FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
þ |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30,
2009
OR
|
|
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to
Commission File Number:
001-14437
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
52-2115953
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
Westpointe Corporate Center One,
5th
Floor
1550 Coraopolis Heights Road
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
15108-2973
(Zip Code)
|
(412) 893-0026
Registrants telephone number,
including area code:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer
or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the Corporations common stock
(Common Stock) outstanding as of July 31,
2009
was 23,119,670.
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC AND CONSOLIDATED
SUBSIDIARIES
As used in this report, the terms RTI,
Company, Registrant, we,
our, and us, mean RTI International
Metals, Inc., its predecessors, and consolidated subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, unless the context indicates otherwise.
INDEX
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
104,354
|
|
|
$
|
159,829
|
|
|
$
|
210,408
|
|
|
$
|
310,477
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
90,859
|
|
|
|
110,626
|
|
|
|
180,621
|
|
|
|
209,216
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14,595
|
|
|
|
17,798
|
|
|
|
31,142
|
|
|
|
36,106
|
|
Research, technical, and product development expenses
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,603
|
)
|
|
|
30,894
|
|
|
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
|
64,120
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
|
|
1,754
|
|
|
|
(680
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(4,776
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,676
|
)
|
|
|
30,123
|
|
|
|
(4,336
|
)
|
|
|
64,197
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
(2,801
|
)
|
|
|
11,510
|
|
|
|
(3,002
|
)
|
|
|
23,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
18,613
|
|
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,898,490
|
|
|
|
22,835,487
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
22,899,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
22,971,124
|
|
|
|
23,048,041
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
23,151,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
261,069
|
|
|
$
|
284,449
|
|
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $594 and
$2,260
|
|
|
57,262
|
|
|
|
79,778
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
278,774
|
|
|
|
274,330
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
29,746
|
|
|
|
29,456
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
15,243
|
|
|
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
642,094
|
|
|
|
679,122
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment, net
|
|
|
291,356
|
|
|
|
271,062
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
48,615
|
|
|
|
47,984
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
13,487
|
|
|
|
13,196
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
19,696
|
|
|
|
15,740
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,893
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,017,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
42,875
|
|
|
$
|
54,422
|
|
Accrued wages and other employee costs
|
|
|
10,546
|
|
|
|
20,452
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
22,660
|
|
|
|
22,352
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
24,319
|
|
|
|
1,375
|
|
Current liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
Current liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,112
|
|
|
|
18,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
122,265
|
|
|
|
119,521
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
217,033
|
|
|
|
238,550
|
|
Noncurrent liability for post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
31,246
|
|
|
|
30,732
|
|
Noncurrent liability for pension benefits
|
|
|
26,995
|
|
|
|
26,535
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
10,999
|
|
|
|
11,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
408,692
|
|
|
|
427,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,813,584 and 23,688,010 shares issued; 23,119,270 and
23,004,136 shares outstanding
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
309,666
|
|
|
|
307,604
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 694,314 and 683,874 shares
|
|
|
(16,979
|
)
|
|
|
(16,891
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(40,478
|
)
|
|
|
(46,352
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
356,002
|
|
|
|
357,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
608,449
|
|
|
|
601,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,017,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,850
|
|
Adjustment for non-cash items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
|
|
9,622
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(3,862
|
)
|
|
|
(6,813
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
(437
|
)
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
24,408
|
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,837
|
)
|
|
|
(19,968
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
3,671
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(683
|
)
|
|
|
278
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
17,833
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(13,818
|
)
|
|
|
(21,983
|
)
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
1,524
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,980
|
|
|
|
33,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(45,167
|
)
|
|
|
(48,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(45,167
|
)
|
|
|
(48,122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Borrowings on long-term debt
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Repayments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(549
|
)
|
Purchase of common stock held in treasury
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(9,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
(7,358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
(712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(23,380
|
)
|
|
|
(22,691
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
284,449
|
|
|
|
107,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
261,069
|
|
|
$
|
84,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and
Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
23,004,136
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
307,604
|
|
|
$
|
(16,891
|
)
|
|
$
|
357,336
|
|
|
$
|
(3,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39,321
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,706
|
)
|
|
$
|
601,934
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,334
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
Unrecognized gain on derivatives (interest rate swaps), net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
Benefit plan amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,540
|
|
Shares issued for directors compensation
|
|
|
35,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued for restricted stock award plans
|
|
|
87,360
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Shares issued for performance share award plans
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
Treasury stock purchased at cost
|
|
|
(6,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Exercise of employee options
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock awards
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock-based compensation activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
23,119,270
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
309,666
|
|
|
$
|
(16,979
|
)
|
|
$
|
356,002
|
|
|
$
|
(2,256
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,081
|
)
|
|
$
|
(141
|
)
|
|
$
|
608,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Note 1BASIS
OF PRESENTATION:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of
RTI International Metals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company or RTI) have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the
instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally
included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations,
although the Company believes that the disclosures made are
adequate to make the information not misleading. In the opinion
of management, these financial statements contain all of the
adjustments of a normal and recurring nature considered
necessary to state fairly the results for the interim periods
presented. The results for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
year.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived
from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not
include all of the information and notes required by accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for complete
financial statements. Although the Company believes that the
disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not
misleading, it is suggested that these financial statements be
read in conjunction with accounting policies and notes to
consolidated financial statements included in the Companys
2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Note 2ORGANIZATION:
The Company is a leading U.S. producer of titanium mill
products and a global supplier of fabricated titanium and
specialty metal components for the national and international
market. It is a successor to entities that have been operating
in the titanium industry since 1951. The Company first became
publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange in 1990 under the
name RMI Titanium Co., and was reorganized into a holding
company structure in 1998 under the symbol RTI.
