UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

The Macerich Company

April 26, 2019

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Friday, June 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. local time at The Fairmont Miramar Hotel, 101 Wilshire Boulevard, Santa Monica, California 90401.

The accompanying Notice and Proxy Statement contain details concerning the matters to be considered during our Annual Meeting. At our Annual Meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote on the following matters:

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares:

“FOR” the election of the ten director nominees named in our Proxy Statement;

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm; and

“FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in the accompanying Proxy Statement.

We are pleased to again take advantage of the Securities and Exchange Commission rules that allow us to furnish proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. We believe that this e-proxy process expedites stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, while also lowering the costs and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. On or about April 26, 2019, we mailed most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders and authorize their proxies online. All other stockholders will receive these materials by mail. If you only received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, the Notice contains instructions on how you can obtain a paper copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report.

We look forward to seeing you at our Annual Meeting and thank you for your continued support.

Your vote is important.    Whether or not you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your Proxy to ensure your shares are represented and voted at our Annual Meeting. If you attend our Annual Meeting, you may continue to have your shares voted as instructed on your Proxy or you may withdraw your Proxy at the meeting and vote your shares in person.

THE MACERICH COMPANY

401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD

SUITE 700

SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401

NOTICE OF THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 7, 2019

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of The Macerich Company, a Maryland corporation, will be held on Friday, June 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. local time at The Fairmont Miramar Hotel, 101 Wilshire Boulevard, Santa Monica, California 90401, to consider and vote upon:

Action may be taken on the foregoing matters at our Annual Meeting on the date specified above, or on any date or dates to which our Annual Meeting may be postponed or adjourned. Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 25, 2019 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, our Annual Meeting and at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

Your vote is important.    Whether or not you plan to attend our Annual Meeting, we urge you to submit your Proxy to ensure your shares are represented and voted at our Annual Meeting. If you attend our Annual Meeting, you may continue to have your shares voted as instructed on your Proxy or you may revoke your Proxy at our Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person.

Record stockholders may authorize their Proxies:

Beneficial stockholders: If your shares of common stock are held by a bank, broker or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other nominee to instruct how your shares of common stock are to be voted at our Annual Meeting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in our Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting or authorizing a proxy to vote your shares. Page references are supplied to help you find further information in our Proxy Statement.

Our Annual Meeting

		TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m. local time on Friday, June 7, 2019				PLACE: The Fairmont Miramar Hotel 101 Wilshire Boulevard Santa Monica, California				RECORD DATE: Close of business on March 25, 2019

Voting

Each share of our common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each matter to be voted upon at our Annual Meeting.

You may vote or authorize a proxy to vote by any of the following methods:

About Our Annual Meeting (page 1)

We provide answers to many questions about our Annual Meeting, including how to vote your shares, in our Q&A section beginning on page 1 of our Proxy Statement.

Proposals and Board Recommendations

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    i

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Our Business Highlights (page 27)

ii    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Director Nominees (page 5)

Ratification of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (page 64)

We are asking our stockholders to consider and vote upon the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019.

Say-on-Pay Vote (page 65)

With the refinements to our executive compensation program over the past several years, it continues to receive strong support from our Company’s stockholders. At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved our say-on-pay non-binding, advisory vote by approximately 89% of the votes cast.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    iii

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Executive Compensation Program Highlights (page 30)

Our executive compensation program is designed to align our executive compensation with long-term stockholder interests as described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 27.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

WHAT WE DO

WHAT WE DON’T DO

iv    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Corporate Governance Highlights (page 12)

Our Board of Directors is committed to strong corporate governance. Our governance framework is designed to promote the long-term interests of our stockholders and strengthen Board and management accountability.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

WHAT WE DO

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    v

THE MACERICH COMPANY

401 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD

SUITE 700

SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 7, 2019

We are sending you this Proxy Statement in connection with the solicitation of Proxies by our Board of Directors for exercise at our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and at any postponement or adjournment thereof. We are first providing this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy to our stockholders on or about April 26, 2019. Our 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders (“2018 Annual Report”), including financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, is being provided to stockholders concurrently with this Proxy Statement. Our 2018 Annual Report, however, is not part of the proxy solicitation material. We sometimes refer to The Macerich Company as our “Company,” “Macerich,” “we” or “us” and to our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, including any postponement or adjournment thereof, as our “Annual Meeting.”

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be Held on June 7, 2019. The Notice of the 2019 Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and our 2018 Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.

ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

Why did I receive a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of paper copies of the Proxy materials?

This year, we are again using the Securities and Exchange Commission or “SEC” notice and access rule that allows us to furnish our Proxy materials over the Internet to our stockholders instead of mailing paper copies of those materials to each stockholder. This allows us to provide our stockholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. Beginning on or about April 26, 2019, we mailed to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or “Notice” containing instructions on how to access our Proxy materials over the Internet and authorize your Proxy online. This Notice is not a Proxy and cannot be used to vote your shares. If you received only a Notice this year, you will not receive paper copies of the Proxy materials unless you request the materials by following the instructions on the Notice or on the website referred to on the Notice. We mailed to some of our stockholders, including stockholders who have previously requested paper copies of the Proxy materials and some of our stockholders who are participants in our benefit plans, paper copies of the Proxy materials instead of a Notice.

If you own shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, referred to as “Common Stock,” in more than one account—for example, in a joint account with your spouse and in your individual brokerage account—you may have received more than one Notice or more than one set of paper Proxy materials. To vote all of your shares by Proxy, please follow each of the separate Proxy voting instructions that you received for your shares of Common Stock held in each of your different accounts.

When and where is our Annual Meeting?

Our Annual Meeting will be held on Friday, June 7, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. local time at The Fairmont Miramar Hotel, 101 Wilshire Boulevard, Santa Monica, California 90401.

What is the purpose of our Annual Meeting?

At our Annual Meeting, our stockholders will consider and vote on the following matters:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    1

ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

In addition, our stockholders will transact any other business that properly comes before our Annual Meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. Management will also respond to appropriate questions from our stockholders.

Who is entitled to vote?

Only holders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on the record date, March 25, 2019, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, our Annual Meeting. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held by them on each matter to be voted upon. Our Common Stock is our only class of securities entitled to vote at our Annual Meeting. Under applicable law and our charter, a stockholder is not entitled to cumulative voting rights in the election of our directors.

Who is entitled to attend our Annual Meeting?

All of our stockholders of record as of the close of business on the record date, or their duly appointed Proxy holders, may attend our Annual Meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you should provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the record date, such as an account statement reflecting your stock ownership as of the record date, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. If you do not have proof of ownership, you may not be admitted to our Annual Meeting. Each stockholder and Proxy holder may be asked to present a valid government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license or passport, before being admitted. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted, and attendees may be subject to security inspections and other security precautions.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence, in person or by Proxy, of holders entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at our Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at our Annual Meeting. As of the record date, 141,233,771 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to be voted by the holders thereof. Abstentions and broker non-votes will count toward the presence of a quorum. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial owner returns a properly executed Proxy but does not cast a vote with respect to a particular proposal because the broker does not have discretionary voting power with respect to that matter and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner.

How do I vote?

Voting in Person at our Annual Meeting.    If you are a stockholder of record as of the close of business on the record date and attend our Annual Meeting, you may vote in person. If your shares of Common Stock are held in street name and you wish to vote in person at our Annual Meeting, you will need to obtain and present prior to voting at our Annual Meeting a “legal proxy” from the broker, bank or other nominee through which your shares of Common Stock are held of record. Obtaining a legal proxy usually takes several days.

Voting by Proxy for Shares Registered Directly in the Name of the Stockholder.    If you hold your shares of Common Stock in your own name as a holder of record with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you may instruct the Proxy holders how to vote your shares of Common Stock in one of the following ways:

2    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

Voting by Proxy for Shares Held in Street Name.    If your shares of Common Stock are held in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee that you must follow in order to instruct how your shares of Common Stock are to be voted at our Annual Meeting.

What if I sign and return a Proxy by mail or authorize my Proxy by telephone or the Internet but do not specify how I wish to vote my shares?

If you sign and return a Proxy or authorize your Proxy by telephone or the Internet but do not specify how your shares will be voted on one or more matters listed in the Notice of our Annual Meeting, the shares will be voted with respect to such matters as follows:

FOR the election of each of the ten nominees for director named in this Proxy Statement;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019; and

FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

The holders of the Proxy will also have authority to vote in their discretion on any other matter that may be properly brought before our Annual Meeting or that may be incidental to the conduct of the meeting.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Proxy?

If you own shares of our Common Stock in more than one account—for example, in a joint account with your spouse and in your individual brokerage account—you may have received more than one Notice or set of Proxy materials. To ensure that all of your shares are voted, please follow each of the separate Proxy voting instructions that you received for your shares of Common Stock held in each of your different accounts.

Will other matters be voted on at our Annual Meeting?

It is not anticipated that any matter, other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement, will be presented at our Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly presented, Proxies will be voted by the Proxy holders in their discretion. Stockholder votes will be tabulated by the person appointed to act as inspector of election for our Annual Meeting.

May I change my vote or revoke my Proxy after I return my Proxy?

If you are a stockholder of record as of the record date, you may change your vote or revoke your Proxy before it has been voted at our Annual Meeting by:

Any stockholder of record as of the record date attending our Annual Meeting may vote in person whether or not a Proxy has been previously given, but the presence (without further action) of a stockholder at our Annual Meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given Proxy.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    3

ABOUT OUR ANNUAL MEETING

For shares of Common Stock you hold in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee giving you the right to vote your shares at our Annual Meeting, by appearing in person and voting at our Annual Meeting.

