ugp20180309_6k.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing

Form 6-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Report Of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant To Rule 13a-16 Or 15d-16 Of

The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

For the month of March, 2018

Commission File Number: 001-14950

ULTRAPAR HOLDINGS INC.

(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)

 

Avenida Brigadeiro Luis Antonio, 1343, 9º Andar

São Paulo, SP, Brazil 01317-910

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

Form 20-F     X                        Form 40-F             

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):

Yes                                 No     X    

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):

Yes                                 No     X    


 

 
 

 

 



 
 

 



MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGEMENT


Dear Shareholders,


We are pleased to invite you to attend the Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting (the “Meeting”) of Ultrapar Participações S.A. (“Ultrapar” or the “Company”), to be held on
April 11,  2018, at 2:00 p.m., in the Company’s headquarters, located at Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antônio, nr 1,343, 9th floor, in the City and State of São Paulo, Brazil, in accordance with the Call Notice, to be published in the newspapers Valor Econômico on March 12, 13 and 14, 2018 and  Diário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo on March 13, 14 and 15, 2017, also available at the Company’s website (ri.ultra.com.br).

The preparation of this Shareholders’ Meeting Manual (the “Manual”) is aligned with the Company’s philosophy towards the continuous improvement of its corporate governance practices, including the quality and convenience of the information provided to our shareholders.

The purpose of this document is to present the management proposals and to provide you with clarification and guidance regarding the matters to be discussed and procedures required for your attendance and power of attorney to participate in the Meeting, consolidating in a single file all documents published by Ultrapar in connection with the Meeting.

In addition to the information disclosed, we also inform you that Ultrapar’s Investor Relations team will be available for additional clarification by e-mail Invest@ultra.com.br  or telephone +55 (11) 3177-7014.

All shareholders of Ultrapar (including holders of common shares in the form of ADRs) may vote in all matters included in the agenda. Each common share entitles its holder to one vote in the Meeting’s resolutions. Holders of ADR will be represented as specified in a communication to be delivered to ADR holders by the depositary institution, pursuant to the terms of the depositary agreement.

We count on your presence.

 


 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CALL NOTICE

 


 
 

 

 

 

 

ULTRAPAR PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A.

Publicly-Traded Company

CNPJ nº 33.256.439/0001- 39    NIRE 35.300.109.724

 

Call Notice

ANNUAL GENERAL SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETING



 

The shareholders are hereby invited to attend the Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting of Ultrapar Participações S.A. (“Ultrapar” or the “Company”), to be held on April 11, 2018, at 2:00 p.m., in the Company’s headquarters, located at Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antônio, nr 1343, 9th floor, in the City and State of São Paulo (the “Shareholders’ Meeting”), to pass on the following matters:

1. The examination and approval of the Management Report and accounts and financial statements of the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2017, including the report from the Independent Auditors and the opinion from the Fiscal Council;    

2. The allocation of net earnings for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2017;

3. The approval of the annual Management’s compensation;

4. The election of the effective and alternate members of the Fiscal Council  based on the request for installation of the Fiscal Council submitted by shareholders representing more than 2% (two percent) of the voting shares issued by the Company, pursuant to article 161 of the Brazilian Corporate Law nr 6.404/76 and CVM Instruction 324/00; and

5. In accordance to the item above, approval of the Fiscal Council’s compensation for the period of it terms.


Attendance at the Meeting

The shareholders, including holders of American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), of the Company may attend the Meeting in person or represented by proxies, upon the fulfilment of the requirements for attendance provided for in article 12 of the Company’s Bylaws, presenting the documents listed under items Individual Shareholder, Corporate Shareholder and Investment Funds below.

The status of shareholder will be evidenced by submitting a statement issued by the bookkeeping institution or by the custodian institution, indicating the number of shares held by them up to three days prior to the Meeting.

The Company will adopt for this Shareholders’ Meeting the remote voting system in accordance with CVM Instruction 481/09, allowing its shareholders to send, through their respective custodian institution or bookkeeping institution or directly to the Company, a Remote Voting Form, as provided by the Company together with other documents to be discussed at the Shareholders’ Meeting. The Company informs that the instructions for the exercise of the remote voting are described in the Shareholders’ Meeting Manual.

Holders of ADRs will be represented at the Shareholders Meeting by the custodian of underlying shares of the ADRs pursuant to the terms of the deposit agreement, dated December 16, 1999, as


 
 

amended (“Deposit Agreement”).  The procedures for exercising voting rights in connection with the ADRs will be specified in a communication to be delivered to ADR holders by the depositary institution, pursuant to the terms of the Deposit Agreement.


Individual Shareholder

·  Original or certified copy of a photo identification (ID, Alien Resident Card, driver’s license, officially recognized work card, or passport, in case of non-Brazilians); and

·  Original or certified copy of the power-of-attorney, if applicable, and a photo identification of the proxy.


Corporate Shareholder

·  Certified copy of the most recent consolidated bylaws or articles of incorporation and of the corporate acts granting power of attorney (minutes of the meeting of election of the board members and/or power of attorney);

·  Original or certified copy of photo identification of the proxy or proxies; and;

·  Original or certified copy of the power of attorney, if applicable, and photo identification of the proxy.


Investment Funds

·  Evidence of the capacity of fund manager conferred upon the individual or legal entity representing the shareholder at the Shareholders’ Meeting, or the proxy granting such powers;

·  The corporate acts of the manager, in case it is a legal entity, granting powers to the representative attending the Shareholders’ Meeting or to whom the power of attorney has been granted; and

·  In the event the representative or proxy is a legal entity, the same documents referred to in “Corporate Shareholder” must be presented to the Company.

The documents listed above must be sent to the Investor Relations Department until 2:00 p.m. of April 9, 2018.


Availability of Documents and Information

In accordance with Ultrapar’s Bylaws and with article 6 of CVM Instruction 481/09, the documents and information regarding the matters to be voted upon, as well as the Shareholders’ Meeting Manual and other relevant information and documents to the exercise of voting rights in the Meeting, were filed with the CVM and are available in CVM website (www.cvm.gov.br), in the Company's headquarters, in the B3 – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão website (www.b3.com.br) and in the Company’s website (ri.ultra.com.br).





São Paulo, March 12, 2018.

PAULO GUILHERME AGUIAR CUNHA

Chairman of the Board of Directors


 

 

    

 

ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES

The documents necessary for your participation in the Meeting are specified in the Call Notice.

We clarify that in the case of non-Brazilian investment funds and shareholders, a sworn translation of the documents shall not be required if the documents are originally in English or Spanish.

Ultrapar, aiming to facilitate the representation of its shareholders at the Meeting (excluding holders of common shares in the form of ADRs), provides in the end of this Manual a power-of-attorney model, through which shareholders may appoint the lawyers thereby indicated to represent them at the Meeting, at no cost and strictly in accordance with the powers granted. To the extent shareholders (excluding holders of common shares in the form of ADRs) opt to be represented at the Meeting using the model provided by the Company, the power of attorney must include all the representatives listed in the power-of-attorney model.

We kindly ask you to send the documents listed above to the Investor Relations Department, at Avenida Brigadeiro Luís Antônio, 1,343, 8th floor, CEP 01317-910, in the City and State of São Paulo, up to 2:00 p.m. of April 9, 2018.


Remote Voting

The form and other supporting documents shall be filed at the Company within 7 days from the GSM date, that is, until April 5, 2018.


 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL

 


 
 

 

 

 

 

ULTRAPAR PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A.

Publicly-Traded Company

CNPJ nº 33.256.439/0001- 39    NIRE 35.300.109.724

           


MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL

 

Dear Shareholders,

The Management of Ultrapar Participações S.A. (“Company”) hereby presents to the Company’s Shareholders the Management Proposal, regarding the resolutions to be voted in the Annual General Shareholders’ Meeting, to be held on April 11, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.

 

1) The examination and approval of the Management Report and accounts and financial statements for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2017 including the report from the Independent Auditors and the opinion from the Fiscal Council

The Management’s Report and financial statements for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2017 were filed at CVM’s website on February 21, 2018, and published in wide-circulation newspapers on February 23, 2018.

The mentioned documents (i) were approved by the Board of Directors and (ii) obtained a favorable opinion from the Company’s Fiscal Council at meetings held on February 21, 2018, whose minutes were also filed at CVM on the date.

In addition, the financial statements were audited and received a report with an unqualified opinion from the Company’s independent auditors, KPMG Independent Auditors. Such documents are available in Exhibit I of the present proposal. The Management discussion and analysis on the financial conditions of the Company, under the terms of item 10 of the Reference Form, are available in Exhibit II.

We propose the approval without reservations of the documents mentioned above by the Company’s shareholders.

2) The allocation of net earnings for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2017

Pursuant to item II of paragraph 1 of article 9 of CVM Instruction 481/09, as amended, and in the format of annex 9-1-II of the same instruction, we have made available information regarding the allocation of net earnings for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2017 in Exhibit III.

We propose the approval of the allocation of net earnings according to Exhibit III and the Company’s financial statements.

 

3) The approval of the Management’s annual global compensation

We propose the approval of the Company’s Management global compensation proposal for the period between May 2018 and April 2019 according to the terms presented in Exhibit IV.

In order to allow for a better understanding of the rationale of the present proposal, we disclose additional information regarding the Management’s compensation policies and practices in Exhibit V, according to item 13 of the Reference Form.


 
 


4) The election of the members of the Fiscal Council and their alternates based on the request for its installation made by shareholders representing more than 2% (two percent) of the voting shares issued by the Company

Considering that the Fiscal Council will be established by request of a shareholder representing more than 2% (two percent) of voting shares issued by the Company, pursuant to article 161 of the Brazilian Corporate Law, paragraph 2 and CVM Instruction 324/00, we propose the election of the following candidates as members of the Company’s Fiscal Council, as well as their alternates:


(i) Flavio César Maia Luz (effective) / Márcio Augustus Ribeiro (alternate)

(ii) Geraldo Toffanello (effective) / Pedro Ozires Predeus (alternate)

(iii) William Bezerra Cavalcanti Filho (effective) / Paulo Cesar Pascotini (alternate)


Detailed information about the candidates is available in
Exhibit VI, according to items 12.5 to 12.10 of the Reference Form.


5) The approval of the Fiscal Council’s compensation

We propose the approval of the compensation of the members of the Fiscal Council for their term of office according to the terms presented in Exhibit IV.


Availability of Documents and Information

In accordance with Ultrapar’s Bylaws and with article 6 of CVM Instruction 481/09, as amended, the documents and information regarding the matters to be approved, as well the remote voting form and other relevant information and documents necessary to the exercise of voting rights in the Meeting, were filed at CVM and are available in CVM’s website (www.cvm.gov.br), at the Company's headquarters, B3 - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão website (www.b3.com.br) and in the Company’s website (ri.ultra.com.br).





São Paulo, March 12, 2018.

PAULO GUILHERME AGUIAR CUNHA

Chairman of the Board of Directors


 
 

  

 

EXHIBITS

 

 


 
 

  

 

 

 

EXHIBIT I – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

This Annex was previously filed on Ultrapar’s Form 6-K dated February 21, 2018.


 
 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT II – ITEM 10 OF THE REFERENCE FORM (MD&A)


 
 

EXHIBIT II – ITEM 10 OF THE REFERENCE FORM (MD&A)

 

10. Management discussion


10.1 - Management discussion & analysis:


Introduction

You should read this discussion together with our consolidated financial statements, filed with the CVM on February 21, 2018, including the Notes thereto, and other financial information included elsewhere in this document.

 

a. General financial and equity conditions


Company overview

Ultrapar is a multi-business Company with 80 years of history, with distinguished position in the markets in which it operates. Our five principal segments are:

 

·          the LPG distribution business, conducted by Ultragaz;

·          the fuels distribution business, conducted by Ipiranga;

·          the chemical and petrochemical business, conducted by Oxiteno;

·          the storage for liquid bulk business, conducted by Ultracargo; and

·          the retail pharmacy business, conducted by Extrafarma.

 

Ultragaz distributes LPG to residential, commercial and industrial market segments. Ipiranga distributes gasoline, ethanol, diesel, NGV (natural gas for vehicles), fuel oil, kerosene, lubricants and ARLA through a network of 8 thousand service stations and directly to large customers. Oxiteno produces ethylene oxide and its main derivatives, and is a major producer of specialty chemicals, particularly surfactants. It produces approximately 1.1 thousand products used in various industrial sectors such as cosmetics, detergents, agrochemicals, packaging, textiles, paints and coatings. Ultracargo is the largest provider of storage for liquid bulk in Brazil. Extrafarma operates in distribution and retail pharmacy sector, with 394 stores at the end of 2017, one of the leaders in its operational area and the seventh largest drugstore chain in Brazil according to the ABRAFARMA ranking.

In 2017, Ultrapar implemented initiatives and projects that allow us to establish new sources of growth paths for our businesses. Despite the CADE’s (Administrative Council for Economic Defense) decision against the purchase of ALESAT, we reviewed our investments over the course of 2017 to R$ 2.3 billion, bigger investments than originally planned. The creation of a new lubricants business in partnership with Chevron announced in 2016 started operations in December 2017. On February 28, 2018 CADE decided against the purchase of Liquigás, an operation announced in November 2016 which was under the antithrust authority analysis for 327 days. Such initiatives did not affect the company’s general financial and equity conditions.

 


 
 

 

2017

After two difficult years in deep recession, Brazilian GDP started 2017 in a downward trend, with gradual recovery of the economic activity throughout the year. The early expectations on the economy resumption were gradually confirmed by an increase in real average income and stable unemployment rates. The beginning of the economic situation upturn allowed continued reduction of the basic interest rate, which dropped from 13.75% at yearend 2016 to 7.00% in 2017. The average price of the US Dollar relative to the Brazilian Real in 2017 was R$ 3.19 vis-à-vis R$ 3.49 in 2016, a 9% drop. After four years of decreasing indicators, the number of light vehicles registered resumed growth and reached 2.2 million units, up 9% from 2016. The decision of OPEC members to reduce oil production until November 2018 influenced the international oil price, which was US$ 55/barrel (Brent) when 2017 began and reached yearend at US$ 67/barrel, up 21%. In the petrochemical market, ABIQUIM data show a 6% increase in National Apparent Consumption in 2017. As for pharmaceuticals retailing, Abrafarma data show 9% bigger gross revenue in 2017. In 2017, Ultrapar’s net sales and services amounted to R$ 80.0 billion, EBITDA amounted to R$ 4,063.5 million and net earnings amounted to R$ 1,573.9 million. Net debt to EBITDA ratio in the end of 2017 was 1.8 times. Ultrapar ended 2017 with total assets of R$ 28.3 billion and shareholders’ equity of R$ 9.7 billion.

 

2016

In a year characterized by the worsening of the crises on both political and economic fronts, Brazil ended 2016 with a combination of slowing business activity and a deterioration in disposable incomes and employment, thus curbing consumption and creating a challenging business environment. In the second half, there were some sporadic signs of improvement and inflation rates declined paving the way for cuts in the basic interest rate from 14.25% at the end of 2015 to 13.75% in 2016. The average R$/US Dollar exchange rate in 2016 was R$ 3.49 compared with R$ 3.33 in 2015, a devaluation of 5% of the Real on average albeit with an appreciating tendency of 17% during 2016. The number of light vehicles licensed during the year amounted to 2.0 million, making for a 2% growth in the fleet in 2016. The downturn in the global economy and the decisions of production of the OPEC member countries had influenced international oil prices, which began the year at US$ 36/barrel (Brent) and closed 2016 at US$ 55/barrel. In the petrochemical market, ABIQUIM (the Brazilian Chemical Industry Association) data indicated an increase of 5% in 2016 in National Apparent Consumption. Sales in the retail pharmacy sector, according to data from members of Abrafarma (the Brazilian Association of Pharmacies and Drugstores), grew 11% in 2016. In 2016, Ultrapar’s net sales and services amounted to R$ 77.4 billion, EBITDA amounted to R$ 4,216.7 million and net earnings amounted to R$ 1,570.6 million. Net debt to EBITDA ratio in the end of 2016 was 1.4 times, slightly above the ratio at the end of 2015. Ultrapar ended 2016 with total assets of R$ 24.2 billion and shareholders’ equity of R$ 8.6 billion.


2015

The business environment remained challenging in 2015, with the combination of economic slowdown, higher unemployment levels, inflation above target, rising interest rates and depreciation of the Real. Political instability created hurdles to approve tax adjustments necessary to Brazil, resulting in the downgrade of the sovereign rating by credit rating agencies. With the purpose of curbing soaring inflation rates found over the year, the Brazilian Central Bank raised the basic interest rate, from 11.75% at the end of 2014 to 14.25% at the end of 2015. GDP expectations for 2015, according to data published in the Focus Bulletin of the Central Bank of Brazil, began the year with a perspective of growth of 0.5% and ended with an expected drop of almost 4%. The average Real/Dollar exchange rate in 2015 was R$ 3.33/US$ as compared to R$ 2.35/US$ in 2014, an increase of 42%. The number of light vehicles licensed totaled 2.5 million units, allowing the fleet to a 3% estimated growth in 2015.


 
 

The deceleration in global economy and the decisions of production of the OPEC member countries had influence on the international oil price, which started the year at a price of US$ 57/barrel (Brent), remained stable in the first semester and ended 2015 at a price of US$ 36/barrel. The drop in oil prices and the increases in oil derivatives prices by Brazilian refineries maintained average domestic prices above international benchmarks. In the petrochemical market, ABIQUIM data showed a drop of 7% in 2015 in the national apparent consumption. Sales in the retail pharmacy sector, according to data from members of ABRAFARMA, continued to grow in nominal terms although at a lower level, showing a 12% increase in 2015. In 2015, Ultrapar’s net sales and services amounted to R$ 75.7 billion, EBITDA amounted to R$ 3,953.3 million and net earnings amounted to R$ 1,513.0 million. Net debt to EBITDA ratio in the end of 2015 was 1.2, slightly below the index at the end of 2014. Ultrapar ended 2015 with total assets of R$ 20.7 billion and shareholders’ equity of R$ 8.0 billion.

