Edgar Filing: UMB FINANCIAL CORP

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-4887

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Missouri		43-0903811
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. – Employer Identification Number)

1010 Grand Boulevard, Kansas City, Missouri		64106
(Address of principal executive offices)		(ZIP Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (816) 860-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date.

As of July 31, 2010, UMB Financial Corporation had 40,473,129 shares of common stock outstanding.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

INDEX


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)	3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME		4
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		5
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		7
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	20
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	35
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	39

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		40

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	40
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	40
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	40
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	41
ITEM 4.	RESERVED	41
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	41
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	41
SIGNATURES		42
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT		43
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT		44
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002		45
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002		46

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


	June 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Loans:	$	4,448,418		$	4,314,705
Allowance for loan losses		(70,110	)		(64,139	)

Net loans		4,378,308			4,250,566

Loans held for sale		10,439			17,523
Securities:
Available for sale		4,925,822			4,885,788
Held to maturity (market value of $62,762 and $58,366, respectively)		57,075			56,986
Federal Reserve Bank stock and other		21,838			22,732
Trading		47,779			38,214

Total investment securities		5,052,514			5,003,720

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell		29,636			329,765
Interest-bearing due from banks		718,410			1,057,195
Cash and due from banks		311,171			458,093
Bank premises and equipment, net		213,648			217,642
Accrued income		61,810			64,949
Goodwill		131,356			131,356
Other intangibles		53,015			47,462
Other assets		101,973			85,084

Total assets	$	11,062,280		$	11,663,355

LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand	$	2,865,776		$	2,775,222
Interest-bearing demand and savings		4,047,404			3,904,268
Time deposits under $100,000		716,839			772,040
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		790,373			1,082,958

Total deposits		8,420,392			8,534,488
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements		1,400,866			1,927,607
Short-term debt		28,622			29,514
Long-term debt		9,316			25,458
Accrued expenses and taxes		117,837			107,896
Other liabilities		16,749			22,841

Total liabilities		9,993,782			10,647,804

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized; 55,056,730 shares issued; and 40,443,242 and 40,439,607 shares outstanding, respectively		55,057			55,057
Capital surplus		715,038			712,774
Retained earnings		596,973			562,748
Accumulated other comprehensive income		60,378			40,454
Treasury stock, 14,613,488 and 14,617,123 shares, at cost, respectively		(358,948	)		(355,482	)

Total shareholders’ equity		1,068,498			1,015,551

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	11,062,280		$	11,663,355

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(unaudited, dollars in thousands, except share and per share data)


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
INTEREST INCOME
Loans	$	55,949	$	53,535	$	109,432	$	106,335
Securities:
Taxable interest		22,496		25,818		46,275		54,935
Tax-exempt interest		7,028		7,168		14,345		14,188

Total securities income		29,524		32,986		60,620		69,123
Federal funds and resell agreements		47		50		109		181
Interest-bearing due from banks		1,032		942		2,350		1,787
Trading securities		181		194		323		362

Total interest income		86,733		87,707		172,834		177,788

INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits		8,462		12,609		18,085		26,433
Federal funds and repurchase agreements		503		537		948		1,197
Long-term debt		100		387		360		777

Total interest expense		9,065		13,533		19,393		28,407

Net interest income		77,668		74,174		153,441		149,381
Provision for loan losses		8,100		6,300		16,410		12,300

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		69,568		67,874		137,031		137,081

NONINTEREST INCOME
Trust and securities processing		38,615		28,635		74,187		53,534
Trading and investment banking		5,530		8,977		12,557		13,838
Service charges on deposits		20,163		21,135		40,683		41,929
Insurance fees and commissions		1,287		886		2,986		2,456
Brokerage fees		1,598		1,512		2,934		3,864
Bankcard fees		13,979		11,142		25,998		22,089
Gain on sales of securities available for sale, net		1,136		1,849		6,518		1,891
Other		6,792		3,187		9,643		6,632

Total noninterest income		89,100		77,323		175,506		146,233

NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits		63,552		59,596		125,805		117,593
Occupancy, net		8,924		8,572		17,844		16,716
Equipment		11,213		11,998		22,083		24,994
Supplies and services		4,680		5,570		9,387		10,947
Marketing and business development		4,430		4,171		8,135		7,361
Processing fees		11,214		8,140		22,242		15,143
Legal and consulting		2,770		2,644		4,392		4,192
Bankcard		4,360		2,927		7,550		6,884
Amortization of intangible assets		2,442		1,495		4,533		2,471
Regulatory Fees		3,516		7,908		6,754		9,635
Other		9,021		5,859		14,750		9,587

Total noninterest expense		126,122		118,880		243,475		225,523

Income before income taxes		32,546		26,317		69,062		57,791
Income tax provision		9,533		7,290		19,864		16,163

NET INCOME	$	23,013	$	19,027	$	49,198	$	41,628

PER SHARE DATA
Net income - basic	$	0.57	$	0.47	$	1.23	$	1.03
Net income - diluted		0.57		0.47		1.22		1.02
Dividends		0.185		0.175		0.370		0.350

Weighted average shares outstanding		40,079,714		40,374,963		40,084,593		40,485,689

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share data)


	Common Stock		Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Treasury Stock			Total
Balance - January 1, 2009	$	55,057	$	707,812		$	502,073		$	41,105	$	(331,236	)	$	974,811
Comprehensive income
Net income		—		—			41,628			—		—			41,628
Change in unrealized gains on securities		—		—			—			3,133		—			3,133

Total comprehensive income															44,761
Cash dividends ($0.35 per share)		—		—			(14,253	)		—		—			(14,253	)
Purchase of treasury stock		—		—			—			—		(17,298	)		(17,298	)
Issuance of equity awards		—		(1,263	)		—			—		1,395			132
Recognition of equity based compensation		—		2,571			—			—		—			2,571
Net tax benefit related to equity compensation plans		—		169			—			—		—			169
Sale of treasury stock		—		221			—			—		106			327
Exercise of stock options		—		329			—			—		435			764

Balance – June 30, 2009	$	55,057	$	709,839		$	529,448		$	44,238	$	(346,598	)	$	991,984

Balance - January 1, 2010	$	55,057	$	712,774		$	562,748		$	40,454	$	(355,482	)	$	1,015,551
Comprehensive income
Net income		—		—			49,198			—		—			49,198
Change in unrealized gains on securities		—		—			—			19,924		—			19,924

Total comprehensive income															69,122
Cash dividends ($0.37 per share)		—		—			(14,973	)		—		—			(14,973	)
Purchase of treasury stock		—		—			—			—		(5,211	)		(5,211	)
Issuance of equity awards		—		(1,225	)		—			—		1,350			125
Recognition of equity based compensation		—		2,882			—			—		—			2,882
Net tax benefit related to equity compensation plans		—		147			—			—		—			147
Sale of treasury stock		—		233			—			—		125			358
Exercise of stock options		—		227			—			—		270			497

Balance – June 30, 2010	$	55,057	$	715,038		$	596,973		$	60,378	$	(358,948	)	$	1,068,498

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, dollars in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Operating Activities
Net Income	$	49,198		$	41,628
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		16,410			12,300
Depreciation and amortization		18,679			18,717
Deferred income tax expense		(5,962	)		(3,843	)
Net (increase) decrease in trading securities		(9,565	)		457
Gains on sales of securities available for sale		(6,518	)		(1,891	)
Gains on sales of assets		(79	)		(18	)
Amortization of securities premiums, net of discount accretion		14,584			10,859
Originations of loans held for sale		(80,296	)		(151,573	)
Net gains on sales of loans held for sale		(246	)		(890	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		87,626			136,289
Issuance of equity awards		125			132
Equity based compensation		2,882			2,571
Changes in:
Accrued income		3,139			3,437
Accrued expenses and taxes		4,101			381
Other assets and liabilities, net		(1,253	)		2,525

Net cash provided by operating activities		92,825			71,081

Investing Activities
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity		5,997			2,350
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		416,947			45,046
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		1,227,897			2,141,450
Purchases of securities held to maturity		(5,928	)		(2,808	)
Purchases of securities available for sale		(1,682,415	)		(1,201,056	)
Net (increase) decrease in loans		(66,232	)		44,472
Net decrease in fed funds sold and resell agreements		300,129			104,992
Net decrease (increase) in interest-bearing balances due from other financial institutions		13,703			(87,078	)
Net change in unsettled securities transactions		—			(10,231	)
Purchases of bank premises and equipment		(10,494	)		(8,288	)
Net cash paid for acquisitions		(87,527	)		(23,391	)
Proceeds from sales of bank premises and equipment		285			557

Net cash provided by investing activities		112,362			1,006,015

Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in demand and savings deposits		233,540			(194,027	)
Net (decrease) increase in time deposits		(347,786	)		142,623
Net decrease in fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements		(526,741	)		(1,038,907	)
Net (decrease) increase in short-term debt		(9,792	)		20,189
Proceeds from short-term debt		25,000			—
Repayment of short-term debt		(17,300	)		—
Repayment of long-term debt		(14,942	)		(4,852	)
Cash dividends paid		(14,961	)		(14,244	)
Net tax benefit related to equity compensation plans		147			169
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and sales of treasury shares		855			1,091
Purchases of treasury stock		(5,211	)		(17,298	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(677,191	)		(1,105,256	)

Decrease in cash and due from banks		(472,004	)		(28,160	)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period		1,229,645			887,559

Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	757,641		$	859,399

Supplemental Disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	24,321		$	22,269
Total interest paid	$	21,889		$	29,803

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

1. Financial Statement Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of UMB Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) after elimination of all significant intercompany transactions. In the opinion of management of the Company, all adjustments, which were of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations, have been made. The results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented may not be indicative of the results of the full year. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

2. Summary of Accounting Policies

The Company is a multi-bank financial holding company, which offers a wide range of banking and other financial services to its customers through its branches and offices in the states of Missouri, Kansas, Colorado, Illinois, Oklahoma, Arizona, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Indiana, Wisconsin, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also impact reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A summary of the significant accounting policies to assist the reader in understanding the financial presentation is listed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Interest-bearing Due From Banks