What are our Board of Directors’ recommendations?

Unless you give other instructions on your Proxy, the persons named as Proxy holders on the Proxy will vote a properly given Proxy in accordance with the recommendations of our Board of Directors. Our Board’s recommendations together with the description of each matter, are set forth in this Proxy Statement. In summary, our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

FOR the election of each of the ten director nominees named in this Proxy Statement;

FOR the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019; and

FOR the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers.

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before our Annual Meeting, the Proxy holders will vote on such matter in their discretion.

What vote is required to approve each matter?

Assuming the presence of a quorum, the affirmative vote of a majority of all of the votes cast on the matter at our Annual Meeting in person or by Proxy is required by our charter and/or Bylaws for the election of each director nominee, the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm and the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. For purposes of these proposals, abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will not be counted as votes cast and therefore will have no effect on the outcome of any of these proposals.

The proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers is advisory only and is not binding on our Company or our Board. Our Board values the opinion of our stockholders and our Board, or an appropriate committee of our Board, will consider the outcome of the vote on this proposal in considering what action, if any, should be taken in response to the advisory vote by stockholders.

The proposal to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is considered a routine item under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards. Accordingly, if your shares are held in street name and you do not submit voting instructions to your broker, your broker may exercise its discretion to vote your shares on this proposal. If your broker exercises this discretion, your shares will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at our Annual Meeting and will be voted in the manner directed by your broker on the proposal to ratify KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, but your shares will constitute broker non-votes on each of the other proposals at our Annual Meeting.

4    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Introduction: How Our Board Composition is Aligned with our Strategy

We have a long-term, four-pronged business strategy that focuses on the acquisition, leasing and management, redevelopment and development of regional malls and shopping centers that fit specified criteria. We believe that our business requires specialized skills across a broad array of disciplines for effective and profitable operations. Our Board of Directors consists of a highly experienced group of business leaders who share our values, oversee and support our strategy and reflect our culture. Many of our directors have served as executive officers or on boards and board committees of major companies and have an extensive understanding of the principles of corporate governance. Our nominees have experience in the following fields that are relevant to our Company, business, industry and strategies:

Under our Bylaws, our Board of Directors determines the number of our directors, provided that the number shall never be less than the minimum required by the Maryland General Corporation Law, which is one, nor more than twelve. Our Board of Directors currently consists of ten directors. The present term of our ten director nominees will expire at our Annual Meeting. Our director nominees, if elected at our Annual Meeting, will serve until our annual meeting of stockholders in 2020 and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualify.

Our Board of Directors, based on the recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has nominated the following individuals to serve as directors of our Company:

Each of our director nominees was previously elected to serve on our Board by our stockholders. Each of our director nominees is currently serving as a director and has consented to be nominated and to serve if elected. However, if any nominee becomes unable or unwilling for good cause to serve as a director if elected, the Proxy holders may vote for another person nominated by our Board of Directors.

Our Board of Directors will consider a nominee for election to our Board recommended by a stockholder of record if the stockholder submits a written notice regarding such recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee c/o our Secretary in the manner described under the heading “Our Board of Directors and its Committees—Director Selection Process.”

Our charter and Bylaws provide that our directors are required to be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of all the votes cast on the matter in person or by Proxy at our Annual Meeting at which a quorum is present. Our Guidelines on Corporate Governance further provide that any incumbent director who fails to receive the required vote for re-election must offer to resign from our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make a recommendation to our Board on whether to accept or reject the offer to

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    5

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

resign. Our Board will then act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision within 90 days after the date of the certification of the election results. If the offer to resign is not accepted, the director will continue to serve until the next annual meeting and until the director’s successor is elected and qualifies. If the offer to resign is accepted, then our Board, in its sole discretion, may fill any resulting vacancy or may decrease the size of our Board pursuant to our charter and Bylaws. The director whose offer to resign is under consideration will not participate in our Board’s decision regarding whether to accept or reject such director’s offer to resign.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES. PROXIES RECEIVED WILL BE VOTED “FOR” EACH OF OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES UNLESS STOCKHOLDERS SPECIFY OTHERWISE IN THE PROXY.

INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Our Board seeks a mix of backgrounds and experience among its members and does not follow any ratio or formula to determine the appropriate mix. Rather, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee uses its judgment to identify nominees whose viewpoints, backgrounds, experience and other demographics, taken as a whole, contribute to the high standards of Board service on our Board. The following provides certain biographical information with respect to our nominees for director as well as the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board to conclude that each director should serve as a member of our Board of Directors. Each director has served continuously since elected.

6    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Peggy Alford

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2018

Age: 48

Board Committees: Audit (Chair)

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

As of March 1, 2019, Ms. Alford rejoined PayPal as their Senior Vice President of Core Markets leading commercial teams in the largest and most established markets, including North America, UK, Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Australia. From September 2017 to February 2019, Ms. Alford was the Chief Financial Officer and Head of Operations for the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, a philanthropic organization that brings together world-class engineering, grant-making, impact investing, policy and advocacy work, with oversight of finance, real estate, facilities and general operations. Prior to joining the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative in September 2017, Ms. Alford held a variety of senior positions at PayPal from May 2011 to August 2017, including Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Americas, Global Customer and Global Credit, where she was responsible for all finance and analytics for PayPal’s Global Merchant and Global Consumer Business Units, its Global Credit business, and its North America and Latin America regions. She also served as PayPal’s Senior Vice President of Human Resources, People Operations and Global Head of Cross Border Trade. From 2007 to 2011, Ms. Alford was President and General Manager of Rent.com (an eBay Inc. company), also serving as its Chief Financial Officer from October 2005 to March 2009. From 2002 to 2005 she served as Marketplace Controller and Director of Accounting Policy, leading accounting policy at eBay Inc. where she was instrumental in creating eBay marketplace controller’s group ensuring the financial integrity of eBay transactions. Ms. Alford started her career at Arthur Andersen LLP in 1993 as an auditor and business consultant in such industries as technology, consumer products, manufacturing, government and education. Ms. Alford earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and Business Administration from the University of Dayton and is a certified public accountant. In July 2018, Ms. Alford was elected to the board of directors of Social Finance Inc., a private company which provides student loan refinancing services, and serves on its audit committee.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Ms. Alford’s wide-ranging financial and operational experience, technology and omnichannel knowledge and significant experience leading complex businesses are invaluable to our Board. Her fresh perspectives and contributions to our Company are also informed by Ms. Alford’s strong digital expertise and track record of driving growth and innovation through data analytics, areas which have become increasingly critical to our business. In addition to her strong managerial and operational background, Ms. Alford brings deep financial expertise to our Board, based on which she serves as our Audit Committee chairperson and has been determined by our Board to be an audit committee financial expert.

John H. Alschuler

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2015

Age: 71

Board Committees: Audit; Nominating and Corporate Governance

Other Public Company Boards: SL Green Realty Corporation; Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc.

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Since 2008, Mr. Alschuler has been the Chairman of HR&A Advisors Inc., an economic development, real estate and public policy consulting organization. Mr. Alschuler also is an Adjunct Associate Professor at Columbia University, where he teaches real estate development at the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation. Mr. Alschuler currently serves on the board of directors of SL Green Realty Corporation and Xenia Hotels and Resorts, Inc., both of which are publicly traded REITs. Mr. Alschuler also serves on the board of directors of the Center for an Urban Future, a Section 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization, and Friends of the High Line Inc., a Section 501(c)(3) tax exempt organization.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Mr. Alschuler’s achievements in academia and business, as well as his extensive knowledge of commercial real estate and national and international markets for real estate, and his expertise in inter-governmental relations, allow him to assess the real estate market and our Company’s business from a knowledgeable and informed perspective. His experience on boards of other public and private companies further enhances his range of knowledge.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    7

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Eric K. Brandt

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2018

Age: 56

Board Committees: Compensation

Other Public Company Boards: Altaba, Inc.; Dentsply Sirona Inc.; Lam Research Corporation

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Mr. Brandt served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Broadcom Corporation, a global supplier of semiconductor devices, from February 2010 to February 2016, and served as Broadcom’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from March 2007 to February 2010. From September 2005 until March 2007, Mr. Brandt served as President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Beginning in 1999, he held various positions at Allergan, Inc., a global specialty pharmaceutical company, including Executive Vice President of Finance and Technical Operations and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Allergan, Mr. Brandt spent ten years with The Boston Consulting Group, a privately held global business consulting firm. In January 2017, Mr. Brandt was elected chairman of the board of Altaba Inc. (formerly Yahoo Inc.) after serving as a member of the board since March 2016 and serves as chair of its audit and nominating and corporate governance committees and as a member of its compensation committee. Mr. Brandt is also chairman of the board and a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee of Dentsply Sirona Inc., a dental products company. He is also a member of the board of directors of Lam Research Corporation, a wafer fabrication equipment company, serving as its audit committee chair. Mr. Brandt currently serves as a member of the Georgia Tech President’s Advisory Board.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Mr. Brandt’s experience as a chief executive and chief financial officer across the financial services, technology and healthcare industries gives him a broad understanding of the operational, financial and strategic matters facing our Company. In these roles, Mr. Brandt gained extensive expertise in leadership, management, financing and business strategies, which as a recent Board member, allows him to provide a valuable perspective on our Company’s opportunities and operations.

