enterprise_10q.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] |
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30,
2010.
|
|
|
|
[ ] |
|
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 For the transition period from ______ to ______
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commission file number
001-15373 |
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP
Incorporated in the State of
Delaware
I.R.S. Employer Identification # 43-1706259
Address: 150 North
Meramec
Clayton, MO 63105
Telephone: (314) 725-5500
___________________
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-7 (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files ). Yes [ ] No
[ ]
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of
“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o |
Accelerated
filer þ |
Non-accelerated filer
o |
Smaller
reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller |
|
|
|
reporting
company) |
|
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act
Yes
[ ] No [X]
As of August 6,
2010, the Registrant had 14,853,912 shares of outstanding common stock.
This document is also
available through our website at http://www.enterprisebank.com.
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page |
PART I - FINANCIAL
INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
(Unaudited) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II - OTHER
INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. |
Risk
Factors |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. |
Exhibits |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certifications |
|
|
37 |
|
PART 1 – ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
|
|
At June 30, |
|
At December 31, |
(In thousands, except share and per
share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
13,711 |
|
|
$ |
16,064 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
7,472 |
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
66,347 |
|
|
|
83,430 |
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
80,088 |
|
|
|
106,966 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
259,961 |
|
|
|
282,461 |
|
Other investments, at cost |
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
|
13,189 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
4,243 |
|
Portfolio loans |
|
|
1,773,315 |
|
|
|
1,833,203 |
|
Less: Allowance for loan
losses |
|
|
45,258 |
|
|
|
42,995 |
|
Portfolio loans, net |
|
|
1,728,057 |
|
|
|
1,790,208 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
25,224 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
|
21,169 |
|
|
|
22,301 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
|
7,751 |
|
State tax credits, held for sale,
including $32,622 and $32,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
carried at fair value, respectively |
|
|
60,134 |
|
|
|
51,258 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
71,058 |
|
|
|
54,437 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,272,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,365,655 |
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
$ |
293,619 |
|
|
$ |
289,658 |
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
|
198,747 |
|
|
|
142,061 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
676,627 |
|
|
|
690,552 |
|
Savings |
|
|
10,488 |
|
|
|
8,822 |
|
Certificates of deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$100k and over |
|
|
334,541 |
|
|
|
443,067 |
|
Other |
|
|
307,801 |
|
|
|
367,256 |
|
Total deposits |
|
|
1,821,823 |
|
|
|
1,941,416 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
|
85,081 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
123,100 |
|
|
|
128,100 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
56,681 |
|
|
|
39,338 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
7,621 |
|
|
|
5,683 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,095,857 |
|
|
|
2,201,743 |
|
|
Shareholders' equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000 shares authorized; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
32,154 |
|
|
|
31,802 |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000,000 shares authorized; 14,929,912 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,958,820 shares issued, respectively |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 76,000 shares |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
|
|
(1,743 |
) |
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
132,911 |
|
|
|
117,000 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
15,790 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
Total shareholders' equity |
|
|
176,872 |
|
|
|
163,912 |
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
|
$ |
2,272,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,365,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
Restated |
(In thousands, except
per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
Interest
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on
loans |
|
$ |
24,655 |
|
|
$ |
29,049 |
|
|
$ |
49,899 |
|
|
$ |
57,670 |
|
Interest on debt
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
2,317 |
|
Nontaxable |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Interest on federal funds
sold |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Interest on interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Dividends on equity
securities |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Total interest income |
|
|
26,710 |
|
|
|
30,341 |
|
|
|
53,985 |
|
|
|
60,159 |
|
Interest
expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction
accounts |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Money market
accounts |
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
Savings |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Certificates of
deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$100 and over |
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
3,925 |
|
|
|
5,324 |
|
|
|
8,380 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
2,019 |
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
3,710 |
|
Subordinated
debentures |
|
|
1,239 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
Notes payable and other
borrowings |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
5,363 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
8,108 |
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
|
|
16,760 |
|
|
|
25,815 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
18,602 |
|
|
|
17,495 |
|
|
|
37,225 |
|
|
|
34,344 |
|
Provision for loan
losses |
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
22,760 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
9,642 |
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
14,465 |
|
|
|
8,812 |
|
Noninterest
income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth Management
revenue |
|
|
1,302 |
|
|
|
1,180 |
|
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
Service charges on deposit
accounts |
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
2,544 |
|
Other service charges and fee
income |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
Sale of other real
estate |
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
State tax credit activity,
net |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Sale of investment
securities |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
|
|
6,579 |
|
Noninterest
expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and
benefits |
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
6,334 |
|
|
|
13,633 |
|
|
|
12,608 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
Furniture and
equipment |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
Data processing |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
2,066 |
|
|
|
2,625 |
|
Goodwill impairment
charge |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45,377 |
|
Loan legal and other real
estate expense |
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
14,146 |
|
|
|
13,804 |
|
|
|
27,801 |
|
|
|
71,722 |
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations before income tax benefit |
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(56,331 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(1,673 |
) |
|
|
(1,962 |
) |
|
|
(4,524 |
) |
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
(51,807 |
) |
|
(Loss) income from
discontinued operations before income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Income tax (benefit)
expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
(Loss) income from
discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
(301 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,787 |
) |
|
Net income (loss)
available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
(903 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,988 |
) |
|
Basic earnings (loss)
per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
From discontinued
operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss)
per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
From discontinued
operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
Total |
|
|
Preferred |
|
Common |
|
Treasury |
|
Additional paid |
|
Retained |
|
comprehensive |
|
shareholders' |
(in thousands, except share and per
share data) |
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
in
capital |
|
earnings |
|
income
(loss) |
|
equity |
Balance December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
31,802 |
|
$ |
130 |
|
$ |
(1,743 |
) |
|
$ |
117,000 |
|
|
$ |
15,790 |
|
|
$ |
933 |
|
|
$ |
163,912 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
Change in fair value of available for sale securities, net of
tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
Reclassification of cash flow hedge, net of tax |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Total comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(534 |
) |
Cash dividends paid on common shares, $0.1050 per share |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(875 |
) |
Preferred stock accretion of discount |
|
|
352 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Issuance under equity compensation plans, net, 39,482
shares |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
365 |
|
Issuance under private stock offering 1,931,610 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,863 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,882 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
943 |
|
Excess tax expense related to equity compensation plans |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
32,154 |
|
$ |
149 |
|
$ |
(1,743 |
) |
|
$ |
132,911 |
|
|
$ |
10,725 |
|
|
$ |
2,676 |
|
|
$ |
176,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)
|
|
Three months
ended June 30, |
|
Six months
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income (loss) |
|
$
|
737 |
|
|
$
|
(301 |
) |
|
$
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
$
|
(51,787 |
) |
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arising during the period, net of tax |
|
|
1,937 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
Less reclassification
adjustment for realized gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on sale of securities included in net income, net of tax |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
(609 |
) |
Reclassification of cash flow hedge, net of tax |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
Total comprehensive income
(loss) |
|
$ |
2,298 |
|
|
$ |
(713 |
) |
|
$ |
(534 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
|
|
Six months
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Cash flows from operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,787 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
1,735 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
22,760 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
|
|
(6,642 |
) |
Net amortization of debt securities |
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
Gain on sale of investment securities |
|
|
(1,082 |
) |
|
|
(952 |
) |
Mortgage loans originated |
|
|
(31,531 |
) |
|
|
(59,215 |
) |
Proceeds from mortgage loans sold |
|
|
33,082 |
|
|
|
59,367 |
|
Gain on sale of other real estate |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Gain on state tax credits, net |
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Excess tax expense on additional share-based compensation from acquisition
of Clayco |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Excess tax expense (benefit) of share-based compensation |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
Goodwill impairment charge |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45,377 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
and income tax receivable
|
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
Accrued interest payable
and other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,608 |
) |
|
|
(1,215 |
) |
Prepaid FDIC
insurance
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4,065 |
|
|
|
3,867 |
|
Net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
27,822 |
|
|
|
20,591 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from sale of
Millennium Brokerage Group |
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
decrease in loans |
|
|
29,142 |
|
|
|
48,100 |
|
Proceeds from the
sale/maturity/redemption/recoveries of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities, available for sale |
|
|
144,934 |
|
|
|
63,918 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
- |
|
State tax credits held for sale |
|
|
4,513 |
|
|
|
2,420 |
|
Other real estate |
|
|
8,033 |
|
|
|
9,701 |
|
Loans previously charged off |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Payments for the
purchase/origination of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale debt securities |
|
|
(120,110 |
) |
|
|
(123,138 |
) |
Other investments |
|
|
(1,511 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
Bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
State tax credits held for sale |
|
|
(10,779 |
) |
|
|
(6,583 |
) |
Fixed assets |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
40,366 |
|
|
|
(6,297 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing deposit accounts |
|
|
3,961 |
|
|
|
(9,222 |
) |
Net decrease in
interest-bearing deposit accounts |
|
|
(123,555 |
) |
|
|
(24,299 |
) |
Net
proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
18,178 |
|
Net proceeds from federal
funds purchased |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
Net
increase in other borrowings |
|
|
17,342 |
|
|
|
7,064 |
|
Cash dividends paid on common
stock |
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
(1,348 |
) |
Cash dividends paid on preferred stock |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
(709 |
) |
Excess tax expense on
additional share-based compensation from acquisition of Clayco |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
Excess tax (expense) benefit of share-based compensation |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
Preferred stock issuance
cost |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
14,882 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds from the exercise of
common stock options |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(95,066 |
) |
|
|
(8,306 |
) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(26,878 |
) |
|
|
5,988 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period |
|
|
106,966 |
|
|
|
42,647 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of
period |
|
$ |
80,088 |
|
|
$ |
48,635 |
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow
information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period
for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
17,334 |
|
|
$ |
20,948 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Noncash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer to other real estate owned in settlement of loans |
|
$ |
17,051 |
|
|
$ |
12,475 |
|
Sales of other real estate financed |
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
- |
|
See accompanying
notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Financial
Statements
NOTE 1—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The significant
accounting policies used by the Company in the preparation of the consolidated
financial statements are summarized below:
Basis of Financial Statement
Presentation
Enterprise
Financial Services Corp (the “Company” or “EFSC”) is a financial holding company
that provides a full range of banking and wealth management services to
individuals and corporate customers located in the St. Louis, Kansas City and
Phoenix metropolitan markets through its banking subsidiary, Enterprise Bank
& Trust (“Enterprise”).
The consolidated
financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. They do not include all information
and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included.
On January 20, 2010,
the Company sold its interest in Millennium Brokerage Group, LLC (“Millennium”)
for $4.0 million in cash. In connection with the sale, the Company recorded a
$1.6 million pre-tax loss from the sale of Millennium in the fourth quarter of
2009. As a result of the sale, Millennium’s financial results are reported as
discontinued operations for all periods presented.
On December 11, 2009,
Enterprise entered into an agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (“FDIC”) and acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities
of Valley Capital Bank N.A. (“Valley Capital”), a full service community bank
that was headquartered in Mesa, Arizona.
On July 9, 2010,
Enterprise entered into a loan sale agreement with the FDIC to purchase the
loans originated and other real estate acquired by the Arizona operations of
Home National Bank (“Home National”), in Blackwell Oklahoma.
See Note 3 –
Acquisitions and Divestitures and Note 11 – Subsequent Events for more
information on the above transactions.
Operating results for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for any other interim period or for the year ending
December 31, 2010. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Loan Participations
During a review of
loan participation agreements in the third quarter of 2009, the Company
determined that certain of its loan participation agreements contained language
inconsistent with sale accounting treatment. The agreements provided the Company
with the unilateral ability to repurchase participated portions of loans at
their outstanding loan balance plus accrued interest at any time, which
conflicts with sale accounting treatment. As a result, rather than accounting
for loans participated to other banks as sales, the Company should have recorded
the participated portion of the loans as portfolio loans, and should have
recorded secured borrowings from the participating banks to finance such loans.
