future10k.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
√
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
or
|
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the transition period from _____________ to
______________
|
Commission
file number: 0-52577
FUTUREFUEL
CORP.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
|
20-3340900
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
8235
Forsyth Blvd., Suite 400
Clayton,
Missouri 63105
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
(805)
565-9800
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
Of Each Class
|
|
Name
Of Each Exchange On Which Registered
|
n/a
|
|
n/a
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common
Stock
(Title of
class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No √
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes
No √
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes √ No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filed” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
|
Accelerated
filer √
|
Non-accelerated
filer (Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller
reporting
company
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes No √
State the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the
last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter. $90,831,900.
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date: 28,190,300.
General
Development of the Business Since January 1, 2008
The
Company
FutureFuel
Corp. (the “Company”
or “we”,
“our” or
“us”) is a
Delaware corporation incorporated on August 12, 2005 under the name
“Viceroy Acquisition Corporation”. We were formed to serve as a
vehicle for the acquisition by way of an asset acquisition, merger, capital
stock exchange, share purchase or similar transaction of one or more operating
businesses in the oil and gas industry. On July 12, 2006, we
completed an offering of 22,500,000 units, each unit consisting of one share of
our common stock and one warrant to acquire one share of our common
stock. These units were issued at $8.00 per unit. In
connection with the offering, our shares and warrants were listed on the
Alternative Investment Market (“AIM”) of
the London Stock Exchange plc. On July 21, 2006, we entered into
an acquisition agreement with Eastman Chemical Company to acquire its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Eastman SE, Inc., a chemical manufacturer which had
just launched a biobased products platform. Our shareholders approved
the acquisition of Eastman SE, Inc. on October 27, 2006. On
October 31, 2006, the acquisition of Eastman SE, Inc. was consummated
(effective after the close of business on that day) and Eastman SE, Inc. became
our wholly-owned subsidiary. In connection with such closing, we
changed our name to FutureFuel Corp. and Eastman SE, Inc. changed its name to
FutureFuel Chemical Company.
As part
of our initial offering in July 2006, we agreed to use our reasonable commercial
efforts to maintain our listing on AIM until at least July 12,
2008. However, because the trading of our shares and warrants on AIM
was limited and a market for our shares and warrants had been developed in the
United States, we recommended to our shareholders that they approve the
cancellation of admission of our securities to AIM. Our shareholders
approved such cancellation on June 24, 2008 and admission of our shares and
warrants to AIM was canceled on July 14, 2008.
In
connection with such cancellation, a market maker applied to have our shares of
common stock quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”). The
OTCBB is an electronic trading service offered by the National Association of
Security Dealers (“NASD”)
that shows real-time quotes, last sale prices and volume information for
over-the-counter equity securities. The NASD approved the application
and our shares of common stock began to be quoted on the OTCBB on July 11,
2008. Since our warrants must be in certificated form for the reasons
set forth below in Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities -- Market
Information, our warrants do not qualify for quotation on the
OTCBB. As such, our warrants are not listed or quoted on any
established exchange.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company
FutureFuel
Chemical Company is a Delaware corporation incorporated on September 1,
2005 under the name Eastman SE, Inc. It owns approximately 2,200
acres of land six miles southeast of Batesville in north central Arkansas
fronting the White River. Approximately 500 acres of the site are
occupied with batch and continuous manufacturing facilities, laboratories and
associated infrastructure, including on-site liquid waste
treatment. The plant is staffed by approximately 460 non-union
full-time employees. FutureFuel Chemical Company manufacturers
diversified chemical products. In addition, in 2005, it launched a
biobased products platform, comprising biofuels and biobased specialty chemical
products.
Plan
of Operation for the Consolidated Company
Our
strategy in relation to the acquired operations is to build a diversified
biofuels and chemical manufacturing organization. Our intention is to
leverage the knowledge, expertise and resources of FutureFuel Chemical Company
to develop an industry-leading biofuels business, while maintaining a focus on
the core chemical business. We believe there are substantial growth
opportunities not only in the biofuels area, but also in both preserving
existing and attracting new custom chemical customers, and also in adding
significantly to our proprietary chemicals product line. Growth in
all areas of the business will follow a consistent strategy of dedicating idle
capacity to those opportunities that we believe provide the highest return,
offer the most attractive long-term risk-reward dynamics, and create the most
value through synergies with existing business lines.
We
initially planned to increase the plant’s biodiesel capacity to 40 million
gallons per year by May 2007 and to 160 million gallons per year by
November 2007, with substantial complementary expenditures on infrastructure to
support this increased capacity. After closing on our acquisition of
FutureFuel Chemical Company on October 31, 2006, we and, to our knowledge,
the industry as a whole witnessed a rapid erosion in margins for producing
biodiesel. See
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2006/12/21/stories/2006122103701200.htm. As
a result of these decreased margins, in January 2007 we determined that it was
not in our shareholders’ best interest to proceed on an accelerated basis to
increase capacity and, therefore, we suspended the biodiesel capacity
expansion. However, we continued with (and in most cases have already
completed) certain core infrastructure projects as described
below. We believe these projects will bring efficiency, operational
flexibility and cost savings to FutureFuel Chemical Company’s existing biodiesel
and chemical business lines.
The core
infrastructure projects included:
|
·
|
adding
methanol recovery and biodiesel feedstock pretreatment capabilities to the
plant - the biodiesel feedstock pretreatment system has been completed and
the methanol recovery system is scheduled for completion in April
2009;
|
|
·
|
constructing
additional storage and related infrastructure at the plant to support
increased movements of feedstocks, methanol and biodiesel on and off the
site - this project is complete;
|
|
·
|
expanding
on-site rail siding and railcar loading and unloading facilities to
accommodate the increased number of railcars expected at the plant - this
project is complete;
|
|
·
|
obtaining
storage/thruput in Little Rock, Arkansas on the Arkansas River so that
biodiesel can be shipped by barge to larger markets and feedstocks can be
brought in to the plant by barge and truck - a lease agreement was signed
with Center Point Terminal Company concurrent with the closing of the
acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical
Company;
|
|
·
|
acquiring
a fleet of tanker trucks to transport biofuels and feedstocks between the
plant and customer locations or leased storage facilities - this project
is complete until logistical requirements dictate a larger internal truck
fleet; and
|
|
·
|
procuring
railcars to transport raw goods to the plant and deliver biodiesel from
the plant to customers - this project is complete until logistical
requirements dictate a larger railcar
fleet.
|
Construction
is in progress for the first site infrastructure project as described above,
while the remaining projects are complete. We believe that FutureFuel
Chemical Company will be able to timely obtain the materials to complete the
first project as scheduled, although no assurances can be given that the
scheduled timetable will be achieved or that such timetable will not be revised
based upon market conditions.
In
December 2006 and January 2009, FutureFuel Chemical Company commenced storage of
its biodiesel at a liquid bulk storage facility in Little Rock, Arkansas and
Chesapeake, Virginia, respectively. Additional locations will be
assessed as market conditions dictate (e.g., FutureFuel Chemical Company’s need
for additional storage space, the availability of such space and the cost of
such space). FutureFuel Chemical Company has already acquired tanker
trucks and has leased methanol and biodiesel railcars. The need for
additional tanker trucks and/or railcars will be assessed as demand for
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biodiesel and logistics dictate. We
believe that implementation of the above strategy has helped and will continue
to help FutureFuel Chemical Company remain a substantial participant in the
biofuels market.
At the
time that we suspended expansion of the biodiesel capacity, we determined that
any future expansions of biodiesel production capacity would be dictated by
changing market conditions. Justification for capacity expansion is
dependent upon three primary factors: (i) the price of crude oil, and more
specifically the price of petrodiesel; (ii) the price of feedstock
oils/fats required to produce biodiesel; and (iii) tax incentives, grants,
and volume mandates. For example, see http://www.wilsoncenter.org/news/docs/Brazil.Biofuels%202007%20Report%20-%20McKinsey%20-%202007.pdf. Biodiesel
is generally sold as a blend with petrodiesel, which is its primary competitive
product, and must be priced close to parity with petrodiesel in order to be
competitive in the marketplace. Feedstock cost is the largest single
component of biodiesel production costs and therefore has a
substantial
impact on production costs. See http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/biodiesel/. In
the second quarter of 2007, crude oil prices strengthened (see http://www.dallasfed.org/research/energy/en0702.cfm)
and, despite corresponding increases in feedstock oil prices, soybean oil in
particular, we judged these and future market conditions to be supportive of
biodiesel capacity expansion and therefore resumed a project to expand capacity
by 35 million gallons per year (for a total capacity of 59 million
gallons per year) through a new continuous processing line, projected to be
operational by April 2009. However, no assurances can be given that
the scheduled timetable will be achieved or that it will not be revised based
upon market conditions such as those discussed above. We continued
this expansion in 2008 notwithstanding declines in energy prices during the year
because these declines were mostly offset by corresponding declines in feedstock
prices. For example, the front-month heating oil contract on the New
York Mercantile Exchange declined 40% in price during 2008. During
the same time period, the front-month soybean oil contract on the Chicago Board
of Trade declined 32% in price and the reported price of edible technical tallow
reported by the Jacobsen pricing service declined 40% in price.
Please
see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Expenditures
and Commitments” below for an estimate of the capital cost of the capital
projects discussed above. The storage and procurement of railcars are
not capital projects; rather, they affect cash flow through ongoing lease
commitments. These lease commitments are included in footnote 21
of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2008 contained elsewhere herein. Based upon our budget, existing cash
and the proceeds from the $50 million credit facility described below, we
do not believe that it will be necessary for us to raise additional funds to
meet the expenditures required for operating the business as set forth
above.
Financial
Information about Segments
Historically,
the business and assets included in FutureFuel Chemical Company were accounted
for by Eastman Chemical Company in various segments of Eastman Chemical
Company’s overall business. Although FutureFuel Chemical Company was
incorporated on September 1, 2005, Eastman Chemical Company did not begin
transferring assets into FutureFuel Chemical Company until January 1, 2006
and completed the transfer in subsequent periods prior to the closing of our
acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company. Notwithstanding that
FutureFuel Chemical Company was a separately incorporated entity, Eastman
Chemical Company did not prepare separate financial statements for FutureFuel
Chemical Company nor was Eastman Chemical Company required to do so under local
law or accounting rules. Rather, the operations of the Batesville
plant were reported within Eastman Chemical Company based upon the underlying
products and the revenues and expenses of the plant were effectively spread
throughout Eastman Chemical Company’s financial statements. In
addition, allocations to the plant of Eastman Chemical Company overhead (such as
insurance, employee benefits, legal expenses and the like) were based upon
assumptions made by Eastman Chemical Company and such assumptions historically
did not reflect expenses which FutureFuel Chemical Company would have incurred
had it been a stand-alone entity. Since we did not acquire or succeed
to all of the assets and liabilities of Eastman Chemical Company, “carve-out”
financial statements have been prepared for the acquired component business,
excluding the continuing operations retained by Eastman Chemical
Company. As our acquisition of Eastman SE, Inc. was accounted for
through purchase accounting, a presentation of the historical financial results
of the Batesville plant occurring before November 1, 2006 is not made
within our historical financial results. The financial data presented
herein represents our consolidated operations for the twelve-month periods ended
December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the
“carve-out” operations of the Batesville plant for the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006 and, where noted, the combined results of us and
FutureFuel Chemical Company for the twelve months ended December 31,
2006.
The
following table sets forth: (i) our consolidated revenues from external
customers for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and our
consolidated revenues from external customers for the year ended
December 31, 2006 plus FutureFuel Chemical Company’s revenues from external
customers for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006; (ii) our
consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
our consolidated income for the year ended December 31, 2006 less
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s net loss for the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006; and (iii) our total assets at December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006. Our and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
information has been combined for the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2006 solely for comparative purposes.
(Dollars
in thousands)
Period
|
|
Revenues
from
External Customers
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
198,330 |
|
|
$ |
22,675 |
|
|
$ |
238,126 |
|
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
169,788 |
|
|
$ |
8,408 |
|
|
$ |
216,113 |
|
Year
ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
134,168 |
|
|
$ |
2,242 |
|
|
$ |
203,059 |
|
For the
ten months ended October 31, 2006, FutureFuel Chemical Company’s revenues
from external customers exclude all revenues from Eastman Chemical
Company. Beginning November 1, 2006, revenues from external
customers equals total revenues. See note 8 to FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s annual financial statements included elsewhere herein for
revenues from Eastman Chemical Company for the ten months ended October 31,
2006.
Prior to
the initiation of its biofuels program in 2005, the Batesville plant did not
have business reporting “segments” as defined by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. After the initiation of the biobased products
program in 2005, it had two segments: chemicals and
biofuels. FutureFuel Chemical Company is not able to allocate net
income and total assets between its two business segments. However,
revenues from external customers can be allocated between the two business
segments as set forth in the following chart. The amounts in the
following chart include: (i) our consolidated revenues from external
customers for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007; and (ii) our
consolidated revenues from external customers for the year ended
December 31, 2006 plus FutureFuel Chemical Company’s revenues from external
customers for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006. Our
and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s information has been combined for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2006 solely for comparative
purposes.
(Dollars
in thousands)
Period
|
|
Revenues
from Chemical Segment
|
|
|
Revenues
from
Biofuels
Segment
|
|
|
Total
Revenues
from
External Customers
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
155,553 |
|
|
$ |
42,777 |
|
|
$ |
198,330 |
|
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
144,474 |
|
|
$ |
25,314 |
|
|
$ |
169,788 |
|
Year
ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
120,828 |
|
|
$ |
13,340 |
|
|
$ |
134,168 |
|
Narrative
Description of the Business
Principal
Executive Offices
Our
principal executive offices are located at 8235 Forsyth Blvd., 4th Floor,
Clayton, Missouri 63105. Our telephone number is (805)
565-9800. FutureFuel Chemical Company’s principal executive offices
are located at 2800 Gap Road, Highway 394 South, Batesville, Arkansas
72501-9680. Its telephone number at such office is
(870) 698-1811.
The
Company
We
completed the offering described above on July 12, 2006 and acquired
FutureFuel Chemical Company at the close of business on October 31,
2006. Our common stock and warrants were initially listed on AIM
under the symbols “FFU” and “FFUW”, respectively. On July 14,
2008, the admission of our securities to AIM was canceled. On
July 11, 2008, our common stock began to be quoted on the OTCBB under the
symbol “FTFL”. Our warrants are not listed or quoted on any national
exchange or any other price quotation system. We have not conducted
any other material business operations.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company
FutureFuel
Chemical Company owns approximately 2,200 acres of land six miles southeast of
Batesville in north central Arkansas fronting the White
River. Approximately 500 acres of the site are occupied with batch
and continuous manufacturing facilities, laboratories and associated
infrastructure, including on-site liquid waste treatment. The plant
is staffed by approximately 460 non-union full-time employees. Land
and support infrastructure are available to support expansion and business
growth.
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, approximately 70% of site revenue was derived
from manufacturing specialty chemicals for specific customers (“custom
manufacturing”) with 8% of revenues being derived from multi-customer specialty
chemicals (“performance chemicals”) and 22% from biofuels. Custom
manufacturing involves producing unique products for individual customers,
generally under long-term contracts. The plant’s custom manufacturing
product portfolio includes a bleach activator for a major detergent
manufacturer, a proprietary herbicide for a major life sciences company and
chlorinated polyolefin adhesion promoters and antioxidant precursors for a major
chemical company. The performance chemicals product portfolio
includes polymer (nylon) modifiers and several small-volume specialty chemicals
for diverse applications.
We are
committed to growing the specialty chemical business and biofuels business of
FutureFuel Chemical Company. FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biofuels
platform has become a core segment of our business. We intend to:
(i) increase production capacity of biodiesel within FutureFuel Chemical
Company as set forth above, and will make future capacity expansions when the
market conditions discussed above support such an increase; and (ii) pursue
commercialization of other products, including cellulose derived biofuels and
building block chemicals. In pursuing this strategy, FutureFuel
Chemical Company will continue to establish a name identity in the biofuels
business, leverage its technical capabilities and quality certifications, secure
local and regional markets and expand marketing efforts to fleets and
regional/national customers. Concurrent efforts will also seek to
enhance margins via: (i) volume increases; (ii) conversion cost
reductions by transition to continuous processing and economies of scale;
(iii) expansion of feedstock options; (iv) legislative incentives; and
(v) value-enhancing applications for glycerin co-product (from the
biodiesel manufacturing process). These items are discussed in
greater detail below.
Biofuels Business Segment
Overview of the Segment
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s biofuels segment was established in early 2005 as an
initiative of the site management team to leverage technical and operational
expertise as well as available manufacturing capacity to pursue business growth
opportunities in addition to the legacy specialty chemicals
business. Management targeted this segment in recognition of three
factors: (i) the abundance and diversity of biomass raw materials in the
immediate area of the plant site; (ii) the ability to utilize existing
infrastructure to support to biofuels production at substantially advantaged
capital cost relative to new construction; and (iii) the existence of
technical and operational expertise to position the business as a high quality,
low-cost industry leader. The biofuels segment had revenue of
$42,777,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008, revenue of $25,314,000
for the year ended December 31, 2007 and revenue of $13,340,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
Biofuel Products
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s biofuels business segment currently targets two products:
biodiesel and cellulose-derived biofuels.
Biodiesel
Biodiesel
is a sustainable, renewable transportation fuel with a growing market in the
United States and internationally. See http://www.emerging-markets.com/biodiesel/default.asp. As
an alternative to petrodiesel and other petroleum-based fuels, biodiesel has
several advantages, including:
|
·
|
extending
domestic diesel fuel supplies;
|
|
·
|
reducing
dependence on foreign crude oil
supplies;
|
|
· |
expanding
markets for domestic and international agricultural
products; |
|
·
|
reducing
emissions of greenhouse gases and other gases that are regulated by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (see, e.g., http://www.cyberlipid.org/glycer/biodiesel.htm);
and
|
|
·
|
being
usable by existing diesel engines while extending their useful lives (see,
e.g., http://www.cyberlipid.org/glycer/biodiesel.htm).
|
As a
result of the benefits that are expected from the widespread use of biodiesel,
federal and state laws (including tax laws), and governmental policy favor and
in some jurisdictions require the increasing use of biodiesel instead of
petrodiesel. For example, the Energy Independence and Security Act of
2007 requires U.S. petroleum refiners and importers to blend 0.5 billion
gallons of biodiesel into petrodiesel in 2009, with increased percentages of
renewable fuel blending required in future years. See “Legislative
Incentives” below.
Biodiesel
commercialization was achieved by FutureFuel Chemical Company in October
2005. Technical and operational competency developed as a supplier of
specialty chemicals enabled the development of a flexible manufacturing process
which can utilize the broadest possible range of feedstock oils, including soy
oil, cottonseed oil, palm oil, pork lard, poultry fat and beef
tallow. The Batesville plant produces B100. B20 (20%
biodiesel; 80% petrodiesel) is currently used in the facility’s diesel fleet and
became available for retail sale at the site in March 2007. In the
second quarter of 2009, FutureFuel Chemical Company plans to begin offering B100
and biodiesel blended with petrodiesel (B2, B5, B10 and B20 grades) at Little
Rock, Arkansas and Memphis, Tennessee.
Cellulose-Derived
Biofuels
FutureFuel
Chemical Company continues to evaluate a variety of manufacturing technologies
for the production of cellulose-derived biofuels and building block
chemicals. Manufacturing processes for these cellulose-derived
products can be categorized into two groups: biochemical and
thermochemical. In addition to producing biofuels and chemicals,
thermochemical processes also have a significant potential to concurrently
produce heat and power. Thermochemical processes also produce a
different set of building block chemicals than biochemical
processes. Building block chemicals produced in a thermochemical
process are acids, alcohols, alkenes, and aldehydes consisting of two to four
carbon atoms much like the products produced in existing petrochemical
plants. Building block chemicals produced in a biochemical process
are typically acids and diacids consisting of four to six atoms.
A typical
biochemical based process for producing cellulose-derived biofuels and building
block chemicals incorporates four distinct processing steps:
(i) pretreatment; (ii) hydrolysis; (iii) fermentation; and
(iv) distillation.
Thermochemical
processes are subdivided into gasification processes and pyrolysis
processes. Thermochemical processes, while less typical than
biochemical processes, generally consist of four distinct processing
steps. The four distinct steps incorporated into gasification
processes are: (i) gasification; (ii) synthesis gas cleanup;
(iii) catalytic reforming; and (iv) final product
refining. The four distinct steps incorporated into pyrolysis
processes are: (i) pyrolysis; (ii) biocrude refining;
(iii) catalytic reforming; and (iv) final product
refining.
While
FutureFuel Chemical Company expects to continue its research program on
cellulose-derived biofuels, initiatives and timelines to progress the
technologies to pilot and/or commercial scale are dependent upon results and
progress in developing the technologies and no assurances can be given that
FutureFuel Chemical Company will be successful or, if successful,
when.
The Biodiesel Production
Process
Biodiesel
can be made from renewable sources such as:
|
·
|
crude
and refined virgin vegetable oils;
|
|
·
|
crude
and refined animal fats; and
|
|
·
|
used
cooking oils and trap grease.
|
The
choice of feedstock is determined primarily by the price and availability of
each feedstock variety, yield loss of lower quality feedstock, and the
capabilities of the producer’s biodiesel production facility. In the
United States, the majority of biodiesel historically has been made from
domestically produced soybean oil. However, FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s plant has been designed to process a wide variety of feedstocks to
take advantage of fluctuating prices and availability of the various
feedstocks.
The
biodiesel manufacturing process has three distinct steps: the chemical reaction
step, the separation step and the polishing step.
Chemical
Reaction. In the chemical reaction step, a mix of biodiesel,
glycerin and soap is created from the selected feedstock, methanol and a
catalyst. The collection of equipment that performs this chemical
reaction step in producing biodiesel is referred to as the
“reactors.” Depending upon the type of reactor used, the mix of
biodiesel, glycerin and soap produced requires differing degrees of further
processing to separate the methyl esters comprising the biodiesel from the
glycerin and soap, to clean or “polish” both the biodiesel and glycerin and to
recover excess methanol from both the biodiesel and
glycerin. Generally, the more efficient the reactor, the less
downstream processing that is required. If the feedstock used is high
in free fatty acids, an esterification step may be
required. Esterification is a chemical reaction in which two
chemicals (typically an alcohol and an acid) form an
ester. Transesterification is the process of exchanging the alkoxy
group of an ester compound by another alcohol.
Separation. The
methyl esters are separated from the glycerin and soap produced during the
chemical reaction step.