 

b. Capital structure and possibility of redemption of shares

 

Capital structure

Ultrapar’s capital as of December 31, 2017 amounted to R$ 5,171.8 million, composed by 556,405,096 common shares, without par value.

 

2017

Ultrapar reached yearend 2017 with R$ 13,590.6 million in gross debt and R$ 6,369.9 million in gross cash, getting to R$ 7,220.7 million net debt. On December 31, 2017, shareholders’ equity amounted R$ 9,720.8 million, resulting in a net debt to shareholders’ equity ratio of 74%.

 

2016

Ultrapar’s gross debt at the end of the fiscal year 2016 was R$ 11,417.1 million with a gross cash position of R$ 5,701.8 million, resulting in a net debt position of R$ 5,715.3 million, an increase of R$ 786.8 million in relation to 2015, in line with the growth of the Company. On December 31, 2016, shareholders’ equity amounted R$ 8,558.6 million, resulting in a net debt to shareholders’ equity ratio of 67%.


2015

Ultrapar ended the fiscal year 2015 with a gross debt of R$ 8,901.6 million and cash of R$ 3,973.2 million, resulting in a net debt of R$ 4,928.4 million, an increase of R$ 953.4 million compared to 2014, in line with the growth of the company. On December 31, 2015, shareholders’ equity amounted to R$ 7,974.1 million, resulting in a net debt to shareholders’ equity ratio of 62%.


Ultrapar association agreement with Extrafarma transaction was closed on January 31, 2014. As a consequence of the closing of the transaction, 12,021,100 new common, nominative book-entry shares with no par value of Ultrapar were issued, totaling an increase in equity of R$ 640.7 million. In addition, Ultrapar issued 3,205,622 shares related to subscription warrants – indemnification that may be exercised from 2020, it is adjusted according to the variations of provisions for tax, civil, and labor risks, and contingent liabilities related to the period beginning before January 31, 2014. The fair value of subscription warrants – indemnification is calculated based on the share price of Ultrapar (UGPA3) and are reduced by the dividend yield until 2020, since the exercise is possible only from 2020, and they are not entitled to receive dividends until that date. For more information, see Notes 3.a and 22 to our 2014 financial statements.


 
 

(R$ million)

2017

% of shareholders’ equity

2016

% of shareholders’ equity

2015

% of shareholders’ equity

             

Gross debt

13,590.6

140%

11,417.1

133%

8,901.6

112%

Cash and financial investments

6,369.9

66%

5,701.8

67%

3,973.2

50%

Net debt

7,220.7

74%

5,715.3

67%

4,928.4

62%


c. Capacity to meet our financial commitments

Our principal sources of liquidity derive from (i) cash, cash equivalents and financial investments, (ii) cash generated from operations and (iii) financings. We believe that these sources are sufficient to satisfy our current funding requirements, which include, but are not limited to, working capital, capital expenditures, amortization of debt and payment of dividends.

Periodically, we assess the opportunities for acquisitions and investments. We consider different types of investments, either directly or through joint ventures, or associated companies, and we finance such investments using cash generated from our operations, debt financing, through capital increases or through a combination of these methods. In 2016, Ultrapar signed agreements for the acquisitions of ALESAT, in the fuel distribution segment, and Liquigás, in the LPG distribution segment, and for the creation of a new lubricants business with Chevron.

We believe we have sufficient working capital to satisfy our current needs. In addition to the cash flow generated from our operations during the year, as of 31 of December 2017, we had R$ 6,285.5 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. The gross indebtedness due between January and December 2018, including estimated interests on loans, totals R$ 3,809.9 million. Furthermore, the investment plan for 2018 totals R$ 2,676.5 million.

We anticipate that we will spend approximately R$ 17.8 billion in the next five years to meet long-term contractual obligations, including the amortization of existing loans and financings, and respective payment of interests, as well as the 2018 budgeted capital expenditures.

(R$ million)

2018-2022

   

Contractual obligations

2,436.8

Investment plan for 2018

2,676.5

Financing¹

10,385.1

Estimated interest payments on financing ²

1,907.2

Hedging instruments ³

395,2

Total

17,800.8

 

¹ Does not include currency and interest rate hedging instruments.

² Includes estimated interest payments on short-term and long-term loans. Information of our derivative instruments is not included. The fair value information of such derivatives is available in Note 31, filed with the CVM on February 21, 2018. To calculate the estimated interest on loans certain macroeconomic assumptions were used, including, on average for the period, (i) CDI of 6.76% in 2018, 8.08% from 2019 to 2020, 9.63% from 2021 to 2022, 10.70% from 2023 to 2033, (ii) exchange rate of the Real against the U.S. dollar of R$ 3.37 in 2018, R$ 3.53 in 2019, R$ 3.77 in 2020, R$ 4.05 in 2021 and R$ 4.35 in 2022, R$ 4.66 in 2023, R$ 4.99 in 2024, R$ 5.35 in 2025, R$ 5.73 in 2026 and R$ 6.13 in 2027 (iii) TJLP of 6.75% p.a. and (iv) IGP-M of 4.38% in 2018, 4.13% in 2019, 4.0% from 2020 to 2033 (v) IPCA of 3.9% (source: B3, Bulletin Focus and financial institutions).


 
 

³ The currency and interest rate hedging instruments were estimated based on projected U.S. dollar futures contracts and the futures curve of DI x Pre and  DI x IPCA contracts quoted on B3 as of December 28, 2017 and on the futures curve of LIBOR (ICE – Intercontinental Exchange) on December 29, 2017. In the table above, only hedging instruments expected to generate losses at the time of settlement were considered.


See “Item 10.1.f. Indebtedness level and debt profile”, “Item 10.8.b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements” and “Item 10.10.a.i. Quantitative and qualitative description of the investments in progress and the estimated investments” for further information.

We expect to meet these cash requirements through a combination of cash generated from operating activities and cash generated by financing activities, including new debt financing and the refinancing of some of our indebtedness.

 

d. Sources for financing working capital and investments in non-current assets


We reported cash flow from operations of R$ 2,279.4 million, R$ 2,513.7 million and R$ 3,201.7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In 2017, net cash provided by operating activities was R$234.3 million lower than that of 2016, mainly due to the reduced EBITDA year-over-year and the increase in investment in working capital given the volatility observed in LPG and fuels’ acquisition prices. In 2016, our cash flow from operations was R$ 688.0 million lower than that of 2015, despite the 7% EBITDA growth and lower investment in working capital in the comparison with 2015. Due to the use of the indirect method of cash flow, interest on financial liabilities and variations on the exchange rates were R$ 818.8 million in the operational cash flow in 2016 compared to 2015. In 2015, our operational cash flow was R$ 551.0 million higher than that of  2014, mainly due to the growth in operations, partially offset by an increase in investment in working capital, that grew from a divestment of R$ 99.0 million to an investment of R$ 436.2 million in 2015.

 

Cash flow of investing activities used an amount of R$$ 1,912.1 million, R$ 1,848.8 million and R$ 801.8 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In 2017, Ultrapar continued with an investment strategy focused on the continuing growth of scale and competitiveness, better serving an increasing number of customers. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we invested R$ 2,016.9 million, R$ 1,637.9 million and R$ 1,334.2 million in additions to fixed assets, equipment and intangible assets, net of disposals. In addition, capital investments in ConectCar amounted to R$ 16.0 million, R$ 47.3 million and R$ 41.1 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015 respectively.

 

Net cash from financing activities totaled a cash generation of R$340.3 million and R$928.4 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively and a cash used of R$2,520.7 million for 2015. In 2017, cash flow used by financing activities decreased in R$588.0 million compared to 2016, mainly due to the growth of use of resources for amortization of debt, partially offset by an increase of R$833.8, which strengthened the cash position. In 2016, cash flow used by financing activities increased in R$ 3,449.1 million compared to 2015, mainly as a result of lower use of resources for amortization of debt and an increase of 


 
 

R$ 1,292.3 million in new loans and financings, that strengthened the cash position and extended the Company’s debt profile. In 2015, cash flow used by financing activities increased in R$ 1,981.4 million compared to 2014, mainly as a result of increased use of resources for amortization of debt and interest payment and for acquisition of shares issued by the Company (share buyback program). Accordingly, cash and cash equivalents totaled R$ 5,002.0 million in 2017, R$ 4,274.2 million in 2016 and R$ 2,702.9 million in 2015.

 

e. Sources for financing working capital and investments in non-current assets to be used in case of deficiencies in liquidity


In 2017, 2016 and 2015, we did not present deficiencies in liquidity. We believe that Ultrapar has own resources and operational cash generation sufficient to finance its needs for working capital and investments estimated for 2018. In addition, if necessary, we have access to third party financing resources.

 


f.
Indebtedness level and debt profile

 

Our total indebtedness, considering all current liabilities and non-current liabilities, grew by 19%, from R$ 15,601.1 million as of December 31, 2016 to R$ 18,619.5 million as of December 31, 2017.

 

Our gross financial debt increased by 19% from R$ 11,417.1 million as of December 31, 2016 to R$ 13,590.6 million as of December 31, 2017. Our short-term financial debt was equivalent to 26% of our gross debt as of December 31, 2017 and to 22% as of December 31, 2016.

 

The table below shows our financial indebtedness for each period:

 

   

Weighted average financial charges as of December 31, 2017

     

Loans

Currency

Principal amount of outstanding debt and accrued interest as of

         
     

12/31/2017

12/31/2016

12/31/2015

           

Foreign currency – denominated loans:

         

Foreign loan

US$

LIBOR (1) + 1.0%

788.8

942.5

1,111.7

Foreign loan

US$

LIBOR (1) +2.2%

259.0

486.5

576.6

Foreign loan

US$

+ 1.9%

298.9

332.6

397.6

Financial institutions

US$

LIBOR (1) + 2.5%

330.8

195.0

77.8

Advances on foreign exchange contracts

US$

+2.4%

44.5

111.1

222.5

Financial institutions

US$

+2.8%

106.7

109.9

142.8

Foreign currency advances delivered

US$

+2.2%

26.1

32.6

50.1

Financial institutions

MX$(2)

+8.5%

27.0

24.6

-

Financial institutions

MX$(2)

TIIE (2) + 1.5%

3.4

9.6

27.1

BNDES

US$

+6.4%

4.5

7.1

24.1

Financial institutions

Bs$(7)

+24.0%

0.6

0.4

-


 
 

Notes in the foreign market

US$

+5.3%

2,454.1

2,412.1

-

Brazilian Reais – denominated loans:

   

 

 

 

Debentures – 1st and 2nd issuances IPP

R$

105.8% of CDI

2,836.7

1,914.5

1,413.1

Banco do Brasil – floating rate

R$

107.3% of CDI

2,794.3

2,956.5

3,115.8

Debentures - 5th issuance

R$

108.3% of CDI

817.7

832.4

833.1

Debentures – CRA

R$

95.0% of CDI

1,380.9

-

-

Debentures – CRA

R$

IPCA + 4.6%

554.4

-

-

BNDES

R$

TJLP (3) + 2.4%

206.4

307.6

409.3

Export Credit Note – floating rate

R$

101.5% of CDI

157.7

158.8

158.6

BNDES

R$

SELIC (6) + 2.3%

69.4

71.4

30.9

BNDES EXIM

R$

TJLP(3) + 3.5%

62.8

62.1

-

Finance leases

R$

IGP-M (5) + 5.6%

48.5

48.6

45.5

FINEP

R$

+4.0%

35.6

48.7

61.7

FINEP

R$

TJLP (3) + 1.0%

32.7

34.6

11.2

BNDES EXIM

R$

SELIC (6) + 3.9%

30.9

28.1

-

Banco do Nordeste do Brasil

R$

8.5% (4)

28.1

47.1

66.1

BNDES

R$

+5.5%

26.3

40.3

49.7

FINAME

R$

TJLP (3)+5.7%

0.1

0.1

0.3

Floating finance leases

R$

 

0.1

0.3

Fixed finance leases

R$

 

0.0

0.1

Export Credit Note

R$

 

27.0

Working capital loans Extrafarma – fixed rate

R$

 

1.2

Total loans 

 

 

13,426.9

11,214.8

8,854.2

Currency and interest rate hedging instruments

   

163.7

202.4

47.4

Total

 

 

13,590.6

11,417.1

8,901.6


(1) LIBOR – London Interbank Offered Rate.

(2) MX$ - Mexican peso; TIIE - Mexican interbank balance interest rate.

    (3) TJLP (Long-Term Interest Rate) = set by the National Monetary Council, TJLP is the basic financing cost of BNDES. As of December 31, 2017, TJLP was fixed at 7.0% p.a.

    (4) Contract linked to the rate of FNE (Northeast Constitutional Financing Fund) fund whose purpose is to promote the development of the industrial sector, managed by Banco do Nordeste do Brasil. As of December 31, 2017, the FNE interest rate was 10% p.a. FNE grants a discount of 15% on the interest rate for timely payments.

    (5) IGP-M = General Index of Market Prices of Brazilian inflation, calculated by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

    (6) SELIC – basic interest rate set by the Brazilian Central Bank

(7) Bs$ = Bolívar.

Our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2017 had the following maturity schedule:

 

 

 
 

Year

Maturities

 

(R$ million)

2018

                 3,503.7

2019

                 1,826.9

2020

                 894.6

2021

                 1,302.5

2022

                 3,016.4

2023 thereafter

                 3,046.5

Total

13,590.6

 

See “Item 10.1.c. Capacity to meet our financial commitments”.

 

i. Relevant loan and financing contracts


Notes in the foreign market

In October 2016, the subsidiary Ultrapar International issued US$ 750 million in notes in the foreign market, maturing in October 2026, with interest rate of 5.25% p.a., paid semiannually. The notes were guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiary IPP. The Company has designated hedge relationships for this transaction (see Note 31 – Hedge accounting: cash flow hedge and net investment hedge in foreign entities).

As a result of the issuance of the notes in the foreign market, the Company and its subsidiary are required to perform certain obligations, including:

• Restriction on sale of all or substantially all assets of the Company and subsidiaries Ultrapar International and Ipiranga.

• Restriction on encumbrance of assets exceeding US$ 150 million or 15% of the amount of the consolidated tangible assets.

The Company and its subsidiaries are in compliance with the levels of covenants required by this debt. The restrictions imposed on the Company and its subsidiaries are customary in transactions of this nature and have not limited their ability to conduct their business to date.

 

Foreign loans

1) The subsidiary IPP has foreign loans in the amount of US$ 320 million. IPP also contracted hedging instruments with floating interest rate in U.S. dollar and exchange rate variation, changing the foreign loans charges, on average, to 102.9% of CDI (see Note 30). IPP designated these hedging instruments as a fair value hedge; therefore, loans and hedging instruments are both measured at fair value from inception, with changes in fair value recognized through profit or loss. The foreign loans are secured by Ultrapar.

The maturity of the foreign loans is distributed as follows:

 

Maturity

US$ (million)

 

Cost in % of CDI

July/18

60.0

 

103.0

September/18

80.0

 

101.5

November/18

80.0

 

101.4

June/22

100.0

 

105.0

Total / average cost

320.0

 

102.9


 
 

 

2) The subsidiary LPG International has a foreign loan in the amount of US$ 30 million with maturity in December 2018 and interest rate of LIBOR + 1.85% p.a, paid quarterly. The foreign loan is guaranteed by Ultrapar and its subsidiary IPP.

During these contracts, the Company shall maintain the following financial ratios, calculated based on its audited consolidated financial statements:

·          Maintenance of a financial ratio, determined by the ratio between consolidated net debt and consolidated EBITDA, at less than or equal to 3.5.

·          Maintenance of a financial ratio, determined by the ratio between consolidated EBITDA and consolidated net financial expenses, higher than or equal to 1.5.

Ultrapar is compliant with the levels of covenants required by these loans. The restrictions imposed on Ultrapar and its subsidiaries are usual for this type of transaction and have not limited their ability to conduct their business to date.

 

3) The subsidiary Global Petroleum Products Trading had a foreign loan in the amount of US$ 12 million with maturity in December 2018 and interest rate of LIBOR + 1.85% p.a., paid quarterly. The foreign loan was guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiary IPP. The subsidiary settled the loan in advance in December 2017.

 

4) The subsidiary Global Petroleum Products Trading has a foreign loan in the amount of US$ 60 million with maturity on June 22, 2020 and interest of LIBOR + 2.0% p.a., paid quarterly. The Company, through the subsidiary Cia. Ultragaz, contracted hedging instruments subject to floating interest rates in dollar and exchange rate variation, changing the foreign loan charge to 105.9% of CDI. The foreign loan is guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiary Oxiteno Nordeste.

Debentures

1) In February 2018, the Company made its sixth issuance of debentures in a single series of 1,725,000, simple, non-convertible into shares, nominative, book-entry and unsecured debentures with a par value of R$ 1,000.00, final maturity in 5 years (lump sum at final maturity) and interest of 105.25% of CDI.

Principal amount: R$ 1,725,000,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000.00

Maturity date: March 5, 2023

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: 105.25% of CDI

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

 

2) In October 2017, the subsidiary IPP carried out its seventh issuance of debentures in the amount of R$ 944,077 thousand, in two single series of 730,384 and 213,693, simple, nonconvertible into shares, nominative, book-entry and unsecured debentures. The debentures have been subscribed by Vert Companhia Securitizadora. The proceeds from this issuance has been used exclusively for the purchase of ethanol.

The debentures were later assigned and transferred to Vert Créditos Ltda, that acquired these agribusiness credit rights with the purpose to bind the issuance of Certificates of Agribusiness Receivables (CRA). The financial settlement occurred on November 1, 2017. The debentures have an additional guarantee from Ultrapar and the main characteristics of the debentures are as follows:

 


 
 

Principal amount: R$ 730,384,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000.00

Maturity date: October 24, 2022

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: 95.0% of CDI

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

 

Principal amount: R$ 213,693,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000.00

Maturity date: October 24, 2024

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: IPCA + 4.33%

Payment of interest: Annually

The subsidiary IPP contracted hedging instruments subjected to IPCA variation, changing the debentures charges linked to IPCA to 97.3% of CDI. IPP designated these hedging instruments as fair value hedges; therefore, debentures and hedging instruments are both measured at fair value from inception, with changes in fair value recognized through profit or loss.