In order to correct the error, the Company recorded the participated portion of
such loans as portfolio loans, along with a secured borrowing liability
(included in Other borrowings in the consolidated balance sheets) to finance the
loans. The Company also recorded incremental interest income on the loans offset
by incremental interest expense on the secured borrowing. Additional provisions
for loan losses and the related income tax effect were also recorded. The
revision did not impact net cash provided by operating activities.
In the fourth quarter
of 2009, the Company obtained amended agreements so that all of the Company’s
loan participation agreements qualify for sale accounting treatment as of
December 31, 2009.
5
The Company has
corrected the error by restating the prior period consolidated financial
statements. Accordingly, the consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive (loss) income for the period ended June 30, 2009 presented herein
have been restated to correct the error. For further information, refer to Note
2 – Loan Participation Restatement in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. The effect of correcting these errors in
the consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009 is presented below.
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
|
|
June 30,
2009 |
|
June 30,
2009 |
(in thousands, except per share
data) |
|
As
reported |
|
As
restated |
|
As
reported |
|
As
restated |
Statement of
Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
27,758 |
|
|
$ |
30,341 |
|
|
$ |
55,084 |
|
|
$ |
60,159 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
10,260 |
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
|
|
20,735 |
|
|
|
25,815 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
23,100 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
(1,776 |
) |
|
|
(3,633 |
) |
|
|
(4,509 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(50,231 |
) |
|
|
(51,787 |
) |
Net loss available to common
shareholders |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
(51,432 |
) |
|
|
(52,988 |
) |
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(4.01 |
) |
|
|
(4.13 |
) |
Diluted loss per share |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(4.01 |
) |
|
|
(4.13 |
) |
NOTE 2—EARNINGS (LOSS) PER
SHARE
Basic earnings (loss)
per common share data is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per common share gives effect to all
dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the
treasury stock method and the if-converted method for convertible securities
related to the issuance of trust preferred securities. The following table
presents a summary of per common share data and amounts for the periods
indicated.
|
|
Three months
ended June 30, |
|
Six months
ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
Restated |
(in thousands, except per share
data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Net income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,807 |
) |
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
(51,787 |
) |
Preferred stock
dividend |
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
(875 |
) |
Accretion of preferred stock discount |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
(326 |
) |
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
122 |
|
|
$ |
(903 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,504 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,988 |
) |
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
14,853 |
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
|
12,831 |
|
Additional dilutive common stock equivalents |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Diluted common shares
outstanding |
|
|
14,855 |
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
|
12,831 |
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
From discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) earnings per
common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing
operations |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
From discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
For the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there were 2.2 million and 2.5 million of weighted
average common stock equivalents excluded from the per share calculations
because their effect was anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2009, there were 2.3 million and 2.4 million of weighted average common
stock equivalents excluded from the per share calculation because their effect
was anti-dilutive. In addition, at June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had
outstanding warrants to purchase 324,074 shares of common stock associated with
the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program which were excluded from the per
common share calculation because their effect was also
anti-dilutive.
NOTE 3—ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES
Acquisition of Valley
Capital
On December 11,
2009, Enterprise entered into a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC and
acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Valley Capital, a
full service community bank that was headquartered in Mesa, Arizona.
The loans and
foreclosed assets purchased are covered by a loss sharing agreement between the
FDIC and Enterprise. For further information on the loss sharing agreement,
refer to Note 3 – Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Enterprise initially
recorded the tangible assets and liabilities at their preliminary fair value of
approximately $42.4 million, and $43.4 million, respectively. Subsequent to the
initial fair value estimate, additional information was obtained on the credit
quality of certain loans and the valuation of Other real estate as of the
acquisition date which resulted in adjustments to the initial fair value
estimates. The fair value of the assets assumed and liabilities acquired may be
adjusted up to one year from the acquisition date.
The following table
summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of the acquisition and the impact of the fair value
refinements.
|
Preliminary |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted |
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
(in thousands) |
2009 |
|
Refinements |
|
2009 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
$
|
3,542 |
|
|
$
|
- |
|
|
$
|
3,542 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
11,563 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,563 |
|
Other investments |
|
59 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Portfolio loans |
|
14,730 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
14,673 |
|
Other real estate |
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
2,306 |
|
FDIC indemnification asset |
|
8,519 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
9,240 |
|
Other assets |
|
567 |
|
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Total deposits |
|
(43,355 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(43,355 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
Goodwill |
$ |
(953 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,021 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010, the
estimate of the cash flows expected to be received on the credit-impaired loans
acquired in the Valley Capital acquisition was $9.0 million. The estimated fair
value of the credit-impaired loans was $7.7 million, net of an accretable yield
of $1.3 million. A majority of these loans were valued based on the liquidation
value of the underlying collateral because the future cash flows are primarily
based on the liquidation of underlying collateral.
At June 30, 2010, the
estimate of the cash flows expected to be received on non-credit-impaired loans
acquired in the Valley Capital acquisition was $7.2 million. The estimated fair
value of the non-credit-impaired loans was $5.5 million, net of an accretable
yield of $1.7 million.
For the three months
and six months ended June 30, 2010, $215,000 and $465,000 was accreted into
interest income from the credit-impaired and non-credit-impaired loans and
$127,000 and $257,000 was accreted into Other income from the indemnification
asset. At June 30, 2010, the remaining accretable difference for the loans was
approximately $2.6 million and $267,000 for the indemnification
asset.
In the second quarter
of 2010, Enterprise submitted a loss share claim of $4.8 million under the terms
of the loss share agreement through March 31, 2010 to the FDIC and received $4.8
million from the FDIC.
7
NOTE 4––INVESTMENTS
The following table
presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of
securities available-for-sale:
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
Available
for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
agencies |
$ |
23,748 |
|
$ |
369 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
24,117 |
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored enterprises |
|
34,512 |
|
|
334 |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
34,846 |
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
|
10,591 |
|
|
59 |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
10,225 |
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
187,052 |
|
|
3,809 |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
190,773 |
|
$ |
255,903 |
|
$ |
4,571 |
|
$ |
(513 |
) |
|
$ |
259,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
Available
for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government
agencies |
$ |
26,940 |
|
$ |
249 |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
27,189 |
Obligations of U.S. Government
sponsored enterprises |
|
75,880 |
|
|
115 |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
75,814 |
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions |
|
3,868 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
3,408 |
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
174,562 |
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
176,050 |
|
$ |
281,250 |
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
$ |
(1,123 |
) |
|
$ |
282,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other
than U.S. government agencies and sponsored enterprises, in an amount greater
than 10% of shareholders’ equity. The residential mortgage-backed securities are
all issued by U.S. government sponsored enterprises. Available for sale
securities having a carrying value of $94.7 million and $66.4 million at June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were pledged as collateral to
secure public deposits and for other purposes as required by law or contract
provisions.
The amortized cost
and estimated fair value of debt securities classified as available for sale at
June, 2010, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may
differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call
or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
Amortized |
|
Estimated |
(in thousands) |
Cost |
|
Fair
Value |
Due in one year or less |
$
|
35,600 |
|
$
|
35,925 |
Due after one year through five years |
|
18,384 |
|
|
18,639 |
Due after five years through ten
years |
|
6,155 |
|
|
6,122 |
Due after ten years |
|
8,712 |
|
|
8,502 |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
187,052 |
|
|
190,773 |
|
$ |
255,903 |
|
$ |
259,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The following table
represents a summary of available-for-sale investment securities that had an
unrealized loss:
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
Obligations of the state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
425 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
425 |
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
88 |
|
|
$ |
24,232 |
|
$ |
513 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
-
|
|
$ |
24,232 |
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
12 months or more |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
(in thousands) |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
|
Fair Value |
|
Losses |
Obligations of U.S. government sponsored
agencies |
|
$ |
29,557 |
|
$ |
181 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
29,557 |
|
$ |
181 |
Obligations of the state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
471 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
471 |
Residential mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
74,625 |
|
|
471 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
74,625 |
|
|
471 |
|
|
$ |
107,012 |
|
$ |
1,123 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
-
|
|
$ |
107,012 |
|
$ |
1,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses
at both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were attributable to changes in
market interest rates since the securities were purchased. Management
systematically evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary declines
in fair value on a quarterly basis. This analysis requires management to
consider various factors, which include (1) the present value of the cash flows
expected to be collected compared to the amortized cost of the security, (2)
duration and magnitude of the decline in value, (3) the financial condition of
the issuer or issuers, (4) structure of the security and (5) the intent to sell
the security or whether its more likely than not that the Company would be
required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery in market value.
At June 30, 2010, management performed its quarterly analysis of all securities
with an unrealized loss and concluded no individual securities were
other-than-temporarily impaired.
The gross gains and
gross losses realized from sales of available-for-sale investment securities
were as follows:
|
Three months
ended June 30, |
|
Six months
ended June 30, |
(in thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Gross gains realized |
$
|
525 |
|
$
|
636 |
|
$
|
1,082 |
|
$
|
952 |
Gross losses realized |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Net gains realized |
$ |
525 |
|
$ |
636 |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5—GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill is tested
for impairment annually and more frequently if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. At March 31, 2009, the
Company recorded an impairment charge of $45.4 million. The impairment charge
was primarily driven by the deterioration in the general economic environment
and the resulting decline in the Company’s share price and market capitalization
in the first quarter of 2009.
At June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the Company’s Banking segment had $2.0 million of Goodwill
from the acquisition of Valley Capital.
The table below
summarizes the changes to intangible asset balances. Core deposit intangibles
are related to the Banking reporting unit.
|
|
Core Deposit |
(in thousands) |
|
Intangible |
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$
|
1,643 |
|
Amortization expense |
|
|
(220 |
) |
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The following table
reflects the expected amortization schedule for the core deposit intangibles.
|
|
Core Deposit |
Year |
|
Intangible |
2010 |
|
$ |
199 |
2011 |
|
|
358 |
2012 |
|
|
296 |
2013 |
|
|
234 |
2014 |
|
|
172 |
After 2014 |
|
|
164 |
|
|
$ |
1,423 |
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6—DISCLOSURES ABOUT FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company issues
financial instruments with off balance sheet risk in the normal course of the
business of meeting the financing needs of its customers. These financial
instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.
These instruments may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest-rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets.
The Company’s extent
of involvement and maximum potential exposure to credit loss in the event of
nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual
amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making
commitments and conditional obligations as it does for financial instruments
included on its consolidated balance sheets. At June 30, 2010, there was $1.7
million of unadvanced commitments on impaired loans. Approximately $340,000 of
the allowance for loan loss reserve was attributable to the unadvanced
commitments on impaired loans.
The contractual
amount of off-balance-sheet financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$
|
401,131 |
|
$
|
457,777 |
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
33,265 |
|
|
32,263 |
Commitments to extend
credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of
any condition established in the contract. Commitments usually have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
Of the total commitments to extend credit at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, approximately $64.1 million and $84.3 million, respectively, represent
fixed rate loan commitments. Since certain of the commitments may expire without
being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent
future cash requirements. The bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness
on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by each bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit
evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts
receivable, inventory, premises and equipment, and real estate.
Standby letters of
credit are conditional commitments issued by Enterprise to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. These standby letters of credit are
issued to support contractual obligations of the bank’s customers. The credit
risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risk
involved in extending loans to customers. The approximate remaining term of
standby letters of credit range from 6 months to 5 years at June 30,
2010.