Polishing. The
methyl esters are purified to remove residual catalysts and other
impurities. Any excess water and methanol is also removed and may be
recycled into earlier steps in the production process train.
Legislative Incentives
Agencies
of the United States government, including the Department of Energy, the
Environmental Protection Agency, the Internal Revenue Service and the Department
of Agriculture, and many states offer biodiesel incentives
or have
mandates for the use of biodiesel, or both. There are other
governmental incentives that do not directly reduce the net cost of producing or
blending biodiesel but that drive the demand for biodiesel. For
example, tax credits are available under the Internal Revenue Code for
investment in qualifying refueling property, the Environmental Protection Agency
will pay 50-100% of the cost for schools to upgrade and/or replace their buses,
and programs administered by the Department of Energy indirectly require
government fleet operators to purchase substantial amounts of
biodiesel. The principal federal incentives that we believe will have
the greatest positive effect on FutureFuel Chemical Company’s business are
discussed below.
The
Energy Policy Act of 1992 requires government fleet operators to use a certain
percentage of alternatively fueled vehicles. The Act established a
goal of replacing 10% of motor fuels with non-petroleum alternatives by 2000,
increasing to 30% by the year 2010. Currently, 75% of all new
light-duty federal vehicles purchased are required to have alternative fuel
capability to set an example for the private automotive and fuel
industries.
Under the
Energy Conservation Reauthorization Act of 1998, vehicle fleets that are
required to purchase alternatively fueled vehicles can generate credit toward
this requirement by purchasing and using biodiesel in a conventional
vehicle. Since there are few cost-effective options for purchasing
heavy-duty alternatively fueled vehicles, federal and state fleet providers can
meet up to 50% of their heavy-duty alternatively fueled vehicle purchase
requirements with biodiesel. The biodiesel fuel credit allows fleets
to purchase and use 450 gallons of biodiesel in vehicles in excess of 8,500
pounds gross vehicle weight instead of alternatively fueled
vehicles. Fleets must purchase and use the equivalent of 450 gallons
of pure biodiesel in a minimum of a 20% blend to earn one
credit. Covered fleets earn one vehicle credit for every light-duty
alternatively fueled vehicle they acquire annually beyond their base vehicle
acquisition requirements. Credits can be banked or sold.
In
October 2004, Congress passed a biodiesel tax incentive, structured as a federal
excise tax credit, as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004. The credit amounts to one cent for each percentage point of
vegetable oil or animal fat biodiesel that is blended with petrodiesel (and
one-half cent for each percentage point of recycled oils and other
non-agricultural biodiesel). For example, blenders that blend B20
made from soy, canola and other vegetable oils and animal fats receive a 20¢ per
gallon excise tax credit, while biodiesel made from recycled restaurant oils
(yellow grease) receive half of this credit. The tax incentive
generally is taken by petroleum distributors and is substantially passed on to
the consumer. It is designed to lower the cost of biodiesel to
consumers in both taxable and tax-exempt markets. The tax credit was
scheduled to expire at the end of 2006, but was extended in the Energy Policy
Act of 2005 to the end of 2008 and subsequently extended to December 31,
2009 through the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. This
Act also revised the credit for recycled oils from a half credit to a full
credit as described below.
Congress
enacted the Energy Policy Act of 2005 in August 2005 and included a number of
provisions intended to spur the production and use of biodiesel. In
particular, the Act’s provisions include biodiesel as part of the minimum volume
of renewable fuels (the renewable fuels standard or “RFS”), in
the nationwide gasoline and diesel pool, with the Environmental Protection
Agency being directed to determine the share to be allocated to biodiesel and
other details through its rulemaking process. The Act also extended
the biodiesel tax credit to 2008 and included a new tax credit for renewable
diesel. More specifically, the RFS requires a specific amount of
renewable fuel to be used each year in the nationwide gasoline and diesel
pool. The volume increases each year, from 4 billion gallons per
year in 2006 to 7.5 billion gallons per year in 2012. The Act
requires the Environmental Protection Agency, beginning in 2006, to publish by
November 30th of each
year, “renewable fuel obligations” that will be applicable to refineries,
blenders and importers in the contiguous 48 states. There must be no
geographic restrictions on where renewable fuel may be used or per-gallon
obligations for the use of renewable fuel. The renewable fuel
obligations are required to be expressed in terms of a volume percentage of
gasoline sold or introduced into commerce and consist of a single applicable
percentage that will apply to all categories of refineries, blenders and
importers. The renewable fuel obligations are to be based on
estimates that the Energy Information Association provides to the Environmental
Protection Agency on the volumes of gasoline it expects will be sold or
introduced into commerce. The Environmental Protection Agency
released the final rules to implement the RFS on April 10,
2007. Under those rules, the RFS compliance period did not begin
until September 1, 2007. The applicable volume of
renewable fuel under this program was 4.7 billion gallons for 2007 and
5.4 billion gallons for 2008 and is 11.1 billion gallons for
2009.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 also created a new tax credit for
small agri-biodiesel producers with production capacity not in excess of
60 million gallons, of 10¢ per gallon for the first 15 million gallons
of agri-biodiesel sold.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s 2008 biodiesel production capacity did not exceed
60 million gallons and thus we qualified for this credit.
On
December 19, 2007, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (“Energy Bill of
2007”) was enacted which, among other things, expanded the
RFS. In contrast to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, this bill provided
an RFS carve-out applicable specifically to biodiesel; the RFS requirement of
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 had mostly been filled by
ethanol. Beginning January 1, 2009, the Energy Bill of 2007
mandates that 500 million gallons of biomass-based diesel (biodiesel) be
used per year. On November 21, 2008, the USEPA announced that
the 2009 RFS for refiners, importers, and blenders was 10.21%. The
2008 RFS was 7.76%. The 2009 RFS represents 11.1 billion gallons
of renewable fuel and is expected to include 500 million gallons of
biodiesel and renewable diesel. The mandate under the Energy Bill of
2007 increases each year and reaches 1 billion gallons per year in
2012. Beyond 2012, the mandate is to be determined by the
Environmental Protection Agency administrator in coordination with the
secretaries of energy and agriculture, but with a minimum of that mandated in
2012, thus a 1 billion gallons per year floor. The Energy Bill
of 2007 also provides an RFS carve-out for cellulosic biofuel, starting at
100 million gallons per year in 2010 and reaches 16 billion gallons
per year in 2022.
The
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 extended the biodiesel tax credits
through December 31, 2009 and qualified all biodiesel for a $1.00 per
gallon tax credit, including biodiesel made from non-virgin feedstocks such as
yellow grease. As noted above, prior legislation limited the tax
credit for biodiesel manufactured from non-virgin feedstocks to $0.50 per
gallon.
The
federal government offers other programs as summarized in the table
below.
Federal
Agency
that
Administers/
Oversees
|
Type
of
Incentive
|
Who
Receives
Incentive
|
Commonly
Known
As
|
Summary
|
IRS
|
income
tax
credit
|
infrastructure
providers
|
Alternative
Fuel
Infrastructure
Credit
|
Provides
a tax credit in an amount equal to 30% of the cost of any qualified
non-residential alternatively fueled vehicle refueling property placed
into service in the United States up to $30,000, subject to certain
limits.
|
EPA
|
grant
program
|
school
districts
|
Clean
School
Bus
Program
|
Reduces
operating costs and children’s exposure to harmful diesel exhaust by
limiting bus idling, implementing pollution reduction technology,
improving route logistics and switching to biodiesel. The
Energy Bill of 2005 utilizes this program to grant up to a 50% cost share
(depending on the age and emissions of the original bus) to replace school
buses with buses that operate on alternative fuel or low-sulfur diesel, or
up to 100% for retrofit projects.
|
USDA
|
grant
program
|
agricultural
producers
and
small
businesses
|
Renewable
Energy
Systems
and
Energy
Efficiency
Improvements
Grant
|
In
2005, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Office of Rural Development
made available $22.8 million in competitive grant funds and
guaranteed loans for the purchase of renewable energy systems and energy
improvements for agricultural producers and small rural
businesses. Eligible projects include biofuels, hydrogen and
energy efficiency improvements, as well as solar, geothermal and
wind.
|
Federal
Agency
that
Administers/
Oversees
|
Type
of
Incentive
|
Who
Receives
Incentive
|
Commonly
Known
As
|
Summary
|
USDA/DOE
|
grant
program
|
biobased
fuels
researchers
|
Biomass
Research
and Development
Act
of 2000
|
Funds
research, development and demonstration biomass projects with respect to
renewable energy resources from the agricultural and agro-forestry
sectors. Biomass is defined as organic matter that is available
on a renewable or recurring
basis.
|
Many
states are following the federal government’s lead and are offering similar
programs and incentives to spur biodiesel production and use. For
example, Arkansas provides an income tax credit of 5% of the cost of the
facilities and equipment used directly in the wholesale or retail distribution
of biodiesel where the equipment has not been claimed in a previous tax
year. In addition, Arkansas offers a tax refund of $0.50 for each
gallon of biodiesel used by a supplier to produce a biodiesel/petrodiesel
mixture of not more than 2% biodiesel. In April 2007, Arkansas passed
legislation that provides for a $0.20 per gallon biodiesel producer credit and
up to $50,000 in grants per site for biodiesel producers and distributors to
install distribution infrastructure. The $0.20 per gallon Arkansas
producer credit is capped at 10 million gallons or production, or
$2 million, per defined time intervals. The first interval was
January 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008. FutureFuel Chemical
Company submitted an application for the $0.20 per gallon biodiesel producer
credit for production during this 18-month interval and received the
$2 million credit in March 2008. The next funding interval is
July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009. FutureFuel Chemical Company
has already applied for funding under this program for biodiesel produced during
this interval and has notified the state that, based on production through
January 2009, it is eligible for the full $2 million
credit. FutureFuel Chemical Company received notification that its
application has been approved but has not received notification of the amount of
funding that will be available from the state. FutureFuel Chemical
Company intends to apply for the credit in future years when and as such credit
is available.
Our
review of state statutes reveals that approximately 45 states provide either
user or producer incentives for biodiesel, several states provide both types of
incentives and approximately 36 states provide incentives to biodiesel producers
to build facilities in their states, typically offering tax credits, grants and
other financial incentives. As FutureFuel Chemical Company expands
its business outside of Arkansas, it will evaluate these additional state
incentives to determine if it qualifies for them.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company will continue to identify and pursue other incentives to
support its business. However, no assurances can be given that
FutureFuel Chemical Company will qualify for any such incentives or, if it does
qualify, what the amount of such incentives will be.
BQ-9000 Status
The
BQ-9000 program was launched in late 2005 by the National Biodiesel
Board. The program requires certified and accredited companies to
possess a quality manual and quality control system and employ best practices in
biodiesel sampling, testing, blending, shipping, storage and
distribution. The goal of the program is to help assure quality of
biodiesel from plant gate to consumer tank. FutureFuel Chemical Company
recognized the potential to establish itself as an industry quality leader
through extension of its existing chemical ISO 9001 quality systems to biodiesel
production. Management further recognized the need within this
developing industry to provide a consistent ASTM standard product as an
essential requirement for market expansion into fleet, government and
on-the-road applications. In February 2006, shortly after the
biodiesel industry established its comprehensive quality standard, BQ-9000,
FutureFuel Chemical Company achieved the fourth such certification in the nation
(as of December 31, 2008, 30 biodiesel producers had
achieved
this quality standard - see
http://www.bq-9000.org/companies/producers.aspx). Consistent with
BQ-9000, all manufactured product is tested in on-site quality control
laboratories and confirmed to meet the ASTM D6751 standard.
Future Strategy of the Enlarged
Group
We intend
to expand FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biodiesel capacity utilizing available
facilities as market conditions dictate as described above. All
future capacity will be operated primarily in continuous processing mode to
realize operating economies and optimum throughput. Existing and
future processes will accommodate a wide range of feedstock oils, allowing
optimization relative to supply and pricing.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company is pursuing the commercialization of cellulose-derived
biofuels. As with biodiesel, FutureFuel Chemical Company intends to
leverage technical expertise and existing idle manufacturing assets to move this
emerging technology from the development stage to commercial
reality. The biofuels platform approach being pursued seeks to
assemble demonstrated component technologies in a process design that leverages
current facility infrastructure and capabilities. However, no
assurances can be given that FutureFuel Chemical Company will develop a
commercially viable cellulose-derived biofuels manufacturing
process.
Customers and Markets
FutureFuel
Chemical Company currently markets its biodiesel products by truck and rail
directly to customers in the United States and in Canada. Through the
utilization of liquid bulk storage facilities and barge loading capabilities,
FutureFuel Chemical Company is positioned to market biodiesel throughout the
United States for transportation and home heating fuel usage. For the
twelve months ended December 31, 2008, six of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
customers represented 80% of biofuels revenues (17% of total revenues) and 46
customers represented 20% of biofuels revenues (4% of total
revenues). Although the regional market is still being developed, we
estimate that the regional direct market available to FutureFuel Chemical
Company at maturity will be at least 30 million gallons per
year.
Competition
As of
September 29, 2008, there was a reported 2.61 billion gallons per year of
biodiesel production capacity in the United States, although only approximately
700 million gallons of biodiesel were actually produced in
2008. FutureFuel Chemical Company competes with these other producers
of biodiesel, both locally, regionally and nationally. There are four
biodiesel plants in the state of Arkansas, but only FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s plant is currently operating. There are several operating
facilities in surrounding states and announced biodiesel production facilities
in Arkansas and surrounding states. We estimate that regional
competitive producers had approximately 150 million gallons of capacity at
the end of 2008.
In
addition to biodiesel producers, FutureFuel Chemical Company competes with new
technologies that are being developed as alternatives to
biodiesel. For example, in December 2006, ConocoPhillips announced
that commercial production of renewable diesel fuel had begun at its Whitegate
refinery in Cork Island, Ireland. The production process, developed
by ConocoPhillips, uses soybean and other vegetable oils to produce fuel that
meets European diesel fuel standards. The fuel is produced using
existing equipment at the refinery and is blended and transported with
petroleum-based diesel. ConocoPhillips claims that renewable diesel
is chemically similar to conventional petrodiesel and can be shipped through
common carrier pipelines. ConocoPhillips is evaluating this
technology for use in the United States. Biotech company LS9 Inc. has
announced that it is producing renewable diesel fuel from E. coli
excrement. See http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/08/12/bug.diesel/index.html. UOP,
a major supplier to the petrochemical refining industry, has also reported the
development of technology for the production of fungible fuels (diesel and
gasoline) by hydro-processing of vegetable oils and cellulose. See
http://www.alternatefuelsworld.com/greendiesel-greengasoline.html. We
cannot give any assurances that renewable diesel
fuel (or some other product) produced by these competing technologies will not
supplant biodiesel as an alternative to conventional
petrodiesel.
Supply and Distribution
As a
result of its feedstock-flexible process, FutureFuel Chemical Company is able to
source feedstock from a broad supplier base which includes pork, chicken and
beef rendering facilities from both national and regional
suppliers. Soybean oil has been sourced from several national and
regional producers. Cottonseed oil has been sourced from a regional
cooperative. All feedstocks are currently supplied by either rail or
truck. We believe that an adequate supply of feedstocks can be
sourced to support anticipated production.
We intend
that biodiesel and other biofuels will be sold from the plant site as well as
shipped to liquid bulk storage facilities for further
distribution. Sales from the plant site are made by railcar and tank
truck. Biodiesel is being delivered to liquid bulk storage facilities
by company-owned tank trucks and common carriers for distribution there and for
further transportation by barge or tank truck.
Cyclicality and
Seasonality
The
following charts depict FutureFuel Chemical Company’s monthly sales of biodiesel
(in gallons) for 2007 and 2008. Tolling sales ceased in September
2007.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s sales of biodiesel are substantially limited in winter
months. Until such time as non-seasonal business (primarily on-road
transportation) expands regionally, FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biodiesel
sales at blends greater than B5 are expected to continue to be lower in winter
months due to the end of farming activity, which is a major user of
biodiesel. Also, cold weather usage and storage properties which
reduce biodiesel demand during winter months require resolution in order to
fully exploit year-round demand opportunities.
Chemicals Business Segment
Overview of the Segment
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s chemicals segment manufactures diversified chemical products
that are sold externally to third party customers. This segment
comprises two components: “custom manufacturing” (manufacturing chemicals for
specific customers); and “performance chemicals” (multi-customer specialty
chemicals). The chemicals segment had revenue of $155,553,000,
$144,474,000, and $137,430,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
Chemical Products
Custom
manufacturing involves producing unique products for individual customers,
generally under long-term contracts. Many of these products are
produced under confidentiality agreements in order to protect intellectual
property. This is a service-based business where customers value
technical capabilities, responsiveness and process improvement to continually
improve costs and reliability. The plant’s custom manufacturing
product portfolio includes four large products or product families which are
generally produced throughout the year: (i) a bleach activator for a major
detergent and consumer products manufacturer; (ii) a proprietary herbicide
for a major life sciences company; (iii) chlorinated polyolefin adhesion
promoters (“CPOs”) for
a major chemical company; and (iv) antioxidant precursors (“DIPBs”)
for a major chemical company. The portfolio also contains a number of
smaller
products which are produced intermittently in a “batch campaign” mode, for
diverse customers and end markets.
Performance
chemicals comprise multi-customer products which are sold based upon
specification and/or performance in the end-use application. This
portfolio includes a family of polymer (nylon) modifiers and several
small-volume specialty chemicals for diverse applications.
Future Strategy
To build
on and maintain FutureFuel Chemical Company’s reputation as a technology-driven
competitive chemical producer, we believe that FutureFuel Chemical Company must
continuously focus on cost control, operational efficiency and capacity
utilization to maximize earnings. The ability to utilize large scale
batch and continuous production processes and a continuous focus on process
improvements allow FutureFuel Chemical Company to compete effectively in the
custom manufacturing market and to remain cost competitive with, and for some
products cost-advantaged over, its competitors. We intend to improve
margins in this area of the FutureFuel Chemical Company business by careful
management of product mix with regard to size of opportunity, timing to market,
capital efficiency and matching of opportunities to assets and
capabilities.
We expect
to derive significant growth in the performance chemicals component primarily as
a result of new biobased co-products derived from biofuels manufacturing, such
as glycerin and derivatives. We believe that these products and
applications will be competitive in the marketplace due to advantaged raw
material costs derived from their co-product status. For example, for
every gallon of biodiesel produced, approximately one pound of co-product
glycerin is generated. See http://www.harvestcleanenergy.org/conference/HCE6/Frear2.pdf. Production
of glycerin from biofuels has significantly reduced the value of glycerin in the
global marketplace and prices for refined glycerin have fallen by over 50% since
late 2004. See http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA6341035.html?ref=nbcs
and http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=1123. The
crude form of glycerin derived directly from biodiesel processing has little or
no value unless purified to an industrial grade quality. See http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=1123
and http://www.ampc.montana.edu/policypaper/policy22.pdf. Many
small biodiesel producers lack this purification capability and we believe that
crude glycerin has become a disposal issue for many of these
producers. See http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=1123, and
http://www.biodieselmagazine.com/article.jsp?article_id=237&q=&page=all
and http://www.ampc.montana.edu/policypaper/policy22.pdf. Leveraging
its specialty chemicals expertise and infrastructure, FutureFuel Chemical
Company is capable of refining glycerin to sufficient purity to derive
commercial value as a co-product and/or converting glycerin through chemical
processing to higher-value derivative products. Commercial
development samples of refined glycerin (bulk quantities) are currently
available for customer evaluations. In July 2006, Eastman SE, Inc.
identified three key areas for the sale of glycerin: (i) sale of existing
unrefined material; (ii) sale of highly refined material; and
(iii) conversion of unrefined and refined material to higher value
products. FutureFuel Chemical Company has offered unrefined glycerin
to users thereof, which has led to sampling programs and field
tests. However, no sales have been arranged on terms satisfactory to
FutureFuel Chemical Company. It has refined glycerin in batch
equipment and has provided samples to various potential customers, but no sales
have been consummated. Conversion of glycerin to higher value
products is still in the research and development stage.
Customers and Markets
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s chemical products are used in a variety of markets and end
uses, including detergent, agrochemical, automotive, photographic imaging,
coatings, nutrition and polymer additives. These products are
generally non-cyclical; however, the customers are often the “brand owners” and
therefore control factors related to demand, such as market development
strategy. In many cases, FutureFuel Chemical Company may be unable to
increase or maintain its level of sales revenue for these products.
All sales
of the bleach activator are made to The Procter & Gamble Company pursuant to
a multiyear supply that was effective April 1, 2008. Sales of
the bleach activator totaled $83,995,000, $82,500,000 and $84,691,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Additionally, all sales of a proprietary herbicide and
certain other intermediates used in the production of this herbicide are made to
Arysta LifeScience North America
Corporation
pursuant to contracts which continue year-to-year unless terminated by notice
given no later than 270 days prior to the end of the current term for the
herbicide and not later than 18 months prior to the current term for the
intermediates. No assurances can be given that these contracts will
not be terminated. Sales of this herbicide and its intermediates
totaled $34,156,000, $25,177,000 and $23,685,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These two
customers represented approximately 60%, 63% and 72% of revenues in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
Competition
Historically,
there have been significant barriers to entry for competitors with respect to
chemicals primarily due to the fact that the relevant technology and
manufacturing capability has been held by a small number of
companies. As technology and investment have increasingly moved
outside of North America, competition from multinational chemical manufacturers
has intensified, primarily from India and China. FutureFuel Chemical
Company competes with these and other producers primarily based on price,
customer service, technology, quality and reliability. FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s major competitors in this segment include large multinational
companies with specialty chemical business units, and smaller independent
producers. The multinational competitors are often disadvantaged by
poor responsiveness and customer service, while the small producers often have
limited technology and financial resources. We believe that
FutureFuel Chemical Company should be well-positioned for growth due to the
combination of its scale of operations, technical capabilities and financial
resources.
Supply and Distribution
Specialty
chemicals are generally high unit value products sold in packaged, or low-volume
bulk form, for which distribution is a relatively minor component of
cost. Most products are sold FOB the Batesville site for distribution
globally. Similarly, raw materials for these products are
comparatively higher-value components that are sourced globally. An
exception will be the biofuels co-products, which will be recovered from local
processing and purified or further functionalized into other products at the
site.
Cyclicality and
Seasonality
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s chemical products typically are not cyclical but they are
sensitive to global economic conditions. Supply and demand dynamics
determine profitability at different stages of cycles and global economic
conditions affect the length of each cycle. Despite some sensitivity
to global economic conditions, many of the products in the chemical segment
provide a stable foundation of earnings.
