UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended July 26, 2009

OR

For the transition period from              to            

Commission File Number 0-20538

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (314) 813-9200

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o   No x

As of August 31, 2009, the Company had a total of 32,286,855 shares of Common Stock outstanding (which excludes 4,327,623 shares held by us in treasury).

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

2

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

(Unaudited)

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

ISLE OF CAPRI CASINOS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

1.  Nature of Operations

Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated in February 1990. Except where otherwise noted, the words “we,” “us,” “our” and similar terms, as well as “Company,” refer to Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries. We are a leading developer, owner and operator of branded gaming facilities and related lodging and entertainment facilities in markets throughout the United States. Our wholly owned subsidiaries own and operate thirteen casino gaming facilities in the United States located in Black Hawk, Colorado; Lake Charles, Louisiana; Lula, Biloxi and Natchez, Mississippi; Kansas City, Caruthersville and Boonville, Missouri; Bettendorf, Davenport, Waterloo and Marquette, Iowa; and Pompano Beach, Florida. Our international gaming interests include wholly owned casinos in Freeport, Grand Bahamas and our discontinued operations in Coventry, England and in Dudley and Wolverhampton, England.

2.  Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, have been made. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 26, 2009 as filed with the SEC and all of our other filings, including Current Reports on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC after such date and through the date of this report, which are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or our website at www.islecorp.com.

Our fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in April. Periodically, this system necessitates a 53-week year.  Fiscal 2010 and 2009 are both 52-week years, which commenced on April 27, 2009 and April 28, 2008, respectively.

Discontinued operations include our remaining casino operations in England held for sale and our formerly wholly owned casino in Coventry, England sold in fiscal year 2009.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period financial statements to conform to the current period presentation. We view each property as an operating segment and all such operating segments have been aggregated into one reporting segment.

The Company evaluated all subsequent events through September 1, 2009, which is the date that the consolidated financial statements were issued. No material subsequent events have occurred since July 26, 2009 that required recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards - In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements, requires noncontrolling interests to be reported as part of equity and changes the income statement presentation of income or losses attributable to the noncontrolling interests. We adopted SFAS 160 as of April 27, 2009, as required. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

6

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 are effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. We adopted FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 as of April 27, 2009, as required. The adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”), which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. In addition, under SFAS 165, an entity is required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. SFAS 165 does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other applicable GAAP that provide different guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events or transactions. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. We adopted SFAS 165 as of April 27, 2009, as required. The adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS 168”), which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. SFAS 168 is effective for most financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We are currently determining the impact of SFAS 168 on our consolidated financial statements.

3.  Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations include the results of our former casino property in Coventry, England, which was sold on April 23, 2009, and our Blue Chip casino properties in England, which are currently classified as held for sale.

7

The assets held for sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale are as follows:

The results of our discontinued operations are summarized as follows:

Net interest expense of $1 and $648 for the first quarters ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008, respectively, has been allocated to discontinued operations and was based on long-term debt and other long-term obligations specific to our UK operations as our UK entities are not guarantors under our senior secured credit facility.

8

4.  Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following:

July 2007 Credit Facility - During 2007, we entered into a $1,350,000 senior secured credit facility (“Credit Facility”), which is secured on a first priority basis by substantially all of our assets and guaranteed by all of our significant domestic subsidiaries. This Credit Facility consists of a $475,000 five-year revolving line of credit and an $875,000 term loan facility.

Our net line of credit availability at July 26, 2009 is approximately $364,000, after consideration of $17,934 in outstanding letters of credit. We have an annual commitment fee related to the unused portion of the Credit Facility of up to 0.5% which is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.  The weighted average effective interest rate of the Credit Facility for the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008 were 4.43% and 5.61%, respectively.

The Credit Facility includes a number of affirmative and negative covenants. Additionally, we must comply with certain financial covenants including maintenance of a leverage ratio and minimum interest coverage ratio.  The Credit Facility also restricts our ability to make certain investments or distributions.  We are in compliance with the covenants as of July 26, 2009.

7% Senior Subordinated Notes - Our 7% Senior Subordinated Notes are due 2014 (“7% Senior Subordinated Notes”) and are guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of our significant domestic subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries as described in Note 12.  All of the guarantor subsidiaries are wholly owned by us. The 7% Senior Subordinated Notes are general unsecured obligations and rank junior to all senior indebtedness. The 7% Senior Subordinated Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option at any time on or after March 1, 2009, with call premiums as defined in the indenture governing the 7% Senior Subordinated Notes.

The indenture governing the 7% Senior Subordinated Notes limits, among other things, our ability and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to borrow money, make restricted payments, use assets as security in other transactions, enter into transactions with affiliates or pay dividends on or repurchase stock. The indenture also limits our ability to issue and sell capital stock of subsidiaries, sell assets in excess of specified amounts or merge with or into other companies.

