Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
PART IV
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
| ý | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 |
||
or |
||
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
Commission file number 1-15319
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| Maryland | 04-3445278 | |
| (State of Organization) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) | |
Two Newton Place, 255 Washington Street, Suite 300, Newton, Massachusetts |
02458-1634 |
|
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
617-796-8350
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title Of Each Class | Name Of Each Exchange On Which Registered | |
|---|---|---|
| Common Shares of Beneficial Interest | New York Stock Exchange | |
| 5.625% Senior Notes due 2042 | New York Stock Exchange | |
| Junior Participating Preferred Share Rights | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
| Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
The aggregate market value of the voting common shares of beneficial ownership, $.01 par value, or common shares, of the registrant held by non-affiliates was $4.9 billion based on the $25.93 closing price per common share on the New York Stock Exchange on June 28, 2013. For purposes of this calculation, an aggregate of 534,085 common shares held directly by, or by affiliates of, the trustees and the officers of the registrant have been included in the number of common shares held by affiliates.
Number of the registrant's common shares outstanding as of March 3, 2014: 188,177,954.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, or our definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms the "Company", "SNH", "we", "us" and "our" include Senior Housing Properties Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.
WARNING CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K CONTAINS STATEMENTS THAT CONSTITUTE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 AND OTHER SECURITIES LAWS. ALSO, WHENEVER WE USE WORDS SUCH AS "BELIEVE", "EXPECT", "ANTICIPATE", "INTEND", "PLAN", "ESTIMATE" OR SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS, WE ARE MAKING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE BASED UPON OUR PRESENT INTENT, BELIEFS OR EXPECTATIONS, BUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE NOT GUARANTEED TO OCCUR AND MAY NOT OCCUR. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS IN THIS REPORT RELATE TO VARIOUS ASPECTS OF OUR BUSINESS, INCLUDING:
OUR ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE CONTAINED IN OR IMPLIED BY OUR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF VARIOUS FACTORS. FACTORS THAT COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND UPON OUR BUSINESS, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, FINANCIAL CONDITION, FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS, OR FFO,
i
NORMALIZED FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS, OR NORMALIZED FFO, NET OPERATING INCOME, OR NOI, CASH FLOWS, LIQUIDITY AND PROSPECTS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
FOR EXAMPLE:
ii
iii
MAINTAIN OUR CURRENT RATE OF DISTRIBUTIONS AND FUTURE DISTRIBUTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED,
iv
THESE RESULTS COULD OCCUR DUE TO MANY DIFFERENT CIRCUMSTANCES, SOME OF WHICH ARE BEYOND OUR CONTROL, SUCH AS CHANGED MEDICARE AND MEDICAID RATES, NEW LEGISLATION OR REGULATIONS AFFECTING OUR BUSINESS OR THE BUSINESSES OF OUR TENANTS OR MANAGERS, CHANGES IN OUR TENANTS' OR MANAGERS' REVENUES OR COSTS, CHANGES IN OUR TENANTS' OR MANAGERS' FINANCIAL CONDITIONS, CHANGES IN CAPITAL MARKETS OR THE ECONOMY GENERALLY OR NATURAL DISASTERS.
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ELSEWHERE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OR IN OUR FILINGS WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, OR SEC, INCLUDING UNDER THE CAPTION "RISK FACTORS", OR INCORPORATED HEREIN OR THEREIN, IDENTIFIES OTHER IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE DIFFERENCES FROM OUR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. OUR FILINGS WITH THE SEC ARE AVAILABLE ON THE SEC'S WEBSITE AT WWW.SEC.GOV.
YOU SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE UPON OUR FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.
EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW, WE DO NOT INTEND TO UPDATE OR CHANGE ANY FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.
STATEMENT CONCERNING LIMITED LIABILITY
THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST ESTABLISHING SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST, DATED SEPTEMBER 20, 1999, AS AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTED, AS FILED WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION OF MARYLAND, PROVIDES THAT NO TRUSTEE, OFFICER, SHAREHOLDER, EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST SHALL BE HELD TO ANY PERSONAL LIABILITY, JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY, FOR ANY OBLIGATION OF, OR CLAIM AGAINST, SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST. ALL PERSONS DEALING WITH SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST IN ANY WAY SHALL LOOK ONLY TO THE ASSETS OF SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST FOR THE PAYMENT OF ANY SUM OR THE PERFORMANCE OF ANY OBLIGATION.
v
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
2013 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
vi
The Company.
We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, that was organized under the laws of the State of Maryland in 1998. As of December 31, 2013, we owned 375 properties (401 buildings) located in 40 states and Washington, D.C (including 14 properties (17 buildings) classified as held for sale). On that date, the undepreciated carrying value of our properties, net of impairment losses, was $5.3 billion, excluding properties classified as held for sale. Our portfolio includes: 265 senior living communities with 31,627 living units / beds, with an undepreciated carrying value of $3.4 billion; 100 properties (126 buildings) leased to medical providers, medical related businesses, clinics and biotech laboratory tenants, or MOBs, with 8.7 million square feet of space and an undepreciated carrying value of $1.7 billion; and 10 wellness centers with approximately 812,000 square feet of interior space plus outdoor developed facilities with an undepreciated carrying value of $180.0 million.
Our principal executive offices are located at Two Newton Place, 255 Washington Street, Suite 300, Newton, Massachusetts 02458-1634, and our telephone number is (617) 796-8350.
We believe that the aging of the U.S. population will increase demand for existing independent living communities, assisted living communities, nursing homes, MOBs, wellness centers and other medical and healthcare related properties. We plan to profit from this demand by purchasing additional properties and entering into leases and management agreements with qualified tenants and operators which generate returns to us that exceed our operating and capital costs, including structuring leases that provide or permit for periodic rental increases.
Our business plan contemplates investments in independent living communities, assisted living communities, nursing homes, MOBs and wellness centers. Some properties combine more than one type of service in a single building or campus. Our Board of Trustees establishes our investment, financing and disposition policies and may change them at any time without shareholder approval.
Short and Long Term Residential Care Facilities.
Independent Living Communities. Independent living communities, or congregate care communities, also provide high levels of privacy to residents and require residents to be capable of relatively high degrees of independence. Unlike a senior apartment property, an independent living community usually bundles several services as part of a regular monthly charge. For example, an independent living community may include one or two meals per day in a central dining room, daily or weekly maid service or a social director in the base charge. Additional services are generally available from staff employees on a fee for service basis. In some of our independent living communities, separate parts of the property are dedicated to assisted living and/or nursing services.
Assisted Living Communities. Assisted living communities typically have one bedroom units which include private bathrooms and efficiency kitchens. Services bundled within one charge usually include three meals per day in a central dining room, daily housekeeping, laundry, medical reminders and 24 hour availability of assistance with the activities of daily living, such as dressing and bathing. Professional nursing and healthcare services are usually available at the property on call or at regularly scheduled times. In some of our assisted living communities, separate parts of the property are dedicated to independent living and/or nursing services.
Nursing Homes. Nursing homes generally provide extensive nursing and healthcare services similar to those available in hospitals, without the high costs associated with operating theaters, emergency rooms or intensive care units. A typical purpose built nursing home includes mostly rooms with one or
1
two beds, a separate bathroom and shared dining facilities. Licensed nursing professionals staff nursing homes 24 hours per day.
Rehabilitation Hospitals (through December 31, 2013). We previously owned two rehabilitation hospitals that we sold during the fourth quarter of 2013. These rehabilitation hospitals are also known as inpatient rehabilitation facilities, or IRFs, and they provide intensive physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech language pathology services beyond the capabilities customarily available in nursing homes. Our two rehabilitation hospitals had beds available for inpatient services and provided outpatient services from the hospitals' premises.
Properties Leased to Medical Providers, Medical Related Businesses, Clinics and Biotech Laboratory Tenants (MOBs).
MOBs are office or commercial buildings constructed for use or operated as medical office space for physicians and other health personnel, and other businesses in medical related fields, including clinics and laboratory uses. Some of our MOBs are occupied as back office facilities for healthcare companies, such as hospitals and healthcare insurance companies.
Wellness Centers.
Wellness centers typically have gymnasiums, strength and cardiovascular equipment areas, tennis and racquet sports facilities, pools, spas and children's centers. Professional sport training and therapist services are often available. Wellness centers often market themselves as clubs for which members may pay monthly fees plus additional fees for specific services.
Other Types of Real Estate.
In the past, we have considered investing in real estate different from our existing property types, including age restricted apartment buildings and some properties located outside the United States. We may explore these or other alternative investments in the future.
Lease Terms.
Our leases of senior living communities and wellness centers are so-called "triple-net" leases which generally require the tenants to pay rent, to pay all operating expenses of the properties, to indemnify us from liability which may arise by reason of our ownership of the properties, to maintain the leased properties at their expense, to remove and dispose of hazardous substances in compliance with applicable law and to maintain insurance for their own and our benefit. In the event of partial damage, condemnation or taking, these tenants are required to rebuild with insurance or other proceeds, if any; in the case of total destruction, condemnation or taking, we receive all insurance or other proceeds and these tenants are required to pay to us any shortfall in the amount of those proceeds versus our historical investments in the affected properties; in the event of material destruction or condemnation, some of these tenants have a right to purchase the affected property for amounts at least equal to our historical investment in the affected property.
Our leases of MOBs include both triple-net leases, as described above, and some net and modified gross leases where we are responsible to operate and maintain the properties and we charge tenants for some or all of the property operating costs. A small percentage of our MOB leases are so-called "full-service" leases where we receive fixed rent from our tenants and no reimbursement for our property operating costs.
Events of Default. Under our leases, events of default generally include:
2
Default Remedies. Upon the occurrence of any event of default under our leases, we generally may (subject to applicable law):
For more information about our leases with Five Star Quality Care, Inc., or Five Star, see Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 15 below.
Management Contracts.
Because we are a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we generally may not operate our communities. For certain of our managed senior living communities, we use the taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS, structure authorized by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act. Under this structure, we lease certain of our communities to our TRSs and the TRSs enter into long term management agreements with third parties for the operation of such communities. The management agreements for the communities managed for our account provide the manager with a management fee, which is a percentage of the gross revenues realized at the communities, plus reimbursement for the manager's direct costs and expenses related to the communities and generally provides the manager with an incentive fee equal to a percentage of the annual net operating income of the communities after we realize an annual return equal to a percentage of our invested capital. Our currently effective management agreements generally expire on December 31, 2031, and are subject to automatic renewal for two consecutive 15 year terms, unless earlier terminated or timely notice of nonrenewal is delivered. In general, we have the right to terminate the management agreements upon certain manager events of default, including without limitation, a change in control of the manager, as defined and our manager has the right to terminate the management agreements upon certain events of default applicable to us.
Although we have various rights as owner under the management agreements, we rely on the manager's personnel, good faith, expertise, historical performance, technical resources and information systems, proprietary information and judgment to manage our managed senior living communities efficiently and effectively. We also rely on the manager to set resident fees and otherwise operate those properties in compliance with our management agreements. For more information about our management agreements with Five Star and the related pooling agreements, see Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 15 below.
3
Investment Policies.
Acquisitions. Our present investment goals are to acquire additional properties primarily for income and secondarily for appreciation potential. In implementing this acquisition strategy, we consider a range of factors relating to each proposed acquisition, including:
We have no policies which specifically limit the percentage of our assets which may be invested in any individual property, in any one type of property, in properties leased to any one tenant or in properties leased to an affiliated group of tenants.
Form of Investments. We prefer wholly owned investments in fee interests. However, circumstances may arise in which we may invest in leaseholds, joint ventures, mortgages and other real estate interests. We may invest in real estate joint ventures if we conclude that by doing so we may benefit from the participation of co-venturers or that our opportunity to participate in the investment is contingent on the use of a joint venture structure. We may invest in participating, convertible or other types of mortgages if we conclude that by doing so, we may benefit from the cash flow or appreciation in the value of a property which is not available for purchase.
Mergers and Strategic Combinations.
In the past, we have considered the possibility of entering into mergers or strategic combinations with other companies and we may again explore such possibilities in the future.
Disposition Policies.
From time to time, we consider the sale of one or more properties or investments. Disposition decisions are made based on a number of factors including, but not limited to, the following:
4
Financing Policies.
There are no limitations in our organizational documents on the amount of indebtedness we may incur. Our revolving credit facility and our senior note indenture contain financial covenants which, among other things, restrict our ability to incur indebtedness and require us to maintain financial ratios and a minimum net worth. However, we may seek to amend these covenants or seek replacement financings with less restrictive covenants. In the future, we may decide to seek changes in the financial covenants which currently restrict our debt leverage based upon then current economic conditions, the relative availability and costs of debt versus equity capital and our need for capital to take advantage of acquisition opportunities or otherwise.
We may also determine to seek additional capital through equity offerings, debt financings, retention of cash flows in excess of distributions to shareholders, or a combination of these methods. To the extent we decide to obtain additional debt financing, we may do so on an unsecured basis or a secured basis. We may seek to obtain lines of credit or to issue securities senior to our common shares, including preferred shares or debt securities, some of which may be convertible into common shares or be accompanied by warrants to purchase common shares. We may also finance acquisitions by assuming debt, through an exchange of properties or through the issuance of equity or other securities.
We currently have a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility that we use for working capital and general business purposes and for acquisition funding on an interim basis until we may refinance with equity or long term debt. In some instances, we may assume outstanding mortgage debt in connection with our acquisition of properties. For more information regarding our financing sources and activities, please see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Our Investment and Financing Liquidity and Resources" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Manager.
Our day to day operations are conducted by Reit Management & Research LLC, or RMR. RMR originates and presents investment and divestment opportunities to our Board of Trustees and provides management and administrative services to us. RMR is a Delaware limited liability company beneficially owned by Barry M. Portnoy and Adam D. Portnoy, our Managing Trustees. RMR has a principal place of business at Two Newton Place, 255 Washington Street, Suite 300, Newton, Massachusetts 02458-1634, and its telephone number is (617) 796-8390. RMR also acts as the manager to CommonWealth REIT, or CWH, Government Properties Income Trust, or GOV, Hospitality Properties Trust, or HPT, and Select Income REIT, or SIR, and provides management and other services to other public and private companies, including Five Star Quality Care, Inc., or Five Star, TravelCenters of America LLC, or TA, and Sonesta International Hotels Corporation, or Sonesta. Barry M. Portnoy is the Chairman of RMR, and its other directors are Adam D. Portnoy, Gerard M. Martin, formerly one of our Managing Trustees, and David J. Hegarty, our President and Chief Operating Officer. The executive officers of RMR are: Adam D. Portnoy, President and Chief Executive Officer; David M. Blackman, Executive Vice President; Jennifer B. Clark, Executive Vice President and General Counsel; David J. Hegarty, Executive Vice President and Secretary; Mark L. Kleifges, Executive Vice President; Bruce J. Mackey Jr., Executive Vice President; John G. Murray, Executive Vice President; Thomas M. O'Brien, Executive Vice President; John C. Popeo, Executive Vice President; William J. Sheehan, Executive Vice President; Ethan S. Bornstein, Senior Vice President; Richard A. Doyle, Senior Vice President; Paul V. Hoagland, Senior Vice President; Matthew P. Jordan, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer; David M. Lepore, Senior Vice President; Andrew J. Rebholz, Senior Vice President; and Mark R. Young, Senior Vice President. David J. Hegarty and Richard A. Doyle are our executive officers and other executive officers of RMR also serve as officers of other companies to which RMR provides management services.
5
Employees.
We have no employees. Services which would otherwise be provided by employees are provided by RMR and by our Managing Trustees and officers. As of March 3, 2014, RMR had approximately 850 full time employees, including a headquarters staff and regional offices and other personnel located throughout the United States.
Government Regulation and Reimbursement.
The senior living and healthcare industries are subject to extensive, frequently changing federal, state and local laws and regulations. Although most of these laws and regulations affect the manner in which our tenants and managers operate our properties, some of them also impact the values of our properties. Some of the laws that impact or may impact us or our tenants or managers include: state and local licensure laws; laws protecting consumers against deceptive practices; laws relating to the operation of our properties and how our tenants and managers conduct their operations, such as fire, health and safety laws and privacy laws; federal and state laws affecting assisted living communities that participate in Medicaid and skilled nursing facilities, or SNFs; federal and state laws affecting hospitals, clinics and other healthcare facilities that participate in both Medicaid and Medicare that mandate allowable costs, pricing, reimbursement procedures and limitations, quality of services and care, food service and physical plants; resident rights laws (including abuse and neglect laws) and fraud laws; anti-kickback and physician referral laws; the Americans with Disabilities Act, or the ADA, and similar state and local laws; and safety and health standards set by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Medicaid funding is available in some, but not all, states for assisted living services. State licensure standards for assisted living communities, SNFs, hospitals, clinics and other healthcare facilities typically address facility policies, staffing, quality of services and care, resident rights, fire safety and physical plant matters, and related matters. We are unable to predict the future course of federal, state and local legislation or regulation. Changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay us rent, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
State and local health and social service agencies and other regulatory authorities regulate and license many senior living communities. State health authorities regulate and license hospitals, clinics and other healthcare facilities. In most states in which we own properties, we and our tenants and managers are prohibited from providing certain services without first obtaining appropriate licenses. In addition, most states require a certificate of need, or CON, before an entity may open a SNF or hospital or expand services at an existing facility. In some states, CON requirements also apply to assisted living communities and some other healthcare facilities. In addition, some states (such as California and Texas) that have eliminated CON laws have retained other means of limiting development of SNFs, including moratoria, licensing laws and limitations upon participation in the state Medicaid program. Senior living facilities, hospitals and other healthcare facilities must also comply with applicable state and local building, zoning, fire and food service codes before licensing or Medicare and Medicaid certification are granted. These laws and regulatory requirements could affect our ability and that of our tenants and managers to expand into new markets or to expand communities in existing markets. In addition, the operation of our properties outside of the scope of applicable licensed authority can result in us, our tenants or managers being subject to penalties and sanctions, including closure of facilities.
In addition, governmental authorities have been subjecting healthcare facilities such as those that we own to increasing numbers of inspections, surveys, investigations, audits and other potential enforcement actions. We and our tenants and managers expend considerable resources to respond to such actions. Unannounced inspections or surveys may occur annually or biannually, or even more regularly, such as following a regulatory body's receipt of a complaint about a facility. From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we and our tenants and managers receive deficiency reports
6
from state regulatory bodies resulting from those inspections and surveys. We and our tenants and managers seek to resolve most inspection deficiencies through a plan of corrective action relating to the affected facility's operations. If we or our tenants or managers fail to comply with any applicable legal requirements, or are unable to cure deficiencies, certain sanctions may be imposed and, if imposed, may adversely affect the ability of our tenants to pay their rent to us, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. In addition, governmental agencies typically have the authority to take or seek further action against a licensed or certified facility, including the ability to impose civil money penalties or fines; suspend, modify, or revoke a license or Medicare or Medicaid participation; suspend or deny admissions of residents; deny payments in full or in part; institute state oversight, temporary management or receivership; and impose criminal penalties. Loss, suspension or modification of a license or certification or the imposition of other sanctions or penalties could adversely affect the values of our properties, the ability of our tenants to pay their rents and the profitability of our managed senior living communities.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, has increased its oversight of state survey agencies in recent years, focusing its enforcement efforts on nursing homes and chains of nursing home operators with findings of substandard care or repeat and continuing deficiencies and violations. CMS has also sought to provide consumers with additional information relating to nursing homes. Moreover, state Attorneys General typically enforce consumer protection laws relating to senior living services, hospitals, clinics and other healthcare facilities. In addition, state Medicaid fraud control agencies may investigate and prosecute assisted living communities and nursing facilities, hospitals, clinics and other healthcare facilities under fraud and patient abuse and neglect laws.
Current state laws and regulations allow enforcement officials to make determinations as to whether the care provided by or on behalf of our tenants at our healthcare facilities exceeds the level of care for which a particular facility is licensed. A finding that a facility is delivering care beyond the scope of its license can result in the immediate discharge and transfer of residents, which could adversely affect the ability of the tenant to pay rent to us, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. Furthermore, some states and the federal government allow certain citations of one facility to impact other facilities operated by the same entity or a related entity, including facilities in other states. Revocation of a license or certification at one facility could therefore impact our or a tenant's or manager's ability to obtain new licenses or certifications or to maintain or renew existing licenses at other facilities, which could adversely affect the ability of that tenant to pay rent to us or the profitability of that manager. In addition, an adverse finding by state officials could serve as the basis for lawsuits by private plaintiffs and may lead to investigations under federal and state laws, which could result in civil and/or criminal penalties against the facility as well as a related individual or entity.
As of December 31, 2013, approximately 95% of our current net operating income, or NOI, as defined in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, from our properties came from properties where a majority of the NOI is derived from private resources, and the remaining 5% of our NOI from our properties came from properties where a majority of the NOI is dependent upon Medicare and Medicaid programs. Our tenants operate facilities in many states and participate in federal and state healthcare payment programs, including the federal Medicare and state Medicaid benefit programs for services in SNFs, hospitals and other similar facilities and state Medicaid programs for services in assisted living communities. In light of the current federal budget deficit and challenging state fiscal conditions, there have been numerous recent legislative and regulatory actions or proposed actions with respect to federal Medicare rates and state Medicaid rates and federal payments to states for Medicaid programs, each of which could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay us
7
rent, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. Examples include:
8
implementation of RUG-IV to increase Medicare billing, however, and on October 1, 2011, CMS adopted a final rule designed to recalibrate Medicare PPS rates for SNFs. The rule resulted in a reduction in aggregate Medicare payments for SNFs by approximately 11.1%, or $3.87 billion, in federal fiscal year 2012. CMS updated Medicare payment rates for SNFs effective October 1, 2012, which increased aggregate Medicare payment rates for SNFs by 1.8%, or $670 million, for federal fiscal year 2013. On October 1, 2013, CMS updated Medicare payments to SNFs for federal fiscal year 2014, which CMS estimates will increase payments to SNFs by 1.3%, or approximately $470 million. Due to the previous reduction of approximately 11.1% discussed above, however, Medicare payment rates will be lower for federal fiscal year 2014 than they were in federal fiscal year 2011. In addition, the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, enacted in February 2012, incrementally reduces the SNF reimbursement rate for Medicare bad debt from 100% to 65% by federal fiscal year 2015 for beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. Because nearly 90% of SNF bad debt is related to dual-eligible beneficiaries, this rule has a substantial negative effect on SNFs. The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 also reduced the SNF Medicare bad debt reimbursement rate for Medicare beneficiaries not eligible for Medicaid from 70% to 65% in federal fiscal year 2013 and going forward. The changes to the reimbursement rates for bad debt may have a material adverse effect on our tenants' ability to pay us rent, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
9
reductions, as are certain Medicare benefits. We are unable to predict the long-term financial impact on us and our tenants of the automatic payment cuts; however, such impact may be adverse and material to our tenants' ability to pay rent to us and on the value of our properties.
We are unable to predict the impact of these or other recent legislative and regulatory actions or proposed actions with respect to state Medicaid rates and federal Medicare rates and federal payments to states for Medicaid programs on those of our tenants that derive a portion of their revenues from Medicare, Medicaid and other governmental programs, or those of our managers that provide management services to such tenants. The changes implemented or to be implemented as a result of
10
such actions could result in the failure of Medicare, Medicaid or private payment reimbursement rates to cover increasing costs, in a reduction in payments or other circumstances that could have a material adverse effect on the ability of some of our tenants to pay rent to us, the profitability of affected managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
Federal and state efforts to target false claims, fraud and abuse and violations of anti-kickback, physician referral and privacy laws by providers under Medicare, Medicaid and other public and private programs have increased in recent years, as have civil monetary penalties, treble damages, repayment requirements and criminal sanctions for noncompliance. The federal False Claims Act, as amended and expanded by the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009 and the ACA, provides significant civil monetary penalties and treble damages for false claims and authorizes individuals to bring claims on behalf of the federal government for false claims. The federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law authorizes the Secretary of HHS to impose substantial civil penalties, treble damages and program exclusions administratively for false claims or violations of the federal Anti-Kickback statute. In addition, the ACA increased penalties under federal sentencing guidelines between 20% and 50% for healthcare fraud offenses involving more than $1 million. Governmental authorities are devoting increasing attention and resources to the prevention, detection, and prosecution of healthcare fraud and abuse. CMS contractors are also expanding the retroactive audits of Medicare claims submitted by IRFs, SNFs and other providers, and recouping alleged overpayments for services determined by auditors not to have been medically necessary or not to meet Medicare coverage criteria as billed. State Medicaid programs and other third party payers are conducting similar medical necessity and compliance audits. The ACA facilitates the Department of Justice's, or the DOJ's, ability to investigate allegations of wrongdoing or fraud at SNFs, in part because of increased cooperation and data sharing among CMS, OIG, DOJ and the states. In addition, the ACA requires all states to terminate the Medicaid participation of any provider that has been terminated under Medicare or any Medicaid state plan. Our tenants and managers expend significant resources to comply with these laws and regulations, and any findings of noncompliance by governmental authorities may have a material and adverse effect on their ability to pay rent to us.
Federal and state laws designed to protect the confidentiality and security of individually identifiable information apply to us, our tenants and our managers. Under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, we, our tenants and our managers that are "covered entities" or "business associates" within the meaning of HIPAA must comply with rules adopted by HHS governing the privacy, security, use and disclosure of individually identifiable information, including financial information and protected health information, or PHI, and also with security rules for electronic PHI. There may be both civil monetary penalties and criminal sanctions for noncompliance with such federal laws. On January 17, 2013, HHS released the HIPAA Omnibus Rule, or the Omnibus Rule, which went into effect on March 26, 2013 and required compliance with most provisions by September 23, 2013. Pursuant to the Omnibus Rule, "covered entities" were required to make certain modifications to any business associate agreements that they have in place with their "business associates" within the meaning of HIPAA. In addition, the Omnibus Rule required "covered entities" to modify and redistribute their notices of privacy practices to include certain provisions relating to the use of PHI. Further, the Omnibus Rule modified the standard for providing breach notices, which was previously to perform an analysis of the harm of any disclosure to a more objective analysis relating to whether any PHI was actually acquired or viewed as a result of the breach. In addition to HIPAA, many states have enacted their own security and privacy laws relating to individually identifiable information. In some states, these laws are more stringent than HIPAA, and we, our tenants and our managers must comply with applicable federal and state standards.
We require our tenants and managers to comply with all laws that regulate the operation of our senior living communities. Although we do not believe that the costs to comply with these laws will
11
have a material adverse effect on us directly, those costs may adversely affect the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the ability of our tenants to pay their rent to us. If we or any of our tenants or managers were subject to an action alleging violations of such laws or to any adverse determination concerning any of our or our tenants' licenses or eligibility for Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement or any substantial penalties, repayments or sanctions, these actions could materially and adversely affect the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. If any of our tenants or managers becomes unable to operate our properties, or if any of our tenants becomes unable to pay its rent because it has violated government regulations or payment laws, we may experience difficulty in finding a substitute tenant or manager or selling the affected property for a fair and commercially reasonable price, and the value of the affected property may decline materially.
Federal, state and local agencies regulate our MOB tenants that provide healthcare services. Many states require medical clinics, ambulatory surgery centers, clinical laboratories and other outpatient healthcare facilities to be licensed and inspected for compliance with licensure regulations concerning professional staffing, services, patient rights and physical plant requirements, among other matters. Our tenants must comply with the ADA and similar state and local laws to the extent that such facilities are "public accommodations" as defined in those statutes. The obligation to comply with the ADA and similar laws is an ongoing obligation, and our tenants expend significant resources to comply with such laws.
Healthcare providers and suppliers, including physicians and other licensed medical practitioners, that receive federal or state reimbursement under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state programs must comply with the requirements for their participation in those programs. Our tenants that are healthcare providers are subject to reimbursement rates that are increasingly subject to cost control pressures and may be reduced or may not be increased sufficiently to cover their increasing costs, including our rents.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, and other federal, state and local authorities extensively regulate our biotechnology laboratory tenants that develop, manufacture, market or distribute new drugs, biologicals or medical devices for human use. The FDA and such other authorities regulate the clinical development, testing, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record keeping, advertising and promotion of those products. Before a new pharmaceutical product or medical device may be marketed and distributed in the United States, the FDA must approve it as safe and effective for human use. Preclinical and clinical studies and documentation in connection with FDA approval of new pharmaceuticals or medical devices involve significant time, expense and risks of failure. Once a product is approved, the FDA maintains oversight of the product and its developer and can withdraw its approval, recall products or suspend their production, impose or seek to impose civil or criminal penalties on the developer or take other actions for the developer's failure to comply with regulatory requirements, including anti-fraud, false claims, anti-kickback or physician referral laws. Other concerns affecting our biotechnology laboratory tenants include the potential for subsequent discovery of safety concerns and related litigation, ensuring that the product qualifies for reimbursement under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state programs, cost control initiatives of payment programs, the potential for litigation over the validity or infringement of intellectual property rights related to the product, the eventual expiration of relevant patents and the need to raise additional capital. The cost of compliance with these regulations and the risks described in this paragraph, among others, could adversely affect the ability of our biotechnology laboratory tenants to pay rent to us.
Competition.
Investing in senior living facilities, wellness centers, MOBs and other real estate is a highly competitive business. We compete against other REITs, numerous financial institutions, individuals and
12
public and private companies who are actively engaged in this business. Also, we compete for investments based on a number of factors including rates, financings offered, underwriting criteria and reputation. Our ability to successfully compete is also impacted by economic and population trends, availability of acceptable investment opportunities, our ability to negotiate beneficial investment terms, availability and cost of capital and new and existing laws and regulations. Some of our competitors are dominant in selected geographic or property markets, including in markets we operate. Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we have. We believe the geographic diversity of our investments, the experience and abilities of our management, our affiliation with RMR, the quality of our assets and the financial strength of many of our tenants and operators affords us some competitive advantages which have and will allow us to operate our business successfully despite the competitive nature of our business.
The tenants and managers that operate our healthcare facilities compete on a local and regional basis with operators of facilities that provide comparable services. Operators compete for residents and patients based on quality of care, reputation, physical appearance of properties, services offered, family preferences, physicians, staff, price and location. We and our tenants and managers also face competition from other healthcare facilities for tenants, such as physicians and other healthcare providers that provide comparable facilities and services.
For additional information on competition and the risks associated with our business, please see "Risk Factors" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Environmental and Climate Change Matters.
Under various laws, owners as well as tenants and operators of real estate may be required to investigate and clean up or remove hazardous substances present at or migrating from properties they own, lease or operate and may be held liable for property damage or personal injuries that result from hazardous substances. These laws also expose us to the possibility that we may become liable to reimburse governments or third parties for damages and costs they incur in connection with hazardous substances. We reviewed environmental conditions surveys of the properties we own prior to their purchase. Based upon those surveys we do not believe that there are environmental conditions at any of our properties that have had or will have a material adverse effect on us. However, no assurances can be given that conditions are not present at our properties or that costs we may be required to incur in the future to remediate contamination will not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition and results of operations.
The current political debate about global climate change has resulted in various treaties, laws and regulations which are intended to limit carbon emissions. We believe these laws being enacted or proposed may cause energy costs at our properties to increase, but we do not currently expect the direct impact of these increases to be material to our results of operations, because we expect the increased costs either would be the responsibility of our tenants directly or in large part may be passed through by us to our tenants as additional lease payments. Although we do not believe it is likely in the foreseeable future, laws enacted to mitigate climate change may make some of our buildings obsolete or cause us to make material investments in our properties which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition. For more information regarding climate change matters and their possible adverse impact on us, please see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Impact of Climate Change."
Insurance.
We generally provide insurance coverage for our managed senior living communities, and our leases of other properties generally provide that our tenants are responsible for the costs of insurance coverage for the properties we lease to them, including for casualty, liability, fire, extended coverage
13
and rental or business interruption loss. Except in the case of our managed senior living communities, we either purchase the insurance ourselves and our tenants reimburse us, or the tenants buy the insurance directly and are required to list us as an insured party. In addition, we participate with RMR and other companies to which RMR provides management services in a combined insurance program through AIC, and with respect to which AIC is a reinsurer of certain coverage amounts. For more information, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Related Person Transactions."
Internet Website.
Our internet website address is www.snhreit.com. Copies of our governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics, or Code of Conduct, our policy outlining procedures for handling concerns or complaints about accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the charters of our audit, compensation and nominating and governance committees are posted on our website and may be obtained free of charge by writing to our Secretary, Senior Housing Properties Trust, Two Newton Place, 255 Washington Street, Suite 300, Newton, Massachusetts 02458-1634 or at our website. We make available, free of charge, on our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after these forms are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Any shareholder or other interested party who desires to communicate with our non-management Trustees, individually or as a group, may do so by filling out a report on our website. Our Board of Trustees also provides a process for security holders to send communications to the entire Board of Trustees. Information about the process for sending communications to our Board of Trustees can be found on our website. Our website address is included several times in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as a textual reference only and the information in the website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Segment Reporting.
As of December 31, 2013, we have four operating segments. The first operating segment includes triple net senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents. Properties in this segment include leased independent living communities, assisted living communities and skilled nursing facilities. We earn rental income revenues from the tenants that lease and operate our leased communities. The second operating segment includes managed senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents. Properties in this segment include managed independent living communities and assisted living communities. We earn fees and services revenues from the residents of our managed senior living communities. We began our managed senior living communities business in June 2011. The third operating segment includes properties where medical related activities occur but where residential overnight stays and dining services are not provided. Properties in this segment include MOBs. The fourth operating segment includes the operating results of certain properties that offer fitness, wellness and spa services to members, which we do not consider to be sufficiently material as to constitute a separate reporting segment. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and our consolidated financial statements included in "Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules" of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further financial information on our operating segments.
14
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following summary of United States federal income tax considerations is based on existing law, and is limited to investors who own our shares as investment assets rather than as inventory or as property used in a trade or business. The summary does not discuss all of the particular tax consequences that might be relevant to you if you are subject to special rules under federal income tax law, for example if you are:
The sections of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the IRC, that govern the federal income tax qualification and treatment of a REIT and its shareholders are complex. This presentation is a summary of applicable IRC provisions, related rules and regulations and administrative and judicial interpretations, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. Future legislative, judicial or administrative actions or decisions could also affect the accuracy of statements made in this summary. We have not received a ruling from the United States Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, with respect to any matter described in this summary, and we cannot assure you that the IRS or a court will agree with all of the statements made in this summary. The IRS or a court could, for example, take a different position from that described in this summary with respect to our acquisitions, operations, restructurings or other matters, which, if successful, could result in significant tax liabilities for applicable parties. In addition, this summary is not exhaustive of all possible tax consequences, and does not discuss any estate, gift, state, local or foreign tax consequences. For all these reasons, we urge you and any prospective acquiror of our shares to consult with a tax advisor about the federal income tax and other tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our shares. Our intentions and beliefs described in this summary are based upon our understanding of applicable laws and regulations that are in effect as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If new laws or regulations are enacted which impact us directly or indirectly, we may change our intentions or beliefs.
15
Your federal income tax consequences may differ depending on whether or not you are a "U.S. shareholder." For purposes of this summary, a "U.S. shareholder" is a beneficial owner of our shares who is:
whose status as a U.S. shareholder is not overridden by an applicable tax treaty. Conversely, a "non-U.S. shareholder" is a beneficial owner of our shares who is not a U.S. shareholder.
If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of our shares, the tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A beneficial owner that is a partnership and partners in such a partnership are urged to consult their tax advisors about the federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our shares.
Taxation as a REIT
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the IRC, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1999. Our REIT election, assuming continuing compliance with the then applicable qualification tests, will continue in effect for subsequent taxable years. Although no assurance can be given, we believe that we have been organized and have operated, and will continue to be organized and to operate, in a manner that qualified and will continue to qualify us to be taxed under the IRC as a REIT.
As a REIT, we generally are not subject to federal income tax on our net income distributed as dividends to our shareholders. Distributions to our shareholders generally are included in their income as dividends to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Our dividends are not generally entitled to the preferential tax rates on qualified dividend income, but a portion of our dividends may be treated as capital gain dividends or as qualified dividend income, all as explained below. No portion of any of our dividends is eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders. Distributions in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits generally are treated for federal income tax purposes as returns of capital to the extent of a recipient shareholder's basis in our shares, and will reduce this basis. Our current or accumulated earnings and profits are generally allocated first to distributions made on our preferred shares, of which there are none outstanding at this time, and thereafter to distributions made on our common shares. For all these purposes, our distributions include both cash distributions and any in kind distributions of property that we might make.
Our counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, has provided to us an opinion that we have been organized and have qualified as a REIT under the IRC for our 1999 through 2013 taxable years, and that our current investments and current and anticipated plan of operation will enable us to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the IRC. Our counsel's opinions are conditioned upon the assumption that our leases, our declaration of trust and all other
16
legal documents to which we are or have been a party have been and will be complied with by all parties to those documents, upon the accuracy and completeness of the factual matters described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and upon representations made by us as to certain factual matters relating to our organization and operations and our expected manner of operation. If this assumption or a representation is inaccurate or incomplete, our counsel's opinions may be adversely affected and may not be relied upon. The opinions of our counsel are based upon the law as it exists today, but the law may change in the future, possibly with retroactive effect. Given the highly complex nature of the rules governing REITs, the ongoing importance of factual determinations, and the possibility of future changes in our circumstances, no assurance can be given by Sullivan & Worcester LLP or us that we will qualify as or be taxed as a REIT for any particular year. Any opinion of Sullivan & Worcester LLP as to our qualification or taxation as a REIT will be expressed as of the date issued. Our counsel will have no obligation to advise us or our shareholders of any subsequent change in the matters stated, represented or assumed or of any subsequent change in the applicable law. Also, the opinions of our counsel are not binding on either the IRS or a court, and either could take a position different from that expressed by our counsel.
Our continued qualification and taxation as a REIT will depend upon our compliance on a continuing basis with various qualification tests imposed under the IRC and summarized below. While we believe that we will satisfy these tests, our counsel does not review compliance with these tests on a continuing basis. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any year, we will be subject to federal income taxation as if we were a corporation taxed under subchapter C of the IRC, or a C corporation, and our shareholders will be taxed like shareholders of C corporations, meaning that federal income tax generally will be applied at both the corporate and shareholder levels. In this event, we could be subject to significant tax liabilities, and the amount of cash available for distribution to our shareholders could be reduced or eliminated.
If we qualify as a REIT and meet the tests described below, we generally will not pay federal income tax on amounts we distribute to our shareholders. However, even if we qualify as a REIT, we may be subject to federal tax in the following circumstances:
17
If we fail to qualify as a REIT or elect not to qualify as a REIT, then we will be subject to federal income tax in the same manner as a regular C corporation. Further, as a regular C corporation, distributions to our shareholders will not be deductible by us, nor will distributions be required under the IRC. Also, to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to our shareholders will generally be taxable as ordinary dividends potentially eligible for the preferential tax rates discussed below in "Taxation of U.S. Shareholders" and, subject to limitations in the IRC, will be potentially eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporate shareholders. Finally, we will generally be disqualified from qualification as a REIT for the four taxable years following the taxable year in which the termination is effective. Our failure to qualify as a REIT for even one year could result in reduction or elimination of distributions to our shareholders, or in our incurring substantial indebtedness or liquidating substantial investments in order to pay the resulting corporate-level taxes. The IRC provides relief provisions under which we might avoid automatically ceasing to be a REIT for failure to meet specified REIT requirements, all as discussed in more detail below.
18
REIT Qualification Requirements
General Requirements. Section 856(a) of the IRC defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:
Section 856(b) of the IRC provides that conditions (1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable year and that condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a taxable year of less than 12 months. Section 856(h)(2) of the IRC provides that neither condition (5) nor (6) need to have been met during our first taxable year as a REIT. We believe that we have met conditions (1) through (7) during each of the requisite periods ending on or before the close of our most recently completed taxable year, and that we will continue to meet these conditions in future taxable years. There can, however, be no assurance in this regard.
By reason of condition (6), we will fail to qualify as a REIT for a taxable year if at any time during the last half of a year (except for our first taxable year as a REIT) more than 50% in value of our outstanding shares is owned directly or indirectly by five or fewer individuals. To help comply with condition (6), our declaration of trust restricts transfers of our shares that would otherwise result in concentrated ownership positions. In addition, if we comply with applicable Treasury regulations to ascertain the ownership of our outstanding shares and do not know, or by exercising reasonable diligence would not have known, that we failed condition (6), then we will be treated as having met condition (6). However, our failure to comply with these regulations for ascertaining ownership may result in a penalty of $25,000, or $50,000 for intentional violations. Accordingly, we have complied and will continue to comply with these regulations, including requesting annually from record holders of significant percentages of our shares information regarding the ownership of our shares. Under our declaration of trust, our shareholders are required to respond to these requests for information. A shareholder who fails or refuses to comply with the request is required by Treasury regulations to submit a statement with its federal income tax return disclosing its actual ownership of our shares and other information.
For purposes of condition (6), the term "individuals" is defined in the IRC to include natural persons, supplemental unemployment compensation benefit plans, private foundations and portions of a trust permanently set aside or used exclusively for charitable purposes, but not other entities or qualified pension plans or profit-sharing trusts. As a result, REIT shares owned by an entity that is not an "individual" are considered to be owned by the direct and indirect owners of the entity that are individuals (as so defined), rather than to be owned by the entity itself. Similarly, REIT shares held by a qualified pension plan or profit-sharing trust are treated as held directly by the individual beneficiaries in proportion to their actuarial interests in such plan or trust. Consequently, five or fewer such trusts could own more than 50% of the interests in an entity without jeopardizing that entity's
19
federal income tax qualification as a REIT. However, as discussed below, if a REIT is a "pension-held REIT," each qualified pension plan or profit-sharing pension trust owning more than 10% of the REIT's shares by value generally may be taxed on a portion of the dividends it receives from the REIT.
The IRC provides that we will not automatically fail to be a REIT if we do not meet conditions (1) through (6), provided we can establish that such failure was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Each such excused failure will result in the imposition of a $50,000 penalty instead of REIT disqualification. It is impossible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of this relief provision. This relief provision applies to any failure of the applicable conditions, even if the failure first occurred in a prior taxable year.
Our Wholly Owned Subsidiaries and Our Investments Through Partnerships. Except in respect of TRSs as discussed below, Section 856 (i) of the IRC provides that any corporation, 100% of whose stock is held by a REIT and its disregarded subsidiaries, is a qualified REIT subsidiary and shall not be treated as a separate corporation. The assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of a qualified REIT subsidiary are treated as the REIT's. We believe that each of our direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries, other than the TRSs discussed below, will be either a qualified REIT subsidiary within the meaning of Section 856(i) of the IRC, or a noncorporate entity that for federal income tax purposes is not treated as separate from its owner under Treasury regulations issued under Section 7701 of the IRC. Thus, except for the TRSs discussed below, in applying all the federal income tax REIT qualification requirements described in this summary, all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of our direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries are treated as ours.
We may invest in real estate through one or more entities that are treated as partnerships for federal income tax purposes, including limited or general partnerships, limited liability companies or foreign entities. In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, Treasury regulations provide that, for purposes of the REIT qualification requirements regarding income and assets discussed below, the REIT is deemed to own its proportionate share of the assets of the partnership corresponding to the REIT's proportionate capital interest in the partnership and is deemed to be entitled to the income of the partnership attributable to this proportionate share. In addition, for these purposes, the character of the assets and items of gross income of the partnership generally remains the same in the hands of the REIT. Accordingly, our proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, and items of income of each partnership in which we become a partner is treated as ours for purposes of the income tests and asset tests discussed below. In contrast, for purposes of the distribution requirement discussed below, we would take into account as a partner our share of the partnership's income as determined under the general federal income tax rules governing partners and partnerships under Sections 701 through 777 of the IRC.
Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. We are permitted to own any or all of the securities of a "taxable REIT subsidiary" as defined in Section 856(l) of the IRC, provided that no more than 25% of the total value of our assets, at the close of each quarter, is comprised of our investments in the stock or securities of our TRSs. Among other requirements, a TRS of ours must:
20
In addition, any corporation (other than a REIT) in which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the outstanding securities of such corporation will automatically be treated as a TRS. Subject to the discussion below, we believe that we and each of our TRSs have complied with, and will continue to comply with, on a continuous basis, the requirements for TRS status at all times during which the subsidiary's TRS election is reported as being in effect, and we believe that the same will be true for any TRS that we later form or acquire.
We have elected to treat as a TRS a particular corporate subsidiary of Five Star with whom we do not have a rental relationship. This intended TRS manages and operates independent living facilities for us, and in the future may operate additional independent living facilities for us. In that role, the intended TRS provides amenities and services to our tenants, the independent living residents; for the duration of our ownership of these independent living facilities, there have not been, and are not expected to be, assisted living or skilled nursing residents at these facilities, and neither we nor the intended TRS have provided or expect to provide health care services at these facilities or elsewhere. Although the law is unclear on this point, and in fact a close read of the statute and legislative history might suggest otherwise, IRS private letter rulings conclude and imply that the management and operation of independent living facilities do not constitute operating or managing a health care facility such that TRS status is precluded, provided that there are no assisted living or skilled nursing residents in the facilities and provided further that neither the REIT nor the intended TRS provide health care services. Although IRS private letter rulings do not generally constitute binding precedent, they do represent the reasoned, considered judgment of the IRS and thus provide insight into how the IRS applies and interprets the federal income tax laws. Based on these IRS private letter rulings, our counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, has opined that it is more likely than not that our intended TRS that manages and operates pure independent living facilities will qualify as a TRS, provided that there are no assisted living or skilled nursing residents in the subject facilities and provided further that neither we nor the intended TRS provide health care services.
Our ownership of stock and securities in TRSs is exempt from the 10% and 5% REIT asset tests discussed below. Also, as discussed below, TRSs can perform services for our tenants without disqualifying the rents we receive from those tenants under the 75% or 95% gross income tests discussed below. Moreover, because TRSs are taxed as C corporations that are separate from us, their assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit generally are not imputed to us for purposes of the REIT qualification requirements described in this summary. Therefore, TRSs can generally undertake third-party management and development activities and activities not related to real estate. Finally, while a REIT is generally limited in its ability to earn qualifying rental income from a TRS, a REIT can earn qualifying rental income from the lease of a qualified health care property to a TRS if an eligible independent contractor operates the facility, as discussed more fully below.
Restrictions are imposed on TRSs to ensure that they will be subject to an appropriate level of federal income taxation. For example, a TRS may not deduct interest paid in any year to an affiliated REIT to the extent that the interest payments exceed, generally, 50% of the TRS's adjusted taxable income for that year. However, the TRS may carry forward the disallowed interest expense to a succeeding year, and deduct the interest in that later year subject to that year's 50% adjusted taxable income limitation. In addition, if a TRS pays interest, rent or other amounts to its affiliated REIT in an amount that exceeds what an unrelated third party would have paid in an arm's length transaction, then the REIT generally will be subject to an excise tax equal to 100% of the excessive portion of the payment. Finally, if in comparison to an arm's length transaction, a tenant has overpaid rent to the REIT in exchange for underpaying the TRS for services rendered, and if the REIT has not adequately compensated the TRS for services provided to or on behalf of a tenant, then the REIT may be subject to an excise tax equal to 100% of the undercompensation to the TRS. There can be no assurance that arrangements involving our TRSs will not result in the imposition of one or more of these deduction limitations or excise taxes, but we do not believe that we or our TRSs are or will be subject to these impositions.
21
Income Tests. There are two gross income requirements for qualification as a REIT under the IRC:
For purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests outlined above, income derived from a "shared appreciation provision" in a mortgage loan is generally treated as gain recognized on the sale of the property to which it relates. Although we will use our best efforts to ensure that the income generated by our investments will be of a type that satisfies both the 75% and 95% gross income tests, there can be no assurance in this regard.
In order to qualify as "rents from real property" under Section 856 of the IRC, several requirements must be met:
22
of the outstanding common shares of Five Star, and Five Star has undertaken to limit its redemptions of outstanding common shares so that we do not come to own 10% or more of its outstanding common shares. Our declaration of trust disallows transfers or purported acquisitions, directly or by attribution, of our shares to the extent necessary to maintain our REIT status under the IRC. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that these provisions in our declaration of trust will be effective to prevent our REIT status from being jeopardized under the 10% affiliated tenant rule. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to monitor and enforce these restrictions, nor will our shareholders necessarily be aware of ownership of shares attributed to them under the IRC's attribution rules.
We believe that all or substantially all of our rents have qualified and will qualify as rents from real property for purposes of Section 856 of the IRC, subject to the considerations in the following paragraph.
As discussed above, we currently own independent living facilities that we purchased to be managed and operated by a TRS; the TRS provides amenities and services, but not health care services, to the facility's residents, who are our tenants. We may from time to time in the future acquire additional properties to be managed and operated in this manner. Our counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, has opined that it is more likely than not that our intended TRS that manages and operates independent living facilities will qualify as a TRS, provided that there are no assisted living or skilled nursing residents in the subject facilities and provided further that neither we nor the intended TRS provide health care services. Accordingly, we expect that the rents we receive from these facilities' independent living residents will qualify as rents from real property because services and amenities to
23
them are provided through a TRS. If the IRS should assert, contrary to its current private letter ruling practice, that our intended TRS does not in fact so qualify, and if a court should agree, then the rental income we receive from the independent living facility residents who are our tenants would be nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests, possibly jeopardizing our compliance with the 95% gross income test. Under those circumstances, however, we expect that we would qualify for the gross income tests' relief provision described below, and thereby would preserve our qualification as a REIT. If the relief provision below were to apply to us, we would be subject to tax at a 100% rate on the amount by which we failed the 95% gross income test, with adjustments, multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability for the taxable year; however, in a typical taxable year, we have little or no nonqualifying income from other sources and thus would expect to owe little tax in such circumstances.
In order to qualify as mortgage interest on real property for purposes of the 75% test, interest must derive from a mortgage loan secured by real property with a fair market value at the time the loan is made (reduced by any senior liens on the property) at least equal to the amount of the loan. If the amount of the loan exceeds the fair market value of the real property (as so reduced by senior liens), the interest will be treated as interest on a mortgage loan in a ratio equal to the ratio of the fair market value of the real property (as so reduced by senior liens) to the total amount of the mortgage loan.
Absent the "foreclosure property" rules of Section 856(e) of the IRC, a REIT's receipt of business operating income from a property would not qualify under the 75% and 95% gross income tests. But as foreclosure property, gross income from such a business operation would so qualify. In the case of property leased by a REIT to a tenant, foreclosure property is defined under applicable Treasury regulations to include generally the real property and incidental personal property that the REIT reduces to possession upon a default or imminent default under the lease by the tenant, and as to which a foreclosure property election is made by attaching an appropriate statement to the REIT's federal income tax return. Any gain that a REIT recognizes on the sale of foreclosure property held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers, plus any income it receives from foreclosure property that would not qualify under the 75% gross income test in the absence of foreclosure property treatment, reduced by expenses directly connected with the production of those items of income, would be subject to income tax at the maximum corporate rate, currently 35%, under the foreclosure property income tax rules of Section 857(b)(4) of the IRC. Thus, if a REIT should lease foreclosure property in exchange for rent that qualifies as "rents from real property" as described above, then that rental income is not subject to the foreclosure property income tax.