Backlog
The
majority of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s revenues are derived under tolling
arrangements with specific customers. These customers generally
provide FutureFuel Chemical Company with forecasts of demand on a monthly or
quarterly basis. These forecasts are intended to enable FutureFuel
Chemical Company to optimize the efficiency of its production processes and
generally are not firm sales orders. As such, FutureFuel Chemical
Company does not monitor or report backlog.
Management Team and
Workforce
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s executive management team consists of four individuals with a
combined 100 plus years of experience in the chemicals industry, comprising
technical, operational and business responsibilities. Three of the
four members of the executive team have international experience, including
assignments in Europe and Asia. Another member, the chief financial
officer, began employment concurrently with the closing of our acquisition of
FutureFuel Chemical Company. The operational and commercial
management group at the Batesville site includes five additional degreed
professionals with an average experience of over 20 years in the chemical
industry.
The Batesville workforce comprises
approximately 450 additional full-time employees, with a total of 69 degreed
professionals, including 19 chemists (9 PhDs) and 33 engineers (including 8
licensed professional engineers and 17 chemical engineers). The site
is non-unionized. Operations personnel are highly skilled as all site
manufacturing and infrastructure is fully automated and
computer-controlled. The workforce is substantially self-sufficient
in the
range of
required operational skills and experience due to the lack of locally-available
process industry infrastructure. Voluntary attrition at the site has
averaged less than 2% annually since 2003.
Intellectual Property
We
consider FutureFuel Chemical Company’s intellectual property portfolio to be a
valuable corporate asset which we intend to expand and protect globally through
a combination of trade secrets, confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements,
patents and copyrights. As a producer of a broad and diverse
portfolio of chemicals, FutureFuel Chemical Company’s intellectual property
relates to a wide variety of products and processes acquired through the
development and manufacture of over 300 specialty chemicals during the history
of the site. Our primary strategy regarding FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s intellectual property portfolio will be to appropriately protect all
innovations and know-how in order to provide FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
business segments with a technology-based competitive advantage wherever
possible. In the chemicals business segment, custom manufacturing
projects are primarily conducted within the framework of confidentiality
agreements with each customer to ensure that intellectual property rights are
defined and protected. In the biofuels business segment, innovations
and process know-how will be vigorously protected as appropriate. As
may be necessary, we will seek to license technology from third parties that
complements FutureFuel Chemical Company’s strategic business
objectives. Neither FutureFuel Chemical Company’s business as a whole
nor any particular segment is materially dependent upon any one particular
patent, copyright or trade secret. As the laws of many foreign
countries do not protect intellectual property to the same extent as the laws of
the United States, we can make no assurance that FutureFuel Chemical Company
will be able to adequately protect all of its intellectual property
assets.
Research and Development
FutureFuel
Chemical Company devotes significant resources to its research and development
programs which are primarily targeted towards two objectives:
|
·
|
innovating,
developing and improving biofuels processes, in particular biodiesel and
cellulose-derived biofuels, including value-up technology and applications
for co-products; and
|
|
·
|
developing
and improving processes for custom manufacturing products or performance
chemicals.
|
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s research and development capabilities comprise analytical
chemistry competencies to assay and characterize raw materials and products,
organic chemistry expertise applied across a breadth of reaction chemistries and
materials and process engineering capabilities for batch and continuous
processing of both solid and liquid materials. We believe that these
core competencies, established in support of the legacy chemical business, are
applicable to building a technology-based position in biofuels and associated
biobased specialty products.
Research
and development expense incurred by FutureFuel Chemical Company during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $3,951,000, $3,434,000 and
$4,919,000, respectively. Substantially all of such research and
development expense related to the development of new products, services and
processes or the improvement of existing products, services and
processes. Research and development expense declined from 2006 to
2007 primarily due to the lack of corporate overhead allocations from Eastman
Chemical Company and also because some research and development costs were
funded by new customers. This funding by new customers did not repeat
in 2008. In addition, FutureFuel Chemical Company expanded the
utilization of external resources to advance certain key projects during
2008. These factors account for the increase in research and
development expense in 2008 as compared to 2007.
Regulatory and Environmental
Matters
Various
aspects of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s operations are subject to regulation by
state and federal agencies. Oil and gas operations as well as
chemical operations are subject to numerous, stringent and complex laws and
regulations at the federal, state and local levels governing the discharge of
materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental
protection. These laws and regulations may:
|
·
|
require
acquisition of permits regarding discharges into the air and discharge of
waste waters;
|
|
·
|
place
restrictions on the handling and disposal of hazardous and other wastes;
and
|
|
·
|
require
capital expenditures to implement pollution control
equipment.
|
Compliance
with such laws and regulations can be costly and noncompliance can result in
substantial civil and even criminal penalties. Some environmental
laws impose strict liability for environmental contamination, rendering a person
liable for environmental damages and cleanup costs without regard to negligence
or fault. Moreover, public interest in the protection of the
environment has increased substantially in recent years. FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s operations could be adversely affected to the extent laws are
enacted or other governmental action is taken that imposes environmental
protection requirements that result in increased costs to the oil and gas
industry and/or the chemical manufacturing industry in general. The
following provides a general discussion of some of the significant environmental
laws and regulations that impact FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
activities.
The
federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(“CERCLA”),
and analogous state laws, impose joint and several liabilities, without regard
to fault or the legality of the original act, on certain classes of persons that
contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the
environment. These persons include the owner and operator of the site
where the release occurred, past owners and operators of the site, and companies
that disposed or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at the
site. Responsible parties under CERCLA may be liable for the costs of
cleaning up hazardous substances that have been released into the environment
and for damages to natural resources. Additionally, it is not
uncommon for third parties to assert claims for personal injury and property
damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other
pollutants into the environment.
The
federal Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (“RCRA”), is
the principal federal statute governing the management of wastes, including the
treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes. RCRA imposes
stringent operating requirements, and liability for failure to meet such
requirements, on a person who is either a generator or transporter of hazardous
waste or an owner or operator of a hazardous waste treatment, storage or
disposal facility. Many of the wastes generated in FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s manufacturing facility are governed by RCRA.
The
federal Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA”) and
regulations thereunder impose liability on responsible parties for damages
resulting from oil spills into or upon navigable waters, adjoining shorelines or
in the exclusive economic zone of the United States. A responsible
party includes the owner or operator of an onshore facility. OPA
limits liability for onshore facilities to $350 million. These
liability limits may not apply if a spill is caused by a party’s gross
negligence or willful misconduct, the spill resulted from violation of a federal
safety, construction or operating regulation, or if a party fails to report a
spill or to cooperate fully in a clean-up. Failure to comply with
OPA’s requirements may subject a responsible party to civil, criminal or
administrative enforcement actions.
The
federal Water Pollution Control Act (“Clean Water
Act”) imposes restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants
into navigable waters. These controls have become more stringent over
the years, and it is possible that additional restrictions may be imposed in the
future. Permits must be obtained to discharge pollutants into state
and federal waters. The Clean Water Act provides for civil, criminal
and administrative penalties for discharges of oil and other pollutants, and
imposes liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of
cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural
resource damages resulting from the release. Comparable state
statutes impose liabilities and authorize penalties in the case of an
unauthorized discharge of petroleum or its derivatives, or other pollutants,
into state waters.
The
federal Clean Air Act (“Clean Air
Act”), and associated state laws and regulations, restrict the emission
of air pollutants from many sources, including facilities involved in
manufacturing chemicals and biofuels. New facilities are generally
required to obtain permits before operations can commence, and new or existing
facilities may be required to incur certain capital expenditures to install air
pollution control equipment in connection with obtaining and maintaining
operating permits and approvals. Federal and state regulatory
agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for
non-compliance with permits or other requirements of the Clean Air Act and
associated state laws and regulations.
The
federal Endangered Species Act, the federal Marine Mammal Protection Act, and
similar federal and state wildlife protection laws prohibit or restrict
activities that could adversely impact protected plant and animal species or
habitats. Manufacturing activities could be prohibited or delayed in
areas where such protected species or habitats may be located, or expensive
mitigation may be required to accommodate such activities.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s policy is to operate its plants and facilities in a manner
that protects the environment and the health and safety of its employees and the
public. FutureFuel Chemical Company intends to continue to make
expenditures for environmental protection and improvements in a timely manner
consistent with its policies and with the technology available. In
some cases, applicable environmental regulations such as those adopted under the
Clean Air Act and RCRA, and related actions of regulatory agencies, determine
the timing and amount of environmental costs incurred by FutureFuel Chemical
Company.
We
establish reserves for closure/post-closure costs associated with the
environmental and other assets we maintain. Environmental assets
include waste management units such as incinerators, landfills, storage tanks
and boilers. When these types of assets are constructed or installed,
a reserve is established for the future costs anticipated to be associated with
the closure of the site based on an expected life of the environmental assets,
the applicable regulatory closure requirements and our environmental policies
and practices. These expenses are charged into earnings over the
estimated useful life of the assets. Currently, we estimate the
useful life of each individual asset up to 35 years.
In
addition to our general environmental policies and policies for asset retirement
obligations and environmental reserves, we accrue environmental costs when it is
probable that we or our subsidiary has incurred a liability and the amount can
be reasonably estimated. In some instances, the amount cannot be
reasonably estimated due to insufficient data, particularly in the nature and
timing of the future performance. In these cases, the liability is
monitored until such time that sufficient data exists. With respect
to a contaminated site, the amount accrued reflects our assumptions about
remedial requirements at the site, the nature of the remedy, the outcome of
discussions with regulatory agencies and other potentially responsible parties
at multi-party sites, and the number and financial viability of other
potentially responsible parties. Changes in the estimates on which
the accruals are based, unanticipated government enforcement action, or changes
in health, safety, environmental, chemical control regulations, and testing
requirements could result in higher or lower costs.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s cash expenditures related to environmental protection and
improvement were approximately $11,507,000, $13,500,000 and $13,300,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These amounts pertain primarily to operating costs
associated with environmental protection equipment and facilities, but also
include expenditures for construction and development. We do not
expect future environmental capital expenditures arising from requirements of
environmental laws and regulations to materially increase FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s planned level of annual capital expenditures for environmental control
facilities.
We
believe that FutureFuel Chemical Company has obtained in all material respects
the necessary permits and licenses to carry on its operations as presently
conducted. We have reviewed environmental investigations of the
properties owned by FutureFuel Chemical Company and believe, on the basis of the
results of the investigations carried out to date, that there are no material
regulatory and/or environmental issues which adversely impact FutureFuel
Chemical Company. In addition, under our acquisition agreement with
Eastman Chemical Company, Eastman Chemical Company acquired environmental
insurance with respect to environmental conditions at the Batesville plant
existing as of the closing date and Eastman Chemical Company has agreed, subject
to certain limitations, to indemnify FutureFuel Chemical Company with respect to
such environmental conditions.
Objectives
Our
business objectives for FutureFuel Chemical Company are to: (i) exploit
growth opportunities in its two core business segments, biofuels and chemicals;
and (ii) improve gross margins.
Exploit Growth Opportunities in Core
Business Segments
We
believe that FutureFuel Chemical Company can become a market leader in biofuels
by leveraging its specialty chemicals technical expertise and by fully utilizing
idle site assets and infrastructure headspace, with emphasis on:
|
·
|
operational
expertise to produce ASTM D6751 quality biodiesel from diverse
feedstocks;
|
|
·
|
leveraging
quality certifications to supply demanding biodiesel
applications;
|
|
·
|
conversion
of available capacity at below new-build
costs;
|
|
·
|
service
to regional markets and enhanced distribution channels to national
markets;
|
|
·
|
process
improvement to reduce costs of
manufacturing;
|
|
·
|
adding
value to co-products and by-products from biofuels production;
and
|
|
·
|
producing
cellulose-derived biofuels.
|
We
believe that FutureFuel Chemical Company is one of the largest independent
custom chemical manufacturers in North America and that it will continue to grow
this business based upon:
|
·
|
long
term contracts for most custom manufacturing
products;
|
|
·
|
strong
relationships with customers who are market leaders, leading to repeat
business;
|
|
·
|
technical
capability to innovate processes, particularly the ability to apply both
chemistry and engineering disciplines to solve complex technical
problems;
|
|
·
|
responsiveness
and customer service from an entrepreneurial
organization;
|
|
·
|
ability
to practice a range of manufacturing scale;
and
|
|
·
|
process
improvement capability to achieve lowest-cost manufacturing
position.
|
We intend
to grow FutureFuel Chemical Company’s multi-customer chemicals portfolio by
producing marketable chemical co-products from biofuels production, biobased
specialty products derived from biofuel products and/or raw materials, and
cellulose-derived building block chemicals. As an example, a
significant co-product from biodiesel production is glycerin, which can be
purified and sold and which may also be chemically converted into other chemical
products and derivatives. See the discussion above.
Improve Gross Margins
We intend
that FutureFuel Chemical Company will continue to work to maximize the value of
core businesses by improving gross margins through:
|
·
|
enhancing
pricing processes and strategies, and optimizing biofuels channels to
market;
|
|
·
|
continuing
to pursue cost reduction opportunities, including improved operational
efficiency through business
simplification;
|
|
·
|
achieving
high utilization of manufacturing
assets;
|
|
·
|
improving
capital efficiency through high value de-bottlenecking opportunities and
incremental expansions of existing assets and infrastructure;
and
|
|
·
|
enhancing
custom manufacturing project selection and portfolio
mix.
|
However,
no assurances can be given that these objectives will be met, in whole or in
part.
Financial
Information about Geographic Areas
Most of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s sales are FOB the Batesville plant, although some
FOB points are in other states or at foreign ports. While many of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s chemicals are utilized to manufacture products
that are shipped, further processed and/or consumed throughout the world, the
chemical products, with limited exceptions, generally leave the United States
only after ownership has transferred from FutureFuel Chemical Company to the
customer. Rarely is FutureFuel Chemical Company the exporter of
record, never is FutureFuel Chemical Company the importer of record into foreign
countries and FutureFuel Chemical Company is not always aware of the exact
quantities of its products that are moved into foreign markets by its
customers. FutureFuel Chemical Company does track the addresses of
its customers for invoicing purposes and uses this address to determine whether
a particular sale is within or outside the United States. FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s revenues for the last three fiscal years attributable to the
United States and foreign countries (based upon the billing addresses of its
customers) were as set forth in the following table. The amounts in
the following table include: (i) our consolidated revenues for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007; and (ii) our consolidated revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2006 plus FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
revenues for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006. Our
and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s information has been combined for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2006 solely for comparative
purposes.
(Dollars
in thousands)
Period
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
All
Foreign
Countries
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
164,963 |
|
|
$ |
33,367 |
|
|
$ |
198,330 |
|
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
$ |
141,233 |
|
|
$ |
28,555 |
|
|
$ |
169,788 |
|
Year
ended December 31, 2006
|
|
$ |
131,893 |
|
|
$ |
18,877 |
|
|
$ |
150,770 |
|
For each
of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, revenues from Mexico
accounted for 11% of total revenues. Beginning in the third quarter
of 2007, FutureFuel Chemical Company began selling significant quantities of
biodiesel to companies in Canada, at which time revenues from Canada became a
material component of total revenues. Revenues from Canada accounted
for 5% of total revenues for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007. Other than Mexico and Canada, revenues from a single foreign
country during 2008, 2007 and 2006 did not exceed 3% of total
revenues.
All of
our and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s long-lived assets are located in the
United States.
We have
no foreign operations. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” below for a
discussion of risks attendant to FutureFuel Chemical Company’s foreign
operations.
Available
Information
We make
available free of charge, through the “Investor Relations - SEC Filings” section
of our Internet website (http://www.FutureFuelCorporation.com), our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such
material with, or furnishing it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). Once
filed with the SEC, such documents may be read and/or copied at the SEC’s Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C.
20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may
be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the
SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers that electronically file
with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
We make
available free of charge, through the “Investor Relations - Corporate
Governance” section of our website (http://www.FutureFuelCorporation.com), the
corporate governance guidelines of our board of directors, the charters of each
of the committees of our board of directors, and codes of ethics and business
conduct for our directors, officers and employees. Such materials
will be made available in print upon the written request of any shareholder to
FutureFuel Corp., 8235 Forsyth Blvd., 4th Floor,
Clayton, Missouri 63105, Attention: Investor Relations.
An
investment in us involves a high degree of risk and may result in the loss of
all or part of your investment. You should consider carefully all of
the information set out in this document and the risks attaching to an
investment in us, including, in particular, the risks described
below. The information below does not purport to be an exhaustive
list and should be considered in conjunction with the contents of the rest of
this document.
Risks associated with
FutureFuel Chemical Company.
The
current volatility in global economic conditions and the financial markets may
adversely affect our industry, business and results of operations.
The
volatility and disruption to the capital and credit markets since mid-2008 have
affected global economic conditions, resulting in significant recessionary
pressures and declines in consumer confidence and economic
growth. These conditions have led to economic contractions in the
developed economies and reduced growth rates in the emerging
markets. Despite fiscal and monetary intervention, it is possible
that further declines in consumer spending and global growth rates may occur in
the foreseeable future. Reduced consumer spending may cause changes
in customer order patterns including order cancellations, and changes in the
level of inventory held by our customers, which may adversely affect our
industry, business and results of operations. The impact of the
credit crisis and economic slowdown will vary by region and
country. The diversity of our geographic customer and operating
footprint limits our reliance and exposure to any single economy.
These
conditions have also resulted in a substantial tightening of the credit markets,
including lending by financial institutions and other sources of credit and
liquidity. This tightening of the credit markets has increased the
cost of capital and reduced the availability of credit. Based on our
latest discussions, we believe that our sources of credit and liquidity are able
to fulfill their commitments to us as of our filing date. We cannot
predict, however, how long the current economic and capital and credit market
conditions will continue, whether they will continue to deteriorate and which
aspects of our products or business could be adversely
affected. However, if current levels of economic and capital and
credit market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no
assurance that we will not experience an adverse impact, which may be material,
on our business, the cost of and access to capital and credit markets, and our
results of operations. In addition, we monitor the financial
condition of our customers on a regular basis based on public information or
data provided directly to us. If the financial condition of one of
our major customers was negatively impacted by market conditions or liquidity,
we could be adversely impacted in terms of accounts receivable and/or inventory
specifically attributable to them.
The
industries in which FutureFuel Chemical Company competes are highly
competitive.
The oil
and gas industry, as well as the chemical business, are highly
competitive. There is competition within these industries and also
with other industries in supplying the energy, fuel and chemical needs of
industry and individual consumers. FutureFuel Chemical Company will
compete with other firms in the sale or purchase of various goods or services in
many national and international markets. FutureFuel Chemical Company
will compete with large national and multi-national companies that have longer
operating histories, greater financial, technical and other resources and
greater name recognition than FutureFuel Chemical Company does. In
addition, FutureFuel Chemical Company will compete with several smaller
companies capable of competing effectively on a regional or local basis, and the
number of these smaller companies is increasing. FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new or emerging
technologies and services and changes in customer requirements. As a
result of competition, FutureFuel Chemical Company may lose market share or be
unable to maintain or increase prices for its products and/or services or to
acquire additional business opportunities, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows. Although FutureFuel Chemical Company will employ all methods
of competition which are lawful and appropriate for such purposes, no assurances
can be made that they will be successful. A key component of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s competitive position, particularly given the
expected commodity-based nature of many of its products, will be its ability to
manage expenses successfully, which requires continuous management focus on
reducing unit costs and improving efficiency. No assurances can be
given that FutureFuel Chemical Company will be able to successfully manage such
expenses.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s competitive position in the markets in which it participates
is, in part, subject to external factors in addition to those that FutureFuel
Chemical Company can impact. Natural disasters, changes in laws or
regulations, war or other outbreak of hostilities, or other political factors in
any of the countries or regions in which FutureFuel Chemical Company operates or
does business, or in countries or regions that are key suppliers of strategic
raw materials, could negatively impact FutureFuel Chemical Company’s competitive
position and its ability to maintain market share.
Increases
in the construction of biodiesel production plants may cause excess biodiesel
production capacity in the market. Excess capacity may adversely
affect the price at which FutureFuel Chemical Company is able to sell the
biodiesel that it produces and may also adversely affect our anticipated results
of operation and financial condition.
In 2006
and 2007, approximately 250 million gallons and 490 million gallons,
respectively, of biodiesel were produced in the United States. 2008
biodiesel production is estimated at approximately 700 million
gallons. See http://www.americanfuels.info/2008/11/august-biodiesel-production-down.html. As
of September 29, 2008, there was a reported 2.61 billion gallons per
year of biodiesel production capacity in the United States. www.biodiesel.org - see link to Production
Facilities, p 8. With such biodiesel production capacity in the
United States, compared to historical production levels, there is a risk that
there will be a significant amount of excess biodiesel production capacity in
the U.S., which may adversely affect the price at which FutureFuel Chemical
Company is able to sell the biodiesel that it sells and thereby adversely affect
our anticipated results of operation and financial condition.
The
U.S. biodiesel manufacturing base is contracting. This contraction
may adversely affect FutureFuel Chemical Company’s ability to sell
biodiesel.
The
excess biodiesel production in the U.S. as described above has been ameliorated
somewhat in 2008 in that at least 20 of 178 plants are idled while others have
reduced production, which has resulted in approximately 700 million gallons
of biodiesel actually produced in the United States in 2008 as compared to
actual production capacity. See, for example, www.biodiesel.org/buyingbiodiesel/producres_marketers/Producers%20Map-Existing and www.biodiesel.org/pdf_files/fuelfactsheets/Production_Graph_Slide. Further industry consolidation is
expected. While such industry consolidation addresses the issue of
excess production, it could affect the willingness of potential customers to
purchase biodiesel if they perceive that the biodiesel market is not a stable
long-term supply of product, which could adversely affect our financial
condition and results of operation.
Anti-subsidy
and anti-dumping complaints have been filed with the European Commission
concerning imports of biodiesel originating in the United States. The
existence of such complaints, and an adverse decision by the European
Commission, could reduce demand for biodiesel produced in the United
States.
Anti-subsidy
and anti-dumping complaints have been filed with the European Commission
concerning imports of biodiesel originating in the United
States. Although we are not a target of such complaints and do not
import biodiesel into the European community, the existence of such complaints,
and an adverse decision by the European Commission, could reduce demand for
biodiesel produced in the United States. Such a reduction in demand
could reduce the amount of biodiesel that FutureFuel Chemical Company sells,
which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
Fluctuations
in commodity prices may cause a reduction in the demand or profitability of the
products or services FutureFuel Chemical Company produces.