Amounts due from the Federal Reserve Bank which are interest-bearing for all periods presented, and amounts due from certificates of deposits held at other financial institutions are included in interest-bearing due from banks. The amount due from the Federal Reserve Bank totaled $446.5 million and $499.9 million at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and is considered cash and cash equivalents. The amounts due from certificates of deposit totaled $271.9 million and $198.3 million at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

This table provides a summary of cash and due from banks as presented on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as of June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 (in thousands):


	June 30,
	2010		2009
Due from the Federal Reserve	$	446,470	$	499,930
Cash and due from banks		311,171		359,469

Cash and due from banks at end of period	$	757,641	$	859,399

Per Share Data

Basic income per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted quarterly per share data includes the dilutive effect of 287,458 and 325,620 shares issuable upon the exercise of options granted by the Company and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Diluted year-to-date income per share includes the dilutive effect of 280,809 and 291,189 shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options granted by the Company and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Options issued under employee benefit plans to purchase 688,640 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2010, but were not included in the computation of quarterly diluted EPS because the options were anti-dilutive. Options issued under employee benefit plans to purchase 874,914 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2010, but were not included in the computation of year-to-date diluted EPS because the options were anti-dilutive. Options issued under employee benefit plans to purchase 473,771 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2009, but were not included in the computation of quarterly diluted EPS because the options were anti-dilutive. Options issued under employee benefit plans to purchase 791,984 shares of common stock were outstanding at June 30, 2009, but were not included in the computation of year-to-date diluted EPS because the options were anti-dilutive.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

3. New Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 166 “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” or Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 860. The objective of this Statement is to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. This Statement removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS No. 140 and removes the exception from applying FASB Interpretation No. 46 to qualifying special-purpose entities. The Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2010 without a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” or ASC 810, which amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The amendments to the consolidation guidance affect all entities currently within the scope of FIN 46(R), as well as qualifying special-purpose entities that are currently excluded from the scope of FIN 46(R). The Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2010 without a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASU 2010-06), which amends ASC 820, adding new requirements for disclosures for Levels 1 and 2, separate disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements and clarification of existing fair value disclosures. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this statement on January 1, 2010 without a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, “Disclosures About the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses” (ASU 2010-10), which amends ASC 310 by requiring more robust and disaggregated disclosures about the credit quality of an entity’s financial receivables and its allowance for credit losses. ASU 2010-20 will be effective for the Company for the annual reporting period ending December 31, 2010. The Company cannot currently quantify with precision the effect that this standard will have on the financial position or results of operations in the future.

4. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

This table provides a summary of the major categories of loans as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):


	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	1,966,505	$	1,963,533
Real estate construction		101,814		106,914
Consumer		462,714		441,406
Real estate		1,908,349		1,795,342
Leases		9,036		7,510

Total loans		4,448,418		4,314,705
Loans held for sale		10,439		17,523

Total loans and loans held for sale	$	4,458,857	$	4,332,228

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

This table provides an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Beginning allowance – April 1 and January 1	$	67,442		$	54,005		$	64,139		$	52,297
Additions (deductions):
Charge-offs		(6,357	)		(6,273	)		(12,364	)		(12,243	)
Recoveries		925			1,077			1,925			2,755

Net charge-offs		(5,432	)		(5,196	)		(10,439	)		(9,488	)

Provision charged to expense		8,100			6,300			16,410			12,300

Ending allowance – June 30	$	70,110		$	55,109		$	70,110		$	55,109

Impaired loans Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, at the loan’s observable market price, or at the fair value of the collateral securing the loan. The summary below provides an analysis of impaired loans as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and twelve months ended December 31, 2009 (in thousands):


	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Total impaired loans as of June 30 and December 31	$	22,081	$	20,880
Amount of impaired loans which have a related allowance		15,309		14,290
Amount of related allowance		2,858		3,813
Remaining impaired loans with no allowance		6,772		6,590
Average recorded investment in impaired loans during the period		22,137		14,974

There was an insignificant amount of interest recognized on impaired loans during 2010 and 2009.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

5. Securities

Securities Available for Sale

This table provides detailed information about securities available for sale at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):


June 30, 2010	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury	$	827,395	$	6,007	$	—		$	833,402
U.S. Agencies		1,536,682		13,532		—			1,550,214
Mortgage-backed		1,486,925		51,255		(156	)		1,538,024
State and political subdivisions		979,611		24,923		(352	)		1,004,182

Total	$	4,830,613	$	95,717	$	(508	)	$	4,925,822


December 31, 2009	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury	$	596,067	$	3,549	$	(539	)	$	599,077
U.S. Agencies		1,479,784		10,426		(1,450	)		1,488,760
Mortgage-backed		1,786,899		33,038		(6,279	)		1,813,658
State and political subdivisions		958,231		26,530		(468	)		984,293

Total	$	4,820,981	$	73,543	$	(8,736	)	$	4,885,788

The following table presents contractual maturity information for securities available for sale at June 30, 2010 (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in 1 year or less	$	739,411	$	744,144
Due after 1 year through 5 years		2,388,137		2,422,372
Due after 5 years through 10 years		208,587		213,565
Due after 10 years		7,553		7,717

Total		3,343,688		3,387,798
Mortgage-backed securities		1,486,925		1,538,024

Total securities available for sale	$	4,830,613	$	4,925,822

Securities may be disposed of before contractual maturities due to sales by the Company or because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, proceeds from the sales of securities available for sale were $416,947,000 compared to $45,046,000 for the same period in 2009. Securities transactions resulted in gross realized gains of $6,747,000 and $1,891,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The gross realized losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were $229,000 and $0, respectively.

Trading Securities

The net unrealized gains on trading securities at June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were $281,000 and $271,000 respectively, and were included in trading and investment banking income.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

Securities Held to Maturity

The table below provides detailed information for securities held to maturity at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):


June 30, 2010	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	57,075	$	5,687	$	—	$	62,762


December 31, 2009

State and political subdivisions	$	56,986	$	1,380	$	—	$	58,366

The following table presents contractual maturity information for securities held to maturity at June 30, 2010 (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in 1 year or less	$	130	$	143
Due after 1 year through 5 years		13,090		14,394
Due after 5 years through 10 years		11,670		12,833
Due after 10 years		32,185		35,392

Total securities held to maturity	$	57,075	$	62,762

Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

There were no sales of securities held to maturity during the first six months of 2010 and 2009.

Securities available for sale and held to maturity with a market value of $3,536,014,161 at June 30, 2010, and $4,227,243,117 at December 31, 2009, were pledged to secure U.S. Government deposits, other public deposits and certain trust deposits as required by law.

The following table shows the Company’s available for sale investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. (in thousands).


June 30, 2010	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury Obligations	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Direct obligations of U.S. government agencies		—		—			—		—			—		—
Federal agency mortgage backed securities		16,714		(156	)		—		—			16,714		(156	)
Municipal securities		51,338		(324	)		2,125		(28	)		53,463		(352	)

Total temporarily-impaired debt securities available for sale	$	68,052	$	(480	)	$	2,125	$	(28	)	$	70,177	$	(508	)

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)


December 31, 2009	Less than 12 months					12 months or more					Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	169,516	$	(539	)	$	—	$	—		$	169,516	$	(539	)
Direct obligations of U.S. government agencies		373,255		(1,450	)		—		—			373,255		(1,450	)
Federal agency mortgage backed securities		398,111		(6,279	)		—		—			398,111		(6,279	)
Municipal securities		44,921		(427	)		1,711		(41	)		46,632		(468	)

Total temporarily-impaired debt securities available for sale	$	985,803	$	(8,695	)	$	1,711	$	(41	)	$	987,514	$	(8,736	)

The unrealized losses in the Company’s investments in direct obligations of U.S. government agencies, federal agency mortgage backed securities, and municipal securities were caused by interest rate risk. The Company does not expect any losses caused by credit risk on these securities. Because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these securities before a recovery of fair value, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2010.

6. Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by operating segment are as follows (in thousands):


	Commercial Financial Services			Institutional Financial Services		Personal Financial Services			Total
Balances as of January 1, 2009	$	42,999		$	25,988	$	35,937		$	104,924
Acquisition of J.D. Clark & Co., Inc.		—			19,476		—			19,476
Other goodwill acquired during period					5,875		1,355			7,230
Other		(154	)		—		(120	)		(274	)

Balances as of December 31,2009	$	42,845		$	51,339	$	37,172		$	131,356

Balances as of January 1, 2010	$	42,845		$	51,339	$	37,172		$	131,356

Balances as of June 30, 2010	$	42,845		$	51,339	$	37,172		$	131,356

Following are the intangible assets that continue to be subject to amortization as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (in thousands):


	As of June 30, 2010
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Amount
Core deposit intangible assets	$	36,497	$	25,627	$	10,870
Other intangible assets		44,680		12,188		32,492
Other intangible assets acquired during period		10,087		434		9,653

Total other intangible assets		54,767		12,622		42,145

Total intangible assets	$	91,264	$	38,249	$	53,015

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)


	As of December 31, 2009
Core deposit intangible assets	$	36,497	$	24,444	$	12,053
Other intangible assets		9,151		6,812		2,315
Other intangible assets acquired from the acquisition of J.D. Clark & Co., Inc.		24,831		2,278		22,553
Other intangible assets acquired during period		10,699		182		10,541

Total other intangible assets		44,681		9,272		35,409

Total intangible assets	$	81,178	$	33,716	$	47,462

Following is the aggregate amortization expense recognized in each period (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Aggregate amortization expense	$	2,442	$	1,495	$	4,533	$	2,471

Estimated amortization expense of intangible assets on future years (in thousands):


For the six months ended December 31, 2010	$	4,909
For the year ended December 31, 2011		9,051
For the year ended December 31, 2012		7,880
For the year ended December 31, 2013		6,905
For the year ended December 31, 2014		6,292

7. Other Comprehensive Income

The Company’s only component of other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was the net unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Change in unrealized holding gains, net	$	38,585		$	(1,657	)	$	37,914		$	6,911
Less: Reclassification adjustments for gains included in income		(1,136	)		(1,849	)		(6,518	)		(1,891	)

Net unrealized holding gains (losses)		37,449			(3,506	)		31,396			5,020
Income tax (expense) benefit		(13,702	)		1,268			(11,472	)		(1,887	)

Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	23,747		$	(2,238	)	$	19,924		$	3,133

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

8. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees

In the normal course of business, the Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in order to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, standby letters of credit, futures contracts, forward foreign exchange contracts and spot foreign exchange contracts. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. The contract or notional amount of those instruments reflects the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. Many of the commitments expire without being drawn upon, therefore, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent the future cash requirements of the Company.