The Company conducts business in three segments: the Titanium
Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Group melts and produces a complete range of
titanium mill products, which are further processed by its
customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace, defense,
and industrial applications. The titanium mill products consist
of basic mill shapes including ingot, slab, bloom, billet, bar,
plate, and sheet. The Titanium Group also produces ferro
titanium alloys for steel-making customers.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies that fabricate,
machine, and assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts
and components. Its products, many of which are complex
engineered parts and assemblies, serve commercial aerospace,
defense, oil and gas, power generation, and chemical process
industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer
markets.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys.
6
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Note 3STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
Stock
Options
A summary of the status of the Companys stock options as
of June 30, 2009, and the activity during the six months
then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
352,680
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
170,430
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,734
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(1,367
|
)
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
513,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
286,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options granted was estimated at the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based
upon the assumptions noted in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.85
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected lives (in years)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
58.00
|
%
|
Restricted
Stock
A summary of the status of the Companys nonvested
restricted stock as of June 30, 2009, and the activity
during the six months then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested Restricted Stock Awards
|
|
Shares
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
161,669
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
123,271
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(63,132
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
217,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock grants was calculated using
the market value of the Companys Common Stock on the date
of issuance. The weighted-average grant date fair value of
restricted stock awards granted during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $14.46.
7
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Performance
Share Awards
A summary of the Companys performance share award activity
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 is presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Maximum Shares
|
Performance Share Awards
|
|
Granted
|
|
Eligible to Receive
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
85,730
|
|
|
|
171,460
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,900
|
)
|
|
|
(7,800
|
)
|
Vested
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
109,830
|
|
|
|
219,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the performance share awards granted was
estimated by the Company at the grant date using a Monte Carlo
model. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of performance
shares awarded during the six months ended June 30, 2009
was $20.65.
Note 4INCOME
TAXES:
Management evaluates the estimated annual effective income tax
rate on a quarterly basis based on current and forecasted
business levels and activities, including the mix of domestic
and foreign results and enacted tax laws. This estimated annual
effective tax rate is updated quarterly based upon actual
results and updated operating forecasts. Items unrelated to
current year ordinary income are recognized entirely in the
period identified as a discrete item of tax. The quarterly
income tax provision is comprised of tax on ordinary income at
the most recent estimated annual effective tax rate, adjusted
for the effect of discrete items.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the estimated
annual effective tax rate applied to ordinary income was 83.3%
compared to a rate of 37.2% for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. These rates differ from the federal
statutory rate of 35% principally as a result of the mix of
domestic income and foreign losses benefited at lower tax rates.
The lower level of income amplifies the rate impact of these mix
effects in the current period compared to the comparable period
last year.
Inclusive of discrete items, the Company recognized a provision
for (benefit from) income taxes of $(2,801), or 104.7% of pretax
income (loss), and $11,510, or 38.2% of pretax income for
federal, state, and foreign income taxes for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The current
provision as a percentage of pretax income is higher than the
comparable period principally as a result of the mix of domestic
income and foreign losses benefited at lower tax rates. The
lower level of income amplifies the rate impact of these mix
effects compared to the comparable period. Discrete items
recognized during each period were not material.
The Company recognized a provision for (benefit from) income
taxes of $(3,002), or 69.2% of pretax income (loss), and
$23,347, or 36.4% of pretax income for federal, state, and
foreign income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. The provision for the current period as
a percentage of pretax income is higher than the comparable
period principally as a result of the mix of domestic income and
foreign losses benefited at lower tax rates. The lower level of
income amplifies the rate impact of these mix effects in the
current period compared to the comparable period. Discrete items
totaling $610 reduced the benefit from income taxes for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and were comprised primarily of
adjustments to unrecognized tax benefits. Discrete items
totaling $535 reduced the provision for income taxes for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and were comprised primarily of
adjustments to the prior year state income tax provision.
8
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Note 5EARNINGS
PER SHARE:
Earnings per share amounts for each period are presented in
accordance with Statement of Financial Standards
(SFAS) No. 128, Earnings Per Share
(SFAS 128), which requires the presentation
of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per
share was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the
weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding
for each respective period. Diluted earnings per share was
calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average
of all potentially dilutive shares of Common Stock that were
outstanding during the periods presented.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB Staff Position
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP
EITF 03-6-1).
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents,
whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities to be
included in the computation of earnings per share under the
two-class method described in SFAS 128. The provisions of
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
are applied retrospectively. The Companys restricted stock
awards are considered participating securities under the
provisions of FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
The adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
reduced basic EPS by $0.01 for both the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2008. There was no effect on diluted
EPS.