 

3) In July 2017, the subsidiary IPP made its sixth issuance of public debentures, in one single series of 1,500,000 simple, nonconvertible into shares and unsecured debentures, which main characteristics are as follows:

Principal amount: R$ 1,500,000,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000.00

Maturity date: July 28, 2022

Repayment method: Annual as from July 2021

Interest: 105.0% of CDI

Payment of interest: Annually

 

4) In April 2017, the subsidiary IPP carried out its fifth issuance of debentures, in two single series of 660,139 and 352,361, simple, nonconvertible into shares, nominative, book-entry and unsecured debentures. The debentures have been subscribed by Eco Consult – Consultoria de OperaçõesFinanceiras Agropecuárias Ltda. The proceeds from this issuance has been used exclusively for the purchase of ethanol.

The debentures were later assigned and transferred to Eco Securitizadora de Direitos Creditórios do Agronegócio S.A. that acquired these agribusiness credit rights with the purpose to bind the issuance of Certificates of Agribusiness Receivables (CRA). The debentures have an additional guarantee from Ultrapar and the main characteristics of the debentures are as follows:

Principal amount: R$ 660,139,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000.00

Maturity date: April 18, 2022

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: 95.0% of CDI


 
 

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

 

Principal amount: R$ 352,361,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000.00

Maturity date: April 15, 2024

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: IPCA + 4.7%

Payment of interest: Annually

 

The subsidiary IPP contracted hedging instruments subjected to IPCA variation, changing the debentures charges linked to IPCA to 93.9% of CDI. IPP designated these hedging instruments as fair value hedges; therefore, debentures and hedging instruments are both measured at fair value from inception, with changes in fair value recognized through profit or loss.

 

5) In May 2016, the subsidiary IPP made its fourth issuance of public debentures, in one single series of 500 simple, nominative, registered debentures, nonconvertible into shares and unsecured, which main characteristics are as follows:

Principal amount: R$ 500,000,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 1,000,000.00

Maturity date: May 25, 2021

Repayment method: Amortizing annually, beginning in May 2019

Interest: 105.00% of CDI

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

 

6) In March 2015, the Company made its fifth issuance of debentures, in a single series of 80,000 simple, nonconvertible into shares, unsecured debentures, which main characteristics are as follows:

Principal amount: R$ 800,000,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 10,000.00

Maturity date: March 16, 2018

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: 108.25% of CDI

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

 

7) In January 2014, the subsidiary IPP made its second issuance of public debentures, in a single series of 80,000 simple, nominative, registered debentures, nonconvertible into shares and unsecured, which main characteristics are as follows:

Principal amount: R$ 800,000,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 10,000.00

Maturity date: December 20, 2018

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity


 
 

Interest: 107.9% of CDI

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

 

8) In December 2012, the subsidiary IPP made its first issuance of public debentures, in a single series of 60,000 simple, nominative, registered debentures, nonconvertible into shares and unsecured, which main characteristics are as follows:

Principal amount: R$ 600,000,000.00

Unit par value: R$ 10,000.00

Maturity date: November 16, 2017

Repayment method: Lump sum at final maturity

Interest: 107.9% of CDI

Payment of interest: Semi-annually

The debentures were settled by the Company on the maturity date.

 


BNDES

Ultrapar and its subsidiaries have financing from BNDES for some of their investments and for working capital.

During the term of these agreements, the Company must maintain the following capitalization and current liquidity levels, to be verified in the annual consolidated audited financial statements:

·          Capitalization level: shareholders’ equity / total assets equal to or above 0.3; and

·          Current liquidity level: current assets / current liabilities equal to or above 1.3.

Ultrapar is in compliance with the levels of covenants required by these loans. The restrictions imposed on the Company and its subsidiaries are usual for this type of transaction and have not limited their ability to conduct their business to date.

 

Financial Institutions

The subsidiaries Oxiteno Mexico S.A. de C.V., Oxiteno USA LLC and Oxiteno Uruguay have loans to finance investments and working capital.

In February 2016, subsidiary Oxiteno USA entered into a loan agreement in the amount of US$ 40 million, due in February 2021 and bearing interest of LIBOR + 3.0% p.a., paid quarterly. The loan is guaranteed by Ultrapar and the subsidiary Oxiteno Nordeste and the proceeds of this loan will be used to fund the construction of a new alkoxylation plant in the state of Texas.

In September 2016, subsidiary Oxiteno USA renegotiated a loan in the notional amount of US$20 million, changing the maturity from October 2017 to September 2020, with interest of LIBOR + 3% p.a., paid quarterly. The loan is guaranteed by Ultrapar and the subsidiary Oxiteno S.A.

In October 2017, subsidiary Oxiteno USA entered into a loan agreement in the amount of US$ 40 million, due in October 2022 and bearing interest of LIBOR + 1.73% p.a., paid quarterly. The proceeds of this loan will be used to fund the construction of a new alkoxylation plant in the state of Texas. The loan is guaranteed by Ultrapar.


 
 

 

Banco do Brasil

As of December 31, 2017, the subsidiary IPP was party to seven floating interest rate loan agreements with Banco do Brasil S.A., in the total outstanding balance of R$2,794.3 million, to finance the marketing, processing or manufacturing of agricultural goods, including the production of ethanol. Except for one of such agreements, each was renegotiated to allow for the segregation of their principal amounts into subcredits, with different amounts, interest rates and maturity dates.

These loans mature, as follows (including interest until December 31, 2017):

Maturity

   

 

January/18

 

172.8

 

April/18

 

100.6

 

February/19

 

168.4

 

May/19

 

1,339.0

 

May/20

 

337.8

 

May/21

 

337.8

 

May/22

 

337.8

 

Total

 

2,794.3

 

 

Export Credit Note

The subsidiary Oxiteno Nordeste has export credit note contract in the amount of R$ 156.8 million, with maturity in May 2018, and floating rate of 101.5% of CDI, paid quarterly.

 

ii. Other long-term relations with financial institutions

 

In addition to the relationships mentioned in items 10.1.f.i. Relevant loan and financing contracts and 10.1.g. Limits of use of contracted loans and financing, Ultrapar maintains long term relationships with financial institutions (i) in connection with the ordinary course of the business, such as the payroll of its employees, credit and collection, payments and currency and interest rate hedging instruments and (ii) through a long-term contract between Ipiranga and Itaú Unibanco for the provision of financial services and management of the Ipiranga-branded credit cards.

 

In October 2015, Redecard acquired 50% of ConectCar, a company that operates in the segment of electronic payment for tolls, parking lots and fuel. Ipiranga holds the remaining 50% interest of the company. The deal was concluded in January 2016, after the meeting of some requirements and the approval by the regulatory authority.

 

iii.   Subordination of debt

 

Our secured debt as of December 31, 2017, amounted R$ 66 million. Except for secured debt, there is no subordination among our existing debt contracts.

 

iv. Any restrictions imposed on the issuer, especially related to indebtedness limits and the hiring of new debt, to dividend distribution, to the sale of assets, to the issuing of new securities and to change of control, and if the issuer has complied with these restrictions.

 

Ultrapar and its subsidiaries are subject to some covenants required by loans contracted. The restrictions imposed on Ultrapar and its subsidiaries are those usual for transactions of this nature and have not limited their ability to conduct their business to date.


 
 

 

As a result of foreign loans, the Company shall maintain the following financial ratios, calculated based on its audited consolidated financial statements:

·          Maintenance of a financial ratio, determined by the ratio between consolidated net debt and consolidated EBITDA, at less than or equal to 3.5; and

·          Maintenance of a financial ratio determined by the ratio between consolidated EBITDA and consolidated net financial expenses, higher than or equal to 1.5.

During the life of the agreements entered into with BNDES, Ultrapar must keep the following capitalization and current liquidity levels, as verified in annual consolidated audited balance sheet:

·          Capitalization level: shareholders’ equity / total assets equal to or above 0.30; and

·          Current liquidity level: current assets / current liabilities equal to or above 1.3.


The Company is compliant with the covenants levels required by financing contractors.

 

g. Limits of use of contracted loans and financings and percentages already used


The Company has certain financing contracts with BNDES whose amounts were only partially received. As of December 31, 2017, the total value of such contracts amounted R$ 227 million, sum that had not been yet used.

 

h. Main changes in each item of the financial statements


Ultrapar – Consolidated

 

(R$ million)

 Information as of

 Variation %

 

12/31/2017

12/31/2016

12/31/2015

 12/31/2017 vs. 12/31/2016 

 12/31/2016 vs. 12/31/2015 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

   Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments

6,285.5

5,686.7

3,506.2

11%

62%

   Trade accounts receivable

4,337.1

3,502.3

3,167.2

24%

11%

   Inventories

3,491.9

2,761.2

2,495.2

26%

11%

   Recoverable taxes

881.6

541.8

628.8

63%

-14%

   Other

205.2

519.8

114.0

-61%

356%

       Total Current Assets

15,201.3

13,011.8

9,911.4

17%

31%

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Investments

150.2

141.7

103.7

6%

37%

   Property, plant and equipment and intangibles assets

10,335.3

9,159.6

8,732.8

13%

5%

   Financial investments

84.4

15.1

467.0

459%

-97%

   Trade accounts receivable

330.0

227.1

152.2

45%

49%

   Deferred income tax

545.6

417.3

306.0

31%

36%

 


 
 

   Escrow deposits

822.7

778.8

740.8

6%

5%

   Other

870.9

408.3

299.1

113%

37%

       Total Non-Current Assets

13,139.0

11,147.9

10,801.7

18%

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

28,340.3

24,159.7

20,713.1

17%

17%

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES

 

 

 

 

 

   Loans, debentures and financial leases

3,503.7

2,475.6

1,097.9

42%

125%

   Trade payables

2,155.5

1,709.7

1,460.5

26%

17%

   Salaries and related charges

388.1

362.7

404.3

7%

-10%

   Taxes payable

312.7

311.0

385.7

1%

-19%

   Other

654.0

628.0

485.0

4%

29%

       Total Current Liabilities

7,014.0

5,486.9

3,833.4

28%

43%

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Loans, debentures and financial leases

10,086.9

8,941.5

7,803.8

13%

15%

   Provision for tax, civil and labor risks

861.2

727.1

684.7

18%

6%

   Post-employment benefits

207.5

119.8

112.8

73%

6%

   Other

449.9

325.7

304.3

38%

7%

       Total Non-Current Liabilities

11,605.5

10,114.2

8,905.5

15%

14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

18,619.5

15,601.1

12,738.9

19%

22%

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

   Capital

5,171.8

3,838.7

3,838.7

35%

0%

   Reserves

4,317.8

5,023.8

4,354.2

-14%

15%

   Treasury shares

(482.3)

(483.9)

(490.9)

0%

-1%

   Others

377.0

149.0

243.0

153%

-39%

   Non-controlling interest

339.6

30.9

29.1

998%

6%

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

9,720.8

8,558.6

7,974.1

14%

7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY.

28,340.3

24,159.7

20,713.1

17%

17%


 
 

 

Main changes in the consolidated balance sheet accounts on December 31, 2017 compared with December 31, 2016

Assets

Current assets

Current assets totaled R$ 15,201.3 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 2,189.5 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to increases in cash, equivalents and financial investments, inventory and accounts receivable.

 

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments totaled R$ 6,285.5 million on December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 598.8 million compared to December 31, 2017, mainly due to new loans and financings in the period.

 

Trade accounts receivable

Trade accounts receivable totaled R$ 4,337.1 million on December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 834.8 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to an increase in days sales outstanding (DSO) the average collection period for Ipiranga.

 

Inventories

Inventories amounted to R$ 3,491.9 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 730.7 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to (i) increases in ethanol and gasoline costs throughout the year, increasing the final inventory balance of Ipiranga, (ii) increases in LPG acquisition,  and (ii) the adjustment of prices of medicines set by the Chamber for the Regulation of the Medical Pharmaceuticals (CMED) and a larger number of newly opened stores, both increasing Extrafarma’s inventory.

 

Non-current assets

Non-current assets totaled R$ 13,139.0 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,991.2 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to increases in fixed and intangible assets and financial investments, deferred income tax and trade account receivables.

 

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets totaled R$ 10,335.3 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,175.7 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to investments in expansion carried out throughout 2017, offset by depreciation and amortization during the period.

 


 
 

 


Liabilities

Current liabilities

Current liabilities amounted R$ 7,014.0 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,527.0 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to an increase in loans and debentures


Loans, debentures and financial leases

Loans, debentures and financial leases totaled R$ 3,503.7 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,028.1 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to transfer of the amount due in 2018 from non-current liabilities to current liabilities, partially offset by the payment of loans maturing in 2018. See "Non-current liabilities - Loans, debentures and financial leases."


Trade payables

Trade payables amounted to R$ 2,155.5 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 445.8 million compared to December 31, 2016, due to an increase in trade payables in all business, escept for Ultracargo.

Non-current liabilities

Non-current liabilities totaled R$ 11,605.5 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,491.3 million compared to December 31, 2016. The increase in non-current liabilities is mainly due to the increase in loans and debentures.


Loans, debentures and financial leases

Loans, debentures and financial leases totaled R$ 10,086.95 million as of December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,145.4 million compared to December 31, 2016, mainly due to new loans and financings.

 

Shareholders’ equity

Ultrapar’s shareholders' equity amounted to R$ 9,720.8 million on December 31, 2017, an increase of R$ 1,162.3 million compared to December 31, 2016, as a result of an increase in profit reserves, due to earnings generated in 2017 and the joint venture with Chevron in the lubricants segment.

 

Main changes in the consolidated balance sheet accounts on December 31, 2016 compared with December 31, 2015

 

 


 
 

Assets

Current assets

Current assets totaled R$ 13,011.8 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 3,100.4 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to increases in cash, equivalents and financial investments, inventory and accounts receivable.

 

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments totaled R$ 5,686.7 million in December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 2,180.5 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to new  loans and financings in the period.

 

Trade accounts receivable

Trade accounts receivable totaled R$ 3,502.3 million in December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 335.2 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to an increase in days sales outstanding (DSO) the average collection period for Ipiranga.

 

Inventories

Inventories amounted to R$ 2,761.2 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 266.0 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to (i) increases in ethanol and gasoline costs throughout the year, increasing the final inventory balance of Ipiranga, and (ii) the adjustment of prices of medicines set by the Chamber for the Regulation of the Medical Pharmaceuticals (CMED) and a larger number of newly opened stores, both increasing Extrafarma’s inventory.

 

Non-current assets

Non-current assets totaled R$ 11,147.9 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 346.2 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to increases in fixed and intangible assets and financial investments.

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets totaled R$ 9,159.6 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 426.8 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to investments in expansion carried out throughout 2016, offset by depreciation and amortization during the period.


Liabilities

Current liabilities

Current liabilities amounted R$ 5,486.9 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 1,653.6 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to an increase in loans and debentures


 
 


Loans, debentures and financial leases

Loans, debentures and financial leases totaled R$ 2,475.6 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 1,377.7 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to transfer of the amount due in 2017 from non-current liabilities to current liabilities, partially offset by the payment of loans maturing in 2016. See "Non-current liabilities - Loans, debentures and financial leases."


Trade payables

Trade payables amounted to R$ 1,709.7 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 249.1 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly concentrated in Ipiranga suppliers.

 

Non-current liabilities

Non-current liabilities totaled R$ 10,114.2 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 1,208.6 million compared to December 31, 2015. The increase in non-current liabilities is mainly due to the increase in loans and debentures.


Loans, debentures and financial leases

Loans, debentures and financial leases totaled R$ 8,941.5 million as of December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 1,137.8 million compared to December 31, 2015, mainly due to new loans and financings.

 

Shareholders’ equity

Ultrapar’s shareholders' equity amounted to R$ 8,558.6 million on December 31, 2016, an increase of R$ 584.4 million compared to December 31, 2015, as a result of an increase in profit reserves, due to earnings generated in 2017 and the joint venture with Chevron in the lubricants segment.

 

          Main changes in the consolidated balance sheet accounts on December 31, 2015 compared with December 31, 2014


Assets

Current assets

Current assets totaled R$ 9,995.4 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 493.0 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to inventory increases and trade accounts receivable.


Trade accounts receivable

Trade accounts receivable amounted to R$ 3,167.2 million on December 31, 2015, a R$ 563.1 million increase compared with December 31, 2014, mainly due to increases in ethanol, diesel and gasoline costs throughout the year.

 

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments totaled R$ 3,506.2 million as of December 31, 2015, a decrease of R$ 763.0 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to (i) the amortization of


 
 

financing and higher interest payments due to the increase in interest rates during 2015, (ii) organic investments made in 2015, and (iii) growth in dividend payments and in the share repurchase program, increasing shareholder returns, partially offset by cash generated from our operations.

 

Inventories

Inventories amounted to R$ 2,495.2 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 570.2 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to increases in ethanol, diesel and gasoline costs throughout the year.


Non-current assets

Non-current assets totaled R$ 10,970.7 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 992.6 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to increases in fixed and intangible assets and financial investments.


Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets totaled R$ 8,732.8 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 482.7 million compared to December 31, 2014, due to investments in expansion carried out throughout 2015, partially offset by depreciation and amortization during the period.


Liabilities

Current liabilities

Current liabilities amounted R$ 3,833.4 million as of December 31, 2015, a decrease of R$ 1,858.7 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to a reduction in loans and debentures, partially offset by increases in suppliers.


Loans and debentures

Loans and debentures totaled R$ 1,097.9 million in December 31, 2015, a decrease of R$ 2,344.5 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to the payment of loans maturing in 2015, partially offset by the transfer of the amount due in 2016 from non-current liabilities to current liabilities. See "Non-current liabilities - Loans and debentures."


Trade payables

Trade payables amounted to R$ 1,460.5 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 181.0 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly concentrated in Ipiranga suppliers due to higher ethanol, diesel and gasoline costs throughout 2015.