9

5.  Common Stock

Earnings per Share of Common Stock - The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

Our basic earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Stock options representing 1,177,823 shares were excluded from the calculation of earnings per share for the three months ended July 26, 2009 as they were anti-dilutive. Due to the net loss, stock options representing 75,343 shares which are potentially dilutive, and 3,964,472 shares which were anti-dilutive, were excluded from the calculation of common shares for diluted (loss) per share for the three month period ended July 27, 2008.

Stock Based Compensation — Under our amended and restated 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan we have issued stock options and restricted stock.

Stock Options - We have issued incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options which have a maximum term of 10 years and are, generally, vested and exercisable in yearly installments of 20% commencing one year after the date of grant. We currently estimate our forfeiture rates at 39.6% for executives and 56.5% for optionees beneath the executive level. As of July 26, 2009, our unrecognized compensation cost for unvested stock options is $1,764 with a weighted average vesting period of 3.5 years.

Restricted Stock — During the three months ended July 26, 2009, we issued 512,375 shares of restricted common stock with a weighted average grant-date fair value of $13.03 to employees under the 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan. Restricted stock awarded to employees under annual long-term incentive grants vests one-third on each anniversary of the grant date and for directors vests one-half on the grant date and one-half on the first anniversary of the grant date. Restricted stock awarded under our previous tender offer vest three years from the date of award. Our estimate of forfeitures for restricted stock for employees is 10%. No forfeiture rate is

10

estimated for directors. As of July 26, 2009, our unrecognized compensation cost for unvested restricted stock is $10,354 with a remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.7 years.

6.  Write –Offs and Other Charges

During the three months ended July 27, 2008, we reached an agreement terminating our agreement for the potential development of a casino project in Portland, Oregon.  As a part of this agreement, we agreed to terminate our rights under a land option and pay a termination fee.  As a result of this termination, we recorded a $6,000 charge consisting of a non-cash write-off of $5,000 representing our rights under the land option and a $1,000 termination fee.  Under the terms of the agreement, we retain certain rights but no continuing obligations with regard to this development project.

7.   Fair Value Measurements

Interest Rate Swap Agreements—We have entered into various interest rate swap agreements pertaining to the Credit Facility for an aggregate notional value of $500,000 with maturity dates ranging from fiscal year 2009 to 2013 in order to manage market risk on variable rate term loans outstanding, as well as comply with, in part, requirements under the Credit Facility.

These swap agreements meet the criteria for hedge accounting for cash flow hedges and have been evaluated, as of July 26, 2009, as being fully effective. As a result, there is no impact on our consolidated statement of operations from changes in fair value. As July 26, 2009, the weighted average fixed LIBOR interest rate of our interest rate swap agreements was 4.58%.

The fair value of derivatives included in our consolidated balance sheet and change in our unrealized loss are as follows:

The fair value of our interest swap contracts are measured using Level 3 inputs at the present value of all expected future cash flows based on the LIBOR-based swap yield curve as of the date of the valuation, subject to a credit adjustment to the LIBOR-based yield curve’s implied discount rates. The credit adjustment reflects our best estimate as to the inherent credit risk as of our balance sheet date. The fair value of our interest rate swap contracts as recorded in our consolidated balance sheet is recorded net of deferred income tax benefits of $8,019 and $8,879, as of July 26, 2009 and April 26, 2009, respectively.

The amount of the gain (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings and its location in the consolidated statements of income is as follows:

11

The amount of gain (loss) recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:

A detail of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:

Financial Instruments - The estimated carrying amounts and fair values of our other financial instruments are as follows:

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and notes receivable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities.

Marketable securities are based upon Level 1 inputs obtained from quoted prices available in active markets and represent the amounts we would expect to receive if we sold these marketable securities.

The fair value of our long-term debt or other long-term obligations is estimated based on the quoted market price of the underlying debt issue or, when a quoted market price is not available, the discounted cash flow of future payments utilizing current rates available to us for debt of similar remaining maturities. Debt obligations with a short remaining maturity are valued at the carrying amount.

8.  Income Taxes

Our effective income tax rates from continuing operations for the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008 were 49.2% and (30.4%), respectively. Our effective rate is based upon statutory rates applied to our income adjusted for permanent differences. Our actual effective rate will fluctuate based upon the amount of our pretax book income, permanent differences and other items used in the calculation of our income tax benefit.

For the three months ended July 26, 2009, our income tax provision included a $230 provision recognized from interest accrued on our FIN 48 liabilities and amended returns.

12

9.  Supplemental Disclosures

Cash Flow — For the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008, we made net cash payments of interest for $12,262 and $14,834, respectively. Additionally, we received income tax refunds of $3,590 and $388 during the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008, respectively.