10
NOTE 7—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING
ACTIVITIES
The Company is a
party to various derivative financial instruments that are used in the normal
course of business to meet the needs of its clients and as part of its risk
management activities. These instruments include interest rate swaps, option
contracts and foreign exchange forward contracts. The Company does not enter
into derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Interest rate swap
contracts involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payment
obligations without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. The
Company enters into interest rate swap contracts on behalf of its clients and
also utilizes such contracts to reduce or eliminate the exposure to changes in
the cash flows or fair value of hedged assets or liabilities due to changes in
interest rates. Interest rate option contracts consist of caps and provide for
the transfer or reduction of interest rate risk in exchange for a
fee. Foreign exchange forward contracts are
agreements between two parties to exchange a specified amount of one currency
for another currency at a specified foreign exchange rate on a future date. The
Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts with their clients and
enters into an offsetting foreign exchange contract with established financial
institution counterparties.
All derivative
financial instruments, whether designated as hedges or not, are recorded on the
consolidated balance sheet at fair value within Other assets or Other
liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative in the
consolidated statement of operations depends on whether the contract has been
designated as a hedge and qualifies for hedge accounting. At June 30, 2010, the
Company did not have any derivatives designated as cash flow or fair value
hedges.
Using derivative
instruments means assuming counterparty credit risk. Counterparty credit risk
relates to the loss the Company could incur if a counterparty were to default on
a derivative contract. Notional amounts of derivative financial instruments do
not represent credit risk, and are not recorded in the consolidated balance
sheet. They are used merely to express the volume of this activity. The overall
credit risk and exposure to individual counterparties is monitored. The Company
does not anticipate nonperformance by any counterparties. The amount of
counterparty credit exposure is the unrealized gains and losses, if any, on such
derivative contracts. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Enterprise had
pledged cash of $830,000 and $1.5 million, respectively, as collateral in
connection with interest rate swap agreements. At June 30, 2010, we had
accepted, as collateral in connection with our interest rate swap agreements,
pledged securities of $2.5 million.
Risk Management Instruments. The Company enters into certain derivative
contracts to economically hedge state tax credits and certain loans.
-
Economic hedge of state tax credits.
In November 2008, the
Company paid $2.1 million to enter into a series of interest rate caps in
order to economically hedge changes in fair value of the state tax credits
held for sale. In February
2010, the Company paid $750,000 for an additional series of interest rate
caps. See Note 9—Fair Value Measurements for further discussion of the fair
value of the state tax credits.
-
Economic hedge of prime based loans.
Previously, the Company
had two outstanding interest rate swap agreements whereby Enterprise paid a
variable rate of interest equivalent to the prime rate and received a fixed
rate of interest. The interest rate swaps had notional values of $40.0 million
each and Enterprise received fixed rates of 4.81% and 4.25%, respectively. The
swaps were designed to hedge the cash flows associated with a portion of prime
based loans. The derivatives had previously been designated as cash flow
hedges. However, in December 2008, due to a variable rate differential, the
Company concluded the cash flow hedges would not be prospectively effective
and the hedges were dedesignated. The swaps were terminated in February 2009,
at which time the Company recognized a loss of $530,000 upon termination. The
loss was included in Miscellaneous income in the consolidated statement of
operations. The unrealized gain prior to dedesignation was included in
Accumulated other comprehensive income and is being amortized over the
expected life of the related loans. At June 30, 2010, the amount remaining in
Accumulated other comprehensive income was $179,000. For the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, $62,000 was amortized into Miscellaneous income.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, $124,000 was amortized into
Miscellaneous income. The Company expects to reclassify $132,000 of remaining
derivative gains from Accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings over
the next twelve months.
11
The table below
summarizes the notional amounts and fair values of the derivative instruments
used to manage risk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Derivatives |
|
Liability
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Other Assets) |
|
(Other Liabilities) |
|
|
Notional Amount |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
Non-designated hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap contracts |
|
$ |
348,550 |
|
$ |
84,050 |
|
$ |
627 |
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
The following table
shows the location and amount of gains and losses related to derivatives used
for risk management purposes that were recorded in the consolidated statements
of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009.
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Operations on |
|
Recognized in Operations on |
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Recognized in Operations on |
|
Three months
ended June 30, |
|
Six months
ended June 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
Derivative |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Non-designated hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate cap
contracts |
|
State tax credit activity, net |
|
$ |
(676 |
) |
|
$ |
736 |
|
$ |
(1,241 |
) |
|
$ |
652 |
|
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
(406 |
) |
Client-Related Derivative Instruments.
As an accommodation to
certain customers, the Company enters into interest rate swaps to economically
hedge changes in fair value of certain loans. During the first quarter of 2010,
the Company entered into two new client-related interest rate swaps with
notional values of $40.0 million each.
During the second
quarter of 2010, the Company entered into several foreign exchange forward
contracts with clients and entered into offsetting foreign exchange forward
contracts with established financial institution counterparties. The table below
summarizes the notional amounts and fair values of the client-related derivative
instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives |
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Other
Assets) |
|
(Other
Liabilities) |
|
|
Notional
Amount |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Fair
Value |
(in thousands) |
|
June 30,
2010 |
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
June 30,
2010 |
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
June 30,
2010 |
|
December 31,
2009 |
Non-designated hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
contracts |
|
$ |
109,653 |
|
$ |
30,279 |
|
$ |
986 |
|
$ |
120 |
|
$ |
986 |
|
$ |
1,105 |
Foreign
exchange forward contracts |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
- |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
- |
Changes in the fair
value of client-related derivative instruments are recognized currently in
operations. The following table shows the location and amount of gains and
losses recorded in the consolidated statements of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Amount of Gain or (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Operations on |
|
Recognized in Operations on |
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss) |
|
Derivative |
|
Derivative |
|
|
Recognized in Operations on |
|
Three months
ended June 30, |
|
Six months
ended June 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
Derivative |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Non-designated hedging
instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
contracts |
|
Interest and fees on loans |
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
(323 |
) |
|
$ |
(290 |
) |
NOTE 8—COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company maintains
a number of share-based incentive programs, which are discussed in more detail
in Note 17 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. There were no stock options or restricted stock units granted
in the first six months of 2010. There were 17,500 stock-settled stock
appreciation rights issued in the first six months of 2010. The share-based
compensation expense was $492,000 and $1.1 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The share-based compensation expense was
$491,000 and $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively.
12
Employee Stock Options and Stock-settled Stock
Appreciation Rights (“SSAR”)
At June 30, 2010, there was $6,000 and $1.6 million of total unrecognized
compensation costs related to stock options and SSAR’s, respectively, which is
expected to be recognized over weighted average periods of 0.50 and 2.1 years,
respectively. Following is a summary of the employee stock option and SSAR
activity for the first six months of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
(Dollars in thousands, except
share data) |
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Value |
Outstanding at December 31,
2009 |
|
803,735 |
|
|
$ |
16.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
11.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
(14,693 |
) |
|
|
13.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
806,542 |
|
|
$ |
16.71 |
|
5.1 years |
|
$ |
- |
Exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
|
549,541 |
|
|
$ |
15.29 |
|
3.7 years |
|
$ |
- |
Vested and expected to vest at June 30,
2010 |
|
727,028 |
|
|
$ |
16.23 |
|
5.1
years |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)
At June 30, 2010,
there was $1.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to the
RSU’s, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8
years. A summary of the Company's restricted stock unit activity for the first
six months of 2010 is presented below.
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
Grant Date |
|
Shares |
|
Fair
Value |
Outstanding at December 31,
2009 |
78,150 |
|
|
$
|
23.05 |
Granted |
- |
|
|
|
- |
Vested |
- |
|
|
|
- |
Forfeited |
(3,223 |
) |
|
|
25.36 |
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
74,927 |
|
|
$ |
22.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Plan for Non-Management Directors
Shares are issued
twice a year and compensation expense is recorded as the shares are earned,
therefore, there is no unrecognized compensation expense related to this plan.
The Company recognized $15,000 and $158,000 of share-based compensation expense
for the directors for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. The Company recognized $8,000 and $105,000 of share-based
compensation expense for the directors for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively. Pursuant to this plan, the Company issued 16,823 and
8,829 shares in the first six months of 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Employee Stock Issuance
Restricted stock was
granted to certain key employees as part of their compensation. The restricted
stock may be in a form of a one-time award or in paid pro-rata installments. The
stock is restricted for 2 years and upon issuance may be fully vested or vest
over five years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company
recognized $2,000 and $43,000 of share-based compensation related to these
awards and issued 8,999 shares year to date.
In conjunction with
the Company’s short-term incentive plan, in February 2010, the Company issued
13,660 restricted shares to certain key employees. The compensation expense
related to these shares was expensed in 2009. For further information on the
short-term incentive plan, refer to the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in
the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 annual meeting.
13
Moneta Plan
As of December 31, 2006, the fair value of all
Moneta options had been expensed. As a result, there have been no option-related
expenses for Moneta in 2010 or 2009. Following is a summary of the Moneta stock
option activity for the first six months of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
(Dollars in thousands, except share
data) |
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
Value |
Outstanding at December 31,
2009 |
29,346 |
|
|
$
|
14.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
(3,241 |
) |
|
|
18.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30,
2010 |
26,105 |
|
|
$ |
13.58 |
|
1.7 years |
|
$ |
- |
Exercisable at June 30,
2010 |
26,105 |
|
|
$ |
13.58 |
|
1.7
years |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Below is a
description of certain assets and liabilities measured at fair
value.
The following table
summarizes financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as
of June 30, 2010, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the
fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value.
|
|
Quoted
Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
Markets
for |
|
Other |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
Assets |
|
Observable |
|
Inputs |
|
Total
Fair |
(in
thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Value |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies |
|
$
|
- |
|
$
|
24,117 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$
|
24,117 |
Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored enterprises |
|
|
- |
|
|
34,846 |
|
|
- |
|
|
34,846 |
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
3,018 |
|
|
10,225 |
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
- |
|
|
190,773 |
|
|
- |
|
|
190,773 |
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
256,943 |
|
$ |
3,018 |
|
$ |
259,961 |
Portfolio loans |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,820 |
|
|
- |
|
|
16,820 |
State tax credits held for sale |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
32,622 |
|
|
32,622 |
Derivative financial instruments |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,149 |
Total assets |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
275,912 |
|
$ |
35,640 |
|
$ |
311,552 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,747 |
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Securities
available for sale. Securities
classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2
and Level 3 inputs. The Company obtains fair value measurements from an
independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable
data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S.
Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market
consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond's terms and
conditions. Through June 30, 2010, Level 3 securities available for sale
include three Auction Rate Securities.
- Portfolio
Loans. Certain fixed rate
portfolio loans are accounted for as trading instruments and reported at fair
value. Fair value on these loans is determined using a third party valuation
model with observable Level 2 market data inputs.
- State tax
credits held for sale. At June
30, 2010, of the $60.1 million of state tax credits held for sale on the
consolidated balance sheet, approximately $32.6 million were carried at fair
value. The remaining $27.5 million of state tax credits were accounted for at
cost. The Company elected not to account for state tax credits purchased in
the first six months of 2010 at fair value in order to limit the volatility of
the fair value changes in the consolidated statements of
operations.
14
The fair value of the state tax credits carried at fair value increased
by $1.4 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to a $1.2 million
decrease in the first six months of 2009. These fair value changes are included
in State tax credit activity, net in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company is not aware of an active market that exists for the 10-year
streams of state tax credit financial instruments. However, the Company’s
principal market for these tax credits consists of Missouri state residents who
buy these credits and local and regional accounting firms who broker them. As
such, the Company employed a discounted cash flow analysis (income approach) to
determine the fair value.
The fair value measurement is calculated using an internal valuation
model with observable market data including discounted cash flows based upon the
terms and conditions of the tax credits. Assuming that the underlying project
remains in compliance with the various federal and state rules governing the tax
credit program, each project will generate about 10 years of tax credits. The
inputs to the fair value calculation include: the amount of tax credits
generated each year, the anticipated sale price of the tax credit, the timing of
the sale and a discount rate. The discount rate is defined as the LIBOR swap
curve at a point equal to the remaining life in years of credits plus a 205
basis point spread. With the exception of the discount rate, the other inputs to
the fair value calculation are observable and readily available. The discount
rate is considered a Level 3 input because it is an “unobservable input” and is
based on the Company’s assumptions. Given the significance of this input to the
fair value calculation, the state tax credit assets are reported as Level 3
assets.