Other than sales of foreclosure property, any gain we realize on the sale of property held as inventory or other property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a penalty tax at a 100% rate. This prohibited transaction income also may adversely affect our ability to satisfy the 75% and 95% gross income tests for federal income tax qualification as a REIT. Whether property is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances surrounding the particular transaction. We therefore cannot provide assurances as to whether or not the IRS might successfully assert that one or more of our dispositions is subject to the 100% penalty tax. Sections 857(b)(6)(C) and (E) of the IRC provide a safe harbor pursuant to which limited sales of real property held at least two years and meeting specified additional requirements will not be treated as prohibited transactions. However, compliance with the safe harbor is not always achievable in practice.
24
We believe that dispositions of assets that we have made or that we might make in the future will not be subject to the 100% penalty tax, because our general intent has been and is to:
If we fail to satisfy one or both of the 75% or the 95% gross income tests in any taxable year, we may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for that year if we satisfy the following requirements:
It is impossible to state whether in all circumstances we would be entitled to the benefit of this relief provision for the 75% and 95% gross income tests. Even if this relief provision does apply, a 100% tax is imposed upon the greater of the amount by which we failed the 75% test or the amount by which we failed the 95% test, with adjustments, multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability. This relief provision applies to any failure of the applicable income tests, even if the failure first occurred in a year prior to the taxable year in which the failure was discovered.
Asset Tests. At the close of each quarter of each taxable year, we must also satisfy the following asset percentage tests in order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes:
When a failure to satisfy the above asset tests results from an acquisition of securities or other property during a quarter, the failure can be cured by disposition of sufficient nonqualifying assets within 30 days after the close of that quarter.
In addition, if we fail the 5% value test or the 10% vote or value tests at the close of any quarter and we do not cure such failure within 30 days after the close of that quarter, that failure will nevertheless be excused if (a) the failure is de minimis and (b) within 6 months after the last day of the quarter in which we identify the failure, we either dispose of the assets causing the failure or otherwise satisfy the 5% value and 10% vote and value asset tests. For purposes of this relief provision, the failure will be "de minimis" if the value of the assets causing the failure does not exceed the lesser of (a) 1% of the total value of our assets at the end of the relevant quarter or (b) $10,000,000. If our failure is not de minimis, or if any of the other REIT asset tests have been violated, we may
25
nevertheless qualify as a REIT if (a) we provide the IRS with a description of each asset causing the failure, (b) the failure was due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, (c) we pay a tax equal to the greater of (1) $50,000 or (2) the highest rate of corporate tax imposed (currently 35%) on the net income generated by the assets causing the failure during the period of the failure and (d) within 6 months after the last day of the quarter in which we identify the failure, we either dispose of the assets causing the failure or otherwise satisfy all of the REIT asset tests. These relief provisions apply to any failure of the applicable asset tests, even if the failure first occurred in a year prior to the taxable year in which the failure was discovered.
The IRC also provides an excepted securities safe harbor to the 10% value test that includes among other items (a) "straight debt" securities, (b) certain rental agreements in which payment is to be made in subsequent years, (c) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (d) securities issued by governmental entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the profits of or payments from a nongovernmental entity and (e) any security issued by another REIT.
We have maintained and will continue to maintain records of the value of our assets to document our compliance with the above asset tests, and intend to take actions as may be required to cure any failure to satisfy the tests within 30 days after the close of any quarter or within the six month periods described above.
Our Relationships with Five Star. On December 31, 2001, we and CWH spun off substantially all of our Five Star common shares. In August 2009, we closed a mortgage financing with the Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, and in connection with the FNMA transaction, we realigned our leases with Five Star. Pursuant to the terms of the realignment agreement, we also purchased 3,200,000 common shares from Five Star, which, when aggregated with our prior ownership of Five Star common shares, then represented approximately 9% of the total common shares of Five Star outstanding (approximately 9% as of December 31, 2013, including the 1,000,000 shares of Five Star common stock we purchased from the underwriters in Five Star's public equity offering of June 2011), determined after this new issuance. Our leases with Five Star, Five Star's charter, the transaction agreement governing the 2001 spin off, and the realignment agreement collectively contain restrictions upon the ownership of Five Star common shares and require Five Star to refrain from taking any actions that may result in any affiliation with us that would jeopardize our qualification as a REIT under the IRC. Accordingly, commencing with our 2002 taxable year, we expect that the rental income we receive from Five Star and its subsidiaries will be "rents from real property" under Section 856(d) of the IRC, and therefore qualifying income under the 75% and 95% gross income tests described above.
In addition, as described above, we have elected to treat as a TRS a particular corporate subsidiary of Five Star with whom we do not have a rental relationship, and our counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, has opined that it is more likely than not that this intended TRS will so qualify. Finally, as described below, we have engaged as an intended eligible independent contractor another corporate subsidiary of Five Star with whom we do not have a rental relationship.
Our Relationship with Our Taxable REIT Subsidiaries. In addition to the TRS described above that manages and operates independent living facilities for us, we also have wholly owned TRSs that lease properties from us. We may from time to time in the future acquire additional properties to be leased in this manner. In addition, in response to a lease default or expiration, we may choose to lease a reclaimed qualified health care property to a TRS.
In lease transactions involving our TRSs, our intent is that the rents paid to us by the TRS qualify as "rents from real property" under the REIT gross income tests summarized above. In order for this to be the case, the manager operating the leased property on behalf of the applicable TRS must be an "eligible independent contractor" within the meaning of Section 856(d)(9)(A) of the IRC, and the properties leased to the TRS must be "qualified health care properties" within the meaning of
26
Section 856(e)(6)(D) of the IRC. Qualified health care properties are defined as health care facilities and other properties necessary or incidental to the use of a health care facility.
For these purposes, a contractor qualifies as an "eligible independent contractor" if it is less than 35% affiliated with the REIT and, at the time the contractor enters into the agreement with the TRS to operate the qualified health care property, that contractor or any person related to that contractor is actively engaged in the trade or business of operating qualified health care properties for persons unrelated to the TRS or its affiliated REIT. For these purposes, an otherwise eligible independent contractor is not disqualified from that status on account of the TRS bearing the expenses of the operation of the qualified health care property, the TRS receiving the revenues from the operation of the qualified health care property, net of expenses for that operation and fees payable to the eligible independent contractor, or the REIT receiving income from the eligible independent contractor pursuant to a preexisting or otherwise grandfathered lease of another property.
We have engaged as an intended eligible independent contractor a particular corporate subsidiary of Five Star with whom we do not have a rental relationship. This contractor and its affiliates at Five Star are actively engaged in the trade or business of operating qualified health care properties for their own accounts, including pursuant to management contracts among themselves and including properties that we do not lease to them; however, this contractor and its affiliates have few if any management contracts for qualified health care properties for third parties other than us and our TRSs. Based on a plain reading of the statute as well as applicable legislative history, our counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, has opined that this intended eligible independent contractor should in fact so qualify. If the IRS or a court determines that this opinion is incorrect, then the rental income we receive from our TRSs in respect of properties managed by this particular contractor would be nonqualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% gross income tests, possibly jeopardizing our compliance with the 95% gross income test. Under those circumstances, however, we expect we would qualify for the gross income tests' relief provision described above, and thereby would preserve our qualification as a REIT. If the relief provision were to apply to us, we would be subject to tax at a 100% rate on the amount by which we failed the 95% gross income test, with adjustments, multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability for the taxable year; even though we have little or no nonqualifying income from other sources in a typical taxable year, imposition of this 100% tax in this circumstance could be material because to date all of the properties leased to our TRSs are managed for the TRSs by this contractor.
As explained above, we will be subject to a 100% tax if the IRS successfully asserts that the rents paid to us by any of our TRSs exceed an arm's length rental rate. Although there is no clear precedent to distinguish for federal income tax purposes among leases, management contracts, partnerships, financings, and other contractual arrangements, we believe that our leases and our TRSs' management agreements will be respected for purposes of the requirements of the IRC discussed above. Accordingly, we expect that the rental income from our current and future TRSs will qualify as "rents from real property," and that the 100% tax on excessive rents from a TRS will not apply.
Annual Distribution Requirements. In order to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the IRC, we are required to make annual distributions other than capital gain dividends to our shareholders in an amount at least equal to the excess of:
27
The distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if declared before we timely file our federal income tax return for the earlier taxable year and if paid on or before the first regular distribution payment after that declaration. If a dividend is declared in October, November or December to shareholders of record during one of those months, and is paid during the following January, then for federal income tax purposes the dividend will be treated as having been both paid and received on December 31 of the prior taxable year. A distribution which is not pro rata within a class of our beneficial interests entitled to a distribution, or which is not consistent with the rights to distributions among our classes of beneficial interests, is a preferential distribution that is not taken into consideration for purposes of the distribution requirements, and accordingly the payment of a preferential distribution could affect our ability to meet the distribution requirements. Taking into account our distribution policies, including the dividend reinvestment plan we have adopted, we do not believe that we have made or will make any preferential distributions. The distribution requirements may be waived by the IRS if a REIT establishes that it failed to meet them by reason of distributions previously made to meet the requirements of the 4% excise tax discussed below. To the extent that we do not distribute all of our net capital gain and all of our real estate investment trust taxable income, as adjusted, we will be subject to federal income tax on undistributed amounts.
In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax to the extent we fail within a calendar year to make required distributions to our shareholders of 85% of our ordinary income and 95% of our capital gain net income plus the excess, if any, of the "grossed up required distribution" for the preceding calendar year over the amount treated as distributed for that preceding calendar year. For this purpose, the term "grossed up required distribution" for any calendar year is the sum of our taxable income for the calendar year without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and all amounts from earlier years that are not treated as having been distributed under the provision. We will be treated as having sufficient earnings and profits to treat as a dividend any distribution by us up to the amount required to be distributed in order to avoid imposition of the 4% excise tax.
If we do not have enough cash or other liquid assets to meet the 90% distribution requirements, we may find it necessary and desirable to arrange for new debt or equity financing to provide funds for required distributions in order to maintain our REIT status. We can provide no assurance that financing would be available for these purposes on favorable terms.
We may be able to rectify a failure to pay sufficient dividends for any year by paying "deficiency dividends" to shareholders in a later year. These deficiency dividends may be included in our deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year, but an interest charge would be imposed upon us for the delay in distribution.
In addition to the other distribution requirements above, to preserve our status as a REIT we are required to timely distribute all C corporation earnings and profits that we inherit from acquired corporations.
Acquisition of C Corporations
On each of January 11, 2002, March 31, 2008, and November 1, 2008, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of a C corporation. At the time of those acquisitions, certain of those C corporations directly or indirectly owned all of the outstanding equity interests in various corporate and noncorporate subsidiaries. On October 1, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of an S corporation and its disregarded entity subsidiary, which were formerly C corporations. Upon these acquisitions, each of the acquired entities became either our qualified REIT subsidiary under Section 856(i) of the IRC or a disregarded entity under Treasury regulations issued under Section 7701 of the IRC. Thus, after the acquisition, all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the acquired entities have been treated as ours for purposes of the various REIT qualification tests
28
described above. In addition, we generally were treated as the successor to the acquired entities' federal income tax attributes, such as those entities' adjusted tax bases in their assets and their depreciation schedules; we were also treated as the successor to the acquired corporate entities' earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes, if any.
Built-in Gains from C Corporations. As described above, notwithstanding our qualification and taxation as a REIT, we may still be subject to corporate taxation if we dispose of assets previously held by present or former C corporations. Specifically, if we acquire an asset from a corporation in a transaction in which our adjusted tax basis in the asset is determined by reference to the adjusted tax basis of that asset in the hands of a present or former C corporation, and if we subsequently recognize gain on the disposition of that asset during a specified period (generally ten years) beginning on the date on which the asset ceased to be owned by the C corporation, then we will generally pay tax at the highest regular corporate tax rate, currently 35%, on the lesser of (1) the excess, if any, of the asset's fair market value over its adjusted tax basis, each determined as of the time the asset ceased to be owned by the C corporation, or (2) our gain recognized in the disposition. Accordingly, any taxable disposition of an asset so acquired during the specified period (generally ten years) could be subject to tax under these rules. However, we have not disposed, and have no present plan or intent to dispose, of any material assets acquired in such transactions.
To the extent of our gains in a taxable year that are subject to the built-in gains tax described above, net of any taxes paid on such gains with respect to that taxable year, our taxable dividends paid to you in the following year will be potentially eligible for treatment as qualified dividends that are taxed to our noncorporate U.S. shareholders at preferential rates.
Earnings and Profits. A REIT may not have any undistributed C corporation earnings and profits at the end of any taxable year. Upon the closing of our corporate acquisitions, we succeeded to the undistributed earnings and profits, if any, of the acquired and then disregarded corporate entities. Thus, we needed to distribute any such earnings and profits no later than the end of the applicable tax year. If we failed to do so, we would not qualify to be taxed as a REIT for that year and a number of years thereafter, unless we are able to rely on the relief provision described below.
Although Sullivan & Worcester LLP is unable to render an opinion on factual determinations such as the amount of our undistributed earnings and profits, we have computed or retained accountants to compute the amount of undistributed earnings and profits that we inherited in our corporate acquisitions. Based on these calculations, we believe that we did not inherit any undistributed earnings and profits that remained undistributed at the end of the applicable tax year. However, there can be no assurance that the IRS would not, upon subsequent examination, propose adjustments to our calculation of the undistributed earnings and profits that we inherited, including adjustments that might be deemed necessary by the IRS as a result of its examination of the companies we acquired. In any such examination, the IRS might consider all taxable years of the acquired entities as open for review for purposes of its proposed adjustments. If it is subsequently determined that we had undistributed earnings and profits as of the end of the applicable tax year, we may be eligible for a relief provision similar to the "deficiency dividends" procedure described above. To utilize this relief provision, we would have to pay an interest charge for the delay in distributing the undistributed earnings and profits; in addition, we would be required to distribute to our shareholders, in addition to our other REIT distribution requirements, the amount of the undistributed earnings and profits less the interest charge paid.
Depreciation and Federal Income Tax Treatment of Leases
Our initial tax bases in our assets will generally be our acquisition cost. We will generally depreciate our depreciable real property on a straight-line basis over 40 years and our personal property over the applicable shorter periods. These depreciation schedules may vary for properties that we acquire through tax-free or carryover basis acquisitions.
29
We are entitled to depreciation deductions from our facilities only if we are treated for federal income tax purposes as the owner of the facilities. This means that the leases of the facilities must be classified for federal income tax purposes as true leases, rather than as sales or financing arrangements, and we believe this to be the case.
Taxation of U.S. Shareholders
For noncorporate U.S. shareholders, to the extent that their total adjusted income does not exceed applicable thresholds, the maximum federal income tax rate for long-term capital gains and most corporate dividends is generally 15%. For those noncorporate U.S. shareholders whose total adjusted income exceeds the applicable thresholds, the maximum federal income tax rate for long-term capital gains and most corporate dividends is generally 20%. However, because we are not generally subject to federal income tax on the portion of our REIT taxable income distributed to our shareholders, dividends on our shares generally are not eligible for such preferential tax rates. As a result, our ordinary dividends continue to be taxed at the higher federal income tax rates applicable to ordinary income. However, the preferential federal income tax rates for long-term capital gains and for qualified dividends generally apply to:
As long as we qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, a distribution to our U.S. shareholders that we do not designate as a capital gain dividend generally will be treated as an ordinary income dividend to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and profits. Distributions made out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits that we properly designate as capital gain dividends generally will be taxed as long-term capital gains, as discussed below, to the extent they do not exceed our actual net capital gain for the taxable year. However, corporate shareholders may be required to treat up to 20% of any capital gain dividend as ordinary income under Section 291 of the IRC.
In addition, we may elect to retain net capital gain income and treat it as constructively distributed. In that case:
30
If we elect to retain our net capital gains in this fashion, we will notify our U.S. shareholders of the relevant tax information within 60 days after the close of the affected taxable year.
If for any taxable year we designate capital gain dividends for U.S. shareholders, then a portion of the capital gain dividends we designate will be allocated to the holders of a particular class of shares on a percentage basis equal to the ratio of the amount of the total dividends paid or made available for the year to the holders of that class of shares to the total dividends paid or made available for the year to holders of all outstanding classes of our shares. We will similarly designate the portion of any capital gain dividend that is to be taxed to noncorporate U.S. shareholders at preferential maximum rates (including any capital gains attributable to real estate depreciation recapture that are subject to a maximum 25% federal income tax rate) so that the designations will be proportionate among all outstanding classes of our shares.
Distributions in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a U.S. shareholder to the extent that they do not exceed the shareholder's adjusted tax basis in the shareholder's shares, but will reduce the shareholder's basis in those shares. To the extent that these excess distributions exceed a U.S. shareholder's adjusted basis in our shares, they will be included in income as capital gain, with long-term gain generally taxed to noncorporate U.S. shareholders at preferential maximum rates. No U.S. shareholder may include on his federal income tax return any of our net operating losses or any of our capital losses.
If a dividend is declared in October, November or December to shareholders of record during one of those months, and is paid during the following January, then for federal income tax purposes the dividend will be treated as having been both paid and received on December 31 of the prior taxable year. Also, items that are treated differently for regular and alternative minimum tax purposes are to be allocated between a REIT and its shareholders under Treasury regulations which are to be prescribed. It is possible that these Treasury regulations will require tax preference items to be allocated to our shareholders with respect to any accelerated depreciation or other tax preference items that we claim.
A U.S. shareholder will generally recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and the shareholder's adjusted basis in our shares that are sold or exchanged. This gain or loss will be capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shareholder's holding period in our shares exceeds one year. In addition, any loss upon a sale or exchange of our shares held for six months or less will generally be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of our long-term capital gain dividends paid on such shares during the holding period.
U.S. shareholders who are individuals, estates or trusts are generally required to pay a 3.8% Medicare tax on their net investment income (including dividends on and gains from the sale or other disposition of our shares), or in the case of estates and trusts on their net investment income that is not distributed, in each case to the extent that their total adjusted income exceeds applicable thresholds.
If a U.S. shareholder recognizes a loss upon a disposition of our shares in an amount that exceeds a prescribed threshold, it is possible that the provisions of Treasury regulations involving "reportable transactions" could apply, with a resulting requirement to separately disclose the loss-generating transaction to the IRS. These Treasury regulations are written quite broadly, and apply to many routine and simple transactions. A reportable transaction currently includes, among other things, a sale or exchange of our shares resulting in a tax loss in excess of (a) $10 million in any single year or $20 million in any combination of years in the case of our shares held by a C corporation or by a partnership with only C corporation partners or (b) $2 million in any single year or $4 million in any combination of years in the case of our shares held by any other partnership or an S corporation, trust or individual, including losses that flow through pass through entities to individuals. A taxpayer discloses a reportable transaction by filing IRS Form 8886 with its federal income tax return and, in the
31
first year of filing, a copy of Form 8886 must be sent to the IRS's Office of Tax Shelter Analysis. The penalty for failing to disclose a reportable transaction is generally $10,000 in the case of a natural person and $50,000 in any other case.
Noncorporate U.S. shareholders who borrow funds to finance their acquisition of our shares could be limited in the amount of deductions allowed for the interest paid on the indebtedness incurred. Under Section 163(d) of the IRC, interest paid or accrued on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry property held for investment is generally deductible only to the extent of the investor's net investment income. A U.S. shareholder's net investment income will include ordinary income dividend distributions received from us and, if an appropriate election is made by the shareholder, capital gain dividend distributions and qualified dividends received from us; however, distributions treated as a nontaxable return of the shareholder's basis will not enter into the computation of net investment income.
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Shareholders
The rules governing the federal income taxation of tax-exempt entities are complex, and the following discussion is intended only as a summary of these rules. If you are a tax-exempt shareholder, we urge you to consult with your own tax advisor to determine the impact of federal, state, local and foreign tax laws, including any tax return filing and other reporting requirements, with respect to your investment in our shares.
Subject to the pension-held REIT rules discussed below, our distributions made to shareholders that are tax-exempt pension plans, individual retirement accounts or other qualifying tax-exempt entities should not constitute unrelated business taxable income, provided that the shareholder has not financed its acquisition of our shares with "acquisition indebtedness" within the meaning of the IRC, that the shares are not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business of the tax-exempt entity, and that, consistent with our present intent, we do not hold a residual interest in a real estate mortgage investment conduit.
Tax-exempt pension trusts that own more than 10% by value of a "pension-held REIT" at any time during a taxable year may be required to treat a percentage of all dividends received from the pension-held REIT during the year as unrelated business taxable income. This percentage is equal to the ratio of:
except that this percentage shall be deemed to be zero unless it would otherwise equal or exceed 5%. A REIT is a pension-held REIT if:
A REIT is predominantly held by tax-exempt pension trusts if at least one tax-exempt pension trust owns more than 25% by value of the REIT's stock or beneficial interests, or if one or more tax-exempt pension trusts, each owning more than 10% by value of the REIT's stock or beneficial interests, own in the aggregate more than 50% by value of the REIT's stock or beneficial interests. Because of the share ownership concentration restrictions in our declaration of trust, we believe that we are not and will not
32
become a pension-held REIT. However, because our shares are publicly traded, we cannot completely control whether or not we are or will become a pension-held REIT.
Social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts and qualified group legal services plans exempt from federal income taxation under Sections 501(c)(7), (c)(9), (c)(17) and (c)(20) of the IRC, respectively, are subject to different unrelated business taxable income rules, which generally will require them to characterize distributions from a REIT as unrelated business taxable income. In addition, these prospective investors should consult their own tax advisors concerning any "set aside" or reserve requirements applicable to them.
Taxation of Non-U.S. Shareholders
The rules governing the United States federal income taxation of non-U.S. shareholders are complex, and the following discussion is intended only as a summary of these rules. If you are a non-U.S. shareholder, we urge you to consult with your own tax advisor to determine the impact of United States federal, state, local and foreign tax laws, including any tax return filing and other reporting requirements, with respect to your investment in our shares.
In general, a non-U.S. shareholder will be subject to regular United States federal income tax in the same manner as a U.S. shareholder with respect to its investment in our shares if that investment is effectively connected with the non-U.S. shareholder's conduct of a trade or business in the United States (and, if provided by an applicable income tax treaty, is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base the non-U.S. shareholder maintains in the United States). In addition, a corporate non-U.S. shareholder that receives income that is or is deemed effectively connected with a trade or business in the United States may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax under Section 884 of the IRC, which is payable in addition to regular United States federal corporate income tax. The balance of this discussion of the United States federal income taxation of non-U.S. shareholders addresses only those non-U.S. shareholders whose investment in our shares is not effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States.
A distribution by us to a non-U.S. shareholder that is not attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest and that is not designated as a capital gain dividend will be treated as an ordinary income dividend to the extent that it is made out of current or accumulated earnings and profits. A distribution of this type will generally be subject to United States federal income tax and withholding at the rate of 30%, or at a lower rate if the non-U.S. shareholder has in the manner prescribed by the IRS demonstrated its entitlement to benefits under a tax treaty. In the case of any in kind distributions of property, we or other applicable withholding agents will have to collect the amount required to be withheld by reducing to cash for remittance to the IRS a sufficient portion of the property that the non-U.S. shareholder would otherwise receive, and the non-U.S. shareholder may bear brokerage or other costs for this withholding procedure. Because we cannot determine our current and accumulated earnings and profits until the end of the taxable year, withholding at the rate of 30% or applicable lower treaty rate will generally be imposed on the gross amount of any distribution to a non-U.S. shareholder that we make and do not designate as a capital gain dividend. Notwithstanding this withholding on distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits, these distributions are a nontaxable return of capital to the extent that they do not exceed the non-U.S. shareholder's adjusted basis in our shares, and the nontaxable return of capital will reduce the adjusted basis in these shares. To the extent that distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits exceed the non-U.S. shareholder's adjusted basis in our shares, the distributions will give rise to tax liability if the non-U.S. shareholder would otherwise be subject to tax on any gain from the sale or exchange of these shares, as discussed below. A non-U.S. shareholder may seek a refund from the IRS of amounts withheld on distributions to him in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits.
33
From time to time, some of our distributions may be attributable to the sale or exchange of United States real property interests. However, capital gain dividends that are received by a non-U.S. shareholder, as well as dividends attributable to our sales of United States real property interests, will be subject to the taxation and withholding regime applicable to ordinary income dividends and the branch profits tax will not apply, provided that (1) these dividends are received with respect to a class of shares that is "regularly traded" on a domestic "established securities market" such as the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, both as defined by applicable Treasury regulations, and (2) the non-U.S. shareholder does not own more than 5% of that class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of distribution of the applicable capital gain and United States real property interest dividends. If both of these provisions are satisfied, qualifying non-U.S. shareholders will not be subject to withholding either on capital gain dividends or on dividends that are attributable to our sales of United States real property interests as though those amounts were effectively connected with a United States trade or business, and qualifying non-U.S. shareholders will not be required to file United States federal income tax returns or pay branch profits tax in respect of these dividends. Instead, these dividends will be subject to United States federal income tax and withholding as ordinary dividends, currently at a 30% tax rate unless reduced by an applicable treaty, as discussed below. Although there can be no assurance in this regard, we believe that our common shares have been and will remain "regularly traded" on a domestic "established securities market" within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations; however, we can provide no assurance that our shares will continue to be "regularly traded" on a domestic "established securities market" in future taxable years.
Except as discussed above, for any year in which we qualify as a REIT, distributions that are attributable to gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest are taxed to a non-U.S. shareholder as if these distributions were gains effectively connected with a trade or business in the United States conducted by the non-U.S. shareholder. Accordingly, a non-U.S. shareholder that does not qualify for the special rule above will be taxed on these amounts at the normal capital gain and other tax rates applicable to a U.S. shareholder, subject to any applicable alternative minimum tax and to a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals; such a non-U.S. shareholder will be required to file a United States federal income tax return reporting these amounts, even if applicable withholding is imposed as described below; and such a non-U.S. shareholder that is also a corporation may owe the 30% branch profits tax under Section 884 of the IRC in respect of these amounts. We or other applicable withholding agents will be required to withhold from distributions to such non-U.S. shareholders, and remit to the IRS, 35% of the maximum amount of any distribution that could be designated as a capital gain dividend. In addition, for purposes of this withholding rule, if we designate prior distributions as capital gain dividends, then subsequent distributions up to the amount of the designated prior distributions will be treated as capital gain dividends. The amount of any tax withheld is creditable against the non-U.S. shareholder's United States federal income tax liability, and the non-U.S. shareholder may file for a refund from the IRS of any amount of withheld tax in excess of that tax liability.
A special "wash sale" rule applies to a non-U.S. shareholder who owns any class of our shares if (1) the non-U.S. shareholder owns more than 5% of that class of shares at any time during the one-year period ending on the date of the distribution described below, or (2) that class of our shares is not, within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations, "regularly traded" on a domestic "established securities market" such as the NYSE. Although there can be no assurance in this regard, we believe that our common shares have been and will remain "regularly traded" on a domestic "established securities market" within the meaning of applicable Treasury regulations, all as discussed above; however, we can provide no assurance that our shares will continue to be "regularly traded" on a domestic "established securities market" in future taxable years. We thus anticipate this wash sale rule to apply, if at all, only to a non-U.S. shareholder that owns more than 5% of either our common shares or any class of our preferred shares. Such a non-U.S. shareholder will be treated as having made a "wash sale" of our shares if it (1) disposes of an interest in our shares during the 30 days preceding
34
the ex-dividend date of a distribution by us that, but for such disposition, would have been treated by the non-U.S. shareholder in whole or in part as gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest, and then (2) acquires or enters into a contract to acquire a substantially identical interest in our shares, either actually or constructively through a related party, during the 61-day period beginning 30 days prior to the ex-dividend date. In the event of such a wash sale, the non-U.S. shareholder will have gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest in an amount equal to the portion of the distribution that, but for the wash sale, would have been a gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest. As discussed above, a non-U.S. shareholder's gain from the sale or exchange of a United States real property interest can trigger increased United States taxes, such as the branch profits tax applicable to non-U.S. corporations, and increased United States tax filing requirements.
If for any taxable year we designate capital gain dividends for our shareholders, then a portion of the capital gain dividends we designate will be allocated to the holders of a particular class of shares on a percentage basis equal to the ratio of the amount of the total dividends paid or made available for the year to the holders of that class of shares to the total dividends paid or made available for the year to holders of all outstanding classes of our shares.
Tax treaties may reduce the withholding obligations on our distributions. Under some treaties, however, rates below 30% that are applicable to ordinary income dividends from United States corporations may not apply to ordinary income dividends from a REIT or may apply only if the REIT meets specified additional conditions. A non-U.S. shareholder must generally use an applicable IRS Form W-8, or substantially similar form, to claim tax treaty benefits. If the amount of tax withheld with respect to a distribution to a non-U.S. shareholder exceeds the shareholder's United States federal income tax liability with respect to the distribution, the non-U.S. shareholder may file for a refund of the excess from the IRS. The 35% withholding tax rate discussed above on some capital gain dividends corresponds to the maximum income tax rate applicable to corporate non-U.S. shareholders but is higher than the current preferential maximum rates on capital gains generally applicable to noncorporate non-U.S. shareholders. Treasury regulations also provide special rules to determine whether, for purposes of determining the applicability of a tax treaty, our distributions to a non-U.S. shareholder that is an entity should be treated as paid to the entity or to those owning an interest in that entity and whether the entity or its owners are entitled to benefits under the tax treaty. In the case of any in kind distributions of property, we or other applicable withholding agents will have to collect the amount required to be withheld by reducing to cash for remittance to the IRS a sufficient portion of the property that the non-U.S. shareholder would otherwise receive, and the non-U.S. shareholder may bear brokerage or other costs for this withholding procedure.
Non-U.S. shareholders should generally be able to treat amounts we designate as retained but constructively distributed capital gains in the same manner as actual distributions of capital gain dividends by us. In addition, a non-U.S. shareholder should be able to offset as a credit against its federal income tax liability the proportionate share of the tax paid by us on such retained but constructively distributed capital gains. A non-U.S. shareholder may file for a refund from the IRS for the amount that the non-U.S. shareholder's proportionate share of tax paid by us exceeds its federal income tax liability on the constructively distributed capital gains.
If our shares are not "United States real property interests" within the meaning of Section 897 of the IRC, then a non-U.S. shareholder's gain on sale of these shares generally will not be subject to United States federal income taxation, except that a nonresident alien individual who was in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year may be subject to a 30% tax on this gain. Our shares will not constitute a United States real property interest if we are a "domestically controlled REIT." A domestically controlled REIT is a REIT in which at all times during the preceding five-year period less than 50% of the fair market value of the outstanding shares was directly or indirectly held by foreign persons. We believe that we have been and will remain a domestically controlled REIT and
35
thus a non-U.S. shareholder's gain on a sale of our shares will not be subject to United States federal income taxation. However, because our shares are publicly traded, we can provide no assurance that we have been or will remain a domestically controlled REIT. If we are not a domestically controlled REIT, a non-U.S. shareholder's gain on sale of our shares will not be subject to United States federal income taxation as a sale of a United States real property interest, if that class of shares is "regularly traded," as defined by applicable Treasury regulations, on an established securities market like the NYSE, and the non-U.S. shareholder has at all times during the preceding five years owned 5% or less by value of that class of shares. In this regard, because the shares held by others may be redeemed, a non-U.S. shareholder's percentage interest in a class of our shares may increase even if it acquires no additional shares in that class. If the gain on the sale of our shares were subject to United States federal income taxation, the non-U.S. shareholder will generally be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. shareholder with respect to its gain and will be required to file a United States federal income tax return reporting that gain; in addition, a corporate non-U.S. shareholder might owe branch profits tax under Section 884 of the IRC. A purchaser of our shares from a non-U.S. shareholder will not be required to withhold on the purchase price if the purchased shares are regularly traded on an established securities market or if we are a domestically controlled REIT. Otherwise, a purchaser of our shares from a non-U.S. shareholder may be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price paid to the non-U.S. shareholder and to remit the withheld amount to the IRS.
Withholding and Information Reporting
Information reporting and backup withholding may apply to distributions or proceeds paid to our shareholders under the circumstances discussed below. The backup withholding rate is currently 28%. Amounts withheld under backup withholding are generally not an additional tax and may be refunded by the IRS or credited against the shareholder's federal income tax liability. In the case of any in kind distributions of property by us to a shareholder, we or other applicable withholding agents will have to collect any applicable backup withholding by reducing to cash for remittance to the IRS a sufficient portion of the property that our shareholder would otherwise receive, and the shareholder may bear brokerage or other costs for this withholding procedure.
A U.S. shareholder will be subject to backup withholding when it receives distributions on our shares or proceeds upon the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or other disposition of our shares, unless the U.S. shareholder properly executes, or has previously properly executed, under penalties of perjury an IRS Form W-9 or substantially similar form that:
If the U.S. shareholder has not provided and does not provide its correct taxpayer identification number on an IRS Form W-9 or substantially similar form, it may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS, and we or other applicable withholding agents may have to withhold a portion of any distributions or proceeds paid to such U.S. shareholder. Unless the U.S. shareholder has established on a properly executed IRS Form W-9 or substantially similar form that it comes within an enumerated exempt category, distributions or proceeds on our shares paid to it during the calendar year, and the amount of tax withheld, if any, will be reported to it and to the IRS.
Distributions on our shares to a non-U.S. shareholder during each calendar year and the amount of tax withheld, if any, will generally be reported to the non-U.S. shareholder and to the IRS. This information reporting requirement applies regardless of whether the non-U.S. shareholder is subject to withholding on distributions on our shares or whether the withholding was reduced or eliminated by an
36
applicable tax treaty. Also, distributions paid to a non-U.S. shareholder on our shares may be subject to backup withholding, unless the non-U.S. shareholder properly certifies its non-U.S. shareholder status on an IRS Form W-8 or substantially similar form in the manner described above. Similarly, information reporting and backup withholding will not apply to proceeds a non-U.S. shareholder receives upon the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or other disposition of our shares, if the non-U.S. shareholder properly certifies its non-U.S. shareholder status on an IRS Form W-8 or substantially similar form. Even without having executed an IRS Form W-8 or substantially similar form, however, in some cases information reporting and backup withholding will not apply to proceeds that a non-U.S. shareholder receives upon the sale, exchange, redemption, retirement or other disposition of our shares if the non-U.S. shareholder receives those proceeds through a broker's foreign office.
Increased reporting obligations are scheduled to be imposed on non-United States financial institutions and other non-United States entities for purposes of identifying accounts and investments held directly or indirectly by United States persons. The failure to comply with these additional information reporting, certification and other specified requirements could result in withholding tax being imposed on payments of dividends and sales proceeds to applicable shareholders or intermediaries. Specifically, a 30% withholding tax is imposed on dividends on and gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our shares paid to a foreign financial institution or to a foreign nonfinancial entity, unless (1) the foreign financial institution undertakes applicable diligence and reporting obligations or (2) the foreign nonfinancial entity either certifies it does not have any substantial United States owners or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial United States owner. In addition, if the payee is a foreign financial institution, it generally must enter into an agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury that requires, among other things, that it undertake to identify accounts held by applicable United States persons or United States-owned foreign entities, annually report specified information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on payments to noncertified holders. Pursuant to IRS guidance, such withholding will apply only to dividends paid after June 30, 2014 and to other "withholdable payments" (including payments of gross proceeds from a sale or other disposition of our shares) made after December 31, 2016. If you hold our shares through a non-United States intermediary or if you are a non-United States person, we urge you to consult your own tax advisor regarding foreign account tax compliance.
Other Tax Consequences
Our tax treatment and that of our shareholders may be modified by legislative, judicial or administrative actions at any time, which actions may be retroactive in effect. The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by Congress, the IRS and the United States Department of the Treasury, and statutory changes, new regulations, revisions to existing regulations and revised interpretations of established concepts are issued frequently. Likewise, the rules regarding taxes other than federal income taxes may also be modified. No prediction can be made as to the likelihood of passage of new tax legislation or other provisions, or the direct or indirect effect on us and our shareholders. Revisions to tax laws and interpretations of these laws could adversely affect the tax or other consequences of an investment in our shares. We and our shareholders may also be subject to taxation by state, local or other jurisdictions, including those in which we or our shareholders transact business or reside. These tax consequences may not be comparable to the federal income tax consequences discussed above.
37
ERISA PLANS, KEOGH PLANS AND INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS
General Fiduciary Obligations
Fiduciaries of a pension, profit-sharing or other employee benefit plan subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or ERISA, must consider whether:
Trustees and other fiduciaries of an ERISA plan may incur personal liability for any loss suffered by the plan on account of a violation of their fiduciary responsibilities. In addition, these fiduciaries may be subject to a civil penalty of up to 20% of any amount recovered by the plan on account of a violation. Fiduciaries of any individual retirement account or annuity, or IRA, Roth IRA, tax-favored account (such as an Archer MSA, Coverdell education savings account or health savings account), Keogh Plan or other qualified retirement plan not subject to Title I of ERISA, or non-ERISA plans, should consider that the plan may only make investments that are authorized by the appropriate governing instrument.
Fiduciaries considering an investment in our securities should consult their own legal advisors if they have any concern as to whether the investment is consistent with the foregoing criteria or is otherwise appropriate. The sale of our securities to an ERISA or non-ERISA plan is in no respect a representation by us or any underwriter of the securities that the investment meets all relevant legal requirements with respect to investments by plans generally or any particular plan, or that the investment is appropriate for plans generally or any particular plan.
Prohibited Transactions
Fiduciaries of ERISA plans and persons making the investment decision for an IRA or other non-ERISA plan should consider the application of the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and the IRC in making their investment decision. Sales and other transactions between an ERISA or non-ERISA plan, and persons related to it, are prohibited transactions. The particular facts concerning the sponsorship, operations and other investments of an ERISA plan or non-ERISA plan may cause a wide range of other persons to be treated as disqualified persons or parties in interest with respect to it. A prohibited transaction, in addition to imposing potential personal liability upon fiduciaries of ERISA plans, may also result in the imposition of an excise tax under the IRC or a penalty under ERISA upon the disqualified person or party in interest with respect to the plan. If the disqualified person who engages in the transaction is the individual on behalf of whom an IRA or Roth IRA is maintained or his beneficiary, the IRA or Roth IRA may lose its tax-exempt status and its assets may be deemed to have been distributed to the individual in a taxable distribution on account of the prohibited transaction, but no excise tax will be imposed. Fiduciaries considering an investment in our securities should consult their own legal advisors as to whether the ownership of our securities involves a prohibited transaction.
"Plan Assets" Considerations
The United States Department of Labor has issued a regulation defining "plan assets." The regulation generally provides that when an ERISA or non-ERISA plan acquires a security that is an equity interest in an entity and that security is neither a "publicly offered security" nor a security issued by an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, the
38
ERISA plan's or non-ERISA plan's assets include both the equity interest and an undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the entity, unless it is established either that the entity is an operating company or that equity participation in the entity by benefit plan investors is not significant.
Each class of our shares (that is, our common shares and any class of preferred shares that we may issue) must be analyzed separately to ascertain whether it is a publicly offered security. The regulation defines a publicly offered security as a security that is "widely held," "freely transferable" and either part of a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act, or sold under an effective registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, provided the securities are registered under the Exchange Act within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year of the issuer during which the offering occurred. Each class of our outstanding shares has been registered under the Exchange Act within the necessary time frame to satisfy the foregoing condition.
The regulation provides that a security is "widely held" only if it is part of a class of securities that is owned by 100 or more investors independent of the issuer and of one another. However, a security will not fail to be "widely held" because the number of independent investors falls below 100 subsequent to the initial public offering as a result of events beyond the issuer's control. We believe our common shares have been and will remain widely held, and we expect the same to be true of any class of preferred shares that we may issue, but we can give no assurances in this regard.
The regulation provides that whether a security is "freely transferable" is a factual question to be determined on the basis of all relevant facts and circumstances. The regulation further provides that, where a security is part of an offering in which the minimum investment is $10,000 or less, some restrictions on transfer ordinarily will not, alone or in combination, affect a finding that these securities are freely transferable. The restrictions on transfer enumerated in the regulation as not affecting that finding include:
We believe that the restrictions imposed under our declaration of trust on the transfer of shares do not result in the failure of our shares to be "freely transferable." Furthermore, we believe that there exist no other facts or circumstances limiting the transferability of our shares that are not included among those enumerated as not affecting their free transferability under the regulation, and we do not expect or intend to impose in the future, or to permit any person to impose on our behalf, any limitations or restrictions on transfer that would not be among the enumerated permissible limitations or restrictions.
Assuming that each class of our shares will be "widely held" and that no other facts and circumstances exist that restrict transferability of these shares, we have received an opinion of our counsel, Sullivan & Worcester LLP, that our shares will not fail to be "freely transferable" for purposes of the regulation due to the restrictions on transfer of our shares under our declaration of trust and
39
that under the regulation each class of our currently outstanding shares is publicly offered and our assets will not be deemed to be "plan assets" of any ERISA plan or non-ERISA plan that acquires our shares in a public offering. This opinion is conditioned upon certain assumptions and representations, as discussed above in "Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation as a REIT."
Our business faces many risks. The risks described below may not be the only risks we face, but are the risks we know of that we believe may be material at this time. Additional risks that we do not yet know of, or that we currently think are immaterial, may also impair our business operations or financial results. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer and the trading price of our securities could decline. Investors and prospective investors should consider the following risks and the information contained under the heading "Warning Concerning Forward Looking Statements" before deciding whether to invest in our securities.
Risks Related to Our Tenants and Operators
Financial and other difficulties at Five Star could adversely affect us.
As of December 31, 2013, Five Star pays approximately 42.1% of our total annualized rental income and operates approximately 39.9% of our total assets, at cost (less impairments). Five Star has not been consistently profitable since it became a public company in 2001. Also, while Five Star has access to a $25.0 million revolving line of credit that expires in March 2016 and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility maturing in April 2015, Five Star has limited resources and substantial lease obligations to us and others and Five Star is not currently in compliance with certain financial reporting covenants under its lines of credit, which may permit its lenders to stop making borrowings available, and to accelerate the repayment of any outstanding borrowings, under those lines of credit. Five Star's business is subject to a number of risks, including the following:
40
If Five Star's operations are unprofitable, Five Star may default in its rent obligations to us or we may realize reduced income from our managed senior living communities. Additionally, if Five Star were to fail to provide quality services, our income from these properties may be adversely affected. Further if we were required to replace Five Star as our tenant or manager, this could result in significant disruptions at the affected properties and declines in our income and cash flows.
Pending restatements of Five Star's financial statements could adversely affect our operations or our ability to access the capital markets in order to finance acquisitions or for other purposes.
In November 2013, Five Star announced that it will restate its financial results for 2011, 2012 and the first and second quarters of 2013 due to certain errors primarily relating to the accounting for non-cash income tax items in prior periods, and Five Star stated that its previously filed financial reports for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 and for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013 should no longer be relied upon. In addition, Five Star has not yet filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. Five Star also announced that it had determined that, as a result of the matters discussed above, Five Star has a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. We understand that Five Star is currently in the process of preparing restated financial statements for the applicable periods, which will be filed with the SEC on an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and amended Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013. We understand that Five Star is also in the process of preparing its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. However, there is no assurance as to when the restatements and updated SEC filings will be completed.
The delay in filing Five Star's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 may result in defaults under certain of Five Star's debt obligations or its leases with us, subject to certain conditions. In addition, the restatement and related matters could have other adverse impacts on Five Star's business, operations and financial condition. Such defaults and other impacts could materially and adversely affect Five Star's ability to pay rent and perform its obligations to us and our income from our senior living communities managed by Five Star. If we were required to replace Five Star as our tenant or manager, this could result in significant disruptions at the affected properties and declines in our income and cash flows.
Because Five Star is a significant tenant of ours, we are required to include or incorporate by reference in our SEC filings certain information of Five Star that is included in Five Star's filed SEC reports. As such, while Five Star's restatements and filings are pending, we may not be able to obtain public financing or access the capital markets. Alternative financing sources may not be available on favorable terms or at all and our ability to raise funds to pay our obligations, pursue acquisitions and for other purposes could be adversely impacted.
Increases in labor costs at our managed senior living communities may have a material adverse effect on us.
Wages and employee benefits represent a significant part of our senior living operating expenses, incurred by communities leased to our TRSs. Five Star, our manager of these communities, competes with other operators of senior living communities to attract and retain qualified personnel responsible for the day to day operations of each of these communities. The market for qualified nurses, therapists and other healthcare professionals is highly competitive. Periodic and geographic area shortages of nurses or other trained personnel may require Five Star to increase the wages and benefits offered to its employees in order to attract and retain these personnel or to hire more expensive temporary personnel. Also, Five Star may have to compete with numerous other employers for lesser skilled workers. As we lease additional communities to our TRSs, Five Star, our manager of these communities, may be required to pay increased compensation or offer other incentives to retain key
41
personnel and other employees. Employee benefits costs, including employee health insurance and workers' compensation insurance costs, have materially increased in recent years. Although Five Star has determined its self insurance reserves with guidance from third party professionals, its reserves may be inadequate. Increasing employee health and workers' compensation insurance costs and increasing self insurance reserves for labor related insurance may materially and negatively affect our earnings at our managed senior living communities. We cannot assure that labor costs at our managed senior living communities will not increase or that any increase will be matched by corresponding increases in rates charged to residents. Any significant failure by Five Star to control labor costs or to pass on any such increased labor costs to residents through rate increases at our managed senior living communities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Termination of assisted living resident agreements and resident attrition could adversely affect our revenues and earnings at our managed senior living communities.
State regulations governing assisted living communities typically require a written resident agreement with each resident. Most of these regulations also require that each resident have the right to terminate these assisted living resident agreements for any reason on reasonable notice. Consistent with these regulations, most resident agreements at our managed senior living communities allow residents to terminate their agreements on 30 days' notice. Thus, Five Star may be unable to contract with assisted living residents to stay for longer periods of time, unlike typical apartment leasing arrangements that involve lease agreements with terms of up to a year or longer. If a large number of residents elected to terminate their resident agreements at or around the same time, our revenues and earnings from our managed senior living communities could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, the advanced ages of senior living residents at our managed senior living communities makes the resident turnover rate in these senior living communities difficult to predict.
Some of our tenants and managers are faced with significant potential litigation and rising insurance costs that not only affect their ability to obtain and maintain adequate liability and other insurance, but also may affect their ability to pay their lease payments minimum and other returns and fulfill their insurance and indemnification obligations to us.
In some states, advocacy groups monitor the quality of care at SNFs and assisted and independent living communities, and these groups have brought litigation against operators. Also, in several instances, private litigation by SNF patients, assisted and independent living community residents or their families have succeeded in winning very large damage awards for alleged neglect. The effect of this litigation and potential litigation has been to materially increase the costs of monitoring and reporting quality of care compliance incurred by some of our tenants and managers. The cost of liability and medical malpractice insurance has increased and may continue to increase so long as the present litigation environment in many parts of the United States continues. This may affect the ability of some of our tenants and managers to obtain and maintain adequate liability and other insurance and manage their related risk exposures. In addition to causing some of our tenants and managers to be unable to fulfill their insurance, indemnification and other obligations to us under their leases and thereby potentially exposing us to those risks, these litigation risks and costs could cause some of our tenants and managers to become unable to pay rents due to us or generate and pay minimum and other returns to us.
The failure of our tenants or our managers to comply with laws relating to the operation of our leased and managed communities may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay us rent, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
We and our tenants and managers are subject to or impacted by extensive, frequently changing federal, state and local laws and regulations. Some of these laws and regulations include: state and
42
local licensure laws; laws protecting consumers against deceptive practices; laws relating to the operation of our properties and how our tenants and managers conduct their operations, such as fire, health and safety laws and privacy laws; federal and state laws affecting communities that participate in Medicaid and SNFs; federal and state laws affecting hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare communities that participate in both Medicare and Medicaid that mandate allowable costs, pricing, reimbursement procedures and limitations, quality of services and care, food service and physical plants; resident rights laws (including abuse and neglect laws) and fraud laws; anti-kickback and physician referral laws; the ADA and similar state and local laws; and safety and health standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. We and our tenants and managers expend significant resources to maintain compliance with these laws and regulations, and responding to any allegations of noncompliance also results in the expenditure of significant resources. If we or our tenants or managers fail to comply with any applicable legal requirements, or are unable to cure deficiencies, certain sanctions may be imposed and, if imposed, may adversely affect our tenants' ability to pay their rent, the profitability of affected managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. Further, changes in the regulatory framework could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay us rent, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
We and our tenants and managers are required to comply with federal and state laws governing the privacy, security, use and disclosure of individually identifiable information, including financial information and protected health information. Under HIPAA, we and our tenants and managers are required to comply with the HIPAA privacy rule, security standards, and standards for electronic healthcare transactions. State laws also govern the privacy of individual health information, and these laws are, in some jurisdictions, more stringent than HIPAA. Other federal and state laws govern the privacy of individually identifiable information. If we or our tenants or managers fail to comply with applicable federal or state standards, we or they could be subject to civil sanctions and criminal penalties, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The operations of some of our communities are dependent upon payments from the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
As of December 31, 2013, approximately 95% of our NOI was generated from properties where a majority of the NOI is derived from private resources, and the remaining 5% of our NOI was generated from properties where a majority of the NOI was derived from Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. Operations at most Medicare and Medicaid dependent properties currently produce sufficient cash flow to pay our allocated rents or our minimum returns, but operations at certain of these properties do not. Even at properties where less than a majority of the NOI comes from Medicare or Medicaid payments, a reduction in such payments can materially adversely affect profits of or result in losses to our tenants or managers. With the background of the current federal budget deficit and other federal priorities and continued challenging state fiscal conditions, there have been numerous recent legislative and regulatory actions or proposed actions with respect to federal Medicare and state Medicaid rates and federal payments to states for Medicaid programs. If and to the extent Medicare or Medicaid rates are reduced from current levels, or if rate increases are less than increases in operating costs, such changes could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. In addition, the revenues that we or our tenants receive from Medicare and Medicaid may be subject to statutory and regulatory changes, retroactive rate adjustments, recovery of program overpayments or set-offs, administrative rulings and policy interpretations, and payment delays, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us and on the profitability of our managed senior living communities.
43
Pursuant to the Budget Control Act of 2011 and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013, the federal budget has included automatic spending reductions that took effect in March 2013, including reductions of up to 2% to Medicare providers. The impact of these automatic payment cuts may be materially adverse to our tenants' and the profitability of our managed senior living communities.
Provisions of the ACA could adversely affect us or our tenants and managers.
The ACA contains insurance changes, payment changes and healthcare delivery systems changes that have affected, and will continue to affect, us, our tenants and managers. Provisions of the ACA include multiple reductions to the annual market basket updates for inflation that may result in SNF Medicare payment rates being less than for the preceding fiscal year. We are unable to predict how potential Medicare rate reductions under the ACA will affect our tenants' and our managers' future financial results of operations; however, the effect may be adverse and material and hence adverse and material to our future financial condition and results of operations.
The ACA also establishes an Independent Payment Advisory Board to submit legislative proposals to Congress and take other actions with a goal of reducing Medicare spending growth. When and if such spending reductions take effect, they may be adverse and material to our tenants' ability to pay rent to us, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. The ACA includes other changes that may affect us, our tenants and our managers, such as enforcement reforms and Medicare and Medicaid program integrity control initiatives, new compliance, ethics and public disclosure requirements, initiatives to encourage the development of home and community based long term care services rather than institutional services under Medicaid, value-based purchasing plans and a Medicare post-acute care pilot program to develop and evaluate making a bundled payment for services, including hospital, physician and SNF services, provided during an episode of care. Changes to be implemented under the ACA resulting in reduced payments for services or the failure of Medicare, Medicaid or insurance payment rates to cover increasing costs could adversely and materially affect the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us, the profitability of certain of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
The U.S. economy has recently experienced a recession and the recovery to date has been slow, unsteady and incomplete.
