meeting unless we are provided with notice of that proposal no later than September 30, 2010.

AVAILABILITY OF REPORTS ON FORM 10-K

A copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 is being sent to each shareholder with this Proxy Statement. Upon written request, we will provide, without charge, a copy of our 2008 Form 10-K or other SEC filings to any shareholder of record, or to any shareholder who owns Common Stock listed in the name of a bank or broker as nominee, at the close of business on November 24, 2009. Any request for a copy of our 2008 Form 10-K or other SEC filings should be mailed to ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc., 10601 West 48th Avenue, I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660, Attention: Investor Relations.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This proxy statement and materials delivered with this proxy statement include “forward-looking” statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this proxy statement and materials delivered with this proxy statement, including without limitation statements regarding our financial position, business strategy, and plans and objectives of management for future operations and capital expenditures, are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and the assumptions upon which the forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations and assumptions will prove to have been correct. Additional statements concerning important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations (“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in the “Forward-Looking Statements- Cautionary Statements” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf subsequent to the date of this proxy statement are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary Statements.

This notice and proxy statement are sent by order of the Board of Directors.


Dated: November 24, 2009  
Jason T. Young
Chief Executive Officer

* * * * *

28

APPENDIX A
 

ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATIONS
OF DIRECTOR CANDIDATES

Effective January 1, 2009
 

I.       All Nominations

It is the policy of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the “Corporation”) that each candidate recommended for nomination and election to the Board (each, a “Nominee”), regardless of whether such Nominee is recommended by a shareholder of the Corporation, the Board or any other person, shall be approved by a majority of the independent directors of the Board.

The Board believes that certain minimum qualifications must be met by each Nominee for the Board, as well as meeting the applicable independence standards required by the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and federal securities laws. The Board believes that Nominees must reflect a Board that is comprised of directors (i) a majority of whom are independent (as determined under the aforementioned SEC director qualification standards); (ii) who are of high integrity; (iii) who have qualifications that will increase the overall effectiveness of the Board; and (iv) who meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or financial expertise with respect to audit Board members. In evaluating the qualifications of the Nominees, the Board considers many factors, including issues of leadership ability, career success, character, judgment, independence, background, age, expertise, diversity and breadth of experience, length of service, other commitments and the like. The Board evaluates such factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weight or priority to any of these factors. Also, the Board considers the suitability of each Nominee, including the current members of the Board, in light of the current size and composition of the Board.

Unless and until otherwise subsequently determined by the Board, the number of directors of the Corporation at any time shall be the number of directors that the Board nominated for election at the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders, increased by the number of directors, if any, that the Board appointed subsequent to the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders and also increased by the number of directors, if any, whose term as a director did not expire at the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders.

II.      Shareholder Nominations

The Board shall consider recommendations for Nominees to the Board from shareholders (an “Eligible Shareholder”) holding a minimum of $2,000 in market value, or 1%, of the Corporation's voting common stock, which stock is held through the date of the meeting electing directors, and which Eligible Shareholder complies with the nomination notice procedures set forth in these policies and the Corporation's Bylaws.

Nominees recommended by Eligible Shareholders (hereinafter referred to as “Shareholder Candidates”) will be evaluated by the Board on the same basis as Nominees that may be identified by the Board, management or, if the Board permits, a search firm. Such evaluation may, in the Board's discretion, include a review solely of information and documentation provided to the Board or may also include discussions with persons familiar with the Shareholder Candidate, an interview with the Shareholder Candidate or other actions that the Board deems proper. In evaluating and identifying Nominees, the Board has the authority to retain and terminate any third party search firm that is used to identify director Nominees and has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any such search firm.

29

Shareholder Candidates who are recommended by an Eligible Shareholder at a time when there are no open positions on the Board and are considered qualified Nominees by the Board may be placed on the rolling list of Nominees for open Board positions maintained by the Board, generally for a period of up to 24 months from the date that the recommendation was received by the Secretary of the Corporation.

III.      Procedures for Shareholders Regarding Nomination of Director Candidates

For the Shareholder Candidate to be considered by the Board, regardless of whether the Eligible Shareholder (i) is seeking to have the Shareholder Candidate included in the Corporation's proxy statement, (ii) intends to prepare and distribute its own proxy statement, or (iii) intends to nominate the Shareholder Candidate at a meeting, the Eligible Shareholder and the Shareholder Candidate must comply with the procedures set forth herein.