The following table summarizes the Company’s off-balance-sheet financial instruments.

Contract or Notional Amount (in thousands):


	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Commitments to extend credit for loans (excluding credit card loans)	$	1,924,873	$	1,868,869
Commitments to extend credit under credit card loans		1,343,819		1,320,416
Commercial letters of credit		4,451		3,538
Standby letters of credit		310,406		308,866
Futures contracts		21,000		13,300
Forward foreign exchange contracts		64,980		69,342
Spot foreign exchange contracts		8,459		5,513

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit is represented by the contract or notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are named defendants in various lawsuits and counter-claims. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, none of these lawsuits are expected to have a materially adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

9. Business Segment Reporting

The Company has strategically aligned its operations into the following three reportable segments (collectively, “Business Segments”): Commercial Financial Services, Institutional Financial Services, and Personal Financial Services. The Business Segments were redefined during the first quarter of 2010 to better organize the Company’s business around customer needs. In 2009, the Business Segments were Commercial Banking and Lending, Payment and Technology Solutions, Banking Services, Consumer Services, Asset Management, and Fund Services. Business segment financial results produced by the Company’s internal management accounting system are evaluated regularly by the Executive Committee in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance for individual Business Segments. The management accounting system assigns balance sheet and income statement items to each business segment using methodologies that are refined on an ongoing basis. For comparability purposes, amounts in all periods are based on methodologies in effect at June 30, 2010.

The following summaries provide information about the activities of each segment:

Commercial Financial Services resulted in combining Commercial Banking and Lending with Treasury Management (previously a component of Payment and Technology Solutions). Commercial Financial Services serves the commercial lending and leasing, capital markets, and treasury management needs of the Company’s mid-market businesses and governmental entities by offering various products and services. Such services include commercial loans, letters of credit, loan syndication services, consultative services, and a variety of financial options for companies that need non-traditional banking services. Capital markets services include asset-based financing, asset securitization, equity and mezzanine financing, factoring, private and public placement of senior debt, as well as merger and acquisition consulting. Treasury management services include depository services, account reconciliation services, electronic fund transfer services, controlled disbursements, lockbox services, and remote deposit capture services.

Institutional Financial Services is a combination of Banking Services, Fund Services, and Asset Management services provided to institutional clients. This segment also includes consumer credit card services, formerly included in Consumer Services, and commercial credit card services, formerly included in Payment and Technology Solutions. Healthcare services, mutual fund cash management and international payments, previously included in Payment and Technology Solutions, are also included in this segment. Institutional Financial Services includes businesses such as the Company’s institutional investment services functions, Scout Investment Advisors, UMB Fund Services, corporate trust and escrow services as well as correspondent banking, investment banking, and UMB Healthcare Services. Products and services include bond trading transactions, cash letter collections, FiServ account processing, investment portfolio accounting and safekeeping, reporting for asset/liability management, and Fed funds transactions. UMB Fund Services provides fund administration and accounting, investor services and transfer agency, marketing and distribution, custody and alternative investment services.

Personal Financial Services combines Consumer Services and Asset Management services provided to personal clients. This segment combines the Company’s consumer bank with the individual investment and wealth management solutions. The range of services offered to UMB clients extends from a basic checking account to estate planning and trust services. Products and services include the Company’s bank branches, call center, internet banking and ATM network, deposit accounts, private banking, installment loans, home equity lines of credit, residential mortgages, small business loans, brokerage services, and insurance services in addition to a full spectrum of investment advisory, trust, and custody services.

Treasury and Other Adjustments includes asset and liability management activities and miscellaneous other items of a corporate nature not allocated to specific business lines. The assets within this segment include the Company’s investment portfolio. Corporate eliminations are also allocated to this segment.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

Business Segment Information

Segment financial results were as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Commercial Financial Services					Institutional Financial Services
	2010		2009			2010			2009
Net interest income	$	37,961	$	37,077		$	13,450		$	14,289
Provision for loan losses		2,765		3,179			4,960			2,848
Noninterest income		8,651		8,180			54,948			43,875
Noninterest expense		29,005		28,977			49,244			40,835

Income before income taxes	$	14,842	$	13,101		$	14,194		$	14,481

Average assets	$	3,493,000	$	3,539,000		$	761,000		$	560,000
Depreciation and amortization		2,243		2,350			3,796			2,783
Expenditures for additions to premises and equipment		1,624		2,116			3,294			4,045

	Personal Financial Services					Treasury and Other Adjustments
	2010		2009			2010			2009
Net interest income	$	26,262	$	22,840		$	(5	)	$	(32	)
Provision for loan losses		375		273			—			—
Noninterest income		24,105		22,578			1,396			2,690
Noninterest expense		44,643		47,561			3,230			1,507

Income before income taxes	$	5,349	$	(2,416	)	$	(1,839	)	$	1,151

Average assets	$	761,000	$	847,000		$	5,841,000		$	5,059,000
Depreciation and amortization		3,031		3,580			439			602
Expenditures for additions to premises and equipment		2,277		404			203			129

	Total Consolidated Company
	2010		2009
Net interest income	$	77,668	$	74,174
Provision for loan losses		8,100		6,300
Noninterest income		89,100		77,323
Noninterest expense		126,122		118,880

Income before income taxes	$	32,546	$	26,317

Average assets	$	10,856,000	$	10,005,000
Depreciation and amortization		9,509		9,315
Expenditures for additions to premises and equipment		7,398		6,694

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Commercial Financial Services					Institutional Financial Services
	2010		2009			2010			2009
Net interest income	$	76,403	$	74,972		$	24,911		$	29,157
Provision for loan losses		5,623		5,303			9,716			6,505
Noninterest income		17,153		16,372			106,247			83,219
Noninterest expense		58,228		55,425			94,963			76,835

Income before income taxes	$	29,705	$	30,616		$	26,479		$	29,036

Average assets	$	3,500,000	$	3,519,000		$	691,000		$	496,000
Depreciation and amortization		4,494		4,966			7,296			5,136
Expenditures for additions to premises and equipment		1,970		3,048			4,978			4,775

	Personal Financial Services					Treasury and Other Adjustments
	2010		2009			2010			2009
Net interest income	$	52,134	$	45,284		$	(7	)	$	(32	)
Provision for loan losses		1,071		492			—			—
Noninterest income		46,580		45,989			5,526			653
Noninterest expense		86,645		91,717			3,639			1,546

Income before income taxes	$	10,998	$	(936	)	$	1,880		$	(925	)

Average assets	$	769,000	$	868,000		$	5,974,000		$	5,242,000
Depreciation and amortization		5,992		7,731			897			884
Expenditures for additions to premises and equipment		3,096		2,169			450			283

	Total Consolidated Company
	2010		2009
Net interest income	$	153,441	$	149,381
Provision for loan losses		16,410		12,300
Noninterest income		175,506		146,233
Noninterest expense		243,475		225,523

Income before income taxes	$	69,062	$	57,791

Average assets	$	10,934,000	$	10,125,000
Depreciation and amortization		18,679		18,717
Expenditures for additions to premises and equipment		10,494		10,275

10. Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents information about the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine such fair value.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

Fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the hierarchy. In such cases, the fair value is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):


	June 30, 2010	Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using
Description	June 30, 2010	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
U.S. Treasury	400	400	—	—
U.S. Agencies	24,259	24,259	—	—
Mortgage-backed	6,459	—	6,459	—
State and political subdivisions	4,824	—	4,824	—
Trading - other	11,837	11,829	8	—

Trading securities	47,779	36,488	11,291	—

U.S. Treasury	833,402	833,402	—	—
U.S. Agencies	1,550,214	1,550,214	—	—
Mortgage-backed	1,538,024	—	1,538,024	—
State and political subdivisions	1,004,182	—	1,004,182	—

Available for sale securities	4,925,822	2,383,616	2,542,206	—

Total	4,973,601	2,420,104	2,553,497	—

The fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis is required to be disclosed. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:

Cash and Short-Term Investments The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and resell agreements are reasonable estimates of their fair values.

Securities Available for Sale Fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities.

Trading Securities Fair values for trading securities (including financial futures), are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar securities.

Loans Fair values are estimated for portfolios with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type, such as commercial, real estate, consumer, and credit card. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and variable interest rate categories. The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit rating and for the same remaining maturities.

Deposit Liabilities The fair value of demand deposits and savings accounts is the amount payable on demand at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates that are currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (CONTINUED)

FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED)

Short-Term Debt The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and other short-term debt are reasonable estimates of their fair value because of the short-term nature of their maturities.

Long-Term Debt Rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate fair value of existing debt.

Other Off-Balance Sheet Instruments The fair value of loan commitments and letters of credit are determined based on the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreement and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. Neither the fees earned during the year on these instruments nor their fair values at June 30, 2010 are significant to the Company’s consolidated financial position.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at June, 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows (in millions):


	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Cash and short-term investments	$	1,059.2	$	1,059.2	$	1,845.1	1,845.1
Securities available for sale		4,925.8		4,925.8		4,885.8	4,885.8
Securities held to maturity		57.1		57.1		57.0	57.0
Federal Reserve Bank and other stock		21.8		21.8		22.7	22.7
Trading securities		47.8		47.8		38.2	38.2
Loans (exclusive of allowance for loan loss)		4,458.9		4,541.4		4,268.1	4,395.1

FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
Demand and savings deposits		6,913.2		6,913.2		6,679.5	6,679.5
Time Deposits		1,507.2		1,522.2		1,855.0	1,874.7
Federal funds and repurchase agreements		1,400.9		1,400.8		1,927.6	1,927.6
Short-term debt		28.6		28.6		29.5	29.6
Long-term debt		9.3		10.0		25.5	27.8
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Commitments to extend credit for loans				2.9			4.7
Commercial letters of credit				0.1			0.2
Standby letters of credit		310.4		1.0		308.9	1.6

The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The estimated market values have not been updated since June 30, 2010; therefore current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented above.