The U.S. economy has recently experienced a recession and the recovery to date has been slow, unsteady and incomplete, which has created volatile market conditions, resulted in a decrease in availability of credit and led to the insolvency, closure or acquisition of a number of financial institutions. While the markets currently show signs of stabilizing and growth, it remains unclear when the economy will fully recover to pre-recession levels. Continued economic weakness in the U.S. economy generally or a new recession would likely adversely affect our financial condition and that of our tenants, and could impact the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us.
We are not permitted to operate our properties and we are dependent on the managers and tenants of our properties.
Because federal income tax laws restrict REITs and their subsidiaries from operating properties, we do not manage our senior living communities. Instead, we lease nearly all of our communities to operating companies or to our subsidiaries that qualify as TRSs under applicable REIT tax laws. We have retained Five Star to manage our senior living communities. Our income from our properties may be adversely affected if our tenants or managers fail to provide quality services and amenities to residents or if they fail to maintain quality service. While we monitor our tenants' and managers' performances, we have limited recourse under our leases and management agreements if we believe that the tenants or managers are not performing adequately. Failure by our tenants or managers to fully perform the duties agreed to in our leases and management agreements could adversely affect our
44
results of operations. In addition, our tenants and managers operate, and in some cases own or have invested in, properties that compete with our properties, which may result in conflicts of interest. As a result, our tenants and managers have in the past made, and may in the future make, decisions regarding competing properties that may not be in our best interests.
Risks Related to Our Business
If the ongoing weakness in the U.S. economy continues for a substantial period, our operating and financial results may be harmed by further declines in occupancy at our senior living communities, wellness centers and MOBs.
The performance of the U.S. healthcare industry has historically been correlated with the performance of the U.S. economy in general. From 2008 through 2013, the U.S. economy experienced significant weakness due primarily to weakness in the housing market, reduced consumer and business spending and constrained credit markets. As a result, the U.S. healthcare industry generally, and our senior living properties specifically, experienced declines in occupancy, revenues and profitability in 2013 that are expected to continue into 2014 and potentially beyond 2014. For example, the continuing challenging housing market has appeared to restrict the ability or willingness of seniors to sell their houses, resulting in some seniors not relocating to our senior living properties, discretionary medical expenditures are often deferred during weak economic periods causing some of our MOB tenants to reduce their space needs and the operations at our wellness centers may be adversely impacted by deteriorating economic conditions if consumers reduce discretionary spending for wellness activities. If the ongoing economic weakness in the United States continues or worsens, our operating and financial results likely will decline.
We may be unable to access the capital necessary to repay our debts, invest in our properties or fund acquisitions.
To retain our status as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income (excluding capital gains) and satisfy a number of organizational and operational requirements to which REITs are subject. Accordingly, we generally will not be able to retain sufficient cash from operations to repay debts, invest in our properties or fund acquisitions. Our business and growth strategies depend, in part, upon our ability to raise additional capital at reasonable costs to repay our debts, invest in our properties and fund acquisitions. Because of the volatility in the availability of capital to businesses on a global basis and the increased volatility in most debt and equity markets generally, our ability to raise reasonably priced capital is not guaranteed; we may be unable to raise reasonably priced capital because of reasons related to our business or for reasons beyond our control, such as market conditions. If we are unable to raise reasonably priced capital, our business and growth strategies may fail and we may be unable to remain a REIT.
Increasing interest rates may adversely affect us and the value of an investment in our shares.
Interest rates have recently risen from their historical lows but remain below historical long term averages. Increasing interest rates may adversely affect us and the value of an investment in our shares, including in the following ways:
45
Our properties and their operations are subject to extensive regulations.
Various governmental authorities mandate certain physical characteristics of senior housing properties, clinics, other health care communities and biotech laboratories. Changes in laws and regulations relating to these matters may require significant expenditures. Our leases, other than our MOB leases, and our management agreements generally require our tenants or managers to maintain our properties in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and we expend resources to monitor their compliance. However, our tenants or managers may neglect maintenance of our properties if they suffer financial distress. Under some of our leases, we have agreed to fund capital expenditures in return for rent increases and minimum returns due to us, with respect to our managed senior living communities increase by a defined percentage of the capital expenditures we fund at those communities. Our available financial resources or those of our tenants or managers may be insufficient to fund the expenditures required to operate our properties in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. If we fund these expenditures, our tenants' financial resources may be insufficient to satisfy their increased rental payments to us or our managed senior living communities may fail to generate profits sufficient to fund our minimum returns.
Licensing, Medicare and Medicaid laws also require our tenants who operate senior living communities, hospitals, clinics and other healthcare communities to comply with extensive standards governing their operations. In addition, certain laws prohibit fraud by senior living operators, hospitals and other healthcare communities, including civil and criminal laws that prohibit false claims in Medicare, Medicaid and other programs and that regulate patient referrals. In recent years, the federal and state governments have devoted increasing resources to monitoring the quality of care at senior living communities and to anti-fraud investigations in healthcare operations generally. The ACA also facilitates the Department of Justice's ability to investigate allegations of wrongdoing or fraud at SNFs. When violations of anti-fraud, false claims, anti-kickback or physician referral laws are identified, federal or state authorities may impose civil monetary damages, treble damages, repayment requirements and criminal sanctions. Healthcare communities may also be subject to license revocation or conditional licensure and exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid participation or conditional participation. When quality of care deficiencies or improper billing are identified, various laws may authorize civil money penalties or fines; the suspension, modification, or revocation of a license or Medicare/Medicaid participation; the suspension or denial of admissions of residents; the denial of payments in full or in part; the implementation of state oversight, temporary management or receivership; and the imposition of criminal penalties. We, our tenants and managers receive notices of potential sanctions from time to time, and governmental authorities impose such sanctions from time to time on our communities which our tenants and managers operate. If our tenants or managers are unable to cure deficiencies which have been identified or which are identified in the future, these sanctions may be imposed, and if imposed, may adversely affect our tenants' ability to pay rents to us and our ability to identify substitute tenants or managers. Federal and state requirements for change in control of healthcare communities, including, as applicable, approvals of the proposed operator for
46
licensure, CON, and Medicare and Medicaid participation, may also limit or delay our ability to find substitute tenants or managers. If any of our tenants or managers becomes unable to operate our properties, or if any of our tenants becomes unable to pay its rent or generate and pay our minimum returns because it has violated government regulations or payment laws, we may experience difficulty in finding a substitute tenant or manager or selling the affected property for a fair and commercially reasonable price, and the value of an affected property may decline materially.
Various laws administered by the FDA and other agencies regulate the operations of our tenants that operate biotech laboratories that develop, manufacture, market or distribute pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Once a product is approved, the FDA maintains oversight of the product and its developer and can withdraw its approval, recall products or suspend their production, impose or seek to impose civil or criminal penalties on the developer or take other actions for the developer's failure to comply with regulatory requirements, including anti-fraud, false claims, anti-kickback or physician referral laws. Other concerns affecting our biotech laboratory tenants include the potential for subsequent discovery of safety concerns and related litigation, ensuring that the product qualifies for reimbursement under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state programs, cost control initiatives of payment programs, the potential for litigation over the validity or infringement of intellectual property rights related to the product, the eventual expiration of relevant patents and the need to raise additional capital. The cost of compliance with these regulations and the risks described in this paragraph, among others, could adversely affect the ability of our biotech laboratory tenants to pay rent to us.
Our acquisitions may not be successful.
An element of our business plan involves the acquisition of additional properties. We cannot assure that we will be able to consummate attractive acquisition opportunities or that acquisitions we make will be successful. We might encounter unanticipated difficulties and expenditures relating to any acquired properties. Newly acquired properties might require significant management attention that would otherwise be devoted to our ongoing business. We might never realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions. Notwithstanding pre-acquisition due diligence, we do not believe that it is possible to fully understand a property before it is owned and operated for an extended period of time. For example, we could acquire a property that contains undisclosed defects in design or construction. In addition, after our acquisition of a property, the market in which the acquired property is located may experience unexpected changes that adversely affect the property's value. The occupancy of properties that we acquire may decline during our ownership, and rents or returns that are in effect or expected at the time a property is acquired may decline thereafter. Also, our property operating costs for our acquired properties may be higher than we anticipate and our acquired properties may not yield the returns we expect and, if financed using debt or new equity issuances, may result in shareholder dilution. For these reasons, among others, our business plan to acquire additional properties may not succeed or may cause us to experience losses.
Our previously announced purchase of one MOB (two buildings) in Boston, Massachusetts for approximately $1.125 billion and the financing of that purchase may not be completed.
As discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have agreed to purchase a MOB (two buildings) in Boston, Massachusetts primarily leased by Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, or the Vertex MOB, for approximately $1.125 billion and currently expect to close that purchase within the first six months of 2014. In connection with that agreement, we received a term loan commitment for $800 million from two institutional lenders which we expect to be available to us to provide a portion of the financing of the purchase of the Vertex MOB.
The purchase agreement contains certain closing conditions typical of large commercial real estate transactions. While we expect those closing conditions to be satisfied in a timely manner, some are
47
beyond our control, and the failure of those conditions to be satisfied for any reason may prevent, delay or otherwise negatively affect closing of this acquisition. In addition, the terms of the purchase agreement described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may be changed or the agreement may be terminated by agreement of the parties.
The commitments which we received for the term loan are also subject to various conditions, including mutually satisfactory documentation. There can be no assurance that all those conditions, some of which are beyond our control, will be satisfied, that the terms of the term loan described in the commitments will not change, or that the term loan will be available to us. In addition, even if the entire term loan is available to us, we are not committed to borrow the full or any lesser amount under that loan and we may utilize other debt or equity financing for all or a portion of the purchase of the Vertex MOB depending on the cost of such financing and market conditions.
In certain circumstances, our failure to complete the purchase of the Vertex MOB, including by reason of our inability to finance the acquisition, will result in our forfeiture of a $50 million deposit. The unavailability of financing for the purchase of the Vertex MOB to us on favorable terms or any delay in completing this purchase could prevent us from realizing the overall benefits that we expect from the purchase.
We face significant competition and we may be unable to profit from our managed senior living communities.
We face significant competition for acquisition opportunities from other investors, including publicly traded and private REITs, numerous financial institutions, individuals and public and private companies. Because of competition, we may be unable to, or may pay a significantly increased purchase price to, acquire a desired property. Some of our competitors may have greater financial and management resources than we have.
In addition, our leased properties, particularly our MOBs, face competition for tenants. Some competing properties may be newer, better located or more attractive to tenants. Competing properties may have lower rates of occupancy than our properties, which may result in competing owners offering available space at lower rents than we offer at our properties. This competition may affect our ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents we are able to charge.
Furthermore, as the owner and manager of our managed senior living communities, our TRSs and Five Star compete with numerous other companies that provide senior living services, including home healthcare companies and other real estate based service providers. Although some states require CONs to develop new SNFs and assisted living communities, there are fewer barriers to competition for home healthcare or for independent and assisted living services. We cannot assure that our TRSs and Five Star will be able to attract a sufficient number of residents to our managed senior living communities at rates that would generate acceptable returns or that they will be able to attract employees and keep wages and other employee benefits, insurance costs and other operating expenses at levels which will allow our managed senior living communities to compete successfully or to operate profitably.
Increasing investor interest in healthcare related real estate may increase competition and reduce our growth.
Our business is highly competitive and we expect that it may become more competitive in the future. We compete with a number of publicly traded and private REITs, numerous financial institutions, individuals and public and private companies who are actively engaged in our business, some of which are larger and have a lower cost of capital than we do. In the past, periods of economic recession in the economy generally have sometimes caused some investors to focus on healthcare and healthcare real estate investments because some investors believe these types of investments may be
48
less affected by general economic circumstances than most other investments. Further, in light of the currently low historical market interest rates and increased leverage utilized by financial and other buyers, purchase prices for properties have experienced increases resulting in lower rates of returns. These developments could result in increased competition for investments, fewer investment opportunities available to us and lower spreads over our cost of our capital, all of which would limit our ability to grow our business and improve our financial results.
Competition from new communities may adversely affect some of our communities.
Until recently, a large number of new assisted living properties were being developed. In most states these properties are subject to less stringent regulations than nursing homes and can operate with comparatively fewer personnel and at comparatively lower costs. As a result of offering newer accommodations at equal or lower costs, these assisted living properties and other senior living alternatives, including home healthcare, often attract persons who would have previously become nursing home residents. Many of the residents attracted to new assisted living properties were the most profitable nursing home patients, since they paid higher rates than Medicaid or Medicare would pay and they required less amounts of care. Historically, state requirements of obtaining CONs to develop new properties have somewhat protected nursing homes from competition; however, many states are eliminating or reducing these barriers. Also, there are few regulatory barriers to competition for home healthcare or for independent and assisted living services. These competitive factors have caused some nursing homes which we own to decline in value. This decline may continue as assisted living communities or other elderly care alternatives, such as home healthcare, expand their businesses. Each of our tenants of our senior living communities faces similar risks. These competition risks may prevent our tenants and managers from maintaining or improving occupancy at our properties, which may increase the risk of default under our leases and adversely affect the profitability of our managed senior living communities.
When we renew leases or lease to new tenants of our MOBs our rents may decline and our expenses may increase and changes in tenants' requirements for leased MOB space may adversely affect us.
When we renew leases or lease to new tenants of our MOBs we may receive less rent than we currently receive from existing tenants at our MOBs. Market conditions may require us to lower our rents to retain tenants at our MOBs. When we lease to new tenants or renew leases for our MOBs we may have to spend substantial amounts for leasing commissions, tenant improvements or other tenant inducements. Many of our leases for our MOBs are specially suited to the particular business of our tenants. Because these properties have been designed or physically modified for a particular tenant, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to renovate the property at substantial costs, decrease the rent we charge or provide other concessions in order to lease the property to another tenant. MOB tenants have been generally increasingly seeking to increase their space utilization under their leases, including reducing the amount of square footage per employee at leased properties, which may reduce the demand for leased space. If a significant number of such events occur, our income and cash flow may materially decline and our ability to make regular distributions to our shareholders may be jeopardized.
Our failure or inability to meet certain terms of our revolving credit facility agreement would adversely affect our business and may prevent us from making distributions to our shareholders.
Our revolving credit facility agreement includes various conditions to our borrowing and various financial and other covenants and events of default. We may not be able to satisfy all of these conditions or may default on some of these covenants for various reasons, including matters which are beyond our control. If we are unable to borrow under our revolving credit facility, we may be unable to meet our business obligations or to grow by buying additional properties, or we may be required to sell
49
some of our properties. If we default under our revolving credit facility agreement at a time when borrowed amounts are outstanding, our lenders may demand immediate payment, and if we default under our revolving credit facility, our lenders may elect to not make further borrowings available to us. Any default under our revolving credit facility agreement would likely have serious and adverse consequences to us and would likely cause the market price of our shares to materially decline and may prevent our making distributions to our shareholders.
In the future, we may obtain additional debt financing, and the covenants and conditions which apply to any such additional indebtedness may be more restrictive than the covenants and conditions contained in our revolving credit facility agreement.
Ownership of real estate is subject to environmental and climate change risks.
Ownership of real estate is subject to risks associated with environmental hazards. We may be liable for environmental hazards at, or migrating from, our properties, including those created by prior owners or occupants, existing tenants, abutters or other persons. Various federal and state laws impose liabilities upon property owners, such as us, for any environmental damages arising at, or migrating from, properties they own, and we cannot assure that we will not be held liable for environmental investigation and clean up at, or near, our properties, including at sites we own and lease to our tenants. As an owner or previous owner of properties which contain environmental hazards, we also may be liable to pay damages to governmental agencies or third parties for costs and damages they incur arising from environmental hazards at, or migrating from, our properties. Moreover, the costs and damages which may arise from environmental hazards are often difficult to project and may be substantial.
We believe any asbestos in our properties is contained in accordance with current regulations, and we have no current plans to remove it. If we removed the asbestos or demolished these properties, certain environmental regulations govern the manner in which the asbestos must be handled and removed, and we could incur substantial costs complying with such regulations.
The current political debate about climate change has resulted in various treaties, laws and regulations which are intended to limit carbon emissions. We believe these laws being enacted or proposed may cause energy costs at our properties to increase. Laws enacted to mitigate climate change may make some of our buildings obsolete or cause us to make material investments in our properties which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. For more information regarding climate change matters and their possible adverse impact on us, please see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Impact of Climate Change."
Real estate ownership creates risks and liabilities.
In addition to the risks related to environmental hazards and climate change, our business is subject to other risks associated with real estate ownership, including:
50
We have substantial debt obligations and may incur additional debt.
As of December 31, 2013, we had $1.9 billion in debt outstanding, which was 40.5% of our total book capitalization. Our note indenture and revolving credit facility agreement permit us and our subsidiaries to incur additional debt, including secured debt. If we default in paying any of our debts or honoring our debt covenants, it may create one or more cross defaults, our debts may be accelerated and we could be forced to liquidate our assets for less than the values we would receive in a more orderly process.
We rely on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security failure of that technology could harm our business.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information and to manage or support a variety of our business processes, including financial transactions and maintenance of records, which may include personal identifying information of tenants, residents and lease data. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmitting and storing this confidential information, such as individually identifiable information relating to financial accounts. Although we have taken steps to protect the security of the data maintained in our information systems, it is possible that our security measures will not be able to prevent the systems' improper functioning, or the improper disclosure of personally identifiable information such as in the event of cyber attacks. Security breaches, including physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, attacks by hackers and similar breaches, can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Any failure to maintain proper function, security and availability of our information systems could interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties and could materially and adversely affect us.
Insurance on our properties may not adequately cover all losses and uninsured losses could materially and adversely affect us.
Generally, we or our tenants are responsible for the costs of insurance coverage for our properties, including for casualty, including fire and extended coverage, and liability. Either we purchase the insurance ourselves and, except in the case of our managed senior living communities, our tenants are required to reimburse us, or the tenants buy the insurance directly and are required to list us as an insured party. Under certain circumstances insurance proceeds may not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to an affected property and we could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we do not have any insurance designated to limit any losses that we may incur as a result of known or unknown environmental conditions which are not caused by an insured event, such as, for example, fire or flood.
Changes in lease accounting standards may materially and adversely affect us.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has proposed accounting rules that would require companies to capitalize all leases on their balance sheets by recognizing a lessee's rights and obligations. If the proposal is adopted in its current form, many companies that account for certain leases on an "off balance sheet" basis would be required to account for such leases "on balance sheet." This change would remove many of the differences in the way companies account for owned property and leased property, and could have a material effect on various aspects of our tenants' businesses, including their credit quality and the factors they consider in deciding whether to own or lease properties. If the proposal is adopted, it could cause companies that lease properties to prefer shorter lease terms, in an effort to reduce the leasing liability required to be recorded on their balance sheets. The proposal could also make lease renewal options less attractive, as, under certain circumstances, the
51
rule would require a tenant to assume that a renewal right will be exercised and accrue a liability relating to the longer lease term.
Risks Related to Our Relationships with RMR, Five Star and CWH
We are dependent upon RMR to manage our business and implement our growth strategy.
We have no employees. Personnel and services that we require are provided to us under contracts with RMR. Our ability to achieve our business objectives depends on RMR and its ability to manage our properties, identify and complete our acquisitions and dispositions and to execute our financing strategy. Accordingly, our business is dependent upon RMR's business contacts, its ability to successfully hire, train, supervise and manage its personnel and its ability to maintain its operating systems. If we lose the services provided by RMR or its key personnel, our business and growth prospects may decline. We may be unable to duplicate the quality and depth of management available to us by becoming internally managed or by hiring another manager. Also, in the event RMR is unwilling or unable to continue to provide management services to us, our cost of obtaining substitute services may be greater than the fees we pay RMR under our management agreements, and as a result our expenses may increase.
Our management structure and agreements and relationships with RMR and CWH may restrict our investment activities and may create conflicts of interest or the perception of such conflicts.
RMR is authorized to follow broad operating and investment guidelines and, therefore, has discretion in determining the types of properties that will be appropriate investments for us, as well as our individual operating and investment decisions. Our Board of Trustees periodically reviews our operating and investment guidelines and our operating activities and investments but it does not review or approve each decision made by RMR on our behalf. In addition, in conducting periodic reviews, our Board of Trustees relies primarily on information provided to it by RMR. RMR is beneficially owned by our Managing Trustees, Barry M. Portnoy and Adam D. Portnoy.
In addition to managing us, RMR manages CWH, a publicly traded REIT that primarily owns office properties, GOV, a publicly traded REIT that owns properties that are majority leased to government tenants, HPT, a publicly traded REIT that owns hotels and travel centers, and Select Income REIT, or SIR, a publicly traded REIT that primarily owns and invests in net leased, single tenant office and industrial properties and leased lands in Hawaii. RMR also provides services to other publicly and privately owned companies, including Five Star, our largest tenant and manager of our managed senior living communities, TA, which operates and franchises travel centers and convenience stores, and Sonesta, which operates, manages and franchises hotels, resorts and cruise ships. These multiple responsibilities to public companies and other businesses could create competition for the time and efforts of RMR and Messrs. Barry and Adam Portnoy. Also, RMR's multiple responsibilities to us and to other companies to which it provides management services may create potential conflicts of interest, or the appearance of such conflicts of interest. In addition, our transaction agreement with CWH has restrictions on our right to make investments in properties that are within the investment focus of CWH.
Our management agreements were negotiated between related parties, and the terms, including the fees payable to RMR, may not be as favorable to us as they would have been if they were negotiated between unrelated parties. In our management agreements with RMR, we acknowledge that RMR may engage in other activities or businesses and act as the manager to any other person or entity (including other REITs) even though such person or entity has investment policies and objectives similar to those of ours and we are not entitled to preferential treatment in receiving information, recommendations and other services from RMR. Accordingly, we may lose investment opportunities to, and may compete for tenants with, other businesses managed by RMR.
52
Barry Portnoy is Chairman and an employee of RMR, and Adam Portnoy is President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of RMR. All of the members of our Board of Trustees, including our Independent Trustees, are members of one or more boards of trustees or directors of other companies to which RMR provides management services. All of our executive officers are also executive officers of RMR, and David J. Hegarty, our President and Chief Operating Officer, is also a director of RMR. The foregoing individuals may hold equity in or positions with other companies to which RMR provides management services. Such equity ownership and positions by our Trustees and officers could create, or appear to create, conflicts of interest with respect to matters involving us, RMR and its related parties.
Our management arrangements with RMR may discourage our change of control.
A default under our revolving credit facility agreement would occur if RMR ceases to act as our business manager and property manager, unless waived by our lenders holding 2/3 of the aggregate credit exposure under that agreement. We may be unable to duplicate, without considerable cost increases, the quality and depth of management available to us by contracting with RMR if we become internally managed or if we contract with other parties for management services. For these reasons, our management agreements with RMR may discourage a change of control of us, including a change of control which might result in payment of a premium for your common shares.
The potential for conflicts of interest as a result of our management structure may provoke dissident shareholder activities that result in significant costs.
In the past, in particular following periods of volatility in the overall market or declines in the market price of a company's securities, shareholder litigation, dissident shareholder trustee nominations and dissident shareholder proposals have often been instituted against companies alleging conflicts of interest in business dealings with affiliated and related persons and entities. Our relationships with RMR, Five Star, Affiliates Insurance Company, or AIC, the other businesses and entities to which RMR provides management services, Barry Portnoy, Adam Portnoy and other related parties of RMR may precipitate such activities. These activities, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention even if the action is unfounded.
Our business dealings with Five Star may create conflicts of interest.
Five Star was originally organized as our subsidiary. We distributed substantially all our Five Star ownership to our shareholders on December 31, 2001. One of our Managing Trustees, Mr. Barry Portnoy, serves as a managing director of Five Star, and Five Star's other managing director, Mr. Gerard Martin, is a director of RMR. RMR provides management services to both us and Five Star. As of December 31, 2013, our leases with Five Star accounted for 42.1% of our annual rents. As of December 31, 2013, Five Star also managed 44 of our senior living communities. In the future, we expect to do additional business with Five Star. We believe that our current leases, management contracts and other business dealings with Five Star were entered on commercially reasonable terms and that our historical, continuing and increasing business dealings with Five Star have been beneficial to us. Our transactions with Five Star have been approved by our Independent Trustees; however, because of the historical and continuing relationships which we have with Five Star, each of our historical, continuing and expanding business dealings may not be on the same or as favorable terms as we might achieve with a third party with whom we do not have such relationships.
We may experience losses from our business dealings with AIC.
We have invested approximately $5.2 million in AIC, we have purchased substantially all our property insurance in a program designed and reinsured in part by AIC, and we periodically consider the possibilities for expanding our relationship with AIC to other types of insurance. We, RMR and six
53
other companies to which RMR provides management services each own 12.5% of AIC, and we and those other AIC shareholders participate in a combined insurance program designed and reinsured in part by AIC. Our principal reason for investing in AIC and for purchasing insurance in these programs is to seek to improve our financial results by obtaining improved insurance coverages at lower costs than may be otherwise available to us or by participating in any profits which we may realize as an owner of AIC. While we believe we have in the past benefitted from these arrangements, these beneficial financial results may not occur in the future, and we may need to invest additional capital in order to continue to pursue these results. AIC's business involves the risks typical of an insurance business, including the risk that it may be insufficiently capitalized. Accordingly, financial benefits from our business dealings with AIC may not be achieved in the future, and we may experience losses from these dealings.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
Ownership limitations and certain provisions in our declaration of trust, bylaws and shareholder rights agreement, as well as certain provisions of Maryland law, may deter, delay or prevent a change in our control or unsolicited acquisition proposals.
Our declaration of trust prohibits any shareholder other than CWH and RMR and their affiliates, and certain persons who have been exempted by our Board of Trustees, from owning (directly and by attribution) more than 9.8% of the number or value of shares of any class or series of our outstanding shares of beneficial interest, including our common shares. This provision of our declaration of trust is intended to assist with our REIT compliance under the IRC and otherwise to promote our orderly governance. However, this provision also inhibits acquisitions of a significant stake in us and may deter, delay or prevent a change in our control or unsolicited acquisition proposals that a shareholder may consider favorable. Additionally, provisions contained in our declaration of trust and bylaws or under Maryland law may have a similar impact, including, for example, provisions relating to:
54
We also currently maintain a shareholder rights agreement whereby, in the event a person or group of persons acquires 10% or more of our outstanding common shares, unless the acquisition is approved by our Board of Trustees, our shareholders, other than such person or group, will be entitled to purchase additional shares or other securities or property at a discount. Until this agreement expires on April 10, 2014, it may deter, delay or prevent a change in our control or unsolicited acquisition proposals that a shareholder may consider favorable.
In addition, our shareholders agreement with respect to AIC provides that AIC and the other shareholders of AIC may have rights to acquire our interests in AIC in the event that anyone acquires more than 9.8% of our shares or we experience some other change in control.
Our ownership interest in AIC may prevent shareholders from accumulating large share ownership, from nominating or serving as Trustees, or from taking actions to otherwise control our business.
As an owner of AIC, we are licensed and approved as an insurance holding company; and any shareholder who owns or controls 10% or more of our securities or anyone who wishes to solicit proxies for election of, or to serve as, one of our Trustees or for another proposal of business not approved by our Board of Trustees may be required to receive pre-clearance from the concerned insurance regulators. These pre-approval procedures may discourage or prevent investors from purchasing our securities, from nominating persons to serve as our Trustees or from taking other actions.
Our rights and the rights of our shareholders to take action against our Trustees and officers are limited.
Our declaration of trust limits the liability of our Trustees and officers to us and our shareholders for money damages to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law. Under current Maryland law, our Trustees and officers will not have any liability to us and our shareholders for money damages other than liability resulting from:
Our declaration of trust and indemnification agreements require us to indemnify any present or former trustee or officer, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, who is made or threatened to be made a party to a proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity. However, except with respect to proceedings to enforce rights to indemnification, we will indemnify any person referenced in the previous sentence in connection with a proceeding initiated by such person against us only if such proceeding is authorized by our declaration of trust or bylaws or by our Board of Trustees or shareholders. In addition, we may be obligated to pay or reimburse the expenses incurred by our present and former Trustees and officers without requiring a preliminary determination of their ultimate entitlement to indemnification. As a result, we and our shareholders may have more limited rights against our present and former Trustees and officers than might otherwise exist absent the provisions in our declaration of trust and indemnification agreements or that might exist with other companies, which could limit your recourse in the event of actions not in your best interest.
Disputes with Five Star, CWH and RMR and shareholder litigation against us or our Trustees and officers may be referred to binding arbitration proceedings.
Our contracts with Five Star, CWH and RMR provide that any dispute arising under those contracts may be referred to binding arbitration proceedings. Similarly, our bylaws provide that actions by our shareholders against us or against our Trustees and officers, including derivative and class
55
actions, may be referred to binding arbitration proceedings. As a result, we and our shareholders would not be able to pursue litigation for these disputes in courts against Five Star, CWH, RMR or our Trustees and officers if the disputes were referred to arbitration. In addition, the ability to collect attorneys' fees or other damages may be limited in the arbitration proceedings, which may discourage attorneys from agreeing to represent parties wishing to commence such a proceeding.
We may change our operational, financing and investment policies without shareholder approval and we may become more highly leveraged, which may increase our risk of default under our debt obligations.
Our Board of Trustees determines our operational, financing and investment policies and may amend or revise our policies, including our policies with respect to our intention to qualify for taxation as a REIT, acquisitions, dispositions, growth, operations, indebtedness, capitalization and distributions, or approve transactions that deviate from these policies, without a vote of, or notice to, our shareholders. Policy changes could adversely affect the market value of our common shares and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders. Further, our organizational documents do not limit the amount or percentage of indebtedness, funded or otherwise, that we may incur. Our Board of Trustees may alter or eliminate our current policy on borrowing at any time without shareholder approval. If this policy changed, we could become more highly leveraged, which could result in an increase in our debt service costs. Higher leverage also increases the risk of default on our obligations. In addition, a change in our investment policies, including the manner in which we allocate our resources across our portfolio or the types of assets in which we seek to invest, may increase our exposure to interest rate risk, real estate market fluctuations and liquidity risk.
Risks Related to Our Taxation
The loss of our tax status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes could have significant adverse consequences.
As a REIT, we generally do not pay federal and state income taxes. However, actual qualification as a REIT under the IRC depends on satisfying complex statutory requirements, for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. We believe that we have been organized and have operated, and will continue to be organized and to operate, in a manner that qualified and will continue to qualify us to be taxed under the IRC as a REIT. However, we cannot be certain that, upon review or audit, the IRS will agree with this conclusion. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the federal government will not someday eliminate REITs under the IRC.
Maintaining our status as a REIT will require us to continue to satisfy certain tests concerning, among other things, the nature of our assets, the sources of our income and the amounts we distribute to our shareholders. In order to meet these requirements, it may be necessary for us to sell or forgo attractive investments.
If we cease to be a REIT, then our ability to raise capital might be adversely affected, we will be in breach under our revolving credit facility and term loan agreements, we may be subject to material amounts of federal and state income taxes and the value of our shares likely would decline. In addition, if we lose or revoke our tax status as a REIT for a taxable year, we will generally be prevented from requalifying as a REIT for the next four taxable years.
Distributions to shareholders generally will not qualify for reduced tax rates.
Dividends payable by U.S. corporations to noncorporate shareholders, such as individuals, trusts and estates, are generally eligible for reduced tax rates. Distributions paid by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for these reduced rates. The more favorable rates for corporate dividends may cause
56
investors to perceive that an investment in a REIT is less attractive than an investment in a non-REIT entity that pays dividends, thereby reducing the demand and market price of our shares.
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our ability to execute our business plan.
We generally must distribute annually at least 90% of our taxable income, subject to certain adjustments and excluding any net capital gain, in order for federal corporate income tax not to apply to earnings that we distribute. To the extent that we satisfy this distribution requirement, but distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed taxable income. We intend to make distributions to our shareholders to comply with the REIT requirements of the IRC. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax if the actual amount that we pay out to our shareholders in a calendar year is less than a minimum amount specified under federal tax laws.
From time to time, we may generate taxable income greater than our income for financial reporting purposes prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, or differences in timing between the recognition of taxable income and the actual receipt of cash may occur. If we do not have other funds available in these situations we could be required to borrow funds on unfavorable terms, sell investments at disadvantageous prices or distribute amounts that would otherwise be invested in future acquisitions to make distributions sufficient to enable us to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the REIT distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year. These alternatives could increase our costs or reduce our shareholders' equity. Thus, compliance with the REIT requirements may hinder our ability to grow, which could adversely affect the value of our shares.
Even if we qualify and remain qualified as a REIT, we may face other tax liabilities that reduce our cash flow.
Even if we qualify and remain qualified for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, excise taxes, state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes, and other taxes. See "Business—Federal Income Tax Considerations—Taxation as a REIT." In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, prevent the recognition of certain types of non-cash income, or avert the imposition of a 100% tax that applies to certain gains derived by a REIT from dealer property or inventory, we may hold some of our assets and operations through our TRSs or other subsidiary corporations that will be subject to corporate level income tax at regular rates. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distribution to our shareholders.
If arrangements involving our TRSs fail to comply as intended with the REIT qualification and taxation rules, we may fail to qualify as a REIT or be subject to significant penalty taxes.
We lease certain of our properties to our TRSs pursuant to arrangements that, under the IRC, are intended to qualify the rents we receive from our TRSs as income that satisfies the REIT gross income tests. We also intend that our transactions with our TRSs be conducted on arm's length bases so that we and our TRSs will not be subject to penalty taxes under the IRC applicable to mispriced transactions. While relief provisions can sometimes excuse REIT gross income testing failures, in such cases significant penalty taxes can be imposed.
For our TRS arrangements to comply as intended with the REIT qualification and taxation rules under the IRC, a number of requirements must be satisfied, including:
57
There can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will agree with our assessment that our TRS arrangements comply as intended with applicable REIT qualification and taxation rules. If arrangements involving our TRSs fail to comply as intended, we may fail to qualify as a REIT or be subject to significant penalty taxes.
Risks Related to Our Securities
We cannot assure that we will continue to make distributions to our shareholders, and distributions we may make may include a return of capital.
We intend to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to our shareholders. However:
For these reasons, among others, our distribution rate may decline or we may cease making distributions. Also, our distributions may include a return of capital.
Any notes we may issue will be effectively subordinated to the debts of our subsidiaries and our secured debt.
We conduct substantially all of our business through, and substantially all of our properties are owned by, our subsidiaries. Consequently, our ability to pay debt service on our outstanding notes and any notes we issue in the future will be dependent upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and payments by those subsidiaries to us as dividends or otherwise. Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities and have their own liabilities. Payments due on our outstanding notes, and any notes we may issue, are, or will be, effectively subordinated to liabilities of our subsidiaries, including guaranty liabilities. As of December 31, 2013, our subsidiaries had $694.9 million of secured debt. Our outstanding notes are, and any notes we may issue will be, effectively subordinated to any secured debt with regard to our assets pledged to secure those debts.
58
Our notes may permit redemption before maturity, and our noteholders may be unable to reinvest proceeds at the same or a higher rate.
The terms of our notes may permit us to redeem all or a portion of our outstanding notes after a certain amount of time, or up to a certain percentage of the notes prior to certain dates. Generally, the redemption price will equal the principal amount being redeemed, plus accrued interest to the redemption date, plus any applicable premium. If a redemption occurs, our noteholders may be unable to reinvest the money they receive in the redemption at a rate that is equal to or higher than the rate of return on the applicable notes.
There may be no public market for notes we may issue and one may not develop.
Generally, any notes we may issue will be a new issue for which no trading market currently exists. We may not list our notes on any securities exchange or seek approval for price quotations to be made available through any automated quotation system. We cannot assure that an active trading market for any of our notes will exist in the future. Even if a market develops, the liquidity of the trading market for any of our notes and the market price quoted for any such notes may be adversely affected by changes in the overall market for fixed income securities, by changes in our financial performance or prospects, or by changes in the prospects for REITs or for the senior living industry generally.
Rating agency downgrades may increase our cost of capital.
Our notes and certain other obligations are rated by two rating agencies. These rating agencies may elect to downgrade their ratings on our notes or certain other obligations at any time. Such downgrades may negatively affect our access to the capital markets and increase our cost of capital, including the interest rate and fees payable under our revolving credit facility agreement.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
59
At December 31, 2013, we had real estate investments totaling $5.3 billion, at undepreciated cost, after impairment write downs, in 375 properties (401 buildings). At December 31, 2013, 53 properties with an aggregate cost of $1.4 billion and an aggregate carrying value of $964.0 million were mortgaged or subject to capital lease obligations with an aggregate principal balance of $694.9 million.
The following table summarizes some information about our properties as of December 31, 2013. All dollar amounts are in thousands:
Location of Properties by State
|
Number of Properties |
Number of Buildings |
Undepreciated Carrying Value |
Net Book Value |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama |
6 | 6 | $ | 40,930 | $ | 35,149 | |||||||
Arizona |
10 | 10 | 123,464 | 89,173 | |||||||||
California |
20 | 25 | 633,723 | 545,088 | |||||||||
Colorado |
11 | 12 | 68,796 | 49,708 | |||||||||
Connecticut |
2 | 2 | 10,244 | 9,609 | |||||||||
Delaware |
6 | 6 | 91,279 | 67,687 | |||||||||
District of Columbia |
2 | 2 | 64,384 | 59,934 | |||||||||
Florida |
28 | 33 | 632,669 | 513,261 | |||||||||
Georgia |
23 | 23 | 245,585 | 221,194 | |||||||||
Hawaii |
1 | 1 | 66,991 | 64,904 | |||||||||
Idaho |
2 | 2 | 15,747 | 15,175 | |||||||||
Illinois |
6 | 7 | 114,237 | 91,531 | |||||||||
Indiana |
12 | 12 | 141,158 | 120,478 | |||||||||
Iowa |
6 | 6 | 10,357 | 5,345 | |||||||||
Kansas |
4 | 4 | 58,349 | 44,820 | |||||||||
Kentucky |
9 | 9 | 99,107 | 67,419 | |||||||||
Maryland |
15 | 15 | 307,248 | 257,839 | |||||||||
Massachusetts |
19 | 21 | 241,623 | 218,570 | |||||||||
Michigan |
5 | 5 | 16,836 | 12,209 | |||||||||
Minnesota |
8 | 8 | 102,744 | 91,278 | |||||||||
Mississippi |
3 | 3 | 26,104 | 23,604 | |||||||||
Missouri |
1 | 1 | 11,734 | 11,292 | |||||||||
Nebraska |
13 | 13 | 62,091 | 48,742 | |||||||||
Nevada |
1 | 1 | 53,001 | 50,204 | |||||||||
New Hampshire |
1 | 1 | 4,469 | 4,469 | |||||||||
New Jersey |
4 | 4 | 111,221 | 92,424 | |||||||||
New Mexico |
6 | 10 | 104,414 | 88,647 | |||||||||
New York |
6 | 7 | 203,636 | 190,867 | |||||||||
North Carolina |
13 | 13 | 147,395 | 132,628 | |||||||||
Ohio |
3 | 4 | 48,313 | 34,570 | |||||||||
Oklahoma |
4 | 4 | 28,338 | 25,465 | |||||||||
Pennsylvania |
21 | 21 | 180,071 | 142,491 | |||||||||
Rhode Island |
1 | 1 | 325 | 325 | |||||||||
South Carolina |
21 | 21 | 165,253 | 146,803 | |||||||||
South Dakota |
3 | 3 | 7,589 | 3,574 | |||||||||
Tennessee |
13 | 13 | 78,876 | 67,048 | |||||||||
Texas |
24 | 24 | 415,925 | 341,065 | |||||||||
Virginia |
17 | 19 | 208,621 | 161,050 | |||||||||
Washington |
4 | 5 | 68,369 | 64,262 | |||||||||
Wisconsin |
19 | 22 | 271,818 | 236,717 | |||||||||
Wyoming |
2 | 2 | 8,481 | 4,130 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
375 | 401 | $ | 5,291,513 | $ | 4,450,752 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
60
Of the properties listed above, 265 are senior living communities, 100 (126 buildings) are MOBs and 10 are wellness centers. The above table includes properties classified as held for sale, of which $27.9 million of carrying value is included in other assets on the balance sheet.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
61
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common shares are traded on the NYSE (symbol: SNH). The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sale prices for our common shares as reported in the NYSE Composite Transactions reports:
| |
High | Low | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 |
|||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 23.09 | $ | 21.30 | |||
Second Quarter |
$ | 22.32 | $ | 19.83 | |||
Third Quarter |
$ | 24.70 | $ | 21.52 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 23.76 | $ | 21.29 | |||
| |
High | Low | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 |
|||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 26.83 | $ | 22.09 | |||
Second Quarter |
$ | 29.67 | $ | 24.38 | |||
Third Quarter |
$ | 27.25 | $ | 22.23 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 24.98 | $ | 21.85 | |||
The closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on February 28, 2014 was $22.30 per share.
As of February 28, 2014, there were approximately 2,016 shareholders of record.
Information about distributions declared to common shareholders is summarized in the table below. Common share distributions to our shareholders are generally paid in the quarter following the quarter to which they relate.
| |
Distributions per Common Share |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | |||||
First Quarter |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.38 | |||
Second Quarter |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.38 | |||
Third Quarter |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | |||
All common share distributions shown in the table above have been paid, including the quarterly distribution for the fourth quarter of 2013, which we paid on February 21, 2014. We currently intend to continue to declare and pay common share distributions on a quarterly basis. However, the timing and amount of future distributions is determined at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and factors that our Board of Trustees consider in making distribution determinations include our results of operations, our financial condition, debt and equity capital available to us, our expectations of our future capital requirements and operating performance, including our FFO, our Normalized FFO, restrictive covenants in our financial or other contractual arrangements (including those in our revolving credit facility agreement), tax law requirements to maintain our status as a REIT, restrictions under Maryland law and our expected needs and availability of cash to pay our obligations.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
The following table sets forth selected financial data for the periods and dates indicated. Comparative results are affected by property acquisitions and dispositions during the periods shown.
62
This data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Dollars are in thousands, except per share information.
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income Statement Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 459,380 | $ | 450,769 | $ | 412,180 | $ | 338,775 | $ | 296,220 | ||||||
Residents fees and services(1) |
302,058 | 184,031 | 27,851 | — | — | |||||||||||
Net income(2)(3) |
151,164 | 135,884 | 151,419 | 116,485 | 109,715 | |||||||||||
Common distributions declared(4) |
293,474 |
266,589 |
232,849 |
191,387 |
177,238 |
|||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
187,251 |
169,176 |
149,577 |
128,092 |
121,863 |
|||||||||||
Per Common Share Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income(2)(3) |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.91 | $ | 0.90 | ||||||
Cash distributions declared to common shareholders(4) |
1.56 | 1.54 | 1.50 | 1.46 | 1.43 | |||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate properties, at undepreciated cost, net of impairment losses |
$ | 5,263,625 | $ | 5,019,615 | $ | 4,563,842 | $ | 3,642,123 | $ | 3,214,543 | ||||||
Total assets |
4,764,666 | 4,748,002 | 4,383,048 | 3,392,656 | 2,987,926 | |||||||||||
Total indebtedness |
1,892,764 | 2,006,530 | 1,827,385 | 1,204,890 | 1,042,219 | |||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity |
2,776,989 | 2,646,568 | 2,472,606 | 2,127,977 | 1,900,650 | |||||||||||
63
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW
The following tables present an overview of our portfolio (dollars in thousands, except living unit / bed or square foot data):
(As of December 31, 2013)(1)
|
Number of Properties |
Number of Units/Beds or Square Feet |
Investment Carrying Value(2) |
% of Total Investment |
Investment per Unit/Bed or Square Foot(3) |
2013 NOI(4) | % of 2013 NOI |
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Facility Type |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Independent living(5) |
62 | 15,176 | $ | 1,878,786 | 35.7% | $ | 123,800 | $ | 160,287 | 35.6% | |||||||||||
Assisted living(5) |
156 | 11,531 | 1,345,645 | 25.5% | $ | 116,698 | 115,469 | 25.6% | |||||||||||||
Nursing homes(5) |
47 | 4,919 | 202,696 | 3.8% | $ | 41,207 | 18,663 | 4.1% | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal short and long term residential care communities |
265 | 31,626 | 3,427,127 | 65.0% | $ | 108,364 | 294,419 | 65.3% | |||||||||||||
MOBs |
96 | 7,881,797 | 1,668,219 | 31.6% | $ | 212 | 138,427 | 30.8% | |||||||||||||
Wellness centers |
10 | 812,000 | sq. ft. | 180,017 | 3.4% | $ | 222 | 17,577 | 3.9% | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
371 | $ | 5,275,363 | 100.0% | $ | 450,423 | 100.0% | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tenant/Operator/Managed Properties(8) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 1) |
90 | 6,626 | 688,718 | 13.1% | $ | 103,942 | 60,029 | 13.3% | |||||||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 2) |
51 | 7,200 | 682,054 | 12.9% | $ | 94,730 | 62,059 | 13.8% | |||||||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 3) |
17 | 3,281 | 352,380 | 6.7% | $ | 107,400 | 35,271 | 7.8% | |||||||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 4) |
29 | 3,335 | 388,298 | 7.4% | $ | 116,431 | 35,239 | 7.8% | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Five Star |
187 | 20,442 | 2,111,450 | 40.1% | $ | 103,290 | 192,598 | 42.7% | |||||||||||||
Sunrise/Marriott(6) |
4 | 1,619 | 126,326 | 2.4% | $ | 78,027 | 14,523 | 3.2% | |||||||||||||
Brookdale |
18 | 894 | 61,122 | 1.2% | $ | 68,369 | 9,076 | 2.0% | |||||||||||||
6 private senior living companies (combined) |
12 | 1,620 | 94,502 | 1.8% | $ | 58,335 | 9,875 | 2.2% | |||||||||||||
Managed senior living communities(7) |
44 | 7,051 | 1,033,727 | 19.5% | $ | 146,607 | 68,347 | 15.2% | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal short and long term residential care communities |
265 | 31,626 | 3,427,127 | 65.0% | 108,364 | 294,419 | 65.3% | ||||||||||||||
Multi-tenant MOBs |
96 | 7,881,797 | sq. ft. | 1,668,219 | 31.6% | $ | 212 | 138,427 | 30.8% | ||||||||||||
Wellness centers |
10 | 812,000 | sq. ft. | 180,017 | 3.4% | $ | 222 | 17,577 | 3.9% | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
371 | 5,275,363 | 100.0% | $ | 450,423 | 100% | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
64
Tenant/Managed Property Operating Statistics(8)
| |
Rent Coverage | Occupancy | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 1) |
1.19x | 1.21x | 84.5% | 85.5% | |||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 2) |
1.14x | 1.26x | 81.6% | 83.0% | |||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 3) |
1.65x | 1.69x | 88.2% | 89.2% | |||||||||
Five Star (Lease No. 4) |
1.17x | 1.20x | 85.9% | 86.3% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal Five Star |
1.26x | 1.31x | 84.3% | 85.3% | |||||||||
Sunrise/Marriott(6) |
1.93x | 1.88x | 92.7% | 93.2% | |||||||||
Brookdale |
2.50x | 2.37x | 95.3% | 94.0% | |||||||||
6 private senior living companies (combined) |
1.96x | 2.69x | 84.8% | 83.3% | |||||||||
Managed senior living communities(7) |
NA | NA | 87.4% | 87.2% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Subtotal short and long term residential care communities |
1.38x | 1.42x | 85.7% | 86.3% | |||||||||
Multi-tenant MOBs |
NA | NA | 95.0% | 93.3% | |||||||||
Wellness centers |
2.23x | 2.19x | 100.0% | 100.0% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
1.43x | 1.47x | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We have four operating segments, of which three are separately reportable operating segments: (i) triple net senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents, (ii) managed senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents and (iii) MOBs. The "All Other" category
65
includes amounts related to corporate business activities and the operating results of certain properties that offer fitness, wellness and spa services to members.
Triple Net Senior Living Communities.
The following chart presents a summary of our triple net senior living property leases as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands). This summary should be read in conjunction with the more detailed description of our leases set forth below.
Tenant
|
Number of Properties |
Units/Beds | Undepreciated Carrying Value of Properties |
Net Book Value of Properties |
Annualized Rental Income(1) |
Lease Expiration |
Renewal Options | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (Lease No. 1)(2) |
90 | 6,626 | $ | 688,718 | $ | 569,947 | $ | 60,157 | 12/31/2024 | 2 for 15 years each. | ||||||||||
Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (Lease No. 2) |
51 | 7,200 | 682,054 | 505,224 | 64,361 | 6/30/2026 | 2 for 10 years each. | |||||||||||||
Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (Lease No. 3)(3) |
17 | 3,281 | 352,380 | 252,404 | 35,400 | 12/31/2028 | 2 for 15 years each. | |||||||||||||
Five Star Quality Care, Inc. (Lease No. 4)(4) |
29 | 3,335 | 388,298 | 302,899 | 35,387 | 4/30/2017 | 2 for 15 years each. | |||||||||||||
Sunrise / Marriott International, Inc.(5) |
4 | 1,619 | 126,326 | 70,651 | 14,523 | 12/31/2018 | 3 for 5 years each. | |||||||||||||
Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. |
18 | 894 | 61,122 | 44,000 | 9,077 | 12/31/2017 | 2 for 15 years each. | |||||||||||||
Stellar Senior Living, LLC(6) |
5 | 661 | 58,415 | 56,688 | 4,890 | 7/31/2027 & 1/8/2028 | 2 for 10 years each. | |||||||||||||
ABE Briarwood Corp. |
1 | 140 | 15,598 | 5,286 | 937 | 12/31/2015 | None. | |||||||||||||
HealthQuest, Inc. |
3 | 361 | 7,589 | 3,574 | 1,424 | 6/30/2021 | 1 for 10 years. | |||||||||||||
Covenant Care, LLC |
1 | 180 | 3,503 | 1,827 | 1,174 | 9/30/2015 | 1 for 15 years. | |||||||||||||
Evergreen Washington Healthcare, LLC |
1 | 103 | 5,193 | 2,455 | 930 | 12/31/2015 | 1 for 10 years. | |||||||||||||
The MacIntosh Company |
1 | 175 | 4,204 | 2,430 | 599 | 6/30/2019 | 1 for 10 years. | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals |
221 | 24,575 | $ | 2,393,400 | $ | 1,817,385 | $ | 228,859 | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Five Star Quality Care, Inc. We lease 187 senior living communities to Five Star for annual rent of $195.3 million, including percentage rent based on increases in gross revenues at certain properties ($5.2 million in 2013). Five Star is a public company listed on the NYSE, which was our subsidiary until we distributed its then outstanding shares to our shareholders in 2001. Substantially all of the revenues at most of these senior living communities are paid to Five Star by residents from their private resources. For the year ended December 31, 2013, Five Star paid percentage rent equal to 4% of the increase in gross revenues at our senior living communities over base year gross revenues as specified in the lease terms.
66
Lease No. 1 (comprised of three separate leases) expires in 2024 and includes 90 communities, including independent living communities, assisted living communities and skilled nursing facilities, of which nine secure mortgage debt payable to third parties. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for Lease No. 1 was $60.2 million, including percentage rent of $1.4 million.