The following table
presents the changes in Level 3 financial instruments measured at fair value on
a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010.
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
available for |
|
|
|
|
|
sale, at fair |
|
State tax credits |
(in thousands) |
value |
|
held for
sale |
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$
|
2,830 |
|
$
|
32,485 |
|
Total gains or (losses)
(realized and unrealized): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
- |
|
|
1,865 |
|
Included in other comprehensive
income |
|
88 |
|
|
- |
|
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements,
net |
|
100 |
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
Transfer in and/or out of Level
3 |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ |
3,018 |
|
$ |
32,622 |
|
|
Change in unrealized gains or (losses)
relating to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets still held at the reporting
date |
$ |
88 |
|
$ |
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
From time to time,
the Company measures certain assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These
include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or fair value that were
recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period. The following
table presents financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring
basis as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
Total (losses) gains for the
six |
(in thousands) |
|
Total Fair
Value |
|
(Level
1) |
|
(Level
2) |
|
(Level
3) |
|
|
months ended
June 30, 2010 |
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
12,823 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
12,823 |
|
|
$ |
(21,277 |
) |
Other real estate |
|
|
5,259 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,259 |
|
|
|
(1,554 |
) |
Total |
|
$ |
18,082 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
18,082 |
|
|
$ |
(22,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans are
reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral. Fair values for
impaired loans are obtained from current appraisals by qualified licensed
appraisers or independent valuation specialists. Other real estate owned is
adjusted to fair value upon foreclosure of the underlying loan. Subsequently,
foreclosed assets are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less
costs to sell. Fair value of other real estate is based upon the current
appraised values of the properties as determined by qualified licensed
appraisers and the Company’s judgment of other relevant market
conditions.
Following is a
summary of the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial
instruments on the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009.
|
|
June 30,
2010 |
|
December 31,
2009 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
|
Carrying |
|
Estimated |
(in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
fair
value |
|
Amount |
|
fair
value |
Balance sheet assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from
banks |
|
$ |
13,711 |
|
$ |
13,711 |
|
$ |
16,064 |
|
$ |
16,064 |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
7,472 |
|
|
7,472 |
Interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
66,347 |
|
|
66,347 |
|
|
83,430 |
|
|
83,430 |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
259,961 |
|
|
259,961 |
|
|
282,461 |
|
|
282,461 |
Other investments |
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
13,189 |
|
|
13,189 |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
4,243 |
|
|
4,243 |
Derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
2,149 |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
1,237 |
Portfolio loans, net |
|
|
1,728,057 |
|
|
1,733,554 |
|
|
1,790,208 |
|
|
1,794,576 |
State tax credits, held for
sale |
|
|
60,134 |
|
|
60,951 |
|
|
51,258 |
|
|
51,258 |
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
7,263 |
|
|
7,751 |
|
|
7,751 |
|
Balance sheet liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,821,823 |
|
|
1,823,332 |
|
|
1,941,416 |
|
|
1,944,910 |
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
44,751 |
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
43,060 |
Federal Home Loan Bank
advances |
|
|
123,100 |
|
|
134,941 |
|
|
128,100 |
|
|
138,688 |
Other borrowings |
|
|
56,681 |
|
|
56,690 |
|
|
39,338 |
|
|
39,360 |
Derivative financial
instruments |
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
1,105 |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
2,125 |
For information
regarding the methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of each
class of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate such value,
refer to Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
16
NOTE 10—SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company has two
primary operating segments, Banking and Wealth Management, which are delineated
by the products and services that each segment offers. The segments are
evaluated separately on their individual performance, as well as their
contribution to the Company as a whole.
The Banking operating
segment consists of a full-service commercial bank, Enterprise, with locations
in St. Louis, Kansas City, and Phoenix. The majority of the Company’s assets and
income result from the Banking segment. All banking locations have the same
product and service offerings, have similar types and classes of customers and
utilize similar service delivery methods. Pricing guidelines and operating
policies for products and services are the same across all regions.
The Wealth Management
segment includes the Trust division of Enterprise and the state tax credit
brokerage activities. The Trust division provides estate planning, investment
management, and retirement planning as well as consulting on management
compensation, strategic planning and management succession issues. State tax
credits are part of a fee initiative designed to augment the Company’s wealth
management segment and banking lines of business.
The Corporate
segment’s principal activities include the direct ownership of the Company’s
banking subsidiary and the issuance of debt and equity. Its principal sources of
liquidity are dividends from Enterprise and stock option exercises.
The financial
information for each business segment reflects that information which is
specifically identifiable or which is allocated based on an internal allocation
method. There were no material intersegment revenues among the three segments.
Management periodically makes changes to methods of assigning costs and income
to its business segments to better reflect operating results. When appropriate,
these changes are reflected in prior year information presented
below.
17
Following are the
financial results for the Company’s operating segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth |
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Intercompany |
|
Total |
Balance Sheet
Information |
|
At June 30, 2010 |
Loans, less unearned loan fees |
|
$
|
1,773,315 |
|
|
$
|
- |
|
|
$
|
- |
|
|
$
|
1,773,315 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
1,423 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,423 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,841,305 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(19,482 |
) |
|
|
1,821,823 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
126,345 |
|
|
|
55,936 |
|
|
|
82,581 |
|
|
|
264,862 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,190,620 |
|
|
|
60,961 |
|
|
|
21,148 |
|
|
|
2,272,729 |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wealth |
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking |
|
Management |
|
Intercompany |
|
Total |
Loans, less unearned loan fees |
|
$ |
1,833,203 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,833,203 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,960,942 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(19,526 |
) |
|
|
1,941,416 |
|
Borrowings |
|
|
121,442 |
|
|
|
48,496 |
|
|
|
82,581 |
|
|
|
252,519 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,287,936 |
|
|
|
59,225 |
|
|
|
18,494 |
|
|
|
2,365,655 |
|
|
Income Statement
Information |
|
Three months ended June 30,
2010 |
Net interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
20,089 |
|
|
$ |
(346 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,141 |
) |
|
$ |
18,602 |
|
Provision for loan
losses |
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8,960 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
11,535 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
14,146 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
before income tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(2,055 |
) |
|
|
537 |
|
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
1,554 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
(895 |
) |
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2009
(Restated) |
Net
interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
18,999 |
|
|
$ |
(292 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,212 |
) |
|
$ |
17,495 |
|
Provision for loan
losses |
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
2,445 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
13,804 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
before income tax
benefit
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(2,292 |
) |
|
|
(1,634 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
(1,673 |
) |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued
operations
before income tax
expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
Net
loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
Total net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,589 |
|
|
$ |
(632 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,258 |
) |
|
$ |
(301 |
) |
|
Income Statement
Information |
|
Six months ended June 30,
2010 |
Net
interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
40,141 |
|
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,272 |
) |
|
$ |
37,225 |
|
Provision for loan
losses |
|
|
22,760 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,760 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
22,403 |
|
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
2,044 |
|
|
|
27,801 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing
operations
before income tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(4,270 |
) |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
Income tax expense
(benefit) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
|
|
(1,962 |
) |
Net
income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,294 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,277 |
) |
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2009
(Restated) |
Net
interest income (expense) |
|
$ |
37,346 |
|
|
$ |
(543 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,459 |
) |
|
$ |
34,344 |
|
Provision for loan
losses |
|
|
25,532 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
4,113 |
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
6,579 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
20,784 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
26,345 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
|
|
45,377 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45,377 |
|
Loss from continuing
operations
before income tax
benefit
|
|
|
(50,234 |
) |
|
|
(1,493 |
) |
|
|
(4,604 |
) |
|
|
(56,331 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(1,885 |
) |
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
(1,992 |
) |
|
|
(4,524 |
) |
Net loss from continuing
operations |
|
|
(48,349 |
) |
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(2,612 |
) |
|
|
(51,807 |
) |
|
Income from discontinued
operations
before income tax
expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Net
income from discontinued operations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Total net loss |
|
$ |
(48,349 |
) |
|
$ |
(826 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,612 |
) |
|
$ |
(51,787 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11—SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 9, 2010,
Enterprise acquired approximately $256.0 million in assets from the FDIC in
connection with the failure of Home National, an Oklahoma bank with operations
in Arizona. The Company acquired the loans originated and other real estate of
the Home National Arizona operations at a discount of 12.5%, or $223.7 million.
As part of the purchase transaction, Enterprise and the FDIC entered into a loss
sharing agreement on the assets acquired. Enterprise did not assume any deposits
or acquire any branches or other assets of Home National in the
transaction.
18
The acquisition was
initially funded with cash on hand and short-term advances from the Federal
Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines. The short-term advances are
being replaced with $120 million of brokered time deposits at a weighted average
rate of 1.29% and an average term of 2 years. An additional $100 million of
short-term internet time deposits and money market deposits is expected to be
obtained over the next 90 days.
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Some of the information in this report
contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities
laws. Forward-looking statements typically are identified with use of terms such
as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “potential,” “could”, and
similar words, although some forward-looking statements are expressed
differently. Our ability to predict results or the actual effects of future
plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. You should be aware that the
Company’s actual results could differ materially from those contained in the
forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including: burdens
imposed by federal and state regulation, changes in accounting regulation or
standards of banks; credit risk; exposure to general and local economic
conditions; risks associated with rapid increase or decrease in prevailing
interest rates; consolidation within the banking industry; competition from
banks and other financial institutions; our ability to attract and retain
relationship officers and other key personnel and technological developments;
and other risks discussed in more detail in Item 1A: “Risk Factors” on our most
recently filed Form 10-K, all of which could cause the Company’s actual results
to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking
statements.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis
only as of the date of the statements. The Company does not intend to publicly
revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
that arise after the date of this report. Readers should carefully review all
disclosures we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission which are available on our website at
www.enterprisebank.com.
Introduction
The following discussion describes the
significant changes to the financial condition of the Company that have occurred
during the first six months of 2010 compared to the financial condition as of
December 31, 2009. In addition, this discussion summarizes the significant
factors affecting the consolidated results of operations, liquidity and cash
flows of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to the same periods in 2009. This discussion should be read in conjunction with
the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in this report and
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Executive Summary
Net income from continuing operations for the
quarter ended June 30, 2010 was $737,000 compared to $39,000 for the same period
of 2009. After deducting dividends on preferred stock, the Company reported net
income per fully diluted share from continuing operations of $0.01 compared to a
net loss per fully diluted share from continuing operations of $0.04 for the
second quarter of 2009. Results for the second quarter of 2010 include an
increase in net interest income primarily from effectively managing the funding
costs of interest-bearing deposits, and an increase in state tax brokerage
activities, while provision for loan loss remained roughly equivalent to the
same period of 2009.
The Company reported
a net loss from continuing operations of $2.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, compared to a $51.8 million net loss from the same period in
2009. After deducting dividends on preferred stock, the Company reported a net
loss per fully diluted share from continuing operations of $0.24 compared to a
net loss of $4.13 for the same period in 2009. The net loss reported for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was driven by $25.5 million in loan loss provision
and a $45.4 million non-cash accounting charge to eliminate banking segment
goodwill.
Our pre-tax,
pre-provision operating earnings increased on a linked quarter and
year-over-year basis. Pre-tax, pre-provision income from continuing operations
was $9.7 million in the second quarter of 2010, 15% higher than the comparable
figure in the second quarter of 2009 and 7% higher than in the linked first
quarter of 2010. Pre-tax, pre-provision income from continuing operations, which
is a non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) financial measure, is
presented because the Company believes adjusting its results to exclude
discontinued operations, loan loss provision expense, impairment charges,
special FDIC assessments and unusual gains or losses provides shareholders with
a more comparable basis for evaluating period-to-period operating results. A
schedule reconciling GAAP pre-tax income (loss) to pre-tax, pre-provision income
from continuing operations is provided in the table below.