Non-current liabilities

Non-current liabilities totaled R$ 9,158.5 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 3,096.8 million compared to December 31, 2014. The increase in non-current liabilities is mainly due to the increase in loans and debentures.


Loans and debentures


 
 

Loans and debentures totaled R$ 7,803.8 million as of December 31, 2015, an increase of R$ 2,870.9 million compared to December 31, 2014, mainly due to new loans contracted, resulting in the extension of the Ultrapar’s debt maturity.


Shareholders' Equity

Ultrapar’s shareholders' equity amounted to R$ 7,974.1 million on December 31, 2015, a R$ 247.5 million increase compared with December 31, 2014, as a result of an increase in profit reserves, due to earnings generated in 2015, partially offset by the increase of treasury shares due to the share repurchase program.

 

Main changes in the consolidated statements of income

Main changes in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared with the year ended December 31, 2016

 

(R$ million)

Year ending December 31

% of net sales and services

Year ending December 31

% of net sales and services

 Percent change                          2017-2016

 
 

2017

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services

80,007.4

100%

77,353.0

100%

3%

Cost of products and services sold

(72,735.8)

91%

(70,342.7)

91%

3%

           

Gross profit

7,271.6

9%

7,010.2

9%

4%

Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses

(4,461.8)

6%

(4,097.4)

5%

9%

Other operating income, net

59.4

0%

199.0

0%

-70%

Income from disposal of assets

(2.2)

0%

(6.1)

0%

-63%

           

Operating income

2,866.9

4%

3,105.7

4%

-8%

Financial results

(474.3)

1%

(842.6)

1%

-44%

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

20.7

0%

7.5

0%

176%

Income and social contribution taxes

(839.4)

1%

(700.0)

1%

20%

           

Net income

1,573.9

2%

1,570.6

2%

0%


 
 

Net income attributable to:

         

Shareholders of Ultrapar

1,574.3

2%

1,561.6

2%

1%

Non-controlling shareholders of the subsidiaries

(0.4)

0%

9.0

0%

-

           

EBITDA

4,063.5

5%

4,216.7

5%

-4%

Depreciation and amortization

1,176.0

1%

1,103.5

1%

7%

EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, and EBIT – Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, are presented in accordance with CVM Instruction No. 527, issued by CVM on October 4, 2012. The calculation of EBITDA from net earnings is presented below:

R$ million

2017

2016

 (%)

2017v2016

Net earnings

1,574

1,571

0%

(+) Income and social contribution taxes

839

700

 

(+) Financial expenses (income), net

474

843

 

(+) Depreciation and amortization

1,176

1,104

 

EBITDA

4,064

4,217

-4%

 

The EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) presented in this document represents the net income before (i) income and social contribution taxes, (ii) net financial expense (income) and (iii) depreciation and amortization, presented in accordance with ICVM 527/12. The purpose of including EBITDA information is to provide a measure used by the management for internal assessment of our operating results, besides being a directly or indirectly related measure to a portion of our employee profit sharing plan. It is also a financial indicator widely used by investors and analysts to measure our ability to generate cash from operations and our operating performance. We also calculate EBITDA in connection with covenants related to some of our financing, as described in note 14 to the financial statements. We believe EBITDA allows a better understanding not only of our financial performance but also of our capacity of meeting the payment of interest and principal from our debt and of obtaining resources for our investments and working capital. Our definition of EBITDA may differ from, and, therefore, may not be comparable with similarly titled measures used by other companies, thereby limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. Because EBITDA excludes net financial expense (income), income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization, it provides an indicator of general economic performance that is not affected by debt restructurings, fluctuations in interest rates or changes in income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under accounting practices adopted in Brazil or IFRS. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for net income, as a measure of operating performance, as a substitute for cash flows from operations or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA has material limitations that impair its value as a measure of a company’s overall profitability since it does not address certain ongoing costs of our business that could significantly affect profitability such as financial expenses and income taxes and depreciation and amortization.


 
 


Overview on sales volume

 

2017

2016

Percent change 2017-2016

       

Ipiranga (000 m3)

23,458

23,507

0%

Oxiteno (000 tons)

790

738

7%

Ultragaz (000 tons)

1,746

1,760

-1%

Ultracargo (000 m3)

724

672

8%

Extrafarma (number of stores)

394

315

25%

 

Ipiranga’s sales volume remained stable compared to total sales in 2016 with a decrease in volume in the first half of the year and increasing volume in the second half. Despite the increase in fuel prices over the course of the year, the volume of light-vehicle fuels sold (Otto cycle) was up 1%, impacted by fleet expansion. In line with the economy’s performance, the volume of Diesel only began to increase in the second half, and reached yearend at an accumulated reduction of 2%. In 2017, Oxiteno posted record-breaking sales volume, up 7% from 2016. This came as a result of 16% and 5% increases in the volumes of commodities and specialty chemicals, respectively, reflecting the pre-marketing volume sold to USA due to the new plant in Pasadena, along with bigger growth of internal market than the recovery of Brazil’s economy. Ultragaz’s total sales volume was down 1% in 2017. Despite the stable sales volume in the bottled segment, due to investments to add new resellers, the bulk segment posted a 3% reduction, explained by the loss of some customers to natural gas. Total average storage at Ultracargo was up 8% due mainly to the increased fuels handling at the Santos, Suape and Itaqui terminals, reflecting the partial resumption of activities and the higher demand for fuels’ handling at Brazilian ports. Extrafarma opened 100 new stores and closed 21 in 2017, for a 25% expansion (79 stores) of the network.


Net revenue from sales and services

(R$ million)

2017

2016

Percent change 2017-2016

       

Ipiranga

67,730.9

66,407.3

2%

Oxiteno

3,957.6

3,700.7

7%

Ultragaz

6,069.3

5,365.5

13%

Ultracargo

438.4

355.4

23%

Extrafarma

1,869.5

1,578.2

18%

 

As consequence of the revenues increase in every business, Ultrapar’s net sales and services revenues were R$ 80,007 million in 2017, up 3% from 2016. Despite stable sales volumes, Ipiranga’s net revenues were up 2%, in line with the costs, due mainly (i) to shifts in diesel and gasoline prices, which, are now more frequently adjusted to reflect international benchmark prices, (ii) to the increase in fuels’ taxes (PIS/Cofins) in June 2017, (iii) to the greater share of gasoline in the 2017 sales breakdown, and (iv) the strategy of constant fueling station services and convenience innovation, generating improved customer satisfaction and loyalty. Oxiteno’s net revenues were up 7%, due mainly to the greater sales volume. On the other hand, the average price of the Brazilian Real, up 9%, partly offset these effects.


 
 

Ultragaz’s net revenues were up 13% in 2017, due mainly (i) to the higher cost of bottled and bulk LPG at refineries, which now follow international benchmark prices, (ii) the bigger sales volume of bottled LPG as a result of new commercial initiatives to capture new customers and resellers, and (iii) the differentiation and innovation strategy. The lower share of bulk gas in sales partly offset the revenues growth. Ultracargo’s net revenues were up 23% in 2017 due to increased average storage and greater fuels handling, improved productivity at Ultracargo and partially resumed activities in Santos. Extrafarma’s gross revenues were up 18% in 2017 due to 25% increase in retail sales (except for telephony), a result of the bigger average store network and 12% greater same store sales (except for cellular phones sales). The growth was partly offset by a 17% decrease in cellular phones revenues, and lower revenues from the wholesale segment.

 


Cost of products and services sold

(R$ million)

2017

2016

Percent change 2017-2016

       

Ipiranga

63,003.0

61,877.4

2%

Oxiteno

3,199.5

2,781.7

15%

Ultragaz

5,095.6

4,467.2

14%

Ultracargo

218.5

199.0

10%

Extrafarma

1,277.6

1,071.9

19%


Ultrapar’s cost of goods sold and services provided was R$ 72,736 million in 2017, up 3% from 2016 as a result of growth in every business. Ipiranga’s cost of goods sold was up 2%, due mainly to shifts in the costs of diesel and gasoline and to the increase in fuels’ taxes (PIS/Cofins) in June 2017. Oxiteno’s cost of goods sold was up 15% in 2017 due (i) to the greater sales volume, (ii) costs associated with the lengthy stoppage of the Oleoquímica plant, and (iii) higher pre-operational costs at the new Pasadena plant, partially compensated by a stronger Brazilian Real. Ultragaz’s cost of goods sold was up 14%, due mainly to the higher cost of LPG at refineries. Ultracargo’s cost of services provided was up 10%, due mainly to higher payroll and materials costs, in line with the greater volume in storage. Extrafarma’s cost of goods sold was up 19% in 2017, due mainly to the greater sales volume and the annual adjustment in medicine prices as authorized by the Medicine Market Regulation Chamber (“Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamento” – CMED).

 

Gross profit

Ultrapar posted R$ 7,272 million in gross profits in 2017, up 4% from 2016, as a result of combined growth in business.

 

Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses

(R$ million)

2017

2016

Percent change 2017-2016

       

Ipiranga

2,431.3

2,257.6

8%

Oxiteno

668.0

616.4

8%

Ultragaz

630.6

615.5

2%

Ultracargo

112.8

99.7

13%

Extrafarma

622.7

511.1

22%


 
 

 

Ultrapar’s general, administrative, sales and commercial expenses were R$ 4,462 million in 2017, up 9% from 2016 because of the effects of inflation on expenses and other specific reasons in each business. Ipiranga’s general, administrative and sales expenses were up 8% due (i) increase in unit freight, (ii) higher expenses with projects and strategic initiatives, particularly those connected with the joint venture with Chevron for lubricants, and (iii) expansion of the service stations and franchises networks. Oxiteno’s general, administrative and sales expenses were up 8% due to higher freight expenses, because of the greater volume sold and pre-operating expenses at the new Pasadena plant. As result of initiatives to reduce expenses, Ultragaz’s general, administrative and sales expenses growth was lower than the period’s inflation, increasing by 2% in 2017. Ultracargo’s General, administrative and sales expenses were up 13% in 2017, due mainly to (i) payroll expenses because of the additional personnel, the annual salaries’ adjustment and higher variable compensation, in line with operating indicators growth, and (ii) higher costs incurred with consultancies and legal advice. Extrafarma’s general, administrative and sales expenses were up 22% in 2017. The increase is due to the 23% greater average number of stores and to non-recurring expenses with the transfer of the distribution center from Belém to Benevides, and indemnities in 1Q17. Excluding the mentioned one-off and the impacts from new stores, expenses grew bellow inflation as consequence of initiatives to increase productivity.

 

Depreciation and amortization

Total depreciation and amortization costs and expenses in 2017 were R$ 1,176 million, up 7% from 2016 because of the investments made in the period.

 

Other operating income

In 2017, Ultrapar posted revenues net of expenses, in other operating income of R$ 59 million, versus R$ 199 million in net revenues in 2016, due (i) to the effects of the April 2015 fire in Santos, with a positive impact of R$ 68 million in 2016, due mainly to recovery from insurers, and a negative impact of R$ 39 million in 2017; and (ii) the Cease and Desist Agreement that Ultrapar signed, with a negative impact of R$ 84 million in 2017.  Ultragaz’s “Other operating income” line reached yearend 2017 with net expenses of R$ 79 million, from R$ 4 million in net revenues in 2016. In 2017, Ultragaz registered R$ 84 million in expenses associated with an one-off contingency related to the signing of a Cease and Desist Agreement (“Termo de Compromisso de Cessação de Prática”) that put an end to proceedings before anti-trust authority CADE. Ultracargo’s “Other operating income” line reached yearend 2017 with R$ 37 million in net expenses. In 2016, Ultracargo had R$ 134 million in revenues from fire insurance in addition to fire-linked expenses, leading “Other operating income” to R$ 71 million yearend.

 

Income from disposal of assets

In 2017 Ultrapar posted disposal of property expenses of R$ 2 million, compared with net expenses of R$ 6 million in 2016, due mainly to the lower sales of Ipiranga real estate.

 

Operating income

Ultrapar posted R$ 2,867 million in operating income in 2017, down 8% from 2016 because of the lower operating income in every business, with the exception of Ipiranga.


 
 

 

Financial income

Ultrapar’s financial income was R$ 474 million in net expenses in 2017, down R$ 368 million from 2016 despite the greater net debt, due mainly to the lower CDI rate for the period, and  foreign exchange effects in the period.

 

Net income

Ultrapar’s consolidated net income was R$ 1,574 million in 2017, stable relative to 2016, mainly due to the period’s lower financial expense, partly offset by the reduced EBITDA YOY and higher amortization and depreciation because of investments made over the course of 2017.

 

EBITDA

(R$ million)

2017

2016

Percent change 2017-2016

       

Ipiranga

3,136.5

3,080.5

2%

Oxiteno

294.8

458.9

-36%

Ultragaz

453.2

446.6

1%

Ultracargo

124.1

171.2

-28%

Extrafarma

24.0

37.1

-35%

 

Ultrapar’s consolidated EBITDA was R$ 4,064 million in 2017, down 4% from 2016. If adjusted by the positive one-off effects of the related to the exclusion of the ICMS sales tax from the calculation base for PIS and COFINS taxes of Oxiteno, and by the negative effects associated with the signing of the TCC at Ultragaz and, effects related to the fire at Santos in 2015 at Ultracargo, Ultrapar’s EBITDA would have remained stable over 2016 results.  Ipiranga’s 2017 EBITDA was R$ 3,137 million, up 2% from 2016, in line with the revenues growth due mainly (i) to the strategy of constant services and convenience innovation at service stations, and (ii) improved sales breakdown with a bigger share of gasoline in the mix. Oxiteno’s 2017 EBITDA was R$ 295 million, down 36% from 2016 despite the increase in total volumes. The reduction is due mainly (i) to the R$ 0.30/US$ appreciation of the average price of the Brazilian Real in 2017, (ii)  higher volatility of certain raw materials prices, (iii) the lengthy stoppage of the Oleoquímica plant, and (iv) pre-operational costs at the new Pasadena plant. Ultragaz’s EBITDA was R$ 453 million, up 1% from 2016 as a result of costs and expenses cutting initiatives, as well as commercial actions intended to capture new customers and resellers, and of the differentiation and innovation strategy. If the above-mentioned R$ 84 million contingency expense is not considered, Ultragaz EBITDA posted a 20% growth. Ultracargo’s EBITDA was down 28% to R$ 124 million in 2017. Excluding the extraordinary events, Ultracargo’s EBITDA would grow by 58%, because of increased volume handling in its terminals. Extrafarma’s EBITDA was R$ 24 million, down 35% from 2016 because of the greater number of maturing stores, which went from 45% of the chain in 2016 to 55% in 2017, and expenses with the transfer of the distribution center to Benevides. The drop was cushioned by strategic and commercial initiatives intended to reduce costs and increase efficiency.

 

Main changes in the consolidated statements of income


 
 

Main changes in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with the year ended December 31, 2015

 

(R$ million)

Year ending December 31

% of net sales and services

Year ending December 31

% of net sales and services

 Percent change                          2016-2015

 
 

2016

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services

77,353.0

100%

75,655.3

100%

2%

Cost of products and services sold

(70,342.7)

91%

(68,933.7)

91%

2%

           

Gross profit

7,010.2

9%

6,721.6

9%

4%

Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses

(4,097.4)

5%

(3,837.9)

5%

7%

Other operating income, net

199.0

0%

50.6

0%

293%

Income from disposal of assets

(6.1)

0%

27.3

0%

-122%

           

Operating income

3,105.7

4%

2,961.5

4%

5%

Financial results

(842.6)

1%

(703.3)

1%

20%

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

7.5

0%

(10.9)

0%

-169%

Income and social contribution taxes

(700.0)

1%

(734.3)

1%

-5%

           

Net income

1,570.6

2%

1,513.0

2%

4%

Net income attributable to:

         

Shareholders of Ultrapar

1,561.6

2%

1,503.5

2%

4%

Non-controlling shareholders of the subsidiaries

9.0

0%

9.5

0%

-5%

           

EBITDA

4,216.7

5%

3,953.3

5%

7%

Depreciation and amortization

1,103.5

1%

1,002.6

1%

10%

 

EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, and EBIT – Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, are presented in accordance with CVM Instruction No. 527, issued by CVM on October 4, 2012. The calculation of EBITDA from net earnings is presented below:

 

 

 
 

R$ million

2016

2015

 (%)

2016v2015

Net earnings

1,571

1,513

4%

(+) Income and social contribution taxes

700

734

 

(+) Financial expenses (income), net

843

703

 

(+) Depreciation and amortization

1,104

1,003

 

EBITDA

4,217

3,953

7%

 

The EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) presented in this document represents the net income before (i) income and social contribution taxes, (ii) net financial expense (income) and (iii) depreciation and amortization, presented in accordance with ICVM 527/12. The purpose of including EBITDA information is to provide a measure used by the management for internal assessment of our operating results, besides being a directly or indirectly related measure to a portion of our employee profit sharing plan. It is also a financial indicator widely used by investors and analysts to measure our ability to generate cash from operations and our operating performance. We also calculate EBITDA in connection with covenants related to some of our financing, as described in note 14 to the financial statements. We believe EBITDA allows a better understanding not only of our financial performance but also of our capacity of meeting the payment of interest and principal from our debt and of obtaining resources for our investments and working capital. Our definition of EBITDA may differ from, and, therefore, may not be comparable with similarly titled measures used by other companies, thereby limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. Because EBITDA excludes net financial expense (income), income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization, it provides an indicator of general economic performance that is not affected by debt restructurings, fluctuations in interest rates or changes in income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under accounting practices adopted in Brazil or IFRS. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for net income, as a measure of operating performance, as a substitute for cash flows from operations or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA has material limitations that impair its value as a measure of a company’s overall profitability since it does not address certain ongoing costs of our business that could significantly affect profitability such as financial expenses and income taxes and depreciation and amortization.