Actual weighted-average shares of Common Stock outstanding used
in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
18,613
|
|
|
$
|
(1,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,850
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,898,490
|
|
|
|
22,835,487
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
22,899,615
|
|
Effect of diluted securities
|
|
|
72,634
|
|
|
|
212,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
22,971,124
|
|
|
|
23,048,041
|
|
|
|
22,887,743
|
|
|
|
23,151,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.76
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, options
to purchase 417,715 and 493,220 shares of Common Stock, at
an average price of $35.16 and $31.66, respectively, have been
excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share
because their effects were antidilutive. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008, options to purchase 187,040 and
118,129 shares of Common Stock, at an average price of
$58.86 and $66.54, respectively, have been excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effects
were antidilutive.
9
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Note 6INVENTORIES:
Inventories are valued at cost as determined by the
last-in,
first-out (LIFO) method for approximately 62% and
61% of the Companys inventories as of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. The remaining
inventories are valued at cost determined by a combination of
the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) and weighted-average cost methods.
Inventory costs generally include materials, labor, and
manufacturing overhead (including depreciation). When market
conditions indicate an excess of carrying cost over market
value, a
lower-of-cost-or-market
provision is recorded. Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$
|
131,433
|
|
|
$
|
124,689
|
|
Work-in-process
and finished goods
|
|
|
222,922
|
|
|
|
228,745
|
|
LIFO reserve
|
|
|
(75,581
|
)
|
|
|
(79,104
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
278,774
|
|
|
$
|
274,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the current
cost of inventories exceeded their carrying value by $75,581 and
$79,104, respectively. The Companys FIFO inventory value
approximates current costs.
Note 7GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
Under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS 142), goodwill is not amortized;
however, the carrying amount of goodwill is tested, at least
annually, for impairment. Absent any events throughout the year
which would indicate a potential impairment has occurred, the
Company performs its annual impairment testing during the fourth
quarter.
There have been no impairments to date; however, uncertainties
or other factors that could result in a potential impairment in
future periods may include continued long-term production delays
or a significant decrease in expected demand related to the
Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, as well as any cancellation of one of the major
aerospace programs the Company currently supplies, including the
Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program or the Airbus
family of aircraft, including the A380 and A350XWB programs. In
addition, the Companys ability to ramp up its production
of these programs in a cost efficient manner may also impact the
results of a future impairment test.
In June 2009, Boeing announced a further delay in the first
flight of the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
test aircraft in order to strengthen small areas where the wings
join the fuselage. Boeing has not released an updated flight
schedule nor has it provided any information with regards to the
length of production delays, if any, related to this latest
issue. A significant further delay in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production schedule is a specific uncertainty that may impact
the results of a future impairment test.
Goodwill. The carrying amount of goodwill
attributable to each segment at December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,548
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
35,603
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
36,234
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill
|
|
$
|
47,984
|
|
|
$
|
631
|
|
|
$
|
48,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Intangibles. Intangible assets consist of
customer relationships as a result of the Companys 2004
acquisition of Claro Precision, Inc. (Claro). These
intangible assets, which were valued at fair value, are being
amortized over 20 years. In the event that long-term demand
or market conditions change and the expected future cash flows
associated with these assets is reduced, a write-down or
acceleration of the amortization period may be required.
There were no intangible assets attributable to our Titanium
Group and Distribution Group at December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009. The carrying amount of intangible assets
attributable to our Fabrication Group at December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
$
|
13,196
|
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
$
|
13,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8UNEARNED
REVENUE:
The Company reported a liability for unearned revenue of $22,660
as of June 30, 2009 and $22,352 as of December 31,
2008. These amounts primarily represent payments received in
advance from commercial aerospace, defense, and energy market
customers on long-term orders, which the Company has not
recognized as revenues.
Note 9OTHER
INCOME:
Other income (expense) for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was $855 and $(975), respectively. Other income
(expense) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
was $1,754 and $(680), respectively. Other income (expense)
consists primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses from
international operations and fair value adjustments related to
the Companys foreign currency forward contracts. See
Note 14 to the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the
Companys foreign currency forward contracts.
11
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Note 10EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS:
Components of net periodic pension and other post-retirement
benefit cost for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 for those salaried and hourly covered employees
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
|
$
|
970
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
(2,218
|
)
|
|
|
(3,859
|
)
|
|
|
(4,436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
|
|
607
|
|
Amortization of unrealized gains and losses
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
918
|
|
|
$
|
793
|
|
|
$
|
1,838
|
|
|
$
|
1,586
|
|
|
$
|
966
|
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
1,932
|
|
|
$
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is required to make contributions totaling
$2.6 million to its Company-sponsored pension plans in
order to maintain its desired funding status; however, it is
considering making contributions of up to $9.0 million.
Note 11COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
From time to time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal
course of business. In the Companys opinion, the ultimate
liability, if any, resulting from these matters will have no
significant effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Given the critical nature of many of the aerospace end uses for
the Companys products, including specifically their use in
critical rotating parts of gas turbine engines, the Company
maintains aircraft products liability insurance of
$350 million, which includes grounding liability.