Lease No. 2 expires in 2026 and includes 51 communities, including independent living communities, assisted living communities and skilled nursing facilities. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for Lease No. 2 was $64.4 million, including percentage rent of $1.9 million.
Lease No. 3 expires in 2028 and includes 17 communities, including independent living and assisted living communities, all of which secure mortgage debt payable to FNMA. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for Lease No. 3 was $35.4 million, including percentage rent of $1.2 million.
Lease No. 4 (comprised of two separate leases) expires in 2017 and includes 29 communities, including independent living communities, assisted living communities and skilled nursing facilities, of which one secures mortgage debt payable to a third party. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for Lease No. 4 was $35.4 million, including percentage rent of $644,000.
For more information about our dealings and relationships with Five Star, and about the risks which may arise as a result of these related person transactions, please see "Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Relationships with RMR, Five Star and CWH" and "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Related Person Transactions" and Note 5 to our Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. At December 31, 2013, we leased four communities which include assisted living, independent living and SNF units to subsidiaries of Sunrise Senior Living Inc., or SSL, that until 2003 were owned by Marriott. These communities are leased through 2018. In January 2013, SSL was acquired by Health Care REIT Inc. and the management company business of SSL was sold to a separate acquirer. References to Sunrise in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include SSL prior to its acquisition and to the management company business of SSL following the acquisition of SSL. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for this lease was $14.5 million, including percentage rent of $2.0 million based on increases in gross revenues at these communities. Marriott guarantees the rent due to us for these 4 communities.
Brookdale Senior Living, Inc. We lease 18 assisted living communities to a subsidiary of Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., or Brookdale, until 2017. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for this lease was $9.1 million per year, including percentage rent of $2.1 million based on increases in gross revenues at these communities. Residents pay a large majority of the revenues at these communities from their private resources. Brookdale guarantees this rent to us.
Stellar Senior Living, LLC. We lease five communities, including independent and assisted living units, to subsidiaries of Stellar Senior Living, LLC, or Stellar, until 2027 and 2028. At December 31, 2013, the annual rent for these leases was $4.9 million per year. Recognition of percentage rent, based on increases in gross revenues at these communities, will commence in 2014. Residents pay a large majority of the revenues at these communities from their private resources. Stellar is owned by a former officer of Five Star and of RMR and he has personally guaranteed Stellar's rent due to us.
ABE Briarwood Corp. We lease one skilled nursing facility in Canonsburg, PA to a subsidiary of ABE Briarwood Corp., a privately owned company, for $937,000 of annual rent until December 31, 2015. Our property is sub-leased to THI of Pennsylvania at Greenery of Canonsburg, LLC, a subsidiary of another private company, THI of Baltimore, Inc. Our lease is guaranteed by ABE Briarwood Corp., IHS Long Term Care, Inc. and THI of Baltimore, Inc., and is secured by a security deposit of $600,000.
HealthQuest, Inc. We lease two skilled nursing facilities and one independent living community located in Huron and Sioux Falls, SD to HealthQuest, Inc., a privately owned company, until 2021. The
67
lease is guaranteed by the individual shareholder of HealthQuest, Inc. The rent payable to us is approximately $1.4 million per year and will increase at agreed upon times during the lease term.
Covenant Care, LLC. We lease one skilled nursing facility in Fresno, CA to a subsidiary of Covenant Care, LLC, a privately owned company, for $1.2 million of annual rent until 2015. The rent is scheduled to increase at agreed upon times during the lease term. Covenant Care, LLC guarantees the lease and has secured its obligation with a security deposit of $900,000.
Evergreen Washington Healthcare, LLC. We lease one skilled nursing facility in Seattle, WA to a subsidiary of Evergreen Washington Healthcare, LLC, a privately owned company, until 2015. The rent payable to us is approximately $930,000 per year and will increase at agreed upon times during the lease term. Evergreen Washington Healthcare, LLC guarantees this lease and its lease obligations are secured by a security deposit of $385,000.
The MacIntosh Company. We lease one skilled nursing facility in Grove City, OH to The MacIntosh Company for $599,000 per year until 2019. A management company affiliate of this tenant and the former and current majority shareholders of the tenant guarantee this lease.
Managed senior living communities.
We lease 42 managed senior living communities with 6,821 living units to our TRS. These 42 communities and two others with 230 living units are all managed for our account by Five Star under long term agreements. These communities had an undepreciated carrying value of $1.0 billion and a net book value of $907.6 million at December 31, 2013. We derive our revenues at these managed senior living communities primarily from services to residents and we record revenues when services are provided. Our share of the net operating results of our managed senior living communities in excess of the minimum returns due to us, or additional returns, are generally determined annually. We recognize additional returns due to us under our management agreements at year end when all contingencies are met and the income is earned. We had no additional returns in 2013. With the exception of the management agreement for a senior living community in New York, the management agreements for the communities Five Star manages for our account provide Five Star with a management fee equal to 3% of the gross revenues realized at the communities, plus reimbursement for Five Star's direct costs and expenses related to the communities and an incentive fee equal to 35% of the annual net operating income of the communities after we realize an annual return equal to 8% of our invested capital. The management agreements generally expire on December 31, 2031, and are subject to automatic renewal for two consecutive 15 year terms, unless earlier terminated or timely notice of nonrenewal is delivered. The management agreements provide that we and Five Star each have the option to terminate the contracts upon the acquisition by a person or group of more than 9.8% of the other's voting stock and upon other change in control events affecting the other party, as defined in those documents, including the adoption of any shareholder proposal (other than a precatory proposal) or the election to the board of directors or board of trustees of any individual if such proposal or individual was not approved, nominated or appointed, as the case may be, by vote of a majority of the board of directors or board of trustees in office immediately prior to the making of such proposal or the nomination or appointment of such individual.
In connection with the management agreements, we and Five Star have entered into four pooling agreements: three pooling agreements which combine our management agreements for communities that include assisted living units, or the AL Pooling Agreements, and a fourth pooling agreement, which combines our management agreements for communities consisting only of independent living units, or the IL Pooling Agreement. We entered into the initial AL Pooling Agreement in May 2011, the second AL Pooling Agreement in October 2012 and the third AL Pooling Agreement in November 2013. Each of our first and second AL Pooling Agreements includes 20 identified communities. The third AL Pooling Agreement includes the management agreements for the remaining communities that
68
include assisted living units that Five Star currently manages (other than with respect to the senior living community in New York described above). We entered into the IL Pooling Agreement in August 2012 and that agreement currently includes management agreements for two communities that have only independent living units. Each of the AL Pooling Agreements and the IL Pooling Agreement combines the determination of fees and expenses of the various communities that are subject to such pooling agreement, including determinations of our return of our invested capital and Five Star's incentive fees.
Properties Leased to Medical Providers, Medical Related Businesses, Clinics and Biotech Laboratory Tenants (MOBs).
At December 31, 2013, we owned 96 multi-tenant MOBs (119 buildings) located in 24 states and Washington, D.C., excluding four properties (seven buildings) classified in discontinued operations. These properties range in size from 1,700 to 256,000 square feet and have a total of 7.9 million square feet. Leases at these properties have current terms expiring between 2014 and 2034, plus renewal options in some cases. The annual rent payable to us by tenants of these 96 MOBs (119 buildings) is $209.3 million per year, including some scheduled increases and reimbursements of certain operating and tax expenses and excluding lease value amortization.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we entered into MOB lease renewals for 537,015 square feet and new leases for 234,479 square feet, at weighted average rental rates that were 0.2% below rents previously charged for the same space. These leases produce average net rent of $24.22 per square foot. Average lease terms for leases entered into during 2013 were 5.1 years. Commitments for tenant improvement, leasing commission costs and concessions for leases we entered into during 2013 totaled $11.3 million, or $14.60 per square foot on average (approximately $2.87 per square foot per year of the lease term).
69
The following chart presents a summary of our MOB properties by state as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
State
|
Number of Properties |
Number of Buildings |
Sq. Ft. | Undepreciated Carrying Value of Properties |
Net Book Value of Properties |
Annualized Rental Income(1) |
% of Total Annualized Rental Income(1) |
|||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Arizona |
2 | 2 | 222,771 | $ | 18,825 | $ | 17,907 | $ | 2,939 | 1.4 | % | |||||||||||
California |
4 | 9 | 820,743 | 392,924 | 365,132 | 45,651 | 21.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Colorado |
2 | 3 | 77,113 | 17,057 | 16,447 | 2,720 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Connecticut |
2 | 2 | 96,962 | 10,244 | 9,609 | 1,091 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
District of Columbia |
2 | 2 | 212,335 | 64,384 | 59,934 | 10,482 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Florida |
6 | 11 | 320,318 | 56,491 | 54,035 | 5,852 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Georgia |
5 | 5 | 325,544 | 57,208 | 54,216 | 7,069 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Hawaii |
1 | 1 | 203,447 | 66,991 | 64,904 | 7,942 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Illinois |
2 | 3 | 262,836 | 39,710 | 37,696 | 6,671 | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Indiana |
1 | 1 | 94,238 | 16,236 | 15,486 | 2,395 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Maryland |
2 | 2 | 133,976 | 22,391 | 21,208 | 3,238 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Massachusetts |
18 | 20 | 969,660 | 209,273 | 194,282 | 24,372 | 11.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Minnesota |
5 | 5 | 375,497 | 46,318 | 44,016 | 7,196 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Mississippi |
1 | 1 | 71,983 | 12,960 | 12,740 | 1,973 | 0.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
New Mexico |
1 | 2 | 292,043 | 34,476 | 32,030 | 4,870 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
New York |
5 | 6 | 597,174 | 103,840 | 94,514 | 16,938 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Ohio |
1 | 2 | 232,016 | 5,781 | 5,457 | 982 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Oklahoma |
4 | 4 | 210,348 | 28,338 | 25,465 | 2,805 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania |
7 | 7 | 474,819 | 58,722 | 54,317 | 7,851 | 3.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
South Carolina |
3 | 3 | 218,773 | 15,894 | 14,996 | 3,067 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Tennessee |
1 | 1 | 33,796 | 7,565 | 7,402 | 1,070 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Texas |
10 | 10 | 620,073 | 140,823 | 128,416 | 16,354 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Virginia |
3 | 5 | 226,933 | 41,890 | 37,921 | 4,999 | 2.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Washington |
1 | 2 | 144,900 | 30,878 | 30,300 | 3,893 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Wisconsin |
7 | 10 | 643,499 | 169,000 | 152,257 | 16,897 | 8.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals |
96 | 119 | 7,881,797 | $ | 1,668,219 | $ | 1,550,687 | $ | 209,317 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
70
The following chart presents information concerning our MOB tenants that represent 1% or more of total MOB annualized rental income as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
Tenant
|
Sq. Ft. Leased |
% of Total MOB Sq. Ft. Leased |
Annualized Rental Income(1) |
% of Total Annualized Rental Income(1) |
Lease Expiration |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aurora Health Care, Inc. |
643,499 | 8.6 | % | $ | 16,896 | 8.1 | % | 2024 | |||||||
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center |
123,872 | 1.7 | % | 11,570 | 5.5 | % | 2014 - 2019 | ||||||||
The Scripps Research Institute |
164,091 | 2.2 | % | 10,328 | 4.9 | % | 2019 | ||||||||
Reliant Medical Group, Inc. |
362,427 | 4.8 | % | 7,661 | 3.7 | % | 2019 | ||||||||
HCA Holdings, Inc. |
141,648 | 1.9 | % | 5,373 | 2.6 | % | 2014 - 2020 | ||||||||
First Insurance Company of Hawaii |
110,050 | 1.5 | % | 4,837 | 2.3 | % | 2014 - 2018 | ||||||||
Covidien PLC |
315,203 | 4.2 | % | 4,669 | 2.2 | % | 2017 | ||||||||
Abbvie Inc. |
197,976 | 2.6 | % | 4,565 | 2.2 | % | 2017 | ||||||||
Boston Children's Hospital |
99,063 | 1.3 | % | 4,297 | 2.1 | % | 2028 | ||||||||
Emory Healthcare, Inc. |
221,471 | 3.0 | % | 4,083 | 2.0 | % | 2017 - 2021 | ||||||||
Seattle Genetics, Inc. |
144,900 | 1.9 | % | 3,893 | 1.9 | % | 2018 | ||||||||
Health Insurance Plan of GNY |
121,500 | 1.6 | % | 3,885 | 1.9 | % | 2034 | ||||||||
PerkinElmer, Inc. |
105,462 | 1.4 | % | 3,681 | 1.8 | % | 2028 | ||||||||
Boston Scientific Corporation |
169,668 | 2.3 | % | 3,607 | 1.7 | % | 2016 - 2020 | ||||||||
Oklahoma City Clinics |
210,348 | 2.8 | % | 2,805 | 1.3 | % | 2016 | ||||||||
Hematology-Oncology Association of NY |
65,853 | 0.9 | % | 2,624 | 1.3 | % | 2023 | ||||||||
Stryker Corporation |
122,092 | 1.6 | % | 2,225 | 1.1 | % | 2020 | ||||||||
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated |
129,019 | 1.7 | % | 2,122 | 1.0 | % | 2014 - 2016 | ||||||||
Winthrop University Hospital |
62,788 | 0.8 | % | 2,117 | 1.0 | % | 2015 - 2025 | ||||||||
All other MOB tenant |
3,971,902 | 53.2 | % | 108,079 | 51.5 | % | 2014 - 2026 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals |
7,482,832 | 100.0 | % | $ | 209,317 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
71
Wellness Centers (included in "All Other Operations").
The following chart presents a summary of our wellness center leases as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands). This summary should be read in conjunction with the more detailed description of our leases set forth below.
Tenant
|
Number of Properties |
Sq. Ft. | Undepreciated Carrying Value of Properties |
Net Book Value of Properties |
Annualized Rental Income(1) |
Lease Expiration |
Renewal Options | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Starmark Holdings, LLC (Wellbridge)(2) |
3 | 129,500 | $ | 32,438 | $ | 27,910 | $ | 3,015 | 2/28/23 | 3 for 10 years each. | ||||||||||
Starmark Holdings, LLC (Wellbridge)(2) |
1 | 38,500 | 11,206 | 10,220 | 832 | 2/28/23 | 3 for 10 years each. | |||||||||||||
Starmark Holdings, LLC (Wellbridge)(2) |
2 | 186,000 | 36,364 | 32,411 | 3,139 | 11/30/23 | 3 for 10 years each. | |||||||||||||
Life Time Fitness, Inc.(3) |
4 | 458,000 | 100,009 | 88,422 | 10,550 | 8/31/28 | 6 for 5 years each. | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Totals |
10 | 812,000 | $ | 180,017 | $ | 158,963 | $ | 17,536 | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Starmark Holdings, LLC (Wellbridge). We lease six wellness centers located in four states under three separate leases to subsidiaries of Starmark. Starmark is a subsidiary of Central Sports Co. LTD, a publicly owned company listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. These properties operate under the brand Wellbridge and the leases are guaranteed by Starmark. These leases have current terms expiring in 2023 and require aggregate annual rent of $7.0 million, plus consumer price index based increases.
Life Time Fitness, Inc. We lease four wellness centers located in four states under one lease agreement to a subsidiary of Life Time Fitness. Life Time Fitness is a publicly traded company listed on the NYSE. This lease is guaranteed by Life Time Fitness. The lease has a current term expiring in 2028. The aggregate annual rent payable to us averages $10.5 million per year during the lease term.
72
The following tables set forth information regarding our lease expirations as of December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Annualized Rental Income Expiring |
Cumulative Percentage of Annualized Rental Income Expiring |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Annualized Rental Income(1)(2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Year
|
Triple Net Senior Living Communities |
MOBs | Wellness Centers |
Total | |||||||||||||||
2014 |
$ | — | $ | 17,825 | $ | — | $ | 17,825 | 3.9 | % | 3.9 | % | |||||||
2015 |
3,041 | 21,640 | — | 24,681 | 5.4 | % | 9.3 | % | |||||||||||
2016 |
— | 23,985 | — | 23,985 | 5.3 | % | 14.6 | % | |||||||||||
2017 |
44,464 | 26,167 | — | 70,631 | 15.5 | % | 30.1 | % | |||||||||||
2018 |
14,523 | 24,151 | — | 38,674 | 8.5 | % | 38.6 | % | |||||||||||
2019 |
599 | 30,713 | — | 31,312 | 6.9 | % | 45.5 | % | |||||||||||
2020 |
— | 15,622 | — | 15,622 | 3.4 | % | 48.9 | % | |||||||||||
2021 |
1,424 | 5,444 | — | 6,868 | 1.5 | % | 50.4 | % | |||||||||||
2022 |
— | 5,646 | — | 5,646 | 1.2 | % | 51.6 | % | |||||||||||
Thereafter |
164,808 | 38,124 | 17,536 | 220,468 | 48.4 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 228,859 | $ | 209,317 | $ | 17,536 | $ | 455,712 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average remaining lease term for all properties (weighted by annualized rental income): 8.0 years.
| |
Number of Tenants(1) | Percent of Total Number of Tenancies Expiring |
Cumulative Percentage of Number of Tenancies Expiring |
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year
|
Senior Living Communities(2) |
MOBs | Wellness Centers |
Total | |||||||||||||||
2014 |
— | 124 | — | 124 | 21.1 | % | 21.1 | % | |||||||||||
2015 |
3 | 98 | — | 101 | 17.1 | % | 38.2 | % | |||||||||||
2016 |
— | 82 | — | 82 | 13.9 | % | 52.1 | % | |||||||||||
2017 |
2 | 79 | — | 81 | 13.8 | % | 65.9 | % | |||||||||||
2018 |
1 | 75 | — | 76 | 12.9 | % | 78.8 | % | |||||||||||
2019 |
1 | 39 | — | 40 | 6.8 | % | 85.6 | % | |||||||||||
2020 |
— | 27 | — | 27 | 4.6 | % | 90.2 | % | |||||||||||
2021 |
1 | 14 | — | 15 | 2.5 | % | 92.7 | % | |||||||||||
2022 |
— | 14 | — | 14 | 2.4 | % | 95.1 | % | |||||||||||
Thereafter |
4 | 23 | 2 | 29 | 4.9 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
12 | 575 | 2 | 589 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
73
Number of Living Units / Beds or Square Feet with Leases Expiring(1)
| |
Living Units / Beds(2) | Square Feet | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year
|
Triple Net Senior Living Communities (Units / Beds) |
Percent of Total Living Units / Beds Expiring |
Cumulative Percentage of Living Units / Beds Expiring |
MOBs (Square Feet) |
Wellness Centers (Square Feet) |
Total Square Feet |
Percent of Total Square Feet Expiring |
Cumulative Percent of Total Square Feet Expiring |
|||||||||||||||||
2014 |
— | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 453,154 | — | 453,154 | 5.5 | % | 5.5 | % | |||||||||||||
2015 |
423 | 1.7 | % | 1.7 | % | 893,173 | — | 893,173 | 10.8 | % | 16.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2016 |
— | 0.0 | % | 1.7 | % | 1,017,061 | — | 1,017,061 | 12.3 | % | 28.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2017 |
4,229 | 17.2 | % | 18.9 | % | 1,032,344 | — | 1,032,344 | 12.4 | % | 41.0 | % | |||||||||||||
2018 |
1,619 | 6.6 | % | 25.5 | % | 711,965 | — | 711,965 | 8.6 | % | 49.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2019 |
175 | 0.7 | % | 26.2 | % | 979,039 | — | 979,039 | 11.8 | % | 61.4 | % | |||||||||||||
2020 |
— | 0.0 | % | 26.2 | % | 739,016 | — | 739,016 | 8.9 | % | 70.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2021 |
361 | 1.5 | % | 27.7 | % | 214,733 | — | 214,733 | 2.6 | % | 72.9 | % | |||||||||||||
2022 |
— | 0.0 | % | 27.7 | % | 194,244 | — | 194,244 | 2.3 | % | 75.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Thereafter |
17,768 | 72.3 | % | 100.0 | % | 1,248,104 | 812,000 | 2,060,104 | 24.8 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
24,575 | 100.0 | % | 7,482,833 | 812,000 | 8,294,833 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (dollars and square feet in thousands, unless otherwise noted)
The following table summarizes the results of operations of each of our segments for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||
Triple net senior living communities |
$ | 237,209 | $ | 246,948 | $ | 242,652 | ||||
Managed senior living communities |
302,058 | 184,031 | 27,851 | |||||||
MOBs |
204,594 | 186,065 | 151,823 | |||||||
All other operations |
17,577 | 17,756 | 17,705 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues |
$ | 761,438 | $ | 634,800 | $ | 440,031 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income: |
||||||||||
Triple net senior living communities |
$ | 174,561 | $ | 143,374 | $ | 152,921 | ||||
Managed senior living communities |
27,158 | 14,006 | 1,269 | |||||||
MOBs |
46,986 | 77,428 | 74,149 | |||||||
All other operations |
(97,541 | ) | (98,924 | ) | (76,920 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 151,164 | $ | 135,884 | $ | 151,419 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The following sections analyze and discuss the results of operations of each of our segments for the periods presented.
74
Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012:
Triple net senior living communities:
| |
All Properties | Comparable Properties(1) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
Total properties(2) |
221 | 223 | 216 | 216 | |||||||||
# of units / beds(2) |
24,575 | 24,894 | 23,914 | 23,914 | |||||||||
Tenant operating data(3) |
|||||||||||||
Occupancy |
85.3 | % | 86.1 | % | 85.2 | % | 86.1 | % | |||||
Rent coverage |
1.38 | x | 1.42 | x | 1.37 | x | 1.42 | x | |||||
Triple net senior living communities, all properties:
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 237,209 | $ | 246,948 | $ | (9,739 | ) | (3.9 | )% | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
237,209 | 246,948 | (9,739 | ) | (3.9 | )% | |||||||
Depreciation expense |
(66,854 | ) | (68,419 | ) | 1,565 | 2.3 | % | ||||||
Impairment of assets |
(6,685 | ) | — | (6,685 | ) | 100.0 | % | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
163,670 | 178,529 | (14,859 | ) | (8.3 | )% | |||||||
Interest expense |
(26,501 | ) | (35,530 | ) | 9,029 | 25.4 | % | ||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
37,392 | — | 37,392 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Gain on lease terminations |
— | 375 | (375 | ) | (100.0 | )% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 174,561 | $ | 143,374 | $ | 31,187 | 21.8 | % | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Except as noted below under "Rental income", we have not included a discussion and analysis of the results of our comparable properties data for the triple net senior living communities segment as we believe that a comparison of the results for our comparable properties for our triple net senior living communities segment is generally consistent from period to period and a separate, comparable properties comparison is not meaningful.
Rental income. Rental income decreased year over year primarily due to the transfer in the third and fourth quarter of 2012 of the ten communities previously triple net leased to our managed senior
75
living communities segment. This decrease was partially offset by our acquisition of four triple net leased communities during the third quarter of 2012 for approximately $36,500 and one community acquired in January 2013 for $22,350 and our purchase of approximately $57,727 of improvements made to our properties which are leased by Five Star since January 1, 2012. Rental income increased year over year on a comparable property basis by $2,991 primarily as a result of our improvement purchases at certain of the communities we lease to Five Star that we have owned continuously since January 1, 2012 and the resulting increased rent, pursuant to the terms of those leases.
Net operating income. NOI decreased because of the changes in rental income described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our triple net senior living communities segment is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense recognized in this segment decreased year over year as a result of the transfer in the third and fourth quarter of 2012 of ten communities previously triple net leased to our managed senior living communities segment. This decrease was partially offset as a result of our acquisition of five triple net leased communities since January 1, 2012 and our purchase of improvements made to our properties leased to Five Star since January 1, 2012.
Impairment of assets. During 2013, we recorded impairment of assets charges of $6,685 to reduce the carrying value of five of our senior living properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013 to their estimated net sale price.
Interest expense. Interest expense for our triple net senior living communities arises from mortgage debts secured by certain of these properties. The decrease in interest expense is the result of the repayment of 17 mortgage loans in the second quarter of 2012 that had a total principal balance of $33,381 and a weighted average interest rate of 6.89%, the prepayment of $199,197 of our FNMA secured term loan in August 2012 that had an interest rate of 6.4%, the prepayment of four loans in the second quarter of 2013 that had a total principal balance of $10,377 and a weighted average interest rate of 6.1%, as well as the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debts, partially offset by a mortgage debt of $12,266 with an interest rate of 6.25% we assumed in connection with our acquisition of a triple net leased senior living community in January 2013.
Gain on sale of properties. Gain on sale of properties is a result of the sale of one senior living community in August 2013 and two rehabilitation hospitals in December 2013.
Gain on lease terminations. Gain on lease terminations is a result of our May 2012 agreement with Sunrise for early terminations of leases for the ten communities previously triple net leased to Sunrise; the leases for all of the senior living communities formerly leased to Sunrise were terminated prior to December 31, 2012, and resulted in a net gain on lease terminations of approximately $375.
Managed senior living communities:
| |
All Properties | Comparable Properties(1) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
Total properties |
44 | 39 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||
# of units / beds |
7,051 | 6,607 | 3,323 | 3,323 | |||||||||
Occupancy |
87.4 | % | 85.5 | % | 91.2 | % | 87.9 | % | |||||
Average monthly rate |
$ | 4,184 | $ | 4,027 | $ | 3,956 | $ | 3,931 | |||||
76
Managed senior living communities, all properties:
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Residents fees and services |
$ | 302,058 | $ | 184,031 | $ | 118,027 | 64.1 | % | |||||
Property operating expenses |
(233,711 | ) | (138,819 | ) | (94,892 | ) | 68.4 | % | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
68,347 | 45,212 | 23,135 | 51.2 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(28,972 | ) | (19,437 | ) | (9,535 | ) | (49.1 | )% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
39,375 | 25,775 | 13,600 | 52.8 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(12,217 | ) | (11,769 | ) | (448 | ) | (3.8 | )% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 27,158 | $ | 14,006 | $ | 13,152 | 93.9 | % | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residents fees and services. Residents fees and services are the revenues earned at our managed senior living communities. We recognize these revenues as services are provided. The increase in residents fees and services primarily relate to the acquisition of 12 managed senior living communities since January 1, 2012 and the revenues earned at the ten senior living communities that were formerly leased to Sunrise, which were transferred to our managed senior living communities segment during the third and fourth quarters of 2012.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses include expenses incurred at our managed senior living communities and they consist of management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefits of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of these operating properties. The increase in property operating expenses primarily relates to the acquisition of 12 managed senior living communities since January 1, 2012 and the expenses incurred at the ten senior living communities that were formerly leased to Sunrise, which were transferred to our managed senior living communities segment during the third and fourth quarters of 2012.
Net operating income. NOI increased because of the changes in rental income, residents fees and services and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our managed senior living communities segment is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased primarily as a result of acquisitions of managed senior living communities since January 1, 2012 and the transfer of ten senior living communities that were formerly triple net leased to Sunrise to our managed senior living communities segment in the third and fourth quarters of 2012.
Interest expense. Interest expense for our managed senior living communities arises from mortgage debts secured by certain of these properties. The increase in interest expense is the result of our assumption of $41,814 of mortgage debts with a weighted average interest rate of 5.8% in connection with our acquisition of three communities in 2012, partially offset by the repayment of one mortgage loan in February 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $12,400 and an interest rate of 6.0%.
77
Managed senior living communities, comparable properties (managed senior living communities we have owned continuously since January 1, 2012):
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Residents fees and services |
$ | 145,976 | $ | 140,727 | $ | 5,249 | 3.7 | % | |||||
Property operating expenses |
(104,185 | ) | (102,814 | ) | (1,371 | ) | 1.3 | % | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
41,791 | 37,913 | 3,878 | 10.2 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(15,125 |
) |
(14,628 |
) |
(497 |
) |
(3.4 |
)% |
|||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
26,666 | 23,285 | 3,381 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(10,864 |
) |
(11,261 |
) |
397 |
3.5 |
% |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 15,802 | $ | 12,024 | $ | 3,778 | 31.4 | % | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Residents fees and services. We recognize residents fees and services as services are provided. Our residents fees and services increased year over year on a comparable property basis because of an increase in occupancy and an increase in the average monthly rates charged to residents at the 22 communities we have owned continuously since January 1, 2012.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses consist of property management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefit costs of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of operating properties. Property operating expenses increased principally because of increases in utility expenses, real estate taxes, insurance, and other direct costs of operating properties.
Net operating income. NOI increased because of the changes in residents fees and services and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our managed senior living communities segment, comparable properties, is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased as a result of our purchase of improvements made to certain of these properties.
Interest expense. Interest expense for our managed senior living communities arises from mortgage debts secured by certain of these properties. Interest expense decreased as a result of the repayment of one mortgage loan in February 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $12,400 and an interest rate of 6.03% and regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debts.
MOBs:
| |
All Properties(1) | Comparable Properties(1)(2) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
Total properties |
96 | 90 | 78 | 78 | |||||||||
Total buildings |
119 | 113 | 99 | 99 | |||||||||
Total square feet(3) |
7,882 | 7,619 | 6,658 | 6,658 | |||||||||
Occupancy(4) |
94.9% | 92.7% | 94.6% | 94.6% | |||||||||
78
MOBs, all properties:
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 204,594 | $ | 186,065 | $ | 18,529 | 10.0 | % | |||||
Property operating expenses |
(66,167 | ) | (58,877 | ) | (7,290 | ) | (12.4 | )% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
138,427 | 127,188 | 11,239 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation / amortization expense |
(53,408 |
) |
(47,394 |
) |
(6,014 |
) |
(12.7 |
)% |
|||||
Impairment of assets |
— | (3,071 | ) | 3,071 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
85,019 | 76,723 | 8,296 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,466 |
) |
(3,255 |
) |
(2,211 |
) |
(67.9 |
)% |
|||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations |
79,553 | 73,468 | 6,085 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
5,043 | 4,061 | 982 | (24.2 | )% | ||||||||
Impairment of assets from discontinued operations |
(37,610 | ) | — | (37,610 | ) | (100.0 | )% | ||||||
Loss on sale of properties |
— | (101 | ) | 101 | (100.0 | )% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 46,986 | $ | 77,428 | $ | (30,442 | ) | (39.3 | )% | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income. Rental income increased because of rents from 18 MOBs (20 buildings) we acquired for approximately $343,170 since January 1, 2012, partially offset by the sale of one MOB (one building) for approximately $1,100 in July 2012 and the loss of rental income at another MOB (one building) where the lease expired in February 2012 and the MOB has remained vacant. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling $6,119 and $8,362 and net amortization of approximately $(3,776) and $(1,471) of above and below market lease adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses consist of property management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefit costs of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of operating properties. Property operating expenses increased because of our MOB acquisitions since January 1, 2012, partially offset by the sale of one MOB in July 2012.
Net operating income. NOI increased because of the changes in rental income and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our MOB segment is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased primarily because of our MOB acquisitions since January 1, 2012, partially offset by the sale of one MOB in July 2012.
Impairment of assets. During 2012, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $3,071 related to one property (one building) to reduce the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value.
79
Interest expense. Interest expense for our MOBs arises from mortgage debts secured by certain of these properties. The increase in interest expense is the result of our assumption of $73,103 of mortgage debts in connection with our acquisition of three MOBs (three buildings) in 2012 with a weighted average interest rate of 5.9%, partially offset by the repayment of one mortgage loan in April 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $2,330 and an annual interest rate of 6.73%, the repayment of one mortgage loan in October 2012 that had a principal balance of $4,152 and an interest rate of 6.50% and the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debts.
Income from discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations relates to the four MOBs (seven buildings) classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013. The increase in income is primarily due to no longer depreciating the assets as of the date they met the held for sale criteria established under GAAP.
Impairment of assets from discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded impairment of assets charges of $37,610 to reduce the carrying value of four of our MOBs (seven buildings) to their estimated net sale prices.
Loss on sale of properties. In July 2012, we sold one MOB (one building) and recorded a loss on sale of properties of approximately $101.
MOBs, comparable properties (MOBs we have owned continuously since January 1, 2012):
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 170,738 | $ | 174,594 | $ | (3,856 | ) | (2.2 | )% | ||||
Property operating expenses |
(54,817 | ) | (53,713 | ) | (1,104 | ) | (2.1 | )% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
115,921 | 120,881 | (4,960 | ) | (4.1 | )% | |||||||
Depreciation expense |
(42,568 |
) |
(44,761 |
) |
2,193 |
4.9 |
% |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
73,353 | 76,120 | (2,767 | ) | (3.6 | )% | |||||||
Interest expense |
(1,124 |
) |
(1,478 |
) |
354 |
24.0 |
% |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 72,229 | $ | 74,642 | $ | (2,413 | ) | (3.2 | )% | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income. Rental income decreased as a result of renewal of certain leases at lower rents and lower net non-cash items affecting rental income. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling $4,665 and $7,186 and net amortization of approximately $(2,340) and $(910) of above and below market lease adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses consist of property management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefit costs of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of operating properties. Property operating expenses increased principally because of increases in utility expenses, real estate taxes, insurance, and other direct costs of operating properties.
Net operating income. NOI decreased because of the changes in rental income and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our MOB segment for comparable properties is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
80
Depreciation expense. Depreciation / amortization expense decreased primarily because of a reduction in amortization of acquired real estate leases and obligations that we amortize over the respective lease terms, partially offset by an increase in the amortization of leasing costs.
Interest expense. Interest expense for our MOBs arises from mortgage debt secured by certain of these properties. The change in interest expense is the result of the repayment of one mortgage loan in April 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $2,330 and an interest rate of 6.73%, the repayment of one mortgage loan in October 2012 that had a principal balance of $4,152 and an interest rate of 6.50% and the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debt.
All other operations:(1)
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 17,577 | $ | 17,756 | $ | (179 | ) | (1.0 | )% | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: |
|||||||||||||
Depreciation |
3,792 | 3,792 | — | — | |||||||||
General and administrative |
32,657 | 31,517 | 1,140 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
Acquisition related costs |
3,378 | 9,394 | (6,016 | ) | (64.0 | )% | |||||||
Impairment of assets |
1,304 | — | 1,304 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
41,131 | 44,703 | (3,572 | ) | (8.0 | )% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating loss |
(23,554 | ) | (26,947 | ) | 3,393 | 12.6 | % | ||||||
Interest and other income |
711 |
1,117 |
(406 |
) |
(36.3 |
)% |
|||||||
Interest expense |
(73,635 | ) | (66,686 | ) | (6,949 | ) | (10.4 | )% | |||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(797 | ) | (6,349 | ) | 5,552 | 87.4 | % | ||||||
Equity in earnings of an investee |
334 | 316 | 18 | 5.7 | % | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before income tax expense |
(96,941 | ) | (98,549 | ) | 1,608 | 1.6 | % | ||||||
Income tax expense |
(600 | ) | (375 | ) | (225 | ) | (60.0 | )% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss |
$ | (97,541 | ) | $ | (98,924 | ) | $ | 1,383 | 1.4 | % | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling approximately $1,129 and $1,459 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Rental income also includes amortization of approximately $221 of acquired real estate leases and obligations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense remained consistent as there were no wellness center acquisitions nor capital improvement funding since January 1, 2012 and we generally depreciate our long lived wellness center assets on a straight line basis.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses consist of fees pursuant to our business management agreement with RMR, equity compensation expense, legal and accounting fees and other costs relating to our status as a publicly traded company. General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of acquisitions of senior living communities and MOBs for approximately $652,481 since January 1, 2012, partially offset by the sale of one senior living community and two rehabilitation hospitals in 2013 for $92,550 and the sale of one MOB (one building) in July 2012 for approximately $1,100.
81
Acquisition related costs. Acquisition related costs represent legal and due diligence costs incurred in connection with our acquisition activity during 2013 and 2012. Acquisition related costs decreased as a result of reduced acquisition activity and dollar amount of acquisitions in 2013 versus 2012 as well as licensing and other regulatory costs related to the senior living communities formerly leased to Sunrise that were transferred to our TRS in September, October and November 2012.
Interest and other income. The decrease in interest and other income is primarily due to the elimination of interest received from our $80,000 bridge loan with Five Star, or the Bridge Loan, that was repaid in April 2012. Interest and other income also includes interest on our investable cash and dividend income related to the 250,000 common shares of CWH that we own.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased because of our issuance of $350,000 of unsecured senior notes with an interest rate of 5.625% in July 2012, partially offset by lower amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility, reduced interest expense because of our redemption in January 2012 of all $225,000 of our 8.625% unsecured senior notes and the prepayment of four mortgage loans encumbering four of our wellness centers for $10,377 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.1%. Our weighted average balance outstanding and interest rate under our revolving credit facility was $70,912 and 1.6%, and $163,161 and 1.8%, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt. In June 2013, we prepaid four mortgage loans encumbering four of our properties for $10,377 that had maturity dates in 2013. In September 2013, we prepaid a mortgage loan encumbering two of our properties for $13,579 that had a maturity date later in 2013. As a result of the premiums paid to prepay these mortgages, we recorded an aggregate loss on early extinguishment of debt of $259. In September 2013, we amended our revolving credit facility, resulting in a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $538. In August 2012, we prepaid approximately $199,197 of the outstanding principal balance of our FNMA secured term loan; as a result of this prepayment, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $6,349 consisting of a debt prepayment premium, legal fees and the write off of unamortized deferred financing fees.
Equity in earnings of an investee. Equity in earnings of an investee represents our proportionate share of earnings from AIC.
Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2011:
Triple net senior living communities:
| |
All Properties | Comparable Properties(1) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Total properties(2) |
223 | 229 | 223 | 223 | |||||||||
# of units / beds(2) |
24,894 | 26,719 | 26,176 | 26,176 | |||||||||
Tenant operating data:(3) |
|||||||||||||
Occupancy |
85.6% | 85.0% | 85.3% | 85.1% | |||||||||
Rent coverage |
1.40x% | 1.46x% | 1.41x | 1.47x | |||||||||
82
transferred on October 1, 2012, and two communities were transferred on November 1, 2012), partially offset by additional triple net leased properties we acquired since January 1, 2011.
Triple net senior living communities, all properties:
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2012 | 2011 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 246,948 | $ | 242,652 | $ | 4,296 | 1.8% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
246,948 | 242,652 | 4,296 | 1.8% | |||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(68,419 | ) | (68,429 | ) | 10 | 0.0% | |||||||
Impairment of assets |
— | (1,028 | ) | 1,028 | 100.0% | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
178,529 | 173,195 | 5,334 | 3.1% | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(35,530 |
) |
(41,510 |
) |
5,980 |
14.4% |
|||||||
Gain on lease terminations |
375 | — | 375 | 100.0% | |||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
— | 21,236 | (21,236 | ) | (100.0)% | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 143,374 | $ | 152,921 | $ | (9,547 | ) | (6.2)% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Except as noted below under "Rental income", we have not included a discussion and analysis of the results of our comparable properties data for the triple net senior living communities segment as we believe that a comparison of the results for our comparable properties for our triple net senior living communities segment is generally consistent from period to period and a separate, comparable properties comparison is not meaningful.
Rental income. Rental income increased because of rents from our acquisition of four communities during the third quarter of 2012 for approximately $36,500 which are leased by a private tenant, six communities acquired during the second and third quarter of 2011 for approximately $99,808 which are leased by Five Star and our purchase of approximately $63,789 of improvements made to our properties which are leased by Five Star since January 1, 2011, partially offset by a reduction in rental income resulting from the sale of five properties during the second quarter of 2011 for approximately $38,625. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling approximately $4,011 and $2,008 and percentage rent of $10,859 and $11,313 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Rental income increased year over year on a comparable property basis primarily as a result of the improvement purchases from Five Star at certain of the 223 communities we have owned continuously since January 1, 2011.
Net operating income. NOI increased because of the changes in rental income described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our triple net senior living communities segment is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased slightly as a result of our acquisition of ten communities since January 1, 2011 and our purchase of improvements made to our properties which
83
are leased by Five Star since January 1, 2011, largely offset by the sale of five properties during the second quarter of 2011.
Impairment of assets. During 2011, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $1,028 related to one property to reduce the carrying value of this property to its estimated sale price less costs to sell.
Interest expense. Interest expense for our triple net senior living communities arises from mortgage debt secured by certain of these properties. The decrease in interest expense is the result of the repayment of 17 mortgage loans in the second quarter of 2012 that had a total principal balance of $33,381 and a weighted average interest rate of 6.89%, the prepayment of $199,197 of our FNMA secured term loan in August 2012 that had an interest rate of 6.4%, as well as the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debt, partially offset by the assumption of $11,458 of mortgage debt in connection with certain of our 2011 acquisitions occurring in the second quarter of that year, and the assumption of $6,876 of mortgage debt in connection with certain of our 2012 acquisitions occurring in the third quarter.
Gain on lease terminations. Gain on lease terminations is a result of our May 2012 agreement with Sunrise for early terminations of leases for the ten communities previously triple net leased to Sunrise; the leases for all of the senior living communities formerly leased to Sunrise were terminated prior to December 31, 2012, and resulted in a net gain on lease terminations of approximately $375.
Gain on sale of properties. During the second quarter of 2011, we sold five senior living communities and recognized a gain on sale of properties of approximately $21,236.
Managed senior living communities:
| |
All Properties | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
| |
2012 | 2011 | |||||
Total properties |
39 | 22 | |||||
# of units / beds |
6,607 | 3,323 | |||||
Occupancy |
85.5% | 84.2% | |||||
Average monthly rate |
$ | 4,027 | $ | 3,536 | |||
Managed senior living communities, all properties:
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2012 | 2011 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Residents fees and services |
$ | 184,031 | $ | 27,851 | $ | 156,180 | 560.8% | ||||||
Property operating expenses |
(138,819 | ) | (21,639 | ) | (117,180 | ) | 541.5% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
45,212 | 6,212 | 39,000 | 627.8% | |||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(19,437 | ) | (2,591 | ) | (16,846 | ) | (650.2)% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
25,775 | 3,621 | 22,154 | 611.8% | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(11,769 | ) | (2,352 | ) | (9,417 | ) | (400.4)% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 14,006 | $ | 1,269 | $ | 12,737 | 1003.7% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We have not included a discussion and analysis of the results of our comparable properties data for the managed senior living communities segment as we have not owned any of the properties within this segment continuously since January 1, 2011.
84
Residents fees and services. Residents fees and services are the revenues earned at our 29 managed senior living communities that we acquired for approximately $743,877 since June 2011 and the revenues earned at the ten communities that were formerly leased to Sunrise and transferred to our managed senior living communities segment in September, October and November 2012. We recognize these revenues as services are provided.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses include expenses incurred at our 29 managed senior living communities, which are leased to our TRSs and which we acquired since June 2011, and expenses incurred at the ten communities formerly leased to Sunrise and transferred to our managed senior living communities segment in September, October and November 2012. The beginning of our managed senior living communities operations in June 2011, and the increase in the number of our managed senior living communities since that time, are the primary causes for the increase in property operating expenses year over year for the period. Property operating expenses consist of management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefits of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of operating properties.
Net operating income. NOI increased because of the changes in residents fees and services and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for managed senior living communities segment is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased as a result of our acquisition of 29 managed senior living communities, which are leased to our TRSs and which we acquired since June 2011, and the ten communities that were formerly leased to Sunrise being transferred to our managed senior living communities segment in September, October and November 2012.
Interest expense. Interest expense for our managed senior living communities arises from mortgage debt secured by certain of these properties. The increase in interest expense is the result of the assumption of $192,573 of mortgage debt in connection with certain of our 2011 acquisitions occurring in the second, third and fourth quarter of that year, and the assumption of $41,814 of mortgage debt in connection with certain of our 2012 acquisitions occurring in the second and third quarter of that year, partially offset by the repayment of one mortgage loan in February 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $12,386 and an interest rate of 6.03% as well as the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debt.
MOBs:
| |
All Properties(1) | Comparable Properties(1)(2) |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
As of the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||
Total properties |
90 | 78 | 60 | 60 | |||||||||
Total buildings |
113 | 99 | 73 | 73 | |||||||||
Total square feet(3) |
7,619 | 6,658 | 4,624 | 4,624 | |||||||||
Occupancy(4) |
92.7% | 95.9% | 92.0% | 96.7% | |||||||||
85
MOBs, all properties:
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2012 | 2011 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 186,065 | $ | 151,823 | $ | 34,242 | 22.6% | ||||||
Property operating expenses |
(58,877 | ) | (43,761 | ) | (15,116 | ) | (34.5)% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
127,188 | 108,062 | 19,126 | 17.7% | |||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(47,394 |
) |
(36,147 |
) |
(11,247 |
) |
(31.1)% |
||||||
Impairment of assets |
(3,071 | ) | (962 | ) | (2,109 | ) | (219.2)% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
76,723 | 70,953 | 5,770 | 8.1% | |||||||||
Interest expense |
(3,255 |
) |
(996 |
) |
(2,259 |
) |
(226.8)% |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations |
73,468 | 69,957 | 3,511 | 5.0% | |||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
|||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
4,061 | 4,113 | (52 | ) | (1.3)% | ||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of properties |
(101 | ) | 79 | (180 | ) | 227.8% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 77,428 | $ | 74,149 | $ | 3,279 | 4.4% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income. Rental income increased because of rents from 30 MOBs (39 buildings) we acquired for approximately $562,090 since January 1, 2011, partially offset by the sale of two MOBs (two buildings) for approximately $835 during the second quarter of 2011 and the sale of one MOB (one building) for approximately $1,100 in July 2012. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling $8,361 and $7,937 and net amortization of approximately $(1,471) and $218 of above and below market lease adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses consist of property management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefit costs of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of operating properties. Property operating expenses increased because of our MOB acquisitions since January 1, 2011, partially offset by the sale of two MOBs (two buildings) during the second quarter of 2011 and the sale of one MOB (one building) in July 2012.
Net operating income. NOI increased because of the changes in rental income and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our MOB segment is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased because of our MOB acquisitions since January 1, 2011, partially offset by the sale of two MOBs (two buildings) during the second quarter of 2011 and the sale of one MOB (one building) in July 2012.
Impairment of assets. During 2012, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $3,071 related to one property to reduce the carrying value of this property to its estimated fair value. During 2011, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $962 related to three properties to reduce the carrying value of these properties to their estimated sales prices less costs to sell.
86
Interest expense. Interest expense for our MOBs arises from mortgage debt secured by certain of these properties. The change in interest expense is the result of our assumption of $13,286 of mortgage debt in connection with our acquisition of one MOB (one building) in July 2011 and one MOB (one building) in November 2011 and our assumption of $73,103 of mortgage debt in connection with our acquisition of three MOBs (three buildings) in June, September and December 2012, partially offset by the repayment of one mortgage loan in April 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $2,330 and an interest rate of 6.73%, the repayment of one mortgage loan in October 2012 that had a principal balance of $4,152 and an interest rate of 6.50% and the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debt.
Income from discontinued operations. Income from discontinued operations relates to the four MOBs (seven buildings) classified as held for sale.
(Loss) gain on sale of properties. In July 2012, we sold one MOB (one building) and recorded a loss on sale of properties of approximately $101. During the second quarter of 2011, we sold two MOBs (two buildings) and recognized a gain on sale of properties of approximately $79.
MOBs, comparable properties (MOBs we have owned continuously since January 1, 2011):
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2012 | 2011 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 133,859 | $ | 134,737 | $ | (878 | ) | (0.7)% | |||||
Property operating expenses |
(35,733 | ) | (36,508 | ) | 775 | 2.1% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net operating income (NOI) |
98,126 | 98,229 | (103 | ) | (0.1)% | ||||||||
Depreciation expense |
(33,225 |
) |
(31,580 |
) |
(1,645 |
) |
(5.2)% |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
64,901 | 66,649 | (1,748 | ) | (2.6)% | ||||||||
Interest expense |
(682 |
) |
(834 |
) |
152 |
18.2% |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 64,219 | $ | 65,815 | $ | (1,596 | ) | (2.4)% | |||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income. Rental income decreased as a result of a reduction in same store occupancy from 96.7% at December 31, 2011 to 92.0% at December 31, 2012, mainly caused by two MOBs (two buildings) that became vacant in 2012. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling $4,834 and $6,605 and amortization of approximately $1,823 and $1,008 of acquired real estate leases and obligations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Property operating expenses. Property operating expenses consist of property management fees, real estate taxes, utility expense, salaries and benefit costs of property level personnel, repairs and maintenance expense, cleaning expense and other direct costs of operating properties. Property operating expenses decreased principally because of decreases in utility expenses, partially offset by higher real estate taxes.
Net operating income. NOI decreased because of the changes in rental income and property operating expenses described above. The reconciliation of NOI to net income for our MOB segment for comparable properties is shown in the table above. Our definition of NOI and our consolidated reconciliation of NOI to net income are included below in "Non-GAAP Financial Measures".
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense increased primarily because of improvements we made on certain of these properties since January 1, 2011, the amortization of leasing costs and an increase in amortization of above and below market lease adjustments that we amortize over the respective lease terms.
87
Interest expense. Interest expense for our MOBs arises from mortgage debt secured by certain of these properties. The change in interest expense is the result of the repayment of one mortgage loan in April 2012 that had a principal balance of approximately $2,330 and an interest rate of 6.73%, the repayment of one mortgage loan in October 2012 that had a principal balance of $4,152 and an interest rate of 6.50% and the regularly scheduled amortization of our mortgage debt.
All other operations:(1)
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2012 | 2011 | Change | % Change | |||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 17,756 | $ | 17,705 | $ | 51 | 0.3% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses: |
|||||||||||||
Depreciation |
3,792 | 3,792 | — | — | |||||||||
General and administrative |
31,517 | 26,041 | 5,476 | 21.0% | |||||||||
Acquisition related costs |
9,394 | 12,239 | (2,845 | ) | (23.2)% | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
44,703 | 42,072 | 2,631 | 6.3% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating loss |
(26,947 | ) | (24,367 | ) | (2,580 | ) | (10.6)% | ||||||
Interest and other income |
1,117 |
1,451 |
(334 |
) |
(23.0)% |
||||||||
Interest expense |
(66,686 | ) | (53,404 | ) | (13,282 | ) | (24.9)% | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(6,349 | ) | (427 | ) | (5,922 | ) | (1386.9)% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Loss before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee |
(98,865 | ) | (76,747 | ) | (22,118 | ) | (28.8)% | ||||||
Income tax expense |
(375 | ) | (312 | ) | (63 | ) | (20.2)% | ||||||
Equity in earnings (losses) of an investee |
316 | 139 | 177 | (127.3)% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net loss |
$ | (98,924 | ) | $ | (76,920 | ) | $ | (22,004 | ) | (28.6)% | |||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rental income. Rental income for our wellness centers increased because of scheduled consumer price index based rent increases since January 1, 2011 at certain of our wellness centers. Rental income includes non-cash straight line rent adjustments totaling approximately $1,459 and amortization of approximately $221 of acquired real estate leases and obligations in both the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011.
Depreciation expense. Depreciation expense remained consistent as there were no wellness center acquisitions nor capital improvement funding since January 1, 2011 and we generally depreciate our long lived wellness center assets on a straight line basis.
General and administrative expense. General and administrative expenses consist of fees pursuant to our business management agreement with RMR, equity compensation expense, legal and accounting fees and other costs relating to our status as a publicly traded company. General and administrative expenses increased principally as a result of acquisitions of senior living communities and MOBs for approximately $1,442,275 since January 1, 2011, partially offset by the sale of seven properties during the second quarter of 2011 for approximately $39,460 and the sale of one MOB in July 2012 for approximately $1,100.