Overview on sales volume

 

2016

2015

Percent change 2016-2015

       

Ipiranga (000 m3)

23,507

25,725

-9%

Oxiteno (000 tons)

738

725

2%

Ultragaz (000 tons)

1,760

1,697

4%

Ultracargo (000 m3)

672

655

3%

Extrafarma (number of stores)

315

254

24%

 


 
 

Ipiranga’s sales volume recorded a decline of 9% compared with 2015. Fuel sales volume for light vehicles (Otto cycle) reported a decrease of 9%, in spite of the effective growth of 2% in the light vehicle fleet, reflecting economic conditions, a worsening in employment levels and the increase in the relative prices of fuel compared to household income. Diesel volume was also down 9%, mirroring weakness in the economy overall. Volume sold at Oxiteno was 2% higher in 2016 as a result of a 17% expansion in commodities, in search of increased efficiency in the use of capacity and dilution of plant, above all in 1H16 to compensate for the 1% decline in specialty chemicals, a reflection of weak economic activity in Brazil. Sales volume at Ultragaz was 4% higher in 2016, with a 3% growth in the LPG bottled segment, the result of investments to increase the numbers of resellers, and 6% growth in the bulk segment due to investments in the capture of new customers. Ultracargo’s total average storage posted an increase of 3% due mainly to greater fuel handling at the Suape and Aratu port terminals although offset by the partial interruption of activities at the Ultracargo terminal in Santos in 2015 due to the fire in April of that year. Excluding operations in Santos, handling was up by 8%. Extrafarma ended 2016 with 315 stores, a 24% increase (61 stores) compared to 2015. Over the course of the year, 71 new stores were opened and ten closed.

Net revenue from sales and services

(R$ million)

2016

2015

Percent change 2016-2015

       

Ipiranga

66,407.3

65,349.8

2%

Oxiteno

3,700.7

4,082.5

-9%

Ultragaz

5,365.5

4,621.2

16%

Ultracargo

355.4

315.5

13%

Extrafarma

1,578.2

1,336.3

18%

 

In 2016, Ultrapar reported net revenue from sales and services of R$ 77,353 million, a growth of 2% in relation to 2015 due to revenue growth in all the businesses with the exception of Oxiteno. Ipiranga posted a 2% increase in net revenue despite lower sales volume mainly due to (i) the increase in diesel and gasoline costs by Petrobras in October 2015 and also higher ethanol prices, (ii) the greater share of gasoline in the overall sales mix in 2016, and (iii) the strategy of constant innovation in service station services and convenience, resulting in greater customer satisfaction and loyalty. Oxiteno’s net revenue was 9% down, largely due to 15% lower average prices in US Dollars, as a consequence of lower international commodities prices and a greater share of these products in the sales mix. Decrease in net revenue was partially offset by the depreciation of 5% in the Real against the US dollar and increased sales volume. Ultragaz reported net revenues 16% higher, mainly due to (i) the increases in the cost of bottled and bulk LPG at the refineries in 2015 and 2016, (ii) higher volume sold, the result of commercial initiatives for capture of new customers and resellers, (iii) the adoption of differentiation and innovation strategies, and (iv) the increased share of the bulk segment in the composition of total sales mix. Ultracargo’s net revenue was 13% higher mainly due to the increase in average storage and higher average tariffs at the terminals. Excluding operations at the Santos terminal, net revenue was 18% higher. Extrafarma reported an 18% increase in gross revenue due to the larger average number of stores and growth of 21% in same store sales (sales in stores opened over 12 months).

 


 
 

Cost of products and services sold

(R$ million)

2016

2015

Percent change 2016-2015

       

Ipiranga

61,877.4

61,236.8

1%

Oxiteno

2,781.7

2,809.8

-1%

Ultragaz

4,467.2

3,884.6

15%

Ultracargo

199.0

151.9

31%

Extrafarma

1,071.9

900.9

19%


Ultrapar reported cost of goods sold and services provided at R$ 70,343 million in 2016, an increase of 2% in relation to 2015 due to growth recorded at all the businesses with the exception of Oxiteno. Cost of goods sold by Ipiranga was 1% higher, due to increases in diesel and gasoline costs in October 2015 and correspondingly higher ethanol costs, partially attenuated by lower sales volume. Cost of goods sold by Oxiteno fell by 1% due to lower payroll costs offset by higher sales volume, a 5% depreciation in the Real against the US dollar and increased prices of certain raw materials. Ultragaz’s cost of goods sold was 15% higher mainly due to (i) the increase in LPG costs, (ii) higher volumes, and (iii) higher unit freight costs due to the increase in product sourcing from more distant routes. Ultracargo’s cost of services provided reported growth of 31% due to higher costs with payroll and terminal maintenance. Additionally, since January 2016, some expenses have been reclassified as costs, in 2016 amounting to R$ 16 million. In Extrafarma, the cost of goods sold was 19% higher due to greater sales volume and the annual price adjustment in medicines authorized by the Chamber for the Regulation of the Medical Pharmaceuticals Market (CMED).

Gross profit

Ultrapar posted a gross profit of R$ 7,010 million in 2016, an increase of 4% relative to 2015, due to increases in gross profits at Ipiranga, Ultragaz and Extrafarma.

 

Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses

(R$ million)

2016

2015

Percent change 2016-2015

       

Ipiranga

2,257.6

2,087.2

8%

Oxiteno

616.4

690.8

-11%

Ultragaz

615.5

525.4

17%

Ultracargo

99.7

100.6

-1%

Extrafarma

511.1

427.5

20%

 

Ultrapar’s selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses totaled R$ 4,097 million in 2016, 7% more than 2015 due to the effects of inflation on expenses and to particular aspects in each business. Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses of Ipiranga increased by 8% due to (i) higher expenses with studies and projects for expansion and innovation, (ii) expansion in the service station and franchise network and (iii) the effects of inflation in the period, offset in part by reduced freight on


 
 

lower sales volume. In Oxiteno, selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses fell 11%, mainly due to lower personnel expenses, offset by the depreciation of the Real on logistics and international units expenses, aimed by increased sales volume. Ultragaz’s selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by 17% due to (i) higher expenditure on studies and projects for expansion and innovation, (ii) higher expenses with systems and support for commercial initiatives, and (iii) greater spending with advertising and marketing, highlighting key aspects of the current strategy focused on consumer convenience and services. Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses of Ultracargo fell 1% mainly due to expenses that were considered as costs as from January 2016 and partially offset by higher payroll expenses. In Extrafarma, selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses recorded a 20% rise. The increase reflects an 18% average increase in the number of stores, the effects of inflation on payroll expenses and expenses with the launch of the new brand, partially offset by actions implemented for improving retail pharmacy management standards.

 

Depreciation and amortization

Total costs and expenses with depreciation and amortization in 2016 were R$ 1,104 million, 10% higher than 2015 due to investments made during the course of 2016.

 

Income from disposal of assets

In 2016, Ultrapar recorded a net expense from the sale of assets of R$ 6 million against net revenues of R$ 27 million in 2015, mainly due to reduced land sales by Ipiranga.

 

Operating profit

Ultrapar recorded operating income of R$ 3,106 million in 2016, 5% up on 2015, due to higher operating profit at Ipiranga, Ultragaz and Ultracargo.

 

Financial result

Ultrapar’s financial result showed a net expense of R$ 843 million in 2016, R$ 139 million more than 2015, mainly due to (i) higher CDI rates in the period, (ii) higher net debt, and (iii) currency rate fluctuations in the period.

 

Net income

Ultrapar reported a consolidated net income for 2016 of R$ 1,571 million, 4% more than the net income recorded in 2015, due to growth in EBITDA between the periods, partially offset by higher financial expenses and higher amortization and depreciation, the result of investments executed during the period.

 

EBITDA

(R$ million)

2016

2015

Percent change 2016-2015

       

Ipiranga

3,080.5

2,768.8

11%

Oxiteno

458.9

739.8

-38%

Ultragaz

446.6

357.0

25%

Ultracargo

171.2

26.3

551%

Extrafarma

37.1

28.7

29%


 
 

 

Ultrapar’s consolidated EBITDA was R$ 4,217 million in 2016, a growth of 7% in relation to 2015 due to an increase in EBITDA at Ipiranga, Ultragaz, Ultracargo and Extrafarma. Ipiranga’s EBITDA in 2016 amounted to R$ 3.080 million, up 11% compared to 2015, despite lower sales volume, mainly due to (i) the strategy of constant innovation in service station services and convenience, (ii) the better sales mix and (iii) the reduction of the average fuels’ cost, made possible by imports. Oxiteno posted a 2016 EBITDA of R$ 459 million, a year-over-year decline of 38%, mainly due to (i) the variation in currency rates and in prices of certain raw materials, both moving in opposite directions in the comparison between 2016 and 2015, and (ii) the greater share of commodities in the product mix, attenuated by higher sales volume and by a 5% depreciation of the Real against the US dollar(R$ 0.16/US$). Ultragaz’s EBITDA amounted to R$ 447 million, 25% more than in 2015, the result of commercial initiatives for the capture of new customers and resellers and the strategy of differentiation and innovation. Ultracargo reported an EBITDA of R$ 171 million in 2016, a growth of R$ 145 million due to recoveries against insurance claims and greater handling movement. Excluding Santos operations and the effects of the fire, Ultracargo’s remaining port terminals recorded an EBITDA of R$ 100 million, 7% greater than 2015. Extrafarma reported an EBITDA of R$ 37 million, a year-over-year increase of 29% due to sales growth and actions taken to improve pharmaceutical retail management standards, partially attenuated by the larger number of stores yet to reach full maturity.

Main changes in the consolidated statements of income

Main changes in the consolidated statements of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared with the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(R$ million)

Year ending December 31

% of net sales and services

Year ending December 31

% of net sales and services

 Percent change 2015-2014

 
 

2015

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net revenue from sales and services

75,655.3

100%

67,736.3

100%

12%

Cost of products and services sold

(68,933.7)

91%

(62,304.6)

92%

11%

           

Gross profit

6,721.6

9%

5,431.7

8%

24%

Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses

(3,837.9)

5%

(3,289.0)

5%

17%

Other operating income, net

50.6

0%

106.9

0%

-53%

Income from disposal of assets

27.3

0%

37.0

0%

-26%

           

Operating income

2,961.5

4%

2,286.6

3%

30%

Financial results

(703.3)

1%

(445.4)

1%

58%

Income and social contribution taxes

(10.9)

0%

(16.5)

0%

-34%

Equity in earnings (losses) of affiliates

(743.3)

1%

(573.5)

1%

28%

           

Net income

1,513.0

2%

1,251.2

2%

21%

Net income attributable to:

         

Shareholders of Ultrapar

1,503.5

2%

1,241.6

2%

21%

Non-controlling shareholders of the subsidiaries

9.5

0%

9.7

0%

-1%

           

EBITDA

3,953.3

5%

3,157.9

5%

25%

Depreciation and amortization

1,002.6

1%

887,8

1%

13%


 
 

 

EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, and EBIT – Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, are presented in accordance with CVM Instruction No. 527, issued by CVM on October 4, 2012. The calculation of EBITDA from net earnings is presented below:

 

R$ million

2015

2014

 (%)

2015v2014

Net earnings

1,513

1,251

21%

(+) Income and social contribution taxes

743

573

 

(+) Financial expenses (income), net

703

445

 

(+)Depreciation and amortization

1,003

888

 

EBITDA

3,953

3,158

25%

 

The EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) presented in this document represents the net income before (i) income and social contribution taxes, (ii) net financial expense (income) and (iii) depreciation and amortization, presented in accordance with ICVM 527/12. The purpose of including EBITDA information is to provide a measure used by the management for internal assessment of our operating results, besides being a directly or indirectly related measure to a portion of our employee profit sharing plan. It is also a financial indicator widely used by investors and analysts to measure our ability to generate cash from operations and our operating performance. We also calculate EBITDA in connection with covenants related to some of our financing, as described in note 14 to the financial statements. We believe EBITDA allows a better understanding not only of our financial performance but also of our capacity of meeting the payment of interest and principal from our debt and of obtaining resources for our investments and working capital. Our definition of EBITDA may differ from, and, therefore, may not be comparable with similarly titled measures used by other companies, thereby limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. Because EBITDA excludes net financial expense (income), income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization, it provides an indicator of general economic performance that is not affected by debt restructurings,


 
 

fluctuations in interest rates or changes in income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a measure of financial performance under accounting practices adopted in Brazil or IFRS. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for net income, as a measure of operating performance, as a substitute for cash flows from operations or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA has material limitations that impair its value as a measure of a company’s overall profitability since it does not address certain ongoing costs of our business that could significantly affect profitability such as financial expenses and income taxes and depreciation and amortization.


   Overview on sales volume

 

2015

2014

Percent change 2015-2014

       

Ipiranga (000 m3)

25,725

25,614

0%

Oxiteno (000 tons)

725

780

-7%

Ultragaz (000 tons)

1,697

1,711

-1%

Ultracargo (000 m3)

655

715

-8%

Extrafarma (number of stores)

254

223

14%

 

At Ipiranga, the volume sold in 2015 slightly increased by 0.4% over 2014. In 2015, sales volume of gasoline, ethanol and natural gas for vehicles (Otto cycle) increased by 2% compared to 2014, as a result of an estimated 3% growth of the light vehicles fleet and investments made in new service stations and conversion of unbranded service stations, partially offset by the effects of higher unemployment rates over the year and the consequent impact on household consumption. The total volume of diesel decreased by 2% due to the weak performance of the economy. At Oxiteno, specialty chemicals sales had an 8% decrease compared to the previous year, mainly due to the effects of the Brazilian economy slowdown, resulting in a 7% decrease in total volume compared to 2014. Ultragaz’s sales volume had a 1% decrease compared to 2014, mainly due to the economy slowdown in bulk segment, partially offset by the capture of new customers in the residential and small and medium-sized companies segments and condominiums and the 1% growth in bottled segment. Ultracargo’s average storage had an 8% reduction over 2014, mainly as a result of the partial stoppage of the Santos terminal due to the fire occurred in the beginning of April, partially offset by the increased demand of fuels in Suape and Aratu. Extrafarma ended the year with 14% growth over 2014 in the average number of stores, compared to a growth of 8% ABRAFARMA, gaining two positions when compared to December 2014 in the ABRAFARMA ranking, ending the year in 6th position.

 

Net revenue from sales and services

(R$ million)

2015

2014

Percent change 2015-2014

Ipiranga

65,349.8

58,830.1

11%

Oxiteno

4,082.5

3,413.6

20%

Ultragaz

4,621.2

4,091.3

13%

Ultracargo

315.5

346.5

-9%

Extrafarma¹

1,336.3

1,101.3

21%


 
 

    ¹ For the months from February to December 2014.


Ultrapar's net revenue from sales and services amounted to R$ 75,655 million in 2015, a 12% growth over 2014. In the same comparison, Ipiranga’s net sales and services increased by 11% mainly due to the rise in diesel and gasoline costs in refineries in November 2014 and September 2015, besides the increase of CIDE, PIS and Cofins taxes on gasoline and diesel as from February 2015, impacting ethanol costs. Oxiteno reported a growth of 20% in net sales and services, primarily due to the 42% weaker Real and its strategic focus on specialty chemicals, partially offset by the lower sales volume and the decrease in the prices of main raw materials. Ultragaz's net sales and services was R$ 4,621 million in 2015, 13% higher than 2014, mainly due to the increase in the cost of LPG in refineries for use in the bulk segment in December 2014, September 2015 and December 2015, and in the bottled segment in September 2015. Ultracargo’s net sales and services totaled R$ 316 million, a 9% decrease compared to 2014, mainly due to the partial stoppage of the Santos terminal as a result of the fire accident. Extrafarma's net sales and services grew by 21% due to the higher average number of stores and the 11% increase in same store sales excluding mobile phones (sales in stores with more than 12 months).


Cost of products and services sold

(R$ million)

2015

2014

Percent change 2015-2014

       

Ipiranga

61,236.8

55,338.9

11%

Oxiteno

2,809.8

2,624.7

7%

Ultragaz

3,884.6

3,478.5

12%

Ultracargo

151.9

141.9

7%

Extrafarma¹

900.9

752.4

20%

  ¹ For the months from February to December 2014.

The cost of products sold and services provided by Ultrapar was R$ 68,934 million in 2015, an increase of 11% compared to 2014. The cost of goods sold by Ipiranga was 11% higher than 2014, mainly due to the increases in diesel and gasoline costs by Petrobras and the increase of CIDE tax on such costs and higher sales volume. Oxiteno's cost of products sold had a 7% increase over 2014, mainly due to the 42% weaker Real, partially offset by a 22% reduction in unit variable costs in dollar and a decrease in sales volume. Ultragaz’s cost of goods sold was 12% higher compared to 2014, due to the increase in the cost of LPG for use in the bottled and bulk segments by Petrobras and the effects of inflation on personnel expenses. The cost of the services provided by Ultracargo increased by 7% compared to 2014, due to the effects of inflation, mainly on personnel expenses. The cost of products sold by Extrafarma increased by 20%, due to increased sales volume and the annual adjustment in the prices of medicines, set by the Chamber for the Regulation of the Medical Pharmaceuticals Market (CMED).


Gross profit


 
 

Ultrapar reported a gross profit of R$ 6,722 million in 2015, a growth of 24% compared to 2014, due to the increase in gross profits in all business units, except Ultracargo, which reported a decrease due to the fire occurred in Santos.

 

Selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses

 

(R$ million)

2015

2014

Percent change 2015-2014

 

 

 

 

Ipiranga

2,087.2

1,871.1

12%

Oxiteno

690.8

522.7

32%

Ultragaz

525.4

444.2

18%

Ultracargo

100.6

94.1

7%

Extrafarma¹

427.5

332.5

29%

 

 

 

 

¹ For the months from February to December 2014.