Environmental
Matters
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations as
well as various health and safety laws and regulations that are
subject to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs
of compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on the Company in the past, it is impossible to
accurately predict the ultimate effect these changing laws and
regulations may have on the Company in the future. The Company
continues to evaluate its obligation for environmental-related
costs on a quarterly basis and make adjustments in accordance
with provisions of Statement of Position
96-1,
Environmental Remediation Liabilities and
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of the
Companys sites and the evolving nature of environmental
laws, regulations, and remediation techniques, the
Companys ultimate obligation for investigative and
remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is the Companys
policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single
12
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
estimate cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be
reasonably estimated, the Company accrues the amount it
determines to be the most likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, the Company believes that its
share of possible environmental-related costs is in a range from
$1,143 to $2,615 in the aggregate. At June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1,775 and $2,259,
respectively. Of the total amount accrued at June 30, 2009,
$1,539 is expected to be paid out within one year and is
included in the other accrued liabilities line of the balance
sheet. The remaining $236 is recorded in other noncurrent
liabilities. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
Company made payments totaling $569 related to its environmental
liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge the Company from its obligations for these sites which
include the Ashtabula River and the Reserve Environmental
Services Landfill.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
The Company maintained a program through an authorized agent to
recapture duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset
against exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by
the Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to Cost of Sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, the Company
has performed an internal review of the entire
$14.5 million of drawback claims filed with
U.S. Customs to determine to what extent any claims may
have been invalid or may not have been supported with adequate
documentation. As a result, the Company recorded charges
totaling $8.0 million to Cost of Sales through
December 31, 2008. The Company recorded charges totaling
$0.2 million during the three months ended March 31,
2009. During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the
Company recorded additional charges totaling $2.3 million,
primarily as a result of U.S. Customs formal denial
of certain of the Companys previously filed direct claims.
While the Company intends to continue to pursue these claims
through the administrative process, it has fully reserved for
these claims due to the inherent risks and uncertainties related
to the protest process.
These abovementioned charges were determined in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and represent
the Companys current best estimate of
13
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
probable loss. Of this amount, $9.5 million was recorded as
a contingent current liability and $1.0 million was
recorded as a write-off of an outstanding receivable
representing claims filed which had not yet been paid by
U.S. Customs. Through December 31, 2008, the Company
repaid to U.S. Customs $1.1 million for invalid
claims. The Company made additional repayments totaling
$0.2 million during the six months ended June 30,
2009. As a result of these payments, the Companys
liability totaled $8.1 million as of June 30, 2009.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation and the Companys own internal review is not
yet known, the Company believes there is an additional possible
risk of loss between $0 and $3.0 million based on current
facts, exclusive of amounts imposed for interest and penalties,
if any, which cannot be quantified at this time. This possible
risk of future loss relates primarily to indirect duty drawback
claims filed with U.S. Customs by several of the
Companys customers as the ultimate exporter of record in
which we shared in a portion of the revenue.
Other
Matters
The Company is also the subject of, or a party to, a number of
other pending or threatened legal actions involving a variety of
matters incidental to its business. The Company is of the
opinion that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on the results of the operations,
cash flows, or the financial position of the Company.
Note 12LONG-TERM
DEBT:
Long-term debt consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
RTI term loan
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
RTI Claro credit agreement
|
|
|
11,984
|
|
|
|
11,792
|
|
Interest-free loan agreement Canada
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
Other
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
241,352
|
|
|
$
|
239,925
|
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(24,319
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
217,033
|
|
|
$
|
238,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 13SEGMENT
REPORTING:
The Company has three reportable segments: the Titanium
Group, the Fabrication Group, and the Distribution Group.
The Titanium Group manufactures and sells a wide range of
titanium mill products to a customer base consisting primarily
of manufacturing and fabrication companies in the commercial
aerospace and nonaerospace markets. Titanium mill products are
sold primarily to customers such as metal fabricators, forge
shops, and, to a lesser extent, metal distribution companies.
Titanium mill products are usually raw or starting material for
these customers, who then form, fabricate, or further process
mill products into finished or semi-finished components or parts.
14
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that fabricate, machine, and assemble
titanium and other specialty metal parts and components. Its
products, many of which are complex engineered parts and
assemblies, serve the commercial aerospace, defense, oil and
gas, power generation, medical device, and chemical process
industries, as well as a number of other industrial and consumer
markets.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products.
Intersegment sales are accounted for at prices which are
generally established by reference to similar transactions with
unaffiliated customers. Reportable segments are measured based
on segment operating income after an allocation of certain
corporate items such as general corporate overhead and expenses.
Assets of general corporate activities include unallocated cash
and deferred taxes.