19
|
|
For the Quarter
Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
Jun 30, |
|
Mar 31, |
|
Dec 31, |
|
Sep 30, |
|
Jun 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
|
2009 |
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing
operations |
|
$
|
537 |
|
|
$
|
(4,776 |
) |
|
$
|
8 |
|
|
$
|
7,003 |
|
|
$
|
(1,634 |
) |
Sales and fair value
writedowns of other real estate |
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Sale of securities |
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
Gain on extinguishment of
debt |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,062 |
) |
|
|
(5,326 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
FDIC special
assessment
(included in Other noninterest
expense)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
1,100 |
|
Income (loss) before income tax |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
(4,747 |
) |
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
(662 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
13,800 |
|
|
|
8,400 |
|
|
|
6,480 |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
Pre-tax, pre-provision income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
9,650 |
|
|
$ |
9,053 |
|
|
$ |
7,509 |
|
|
$ |
8,557 |
|
|
$ |
8,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company
significantly improved its deposit mix over the past year while nonperforming
loans and provision for loan losses have decreased on a linked quarter basis. We
are seeing improved net interest margins as we maintain loan yields and
effectively manage down our cost of funds. Wealth management revenues have
significantly increased year over year.
In January 2010, we
completed a $15.0 million private offering of common equity. The Company
continues to exceed regulatory standards for “well-capitalized” institutions.
See Capital Resources for more information.
On July 9, 2010,
Enterprise acquired approximately $256.0 million in assets from the FDIC in
connection with the failure of Home National Bank, an Oklahoma bank with
operations in Arizona. The Company acquired the loans originated and other real
estate of the Home National Arizona operations at a discount of 12.5%, or $223.7
million. As part of the purchase transaction, Enterprise and the FDIC entered
into a loss sharing agreement on the assets acquired. Enterprise did not assume
any deposits or acquire any branches or other assets of Home National in the
transaction. With this acquisition, our Arizona assets will be approximately
$300 million.
Approximately $166
million of the acquired assets are performing loans with an average loan size of
less than $1 million. The overall portfolio loan mix consists primarily of
commercial real estate and construction and development loans, mostly located in
the Phoenix area. Based on preliminary estimated cash flows, the Company expects
the acquired portfolio of assets to yield 7 to 8% before funding costs, related
expenses and taxes. This transaction will not materially change our regulatory
capital ratios and management anticipates it will add approximately $0.15 to
$0.20 to the Company’s 2010 earnings per share, subject to our underlying
assumptions and final valuations of the assets. See Liquidity in this section
for more information.
During the second
quarter, the Company opened its second Arizona branch, located in Central
Phoenix and closed its branch in Mesa, Arizona, which was acquired in an
FDIC-assisted acquisition in December, 2009.
Below are additional
highlights of our Banking and Wealth Management segments. For more information
on our segments, see Note 10 – Segment Reporting.
Banking Segment
- Loans – At June 30, 2010, portfolio loans were
$1.77 billion, a decrease of $362.8 million, or 17%, from June 30, 2009, and
$27.0 million, or 1%, from March 31, 2010. Portfolio loans decreased by $59.9
million, or 3%, from December 31, 2009. Excluding the effects of derecognizing
$231.0 million in loan participations at June 30, 2009, loans decreased $132.0
million, or 6%, from June 30, 2009. The decrease from year end is primarily
due to line paydowns, payoffs, amortization and chargeoffs partially offset by
$185.0 million of advances and new loans. The Company anticipates very slight
organic loan growth through the end of the year.
- Deposits – Total deposits were $1.82 billion at June
30, 2010, a decrease of $82.2 million or 4%, from March 31, 2010, as the
Company continued lowering its funding costs by shedding $117.0 million in
higher-cost time deposits that were not tied to client relationships. Total
deposits decreased $62.6 million, or 4%, from June 30, 2009, and $119.6
million, or 6%, from December 31, 2009. Our deposit mix continues to improve.
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits were $293.6 million at June 30, 2010, or
16% of total deposits compared to $238.1 million, or 14% of total deposits at
June 30, 2009 and 15% of total deposits at December 31, 2009.
20
The increase in noninterest bearing demand deposits from June 30, 2009
was $55.5 million, or 23%, while the increase from December 2009 was $4.0
million, or 1%.
Brokered time deposits were $101.4 million at June 30, 2010, a decrease
of $134.7 million, or 57%, from June 30, 2009 and $54.9 million, or 35%, from
December 31, 2009. For the second quarter of 2010, brokered time deposits
represented 6% of total deposits on average compared to 14% for the second
quarter of 2009. Excluding brokered time deposits, “core” deposits grew $197.3
million, or 13%, from a year ago and declined $51.6 million, or 3%, during the
quarter. Core deposits include time deposits sold to clients through the
reciprocal CDARS program. As of June 30, 2010, Enterprise had $157.5 million of
reciprocal CDARS deposits outstanding compared to $105.5 million at June 30,
2009 and $134.7 million December 31, 2009.
The Company’s goal is to drive core deposit growth through relationship
selling while at the same time effectively managing the overall cost of
funds.
- Asset quality –
Nonperforming loans
totaled $46.6 million at June 30, 2010, a decrease of $9.2 million from the
prior quarter and a decrease of $8.1 million from the prior year period.
Nonperforming loans increased $8.0 million from year end 2009. The linked
quarter decrease in nonperforming loans is primarily a result of loans
collateralized by real estate being placed into foreclosure.
Provision for loan losses was $9.0 million in the second quarter of 2010
compared to $13.8 million in the first quarter of 2010 and $9.1 million second
quarter of 2009. The linked quarter decrease in loan loss provision was due to
fewer loan risk rating downgrades during the quarter.
We continue to remain cautious in this uncertain economy recording
provision expense in excess of chargeoffs for the quarter and increasing
reserves to 97% of non-performing loans. We do not foresee a rapid turnaround in
the credit environment, particularly in light of the continued weak real estate
markets. Our commercial and industrial and owner-occupied commercial real estate
segments, which represent half of our loan portfolio, continue to perform well.
The Company continues to monitor loan portfolio risk closely. See Provision for
Loan Losses and Nonperforming Assets below for more information.
- Interest rate margin –
The net interest rate
margin was 3.46% for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to
3.10% for the three month period ended June 30, 2009. We have been effectively
managing down our cost of interest-bearing deposits, reducing the average cost
from 2.03% for the second quarter of 2009 to 1.44% for the second quarter of
2010. The net interest rate margin was flat compared to the first quarter of
2010.
For the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the net interest margin was
3.46% compared to 3.06% for the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Approximately 0.33% of the increase over the prior year was due to the
derecognition of the loan participations. For further information, refer to Loan
Participations in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. During
the first six months of 2010, the net interest rate margin improved as a result
of reduced rates on maturing time deposits and money market account
balances.
Wealth Management Segment
Fee income from the Wealth Management segment,
including results from state tax credit brokerage activity, totaled $2.2 million
in the second quarter of 2010, an increase of $866,000, or 67%, from the same
quarter of 2009. See Noninterest Income in this section for more information.
Net Interest Income
During the second quarter of 2010, the net
interest rate margin was flat with the previous quarter. We continued to improve
our deposit mix by increasing noninterest bearing demand deposits and lower rate
interest-bearing and money market balances, while reducing higher rate time
deposits and brokered deposits. The Enterprise prime rate remained at 4.00% and
we continued to focus on improving loan pricing and spreads. The Company expects
improvement in the net interest rate margin through a better earning asset mix,
core deposit mix, and favorable repricing on maturing time
deposits.
21
Three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent
basis) was $18.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
$18.0 million for the same period of 2009, an increase of $904,000, or 5%. Total
interest income decreased $3.8 million offset by a decrease in total interest
expense of $4.7 million.
Average
interest-earning assets decreased $135.9 million, or 6%, to $2.2 billion for the
quarter ended June 30, 2010 compared to $2.3 billion for the quarter ended June
30, 2009. Loans decreased $393.7 million, or 18%, to $1.8 billion, including the
derecognition of $227.8 million of loan participations in the second quarter of
2009. Investment securities increased $257.8 million, or 170%, to $409.5 million
from the second quarter of 2009 as increased core deposits were deployed to
offset weak loan demand. Short-term investments, including cash balances at the
Federal Reserve, increased $121.9 million to $131.8 million compared to $9.9
million in the same period of 2009. Interest income on loans increased $1.1
million due to higher rates, but was offset by a decrease of $5.7 million due to
lower volumes, for a net decrease of $4.6 million versus the second quarter of
2009.
For the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $180.0 million, or
9%, to $1.9 billion compared to $2.0 billion for the quarter ended June 30,
2009. The decline in interest-bearing liabilities resulted from a $232.7 million
decrease in borrowings related to the derecognition of loan participations, a
$51.8 million decrease in federal funds purchased, and a $127.6 million decrease
in brokered certificates of deposit, offset by a $210.2 million increase in
interest-bearing core deposits and a $21.9 million increase in other borrowings.
For the second quarter of 2010, interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities
decreased $1.9 million due to decreases in volume, while the impact of declining
rates decreased interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities by $2.8 million
versus second quarter of 2009, for a net decrease of $4.7 million.
The tax-equivalent
net interest rate margin was 3.46% for the second quarter of 2010 compared to
3.10% for the same period of 2009. The increase in the margin was due to the
derecognition of loan participations, improved deposit mix and lower rates on
paying liabilities, offset by a reduction in yields on earning assets and a
shift in earning asset mix from loans to investment securities and other short
term investments. The net interest rate margin for the second quarter was flat
with the first quarter of 2010.
Six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Net interest income (on a tax-equivalent
basis) was $37.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to
$35.3 million for the same period of 2009, an increase of $2.4 million, or 7%.
Total interest income decreased $6.7 million offset by a decrease in total
interest expense of $9.1 million.
Average
interest-earning assets decreased $130.9 million, or 6%, to $2.2 billion for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $2.3 billion for the same period in
2009. Loans decreased $391.4 million, or 18%, to $1.8 billion, including the
derecognition of $227.8 million of loan participations in the second quarter of
2009. Investment securities increased $260.6 million, or 191%, to $397.2 million
from the six months end June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as
increased core deposits were deployed to offset weak loan demand. Short-term
investments, including cash balances at the Federal Reserve, increased $103.4
million to $115.0 million compared to $11.6 million in the same period of 2009.
Interest income on loans increased $3.0 million due to higher rates, but was
offset by a decrease of $11.3 million due to lower volumes, for a net decrease
of $8.3 million versus the first six months of 2009.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, average interest-bearing liabilities decreased $176.4
million, or 9%, to $1.9 billion compared to $2.0 billion for the same period in
2009. The decline in interest-bearing liabilities resulted from a $231.7 million
decrease in borrowings related to the derecognition of loan participations, a
$75.4 million decrease in federal funds purchased, and a $143.6 million decrease
in brokered certificates of deposit, offset by a $251.0 million increase in
interest-bearing core deposits and a $23.3 million increase in other borrowings.
For the first half of 2010, interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities
decreased $3.5 million due to decreases in volume, while the impact of declining
rates decreased interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities by $5.5 million
versus first half of 2009, for a net decrease of $9.0 million.
The tax-equivalent
net interest rate margin was 3.46% for six months ended June 30, 2010 compared
to 3.06% for the same period of 2009. The increase in the margin was due to the
derecognition of loan participations, lower interest rates paid on core
deposits, improved deposit mix and higher yields on loans, offset by lower
yields on investments and a less favorable earning asset mix. Higher average
levels of nonperforming loans reduced the net interest rate margin by
approximately 0.15% in the first six months of 2010 compared to a reduction of
0.11% in the prior year period.
22
Average Balance Sheet
The following table presents, for the periods
indicated, certain information related to our average interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as, the corresponding interest rates
earned and paid, all on a tax equivalent basis.