Prices
for alternative fuels tend to fluctuate widely based on a variety of political
and economic factors. These price fluctuations heavily influence the
oil and gas industry. Lower energy prices for existing products tend
to limit the demand for alternative forms of energy services and related
products and infrastructure. Historically, the markets for
alternative fuels have been volatile, and they are likely to continue to be
volatile. Wide fluctuations in alternative fuel prices may result
from relatively minor changes in the supply of and demand for oil and natural
gas, market uncertainty and other factors that are beyond our control,
including:
|
·
|
worldwide
and domestic supplies of oil and
gas;
|
|
·
|
the
price and/or availability of biodiesel
feedstocks;
|
|
·
|
the
level of consumer demand;
|
|
·
|
the
price and availability of alternative
fuels;
|
|
·
|
the
availability of pipeline and refining
capacity;
|
|
·
|
the
price and level of foreign imports;
|
|
·
|
domestic
and foreign governmental regulations and
taxes;
|
|
·
|
the
ability of the members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and production
controls;
|
|
·
|
political
instability or armed conflict in oil-producing regions;
and
|
|
·
|
the
overall economic environment.
|
These
factors and the volatility of the commodity markets make it extremely difficult
to predict future alternative fuel price movements with any
certainty. There may be a decrease in the demand for FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s products or services and our profitability could be adversely
affected.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company is reliant on certain strategic raw materials for its
operations.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company is reliant on certain strategic raw materials (such as acetic
anhydride, pelargonic acid, soybean oil and methanol) for its
operations. We have implemented certain risk management tools, such
as multiple suppliers and hedging, as appropriate, to mitigate short-term market
fluctuations in raw material supply and costs. There can be no
assurance, however, that such measures will result in cost savings or that all
market fluctuation exposure will be eliminated. In addition, natural
disasters, changes in laws or regulations, war or other outbreak of hostilities,
or other political factors in any of the countries or regions in which
FutureFuel Chemical Company operates or does business, or in countries or
regions that are key suppliers of strategic raw materials, could affect
availability and costs of raw materials.
While
temporary shortages of raw materials may occasionally occur, these items have
historically been sufficiently available to cover current
requirements. However, their continuous availability and price are
impacted by natural disasters, plant interruptions occurring during periods of
high demand, domestic and world market and political conditions, changes in
government regulation, and war or other outbreak of hostilities. In
addition, as FutureFuel Chemical Company increases its biodiesel capacity, it
will require larger supplies of raw materials which have not yet been secured
and may not be available for the foregoing reasons, or may be available only at
prices higher than current levels. FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
operations or products may, at times, be adversely affected by these
factors.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company is reliant upon two customers for a substantial amount of its
sales.
All sales
of the bleach activator are made to The Procter & Gamble Company and all
sales of a proprietary herbicide and certain other intermediates used in the
production of this herbicide are made to Arysta LifeScience North America
Corporation. These two customers represented approximately 60% of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31,
2008. The contract with The Procter & Gamble Company is a
multiyear contract and no assurances can be given that such contract will be
extended or, if extended, upon what terms. The contracts with Arysta
LifeScience North America Corporation contain certain termination provisions and
no assurances can be given that these contracts will not be
terminated. The loss of these two companies as customers would have a
material adverse effect on us.
Changes
in technology may render FutureFuel Chemical Company’s products or services
obsolete.
The
alternative fuel and chemical industries may be substantially affected by rapid
and significant changes in technology. Examples include competitive
product technologies, such as green gasoline and renewable diesel produced from
catalytic hydroforming of renewable feedstock oils and competitive process
technologies such as advanced biodiesel continuous reactor and washing designs
that increase throughput. These changes may render obsolete certain
existing products, energy sources, services and technologies currently used by
FutureFuel Chemical Company. We cannot assure you that the
technologies used by or relied upon by FutureFuel Chemical Company will not be
subject to such obsolescence. While we may attempt to adapt and apply
the services provided by FutureFuel Chemical Company to newer technologies, we
cannot assure you that we will have sufficient resources to fund these changes
or that these changes will ultimately prove successful.
Failure
to comply with governmental regulations could result in the imposition of
penalties, fines or restrictions on operations and remedial
liabilities.
The oil
and gas and chemical industries are subject to extensive federal, state, local
and foreign laws and regulations related to the general population’s health and
safety and those associated with compliance and permitting obligations
(including those related to the use, storage, handling, discharge, emission and
disposal of municipal solid waste and other waste, pollutants or hazardous
substances or waste, or discharges and air and other emissions) as well as land
use and development. Existing laws also impose obligations to clean
up contaminated properties or to pay for the cost of such remediation, often
upon parties that did not actually cause the
contamination. Compliance with these laws, regulations and
obligations could require substantial capital expenditures. Failure
to comply could result in the imposition of penalties, fines or restrictions on
operations and remedial liabilities. These costs and liabilities
could adversely affect our operations.
Changes
in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes that
result in more stringent or costly waste handling, storage, transport, disposal
or cleanup requirements could require FutureFuel Chemical Company to make
significant expenditures to attain and maintain compliance and may otherwise
have a material adverse effect on its business segments in general and on our
results of operations, competitive position or financial
condition. We are unable to predict the effect of additional
environmental laws and regulations which may be adopted in the future, including
whether any such laws or regulations would materially adversely increase
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s cost of doing business or affect its operations in
any area.
Under
certain environmental laws and regulations, FutureFuel Chemical Company could be
held strictly liable for the removal or remediation of previously released
materials or property contamination regardless of whether FutureFuel Chemical
Company was responsible for the release or contamination, or if current or prior
operations were conducted consistent with accepted standards of
practice. Such liabilities can be significant and, if imposed, could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s biofuels operations may be harmed if the government were to
change current laws and regulations.
Alternative
fuels businesses benefit from tax credits and government
subsidies. If any of the state or federal laws and regulations
relating to the tax credits and government subsidies change, the ability to
recover capital expenditures from an alternative fuels business could be
harmed. FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biofuels platform is subject to
federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the application and use
of alternative energy products, including those related specifically to
biodiesel. For instance, biodiesel products benefit from being the
only alternative fuel certified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that
fulfills the requirements of Section 211(B) of the Clean Air Act. If
agency determinations, laws and regulations relating to the application and use
of alternative energy are changed, the marketability and sales of biodiesel
production could be materially adversely affected.
The
federal excise tax credit for biodiesel expires on December 31, 2009 and
Congress has not enacted legislation to extend this credit. If the
credit expires, FutureFuel Chemical Company’s cost of producing biodiesel will
be increased, which could have an adverse effect on our financial
position.
In
October 2004, Congress passed a biodiesel tax incentive, structured as a federal
excise tax credit, as part of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004. The credit amounts to one cent for each percentage point of
vegetable oil or animal fat biodiesel that is blended with
petrodiesel. For example, blenders that blend B20 made from soy,
canola and other vegetable oils and animal fats receive a 20¢ per gallon excise
tax credit. The tax incentive generally is taken by petroleum
distributors and is passed on to the consumer. It is designed to
lower the cost of biodiesel to consumers in both taxable and tax-exempt
markets. The tax credit was scheduled to expire at the end of 2006,
but was extended in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to December 31, 2008 and
most recently it was extended to December 31, 2009.
Congress
has not enacted any legislation to extend this tax credit beyond
December 31, 2009. If the tax credit is not extended, FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s biodiesel production costs will increase by $1.00 per
gallon. If biodiesel feedstock costs do not decrease significantly
relative to biodiesel prices by the beginning of 2010, FutureFuel Chemical
Company would realize a negative biodiesel production margin. As a
result, we would cease producing biodiesel, which could have an adverse effect
on our financial condition.
Market
conditions or transportation impediments may hinder access to raw goods and
distribution markets.
Market
conditions, the unavailability of satisfactory transportation or the location of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s manufacturing complex from more lucrative markets
may hinder FutureFuel Chemical Company’s access to raw goods and/or distribution
markets. The availability of a ready market for biodiesel depends on
a number of factors, including the demand for and supply of biodiesel and the
proximity of the plant to trucking and terminal facilities. The sale
of large quantities of biodiesel necessitates that FutureFuel Chemical Company
transport its biodiesel to other markets since the Batesville, Arkansas regional
market is not expected to absorb all of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
contemplated production. Currently, common carrier pipelines are not
transporting biodiesel. This leaves trucks, barges and rail cars as
the means of distribution of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s product from the
plant to these storage terminals for further distribution. However,
the current availability of rail cars is limited and at times unavailable
because of repairs or improvements, or as a result of priority transportation
agreements with other shippers. Additionally, the current
availability of barges is limited, particularly heated barges to transport
biodiesel during winter months. If transportation is restricted or is
unavailable, FutureFuel Chemical Company may not be able to sell into more
lucrative markets and consequently its cash flow from sales of biodiesel could
be restricted.
The
biodiesel industry also faces several challenges to wide biodiesel acceptance,
including cold temperature limitations, storage stability, fuel quality
standards and exhaust emissions. If the industry does not satisfy
consumers that these issues have been resolved or are being resolved, biodiesel
may not gain widespread acceptance which may have an adverse impact on
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s cash flow from sales of biodiesel.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s insurance may not protect it against its business and
operating risks.
We
maintain insurance for some, but not all, of the potential risks and liabilities
associated with FutureFuel Chemical Company’s business. For some
risks, we may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of available insurance
is excessive relative to the risks presented. As a result of market
conditions, premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase
substantially and, in some instances, certain insurance policies may become
unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. As a
result, we may not be able to renew our existing insurance policies or procure
other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at
all. Although we will maintain insurance at levels we believe are
appropriate for FutureFuel Chemical Company’s business and consistent with
industry practice, we will not be fully insured against all risks which cannot
be sourced on economic terms. In addition, pollution and
environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. Losses and
liabilities from uninsured and underinsured events and delay in the payment of
insurance proceeds could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition and results of operations.
If a
significant accident or other event resulting in damage to FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s operations (including severe weather, terrorist acts, war, civil
disturbances, pollution or environmental damage) occurs and is not
fully
covered
by insurance or a recoverable indemnity from a customer, it could adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company depends on key personnel, the loss of any of whom could
materially adversely affect our future operations.
Our
success will depend to a significant extent upon the efforts and abilities of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s executive officers. The loss of the
services of one or more of these key employees could have a material adverse
effect on us. FutureFuel Chemical Company’s business will also be
dependent upon its ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel. Acquiring or retaining these personnel could prove more
difficult to hire or cost substantially more than estimated. This
could cause FutureFuel Chemical Company to incur greater costs, or prevent it
from pursuing its expansion strategy as quickly as it would otherwise wish to
do.
If
FutureFuel Chemical Company is unable to effectively manage the commodity price
risk of its raw materials or finished goods, FutureFuel Chemical Company may
have unexpected losses.
We hedge
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s raw materials and/or finished products for our
biofuels segment to some degree to manage the commodity price risk of such
items. This requires the purchase or sale of commodity futures
contracts and/or options on those contracts or similar financial
instruments. We may be forced to make cash deposits available to
counterparties as they mark to market these financial hedges. This
funding requirement may limit the level of commodity price risk management that
we are prudently able to complete. If we do not or are not capable of
managing the commodity price risk of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s raw materials
and/or finished products for our biofuels segment, FutureFuel Chemical Company
may incur losses as a result of price fluctuations with respect to these raw
materials and/or finished products.
In most
cases we are not capable of hedging raw material and/or finished products for
our chemicals segment. Certain of our products are produced under
manufacturing agreements with our customers which provide us the contractual
ability to pass along raw material price increases. However, we do
not have this protection for all product lines within the chemicals
segment. If we do not or are not capable of managing escalating raw
material prices and/or passing these increases along to our customers via prices
for our finished products, we may incur losses.
If
FutureFuel Chemical Company is unable to acquire or renew permits and approvals
required for its operations, it may be forced to suspend or cease operations
altogether.
The
operation of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s manufacturing plant requires numerous
permits and approvals from governmental agencies. FutureFuel Chemical
Company may not be able to obtain all necessary permits (or modifications
thereto) and approvals and, as a result, our operations may be adversely
affected. In addition, obtaining all necessary renewal permits (or
modifications to existing permits) and approvals for future expansions may
necessitate substantial expenditures and may create a significant risk of
expensive delays or loss of value if a project is unable to function as planned
due to changing requirements.
The
lack of business diversification may adversely affect our results of
operations.
It is
possible that we will not consummate more than one business combination with the
proceeds from our July 2006 offering and FutureFuel Chemical Company may be the
only target business that we acquire. Accordingly, the prospects for
our success may be entirely dependent upon FutureFuel Chemical
Company. Unlike other entities which may have the resources to
complete several business combinations of entities operating in multiple
industries or multiple areas of a single industry, it is possible that we will
not have the resources to diversify effectively our operations or benefit from
the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s indebtedness may limit our ability to borrow additional funds
or capitalize on acquisition or other business opportunities.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company has entered into a $50 million revolving credit facility
with a commercial bank and we have guaranteed FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
obligations thereunder. The restrictions governing this indebtedness
(such as total debt to EBITDA limitations) may reduce our ability to incur
additional indebtedness,
engage in
certain transactions or capitalize on acquisition or other business
opportunities. If FutureFuel Chemical Company is unable to meet its
future debt service obligations and other financial obligations, we could be
forced to restructure or refinance such indebtedness and other financial
transactions, seek additional equity or sell assets.
We
expect to have capital expenditure requirements, and we may be unable to obtain
needed financing on satisfactory terms.
We expect
to make capital expenditures for the expansion of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
biofuels production capacity and complementary infrastructure. We
intend to finance these capital expenditures primarily through cash flow from
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s operations, borrowings under our credit facility
and existing cash. However, if FutureFuel Chemical Company’s capital
requirements vary materially from those provided for in our current projections,
we may require additional financing sooner than anticipated. A
decrease in expected revenues or adverse change in market conditions could make
obtaining this financing economically unattractive or impossible. As
a result, we may lack the capital necessary to complete the projected expansions
or capitalize on other business opportunities.
We
may be unable to successfully integrate future acquisitions with our operations
or realize all of the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions.
Failure
to successfully integrate future acquisitions, if any, in a timely manner may
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. The difficulties of combining acquired
operations include, among other things:
|
·
|
operating
a significantly larger combined
organization;
|
|
·
|
consolidating
corporate technological and administrative
functions;
|
|
·
|
integrating
internal controls and other corporate governance matters;
and
|
|
·
|
diverting
management’s attention from other business
concerns.
|
In
addition, we may not realize all of the anticipated benefits from future
acquisitions, such as increased earnings, cost savings and revenue enhancements,
for various reasons, including difficulties integrating operations and
personnel, higher and unexpected acquisition and operating costs, unknown
liabilities and fluctuations in markets. If benefits from future
acquisitions do not meet the expectations of financial or industry analysts, the
market price of our shares of common stock may decline.
The
scope of indemnity protection afforded to us under the acquisition agreement
with Eastman Chemical Company is limited.
While we
are confident that the due diligence process undertaken in relation to
FutureFuel Chemical Company was sufficient and that material areas of potential
exposure have been discovered, there can be no certainty that all significant
exposures were uncovered by the due diligence process and it is unlikely that
all existing or potential problems and/or liabilities have been
revealed. The inspections that were performed may not have revealed
structural and environmental problems, such as groundwater
contamination. We were not able to obtain contractual indemnities
from Eastman Chemical Company for all liabilities that were created by Eastman
Chemical Company or FutureFuel Chemical Company prior to the completion of the
acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company and have only limited indemnity
protection under the acquisition agreement with Eastman Chemical Company, most
of which expired 18 months after the acquisition. As part of such
acquisition agreement, we, through FutureFuel Chemical Company, assumed the risk
of the physical condition of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s properties in
addition to the risk that the properties may not perform in accordance with
expectations, as well as certain environmental and other unknown liabilities in
excess of certain amounts.
If any
such exposures materialize or the information provided as part of the due
diligence exercise proves to be untrue or inaccurate, we will have to rely on
the remaining limited indemnity protection afforded to us under the acquisition
agreement, if any, in order to seek compensation for any financial loss incurred
as a result. By its nature,
indemnity
protection is limited in scope, being the product of a negotiation exercise
between us and Eastman Chemical Company, and therefore we may not recover any or
sufficient funds fully to cover any loss incurred.
In
addition, even where potential areas of exposure are covered by the scope of
remaining indemnity protection provided under the acquisition agreement, there
is no guarantee that Eastman Chemical Company will be in a financial position to
support the level of indemnification for which it may be
liable. Consequently, we may not recover any or sufficient funds
fully to cover any loss incurred.
Risks associated with owning
our shares and warrants.
The
exercise of our warrants are subject to transfer and exercise requirements under
the Securities Act. In addition, our warrants are represented by
definitive certificates, which could reduce the liquidity of our
warrants.
The
exercise of the warrants for shares of our common stock are subject to certain
conditions designed to ensure compliance with U.S. securities
laws. These conditions include the provision to us of a written
certification that the exercising shareholder is neither within the U.S. nor a
U.S. person and that the warrant is not being exercised on behalf of a U.S.
person, or the provision to us of a written opinion of counsel to the effect
that the transfer of the warrants and issuance of the shares of our common stock
upon the exercise of such warrants have been registered under the United States
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), or are exempt from registration thereunder. As a
result, our warrants are represented by definitive certificates which contain
the following legend.
Prior to
investing in the securities or conducting any transactions in the securities,
investors are advised to consult professional advisers regarding the
restrictions on transfer summarized below and any other
restrictions.
This
security (or its predecessor) was originally issued in a transaction exempt from
registration under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
“Securities Act”), and is a restricted security (as defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act). This security may not be offered, sold or
otherwise transferred in the absence of registration or an applicable exemption
therefrom. Hedging transactions involving this security may not be
conducted directly or indirectly, unless in compliance with the Securities
Act. Each purchaser of this security is hereby notified that the
seller of this security may be relying on the exemption from the provisions of
Section 5 of the Securities Act provided by Rule 144A or
Regulation S thereunder.
The
holder of this security agrees for the benefit of the Company that (a) this
security may be offered, resold, pledged or otherwise transferred, only
(i) in the United States to a person whom the seller reasonably believes is
a qualified institutional buyer (as defined in Rule 144A under the
Securities Act) in a transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A,
(ii) outside of the United States in an offshore transaction in accordance
with Rule 903 or Rule 904 under the Securities Act,
(iii) pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act
provided by Rule 144 thereunder (if available) or (iv) pursuant to an
effective registration statement under the Securities Act, in each of cases (i)
through (iv) in accordance with any applicable securities laws of any state of
the United States, and (b) the holder will, and each subsequent holder is
required to, notify any purchaser of this security from it of the resale
restrictions referred to in (a) above.
The
securities represented by this certificate are subject to transfer restrictions
which require that in addition to any certifications required from a transferor
as set forth on the reverse of this certificate, prior to the expiration of a
distribution compliance period of at least one year, the transferee certifies as
to whether or not it is a US person within the meaning of Regulation S and
provides certain other certifications and agreements. Prior to
permitting any transfer, the Company may request an opinion of counsel
reasonably satisfactory to the
Company
that such transfer is to be effected in a transaction meeting the requirements
of Regulation S under the Securities Act or is otherwise exempt from
registration under the Securities Act.
In order
to transfer or sell our warrants, holders must provide the definitive
certificates to the transfer agent, who will require certain certifications as
set forth above, and on occasion legal opinions as set forth above, prior to
issuing new warrant certificates to new warrant holders. The
Depository Trust Company, which settles electronic trades, does not allow
electronic settlement until the legend has been removed and the certification
requirements required under U.S. securities laws have expired. The
lack of a fully electronic settlement mechanism may have a material adverse
effect on the liquidity and the price of our warrants.
A
minimum holding period for our shares received upon exercise of our warrants may
commence upon the exercise of such warrants.
The
shares of our common stock issued upon the exercise of a warrant generally will
be considered restricted securities subject to a six-month holding period as
described below. In general, a security holder who has not been our
affiliate for three months may resell these securities without any restriction
after satisfying the six-month holding period, provided that we are current in
our SEC filings.
The Rule
144 holding period for the shares of our common stock received upon exercise of
our warrants will start upon the exercise of such
warrants. Accordingly, holders of our warrants that exercise their
warrants for cash will receive shares of our common stock subject to trading
restrictions which are greater than those imposed on the trading of previously
issued shares. Such restrictions may mean the value of the shares
received upon exercise of the warrants may be significantly lower, at least
until the six-month holding period has expired, than the shares originally
issued.
If
our founding shareholders and Mr. Novelly or his designees exercise their
registration rights, such exercise may have an adverse effect on the market
price of our shares of common stock.
Those
shareholders holding shares of our common stock prior to our July 2006 offering
(the “founding shareholders”; see “Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters -- Founding
Shares Owned by the Founding Shareholders” below for a list of the founding
shareholders) and Mr. Paul A. Novelly, our executive chairman of the board, or
his designees, are entitled to demand that we register under the Securities Act,
the resale of their shares of our common stock issued prior to our July 2006
offering (the “founding shares”) and their shares included in the units
purchased in our July 2006 offering. The demand may be made at any
time after the date on which we have become a reporting company under the
Exchange Act, and their founding shares have been released from
escrow. Except in limited circumstances, this date will not be before
July 12, 2009. If our founding shareholders exercise their
registration rights with respect to all of their shares of our common stock,
there will be an additional 11,250,000 shares and/or up to 5,000,000 shares
issued on exercise of their warrants eligible for trading in the public
market. The presence of this additional number of shares eligible for
trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of
our shares.
We
may not list our common stock on a stock exchange other than the OTCBB and we
may not list our warrants on any stock exchange.
Under the
investor rights agreement that we entered into on July 12, 2006 with CRT
Capital Group LLC and KBC Peel Hunt Ltd, we are obligated to use our
commercially reasonable efforts to cause our shares of common stock to be
authorized to be quoted and/or listed (to the extent applicable) on the American
Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange, the NASD Automated Quotation System
or the NASDAQ National Market (or, in each case, a successor thereto) or a
similarly recognized national trading platform, if our common stock so
qualifies. Prior to December 2008, we did not satisfy the listing
requirements of any such exchange other than the OTCBB. Application
for listing was made to the OTCBB and our shares of common stock are quoted
thereon. In December 2008, we met the listing requirements for
certain of the NASDAQ markets, and we are currently assessing whether listing on
a NASDAQ market is commercially reasonable. However, no assurances
can be given that we will list our common stock on such exchange, or, if listed,
whether our common stock will continue to qualify for quotation or listing on
such exchange or other similarly recognized national trading platform, including
the OTCBB.