Edward C. Coppola

Director Nominee

Director Since: 1994

Age: 64

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Mr. E. Coppola was elected our President in September 2008. In partnership with our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. E. Coppola oversees the strategic direction of our Company. He has broad oversight over our Company’s financial and investment strategies, including our Company’s key lender and investor relationships. He also oversees our acquisitions and dispositions, department store relationships and development/redevelopment projects. Mr. E. Coppola was previously an Executive Vice President from our formation through September 2004 and was our Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer from October 2004 until his election as President. He has over 40 years of shopping center experience with The Macerich Group and our Company and is one of our founders. From March 16, 2006 to February 2, 2009, Mr. E. Coppola was a member of the board of directors of Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a publicly traded REIT which owns and manages high end hotels and resorts. Mr. E. Coppola is also an attorney.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Mr. E. Coppola has deep relationships and experience in our industry and in the retail and shopping center landscape. As President, Mr. E. Coppola provides our Board with important information about the overall conduct of our Company’s business and valuable knowledge and perspective regarding our operations, plans and direction. Our Board appreciates his long history and experience in the shopping center industry as well as his expertise with respect to strategic and investment planning, finance, capital markets, acquisition, disposition and development matters.

8    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Steven R. Hash

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2015

Age: 54

Board Committees: Executive (Chair)

Other Public Company Boards: Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Mr. Hash is the President and Chief Operating Officer of Renaissance Macro Research, LLC, an equity research and trading firm focused on macro research in the investment strategy, economics and Washington policy sectors, which he co-founded in 2012. Mr. Hash is a member of the board of directors of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., a publicly traded REIT, where he serves as the lead independent director, chair of the compensation committee and is a member of the audit committee. Mr. Hash is also a member of the board of directors of Nuveen Global Cities REIT, Inc., a non-traded REIT and serves as the lead independent director and a member of the audit committee. Between 1993 and 2012, Mr. Hash held various leadership positions with Lehman Brothers (and its successor, Barclays Capital), including Global Head of Real Estate Investment Banking from 2006 to 2012, Chief Operating Officer of Global Investment Banking from 2008 to 2011, Director of Global Equity Research from 2003 to 2006, Director of U.S. Equity Research from 1999 to 2003, and Senior Equity Research Analyst from 1993 to 1999 covering the Real Estate Investment Trusts sector. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Hash held various positions with Oppenheimer & Company’s Equity Research Department, including senior research analyst. He began his career in 1988 as an auditor for the accounting and consulting firm of Arthur Andersen & Co.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Mr. Hash serves as our Chairman of the Board and brings extensive knowledge of real estate investment strategy and economic trends through years of real estate industry research and investment banking both domestically and internationally. In addition to important insights into the equity and capital markets and investor perspectives, he has valuable experience in accounting and financial reporting based upon his years as an auditor and senior equity research analyst. He also has important corporate governance and board leadership expertise, as well as human capital management and talent development knowledge through his positions at other publicly traded companies and at our Company.

Daniel J. Hirsch

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2018

Age: 45

Board Committees: Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance

Other Public Company Boards: Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V.

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Mr. Hirsch is a consultant to Farallon Capital Management, L.L.C. (“FCM”), an investment firm that manages capital on behalf of institutions and individuals, where he has served as a board designee with respect to FCM’s investment in Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. (“Playa”), since January 2017. Previously, from 2003 to December 2016, Mr. Hirsch held several senior positions at FCM, including Managing Member of the Real Estate Group from 2009 to December 2016, Managing Director from 2007 to 2008 and Legal Counsel from 2003 to 2006. Prior to joining FCM, Mr. Hirsch worked as an associate in the San Francisco office of the law firm Covington & Burling, from 2001 to 2003. He has served as a director of Playa since 2010 and is currently the chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Mr. Hirsch graduated from Yale Law School with a J.D., and summa cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in Law, Jurisprudence and Social Thought from Amherst College.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Mr. Hirsch’s knowledge of the capital markets, real estate sector, and investment experience makes him a valuable member of our Board. In addition, Mr. Hirsch’s substantive public company board experience as a member of Playa’s board, in particular as chair of the compensation committee, brings valuable experience to our Board deliberations.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    9

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Diana M. Laing

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2003

Age: 64

Board Committees: Nominating and Corporate Governance

Other Public Company Boards: Spirit Realty Capital, Inc.; CareTrust REIT, Inc.

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Ms. Laing currently serves as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc., Hawaii’s leading owner and operator of grocery and drug store-anchored retail centers. From May 2014 to June 2018, Ms. Laing served as Chief Financial Officer of American Homes 4 Rent, a publicly traded REIT focused on the acquisition, renovation, leasing and operation of single-family homes as rental properties. From May 2004 until its merger with Parkway Properties of Orlando, Florida in December 2013, Ms. Laing was the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Thomas Properties Group, Inc., a publicly traded real estate operating company and institutional investment manager focused on the development, acquisition, operation and ownership of commercial properties throughout the United States. She was responsible for financial reporting, capital markets transactions and investor relations. Ms. Laing served as Chief Financial Officer of each of Triple Net Properties, LLC from January through April 2004, New Pacific Realty Corporation from December 2001 to December 2003, and Firstsource Corp. from July 2000 to May 2001. From August 1996 to July 2000, Ms. Laing was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Arden Realty, Inc., a publicly traded REIT which was the largest owner and operator of commercial office properties in Southern California. From 1982 to August 1996, she served in various capacities, including Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Southwest Property Trust, Inc., a publicly traded multi-family REIT which owned multi-family properties throughout the southwestern United States. Ms. Laing began her career as an auditor with Arthur Andersen & Co. Ms. Laing is a member of the board of directors of Spirit Capital, Inc., a publicly traded REIT, where she serves as chair of its audit committee. In January 2019, Ms. Laing was elected to the board of directors of CareTrust REIT, Inc. and serves on its audit and compensation committees. She also is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma State University Foundation.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Our Board believes Ms. Laing’s over 35 years of real estate industry experience, with her particular expertise in finance, capital markets, strategic planning, budgeting and financial reporting, make her a valuable member of our Board. This financial and real estate experience is supplemented by her substantive public company and REIT experience, which enhances her understanding of the issues facing our Company and industry.

Thomas E. O’Hern

Director Nominee

Director Since: 2018

Age: 63

Board Committees: Executive

Other Public Company Boards: Douglas Emmett, Inc.

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

On January 1, 2019, Mr. O’Hern became our Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for the strategic direction and overall management of our Company. Mr. O’Hern became one of our Senior Executive Vice Presidents in September 2008 and was our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from July 1994 until his election as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. O’Hern was an Executive Vice President from December 1998 through September 2008 and served as a Senior Vice President from March 1993 to December 1998. From our formation to July 1994, he served as Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. From November 1984 to March 1993, Mr. O’Hern was a Chief Financial Officer at various real estate development companies. He was also a certified public accountant with Arthur Andersen & Co. and he was with that firm from 1978 through 1984. Mr. O’Hern is a member of the board of directors, the audit committee chairman and a member of the compensation committee of Douglas Emmett, Inc., a publicly traded REIT. Mr. O’Hern also serves on The USC Marshall School of Business Board of Leaders and on the board of trustees of the Torrance Memorial Medical Center Foundation.

10    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

As our Chief Executive Officer and long-time Chief Financial Officer, our Board values Mr. O’Hern’s many years of leadership, senior executive expertise and strategic direction. His knowledge of our Company and the REIT industry, tax matters and complex joint venture structuring, expertise in both debt and equity in the capital markets, the financial and operational elements of our Company’s business, as well as his extensive relationships with key stakeholders, including partners, lenders, stockholder advisors and tenants, will continue to provide our Board with critical information to oversee and direct the management of our Company. In addition, his many years of experience on the board of Douglas Emmett, Inc. and his role as audit committee chairman will continue to serve him well on our Board.

Steven L. Soboroff

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2014

Age: 70

Board Committees: Audit; Compensation; Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Steve Soboroff is the managing partner of Soboroff Partners, a shopping center development and leasing company, and has served in such capacity since 1978. In September 2017, Mr. Soboroff was selected to serve a second two-year term as President of the Los Angeles Police Commission. In August 2013, Mr. Soboroff was appointed to the Board of Police Commissioners by Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti and was chosen as the Commission’s President by his fellow commissioners. After serving the maximum of two consecutive years as President, he then served as the Commission’s Vice President from September 2015 to September 2017. During 2001 to 2010, he served in the roles of Chairman and CEO as well as President of Playa Vista, one of the country’s most significant multi-use real estate projects. Mr. Soboroff also was President of the Los Angeles Recreation and Parks Commission from 1995 to 2001 and a member of the Los Angeles Harbor Commission. In addition, Mr. Soboroff is a board member of several non-profit philanthropic and academic organizations.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

Mr. Soboroff is a well-recognized business and government leader with a distinguished record of public and private accomplishments. Mr. Soboroff contributes to the mix of experience and qualifications of our Board through both his real estate and government experience and leadership. During his career in both the public and private sectors, Mr. Soboroff acquired significant financial, real estate, managerial, and public policy knowledge as well as substantial business and government relationships. Our Board values his extensive real estate knowledge and insight into retail operations, developments and strategy, and his wealth of government relations experience.