In fiscal year 2006, we obtained a gaming license for our Waterloo, Iowa property and recorded an intangible asset of $18,547.  Annual payments for the license are recorded on a yearly basis and for the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008, we made payments of $4,000 towards the gaming license.

For the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008, construction costs funded through accounts payable were $1,102 and $235, respectively.

For the three months ended July 27, 2008, we purchased property and equipment financed with a long-term obligation of $4,694.

10.  Closure of Properties due to Flooding

In connection with flooding in the Midwest during April 2008, our Natchez, Mississippi and Davenport, Iowa, properties closed for a combined total of 34 days during the three months ended July 27, 2008.

11.  Contingencies

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings—Lady Luck Gaming Corporation (now our wholly owned subsidiary) and several joint venture partners have been defendants in the Greek Civil Courts and the Greek Administrative Courts in similar lawsuits brought by the country of Greece. The actions allege that the defendants failed to make specified payments in connection with the gaming license bid process for Patras, Greece. Although it is difficult to determine the damages being sought from the lawsuits, the action may seek damages up to that aggregate amount plus interest from the date of the action.

In the Civil Court lawsuit, the Civil Court of First Instance ruled in our favor and dismissed the lawsuit in 2001. Greece appealed to the Civil Appeal Court and, in 2003, the Court rejected the appeal. Greece then appealed to the Civil Supreme Court and, in 2007, the Supreme Court ruled that the matter was not properly before the Civil Courts and should be before the Administrative Court.

In the Administrative Court lawsuit, the Administrative Court of First Instance rejected the lawsuit stating that it was not competent to hear the matter. Greece then appealed to the Administrative Appeal Court, which court rejected the appeal in 2003. Greece then appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court, which remanded the matter back to the Administrative Appeal Court for a hearing on the merits. The re-hearing took place in 2006, and in 2008 the Administrative Appeal Court rejected Greece’s appeal on procedural grounds. On December 22, 2008 and January 23, 2009, Greece appealed the ruling to the Supreme Administrative Court. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

The outcome of this matter is still in doubt and cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. We intend to continue a vigorous and appropriate defense to the claims asserted in this matter. Through July 26, 2009, we have accrued an estimated liability including interest of $9,985.

We are subject to certain federal, state and local environmental protection, health and safety laws, regulations and ordinances that apply to businesses generally, and are subject to cleanup requirements at certain of our facilities as a result thereof. We have not made, and do not anticipate making material expenditures, nor do we anticipate incurring delays with respect to environmental remediation or protection. However, in part because our present and future development sites have, in some cases, been used as manufacturing facilities or other facilities that generate materials that are required to be remediated under environmental laws and regulations, there can be no

13

guarantee that additional pre-existing conditions will not be discovered and we will not experience material liabilities or delays.

We are subject to various contingencies and litigation matters and have a number of unresolved claims. Although the ultimate liability of these contingencies, this litigation and these claims cannot be determined at this time, we believe they will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

12.  Consolidating Condensed Financial Information

Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis, the payment of all obligations under our 7% Senior Subordinated Notes.

The following wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company are guarantors, on a joint and several basis, under the 7% Senior Subordinated Notes: Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi; Riverboat Services, Inc.; CSNO, L.L.C.; St. Charles Gaming Company, Inc.; IOC Holdings, L.L.C.; Grand Palais Riverboat, Inc.; LRGP Holdings, L.L.C.; P.P.I, Inc.; Isle of Capri Casino Colorado, Inc.; IOC-Coahoma, Inc.; IOC-Natchez, Inc.; IOC-Lula, Inc.; IOC-Boonville, Inc.; IOC-Kansas City, Inc.; Isle of Capri Bettendorf, L.C.; Isle of Capri Marquette, Inc.; IOC-Davenport, Inc.; IOC-Black Hawk County, Inc.; IOC-Manufacturing, Inc.; Riverboat Corporation of Mississippi—Vicksburg; Isle of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C.; Isle of Capri Black Hawk Capital Corp.; IC Holdings Colorado, Inc.; CCSC/Blackhawk, Inc.; IOC-Black Hawk Distribution Company, L.L.C.; Casino America of Colorado, Inc.; Black Hawk Holdings, L.L.C.; Louisiana Riverboat Gaming Partnership; Isle of Capri UK Holdings, Inc.; Isle of Capri Bahamas Holdings, Inc.; and IOC-Caruthersville, L.L.C. Each of the subsidiaries’ guarantees is joint and several with the guarantees of the other subsidiaries.

14

Consolidating condensed balance sheets as of July 26, 2009 and April 26, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

15

Consolidating condensed statements of operations for the three months ended July 26, 2009 and July 27, 2008 are as follows (in thousands):