11. Acquisition

On July 30, 2010, UMB Advisors, LLC (“UMB Advisors”) and UMB Merchant Banc, LLC (“UMBMB”, together with UMB Advisors, the “Buyers”), a subsidiary of UMB Financial Corporation, completed the purchase of substantially all of the assets of Prairie Capital Management LLC (“Prairie Capital”) and PCM LLC (“PCM”) for cash of $25.9 million. Prairie Capital is in the business of providing investment management services and PCM is the general partner of various investment funds and associated with Prairie Capital’s business. UMB Advisors will purchase substantially all of the assets of Prairie Capital’s business and UMBMB will purchase substantially all of the assets of PCM’s business. This acquisition will increase the Company’s assets under management base by $2.2 billion and increase the Company’s servicing assets by $2.6 billion.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This review highlights the material changes in the results of operations and changes in financial condition for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010. It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, notes to condensed consolidated financial statements and other financial statistics appearing elsewhere in this report. Results of operations for the periods included in this review are not necessarily indicative of results to be attained during any future period.

SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information included or incorporated by reference in this report contains forward-looking statements of expected future developments within the meaning of and pursuant to the safe harbor provisions established by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may refer to financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future financial performance and business of the Company, including, without limitation:

•

Statements that are not historical in nature; and

•

Statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” or similar words or expressions.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. You are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement which speaks only as of the date it was made. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s expectations and are based on currently available data; however, they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:

•

General economic and political conditions, either nationally, internationally or in the Company’s footprint, may be less favorable than expected;

•

Legislative or regulatory changes;

•

Changes in the interest rate environment;

•

Changes in the securities markets impacting mutual fund performance and flows;

•

Changes in operations;

•

Changes in accounting rules;

•

The ability to successfully and timely integrate acquisitions into existing charters;

•

Competitive pressures among financial services companies may increase significantly;

•

Changes in technology may be more difficult or expensive than anticipated;

•

Changes in the ability of customers to repay loans;

•

Changes in loan demand may adversely affect liquidity needs; and

•

Changes in employee costs.

Any forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with information about risks and uncertainties set forth in this report and in documents incorporated herein by reference. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company does not intend to review or revise any particular forward-looking statement in light of events that occur thereafter or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview

The Company focuses on the following four core strategies. Management believes these strategies will continue to improve net income and strengthen the balance sheet.

The first strategy is to grow the Company’s fee-based businesses. The emphasis on fee-based operations helps reduce the Company’s exposure to changes in interest rates. During the second quarter of 2010, noninterest income increased $11.8 million, or 15.2 percent, compared to the same period of 2009. The Company continues to emphasize its asset management, bankcard services, health care services, and treasury management solution businesses. In particular, during the second quarter of 2010, the increase in noninterest income is primarily attributable to increased trust and securities processing income. The increase in these fees for the three month period compared to the same period last year was primarily attributable to an increase in fee income from Scout Funds and fund administration and custody services. Fee income from the Scout Funds increased by $4.5 million, or 59.1 percent, and fund administration and custody services fees increased by $4.3 million, or 38.3 percent.

The second strategy is a focus on net interest income through loan and deposit growth. This is not just a growth strategy and includes a focus on rate, volume and mix. Net interest income increased $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to one year ago. Total deposits increased $746.4 million, or 9.7 percent, compared to first quarter of 2009, which positions the Company well to fund customer credit needs when the demand for loans increases. While total deposits increased, total interest expense decreased by $4.5 million, or 33.0 percent, primarily due to 14.1 percent of the growth coming from noninterest-bearing deposits. Average earning assets increased by $1.1 billion, or 12.2 percent, compared to the second quarter of 2009 due to the increased deposit funding. This earning asset growth is attributable to an increase of $1.1 billion increase in total securities, including trading.

The third strategy is a focus on improving operating efficiencies. At June 30, 2010, the Company had 135 branches. Repositioning and increasing utilization of our distribution network remains a priority. The Company continues to emphasize increasing its customer base by providing a broad offering of services through our existing network. These efforts have resulted in the total deposits growth previously discussed. The Company’s efficiency ratio for the quarter was 73.9 percent in 2010 and 76.4 percent in 2009. The Company continues to evaluate its cost structure for opportunities to moderate expense growth without sacrificing growth initiatives. The Company continues to focus on cost savings through technology solutions that improve and automate processes.

The fourth strategy is a focus on capital management. Specifically, the Company continues to invest in organic growth; acquisition opportunities that make sense strategically, financially, operationally, and culturally; and focus on returning capital to shareholders. As an example of the Company putting capital to work, bankcard fees increased by $2.8 million, or 25.5 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods one year ago. This increase is directly associated with the acquisition of credit card portfolios since second quarter 2009. The Company repurchased 55,525 shares of common stock at an average price of $40.53 per share during the second quarter of 2010. The Company places a significant emphasis on the maintenance of a strong capital position, which management believes promotes investor confidence, provides access to funding sources under favorable terms, and enhances the Company’s ability to capitalize on business growth and acquisition opportunities. At June 30, 2010, the Company had $1.1 billion in shareholders equity, which resulted in a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.36 percent, which is substantially higher than the 10 percent regulatory minimum to be considered well-capitalized.

Earnings Summary

The Company recorded consolidated net income of $23.0 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to $19.0 million for the same period a year earlier. This represents a 20.9 percent increase over the three-month period ended June 30, 2009. Basic earnings per share for the second quarter of 2010 were $0.57 per share ($0.57 per share fully-diluted) compared to $0.47 per share ($0.47 per share fully-diluted) for the second quarter of 2009. Return on average assets and return on average common shareholders’ equity for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 were 0.85 and 8.77 percent, respectively, compared to 0.76 and 7.66 percent for the three-month period ended June 30, 2009.

The Company recorded consolidated net income of $49.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to $41.6 million for the same period a year earlier. This represents a 18.2 percent increase over the six-month period ended June 30, 2009. Basic earnings per share for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 were $1.23 per share ($1.22 per share fully-diluted) compared to $1.03 per share ($1.02 per share fully-diluted) for the period in 2009. Return on average assets and return on average common shareholders’ equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 were 0.91 and 9.50 percent, respectively, compared to 0.83 and 8.44 percent for the same period in 2009.

Net interest income for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010 increased $3.5 million, or 4.7 percent, and $4.1 million, or 2.7 percent, respectively, compared to the same period in 2009. These increases are primarily due to the reduced level of interest expense on deposits, which outpaced the reduction in interest income during both periods. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, average earning assets increased by $770.8 million, or 8.4 percent, and for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, they increased by $723.6, or 7.8 percent, compared to the same periods in 2009. Net interest margin, on a tax-equivalent basis, decreased to 3.29 percent and 3.24 percent for the three and six-months periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to 3.42 percent and 3.41 percent for the same periods in 2009. These changes are discussed in greater detail below under Net Interest Income.

The provision for loan losses increased by $1.8 million and $4.1 million for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. These changes are a direct result of applying the Company’s methodology for computing the allowance for loan losses. With the increased provision, the allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans increased by 31 basis points to 1.58 percent as of June 30, 2010, compared to June 30, 2009. Management calculates a range in determining the appropriate level of allowance for loan losses. For a description of the Company’s methodology for computing the allowance for loan losses, please see the summary discussion of the Allowance for Loan Losses within the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates subsection of the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Noninterest income increased by $11.8 million, or 15.2 percent, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 and increased by $29.3 million, or 20.0 percent, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods one year ago. These increases are discussed in greater detail below under Noninterest Income.

Noninterest expense increased by $7.2 million, or 6.1 percent, for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, and increased by $18.0 million, or 8.0 percent, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. These increases are discussed in greater detail below under Noninterest Expense.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is a significant source of the Company’s earnings and represents the amount by which interest income on earning assets exceeds the interest expense paid on liabilities. The volume of interest-earning assets and the related funding sources, the overall mix of these assets and liabilities, and the rates paid on each affect net interest income. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2010, net interest income increased $3.5 million, or 4.7 percent, compared to the same period in 2009. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, net interest income increased $4.1 million, or 2.7 percent, compared to the same period in 2009.

Table 1 shows the impact of earning asset rate changes compared to changes in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The Company continues to experience a repricing of these earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities during the recent interest rate cycle. While the Company continues to see declining rates, it has been able to improve net interest income. As illustrated on this table, net interest spread for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by 4 basis points and net interest margin decreased by 13 basis points compared to the same period in 2009. Net interest spread for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased by 9 basis points and net interest margin decreased by 17 basis points compared to the same period in 2009. These results are primarily due to a favorable rate variance on loans and deposits and a volume variance on investments. The combined impact of these variances has led to an increase in the Company’s net interest income.

The favorable rate variance on deposits is bolstered by the contribution from free funds. For the impact of the contribution from free funds, see the Analysis of Net Interest Margin within Table 2 below. Table 2 also illustrates how the changes in volume and rates have resulted in an increase in net interest income.

Table 1

AVERAGE BALANCES/YIELDS AND RATES (tax-equivalent basis) (unaudited, dollars in thousands)

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the average earning assets and resulting yields, as well as the average interest-bearing liabilities and resulting yields, expressed in both dollars and rates. All average balances are daily average balances. The average yield on earning assets without the tax equivalent basis adjustment would have been 3.50 percent for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 and 3.85 percent for the same period in 2009.