Andrea M. Stephen

Independent Director Nominee

Director Since: 2013

Age: 54

Board Committees: Compensation (Chair); Executive

Other Public Company Boards: First Capital Realty, Inc.; Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust; Slate Retail Real Estate Investment Trust

Principal Occupation and Business Experience:

Ms. Stephen served as Executive Vice President, Investments for The Cadillac Fairview Corporation Limited (“Cadillac Fairview”), one of North America’s largest real estate companies, from October 2002 to December 2011 and as Senior Vice President, Investments for Cadillac Fairview from May 2000 to October 2002, where she was responsible for developing and executing Cadillac Fairview’s investment strategy. Prior to joining Cadillac Fairview, Ms. Stephen held the position of Director, Real Estate with the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board, the largest single profession pension plan in Canada, from December 1999 to May 2000, as well as various portfolio manager positions from September 1995 to December 1999. Previously, Ms. Stephen served as Director, Financial Reporting for Bramalea Centres Inc. for approximately two years and as an Audit Manager for KPMG LLP at the end of her over six year tenure. Ms. Stephen is a member of the board of directors of First Capital Realty Inc., Canada’s leading owner, developer and operator of supermarket and drugstore anchored neighborhood and community shopping centers, serving on the audit committee, compensation committee, governance

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    11

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

committee and the executive committee. She is also a member of the board of trustees, serving on the audit committee, of Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust, Canada’s leading owner and operator of multifamily communities. In June 2017, Ms. Stephen was elected to the board of trustees of Slate Retail Real Estate Investment Trust and serves on its audit, compensation and investment committees. Ms. Stephen also previously served on the board of directors of Multiplan Empreendimentos Imobiliários, S.A., a Brazilian real estate operating company, from June 2006 to March 2012.

Key Qualifications, Experience and Attributes:

With over 25 years in the real estate industry and extensive transactional and management experience, Ms. Stephen has a broad understanding of the operational, financial and strategic issues facing real estate companies. She brings management expertise, leadership capabilities, financial knowledge and business acumen to our Board. Her significant international investment experience also provides a global perspective as well as international relationships. In addition, her service on various boards provides valuable insight and makes her an important contributor to our Board.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND ITS COMMITTEES

12    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Board Committee Memberships

During 2018, our Board had standing Audit, Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Executive Committees. The current members of our committees, the principal functions of each committee and the number of meetings held in 2018 are shown below. All members attended each meeting of their respective committees on which he or she served during 2018.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    13

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Enhancements

As part of our Board’s ongoing commitment to governance best practices, our Board has recently adopted two notable corporate governance enhancements:

First, our Board enacted a resolution prohibiting the Company from unilaterally electing to be subject to the provisions of Subtitle 8 of the Maryland General Corporation Law (often referred to as the Maryland Unsolicited Takeovers Act (“MUTA”)). MUTA permits a Maryland corporation with a class of equity securities registered under the Exchange Act and at least three independent directors to elect, notwithstanding any contrary provision in the charter or bylaws, to be subject to any or all of the following five provisions:

Pursuant to the Board’s resolution, the Company is prohibited from electing to be subject to any of the foregoing provisions, and such prohibition may not be repealed unless a proposal to repeal such prohibition with respect to any such section is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the matter by stockholders of the Company.

Second, our Board amended our Bylaws to enhance stockholders’ right to amend our Bylaws by allowing any stockholder to propose amendments to the Bylaws and removing the previous requirement that stockholders meet certain ownership thresholds to submit such a proposal. As a result, stockholders may amend the Company’s Bylaws by the affirmative vote of a majority of all votes entitled to be cast on the matter pursuant to a proposal submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders by any stockholder, following applicable notice requirements.

Related Party Transaction Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee administers our written Related Party Transaction Policies and Procedures. These policies are designed to assist with the proper identification, review and disclosure of related party transactions and apply generally to any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which our Company or an affiliate is a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and a related party has a direct or indirect material interest. A related party generally includes any person who is, or was in the last fiscal year, a director, director nominee, executive officer, stockholder of more than 5% of our Common Stock, an immediate family member of any of the foregoing, or an entity in which one of the foregoing serves as an executive officer, general partner, principal or has a 10% or greater beneficial interest to the extent such information is provided to our Company or is otherwise publicly available. Under the policies and procedures, transactions that fall within this definition will be reported to our Chief Legal Officer or Chief Financial Officer and referred to the Audit Committee for approval, ratification or other action. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances, including the related party’s interest, the amount involved in the transaction, and whether the transaction has terms no less favorable than those generally available from an unrelated third party. The Audit Committee will approve or ratify such transaction if it determines, in good faith, that under all of the circumstances the transaction is fair to our Company. In addition, any related party transaction previously approved by the Audit Committee or otherwise already existing that is ongoing in nature will be reviewed by the Audit Committee annually to ensure that such transaction has been conducted in accordance with the previous approval granted by the Audit Committee, if any, and remains appropriate.

Risk Oversight

One of the principal functions of our Board of Directors is to provide oversight concerning our Company’s assessment and management of risk related to our business. Our Board of Directors is involved in risk oversight through direct decision-making authority with respect

14    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

to fundamental financial and business strategies and major corporate activities, as well as through its oversight of management and the committees of our Board. Management is responsible for identifying the material risks facing our Company, implementing appropriate risk management strategies and ensuring that information with respect to material risks is shared with our Board and/or the appropriate Board committee. In connection with this responsibility, members of management provide regular reports to our Board regarding business operations and strategic planning, financial planning and budgeting, and material litigation and regulations, including any material risk to our Company relating to such matters. Our Board of Directors believes that the processes it has established to administer our Board’s risk oversight function would be effective under a variety of leadership frameworks and therefore these processes do not have any material effect on our Company’s leadership structure described under the heading “Board Leadership Structure” below.

Our Board has delegated oversight for specific areas of risk exposure to our Board committees as follows:

At each regular meeting of our Board of Directors, the chairperson of each committee reports to the full Board regarding the matters reported and discussed at any committee meetings, including any risk exposure and risk management policies with respect to such matters. Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Legal Officer and/or Chief Financial Officer regularly attend meetings of our committees when they are not in executive session. In addition, our directors are free to communicate directly with members of management and our committee charters provide that our committee members may retain outside advisors at our Company’s expense.

Compensation Risk Assessment.    We believe that our compensation programs do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking that could have a material adverse effect on our Company. The Compensation Committee considers, in establishing and reviewing our executive compensation program, whether the program encourages unnecessary or excessive risk taking and has concluded that it does not. Base salaries are fixed in amount and thus do not encourage risk taking. While our annual incentive compensation program focuses on short-term or annual performance, our executives’ annual bonuses are determined based on the Compensation Committee’s consideration of a variety of corporate and individual performance factors as described below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” Therefore, the Compensation Committee believes that the annual bonus program appropriately balances risk and the desire to focus executives on short-term goals important to our success and that it does not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

A significant portion of the compensation provided to our named executive officers is in the form of equity awards that further align executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that these awards do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking since the ultimate value of the awards is tied to our stock price, and since a large percentage of our grants are subject to vesting schedules to help ensure that executives always have significant value tied to our long-term stock price performance. As described in our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” an important component of our executive compensation program is to grant executives performance-based LTIP Unit awards that vest based on the percentile ranking of our total stockholder return as compared to our peer REITs over the applicable performance period. The Compensation Committee believes these awards as well as our other LTIP Unit awards provide additional incentives for executives to create value for our stockholders and, together with the executives’ equity ownership in our Company pursuant to our Stock Ownership Policies as described below, help further link their interests with those of our stockholders.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    15

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Additional Compensation Committee Matters.    The Compensation Committee charter provides that the Compensation Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of any compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other adviser as it deems necessary to assist in the evaluation of director or executive officer compensation and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such compensation consultant, independent legal counsel or other adviser. The Compensation Committee periodically engages independent compensation consultants to assist in the development and review of our director and executive officer compensation programs, including evolving compensation trends and market survey data. The Compensation Committee retains Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), a nationally recognized independent compensation consulting firm to advise on the design and competitive positioning of our executive and non-employee director compensation programs and make recommendations for change, as appropriate. The Compensation Committee considered the independence of FW Cook and determined that its engagement of FW Cook does not raise any conflicts of interest with our Company or any of our directors or executive officers. FW Cook provides no other consulting services to our Company, our executive officers or directors.

Mr. O’Hern generally attended the Compensation Committee meetings in 2018 (excluding any executive sessions) and provided his analysis and recommendations with respect to our executive compensation program, including the compensation for our other executive officers. While Mr. O’Hern’s input is viewed by the Compensation Committee as an integral and vital part of the compensation process, the Compensation Committee is solely responsible for making the final decision regarding the form and amount of compensation for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee may also form and delegate authority to subcommittees, when appropriate, and each subcommittee to consist only of independent directors. No such subcommittee has been formed to date.

Director Selection Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee periodically assesses the appropriate size of our Board of Directors, and whether any vacancies are expected due to retirement or otherwise. In the event that vacancies are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers various potential candidates for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee through current Board members, officers, professional search firms or other persons. These candidates are evaluated at regular or special meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and may be considered at any point during the year. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also may review materials provided by professional search firms or other parties in connection with a nominee. In evaluating such nominations, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience and capability on our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will make the final recommendations of candidates to our Board for nomination.