88
Acquisition related costs. Acquisition related costs represent legal and due diligence costs incurred in connection with our acquisition activity during 2012 and 2011. Acquisition related costs decreased as a result of reduced acquisition activity and dollar amount of acquisitions in 2012 versus 2011, partially offset by licensing and other regulatory costs related to the senior living communities formerly leased to Sunrise that were transferred to our TRS in September, October and November 2012.
Interest and other income. The decrease in interest and other income is primarily due to the elimination of interest received from our Bridge Loan with Five Star that was repaid in April 2012. Interest and other income also includes interest on our investable cash and dividend income related to the 250,000 common shares of CWH that we own.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased because of our issuance of $250,000 of unsecured senior notes with an interest rate of 4.30% in January 2011, our issuance of $300,000 of unsecured senior notes with an interest rate of 6.75% in December 2011, our issuance of $350,000 of unsecured senior notes with an interest rate of 5.625% in July 2012 and greater amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility at slightly higher weighted average interest rates, partially offset by reduced interest expense due to the redemption in January 2012 of all $225,000 of our 8.625% unsecured senior notes. Our weighted average balance outstanding and interest rate under our revolving credit facility was $163,161 and 1.8%, and $40,486 and 1.7%, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt. In August 2012, we prepaid approximately $199,197 of the outstanding principal balance of our FNMA secured term loan. As a result of this prepayment, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $6,349 consisting of a debt prepayment premium, legal fees and the write off of unamortized deferred financing fees. In June 2011, we entered into a new $750,000 unsecured revolving credit facility that replaced our previous $550,000 unsecured revolving credit facility. As a result of this refinancing, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $427 consisting of the write off of unamortized deferred financing fees.
Equity in earnings of an investee. Equity in earnings of an investee represents our proportionate share of earnings from AIC.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
We provide below calculations of our FFO, Normalized FFO and NOI for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. These measures should be considered in conjunction with net income, operating income and cash flow from operating activities as presented in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income and consolidated statements of cash flows. These measures do not represent cash generated by operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, operating income or cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, or as indicators of our financial performance or liquidity, nor are these measures necessarily indicative of sufficient cash flow to fund all of our needs. Other REITs and real estate companies may calculate FFO, Normalized FFO or NOI differently than we do.
Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations
We calculate FFO and Normalized FFO as shown below. FFO is calculated on the basis defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, which is net income, calculated in accordance with GAAP, excluding any gain or loss on sale of properties and impairment of real estate assets, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, as well as other adjustments currently not applicable to us. Our calculation of Normalized FFO differs from NAREIT's definition of FFO because we include estimated percentage rent in the period to which we estimate that it relates
89
rather than when it is recognized as income in accordance with GAAP and exclude acquisition related costs, loss on early extinguishment of debt, gain on lease terminations and loss on impairment of intangible assets, if any. We consider FFO and Normalized FFO to be appropriate measures of operating performance for a REIT, along with net income, operating income and cash flow from operating activities. We believe that FFO and Normalized FFO provide useful information to investors because by excluding the effects of certain historical amounts, such as depreciation expense, FFO and Normalized FFO may facilitate a comparison of our operating performance between periods and with other REITs. FFO and Normalized FFO are among the factors considered by our Board of Trustees when determining the amount of distributions to our shareholders. Other factors include, but are not limited to, requirements to maintain our status as a REIT, limitations in our revolving credit facility agreement, term loan agreement, if any, and public debt covenants, the availability of debt and equity capital to us, our expectation of our future capital requirements and operating performance, and our expected needs and availability of cash to pay our obligations.
Our calculations of FFO and Normalized FFO for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and reconciliations of FFO and Normalized FFO to net income, the most directly comparable financial measure under GAAP reported in our consolidated financial statements, appear in the following table.
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 151,164 | $ | 135,884 | $ | 151,419 | ||||
Depreciation expense from continuing operations |
153,026 | 139,042 | 110,959 | |||||||
Depreciation expense from discontinued operations |
799 | 2,414 | 2,306 | |||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of properties(1) |
(37,392 | ) | 101 | (21,315 | ) | |||||
Impairment of assets from continuing operations(2) |
7,989 | 3,071 | 1,990 | |||||||
Impairment of assets from discontinued operations(3) |
37,610 | — | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO |
313,196 | 280,512 | 245,359 | |||||||
Acquisition related costs |
3,378 | 9,394 | 12,239 | |||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt(4) |
797 | 6,349 | 427 | |||||||
Gain on lease terminations(5) |
— | (375 | ) | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Normalized FFO |
$ | 317,371 | $ | 295,880 | $ | 258,025 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding |
187,251 |
169,176 |
149,577 |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
FFO per share |
$ |
1.67 |
$ |
1.66 |
$ |
1.64 |
||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Normalized FFO per share |
$ | 1.69 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.73 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 1.01 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributions declared per share |
$ | 1.56 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.50 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
90
estimated sale price less costs to sell. During 2011, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $1,990 to reduce the carrying value of four of our properties to their estimated fair value or sales price less costs to sell.
Property Net Operating Income (NOI)
We calculate NOI as shown below. We define NOI as income from our real estate less our property operating expenses. NOI excludes capitalized tenant improvement costs and leasing commissions. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it may help both investors and management to understand the operations of our properties. We use NOI internally to evaluate individual and company wide property level performance, and we believe that NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level and may facilitate comparisons of our operating performance between periods and with other REITs. The calculation of NOI excludes certain components of net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to our properties' results of operations.
The calculation of NOI by reportable segment is included above in this Item 7. The following table includes the reconciliation of NOI to net income, the most directly comparable financial measure under
91
GAAP reported in our consolidated financial statements, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reconciliation of NOI to Net Income:
|
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Triple net senior living communities NOI |
$ | 237,209 | $ | 246,948 | $ | 242,652 | ||||
Managed senior living communities NOI |
68,347 | 45,212 | 6,212 | |||||||
MOB NOI |
138,427 | 127,188 | 108,062 | |||||||
All other operations NOI |
17,577 | 17,756 | 17,705 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total NOI |
461,560 | 437,104 | 374,631 | |||||||
Depreciation expense |
(153,026 | ) | (139,042 | ) | (110,959 | ) | ||||
General and administrative expense |
(32,657 | ) | (31,517 | ) | (26,041 | ) | ||||
Acquisition related costs |
(3,378 | ) | (9,394 | ) | (12,239 | ) | ||||
Impairment of assets(1) |
(7,989 | ) | (3,071 | ) | (1,990 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
264,510 | 254,080 | 223,402 | |||||||
Interest and other income |
711 |
1,117 |
1,451 |
|||||||
Interest expense |
(117,819 | ) | (117,240 | ) | (98,262 | ) | ||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt(2) |
(797 | ) | (6,349 | ) | (427 | ) | ||||
Gain on lease terminations(3) |
— | 375 | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee |
146,605 | 131,983 | 126,164 | |||||||
Income tax expense |
(600 | ) | (375 | ) | (312 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings of an investee |
334 | 316 | 139 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations |
146,339 | 131,924 | 125,991 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
5,043 | 4,061 | 4,113 | |||||||
Loss on impairment from discontinued operations(4) |
(37,610 | ) | — | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before gain (loss) on sale of properties |
113,772 | 135,985 | 130,104 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of properties(5) |
37,392 | (101 | ) | 21,315 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
$ | 151,164 | $ | 135,884 | $ | 151,419 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
92
terminate on December 31, 2013; the leases for all of the ten communities were terminated prior to December 31, 2012, and resulted in a gain on lease terminations of approximately $375.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Rental income revenues and residents fees and services revenues from our leased and managed properties and borrowings under our revolving credit facility are our principal sources of funds to pay operating expenses, debt service and distributions to shareholders. We believe that these sources and our operating cash flow will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses and debt service and pay distributions on our shares for the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future thereafter. Our future cash flows from operating activities will depend primarily upon our ability to:
Our Operating Liquidity and Resources
We generally receive minimum rents monthly or quarterly from our tenants, we receive percentage rents from our senior living community tenants monthly, quarterly or annually and we receive residents fees and services revenues, net of expenses, from our managed senior living communities monthly. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we generated $306.6 million and $283.3 million, respectively, of cash from operations. The increase in our cash from operations over the prior year primarily resulted from our property acquisitions, as further described below.
Our Investment and Financing Liquidity and Resources
As of December 31, 2013, we had $39.2 million of cash and cash equivalents and $650.0 million available to borrow under our revolving credit facility. We expect to use cash balances, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, net proceeds from offerings of equity or debt securities and the cash flow from our operations to fund our operations, debt repayments, distributions, future property acquisitions, expenditures related to the repair, maintenance or renovation of our properties and other general business purposes. We believe such amounts will be sufficient to fund these activities for the next 12 months and the foreseeable future thereafter.
In order to fund acquisitions and to meet cash needs that may result from timing differences between our receipts of rents and our desire or need to make distributions or pay operating or capital expenses, we maintain a $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of institutional lenders. The maturity date of our revolving credit facility is January 15, 2018 and, subject to the payment of an extension fee and meeting certain other conditions, we have an option to extend the
93
stated maturity date of our revolving credit facility by one year to January 15, 2019. In addition, our revolving credit facility includes a feature under which maximum borrowings may be increased to up to $1.5 billion in certain circumstances. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a premium, which was 130 basis points as of December 31, 2013. We also pay a facility fee of 30 basis points per annum on the total amount of lending commitments under our revolving credit facility. Both the interest rate premium and the facility fee are subject to adjustment based upon changes to our credit ratings. We can borrow, repay and reborrow funds available under our revolving credit facility until maturity, and no principal repayment is due until maturity. As of December 31, 2013, the interest rate payable on borrowings under our revolving credit facility was 1.43%. The weighted average interest rate for borrowings under our revolving credit facility was 1.56% for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013 and February 28, 2014, we had $100.0 million and $170 million, respectively, outstanding under our revolving credit facility.
When significant amounts are outstanding under our revolving credit facility or as the maturity dates of our revolving credit facility and term debts approach, we intend to explore alternatives for the repayment of amounts due. Such alternatives may include incurring additional debt and issuing new equity securities. We currently have an effective shelf registration statement that allows us to issue public securities on an expedited basis, but it does not assure that there will be buyers for such securities.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we acquired 12 properties (13 buildings) located in seven states for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $202.8 million, excluding closing costs. At the times of these acquisitions, these properties generated property NOI which yielded approximately 8.1% of the aggregate gross purchase price, based on estimated GAAP revenue, excluding adjustments for above and below market lease value amortization, less property operating expenses. For more information about these acquisitions, see Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 15 below.
In February 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire one MOB (two buildings) for approximately $1.1 billion, excluding closing costs. This MOB is located in Massachusetts and includes 1,651,037 gross square feet. The property is a newly developed facility certified by the U.S. Green Building Council as a leadership in energy and environmental design, or LEED®, gold. This property is located in the Seaport Innovation district of Boston and it is principally leased to Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for a term of approximately 15 years. The closing of this acquisition is contingent upon customary closing conditions; accordingly, we can provide no assurance that we will purchase this property.
In January 2014, we sold one senior living community located in Texas with 36 assisted living units for approximately $2.4 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, pursuant to the terms of our existing leases with Five Star, we purchased $27.2 million of improvements made to our properties leased to Five Star, and, as a result, the annual rent payable to us by Five Star increased by approximately $2.2 million. We used cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility to fund these purchases.
94
During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, cash expenditures made and capitalized for leasing costs and building improvements at our MOBs and our capital expenditures at our managed senior living communities were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | |||||
MOB tenant improvements(1)(2) |
$ | 3,323 | $ | 3,942 | |||
MOB leasing costs(1)(3) |
3,877 | 2,400 | |||||
MOB building improvements(1)(4) |
5,678 | 4,275 | |||||
Managed senior living communities capital improvements |
10,820 | 6,142 | |||||
Development, redevelopment and other activities(5) |
13,300 | 5,030 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 36,998 | $ | 21,789 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
During the year ended December 31, 2013, commitments made for expenditures in connection with leasing space in our MOBs, such as tenant improvements and leasing costs, were as follows (dollars and square feet in thousands, except per square foot amounts):
| |
New Leases | Renewals | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Square feet leased during the year |
234 | 537 | 771 | |||||||
Total leasing costs and concession commitments(1) |
$ |
7,099 |
$ |
4,167 |
$ |
11,266 |
||||
Total leasing costs and concession commitments per square foot(1) |
$ | 30.34 | $ | 7.76 | $ | 14.61 | ||||
Weighted average lease term (years)(2) |
7.3 | 4.4 | 5.1 | |||||||
Total leasing costs and concession commitments per square foot per year(1) |
$ | 4.16 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 2.87 | ||||
95
As of December 31, 2013, our contractual obligations were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| |
Payment due by period | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligations
|
Total | Less than 1 year |
1-3 years | 3-5 years | More than 5 years |
|||||||||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) |
$ | 1,881,629 | $ | 47,678 | $ | 503,080 | $ | 179,349 | $ | 1,151,522 | ||||||
Capital Lease Obligations |
13,314 | 544 | 1,304 | 1,634 | 9,832 | |||||||||||
Ground Lease Obligations |
2,137 | 173 | 346 | 176 | 1,442 | |||||||||||
Interest Expense Obligations(2) |
1,020,514 | 113,306 | 194,964 | 153,756 | 558,488 | |||||||||||
Tenant Related Obligations(3) |
9,024 | 8,021 | — | — | 1,003 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 2,926,618 | $ | 169,722 | $ | 699,694 | $ | 334,915 | $ | 1,722,287 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In June 2013, we repaid mortgage notes for approximately $10.4 million that had maturity dates in 2013 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.1% encumbering four of our properties. In September 2013, we repaid a mortgage note for approximately $13.6 million that had a maturity date later in 2013 with an interest rate of 6.9% encumbering two of our properties.
In January 2013, we issued 11,500,000 common shares in a public offering, raising net proceeds of approximately $262.1 million, before expenses. We used the net proceeds of this offering to repay borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and for general business purposes, including funding acquisitions of properties.
On January 3, 2014, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.39 per common share, or $73.4 million, to our common shareholders of record on January 13, 2014 for the quarter ended December 31, 2013. This distribution was paid to shareholders on or about February 21, 2014, using cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Simultaneous with entering the agreement to acquire the MOB in Boston, MA, we received a term loan commitment for $800.0 million from Jefferies Finance, LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. We expect that the term loan will have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 140 basis points, will mature five years from closing and can be repaid in part or whole at any time without penalty. Prior to closing the acquisition of these buildings, the term loan is expected to be syndicated to a group of banks, and the term loan is expected to close simultaneous with the closing of this acquisition. The actual amount of the term loan may be reduced depending on our funding needs at the time of closing. The commitments which we received for the term loan are subject to various conditions, including mutually satisfactory documentation. There can be no assurance that all those conditions, some of which are beyond our control, will be satisfied, that the terms of the term loan described in the commitments will not change, or that the term loan will be available to us timely or at all. In certain circumstances, our failure to complete the purchase of this MOB, including by reason of our inability to finance the acquisition, will result in our forfeiture of a $50.0 million deposit. The unavailability of financing for
96
the purchase of the buildings on favorable terms or any delay in obtaining this financing or in completing this purchase could prevent us from realizing the benefits that we expect from this purchase.
We believe we will have access to various types of financings, including equity or debt offerings, to fund our future acquisitions and to pay our debts and other obligations as they become due. Our ability to complete and the costs of our future debt transactions depend primarily upon market conditions and our credit ratings. We have no control over market conditions. Our credit ratings depend upon evaluations by credit rating agencies of our business practices and plans and, in particular, whether we appear to have the ability to maintain our earnings and service our debt funding obligations, to space our debt maturities and to balance our use of equity and debt capital so that our financial performance and leverage ratios afford us flexibility to withstand any reasonably anticipatable adverse changes. We intend to conduct our business activities in a manner which will continue to afford us reasonable access to capital for investment and financing activities. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete any equity or debt offerings or that our cost of any future public or private financings will not increase.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2013, we had no off balance sheet arrangements that have had or that we expect would be reasonably likely to have a future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Debt Covenants
Our principal debt obligations at December 31, 2013 were: (1) outstanding borrowings under our $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility; (2) four public issuances of unsecured senior notes, including: (a) $250.0 million principal amount due 2016 at an annual interest rate of 4.30%, (b) $200.0 million principal amount due 2020 at an annual interest rate of 6.75%, (c) $300.0 million principal amount due 2021 at an annual interest rate of 6.75% and (d) $350.0 million principal amount due 2042 at an annual interest rate of 5.625%; and (3) $681.6 million aggregate principal amount of mortgages secured by 51 of our properties with maturity dates from 2014 to 2043. We also have two properties encumbered by capital leases totaling $13.3 million at December 31, 2013. We had $100.0 million outstanding under our unsecured revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2013. Our unsecured senior notes are governed by an indenture. The indenture for our unsecured senior notes and related supplements and our revolving credit facility contain a number of covenants which restrict our ability to incur debts, including debts secured by mortgages on our properties in excess of calculated amounts, require us to maintain a minimum net worth, restrict our ability to make distributions under certain circumstances and generally require us to maintain certain other financial ratios. As of December 31, 2013, we believe we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our indenture and related supplements, our revolving credit facility and our other debt obligations.
None of our indenture and related supplements, our revolving credit facility or our other debt obligations contain provisions for acceleration which could be triggered by our debt ratings. However, in certain circumstances, our revolving credit facility uses our senior debt rating to determine the fees and the interest rate payable by us.
Our public debt indenture and related supplements contain cross default provisions, which are generally triggered upon default of any of our other debts of at least $10.0 million or, with respect to certain notes under such indenture and supplements, higher amounts. Similarly, our revolving credit facility contains a cross default provision to any other debts of $25.0 million or more that are recourse debts and to any other debts of $75.0 million or more that are non-recourse debts. Our revolving credit
97
facility agreement provides for acceleration of payment of all amounts outstanding upon the occurrence and continuation of certain events of default, such as a change of control of us, which includes RMR ceasing to act as our business manager and property manager.
Related Person Transactions
We have relationships and historical and continuing transactions with our Trustees, our executive officers, RMR, Five Star, CWH, AIC and other companies to which RMR provides management services and others affiliated with them. For example, we have no employees and personnel and various services we require to operate our business are provided to us by RMR pursuant to management agreements; and RMR is owned by our Managing Trustees. Also, as a further example, we have relationships with other companies to which RMR provides management services and which have trustees, directors and officers who are also trustees, directors or officers of ours or RMR, including: Five Star is our former subsidiary, our largest tenant and a manager of certain of our senior living communities, and we are Five Star's largest stockholder; D&R Yonkers LLC is owned by our executive officers and one of our TRSs subleases a portion of a senior living community we own to it in order to accommodate certain requirements of New York healthcare licensing laws; CWH, was our former parent and we have engaged in transactions with CWH from time to time, including our acquiring MOBs from CWH; and we, RMR, Five Star, CWH and four other companies to which RMR provides management services each currently own 12.5% of AIC, an Indiana insurance company, and we and the other shareholders of AIC have property insurance in place providing $500.0 million of coverage pursuant to an insurance program arranged by AIC and with respect to which AIC is a reinsurer of certain coverage amounts. For further information about these and other such relationships and related person transactions, please see Note 5 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by reference, and the section captioned "Business" above in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, for more information about these transactions and relationships and about the risks that may arise as a result of these and other related person transactions and relationships, please see elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including "Warning Concerning Forward Looking Statements" and Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors." Copies of certain of our agreements with these related parties, including our business management agreement and property management agreement with RMR, our leases, forms of management agreements and related pooling agreements and former Bridge Loan with Five Star, our agreements with D&R Yonkers LLC and its owners, various agreements we have entered with CWH and our shareholders agreement with AIC and its shareholders, are publicly available as exhibits to our public filings with the SEC and accessible at the SEC's website, www.sec.gov.
We believe that our agreements with RMR, Five Star, D&R Yonkers LLC and its owners, CWH and AIC are on commercially reasonable terms. We also believe that our relationships with RMR, Five Star, D&R Yonkers LLC and its owners, CWH and AIC and their affiliated and related persons and entities benefit us and, in fact, provide us with competitive advantages in operating and growing our business.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies are those that will have the most impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations and those requiring significant judgments and estimates. We believe that our judgments and estimates are consistently applied and produce financial information that fairly presents our results of operations. Our most critical accounting policies involve our investments in real property. These policies affect our:
98
We allocate the consideration paid, generally cash, for our properties among land, building and improvements, identified intangible assets and liabilities, generally consisting of the value of above market and below market leases, the value of in place leases, the value of tenant relationships and the fair value of any assumed liabilities. Purchase price allocations and the determination of useful lives are based on our estimates and, under some circumstances, studies from independent real estate appraisal firms to provide market information and evaluations that are relevant to our purchase price allocations and determinations of useful lives; however, we are ultimately responsible for the purchase price allocations and determination of useful lives.
We allocate the consideration to land, building and improvements based on a determination of the fair values of these assets assuming the property is vacant. We determine the fair value of a property using methods that we believe are similar to those used by independent appraisers. Purchase price allocations to above market and below market leases are based on the estimated present value (using an interest rate which reflects our assessment of the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (1) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in place leases and (2) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Purchase price allocations to in place leases and tenant relationships are determined as the excess of (1) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in place leases to estimated market rental rates over (2) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant. We aggregate this value between in place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease; however, the value of tenant relationships has not been separated from in place lease value for our properties because we believe such value and related amortization expense is immaterial for acquisitions reflected in our historical financial statements. We consider certain factors in performing these analyses including estimates of carrying costs during the expected lease up periods, including real estate taxes, insurance and other operating income and expenses and costs to execute similar leases in current market conditions, such as leasing commissions, legal and other related costs. If we believe the value of tenant relationships are material in the future, those amounts will be separately allocated and amortized over the estimated lives of the relationships. We recognize the excess, if any, of the consideration paid over amounts allocated to land, buildings and improvements and identified intangible assets and liabilities as goodwill.
We compute depreciation expense using the straight line method over estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings and improvements, and up to 12 years for personal property. We do not depreciate the allocated cost of land. We amortize capitalized above market lease values (included in acquired real estate leases) as a reduction to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. We amortize capitalized below market lease values (presented as acquired real estate lease obligations) as an increase to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. We amortize the value of in place leases exclusive of the value of above market and below market in place leases to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease are written off. Purchase price allocations require us to make certain assumptions and estimates. Incorrect assumptions and estimates may result in inaccurate depreciation and amortization charges over future periods.
We periodically evaluate our properties for impairment. Impairment indicators may include declining tenant occupancy, weak or declining tenant profitability, cash flow or liquidity, our decision to dispose of an asset before the end of its estimated useful life and legislative, market or industry changes that could permanently reduce the value of a property. If indicators of impairment are present,
99
we evaluate the carrying value of the related property by comparing it to the expected future undiscounted cash flows to be generated from that property. If the sum of these expected future cash flows is less than the carrying value, we reduce the net carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value. This analysis requires us to judge whether indicators of impairment exist and to estimate likely future cash flows. If we misjudge or estimate incorrectly or if future tenant operations, market or industry factors differ from our expectations we may record an impairment charge that is inappropriate or fail to record a charge when we should have done so, or the amount of any such charges may be inaccurate.
Each time we enter a new lease or materially modify an existing lease, we evaluate its classification as either a capital or operating lease. The classification of a lease as capital or operating affects the carrying value of a property, as well as our recognition of rental payments as revenue. These evaluations require us to make estimates of, among other things, the remaining useful life and fair market value of a leased property, appropriate discount rates and future cash flows. Incorrect assumptions or estimates may result in misclassification of our leases.
These policies involve significant judgments made based upon experience, including judgments about current valuations, ultimate realizable value, estimated useful lives, salvage or residual value, the ability and willingness of our tenants to perform their obligations to us, and the current and likely future operating and competitive environments in which our properties are operated. In the future, we may need to revise our carrying value assessments to incorporate information which is not now known, and such revisions could increase or decrease our depreciation expense or impairment charges related to properties we own, result in the classification of our leases as other than operating leases or decrease the carrying values of our assets.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation in the past several years in the United States has been modest. Future inflation might have either positive or negative impacts on our business. Inflation might cause the value of our real estate to increase. In an inflationary environment, the percentage rents which we receive based upon a percentage of our tenants' revenues should increase. Further, inflation may permit us to increase rents upon renewal or enter new leases above the previous rent amounts for the leased space. Offsetting these benefits, inflation might cause our costs of equity and debt capital and operating costs to increase. An increase in our capital costs or in our operating costs may result in decreased earnings unless it is offset by increased revenues. In periods of rapid inflation, our tenants' or managers' operating costs may increase faster than revenues, which may have an adverse impact upon us if our tenants' or managers' operating income from our properties becomes insufficient to pay our rents or returns. To mitigate the adverse impact of increased tenant financial distress upon us, we generally require our tenants to provide guarantees for our rent. To mitigate the adverse impact of any increased cost of debt capital in the event of material inflation, we previously have purchased interest rate cap agreements and we may enter into additional interest rate hedge arrangements in the future. The decision to enter into these agreements was and will be based on various factors, including the amount of our floating rate debt outstanding, our belief that material interest rate increases are likely to occur, the costs of and our expected benefit from these agreements and upon requirements of our borrowing arrangements.
Impact of Government Reimbursement
As of December 31, 2013, approximately 95% of our NOI was generated from properties where a majority of the NOI is derived from private resources, and the remaining 5% of our NOI was generated from properties where a majority of the NOI was derived from Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. We and our tenants operate facilities in many states and participate in federal and state healthcare payment programs, including the federal Medicare and state Medicaid programs for
100
services in SNFs, hospitals and other similar facilities, state Medicaid programs for services in assisted living communities and other federal and state healthcare payment programs. Because of the current federal budget deficit and other federal spending priorities and continued challenging state fiscal conditions, there have been numerous recent legislative and regulatory actions or proposed actions with respect to federal Medicare rates and state Medicaid rates and federal payments to states for Medicaid programs. Examples of these, and other information regarding such programs, are provided under the caption "Business—Government Regulation and Reimbursement" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. CMS has issued updated Medicare PPS rates for SNFs effective October 1, 2013, which CMS estimates will result in a net increase of approximately 1.3% in aggregate Medicare payments for SNFs. In June 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld two major provisions of the ACA—the individual mandate, which requires most Americans to maintain health insurance or to pay a penalty, and the Medicaid expansion, which requires states to expand their Medicaid programs by 2014 to cover all individuals under the age of 65 with incomes not exceeding 133% of the federal poverty level. In upholding the Medicaid expansion, the Supreme Court held that it violated the U.S. Constitution as drafted but remedied the violation by modifying the expansion to preclude the Secretary of HHS from withholding existing federal Medicaid funds from states that fail to comply with the Medicaid expansion, instead allowing the Secretary only to deny new Medicaid expansion funding. As of December 31, 2013, 19 states have elected not to broaden Medicaid eligibility and six remain undecided; those states that ultimately choose not to participate in Medicaid expansion will forgo the federal funds that would otherwise be available for that purpose. We are unable to predict the impact of these or other recent legislative and regulatory actions or proposed actions with respect to state Medicaid rates and the payments to states for Medicaid programs on us.
The ACA includes various provisions affecting Medicare and Medicaid providers, including expanded public disclosure requirements for SNFs and other providers, enforcement reforms and increased funding for Medicare and Medicaid program integrity control initiatives. The ACA has resulted in several changes to existing healthcare fraud and abuse laws, established additional enforcement tools and funding to the government, and provided for increased cooperation between agencies by establishing mechanisms for sharing information relating to noncompliance. Furthermore, the ACA provides for enhanced criminal and administrative penalties for noncompliance. We are unable to predict the impact on our tenants and our managers of the insurance reforms, payment reforms, and healthcare delivery systems reforms contained in and to be developed pursuant to the ACA. Expanded insurance availability could provide more paying customers to our tenants and managers. On the other hand, if the changes to be implemented under the ACA result in reduced payments for the services that our tenants or our managers provide or the failure of Medicare, Medicaid or insurance payment rates to cover our tenants' costs, including the rents and management fees that they pay, our future financial results could be adversely and materially affected.
We cannot estimate the type and magnitude of the potential regulatory changes discussed above, but they may have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay us rent, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties. The changes implemented or to be implemented could result in the failure of Medicare, Medicaid or private payment rates to cover our or our tenants' costs of providing required services to residents, in reductions in payments or other circumstances that could have a material adverse effect on the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us, the profitability of our managed senior living communities and the values of our properties.
Seasonality
Nursing home and assisted living operations have historically reflected modest seasonality. During fourth quarter holiday periods, residents at such facilities are sometimes discharged to join in family celebrations and admission decisions are often deferred. The first quarter of each calendar year usually coincides with increased illness among residents which can result in increased costs or discharges to
101
hospitals. As a result of these factors and others, these operations sometimes produce greater earnings in the second and third quarters of each calendar year and lesser earnings in the fourth and first calendar quarters. We do not expect these seasonal differences to have a material impact upon the ability of our tenants to pay our rent or our ability to fund our managed senior living operations or our other businesses. Our MOBs and wellness center business do not typically experience seasonality.
Impact of Climate Change
The current political debate about global climate change has resulted in various treaties, laws and regulations which are intended to limit carbon emissions. We believe these laws being enacted or proposed may cause energy costs at our properties to increase in the future. In an effort to reduce the effects of any increased energy costs in the future, we and our manager, RMR, continuously study ways to improve the energy efficiency at all of our properties. RMR is a member of the Energy Star Partner program, a joint program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy which is focused on promoting energy efficiency and sustainability at commercial properties through its "ENERGY STAR" label program, and a member of the U.S. Green Building Council, a nonprofit organization focused on promoting energy efficiency and sustainability at commercial properties through its LEED® green building certificate program. We do not expect the direct impact of these possible increases in energy costs resulting from laws designed to address climate change to be material to our results of operations because most of the increased costs either may be the responsibility of our tenants directly or in large part may be passed through by us to our tenants as additional lease payments or, in the longer term, would be passed through as higher charges paid by the patients, residents and other customers of our properties; however, increased costs incurred by our managers may affect their ability to pay us our minimum returns and may prevent or reduce any additional returns we may receive. Although we do not believe it is likely in the foreseeable future, laws enacted to mitigate climate change may make some of our buildings obsolete or cause us to make material investments in our properties which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations or the financial condition of our tenants or managers and their ability to pay rent or returns to us.
There have recently been severe weather activities in different parts of the country that some observers believe evidence global climate change, including the recent Hurricane Sandy that impacted portions of the eastern United States in October 2012. Such severe weather that may result from climate change may have an adverse affect on individual properties we own. We mitigate these risks by owning a diversified portfolio of properties and by procuring insurance coverage we believe adequate to protect us from material damages and losses from such activities. However, there can be no assurance that our mitigation efforts will be sufficient or that storms that may occur due to future climate change or otherwise could not have a material adverse affect on our business.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to risks associated with market changes in interest rates. We manage our exposure to this market risk by monitoring available financing alternatives. Other than as described below, we do not currently foresee any significant changes in our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates or in how we manage this exposure in the near future.
102
At December 31, 2013, our outstanding fixed rate debt included the following (dollars in thousands):
Debt
|
Principal Balance(1) |
Annual Interest Rate(1) |
Annual Interest Expense |
Maturity | Interest Payments Due |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unsecured senior notes |
$ | 350,000 | 5.625% | $ | 19,688 | 2042 | Quarterly | |||||||
Unsecured senior notes |
300,000 | 6.75% | 20,250 | 2021 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
Unsecured senior notes |
250,000 | 4.30% | 10,750 | 2016 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
Unsecured senior notes |
200,000 | 6.75% | 13,500 | 2020 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
Mortgages |
292,612 | 6.71% | 19,634 | 2019 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
87,928 | 5.924% | 5,209 | 2016 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
52,000 | 5.64% | 2,933 | 2016 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
45,753 | 6.54% | 2,992 | 2017 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
36,145 | 5.83% | 2,107 | 2014 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
30,177 | 6.015% | 1,815 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
12,773 | 5.66% | 723 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
12,366 | 6.25% | 773 | 2016 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
12,093 | 6.25% | 756 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
11,465 | 6.365% | 730 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
11,245 | 6.15% | 692 | 2017 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
9,425 | 6.73% | 634 | 2018 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
9,353 | 5.95% | 557 | 2038 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
6,579 | 5.81% | 382 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
6,363 | 5.97% | 380 | 2016 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
5,720 | 5.86% | 335 | 2017 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
5,020 | 5.65% | 284 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
4,672 | 4.38% | 204 | 2043 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
4,502 | 5.810% | 262 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
3,444 | 6.25% | 215 | 2033 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
3,007 | 7.31% | 220 | 2022 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
2,805 | 5.88% | 165 | 2015 | Monthly | |||||||||
Mortgages |
1,482 | 7.85% | 116 | 2022 | Monthly | |||||||||
Bonds |
14,700 | 5.88% | 864 | 2027 | Semi-Annually | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
$ | 1,781,629 | $ | 107,170 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
No principal repayments are due under our unsecured notes or bonds until maturity. Our mortgages require principal and interest payments through maturity pursuant to amortization schedules. Because these debts bear interest at a fixed rate, changes in market interest rates during the term of these debts will not affect our interest obligations. If these debts were refinanced at interest rates which are 100 basis points higher or lower than shown above, our annual interest cost would increase or decrease by approximately $17.8 million.
Changes in market interest rates would affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt obligations; increases in market interest rates decrease the fair value of our fixed rate debt, while decreases in market interest rates increase the fair value of our fixed rate debt. Based on the balances outstanding at December 31, 2013, and discounted cash flow analyses through the respective maturity dates, and assuming no other changes in factors that may affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt obligations, a
103
hypothetical immediate 100 basis point change in interest rates would change the fair value of those obligations by approximately $27.4 million.
Our unsecured senior notes and some of our mortgages contain provisions that allow us to make repayments earlier than the stated maturity date. In some cases, we are not allowed to make early repayment prior to a cutoff date and we are generally allowed to make prepayments only at a premium equal to a make whole amount, as defined, which is generally designed to preserve a stated yield to the noteholder. In the past, we have repurchased and retired some of our outstanding debts and we may do so again in the future. These prepayment rights and our ability to repurchase and retire outstanding debt may afford us opportunities to mitigate the risk of refinancing our debts at maturity at higher rates by refinancing prior to maturity.
Our only current floating rate obligations are under our $750.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility and we had $100.0 million of borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2013 under that credit facility. Our revolving credit facility matures in January 2018, and, subject to our meeting certain conditions, including our payment of an extension fee, we have the option to extend the stated maturity date by one year to January 2019. No principal repayments are required under our revolving credit facility prior to maturity, and prepayments may be made, and redrawn subject to conditions, at any time without penalty. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility are in U.S. dollars and bear interest at LIBOR plus a premium that is subject to adjustment based upon changes to our credit ratings. Accordingly, we are vulnerable to changes in U.S. dollar based short term rates, specifically LIBOR. There have been recent governmental inquiries regarding the setting of LIBOR, which may result in changes to the process that could have the effect of increasing LIBOR. In addition, upon renewal or refinancing of our revolving credit facility, we are vulnerable to increases in interest rate premiums due to market conditions or our perceived credit risk. Generally, a change in interest rates would not affect the value of our floating rate debt but would affect our operating results. The following table presents the impact a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have on our annual floating rate interest expense at December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands).
| |
Impact of Changes in Interest Rates | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Interest Rate Per Year(1) |
Outstanding Debt |
Total Interest Expense Per Year |
Annual Earnings per Share Impact(2) |
|||||||||
At December 31, 2013 |
1.56% | $ | 100,000 | $ | 1,560 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
100 basis point increase |
2.56% | $ | 100,000 | $ | 2,560 | $ | 0.01 | ||||||
The following table presents the impact a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would have on our annual floating rate interest expense at December 31, 2013 if we had fully drawn our revolving credit facility (dollars in thousands):
| |
Impact of Changes in Interest Rates | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Interest Rate Per Year(1) |
Outstanding Debt |
Total Interest Expense Per Year |
Annual Earnings per Share Impact(2) |
|||||||||
At December 31, 2013 |
1.56% | $ | 750,000 | $ | 11,700 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||
100 basis point increase |
2.56% | $ | 750,000 | $ | 19,200 | $ | 0.10 | ||||||
104
The foregoing tables show the impact of an immediate increase in floating interest rates. If interest rates were to change gradually over time, the impact would be spread over time. Our exposure to fluctuations in floating interest rates will increase or decrease in the future with increases or decreases in the outstanding amount under our revolving credit facility or other floating rate debt. In addition, the foregoing table does not reflect interest expense relating to the term loan, if any, which we may incur pursuant to the $800.0 million commitment that we obtained in connection with our agreement to acquire one MOB (two buildings) in Massachusetts, as described elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We expect that term loan, if we incur it, to bear interest at LIBOR plus a premium.
Although we have no present plans to do so, we may in the future enter into hedge arrangements from time to time to mitigate our exposure to changes in interest rates.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by this item is included in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Managing Trustees, President and Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act, Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based upon that evaluation, our Managing Trustees, President and Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management Report on Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Trustees regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992 framework). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our 2013 consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. The report appears elsewhere herein.
None.
105
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
We have a Code of Conduct that applies to all our representatives, including our officers and Trustees and employees of RMR. Our Code of Conduct is posted on our website, www.snhreit.com. A printed copy of our Code of Conduct is also available free of charge to any person who requests a copy by writing to our Secretary, Senior Housing Properties Trust, Two Newton Place, 255 Washington Street, Suite 300, Newton, MA 02458-1634. We intend to disclose any amendments or waivers to our Code of Conduct applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller (or any person performing similar functions) on our website.
The remainder of the information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
Equity Compensation Plan Information. We may grant common shares to our officers and other employees of RMR under our 2012 Equity Compensation Plan, or our Share Award Plan. In addition, each of our Trustees receives 2,000 shares per year as part of his annual compensation for serving as a Trustee and such shares are awarded under this plan. The terms of grants made under our Share Award Plan are determined by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Trustees, at the time of the grant. The following table is as of December 31, 2013:
| |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under our equity compensation plan excluding securities reflected in column (a) (c) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders |
None. | None. | 2,819,433 | (1) | ||||
Equity compensation plan not approved by security holders |
None. | None. | None. | |||||
Total |
None. | None. | 2,819,433 | (1) | ||||
For additional information regarding payments by us to RMR, please see Note 5 to our notes to consolidated financial statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The remainder of the information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.
106
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement.
107
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.
The following consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Senior Housing Properties Trust are included on the pages indicated:
All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions, or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted.
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2014, between Fifty Northern Avenue LLC and Eleven Fan Pier Boulevard LLC, as Seller, and Senior Housing Properties Trust, as Purchaser (with respect to the properties located at 50 Northern Avenue and 11 Fan Pier Boulevard, Boston, MA) (incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 10, 2014.) | ||
3.1 |
Composite Copy of Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated September 20, 1999, as amended to date. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
3.2 |
Articles Supplementary dated May 11, 2000. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
3.3 |
Articles Supplementary dated March 10, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated March 18, 2004, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
3.4 |
Certificate of Correction dated March 29, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
3.5 |
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, adopted February 14, 2012. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 29, 2012.) |
||
108
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | Form of Common Share Certificate. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 22, 2013.) | ||
4.2 |
Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2001, between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-76588.) |
||
4.3 |
Supplemental Indenture No. 4, dated as of April 9, 2010, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, related to 6.75% Senior Notes due 2020, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.) |
||
4.4 |
Supplemental Indenture No. 5, dated as of January 13, 2011, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, related to 4.30% Senior Notes due 2016, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.) |
||
4.5 |
Supplemental Indenture No. 6, dated as of December 8, 2011, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, related to 6.75% Senior Notes due 2021, including form thereof. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.) |
||
4.6 |
Supplemental Indenture No. 7, dated as of July 20, 2012, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, related to 5.625% Senior Notes due 2042, including form thereof (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated July 20, 2012.) |
||
4.7 |
Rights Agreement, dated as of March 10, 2004, between the Company and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 10, 2004, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
4.8 |
Appointment of Successor Rights Agent, dated as of December 13, 2004, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2004, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
8.1 |
Opinion of Sullivan & Worcester LLP as to certain tax matters. (Filed herewith.) |
||
10.1 |
Amended and Restated Business Management Agreement, dated as of December 23, 2013, between the Company and Reit Management & Research LLC.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 23, 2013.) |
||
10.2 |
Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2010, between Reit Management & Research LLC and the Company.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2010.) |
||
10.3 |
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement, dated as of January 14, 2011, between Reit Management & Research LLC and the Company.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.) |
||
10.4 |
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Property Management Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2012, between Reit Management & Research LLC and the Company.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 11, 2012.) |
||
109
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.5 | 1999 Incentive Share Award Plan.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Pre-effective Amendment No. 2), File No. 333-69703.) | ||
10.6 |
Amendment to the 1999 Incentive Share Award Plan.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
10.7 |
2003 Incentive Share Award Plan.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
10.8 |
Form of Restricted Share Agreement.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 21, 2010.) |
||
10.9 |
2012 Equity Compensation Plan.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2012.) |
||
10.10 |
Form of Restricted Share Agreement.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.) |
||
10.11 |
Form of Indemnification Agreement.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2012.) |
||
10.12 |
Summary of Trustee Compensation.(+) (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2013.) |
||
10.13 |
Transaction Agreement, dated September 21, 1999, between HRPT Properties Trust (now known as CommonWealth REIT) and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to CommonWealth REIT's Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 12, 1999, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
10.14 |
First Amendment to Transaction Agreement, dated as of May 5, 2008, between HRPT Properties Trust and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 9, 2008, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
10.15 |
Transaction Agreement, dated December 7, 2001, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto, Five Star Quality Care, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc. party thereto, FSQ, Inc., Hospitality Properties Trust, HRPT Properties Trust and Reit Management & Research LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 13, 2001, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
10.16 |
Credit Agreement, dated as of June 24, 2011, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and each of the other financial institutions initially a signatory thereto. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
10.17 |
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of September 4, 2013, among the Company, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, and each of the other financial institutions party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 4, 2013.) |
||
10.18 |
Master Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, between SNH FM Financing LLC and Citibank, N.A., and acknowledged and agreed to by SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
110
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.19 | Amendment No. 1 to Master Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2010 and executed on or about May 27, 2010, among SNH FM Financing LLC, Citibank, N.A. and Fannie Mae, and acknowledged and agreed to by SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.) | ||
10.20 |
Amendment No. 2 to Master Credit Facility Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012, among SNH FM Financing LLC, Citibank, N.A. and Fannie Mae, and acknowledged and agreed to by SNH FM Financing Trust, Ellicott City Land I, LLC and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
10.21 |
Key Principal Guaranty and Indemnity Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, by the Company for the benefit of Citibank, N.A. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.22 |
Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of August 4, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.23 |
Partial Termination of and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of October 1, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009.) |
||
10.24 |
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of November 17, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.) |
||
10.25 |
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of December 10, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.) |
||
10.26 |
Partial Termination of and Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of August 1, 2010, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.) |
||
10.27 |
Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of May 1, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
10.28 |
Partial Termination of and Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of June 1, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
111
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.29 | Seventh Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of June 20, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) | ||
10.30 |
Eighth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of August 31, 2012, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
10.31 |
Partial Termination of and Ninth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of August 1, 2013, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.) |
||
10.32 |
Partial Termination of and Tenth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of January 22, 2014, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Filed herewith.) |
||
10.33 |
Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of August 4, 2009, made by Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Guarantor, for the benefit of certain subsidiaries of the Company, relating to the Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 1), dated as of August 4, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care Trust, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.34 |
Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of August 4, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.35 |
Partial Termination of and First Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of November 1, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.) |
||
10.36 |
Partial Termination of and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of August 1, 2010, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.) |
||
10.37 |
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of June 20, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
10.38 |
Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of July 22, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.) |
||
112
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.39 | Fifth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of August 31, 2012, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) | ||
10.40 |
Partial Termination of and Sixth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of September 19, 2013, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 19, 2013.) |
||
10.41 |
Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of August 4, 2009, made by Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Guarantor, for the benefit of certain subsidiaries of the Company, relating to the Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 2), dated as of August 4, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.42 |
Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of August 4, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.43 |
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of October 1, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.) |
||
10.44 |
Partial Termination of and Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of May 1, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
10.45 |
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of June 20, 2011, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
10.46 |
Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of August 31, 2012, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
10.47 |
Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of August 4, 2009, made by Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Guarantor, for the benefit of certain subsidiaries of the Company, relating to the Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement (Lease No. 4), dated as of August 4, 2009, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and certain subsidiaries of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
113
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.48 | Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, among SNH FM Financing LLC, SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC, as Landlord, and FVE FM Financing, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) | ||
10.49 |
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, among SNH FM Financing LLC, SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC, as Landlord, and FVE FM Financing, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.50 |
Partial Termination of and Amendment No. 2 to Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012, among SNH FM Financing LLC, SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC, as Landlord, and FVE FM Financing, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
10.51 |
Amended and Restated Guaranty Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, made by Five Star Quality Care, Inc., as Guarantor, for the benefit of SNH FM Financing LLC, SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC, relating to the Amended and Restated Master Lease Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, among SNH FM Financing LLC, SNH FM Financing Trust and Ellicott City Land I, LLC, as Landlord, and FVE FM Financing, Inc., as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.52 |
Lease Realignment Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, among the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, and Five Star Quality Care, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
10.53 |
Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated May 21, 2012, among Affiliates Insurance Company, Five Star Quality Care, Inc., Hospitality Properties Trust, CommonWealth REIT, the Company, TravelCenters of America LLC, Reit Management & Research LLC, Government Properties Income Trust and Select Income REIT. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.) |
||
10.54 |
Amended and Restated Pooling Agreement No. 1, dated October 30, 2012, between FVE Managers, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of the Company, amending and restating the Pooling Agreement, dated as of May 12, 2011, between such parties. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
10.55 |
Pooling Agreement No. 2, dated October 30, 2012, between FVE Managers, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
10.56 |
Representative form of Accession Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2012, by SNH SE Tenant TRS, Inc. in favor of FVE Managers, Inc., relating to Pooling Agreement No. 2, dated as of October 30, 2012, between FVE Managers, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.) |
||
114
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.57 | Representative form of Management Agreement for assisted living communities, dated as of May 12, 2011, between FVE Managers, Inc., as Manager, and SNH SE Burlington Tenant LLC, as Owner. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 13, 2011.) | ||
12.1 |
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. (Filed herewith.) |
||
21.1 |
Subsidiaries of the Company. (Filed herewith.) |
||
23.1 |
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. (Filed herewith.) |
||
23.2 |
Consent of Sullivan & Worcester LLP. (Contained in Exhibit 8.1.) |
||
31.1 |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification. (Filed herewith.) |
||
31.2 |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification. (Filed herewith.) |
||
31.3 |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification. (Filed herewith.) |
||
31.4 |
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification. (Filed herewith.) |
||
32.1 |
Section 1350 Certification. (Furnished herewith.) |
||
99.1 |
Master Lease Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2008, among certain subsidiaries of the Company, as Landlord, and Five Star Quality Care-RMI, LLC, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
99.2 |
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2008, made by Five Star Quality Care, Inc., for the benefit of certain subsidiaries of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, File Number 001-15319.) |
||
99.3 |
Lease Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2011, between SNH/LTA SE McCarthy New Bern LLC, as Landlord, and FVE SE McCarthy New Bern LLC, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
99.4 |
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of June 20, 2011, from Five Star Quality Care, Inc. in favor of SNH/LTA SE McCarthy New Bern LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
99.5 |
Lease Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2011, between SNH/LTA SE Wilson LLC, as Landlord, and FVE SE Wilson LLC, as Tenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
99.6 |
Guaranty Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2011, from Five Star Quality Care, Inc. in favor of SNH/LTA SE Wilson LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 27, 2011.) |
||
99.7 |
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2009, between Five Star Quality Care, Inc. and the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.) |
||
99.8 |
Operations Transfer Agreement, dated as of May 29, 2012, among FVE Managers, Inc., certain subsidiaries of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 29, 2012.) |
||
115
| Exhibit Number |
Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 99.9 | Pooling Agreement, dated August 31, 2012, between FVE IL Managers, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) | ||
99.10 |
Representative form of Management Agreement for independent living communities, dated as of December 15, 2011, between FVE IL Managers, Inc., as Manager, and SNH IL Properties Trust, as Owner. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.) |
||
99.11 |
Sublease Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012, between SNH Yonkers Tenant Inc., as Sublessor, and D&R Yonkers LLC, as Subtenant. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
99.12 |
Management Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012, between FVE Managers, Inc., as Manager, and D&R Yonkers LLC, as Licensee. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
99.13 |
Representative form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2012, relating to D&R Yonkers LLC. (Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.) |
||
101.1 |
The following materials from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) related notes to these financial statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail. (Filed herewith.) |
||
116
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Shareholders of Senior Housing Properties Trust:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Senior Housing Properties Trust (the "Company") as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Senior Housing Properties Trust at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Senior Housing Properties Trust's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated March 3, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
March 3, 2014
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Shareholders of Senior Housing Properties Trust:
We have audited Senior Housing Properties Trust's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). Senior Housing Properties Trust's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Item 9A of Senior Housing Properties Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading Management Report on Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Senior Housing Properties Trust maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2013 consolidated financial statements of Senior Housing Properties Trust and our report dated March 3, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
March 3, 2014
F-2
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
| |
December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | |||||
ASSETS |
|||||||
Real estate properties: |
|||||||
Land |
$ | 623,756 | $ | 599,313 | |||
Buildings, improvements and equipment |
4,639,869 | 4,420,302 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
5,263,625 | 5,019,615 | |||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
840,760 | 714,687 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
4,422,865 | 4,304,928 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
39,233 | 42,382 | |||||
Restricted cash |
12,514 | 9,432 | |||||
Investments in available for sale securities |
29,078 | 25,177 | |||||
Deferred financing fees, net |
27,975 | 29,410 | |||||
Due from affiliate |
19,618 | 18,331 | |||||
Acquired real estate leases and other intangible assets, net |
103,494 | 113,986 | |||||
Other assets |
109,889 | 204,356 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total assets |
$ | 4,764,666 | $ | 4,748,002 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||
Unsecured revolving credit facility |
$ | 100,000 | $ | 190,000 | |||
Senior unsecured notes, net of discount |
1,093,337 | 1,092,053 | |||||
Secured debt and capital leases |
699,427 | 724,477 | |||||
Accrued interest |
15,839 | 15,757 | |||||
Due to affiliate |
11,876 | 11,527 | |||||
Assumed real estate lease obligations, net |
12,528 | 13,482 | |||||
Other liabilities |
54,670 | 54,138 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities |
1,987,677 | 2,101,434 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Commitments and contingencies |
|||||||
Shareholders' equity: |
|||||||
Common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value: 199,700,000 shares authorized, 188,167,643 and 176,553,600 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively |
1,881 | 1,765 | |||||
Additional paid in capital |
3,497,590 | 3,233,354 | |||||
Cumulative net income |
1,194,985 | 1,043,821 | |||||
Cumulative other comprehensive income |
8,412 | 4,562 | |||||
Cumulative distributions |
(1,925,879 | ) | (1,636,934 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Total shareholders' equity |
2,776,989 | 2,646,568 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
$ | 4,764,666 | $ | 4,748,002 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
F-3
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
| |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 459,380 | $ | 450,769 | $ | 412,180 | ||||
Residents fees and services |
302,058 | 184,031 | 27,851 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues |
761,438 | 634,800 | 440,031 | |||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
299,878 | 197,696 | 65,400 | |||||||
Depreciation |
153,026 | 139,042 | 110,959 | |||||||
General and administrative |
32,657 | 31,517 | 26,041 | |||||||
Acquisition related costs |
3,378 | 9,394 | 12,239 | |||||||
Impairment of assets |
7,989 | 3,071 | 1,990 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
496,928 | 380,720 | 216,629 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income |
264,510 |
254,080 |
223,402 |
|||||||
Interest and other income |
711 |
1,117 |
1,451 |
|||||||
Interest expense |
(117,819 | ) | (117,240 | ) | (98,262 | ) | ||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
(797 | ) | (6,349 | ) | (427 | ) | ||||
Gain on lease terminations |
— | 375 | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee |
146,605 | 131,983 | 126,164 | |||||||
Income tax expense |
(600 | ) | (375 | ) | (312 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings of an investee |
334 | 316 | 139 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from continuing operations |
146,339 | 131,924 | 125,991 | |||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
5,043 | 4,061 | 4,113 | |||||||
Loss on asset impairment from discontinued operations |
(37,610 | ) | — | — | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before gain (loss) on sale of properties |
113,772 | 135,985 | 130,104 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of properties |
37,392 | (101 | ) | 21,315 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income |
151,164 | 135,884 | 151,419 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||
Change in net unrealized gain / loss on investments |
3,901 | 8,312 | (17,383 | ) | ||||||
Share of comprehensive (loss) income of an investee |
(51 | ) | 22 | 75 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive income |
$ | 155,014 | $ | 144,218 | $ | 134,111 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted average shares outstanding |
187,251 |
169,176 |
149,577 |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share: |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations per share |
$ | 0.98 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.98 | ||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations per share |
(0.17 | ) | 0.02 | 0.03 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income per share |
$ | 0.81 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 1.01 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
F-4
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
| |
Number of Shares |
Common Shares |
Additional Paid-in Capital |
Cumulative Net Income |
Cumulative Distributions |
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments |
Totals | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at December 31, 2010: |
141,854,657 | $ | 1,418 | $ | 2,510,373 | $ | 756,518 | $ | (1,153,868 | ) | $ | 13,536 | $ | 2,127,977 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
— | — | — | 151,419 | — | (17,308 | ) | 134,111 | ||||||||||||||
Distributions |
— | — | — | — | (223,529 | ) | — | (223,529 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of shares |
20,700,000 | 207 | 432,026 | — | — | — | 432,233 | |||||||||||||||
Share grants |
91,389 | 1 | 1,813 | — | — | — | 1,814 | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011: |
162,646,046 | $ | 1,626 | $ | 2,944,212 | $ | 907,937 | $ | (1,377,397 | ) | $ | (3,772 | ) | $ | 2,472,606 | |||||||
Comprehensive income |
— | — | — | 135,884 | — | 8,334 | 144,218 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions |
— | — | — | — | (259,537 | ) | — | (259,537 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of shares |
13,800,000 | 138 | 286,914 | — | — | — | 287,052 | |||||||||||||||
Share grants |
107,554 | 1 | 2,228 | — | — | — | 2,229 | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012: |
176,553,600 | $ | 1,765 | $ | 3,233,354 | $ | 1,043,821 | $ | (1,636,934 | ) | $ | 4,562 | $ | 2,646,568 | ||||||||
Comprehensive income |
— | — | — | 151,164 | — | 3,850 | 155,014 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions |
— | — | — | — | (288,945 | ) | — | (288,945 | ) | |||||||||||||
Issuance of shares |
11,500,000 | 115 | 261,698 | — | — | — | 261,813 | |||||||||||||||
Share grants |
114,043 | 1 | 2,538 | — | — | — | 2,539 | |||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2013: |
188,167,643 | $ | 1,881 | $ | 3,497,590 | $ | 1,194,985 | $ | (1,925,879 | ) | $ | 8,412 | $ | 2,776,989 | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
F-5
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
| |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 151,164 | $ | 135,884 | $ | 151,419 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||
Depreciation |
153,825 | 141,456 | 113,265 | |||||||
Net amortization of debt discounts, premiums and deferred financing fees |
6,042 | 5,327 | 5,067 | |||||||
Straight line rental income |
(7,080 | ) | (13,849 | ) | (11,457 | ) | ||||
Amortization of acquired real estate leases and other intangible assets |
3,656 | 1,597 | (93 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
797 | 6,349 | 427 | |||||||
Impairment of assets |
45,599 | 3,071 | 1,990 | |||||||
Gain on lease terminations |
— | (375 | ) | — | ||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of properties |
(37,392 | ) | 101 | (21,315 | ) | |||||
Equity in (earnings) losses of an investee |
(334 | ) | (316 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||
Restricted cash |
(3,082 | ) | (2,304 | ) | (2,134 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
(11,051 | ) | 991 | (7,341 | ) | |||||
Accrued interest |
82 | (6,524 | ) | 7,288 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
4,477 | 11,894 | 17,259 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash provided by operating activities |
306,703 | 283,302 | 254,236 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||
Real estate acquisitions and deposits |
(193,303 | ) | (316,769 | ) | (797,113 | ) | ||||
Real estate improvements |
(52,270 | ) | (50,131 | ) | (39,309 | ) | ||||
Loan receivable |
— | — | (80,000 | ) | ||||||
Principal payments on loan receivable |
— | 38,000 | 42,000 | |||||||
Investment in Five Star Quality Care, Inc. |
— | — | (5,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of properties |
92,550 | 1,041 | 38,663 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash used for investing activities |
(153,023 | ) | (327,859 | ) | (840,759 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares, net |
261,813 | 287,052 | 432,233 | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of unsecured senior notes, net of discount |
— | 350,000 | 541,984 | |||||||
Proceeds from borrowings on revolving credit facility |
275,000 | 669,000 | 690,000 | |||||||
Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facility |
(365,000 | ) | (479,000 | ) | (818,000 | ) | ||||
Redemption of senior notes |
— | (225,000 | ) | — | ||||||
Repayment of other debt |
(36,371 | ) | (266,528 | ) | (9,711 | ) | ||||
Payment of deferred financing fees |
(3,326 | ) | (12,608 | ) | (13,760 | ) | ||||
Distributions to shareholders |
(288,945 | ) | (259,537 | ) | (223,529 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
(156,829 | ) | 63,379 | 599,217 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,149 | ) | 18,822 | 12,694 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
42,382 | 23,560 | 10,866 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 39,233 | $ | 42,382 | $ | 23,560 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
See accompanying notes.