15
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
A summary of financial information by reportable segment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
27,124
|
|
|
$
|
52,374
|
|
|
$
|
57,427
|
|
|
$
|
107,501
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
35,278
|
|
|
|
43,579
|
|
|
|
69,029
|
|
|
|
90,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group net sales
|
|
|
62,402
|
|
|
|
95,953
|
|
|
|
126,456
|
|
|
|
198,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
26,487
|
|
|
|
41,152
|
|
|
|
52,551
|
|
|
|
71,064
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
14,210
|
|
|
|
23,116
|
|
|
|
28,575
|
|
|
|
45,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group net sales
|
|
|
40,697
|
|
|
|
64,268
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
116,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
50,743
|
|
|
|
66,303
|
|
|
|
100,430
|
|
|
|
131,912
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group net sales
|
|
|
51,331
|
|
|
|
66,598
|
|
|
|
101,695
|
|
|
|
133,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
50,076
|
|
|
|
66,990
|
|
|
|
98,869
|
|
|
|
137,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
104,354
|
|
|
$
|
159,829
|
|
|
$
|
210,408
|
|
|
$
|
310,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group before corporate allocations
|
|
$
|
4,496
|
|
|
$
|
21,330
|
|
|
$
|
11,475
|
|
|
$
|
52,687
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
|
(2,897
|
)
|
|
|
(5,144
|
)
|
|
|
(5,902
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Titanium Group operating income
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
18,433
|
|
|
|
6,331
|
|
|
|
46,785
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabrication Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
(4,213
|
)
|
|
|
7,674
|
|
|
|
(8,865
|
)
|
|
|
7,218
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(2,222
|
)
|
|
|
(2,368
|
)
|
|
|
(4,791
|
)
|
|
|
(4,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fabrication Group operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,435
|
)
|
|
|
5,306
|
|
|
|
(13,656
|
)
|
|
|
2,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Group before corporate allocations
|
|
|
4,488
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
18,907
|
|
Corporate allocations
|
|
|
(1,766
|
)
|
|
|
(1,975
|
)
|
|
|
(3,809
|
)
|
|
|
(3,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Distribution Group operating income
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
4,943
|
|
|
|
14,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,603
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,894
|
|
|
$
|
(2,382
|
)
|
|
$
|
64,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
$
|
18,632
|
|
|
$
|
6,927
|
|
|
$
|
47,535
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(8,041
|
)
|
|
|
4,470
|
|
|
$
|
(16,843
|
)
|
|
|
908
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
3,149
|
|
|
|
7,021
|
|
|
|
5,580
|
|
|
|
15,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,676
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,123
|
|
|
$
|
(4,336
|
)
|
|
$
|
64,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
388,221
|
|
|
$
|
374,999
|
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
226,826
|
|
|
|
224,534
|
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
142,311
|
|
|
|
155,838
|
|
General corporate assets
|
|
|
259,783
|
|
|
|
273,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
1,017,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,029,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 14FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS:
When appropriate, the Company uses derivatives to manage its
exposure to changes in interest rates. The interest differential
to be paid or received is recorded as interest expense.
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), defines
derivatives, requires that derivatives be carried at fair value
on the balance sheet, and provides for hedge accounting when
certain conditions are met. In accordance with this standard,
the Companys derivative financial instruments are
recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments designated as cash
flow hedges under SFAS 133, to the extent the hedges
are highly effective, are recorded in other comprehensive
income, net of tax effects. The ineffective portions of
cash flow hedges, if any, are recorded into current
period earnings. Amounts recorded in other comprehensive income
are reclassified into current period earnings when the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Changes in the fair value of
derivative instruments designated as fair value
hedges under SFAS 133, along with corresponding changes in
the fair values of the hedged assets or liabilities, are
recorded in current period earnings.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company maintained several
interest rate swap agreements (the swap agreements),
with notional amounts totaling $146.3 million. The swap
agreements effectively convert, from floating-rate to
fixed-rate, the first 65% of interest payments on the
Companys $225.0 million term loan. The swap
agreements amortize proportionally with the amortization of the
term loan and allow the Company to convert a portion of its
interest expense from one-month LIBOR to a fixed rate. The swap
agreements expire on September 27, 2012. The swap
agreements are accounted for as cash flow hedges
under the provisions of SFAS 133 as they are highly
effective at offsetting the cash flows related to interest
payments on the Companys $225.0 million term loan.
The fair value of the swap agreements is recorded in Accumulated
other comprehensive income. Amounts recorded in Accumulated
other comprehensive income are reclassified into Interest
expense in the period the transaction affects earnings.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company maintained several foreign
currency forward contracts, with notional amounts totaling
9.7 million, that are used to manage foreign currency
exposure related to equipment purchases associated with the
Companys ongoing capital expansion projects. These forward
contracts settle throughout fiscal 2009. They have not been
designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133. Changes
in the fair value of these forward contracts are recorded in
current period earnings within Other income (expense).
A summary of the Companys derivative instrument portfolio
as of June 30, 2009, is below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as
|
|
Statement of Financial
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
|
Hedging Instrument
|
|
Position Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(3,893
|
)
|
Foreign currency forwards
|
|
|
No
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
17
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
Note 15FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157) clarifies that fair value is an
exit price, representing the amount that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is
a market-based measurement that should be determined based upon
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions,
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the inputs utilized in measuring fair value as
follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than
the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable
inputs in which there is little or no market data and which
requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This
hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data,
when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company
measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value,
including its cash equivalents.
The Companys cash equivalents consist of highly liquid
Money Market Funds that are classified within Level 1 of
the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted
market prices. The Companys interest rate swap agreements
are estimated utilizing the terms of the interest rate swap
agreements and available market yield curves. The Companys
foreign currency forward contracts are estimated utilizing the
terms of the contracts and available forward pricing
information. However, because these derivative contracts are
unique and not actively traded, the fair values are classified
as Level 2 estimates under the provision of SFAS 157.
Listed below are the Companys assets and liabilities, and
their fair values, that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
261,069
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
261,069
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
261,069
|
|
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
262,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,893
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, the Company did not have any financial
assets or liabilities that were measured on a nonrecurring basis.