Our Board of Directors has a policy that stockholders may recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for election at an annual meeting of stockholders by submitting the names and qualifications of such persons in writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o our Secretary, no later than the December 1 prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders, together with information about the stockholder and the candidate otherwise required for director nominations by a stockholder pursuant to Section 1.11 of our Bylaws, a copy of which will be made available upon request. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may request additional information concerning such director candidate as it deems reasonably required to determine the eligibility and qualification of the director candidate to serve as a member of our Board.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board of Directors will consider all persons properly recommended as a nominee for election to our Board in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not apply any specific, minimum qualifications in considering a director candidate and does not impose additional qualifications on stockholder-recommended potential nominees. Instead, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the candidates taking into account the current Board membership and considers a variety of factors, including the specific needs of our Company and our Board, the experience, skills, areas of expertise, independence, productivity, length of service, occupational and other responsibilities (including other public company board memberships and committee memberships) of the candidates, and such other factors as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may determine are appropriate for review. This process is described in our Guidelines on Corporate Governance which is available at www.macerich.com under “Investors—Corporate Governance.” The information contained on, or available through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement. Stockholders who wish to nominate a person for election as a director in connection with an annual meeting of stockholders (as opposed to making a recommendation to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as described above) must deliver written notice to our Secretary in the manner described in Section 1.11 of our current Bylaws and within the time periods set forth herein under the heading “Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominees.”

16    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our Company’s stockholders also possess the right to nominate candidates for election to our Board through the “proxy access” provisions of our Company’s Bylaws, pursuant to which an eligible stockholder, or a qualifying group of up to 20 stockholders, owning at least 3% of our outstanding shares of Common Stock continuously for at least three years, may nominate up to the greater of two directors or the largest whole number that does not exceed 20% of the number of directors then serving on our Board, for inclusion in our proxy materials, subject to complying with the requirements contained in Section 1.13 of our Bylaws.

Diversity.    Although our Company does not have a formal policy for the consideration of diversity in identifying nominees for director, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recognizes the benefits associated with a diverse Board and strives to create diversity in our Board as a whole when identifying and selecting nominees. Thirty percent of our Board’s nominees at our Annual Meeting are female and beyond gender diversity, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes a broad conception of diversity, including diversity of professional experience, background, skills, areas of expertise and perspective. These factors, the additional factors described above under “Director Selection Process” and others that are considered useful by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are reviewed in terms of assessing the perceived needs of our Board at any particular point in time. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee focuses on having a Board which collectively possesses a broad range of talent, skill, expertise and experience useful to the effective oversight of our Company’s business and affairs. On an annual basis, as part of our Board’s self-evaluation, our Board assesses whether the overall mix of our Board members is appropriate for our Company.

Board Leadership Structure

Steven R. Hash, previously our Lead Independent Director, was appointed to serve as Independent Chairman of the Board in June 2018 in connection with Mr. A. Coppola’s retirement as Chairman and as a member of our Board effective as of our 2018 Annual Meeting. As Independent Chairman of the Board, Mr. Hash, continues to perform the functions previously discharged in his role as Lead Director and assumed the duties of Chairman of the Board. Our Independent Chairman actively manages our Board by: working with the CEO, other directors and our management team to set the agenda for our Board meetings; presiding over all meetings of our Board meetings and executive sessions of the independent directors; serving as the principal liaison on all Board issues; and other customary duties. The Independent Chairman serves as an information resource for the independent directors and acts as a liaison between directors, committee chairs and management. Our Board believes this structure continues to ensure strong, independent oversight and leadership. The independent directors meet in separate executive sessions after each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The independent directors met six times in 2018.

Our Guidelines on Corporate Governance provide that our Board is free to combine or separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and CEO in any way that our Board considers is best for our Company. Our Board recognizes that no single leadership model is correct at all times and that, depending on the circumstances, another leadership model might be appropriate. Our Board, therefore, believes that it should have the flexibility to decide whether it is best for our Company at any point in time to combine or separate the roles of CEO and Chairman of the Board.

Annual Board, Committee and Director Evaluations

Pursuant to our Guidelines on Corporate Governance and the charter of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluation of the performance of our Board and its committees in order to assess the overall effectiveness of our Board and its committees. The results of the assessment are reported by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee directly to, and are discussed with, our Board following the end of each fiscal year. The evaluation process is designed to facilitate ongoing, systematic examination of our Board’s effectiveness and accountability, and to identify opportunities for improving its operations and procedures.

In 2018, in accordance with the requirements of the NYSE listing standards, our Board completed an evaluation process focusing on the effectiveness of the performance of our Board. Our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees each conducted a separate evaluation of its own performance and of the adequacy of its charter and reported to our Board on the results of its evaluation. In addition to our Board and committee self-evaluations, our Independent Chairman meets throughout the year as necessary with directors individually.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    17

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Succession Planning

Our Board is focused on ensuring that we have a high-performing management team. Our Board, acting through our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, reviews management development and succession planning at least annually to ensure continuity in our Company’s management, including policies and principles for named executive officer selection. This plan, on which each named executive officer reports his recommendations, addresses both emergency succession and succession in the ordinary course of business. In addition, high-potential leaders are given exposure and visibility to Board members through formal presentations at Board and committee meetings, as well as through informal events, such as dinners, lunches and site visits.

Attendance at Stockholders’ Meetings

Our Board does not require director attendance at our stockholders’ meetings because our stock is predominately held by institutional stockholders and attendance is traditionally light. Our Board encourages directors in the Santa Monica area at the time of the stockholders’ meeting to attend the meeting. Mr. O’Hern and two of our executive officers attended our 2018 annual stockholders’ meeting.

Codes of Ethics

Our Company expects that all of our directors, officers and employees maintain a high level of integrity in their dealings with and on behalf of our Company and will act in the best interests of our Company. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics provides principles of conduct and ethics for our directors, officers and employees. This Code complies with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and the NYSE listing standards. In addition, our Company adopted a Code of Ethics for our CEO and senior financial officers which supplements our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees and complies with the additional requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and applicable SEC rules. To the extent required by applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, we intend to promptly disclose future amendments to certain provisions of these Codes or waivers of such provisions granted to directors and executive officers, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions, on our website at www.macerich.com under “Investors—Corporate Governance—Code of Ethics.” Each of these Codes of Conduct is available on our website at www.macerich.com under “Investors—Corporate Governance.” The information contained on, or available through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

18    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Stockholder Engagement

It is a priority of our Company and Board to maintain open communication with our stockholders. Our Company and Board are committed to regularly engaging with our stockholders on our Company’s strategic direction, performance, governance practices, compensation programs and other key matters. Both management and our Board believe that this is best done through ongoing dialogue with stockholders, including soliciting feedback and suggestions from our stockholders to strengthen the long-term prospects of our Company. This is an ongoing activity, not a check-the-box exercise.

During 2018, members of our Board and management met, either telephonically or in-person with stockholders representing a substantial majority of our outstanding shares of common stock, and we continue to actively engage with our stockholders on an ongoing basis. Our Board and management are committed to maintaining and enhancing this dialog with our stockholders.

2018 Sustainability Highlights

Macerich’s Sustainability Goals

Macerich continues to implement and execute on processes and invest in capital projects to minimize the risks of the changing global climate. Here are the four pillars of our fully integrated sustainability program:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    19

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Part of Macerich’s role as an industry leader in sustainability is active engagement. Our goal is to achieve more than 70% documented engagement by stakeholders and members of our community — retailers, shoppers, vendors and more — by 2025. This ranges from working closely with retailers, restaurants and other tenants to be a resource and help them realize their own sustainability goals to inviting local communities to take note of the leading-edge sustainability practices at our properties. For us, being sustainable also means contributing to the vitality of our communities in a range of different ways that promote health, wellness and connection. Throughout the year, our properties host everything from free outdoor yoga, fun runs and walks for great cause, blood drives and school supply drives to disaster relief and anti-bullying events.

20    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

To fulfill our commitment to sustainability, Macerich integrates environmental thinking and practices into everything we do. It’s in our core commitment to green building. It drives our disciplined procurement process and how we choose vendors and contractors. It shapes daily decisions across our operations. And Macerich has a target of integrating sustainability practice principles in 80% of corporate and property operations and functions by 2025.

To learn more about our Company’s sustainability efforts, please view our Sustainability Report on our website at www.macerich.com under “About—Sustainability.” The information contained on, or available through, our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Our non-employee directors are compensated for their services according to an arrangement approved by our Board of Directors and recommended by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee generally reviews director compensation annually. Any Board member who is also an employee of our Company or a subsidiary does not receive compensation for service as a director. Messrs. E. Coppola and O’Hern are currently the only directors who are also employees of our Company or a subsidiary.

In October 2018, FW Cook conducted a competitive review of our non-employee director compensation program, including the review of the director compensation programs of companies within our peer group, and suggested changes for the Compensation Committee’s consideration. Based on the recommendations of the Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors revised certain aspects of our non-employee director compensation. The following sets forth the compensation structure effective in 2018, which had been in place for our non-employee directors since July 21, 2016, as well as the revised compensation structure effective January 1, 2019:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    21

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY AWARD PROGRAMS

In addition, our Director Phantom Stock Plan offers our non-employee directors the opportunity to defer cash compensation otherwise payable and to receive that compensation (to the extent that it is actually earned by service during that period) in cash or in shares of Common Stock as elected by the director, after termination of the director’s service or on a specified payment date. Such compensation includes the annual cash retainers payable to our non-employee directors. A majority of our non-employee directors serving in 2018 elected to receive all or a portion of their 2018 cash retainers in Common Stock. Deferred amounts are generally credited as stock units at the beginning of the applicable deferral period based on the present value of such deferred compensation divided by the average fair market value of our Common Stock for the preceding 10 trading days. Stock unit balances are credited with additional stock units as dividend equivalents and are ultimately paid out in shares of our Common Stock on a one-for-one basis. A maximum of 500,000 shares of our Common Stock may be issued in total under our Director Phantom Stock Plan, subject to certain customary adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and similar events. The vesting of the stock units is accelerated in case of the death or disability of a director or, upon the termination of service as a director at the time of or after a change of control event. Our Company has a deferral program for the equity compensation of our non-employee directors which allows them to defer the receipt of all or a portion of their restricted stock unit awards and receive the underlying Common Stock after termination of service or a specified payment date. Any dividends payable with respect to those deferred restricted stock units will also be deferred and will be paid in accordance with their payment election. The deferred dividend equivalents may be paid in cash or converted into additional restricted stock units and ultimately paid in shares of our Common Stock on a one-to-one basis. The vesting of the deferred restricted stock units is accelerated in case of the death or disability of a director or upon a change of control event.