	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2010					2009
	Average Balance			Average Yield/Rate		Average Balance			Average Yield/Rate
Assets
Loans, net of unearned interest	$	4,418,479		5.08	%	$	4,433,564		4.85	%
Securities:
Taxable		3,909,296		2.31			3,224,646		3.21
Tax-exempt		977,538		4.47			894,669		4.99

Total securities		4,886,834		2.74			4,119,315		3.60
Federal funds and resell agreements		43,402		0.43			45,967		0.44
Interest-bearing due from banks		551,402		0.75			539,774		0.70
Trading		40,399		1.92			31,056		2.84

Total earning assets		9,940,516		3.66			9,169,676		4.01
Allowance for loan losses		(67,991	)				(55,336	)
Other assets		983,600					890,399

Total assets	$	10,856,125				$	10,004,739

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits	$	5,510,102		0.62	%	$	5,149,419		0.98	%
Federal funds and repurchase agreements		1,345,516		0.15			1,254,984		0.17
Borrowed funds		46,154		0.87			55,023		2.82

Total interest-bearing liabilities		6,901,772		0.53			6,459,426		0.84
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		2,771,267					2,452,041
Other liabilities		131,067					97,302
Shareholders’ equity		1,052,019					995,970

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	10,856,125				$	10,004,739

Net interest spread				3.13	%				3.17	%
Net interest margin				3.29					3.42


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010					2009
	Average Balance			Average Yield/Rate		Average Balance			Average Yield/Rate
Assets
Loans, net of unearned interest	$	4,391,601		5.03	%	$	4,423,369		4.85	%
Securities:
Taxable		3,823,603		2.44			3,454,857		3.21
Tax-exempt		979,218		4.58			874,301		5.08

Total securities		4,802,821		2.88			4,329,158		3.59
Federal funds and resell agreements		65,854		0.33			66,097		0.55
Interest-bearing due from banks		748,294		0.63			473,480		0.76
Trading		38,308		1.84			31,200		2.62

Total earning assets		10,046,878		3.63			9,323,304		4.02
Allowance for loan losses		(66,499	)				(54,479	)
Other assets		953,165					856,635

Total assets	$	10,933,544				$	10,125,460

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing deposits	$	5,587,925		0.65	%	$	5,173,137		1.03	%
Federal funds and repurchase agreements		1,367,838		0.14			1,455,881		0.17
Borrowed funds		46,934		1.55			53,629		2.92

Total interest-bearing liabilities		7,002,697		0.56			6,682,647		0.86
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		2,759,309					2,351,013
Other liabilities		127,346					97,388
Shareholders’ equity		1,044,192					994,412

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	10,933,544				$	10,125,460

Net interest spread				3.07	%				3.16	%
Net interest margin				3.24					3.41

Table 2 presents the dollar amount of change in net interest income and margin due to volume and rate. Table 2 also reflects the effect that interest-free funds have on net interest margin. Although interest-free funds (total earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities) increased $328.5 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 and increased $403.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, the benefit from interest free funds declined by 9 basis points from the three months ended June 30, 2009, and declined by 8 basis points from the six months ended June 30, 2009, due to decreases in interest rates.

Table 2

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN (unaudited, dollars in thousands)

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs 2009									Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 vs 2009
	Volume			Rate			Total			Volume			Rate			Total
Change in interest earned on:
Loans	$	(190	)	$	2,604		$	2,414		$	(788	)	$	3,885		$	3,097
Securities:
Taxable		3,940			(7,262	)		(3,322	)		4,463			(13,123	)		(8,660	)
Tax-exempt		970			(1,110	)		(140	)		2,369			(2,212	)		157
Federal funds sold and resell agreements		(3	)		—			(3	)		—			(72	)		(72	)
Interest-bearing due from banks		22			68			90			863			(300	)		563
Trading		50			(63	)		(13	)		44			(82	)		(38	)

Interest income		4,789			(5,763	)		(974	)		6,951			(11,904	)		(4,953	)
Change in interest incurred on:
Interest-bearing deposits		554			(4,701	)		(4,147	)		1,342			(9,690	)		(8,348	)
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements		34			(68	)		(34	)		(61	)		(188	)		(249	)
Borrowed funds		(19	)		(268	)		(287	)		(51	)		(366	)		(417	)

Interest expense		569			(5,037	)		(4,468	)		1,230			(10,244	)		(9,014	)

Net interest income	$	4,220		$	(726	)	$	3,494		$	5,721		$	(1,660	)	$	4,061


ANALYSIS OF NET INTEREST MARGIN

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change
Average earning assets	$	9,940,516		$	9,169,676		$	770,840		$	10,046,878		$	9,323,304		$	723,574
Average interest-bearing liabilities		6,901,772			6,459,426			442,346			7,002,697			6,682,647			320,050

Average interest free funds	$	3,038,744		$	2,710,250		$	328,494		$	3,044,181		$	2,640,657		$	403,524

Free funds ratio (free funds to earning assets)		30.57	%		29.56	%		1.01	%		30.30	%		28.32	%		1.98	%
Tax-equivalent yield on earning assets		3.66			4.01			(0.35	)%		3.63	%		4.02	%		(0.39	)%
Cost of interest-bearing liabilities		0.53			0.84			(0.31	)		0.56			0.86			(0.30	)

Net interest spread		3.13	%		3.17	%		(0.04	)%		3.07	%		3.16	%		(0.09	)%
Benefit of interest-free funds		0.16			0.25			(0.09	)		0.17			0.25			(0.08	)

Net interest margin		3.29	%		3.42	%		(0.13	)%		3.24	%		3.41	%		(0.17	)%

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses (ALL) represents management’s judgment of the losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. An analysis is performed quarterly to determine the appropriate balance of the ALL. This analysis considers items such as historical loss trends, a review of individual loans, migration analysis, current economic conditions, loan growth and characteristics, industry or segment concentration and other factors. This analysis is performed separately for each bank as regulatory agencies require that the adequacy of the ALL be maintained on a bank-by-bank basis. After the balance sheet analysis is performed for the ALL, the provision for loan losses is computed as the amount required to adjust the ALL to the appropriate level.

Based on the factors above, management of the Company expensed $8.1 million and $16.4 million related to the provision for loan losses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to $6.3 million and $12.3 million for the same periods in 2009. As illustrated in Table 3 below, the ALL increased to 1.58 percent of total loans as of June 30, 2010, compared to 1.27 percent of total loans as of the same period in 2009.

Table 3 presents a summary of the Company’s ALL for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2009. Net charge-offs were $10.4 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to $9.5 million for the same period in 2009. See “Credit Risk Management” under “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this report for information relating to nonaccrual loans, past due loans, restructured loans and other credit risk matters.

Table 3

ANALYSIS OF ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (unaudited, dollars in thousands)


	Six Months Ended June 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2009
Allowance-January 1	$	64,139		$	52,297		$	52,297
Provision for loan losses		16,410			12,300			32,100
Allowance of banks and loans acquired		—			—			—

Charge-offs:
Commercial		(3,069	)		(2,652	)		(5,532	)
Consumer:
Bankcard		(7,498	)		(6,820	)		(13,625	)
Other		(1,777	)		(2,522	)		(4,911	)
Real estate		(20	)		(249	)		(881	)

Total charge-offs		(12,364	)		(12,243	)		(24,949	)

Recoveries:
Commercial		241			1,138			1,419
Consumer:
Bankcard		609			676			1,334
Other		1,074			940			1,936
Real estate		1			1			2

Total recoveries		1,925			2,755			4,691

Net charge-offs		(10,439	)		(9,488	)		(20,258	)

Allowance-end of period		70,110			55,109			64,139

Average loans, net of unearned interest	$	4,376,529		$	4,389,597		$	4,356,187
Loans at end of period, net of unearned interest		4,448,418			4,331,887			4,314,705
Allowance to loans at end of period		1.58	%		1.27	%		1.49	%
Allowance as a multiple of net charge-offs		3.33	x		2.88	x		3.17	x
Net charge-offs to:
Provision for loan losses		63.62	%		77.14	%		63.11	%
Average loans		0.48			0.44			0.47

Noninterest Income

A key objective of the Company is the growth of noninterest income to enhance profitability and provide steady income. Fee-based services are typically non-credit related and not generally affected by fluctuations in interest rates.

The Company’s fee-based services provide the opportunity to offer multiple products and services, which management believes will more closely align the customer with the Company. The Company is currently emphasizing fee-based services including trust and securities processing, bankcard, brokerage, health care services, and treasury management. Management believes it can offer these products and services both efficiently and profitably, as most share common platforms and support structures Table 4 below summarizes the components of noninterest income and the respective year-over-year comparison for each category.

Table 4

SUMMARY OF NONINTEREST INCOME (unaudited, dollars in thousands)


	Three Months Ended June 30,
					Dollar Change			Percent Change
	2010		2009		10-09			10-09
Trust and securities processing	$	38,615	$	28,635	$	9,980		34.85	%
Trading and investment banking		5,530		8,977		(3,447	)	(38.40	)
Service charges on deposit accounts		20,163		21,135		(972	)	(4.60	)
Insurance fees and commissions		1,287		886		401		45.26
Brokerage fees		1,598		1,512		86		5.69
Bankcard fees		13,979		11,142		2,837		25.46
Gains on sales of securities available for sale, net		1,136		1,849		(713	)	(38.56	)
Other		6,792		3,187		3,605		113.12

Total noninterest income	$	89,100	$	77,323	$	11,777		15.23	%


	Six Months Ended June 30,
					Dollar Change			Percent Change
	2010		2009		10-09			10-09
Trust and securities processing	$	74,187	$	53,534	$	20,653		38.58	%
Trading and investment banking		12,557		13,838		(1,281	)	(9.26	)
Service charges on deposits		40,683		41,929		(1,246	)	(2.97	)
Insurance fees and commissions		2,986		2,456		530		21.58
Brokerage fees		2,934		3,864		(930	)	(24.07	)
Bankcard fees		25,998		22,089		3,909		17.70
Gains on sales of securities available for sale, net		6,518		1,891		4,627		244.69
Other		9,643		6,632		3,011		45.40

Total noninterest income	$	175,506	$	146,233	$	29,273		20.02	%

Fee-based, or noninterest income (summarized in Table 4), increased by $11.8 million, or 15.2 percent, during the three months ended June 30, 2010, and increased by $29.3 million, or 20.0 percent, during the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009.

Trust and securities processing consists of fees earned on personal and corporate trust accounts, custody of securities services, trust investments and money management services, and servicing of mutual fund assets. The increase in these fees for the three and six-month periods compared to the same periods last year was primarily attributable to an increase in fee income from Scout Funds and fund administration and custody services. Fee income from the Scout Funds for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, increased by $4.5 million, or 59.1 percent, and by $8.3 million, or 58.2 percent, respectively. Fund administration and custody services fees for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, increased by $4.3 million, or 38.3 percent, and $10.9 million, or 54.8 percent, respectively. Trust and securities processing fees are asset-based. As such, they are highly correlated to the change in market value of the assets. Thus, the related income for the remainder of the year will be affected by changes in the securities markets. Management continues to emphasize sales of services to both new and existing clients as well as increasing and improving the distribution channels, which lead to increased inflows into the Scout Funds.