Note 16NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)).
SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how
an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and the goodwill
acquired. SFAS 141(R) also establishes additional
disclosure requirements related to the financial effects of a
business combination. SFAS 141(R) became effective as of
January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not
have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
18
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount
of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership
interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity
investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160
also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify
and distinguish between the interest of the parent and the
interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 became
effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 160 did not have a material effect on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161
provides for additional disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, including disclosures as to
how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under SFAS 133 and how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect a companys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 became
effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 161 did not have a material effect on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. See
Note 14 to the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the
Companys derivative instruments.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents,
whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities to be
included in the computation of earnings per share under the
two-class method described in SFAS 128. The provisions of
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
became effective as of January 1, 2009, and required
retrospective application. The adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
did not have a material impact on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 5 to the
Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
further information on the Companys earnings per share.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No
FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosure about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP
SFAS 132(R)-1). FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 provides
guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of
a defined benefit or other postretirement plan, to include
investment policies and strategies; associated and concentrated
risks; major asset categories and their fair values; inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure fair-value of plan assets;
and the net periodic benefit costs recognized for each annual
period. FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 is effective for reporting
periods ending after December 15, 2009. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact the adoption of FSP
SFAS 132(R)-1 will have on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
No. 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB
28-1).
FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments in interim financial
statements as well as in annual financial statements and amends
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to
require disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
is effective for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
did not have a material effect on the Companys
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165).
SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. Additionally, SFAS 165 requires disclosure of
the date through
19
RTI
INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless
otherwise indicated)
which subsequent events have been evaluated. The adoption of
SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(SFAS 168). SFAS 168 identifies the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the sole source of US GAAP
recognized by the FASB. The Codification identifies only two
levels of GAAP: authoritative and nonauthoritative.
SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the
adoption of SFAS 168 to have a material effect on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 17SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS:
The Company evaluated subsequent events through August 10,
2009, the date the financial statements were issued. On
July 31, 2009, the Company prepaid $78.8 million on
its $225.0 million term loan in order to reduce its
interest expense.
20
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
The following discussion should be read in connection with the
information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements
and Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The
following information contains forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is subject to the safe harbor
created by that Act. Such forward-looking statements may be
identified by their use of words like expects,
anticipates, intends,
projects, or other words of similar meaning.
Forward-looking statements are based on expectations and
assumptions regarding future events. In addition to factors
discussed throughout this quarterly report, the following
factors and risks should also be considered, including, without
limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
statements regarding the future availability and prices of raw
materials,
|
|
|
|
competition in the titanium industry,
|
|
|
|
demand for the Companys products,
|
|
|
|
the historic cyclicality of the titanium and commercial
aerospace industries,
|
|
|
|
changes in defense spending,
|
|
|
|
the success of new market development,
|
|
|
|
ability to obtain access to financial markets and to maintain
current covenant requirements,
|
|
|
|
long-term supply agreements,
|
|
|
|
the impact of Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production delays,
|
|
|
|
legislative challenges to the Specialty Metals Clause,
|
|
|
|
labor matters,
|
|
|
|
outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation,
|
|
|
|
the successful completion of our expansion projects,
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute on new business awards,
|
|
|
|
our order backlog and the conversion of that backlog into
revenue, and
|
|
|
|
other statements contained herein that are not historical facts.
|
Because such forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties, there are important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. These and other risk
factors are set forth in this, as well as in other filings filed
with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) over the last 12 months, copies of which
are available from the SEC or may be obtained upon request from
the Company.
21
Overview
RTI International Metals, Inc. (the Company,
RTI, we, us, or
our) is a leading U.S. producer and supplier of
titanium mill products and a supplier of fabricated titanium and
specialty metal parts for the global market.
The Titanium Group melts, processes, and produces a complete
range of titanium mill products which are further processed by
its customers for use in a variety of commercial aerospace,
defense, and industrial and consumer applications. With
operations in Niles, Ohio; Canton, Ohio; and Hermitage,
Pennsylvania, the Titanium Group has overall responsibility for
the production of primary mill products including, but not
limited to, bloom, billet, sheet, and plate. This Group also
focuses on the research and development of evolving technologies
relating to raw materials, melting and other production
processes, and the application of titanium in new markets.
The Fabrication Group is comprised of companies with significant
hard-metal expertise that extrude, fabricate, machine, and
assemble titanium and other specialty metal parts and
components. Its products, many of which are complex engineered
parts and assemblies, serve commercial aerospace, defense, oil
and gas, power generation, and chemical process industries, as
well as a number of other industrial and consumer markets. With
operations located in Houston, Texas; Washington, Missouri;
Laval, Quebec; and a representative office in China, the
Fabrication Group concentrates its efforts on offering
value-added products and services such as engineered tubulars
and extrusions, fabricated and machined components and
sub-assemblies,
as well as engineered systems for energy-related markets by
accessing the Titanium Group as its primary source of mill
products.