2018 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid, awarded or earned with respect to each of our non-employee directors during 2018. We do not provide our non-employee directors with initial inducement awards upon joining our Board other than the regular annual equity award granted to our existing directors. Mr. Sullivan informed our Board on January 31, 2018 that he would not stand for re-election at our 2018 annual meeting. On March 29, 2018, Mr. Hubbell resigned from our Board and Ms. Alford was elected as a director by our Board. On June 21, 2018, Messrs. Brandt and Hirsch were elected to our Board and Mr. Ross did not stand for re-election at our 2018 annual meeting.

22    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

As of December 31, 2018, our non-employee directors held the following number of unpaid phantom stock units and unvested restricted stock units:

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2019, the names, ages and positions of our executive officers and the year each became an executive officer.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    23

EQUITY OWNERSHIP

EQUITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock and OP Units exchangeable for shares of our common stock, as of the record date, March 25, 2019, unless otherwise noted, for (i) each of current our directors, (ii) each of our named executive officers who is not a director, (iii) our directors and executive officers as a group and (iv) each person known by our Company to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. All information in the following table is based on Schedules 13D, 13G and/or any amendments thereto, filed with the SEC, and on information supplied to us by our directors and officers. Except as otherwise described in the notes below, the following beneficial owners have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to all shares set forth opposite their respective names. As of March 25, 2019, 141,233,771 shares of common stock were outstanding.

24    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

EQUITY OWNERSHIP

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    25

EXECUTIVE OFFICER BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

EXECUTIVE OFFICER BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

Biographical information concerning Messrs. E. Coppola and O’Hern is set forth above under the caption “Information Regarding our Director Nominees.”

Douglas J. Healey joined our Company in May 2005 as a Senior Vice President of Leasing following our acquisition of the Wilmorite portfolio. He was elected our Executive Vice President of Leasing in March 2016. Mr. Healey directs strategic leasing for our Company’s entire portfolio of regional shopping centers and has over 25 years of expertise in the retail industry, specializing in retail merchandising. Prior to joining our Company, he held various leasing positions with Wilmorite Properties from 1991until 2005. Mr. Healey is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers.

Scott W. Kingsmore assumed the role of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on January 1, 2019, and is responsible for accounting, financial and tax reporting, investor relations, raising capital through debt and equity markets and information technology systems. Mr. Kingsmore’s tenure at our Company started in 1996 as Vice President and Controller, and since then he has served in key roles in finance for over 20 years, most recently as Senior Vice President of Finance from April 1, 2004 until December 31, 2018. Prior to joining our Company, he worked for Westfield America within its corporate accounting department. Mr. Kingsmore was also a certified public accountant with PricewaterhouseCoopers from 1991 to 1995, and he graduated from University of California at Los Angeles in 1991.

Ann C. Menard joined our Company on January 29, 2018 as an Executive Vice President and has been our Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since March 1, 2018. Prior to joining our Company, Ms. Menard was U.S. General Counsel and Managing Director for Tishman Speyer, a global real estate owner, operator, developer and fund manager from October 2005 through December 2017, where she managed legal activities and risk in connection with operations in major U.S. markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Seattle, Chicago and Atlanta. Prior to joining Tishman Speyer, Ms. Menard was a partner in the real estate and corporate finance departments at O’Melveny & Myers, LLP in their Los Angeles and Newport Beach offices. Ms. Menard received her JD, magna cum laude, from Loyola Law School of Los Angeles in 1991, after graduating with a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Kenneth L. Volk was elected Executive Vice President of Business Development in January 2019 and directs common area retail, media and sponsorship, brand experiences and alternative revenue, as well as short-term inline leasing. Mr. Volk joined our Company in 2007 as Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer overseeing business development and marketing. He has over 25 years of experience in the retail REIT industry, specializing in marketing and communications. Prior to joining our Company, Mr. Volk served as Senior Vice President of Marketing and Communication for The Mills Corporation from September 2002 to March 2007, where he also oversaw strategic partnerships and the Mills TV digital media network. Mr. Volk also previously served as Senior Vice President of Shopping Center Marketing for Simon Property Group from May 1989 until August 2002.

The following Report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed soliciting material or to be filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent our Company specifically requests that this Report be treated as soliciting material or specifically incorporates this Report by reference into a filing under either of such Acts.

26    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of The Macerich Company, a Maryland corporation, has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and this Proxy Statement for our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Compensation Committee

Andrea M. Stephen, Chair

Eric K. Brandt

Daniel J. Hirsch

Steven L. Soboroff

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Compensation Discussion & Analysis (“CD&A”) describes the material elements of our executive compensation program, how the program is designed to support the achievement of our key strategic and financial objectives, and the compensation decisions the Compensation Committee made under the program for our named executive officers, who for 2018 were:

For purposes of this CD&A, we refer to the Compensation Committee as the “Committee.”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

2018 was a year of evolution for Macerich as we continued to adapt to the changing retail environment. Despite continued retailer fallout stemming from unprecedented tenant bankruptcies in 2017, we posted solid operating results and earnings performance for 2018. While store closings and tenant bankruptcies have adversely impacted our short-term total stockholder return (“TSR”), they often present opportunities to secure more productive and contemporary tenants that will generate higher sales in the coming years. Two examples of successful redevelopment projects in 2018 include Kings Plaza, the only enclosed mall in Brooklyn, New York and Scottsdale Fashion Square in Scottsdale, Arizona. In summer 2018, we completed the redevelopment of the former four-level Sears store at Kings Plaza with Primark and Zara, both new to the Brooklyn market, and Burlington and JCPenney. This redevelopment is significantly improving retailer demand throughout Kings Plaza. At Scottsdale Fashion Square, we repurposed the former Barneys location with a two-level

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    27

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Apple flagship store which opened in November 2018, followed by the debut in our portfolio of the co-working concept, Industrious, in January 2019. We believe that we remain well-positioned to take advantage of other opportunities for us to improve our high-quality portfolio, both in terms of tenant quality, sales productivity, traffic and densification.

28    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

In 2018, our Company continued to demonstrate the strength of our portfolio through consistently strong operating metrics and the delivery of stable, high-quality cash flows, despite the challenges facing the retail industry. For additional information about the following financial metrics, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 and Appendix I of this Proxy Statement.

In recent years, REIT TSRs have been generally lower than the broader market, and regional mall REITs in particular underperformed other REITs. We believe that our negative TSR has been driven primarily by bearish investor sentiment for the mall REIT sector in general, in the wake of store closings and tenant bankruptcies announced by several high-profile retailers. However, our performance versus other mall REITs has been strong. Over the past five and ten years we generated a higher total return to our stockholders than all but one of our direct competitors, and over the past ten years we outperformed both the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index and the S&P 500 Index, as illustrated in the following table.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    29

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Compensation Elements.    The following chart summarizes, for each component of our ongoing executive compensation program, the objectives and key features and the compensation decisions made by the Committee for our named executive officers, except Mr. Healey:

Mr. Healey was promoted to Executive Vice President, Leasing in March 2016 and became an executive officer in June 2018. During 2018, Mr. Healey participated in a different compensation program than the other named executive officers. His 2018 annual incentive bonus was earned at 100% of target, based on his significant contributions in achieving strong occupancy and double-digit releasing

30    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

spreads. In particular, the Committee considered his success in his expanded role in directing strategic leasing of our Company’s entire portfolio. He participated in our Restricted Stock/Stock Unit/LTIP Unit Bonus Program, as described below, and elected in advance to convert 50% of what would otherwise have been a cash bonus into restricted stock units, with a value equal to 1.5x the value of the cash converted. These restricted stock units vest over three years; because they were granted in calendar year 2019, they will be reported in next year’s proxy statement. Mr. Healey did not participate in any other long-term incentive program.

Two of our named executive officers were granted one-time special equity awards in 2018 in connection with hire or promotion.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    31

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Target Total Direct Compensation Mix

32    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

LTIP Pay for Performance Alignment.    The forfeiture, and tracking forfeiture, of the performance-based LTIP Unit awards for 2016 through 2018 reflects strong pay for performance alignment with respect to the applicable performance periods. The graphic below summarizes the performance periods and outcome, or projected outcome, of our performance-based LTIP Unit awards in 2016, 2017 and 2018, through December 31, 2018.

The three-year performance period for the 2016 performance-based LTIP Unit awards has been completed and the entire award was forfeited because the Company did not achieve the Threshold relative TSR ranking.

The total amount realized with respect to the outstanding 2017 and 2018 performance-based LTIP Unit awards will be determined following the three-year performance periods ending December 31, 2019 and 2020, respectively. If the performance period had ended on December 31, 2018, the 2017 and 2018 performance-based LTIP Unit awards would have resulted in $0 realized pay due to the failure to satisfy the Threshold relative TSR achievement level.