Trading and investment banking fees decreased by $3.4 million, or 38.4 percent, and by $1.3 million, or 9.3 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared the same periods one year ago. This activity is indicative of the dynamic rate environment and is predominately due to market fluctuations in the Company’s mutual fund investments.

Bankcard fees increased by $2.8 million, or 25.5 percent, and by $3.9 million, or 17.7 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods one year ago. This increase is directly associated with the acquisition of credit card portfolios during the period.

During the first six months of 2010, $6.5 million in pre-tax gains were recognized on the sales of securities available for sale. These sales are part of an objective to monitor and control the Company’s interest rate sensitivity in an anticipated rising interest rate environment.

Other noninterest income increased $3.6 million, or greater than 100.0 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and by $3.0 million, or 45.4 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. This increase is attributable to the pre-tax gain of $3.5 million on the sale of art, which was contributed to a charitable foundation (see other non-interest expense below).

Noninterest Expense

The components of noninterest expense are shown below on Table 5.

Table 5

SUMMARY OF NONINTEREST EXPENSE (unaudited in thousands)


	Three Months Ended June 30,
					Dollar Change			Percent Change
	2010		2009		10-09			10-09
Salaries and employee benefits	$	63,552	$	59,596	$	3,956		6.64	%
Occupancy, net		8,924		8,572		352		4.11
Equipment		11,213		11,998		(785	)	(6.54	)
Supplies and services		4,680		5,570		(890	)	(15.98	)
Marketing and business development		4,430		4,171		259		6.21
Processing fees		11,214		8,140		3,074		37.76
Legal and consulting		2,770		2,644		126		4.77
Bankcard		4,360		2,927		1,433		48.96
Amortization of other intangible assets		2,442		1,495		947		63.34
Regulatory fees		3,516		7,908		(4,392	)	(55.54	)
Other		9,021		5,859		3,162		53.96

Total noninterest expense	$	126,122	$	118,880	$	7,242		6.09	%


	Six Months Entded June 30,
					Dollar Change			Percent Change
	2010		2009		10-09			10-09
Salaries and employee benefits	$	125,805	$	117,593	$	8,212		6.98	%
Occupancy, net		17,844		16,716		1,128		6.75
Equipment		22,083		24,994		(2,911	)	(11.65	)
Supplies and services		9,387		10,947		(1,560	)	(14.25	)
Marketing and business development		8,135		7,361		774		10.51
Processing fees		22,242		15,143		7,099		46.88
Legal and consulting		4,392		4,192		200		4.77
Bankcard		7,550		6,884		666		9.67
Amortization of other intangible assets		4,533		2,471		2,062		83.45
Regulatory fees		6,754		9,635		(2,881	)	(29.90	)
Other		14,750		9,587		5,163		53.85

Total noninterest expense	$	243,475	$	225,523	$	17,952		7.96	%

Noninterest expense increased by $7.2 million, or 6.1 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and by $18.0 million, or 8.0 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. Table 5 above summarizes the components of noninterest expense and the respective year-over-year comparison for each category.

Salaries and employee benefits increased by $4.0 million, or 6.6 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and by $8.2 million, or 7.0 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. These increases are primarily due to higher base salary, commission, and health insurance costs. Salaries increased by $1.6 million, or 3.9 percent, and $3.0 million, or 3.7 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. Commissions and bonuses increased by $1.3 million, or 12.9 percent, and $3.2 million, or 16.3 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009. Health insurance costs increased by $0.6 million, or 16.2 percent, and $1.6 million, or 22.3 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009.

Processing fees increased $3.1 million, or 37.8 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and by $7.1 million, or 46.9 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. This increase, which is correlated to the increase in trust and securities processing income noted above, is due to increased third party custodian fees related to international transactions from mutual fund clients and fees paid by the advisor to third-party distributors of the Scout Funds.

Regulatory fees decreased $4.4 million, or 55.5 percent, and $2.9 million, or 29.9 percent, for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. The decreases in both periods are a direct result of a special assessment levied by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) during the second quarter of 2009.

Other noninterest expense increased $3.2 million, or 54.0 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and by $5.2 million, or 53.9 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to the same period in 2009. This increase is attributable to the contribution of $3.5 million in proceeds from the sale of art to a charitable foundation.

Income Tax Expense

The effective tax rate is 28.8 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010, compared to 28.0 percent for the same period in 2009. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to tax-exempt income representing a slightly smaller percentage of pre-tax earnings in 2010 compared to 2009.

Strategic Lines of Business

Table 6

NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES BY SEGMENT (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010		2009
Segment
Commercial Financial Services	$	14,842		$	13,101		$	29,705	$	30,616
Institutional Financial Services		14,194			14,481			26,479		29,036
Personal Financial Services		5,349			(2,416	)		10,998		(936	)
Treasury and Other Adjustments		(1,839	)		1,151			1,880		(925	)

Total Consolidated Company	$	32,546		$	26,317		$	69,062	$	57,791

Commercial Financial Services’ net income before taxes decreased $0.9 million to $29.7 million compared to 2009. The decrease in net income was driven primarily by an increase in noninterest expense of $2.8 million, or 5.1 percent, offset by an increase in net interest income of $1.4 million, or 1.9 percent and an increase in noninterest income of $0.8 million, or 4.8 percent. Noninterest expense increased due to higher allocated overhead costs compared to 2009. Loan and deposit balances in this segment were flat compared to 2009. The net margin on commercial loans widened by approximately 61 basis points from increasing interest yields and a decrease to the funds transfer pricing charge on loans. The net margin on deposits and repurchase agreements in the segment decreased over the same period in 2009 by approximately 41 basis points due to the continued low rate environment. The impact of the rate movements on loans, deposits, and repurchase agreements resulted in the increase in net interest income. Noninterest income increased due to higher loan fees. Management anticipates a static or slowly recovering economic environment during the remainder of 2010 with little movement in interest rates and net income growth to be relatively flat.

Institutional Financial Services’ net income before taxes decreased $2.6 million to $26.5 million from the same period in 2009. Noninterest income increased $22.9 million, offset by a $18.1 million increase in noninterest expense and a $4.1 million decrease in net interest income. Noninterest income increased due to a $8.3 million increase in advisory fees associated with the Scout Funds and a $10.9 million increase in fund administration and custody services income. Scout Fund fee income increased due to inflows of $1.5 billion for the twelve months ended June 30, 2010 and overall market appreciation over last year. Fee income from the acquisition of J.D. Clark & Co., Inc. and market appreciation were the drivers of the increase in fund administration and custody services income compared to 2009. Credit card income increased $3.3 million due to increased processing fees. Credit card balances increased approximately $125.0 million compared to 2009 primarily from the acquisition of 5 credit card portfolios totaling approximately $90.0 million over the past year. Noninterest expense increased $3.8 million from third party custodial fees related to international transactions from mutual fund clients and increased $2.5 million in third party fees paid by the advisor to distributors of the Scout Funds. The other driver was an increase in salaries and benefits of $9.2 million due to increased commission expense related to the increased revenue in this segment as well as the addition of base salary expenses from the acquisition of J.D. Clark & Co., Inc. Net interest income decreased due to decreased funds transfer pricing on deposits in this segment.

Personal Financial Services’ net income before taxes increased by $11.9 million to $11.0 million compared to 2009. Several drivers contributed to this increase. Earning asset balances have decreased, but the rate of the decrease has slowed in 2010 as the indirect automobile portfolio runoff is slowing. This is offset by the growth in the home equity loan portfolio. Net interest income increased $6.9 million, or 15.1 percent, over 2009 due to decreased funds transfer pricing costs on assets and an increased funds transfer pricing on deposits in this segment. The deposit balances have also increased in this segment compared to 2009. Noninterest income increased $0.6 million, or 3.6 percent, from 2009. This increase was due to an increase in trust fee income offset by a reduction in deposit service charges as a result of changes in consumer behavior, a reduction of third party revenue sharing streams as off-balance sheet balances are not as valuable in the current rate environment, and lower annuity and brokerage sales. Noninterest expense decreased $5.1 million, or 5.5 percent, over 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a decreased salaries and benefits expenses and decreased allocated overhead expenses.

The net income before tax for the Treasury and Other Adjustments category was $1.9 million for the first six months of 2010, compared to net loss before tax of $0.9 million for the same period in 2009.

Balance Sheet Analysis

Total assets of the Company as of June 30, 2010 decreased $601.1 million compared to December 31, 2009 and increased $1.1 billion, or 11.1 percent, compared to June 30, 2009. The increase in total assets from June 2009 to June 2010 is a result of increased investment securities balances including trading securities of $1.1 billion, or 28.4 percent. This asset balance increase is directly related to a corresponding increase in deposit balances between the same periods of $746.4 million, or 9.7 percent, and an increase in fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements of $312.4 million, or 28.7 percent. The decrease in total assets from December to June is primarily a result of the cyclical trend due to the pledging of investment securities and collateral required related to seasonal public fund repurchase agreements and deposits.

Total deposits and federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase declined at June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009. Deposits declined by $114.1 million, or 1.3 percent, from December to June, and federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase decreased by $526.7 million, or 27.3 percent, from December to June. This decline in deposits and securities sold under agreement to repurchase is primarily driven by the run-off of seasonal public fund tax deposits, as such tax deposits are generally higher around the end of the calendar year.

Table 7

SELECTED BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION (unaudited, dollars in thousands)


	June 30,				December 31, 2009
	2010		2009		December 31, 2009
Total assets	$	11,062,280	$	9,955,126	$	11,663,355
Loans, net of unearned interest		4,448,418		4,331,887		4,314,705
Total investment securities		5,052,514		3,935,132		5,003,720
Interest-bearing due from banks		718,410		698,246		1,057,195
Total earning assets		10,189,307		9,078,316		10,658,769
Total deposits		8,420,392		7,674,009		8,534,488
Total borrowed funds		1,438,804		1,155,515		1,982,579

Loans

Loans represent the Company’s largest source of interest income. In addition to growing the commercial loan portfolio, management believes its middle market commercial business and its consumer business, including home equity and credit card loan products, are the market niches that represent its best opportunity to cross-sell fee-related services.