F-6
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS)
| |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 111,695 | $ | 118,437 | $ | 85,907 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
600 | 389 | 264 | |||||||
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||
Acquisitions funded by assumed debt |
(12,266 | ) | (121,793 | ) | (217,317 | ) | ||||
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||
Assumption of mortgage notes payable |
12,266 | 121,793 | 217,317 | |||||||
Issuance of common shares |
2,541 | 2,229 | 1,814 | |||||||
See accompanying notes.
F-7
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 1. Organization
We are a real estate investment trust, or REIT, organized under Maryland law. At December 31, 2013, we owned 375 properties (401 buildings) located in 40 states and Washington, D.C.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
BASIS OF PRESENTATION. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Senior Housing Properties Trust, or SNH, we, us or our, and our subsidiaries, all of which are 100% owned directly or indirectly by us. All intercompany transactions and balances with or among our consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated.
REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES. We depreciate real estate properties on a straight line basis over estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings and improvements and up to 12 years for personal property. Our management regularly evaluates whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred that could indicate an impairment in the value of long lived assets. If there is an indication that the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable, we estimate the projected undiscounted cash flows to determine if an impairment loss should be recognized. We determine the amount of any impairment loss by comparing the historical carrying value to estimated fair value. We estimate fair value through an evaluation of recent financial performance and projected discounted cash flows using standard industry valuation techniques. In addition to consideration of impairment upon the events or changes in circumstances described above, we regularly evaluate the remaining lives of our long lived assets. If we change our estimate of the remaining lives, we allocate the carrying value of the affected assets over their revised remaining lives.
We allocate the consideration paid, generally cash, for our properties among land, building and improvements, identified intangible assets and liabilities, generally consisting of the value of above market and below market leases, the value of in place leases, the value of tenant relationships and the fair value of any assumed liabilities. Purchase price allocations and the determination of useful lives are based on our estimates and, under some circumstances studies from independent real estate appraisal firms to provide market information and evaluations that are relevant to our purchase price allocations and determinations of useful lives; however, we are ultimately responsible for the purchase price allocations and determination of useful lives.
We allocate the consideration to land, building and improvements based on a determination of the fair values of these assets assuming the property is vacant. We determine the fair value of a property using methods that we believe are similar to those used by independent appraisers. Purchase price allocations to above market and below market leases are based on the estimated present value (using an interest rate which reflects our assessment of the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in place leases and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Purchase price allocations to in place leases and tenant relationships are determined as the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in place leases to estimated market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant. We aggregate this value between in place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease; however, the value of tenant relationships has not been separated from in place lease value for our properties because we believe such value and related amortization expense is immaterial for acquisitions reflected in our
F-8
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
historical financial statements. We consider certain factors in performing these analyses including estimates of carrying costs during the expected lease up periods, including real estate taxes, insurance and other operating income and expenses and costs to execute similar leases in current market conditions, such as leasing commissions, legal and other related costs. If we believe the value of tenant relationships are material in the future, those amounts will be separately allocated and amortized over the estimated lives of the relationships. We recognize the excess, if any, of the consideration paid over amounts allocated to land, buildings and improvements and identified intangible assets and liabilities as goodwill.
We amortize capitalized above market lease values (included in acquired real estate leases in our consolidated balance sheets) as a reduction to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. We amortize capitalized below market lease values (presented as acquired real estate lease obligations in our consolidated balance sheets) as an increase to rental income over the non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. We amortize the value of in place leases exclusive of the value of above market and below market in place leases to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration, the unamortized amount relating to that lease is written off.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS. We carry cash and cash equivalents, consisting of overnight repurchase agreements and short term investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
RESTRICTED CASH. Restricted cash consists of amounts escrowed for real estate taxes, insurance and capital expenditures at certain of our mortgaged properties and security deposits for tenants of our managed senior living communities.
INVESTMENTS IN AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES. We own 250,000 common shares, or 0.2% at December 31, 2013, of CommonWealth REIT, or CWH. We also own 4,235,000 common shares, or 8.7% at December 31, 2013, of Five Star Quality Care, Inc., or Five Star. We classify these holdings as available for sale and carry them at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of shareholders' equity. Cumulative other comprehensive income shown in our consolidated balance sheets includes the net unrealized gain or loss on investments determined as the net difference between the market value of these shares of CWH and Five Star calculated by using weighted average quoted market prices on the dates we acquired these shares ($26.00 and $3.36 per share, respectively) and on December 31, 2013 ($23.31 and $5.49 per share, respectively). At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our investment in CWH had a fair value of $5,828 and $3,960, respectively, including an unrealized loss of $673 and $2,540, respectively. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our investment in Five Star had a fair value of $23,250 and $21,217, respectively, including an unrealized gain of $9,036 and $7,003, respectively.
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS. We and the other seven current shareholders each currently own 12.5% of Affiliates Insurance Company, or AIC's, outstanding equity. Although we own less than 20% of AIC, we use the equity method to account for this investment because we believe that we have significant influence over AIC because all of our Trustees are also directors of AIC. Under the equity method, we record our percentage share of net earnings from AIC in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. If we determine there is an "other than temporary impairment" in the fair value of this investment, we would record a charge to earnings. In evaluating the fair value of
F-9
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
this investment, we have considered, among other things, the assets and liabilities held by AIC, AIC's overall financial condition and earning trends, and the financial condition and prospects for the insurance industry generally. See Note 5 for a further discussion of our investment in AIC.
DEFERRED FINANCING FEES. We capitalize issuance costs related to borrowings and amortize them over the terms of the respective loans. During 2013, we capitalized $3,326 of issuance costs, including $3,078 related to the amendment of our revolving credit facility in September 2013 and $248 related to our assumption of a mortgage loan during 2013. During 2012, we capitalized $12,608 of issuance costs, including $11,439 related to our $350,000 senior notes issued in July 2012, $1,125 related to our assumption of mortgage loans during 2012 and $44 related to our $300,000 senior notes issued in December 2011. During 2011, we capitalized $13,760 of issuance costs, including $6,723 related to refinancing our revolving credit facility in June 2011, $2,540 related to our assumption of mortgage loans during 2011, $2,487 related to our $300,000 senior notes issued in December 2011, $1,973 related to our $250,000 senior notes issued in January 2011 and $37 related to our $512,934 Federal National Mortgage Association, or FNMA, mortgage financing we closed in August 2009. During 2013, we wrote off $538 of unamortized deferred financing fees in connection with the amendment of our revolving credit facility in September 2013. During 2012, we wrote off $3,897 of unamortized deferred financing fees in connection with our prepayment of approximately $199,197 of the outstanding principal balance of our $512,934 FNMA mortgage financing we closed in August 2009. During 2011, we wrote off $427 of unamortized deferred financing fees in connection with the refinancing of our revolving credit facility. The unamortized gross balance of deferred financing fees and related accumulated amortization was $42,797 and $14,822, and $39,471 and $10,061 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average amortization period is approximately 14.2 years. We expect that the amortization expense relating to the unamortized gross balance of deferred financing fees for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2013 will be $4,555 in 2014, $4,279 in 2015, $3,636 in 2016, $3,148 in 2017, $1,795 in 2018 and $10,562, thereafter.
DEFERRED LEASING COSTS. Deferred leasing costs include brokerage, legal and other fees associated with the successful negotiation of leases and are amortized on a straight line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Deferred leasing costs are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. The unamortized gross balance of deferred leasing costs and related accumulated amortization was $10,542 and $2,687, and $6,917 and $1,793 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average amortization period is approximately 6.8 years. We expect that the amortization expense for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2013 will be $1,516 in 2014, $1,386 in 2015, $1,197 in 2016, $930 in 2017, $804 in 2018 and $2,021, thereafter.
LOANS RECEIVABLE. Loans receivable are stated at the unpaid principal balance. We recognized interest income based on the contractual terms in the loan agreement, which is included in interest and other income on our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability or unwillingness of certain tenants to make payments required under their leases. The computation of the allowance is based on the tenants' payment histories and current credit profiles, as well as other considerations. The net amount of our accounts receivables from third parties appear in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
F-10
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
REVENUE RECOGNITION. We recognize rental income from operating leases on a straight line basis over the term of each lease agreement. We recognize percentage rents when realizable and earned, which is generally during the fourth quarter of the year. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, percentage rents earned aggregated $9,226, $10,859, and $11,313, respectively.
As of December 31, 2013, we own 44 senior living communities, including 34 communities that we acquired since June 2011 and the ten senior living communities formerly leased to Sunrise Senior Living, Inc., or Sunrise, that are managed by Five Star. We refer to these 44 communities as the managed senior living communities. We derive our revenues at these 44 managed senior living communities primarily from services to residents and we record revenues when services are provided. Our share of the net operating results of our managed senior living communities in excess of the minimum returns due to us, or additional returns, are generally determined annually. We recognize additional returns due to us under our management agreements at year end when all contingencies are met and the income is earned. We had no additional returns in 2013 and 2012.
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE. We compute earnings per common share using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. We have no common share equivalents, instruments convertible into common shares or other dilutive instruments.
USE OF ESTIMATES. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and related notes. The actual results could differ from these estimates.
INCOME TAXES. We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and as such are generally not subject to federal and most state income taxation on our operating income, provided we distribute our taxable income to our shareholders and meet certain organization and operating requirements. We do, however, lease nearly all of our managed senior living communities to our wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, that, unlike most of our subsidiaries, file separate tax returns and are subject to federal and state income taxes. Our consolidated income tax provision includes the income tax provision related to the operations of our TRSs and certain state income taxes incurred by us, despite our REIT status.
The Income Taxes Topic of the Codification prescribes how we should recognize, measure and present in our financial statements uncertain tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in a tax return. Deferred tax benefits are recognized to the extent that it is "more likely than not" that a particular tax position will be sustained upon examination or audit. To the extent the "more likely than not" standard has been satisfied, the benefit associated with a tax position is measured as the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement. We classify interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, in our financial statements as a component of general and administrative expense.
SEGMENT REPORTING. As of December 31, 2013, we have four operating segments, of which three are separately reportable operating segments. The first operating segment includes triple net senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents. The second operating segment includes managed senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents. The third operating segment includes properties where medical related activities occur but where residential overnight stays and
F-11
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
dining services are not provided. Properties in this segment include those leased to medical providers, medical related businesses, clinics and biotech laboratory tenants, or MOBs. The fourth operating segment includes the operating results of certain properties that offer fitness, wellness and spa services to members, which we do not consider to be sufficiently material as to constitute a separate reporting segment.
RECLASSIFICATIONS. We have made reclassifications to the prior years' financial statements to conform to the current year's presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders' equity.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS. In January 2013, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update is the culmination of the FASB's deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI. This standard does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, it requires disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in their entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. This update has not caused any material changes to the disclosures in, or the presentation of, our condensed consolidated financial statements.
Note 3. Real Estate Properties
Our real estate properties, excluding those classified as held for sale, at cost, consisted of land of $623,756, buildings and improvements of $4,423,517 and furniture, fixtures and equipment, or FF&E, of $216,352 as of December 31, 2013; and land of $599,313, buildings and improvements of $4,222,832 and FF&E of $197,470 as of December 31, 2012. Accumulated depreciation was $723,258 and $117,502 for buildings and improvements and FF&E, respectively, as of December 31, 2013; and $615,001 and $99,686 for buildings and improvements and FF&E, respectively, as of December 31, 2012.
The future minimum lease payments due to us during the current terms of our leases as of December 31, 2013, are $407,401 in 2014, $391,338 in 2015, $372,131 in 2016, $329,421 in 2017, $289,009 in 2018 and $1,687,867 thereafter.
See Note 10 for further information regarding our reportable operating segments.
Triple Net Senior Living Communities Acquisitions:
During 2013, we acquired one triple net senior living community with 150 living units for approximately $22,350, including the assumption of approximately $12,266 of mortgage debt and excluding closing costs. During 2012, we acquired four triple net senior living communities with a total of 511 living units
F-12
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 3. Real Estate Properties (Continued)
for total purchase prices of approximately $36,500, including the assumption of approximately $6,876 of mortgage debt and excluding closing costs. Details of these acquisitions are as follows:
Date
|
Location | Number of Properties |
Units/ Beds |
Cash Paid plus Assumed Debt(1) |
Land | Buildings and Improvements |
FF&E | Intangible Assets |
Assumed Debt |
Premium on Assumed Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Triple Net Senior Living Communities Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 2013(2) |
WA | 1 | 150 | $ | 22,350 | $ | 5,120 | $ | 16,562 | $ | 669 | $ | 1,039 | $ | 12,266 | $ | 1,040 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
1 | 150 | $ | 22,350 | $ | 5,120 | $ | 16,562 | $ | 669 | $ | 1,039 | $ | 12,266 | $ | 1,040 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Triple Net Senior Living Communities Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2012(3) |
Various | 4 | 511 | $ | 36,500 | $ | 4,100 | $ | 29,728 | $ | 1,400 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 6,876 | $ | 628 | |||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
4 | 511 | $ | 36,500 | $ | 4,100 | $ | 29,728 | $ | 1,400 | $ | 1,900 | $ | 6,876 | $ | 628 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Managed Senior Living Communities Acquisitions:
During 2013, we acquired five managed senior living communities with a total of 374 living units for total purchase prices of approximately $62,999, excluding closing costs. During 2012, we acquired seven managed senior living communities with a total of 948 living units for total purchase prices of approximately $187,462, including the assumption of approximately $41,814 of mortgage debt and excluding closing costs. Subsidiaries of Five Star, which we refer to together with Five Star, collectively, in these notes to our consolidated financial statements as Five Star, manage these communities pursuant to long term management agreements. As of December 31, 2013, we own 44 managed senior living communities that are managed by Five Star. We use the TRS structure authorized by the Real Estate Investment Trust Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act for nearly all of our
F-13
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 3. Real Estate Properties (Continued)
managed senior living communities, which we began acquiring in June 2011. Details of these acquisitions are as follows:
Date
|
Location | Number of Properties |
Units/ Beds |
Cash Paid plus Assumed Debt(1) |
Land | Buildings and Improvements |
FF&E | Intangible Assets |
Assumed Debt |
Premium on Assumed Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Managed Senior Living Communities Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
August 2013 |
GA | 1 | 93 | $ | 22,030 | $ | 1,548 | $ | 18,666 | $ | 803 | $ | 1,013 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
October 2013 |
Various | 3 | 213 | 29,004 | 2,242 | 23,861 | 612 | 2,289 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
November 2013 |
WI | 1 | 68 | 11,965 | 1,365 | 9,628 | 199 | 773 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
5 | 374 | $ | 62,999 | $ | 5,155 | $ | 52,155 | $ | 1,614 | $ | 4,075 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Managed Senior Living Communities Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 2012 |
AL | 1 | 92 | $ | 11,300 | $ | 1,300 | $ | 9,071 | $ | 346 | $ | 583 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
May 2012 |
SC | 1 | 59 | 8,059 | 1,092 | 6,405 | 200 | 362 | 4,789 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
July 2012 |
SC | 1 | 232 | 37,273 | 3,898 | 30,670 | 943 | 1,762 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
August 2012 |
NY | 1 | 310 | 99,000 | 8,460 | 87,492 | 3,069 | 2,726 | 31,187 | 2,747 | ||||||||||||||||||||
August 2012 |
MO | 1 | 87 | 11,280 | 260 | 10,852 | 530 | 330 | 5,838 | 692 | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 2012 |
TN | 1 | 90 | 11,550 | 800 | 10,000 | 322 | 428 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 2012 |
TX | 1 | 78 | 9,000 | 1,440 | 6,879 | 246 | 435 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
7 | 948 | $ | 187,462 | $ | 17,250 | $ | 161,369 | $ | 5,656 | $ | 6,626 | $ | 41,814 | $ | 3,439 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
See Note 5 for further information regarding the arrangements we have with Five Star regarding the lease, operations and management of our senior living communities.
MOB Acquisitions:
During 2013, we acquired six MOBs (seven buildings) with a total of 385,171 square feet for total purchase prices of approximately $117,475, excluding closing costs. During 2012, we acquired 12 MOBs (13 buildings) with a total of 839,194 square feet for total purchase prices of approximately $225,695,
F-14
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 3. Real Estate Properties (Continued)
including the assumption of approximately $73,103 of mortgage debt and excluding closing costs. Details of these acquisitions are as follows:
Date
|
Location | Number of Properties |
Square Feet |
Cash Paid plus Assumed Debt(1) |
Land | Buildings and Improvements |
Acquired Real Estate Leases |
Acquired Real Estate Lease Obligations |
Assumed Debt |
Premium on Assumed Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOB Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 2013 |
WA | 1 | 144,900 | $ | 38,000 | $ | 5,639 | $ | 27,213 | $ | 6,736 | $ | 1,588 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
March 2013 |
MS | 1 | 71,983 | 14,600 | 1,269 | 12,516 | 1,498 | 683 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
August 2013(2) |
MA | 1 | 105,462 | 49,500 | 4,559 | 44,941 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 2013 |
FL | 3 | 62,826 | 15,375 | 2,432 | 11,165 | 1,778 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
6 | 385,171 | $ | 117,475 | $ | 13,899 | $ | 95,835 | $ | 10,012 | $ | 2,271 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
MOB Acquisitions during the year ended December 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 2012 |
GA | 1 | 28,440 | $ | 8,600 | $ | 1,080 | $ | 6,138 | $ | 1,392 | $ | 10 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||
May 2012 |
GA | 1 | 111,538 | 23,100 | 3,500 | 13,179 | 6,421 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 2012 |
HI | 1 | 204,429 | 70,495 | 11,200 | 55,618 | 4,306 | 629 | 52,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
June 2012 |
MD | 1 | 92,180 | 18,250 | 1,900 | 12,858 | 3,570 | 78 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
July 2012 |
TX | 1 | 63,082 | 16,850 | 990 | 13,887 | 1,973 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
July 2012 |
FL | 1 | 52,858 | 7,750 | 1,620 | 5,341 | 789 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 2012 |
MA | 1 | 33,600 | 16,400 | 1,443 | 14,153 | 1,812 | — | 11,462 | 1,008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
November 2012 |
TN | 1 | 33,796 | 9,200 | 1,528 | 6,590 | 1,132 | 50 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 2012 |
MN | 1 | 76,637 | 15,100 | 2,774 | 9,276 | 4,087 | 183 | 9,641 | 854 | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 2012 |
CO | 1 | 62,418 | 16,400 | 1,437 | 11,777 | 3,196 | 10 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 2012 |
TX | 2 | 80,216 | 23,550 | 3,116 | 16,439 | 4,006 | 11 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
12 | 839,194 | $ | 225,695 | $ | 30,588 | $ | 165,256 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 971 | $ | 73,103 | $ | 1,862 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In February 2014, we entered into an agreement to acquire one MOB (two buildings) for approximately $1,125,420, excluding closing costs. The MOB is located in Massachusetts and includes 1,651,037 gross building square feet. The closing of this acquisition is contingent upon customary closing conditions; accordingly, we can provide no assurance that we will purchase this property, that the acquisition will not be delayed or that its terms will not change.
In May 2012, we entered into an operations transfer agreement, or the Operations Transfer Agreement, with Sunrise and Five Star related to the ten communities that we were then leasing to Sunrise, pursuant to which we and Sunrise accelerated the December 31, 2013 termination date of these Sunrise leases, and we began leasing the ten communities to our TRS. Five Star is managing the ten communities pursuant to long term management agreements. As a result of these lease terminations, we recorded a gain on lease terminations of approximately $375 during the year ended December 31, 2012. Pursuant to the Operations Transfer Agreement, we paid Sunrise $1,000 to purchase the inventory and certain improvements owned by Sunrise at these ten communities, which were transferred to our managed senior living communities segment.
F-15
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 3. Real Estate Properties (Continued)
In August and December 2013, we sold three properties, including one skilled nursing facility and two rehabilitation hospitals which were previously classified as held for sale, for combined sales prices of $92,550, excluding closing costs, and recognized an aggregate gain on sale of these properties of approximately $37,392. In July 2012, we sold one MOB (one building) located in Massachusetts with approximately 18,900 square feet for a sale price of approximately $1,100 and recorded a loss on the sale of this property of approximately $101.
In January 2014, we sold one senior living community located in Texas for a sale price of $2,400, excluding closing costs.
We amortize capitalized above market lease values (included in acquired real estate leases and other intangible assets in our consolidated balance sheets) as a reduction in rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. We amortize capitalized below market lease values (presented as acquired real estate lease obligations in our consolidated balance sheets) as an increase in rental income over the non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. Such amortization resulted in a reduction in rental income of $3,656 during the year ended December 31, 2013, a reduction in rental income of $1,597 during the year ended December 31, 2012, and an increase in rental income of $93 during the year ended December 31, 2011. We amortize the value of in place leases exclusive of the value of above market and below market in place leases to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. Such amortization included in depreciation and amortization totaled $22,718, $19,340, $11,318 during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. If a lease is terminated prior to its stated expiration, the unamortized amount relating to that lease is written off.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had recorded intangible lease assets of $166,247, including $44,279 of capitalized above market lease values and $121,968 of the value of in place leases, and $161,419, including $45,290 of capitalized above market lease values and $116,129 of the value of in place leases, and intangible lease liabilities of $22,170 and $21,978, respectively. We recorded intangible lease assets of $17,131 and $41,764 and intangible lease liabilities of $2,271 and $971 for properties acquired in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized above market lease values was $16,148 and $13,675 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average remaining amortization period of capitalized above market lease values is approximately 6.0 years. Accumulated amortization of capitalized below market lease values was $9,642 and $8,286 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average amortization period of capitalized below market lease values is approximately 6.9 years. Accumulated amortization of the value of in place leases exclusive of the value of above and below market in place leases was $46,605 and $31,907 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The weighted average amortization period of the value of in place leases exclusive of the value of above and below market in place leases is approximately 5.8 years. We expect to recognize net future amortization of these intangible lease assets and liabilities in the amounts of approximately $22,762 in 2014, $17,964 in 2015, $15,478 in 2016, $11,987 in 2017, $8,393 in 2018 and $14,384, thereafter.
Impairment
We periodically evaluate our properties for impairments. Impairment indicators may include declining tenant occupancy, weak or declining tenant profitability, cash flow or liquidity, our decision to dispose
F-16
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 3. Real Estate Properties (Continued)
of an asset before the end of its estimated useful life and legislative, market or industry changes that could permanently reduce the value of a property. If indicators of impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of the affected property by comparing it to the expected future undiscounted net cash flows to be generated from that property. If the sum of these expected future net cash flows is less than the carrying value, we reduce the net carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value. During 2013, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $1,304 to reduce the carrying value of one of our properties to its estimated net sale price. During 2012, we recorded an impairment of assets charge of $3,071 to reduce the carrying value of one of our properties to its estimated net sale price. During 2011, we recorded impairment of assets charges of $1,990 to reduce the carrying value of four of our properties to their estimated net sales prices.
As of December 31, 2013, we had 10 senior living communities with 744 living units and four MOBs (seven buildings) with 831,499 square feet categorized as properties held for sale. During 2013, we recorded impairment of assets charges of $44,295 to reduce the carrying value of 11 of these 17 properties to their aggregate estimated net sale price. These properties are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and have a net book value (after impairment) of approximately $27,888 at December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2012, we had one senior living community with 120 units held for sale (which is included within the 10 senior living communities held for sale as of December 31, 2013). This property is included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets and had a net book value (after impairment) of approximately $850 at December 31, 2012. We decided to sell these properties due to underlying conditions in the markets where these properties are located. We classify all properties that meet the criteria outlined in the Property, Plant and Equipment Topic of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or the Codification, as held for sale within other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
Results of operations for properties sold or held for sale are included in discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations once the criteria for discontinued operations in the Presentation of Financial Statements Topic of the Codification are met. Summarized income statement information for the four MOBs (seven buildings) that meet the criteria for discontinued operations is included in discontinued operations as follows:
| |
For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Rental income |
$ | 9,451 | $ | 10,042 | $ | 9,986 | ||||
Property operating expenses |
(3,609 | ) | (3,567 | ) | (3,567 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(799 | ) | (2,414 | ) | (2,306 | ) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 5,043 | $ | 4,061 | $ | 4,113 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
During 2013 and 2012, pursuant to the terms of our existing leases with Five Star, we purchased $27,208 and $30,520, respectively, of improvements made to our properties leased to Five Star, and, as a result, the annual rent payable to us by Five Star increased by approximately $2,177 and $2,456, respectively.
F-17
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 3. Real Estate Properties (Continued)
We committed $9,727 for expenditures related to 771,000 square feet of leases executed during 2013. Committed and unspent tenant related obligations based on executed leases as of December 31, 2013, were $9,024.
Note 4. Shareholders' Equity
We have common shares available for issuance under the terms of our equity compensation plan, as then in effect, or our Share Award Plan. We awarded 82,600 common shares with an aggregate market value of $1,888, 78,492 common shares with an aggregate market value of $1,775 and 72,450 common shares with an aggregate market value of $1,732 to our officers and certain employees of Reit Management & Research LLC, or RMR, pursuant to our Share Award Plan during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, we awarded each of our Trustees 2,000 common shares in each of 2013, 2012 and 2011 with an aggregate market value of $286 ($57 to each Trustee), $205 ($41 to each Trustee) and $234 ($47 to each Trustee), respectively, pursuant to our Share Award Plan as part of their annual fees. Shares awarded to the Trustees vest immediately. The shares awarded to our officers and certain employees of our manager vest in five equal annual installments beginning on the date of grant. We include the value of awarded shares in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated income statement at the time the awards vest. At December 31, 2013, 2,819,433 of our common shares remain available for issuance under our Share Award Plan.
A summary of shares granted and vested under the terms of our Share Award Plan from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013 is as follows:
| |
Number of Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unvested shares at December 31, 2010 |
118,670 | $ | 21.83 | ||||
Shares granted in 2011 |
82,450 | $ | 23.84 | ||||
Shares vested in 2011 |
(68,500 | ) | $ | 23.36 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Unvested shares at December 31, 2011 |
132,620 | $ | 22.86 | ||||
Shares granted in 2012 |
87,092 | $ | 22.38 | ||||
Shares vested in 2012 |
(79,678 | ) | $ | 22.18 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Unvested shares at December 31, 2012 |
140,034 | $ | 23.03 | ||||
Shares granted in 2013 |
92,075 | $ | 23.48 | ||||
Shares vested in 2013 |
(81,398 | ) | $ | 23.85 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Unvested shares at December 31, 2013 |
150,711 | $ | 23.84 | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
The 150,711 unvested shares as of December 31, 2013 are scheduled to vest as follows: 57,554 shares in 2014, 45,174 shares in 2015, 31,533 shares in 2016 and 16,450 shares in 2017. As of December 31, 2013, the estimated future compensation for the unvested shares was $3,350 based on the closing share price of $22.23 on December 31, 2013. The weighted average period over which the compensation expense will be recorded is approximately 1.5 years. We recorded share based compensation expense of $1,961 in 2013, $1,827 in 2012 and $1,659 in 2011.
F-18
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 4. Shareholders' Equity (Continued)
On January 3, 2014, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.39 per share, or $73,385, to our common shareholders of record on January 13, 2014, with respect to our operating results for the quarter ended December 31, 2013; we paid this distribution on February 21, 2014, using cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our cash distributions to our common shareholders for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, were $1.56 per share, $1.53 per share and $1.49 per share, respectively. The characterization of the distributions made in 2013, 2012 and 2011 was 66.19%, 62.65% and 65.64% ordinary income, respectively; 21.30%, 37.35% and 27.48% return of capital, respectively; 3.10%, 0% and 2.59% capital gain, respectively; and 9.41%, 0% and 4.29% unrecaptured Section 1250 gain, respectively.
In January 2013, we issued 11,500,000 common shares in a public offering, raising net proceeds of approximately $262,068, before expenses. In July 2012, we issued 13,800,000 common shares in a public offering, raising net proceeds of approximately $287,052. In July and October 2011, we issued 11,500,000 and 9,200,000 common shares in two public offerings, raising net proceeds of approximately $247,498 and $184,735, respectively. We used the net proceeds from these offerings to repay borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and for general business purposes, including the partial funding of the acquisitions described above.
Note 5. Related Person Transactions
We have adopted written Governance Guidelines that describe the consideration and approval of any related person transactions. Under these Governance Guidelines, we may not enter into any transaction in which any Trustee or executive officer, any member of the immediate family of any Trustee or executive officer or any other related person, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest unless that transaction has been disclosed or made known to our Board of Trustees and our Board of Trustees reviews and approves or ratifies the transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested Trustees, even if the disinterested Trustees constitute less than a quorum. If there are no disinterested Trustees, the transaction must be reviewed and approved or ratified by both (i) the affirmative vote of a majority of our Board of Trustees and (ii) the affirmative vote of a majority of our Independent Trustees. In determining whether to approve or ratify a transaction, our Board of Trustees, or disinterested Trustees or Independent Trustees, as the case may be, also act in accordance with any applicable provisions of our declaration of trust, consider all of the relevant facts and circumstances and approve only those transactions that are fair and reasonable to us and our shareholders. All related person transactions described below were reviewed and approved or ratified by a majority of the disinterested Trustees or otherwise in accordance with our policies and our declaration of trust, each as described above. In the case of transactions with us by RMR employees (other than our Trustees and executive officers) subject to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the employee must seek approval from an executive officer who has no interest in the matter for which approval is being requested. Copies of our Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics are available on our website, www.snhreit.com.
Five Star: Five Star was formerly our 100% owned subsidiary. Five Star is our largest tenant, we are Five Star's largest stockholder and Five Star manages several senior living communities for us. In 2001, we distributed substantially all of Five Star's then outstanding shares of common stock to our shareholders. As of December 31, 2013, we owned 4,235,000 shares of common stock of Five Star, or approximately 8.7% of Five Star's outstanding shares of common stock. One of our Managing Trustees,
F-19
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
Mr. Barry Portnoy, is a managing director of Five Star. RMR provides management services to both us and Five Star. Five Star's President and Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer are officers of RMR. Accordingly, the transactions between us and Five Star entered after Five Star became a separate public company and that are described herein were approved by our Independent Trustees and Five Star's independent directors who are not trustees or directors of the other company. In order to effect the spin-off of Five Star and to govern relations after the spin-off, Five Star entered into agreements with us and others, including RMR. Since then, Five Star has entered into various leases, management agreements and other agreements with us that include provisions that confirm and modify these undertakings. Among other matters, these agreements provide that:
As of December 31, 2013, we leased 187 senior living communities to Five Star. Under Five Star's leases with us, Five Star pays us rent consisting of minimum annual rent amounts plus percentage rent based on increases in gross revenues at certain properties. Five Star's total minimum annual rent payable to us as of December 31, 2013 was $190,134, excluding percentage rent. We recognized total rental income from Five Star of $203,724, $200,912 and $195,409 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, our rents receivable from Five Star were $17,960 and $17,680, respectively, and those amounts are included in due from affiliate in our consolidated balance sheets. We determine percentage rent due under our Five Star leases annually and recognize it at year end when all contingencies are met. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, pursuant to the terms of our leases with Five Star, we purchased $27,208, $30,520 and $33,269, respectively, of improvements made to properties leased to Five Star, and, as a result, the
F-20
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
annual rent payable to us by Five Star increased by approximately $2,177, $2,456 and $2,665, respectively.
In December 2013, pursuant to the asset purchase agreement, or Purchase Agreement, we sold two rehabilitation hospitals and certain related assets to certain unrelated parties for a sales price of approximately $90,000, and Five Star transferred the operations of the two hospitals and several in-patient and out-patient clinics affiliated with those hospitals, to those third parties. Each hospital was previously leased by us to Five Star under Lease No. 2 and was operated by Five Star. Pursuant to an amendment to Lease No. 2 that we entered into in September 2013 in connection with our agreement to sell these rehabilitation hospitals and Five Star's agreement to transfer its related hospital operations, Lease No. 2 terminated with respect to the rehabilitation hospitals and the annual rent paid to us by Five Star under Lease No. 2 was reduced by $9,500 upon the closing of the sale of the hospitals. The lease amendment also provides for an allocation of indemnification obligations under the Purchase Agreement between us and Five Star.
We and Five Star have agreed to offer for sale 11 senior living communities we lease to Five Star. Five Star's rent payable to us will be reduced if and as these sales may occur pursuant to terms set in our leases with Five Star. In August 2013, we sold one of these communities, a skilled nursing facility, or SNF, with 112 living units, for a sales price of $2,550, and as a result of this sale, Five Star's annual minimum rent payable to us decreased by $255, or 10% of the net proceeds of the sale to us, in accordance with the terms of the applicable lease. In January 2014, we sold one senior living community located in Texas with 36 assisted living units, for a sale price of $2,400, and as a result of this sale, Five Star's annual minimum rent payable to us decreased by $210, or 8.75% of the net proceeds of the sale to us, in accordance with the terms of the applicable lease. We can provide no assurance that the remaining nine senior living communities which we and Five Star have agreed to offer for sale will be sold or what the terms of any sales may provide.
Five Star began managing communities for our account in June 2011 in connection with our acquisition of certain senior living communities at that time. We have since acquired additional communities that are being managed by Five Star. As of December 31, 2013, Five Star managed 44 senior living communities for our account. We lease our senior living communities that are managed by Five Star that include assisted living units or skilled nursing facilities to our TRSs, and Five Star manages these communities pursuant to long term management agreements on substantially similar terms. With the exception of the management agreement for the senior living community in New York described below, the management agreements for the communities Five Star manages for our account provide Five Star with a management fee equal to 3% of the gross revenues realized at the communities, plus reimbursement for Five Star's direct costs and expenses related to the communities and an incentive fee equal to 35% of the annual net operating income of the communities after we realize an annual return equal to 8% of our invested capital. The management agreements generally expire on December 31, 2031, and are subject to automatic renewal for two consecutive 15 year terms, unless earlier terminated or timely notice of nonrenewal is delivered. The management agreements provide that we and Five Star each have the option to terminate the agreements upon the acquisition by a person or group of more than 9.8% of the other's voting stock and upon other change in control events affecting the other party, as defined in those documents, including the adoption of any shareholder proposal (other than a precatory proposal) or the election to the board of directors or board of trustees of any individual if such proposal or individual was not approved, nominated or appointed, as
F-21
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
the case may be, by vote of a majority of the board of directors or board of trustees in office immediately prior to the making of such proposal or the nomination or appointment of such individual.
In connection with the management agreements, we and Five Star have entered into four combination agreements, or pooling agreements: three pooling agreements which combine our management agreements for communities that include assisted living units, or the AL Pooling Agreements, and a fourth pooling agreement, which combines our management agreements for communities consisting only of independent living units, or the IL Pooling Agreement. We entered into the initial AL Pooling Agreement in May 2011 and the second AL Pooling Agreement in October 2012. Each of our first and second AL Pooling Agreements includes 20 identified communities. We and Five Star entered into the third AL Pooling Agreement in November 2013 and that pooling agreement currently includes the management agreement for the community we acquired in November 2013, as further described below. We entered into the IL Pooling Agreement in August 2012 and that agreement currently includes management agreements for two communities that have only independent living units. The senior living community in New York described below that Five Star manages for our account is not included in any of our pooling agreements. Each of the AL Pooling Agreements and the IL Pooling Agreement aggregates the determination of fees and expenses of the various communities that are subject to such pooling agreement, including determinations of our return on our invested capital and Five Star's incentive fees. Under each of the pooling agreements, we have the right, after the period of time specified in the agreement has elapsed and subject to Five Star's cure rights, to terminate all, but not less than all, of the management agreements that are subject to the agreement if we do not receive our minimum return in each of three consecutive years. In addition, under each of the pooling agreements, Five Star has a limited right to require the sale of underperforming communities. Also, under each of the pooling agreements, any nonrenewal notice given by Five Star with respect to a community is deemed a nonrenewal with respect to all the communities that are the subject of the agreement. Special committees of each of our Board of Trustees and Five Star's board of directors composed solely of our Independent Trustees and Five Star's independent directors who are not also trustees or directors of the other party and who were represented by separate counsel reviewed and approved the terms of these management agreements and pooling agreements. We incurred management fees of $9,229, $5,582 and $835 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, with respect to the communities Five Star manages. These amounts are included in property operating expenses in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
In August 2013, we acquired a senior living community located in Georgia with 93 assisted living units for $22,030, excluding closing costs. In October 2013, we acquired three senior living communities with an aggregate of 213 assisted living units for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $29,004, excluding closing costs; one of those communities is located in Tennessee, and the other two are located in Georgia. In November 2013, we acquired a senior living community in Wisconsin with 68 assisted living units for $11,965, excluding closing costs. We lease these five senior living communities to our TRSs and Five Star manages these communities for our account pursuant to separate long term management agreements on terms similar to those management arrangements we currently have with Five Star for communities that include assisted living units. The management agreements for the senior living communities we acquired in August and October 2013 were added to our second AL Pooling Agreement and the management agreement for the senior living community we acquired in November 2013 was added to the third AL Pooling Agreement. We expect that we may enter into additional
F-22
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
management arrangements with Five Star for senior living communities that we may acquire in the future on terms similar to those management arrangements we currently have with Five Star.
We own a senior living community in New York with 310 living units, a portion of which is managed by Five Star pursuant to a long term management agreement with us with respect to the living units at this community that are not subject to the requirements of New York healthcare licensing laws. The terms of this management agreement are substantially consistent with the terms of our other management agreements with Five Star for communities that include assisted living units, except the management fee we pay is equal to 5% of the gross revenues realized at that portion of the community and there is no incentive fee payable by us to Five Star. In order to accommodate certain requirements of New York healthcare licensing laws, one of our TRSs subleases the portion of this community that is subject to those requirements to an entity, D&R Yonkers LLC, which is owned by our President and Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer. Five Star manages this portion of the community pursuant to a long term management agreement with D&R Yonkers LLC. Under the sublease agreement, D&R Yonkers LLC is obligated to pay rent only from available revenues generated by the subleased community. Our TRS is obligated to advance any rent shortfalls to D&R Yonkers LLC, and D&R Yonkers LLC is obligated to repay one of our TRSs only from available revenues generated by the subleased community. Pursuant to the management agreement between D&R Yonkers LLC and Five Star, D&R Yonkers LLC pays Five Star a management fee equal to 3% of the gross revenues realized at that portion of the community and there is no incentive fee payable by D&R Yonkers LLC to Five Star. D&R Yonkers LLC's management agreement with Five Star expires on August 31, 2017, and is subject to renewal for nine consecutive five year terms, unless earlier terminated or timely notice of nonrenewal is delivered. Further, we have entered into an indemnification agreement with the owners of D&R Yonkers LLC, pursuant to which we have agreed to indemnify them for costs, losses and expenses they may sustain by reason of being a member, director or officer of D&R Yonkers LLC or in connection with any costs, losses or expenses under our TRS's sublease with D&R Yonkers LLC or the management agreement between D&R Yonkers LLC and Five Star.
As discussed in Note 6, in May 2011, we and Five Star entered into a bridge loan, or the Bridge Loan, under which we lent to Five Star $80,000 to fund a portion of Five Star's purchase of six senior living communities. In April 2012, Five Star repaid in full the $38,000 principal amount then outstanding under the Bridge Loan, resulting in the termination of the Bridge Loan. We recognized interest income from the Bridge Loan of $314 and $593 for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
As discussed in Note 7, in August 2012, we prepaid approximately $199,197 of the outstanding principal balance of our FNMA secured term loan. As a result of this prepayment, 11 of the 28 properties securing that debt were released from the mortgage and, in connection with this release, we entered into amendments to the related master credit agreement and our leases with Five Star so that these 11 properties were removed from the lease created to accommodate this FNMA debt and were added to our other multi-property leases with Five Star.
In 2011 and 2012, there were additional transactions between us and Five Star. A further description of the terms of certain of those transactions is included in our annual reports to shareholders and our Annual Reports on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, in each case for the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
F-23
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
RMR: We have no employees. Personnel and various services we require to operate our business are provided to us by RMR. We have two agreements with RMR to provide management and administrative services to us: (i) a business management agreement, which relates to our business generally, and (ii) a property management agreement, which relates to the property level operations of our MOBs.
One of our Managing Trustees, Mr. Barry Portnoy, is Chairman, majority owner and an employee of RMR. Our other Managing Trustee, Mr. Adam Portnoy, is the son of Mr. Barry Portnoy, and an owner, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of RMR. Each of our executive officers is also an officer of RMR, and our President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. David Hegarty, is a director of RMR. Our Independent Trustees also serve as independent directors or independent trustees of other public companies to which RMR provides management services. Mr. Barry Portnoy serves as a managing director or managing trustee of those companies and Mr. Adam Portnoy serves as a managing trustee of a majority of those companies. In addition, officers of RMR serve as officers of those companies.
Our Board of Trustees has given our Compensation Committee, which is comprised exclusively of our Independent Trustees, authority to act on our behalf with respect to our management agreements with RMR. The charter of our Compensation Committee requires the committee to annually review the terms of these agreements, evaluate RMR's performance under the agreements and determine whether to renew, amend or terminate the management agreements.
In 2013, our Compensation Committee retained FTI Consulting, Inc., a nationally recognized compensation consultant experienced in REIT compensation programs, to assist the committee in developing the terms of the incentive fee payable to RMR under our business management agreement with RMR beginning in 2014. In connection with retaining this consultant, our Compensation Committee determined that the consultant did not have any conflicts of interest which would prevent the consultant from advising the committee.
On December 23, 2013, we and RMR entered into an amended and restated business management agreement, effective with respect to services performed on and after January 1, 2014. Under the terms of this amended and restated business management agreement:
F-24
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
Capitalization, up to $250,000, plus (b) 0.5% of our Average Market Capitalization exceeding $250,000.
The average book value and average historical cost of our real estate investments will include our consolidated assets invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in or loans secured by real estate and personal property owned in connection with such real estate (including acquisition related costs and costs which may be allocated to intangibles or are unallocated), all before reserves for depreciation, amortization, impairment charges or bad debts or other similar noncash reserves.
The terms of the amended and restated business management agreement described above were approved by our Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of our Independent Trustees, and
F-25
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
the terms of the incentive fee were developed by our Compensation Committee in consultation with FTI Consulting, Inc., an independent compensation consultant.
For 2013, 2012 and 2011, our business management agreement provided for the base business management fee to be paid to RMR at an annual rate equal to the sum of (a) 0.5% of the book value of the Transferred Assets, plus (b) 0.7% of the historical cost of our other real estate investments excluding the Transferred Assets, up to the first $250,000 of such investments, and 0.5% thereafter. In addition, for 2013, 2012 and 2011, our business management agreement provided for RMR to be paid an incentive fee equal to 15% of the product of (i) the weighted average of our common shares outstanding on a diluted basis during a fiscal year and (ii) the excess, if any, of the FFO Per Share, as defined in the business management agreement, for such fiscal year over the FFO Per Share for the preceding fiscal year. We recognized business management fees of $27,013, $25,372 and $20,814 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts are included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated financial statements. In March 2013 and 2012, we issued 21,968 and 20,462 of our common shares to RMR for the incentive fees for 2012 and 2011, respectively. No incentive fee was earned in 2013.
Our property management agreement with RMR provides for management fees for our MOB properties equal to 3.0% of gross rents and construction supervision fees for construction on those properties equal to 5.0% of construction costs. The aggregate property management and construction supervision fees we recognized were $6,568, $5,791 and $4,455 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts are included in property operating expenses or have been capitalized, as appropriate, in our consolidated financial statements.
RMR also provides internal audit services to us in return for our share of the total internal audit costs incurred by RMR for us and other publicly owned companies managed by RMR and its affiliates, which amounts are subject to approval by our Compensation Committee. Our Audit Committee appoints our Director of Internal Audit. Our share of RMR's costs of providing this internal audit function was approximately $201, $193 and $240 for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which amounts are included in general and administrative expenses in our consolidated financial statements. These allocated costs are in addition to the business and property management fees we paid to RMR.
We are generally responsible for all of our operating expenses, including certain expenses incurred by RMR on our behalf. We are generally not responsible for payment of RMR's employment, office or administration expenses incurred to provide management services to us, except for the employment and related expenses of RMR employees who provide on-site property management services at our owned properties and our share of the staff employed by RMR who perform our internal audit function. Pursuant to our amended and restated business management agreement, RMR may from time to time negotiate on our behalf with certain third party vendors and suppliers for the procurement of services to us. As part of this arrangement, we may enter agreements with RMR and other companies to which RMR provides management services for the purpose of obtaining more favorable terms from such vendors and suppliers.
The current terms of both our amended and restated business management agreement with RMR and our property management agreement with RMR end on December 31, 2014 and automatically renew for successive one year terms unless we or RMR give notice of non-renewal before the end of an applicable term. We or RMR may terminate either agreement upon 60 days' prior written notice, and
F-26
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
RMR may also terminate the property management agreement upon five business days' notice if we undergo a change of control, as defined in the property management agreement.