Target vs. Realizable CEO Compensation

As illustrated above, the majority of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation opportunity is “at risk” and tied to performance goals and our relative TSR. Because a significant portion of compensation opportunity is in the form of equity awards, the value is also tied to our absolute TSR. Our pay-for-performance philosophy is further illustrated by comparing target total direct compensation to “realizable” compensation, which after taking into account actual performance demonstrates alignment of pay and performance.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    33

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Our operating performance was solid during 2016 and 2017, but fell short of targets in 2018. Annual bonuses earned in each year were aligned with operating and individual performance. As illustrated above, our TSR lagged peers, resulting in no payout for the 2016-2018 performance-based LTIP Units, and the 2017-2019 and 2018-2020 performance-based LTIP Units are tracking at no payout. Service-based LTIP Units have lost value, consistent with our negative absolute TSR.

Target pay includes base salary, target annual incentive compensation, and the target grant-date fair value of long-term incentives in each of 2016, 2017 and 2018 for Mr. A. Coppola and in 2019 for Mr. O’Hern. Realizable pay includes: (i) annual base salary earned; (ii) actual annual incentive earned in respect of the applicable year; and (iii) the value of performance-based LTIP Units (assuming the performance period had ended December 31, 2018) and service-based LTIP Units as of December 31, 2018, including earned dividend equivalents. None of the performance-based LTIP Units granted in 2016 were earned, and none of the performance-based LTIP Units granted in 2017 and 2018 would have been earned at December 31, 2018 based on our relative TSR performance as of such date. The value of the service-based LTIP Units is based on our closing stock price on December 31, 2018, the last trading day of fiscal 2018. This chart and the total realizable pay reported in this chart provide supplemental information regarding the compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and should not be viewed as a substitute for the 2018 Summary Compensation Table. We believe that showing realizable compensation illustrates for stockholders the alignment between pay and performance.

With the CEO and other executive transitions, our overall 2019 compensation to our NEOs will be significantly reduced. As the table above illustrates, Mr. O’Hern’s 2019 target TDC is 53% of Mr. A. Coppola’s 2018 target TDC. In addition, the aggregate 2019 target TDC for our CEO, CFO and the next three highest paid executives is 63% of 2018 target TDC for Messrs. A. Coppola, E. Coppola, O’Hern, Perlmutter and Leanse.

2018 Say-on-Pay Vote

At our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders’ meeting, approximately 89% of the votes cast were in favor of the non-binding, advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. Although the results of the say-on-pay vote are advisory and not binding on our Company, our Board of Directors or the Committee, our Board of Directors and the Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and take the results of the say-on-pay vote into account when making decisions regarding the compensation of our named executive officers. Following our 2015 annual meeting, the Committee, working with FW Cook, made meaningful changes to our executive compensation program in response to our stockholders’ feedback, including switching from a one-year performance period

34    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

for our performance-based LTIP Units to a three-year performance period. The Committee has considered the result of the 2018 say-on-pay vote and, in light of the strong stockholder support for our executive compensation program as evidenced by the high percentage of votes cast in favor of this proposal, the Committee believes that our current compensation program design and structure is supported by stockholders. Accordingly, the Committee decided to maintain our general approach to executive compensation and made no significant changes to our executive compensation program during 2018.

Throughout 2018, we continued engagement with stockholders on a variety of issues, including executive compensation and corporate governance. As part of our commitment to ongoing, transparent communication with our stockholders, we will continue this open dialogue to ensure we understand stockholder views on these important issues.

Compensation Governance Highlights

Our executive compensation and corporate governance programs are designed to closely link pay with operational performance and increases in long-term stockholder value while minimizing excessive risk taking. To help us accomplish these important objectives, we have adopted the following policies and practices:

No Excessive Risk Taking.    Our compensation program is designed to not incentivize excessive risk taking by participants. We conduct an annual risk assessment of all of our compensation programs.

No Excise Tax Gross-Ups.    None of our Company’s executives are entitled to any excise tax gross-ups.

Double-Trigger Equity Vesting.    Our equity awards are subject to double-trigger vesting acceleration in connection with a change of control.

Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines.    We have robust stock ownership policies for our named executive officers and directors, and each individual who is subject to them is in compliance with those policies. See “Stock Ownership Policies” on page 44 of this Proxy Statement.

Holding Period.    Until the minimum required stock ownership level is achieved, our named executive officers must retain 50% of the net-after-tax profit shares from vesting of equity compensation awards. See “Stock Ownership Policies” on page 44 of this Proxy Statement.

Clawback Policy.    We have a clawback policy that allows us to recover cash and equity incentive compensation paid to our executive officers if the compensation was based on achieving financial results that were subsequently restated and the amount of the executive officer’s incentive compensation would have been lower had the financial results been properly reported.

No Repricing.    We do not permit repricing of underwater options or SARs or permit exchange of underwater options or SARs for other awards or cash, without prior stockholder approval.

Anti-Hedging Policy.    We have a policy prohibiting all of our directors, officers and employees from engaging in any hedging or monetization transactions that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of our securities. This policy also prohibits short sales and the purchase and sale of publicly traded options of our Company.

Anti-Pledging Policy.    In addition, we have a policy (a) prohibiting all our directors and executive officers from pledging our securities if they are unable to meet our stock ownership requirements without reference to such pledged shares and (b) recommending that our directors and executive officers not pledge our Company’s securities. Currently, no shares of our Company are pledged by our directors and executive officers.

Independent Compensation Consultant.    The Committee engages an independent compensation consulting firm that provides us with no other services.

Annual Say-on-Pay.    We annually submit our executive compensation program for our named executive officers to say-on-pay advisory votes for stockholder consideration.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation program is designed to achieve the following objectives:

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    35

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The Committee believes strongly in linking compensation to corporate performance: the annual incentive awards are primarily based on overall corporate performance and vesting of 75% of the long-term incentive equity awards for most named executive officers depends on our three-year relative TSR. The Committee also recognizes individual performance in making its executive compensation decisions. The Committee believes this is the best program overall to attract, motivate and retain highly skilled executives whose performance and contributions benefit our Company and our stockholders.

The Committee does not have a strict policy for allocating a specific portion of compensation to our named executive officers between cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term compensation. Instead, the Committee considers how each component promotes retention and/or motivates performance by the executive. The Committee believes it utilizes the right blend of cash and equity to provide appropriate incentives for executives while aligning their interests with those of our stockholders and encouraging the executives’ long-term commitment to our Company.

Role of the Compensation Committee

The Committee reviews and approves the compensation for our executive officers, reviews our overall compensation structure and philosophy and administers certain of our employee benefit and stock plans, with authority to authorize awards under our incentive plans. The Committee currently consists of four independent directors, Ms. Stephen (Chair) and Messrs. Brandt, Hirsch, and Soboroff.

Role of Management

Management, under the leadership of our Chief Executive Officer, develops our Company’s strategy and corresponding internal business plans, which our executive compensation program is designed to support. Our Chief Executive Officer also provides the Committee with his evaluation of the performance of and his recommendations on compensation for his direct reports, including the other named executive officers.

Role of Compensation Consultant

The Committee may, in its sole discretion, retain or obtain the advice of any compensation consultant as it deems necessary to assist in the evaluation of director or executive officer compensation and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of any such compensation consultant. The Committee retained FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant with respect to our compensation programs. FW Cook’s role is to evaluate the existing executive and non-employee director compensation programs, assess the design and competitive positioning of these programs, and make recommendations for change, as appropriate. The Committee considered the independence of FW Cook and determined that its engagement of FW Cook does not raise any conflicts of interest with our Company or any of our directors or executive officers. FW Cook provides no other consulting services to our Company, executive officers or directors.

36    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Role of Data for Peer Companies

FW Cook periodically conducts competitive reviews of our executive compensation program, including a competitive analysis of pay opportunities for our named executive officers as compared to the relevant peer group selected by the Committee. The Committee reviews compensation practices at peer companies to inform itself and aid it in its decision-making process so it can establish compensation programs that it believes are reasonably competitive. In 2017, FW Cook conducted a competitive analysis of our executive compensation program against the following U.S.-based, publicly-traded REITs:

The group included our direct mall REIT competitors, both larger and smaller than us, as well as REITs in other asset classes, primarily selected based on size, as measured by total capitalization. At the time FW Cook conducted the 2017 competitive review, our one-year average total capitalization was in the median range compared to the peer group. In 2018, FW Cook used this peer group to analyze the typical mix between time-based and performance-based long-term incentive compensation. The Committee believes that these REITs best reflected a complexity and breadth of operations, as well as the amount of capital and assets managed, similar to our Company at the time the study was conducted.

The Committee does not set compensation components to meet specific benchmarks. Instead the Committee focuses on a balance of annual and long-term compensation, which is heavily weighted toward “at risk” performance-based compensation. Peer group data is not used as the determining factor in setting compensation because each officer’s role and experience is unique. The Committee believes that ultimately the decision as to appropriate compensation for a particular officer should be made based on a full review of that officer’s and our Company’s performance.

COMPENSATION FOR 2018 PERFORMANCE

Compensation opportunities for each named executive officer consisted of a base salary, an annual bonus opportunity, and long-term incentives, each of which is described in more detail below.

Base Salary

As they do annually, the Committee members reviewed base salaries of the named executive officers to determine whether they remain appropriate based on the factors identified above. For named executive officers continuing in the same position, 2018 base salaries remained unchanged from 2017. Ms. Menard’s base salary was established by the Committee when she was hired in January 2018.