The Distribution Group stocks, distributes, finishes,
cuts-to-size,
and facilitates
just-in-time
delivery services of titanium, steel, and other specialty metal
products, primarily nickel-based specialty alloys. With
operations in Garden Grove, California; Windsor, Connecticut;
Sullivan, Missouri; Staffordshire, England; and Rosny-Sur-Seine,
France; the Distribution Group services a variety of commercial
aerospace, defense, and industrial and consumer customers.
During the first quarter of 2009, we closed our distribution
facility located in Indianapolis, Indiana. We closed our
Houston, Texas, distribution facility during the second quarter
of 2009. Both of these closures were done as part of our ongoing
cost rationalization strategy within the Distribution Group in
light of current market conditions. These closures did not have
a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Both the Fabrication and Distribution Groups access the Titanium
Group as their primary source of mill products. For the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, approximately 57% and
45%, respectively, of the Titanium Groups sales were to
the Fabrication and Distribution Groups. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, approximately 55% and 46%,
respectively, of the Titanium Groups sales were to the
Fabrication and Distribution Groups.
Our net income for the three months ended June 30, 2009
totaled $0.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, on sales
of $104.4 million, compared with net income totaling
$18.6 million, or $0.81 per diluted share, on sales of
$159.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2008. Our net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009
totaled $(1.3) million, or $(0.06) per diluted share, on
sales of $210.4 million, compared with net income of
$40.9 million, or $1.76 per diluted share, on sales of
$310.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Trends
and Uncertainties
Our business has been significantly impacted by the global
economic crisis. This impact was exacerbated by the severe
global credit crisis that started in September 2008. Our primary
market, the commercial aerospace industry, has been hit
especially hard by these crises as most aircraft purchases are
financed over long periods of time. The result of these two
crises combined with the long-term delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, is that our industry is left with a significant
oversupply of inventory and a severe contraction in demand. As a
result, our spot sales of titanium mill products have been
minimal. Somewhat offsetting these impacts has been our focus
22
on removing some of the cyclicality of the industry by signing
longer-term contracts for specific quantities of material. These
contracts have allowed us to maintain a level of volumes in
excess of those seen during the last market downturn following
September 11, 2001.
In such market downturns, we strive to reduce our variable costs
to counteract such declines in spot sales, although we cannot
always do so as quickly as sales levels decline. We continue to
balance our expectations of future business with our need to
contain costs.
Production delays related to the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program continue to hamper our Fabrication and Distribution
Groups as well. The 787, which was initially scheduled to begin
customer deliveries in late 2007, currently has a first delivery
date of early 2010. We have invested a significant amount of
capital into our facilities to prepare for the ramp up of 787
production. As such, while we attempt to reduce our own variable
expenses (primarily labor, outside processing, overtime, and
supplies) to match the reduced near-term demand from Boeing, our
fixed costs cannot be reduced. While we expect to receive the
anticipated volumes from this program, it will be difficult to
predict in what period they will occur given the uncertainly in
the programs production schedule.
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared To Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
27.1
|
|
|
$
|
52.4
|
|
|
$
|
(25.3
|
)
|
|
|
(48.3
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
(14.6
|
)
|
|
|
(35.5
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)
|
|
|
(23.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
104.4
|
|
|
$
|
159.8
|
|
|
$
|
(55.4
|
)
|
|
|
(34.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of a 4% decrease in the average realized selling
prices of prime mill products and a 44% decrease in prime mill
shipments to our trade customers resulted in a
$21.2 million reduction in the Titanium Groups net
sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was
primarily due to changes in the sales mix between periods, with
the mix in 2009 consisting of a higher percentage of sales
related to long-term supply agreements, which generally carry
lower overall sales prices and are subject to annual pricing
adjustments. Furthermore, excess inventory in the market due to
the ongoing Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program delays and the lower overall titanium demand profile
resulted in a reduction in spot market volume and a decrease in
realized selling prices on spot sales compared to the prior
period. Additionally, decreasing demand from the specialty steel
industry resulted in a $3.8 million reduction in ferro
titanium sales.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups net sales
principally relates to the relatively low price of oil compared
to the prior year, which has led to a slow down in orders from
our energy market customers, resulting in a $9.9 million
decrease in net sales compared to the prior year. In addition,
continued delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program, as well as the general downturn in the commercial
aerospace market, resulted in a reduction in net sales totaling
$4.2 million compared to the prior year.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally related to lower demand resulting from the global
economic downturn and the slow down in the commercial aerospace
market which has resulted in higher levels of titanium inventory
throughout the supply chain. Lower demand and lower realized
pricing for the Groups titanium products resulted in a
$10.2 million reduction in net sales. Lower demand and
lower realized pricing for the Groups specialty alloys
products resulted in a $5.3 million reduction in net sales.
23
Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit (loss) for
our reportable segments, for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.2
|
|
|
$
|
(17.4
|
)
|
|
|
(71.9
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
(110.9
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
(39.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
49.4
|
|
|
$
|
(35.9
|
)
|
|
|
(72.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.3 million charge in the current period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, gross profit for the
Titanium Group decreased $15.1 million compared to the
prior year. The decrease in the Titanium Groups gross
margin was largely the result of lower sales levels, which
reduced gross profit by $5.7 million. In addition, lower
average realized selling prices and a lower margin sales mix
reduced gross profit by $3.5 million. Higher raw material
costs and lower absorption of production overhead due to the
lower level of production in the current period reduced gross
profit $1.4 million. Furthermore, gross profit at the
Titanium Group was unfavorably impacted $0.6 million by
reduced sales of Titanium Group-sourced inventory by our
Fabrication Group and Distribution Group business.