 

Ultrapar's selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses amounted to R$ 3,838 million in 2015, a 17% growth compared to 2014, due to the effects of inflation on expenses and particular effects on each business. Ipiranga's selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by 12% compared to 2014 due to (i) the expansion of the distribution network, (ii) higher freight expenses mainly due to the rise in diesel costs and (iii) higher expenses with variable compensation, in line with the earnings progression. Oxiteno's selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by 32% compared to 2014 due to (i) higher expenses with variable compensation, in line with the earnings progression, (ii) the effects of the weaker Real on expenses with logistics and international units, and (iii) the effects of inflation. Ultragaz's selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by 18% compared to 2014 mainly due to (i) higher expenses with variable compensation, in line with the earnings progression, (ii) the effects of inflation on expenses, and (iii) higher expenses with advertising and marketing in the relaunch campaign of the Ultragaz brand, highlighting the attributes of its current strategy focused on convenience and services for consumers. Ultracargo's selling, marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by 7%, excluding expenses related to the fire highlighted below under “Other operating results”. Extrafarma's selling, general, administrative and commercial expenses increased by 29% due to (i) the 14% increase in the average number of stores, (ii) the inclusion of expenses for the structuring for a more accelerated growth during 2014, (iii) the beginning of the operation of the new distribution center of Ceará at the end of 2014, and (iv) due to the effects of inflation on expenses, partially offset by lower integration expenses.


Depreciation and amortization

Total costs and expenses with depreciation and amortization in 2015 was R$ 1,003 million, R$ 115 million or 13% higher compared to 2014, due to the investments made over the period.


Income from disposal of assets

Ultrapar recorded in 2015 a net revenue from the sale of assets of R$ 27 million, R$ 10 million less than the revenue recorded in 2014.


Operating profit


 
 

Ultrapar reported an operating profit of R$ 2,962 million in 2015, a growth of 30% compared to 2014, due to the higher operating income obtained in Ipiranga, Oxiteno and Ultragaz.


Financial result

Ultrapar’s financial results reported net expenses of R$ 703 million in 2015, a R$ 258 million increase compared to 2014, mainly due to (i) higher CDI during the period, (ii) the higher net debt, in line with the growth of the company, (iii) the exchange rate fluctuations in the period and (iv) PIS/COFINS contributions on financial revenue as from July. 


Net income

Ultrapar's consolidated net earnings for 2015 reached R$ 1,513 million, 21% above the net income reported in 2014, mainly due to the EBITDA growth between the periods, partially offset by the increase in financial expenses and higher expenses and costs with depreciation and amortization costs, as a result of investments made over the period.

 

EBITDA

(R$ million)

2015

2014

Percent change 2015-2014

 

 

 

 

Ipiranga

2,768.8

2,288.0

21%

Oxiteno

739.8

403.7

83%

Ultragaz

357.0

305.5

17%

Ultracargo

26.3

166.9

-84%

Extrafarma¹

28.7

29.8

-4%

 

 

 

 

¹ For the months from February to December 2014.


Ultrapar's consolidated EBITDA amounted to R$ 3,953 million in 2015, up 25% compared to 2014. Ipiranga reported EBITDA of R$ 2,769 million in 2015, a growth of 21% compared to 2014, primarily due to (i) the strategy of constant innovation in services and convenience in service stations, generating greater customer satisfaction and loyalty, (ii) increased sales volume in Otto cycle, and (iii) effects of import and inventory gains resulting from the economic adjustments in the Brazilian fuels market. Oxiteno reported EBITDA of R$ 740 million, an 83% increase over 2014, mainly due to the effect of a weaker Real against US dollar and its strategic focus on specialty chemicals, partially offset by lower sales volume. Ultragaz's EBITDA totaled R$ 357 million, 17% higher than 2014, mainly due to the company’s commercial initiatives, specially in capturing residential and small and medium-sized companies and condominiums, as well as the expansion of its resellers. Ultracargo’s EBITDA totaled R$ 26 million in 2015, an 84% decrease mainly due to the lower handling, due to the partial stoppage of the Santos terminal and its fire related expenses. Excluding Santos operations, other Ultracargo’s terminals reported an EBITDA of R$ 93 million, a 5% decrease mainly due to the effects of economy slowdown on handling of chemicals. Extrafarma reported EBITDA of R$ 29 million, a 4% decrease as compared to 2014, due to the initiatives for a more accelerated growth, including the beginning of the operation of the new distribution center of Ceará and the increased pace of new drugstores openings, the benefits of which shall be generated in the next years, partially offset by the increase in same store sales.


10.2 – Comments on:


 
 


a. Company’s operating results, especially:


i. Description of major components of revenues

More than 90% of consolidated net revenues of Ultrapar is generated by the fuel and LPG distribution businesses. Therefore, the main components of these revenues come from diesel, gasoline and ethanol sales by Ipiranga and from LPG sales by Ultragaz. See “Item 10.2.c. effect of inflation, changes in prices of main inputs and products, foreign exchange and interest rates on the Company’s operating results and financial results”.

 

ii. Factors that materially affected operating results

See “Item 10.1.h. Main changes in each item of the financial statements – Main changes in consolidated income statement”.

 

b. Changes in revenues attributable to changes in prices, exchange rates, inflation, changes in volumes and introduction of new products and services


See “Item 10.1.h. Main changes in each item of the financial statements – Main changes in consolidated income statement” and See “Item 10.2.c. effect of inflation, changes in prices of main inputs and products, foreign exchange and interest rates on the Company’s operating results and financial results”.

 

c. Effect of inflation, changes in prices of main inputs and products, foreign exchange and interest rates on the Company’s operating results and financial results, if relevant


LPG business

Between 2003 and the end of 2007, LPG prices charged to LPG distributors in Brazil have been stable, despite increases in oil and LPG prices in the international markets, which were partially offset by the appreciation of the Real compared to the U.S. dollar. However, since 2008 Petrobras has increased LPG refinery price dynamics for commercial and industrial usage sporadically. In 2017, LPG refinery prices were adjusted more frequently, as shown bellow:

 

 

Jan/08

 

Apr/08

 

Jul/08

 

Jan/10

 

Dec/14

 

Sep/15

 

Dec/15

 

Dec/16

 

Commercial and Industrial LPG (% adjustment).............................

       15%             

        10%

        6%

     6%

        15%

      11%

     4%

        12%

 

 

Apr/17

 

Jul/17

 

Aug/17

 

Sep/17

 

Nov/17

 

Dec/17

 

Commercial and Industrial LPG (% adjustment)......................................

     -4.0%

-5.2% and 8.0%

7.2%

2.3% and 7.9%

     6.5%

5.3%

 

The LPG refinery prices for residential use remained unchanged from May 2003 to September 2015, when Petrobras increased prices by 15%. In the last years, Petrobras’ practice was not to immediately reflect volatility of international prices of oil and its derivatives in the Brazilian market. However, in June 2017, the dynamic of LPG prices supplied by the distributors was modified to reflect international price volatility and exchange rate variation, as shown bellow:

 

 
 

 

Mar/17

 

Jun/17

 

Jul/17

 

Aug/17

 

Sep/17

 

Oct/17

 

Nov/17

 

Dec/17

Residential LPG (% adjustment)

      9.8%

       6.7%

    -4.5%

  6.9%

10.7% and 6.9%

       12.9%          

       4.5%

       8.9%

 

To smooth out the peaks and troughs in international prices, in January 2018, the pricing dynamic was adjusted. The period for verification of international prices and currency rates which dictate the percentages of price adjustment will be the average of the preceding twelve months and no longer the monthly variation and price movement will now become quarterly and not monthly.

We cannot guarantee that this trend will continue. Any sharp fluctuation in LPG prices charged to LPG distributors could have an impact on Ultragaz’s results if it is unable to maintain its operational margins or sales volume.

LPG bulk sales are correlated to economic growth. Thus, an acceleration or deceleration in Brazilian GDP growth can affect our sales volume, since the segment represented approximately 30% of the volume sold by Ultragaz. Bottled LPG is an essential good and, therefore, it has a relatively low correlation with economic performance.

Chemical and petrochemical business

The specialty chemicals volume in the Brazilian market is correlated to economic performance. Therefore, an acceleration or deceleration in the Brazilian GDP can affect our sales volume, as Oxiteno’s specialty chemicals sales in Brazil represented 55% of its total sales in 2017. In the end of 2008, Oxiteno concluded certain capacity expansions that, combined to the increase of 70 thousand tons per year in the ethoxylate unit of Camaçari in 2010 and of 90 thousand tons per year of ethylene oxide also in Camaçari in 2011, allowed an increase in sales volume, exports and, therefore, in the share of international units in volume sold. As the Brazilian market grows, Oxiteno aims at (i) increasing the volume sold in the domestic market once the logistics costs are usually lower than those of sales outside Brazil, and (ii) increasing sales volume of specialties, products of higher value added than commodities. In 2017, sales of specialty chemicals represented 82% of the total volume sold by Oxiteno, lower than the percentage of 83% sold in 2016.

In 2012, Oxiteno expanded its activities to the United States, through the acquisition of a specialty chemicals plant in Pasadena, Texas, with production capacity of 32 thousand tons per year, and to Uruguay, through the acquisition of American Chemical, a specialty chemicals Company, with production capacity of 81 thousand tons per year. In 2014, Oxiteno invested in the continuity of the expansion of the production capacity in Coatzacoalcos. In 2015, Oxiteno announced investments of US$ 148 million to build a new ethoxylation unit in its site in Texas, which is expected to be completed in the first half of 2018. The new facility will reach a production capacity of 120 thousand tons per year in its final stage. In 2017, Oxiteno invested R$ 463 million for maintenance of its units and for the new site in Texas.

Almost all of Oxiteno’s products prices and variable costs are linked to U.S. dollar. Therefore, a sharp appreciation or depreciation of the U.S. dollar could have an impact on Oxiteno’s contribution margin in the future. In 2015, Real depreciated 47% against the U.S. dollar. In 2016, the Real appreciated 17% against the U.S. dollar. In 2017 Real depreciated 15% against the U.S. dollar.

Oxiteno’s main raw material is the ethylene, which is produced from naphtha in Brazil. Generally, naphtha prices in Brazil fluctuate with oil prices. In 2015, oil prices ended at US$ 36/barrel, down 36% compared to 2014. In 2016, oil prices ended at US$ 55/barrel, up 55% compared to 2015. In 2017, oil prices ended at US$ 67/barrel, up 21% compared to 2016. A sharp variation in ethylene prices would impact Oxiteno's results if it is not able to keep operating margins. The second most important raw material for Oxiteno is the palm kernel oil, whose international prices increased from US$ 903/ton in December 2015 to US$ 1,747/ton in December 2016 and to US$ 1,367/ton in December 2017.


 
 

The increase in demand for chemical and petrochemical products in Brazil during the last years and the ongoing integration of regional and world markets have contributed to the increasing integration of the Brazilian petrochemical industry into the international marketplace. As a consequence, events affecting the petrochemical industry worldwide could have a material effect on our business and results of operations. The chemical industry performance worldwide was strongly affected by the world financial crisis in 2009, which caused the demand for chemical products to decrease in several countries. Due to the growth of the Brazilian chemicals market, Oxiteno faces tougher competition from certain foreign producers since 2009, including ethylene oxide and derivatives producers with access to natural-gas-based raw materials.

 

Fuel distribution business

In the recent past, the combined sales of gasoline, ethanol and natural gas (Otto cycle) in Brazil have been correlated mainly to the growth of the light vehicle fleet. According to ANFAVEA, in 2017 the light vehicle fleet continued to grow, with about 2.2 million new vehicles licensed in Brazil and estimated growth of 1.7% of the average fleet compared to 2016, reaching about 41 million light vehicles. Additionally, we believe the current ratio of inhabitants per vehicle in Brazil is still low when compared to the rate seen in countries with similar level of development. According to 2015 data released by ANFAVEA (the last available data), the penetration of light vehicles in Brazil is about 21% of total inhabitants, while in Argentina is 31% and in Mexico is 29%.

After a decrease in 2016, Otto Cycle presented a light growth in 2017, due to growing in light vehicle fleet.

Diesel sales, which in 2017 accounted for 50% of the volume sold by Ipiranga, have historically been correlated with Brazilian economic performance, particularly the agricultural and consumer goods segments. In 2017, the Brazilian diesel market, according to ANP data, showed a growth of 1% when compared to 2016, influenced by smooth recovery of the economy. The increase in fuels consumption could have a positive effect on the future volume sold by the Company and on its results.

In the last few years, Petrobras’ practice was not to immediately reflect the volatility of international prices of oil and its derivatives in the Brazilian market. Between January 2012 and September 2016, increases in prices occurred, on average, every eight months. In October 2016, a new dynamic for gasoline and diesel prices was established with the objective of, amongst other aspects, fluctuate prices according to international references on a monthly basis. Therefore, gasoline and diesel prices became directly influenced by the international prices and the Real/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The prices started to fluctuate on a daily basis from June 2017 on.

The following figures show the price volatility of fuels acquired by the distributors from the refineries:


 
 

 



 

Effects of inflation over our operational costs and expenses

Ultrapar’s operational costs and expenses are substantially in Reais, thus influenced by the general price levels in the Brazilian economy. In 2017, 2016 and 2015, the variation of IPCA (Consumer Prices Index), the index adopted by the Brazilian government to set inflation targets, was 2.95%, 6.3%, 10.7%, respectively. From December 31, 2017 to January 31, 2018, the variation of IPCA was 0.3%.

 

Financial result

The main macroeconomic factors that influence the financial results of Ultrapar are the foreign exchange and interest rates.

 

Exchange rate

Most of the transactions of the Company are located in Brazil and, therefore, the reference currency for currency risk management is the Real. Currency risk management is guided by neutrality of currency exposures and considers the transactional, accounting, and operational risks of the Company and its exposure to changes in exchange rates. The Company considers as its main currency exposures the assets and liabilities in foreign currency and the short-term flow of net sales in foreign currency of Oxiteno. Ultrapar and its subsidiaries use exchange rate hedging instruments (especially between the Real and the U.S. dollar) available in the financial market to protect their assets, liabilities, revenues and disbursements in foreign currency and net investments in foreign operations, in order to reduce the effects of changes in exchange rates on its results and cash flows in Reais within the exposure limits under its Policy. Such foreign exchange hedging instruments have amounts, periods, and rates substantially equivalent to those of assets, liabilities, revenues and disbursements in foreign currency to which they are related. Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are stated below, translated into Reais as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:


 
 

 

Assets and liabilities in foreign currency

 

 

 

 

(R$ million)

12/31/2017

12/31/2016

12/31/2015

       

Assets in foreign currency

     

Cash, cash equivalents and financial investments in foreign currency (except for hedging instrument)

236.4

423.9

147.8

Foreign trade accounts receivable, net of provision for loss

214.9

323.4

188.8

Advances to foreign suppliers, net of accounts payable from imports

930.0

600.9

611.4

 

1,381.3

1,348.2

948.0

       

Liabilities in foreign currency

     

Financing in foreign currency

(4,416.2)

(4,736.3)

(2,630.3)

Accounts payable arising from imports, net of advances to foreign suppliers

(173.1)

(57.1)

(64.4)

 

(4,589.3)

(4,793.4)

(2,694.7)

       

Foreign currency hedging instruments

1,777.6

2,206.4

2,667.2

Net asset  position — Total

(1,430.4)

(1,238.8)

920.5

Net asset (liability) position – Income statement effect

(26.1)

24.8

(40.7)

Net asset (liability) position – Shareholders’ equity effect

(1,404.3)

(1,263.6)

961.2

 

Sensitivity analysis of assets and liabilities in foreign currency

The table below shows the effect of exchange rate changes in different scenarios, based on the net liability position of R$ 1,430.4 million in foreign currency:

 

(R$ million)

Risk

Scenario I

Scenario II

Scenario III

   

10%

25%

50%

         

   (1) Income effect

Real devaluation

(2.6)

(6.5)

(13.0)

   (2) Equity effect

(140.4)

(351.1)

(702.2)

   (1) + (2)

Net effect

(143.0)

(357.6)

(715.2)

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

   (3) Income effect

Real valuation

2.6

6.5

13.0

   (4) Equity effect

140.4

351.1

702.2

   (3) + (4)

Net Effect

143.0

357.6

715.2


 
 

 

 

The shareholders’ equity effect refers to cumulative translation adjustments of changes in the exchange rate on equity of foreign subsidiaries (see Notes 2.r and 23.f - Cumulative Translation Adjustments), net investments hedge in foreign entities, cash flow hedge of firm commitments and highly probable transaction (see Note 2.c).


Interest Rate

The Company and its subsidiaries adopt conservative policies for borrowing and investing financial resources and for capital cost minimization. The financial investments of the Company and its subsidiaries are primarily held in transactions linked to the CDI, as set forth in Note 4. Borrowings primarily relate to financing from Banco do Brasil, BNDES and other development agencies, debentures and borrowings in foreign currency, as shown in Note 14. The Company attempts to maintain its financial interest assets and liabilities at floating rates.