We have
no obligation to list or quote our warrants on any exchange, and no assurances
can be given that we will attempt to cause our warrants to be authorized to be
quoted and/or listed on any exchange or recognized national trading
platform.
None.
The
Company
We are a
holding company whose principal assets are all of the issued and outstanding
shares of stock of FutureFuel Chemical Company and cash, cash equivalents and
investments.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s principal asset is a manufacturing plant situated on
approximately 2,200 acres of land six miles southeast of Batesville in north
central Arkansas fronting the White River. Approximately 500 acres of
the site are occupied with batch and continuous manufacturing facilities,
laboratories and infrastructure, including on-site liquid waste
treatment. FutureFuel Chemical Company is the fee owner of this plant
and the land upon which it is situated, and manufactures both biofuels and
chemicals at the plant. Utilization of these facilities may vary with
product mix and economic, seasonal and other business conditions, but the plant
is substantially utilized with the exception of facilities designated for
capacity expansion of biodiesel and a facility targeted for the potential future
production of cellulose-derived biofuels. The plant, including
approved expansions, has sufficient capacity for existing needs and expected
near-term growth. We believe that the plant is generally well
maintained, in good operating condition and suitable and adequate for its
uses.
Neither
we nor our subsidiary are a party to, nor is any of ours or its property subject
to, any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine
litigation incidental to their businesses. However, from time to
time, FutureFuel Chemical Company and its operations may be parties to, or
targets of, lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including product
liability, personal injury, asbestos, patent and intellectual property,
commercial, contract, environmental, antitrust, health and safety and employment
matters, which we expect to be handled and defended in the ordinary course of
business. While we are unable to predict the outcome of any matters
currently pending, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of any such
pending matters will have a material adverse effect on our overall financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. However, adverse
developments could negatively impact earnings or cash flows in future
periods.
None.
Market
Information
Our
shares and warrants were listed on AIM under the ticker symbols “FFU” and
“FFUW,” respectively. Trading of our shares of common stock and
warrants on AIM commenced July 12, 2006 and was suspended on July 24,
2006, the date that our acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company was
announced. Trading resumed on October 9,
2006. However, in connection with the restatement of our financial
statements to comply with purchase accounting as discussed below, trading in our
shares of common stock and warrants was again suspended on July 26, 2007 at
our request. We completed the restatement of our financial statements
and requested that our shares and warrants again be traded on
AIM. Trading of our shares and warrants was approved on
February 1, 2008 and trading recommenced on that date. Admission
of our shares and warrants was cancelled on July 14, 2008.
Commencing
July 11, 2008, shares of our common stock were quoted on the OTCBB under
the symbol “FTFL”. The high and low bid quotations on the OTCBB for
our shares of common stock for 2008 for the periods during which it was quoted
on the OTCBB are set forth in the following table.
|
|
Shares
|
|
Period
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
July 11,
2008 - September 30, 2008
|
|
$ |
7.00 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
October
1, 2008 - December 31, 2008
|
|
$ |
6.40 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
Our
warrants are not quoted or listed on any established exchange or quotation
system.
There are
currently outstanding 28,190,300 shares of our common stock and warrants to
purchase 21,317,500 shares of our common stock at $6.00 per
share. Under U.S. securities laws at the time of our offering, shares
of our common stock and warrants that were sold or acquired on July 12,
2006 could not be re-sold until they had been held for two years, unless
registered with the SEC or unless an exemption from registration was
available. The relevant U.S. securities laws were revised to reduce
the holding period to six months, effective February 15,
2008. As a result, such shares and warrants (subject, in the case of
warrants, to the qualification discussed below) may be sold by non-affiliates of
the Company, either within or outside the U.S., without restrictions imposed by
U.S. securities laws. Affiliates of the Company, defined generally as
any person that directly or indirectly controls, is controlled by, or is under
common control with the Company (typically directors, executive officers and
primary shareholders) remain limited in the amount and manner in which they may
sell our shares and warrants. Thus, non-affiliates who acquired our
shares and warrants which were issued in our initial offering on July 12,
2006 may generally freely trade those shares and warrants in the United
States.
Please
note, however, that the exercise of the warrants for shares of our common stock
are subject to certain conditions designed to ensure compliance with U.S.
securities laws. These conditions include the provision to us of a
written certification that the exercising shareholder is neither within the U.S.
nor a U.S. person and that the warrant is not being exercised on behalf of a
U.S. person, or the provision to us of a written opinion of counsel to the
effect that the transfer of the warrants and issuance of the shares of our
common stock upon the exercise of such warrants have been registered under the
Securities Act, or are exempt from registration thereunder. The
shares of our common stock issued upon the exercise of a warrant generally will
be considered restricted securities subject to a six-month holding
period. In general, a security holder who has not been an affiliate
of the Company for three months may resell these securities without any
restriction after satisfying the six-month holding period, provided that we are
current in our SEC filings. Because of these restrictions, our
warrants must contain an appropriate legend, which means they must be
certificated.
Holders
The
shares of our common stock and our warrants were held by approximately 420 and
69 holders of record, respectively, on March 10, 2009 as recorded on our
transfer agent’s registers.
Dividends
The
payment of cash dividends by us is dependent upon our future earnings, capital
requirements and overall financial condition. There were no cash
dividends declared on shares of our common stock in 2007. A special
cash dividend of $0.70 per share was paid on our common stock in
2008. We currently have no intention of paying dividends in the
foreseeable future.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plan
Our board
of directors adopted an omnibus incentive plan which was approved by our
shareholders at our 2007 annual shareholder meeting on June 26,
2007. We do not have any other equity compensation
plan. Under this plan, we are authorized to issue 2,670,000 shares of
our common stock. The shares to be issued under the plan were
registered with the SEC on a Form S-8 filed on April 29,
2008. Through December 31, 2008, we issued options to purchase
410,000 shares of our common stock and awarded an additional 39,800 shares to
participants under the plan. The following additional information
regarding this plan is as of December 31, 2008.
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities
to
be issued upon
exercise
of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
|
Weighted-average
exercise
price of
outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
|
Number
of securities
remaining
available
for
future issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans
(excluding
securities
reflected
in column
(a))
|
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
Equity compensation plans
approved by security holders
|
142,000
|
$ 5.25
|
2,220,200
|
Performance
Graph
The
following graph shows changes over the 29 month period beginning July 13,
2006 (the completion of our offering of units) through December 31, 2008 in
the value of an $100 investment in: (i) our common stock; (ii) Russell
2000; and (iii) an industry group of other companies that file reports with
the SEC using SIC Code 2860. These companies are: AE Biofuels, Inc.,
Aventine Renewable Energy Holdings; Biofuel Energy Corp., Bluefire Ethanol
Fuels; China Clean Energy Inc.; Epolin Inc.; Ethos Environmental Inc.; Global
Green Solutions, Inc.; Green Energy Resources, Inc.; Green Plains Renewable
Energy; Greenshift Corp.; International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.; Kreido
Biofuels Inc.; Momentum Biofuels, Inc.; New Generation Biofuels Holdings, Inc.;
OM Group Inc.; Originoil Inc.; Pacific Ethanol Inc.; Panda Ethanol Inc.; Pure
Biofuels Corp.; Rentech Inc.; Stratos Renewables Corp.; Synthetech Inc.; United
Energy Corp.; Verasun Energy Corp.; and Westlake Chemical Corp.
Securities
Sold and Consideration
The
following is a description of all securities sold by us within the past three
years, which securities were not registered under the Securities
Act.
We were
incorporated on August 12, 2005. We issued 5,000,000 shares of
common stock on September 1, 2005 to certain founding shareholders for an
aggregate consideration of $25,000. On May 24, 2006, we issued a
common stock dividend of 0.25 shares for each outstanding share, effectively
lowering the purchase price paid by each of the founding shareholders to $.004
per share. The total number of issued shares of our common stock
following such stock dividend was 6,250,000. On June 27, 2006,
we and certain of our founding shareholders cancelled an aggregate of 625,000
shares of our common stock, reducing the founding shares outstanding to
5,625,000 shares.
On
July 12, 2006, we issued 22,500,000 units, each unit consisting of one
share of our common stock and one warrant entitling the holder thereof to
purchase one share of our common stock. The sales price was $8.00 per
unit for an aggregate sales price of $180,000,000.
Placing
Agents and Other Purchasers
KBC Peel
Hunt Ltd and CRT Capital Group, LLC, who served as placing agents in the
offering of the units, assisted us in procuring subscribers for 16,875,000
units. The remaining units sold in the offering were sold to the
following designees of Mr. Novelly.
Name
|
|
Shares
|
St.
Albans Global Management, Limited Partnership, LLLP
|
|
4,531,250
|
Apex
Holding Co.
|
|
625,000
|
Ed
Wahl
|
|
31,250
|
Jeff
Call
|
|
31,250
|
Graziadio
Family Trust
|
|
62,500
|
Bermuda
Life Insurance Company/Separate Account C
|
|
93,750
|
William
Doré
|
|
109,375
|
Lori
L. Mikles
|
|
46,875
|
J.
B. Ladd Trust
|
|
32,500
|
Thomas
Evans
|
|
30,000
|
Steve
Wallace
|
|
31,250
|
Total
|
|
5,625,000
|
Exemption
from Registration Claimed
Shares of
our common stock were issued to our founding shareholders on the basis of an
exemption from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for
transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering. Each of
our founding shareholders was, and is, a sophisticated investor who or which
would qualify as an accredited investor (as defined in Rule 501 under the
Securities Act). Neither we nor any person acting on our behalf
offered or sold the shares to the founding shareholders by any form of general
solicitation or general advertising, and each of our founding shareholders
understands that such shares are “restricted securities” (as defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act). Each of our founding shareholders was
required to represent to us that, among other matters, he or it was purchasing
our shares for investment purposes only, for his or its own account and not with
a view toward selling or otherwise distributing the shares.
The units
were sold: (i) to “qualified institutional buyers” (as defined in Rule 144A
under the Securities Act) and a limited number of “accredited investors” (as
defined in Rule 501 under the Securities Act); and (ii) in offshore
transactions complying with Rule 903 of Regulation S under the Securities
Act. More specifically, the units were not registered under the
Securities Act and are “restricted securities” as defined in Rule
144. A purchaser of such securities may not offer, sell, pledge or
otherwise transfer such securities in the United States or to, or for the
account or benefit of, any U.S. person (as defined under Regulation S of the
Securities Act), except: (a) pursuant to an effective registration
statement under the Securities Act; (b) to a person whom the seller
reasonably believes is a qualified institutional buyer in a transaction meeting
the requirements of Rule 144A under the Securities Act; (c) pursuant to an
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act provided by
Rule 144 thereunder (if available); or (d) in certain transactions
specified in Regulation S. The selling restrictions set forth in the
preceding sentence will continue to be applicable to our shares and warrants
notwithstanding the expiration of the compliance period described
below. Under our bylaws, we are required to refuse to register any
transfer of our securities not made in accordance with the provisions of Rule
144A, Rule 144 (if available), Regulation S, or pursuant to registration under
the Securities Act or another exemption from registration under the Securities
Act.
Our
shares and warrants are subject to the conditions listed under section
903(b)(3), or Category 3, of Regulation S of the Securities
Act. Under Category 3, “offering restrictions” (as defined under
Regulation S) must be in place and additional restrictions are imposed on
resales of the shares and warrants as described below. All shares and
warrants are subject to these restrictions, regardless of whether the purchaser
acquired the shares or warrants in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A or in a
transaction pursuant to Regulation S.
Prior to
one year after the later of (i) the time when the shares or warrants were first
offered to persons other than distributors in reliance upon Regulation S or (ii)
the date of closing of the offering, or such longer period as may be required
under applicable law (the “compliance period”):
(a) every
purchaser of shares or warrants other than a distributor will be required to
certify that it is not a U.S. person and is not acquiring the securities for the
account or benefit of any U.S. person (as defined under Regulation S of the
Securities Act) or is a U.S. person who purchased securities in a transaction
that did not require registration under the Securities Act;
(b) every
purchaser of the shares or warrants has been, or will be, required to agree to
resell such shares or warrants only in accordance with the provisions of Rule
144A, Rule 144 (if available) or Regulation S, or pursuant to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act, and will be required to agree
to not engage in hedging transactions with regard to the securities unless in
compliance with the Securities Act;
(c) the
shares and warrants will (i) contain a legend to the effect that transfer is
prohibited except in accordance with the restrictions set forth in (a) and (b)
above during the compliance period, and (ii) with respect to the warrants
(notwithstanding the expiration of the compliance period), and pursuant to Rule
903(b)(5)(i), contain a legend stating that the warrants and securities to be
issued upon their exercise have not been registered under the Securities Act and
that the warrant may not be exercised by or on behalf of any U.S. person without
an opinion of counsel;
(d) each
distributor selling securities to a distributor, a dealer (as defined in Section
2(a)(12) of the Securities Act), or a person receiving a selling concession, fee
or other remuneration will be required to send a confirmation or other notice to
the purchaser stating that the purchaser is subject to the same restrictions on
offers and sales that apply to a distributor; and
(e) under
our bylaws, we are required to refuse to register any transfer of our securities
not made in accordance with the provisions of Rule 144A, Rule 144 (if available)
or Regulation S, or pursuant to registration under the Securities Act or another
exemption from registration under the Securities Act.
Each
purchaser of our warrants (regardless of whether such purchaser acquired such
warrants in a transaction pursuant to Rule 144A, Regulation D or Regulation S),
upon exercise of each warrant, must:
(a) provide
us with a written certification that it is neither within the U.S. nor a U.S.
person and the warrant is not being exercised on behalf of a U.S. person;
or
(b) provide
us with a written opinion of counsel to the effect that the transfer of the
warrants and issuance of the shares upon the exercise of such warrants to such
person have been registered under the Securities Act or are exempt from
registration thereunder; and
(c) receive
certificated securities containing the legend described below.
In the
offerings of the units, each purchaser of the shares and warrants was deemed to
have represented and agreed as follows:
(1) the
purchaser (A) (i) is an institutional accredited investor that is a qualified
institutional buyer (subject to certain limited exceptions in the case of the
initial purchase only), (ii) is aware that the sale to it is being made in
reliance on Rule 144A (or, in the case of the initial purchaser only, in
reliance on Regulation D) and (iii) is acquiring the securities for its own
account or for the account of a qualified institutional buyer or (B) is not a
U.S. person and is purchasing the securities in an offshore transaction pursuant
to Regulation S;
(2) the
purchaser understands that the securities were offered in a transaction not
involving any public offering within the meaning of the Securities Act, that the
securities have not been and, except as otherwise described in the offering
documents relating to the unit issuance, will not be registered under the
Securities Act and that if in the future it decides to offer, resell, pledge or
otherwise transfer any such securities, such securities may be offered, resold,
pledged or otherwise transferred only (i) in the United States to a person
whom the seller reasonably believes is a qualified institutional buyer in a
transaction meeting the requirements of Rule 144A, (ii) outside the United
States in a transaction complying with the provisions of Rule 903 or Rule 904
under the Securities Act, (iii) pursuant to an exemption from registration
under the Securities Act provided by Rule 144 (if available), or
(iv) pursuant to an effective registration statement under the Securities
Act, in each of cases (i) through (iv) in accordance with any applicable
securities laws of any state of the United States;
(3) the
purchaser understood and agreed that, in addition to the restrictions set forth
in (2) above, if in the future it decides to resell, pledge or otherwise
transfer any securities or any beneficial interests in any securities prior to
the date which is one year after the later of (1) the date when the shares or
warrants are first offered to persons (other than distributors) pursuant to
Regulation S and (2) the date of closing of the unit offering, it will do
so
only
(i) in compliance with the restrictions set forth above, (ii) pursuant
to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act, or
(iii) in accordance with the provisions of Rule 144A, Rule 144 (if
available) or Regulation S, and in each of such cases in accordance with any
applicable securities law of any state of the United States;
(4) the
purchaser agreed to and each subsequent holder is required to, notify any
purchaser of the shares or warrants from it of the resale restrictions referred
to in paragraphs (2) and (3) above, if then applicable;
(5) the
purchaser acknowledged that, prior to any proposed transfer of shares or
warrants other than pursuant to an effective registration statement, the
transferee of shares or warrants may be required to provide certifications and
other documentation relating to the non-U.S. person status of such
transferee;
(6) the
purchaser acknowledged that we, our placing agents in the unit issuance and
others rely upon the truth and accuracy of the foregoing acknowledgements,
representations and warranties and agreed that if any such acknowledgement,
representation or warranty deemed to have been made by virtue of its purchase of
shares or warrants is no longer accurate, it must promptly notify our placing
agents and us;
(7) the
purchaser acknowledged that neither we, our placing agents nor any person
representing any of them, has made any representation to it with respect to us
or the unit offering, other than the information contained in the offering
documents related to the unit offering, which had been delivered to the
purchaser and upon which the purchaser relied in making its investment decision
with respect to the securities offered; the purchaser has had access to such
financial and other information concerning us and the securities offered,
including an opportunity to ask questions of and request information from us and
our placing agents;
(8) the
purchaser purchased the units for its own account, or for one or more investor
accounts for which it was acting as fiduciary or agent, in each case, not with a
view to, or for offer or sale in connection with, any distribution thereof in
violation of the Securities Act, subject to any requirement of law that the
disposition of its property or the property of such investor account or accounts
be at all times within its or their control and subject to its or their ability
to resell, reoffer or otherwise transfer such securities pursuant to Rule 144A,
Regulation S or Rule 144 (if available) under the Securities
Act;
(9) the
purchaser understood that the securities offered, as “Restricted Securities”
under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, will, until the expiration of the
applicable holding period with respect to the securities set forth in Rule 144
of the Securities Act, and the expiration of the compliance period described
above, will bear legends described below, unless we determine otherwise in
compliance with applicable law; and
(10) the
purchaser acknowledged that the shares and warrants, whether purchased pursuant
to Rule 144A of the Securities Act, Regulation D of the Securities Act or
pursuant to Regulation S of the Securities Act, will bear a restrictive legend
to the following effect, unless we determine otherwise in compliance with
applicable law:
PRIOR
TO INVESTING IN THE SECURITIES OR CONDUCTING ANY TRANSACTIONS IN THE SECURITIES,
INVESTORS ARE ADVISED TO CONSULT PROFESSIONAL ADVISERS REGARDING THE
RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFER SUMMARIZED BELOW AND ANY OTHER
RESTRICTIONS.
THIS
SECURITY (OR ITS PREDECESSOR) WAS ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN A TRANSACTION EXEMPT FROM
REGISTRATION UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED (THE
“SECURITIES ACT”), AND IS A RESTRICTED SECURITY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 144 UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT). THIS SECURITY MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD OR
OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF REGISTRATION OR AN APPLICABLE EXEMPTION
THEREFROM. HEDGING TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THIS SECURITY MAY NOT BE
CONDUCTED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, UNLESS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SECURITIES
ACT. EACH PURCHASER OF THIS SECURITY IS HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT THE
SELLER OF THIS SECURITY MAY BE RELYING ON THE EXEMPTION FROM THE PROVISIONS OF
SECTION 5 OF THE SECURITIES ACT PROVIDED BY RULE 144A OR REGULATION S
THEREUNDER.
THE
HOLDER OF THIS SECURITY AGREES FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY THAT (A) THIS
SECURITY MAY BE OFFERED, RESOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED, ONLY (I) IN
THE UNITED STATES TO A PERSON WHOM THE SELLER REASONABLY BELIEVES IS A QUALIFIED
INSTITUTIONAL BUYER (AS DEFINED IN RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT) IN A
TRANSACTION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF RULE 144A, (II) OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED
STATES IN AN OFFSHORE TRANSACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 903 or RULE 904 UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT, (III) PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT PROVIDED BY RULE 144 THEREUNDER (IF AVAILABLE) OR (IV) PURSUANT
TO AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, IN EACH OF
CASES (I) THROUGH (IV) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY
STATE OF THE UNITED STATES, AND (B) THE HOLDER WILL, AND EACH SUBSEQUENT HOLDER
IS REQUIRED TO, NOTIFY ANY PURCHASER OF THIS SECURITY FROM IT OF THE RESALE
RESTRICTIONS REFERRED TO IN (A) ABOVE.
THE
SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT BE SOLD OR TRANSFERRED TO ANY
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN AS DEFINED IN SECTION 3(3) OF ERISA SUBJECT TO TITLE I OF
ERISA OR ANY PLAN AS DEFINED IN SECTION 4975 OF THE CODE WHICH IS SUBJECT TO THE
RULES OF SECTION 4975 OR ANY ENTITY DEEMED TO HOLD ASSETS OF ANY SUCH
PLANS.
THE
SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE SUBJECT TO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS
WHICH REQUIRE THAT IN ADDITION TO ANY CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED FROM A TRANSFEROR
AS SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF A
DISTRIBUTION COMPLIANCE PERIOD OF AT LEAST ONE YEAR, THE TRANSFEREE CERTIFIES AS
TO WHETHER OR NOT IT IS A U.S. PERSON WITHIN THE MEANING OF REGULATION S AND
PROVIDES CERTAIN OTHER CERTIFICATIONS AND AGREEMENTS. PRIOR TO
PERMITTING ANY TRANSFER, THE COMPANY MAY REQUEST AN OPINION OF COUNSEL
REASONABLY SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH TRANSFER IS TO BE EFFECTED IN A
TRANSACTION MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF REGULATION S UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OR
IS EXEMPT FROM REGISTRATION.
In
addition, each purchaser of Warrants was deemed to have represented and agreed
as follows:
(1) the
purchaser understood that shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are,
subject to certain exceptions, not being offered in the United States or to U.S.
persons (as defined in Regulation S under the Securities Act) and that warrant
holders will be required, as a condition precedent to the exercise of any
warrants, to comply with the certain requirements; and
(2) the
purchaser understood that warrant holders located in the United States or who
are U.S. persons (as defined under Regulation S of the Securities Act) may be
permitted to exercise their warrants for shares if we reasonably believe that
such exercise does not require registration under the Securities Act in reliance
upon such warrant holder (i) certifying that it is a qualified institutional
buyer and understands that the shares to be issued upon exercise of such
warrants have not been registered under the Securities Act, (ii) supplying an
opinion of counsel that the warrants and the shares issuable upon exercise are
exempt from registration under the Securities Act and (iii) agreeing that (x)
such shares will be subject to certain restrictions on transfer as set forth
above for the shares and warrants, (y) a new holding period for the shares
issued upon exchange of such warrant, for purposes of Rule 144 under the
Securities Act, will commence upon issue of such shares and (z) its acquisition
of shares was not solicited by any form of general solicitation or general
advertising and that it has been given access to information sufficient to
permit it to make an informed decision as to whether to invest in the
shares. We may, in our sole discretion, permit the exercise of
warrants in certain limited circumstances in accordance with their terms if the
requirements of other exemptions under the Securities Act and other applicable
laws can be satisfied.