Under our amended and restated business management agreement with RMR, we acknowledge that RMR may engage in other activities or businesses and act as the manager to any other person or entity (including other REITs) even though such person or entity has investment policies and objectives similar to ours and we are not entitled to preferential treatment in receiving information, recommendations and other services from RMR. Previously our business management agreement had provided that, with certain exceptions, if we determined to offer for sale or other disposition any real property that, at such time, is of a type within the investment focus of another REIT to which RMR provides management services, we would first offer that property for purchase or disposition to that REIT and negotiate in good faith for such purchase or disposition. This right of first offer provision was eliminated when the business management agreement was amended and restated on December 23, 2013.
RMR also leased from us approximately 4,100 square feet of office space for one of its regional offices until that lease was terminated in December 2012. We earned approximately $186 and $180 in rental income from RMR in 2012 and 2011, respectively, which we believe was commercially reasonable rent for this office space.
Under our Share Award Plan, we grant restricted shares to certain employees of RMR, some of whom are our officers. We granted a total of 82,600 restricted shares with an aggregate value of $1,888, 78,492 restricted shares with an aggregate value of $1,775 and 72,450 restricted shares with an aggregate value of $1,732 to such persons in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, based upon the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the dates of grants. One fifth of those restricted shares vested on the grant dates and one fifth vests on each of the next four anniversaries of the grant dates. These share grants to RMR employees are in addition to the fees we pay to RMR. On occasion, we have entered into arrangements with former employees of RMR in connection with the termination of their employment with RMR, providing for the acceleration of vesting of restricted shares previously granted to them under our Share Award Plan. Additionally, each of our President and Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer received grants of restricted shares of other companies to which RMR provides management services, including Five Star, in their capacities as officers of RMR.
CWH: CWH was formerly our parent. We were spun off to CWH's shareholders in 1999. As of December 31, 2013, we own 250,000 common shares of CWH. One of our Managing Trustees, Mr. Barry Portnoy, is a managing trustee of CWH. Our other Managing Trustee, Mr. Adam Portnoy, is a managing trustee and the President of CWH. In addition, one of our Independent Trustees is an independent trustee of CWH. RMR provides management services to both us and CWH. CWH's executive officers are officers of RMR. Accordingly, the purchase and right of first refusal transaction agreements between us and CWH described below were negotiated and approved by special committees of each company's board of trustees comprised solely of Independent Trustees who were not also Independent Trustees of the other company.
At the time of our spin-off from CWH, we and CWH entered into a transaction agreement, which was amended on May 5, 2008, pursuant to which, among other things, we and CWH agreed that so long as CWH owns 10% or more of our common shares, we and CWH engage the same manager or we and
F-27
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
CWH have any common managing trustees: (i) CWH will not make any investment in senior apartments, congregate communities, assisted living properties, nursing homes or other healthcare properties, including MOBs, without the prior approval of a majority of our Independent Trustees, and (ii) we will not make any investment in office buildings, warehouses or malls, excluding MOBs, without the prior approval of a majority of CWH's independent trustees. In 2008, in connection with our agreement to purchase 45 MOBs from CWH, we and CWH amended the transaction agreement to permit us, rather than CWH, to invest in MOBs and CWH granted us a right of first refusal to purchase up to 45 identified MOBs then owned by CWH if CWH decided to sell those properties.
Between November 2010 and January 2011, we purchased 27 properties (approximately 2,803,000 square feet of rental space), which were majority leased as MOBs from CWH for total sale prices of $470,000, excluding closing costs. In September 2011, we acquired from CWH 13 additional properties (approximately 1,310,000 square feet), which were majority leased as MOBs for total sale prices of $167,000, excluding closing costs. In connection with our September 2011 purchase of the 13 properties from CWH, we and CWH terminated our existing right of first refusal, as we have purchased substantially all of the properties that were subject to that right of first refusal. Our purchase agreements with CWH include arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes.
AIC: We, RMR, Five Star, CWH and four other companies to which RMR provides management services each currently own 12.5% of AIC. All of our Trustees and most of the trustees and directors of the other AIC shareholders currently serve on the board of directors of AIC. RMR provides management and administrative services to AIC pursuant to a management and administrative services agreement with AIC. Our Governance Guidelines provide that any material transaction between us and AIC shall be reviewed, authorized and approved or ratified by the affirmative votes of both a majority of our Board of Trustees and a majority of our Independent Trustees. The shareholders agreement among us, the other shareholders of AIC and AIC includes arbitration provisions for the resolution of disputes.
As of December 31, 2013, we have invested approximately $5,209 in AIC since its formation in 2008. Although we own less than 20% of AIC, we use the equity method to account for this investment because we believe that we have significant influence over AIC as all of our Trustees are also directors of AIC. Our investment in AIC had a carrying value of $5,913 and $5,629 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which amounts are included in other assets on our consolidated balance sheets. We recognized income of $334, $316 and $139 arising from our investment in AIC for 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In June 2013, we and the other shareholders of AIC purchased a one-year property insurance policy providing $500,000 of coverage pursuant to an insurance program arranged by AIC and with respect to which AIC is a reinsurer of certain coverage amounts. We paid AIC a premium, including taxes and fees, of approximately $4,748 in connection with that policy, which amount may be adjusted from time to time as we acquire or dispose of properties that are included in the policy. Our annual premiums for this property insurance in 2012 and 2011 were $4,438 and $1,600, respectively, before adjustments made for acquisitions or dispositions we made during those periods. We periodically consider the possibilities for expanding our insurance relationships with AIC to include other types of insurance and may in the future participate in additional insurance offerings AIC may provide or arrange. We may invest additional amounts in AIC in the future if the expansion of this insurance business requires additional capital, but we are not obligated to do so. By participating in this insurance business with RMR and the other companies to which RMR provides management services, we expect
F-28
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 5. Related Person Transactions (Continued)
that we may benefit financially by possibly reducing our insurance expenses or by realizing our pro rata share of any profits of this insurance business.
Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance: In July 2013, we, RMR, Five Star, CWH and three other companies to which RMR provides management services purchased a combined directors' and officers' liability insurance policy providing $10,000 in aggregate primary non-indemnifiable coverage and $5,000 in aggregate excess coverage and we also purchased from an unrelated third party insurer a separate directors' and officers' liability insurance policy providing $5,000 in coverage. We paid aggregate premiums of approximately $343 for these policies.
Note 6. Loan Receivable
In May 2011, we and Five Star entered into the Bridge Loan under which we agreed to lend Five Star up to $80,000 to fund a portion of Five Star's purchase of a portfolio of six senior living communities. By September 30, 2011, Five Star had completed its acquisition of these communities and had borrowed all $80,000 of this Bridge Loan. By December 31, 2011, Five Star had repaid $42,000 of those borrowings. In April 2012, Five Star paid the remaining balance of $38,000, resulting in the termination of this Bridge Loan. The Bridge Loan was secured by mortgages on three of the senior living communities that Five Star acquired and on four other senior living communities owned by Five Star. The Bridge Loan bore interest at a rate equal to the annual rates of interest applicable to our borrowings under our revolving credit facility, plus 1%. We recognized interest income from this Bridge Loan of $314 for the year ended December 31, 2012, which is included in interest and other income in our consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.
Note 7. Indebtedness
Our principal debt obligations at December 31, 2013 were: (1) outstanding borrowings under our $750,000 unsecured revolving credit facility; (2) four public issuances of unsecured senior notes, including: (a) $250,000 principal amount at an annual interest rate of 4.30% due 2016, (b) $200,000 principal amount at an annual interest rate of 6.75% due 2020, (c) $300,000 principal amount at an annual interest rate of 6.75% due 2021 and (d) $350,000 principal amount at an annual interest rate of 5.625% due 2042; and (3) $681,628 aggregate principal amount of mortgages secured by 51 of our properties with maturity dates from 2013 to 2043. The 51 mortgaged properties had a carrying value of $945,419 at December 31, 2013. We also have two properties subject to capital leases totaling $13,314 at December 31, 2013; these two properties had a carrying value of $18,627 at December 31, 2013.
In connection with the acquisitions discussed in Note 3 above, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we assumed $12,266 of mortgage debt, which was recorded at a fair value of $13,306. This mortgage has a contractual interest rate of 6.25% and matures in May 2015. We recorded the assumed mortgage at its fair value, which exceeded its outstanding principal balance by $1,040. We determined the fair value of the assumed mortgage using a market approach based upon Level 3 inputs (significant other unobservable inputs) in the fair value hierarchy.
In June 2013, we prepaid mortgage notes encumbering four of our properties that had an aggregate principal balance of $10,377, a weighted average interest rate of 6.1% and maturity dates later in 2013. In September 2013, we prepaid a mortgage note encumbering two of our properties that had an aggregate principal balance of $13,579, a weighted average interest rate of 6.9% and a maturity date later in 2013. As a result, we recognized losses on early extinguishment of debt of $259 for the year ended December 31, 2013.
F-29
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 7. Indebtedness (Continued)
Also in September 2013, we amended the agreement governing our unsecured revolving credit facility with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and a syndicate of other lenders. As a result of the amendment the stated maturity date of the revolving credit facility was extended from June 24, 2015 to January 15, 2018. Subject to the payment of an extension fee and meeting certain other conditions, we have an option to further extend the stated maturity date by an additional one year. The revolving credit facility agreement provides that we can borrow, repay and reborrow funds available under the revolving credit facility agreement until maturity, and no principal repayment is due until maturity. The $750,000 maximum amount of our revolving credit facility remained unchanged by the amendment. The revolving credit facility agreement continues to include a feature under which maximum borrowings under the facility may be increased to up to $1,500,000 in certain circumstances. Under this amendment, the interest rate paid on borrowings under the revolving credit facility agreement was reduced from LIBOR plus a premium of 160 basis points to LIBOR plus a premium of 130 basis points, and the facility fee was reduced from 35 basis points to 30 basis points per annum on the total amount of lending commitments. Both the interest rate premium and the facility fee are subject to adjustment based upon changes to our credit ratings. As a result of the amendment, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $538. As of December 31, 2013, the interest rate payable on borrowings under our revolving credit facility was 1.4% and the weighted average interest rate for borrowings under our revolving credit facility was 1.6% and 1.8% for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and February 28, 2014, we had $100,000 and $170,000, respectively outstanding under our revolving credit facility. We incurred interest expense and other associated costs related to our revolving credit facility of $3,781, $5,733 and $2,745 for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Our revolving credit facility agreement provides for acceleration of payment of all amounts outstanding upon the occurrence and continuation of certain events of default, such as a change of control of us, which includes RMR ceasing to act as our business manager and property manager.
Our public debt indentures and related supplements and our credit facility agreement contain a number of financial and other covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to incur indebtedness or to make distributions under certain circumstances and require us to maintain financial ratios and a minimum net worth.
In July 2012, we sold $350,000 of unsecured senior notes. The notes require interest at a fixed rate of 5.625% per annum and are due in 2042. The notes can also be prepaid at par at any time beginning in July 2017. Net proceeds from this sale of the notes, after underwriting discounts, fees and other expenses were approximately $338,561. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly in arrears. We used a part of the net proceeds of this offering to repay borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility and we used the remaining net proceeds from this offering to prepay a part of our FNMA secured term loan and for general business purposes, including funding a part of our recent acquisitions of properties discussed in Note 3 above.
In August 2012, we prepaid approximately $199,197 of the outstanding principal balance of our FNMA secured term loan that had an interest rate of 6.4% at August 31, 2012 and a maturity date in September 2019, using, among other funds, net proceeds from our July 2012 debt offering. As a result of this prepayment, 11 of the 28 properties securing this loan were released from the related mortgage. Also, as a result of this prepayment, we recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of
F-30
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 7. Indebtedness (Continued)
approximately $6,349 consisting of a debt prepayment premium, legal fees and the write off of unamortized deferred financing fees.
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our additional outstanding debt consisted of the following:
| |
|
|
December 31, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unsecured Debt
|
Coupon | Maturity | Face Amount |
Unamortized Discount |
Face Amount |
Unamortized Discount |
|||||||||||||
Senior notes |
4.300 | % | 2016 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 1,085 | $ | 250,000 | $ | 1,620 | ||||||||
Senior notes |
6.750 | % | 2020 | 200,000 | 1,348 | 200,000 | 1,563 | ||||||||||||
Senior notes |
6.750 | % | 2021 | 300,000 | 4,230 | 300,000 | 4,764 | ||||||||||||
Senior notes |
5.625 | % | 2042 | 350,000 | — | 350,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total unsecured debt |
$ | 1,100,000 | $ | 6,663 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 7,947 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Principal Balance as of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
Net Book Value of Collateral |
|||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Interest Rate |
|
Number of Properties as Collateral |
Initial Cost of Collateral |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Secured and Other Debt
|
2013(1) | 2012(1) | Maturity | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgages(2) |
$ | — | $ | 10,565 | 6.11% | Dec 13 | — | $ | 17,034 | $ | — | $ | 14,883 | ||||||||||||
Mortgages(2) |
— | 13,759 | 6.91% | Dec 13 | — | 36,359 | — | 33,057 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgages |
36,145 | 36,906 | 5.83% | Jun 14 | 2 | 79,000 | 77,799 | 78,594 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
30,177 | 30,944 | 6.02% | Mar 15 | 1 | 99,000 | 96,354 | 98,346 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
12,093 | — | 6.25% | May 15 | 1 | 22,350 | 22,033 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
5,020 | 5,121 | 5.65% | Jun 15 | 1 | 22,143 | 20,965 | 21,435 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
11,465 | 11,612 | 6.37% | Jul 15 | 1 | 14,849 | 14,197 | 14,432 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgages |
12,773 | 13,051 | 5.66% | Jul 15 | 3 | 26,606 | 25,457 | 25,868 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
2,805 | 2,878 | 5.880% | Jul 15 | 1 | 15,397 | 14,384 | 14,774 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
6,579 | 6,792 | 5.81% | Oct 15 | 1 | 9,650 | 9,474 | 9,665 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
4,502 | 4,596 | 5.810% | Oct 15 | 1 | 8,600 | 8,168 | 8,391 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgages |
52,000 | 52,000 | 5.64% | Jan 16 | 1 | 70,495 | 64,904 | 66,123 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
6,363 | 6,476 | 5.97% | Apr 16 | 1 | 10,272 | 9,811 | 10,051 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
87,928 | 90,607 | 5.92% | Nov 16 | 2 | 157,500 | 151,928 | 154,691 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
12,366 | 12,537 | 6.25% | Nov 16 | 1 | 22,102 | 21,672 | 21,968 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
5,720 | 5,810 | 5.86% | Mar 17 | 1 | 11,280 | 11,292 | 11,562 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgages |
45,753 | 46,753 | 6.54% | May 17 | 8 | 62,500 | 54,702 | 56,341 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
11,245 | 11,419 | 6.150% | Aug 17 | 1 | 16,400 | 15,180 | 15,507 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
9,425 | 9,641 | 6.73% | Apr 18 | 1 | 15,100 | 11,299 | 11,526 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
292,611 | 296,437 | 6.71% | Sep 19 | 17 | 617,161 | 252,404 | 260,274 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage(3) |
3,007 | 3,270 | 7.31% | Jan 22 | 1 | 18,827 | 16,478 | 16,839 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage(3) |
1,482 | 1,608 | 7.85% | Jan 22 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
3,444 | 3,534 | 6.25% | Feb 33 | 1 | 5,200 | 4,588 | 4,695 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
9,353 | 9,492 | 5.95% | Sep 38 | 2 | 11,425 | 9,080 | 9,295 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage |
4,672 | 4,747 | 4.38% | Sep 43 | 1 | 8,059 | 7,632 | 7,768 | |||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
14,700 | 14,700 | 5.88% | Dec 27 | 1 | 34,307 | 25,619 | 26,559 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital Leases |
13,314 | 13,792 | 7.70% | Apr 26 | 2 | 28,601 | 18,626 | 15,603 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total secured |
$ | 694,942 | $ | 719,047 | 53 | $ | 1,440,217 | $ | 964,046 | $ | 1,008,247 | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-31
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 7. Indebtedness (Continued)
assumed certain of these debts. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the unamortized net premiums on certain of these mortgages were $4,485 and $5,430, respectively.
We include amortization of capital lease assets in depreciation expense. Assets encumbered by capital leases had a net book value of $18,627 and $15,602 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Interest on our unsecured senior notes and our bonds is payable semi-annually in arrears; however, no principal repayments are due until maturity. Required monthly payments on our mortgages include principal and interest. Payments under our capital leases are due monthly.
Required principal payments on our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2013, are as follows:
2014 |
$ | 48,222 | ||
2015 |
94,249 | |||
2016 |
410,136 | |||
2017 |
65,382 | |||
2018 |
115,602 | |||
Thereafter |
1,161,353 |
Note 8. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities
The following table presents certain of our assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring and non recurring basis at December 31, 2013 categorized by the level of inputs used in the valuation of each asset or liability.
Description
|
Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets held for sale(1) |
$ | 29,219 | $ | — | $ | 29,219 | $ | — | |||||
Long-lived assets held and used(2) |
$ | 653 | $ | — | $ | 653 | $ | — | |||||
Investments in available for sale securities(3) |
$ | 29,078 | $ | 29,078 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Unsecured senior notes(4) |
$ |
1,099,378 |
$ |
1,099,378 |
$ |
— |
$ |
— |
|||||
Secured debt(5) |
$ | 755,303 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 755,303 | |||||
F-32
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 8. Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities (Continued)
charges of $1,304 and $3,071 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for this property in order to reduce its carrying value to the amount stated.
In addition to the assets and liabilities described in the above table, our additional financial instruments include rents receivable, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, other unsecured debt and other liabilities. The fair values of these additional financial instruments approximate their carrying values at December 31, 2013 based upon their liquidity, short term maturity, variable rate pricing or our estimate of fair value using discounted cash flow analyses and prevailing interest rates.
Note 9. Concentration of Credit Risk
The assets included in these financial statements are primarily income producing senior housing and healthcare related real estate located throughout the United States. The following is a summary of the assets leased and rents earned from our significant lessee as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
| |
At December 31, 2013 |
At December 31, 2012 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Investment(1) | % of Total | Investment(1) | % of Total | |||||||||
Five Star |
$ | 2,099,713 | 40% | $ | 2,074,877 | 41% | |||||||
All others |
3,163,912 | 60% | 2,944,738 | 59% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
$ | 5,263,625 | 100% | $ | 5,019,615 | 100% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Rental income | % of Total | Rental income | % of Total | |||||||||
Five Star |
$ | 203,719 | 44% | $ | 200,912 | 45% | |||||||
All others |
255,661 | 56% | 249,857 | 55% | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
$ | 459,380 | 100% | $ | 450,769 | 100% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-33
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 9. Concentration of Credit Risk (Continued)
As discussed above, Five Star is our former subsidiary. Rental income from Five Star represented 42% of our annualized rental income and the properties Five Star leases from us represented 40% of our investments, at cost, as of December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2013, Five Star also managed a portfolio of 44 senior living communities for our account.
Subject to the information in the following paragraph, financial information about Five Star may be found on the SEC's website by entering Five Star's name at http://www.sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/companysearch.html. Reference to Five Star's financial information on this external website is presented to comply with applicable accounting regulations of the SEC. Except for such financial information contained therein as is required to be included herein under such regulations, Five Star's public filings and other information located in external websites are not incorporated by reference into these financial statements.
In November 2013, Five Star announced that it will restate its financial results for 2011, 2012 and the first and second quarters of 2013 due to certain errors primarily relating to the accounting for non-cash income tax items in prior periods, and that its previously filed financial reports for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 and for the periods ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013 should no longer be relied upon. In addition, Five Star has not yet filed its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. Five Star also announced that it had determined that, as a result of the matters discussed above, Five Star has a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting. We understand that Five Star is currently in the process of preparing restated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2012 and the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013, which will be filed with the SEC on an amended Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and amended Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013. We understand that Five Star is also in the process of preparing its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. However, there is no assurance as to when the restatements and updated SEC filings will be completed.
See Note 5 for further information relating to our leases and management arrangements with Five Star.
Note 10. Segment Reporting
We have four operating segments, of which three are separately reportable operating segments: (i) triple net senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents, (ii) managed senior living communities that provide short term and long term residential care and dining services for residents and (iii) MOBs. Our triple net and managed senior living communities include independent living communities and assisted living communities and SNFs. Properties in the MOB segment include medical office, clinic and biotech laboratory buildings. The "All Other" category in the following table includes amounts related to corporate business
F-34
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 10. Segment Reporting (Continued)
activities and the operating results of certain properties that offer fitness, wellness and spa services to members.
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Triple Net Senior Living Communities |
Managed Senior Living Communities |
MOBs | All Other Operations |
Consolidated | |||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 237,209 | $ | — | $ | 204,594 | $ | 17,577 | $ | 459,380 | ||||||
Residents fees and services |
— | 302,058 | — | — | 302,058 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues |
237,209 | 302,058 | 204,594 | 17,577 | 761,438 | |||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
— | 233,711 | 66,167 | — | 299,878 | |||||||||||
Depreciation |
66,854 | 28,972 | 53,408 | 3,792 | 153,026 | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
— | — | — | 32,657 | 32,657 | |||||||||||
Acquisition related costs |
— | — | — | 3,378 | 3,378 | |||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
6,685 | — | — | 1,304 | 7,989 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
73,539 | 262,683 | 119,575 | 41,131 | 496,928 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) |
163,670 |
39,375 |
85,019 |
(23,554 |
) |
264,510 |
||||||||||
Interest and other income |
— | — | — | 711 | 711 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
(26,501 | ) | (12,217 | ) | (5,466 | ) | (73,635 | ) | (117,819 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
— | — | — | (797 | ) | (797 | ) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee |
137,169 |
27,158 |
79,553 |
(97,275 |
) |
146,605 |
||||||||||
Income tax expense |
— | — | — | (600 | ) | (600 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of an investee |
— | — | — | 334 | 334 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
137,169 | 27,158 | 79,553 | (97,541 | ) | 146,339 | ||||||||||
Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
— | — | 5,043 | — | 5,043 | |||||||||||
Impairment of assets from discontinued operations |
— | — | (37,610 | ) | — | (37,610 | ) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before gain on sale of properties |
137,169 | 27,158 | 46,986 | (97,541 | ) | 113,772 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
37,392 | — | — | — | 37,392 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) |
$ |
174,561 |
$ |
27,158 |
$ |
46,986 |
$ |
(97,541 |
) |
$ |
151,164 |
|||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets |
$ |
1,778,591 |
$ |
979,152 |
$ |
1,727,497 |
$ |
279,426 |
$ |
4,764,666 |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-35
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 10. Segment Reporting (Continued)
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Triple Net Senior Living Communities |
Managed Senior Living Communities |
MOBs | All Other Operations |
Consolidated | |||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 246,948 | $ | — | $ | 186,065 | $ | 17,756 | $ | 450,769 | ||||||
Residents fees and services |
— | 184,031 | — | — | 184,031 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues |
246,948 | 184,031 | 186,065 | 17,756 | 634,800 | |||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
— | 138,819 | 58,877 | — | 197,696 | |||||||||||
Depreciation |
68,419 | 19,437 | 47,394 | 3,792 | 139,042 | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
— | — | — | 31,517 | 31,517 | |||||||||||
Acquisition related costs |
— | — | — | 9,394 | 9,394 | |||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
— | — | 3,071 | — | 3,071 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
68,419 | 158,256 | 109,342 | 44,703 | 380,720 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) |
178,529 |
25,775 |
76,723 |
(26,947 |
) |
254,080 |
||||||||||
Interest and other income |
— | — | — | 1,117 | 1,117 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
(35,530 | ) | (11,769 | ) | (3,255 | ) | (66,686 | ) | (117,240 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
— | — | — | (6,349 | ) | (6,349 | ) | |||||||||
Gain on lease terminations |
375 | — | — | — | 375 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee |
143,374 |
14,006 |
73,468 |
(98,865 |
) |
131,983 |
||||||||||
Income tax expense |
— | — | — | (375 | ) | (375 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of an investee |
— | — | — | 316 | 316 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
143,374 | 14,006 | 73,468 | (98,924 | ) | 131,924 | ||||||||||
Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
— | — | 4,061 | — | 4,061 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before loss on sale of properties |
143,374 | 14,006 | 77,529 | (98,924 | ) | 135,985 | ||||||||||
Loss on sale of properties |
— | — | (101 | ) | — | (101 | ) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) |
$ |
143,374 |
$ |
14,006 |
$ |
77,428 |
$ |
(98,924 |
) |
$ |
135,884 |
|||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets |
$ |
1,817,253 |
$ |
949,974 |
$ |
1,684,434 |
$ |
296,341 |
$ |
4,748,002 |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-36
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 10. Segment Reporting (Continued)
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Triple Net Senior Living Communities |
Managed Senior Living Communities |
MOBs | All Other Operations |
Consolidated | |||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Rental income |
$ | 242,652 | $ | — | $ | 151,823 | $ | 17,705 | $ | 412,180 | ||||||
Residents fees and services |
— | 27,851 | — | — | 27,851 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total revenues |
242,652 | 27,851 | 151,823 | 17,705 | 440,031 | |||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses |
— | 21,639 | 43,761 | — | 65,400 | |||||||||||
Depreciation |
68,429 | 2,591 | 36,147 | 3,792 | 110,959 | |||||||||||
General and administrative |
— | — | — | 26,041 | 26,041 | |||||||||||
Acquisition related costs |
— | — | — | 12,239 | 12,239 | |||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
1,028 | — | 962 | — | 1,990 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total expenses |
69,457 | 24,230 | 80,870 | 42,072 | 216,629 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating income (loss) |
173,195 |
3,621 |
70,953 |
(24,367 |
) |
223,402 |
||||||||||
Interest and other income |
— | — | — | 1,451 | 1,451 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
(41,510 | ) | (2,352 | ) | (996 | ) | (53,404 | ) | (98,262 | ) | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
— | — | — | (427 | ) | (427 | ) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) before income tax expense and equity in earnings of an investee |
131,685 |
1,269 |
69,957 |
(76,747 |
) |
126,164 |
||||||||||
Income tax expense |
— | — | — | (312 | ) | (312 | ) | |||||||||
Equity in earnings of an investee |
— | — | — | 139 | 139 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
131,685 | 1,269 | 69,957 | (76,920 | ) | 125,991 | ||||||||||
Discontinued Operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
— | — | 4,113 | — | 4,113 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income before gain on sale of properties |
131,685 | 1,269 | 74,070 | (76,920 | ) | 130,104 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
21,236 | — | 79 | — | 21,315 | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) |
$ |
152,921 |
$ |
1,269 |
$ |
74,149 |
$ |
(76,920 |
) |
$ |
151,419 |
|||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total assets |
$ |
1,818,469 |
$ |
643,063 |
$ |
1,487,364 |
$ |
434,152 |
$ |
4,383,048 |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
F-37
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 11. Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists of the following:
| |
For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Current: |
||||||||||
Federal |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
State |
600 | 375 | 312 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
600 | 375 | 312 | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred: |
||||||||||
Federal |
— | — | — | |||||||
State |
— | — | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|
— | — | — | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Income tax provision |
$ | 600 | $ | 375 | $ | 312 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
A reconciliation of our effective tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate is as follows:
| |
For the year ended December 31, | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Taxes at statutory U.S. federal income tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
Nontaxable income of SNH |
(35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | (35.0 | )% | ||||
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
0.4 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
Change in valuation allowance |
3.5 | % | 2.4 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Other differences, net |
(3.5 | )% | (2.4 | )% | (0.4 | )% | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Effective tax rate |
0.4 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Deferred income tax balances reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets and the amounts used for income
F-38
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 11. Income Taxes (Continued)
tax purposes and are stated at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
| |
For the year ended December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | |||||
Deferred tax assets: |
|||||||
Deferred revenue |
$ | 2,987 | $ | 2,169 | |||
Tax loss carryforwards |
7,373 | 1,751 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
10,360 | 3,920 | |||||
Valuation allowance |
(10,203 | ) | (3,814 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
|
157 | 106 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|||||||
Depreciable assets |
(157 | ) | (106 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
|
— | — | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Net deferred income taxes |
$ | — | $ | — | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Deferred tax liabilities are included in other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Because of our TRSs' short operating history and history of losses, we are not able to conclude that it is more likely than not we will realize the future benefit of our deferred tax assets; thus we have provided a 100% valuation allowance as of December 31, 2013 and 2012. If and when we believe it is more likely than not that we will recover our deferred tax assets, we will reverse the valuation allowance as an income tax benefit in our consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2013, our consolidated TRSs had net operating loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $18,648, which, if unused, begin to expire in 2031.
Note 12. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
The following is a summary of our unaudited quarterly results of operations for 2013 and 2012:
| |
2013 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
|||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 186,909 | $ | 186,928 | $ | 187,265 | $ | 200,336 | |||||
Net income(1) |
35,235 | 5,598 | 38,125 | 72,206 | |||||||||
Per share data: |
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.38 | |||||
Common distributions declared(2) |
$ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | |||||
F-39
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise stated)
Note 12. Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited) (Continued)
| |
2012 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
|||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 142,596 | $ | 144,393 | $ | 156,108 | $ | 191,703 | |||||
Net income |
32,352 | 33,251 | 25,646 | 44,636 | |||||||||
Per share data: |
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.25 | |||||
Common distributions declared(2) |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.39 | |||||
Note 13. Pro Forma Information (unaudited)
During 2013, we purchased six senior living communities and six MOBs (seven buildings) for $202,824 and assumed $12,266 of mortgage debt at a weighted average interest rate of 6.25% related to certain of our 2013 acquisitions. We sold one skilled nursing facility and two rehabilitation hospitals for $92,250, recording a gain on sale of $37,392. In January 2013, we issued 11,500,000 common shares in a public offering, raising net proceeds of approximately $262,068.
During 2012, we purchased 11 senior living communities and 12 MOBs (13 buildings) for $449,657 and assumed $121,793 of mortgage debt at a weighted average interest rate of 5.84% related to certain of our 2012 acquisitions. We sold one MOB (one building) for $1,100, recording a loss on sale of $101. In July 2012, we issued 13,800,000 common shares in a public offering, raising net proceeds of approximately $287,052. In July 2012, we sold $350,000 of unsecured senior notes due 2042 at a fixed rate of 5.625% per annum.
The following table presents our pro forma results of operations as if all of these 2012 and 2013 activities were completed on January 1, 2012. This pro forma data is not necessarily indicative of what actual results of operations would have been for the periods presented, nor does it represent the results of operations for any future period. Differences could result from, but are not limited to, additional property sales or investments, changes in interest rates and changes in our equity or debt structure.
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
2013 | 2012 | |||||
Total revenues |
$ | 766,263 | $ | 696,806 | |||
Net income |
$ | 113,150 | $ | 179,804 | |||
Per common share data: |
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.60 | $ | 0.96 | |||
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized revenues of $12,306, property operating expenses of $4,057 and interest expense of $368 arising from our acquisitions completed in 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recognized revenues of $26,840, property operating expenses of $15,957 and interest expense of $2,354 arising from our acquisitions completed in 2012.
F-40
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2184 Parkway Lake Drive |
Birmingham | AL | — | 580 | 5,980 | 188 | — | 580 | 6,168 | 6,748 | 820 | 8/1/2008 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2634 Valleydale Road |
Birmingham | AL | — | 600 | 7,574 | 879 | — | 600 | 8,453 | 9,053 | 1,083 | 8/1/2008 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2021 Dahike Drive, NE |
Cullman | AL | — | 287 | 3,415 | 289 | — | 287 | 3,704 | 3,991 | 977 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
49 Hughes Road |
Madison | AL | — | 334 | 3,981 | 429 | — | 334 | 4,410 | 4,744 | 1,120 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
200 Terrace Lane |
Priceville | AL | — | 1,300 | 9,447 | 114 | — | 1,300 | 9,561 | 10,861 | 500 | 2/1/2012 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
413 Cox Boulevard |
Sheffield | AL | — | 394 | 4,684 | 456 | — | 394 | 5,140 | 5,534 | 1,281 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13840 North Desert Harbor Drive |
Peoria | AZ | — | 2,687 | 15,843 | 3,175 | — | 2,687 | 19,018 | 21,705 | 6,574 | 1/11/2002 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2444 West Las Palmaritas Drive |
Phoenix | AZ | — | 3,820 | 6,666 | — | — | 3,820 | 6,666 | 10,486 | 500 | 12/22/2010 | 1982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11209 N. Tatum Boulevard |
Phoenix | AZ | — | 1,380 | 6,349 | 610 | — | 1,380 | 6,959 | 8,339 | 418 | 9/30/2011 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7090 East Mescal Street |
Scottsdale | AZ | — | 2,315 | 13,650 | 3,809 | — | 2,315 | 17,459 | 19,774 | 5,683 | 1/11/2002 | 1984 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6001 E. Thomas Road |
Scottsdale | AZ | — | 941 | 8,807 | 480 | — | 941 | 9,287 | 10,228 | 4,417 | 5/16/1994 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
17225 Boswell Blvd. |
Sun City | AZ | — | 1,189 | 10,569 | 367 | — | 1,189 | 10,936 | 12,125 | 5,261 | 6/17/1994 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14001 W. Meeker Boulevard |
Sun City West | AZ | — | 395 | 3,307 | — | — | 395 | 3,307 | 3,702 | 1,021 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2500 North Rosemont Boulevard |
Tucson | AZ | — | 4,429 | 26,119 | 3,372 | — | 4,429 | 29,491 | 33,920 | 10,417 | 1/11/2002 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
710 N. Euclid |
Anaheim | CA | — | 2,850 | 6,964 | 734 | — | 2,888 | 7,660 | 10,548 | 1,011 | 7/9/2008 | 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1350 S. El Camino Real |
Encinitas | CA | — | 1,510 | 18,042 | 374 | — | 1,510 | 18,416 | 19,926 | 2,675 | 3/31/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
47201 Lakeview Boulevard |
Fremont | CA | — | 3,200 | 10,177 | — | — | 3,200 | 10,177 | 13,377 | 572 | 9/30/2011 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
47211/47215 Lakeview Boulevard |
Fremont | CA | — | 3,750 | 12,656 | — | — | 3,750 | 12,656 | 16,406 | 712 | 9/30/2011 | 1985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
47900 Bayside Parkway |
Fremont | CA | — | 4,580 | 10,370 | 852 | — | 4,580 | 11,222 | 15,802 | 611 | 9/30/2011 | 1991 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
577 South Peach Street |
Fresno | CA | — | 738 | 2,577 | 188 | — | 738 | 2,765 | 3,503 | 1,677 | 12/28/1990 | 1963 / 1985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6075 N. Marks Avenue |
Fresno | CA | — | 880 | 12,751 | 322 | — | 880 | 13,073 | 13,953 | 1,878 | 3/31/2008 | 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
24552 Paseo de Valencia |
Laguna Hills | CA | — | 3,172 | 28,184 | 1,139 | — | 3,172 | 29,323 | 32,495 | 13,851 | 9/9/1994 | 1975 / 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1642 West Avenue J |
Lancaster | CA | — | 601 | 1,859 | 3,069 | — | 601 | 4,928 | 5,529 | 2,157 | 12/28/1990 | 1969 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8631 West 3rd Street |
Los Angeles | CA | — | 24,640 | 88,277 | 2,655 | — | 24,640 | 90,932 | 115,572 | 6,926 | 11/22/2010 | 1978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8635 West 3rd Street |
Los Angeles | CA | — | 24,640 | 90,352 | 2,724 | — | 24,640 | 93,076 | 117,716 | 7,104 | 11/22/2010 | 1978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1319 Brookside Avenue |
Redlands | CA | — | 1,770 | 9,982 | 255 | — | 1,770 | 10,237 | 12,007 | 1,469 | 3/31/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-1
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
110 Sterling Court |
Roseville | CA | — | 1,620 | 10,262 | 343 | — | 1,620 | 10,605 | 12,225 | 1,518 | 3/31/2008 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1371 Parkside Drive |
San Bernardino | CA | — | 1,250 | 9,069 | 686 | — | 1,250 | 9,755 | 11,005 | 2,012 | 8/31/2006 | 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
16925 & 16916 Hierba Drive |
San Diego | CA | — | 9,142 | 53,904 | 10,341 | — | 9,142 | 64,245 | 73,387 | 21,566 | 1/11/2002 | 1987 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3030 Science Park |
San Diego | CA | — | 2,466 | 46,473 | — | — | 2,466 | 46,473 | 48,939 | 5,131 | 8/6/2009 | 1986 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3040 Science Park |
San Diego | CA | — | 1,225 | 23,077 | — | — | 1,225 | 23,077 | 24,302 | 2,548 | 8/6/2009 | 1986 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3050 Science Park |
San Diego | CA | — | 1,508 | 28,753 | — | — | 1,508 | 28,753 | 30,261 | 3,175 | 8/6/2009 | 1986 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
537 E. Fulton Street |
Stockton | CA | — | 382 | 2,750 | 787 | — | 382 | 3,537 | 3,919 | 1,906 | 6/30/1992 | 1968 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
877 East March Lane |
Stockton(4) | CA | 7,516 | 1,176 | 11,171 | 5,132 | — | 1,176 | 16,303 | 17,479 | 4,541 | 9/30/2003 | 1988 / 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3530 Deer Park Drive |
Stockton | CA | — | 670 | 14,419 | 357 | — | 670 | 14,776 | 15,446 | 2,124 | 3/31/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
93 W Avenida de Los Arboles |
Thousand Oaks | CA | — | 622 | 2,522 | 2,456 | — | 622 | 4,978 | 5,600 | 2,332 | 12/28/1990 | 1965 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6835 Hazeltine Street |
Van Nuys | CA | — | 718 | 378 | 755 | — | 718 | 1,133 | 1,851 | 591 | 12/28/1990 | 1969 / 1984 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1866 San Miguel Drive |
Walnut Creek | CA | — | 2,010 | 9,290 | 1,175 | — | 2,010 | 10,465 | 12,475 | 546 | 12/1/2011 | 1996 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
515 Fairview |
Canon City | CO | — | 292 | 6,228 | 1,037 | (3,512 | ) | 292 | 3,753 | 4,045 | 1,442 | 9/26/1997 | 1970 / 1984 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
110 West Van Buren |
Colorado Springs | CO | — | 245 | 5,236 | 1,673 | (3,031 | ) | 245 | 3,878 | 4,123 | 1,409 | 9/26/1997 | 1972 / 1996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
3920 East San Miguel Street |
Colorado Springs | CO | — | 1,380 | 8,894 | 96 | — | 1,380 | 8,990 | 10,370 | 364 | 7/31/2012 | 1977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2050 South Main |
Delta | CO | — | 167 | 3,570 | 763 | — | 167 | 4,333 | 4,500 | 1,854 | 9/26/1997 | 1963 / 1978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2501 Little Bookcliff Drive |
Grand Junction | CO | — | 204 | 3,875 | 1,435 | — | 204 | 5,310 | 5,514 | 2,708 | 12/30/1993 | 1968 / 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2825 Patterson Road |
Grand Junction | CO | — | 173 | 2,583 | 2,101 | — | 173 | 4,684 | 4,857 | 2,416 | 12/30/1993 | 1978 / 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1599 Ingalls Street |
Lakewood | CO | — | 232 | 3,766 | 2,882 | — | 232 | 6,648 | 6,880 | 3,308 | 12/28/1990 | 1972 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5555 South Elati Street |
Littleton | CO | — | 185 | 5,043 | 2,314 | — | 185 | 7,357 | 7,542 | 3,895 | 12/28/1990 | 1965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8271 South Continental Divide Road |
Littleton | CO | — | 400 | 3,507 | — | — | 400 | 3,507 | 3,907 | 1,082 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9005 / 9025 Grant Street |
Thornton | CO | — | 961 | 10,867 | 1 | — | 961 | 10,868 | 11,829 | 272 | 12/28/2012 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9005 / 9025 Grant Street |
Thornton | CO | — | 475 | 909 | — | — | 475 | 909 | 1,384 | 23 | 12/28/2012 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7809 W. 38th Avenue |
Wheat Ridge | CO | — | 470 | 3,373 | — | — | 470 | 3,373 | 3,843 | 316 | 4/1/2010 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
40 Sebethe Drive |
Cromwell | CT | — | 570 | 5,304 | 491 | — | 570 | 5,795 | 6,365 | 398 | 12/22/2010 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
866 North Main Street |
Wallingford | CT | — | 430 | 3,136 | 313 | — | 430 | 3,449 | 3,879 | 237 | 12/22/2010 | 1984 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-2
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
1145 19th Street |
Washington | DC | — | 13,600 | 24,880 | 2,449 | — | 13,600 | 27,329 | 40,929 | 3,242 | 5/20/2009 | 1976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2141 K Street |
Washington | DC | — | 13,700 | 8,400 | 1,356 | — | 13,700 | 9,756 | 23,456 | 1,209 | 12/22/2008 | 1966 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
255 Possum Park Road |
Newark | DE | — | 2,010 | 11,852 | 2,777 | — | 2,010 | 14,629 | 16,639 | 4,885 | 1/11/2002 | 1982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4175 Ogletown Road / 501 South Harmony Road |
Newark | DE | — | 1,500 | 19,447 | 990 | — | 1,500 | 20,437 | 21,937 | 2,889 | 3/31/2008 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1912 Marsh Road |
Wilmington | DE | — | 4,365 | 25,739 | 2,503 | — | 4,365 | 28,242 | 32,607 | 9,444 | 1/11/2002 | 1988 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1212 Foulk Road |
Wilmington(4) | DE | 7,304 | 1,179 | 6,950 | 1,329 | — | 1,179 | 8,279 | 9,458 | 3,069 | 1/11/2002 | 1974 / 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
407 Foulk Road |
Wilmington | DE | — | 38 | 227 | 1,080 | — | 38 | 1,307 | 1,345 | 409 | 1/11/2002 | 1965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2723 Shipley Road |
Wilmington | DE | — | 869 | 5,126 | 3,297 | — | 869 | 8,423 | 9,292 | 2,896 | 1/11/2002 | 1989 / 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13709 Progress Boulevard |
Alachua | FL | — | 1,080 | 1,675 | 178 | — | 1,080 | 1,853 | 2,933 | 109 | 6/6/2011 | 1985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress Center—Lot 1 Property |
Alachua | FL | — | 165 | — | — | — | 165 | — | 165 | — | 6/6/2011 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress Center—Lot 4 Property |
Alachua | FL | — | 331 | — | — | — | 331 | — | 331 | — | 6/6/2011 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13859 Progress Boulevard |
Alachua(4) | FL | 3,444 | 570 | 4,276 | — | — | 570 | 4,276 | 4,846 | 258 | 7/26/2011 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13545 Progress Boulevard |
Alachua | FL | — | 512 | 4,935 | — | — | 512 | 4,935 | 5,447 | 319 | 6/6/2011 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13631 Progress Boulevard |
Alachua | FL | — | 512 | 4,941 | — | — | 512 | 4,941 | 5,453 | 319 | 6/6/2011 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress Vacant Land (47 acres) |
Alachua | FL | — | 4,000 | — | — | — | 4,000 | — | 4,000 | — | 8/30/2011 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6343 Via de Sonrisa del Sur |
Boca Raton | FL | — | 4,166 | 39,633 | 729 | — | 4,166 | 40,362 | 44,528 | 19,800 | 5/20/1994 | 1994 / 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
22601 Camino Del Mar |
Boca Raton(4) | FL | 19,751 | 3,200 | 46,800 | 1,586 | — | 3,200 | 48,386 | 51,586 | 2,779 | 12/15/2011 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1425 Congress Avenue |
Boynton Beach | FL | — | 2,390 | 14,768 | 779 | — | 2,390 | 15,547 | 17,937 | 1,012 | 8/9/2011 | 1994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1325 S. Congress Avenue |
Boynton Beach | FL | — | 1,620 | 5,341 | 13 | — | 1,620 | 5,354 | 6,974 | 190 | 7/27/2012 | 1985 / 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1416 Country Club Blvd. |
Cape Coral | FL | — | 400 | 2,907 | — | — | 400 | 2,907 | 3,307 | 899 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8500 Royal Palm Boulevard |
Coral Springs | FL | — | 3,410 | 20,104 | 22,676 | — | 3,410 | 42,780 | 46,190 | 10,135 | 1/11/2002 | 1984 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3001 Deer Creek Boulevard |
Deerfield Beach | FL | — | 3,196 | 18,848 | 15,198 | — | 3,196 | 34,046 | 37,242 | 9,069 | 1/11/2002 | 1990 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1208 South Military Trail |
Deerfield Beach | FL | — | 1,690 | 14,972 | 3,112 | — | 1,690 | 18,084 | 19,774 | 7,633 | 5/16/1994 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2525 East First Street |
Fort Myers | FL | — | 2,385 | 21,137 | 1,720 | — | 2,475 | 22,767 | 25,242 | 10,537 | 8/16/1994 | 1984 / 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12780 Kenwood Lane |
Fort Myers | FL | — | 369 | 2,174 | 2,315 | — | 369 | 4,489 | 4,858 | 1,207 | 1/11/2002 | 1990 / 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1825 Ridgewood Avenue |