The table below shows the financial assets and liabilities exposed to floating interest rates as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:

 

(R$ million)

               Note

12/31/2017

 

12/31/2016

 

12/31/2015

CDI

           

Cash equivalents

4

4,822

 

3,838

 

               2,498

Financial investments

4

1,153

 

1,174

 

                    802

Asset position of foreign exchange hedging instruments – CDI

31

30

 

28

 

                    31

Loans and debentures

14

(7,987)

 

(5,862)

 

             (5,521)

Liability position of foreign exchange hedging instruments – CDI

31

(1,877)

 

(2,182)

 

                  (2,225)

Liability position of hedging instruments from pre-fixed interest to CDI

31

(587)

 

-

 

                  (28)

       

 

 

 

Net liability position in CDI

 

(4,447)

 

(3,003)

 

             (4,444)

             

TJLP

           

Loans –TJLP

14

(302)

 

(404)

 

(421)


 
 

 

Net liability position in TJLP

 

(302)

 

(404)

 

                  (421)

             

LIBOR

           

Asset position of foreign exchange hedging instruments – LIBOR

31

984

 

1,150

 

                    1,364

Loans – LIBOR

14

(1,419)

 

(1,470)

 

                  (1,587)

Net liability position in LIBOR

 

(434)

 

(320)

 

                     (223)

             

TIIE

           

Loans - TIIE

14

(3)

 

(10)

 

                     (27)

Net liability position in TIIE

 

(3)

 

(10)

 

                     (27)

SELIC

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans - SELIC

14

(100)

 

(99)

 

                     (31)

Net liability position in SELIC

 

(100)

 

(99)

 

                     (31)

Total net liability

 

(5,287)

 

(3,837)

 

             (3,311)

Sensitivity analysis of floating interest rate risk

The table below shows the incremental expenses and income that would be recognized in financial income in 2017, due the effect of floating interest rate changes in different scenarios:

 

 

 
 

 

(R$ million)

Risk

Scenario I

Scenario II

Scenario III

   

10%

25%

50%

Exposure of interest rate risk

       

Interest effect on cash equivalents and financial investments

Increase in CDI

47.3

118.1

236.3

Foreign exchange hedging instruments (assets in CDI) effect

Increase in CDI

0.2

0.5

1.0

Interest effect on debt

Increase in CDI

(67.2)

(168.0)

(336.0)

Interest rate hedging instruments (liabilities in CDI) effect

Increase in CDI

(38.6)

(94.2)

(186.7)

Incremental expenses

 

(58.3)

(143.6)

(285.4)

   

 

 

 

Interest effect on debt

Increase in TJLP

(2.3)

(5.6)

(11.3)

Incremental expenses

 

(2.3)

(5.6)

(11.3)

   

 

 

 

Foreign exchange hedging instruments (assets in LIBOR) effect

Increase in LIBOR

1.4

3.4

6.8

Interest effect on debt

Increase in LIBOR

(1.7)

(4.4)

(8.7)

Incremental expenses

 

(0.3)

(1.0)

(1.9)

   

 

 

 

Interest effect on debt

Increase in TIIE

(0.0)

(0.1)

(0.2)

Incremental expenses

 

(0.0)

(0.1)

(0.2)

Interest effect on debt

Increase in SELIC

(1.0)

(2.5)

(4.9)

Incremental expenses

 

(1.0)

(2.5)

(4.9)

 

10.3 - Comments on material effects that the events below have caused or are expected to cause on the Company’s financial statements and results:

 

a. Introduction or disposal of operating segment

There was no introduction or disposal of operating segment in the fiscal year 2017.

 

b. Establishment, acquisition or sale of ownership interest


 
 

There was no relevant establishment, acquisition or sale of ownership interest in the fiscal 2017 that have caused or are expected to cause significant effects on the Company's financial statements.

In 2016, Ultrapar signed agreements for associations and acquisitions, with prospective effects for the conclusion of each transaction, after the approval of CADE:

- On June 12, 2016, Ultrapar, by its subsidiary IPP, signed a sale and purchase agreement for the acquisition of ALESAT and its assets. The conclusion of the acquisition was subject to certain conditions precedent, usual in this type of transactions. On August 2, 2017, the Court of Appeals of CADE voted the transaction and despite all the efforts endeavored by the applicants throughout the analysis of the Concentration Act and the negotiations conducted with the Court of Appeals, the Court blocked the transaction. The contract is automatically resolved without any penalty from either party.

- On August 4, 2016, the Company through its subsidiary Ipiranga Produtos de Petróleo S.A. (“IPP”) entered into a joint venture agreement with Chevron Brasil Lubrificantes Ltda. (“Chevron”) to create a new company in the lubricants market. Under this agreement, the JV is formed by Ipiranga’s and Chevron’s lubricants operations in Brazil. Ipiranga and Chevron hold 56% and 44%, respectively, of the new company’s capital. On February 9, 2017, this transaction was approved without restrictions through an opinion issued by the General Superintendence (“SG”) of the Brazilian Antitrust Authority (“CADE”). On March 2, 2017, CADE issued a certificate approving the decision published on February 10, 2017. On August 1, 2017, IPP segregated the lubricants business to the subsidiary Ipiranga Lubrificantes S.A. (“IpiLubs”) and the operating contracts were signed. On December 1, 2017, the joint venture was concluded, through the contribution of IpiLubs to Chevron Brasil Lubrificantes S.A. (“CBLSA”) and consequently IPP obtains direct control of CBLSA.

- On November 17, 2016, Ultrapar, by its subsidiary Companhia Ultragaz S.A, signed a sale and purchase agreement for the acquisition of Liquigás. The conclusion of the acquisition was subjected to certain conditions precedent, usual in this type of transactions, and mainly the Antitrust Authority’s approval. On February 28, 2018, the Court of Appeals of CADE voted the transaction and despite all the efforts endeavored by the applicants throughout the analysis of the Concentration Act and the negotiations conducted with the Court of Appeals, the Court blocked the transaction.

 

c. Unusual events or transactions

Not applicable.

 

10.4 - Comments on:


a. Significant changes in accounting practices


  All the financial information contained in Item 10 is presented the same accounting practices (IFRS).


2017:

There were no significant changes in accounting practices in the fiscal year 2017.

2016:

There were no significant changes in accounting practices in the fiscal year 2016.

2015:

There were no significant changes in accounting practices in the fiscal year 2015.


 
 

 

b. Significant effects of changes in accounting practices

Not applicable for fiscal year 2017, 2016 and 2015.


c. Exceptions and emphasis present in the auditor’s opinion

None.

 

10.5 - Comments on the Company’s critical accounting policies

The presentation of our financial condition and results of operations requires our management to make judgments regarding the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain on the carrying value of our assets and liabilities and may affect the reported amount of them as well as our revenues and expenses. The financial statements include, among others, estimates mainly related to (i) determining the fair value of financial instruments (Notes 4, 14 and 31), (ii) the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts (Notes 5 and 31), (iii) the determination of provisions for losses of inventories (Note 6), (iv) the determination of deferred income taxes amounts (Note 9), (v) useful life of property, plant and equipment (Note 12), (vi) the useful life of intangible assets and the determination of the recoverable amount of goodwill (Note 13), (vii) provisions for assets retirement obligations (Note 19), (viii) provisions for tax, civil and labor liabilities (Note 20), (ix) estimates for the preparation of actuarial reports (Note 18), (x) the fair value determination of the subscription warrants – indemnification (Note 3.a and 31) and (xi) the determination of exchange rate used to translation of Oxiteno Andina financial statements (Note 2.r).

The effective results and information of transactions may differ from these estimates when they materialize. Actual results may differ from those estimated under different variables, assumptions or conditions, even though our management believes that its accounting estimates are reasonable. The following paragraphs review the critical accounting estimates that management considers most important for understanding our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. An accounting estimate is considered a critical accounting estimate if it meets the following criteria:

 

·          The accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that were highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate was made; and

 

·          Different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

We have identified the following accounting policies as critical:

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the subsequent inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded in an amount we consider sufficient to cover any probable losses on realization of our accounts receivable from our customers, as well as other receivables, and is included as selling expenses; no adjustment is made to net sales and services revenue. In order to establish the allowance for doubtful accounts, our management constantly evaluates the amount and characteristics of our accounts receivable. When significant delays occur and the likelihood of receiving these payments decreases, a provision is made. In case receivables in arrears are guaranteed or there are reasonable grounds to believe they will be paid, no provision is made. If the financial conditions of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances would be required in future periods. However, because we cannot predict with certainty the future financial stability of our customers, we cannot guarantee that our reserves will continue to be adequate. Actual credit losses may be greater than the allowance we have established, which could have a significant impact on our selling expenses (see Notes 5 and 31).


 
 


Provisions for inventory losses

If net realizable values are below inventory costs, a provision corresponding to this difference is recognized. Provisions are also made for obsolescence of products, materials or supplies that (i) do not meet Ultrapar and its subsidiaries’ specifications, (ii) have exceeded their expiration date or (iii) are considered slow-moving inventory. This classification is made by management with the support of its industrial team. For further information on Ultrapar’s provisions for inventory losses, see Note 6.

 

Income tax and social contribution

Current and deferred income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution tax on net income (CSLL) are calculated based on their effective rates, considering the value of tax incentives. Taxes are recognized based on the rates of IRPJ and CSLL provided for by the legislation in force on the last day of the financial statements. The current rates in Brazil are 25% for income tax and 9% for social contribution tax on net income. For further details about recognition and realization of IRPJ and CSLL, see Note 9.

 

 

 

Provision for civil and labor tax risks

A provision for tax, civil and labor risks is recognized for quantifiable risks, when the chance of loss is more-likely-than-not in the opinion of management and internal and external legal counsel, and the amounts are recognized based on the evaluation of the outcomes of the legal proceedings (see Note 20).

 

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment is recognized at acquisition or construction cost, including financial charges incurred on property, plant and equipment under construction, as well as maintenance costs resulting from scheduled plant outages and estimated costs to remove, to decommission or to restore assets (see Notes 2.m and 19).

Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method, for the periods mentioned in Note 12, taking into account the useful life of the assets, which are reviewed annually. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease contract term and useful life of the property.

 

Intangible assets

Intangible assets include assets acquired by the Company and its subsidiaries from third parties, according to the criteria below (see Note 13):


 
 

·          Goodwill is carried net of accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2008, when it ceased to be amortized. Goodwill generated since January 1, 2009 is shown as intangible assets corresponding to the positive difference between the amount paid or payable to the seller and the fair value of the identified assets and liabilities assumed of the acquired entity, and is tested annually for impairment. Goodwill is allocated to the business segments, which represent the lowest level that goodwill is monitored by the Company for impairment testing purposes.

·          Bonus disbursements as provided in Ipiranga’s agreements with reseller service stations and major consumers are recognized as distribution rights when paid and amortized using the straight-line method according to the term of the agreement.

·          Other intangible assets acquired from third parties, such as software, technology, and commercial property rights, are measured at the total acquisition cost and amortized using straight-line method, over the periods mentioned in Note 13, taking into account their useful life, which is reviewed annually.

The Company and its subsidiaries have not recognized intangible assets that were generated internally. The Company and its subsidiaries have goodwill and brands acquired in business combinations, which are evaluated as intangible assets with indefinite useful life (see Note 13 items i and vi).

 

Impairment of Assets

The Company and its subsidiaries review, at least annually, the existence of any indication that an asset may be impaired. If there is an indication, the Company and its subsidiaries estimate the recoverable amount of the asset. Assets that cannot be evaluated individually are grouped in the smallest group of assets that generate cash flow from continuous use and that are largely independent of cash flows of other assets (cash generating units -“CGU”). The recoverable amount of assets or CGUs corresponds to the greater of their fair value net of applicable direct selling costs and their value in use.

The fair value less costs of disposal is determined by the price that would be received to sell an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, net of costs of removing the asset, and direct incremental costs to bring an asset into condition for its sale, legal costs, and taxes.

To assess the value in use, the Company and its subsidiaries consider the projections of future cash flows, trends, and outlooks, as well as the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors. Such cash flows are discounted to their present values using the discount rate before tax that reflects market conditions for the period of impairment testing and the specific risks of the asset or CGU being evaluated. In cases where the expected discounted future cash flows are less than their carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of these assets. Losses for impairment of assets are recognized in profit or loss. In case goodwill has been allocated to a CGU, the recognized losses are first allocated to reduce the corresponding goodwill. If the goodwill is not enough to absorb such losses, the surplus is allocated to the assets on a pro-rata basis. An impairment of goodwill cannot be reversed. For other assets, impairment losses may be reversed only to the extent that the asset's carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if the impairment had not been recognized.

In 2017, Ultrapar and its subsidiaries did not register reduction in the recoverable amount (See Note 13 item i).

 

Provisions for assets retirement obligations

The Company and its subsidiaries have the legal obligation to remove Ipiranga’s underground fuel tanks located at Ipiranga-branded service stations after a certain period. The estimated cost of the


 
 

obligation to remove these fuel tanks is recognized as a liability when the tanks are installed. The estimated cost is recognized in property, plant, and equipment and depreciated over the respective useful lives of the tanks. The amounts recognized as a liability are monetarily restated using the National Consumer Price Index - IPCA until the respective tank is removed (see Note 19). An increase in the estimated cost of the obligation to remove the tanks could result in negative impact in future results. The estimated removal cost is reviewed and updated annually or when there is significant change in its amount and change in the estimated costs are recognized in income when they become known.

 

Fair value of financial instruments

Our financial instruments are classified in accordance with the following categories:

·          Measured at fair value through profit or loss: financial assets held for trading, that is, acquired or incurred principally for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term, and derivatives. The balances are stated at fair value. The interest earned, the exchange variation, and changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss.

·          Held to maturity: non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments, and fixed maturities for which the entity has the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. The interest earned and the foreign currency exchange variation are recognized in profit or loss, and balances are stated at acquisition cost plus the interest earned, using the effective interest rate method.

·          Available for sale: non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available for sale or that are not classified into other categories at initial recognition. The balances are stated at fair value, and the interest earned and the foreign currency exchange variation are recognized in profit or loss. Differences between fair value and acquisition cost plus the interest earned are recognized in other comprehensive income in the “Valuation adjustments”. Accumulated gains and losses recognized in shareholders’ equity are reclassified to profit or loss in case of prepayment.

·          Loans and receivables: non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments or receipts, not quoted in an active market, except: (i) those which the entity intends to sell immediately or in the near term and which the entity classified as measured at fair value through profit or loss; (ii) those classified as available for sale; or (iii) those for which the Company may not recover substantially all of its initial investment for reasons other than credit deterioration. The interest earned and the foreign currency exchange variation are recognized in profit or loss. The balances are stated at acquisition cost plus interest, using the effective interest rate method.

 

The Company and its subsidiaries use financial instruments for hedging purposes, applying the concepts described below:

·          Hedge accounting - fair value hedge: financial instruments used to hedge exposure to changes in the fair value of an item, attributable to a particular risk, which can affect the entity’s profit or loss. In the initial designation of the fair value hedge, the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item is documented, including the objectives of risk management, the strategy in conducting the transaction, and the methods to be used to evaluate its effectiveness. Once the fair value hedge has been qualified as effective, the hedge item is also measured at fair value. Gains and losses from hedge instruments and hedge items are recognized in profit or loss. The hedge accounting must be discontinued when the hedge becomes ineffective.

·          Hedge accounting - cash flow hedge: financial instruments used to hedge the exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a risk associated with an asset or liability or highly


 
 

probable transaction or firm commitment that may affect the income statements. The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is determined to be effective relating to the effects of exchange rate effect, is recognized directly in equity in accumulated other comprehensive income as “Valuation adjustments” while the ineffective portion is recognized in profit or loss. Gains or losses on the hedging instrument relating to the effective portion of this hedge that had been recognized directly in accumulated other comprehensive income shall be recognized in profit or loss in the period in which the hedged item is recognized in profit or loss or as initial cost of non- financial assets, in the same line of the statement that the hedged item is recognized. The hedge accounting shall be discontinued when (i) the Company cancels the hedging relationship; (ii) the hedging instrument expires; and (iii) the hedging instrument no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. When hedge accounting is discontinued, gains and losses recognized in other comprehensive income in equity are reclassified to profit or loss in the period which the hedged item is recognized in profit or loss. If the transaction hedged is canceled or is not expected to occur, the cumulative gains and losses in other comprehensive income in equity shall be recognized immediately in profit or loss.

·          Hedge accounting - hedge of net investments in foreign operation: financial instruments used to hedge exposure on net investments in foreign subsidiaries due to the fact that the local functional currency is different from the functional currency of the Company. The portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument that is determined to be effective, referring to the exchange rate effect, is recognized directly in equity in accumulated other comprehensive income as cumulative translation adjustments, while the ineffective portion and the operating costs are recognized in profit or loss. The gain or loss on the hedging instrument that has been recognized directly in accumulated other comprehensive income shall be recognized in income upon disposal of the foreign operation.

In order to estimate fair values, we consider several variables, such as interest rates, discount rates, foreign exchange rates and future cash flows. Our most important sources of information concerning these variables are the market projections of future exchange and interest rates provided by the B3 and BBA – British Bankers Association. We believe B3 and BBA – British Bankers Association to be the most adequate and reliable sources of information available for our calculations. However, given the volatility inherent in financial markets, estimates concerning the variables used to calculate fair values are subject to constant change. As a consequence, our judgment related to, among other issues, the behavior of these variables, the selection of sources of information and the timing of calculation, directly affects the fair values of our financial instruments and the amount of gains or losses recorded in the income statement. Additional information regarding fair value of financial instruments is available in Notes 4, 14 and 31.


Employee Benefits and Private Pension Plan

Ultrapar and its subsidiaries offer their employees a defined contribution pension plan, managed by Ultraprev — Associação de Previdência Complementar. Under the terms of the plan, every year each participating employee chooses his or her basic contribution to the plan. Each sponsoring Company provides a matching contribution in an amount equivalent to each basic contribution, up to a limit of 11% of the employee’s reference salary, according to the rules of the plan. As participating employees retire, they may choose to receive either (i) a monthly sum ranging between 0.5% and 1.0% of their respective accumulated fund in Ultraprev or (ii) a fixed monthly amount which will exhaust their respective accumulated fund over a period of 5 to 25 years. The sponsoring Company and its subsidiaries do not guarantee the amounts or the duration of the benefits received by each employee that retires.


 
 

Ultrapar and its subsidiaries recognized a provision for post-employment benefits mainly related to seniority bonus, payment of Government Severance Indemnity Fund (“FGTS”), and health, dental care and life insurance plan for eligible retirees. The amounts related to such benefits were determined based on a valuation conducted by an independent actuary on December 31, 2017 and are recorded in the financial statements in accordance with Resolution CVM 695/2012.

 

Significant actuarial assumptions adopted include:

 

Economic factors

12/31/2017

 

% p.a.

Discount rate for the actuarial obligation at present value

9.51

Average projected salary growth rate

8.38

Inflation rate (long term)

4.50

Growth rate of medical services

8.68

 

Demographic factors

 

 


Fair value of the Subscription Warrants – indemnification

Indemnification subscription warrants’ fair value is measured based on the share price of Ultrapar (UGPA3) as of the date of the financial statements and is reduced by the dividend yield until 2020, since the exercise is possible only from 2020, and they are not entitled to dividends until that date. The quantity of shares of the subscription warrants – indemnification is also adjusted according to the variation of the amounts of provisions and of tax, civil and labor risks contingent liabilities, relative to the period before January 31, 2014. For more information about Extrafarma’s acquisition, see Note 22.