A. Recommendations for Shareholder Candidate(s) to the Board of Directors from an Eligible Shareholder must be directed in writing to ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, at the Corporation's principal offices at 10601 West 48th Avenue, I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660. Each such recommendation from an Eligible Shareholder shall include and set forth the following information regarding the Shareholder Candidate whom the Eligible Shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director:

1. 
the name, age, business address and residence address of such Shareholder Candidate;

2. 
the principal occupation or employment of the Shareholder Candidate;

3. 
the class and number of shares of the Corporation's securities beneficially owned by such Shareholder Candidate, if any;

4. 
detailed biographical data and qualifications and information regarding any relationships between the Shareholder Candidate and the Corporation within the last three years;

5. 
a statement signed by the Shareholder Candidate acknowledging that:

(a)    the Shareholder Candidate consents to being named in the Corporation's proxy materials, and, if elected, will serve as a director of the Corporation and will represent all shareholders of the Corporation in accordance with applicable laws and the Corporation's articles of incorporation and by-laws, as may be amended from time to time; and

(b)    the Shareholder Candidate, if elected, will comply with the Corporation's Amended and Restated Code of Ethics, any corporate governance guidelines, and any other applicable rule, regulation, policy or standard of conduct applicable to the Board of Directors and its individual members.

30

6. 
a fully completed and signed Questionnaire for Directors and Officers on the Corporation's standard form and provide any additional information requested by the Board or the Corporation, including any information that would be required to be included in a proxy statement in which the Shareholder Candidate is named as a nominee for election as a director and information showing that the Shareholder Candidate meets the Board's qualifications for nomination as a director and for service on the Committees of the Board; and

7. 
any other information relating to such Shareholder Candidate required to be disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), and the rules thereunder.

B. The Eligible Shareholder submitting the recommendation must provide:

1.   the name and record address of the Eligible Shareholder and the class and number of shares of the Corporation's securities beneficially owned by the Eligible Shareholder;

2.   any material interest of the Eligible Shareholder in such nomination;

3.   a description of all arrangements or understandings between the Eligible Shareholder making such nomination and the Shareholder Candidate and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination is made by the Eligible Shareholder;

4.   a statement from the recommending Eligible Shareholder in support of the Shareholder Candidate and providing references for the Shareholder Candidate;

5.   a representation that such Eligible Shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the Shareholder Candidate named in its recommendation; and

6.   any other information that is required to be provided by the shareholder pursuant to Regulation 14A under the 1934 Act, in his/her capacity as a proponent to a shareholder proposal.

In addition to the required information detailed above, a Shareholder Candidate must be available for interviews with members of the Board.

IV.      Timing of Shareholder Candidate Recommendations

An Eligible Shareholder who wishes to recommend a Shareholder Candidate for election as a director, regardless of whether the Eligible Shareholder (i) is seeking to have the Shareholder Candidate included in the Corporation's proxy statement, (ii) intends to prepare and distribute its own proxy statement, or (iii) intends to nominate the Shareholder Candidate at a meeting, must submit the information and documentation described above for receipt by the Secretary of the Corporation in a timely manner, with “timely” determined as set forth in the next succeeding sentence herein. To be timely, an Eligible Shareholder's notice must be received at the Corporation's principal office not less than 120 calendar days before the date that the Corporation's proxy statement or notice thereof was first mailed to shareholders in connection with the previous year's annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event (i) the Corporation did not hold an annual meeting in the previous year, (ii) the date of the annual meeting has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year's meeting, or (iii) the meeting is a special meeting called in the manner set forth in the Corporation's bylaws, then notice by the Eligible Shareholder, to be timely, must be delivered to the Corporation not later than the 10th day following the day on which a Public Announcement (defined in Article II Section 5 of the bylaws) of the date of such meeting is first made. The Secretary of the Corporation will provide a copy of the Bylaws and/or the Policies and Procedures for Shareholder Nominations of Director Candidates upon a request in writing from the Eligible Shareholder.

31

V.       Decisions by the Independent Directors

The majority of the independent directors shall have final authority on determining the selection of director Nominees for nomination to the Board.

VI.      Modification of Policies and Procedures

The policies and procedures set forth herein may be modified at any time as may be determined by the Board and a majority of the independent directors.


 
32