Terms
of Warrant Conversion or Exercise
Each of
our outstanding warrants entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of
our common stock at an exercise price of $6.00 per share, subject to adjustment
as discussed below, at any time commencing on October 31,
2006. The warrants expire on July 12, 2010 at 5:00 p.m., New
York City time.
We may
call the warrants for redemption at any time after they become
exercisable:
|
·
|
in
whole and not in part;
|
|
·
|
at
a price of $0.01 per warrant;
|
|
·
|
upon
a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption to each warrant
holder;
|
|
·
|
if,
and only if, the last independent bid price on AIM of our shares of common
stock equals or exceeds $11.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a
30 trading day period ending three business days before we send the notice
of redemption; and
|
|
·
|
the
weekly trading volume of our shares has been at least 200,000 shares for
each of the two calendar weeks prior to the day we send the notice of
redemption.
|
If the
foregoing conditions are satisfied and we call the warrants for redemption, each
warrant holder is entitled to exercise its warrant prior to the date scheduled
for redemption by payment of the exercise price in cash.
The
warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant deed between Capita IRG
(Offshore) Limited, as warrant agent, and us. In 2008, Computershare
Investor Services (Channel Islands) Limited succeeded Capita IRG (Offshore)
Limited as warrant agent.
The
exercise price and number of shares of our common stock issuable on exercise of
the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances, including in the event of
a share dividend or our recapitalization, reorganization, merger or
consolidation. However, the warrants will not be adjusted for
issuances of shares of our common stock at a price below the exercise price of
the warrants.
The
warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior
to the expiration date at the offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise
form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as
indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price by certified check
payable to us for the number of warrants being exercised. The warrant
holders do not have the rights or privileges of holders of shares of common
stock or any voting rights until they exercise their warrants and receive
shares.
No
warrants will be exercisable by a U.S. warrant holder unless, at the time of
exercise, the exercise of the warrants for shares has been registered under the
Securities Act, or is exempt from registration. U.S. warrant holders
will be required to provide appropriate representations, warranties and legal
opinions to support any applicable exemption and, if received in an exempt
transaction, the shares received upon exercise of the warrant would be
restricted securities with the certificate bearing a restrictive legend and not
saleable in the U.S. unless registered under the Securities Act, or exempt from
registration.
No
fractional shares will be issued upon exercise of the warrants. If,
upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a
fractional interest in a share of our common stock, we will, upon exercise,
round up to the nearest whole number the number of shares to be issued to the
warrant holder.
The
following chart sets forth the status of the outstanding warrants as of
December 31, 2008.
Initial
issuance of warrants
|
22,500,000
|
Warrants
exercised in 2006
|
-
|
Outstanding
warrants at December 31, 2006
|
22,500,000
|
Warrants
exercised in 2007
|
-
|
Outstanding
warrants at December 31, 2007
|
22,500,000
|
Warrants
exercised in 2008
|
1,182,500
|
Outstanding
warrants at December 31, 2008
|
21,317,500
|
Use
of Proceeds
The
proceeds of our July 2006 offering aggregated $180 million, which proceeds were
used as follows.
(Dollars
in thousands)
Item
|
|
Amount
|
|
Offering
proceeds
|
|
$ |
180,000 |
|
Underwriters’
fees
|
|
|
(6,750 |
) |
Working
capital amount
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
Amount
transferred to the trust fund
|
|
$ |
172,500 |
|
The
working capital amount was released to us to pay, among other things, the
expenses of the offering (which aggregated $825,000(a)). In
addition to the underwriters’ fees of $6,750,000 paid in connection with the
offering, the underwriters deferred $2,700,000 of their fees, which deferred
fees were payable upon the consummation of a qualified business combination and
which were in fact paid on October 31, 2006 in connection with the
consummation of our acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company.
__________
(a)
|
The
expenses of the offering in excess of $750,000 were paid from the proceeds
of loans made by Mr. Lee E. Mikles and St. Albans Global Management,
Limited Partnership, LLLP to us in the aggregate amount of $700,000, which
loans were repaid as set forth
below.
|
The trust
fund was released concurrently with the consummation of our acquisition of
FutureFuel Chemical Company (which acquisition constituted a qualified business
combination) and was disbursed as follows.
(Dollars
in thousands)
Item
|
|
Amount
|
|
Trust
Amount(a)
|
|
$ |
174,123 |
|
Acquisition
purchase price(b)
|
|
|
(73,971 |
) |
Additional
acquisition costs
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Reimbursement
of due diligence expenses
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
Repayment
of the loans from the founding shareholders
|
|
|
(700 |
) |
Deferred
underwriters’ fees
|
|
|
(2,700 |
) |
Deferred
NOMAD fee
|
|
|
(250 |
) |
Exercise
of repurchase rights (discussed below)
|
|
|
(10,987 |
) |
Amount
disbursed to us
|
|
$ |
85,280 |
|
__________
(a)
|
Includes
$2,623 in interest income, less $1,000 transferred to us for working
capital purposes.
|
(b)
|
Prior
to purchase price adjustments. After purchase price
adjustments, the amount was $70,970. See note 3 to our
annual consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere
herein.
|
Purchase
of Securities by Us
Neither
we nor anyone acting on our behalf has purchased any shares or other units of
any class of our equity securities that is registered pursuant to
section 12 of the Exchange Act. However, in connection with the
July 2006 offering of units, shareholders other than founding shareholders (“new
shareholders”) were granted certain rights to have their shares of our common
stock repurchased by us (“repurchase rights”). At the time we sought
approval of any business combination, each new shareholder that voted against
the business combination was entitled to simultaneously exercise his repurchase
rights with respect to his shares (exclusive of founding shares); provided that
our repurchase obligations were only effective if such business combination was
approved by the new shareholders and completed.
Since our
acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company constituted a business combination, a
new shareholder was entitled to have his shares repurchased by us at the
repurchase price described below following consummation of the acquisition if
the new shareholder voted against the acquisition and exercised his repurchase
rights. Our board of directors imposed as a condition to us
consummating the acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company the requirement that
those new shareholders voting against the acquisition and exercising their
repurchase rights must own in the aggregate not more than 15% of the issued and
outstanding shares of our common stock. At our shareholder meeting to
approve the acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company, 28,125,000 shares were
issued and outstanding. Consequently, if new shareholders holding
more than 4,218,750 shares voted against the acquisition and exercised their
repurchase rights, the acquisition would not be approved. At the
shareholder meeting, new shareholders holding an aggregate of 1,425,000 shares
voted against the acquisition and exercised their repurchase rights, and
shareholders holding 25,205,477 shares voted to approve the
acquisition. Consequently, since the 15% threshold was not exceeded,
the acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company by us was approved.
The
repurchase price was $7.667 per eligible share plus any interest earned by the
trust fund, net of expenses and income taxes payable on such
interest. The interest earned by the trust fund, net of expenses and
income taxes payable on such interest, was $973,594 as of the consummation of
the acquisition, for a repurchase price of $7.71 per eligible share and an
aggregate repurchase price of $10,986,750. Such payments to new
shareholders exercising their repurchase rights were made and the 1,425,000
shares have been canceled.
Following
consummation of our acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company, new shareholders
who did not exercise their repurchase rights ceased to have such repurchase
rights.
Historically,
the business and assets included in FutureFuel Chemical Company were accounted
for by Eastman Chemical Company in various segments of Eastman Chemical
Company’s overall business. Although FutureFuel Chemical Company was
incorporated on September 1, 2005, Eastman Chemical Company did not begin
transferring assets into FutureFuel Chemical Company until January 1, 2006
and completed the transfer in subsequent periods prior to the closing of our
acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company. Notwithstanding that
FutureFuel Chemical Company was a separately incorporated entity, Eastman
Chemical Company did not prepare separate financial statements for FutureFuel
Chemical Company nor was it required to do so under local law or accounting
rules. Rather, the operations of the Batesville plant were reported
within Eastman Chemical Company based upon the underlying products, and the
revenues and expenses of the plant were presented in various segments within
Eastman Chemical Company’s financial statements. In addition,
allocations to the plant of Eastman Chemical Company overhead (such as
insurance, employee benefits, legal expenses and the like) were based upon
assumptions made by Eastman Chemical Company and such assumptions historically
did not reflect expenses which FutureFuel Chemical Company would have incurred
had it been a stand-alone entity. Since we did not acquire or succeed
to all of the assets and liabilities of Eastman Chemical Company, “carve-out”
financial statements have been prepared for the acquired component business,
excluding the continuing operations retained by Eastman Chemical Company, and
allocations for overhead components described above have been
effected.
For
purposes of preparing our financial statements, we initially accounted for the
acquisition of Eastman SE, Inc. as a reverse acquisition and did not apply
purchase accounting to such transaction. On July 27, 2007, we
issued a Form 8-K pursuant to Item 4.02(a) of Form 8-K, informing
investors that our 2006 Annual Financial Statements should not be relied upon
for the reasons set forth therein. A copy of that Form 8-K may
be obtained free of charge on our website at
http://ir.futurefuelcorporation.com/sec.cfm or by requesting the same from us at
FutureFuel Corp., 8235 Forsyth Blvd., 4th Floor,
Clayton, Missouri 63105 Attn: Investor Relations. We restated our
2006 financial statements to apply purchase accounting to our acquisition of
Eastman SE, Inc., a portion of which 2006 financial statements are included
herein. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2006 included in Amendment No. 3 to our
Form 10 filed with the SEC on April 9, 2008 for a detailed discussion
of the effects of such restatement.
The
following tables set forth our and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s summary
historical financial and operating data for the periods indicated
below. This summary historic financial and operating data has been
derived from FutureFuel Chemical Company’s “carve-out” financial statements as
of and for the ten months ended October 31, 2006 (the period between
January 1, 2006 and the date we acquired FutureFuel Chemical Company), the
twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (the two most recent
complete fiscal years prior to 2006) and our consolidated financial statements
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, all of which
are included elsewhere herein or in Amendment No. 3 to our Form 10
filed with the SEC on April 9, 2008. The information presented
in the table below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and such
financial statements and notes thereto. The selected financial data
for FutureFuel Chemical Company prior to our acquisition thereof represent the
complete financial information prepared and provided by Eastman Chemical Company
to us in conjunction with the carve out and sale of the Batesville plant to us
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, as well as the ten
months ended October 31, 2006.
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
FutureFuel
Corp. Consolidated
|
|
|
FutureFuel
Corp.
and FutureFuel Chemical Company Combined
|
|
|
Future
Fuel
Corp.
Consolidated
|
|
|
Future
Fuel Chemical Company
|
|
Item
|
|
Twelve
Months
Ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Twelve
Months
Ended
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Twelve
Months
Ended
December
31,
2006
|
|
|
Twelve
Months
Ended
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Ten
Months
Ended
October
31,
2006
|
|
|
Twelve
Months
Ended
December
31,
2005
|
|
|
Twelve
Months
Ended
December
31,
2004
|
|
Operating
Revenues
|
|
$ |
198,330 |
|
|
$ |
169,788 |
|
|
$ |
150,770 |
|
|
$ |
23,043 |
|
|
$ |
127,727 |
|
|
$ |
119,539 |
|
|
$ |
144,157 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
22,675 |
|
|
$ |
8,408 |
|
|
$ |
2,242 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
|
$ |
(475 |
) |
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
(14,867 |
) |
Earnings
per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
|
NA
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
238,126 |
|
|
$ |
216,113 |
|
|
$ |
203,059 |
|
|
$ |
203,516 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
$ |
114,500 |
|
|
$ |
118,164 |
|
Long-term
obligations
|
|
$ |
34,377 |
|
|
$ |
24,353 |
|
|
$ |
20,740 |
|
|
$ |
20,740 |
|
|
NA
|
|
|
$ |
24,830 |
|
|
$ |
25,105 |
|
Cash
dividends per common share
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
36,275 |
|
|
$ |
21,554 |
|
|
$ |
(3,960 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,494 |
) |
|
$ |
8,534 |
|
|
$ |
7,556 |
|
|
$ |
19,044 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$ |
(52,009 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,978 |
) |
|
$ |
(91,168 |
) |
|
$ |
(82,619 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,549 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,594 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,520 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$ |
(11,466 |
) |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
158,229 |
|
|
$ |
158,214 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
(962 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,524 |
) |
For the
combined year ended December 31, 2006, operating revenues, net income
(loss) and earnings per common share combine our consolidated results for the
entire twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
results for the ten months ended October 31, 2006. This
information is for illustrative purposes only. The consolidated
company would likely have performed differently had they always been
combined. The information should not be relied on as an indication of
future results that the combined company will experience after the acquisition
of FutureFuel Chemical Company because of a variety of factors, including access
to additional information and changes in value.
Our
Amendment No. 3 to Form 10 Registration Statement filed with the SEC
on April 9, 2008 contains all the financial statements and selected
financial data for FutureFuel Chemical Company that was provided to us by
Eastman Chemical Company.
Prior to
the initiation of its biofuels program in 2005, the Batesville plant did not
report financial results by business “segments” as defined by generally accepted
accounting principles. After the initiation of such program and upon
divestiture, it defined two segments: chemicals and biofuels.
In March
2007, FutureFuel Chemical Company entered into a $50 million credit
facility with Regions Bank as described below. As of
December 31, 2008, FutureFuel Chemical Company had no borrowings under such
credit facility.
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations should be read together with our and FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s financial statements, including the notes thereto, set forth or
otherwise referenced herein. For the year ended December 31,
2006, the financial information presented combines our consolidated results for
the entire twelve months ended December 31, 2006 and FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s results for the ten months ended October 31,
2006. This information is for illustrative purposes only and to
provide additional information to investors by showing FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s contribution to the results of the combined company. As a
result of this presentation, however, the amounts referred to in this
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (including the tables set forth below) will not agree to our
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
consolidated company, moreover, would likely have performed differently had we
and FutureFuel Chemical Company always been combined. The information
should not be relied on as an indication of future results that the combined
company will experience after the acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company
because of a variety of factors, including access to additional information and
changes in value. This discussion contains forward-looking statements
that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial
performance. Actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements. See “Forward Looking
Information” below for additional discussion regarding risks associated with
forward-looking statements.
Results
of Operations
In General
We were
not incorporated until August 12, 2005, we did not complete our offering
until July 12, 2006 and we did not complete the acquisition of FutureFuel
Chemical Company until October 31, 2006. Other than the offering
and the acquisition, we did not carry on any material business activities prior
to November 1, 2006.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s historical revenues have been generated through the sale of
specialty chemicals. FutureFuel Chemical Company breaks its chemicals
business into two main product groups: custom manufacturing and performance
chemicals. Major products in the custom manufacturing group include:
(i) nonanoyloxybenzene-sulfonate, a bleach activator manufactured
exclusively for a customer for use in a household detergent; (ii) a
proprietary herbicide (and intermediates) manufactured exclusively for a
customer; and (iii) two other product lines (CPOs and DIPBs) produced under
conversion contracts for another customer. The major product line in
the performance chemicals group is SSIPA/LiSIPA, polymer modifiers that aid the
properties of nylon manufactured for a broad customer base. There are
a number of additional small volume custom and performance chemical products
that FutureFuel Chemical Company groups into “other products”. In
late 2005, FutureFuel Chemical Company began producing biodiesel as a
product. Beginning in 2006, revenues and cost of goods sold for
biofuels were treated as a separate business segment.
Revenues
generated from the bleach activator are based on a supply agreement with the
customer. The supply agreement stipulates selling price per kilogram
based on volume sold, with price moving up as volumes move down, and
vice-versa. The current contract expires in March
2013. FutureFuel Chemical Company pays for raw materials required to
produce the bleach activator. The contract with the customer provides
that the price received by FutureFuel Chemical Company for the bleach activator
is indexed to changes in certain items, enabling FutureFuel Chemical Company to
pass along most inflationary increases in production costs to the
customer.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company has been the exclusive manufacturer for a customer of a
proprietary herbicide and certain intermediates. These products are
beginning to face some generic competition, and no assurances can be given that
FutureFuel Chemical Company will remain the exclusive manufacturer for this
product line. The contracts automatically renew for successive
one-year periods, subject to the right of either party to terminate the contract
not later than 270 days prior to the end of the then current term for the
herbicide and not later than 18 months prior to the then current term for the
intermediates. No assurances can be given that these contracts will
not be terminated. The customer supplies most of the key raw
materials for production of the proprietary herbicide. There is no
pricing mechanism or specific protection against cost changes for raw materials
or conversion costs that FutureFuel Chemical Company is responsible for
purchasing and/or providing.
CPOs are
chemical intermediates that promote adhesion for plastic coatings and DIPBs are
intermediates for production of Eastman Chemical Company products used as
general purpose inhibitors, intermediates or antioxidants. As part of
our acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company, FutureFuel Chemical Company
entered into conversion agreements with Eastman Chemical Company that
effectively provide a conversion fee to FutureFuel Chemical Company for CPOs and
DIPB based on volume manufactured, with a minimum annual fee for both
products. In addition, the conversion agreements provide for revenue
adjustments for actual price of raw materials purchased by FutureFuel Chemical
Company at standard usages. Eastman Chemical Company provides key raw
materials at no cost. For the key raw materials, usage over standard
is owed Eastman Chemical Company; likewise, any improvement over standard is
owed to FutureFuel Chemical Company at the actual price Eastman Chemical Company
incurred for the key raw material.
SSIPA/LiSIPA
revenues are generated from a diverse customer base of nylon fiber
manufacturers. Contract sales with two customers are indexed to key
raw materials for inflation; otherwise, there is no pricing mechanism or
specific protection against raw material or conversion cost
changes.
Other
products include agricultural intermediates and additives, imaging chemicals,
fiber additives, various specialty pharmaceutical intermediates and various
other chemicals that FutureFuel Chemical Company has in full commercial
production or in development. Pricing for these products is
negotiated directly with the customer (in the case of custom manufacturing) or
is established based upon competitive market conditions (in the case of
performance chemicals). In general, these products have no pricing
mechanism or specific protection against raw material or conversion cost
changes.
The year
ended December 31, 2006 was the first full year that FutureFuel Chemical
Company sold biodiesel. Capacity was initially 3 million gallons
per year, increasing to 24 million gallons per year by the end of 2007
through a dedicated continuous processing line and, to a lesser extent, batch
processing. During 2006 and 2007, FutureFuel Chemical Company sold
for its own account and produced, for a fee, biodiesel for a third party under a
tolling agreement. The tolling agreement terminated on
September 30, 2007 and was not renewed. Today, FutureFuel
Chemical Company procures all of its own feedstock and only sells biodiesel for
its own account. In rare instances, FutureFuel Chemical Company
purchases biodiesel from other producers for resale. FutureFuel
Chemical Company has the capability to process multiple types of vegetable oils
and animal fats, it can receive feedstock by rail or truck, and it has completed
the construction of substantial storage capacity to acquire feedstock at
advantaged prices when market conditions permit. We have plans to
increase FutureFuel Chemical Company’s production capacity to 59 million
gallons of biodiesel per year by April 2009 through the addition of a second
continuous processing line. We believe we have successfully
demonstrated our ability to keep our existing continuous processing line at or
near capacity for sustained periods of time as well as our ability to both
procure and logistically handle large quantities of
feedstock. Uncertainty related to our future biodiesel production
relates to changes in feedstock prices relative to biodiesel prices, the $1 per
gallon federal blenders credit, which has been extended to the end of 2009 and
overall biodiesel demand and usage in the United States.
The
majority of our and FutureFuel Chemical Company’s expenses are cost of goods
sold. Cost of goods sold reflects raw material costs as well as both
fixed and variable conversion costs, conversion costs being those expenses that
are directly or indirectly related to the operation of FutureFuel Chemical
Company’s plant. Significant conversion costs include labor,
benefits, energy, supplies and maintenance and repair. In addition to
raw material and conversion costs, cost of goods sold includes environmental
reserves and costs related to idle capacity. Finally, cost of goods
sold includes hedging gains and losses recognized by us. Cost of
goods sold is allocated to the chemical and biofuels business segments based on
equipment and resource usage for most conversion costs and based on revenues for
most other costs.
Operating
costs include selling, general and administrative and research and development
expenses. These expense categories include expenses that were
directly incurred by us and FutureFuel Chemical Company and, for the periods
prior to October 31, 2006, corporate expense allocations from Eastman
Chemical Company. Allocations from Eastman Chemical Company of costs
of goods sold, distribution and selling and general administrative expenses were
made primarily based on a percentage of revenues and allocations of research and
development expenses were made based upon actual time incurred; we believe both
represent reasonable allocation methodologies. These allocations and
estimates are not necessarily indicative of the costs and expenses that would
have resulted if FutureFuel Chemical Company had been operating as a separate
entity. Beginning November 1, 2006, all operating expenses were
directly incurred by us and FutureFuel Chemical Company. Please see
footnote 1
of
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s financial statements set forth below for a more
detailed discussion of corporate expense allocations.
The
financial statements provided herein disclose related party transactions and the
impact of those transactions on historical revenues and expenses. The
discussions of results of operations that follow are based on revenues and
expenses in total and for individual product lines and do not differentiate
related party transactions. See footnote 18 to our consolidated
annual financial statements and footnote 1 and footnote 8 to
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s annual financial statements contained elsewhere
herein for more details.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2008 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
Revenues:
Revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $198,330,000 as compared to
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $169,788,000, an increase
of 17%. The increase was mainly attributable to increased volumes and
prices of biodiesel and the proprietary herbicide and
intermediates. Revenues from biofuels increased 69% and accounted for
21% of total revenues in 2008 as compared to 15% in 2007. Revenues
from chemicals increased 8% and accounted for 79% of total revenues in 2008 as
compared to 85% in 2007. Within the chemicals segment, revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2008 changed as follows as compared to the year
ended December 31, 2007: revenues from the bleach activator increased 2%;
revenues from the proprietary herbicide and intermediates increased 36%;
revenues from CPOs increased 11%; revenues from DIPB decreased 4%; revenues from
SSIPA/LiSIPA decreased 12%; and revenues from other products increased
9%.