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
(in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable loans (1) |
|
$
|
1,750,289 |
|
|
$
|
24,222 |
|
5.55 |
% |
|
$
|
2,114,254 |
|
|
$
|
28,235 |
|
5.36 |
% |
Tax-exempt loans (2) |
|
|
27,630 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
9.83 |
|
|
|
57,359 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
8.95 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,777,919 |
|
|
|
24,899 |
|
5.62 |
|
|
|
2,171,613 |
|
|
|
29,515 |
|
5.45 |
|
Taxable investments in debt and equity securities |
|
|
272,749 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
141,224 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
3.62 |
|
Non-taxable investments in debt and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities (2) |
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
6.34 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
131,761 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
9,928 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
0.53 |
|
Total securities and short-term investments |
|
|
409,535 |
|
|
|
2,078 |
|
2.04 |
|
|
|
151,721 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
3.43 |
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,187,454 |
|
|
|
26,977 |
|
4.95 |
|
|
|
2,323,334 |
|
|
|
30,811 |
|
5.32 |
|
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
14,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
186,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(45,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,342,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,447,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
196,575 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
0.48 |
% |
|
$ |
124,250 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
0.55 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
661,477 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
610,891 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
0.99 |
|
Savings |
|
|
10,006 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
9,343 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
0.39 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
720,443 |
|
|
|
4,008 |
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
761,456 |
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
3.13 |
|
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
1,588,501 |
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1,505,940 |
|
|
|
7,636 |
|
2.03 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
5.84 |
|
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
|
1,312 |
|
6.19 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
182,678 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
445,194 |
|
|
|
3,898 |
|
3.51 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,856,260 |
|
|
|
8,108 |
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
2,036,215 |
|
|
|
12,846 |
|
2.53 |
|
Noninterest bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
301,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
8,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,165,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,286,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
176,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity |
|
$ |
2,342,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,447,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,965 |
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.79 |
% |
Net interst rate margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
(1) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual
loans. The income on such loans is included in interest but is recognized
only upon receipt. Loan fees, net of amortization of deferred loan
origination fees and costs, included in interest income are approximately
$321,000 and $380,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. |
(2) |
|
Non-taxable income is presented on a
fully tax-equivalent basis using the combined statutory federal and state
income tax in effect for the year. The tax-equivalent adjustments were
$266,000 and $470,000 for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. |
(3) |
|
Net interest income divided by average
total interest-earning assets. |
23
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
|
Average |
|
Income/ |
|
Yield/ |
(in thousands) |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Expense |
|
Rate |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable loans (1) |
|
$
|
1,771,937 |
|
|
$
|
49,061 |
|
5.58 |
% |
|
$
|
2,131,474 |
|
|
$
|
55,941 |
|
5.29 |
% |
Tax-exempt loans (2) |
|
|
28,220 |
|
|
|
1,309 |
|
9.35 |
|
|
|
60,139 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
9.11 |
|
Total loans |
|
|
1,800,157 |
|
|
|
50,370 |
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
2,191,613 |
|
|
|
58,659 |
|
5.40 |
|
Taxable investments in debt and equity securities |
|
|
279,103 |
|
|
|
3,845 |
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
124,429 |
|
|
|
2,445 |
|
3.96 |
|
Non-taxable investments in debt and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities (2) |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
6.20 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
114,993 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
11,570 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
0.52 |
|
Total securities and short-term investments |
|
|
397,206 |
|
|
|
4,114 |
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
136,650 |
|
|
|
2,495 |
|
3.68 |
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
2,197,363 |
|
|
|
54,484 |
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
2,328,263 |
|
|
|
61,154 |
|
5.30 |
|
Noninterest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
12,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
174,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(45,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,339,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,474,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders'
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts |
|
$ |
190,941 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
0.48 |
% |
|
$ |
121,505 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
0.57 |
% |
Money market accounts |
|
|
654,615 |
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
626,709 |
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
0.97 |
|
Savings |
|
|
9,691 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
9,222 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
0.39 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
750,028 |
|
|
|
8,643 |
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
740,417 |
|
|
|
12,090 |
|
3.29 |
|
Total interest-bearing
deposits |
|
|
1,605,275 |
|
|
|
11,962 |
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
1,497,853 |
|
|
|
15,473 |
|
2.08 |
|
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
85,081 |
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
6.31 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
177,880 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
461,713 |
|
|
|
7,681 |
|
3.35 |
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,868,236 |
|
|
|
16,760 |
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
2,044,647 |
|
|
|
25,815 |
|
2.55 |
|
Noninterest-bearing
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits |
|
|
287,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
7,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,163,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,287,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
176,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & shareholders' equity |
|
$ |
2,339,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,474,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
37,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,339 |
|
|
|
Net interest spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.75 |
% |
Net interest rate margin (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
(1) |
|
Average balances include non-accrual
loans. The income on such loans is included in interest but is recognized
only upon receipt. Loan fees, net of amortization of deferred loan
origination fees and costs, included in interest income are approximately
$945,000 and $797,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. |
(2) |
|
Non-taxable income is presented on a
fully tax-equivalent basis using the combined statutory federal and state
income tax in effect for the year. The tax-equivalent adjustments were
$499,000 and $995,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. |
(3) |
|
Net interest income divided by average
total interest-earning assets. |
24
Rate/Volume
The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis for the periods
indicated, a summary of the changes in interest income and interest expense
resulting from changes in yield/rates and volume.
|
|
2010 compared to 2009
(Restated) |
|
|
3 month |
|
6 month |
|
|
Increase (decrease) due
to |
|
Increase (decrease) due
to |
(in thousands) |
|
Volume(1) |
|
Rate(2) |
|
Net |
|
Volume(1) |
|
Rate(2) |
|
Net |
Interest earned on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable loans |
|
$ |
(5,006 |
) |
|
$ |
993 |
|
|
$ |
(4,013 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,827 |
) |
|
$ |
2,947 |
|
|
$ |
(6,880 |
) |
Nontaxable loans (3) |
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
(1,479 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(1,409 |
) |
Taxable investments in
debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and equity securities |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
(907 |
) |
|
|
1,400 |
|
Nontaxable investments in debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and equity securities (3) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
Total interest-earning
assets |
|
$ |
(4,599 |
) |
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
(3,834 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,760 |
) |
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
|
$ |
(6,670 |
) |
|
Interest paid on: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction
accounts |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
113 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(1,631 |
) |
|
|
(1,936 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(3,602 |
) |
|
|
(3,447 |
) |
Subordinated
debentures |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
Borrowed funds |
|
|
(1,869 |
) |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
(2,736 |
) |
|
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
|
(1,377 |
) |
|
|
(5,352 |
) |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(1,965 |
) |
|
|
(2,773 |
) |
|
|
(4,738 |
) |
|
|
(3,517 |
) |
|
|
(5,538 |
) |
|
|
(9,055 |
) |
Net interest
income |
|
$ |
(2,634 |
) |
|
$ |
3,538 |
|
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
(5,243 |
) |
|
$ |
7,628 |
|
|
$ |
2,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Change in volume multiplied by
yield/rate of prior period. |
(2) |
|
Change in yield/rate multiplied by
volume of prior period. |
(3) |
|
Nontaxable income is presented on a
fully tax-equivalent basis using the combined statutory federal and state
income tax rate in effect for each year. |
|
|
NOTE: The change in interest due to both
rate and volume has been allocated to rate and volume changes in
proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the
change in each. |
Provision for Loan Losses and Nonperforming
Assets
The provision
for loan losses in the second quarter of 2010 was $9.0 million compared to $13.8
million in the first quarter of 2010 and $9.1 million in the second quarter of
2009. The lower loan loss provision in the second quarter of 2010 compared to
the first quarter of 2010 was due to fewer loan risk rating downgrades. The
allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 2.55% at June 30,
2010 compared to 2.35% at December 31, 2009 and 2.10% at June 30, 2009.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at June 30,
2010.
For the second
quarter of 2010, the Company recorded net chargeoffs of $7.8 million, or 1.76%,
of average portfolio loans on an annualized basis, compared to $12.7 million, or
2.83%, for the first quarter of 2010 and $6.6 million, or 1.22%, for the second
quarter of 2009. Approximately 37% of the chargeoffs in the second quarter of
2010 were related to investor-owned commercial real estate loans, 20% were
related to commercial and industrial loans, 23% were related to construction
real estate loans. In spite of the second quarter 2010 chargeoffs in the
commercial & industrial segment, the second quarter loss rate of this
portfolio was relatively low at 30 basis points. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2010, the Company recorded net chargeoffs of $20.5 million.
Approximately 47% of the chargeoffs for the first six months of 2010 were
related to investor-owned commercial real estate loans, and 31% were related to
construction real estate loans.
At June 30, 2010,
nonperforming loans were $46.6 million, or 2.63%, of total loans. This compares
to $38.5 million, or 2.10%, at December 31, 2009 and $54.7 million, or 2.56%, at
June 30, 2009. The nonperforming loans are comprised of approximately 38
relationships with the largest being a $4.2 million loan secured by a retail
development in St. Louis. Five relationships comprise 42% of the nonperforming
loans. Approximately 61% of the nonperforming loans are located in the St. Louis
region. At June 30, 2010, there were no performing restructured loans that have
been excluded from the nonperforming loan amounts.
25
Nonperforming loans
based on Call Report codes were as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
March 31, 2010 |
|
December 31,
2009 |
Construction, Real Estate/Land
Acquisition and Development |
|
$
|
18,897 |
|
$
|
20,119 |
|
$
|
21,682 |
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
18,481 |
|
|
26,485 |
|
|
9,384 |
Residential Real Estate |
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
4,130 |
Commercial & Industrial |
|
|
6,663 |
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
3,254 |
Consumer &
Other |
|
|
- |
|
|
85 |
|
|
90 |
Total |
|
$ |
46,550 |
|
$ |
55,785 |
|
$ |
38,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table
summarizes the changes in nonperforming loans by quarter.
|
|
2010 |
(in thousands) |
|
2nd Qtr |
|
1st Qtr |
|
Total Year |
Nonperforming loans beginning of
period |
|
$
|
55,785 |
|
|
$
|
38,540 |
|
|
$
|
38,540 |
|
Additions to nonaccrual
loans |
|
|
15,440 |
|
|
|
39,663 |
|
|
|
55,103 |
|
Additions to restructured loans |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
Chargeoffs |
|
|
(8,314 |
) |
|
|
(12,963 |
) |
|
|
(21,277 |
) |
Other principal reductions |
|
|
(4,580 |
) |
|
|
(2,739 |
) |
|
|
(7,319 |
) |
Moved to Other real
estate |
|
|
(11,350 |
) |
|
|
(5,564 |
) |
|
|
(16,914 |
) |
Moved to Other bank owned assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(955 |
) |
Moved to performing |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
|
|
(1,693 |
) |
Loans past due 90 days or more
and still accruing interest |
|
|
(885 |
) |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Nonperforming loans end of
period |
|
$ |
46,550 |
|
|
$ |
55,785 |
|
|
$ |
46,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate
Other real estate was $26.0 million at June
30, 2010 compared to $25.2 million at December 31, 2009 and $16.1 million at
June 30, 2009. Included in the Other real estate is $2.4 million related to
Valley Capital. The following table summarizes the changes in Other real estate
since December 31, 2009.
|
|
2010 |
(in thousands) |
|
2nd Qtr |
|
1st Qtr |
|
Total Year |
Other real estate beginning of
period |
|
$
|
21,087 |
|
|
$
|
25,224 |
|
|
$
|
25,224 |
|
Additions and expenses
capitalized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to prepare property for sale |
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
5,564 |
|
|
|
16,914 |
|
Addition of Valley Capital ORE |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Writedowns in fair
value |
|
|
(1,364 |
) |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
(1,938 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
(5,049 |
) |
|
|
(9,240 |
) |
|
|
(14,289 |
) |
Other real estate end of
period |
|
$ |
26,024 |
|
|
$ |
21,087 |
|
|
$ |
26,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2010,
Other real estate was comprised of 27% residential lots, 35% completed homes,
and 38% commercial real estate. Of the total Other real estate, 47%, or 35
properties, are located in the Kansas City region, 44%, or 17 properties, are
located in the St. Louis region and 9%, or 8 properties, are located in the
Arizona region related to Valley Capital.