Effective April 26, 2018, Mr. O’Hern’s base salary was increased to $800,000, pursuant to his offer letter described below under “Offer Letter with Mr. O’Hern,” to become Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2019 when Mr. A. Coppola stepped down. The Committee considered his anticipated roles and responsibilities, as well as compensation for similarly situated executives in our compensation peer group. Mr. O’Hern’s 2018 base salary remained below the median of his peers and remains unchanged for 2019 at $800,000.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    37

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Annual Incentives

Each executive officer has a target annual incentive opportunity, expressed as a percentage of base salary. Target bonus was 200% of base salary for Messrs. A. Coppola and E. Coppola and 150% of base salary for Ms. Menard. Prior to April 26, 2018, target bonus for Mr. O’Hern was 150% of base salary, and from April 26 to December 31, 2018, Mr. O’Hern’s target bonus was 200% of base salary. Mr. Healey participated in the EVP annual incentive program, with a target of 100% of base salary. Mr. Perlmutter forfeited his eligibility for a 2018 bonus because he resigned in April 2018. Pursuant to his Separation Agreement and Release of Claims (as described in more detail below under “Separation and Release of Claims Agreement and Consulting Agreement with Mr. Leanse”), Mr. Leanse received a pro-rata target bonus for the portion of fiscal year 2018 he was employed.

The Committee set target bonuses for Messrs. A. Coppola and E. Coppola (and after April 26, 2018 for Mr. O’Hern) at a higher percentage of base salary than the other executives because their positions are those of strategic leaders who manage and direct our other named executive officers. Actual bonuses can range from 0% to 200% of each executive’s target bonus, based on the Committee’s assessment of annual performance against the objectives established for the year.

Under our annual incentive program for all of the named executive officers except Mr. Healey, the Committee evaluates performance against a “scorecard” of performance objectives established at the beginning of the year. These rigorous scorecard goals are designed to reward the successful execution of our strategies, and were consistent with our external guidance as disclosed in the first quarter of 2018. For 2018, three corporate measures determined 75% of each participating executive’s earned bonus; the remaining 25% was based on the Committee’s assessment of the executive’s individual performance. The 2018 corporate scorecard measures, as well as actual achievement versus each goal, are outlined in the following table:

2018 Corporate Goals—Weighted 75%

At the time the goals were set, the Committee believed these goals were rigorous, in particular in the context of the anticipated slowing growth in the retail REIT sector and the continued retailer bankruptcies and store closures. The challenging nature of these performance requirements in the current retail environment can be seen based on no payout for the corporate financial component.

Individual Performance–Weighted 25%

A portion of the annual incentive is based on an assessment of individual performance in order to reward individual achievements and contributions. The Committee evaluated the 2018 individual performance of our named executive officers and considered the following accomplishments for Messrs. O’Hern, E. Coppola and A. Coppola and Ms. Menard:

With respect to Mr. O’Hern:    his leadership in supporting and executing our strategic, financial and operational initiatives. The Committee considered Mr. O’Hern’s performance and leadership in:

38    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Based on their assessment of Mr. O’Hern’s individual performance and recognizing his successful transition to the Chief Executive Officer role, the Committee awarded him $750,000, the maximum amount for the individual component.

With respect to Mr. E. Coppola:    his continued leadership and achievements in our key developments and redevelopments, including:

His knowledge of the real estate markets as well as his strong relationships with real estate owners, partners and governmental officials were critical to the success of our disposition and development strategies. The Committee also recognized his support through the Chief Executive Officer transition. Based on their assessment of Mr. E. Coppola’s individual performance, the Committee awarded him $750,000, which was slightly below the maximum for the individual component.

With respect to Ms. Menard:    her success in her new role as Chief Legal Officer, improving the performance of the organization through partnership with the legal group, including:

The Committee also recognized that Ms. Menard provided critical leadership at a time of considerable organizational change, including the departure of the chief operating officer, a significant restructuring, and the complex chief executive officer transition. Because 2018 was Ms. Menard’s first year with the Company, and recognizing that material aspects of her work during 2018 were not contemplated when she joined the Company, the Committee awarded her a bonus of $750,000, which equals her overall target bonus value.

With respect to Mr. A. Coppola:    his accomplishments for 2018 included his leadership in our Company’s efforts to continue to advance digitally native, vertically integrated retail strategies, revitalize tenant mix, nurture succession planning and upward mobility throughout our Company, and in particular Mr. O’Hern’s transition to the Chief Executive Officer role. The Committee awarded Mr. A. Coppola a bonus of $500,000, which equals the target amount for his individual component.

Earned bonuses for 2018 performance were paid in cash, whereas earned bonuses for 2017 performance were paid in fully-vested LTIP units. Under applicable SEC rules, in the tables below in this Proxy Statement, earned cash incentives are reported as compensation in the year to which the performance relates, whereas equity awards are reported as compensation in the year in which the award was granted, not the year to which the performance relates. Accordingly, both the LTIP Units awarded as annual incentive compensation based on 2017 performance and the cash paid as annual incentive compensation based on 2018 performance are reported in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2018, which overstates the compensation of our named executive officers for 2018. See “2018 Total Compensation” below.

2019 PROXY STATEMENT    39

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Mr. Healey’s Annual Incentive.    Mr. Healey was promoted to Executive Vice President, Leasing in March 2016 and became an executive officer in June 2018. During 2018, Mr. Healey participated in a different compensation program than the other named executive officers. His 2018 annual incentive bonus was earned at 100% of target, based on his significant contributions in achieving strong occupancy and double-digit releasing spreads. In particular, the Committee considered his success in his expanded role in directing strategic leasing of our Company’s entire portfolio. He also participated in our Restricted Stock/Stock Unit/LTIP Unit Bonus Program, through which he elected in advance to convert 50% of what would otherwise have been a cash bonus into restricted stock units, with a value equal to 1.5x the value of the cash converted. These restricted stock units vest over three years; because they were granted in calendar year 2019, they will be reported in next year’s proxy statement.

Long-Term Incentives–Significant Portion is Performance-Based and Tied to Achieving Strong Relative Returns

Since 2006, our Company has utilized a long-term equity-based incentive program as an important means to align the interests of our executives and our stockholders, to encourage our executives to adopt a longer-term perspective and to reward them for creating stockholder value in a pay-for-performance structure.

For 2018, the Committee approved for each named executive officer, other than Mr. Healey, an aggregate grant date fair value for these awards, to be granted in the form of LTIP Units. That amount was divided between two types of LTIP Units as follows:

Performance-Based LTIP Units.    May be earned from 0% to 150% of the target number of units awarded based on our TSR performance relative to the Equity Peer REITs for the three-year performance period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. Payouts, as a percentage of target units, for the performance-based LTIP Units for various levels of relative TSR performance are outlined in the following table, with linear interpolation for performance between performance levels.

Seventy-five percent (75%) of the target annual LTIP grant value for the named executive officers other than Mr. Healey was granted in the form of performance-based LTIP Units. Prior to 2016, our performance-based LTIP Units included an absolute TSR hurdle; which was removed starting with our 2016 performance-based LTIP Unit grants based on stockholder feedback in 2015.

Service-Based LTIP Units.    Vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period to promote retention and further alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. Twenty-five percent (25%) of the target LTIP grant value for the named executive officers other than Mr. Healey was granted in the form of service-based LTIP Units.

The Committee reviewed peer group data relating to the allocation of long-term incentive equity awards between performance-based and service-based awards and determined that 75% performance-based was a higher percentage than the median mix between performance-based and service-based equity among the peer group, and therefore consistent with our emphasis on “at risk” compensation. For the performance-based component, the Committee considered the range of potential realizable values that our executives could earn to ensure that the awards would be both reasonably competitive and appropriate to motivate our leadership team.

Long-Term Incentives for Mr. Healey.    As previously discussed, Mr. Healey was promoted to Executive Vice President, Leasing in March 2016 and became an executive officer in June 2018. During 2018, Mr. Healey participated in a different compensation program than the other named executive officers. His long-term incentive compensation was provided through our Restricted Stock/Stock Unit/LTIP Unit Bonus Program, pursuant to which he could elect in advance to convert 50% of what would otherwise have been a cash bonus into restricted stock units, with a value equal to 1.5x the cash converted. His 2018 earned bonus was $450,000. He elected to convert 50% of that amount into restricted stock units with a value of $337,500 which were granted March 8, 2019 and vest over three years. Because they were granted in calendar year 2019, they will be reported in next year’s proxy statement. Mr. Healey did not participate in any other long-term incentive program.

40    2019 PROXY STATEMENT

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Special One-Time Equity Awards.    Two of our named executive officers were granted one-time special equity awards in 2018:

2018 Total Compensation

We are including this supplemental information to provide a more meaningful view of the compensation of our named executive officers for their performance during 2018. The table below shows each named executive officer’s salary, the grant date fair value of annual long-term incentive equity awards which were granted in January 2018, bonus for services performed in 2018 and all other compensation. This table, in contrast to the Summary Compensation Table on page 46 of this Proxy Statement, excludes equity awards granted under our annual incentive award program in March 2018 for services performed in 2017. It also excludes the equity awards granted to Mr. Healey in 2018 for services performed in 2017, but includes the equity awards granted to Mr. Healey in 2019 for services performed in 2018, through our Restricted Stock/Stock Unit/LTIP Unit Bonus Program.