Holly Hill(4) | FL | 12,366 | 900 | 21,202 | 1,069 | — | 900 | 22,271 | 23,171 | 1,499 | 7/22/2011 | 1926 / 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-3
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2480 North Park Road |
Hollywood | FL | — | 4,500 | 40,500 | 9,394 | — | 4,500 | 49,894 | 54,394 | 2,508 | 12/15/2011 | 1986 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8901 Tamiami Trail E. |
Naples | FL | — | 3,200 | 2,898 | 12,392 | — | 3,200 | 15,290 | 18,490 | 2,614 | 8/31/2006 | 1984 / 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
12780 Waterford Lakes Parkway |
Orlando | FL | — | 977 | 3,926 | — | — | 977 | 3,926 | 4,903 | — | 12/18/2013 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1603 S. Hiawassee Road |
Orlando | FL | — | 488 | 2,617 | — | — | 488 | 2,617 | 3,105 | — | 12/18/2013 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1825 N. Mills Avenue, Orlando |
Orlando | FL | — | 519 | 1,799 | 336 | — | 519 | 2,135 | 2,654 | 247 | 12/22/2008 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1911 N. Mills Avenue, Orlando |
Orlando | FL | — | 1,946 | 7,197 | 492 | — | 1,946 | 7,689 | 9,635 | 945 | 12/22/2008 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1925 N. Mills Avenue, Orlando |
Orlando | FL | — | 135 | 532 | 49 | — | 135 | 581 | 716 | 69 | 12/22/2008 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
250 N. Alafaya Trail |
Orlando | FL | — | 967 | 4,362 | — | — | 967 | 4,362 | 5,329 | — | 12/18/2013 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
900 West Lake Road |
Palm Harbor(4) | FL | 23,359 | 3,449 | 20,336 | 5,555 | — | 3,449 | 25,891 | 29,340 | 8,524 | 1/11/2002 | 1989 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
45 Katherine Boulevard |
Palm Harbor | FL | — | 3,379 | 29,945 | 1,495 | — | 3,379 | 31,440 | 34,819 | 15,025 | 5/16/1994 | 1992 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8500 West Sunrise Boulevard |
Plantation(4) | FL | 16,393 | 4,700 | 24,300 | 1,677 | — | 4,700 | 25,977 | 30,677 | 1,685 | 12/15/2011 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2701 North Course Dr. |
Pompano Beach | FL | — | 7,700 | 2,127 | 34,456 | — | 7,700 | 36,583 | 44,283 | 6,489 | 8/31/2006 | 1985 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1371 South Ocean Boulevard |
Pompano Beach | FL | — | 2,500 | 15,500 | 1,243 | — | 2,500 | 16,743 | 19,243 | 1,050 | 12/15/2011 | 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
20480 Veterans Boulevard |
Port Charlotte | FL | — | 400 | 11,934 | 498 | — | 400 | 12,432 | 12,832 | 868 | 7/22/2011 | 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
501 N.W. Cashmere Boulevard |
Port St. Lucie | FL | — | 890 | 9,345 | 487 | — | 890 | 9,832 | 10,722 | 694 | 7/22/2011 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1699 S.E. Lyngate Drive |
Port St. Lucie | FL | — | 1,242 | 11,009 | 509 | — | 1,242 | 11,518 | 12,760 | 5,526 | 5/20/1994 | 1993 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
900 South Harbour Island Blvd. |
Tampa | FL | — | 4,850 | 6,349 | 7 | — | 4,850 | 6,356 | 11,206 | 986 | 10/30/2007 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
111 Executive Center Drive |
West Palm Beach | FL | — | 2,061 | 12,153 | 9,363 | — | 2,061 | 21,516 | 23,577 | 6,411 | 1/11/2002 | 1988 / 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
855 North Point Pkwy |
Alpharetta | GA | — | 5,390 | 26,712 | — | — | 5,390 | 26,712 | 32,102 | 3,589 | 8/21/2008 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1291 Cedar Shoals Drive |
Athens | GA | — | 337 | 4,006 | 397 | — | 337 | 4,403 | 4,740 | 1,104 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
59 Executive Park South |
Atlanta | GA | — | 4,980 | 11,266 | 474 | — | 4,980 | 11,740 | 16,720 | 847 | 1/26/2011 | 1966 / 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1515 Sheridan Road |
Atlanta | GA | — | 5,800 | 9,305 | 3 | — | 5,800 | 9,308 | 15,108 | 1,425 | 11/30/2007 | 1978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
240 Marietta Highway |
Canton | GA | — | 806 | 8,555 | 359 | — | 806 | 8,914 | 9,720 | 50 | 10/1/2013 | 1997 / 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4500 South Stadium Drive |
Columbus | GA | — | 294 | 3,505 | 132 | — | 294 | 3,637 | 3,931 | 927 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1352 Wellbrook Circle |
Conyers | GA | — | 342 | 4,068 | 822 | — | 342 | 4,890 | 5,232 | 1,162 | 11/19/2004 | 1997 / 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1501 Milstead Road |
Conyers | GA | — | 750 | 7,788 | — | — | 750 | 7,788 | 8,538 | 634 | 9/30/2010 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-4
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
4960 Jot Em Down Road |
Cumming | GA | — | 1,548 | 18,666 | 887 | — | 1,548 | 19,553 | 21,101 | 204 | 8/1/2013 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2470 Dug Gap Road |
Dalton | GA | — | 262 | 3,119 | 343 | — | 262 | 3,462 | 3,724 | 843 | 11/19/2004 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
101 West Ponce De Leon Avenue |
Decatur | GA | — | 3,500 | 13,179 | — | — | 3,500 | 13,179 | 16,679 | 522 | 5/30/2012 | 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2801 N. Decatur Road |
Decatur | GA | — | 3,100 | 4,436 | 516 | — | 3,100 | 4,952 | 8,052 | 733 | 7/9/2008 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
114 Penland Street |
Ellijay | GA | — | 496 | 7,107 | 217 | — | 496 | 7,324 | 7,820 | 41 | 10/1/2013 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
353 North Belair Road |
Evans | GA | — | 230 | 2,663 | 347 | — | 230 | 3,010 | 3,240 | 775 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2435 Limestone Parkway |
Gainesville | GA | — | 268 | 3,186 | 191 | — | 268 | 3,377 | 3,645 | 866 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8080 Summit Business Parkway |
Jonesboro | GA | — | 1,800 | 20,664 | 384 | — | 1,800 | 21,048 | 22,848 | 1,515 | 6/20/2011 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6191 Peake Road |
Macon | GA | — | 183 | 2,179 | 284 | — | 183 | 2,463 | 2,646 | 631 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1360 Upper Hembree Road |
Roswell | GA | — | 1,080 | 6,138 | — | — | 1,080 | 6,138 | 7,218 | 256 | 5/7/2012 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5200 Habersham Street |
Savannah(4) | GA | 4,502 | 800 | 7,800 | 143 | — | 800 | 7,943 | 8,743 | 575 | 6/23/2011 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7410 Skidaway Road |
Savannah | GA | — | 400 | 5,670 | 794 | — | 400 | 6,464 | 6,864 | 1,352 | 11/1/2006 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Savannah Square Drive |
Savannah | GA | — | 1,200 | 19,090 | 3,991 | — | 1,200 | 23,081 | 24,281 | 4,227 | 10/1/2006 | 1987 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2078 Scenic Highway North |
Snellville | GA | — | 870 | 4,030 | 121 | — | 870 | 4,151 | 5,021 | 474 | 12/10/2009 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1300 Montreal Road |
Tucker | GA | — | 690 | 6,210 | 711 | — | 690 | 6,921 | 7,611 | 1,639 | 6/3/2005 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1100 Ward Avenue |
Honolulu(4) | HI | 52,000 | 11,200 | 55,618 | 173 | — | 11,200 | 55,791 | 66,991 | 2,087 | 6/18/2012 | 1961 / 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
600 Manor Drive |
Clarinda | IA | — | 77 | 1,453 | 906 | — | 77 | 2,359 | 2,436 | 1,297 | 12/30/1993 | 1968 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2401 E. 8th Street |
Des Moines | IA | — | 123 | 627 | 894 | — | 123 | 1,521 | 1,644 | 628 | 7/1/2000 | 1965 / 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
608 Prairie Street |
Mediapolis | IA | — | 94 | 1,776 | 714 | — | 94 | 2,490 | 2,584 | 1,383 | 12/30/1993 | 1973 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1015 West Summit |
Winterset | IA | — | 111 | 2,099 | 1,313 | (314 | ) | 111 | 3,098 | 3,209 | 1,704 | 12/30/1993 | 1973 / 1995 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2340 West Seltice Way |
Coeur d'Alene | ID | — | 910 | 7,170 | 122 | — | 910 | 7,292 | 8,202 | 295 | 7/31/2012 | 1993 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
850 Lincoln Drive |
Idaho Falls | ID | — | 510 | 6,640 | 395 | — | 510 | 7,035 | 7,545 | 277 | 7/31/2012 | 1978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1250 West Central Road |
Arlington Heights | IL | — | 3,665 | 32,587 | 1,999 | — | 3,665 | 34,586 | 38,251 | 15,990 | 9/9/1994 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1450 Busch Parkway |
Buffalo Grove | IL | — | 3,800 | 11,456 | 163 | — | 3,800 | 11,619 | 15,419 | 944 | 9/16/2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7130 Crimson Ridge Drive |
Rockford | IL | — | 200 | 7,300 | 14 | — | 200 | 7,314 | 7,514 | 538 | 5/1/2011 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1220 Lakeview Drive |
Romeoville | IL | — | 1,120 | 19,582 | — | — | 1,120 | 19,582 | 20,702 | 2,631 | 8/21/2008 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-5
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
900 Southwind Road |
Springfield | IL | — | 300 | 6,744 | 1,014 | — | 300 | 7,758 | 8,058 | 1,532 | 8/31/2006 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1675 Lakeside Drive |
Waukegan | IL | — | 2,420 | 9,382 | 38 | — | 2,420 | 9,420 | 11,840 | 528 | 9/30/2011 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1615 Lakeside Drive |
Waukegan | IL | — | 2,700 | 9,590 | 161 | — | 2,700 | 9,751 | 12,451 | 543 | 9/30/2011 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
406 Smith Drive |
Auburn(4) | IN | 6,561 | 380 | 8,246 | 40 | — | 380 | 8,286 | 8,666 | 1,173 | 9/1/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6990 East County Road 100 North |
Avon(4) | IN | 9,378 | 850 | 11,888 | 152 | — | 850 | 12,040 | 12,890 | 1,698 | 9/1/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2455 Tamarack Trail |
Bloomington | IN | — | 5,400 | 25,129 | 3,000 | — | 5,400 | 28,129 | 33,529 | 3,438 | 11/1/2008 | 1983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
701 East County Line Road |
Greenwood | IN | — | 1,830 | 14,303 | 103 | — | 1,830 | 14,406 | 16,236 | 749 | 12/1/2011 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8505 Woodfield Crossing Boulevard |
Indianapolis(4) | IN | 24,479 | 2,785 | 16,396 | 5,363 | — | 2,785 | 21,759 | 24,544 | 6,892 | 1/11/2002 | 1986 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
603 Saint Joseph Drive |
Kokomo(4) | IN | 4,155 | 220 | 5,899 | 163 | — | 220 | 6,062 | 6,282 | 872 | 9/1/2008 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1211 Longwood Drive |
La Porte(4) | IN | 4,584 | 770 | 5,550 | 35 | — | 770 | 5,585 | 6,355 | 826 | 9/1/2008 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1590 West Timberview Drive |
Marion(4) | IN | 3,864 | 410 | 5,409 | 209 | — | 410 | 5,618 | 6,028 | 816 | 9/1/2008 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1473 East McKay Road |
Shelbyville(4) | IN | 3,725 | 190 | 5,328 | 79 | — | 190 | 5,407 | 5,597 | 784 | 9/1/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
17441 State Rd. #23 (aka 17490 E. Douglas Rd.) |
South Bend | IN | — | 400 | 3,107 | — | — | 400 | 3,107 | 3,507 | 960 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
222 South 25th Street |
Terra Haute(4) | IN | 10,798 | 300 | 13,115 | 46 | — | 300 | 13,161 | 13,461 | 1,893 | 9/1/2008 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
150 Fox Ridge Drive |
Vincennes(4) | IN | 2,688 | 110 | 3,603 | 349 | — | 110 | 3,952 | 4,062 | 575 | 9/1/2008 | 1985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
510 W. 7th Street |
Ellinwood | KS | — | 130 | 1,137 | 497 | — | 130 | 1,634 | 1,764 | 791 | 4/1/1995 | 1972 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1501 Inverness Drive |
Lawrence | KS | — | 1,600 | 18,565 | 272 | — | 1,600 | 18,837 | 20,437 | 2,279 | 10/1/2009 | 1988 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3501 West 95th Street |
Overland Park(4) | KS | 20,122 | 2,568 | 15,140 | 3,642 | — | 2,568 | 18,782 | 21,350 | 6,248 | 10/25/2002 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6555 West 75th Street |
Overland Park | KS | — | 1,274 | 1,126 | 12,399 | — | 1,274 | 13,525 | 14,799 | 4,211 | 1/11/2002 | 1985 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
981 Campbell Lane |
Bowling Green | KY | — | 365 | 4,345 | 487 | — | 365 | 4,832 | 5,197 | 1,186 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
102 Leonardwood |
Frankfort | KY | — | 560 | 8,282 | 1,180 | — | 560 | 9,462 | 10,022 | 1,851 | 8/31/2006 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4190 Lafayette Road |
Hopkinsville | KY | — | 316 | 3,761 | 185 | — | 316 | 3,946 | 4,262 | 999 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
690 Mason Headley Road |
Lexington(5) | KY | 10,885 | — | 10,848 | 11,193 | — | — | 22,041 | 22,041 | 10,056 | 1/11/2002 | 1985 / 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
700 Mason Headley Road |
Lexington(5) | KY | 2,428 | — | 6,394 | 5,552 | — | — | 11,946 | 11,946 | 5,304 | 1/11/2002 | 1980 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-6
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
200 Brookside Drive |
Louisville(4) | KY | 29,613 | 3,524 | 20,779 | 5,596 | — | 3,524 | 26,375 | 29,899 | 9,021 | 1/11/2002 | 1984 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1517 West Broadway |
Mayfield | KY | — | 268 | 2,730 | 736 | — | 268 | 3,466 | 3,734 | 874 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1700 Elmdale Road |
Paducah | KY | — | 450 | 5,358 | 822 | — | 450 | 6,180 | 6,630 | 1,480 | 11/19/2004 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 Neighborly Way |
Somerset | KY | — | 200 | 4,919 | 257 | — | 200 | 5,176 | 5,376 | 918 | 11/6/2006 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
35 Milbury St |
Auburn | MA | — | 1,510 | 7,000 | 310 | — | 1,510 | 7,310 | 8,820 | 1,012 | 8/8/2008 | 1977 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1295 Boylston Street |
Boston | MA | — | 7,600 | 18,140 | 53 | — | 7,600 | 18,193 | 25,793 | 1,323 | 1/26/2011 | 1930 / 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
549 Albany Street |
Boston | MA | — | 4,576 | 45,105 | — | — | 4,576 | 45,105 | 49,681 | 376 | 8/22/2013 | 1895 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
370 Lunenburg St |
Fitchburg | MA | — | 330 | 3,361 | 32 | — | 330 | 3,393 | 3,723 | 456 | 8/8/2008 | 1994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
165 Mill St |
Leominster | MA | — | 1,520 | 8,703 | 718 | — | 1,520 | 9,421 | 10,941 | 1,284 | 8/8/2008 | 1966 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 Maguire Road |
Lexington | MA | — | 3,600 | 15,555 | 1,927 | (7,255 | ) | 3,600 | 10,227 | 13,827 | 1,688 | 12/22/2008 | 1994 / 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
100 Hampshire Street |
Mansfield | MA | — | 2,090 | 8,215 | — | — | 2,090 | 8,215 | 10,305 | 616 | 12/22/2010 | 1975 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 Hampshire Street |
Mansfield | MA | — | 1,360 | 7,326 | 108 | — | 1,360 | 7,434 | 8,794 | 558 | 12/22/2010 | 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 Hampshire Street |
Mansfield | MA | — | 1,190 | 5,737 | — | — | 1,190 | 5,737 | 6,927 | 430 | 12/22/2010 | 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
176 West St |
Milford | MA | — | 510 | 3,039 | 595 | — | 510 | 3,634 | 4,144 | 625 | 8/8/2008 | 1989 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
108 Elm St |
Millbury | MA | — | 160 | 767 | — | — | 160 | 767 | 927 | 104 | 8/8/2008 | 1950 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 Newcrossing Road |
Reading(4) | MA | 11,245 | 1,443 | 14,153 | 26 | — | 1,443 | 14,179 | 15,622 | 442 | 9/27/2012 | 1986 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
407 Main St |
Spencer | MA | — | 270 | 2,607 | 476 | — | 270 | 3,083 | 3,353 | 470 | 8/8/2008 | 1992 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
106 East Main |
Westborough | MA | — | 920 | 6,956 | 126 | — | 920 | 7,082 | 8,002 | 956 | 8/8/2008 | 1986 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
112 East Main |
Westborough | MA | — | 230 | 135 | — | — | 230 | 135 | 365 | 20 | 8/8/2008 | 1900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
299 Cambridge Street |
Winchester | MA | — | 3,218 | 18,988 | 10,144 | — | 3,218 | 29,132 | 32,350 | 8,062 | 1/11/2002 | 1991 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
135 Goldstar Blvd |
Worcester | MA | — | 865 | 10,912 | 1,136 | — | 865 | 12,048 | 12,913 | 1,543 | 8/8/2008 | 1989 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
191 May St |
Worcester | MA | — | 730 | 3,634 | 42 | — | 730 | 3,676 | 4,406 | 495 | 8/8/2008 | 1986 / 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
277 E Mountain |
Worcester | MA | — | 191 | 2,133 | 113 | (889 | ) | 191 | 1,357 | 1,548 | 208 | 8/8/2008 | 1992 / 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
425 N Lake Ave |
Worcester | MA | — | 1,200 | 6,176 | 101 | — | 1,200 | 6,277 | 7,477 | 848 | 8/8/2008 | 1985 / 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
630 Plantation St |
Worcester | MA | — | 770 | 10,408 | 528 | — | 770 | 10,936 | 11,706 | 1,536 | 8/8/2008 | 1990 / 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2717 Riva Road |
Annapolis | MD | — | 1,290 | 12,373 | 515 | — | 1,290 | 12,888 | 14,178 | 1,855 | 3/31/2008 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-7
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
658 Boulton Street |
Bel Air | MD | — | 4,750 | 16,504 | 2 | — | 4,750 | 16,506 | 21,256 | 2,527 | 11/30/2007 | 1980 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7600 Laurel Bowie Road |
Bowie | MD | — | 408 | 3,421 | 416 | — | 408 | 3,837 | 4,245 | 1,263 | 10/25/2002 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8100 Connecticut Avenue |
Chevy Chase(4) | MD | 55,346 | 15,170 | 92,830 | 1,230 | — | 15,175 | 94,055 | 109,230 | 5,141 | 12/15/2011 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8220 Snowden River Parkway |
Columbia | MD | — | 1,390 | 10,303 | 155 | — | 1,390 | 10,458 | 11,848 | 1,520 | 3/31/2008 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
700 Port Street |
Easton | MD | — | 383 | 4,555 | 2,961 | — | 383 | 7,516 | 7,899 | 1,864 | 10/25/2002 | 2000 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3004 North Ridge Road |
Ellicott City(4) | MD | 19,819 | 1,409 | 22,691 | 6,218 | — | 1,409 | 28,909 | 30,318 | 7,734 | 3/1/2004 | 1997 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1820 Latham Drive |
Frederick | MD | — | 385 | 3,444 | 427 | — | 385 | 3,871 | 4,256 | 1,279 | 10/25/2002 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2100A & B Whittier Drive |
Frederick | MD | — | 1,260 | 9,464 | 933 | — | 1,260 | 10,397 | 11,657 | 1,425 | 3/31/2008 | 1999 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10114 + 10116 Sharpsburg Pike |
Hagerstown | MD | — | 1,040 | 7,471 | 227 | — | 1,040 | 7,698 | 8,738 | 1,110 | 3/31/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4000 Old Court Road |
Pikesville | MD | — | 2,000 | 4,974 | 308 | — | 2,000 | 5,282 | 7,282 | 675 | 12/22/2008 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
715 Benfield Road |
Severna Park(4) | MD | 8,761 | 229 | 9,798 | 1,629 | — | 229 | 11,427 | 11,656 | 3,557 | 10/25/2002 | 1998 / 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
801 Roeder Road, Unit OU-1 |
Silver Spring | MD | — | 1,900 | 12,858 | 351 | — | 1,900 | 13,209 | 15,109 | 509 | 6/27/2012 | 1976 / 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
14400 Homecrest Road |
Silver Spring | MD | — | 1,200 | 9,288 | 6,070 | — | 1,200 | 15,358 | 16,558 | 4,469 | 10/25/2002 | 1996 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3701 International Drive |
Silver Spring | MD | — | 3,301 | 29,065 | 714 | — | 3,301 | 29,779 | 33,080 | 14,486 | 7/25/1994 | 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
720 & 734 N. Pine Road |
Hampton | MI | — | 300 | 2,406 | — | — | 300 | 2,406 | 2,706 | 744 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4004 & 4012 Waldo Road |
Midland | MI | — | 400 | 2,606 | — | — | 400 | 2,606 | 3,006 | 811 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1605 & 1615 Fredericks Drive |
Monroe | MI | — | 300 | 2,506 | — | — | 300 | 2,506 | 2,806 | 778 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3150 & 3100 Old Centre Road |
Portage | MI | — | 300 | 2,206 | — | — | 300 | 2,206 | 2,506 | 683 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2445 & 2485 Mc Carty Road |
Saginaw | MI | — | 600 | 5,212 | — | — | 600 | 5,212 | 5,812 | 1,610 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11855 Ulysses Street NE |
Blaine(4) | MN | 9,425 | 2,774 | 9,276 | 6 | — | 2,774 | 9,282 | 12,056 | 232 | 12/21/2012 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1305 Corporate Center Drive |
Eagan | MN | — | 2,300 | 13,105 | 103 | — | 2,300 | 13,208 | 15,508 | 987 | 12/22/2010 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1201 Northland Drive |
Mendota Heights | MN | — | 1,220 | 10,208 | 95 | — | 1,220 | 10,303 | 11,523 | 747 | 1/25/2011 | 1989 / 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
20500/20600 South Diamond Lake Road |
Rogers | MN | — | 2,760 | 45,789 | 863 | — | 2,760 | 46,652 | 49,412 | 7,034 | 3/1/2008 | 1999 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2200 County Road C West |
Roseville | MN | — | 590 | 702 | — | — | 590 | 702 | 1,292 | 39 | 9/30/2011 | 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4166 Lexington Avenue N |
Shoreview | MN | — | 1,300 | 4,547 | 92 | — | 1,320 | 4,619 | 5,939 | 297 | 5/20/2011 | 1988 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
305 & 315 Thompson Avenue |
West St. Paul | MN | — | 400 | 2,506 | — | — | 400 | 2,506 | 2,906 | 867 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-8
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
1365 Crestridge Lane |
West St. Paul | MN | — | 400 | 3,608 | 100 | — | 400 | 3,708 | 4,108 | 1,263 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3828 College View Drive |
Joplin(4) | MO | 5,720 | 260 | 11,382 | 92 | — | 260 | 11,474 | 11,734 | 442 | 8/31/2012 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Lincoln Parkway |
Hattiesburg | MS | — | 1,269 | 11,691 | — | — | 1,269 | 11,691 | 12,960 | 219 | 3/22/2013 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1488 Belk Boulevard |
Oxford | MS | — | 450 | 5,791 | 304 | — | 450 | 6,095 | 6,545 | 1,136 | 10/1/2006 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
108 Clarington Drive |
Southaven | MS | — | 450 | 5,795 | 355 | — | 450 | 6,150 | 6,600 | 1,145 | 10/1/2006 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
112 + 118 Alamance Road |
Burlington(4) | NC | 6,363 | 575 | 9,697 | 219 | — | 575 | 9,916 | 10,491 | 680 | 6/23/2011 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1050 Crescent Green Drive |
Cary(4) | NC | 8,369 | 713 | 4,628 | 1,949 | — | 713 | 6,577 | 7,290 | 2,145 | 10/25/2002 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2220 & 2230 Farmington Drive |
Chapel Hill | NC | — | 800 | 6,414 | — | — | 800 | 6,414 | 7,214 | 1,981 | 2/28/2003 | 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5920 McChesney Drive |
Charlotte | NC | — | 820 | 7,790 | 45 | — | 820 | 7,835 | 8,655 | 912 | 11/17/2009 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6101 Clarke Creek Parkway |
Charlotte | NC | — | 500 | 13,960 | 36 | — | 500 | 13,996 | 14,496 | 1,616 | 11/17/2009 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2101 Runnymede Lane |
Charlotte | NC | — | 2,475 | 11,451 | 271 | — | 2,475 | 11,722 | 14,197 | 834 | 6/20/2011 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1002 State Highway 54 |
Durham | NC | — | 595 | 5,200 | 79 | — | 595 | 5,279 | 5,874 | 365 | 6/20/2011 | 1988 / 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1001 Phifer Road |
Kings Mountain(4) | NC | 3,171 | 655 | 8,283 | 183 | — | 655 | 8,466 | 9,121 | 602 | 6/23/2011 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
128 Brawley School |
Mooresville(4) | NC | 4,600 | 595 | 7,305 | 189 | — | 595 | 7,494 | 8,089 | 498 | 6/23/2011 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1309 , 1321 + 1325 McCarthy Boulevard |
New Bern(4) | NC | 5,020 | 1,245 | 20,898 | 262 | — | 1,245 | 21,160 | 22,405 | 1,440 | 6/20/2011 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13150 Dorman Road |
Pineville | NC | — | 550 | 7,570 | 140 | — | 550 | 7,710 | 8,260 | 881 | 11/17/2009 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
13180 Dorman Road |
Pineville | NC | — | 630 | 15,230 | 7 | — | 630 | 15,237 | 15,867 | 1,759 | 11/17/2009 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1730 Parkwood Boulevard West |
Wilson(4) | NC | 2,805 | 610 | 14,787 | 39 | — | 610 | 14,826 | 15,436 | 1,053 | 6/20/2011 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1700 Furnace Street |
Ashland | NE | — | 28 | 1,823 | 1,262 | — | 28 | 3,085 | 3,113 | 1,258 | 7/1/2000 | 1965 / 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
414 North Wilson Street |
Blue Hill | NE | — | 56 | 1,064 | 807 | — | 56 | 1,871 | 1,927 | 741 | 7/1/2000 | 1967 / 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2720 South 17th Ave |
Central City | NE | — | 21 | 919 | 650 | — | 21 | 1,569 | 1,590 | 712 | 7/1/2000 | 1969 / 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1112 15th Street |
Columbus | NE | — | 88 | 561 | 461 | — | 88 | 1,022 | 1,110 | 469 | 7/1/2000 | 1955 / 1978 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
800 Stoeger Drive |
Grand Island | NE | — | 119 | 1,446 | 1,404 | — | 119 | 2,850 | 2,969 | 1,275 | 4/1/1995 | 1963 / 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
700 South Highway 6 |
Gretna | NE | — | 237 | 673 | 890 | — | 237 | 1,563 | 1,800 | 636 | 7/1/2000 | 1972 / 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1100 West First Street |
Milford | NE | — | 24 | 880 | 648 | — | 24 | 1,528 | 1,552 | 689 | 7/1/2000 | 1967 / 1970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-9
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
510 Centennial Circle |
North Platte | NE | — | 370 | 8,968 | 464 | — | 370 | 9,432 | 9,802 | 1,362 | 2/17/2008 | 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
17007 Elm Plaza |
Omaha | NE | — | 4,680 | 22,022 | — | — | 4,680 | 22,022 | 26,702 | 2,959 | 8/21/2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3030 South 80th Street |
Omaha | NE | — | 650 | 5,850 | 416 | — | 650 | 6,266 | 6,916 | 1,490 | 6/3/2005 | 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
333 Maple |
Sutherland | NE | — | 19 | 1,251 | 478 | — | 19 | 1,729 | 1,748 | 701 | 7/1/2000 | 1970 / 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1350 Centenial Ave |
Utica | NE | — | 21 | 569 | 447 | — | 21 | 1,016 | 1,037 | 410 | 7/1/2000 | 1966 / 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
11041 North 137th Street |
Waverly | NE | — | 529 | 686 | 609 | — | 529 | 1,295 | 1,824 | 647 | 7/1/2000 | 1989 / 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
490 Cooper Landing Road |
Cherry Hill | NJ | — | 1,001 | 8,175 | 1,832 | — | 1,001 | 10,007 | 11,008 | 2,291 | 12/29/2003 | 1999 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1400 Route 70 |
Lakewood(6) | NJ | 14,700 | 4,885 | 28,803 | 2,537 | — | 4,885 | 31,340 | 36,225 | 10,606 | 1/11/2002 | 1987 / 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 Hillside Drive |
Mt. Arlington | NJ | — | 1,375 | 11,232 | 757 | — | 1,375 | 11,989 | 13,364 | 3,174 | 12/29/2003 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
655 Pomander Walk |
Teaneck(4) | NJ | 32,581 | 4,950 | 44,550 | 1,124 | — | 4,950 | 45,674 | 50,624 | 2,727 | 12/15/2011 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4411 The 25 Way |
Albuquerque | NM | — | 3,480 | 25,245 | 1,656 | — | 3,593 | 26,788 | 30,381 | 2,247 | 12/22/2010 | 1970 / 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4420 The 25 Way |
Albuquerque | NM | — | 1,430 | 2,609 | 55 | — | 1,476 | 2,618 | 4,094 | 199 | 12/22/2010 | 1970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10500 Academy Road NE |
Albuquerque(4) | NM | 26,360 | 3,828 | 22,572 | 5,052 | — | 3,828 | 27,624 | 31,452 | 8,793 | 1/11/2002 | 1986 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4300 Landau Street NE |
Albuquerque | NM | — | 1,060 | 9,875 | 8 | — | 1,060 | 9,883 | 10,943 | 1,534 | 10/30/2007 | 1973 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4100 Prospect Avenue NE |
Albuquerque | NM | — | 540 | 10,105 | 8 | — | 540 | 10,113 | 10,653 | 1,570 | 10/30/2007 | 1977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9190 Coors Boulevard NW |
Albuquerque | NM | — | 1,660 | 9,173 | 8 | — | 1,660 | 9,181 | 10,841 | 1,425 | 10/30/2007 | 1983 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3201 Plumas Street |
Reno | NV | — | 2,420 | 49,580 | 1,001 | — | 2,420 | 50,581 | 53,001 | 2,797 | 12/15/2011 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6300 Eighth Ave |
Brooklyn | NY | — | 3,870 | 8,545 | 6 | — | 3,870 | 8,551 | 12,421 | 1,149 | 8/8/2008 | 1971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5823 Widewaters Parkway |
Dewitt | NY | — | 600 | 5,004 | 8 | — | 600 | 5,012 | 5,612 | 282 | 9/30/2011 | 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4939 Brittonfield Parkway |
East Syracuse | NY | — | 720 | 17,084 | 179 | — | 720 | 17,263 | 17,983 | 2,272 | 9/30/2008 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5008 Brittonfield Parkway |
East Syracuse(4) | NY | 4,488 | 420 | 18,407 | 166 | — | 420 | 18,573 | 18,993 | 2,515 | 7/9/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
200 Old County Road |
Mineola | NY | — | 4,920 | 24,056 | 1,361 | — | 4,920 | 25,417 | 30,337 | 1,423 | 9/30/2011 | 1971 / 1988 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 North Broadway |
White Plains | NY | — | 4,900 | 13,594 | — | — | 4,900 | 13,594 | 18,494 | 1,686 | 1/26/2009 | 1952 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
537 Riverdale Avenue |
Yonkers(4) | NY | 30,177 | 8,460 | 90,561 | 775 | — | 8,460 | 91,336 | 99,796 | 3,442 | 8/31/2012 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4590 and 4625 Knightsbridge Boulevard |
Columbus(4) | OH | 18,361 | 3,623 | 27,778 | 6,926 | — | 3,623 | 34,704 | 38,327 | 11,644 | 1/11/2002 | 1989 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-10
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
3929 Hoover Road |
Grove City | OH | — | 332 | 3,081 | 791 | — | 332 | 3,872 | 4,204 | 1,774 | 6/4/1993 | 1965 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5260 Naiman Parkway |
Solon | OH | — | 450 | 2,305 | 275 | — | 545 | 2,485 | 3,030 | 202 | 12/22/2010 | 1975 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5370 Naiman Parkway |
Solon | OH | — | 550 | 2,147 | 54 | — | 550 | 2,201 | 2,751 | 122 | 9/30/2011 | 1975 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
200 N. Bryant Ave. |
Edmond | OK | — | 430 | 2,955 | — | — | 430 | 2,955 | 3,385 | 320 | 9/1/2009 | 1993 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
600 National Ave |
Midwest City | OK | — | 410 | 2,970 | — | — | 410 | 2,970 | 3,380 | 322 | 9/1/2009 | 1985 / 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
701 Northeast 10th Street |
Oklahoma City | OK | — | 500 | 19,046 | — | — | 500 | 19,046 | 19,546 | 2,063 | 9/1/2009 | 1982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8315 S. Walker Ave. |
Oklahoma City | OK | — | 480 | 1,546 | — | — | 480 | 1,546 | 2,026 | 168 | 9/1/2009 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
71 Darlington Road |
Beaver Falls | PA | — | 1,500 | 13,500 | 413 | — | 1,500 | 13,913 | 15,413 | 3,246 | 10/31/2005 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
200 Hill Church-Houston RD., Rt. 519 S. |
Canonsburg | PA | — | 1,518 | 13,493 | 587 | — | 1,518 | 14,080 | 15,598 | 10,312 | 3/1/1991 | 1985 / 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
950 Morgan Highway |
Clarks Summit | PA | — | 1,001 | 8,233 | 318 | — | 1,001 | 8,551 | 9,552 | 2,287 | 12/29/2003 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
145 Broadlawn Drive |
Elizabeth | PA | — | 696 | 6,304 | 689 | — | 696 | 6,993 | 7,689 | 1,638 | 10/31/2005 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
600 N. Pottstown Pike |
Exton | PA | — | 1,001 | 8,233 | 1,033 | — | 1,001 | 9,266 | 10,267 | 2,378 | 12/29/2003 | 2000 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
475 Virginia Drive |
Fort Washington | PA | — | 1,010 | 4,837 | 97 | — | 1,010 | 4,934 | 5,944 | 275 | 9/30/2011 | 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
525 Virginia Drive |
Fort Washington | PA | — | 3,100 | 6,775 | — | (9,222 | ) | 653 | — | 653 | — | 6/25/2008 | 1997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
242 Baltimore Pike |
Glen Mills | PA | — | 1,001 | 8,233 | 484 | — | 1,001 | 8,717 | 9,718 | 2,386 | 12/29/2003 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
723 Dresher Road |
Horsham | PA | — | 1,010 | 4,456 | 392 | — | 1,010 | 4,848 | 5,858 | 397 | 12/22/2010 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
210 Mall Boulevard |
King of Prussia | PA | — | 1,540 | 4,743 | (11 | ) | — | 1,540 | 4,732 | 6,272 | 636 | 8/8/2008 | 1970 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
216 Mall Boulevard |
King of Prussia | PA | — | 880 | 2,871 | — | — | 880 | 2,871 | 3,751 | 209 | 1/26/2011 | 1970 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5300 Old William Penn Highway |
Murrysville | PA | — | 300 | 2,506 | — | — | 300 | 2,506 | 2,806 | 854 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
800 Manor Drive |
New Britain (Chalfont) | PA | — | 979 | 8,052 | 484 | — | 979 | 8,536 | 9,515 | 2,338 | 12/29/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7151 Saltsburg Road |
Penn Hills | PA | — | 200 | 904 | — | — | 200 | 904 | 1,104 | 310 | 2/28/2003 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
730 Holiday Drive |
Pittsburgh | PA | — | 2,480 | 6,395 | 908 | — | 2,480 | 7,303 | 9,783 | 518 | 12/22/2010 | 1985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5750 Centre Ave |
Pittsburgh | PA | — | 3,000 | 11,828 | 684 | — | 3,000 | 12,512 | 15,512 | 1,850 | 6/11/2008 | 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3043 Walton Road |
Plymouth Meeting | PA | — | 1,680 | 9,187 | 83 | — | 1,680 | 9,270 | 10,950 | 520 | 9/30/2011 | 1969 / 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1400 Riggs Road |
South Park | PA | — | 898 | 8,102 | 248 | — | 898 | 8,350 | 9,248 | 1,975 | 10/31/2005 | 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
700 Northampton Street |
Tiffany Court (Kingston) | PA | — | — | 5,682 | 1,420 | — | — | 7,102 | 7,102 | 1,811 | 12/29/2003 | 1997 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-11
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
5250 Meadowgreen Drive |
Whitehall | PA | — | 1,599 | 14,401 | 1,182 | — | 1,599 | 15,583 | 17,182 | 3,640 | 10/31/2005 | 1987 / 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1304 McLees Road |
Anderson | SC | — | 295 | 3,509 | 213 | — | 295 | 3,722 | 4,017 | 944 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
109 Old Salem Road |
Beaufort | SC | — | 188 | 2,234 | 586 | — | 188 | 2,820 | 3,008 | 843 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1119 Pick Pocket Plantation Drive |
Beaufort | SC | — | 1,200 | 10,810 | 341 | — | 1,200 | 11,151 | 12,351 | 797 | 6/20/2011 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
719 Kershaw Highway |
Camden | SC | — | 322 | 3,697 | 861 | — | 322 | 4,558 | 4,880 | 1,179 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2333 Ashley River Road |
Charleston(4) | SC | 11,465 | 848 | 14,000 | 317 | — | 848 | 14,317 | 15,165 | 969 | 6/20/2011 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
320 Seven Farms Drive |
Charleston(4) | SC | 4,672 | 1,092 | 6,605 | 238 | — | 1,092 | 6,843 | 7,935 | 304 | 5/29/2012 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
201 Executive Center Drive |
Columbia | SC | — | 390 | 4,659 | 98 | — | 390 | 4,757 | 5,147 | 351 | 12/22/2010 | 1985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7909 Parklane Road |
Columbia | SC | — | 1,580 | 4,520 | 296 | — | 1,580 | 4,816 | 6,396 | 259 | 9/30/2011 | 1990 / 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
251 Springtree Drive |
Columbia | SC | — | 300 | 1,905 | — | — | 300 | 1,905 | 2,205 | 589 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 Summit Terrace |
Columbia | SC | — | 610 | 7,900 | 240 | — | 610 | 8,140 | 8,750 | 920 | 11/17/2009 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
355 Berkmans Lane |
Greenville | SC | — | 700 | 7,240 | 85 | — | 700 | 7,325 | 8,025 | 857 | 11/17/2009 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
116 Enterprise Court |
Greenwood | SC | — | 310 | 2,790 | 193 | — | 310 | 2,983 | 3,293 | 731 | 6/3/2005 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1901 West Carolina |
Hartsville | SC | — | 401 | 4,775 | 571 | — | 401 | 5,346 | 5,747 | 1,338 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
218 Old Chapin Road |
Lexington | SC | — | 363 | 4,322 | 402 | — | 363 | 4,724 | 5,087 | 1,224 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
491 Highway 17 |
Little River(4) | SC | 5,002 | 750 | 9,018 | 197 | — | 750 | 9,215 | 9,965 | 618 | 6/23/2011 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1010 Lake Hunter Circle / 987 Bowman Road |
Mt. Pleasant | SC | — | 3,898 | 31,613 | 810 | — | 3,898 | 32,423 | 36,321 | 1,314 | 7/1/2012 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9547 Highway 17 North |
Myrtle Beach | SC | — | 543 | 3,202 | 6,684 | — | 543 | 9,886 | 10,429 | 1,965 | 1/11/2002 | 1980 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2306 Riverbank Drive |
Orangeburg | SC | — | 303 | 3,607 | 686 | — | 303 | 4,293 | 4,596 | 1,101 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1920 Ebenezer Road |
Rock Hill | SC | — | 300 | 1,705 | — | — | 300 | 1,705 | 2,005 | 566 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
15855 Wells Highway |
Seneca | SC | — | 396 | 4,714 | 470 | — | 396 | 5,184 | 5,580 | 1,295 | 11/19/2004 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Southern Court |
West Columbia | SC | — | 520 | 3,831 | — | — | 520 | 3,831 | 4,351 | 287 | 12/22/2010 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1345 Michigan Ave SW |
Huron | SD | — | 144 | 3,108 | 4 | — | 144 | 3,112 | 3,256 | 1,747 | 6/30/1992 | 1968 / 1977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1251 Arizona S.W. |
Huron | SD | — | 45 | 968 | 1 | — | 45 | 969 | 1,014 | 544 | 6/30/1992 | 1968 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3600 S. Norton |
Sioux Falls | SD | — | 253 | 3,062 | 4 | — | 253 | 3,066 | 3,319 | 1,724 | 6/30/1992 | 1960 / 1979 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6716 Nolensville Road |
Brentwood | TN | — | 1,528 | 6,037 | — | — | 1,528 | 6,037 | 7,565 | 164 | 11/30/2012 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-12
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
51 Patel Way |
Clarksville | TN | — | 800 | 10,322 | 278 | — | 800 | 10,600 | 11,400 | 303 | 12/19/2012 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
207 Uffelman Drive |
Clarksville | TN | — | 320 | 2,994 | 611 | — | 320 | 3,605 | 3,925 | 665 | 12/31/2006 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2900 Westside Drive |
Cleveland | TN | — | 305 | 3,627 | 682 | — | 305 | 4,309 | 4,614 | 1,061 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1010 East Spring Street |
Cookeville | TN | — | 322 | 3,828 | 583 | — | 322 | 4,411 | 4,733 | 1,065 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
105 Sunrise Circle |
Franklin | TN | — | 322 | 3,833 | 558 | — | 322 | 4,391 | 4,713 | 1,067 | 11/19/2004 | 1997 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1085 Hartsville Pike |
Gallatin | TN | — | 280 | 3,327 | 244 | — | 280 | 3,571 | 3,851 | 901 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2025 Caldwell Drive |
Goodlettsville | TN | — | 400 | 3,507 | — | — | 400 | 3,507 | 3,907 | 1,082 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1200 North Parkway |
Jackson | TN | — | 295 | 3,506 | 312 | — | 295 | 3,818 | 4,113 | 985 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
550 Deer View Way |
Jefferson City | TN | — | 940 | 8,057 | 279 | — | 940 | 8,336 | 9,276 | 46 | 10/15/2013 | 2001 / 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3020 Heatherton Way |
Knoxville | TN | — | 304 | 3,618 | 1,639 | — | 304 | 5,257 | 5,561 | 1,241 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
511 Pearson Springs Road |
Maryville | TN | — | 300 | 3,207 | 100 | — | 300 | 3,307 | 3,607 | 1,021 | 2/28/2003 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1710 Magnolia Blvd |
Nashville | TN | — | 750 | 6,750 | 4,112 | — | 750 | 10,862 | 11,612 | 2,228 | 6/3/2005 | 1979 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
971 State Hwy 121 |
Allen | TX | — | 2,590 | 17,912 | — | — | 2,590 | 17,912 | 20,502 | 2,407 | 8/21/2008 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6818 Austin Center Blvd |
Austin | TX | — | 1,540 | 27,467 | 701 | — | 1,540 | 28,168 | 29,708 | 3,682 | 10/31/2008 | 1994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6937 IH 35 North-Am Founders |
Austin | TX | — | 760 | 5,186 | 415 | — | 760 | 5,601 | 6,361 | 446 | 1/26/2011 | 1980 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bailey Square (1111 W 34th St) |
Austin | TX | — | 400 | 21,021 | 446 | — | 400 | 21,467 | 21,867 | 2,955 | 6/25/2008 | 1975 / 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7600 Capital Texas Highway |
Austin | TX | — | 300 | 4,557 | — | — | 300 | 4,557 | 4,857 | 342 | 12/22/2010 | 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4620 Bellaire Boulevard |
Bellaire | TX | — | 1,238 | 11,010 | 653 | — | 1,238 | 11,663 | 12,901 | 5,520 | 5/16/1994 | 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
120 Crosspoint Drive |
Boerne | TX | — | 220 | 4,926 | 124 | — | 220 | 5,050 | 5,270 | 741 | 2/7/2008 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4015 Interstate 45 |
Conroe | TX | — | 620 | 14,074 | 74 | — | 620 | 14,148 | 14,768 | 1,111 | 10/26/2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5455 La Sierra Drive |
Dallas | TX | — | 2,300 | 25,200 | 452 | — | 2,300 | 25,652 | 27,952 | 1,468 | 12/15/2011 | 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7831 Park Lane |
Dallas | TX | — | 4,709 | 27,768 | 6,574 | — | 4,709 | 34,342 | 39,051 | 10,867 | 1/11/2002 | 1990 / 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1575 Belvidere |
El Paso | TX | — | 2,301 | 13,567 | 1,548 | — | 2,301 | 15,115 | 17,416 | 5,174 | 1/11/2002 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
96 E. Frederick Rd. |
Fredericksburg | TX | — | 280 | 4,866 | 240 | — | 280 | 5,106 | 5,386 | 738 | 2/7/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6435 S.F.M. 549 |
Heath | TX | — | 1,135 | 7,892 | — | — | 1,135 | 7,892 | 9,027 | 197 | 12/31/2012 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
777 North Post Oak Road |
Houston | TX | — | 5,537 | 32,647 | 9,890 | — | 5,537 | 42,537 | 48,074 | 13,457 | 1/11/2002 | 1989 / 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-13
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
13215 Dotson Road |
Houston | TX | — | 990 | 13,887 | — | — | 990 | 13,887 | 14,877 | 492 | 7/17/2012 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4770 Regent Blvd |
Irving | TX | — | 2,830 | 15,082 | 10 | — | 2,830 | 15,092 | 17,922 | 2,090 | 6/25/2008 | 1995 / 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9812 Slide Road |
Lubbock | TX | — | 1,110 | 9,798 | — | — | 1,110 | 9,798 | 10,908 | 878 | 6/4/2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
605 Gateway Central / 601 Steve Hawkins Prkway |
Marble Falls | TX | — | 1,440 | 7,125 | 105 | — | 1,440 | 7,230 | 8,670 | 211 | 12/19/2012 | 1994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7150 N. President George Bush Turnpike |
North Garland | TX | — | 1,981 | 8,548 | — | — | 1,981 | 8,548 | 10,529 | 214 | 12/31/2012 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
511 Knights Cross Drive |
San Antonio | TX | — | 1,200 | 6,500 | 24 | — | 1,200 | 6,524 | 7,724 | 764 | 11/17/2009 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
575 Knights Cross Drive |
San Antonio | TX | — | 1,100 | 13,900 | 375 | — | 1,100 | 14,275 | 15,375 | 1,657 | 11/17/2009 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
311 Nottingham West |
San Antonio(4) | TX | 27,943 | 4,283 | 25,256 | 5,698 | — | 4,283 | 30,954 | 35,237 | 10,218 | 1/11/2002 | 1989 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5055 West Panther Creek Drive |
Woodlands(4) | TX | 37,767 | 3,694 | 21,782 | 3,825 | — | 3,694 | 25,607 | 29,301 | 9,232 | 1/11/2002 | 1988 / 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
900 North Taylor Street |
Arlington | VA | — | 1,885 | 16,734 | 270 | — | 1,885 | 17,004 | 18,889 | 8,271 | 7/25/1994 | 1992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
491 Crestwood Drive |
Charlottesville(4) | VA | 10,030 | 641 | 7,633 | 928 | — | 641 | 8,561 | 9,202 | 2,144 | 6/17/1994 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2610 Barracks Road |
Charlottesville | VA | — | 2,976 | 26,422 | 431 | — | 2,976 | 26,853 | 29,829 | 13,118 | 11/19/2004 | 1991 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1005 Elysian Place |
Chesapeake | VA | — | 2,370 | 23,705 | 105 | — | 2,370 | 23,810 | 26,180 | 1,649 | 6/20/2011 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2856 Forehand Drive |
Chesapeake | VA | — | 160 | 1,498 | 774 | — | 160 | 2,272 | 2,432 | 671 | 5/30/2003 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4001 Fair Ridge Drive |
Fairfax | VA | — | 2,500 | 7,147 | 476 | — | 2,500 | 7,623 | 10,123 | 1,105 | 12/22/2008 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
20 HeartFields Lane |
Fredericksburg(4) | VA | 10,517 | 287 | 8,480 | 1,265 | — | 287 | 9,745 | 10,032 | 3,036 | 10/25/2002 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2800 Polo Parkway |
Midlothian | VA | — | 1,103 | 13,126 | 1,342 | — | 1,103 | 14,468 | 15,571 | 3,635 | 11/19/2004 | 1996 / 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
655 Denbigh Boulevard |
Newport News(4) | VA | 8,024 | 581 | 6,921 | 409 | — | 581 | 7,330 | 7,911 | 1,851 | 11/19/2004 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
885 Kempsville Rd |
Norfolk | VA | — | 1,780 | 8,354 | 657 | — | 1,780 | 9,011 | 10,791 | 1,139 | 5/20/2009 | 1981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6161 Kempsville Rd |
Norfolk | VA | — | 1,530 | 9,531 | 387 | — | 1,530 | 9,918 | 11,448 | 1,278 | 12/22/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
6311 Granby Street |
Norfolk | VA | — | 1,920 | 16,538 | 30 | — | 1,920 | 16,568 | 18,488 | 1,181 | 6/20/2011 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
531 Wythe Creek Road |
Poquoson | VA | — | 220 | 2,041 | 699 | — | 220 | 2,740 | 2,960 | 794 | 5/30/2003 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9900 Independence Park Drive |
Richmond(4) | VA | 9,353 | 326 | 3,166 | — | — | 326 | 3,166 | 3,492 | 165 | 11/22/2011 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
9930 Independence Park Drive |
Richmond(4) | VA | — | 604 | 5,432 | — | — | 604 | 5,432 | 6,036 | 283 | 11/22/2011 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3000 Skipwith Road |
Richmond | VA | — | 732 | 8,717 | 730 | — | 732 | 9,447 | 10,179 | 2,340 | 11/19/2004 | 1999 / 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-14
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
5620 Wesleyan Drive |
Virginia Beach | VA | — | 893 | 7,926 | 501 | — | 893 | 8,427 | 9,320 | 3,969 | 5/16/1994 | 1990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
4132 Longhill Road |
Williamsburg | VA | — | 270 | 2,468 | 943 | — | 270 | 3,411 | 3,681 | 942 | 5/30/2003 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
21717 30th Drive SE |
Bothell | WA | — | 3,012 | 12,582 | — | — | 3,012 | 12,582 | 15,594 | 288 | 2/14/2013 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
21823 30th Drive SE |
Bothell | WA | — | 2,627 | 12,657 | — | — | 2,629 | 12,655 | 15,284 | 290 | 2/14/2013 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
516 Kenosia Avenue South |
Kent(4) | WA | 6,579 | 1,300 | 8,458 | 54 | — | 1,300 | 8,512 | 9,812 | 338 | 7/31/2012 | 1971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2956 152nd Ave NE |
Redmond(4) | WA | 12,093 | 5,120 | 16,683 | 683 | — | 5,120 | 17,366 | 22,486 | 453 | 1/9/2013 | 1990 / 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
555 16th Avenue |
Seattle | WA | — | 256 | 4,869 | 67 | — | 256 | 4,936 | 5,192 | 2,738 | 11/1/1993 | 1964 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
18740 W. Bluemound Rd. |
Brookfield | WI | — | 832 | 3,849 | 4,087 | — | 832 | 7,936 | 8,768 | 3,383 | 12/28/1990 | 1964 / 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3003 West Good Hope Road |
Glendale | WI | — | 1,500 | 33,747 | — | — | 1,500 | 33,747 | 35,247 | 3,586 | 9/30/2009 | 1963 / 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
7007 North Range Line Road |
Glendale | WI | — | 250 | 3,797 | — | — | 250 | 3,797 | 4,047 | 403 | 9/30/2009 | 1964 / 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
215 Washington Street |
Grafton | WI | — | 500 | 10,058 | — | — | 500 | 10,058 | 10,558 | 1,069 | 9/30/2009 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8351 Sheridan Rd |
Kenosha | WI | — | 750 | 7,669 | 112 | — | 750 | 7,781 | 8,531 | 1,155 | 1/1/2008 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5601 Burke Rd |
Madison | WI | — | 700 | 7,461 | 47 | — | 700 | 7,508 | 8,208 | 1,118 | 1/1/2008 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
10803 N. Port Washington Rd |
Mequon(4) | WI | 4,272 | 800 | 8,388 | 396 | — | 800 | 8,784 | 9,584 | 1,326 | 1/1/2008 | 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
701 East Puetz Rd |
Oak Creek | WI | — | 650 | 18,396 | 217 | — | 650 | 18,613 | 19,263 | 2,801 | 1/1/2008 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
W231 N1440 Corporate Court |
Pewaukee | WI | — | 3,900 | 41,140 | — | — | 3,900 | 41,140 | 45,040 | 4,371 | 9/30/2009 | 1994 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
321 Riverside Drive |
Pewaukee | WI | — | 984 | 2,432 | 1,237 | — | 984 | 3,669 | 4,653 | 1,898 | 9/10/1998 | 1963 / 1969 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
8438 & 8400 Washington Avenue |
Racine | WI | — | 1,150 | 22,436 | — | — | 1,150 | 22,436 | 23,586 | 2,384 | 9/30/2009 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1221 North 26th Street |
Sheboygan | WI | — | 300 | 975 | — | — | 300 | 975 | 1,275 | 104 | 9/30/2009 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2414 Kohler Memorial Drive |
Sheboygan | WI | — | 1,400 | 35,168 | — | — | 1,400 | 35,168 | 36,568 | 3,737 | 9/30/2009 | 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1222 North 23rd Street |
Sheboygan | WI | — | 120 | 4,014 | — | — | 120 | 4,014 | 4,134 | 427 | 9/30/2009 | 1987 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1125 N Edge Trail |
Verona | WI | — | 1,365 | 9,581 | 264 | — | 1,365 | 9,845 | 11,210 | 33 | 11/1/2013 | 2001 / 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1451 Cleveland Avenue |
Waukesha | WI | — | 68 | 3,452 | 3,115 | — | 68 | 6,567 | 6,635 | 3,467 | 12/28/1990 | 1958 / 1995 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
3289 North Mayfair Road |
Wauwatosa | WI | — | 2,300 | 6,245 | — | — | 2,300 | 6,245 | 8,545 | 664 | 9/30/2009 | 1964 / 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
5301 W. Lincoln Ave |
West Allis | WI | — | 1,600 | 20,377 | 1,008 | — | 1,600 | 21,385 | 22,985 | 3,168 | 1/1/2008 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
503 South 18th Street |
Laramie | WY | — | 191 | 3,632 | 789 | — | 191 | 4,421 | 4,612 | 2,444 | 12/30/1993 | 1964 / 1986 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
S-15
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars appearing in the table below are in thousands)
| |
|
|
|
Initial Cost to Company | |
Cost at December 31, 2013 | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Address
|
City | State | Encumbrances | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Cost Capitalized Subsequent to Acquisition |
Impairment | Land | Buildings, Improvements & Equipment |
Total(1) | Accumulated Depreciation(2) |
Date Acquired(3) |
Original Construction / Renovated Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
1901 Howell Ave. |
Worland | WY | — | 132 | 2,507 | 1,230 | — | 132 | 3,737 | 3,869 | 1,906 | 12/30/1993 | 1970 / 1996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total | $ | 694,943 | $ | 625,794 | $ | 4,222,700 | $ | 439,354 | $ | (24,223 | ) | $ | 623,756 | $ | 4,639,869 | $ | 5,263,625 | $ | 840,760 | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Note: The above table excludes properties classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013.
S-16
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST
SCHEDULE III
REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION
DECEMBER 31, 2013
(Dollars in thousands)
Analysis of the carrying amount of real estate and equipment and accumulated depreciation during the period:
| |
Real Estate and Equipment |
Accumulated Depreciation |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 3,641,483 | $ | 511,225 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Additions |
951,029 | 97,103 | |||||
Disposals |
(27,540 | ) | (9,655 | ) | |||
Impairment |
(1,190 | ) | (228 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
4,563,782 | 598,445 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Additions |
460,272 | 116,772 | |||||
Disposals |
(846 | ) | (8 | ) | |||
Impairment |
(3,593 | ) | (522 | ) | |||
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
5,019,615 | 714,687 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Additions |
245,330 | 126,073 | |||||
Disposals |
— | — | |||||
Impairment |
(1,320 | ) | — | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 |
$ | 5,263,625 | $ | 840,760 | |||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
S-17
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SENIOR HOUSING PROPERTIES TRUST |
||||
By: |
/s/ DAVID J. HEGARTY |
|||
| David J. Hegarty President and Chief Operating Officer |
||||
Dated: March 3, 2014 |
||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /s/ DAVID J. HEGARTY David J. Hegarty |
President and Chief Operating Officer | March 3, 2014 | ||
/s/ RICHARD A. DOYLE Richard A. Doyle |
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) |
March 3, 2014 |
||
/s/ JOHN L. HARRINGTON John L. Harrington |
Independent Trustee |
March 3, 2014 |
||
/s/ ADAM D. PORTNOY Adam D. Portnoy |
Managing Trustee |
March 3, 2014 |
||
/s/ BARRY M. PORTNOY Barry M. Portnoy |
Managing Trustee |
March 3, 2014 |
||
/s/ JEFFREY P. SOMERS Jeffrey P. Somers |
Independent Trustee |
March 3, 2014 |
||
/s/ FREDERICK N. ZEYTOONJIAN Frederick N. Zeytoonjian |
Independent Trustee |
March 3, 2014 |