Second quarter
additions include a $3.9 million commercial real estate property and a $2.3
million residential property with 34 condominium units.
Fair value of other
real estate is based upon the current appraised values of the properties as
determined by qualified licensed appraisers and the Company’s judgment of other
relevant market conditions. Writedowns in fair value of Other real estate is
recorded in Loan legal and other real estate expense which is reported as part
of noninterest expense.
26
At June 30, 2010,
nonperforming assets also included $850,000 of non-real estate repossessed
assets.
Our nonperforming
credits are concentrated in the construction, land development and commercial
real estate segments and those areas remain stressed with persistent downward
pressure on valuations. We continue to monitor our loan portfolio for signs of
credit weakness in segments other than real estate. Our commercial and
industrial portfolio has shown no significant signs of deterioration. While we
have no significant nonperforming assets or past due loans in this sector,
certain segments of the commercial and industrial portfolio may be adversely
affected should the current economic recession continue for a protracted period
of time.
The following table
summarizes changes in the allowance for loan losses arising from loans charged
off and recoveries on loans previously charged off, by loan category, and
additions to the allowance charged to expense.
|
Three months ended June
30, |
|
Six months ended June
30, |
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
(in thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Allowance at beginning of
period |
$
|
44,079 |
|
|
$
|
42,286 |
|
|
$
|
42,995 |
|
|
$
|
33,808 |
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
2,466 |
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
10,123 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
Construction |
|
2,240 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
4,794 |
Residential |
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
Consumer and other |
|
182 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
42 |
Total loans charged off |
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
6,635 |
|
|
|
21,277 |
|
|
|
14,703 |
Recoveries of loans previously charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
5 |
Real estate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
- |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
66 |
Construction |
|
274 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
3 |
Residential |
|
169 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
46 |
Consumer and other |
|
70 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
11 |
Total recoveries of
loans |
|
533 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
131 |
Net loan chargeoffs |
|
7,781 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
|
|
20,497 |
|
|
|
14,572 |
Provision for loan losses |
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
9,073 |
|
|
|
22,760 |
|
|
|
25,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at end of period |
$ |
45,258 |
|
|
$ |
44,768 |
|
|
$ |
45,258 |
|
|
$ |
44,768 |
|
Average loans |
$ |
1,777,919 |
|
|
$ |
2,171,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,800,157 |
|
|
$ |
2,191,613 |
Total portfolio loans |
|
1,773,315 |
|
|
|
2,136,125 |
|
|
|
1,773,315 |
|
|
|
2,136,125 |
Nonperforming loans |
|
46,550 |
|
|
|
54,699 |
|
|
|
46,550 |
|
|
|
54,699 |
|
Net chargeoffs to average loans
(annualized) |
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
1.22 |
% |
|
|
2.30 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
Allowance for loan losses to loans |
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
27
The following table
presents the categories of nonperforming assets and other ratios as of the dates
indicated.
|
June 30, |
|
December 31 |
(in thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
Non-accrual loans |
$
|
44,386 |
|
|
$
|
37,441 |
|
Loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and still accruing
interest |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Restructured loans |
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
1,099 |
|
Total nonperforming
loans |
|
46,550 |
|
|
|
38,540 |
|
Foreclosed property |
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
25,224 |
|
Other bank owned assets |
|
850 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total nonperforming assets |
$ |
73,424 |
|
|
$ |
63,764 |
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
2,272,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,365,655 |
|
Total portfolio loans |
|
1,773,315 |
|
|
|
1,833,203 |
|
Total loans plus foreclosed
property |
|
1,800,189 |
|
|
|
1,858,427 |
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total
loans |
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
2.10 |
% |
Nonperforming assets to total loans plus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foreclosed property |
|
4.08 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
Nonperforming assets to total
assets |
|
3.23 |
|
|
|
2.70 |
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans |
|
97.00 |
% |
|
|
112.00 |
% |
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income increased $1.3 million, or
34%, from the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2010. The
increase is primarily due to gains from the state tax credit activities.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, noninterest income increased $2.5 million, or 38%, from the
same period in 2009. The six month period ended June 30, 2009 includes a pre-tax
loss of $530,000 realized from the termination of two interest rate swaps.
Excluding this loss, the increase from the prior period is primarily due to
gains from the state tax credit activities.
- Wealth Management revenue – For the
three months ended June 30, 2010, Wealth Management revenue from the Trust
division increased $122,000, or 10%, compared to the same period in 2009.
Trust revenues increased $212,000, or 9%, on a year-to-date basis from the
same period in 2009. Assets under administration increased to $1.2 billion at
June 30, 2010, an 11% increase from June 30, 2009 primarily due to market
value increases.
- Service charges on deposit
accounts – Decreases in
Service charges on deposit accounts were primarily due to reduced overdraft
and service charges on business checking accounts.
- Sale of other real estate – For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we
sold $5.0 million of Other real estate for a gain of $302,000. Year-to-date
through June 30, 2010, we sold $14.3 million of Other real estate for a net
gain of $290,000. For the year-to-date period in 2009, we sold $9.6 million of
Other real estate for a net gain of $57,000.
- State tax credit brokerage
activities – For the
quarter ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a gain of $851,000 compared to a gain
of $109,000 in the second quarter of 2009. For the six months ended June 30,
2010, we recorded a gain of $1.4 million on state tax credit activity compared
to a gain of $63,000 in the first half of 2009. For the six months ended June
30, 2010, gains of $1.2 million from the sale of state tax credits to clients
and a positive fair value adjustment of $1.4 million were partially offset by
a $1.2 million negative fair value adjustment on the interest rate caps used
to economically hedge the tax credits. See Note 7 – Derivatives Instruments
and Hedging Activities above for more information on the interest rate caps.
For more detailed information on the fair value treatment of the state tax
credits, see Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements.
- Sale of investment
securities – During the
first six months of 2010, the Company elected to reposition a portion of the
investment portfolio and we sold approximately $95.1 million of securities
realizing a $1.1 million gain
on these sales. We reinvested the proceeds in U.S. Government sponsored
enterprises and Residential mortgage-backed securities.
-
Miscellaneous income – The year over year increase includes
$237,000 from Bank Owned Life Insurance cash value and $257,000 related to the
accretion of the indemnification asset as part of the Valley Capital
acquisition. In the first six months of 2009, Miscellaneous income included a
$530,000 loss realized from the termination of two interest rate
swaps.
28
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expenses were $14.1 million in the
second quarter of 2010, an increase of $342,000, or 2%, from the second quarter
of 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, noninterest expense decreased
$43.9 million, or 61%, from prior year. The decrease is due to a $45.4 million
goodwill impairment charge related to the banking segment. Excluding the
goodwill impairment charge, noninterest expenses increased $1.5 million, or 6%,
compared to the first six months of 2009. The increase resulted from an increase
in salaries and benefits and loan, legal and other real estate expense, offset
by a decrease in FDIC insurance expense.
For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, salaries and benefits increased primarily due to the
recruitment of several prominent St. Louis bankers and the accrual of higher
variable compensation expense.
For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, increases in loan legal and other real estate were
largely due to fair value adjustments on other real estate.
The decrease in FDIC
Insurance was primarily due to the FDIC special assessment that occurred during
the second quarter of 2009.
The Company’s
efficiency ratio in the second quarter of 2010 was 60% compared to 65% in the
second quarter of 2009. Excluding the goodwill impairment charge in 2009, the
year-to-date efficiency ratio was 60% and 67%, in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Income Taxes
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company
concluded that minor changes in the Company’s estimated 2010 pre-tax results and
changes in projected permanent items produced significant variability in the
estimated annual effective tax rate. Accordingly, the Company has determined
that the actual effective tax rate for the year-to-date period is the best
estimate of the effective tax rate. The effective tax rate for 2010 could differ
significantly from the effective tax rate for the first six months of 2010.
For the three months
ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s income tax benefit, which includes both
federal and state taxes, was $200,000 compared to a $1.7 million benefit for the
same period in 2009. The combined federal and state effective income tax rates
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were 37.2% and 46.3%,
respectively, compared to 102.4% and 8.0% for the same periods in 2009. The
change in the effective tax rate is primarily the result of the $45.4 million
nondeductible goodwill impairment charge in 2009.
The Company
recognizes deferred tax assets only to the extent that they are expected to be
used to reduce amounts that have been paid or will be paid to tax authorities.
Management believes, based on all positive and negative evidence, that the
deferred tax asset at June 30, 2010 is more likely-than-not to be realized, and
accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Liquidity management
The objective of liquidity management is to
ensure the Company has the ability to generate sufficient cash or cash
equivalents in a timely and cost-effective manner to meet its commitments as
they become due. Typical demands on liquidity are deposit run-off from demand
deposits, maturing time deposits which are not renewed, and fundings under
credit commitments to customers. Funds are available from a number of sources,
such as from the core deposit base and from loans and securities repayments and
maturities. Additionally, liquidity is provided from sales of the securities
portfolio, fed funds lines with correspondent banks, the Federal Reserve and the
FHLB, the ability to acquire brokered deposits and the ability to sell loan
participations to other banks. These alternatives are an important part of our
liquidity plan and provide flexibility and efficient execution of the
asset-liability management strategy.
29
Our Asset-Liability
Management Committee oversees our liquidity position, the parameters of which
are approved by the Board of Directors. Our liquidity management framework
includes measurement of several key elements, such as the loan to deposit ratio,
a liquidity ratio, and a dependency ratio. The Company’s liquidity framework
also incorporates contingency planning to assess the nature and volatility of
funding sources and to determine alternatives to these sources. While core
deposits and loan and investment repayments are principal sources of liquidity,
funding diversification is another key element of liquidity management and is
achieved by strategically varying depositor types, terms, funding markets, and
instruments.
Parent Company
liquidity
The parent
company’s liquidity is managed to provide the funds necessary to pay dividends
to shareholders, service debt, invest in subsidiaries as necessary, and satisfy
other operating requirements. The parent company’s primary funding sources to
meet its liquidity requirements are dividends and other payments from
subsidiaries and proceeds from the issuance of equity (i.e. stock option
exercises).
On June 17, 2009, the
Company filed a Shelf Registration statement on Form S-3 for up to $35.0 million
of certain types of our securities. The Registration became effective on July 1,
2009. In January 2010, the Company issued $15.0 million in stock through a
private offering and separately registered those shares in March 2010. The
proceeds of the offering were injected into Enterprise to improve the Bank’s
capital position. Proceeds from any additional offerings would be used for
capital expenditures, repayment or refinancing of indebtedness or other
securities from time to time, working capital, to make acquisitions, for general
corporate purposes, or for the redemption of all or part of the preferred stock
held by the U.S. Treasury as a result the Company’s participation in the Capital
Purchase Program.
As of June 30, 2010,
the Company had $82.6 million of outstanding subordinated debentures as part of
nine Trust Preferred Securities Pools. These securities are classified as debt
but are included in regulatory capital and the related interest expense is
tax-deductible, which makes them a very attractive source of funding. Management
believes our current level of cash at the holding company of approximately $19.5
million will be sufficient to meet all projected cash needs in
2010.
Enterprise liquidity
During the second quarter of 2010, we
maintained a strong liquidity position and reduced our reliance on wholesale and
volatile deposit sources. Money market and savings balances increased $46.6
million, offset by decreases of $8.2 million in noninterest bearing demand
deposits, $4.3 million in interest-bearing checking deposits and $86.7 million
in time deposits. The decline in time deposits included the loss of
approximately $67 million of high rate accounts generated through a targeted
campaign in 2009. Brokered time deposit balances declined $30.6 million. Loan
balances declined $26.0 million and cash reserves declined $61.6 million. We
also decreased our investment portfolio by $7.3 million.