Sales
volumes of the bleach activator during the year ended December 31, 2008
were unchanged from volumes for the year ended December 31, 2007 and were
generally in-line with expectations. The 2% increase in revenue was
mainly attributable to higher prices that resulted from contractual inflationary
increases of certain raw material prices. We experienced relatively
stable demand from this customer through 2007 and 2008. Demand from
this customer began to deteriorate in the first quarter of 2009 and our
customer’s demand for 2009 may be materially less than the preceding two
years. However, our agreement with this customer provides a
volume-price curve that protects our gross margin at these lower
volumes.
At
present, revenues from the bleach activator and the proprietary herbicide and
intermediates are together the most significant components of FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s revenue base, together accounting for 59% of revenues in the
year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 64% in the year ended
December 31, 2007. The future volume of and revenues from the
bleach activator depend on both consumer demand for the product containing the
bleach activator and the manufacturing, sales and marketing priorities of our
customer. We are unable to predict with certainty the revenues we
will receive from this product in the future. We believe our customer
for the proprietary herbicide has been able to maintain or increase its volume
in light of generic competition by being more price competitive, changing its
North American distribution system and developing new
applications. In addition, our customer has benefited from the
general increase in planted acreage in the markets it serves.
Revenues
from CPOs and DIPBs together increased 3% during 2008, due mainly to higher
prices stemming from contractual inflationary increases of certain raw material
prices and conversion costs. Both of these products are late in their
life cycle and both are negatively impacted by the automotive and housing slow
down. As a result, our customer’s demand for these products, CPOs in
particular, has eroded in the first quarter of 2009 and future market conditions
for both CPOs and DIPBs may be challenging. We believe our customer
is actively seeking new customers and new applications for these
products. Absent success in these areas by our customer, we
anticipate a material decrease in revenues, on a percentage basis, for 2009
versus 2008.
The
majority of the increased revenues from biodiesel stem from higher selling
prices during 2008 as compared to 2007. In addition, gallons of
biodiesel sold during 2008 were 42% greater than 2007; this volume increase was,
in turn, due to stronger demand from certain key bulk
customers. There were no material shutdowns during 2008 and we
leveraged our newly built storage capacity and expanded infrastructure, as well
as our fleet of leased railcars, to meet customer requirements during the peak
demand season for biodiesel.
Cost of Goods Sold and
Distribution:
Total
cost of goods sold and distribution for the year ended December 31, 2008
were $157,913,000 as compared to total cost of goods sold and distribution for
the year ended December 31, 2007 of $152,555,000, an increase of
4%.
Cost of
goods sold and distribution for the year ended December 31, 2008 for
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s chemicals segment were $122,815,000 as compared to
cost of goods sold and distribution for the year ended December 31, 2007 of
$117,367,000. On a percentage basis, cost of goods sold and
distribution increased 5% as compared to an 8% increase in
revenues. This margin increase is due to: (i) FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s ability to pass the majority of raw material prices increases
on to its customers via contractual inflationary price adjustments (although, in
some cases, increases in prices of finished products via these contractual
adjustments lag increases in raw material prices); (ii) overall conversion
cost control; and (iii) increased sales of biodiesel during 2008, which in
turn pulled a greater share of fixed cost away from the chemicals segment as
compared to 2007.
Cost of
goods sold and distribution for 2008 for FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biofuels
segment were $35,098,000 as compared to cost of goods sold and distribution for
2007 of $35,188,000. On a percentage basis, cost of goods sold and
distribution did not change against increased revenues of 69%, resulting in
increased margins for the biofuels segment for 2008 as compared to
2007. These increased margins are a result of economies of scale that
result from higher volumes of biodiesel produced and sold. In
addition, margins were favorably impacted by gains on hedging activity of
$9,519,000 during 2008 as compared to losses of $6,910,000 during
2007. The gains on hedging activity are a direct result of declining
prices of heating oil and other commodities during the second half of
2008. We manage price risk in our biofuels segment by selling heating
oil futures contracts (and/or options on futures contracts) at the time of
establishing price commitments for feedstock purchases, thereby preserving the
per gallon margin available at the time of such commitment. As
heating oil (and biodiesel) prices declined during the second half of 2008, we
recognized gains on our hedging positions and lower margins (or in some cases
losses) on the sale of the physical product. In addition, commodity
price declines resulted in our cost of biodiesel (and certain associated raw
material) inventory at December 31, 2008 exceeding its market
value. Cost of goods sold for 2008 include a $3,973,000 charge to
reduce these inventories to market value. The majority of this charge
is attributable to the biofuels segment. Cost of goods sold and
distribution for the biofuels segment includes funding from the State of
Arkansas under the Arkansas Alternative Fuels Development Program of
$2,000,000. Under this program, biodiesel producers in the state of
Arkansas were eligible to receive $0.20 per gallon for every gallon of
biodiesel produced during defined time periods, up to a maximum of $2,000,000
per period. FutureFuel Chemical Company applied for and received the
maximum $2,000,000 funding under this program for biodiesel produced between
January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2008. The next eligible
application period opened July 1, 2008 and closes June 30,
2009. FutureFuel Chemical Company has applied for the $0.20 per
gallon credit for biodiesel produced during the second half of
2008. Due to the uncertainty of funding from this program, we do not
recognize a credit to cost of goods sold and distribution until such time as our
application is approved and funding is received.
Operating
Expenses:
Operating
expense increased from $7,578,000 in 2007 to $8,236,000 in 2008, or
approximately 9%. This increase was primarily the result of higher
compensation expense and research and development expense.
Our
consolidated financial statements present the four principal components of
selling, general and administrative expenses: (i) compensation expense,
which includes salaries, wages and benefits paid to sales and administrative
personnel, as well as fees paid to directors; (ii) formation expense and
cancelled offerings costs; (iii) other expense, which includes travel and
entertainment, selling, advertising, third party services, charitable
contributions, memberships, dues and subscriptions and overhead allocations; and
(iv) related party expenses, which consist primarily of reimbursement of
travel and administrative services incurred on our behalf, as well as fees for a
commodity trading advisory agreement with an affiliate.
Selling,
general and administrative expense increased $141,000 from 2007 to 2008, or
approximately 3%. This increase is a result of higher compensation
expense for 2008, partially offset by the lack of formation expense or canceled
offering costs in 2008, as well as a decline in other
expense. Research and development expense increased $517,000 from
2007 to 2008, or approximately 15%. This increase is the result of
customer reimbursement of certain research and development activities in 2007,
which had the effect of reducing overall research and
development
expense in that year, as well as expanded utilization of external resources to
advance certain key projects during 2008.
Provision
for Income Taxes:
The
effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 reflect our expected tax rate on reported operating
earnings before income taxes. We have determined that we do not
believe that we have a more likely than not probability of realizing a portion
of our deferred tax assets. As such, we have recorded a valuation
allowance of $737,000 at December 31, 2008. An allowance of
$472,000 was recorded at December 31, 2007.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
2007 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006
Revenues:
Revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2007 were $169,788,000 as compared to
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006 of $150,770,000, an increase
of 13%. (Revenues from FutureFuel Chemical Company for the ten-month
period ended October 31, 2006 were $127,727,000.) Revenues from
biodiesel increased 88% and accounted for 15% of total revenues in 2007 as
compared to 9% in 2006. Revenues from the bleach activator decreased
3% and accounted for 49% of total revenues in 2007 as compared to 56% in
2006. Revenues from the proprietary herbicide and intermediates
increased 6% and accounted for 15% of total revenues in 2007 as compared to 16%
in 2006. Revenues from CPOs increased 37% in 2007 and accounted for
4% of total revenues in 2007 compared to 3% in 2006. Revenues from
DIPBs increased 12% and accounted for 5% of total revenues in both 2007 and
2006. Revenues from SSIPA/LiSIPA increased 31% and accounted for 5%
of total revenues in 2007 as compared to 4% in 2006. Revenues from
other products increased 29% and accounted for 7% of total revenues in both 2007
and 2006. All of the revenues from these operating activities were
generated at FutureFuel Chemical Company.
During
2007, revenues for the bleach activator decreased due to lower volumes which
were partially offset by higher prices stipulated by the pricing curve embedded
in the supply agreement with this customer. Demand for the bleach
activator was very strong during the fourth quarter and remained strong into
2008. Revenue from the proprietary herbicide and intermediates
increased as very strong volumes offset a net price reduction as more fully
described below. Revenues from the bleach activator and the
proprietary herbicide and intermediates were together the most significant
components of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s revenue base, accounting for 63% of
revenues in 2007 as compared to 72% in 2006. The prices for the
proprietary herbicide and intermediates were reduced by 10% from 2006 to 2007
due to continued competitive pressures as described above. This price
decrease was partially offset by a June 1, 2007 price increase of
approximately 4% to cover certain raw material cost increases that we had
incurred beginning in the first quarter of 2007. We believe our
customer was able to maintain its volume in light of generic competition by
being more price competitive, changing its North American distribution system
and developing new applications.
Revenues
from CPOs and DIPBs together increased 22% during 2007. This increase
is largely the result of new supply agreements and pricing mechanisms in place
following the acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company.
Revenue
from biodiesel increased in 2007 due to an increase in production capacity and a
stronger focus on the biofuels segment. Biodiesel capacity was 2
million gallons per year at the beginning of 2006 and increased to
24 million gallons per year by the end of 2006. Capacity was 24
million gallons per year for all of 2007. Capacity in 2007 was
reduced from February through May due to a fire that destroyed the two
centrifuges that were part of the continuous biodiesel production
line. Without these centrifuges, the continuous line operated at very
low rates. We increased batch production to the greatest extent
possible to offset lost continuous production but still were unable to sell as
much product during the shutdown period or accumulate as much inventory as we
had planned leading into the summer. We filed business interruption
and property claims to recover losses incurred as a result of the fire and in
March 2008 these claims were approved by our underwriters. The
financial impact of these claims is discussed in Cost of Goods Sold and
Distribution below.
Cost of Goods Sold and
Distribution:
Total
cost of goods sold and distribution for 2007 was $152,555,000 as compared to
total cost of goods sold and distribution for 2006 of $139,674,000, an increase
of 9%. (Cost of goods sold and distribution of FutureFuel Chemical
Company for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006 was
$119,576,000.)
Cost of
goods sold and distribution for 2007 for FutureFuel Chemical Company’s chemicals
segment was $117,367,000 as compared to cost of goods sold and distribution for
2006 of $115,252,000, an increase of 2%. (Cost of goods sold and
distribution for FutureFuel Chemical Company’s chemical segment for the
ten-month period ended October 31, 2006 was $100,024,000.) Cost
of goods sold and distribution for all chemical products excluding the bleach
activator, measured as a percent of total chemical revenues, decreased from 41%
in 2006 to 35% during 2007. Cost of goods sold and distribution for
the bleach activator increased from 43% of total chemical revenues in 2006 to
46% in 2007; this increase was largely the result of increased raw material
prices resulting from new supply agreements and pricing mechanisms in place
following the acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company. Gross
margins improved substantially for all chemical products excluding the bleach
activator. This improvement was attributable to growth of FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s biodiesel segment. As more fully described above,
biodiesel is made using the same assets utilized to manufacture the majority of
our product lines (other than the bleach activator), and as biodiesel production
increases the biofuels segment absorbs more cost away from other chemical
products that utilize those assets.
Cost of
goods sold and distribution for 2007 for FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biofuels
segment was $35,188,000 as compared to cost of goods sold and distribution for
2006 of $24,422,000, an increase of 44%. (The cost of goods sold and
distribution of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biofuels segment for the ten-month
period ended October 31, 2006 was $19,552,000.) The largest
component of this increase was hedging losses of $6,910,000 in 2007; gains from
hedging in 2006 were insignificant. Hedging losses were attributable
to steadily increasing energy prices during 2007, heating oil in particular,
which is the commodity that we believe is most appropriate for use in hedging
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biodiesel inventory. Our practice was
to run a relatively balanced position, meaning we generally sold heating oil
futures or options to lock our selling prices whenever we locked our feedstock
cost. Had we not fixed our feedstock cost, we would not have fixed
our selling cost; in this case we would not have incurred hedging losses but we
would have experienced markedly higher feedstock costs.
Gross
loss for the biofuels segment was $(9,874,000) in 2007, up from $(11,082,000) in
2006. (The gross loss of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s biofuels
segment for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006 was
$(7,973,000).) Of the gross loss for 2007, greater than 75% is
attributable to the first quarter. This is due to lower chemical
revenues across the plant in the first quarter which effectively forced the
biofuels segment to carry a larger than normal amount of fixed cost, as well as
the higher cost of batch production after the fire discussed above forced us to
produce biodiesel almost exclusively in the batch plant. Our
underwriters approved our $657,000 business interruption claim (net of
deductible) which helped to offset some of these losses.
For the
year 2007 as a whole, the increase in cost of goods sold and distribution for
the biofuels segment was only half the increase in biofuels
revenues. We were successful in reducing costs during the second half
of the year through a focus on continuous manufacturing and also through the use
of new tankage and other infrastructure. The biofuels segment began
production in the batch plant and has continued to utilize the batch process to
test new processing techniques, experiment with various alternative feedstocks
and meet peak demand. The biodiesel segment also utilizes a
continuous processing line that is more efficient and produces higher volumes
per reactor than the batch process, and hence absorbs fewer overhead costs per
gallon of biodiesel produced. FutureFuel Chemical Company has
transitioned from primarily batch processing to primarily continuous processing,
a strategy which is expected to continue to significantly reduce fixed cost
allocation and as a result reduce total cost of goods sold and distribution per
gallon of biodiesel produced.
In
addition to the above considerations, we were successful in reducing costs per
gallon of biodiesel produced through selective sales of biodiesel feedstocks to
third parties. As a result of fixed price purchase commitments into
which we entered during 2007 and rapidly increasing commodity prices late in
2007, we determined that, in certain cases, the value of our feedstocks was
greater individually than the value of biodiesel finished product we could
produce utilizing these feedstocks.
Operating
Expenses:
Operating
expenses decreased from $11,581,000 for 2006 to $7,578,000 for 2007, or
approximately 35%. (Operating expenses of FutureFuel Chemical Company
for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006 was
$9,399,000.) This decrease was primarily the result of lower overall
operating expenses incurred by FutureFuel Chemical Company on a standalone
basis. Prior to November 1, 2006, corporate overhead allocations
from Eastman Chemical Company comprised the largest component of FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s selling, general and administrative and research and
development expenses. These corporate overhead allocations are
detailed in note 1 of FutureFuel Chemical Company’s financial statements
included elsewhere herein. Following the acquisition of FutureFuel
Chemical Company by us, FutureFuel Chemical Company developed standalone sales,
marketing, legal, corporate finance and general administrative functions, and as
a whole, the related expenses have been significantly less than the allocation
from Eastman Chemical Company for corporate support in these functional
areas.
Our
consolidated financial statements present the four principal components of
selling, general and administrative expenses: (i) compensation expense,
which includes salaries, wages and benefits paid to sales and administrative
personnel, as well as fees paid to directors; (ii) formation expense and
cancelled offerings costs; (iii) other expense, which includes travel and
entertainment, selling, advertising, third party services, charitable
contributions, memberships, dues and subscriptions and overhead allocations; and
(iv) related party expenses, which consist primarily of reimbursement of
travel and administrative services incurred on our behalf, as well as fees for a
commodity trading advisor agreement with an affiliate.
For
FutureFuel Chemical Company in periods prior to November 1, 2006, the
material component of selling, general and administrative expenses is corporate
overhead allocations. Due to the changes in the structure,
organization and the related expense of the sales and administrative departments
of FutureFuel Chemical Company pre- and post-acquisition, we do not believe a
comparison of the material components of selling, general and administrative
expenses pre- and post-acquisition is meaningful. As such, we have
not included a discussion and analysis of the material components of selling,
general and administrative expenses for 2007 versus 2006.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Purchase Price Allocation
Following
our acquisition of Eastman SE, Inc., we allocated the cost of the acquired
entity to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values at the date of acquisition. We do not anticipate these
estimates changing in the future.
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
We reduce
our accounts receivable by amounts that may be uncollectible in the
future. This estimated allowance is based upon management’s
evaluation of the collectibility of individual invoices and is based upon
management’s evaluation of the financial condition of our customers and
historical bad debt experience. This estimate is subject to change
based upon the changing financial condition of our customers. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts
of $4,000 and $42,000, respectively, the majority of which pertained to one
customer. FutureFuel Chemical Company historically has not
experienced significant problems in collecting its receivables and we do not
expect this to change going forward.
Depreciation
Depreciation
is provided for using the straight-line method over the associated assets’
estimated useful lives. We primarily base our estimate of an asset’s
useful life on our experience with other similar assets. The actual
useful life of an asset may differ significantly from our estimate for such
reasons as the asset’s build quality, the manner in which the asset is used or
changes in the business climate. When the actual useful life differs
from the estimated useful life, impairment charges may result. We
monitor the estimate useful lives of our assets and do not currently anticipate
impairment charges.
Asset Retirement
Obligations
We
establish reserves for closure/post-closure costs associated with the
environmental and other assets we maintain. Environmental assets
include waste management units such as incinerators, landfills, storage tanks
and boilers. When these types of assets are constructed or installed,
a reserve is established for the future costs anticipated to be associated with
the closure of the site based on an expected life of the environmental assets,
the applicable regulatory closure requirements and our environmental policies
and practices. These expenses are charged into earnings over the
estimated useful life of the assets. The future costs anticipated to
be associated with the closure of the site are based upon estimated current
costs for such activities adjusted for anticipated future inflation
rates. Unanticipated changes in either of these two variables or
changes in the anticipated timing of closure/post-closure activities may
significantly affect the established reserves. As of
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, we recorded a reserve for
closure/post-closure liabilities of $588,000 and $566,000,
respectively. We monitor this reserve and the assumptions used in its
calculation. As deemed necessary, we have made changes to this
reserve balance and anticipate that future changes will occur.
Revenue Recognition
For most
product sales, revenue is recognized when product is shipped from our facilities
and risk of loss and title have passed to the customer, which is in accordance
with our customer contracts and the stated shipping terms. All custom
manufactured products are manufactured under written
contracts. Performance chemicals and biodiesel are sold pursuant to
the terms of written purchase orders. In general, customers do not
have any rights of return, except for quality disputes. However, all
of our products are tested for quality before shipment, and historically returns
have been inconsequential. We do not offer volume discounts, rebates
or warranties.
Revenue
from bill and hold transactions in which a performance obligation exists is
recognized when the total performance obligation has been met. Bill
and hold transactions for three specialty chemical customers in 2008 and for two
specialty chemical customers in 2007 related to revenue that was recognized in
accordance with contractual agreements based on product produced and ready for
use. These sales were subject to written monthly purchase orders with
agreement that production was reasonable. The inventory was custom
manufactured and stored at the customer’s request and could not be sold to
another buyer. Credit and payment terms for bill and hold customers
are similar to other specialty chemical customers. Sales revenue
under bill and hold arrangements were $50,527,000, $33,494,000 and $31,550,000
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Income Taxes
We
account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under
this method, income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary
differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their respective income tax basis. A future income
tax asset or liability is estimated for each temporary difference using enacted
and substantively enacted income tax rates and laws expected to be in effect
when the asset is realized or the liability settled. Changes in the
expected tax rates and laws to be in effect when the asset is realized or the
liability settled could significantly affect the income tax assets and
liabilities booked by us. We monitor changes in applicable tax laws
and adjust our income tax assets and liabilities as necessary.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our and
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities, investing activities and financing activities for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are set forth in the following
chart. The 2008 and 2007 amounts are our consolidated results, and
the 2006 amounts are our consolidated results plus FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
results for the ten-month period ended October 31, 2006. The
combined results for 2006 are presented for comparative purposes
only.
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
36,275 |
|
|
$ |
21,554 |
|
|
$ |
(3,960 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
$ |
(52,009 |
) |
|
$ |
(29,978 |
) |
|
$ |
(91,168 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$ |
(11,446 |
) |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
158,229 |
|
FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s net cash provided by (used in) operating activities,
investing activities and financing activities for the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006 was:
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Ten
Months Ended October 31, 2006
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
8,534 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
$ |
(8,549 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Operating Activities
Cash
provided by operating activities increased from $21,554,000 during 2007 to
$36,275,000 during 2008. The increase in cash provided by operating
activities is a result of a $14,267,000 increase in net income, a $6,852,000
increase in cash provided by the change in deferred revenue, a $3,127,000
increase in the fair value of derivative instruments and other marketable
securities, a $2,468,000 increase in cash provided by the change in other
assets, a $1,088,000 increase in depreciation and amortization, and a $1,325,000
increase in cash provided by the change in accounts payable, including related
party balances. Offsetting these cash flows were a $8,923,000
increase in cash used for accounts receivable, a $3,172,000 increase in cash
used for inventory and a $2,712,000 increase in cash used for accrued expenses,
including related party balances and other current liabilities. Other
than the changes in cash discussed above, no single item resulted in a greater
or less than $1,000,000 change in cash provided from operating activities
between 2007 and 2008.
Cash
provided by (used in) operating activities increased from $(3,960,000) in 2006
to $21,554,000 in 2007, an increase of $25,514,000. (FutureFuel
Chemical Company’s net cash provided by operating activities for the ten-month
period ended October 31, 2006 was $8,534,000.) The increase
primarily resulted from changes in accounts receivable from year to
year. During 2006, FutureFuel Chemical Company used $(13,022,000) of
cash to build accounts receivable up to normal levels following the purchase of
the plant from Eastman Chemical Company. Additionally, accounts
receivable levels at the end of 2006 were abnormally high due to delayed
collections of balances which Eastman Chemical Company had collected on
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s behalf. These balances were collected
early in 2007 and accounts receivable were at a more normalized historical level
as of the end of 2007. (Accounts receivable at FutureFuel Chemical
Company provided $7,412,000 in cash for the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006.) Other significant year to year changes
include a decrease in cash provided by (used in) changes in accounts payable,
including related party balances, from $5,107,000 in 2006 to $(314,000) in 2007,
and an increase in cash provided by (used in) changes in accrued expenses and
other current liabilities, from $(3,900,000) in 2006 to $1,613,000 in
2007. (For FutureFuel Chemical Company for the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006, the decrease in cash provided by (used in) changes in
accounts payable was $2,271,000, and the increase in cash provided by (used in)
changes in accrued expenses and other current liabilities was
$(5,657,000).)
Investing Activities
Cash used
in investing activities increased from $29,978,000 in 2007 to $52,009,000 in
2008. The aggregate amount of cash used in the purchase and sale of
marketable securities, auction rate securities and commercial paper increased
from $14,803,000 in 2007 to $31,647,000 in 2008 as we sought both higher yield
and security for our cash. These investments are further described
under “Capital Management”. In addition, the increase in cash used in
investing activities was attributable to a $9,826,000 increase in cash used for
the collateralization of derivative instruments, which in turn resulted from a
greater use of options in our hedging activities, partially offset by an
increase in cash provided by restricted cash (which resulted from the Arkansas
Department of Environmental Quality relinquishing the need for us to maintain a
trust account to satisfy potential plant closure obligations).