 

Exchange Rate used in the translation of financial statements – Oxiteno Andina

Venezuela is considered a hyperinflationary country. Consequently, Oxiteno Andina financial data is being monetarily restated according to Venezuela’s Consumer Price Index.

On May 19, 2017, the Venezuelan Central Bank issued Currency Agreement 38 which changed the Venezuelan currency market, regulating the legally recognized types of exchange rates:


 
 

a) DIPRO - Tipo de Cambio Protegido (Exchange Protected): Bolivar (“VEF”) is traded at an exchange rate of 9.975 VEF/US$ for purchase and 10.00 VEF/US$ for sale. This rate is applied to importation of essential goods (medicines and food) and raw materials and inputs related to the production of these sectors, which transactions are channeled through CENCOEX - Centro Nacional de Comercio Exterior en Venezuela;

b) DICOM - Tipo de Cambio Complementario Flotante de Mercado Supplemental (Floating Market Exchange): Bolivar was traded at the variable exchange rate of 3,345.00 VEF/US$ for sale and 3,336.64 VEF/US$ for purchase in the last auction of 2017. This rate is applied to all unforeseen currency settlement transactions not expressly set forth in the Foreign Exchange Regulation, which transactions are processed through alternative currency markets.

In the light of the economic and political scenario in Venezuela, the Company’s management uses the DICOM exchange rate for conversion purposes

Changes in Venezuela’s exchange rate, economic and political situation, may impact our results.

For more information, see Explanatory Notes 2.r of the financial statements.

 

 

10.6. – Issuer’s off-balance sheet items


a. Assets and liabilities held by the issuer, whether directly or indirectly, off-balance sheet:


i. Operating leases, assets and liabilities

See “Item 10.6.b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements”.


ii. Receivables portfolios over which the entity has risks and liabilities, indicating respective liabilities

Not applicable.


iii. Future purchase and sale of products or services contracts

See “Item 10.6.b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements”.     


iv. Unfinished construction contracts


 
 

Not applicable

 

v. Other future financing agreements

Not applicable.



 

b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements

The following table shows our main off-balance sheet arrangements on December 31, 2017:

 

Contractual Obligations (off-balance sheet)

Total

Payment due by period

(R$ million)

 

between

1 and 3

years

between   3 and 5 years

More than 5 years

 

Up to 1 year

 

 

Estimated planned funding of pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations (1)

669.5

24.2

51.7

56.5

537.1

Purchase obligations – raw material (2)

1,724.9

399.3

798.6

463.2

63.8

Purchase obligations – utilities (3)

28.4

21.4

7.1

0.0

0.0

Minimum movement obligations – cargo (4)

91.5

11.0

21.9

21.9

36.7

Operating lease (5)

876.4

145.3

207.4

207.4

316.3

 

3,390.8

601.1

1,086.7

748.9

954.0


(1) The estimated payment amount was calculated based on a 5.0% inflation assumption.

(2) Subsidiary Oxiteno Nordeste has a supply agreement with Braskem S.A. which establishes a minimum annually consumption level of ethylene, and conditions for the supply of ethylene until 2021. The minimum purchase commitment clause provided for a minimum annual consumption of 205 thousand tons in 2017. Should the minimum purchase commitment not be met, the subsidiary would be liable for a fine based on the current ethylene price for the quantity not purchased. According to contractual conditions and tolerances, there are no material issues regarding the minimum purchase commitment. Subsidiary Oxiteno S.A. has a supply agreement with Braskem S.A., valid until 2023, which establishes and regulates the conditions for supply of ethylene to Oxiteno based on the international market for this product. The minimum purchase is 22,050 tons of ethylene semiannually. Should the minimum purchase commitment not be met, the subsidiary would be liable for a fine based on the current ethylene price for the quantity not purchased. According to contractual conditions and tolerances, there are no material issues regarding the minimum purchase commitment. (See Note 32.a).

(3) The purchase obligation relates to long-term contracts under which Oxiteno is required to purchase a minimum amount of energy annually.

 (4) Tequimar has agreements with CODEBA — Companhia Docas do Estado da Bahia and Complexo Industrial Portuário Governador Eraldo Gueiros - in connection with its ports facilities in Aratu and Suape, respectively. Such agreements establish a minimum cargo movement of products (i) In Aratu, 397,000 tons per year until 2031, and of 900,000 tons per year until 2022; e (ii) In Suape, 250,000 tons per year until 2027 and 400,000 tons per year until 2029. If the annual movement is less than the minimum contractual movement, the subsidiary is liable to pay the difference between the effective movement and the minimum contractual movement based on the port tariff rates on the date established for payment. As of December 31, 2017, these rates per ton were R$ 6.99 for Aratu and R$ 2.90 for Suape. (See Note 32.a).

(5) The subsidiaries IPP, Extrafarma, and Cia. Ultragaz have operating lease contracts related to land and building of service stations, drugstores, and stores, respectively. Subsidiaries Cia. Ultragaz, Bahiana, Utingás Armazenadora S.A., Tequimar, Serma, and Oxiteno S.A. have operating lease contracts for the use of IT equipment. Subsidiaries Cia. Ultragaz and Bahiana have operating lease contracts related to vehicles in their fleet.

 

Additionally, some subsidiaries issued collateral to financial institutions in connection with the amounts owed by some of their customers to such institutions (vendor financing). If a subsidiary is required to make any payment under these collaterals, this subsidiary may recover the amount paid directly from its customers through commercial collection. As of December 31, 2017, Ultrapar and its subsidiaries did not have losses in connection with these collaterals. (See Note 14.k).

 


 
 

Vendor

 

2017

Term

Less than 212 days

Maximum amount of future payments related to these guarantees

R$ 8.2 million

 

10.7 - Off-balance sheet items

a. How such items change or may change revenues, expenses, operating income, financial expenses or other items of the issuer’s financial statements


Contractual obligation included in “Item 10.6.b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements” would have the following effects on the Company’s net sales and services, costs, expenses, operating income and financial income (expenses), throughout the period of the contract:

 

 

(R$ million)

Estimated planned funding of pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations

Purchase obligations – raw materials

Purchase obligations – utilities

Minimum movement obligations – cargo

Operating lease

Net sales and services

-

-

-

-

-

 

Cost of sales and services

(74.7)

(1,724.9)

(28.4)

(91.5)

-

             

Gross profit

(74.7)

(1,724.9)

(28.4)

(91.5)

-

             

Operating expenses

         
 

Selling expenses

(166.1)

-

-

-

(577.6)

 

General and administrative expenses

(428.6)

-

-

-

(51.2)

 

Income from sale of assets

-

-

-

-

-

 

Other operating income, net

-

-

-

-

(247.6)

Operating income

(669.4)

(1,724.9)

(28.4)

(91.5)

(876.4)

 

Financial results

-

-

-

-

-

 

Financial expenses

-

-

-

-

-


 
 

 

b. Nature and purpose of the transaction

See “Item 10.6.b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements”.

 

c. Nature and amount of obligations assumed by and rights conferred upon the issue due to the transaction

See “Item 10.6.b. Other off-balance sheet arrangements”.


 

 

10.8. - Discussion on the main elements of the issuer’s business plan:

a. Investments


i. Quantitative and qualitative description of the investments in progress and the estimated investments

Ultrapar’s 2017 investments net of divestments and repayments were R$ 2.3 billion. Ipiranga invested R$ 1,336 million, with nearly 50% in the expansion of its network (branding unbranded stations, opening new stations, and new customers) and am/pm and Jet Oil franchises, and the remaining 50% in logistics bases, contracts renewals and maintenance. Out of Ipiranga’s total investments, R$ 1,060 million concern fixed assets and additions to intangible assets, and R$ 277 million concern financing to customers net of repayments. Oxiteno invested a total of R$ 463 million in 2017, mostly in maintenance of its production units and the construction of the new US plant.Ultragaz invested R$ 215 million mainly in the bulk segment, in bottles replacement and acquisition, and bottling bases maintenance. Ultracargo invested R$ 86 million in 2017, mainly in terminal security systems modernization and infrastructure maintenance at existing terminals. Extrafarma invested R$ 170 million in 2017, mainly in the opening of new stores, information technology systems and remodeling of existing stores.

Ultrapar’s 2018 organic investment plan totals R$ 2,676 million, demonstrating the continued presence of good opportunities for organic growth and productivity gains, as well as for modernizing existing operations. The amount does not include potential acquisitions or investments related to Liquigás, a deal announced on November 17, 2016 which was blocked by CADE in February 2018.

At Ipiranga, the approved limit is R$ 1,545 million, of which approximately 50% are intended to increase the pace of expansion of the resellers network by adding fueling stations and am/pm and Jet Oil franchises, in addition to new customers in the corporate segment. The other 50% aim at expanding the logistics infrastructure as a means to support growth and increase productivity, and for activities maintenance and modernization, particularly contracts renewals and information technology in support of innovation and efficiency projects.


 
 

The R$ 343 million investment approved for Oxiteno will be deployed mainly to production units’ modernization and maintenance, for the purposes of improved productivity; to information systems; and includes US$ 34 million intended to complete the new ethoxylation unit in Pasadena, Texas (USA), which we plan to complete in the first half of 2-018. The new unit’s production capacity will be 120 thousand tons per year.

At Ultragaz, the approved amount of R$ 284 million covers R$ 190 million investments in operations maintenance and modernization; technology, with a focus on new systems in support of operations growth and quality; and R$ 94 million allocated to expanding the resellers chain and bulk customers portfolio.

Ultracargo is expected to invest R$ 115 million in the Itaqui and Suape terminals, which completions are expected in 2019 and 2020, respectively; and in continued terminal safety and infrastructure improvements, for a total approved amount of R$ 247 million.

At Extrafarma, we plan to invest R$ 232 million particularly in new stores and the associated logistics infrastructure. These will concentrate in the North and Northeast and in São Paulo state, and in information technology. An extrapolation of the recently observed pace of stores opening (36 in 4Q17) for the following years gives the possibility to Extrafarma’s network reach one thousand stores in 5 years.

The plan also covers continued modernization of the information systems at every business to enable increasingly better customer service, improve logistics efficiency, develop new forms of selling, and expanding our relationships with resellers and partners.


ii. Sources of financing investments

For further details on the sources of financing investments, see “Item 10.1.d. Sources for financing working capital and investments in non-current assets” e “Item 10.1.e. Sources for financing working capital and investments in non-current assets to be used to in case of deficiencies in liquidity”.

iii. Relevant disposals in process and forecasted disposals

There are no significant divestitures in progress or planned.  

 

b. Disclosed acquisitions of plants, equipment, patents or other assets that may materially affect the issuer’s production capacity

There is no disclosed acquisitions of plants, equipment, patents or other assets that may materially affect the issuer's production capacity.


c.
New products and services

Oxiteno carries on a wide range of research and development activities, principally related to the application of specialty chemicals and improvements in production processes. Oxiteno’s research and development expenditures in 2017, 2016 and 2015 were R$ 53 million, R$ 50 million and R$ 41 million, respectively. In 2004, Oxiteno founded its own “Science and Technology Council”, with six of the world’s major specialists in surfactants as members. These specialists, with experience in the surfactants industry or in the academic environment in the US, Europe and Latin America, follow the trends and opportunities in the sector. Since 2004, the council, currently composed of five specialists, has met once a year in São Paulo to analyze Oxiteno’s research and development project portfolio, as well as the management methodology applied. Their recommendations enable Oxiteno to improve its research and development activities’ efficiency, as well as to broaden the reach of its partnerships with


 
 

international entities. In addition, Oxiteno has created specific scientific councils with specialists of its main segments.  

Oxiteno’s investments in research and development have resulted in the introduction of 59 new applications for its products during the last three years. Oxiteno will continue to invest in research and development focused on developing new product applications to meet clients’ needs.

Ipiranga constantly develops specific initiatives for each segment in which it operates, such as the offering of supply and technical support at large clients’ facilities.

In the urban service stations segment, the wide range of non-fuel products and services and the constant pursue of excellence have been contributing significantly to the increase in the number of consumers and the client-loyalty for its service stations. Additionally, the offer of convenience and services at the service stations aims at greater satisfaction to the customers, and therefore more value added. In addition to fueling its vehicles the consumer can also shop at am/pm convenience stores, that has more than 600 bakeries, and at Ipirangashop.com and enjoy other services provided in many service stations of Ipiranga’s network.

In another pioneer initiative, Ipiranga launched in 2009 the program “Km de Vantagens”, a loyalty program in the fuel industry that grants rewards and benefits to customers and resellers that has strengthened as an important platform for customer relationship and for other initiatives of Ipiranga, currently with more than 26 million participants.

Ipiranga’s Posto Ecoeficiente project (Eco-Efficient service station) is one of the differentiation initiatives that reflect Ultrapar’s innovation philosophy. It aggregates, in a single project, innovative solutions and sustainable technologies, in harmony with the profitability of the service station for the reseller. The Posto Ecoeficiente project involves solutions in the construction and operation of service stations that result in better use of resources, such as water and electricity, and reduction of wastage and residues. The Postos Ecoeficientes reached, in 2017, 1,240 service stations in Brazil.

In 2012, among the initiatives of Ipiranga, we highlight the strengthening of Posto Virtual and the creation of ConectCar. ConectCar started its operations in 2013 and reached, in 2017, reached over 970 thousand active tags, and is now available in almost all toll roads in Brazil. The chip installed on the vehicle windshield will allow the automatic opening of toll gates at lower costs, through a prepaid system and free tuition. Additionally, it can be used for fuels purchase. The client may buy the chip at Ipiranga’s service stations, using the points of the loyalty program Km de Vantagens. In 2015, ConectCar announced a new strategic partner, Redecard, which acquired 50% of Odebrecht Transport interest. This new partner provides ConectCar the opportunity to expand its services to new markets, continuing with its purpose of providing the customers with mobility, convenience, flexibility and, above all, differentiated benefits.

In 2014, the novelty was the “Beer Cave”, a new beverage shopping experience for customers in am/pm stores. It is a cold room with a wide variety of labels of domestic and imported beers. Approximately 491 am/pm shops throughout Brazil implemented the novelty in 2017.

Also in 2014, Ipiranga launched an integrated supply solution, concentrating logistics and distribution for am/pm stores in one single structure: am/pm supplies. This initiative aims to facilitate am/pm operations, improve the competitiveness of franchisees and ensure a higher quality product assortment, improving the quality of the service and adding more value to customers and franchisees.

In 2016, am/pm supplies operated 4 distribution centers, located in the states of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná e Rio Grande do Sul, that supplied the stores with the main categories, except tobacco and ice cream. Also in 2015, Ipiranga new configurations of the am/pm store concept, which increases the offer of convenience in urban service stations by offering fresh products – fruits, vegetables, meats – and a broader range of fast foods. Ipiranga also launched, in the state of São Paulo, the “am/pm Station”, a model developed for service stations located in highways, offering long-distance travelers more comfort and personal care products.


 
 

 In 2016, Ipiranga developed and launched Abastece Aí, an initiative to integrate platforms and offer even more comfort and benefits to the final customer. Through the app, customers can program or decide in the gas station the option of refueling, which is recognized by the pump manager. Customers can also pick the benefits of his preference and end the refueling process safely with the Km de Vantagens password.

Ipiranga also launched in 2016 the DT Clean gasoline, formulated with one of the latest additivities technology, that recovery the original performance of the engine, improves its service life and fuel efficiency.

In 2017, further strengthening its products offer at am/pm stores, Ipiranga launched Wine Cave. In an air-conditioned wine cellar, customers can find a wide variety of wines, from 60 to 80 different labels, at the right temperature. As of December 31, 2017, there were 4 Wine Cave units installed in the states of Minas Gerais, São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

In 2017 Ipiranga launched Octapro, a high-octane gas that features a combination of cutting-edge additives and, among other benefits, helps engines reach their top power and improves drivability.


10.9. - Discussion on other relevant factors which affected the operational performance

In April 2015, a fire occurred in six ethanol and gasoline tanks operated by Ultracargo in Santos, which represented 4% of the subsidiary’s overall capacity as of December 31, 2014. The Civil and Federal Police investigated the accident and its impacts, and concluded that it is not possible to determine the cause of the accident, neither to individualize active or passive conduct related to the cause, and there was no criminal charge against either individual or the subsidiary, by both authorities. Nevertheless, Tequimar was indicted by the Public Prosecutor’s Offica (“MPF) and shall wait for the court summons in order to take the necessary measures for its defense.

The decommissioning process, which comprised the removal of equipment and structures of the terminal affected by the fire, was concluded and, in June 2017 the Company obtained the required licenses to resume operations in 67.5 thousand cubic meters of the 150 thousand cubic meters suspended capacity. The remaining suspended capacity is still on a recovery process for further licensing and operations resumption.

As a result of the evolution of the adjustment process with insurers, as of December 31, 2016, the insurance receivable in the amount of R$ 366.7 million and indemnities to customers and third parties in the amount of R$ 99.9 million were recorded. Ultracargo received the total amount of insurance recovery in 1Q17. On December 31, 2017 the remaining amount of indemnities to clients and third parties was R$ 72.2 million. In addition, there are contingent liabilities related to lawsuits and extrajudicial lawsuits in the amount of R$ 88.1 million and R$ 25.9 million, respectively (R$ 96.4 million and R$ 16.6 million in 2016).

 


 
 

 

 

 

 

 

EXHIBIT III – ALLOCATION OF NET EARNINGS
(According to annex 9-1-II of CVM Instruction 481/2009)

 


 
 

EXHIBIT III – ALLOCATION OF NET EARNINGS

 

 

ULTRAPAR PARTICIPAÇÕES S.A.

 

 

ANNEX 9-1-II

 

 

Allocation of net earnings

 

 

 

(in thousands of Reais , except when otherwise mentioned)

 

Year ended

12/31/2017

 

 

 

1. Inform net earnings for the fiscal year

 

1,574,306