Enterprise has a
variety of funding sources available to increase financial flexibility. In
addition to amounts currently borrowed, at June 30, 2010, Enterprise could
borrow an additional $89.8 million from the FHLB of Des Moines under blanket
loan pledges and an additional $237.1 million from the Federal Reserve Bank
under a pledged loan agreement. Enterprise has unsecured federal funds lines
with three correspondent banks totaling $30.0 million.
On July 9, 2010
Enterprise entered into an agreement with the FDIC to purchase approximately
$256 million of loans originated and other real estate acquired from an Oklahoma
bank with operations in Arizona. The acquisition was initially funded with cash
on hand and short-term advances from the Federal Reserve and FHLB. The
short-term advances are being replaced with $120 million of brokered time
deposits at a weighted average rate of 1.29% and a weighted average term of 2
years. An additional $100 million of short-term internet time deposits and money
market balances is expected to be obtained over the next 90 days. In total,
management expects the long-term funding for this acquisition will have a
weighted average rate of approximately 1.25% and a weighted average term of
approximately 18 months.
Of the $260.0 million
of the securities available for sale at June 30, 2010, $94.7 million was pledged
as collateral for public deposits, treasury, tax and loan notes, and other
requirements. The remaining $165.3 million could be pledged or sold to enhance
liquidity, if necessary.
In July 2008,
Enterprise joined the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service, or CDARS,
which allows us to provide our customers with access to additional levels of
FDIC insurance coverage. The Company considers the reciprocal deposits placed
through the CDARS program as core funding and does not report the balances as
brokered sources in its internal or external financial reports. As of June 30,
2010, the Bank had $157.5 million of reciprocal CDARS deposits outstanding. In
addition to the reciprocal deposits available through CDARS, we also have access
to the “one-way buy” program, which allows us to bid on the excess deposits of
other CDARS member banks. The
Company will report any outstanding “one-way buy” funds as brokered funds in its
internal and external financial reports. At June 30, 2010, we had no outstanding
“one-way buy” deposits.
30
Because the Bank is
“well-capitalized”, it has the ability to sell certificates of deposit through
various national or regional brokerage firms, if needed. At June 30, 2010, we
had $101.4 million of brokered certificates of deposit outstanding compared to
$236.0 million outstanding at June 30, 2009, a decrease of $134.6 million and
$156.2 million at December 31, 2009, a decrease of $54.8 million.
Over the normal
course of business, the Company enters into certain forms of off-balance sheet
transactions, including unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit. These
transactions are managed through the Company’s various risk management
processes. Management considers both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet
transactions in its evaluation of the Company’s liquidity. The Company has
$401.1 million in unused loan commitments as of June 30, 2010. While this
commitment level would be difficult to fund given the Company’s current
liquidity resources, the nature of these commitments is such that the likelihood
of funding them is low.
Regulatory capital
The Company and Enterprise are subject to
various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements.
Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Company and its bank affiliate must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and
certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting
practices. The banking affiliate’s capital amounts and classification are also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk
weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures
established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and its
banking affiliate to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the
following table) of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, and of
Tier 1 capital to average assets. To be categorized as “well capitalized”, banks
must maintain minimum total risk-based (10%), Tier 1 risk-based (6%) and Tier 1
leverage ratios (5%). Management believes, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, that the Company and Enterprise met all capital adequacy requirements to
which they are subject.
The following table
summarizes the Company’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios at the dates
indicated:
|
At June 30, |
|
At December
31, |
(Dollars in thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted
assets |
|
11.93 |
% |
|
|
10.67 |
% |
Total capital to risk weighted assets |
|
14.41 |
% |
|
|
13.32 |
% |
Leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to
average assets) |
|
9.84 |
% |
|
|
8.96 |
% |
Tangible common equity to tangible assets |
|
6.23 |
% |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
Tier 1 capital |
$
|
229,837 |
|
|
$
|
215,099 |
|
Total risk-based capital |
$ |
277,812 |
|
|
$ |
268,454 |
|
31
A reconciliation of
shareholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible
assets is provided in the table below. The Company believes the tangible common
equity ratio is an important financial measure of capital strength even though
it is considered to be a non-GAAP measure. The Company continues to exceed
regulatory standards for “well-capitalized” institutions.
|
At June 30, |
|
At December
31, |
(In thousands) |
2010 |
|
2009 |
Shareholders' equity |
$
|
176,872 |
|
|
$
|
163,912 |
|
Less: Preferred stock |
|
(32,154 |
) |
|
|
(31,802 |
) |
Less: Goodwill |
|
(1,974 |
) |
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets |
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
Tangible common equity |
$ |
141,321 |
|
|
$ |
128,493 |
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
2,272,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,365,655 |
|
Less: Goodwill |
|
(1,974 |
) |
|
|
(1,974 |
) |
Less: Intangible assets |
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(1,643 |
) |
Tangible assets |
$ |
2,269,332 |
|
|
$ |
2,362,038 |
|
|
Tangible common equity to tangible
assets |
|
6.23 |
% |
|
|
5.44 |
% |
Critical Accounting
Policies
The impact and
any associated risks related to the Company’s critical accounting policies on
business operations are discussed throughout “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” where such policies
affect our reported and expected financial results. For a detailed discussion on
the application of these and other accounting policies, see the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
New Accounting
Standards
FASB ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing” On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted new
authoritative guidance under ASC Topic 860 which requires additional information
regarding transfers of financial assets and eliminates the concept of a
“qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets, and requires additional disclosures. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of
operations, cash flows or disclosures.
FASB ASU 2009-17, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”
On January 1, 2010,
the Company adopted new authoritative guidance under this ASU, which requires
ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity. Additionally, this guidance requires enhanced
disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more
transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in variable interest
entities. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our
financial position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
FASB ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”
This ASU requires
additional fair value disclosures including disclosing the amounts of
significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and to
describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, the guidance also requires
disclosures about gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlement activity in
the Level 3 rollfoward. The Company has applied the disclosure requirements as
of January 1, 2010, except for the detailed Level 3 rollforward disclosure,
which will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December
15, 2010. ASU 2010-06 concerns disclosure only and will not have a material
impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows,
or disclosures.
32
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The disclosures set
forth in this item are qualified by the section captioned “Safe Harbor Statement
Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” included in Item 2 –
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of this report and other cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in
this report.
Market risk arises
from exposure to changes in interest rates and other relevant market rate or
price risk. The Company faces market risk in the form of interest rate risk
through transactions other than trading activities. Market risk from these
activities, in the form of interest rate risk, is measured and managed through a
number of methods. The Company uses financial modeling techniques to measure
interest rate risk. These techniques measure the sensitivity of future earnings
due to changing interest rate environments. Guidelines established by the
Asset/Liability Management Committees and approved by the Company’s Board of
Directors are used to monitor exposure of earnings at risk. General interest
rate movements are used to develop sensitivity as the Company feels it has no
primary exposure to a specific point on the yield curve. These limits are based
on the Company’s exposure to a 100 basis points and 200 basis points immediate
and sustained parallel rate move, either upward or downward.
Interest rate
simulations for June 30, 2010 demonstrate that a rising rate environment will
initially have a negative impact on net interest income because the Enterprise
prime rate is set higher than the market prime rate and will not increase with
the cost of our deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities.
The following table
represents the Company’s estimated interest rate sensitivity and periodic and
cumulative gap positions calculated as of June 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beyond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or
no stated |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Year 1 |
|
Year 2 |
|
Year 3 |
|
Year 4 |
|
Year 5 |
|
maturity |
|
Total |
Interest-Earning Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale |
|
$ |
89,101 |
|
|
$ |
34,976 |
|
|
$ |
37,400 |
|
$ |
21,440 |
|
$ |
1,464 |
|
$ |
75,580 |
|
$ |
259,961 |
Other investments |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
13,060 |
|
|
13,060 |
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
66,347 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
66,347 |
Federal funds sold |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
30 |
Loans (1) |
|
|
1,146,923 |
|
|
|
185,335 |
|
|
|
262,025 |
|
|
102,801 |
|
|
776 |
|
|
75,455 |
|
|
1,773,315 |
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,518 |
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
1,304,919 |
|
|
$ |
220,311 |
|
|
$ |
299,425 |
|
$ |
124,241 |
|
$ |
2,240 |
|
$ |
164,095 |
|
$ |
2,115,231 |
|
Interest-Bearing
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings, NOW and Money market deposits |
|
$ |
885,862 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
885,862 |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
523,119 |
|
|
|
68,986 |
|
|
|
27,130 |
|
|
20,268 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
642,342 |
Subordinated debentures |
|
|
42,374 |
|
|
|
14,433 |
|
|
|
28,274 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
85,081 |
Other borrowings |
|
|
77,781 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
179,781 |
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
1,529,136 |
|
|
$ |
105,419 |
|
|
$ |
55,404 |
|
$ |
20,268 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
82,839 |
|
$ |
1,793,066 |
|
Interest-sensitivity GAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP by period |
|
$ |
(224,217 |
) |
|
$ |
114,892 |
|
|
$ |
244,021 |
|
$ |
103,973 |
|
$ |
2,240 |
|
$ |
81,256 |
|
$ |
322,165 |
Cumulative GAP |
|
$ |
(224,217 |
) |
|
$ |
(109,325 |
) |
|
$ |
134,696 |
|
$ |
238,669 |
|
$ |
240,909 |
|
$ |
322,165 |
|
$ |
322,165 |
Ratio of interest-earning assets to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
6.13 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1.98 |
|
|
1.18 |
Cumulative GAP as of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Adjusted for the
impact of the interest rate swaps.
33
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of June 30, 2010,
under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), management has
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based
on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2010, to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic SEC filings is
processed, recorded, summarized and reported when required. Disclosure controls
and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports
that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the
issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There were no changes during the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in the Company’s internal
controls that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, those controls.
PART II – OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
Other than the
additional risk factor mentioned below, there are no material changes from the
risk factors set forth under Part I, Item IA. “Risk Factors” in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), was
signed into law by President Obama on July 21, 2010. The Dodd-Frank Act
represents a comprehensive overhaul of the financial services industry within
the United States, establishes the new federal Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection (the “BCFP”), and will require the BCFP and other federal agencies to
implement many new rules. At this time, it is difficult to predict the extent to
which the Dodd-Frank Act or the resulting regulations will impact the Company’s
business. However, compliance with these new laws and regulations will result in
additional costs, which may adversely impact the Company’s results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity, any of which may impact the market
price of the Parent’s common stock.
34
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
Registrant herby
agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, the instruments
defining the rights of holders of each issue of long-term debt of
Registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries. |
|
10.1 |
|
Loan Sale
Agreement dated July 9, 2010 by and between the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, as Receiver for Home National Bank,
Blackwell, Oklahoma and Enterprise Bank & Trust |
|
*31.1 |
|
Chief Executive
Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a). |
|
*31.2 |
|
Chief Financial
Officer’s Certification required by Rule 13(a)-14(a). |
|
**32.1 |
|
Chief Executive
Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
**32.2 |
|
Chief Financial
Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
* Filed herewith
** Furnished
herewith. Notwithstanding any incorporation of this Quarterly Statement on Form
10-Q in any other filing by the Registrant, Exhibits furnished herewith and
designated with two (**) shall not be deemed incorporated by reference to any
other filing unless specifically otherwise set forth herein.
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Clayton, State of Missouri on the day
of August 6, 2010.
|
ENTERPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES
CORP |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Peter F.
Benoist |
|
|
|
Peter F.
Benoist |
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Frank H.
Sanfilippo |
|
|
|
Frank H.
Sanfilippo |
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer |
36