Total loan balances have increased $133.7 million, or 3.1 percent, compared to December 31, 2009 and increased $116.5 million, or 2.7 percent, at June 30, 2010 compared to June 30, 2009. The increase from December 31, 2009 is primarily a result of a 6.3 percent increase in real estate loans driven by home equity and commercial real estate loans. The increase at June 30, 2010 compared to June 30, 2009 was primarily related to a $215.6 million increase in real estate loans offset by a $86.9 million decrease in commercial loans. The increase in real estate loans is driven by home equity loans and commercial real estate loans. The decrease in commercial loans is related to reduced loan commitment line utilization due to the current economic environment.

Nonaccrual, past due and restructured loans are discussed under “Credit Risk Management” within “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this report.

Securities

The Company’s securities portfolio provides liquidity as a result of the composition and average life of the underlying securities. This liquidity can be used to fund loan growth or to offset the outflow of traditional funding sources. In addition to providing a potential source of liquidity, the securities portfolio can be used as a tool to manage interest rate sensitivity. The Company’s goal in the management of its securities portfolio is to maximize return within the Company’s parameters of liquidity goals, interest rate risk and credit risk. The Company maintains strong liquidity levels while investing in only high-grade securities. The securities portfolio generates the Company’s second largest component of interest income.

Investment securities totaled $5.1 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $3.9 billion at June 30, 2009, and $5.0 billion at December 31, 2009. Collateral pledging requirements for public funds, loan demand, and deposit funding are the primary factors impacting changes in the level of security holdings. Investment securities comprised 49.6 percent, 46.9 percent, and 43.3 percent, respectively, of the earning assets as of June 30, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009. There were $3.5 billion of these securities pledged to secure U.S. Government deposits, other public deposits, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and certain trust deposits as required by law at June 30, 2010.

Investment securities had an average tax-equivalent yield of 2.88 percent for the first six months of 2010 compared to 3.59 percent for the same period in 2009, or a decrease of 72 basis points. The average life of the securities portfolio was 23.8 months at June 30, 2010 compared to 22.9 months at December 31, 2009 and 25.7 months at June 30, 2009. The decrease in average life from June 30, 2009 was related to a modest shortening of the portfolio due to shorter investments in the low interest rate environment.

Deposits and Borrowed Funds

Deposits decreased $114.1 million, or 1.3 percent, from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 and increased $746.4 billion from June 30, 2009. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $90.6 million and interest-bearing deposits decreased $204.7 million from December 31, 2009. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $353.4 million and interest-bearing deposits increased $393.0 million from June 30, 2009. The increase in deposits from June 30, 2009 came primarily from our public funds, mutual fund processing and treasury management businesses.

Deposits represent the Company’s primary funding source for its asset base. In addition to the core deposits garnered by the Company’s retail branch structure, the Company continues to focus on its cash management services, as well as its trust and mutual fund services in order to attract and retain additional core deposits. Management believes a strong core deposit composition is one of the Company’s key strenghts given its competitive product mix.

Borrowed funds decreased $543.8 million from December 31, 2009. Borrowed funds are typically higher at year end due to repurchase agreements related to public funds. Borrowings, other than repurchase agreements, are a function of the source and use of funds and will fluctuate to cover short term gaps in funding.

Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreement to repurchase totaled $1.4 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $1.9 billion at December 31, 2009. Repurchase agreements are transactions involving the exchange of investment funds by the customer for securities by the Company under an agreement to repurchase the same or similar issues at an agreed-upon price and date.

Capital and Liquidity

The Company places a significant emphasis on the maintenance of a strong capital position, which promotes investor confidence, provides access to funding sources under favorable terms, and enhances the Company’s ability to capitalize on business growth and acquisition opportunities. Higher levels of liquidity, however, bear corresponding costs, measured in terms of lower yields on short-term, more liquid earning assets and higher expenses for extended liability maturities. The Company manages capital for each subsidiary based upon the subsidiary’s respective risks and growth opportunities as well as regulatory requirements.

Total shareholders’ equity was $1.1 billion at June 30, 2010, a $52.9 million increase compared to December 31, 2009. The Company’s Board of Directors authorized, at its April 27, 2010, April 21, 2009, and April 22, 2008 meetings, the repurchase of up to two million shares of the Company’s common stock during the twelve months following the meetings. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company acquired 132,334 shares and 462,947 shares, respectively, of its common stock under these plans. The Company has not made any purchases other than through these plans.

On July 27, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.185 per share. The dividend will be paid on October 1, 2010 to shareholders of record on September 10, 2010.

Risk-based capital guidelines established by regulatory agencies set minimum capital standards based on the level of risk associated with a financial institution’s assets. A financial institution’s total capital is required to equal at least 8 percent of risk-weighted assets. At least half of that 8 percent must consist of Tier 1 core capital, and the remainder may be Tier 2 supplementary capital. The risk-based capital guidelines indicate the specific risk weightings by type of asset. Certain off-balance-sheet items (such as standby letters of credit and binding loan commitments) are multiplied by credit conversion factors to translate them into balance sheet equivalents before assigning them specific risk weightings. Due to the Company’s high level of core capital and substantial portion of earning assets invested in government securities, the Tier 1 capital ratio of 13.23 percent and total capital ratio of 14.36 percent substantially exceed the regulatory minimums.

For further discussion of capital and liquidity, see “Liquidity Risk” under “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this report.

Table 8

The Company’s capital position is summarized in the table below and exceeds regulatory requirements:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
RATIOS	2010		2009		2010		2009
Return on average assets	0.85	%	0.76	%	0.91	%	0.83	%
Return on average equity	8.77		7.66		9.50		8.44
Average equity to assets	9.69		9.95		9.55		9.82
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio	13.23		13.40		13.23		13.40
Total risk-based capital ratio	14.36		14.35		14.36		14.35
Leverage ratio	7.77		8.01		7.77		8.01

The Company’s per share data is summarized in the table below.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
Per Share Data	2010			2009			2010			2009
Earnings basic	$	0.57		$	0.47		$	1.23		$	1.03	%
Earnings diluted		0.57			0.47			1.22			1.02
Cash dividends		0.185			0.175			0.37			0.35
Dividend payout ratio		32.46	%		37.23	%		30.08	%		33.98	%
Book value	$	26.42		$	24.42		$	26.42		$	24.42

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company’s main off-balance sheet arrangements are loan commitments, commercial and standby letters of credit, futures contracts and forward exchange contracts, which have maturity dates rather than payment due dates. Please see Note 8, “Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed information on these arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to customers and suppliers, allowance for loan losses, bad debts, investments, financing operations, long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which have formed the basis for making such judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from the recorded estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A summary of critical accounting policies is listed in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the Company’s Annual Report Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Risk Management

Market risk is a broad term for the risk of economic loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. These changes may be the result of various factors, including interest rates, foreign exchange prices, commodity prices or equity prices. Financial instruments that are subject to market risk can be classified either as held for trading or held for purposes other than trading.

The Company is subject to market risk primarily through the effect of changes in interest rates of its assets held for purposes other than trading. The following discussion of interest rate risk, however, combines instruments held for trading and instruments held for purposes other than trading, because the instruments held for trading represent such a small portion of the Company’s portfolio that the interest rate risk associated with them is immaterial.

Interest Rate Risk

In the banking industry, a major risk exposure is changing interest rates. To minimize the effect of interest rate changes to net interest income and exposure levels to economic losses, the Company manages its exposure to changes in interest rates through asset and liability management within guidelines established by its Funds Management Committee (“FMC”) and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The FMC has the responsibility for approving and ensuring compliance with asset/liability management policies, including interest rate exposure. The Company’s primary method for measuring and analyzing consolidated interest rate risk is the Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis. The Company also uses a Net Portfolio Value model to measure market value risk under various rate change scenarios and a gap analysis to measure maturity and repricing relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at specific points in time. On a limited basis, the Company uses hedges or swaps to manage interest rate risk by using futures contracts on certain loans and trading securities.

Overall, the Company manages interest rate risk by positioning the balance sheet to maximize net interest income while maintaining an acceptable level of interest rate and credit risk, remaining mindful of the relationship among profitability, liquidity, interest rate risk and credit risk.

Net Interest Income Modeling

The Company’s primary interest rate risk tool, the Net Interest Income Simulation Analysis, measures interest rate risk and the effect of interest rate changes on net interest income and net interest margin. This analysis incorporates substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities together with forecasted changes in the balance sheet and assumptions that reflect the current interest rate environment. Through these simulations, management estimates the impact on net interest income of a 200 basis point upward or downward gradual change of market interest rates over a one year period. Assumptions are made to project rates for new loans and deposits based on historical analysis, management outlook, and repricing strategies. Asset prepayments and other market risks are developed from industry estimates of prepayment speeds and other market changes. Since the results of these simulations can be significantly influenced by assumptions utilized, management evaluates the sensitivity of the simulation results to changes in assumptions.

Table 9 shows the net interest income increase or decrease over the next twelve months as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 based on hypothetical changes in interest rates.

Table 9

MARKET RISK (unaudited, dollars in thousands)


Hypothetical change in interest rate (Rates in Basis Points)	June 30, 2010 Amount of change	June 30, 2009 Amount of change
300	$7,450	$5,757
200	4,903	3,909
100	2,442	2,317
Static	—	—
(100)	N/A	N/A

The Company is sensitive at June 30, 2010, to increases in rates. Increases in interest rates are projected to cause increases in net interest income. A large portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities have reached a floor. Due to the already low interest rate environment, the Company did not include a 100 basis point falling scenario. For projected increases in rates, net interest income is projected to increase due to the Company being positioned to adjust yields on assets with changes in market rates more than the cost of paying liabilities is projected to increase. Nevertheless, the Company is positioned in the current low rate environment to be relatively neutral to further interest rate changes over the next twelve months.

Repricing Mismatch Analysis

The Company also evaluates its interest rate sensitivity position in an attempt to maintain a balance between the amount of interest-bearing assets and interest-bearing liabilities which are expected to mature or reprice at any point in time. While a traditional repricing mismatch analysis (“gap analysis”) provides a snapshot of interest rate risk, it does not take into consideration that assets and liabilities with similar repricing characteristics may not in fact reprice at the same time or the same degree. Also, it does not necessarily predict the impact of changes in general levels of interest rates on net interest income.