Cash
provided by (used in) investing activities increased from $(91,168,000) in 2006
to $(29,978,000) in 2007. (FutureFuel Chemical Company’s net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities for the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006 was $(8,549,000), all of which was attributable to capital
expenditures.) The majority of this
increase
was attributable to $(72,634,000) of cash used in the acquisition of Eastman SE,
Inc. during 2006; there was no cash provided by (used in) this investing
activity in 2007. The increase was also attributable to an increase
in cash provided by (used in) the collateralization of derivative instruments
from $(3,578,000) in 2006 to $2,789,000 in 2007. These increases were
offset by $14,803,000 of cash used to purchase marketable securities during 2007
(no activity during 2006) and capital expenditures which were $5,892,000 higher
in 2007 than 2006.
Financing Activities
Cash used
in financing activities was $50,000 in 2007 as compared to $11,466,000 in
2008. Financing activities during 2007 consisted solely of the
payment of a bank financing fee. Financing activities during 2008
consisted primarily of the payment of $19,705,000 in dividends offset by
$8,169,000 in proceeds from the issuance of shares of our common
stock. The issuance of shares of our common stock resulted from the
exercise of warrants and options.
Cash
provided by (used in) financing activities decreased from $158,229,000 in 2006
to $(50,000) in 2007. (For the ten-month period ended
October 31, 2006, cash provided by (used in) FutureFuel Chemical Company’s
financing activities was $15,000.) This decrease primarily resulted
from our equity offering in July 2006 less various related offering
costs. The only financing activity during 2007 consisted of a bank
financing fee of $(50,000).
Capital
Expenditure Commitments
As
previously disclosed in Item 1. Business - General Development of the Business
above, FutureFuel Chemical Company pursued seven core infrastructure projects
that are expected to bring efficiency, operational flexibility and cost savings
to existing biodiesel and chemical business lines. These
infrastructure projects were: (i) adding methanol recovery and biodiesel
feedstock pretreatment capabilities; (ii) constructing additional storage;
(iii) expanding on-site rail siding and railcar loading and unloading
capabilities; (iv) obtaining storage/thruput in strategic markets;
(v) acquiring a fleet of tanker trucks; (vi) procuring railcars; and
(vii) expanding biodiesel production capacity. Projects (iv) and
(vi) did not require any capital expenditures but instead affect cash flow
through ongoing operating lease commitments. These lease commitments
are included in footnote 21 of our annual consolidated financial statements
presented herein. Projects (ii), (iii) and (v) have been
completed. Projects (i) and (vii) require significant capital
expenditures and are scheduled to be completed in April 2009. We
estimate the total capital cost of these infrastructure projects from
November 1, 2006 through the date of completion will be approximately
$16 million.
For the
infrastructure projects discussed immediately above as well as any additional
capital projects being pursued, FutureFuel Chemical Company typically does not
enter into financial or other commitments that would preclude its ability to
expand or decrease the scope of a given project or cancel it
altogether. The following are our material commitments for capital
expenditures as of December 31, 2008.
(Dollars
in thousands)
General
Purpose of the Commitment
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
Specialty
chemical expansion
|
|
$ |
1,555 |
|
Health,
safety and environment, and maintenance
|
|
|
229 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
FutureFuel
Chemical Company has historically financed capital requirements for its business
with cash flows from operations and has not had the need to incur bank
indebtedness to finance any of its operations during the historical periods
discussed herein.
Credit
Facility
FutureFuel
Chemical Company entered into a $50 million credit agreement with Regions
Bank in March 2007. The loan is a revolving facility the proceeds of
which may be used for working capital, capital expenditures and general
corporate purposes of FutureFuel Chemical Company. The facility
terminates in March 2010. Advances are made pursuant to a borrowing
base comprised of 85% of eligible accounts plus 60% of eligible direct inventory
plus 50%
of
eligible indirect inventory. Advances are secured by a perfected
first priority security interest in accounts receivable and
inventory. The interest rate floats at the following margins over
LIBOR or base rate based upon the leverage ratio from time to time.
Leverage
Ratio
|
|
Base
Rate
Margin
|
|
LIBOR
Margin
|
>
3
|
|
-0.55%
|
|
1.70%
|
> 2 <
3
|
|
-0.70%
|
|
1.55%
|
> 1 <
2
|
|
-0.85%
|
|
1.40%
|
<
1
|
|
-1.00%
|
|
1.25%
|
There is
an unused commitment fee of 0.25% per annum. Beginning
December 31, 2007, and on the last day of each fiscal quarter thereafter,
the ratio of EBITDA to fixed charges may not be less than
1.5:1. Beginning June 30, 2007, the ratio of total funded debt
to EBITDA may not exceed 3.50:1, reduced to 3.25:1 at March 31, 2008,
June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008, and then 3:1
thereafter. We guaranteed FutureFuel Chemical Company’s obligations
under this credit agreement.
FutureFuel
Chemical Company had no borrowings under this credit facility at
December 31, 2008 or 2007.
The
remaining proceeds of our July 2006 offering after consummation of our
acquisition of FutureFuel Chemical Company and repurchase of shares from
shareholders who exercised their repurchase rights described herein were
approximately $85 million. We intend to fund future capital
requirements for FutureFuel Chemical Company’s chemical and biofuels segments
from cash flow generated by FutureFuel Chemical Company as well as from existing
cash and borrowings under the credit facility with Regions Bank. We
do not believe there will be a need to issue any securities to fund such capital
requirements.
Special
Dividend
On
October 1, 2008, we declared a special cash dividend of $0.70 per share on
our common stock, with a record date of October 22, 2008 and a payment date
of November 11, 2008. The special cash dividend amounted to
$19,705,000.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Our only
off-balance sheet arrangements were: (i) the financial assurance trusts
established for the benefit of the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality;
and (ii) hedging transactions. The financial assurance trusts
were established to provide assurances to the Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality that, in the event the Batesville facility is closed
permanently, any reclamation activities necessitated under applicable
environmental laws would be completed. The amounts held in trust were
included in restricted cash and cash equivalents on our balance
sheet. The closure liabilities were included in other noncurrent
liabilities, but only on a present value basis. These financial
assurance trusts were terminated on August 8, 2008 and were replaced by our
guaranty. This guaranty is not expected to have a material adverse
effect upon our financial condition.
We engage
in two types of hedging transactions. First, we hedge our biofuels
sales through the purchase and sale of futures contracts and options on futures
contracts of energy commodities. This activity was captured on our
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007. Second, we hedge our biofuels feedstock through the execution
of purchase contracts and supply agreements with certain
vendors. These hedging transactions are recognized in earnings and
were not recorded on our balance sheet at December 31, 2008 or
December 31, 2007 as they do not meet the definition of a derivative
instrument as defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the
U.S. The purchase of biofuels feedstock generally involves two
components: basis and price. Basis covers any refining or processing
required as well as transportation. Price covers the purchases of the
actual agricultural commodity. Both basis and price fluctuate over
time. A supply agreement with a vendor constitutes a hedge when
FutureFuel Chemical Company has committed to a certain volume of feedstock in a
future period and has fixed the basis for that volume.
Contractual
Obligations
The
following table sets forth as of December 31, 2008 the payments due by
period for the following contractual obligations of us and FutureFuel Chemical
Company.
(Dollars
in thousands)
Contractual
Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
than
1
Year
|
|
|
1-3
Years
|
|
|
3-5
Years
|
|
|
More
than
5
Years
|
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
|
$ |
3,659 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
Purchase
obligations(a)
|
|
|
2,077 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,736 |
|
|
$ |
3,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
|
$ |
871 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
__________
(a)
|
Purchase
obligations within less than one year include: (i) $1,784 for capital
expenditure commitments related to the construction of special chemical
expansion, health, safety and environment, and maintenance projects; and
(ii) $226 for information technology maintenance and software license
commitments. Purchase obligations beyond one year include $67
for information technology maintenance and software license
commitments.
|
Income
Taxes
Our total
liability for uncertain tax positions under Financial Accounting Standards Board
No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of
FASB No. 109 (FIN 48) was $654,729 as of December 31,
2008. We are not able to reasonably estimate the amount by which the
liability will increase or decrease over time; however, at this time, we do not
expect a significant payment related to these obligations within the next
year. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere herein.
Capital
Management
Over
approximately the last 24 months, the global financial markets have experienced
significant volatility and fluctuations in credit market
liquidity. In some instances, these market conditions have caused
companies to reconsider the classification of certain investments on their
balance sheets and, in some cases, to record losses on the reduced fair market
value of those investments. To date, as more fully described in the
following paragraphs, we have been able to avoid these problems through our
active management of our short-term investments and cash.
As a
result of our initial equity offering and the subsequent positive operating
results of FutureFuel Chemical Company, we accumulated excess working
capital. Some of this excess working capital was paid out in 2008 as
a special cash dividend. We intend to retain the remaining cash to
fund infrastructure and capacity expansion at FutureFuel Chemical Company and to
pursue complimentary acquisitions in the oil and gas and chemical
industries. While in the present state of having excess working
capital, we intend to manage these assets in such a way as to generate
sufficient returns on these funds. Third parties have not placed
significant restrictions on our working capital management
decisions.
In 2008,
the management of these funds has largely taken the form of investments in U.S.
treasury bills and bonds, investments in foreign denominated government bonds,
investments in auction rate securities, investments in foreign currency and the
holding of cash in money market or similar bank accounts.
Beginning
in late 2007, we made investments in certain U.S. treasury bills and
notes. As of December 31, 2008, our investments in U.S. treasury
debt securities carried maturity dates ranging from January 2009 to March
2009. We have designated these securities as being
available-for-sale. Accordingly, these securities are carried at fair
value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as a
separate component of stockholders’ equity. The fair value of these
securities, including accrued interest, totaled $15,999,000 at December 31,
2008.
In 2008
we made an investment in treasury bonds of a certain foreign
government. As of December 31, 2008, the instruments comprising
this investment had matured or been sold and no subsequent, similar investments
were made.
We have
selectively made investments in certain auction rate securities that we believe
offer sufficient yield along with sufficient liquidity. To date, all
the auction rate securities in which we invested have maintained a mechanism for
liquidity, meaning that the respective auctions have not failed, the issuers
have called the instruments, or a secondary market exists for liquidation of the
securities. We classified these instruments as current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet and carry them at their estimated fair
market value. The fair value of these instruments approximated their
par value and, including accrued interest, totaled $14,990,000 at
December 31, 2008. Auction rate securities are typically long
term bonds issued by an entity for which there is a series of auctions over the
life of the bond that serve to reset the interest rate on the bonds to a market
rate. These auctions also serve as a mechanism to provide liquidity
to the bond holders; as long as there are sufficient purchasers of the auction
rate securities, the then owners of the auction rate securities are able to
liquidate their investment through a sale to the new purchasers. In
the event of an auction failure, a situation when there are more sellers than
buyers of a particular issue, the current owners of an auction rate security
issue may not be able to liquidate their investment. As a result of
an auction failure, a holder may be forced to hold the particular security
either until maturity or until a willing buyer is found. Even if a
willing buyer is found, however, there is no guarantee that this willing buyer
will purchase the security for its carrying value, which would result in a loss
being realized on the sale. The liquidity problems currently
experienced in the U.S. auction rate securities markets have generally been
focused on closed-end fund and student loan auction rate securities, asset
classes that we have avoided.
Beginning
in the second half of 2008, we made investments in certain commercial
paper. As of December 31, 2008, our investments in commercial
paper carried maturity dates ranging from January 2009 to March
2009. We have designated these investments as being
available-for-sale. Accordingly, these investments are carried at
fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of taxes, reported as a
component of stockholders’ equity. The fair value of these
investments, including accrued interest, totaled $15,422,000 at
December 31, 2008.
In 2008,
we made investments in certain foreign currencies. We exited from
these investments prior to December 31, 2008.
Lastly,
we maintain depository accounts such as checking accounts, money market accounts
and other similar accounts at selected financial institutions.
Other
Matters
We
entered into an agreement with a customer to construct at a fixed price a
processing plant and produce a certain chemical for the customer. We
engaged a third party to act as general contractor on the construction of this
plant for a guaranteed price. That general contractor defaulted on
its obligations under its contract with us and abandoned the
project. As a result, we have undertaken the general contractor role
ourselves. We also filed suit against our former contractor to recoup
any damages that we may incur as a result of his default. The former
contractor has counterclaimed against us for amounts he asserts are due him
under our contract with him. At this time, we are unable to determine
what effect the general contractor’s default and/or his counterclaim will have
on us or on our financial condition.
A
customer entered into a contract with us for the purchase of approximately one
million gallons of biodiesel. The customer defaulted on a portion of
the contract approximately one month later by which time the market price of
biodiesel had declined substantially. Pursuant to the general terms
and conditions of the contract which we had previously agreed to with the
customer, we filed with the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) to recoup
our damages that resulted from the customer’s default. The customer
claims that we breached the contract and has brought suit in court for a
declaratory judgment that we repudiated the contract; that the customer does not
owe us any damages; and for recovery of its court costs and attorneys
fees. Due to the customer’s refusal to participate in the AAA
proceeding, we withdrew from the proceeding and countersued in federal court to
recover our damages resulting from the customer’s default. At this
time we are unable to determine the probability that we will be successful in
recovering our damages. We do not expect that the customer’s claim
against us will have a material impact on our financial condition.
We
entered into a membership agreement with a biodiesel trade association, and
recently filed for rescission of the contract on various grounds. At
this time we are unable to determine the probability that we will be successful
in the rescission suit. However, we do not expect that any potential
claim or counterclaim against us by the
association,
including a claim for breach of contract or default, will have a material impact
on our financial condition.
In recent
years, general economic inflation has not had a material adverse impact on
FutureFuel Chemical Company’s costs and, as described elsewhere herein, we have
passed some price increases along to our customers. However, we are
subject to certain market risks as described below.
Market
risk represents the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates
and prices. Commodity price risk is inherent in the chemical and
biofuels business both with respect to input (electricity, coal, biofuel
feedstocks, etc.) and output (manufactured chemicals and biofuels).
We seek
to mitigate our market risks associated with the manufacturing and sale of
chemicals by entering into term sale contracts that include contractual market
price adjustment protections to allow changes in market prices of key raw
materials to be passed on to the customer. Such price protections are
not always obtained, however, so raw material price risk remains a significant
risk.
In order
to manage price risk caused by market fluctuations in biofuel prices, we may
enter into exchange traded commodity futures and options
contracts. We account for these derivative instruments in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. Under these
standards, the accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative
instrument depends upon whether it has been designated as an accounting hedging
relationship and, further, on the type of hedging relationship. To
qualify for designation as an accounting hedging relationship, specific criteria
must be met and appropriate documentation maintained. We had no
derivative instruments that qualified under these rules as designated accounting
hedges in 2008 or in any preceding year. Changes in the fair value of
our derivative instruments are recognized at the end of each accounting period
and recorded in the statement of operations as a component of cost of goods
sold.
Our
immediate recognition of derivative instrument gains and losses can cause net
income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in
value of the derivative instruments relative to the sale of biofuel being
sold. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair values of our
derivative instruments were a net liability in the amount of $3,175,000 and
$247,000, respectively.
Our gross
profit will be impacted by the prices we pay for raw materials and conversion
costs (costs incurred in the production of chemicals and biofuels) for which we
do not possess contractual market price adjustment protection. These
items are principally comprised of animal fat, electricity, caustic soda, coal
and natural gas. The availability and price of all of these items are
subject to wide fluctuations due to unpredictable factors such as weather
conditions, overall economic conditions, farmers’ planting decisions,
governmental policies and global supply and demand.
We
prepared a sensitivity analysis of our exposure to market risk with respect to
key raw materials and conversion costs for which we do not possess contractual
market price adjustment protections, based on average prices in
2008. We included only those raw materials and conversion costs for
which a hypothetical adverse change in price would result in a 1% or greater
decrease in gross profit. Assuming that the prices of the associated
finished goods could not be increased and assuming no change in quantities sold,
a hypothetical 10% change in the average price of the commodities listed below
would result in the following change in annual gross profit:
(Volumes
and dollars in thousands)
Item
|
|
Volume(a)
Requirements
|
|
Units
|
|
Hypothetical
Adverse
Change
in
Price
|
|
|
Decrease
in Gross Profit
|
|
|
Percentage
Decrease in Gross Profit
|
|
Animal
fat
|
|
|
109,154,161 |
|
LB
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
$ |
4,552 |
|
|
|
11.3%
|
|
Electricity
|
|
|
80,146 |
|
MWH
|
|
|
10.0%
|
|
|
$ |
486 |
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
__________
(a)
|
Volume
requirements and average price information are based upon volumes used and
prices obtained for the twelve months ended December 31,
2008. Volume requirements may differ materially from these
quantities in future years as the business of FutureFuel Chemical Company
evolves.
|
We had no
borrowings as of December 31, 2008 or 2007 and, as such, were not exposed
to interest rate risk for those years. Due to the relative
insignificance of transactions denominated in a foreign currency, we consider
our foreign currency risk to be immaterial.
The
following sets forth our consolidated balance sheets as at December 31,
2008 and 2007 and our consolidated statements of operations, statements of cash
flows and statements of stockholders’ equity for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, together with RubinBrown LLP’s and KPMG
LLP’s respective reports thereon.
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
FutureFuel
Corp.:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of FutureFuel Corp. and
subsidiary (collectively, the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,
changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then
ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of FutureFuel Corp. and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As
discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No.
109.
As
discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, as of
January 1, 2008.
We also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), FutureFuel Corp. and subsidiary’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria
established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) , and our report dated
March 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
/s/
RubinBrown LLP
St.
Louis, Missouri
March 16,
2009
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board
of Directors and Stockholders
FutureFuel
Corp.:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated statement of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006
of FutureFuel Corp. and subsidiary (the Company). These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the results of their operations and their cash flows
for the year ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As
described in note 25 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
has restated the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
/s/ KPMG
LLP
St.
Louis, Missouri
April 23,
2007, except as to note 25,
which
is dated as of December 27, 2007
FutureFuel
Corp.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
As
of December 31, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
$ |
27,455 |
|
|
$ |
54,655 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances of $4 and $42, respectively
|
|
|
20,048 |
|
|
|
17,514 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
27,585 |
|
|
|
24,192 |
|
Income taxes
receivable
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Marketable debt and auction rate
securities
|
|
|
46,411 |
|
|
|
15,086 |
|
Other current
assets
|
|
|
4,751 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
128,336 |
|
|
|
113,188 |
|
Property, plant and equipment,
net
|
|
|
106,320 |
|
|
|
95,036 |
|
Restricted cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,149 |
|
|
|
4,191 |
|
Total noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
109,790 |
|
|
|
102,925 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
238,126 |
|
|
$ |
216,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
13,332 |
|
|
$ |
12,622 |
|
Accounts payable - related
parties
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Income taxes
payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
Current deferred income tax
liability
|
|
|
4,151 |
|
|
|
4,597 |
|
Short term contingent
consideration
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
Accrued expenses and other
current liabilities - related parties
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
22,112 |
|
|
|
22,138 |
|
Long term contingent
consideration
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,989 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
9,994 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax
liability
|
|
|
23,140 |
|
|
|
19,667 |
|
Total noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
34,377 |
|
|
|
24,353 |
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
56,489 |
|
|
|
46,491 |
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized,
28,190,300 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2008
and 26,700,000 issued and outstanding as of December 31,
2007
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Additional paid in
capital
|
|
|
167,524 |
|
|
|
158,436 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
14,095 |
|
|
|
11,125 |
|
Total stockholders’
equity
|
|
|
181,637 |
|
|
|
169,622 |
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$ |
238,126 |
|
|
$ |
216,113 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
FutureFuel
Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
for
the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
193,466 |
|
|
$ |
169,732 |
|
|
$ |
23,043 |
|
Revenues
– related parties
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
|
|
149,122 |
|
|
|
149,181 |
|
|
|
19,966 |
|
Cost
of goods sold – related parties
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Distribution
|
|
|
3,460 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
40,417 |
|
|
|
17,233 |
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
expense
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
Formation expense and canceled
offering costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
Other expense
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Related party
expense
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
Research
and development expenses
|
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
3,434 |
|
|
|
923 |
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
7,578 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
Income
from operations
|
|
|
32,181 |
|
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
2,965 |
|
|
|
3,567 |
|
|
|
3,365 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Gain
on foreign currency
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Loss
on sale of marketable debt securities
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other
expense
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
3,328 |
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
34,996 |
|
|
|
13,191 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
12,321 |
|
|
|
4,783 |
|
|
|
1,373 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
22,675 |
|
|
$ |
8,408 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
27,029,210 |
|
|
|
26,700,000 |
|
|
|
26,700,000 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
27,550,441 |
|
|
|
32,286,996 |
|
|
|
31,818,772 |
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
22,675 |
|
|
$ |
8,408 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(benefit)
of $(26) in 2008 and $34 in 2007
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
$ |
22,632 |
|
|
$ |
8,466 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
FutureFuel
Corp.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
for
the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash
flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
22,675 |
|
|
$ |
8,408 |
|
|
$ |
2,717 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
Provision
(benefit) for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
(956 |
) |
Change
in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
2,928 |
|
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
447 |
|
Loss
on the sale of investments
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accretion
of the discount of marketable debt securities
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Losses on disposals of fixed
assets
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Stock based
compensation
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Noncash interest
expense
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
|
6,389 |
|
|
|
(20,434 |
) |
Inventory
|
|
|
(4,149 |
) |
|
|
(977 |
) |
|
|
(1,256 |
) |
Income taxes
receivable
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
Accrued
interest on marketable debt securities
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
653 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
2,724 |
|
Accounts payable - related
parties
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Income taxes
payable
|
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
|
|
1,916 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(1,119 |
) |
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
1,747 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities - related parties
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,423 |
|
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
36,275 |
|
|
|
21,554 |
|
|
|
(12,494 |
) |
Cash
flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(3,127 |
) |
Collateralization of derivative
instruments
|
|
|
(7,037 |
) |
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
Purchase of marketable
securities
|
|
|
(40,835 |
) |
|
|
(14,803 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Proceeds
from the sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
39,557 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
purchases of auction rate securities
|
|
|
(14,985 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchase of commercial
paper
|
|