Trading Account

The Company’s subsidiary UMB Bank, n.a. carries taxable government securities in a trading account that is maintained according to a board-approved policy and relevant procedures. The policy limits the amount and type of securities that UMB Bank, n.a. can carry in the trading account and also requires that UMB Bank, n.a. comply with any limits under applicable law and regulations. The policy also mandates the use of a value at risk methodology to manage price volatility risks within financial parameters. The risk associated with carrying trading securities is offset by the sale of exchange traded futures contracts, with both the trading account and futures contracts marked to market daily. This account had a balance of $47.8 million as of June 30, 2010 compared to $38.2 million as of December 31, 2009.

The Manager of the Investment Banking Division of UMB Bank, n.a. presents documentation of the methodology used in determining value at risk at least annually to the Board for approval in compliance with OCC Banking Circular 277, Risk Management of Financial Derivatives, and other banking laws and regulations. The aggregate value at risk is reviewed quarterly. The aggregate value at risk in the trading account was insignificant as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Other Market Risk

The Company does not have material commodity price risks or derivative risks. The Company does have minimal foreign currency risk as a result of foreign exchange contracts. See Note 8 “Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees” in the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Credit Risk Management

Credit risk represents the risk that a customer may not perform in accordance with contractual terms. Credit risk is inherent in the financial services business and results from extending credit to customers. The Company utilizes a centralized credit administration function, which provides information on affiliate bank risk levels, delinquencies, an internal ranking system and overall credit exposure. In addition, the Company centrally reviews loan requests to ensure the consistent application of the loan policy and standards. The Company has an internal loan review staff that operates independently of the affiliate banks. This review team performs periodic examinations of each bank’s loans for credit quality, documentation and loan administration. The respective regulatory authority of each affiliate bank also reviews loan portfolios.

A primary indicator of credit quality and risk management is the level of nonperforming loans. Nonperforming loans include both nonaccrual loans and restructured loans. The Company’s nonperforming loans increased $9.0 million to $23.1 million at June 30, 2010, compared to June 30, 2009 and decreased $0.1 million, compared to December 31, 2009. This increase from June, 2009 is related to the downgrade of a large syndicated credit combined with the general effects of the downturn in the economy.

The Company had $6.7 million of other real estate owned as of June 30, 2010 compared to $3.9 million as of June 30, 2009 and $5.2 million as of December 31, 2009. Loans past due more than 90 days totaled $14.6 million as of June 30, 2010, compared to $6.8 million at June 30, 2009 and $8.3 million as of December 31, 2009.

A loan is generally placed on nonaccrual status when payments are past due 90 days or more and/or when management has considerable doubt about the borrower’s ability to repay on the terms originally contracted. The accrual of interest is discontinued and recorded thereafter only when actually received in cash.

Certain loans are restructured to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or principal due to deterioration in the financial condition of the respective borrowers. The Company had $2.0 million of restructured loans at June 30, 2010, $139,000 at June 30, 2009 and $2.0 million at December 31, 2009.

Table 10

LOAN QUALITY (unaudited, dollars in thousands)


	June 30,						December 31, 2009
	2010			2009			December 31, 2009
Nonaccrual loans	$	21,130		$	13,984		$	21,263
Restructured loans		2,009			139			2,000

Total nonperforming loans		23,139			14,123			23,263
Other real estate owned		6,737			3,859			5,203

Total nonperforming assets	$	29,876		$	17,982		$	28,466

Loans past due 90 days or more	$	14,630		$	6,833		$	8,319
Allowance for Loan Losses		70,110			55,109			64,139

Ratios
Nonperforming loans as a percent of loans		0.52	%		0.33	%		0.54	%
Nonperforming assets as a percent of loans plus other real estate owned		0.67			0.41			0.66
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets		0.27			0.18			0.24
Loans past due 90 days or more as a percent of loans		0.33			0.16			0.18
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans		1.58			1.27			1.48
Allowance for loan losses as a multiple of nonperforming loans		3.03	x		3.90	x		2.76	x

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity represents the Company’s ability to meet financial commitments through the maturity and sale of existing assets or availability of additional funds. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and wholesale funds. Ultimately, public confidence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. The primary source of liquidity for the Company is regularly scheduled payments and maturity of assets, which include $4.9 billion of high-quality securities available for sale. Investment securities with a market value of $3.5 billion at June 30, 2010 were pledged to secure U.S. Government deposits, other public deposits, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and certain trust deposits as required by law. The liquidity of the Company and its affiliate banks is also enhanced by its activity in the federal funds market and by its core deposits. Neither the Company nor its subsidiaries are active in the debt market. The traditional funding source for the Company’s subsidiary banks has been core deposits. Based upon regular contact with investment banking firms, management believes it can raise debt or equity capital on favorable terms, should the need arise.

The Company also has other commercial commitments that may impact liquidity. These commitments include unused commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees, and commercial letters of credit. The total amount of these commercial commitments at June 30, 2010 was $3.6 billion. Since many of these commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total amount of these commercial commitments does not necessarily represent the future cash requirements of the Company.

The Company’s cash requirements consist primarily of dividends to shareholders, debt service and treasury stock purchases. Management fees and dividends received from subsidiary banks traditionally have been sufficient to satisfy these requirements and are expected to be sufficient in the future. The Company’s subsidiary banks are subject to various rules regarding payment of dividends to the Company. For the most part, all banks can pay dividends at least equal to their current year’s earnings without seeking prior regulatory approval. From time to time, approvals have been requested to allow a subsidiary bank to pay a dividend in excess of its current earnings.

Operational Risk

Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from the Company’s operations, including those operations performed for the Company by third parties. This would include but is not limited to the risk of fraud by employees or persons outside the Company, the execution of unauthorized transactions by employees or others, errors relating to transaction processing, breaches of the internal control system and compliance requirements, and unplanned interruptions in service. This risk of loss also includes the potential legal or regulatory actions that could arise as a result of an operational deficiency, or as a result of noncompliance with applicable regulatory standards. Included in the legal and regulatory issues with which the Company must comply are a number of imposed rules resulting from the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Company operates in many markets and places reliance on the ability of its employees and systems to properly process a high number of transactions. In the event of a breakdown in the internal control systems, improper operation of systems or improper employee actions, the Company could suffer financial loss, face regulatory action and suffer damage to its reputation. In order to address this risk, management maintains a system of internal controls with the objective of providing proper transaction authorization and execution, safeguarding of assets from misuse or theft, and ensuring the reliability of financial and other data.

The Company maintains systems of controls that provide management with timely and accurate information about the Company’s operations. These systems have been designed to manage operational risk at appropriate levels given the Company’s financial strength, the environment in which it operates, and considering factors such as competition and regulation. The Company has also established procedures that are designed to ensure that policies relating to conduct, ethics and business practices are followed on a uniform basis. In certain cases, the Company has experienced losses from operational risk. Such losses have included the effects of operational errors that the Company has discovered and included as expense in the statement of income. While there can be no assurance that the Company will not suffer such losses in the future, management continually monitors and works to improve its internal controls, systems and corporate-wide processes and procedures.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officers to make certain certifications with respect to this report and to the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The Company has a Code of Ethics that expresses the values that drive employee behavior and maintains the Company’s commitment to the highest standards of ethics.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “Disclosure Controls and Procedures” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by the report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective for ensuring that information the Company is required to report in its periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period required and that information required to be disclosed by the Company is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There were no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed in response to Item 1A to Part 1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, except as set forth below.

The enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act could have an adverse impact on our financial results.

In July 2010, Congress enacted and the President signed broad financial regulatory reform legislation that, among other things, will impose comprehensive regulation on financial institutions. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) will subject financial institutions to substantial supervision and regulation, including capital standards, margin requirements, business conduct standards, recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act and regulations promulgated thereunder will generally become effective one year after the date of enactment of the Act. While we know the substance of the Dodd-Frank Act, it is not possible at this time to predict the final form and substance of the regulations that will be adopted to carry out the Act. Any such regulations that subject us or our counter-parties to additional capital or margin requirements relating to, or to additional restrictions on business practices could have an adverse effect on our financial results. This financial impact is not currently quantifiable.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of our common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1-April 22, 2010	17,332	$	41.95	17,332	1,574,484

April 23-April 30, 2010	11,276		43.95	11,276	1,988,724

May 1-May 31, 2010	4,701		41.34	4,701	1,984,023

June 1-June 30, 2010	22,216		37.52	22,216	1,961,807

Total	55,525	$	40.53	55,525

On April 22, 2009, the Company announced a plan to repurchase up to two million shares of common stock. This plan terminated on April 21, 2010. All open market share purchases under the share repurchase plans are intended to be within the scope of Rule 10b-18 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Rule 10b-18 provides a safe harbor for purchases in a given day if the Company satisfies the manner, timing and volume conditions of the rule when purchasing its own common shares. On April 27, 2010, the Company announced a plan to repurchase up to two million shares of common stock. This plan will terminate on April 26, 2011. The Company has not made any repurchases other than through these plans.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:


i.		3.1 Articles of Incorporation restated as of April 25, 2006. Amended Article III was filed with the Missouri Secretary of State on May 18, 2006 and incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and filed with the Commission on May 9, 2006.

ii.		3.2 Bylaws, amended and restated as of April 22, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 (ii).2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Commission on April 23, 2008.

iii.		4 Description of the Registrant’s common stock in Amendment No. 1 on Form 8, incorporated by reference to its General Form for Registration of Securities on Form 10 dated March 5, 1993.

iv.		10.1 Stock purchase agreement between the Company and Prairie Capital Management, LLC dated June 27, 2010.

v.		31.1 CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

vi.		31.2 CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

vii.		32.1 CEO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

viii.		32.2 CFO Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

ix.		101.INS* XBRL Instance

x.		101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

xi.		101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

xii.		101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition

xiii.		101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels

xiv.		101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

*	XBRL information will be considered to be furnished, not filed, for the first two years of a company’s submission of XBRL information.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

UMB FINANCIAL CORPORATION

/s/ Brian J. Walker

Brian J. Walker

Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller

(Authorized Officer and Chief Accounting Officer)

Date: August 4, 2010