The decrease in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
driven by several factors, including reduced sales volumes which
reduced gross profit by $3.0 million and continued cost
overruns related to certain energy market projects which
negatively impacted gross profit by $6.0 million. In
addition, production execution issues at one of the Fabrication
Groups facilities negatively impacted its ability to
deliver orders and lower than expected material yields at that
same location resulted in higher than expected material costs.
These issues, although largely corrected by the end of the
current period, reduced gross profit by $3.7 million
compared to the prior year. Additionally, ongoing uncertainty
and delays in the ramp up of the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program continue to result in lower utilization and other
operational inefficiencies despite significant actions taken to
manage costs in line with demand.
The decrease in gross profit for the Distribution Group was
principally related to lower sales coupled with a decrease in
realized selling prices for certain specialty metals that
exceeded our decline in product cost. This decrease was
partially offset by our actions taken to rationalize our
domestic Distribution Group facilities and to reduce logistics
costs.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general, and administrative
expenses (SG&A) for our reportable segments for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
5.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(22.7
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
|
$
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
(18.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $3.2 million decrease in SG&A was primarily
related to a $2.2 million reduction in salary and incentive
related expenses, driven by a reduction in expected cash
incentive compensation in the current year compared to the prior
year. Additionally there was a $0.7 million reduction in
pension related expenses and a $0.6 million reduction in
professional and consulting expenses. The decreases reflect
managements focus on reducing expenses during the current
economic downturn while continuing to position the Company for
growth in the future.
24
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses (R&D) were
$0.5 million for both the three month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. This
spending reflects our continued focus on productivity and
quality enhancements to our operations.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
|
$
|
(16.3
|
)
|
|
|
(88.6
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
|
|
(220.8
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)
|
|
|
(62.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
30.9
|
|
|
$
|
(32.5
|
)
|
|
|
(105.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.3 million charge in the current period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, operating income for the
Titanium Group decreased $14.0 million. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower gross profit, largely due to
unfavorable volume and lower realized selling prices, which were
partially offset by a reduction in SG&A expenses.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups operating income
was the result of lower sales to both the energy and aerospace
markets, along with continuing cost overruns on certain energy
market projects and manufacturing execution issues at one of the
Fabrication Groups facilities, although these issues were
largely corrected during the current period. Further, the
Fabrication Group experienced lower utilization as well as
increased operating inefficiencies, which in part were driven by
the ongoing delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program and global economic slow down affecting the commercial
aerospace market, partially offset by reductions in
compensation, professional and consulting expenses during the
period.
The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was
largely due to lower demand in both the titanium and specialty
alloys markets. The lower demand resulted in decreased realized
selling prices for certain specialty metals that exceeded our
decline in product cost. This decrease was slightly offset by a
decrease in compensation-related expenses and other cost
management actions.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense)
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$0.9 million and $(1.0) million, respectively. Other
income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains
and losses from our international operations and fair value
adjustments related to our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
was $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The
decrease was principally related to lower returns on invested
cash compared to the prior year period. Interest expense was
$2.4 and $0.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in
interest expense was primarily attributable to the increase in
our long-term debt compared to the prior year as a result of the
closing of our $225 million term loan in September 2008.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. We
recognized a provision for (benefit from) income taxes of
$(2.8) million, or 104.7% of pretax loss, and
$11.5 million, or 38.2% of pretax income, for federal,
state, and foreign income taxes for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Discrete items
recognized during each period were not material. Income taxes,
as a percentage of pretax income or loss, increased year over
year primarily as a result of the mix of domestic income and
foreign losses benefited at lower rates. The lower level of
income amplifies the rate impact of these mix effects in the
current period compared to the comparable period.
25
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared To Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
Net Sales. Net sales for our reportable
segments, excluding intersegment sales, for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
57.4
|
|
|
$
|
107.5
|
|
|
$
|
(50.1
|
)
|
|
|
(46.6
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
71.1
|
|
|
|
(18.5
|
)
|
|
|
(26.1
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
100.4
|
|
|
|
131.9
|
|
|
|
(31.5
|
)
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales
|
|
$
|
210.4
|
|
|
$
|
310.5
|
|
|
$
|
(100.1
|
)
|
|
|
(32.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The combination of a 9% decrease in the average realized selling
prices of prime mill products and a 41% decrease in prime mill
shipments to our trade customers resulted in a
$44.8 million reduction in the Titanium Groups net
sales. The decrease in average realized selling prices was
primarily due to changes in the sales mix between periods, with
the mix in 2009 consisting of lower priced products. In
addition, a higher percentage of our sales in the current period
were related to long-term supply agreements, which generally
carry lower overall sales prices and are subject to annual
pricing adjustments. Furthermore, excess inventory in the market
due to the ongoing Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program delays and the lower overall titanium demand profile
resulted in a reduction in spot market volume and a decrease in
realized selling prices on spot sales compared to the prior
period. Additionally, decreasing demand from the specialty steel
industry resulted in a $5.5 million reduction in ferro
titanium sales.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups net sales
principally relates to the relatively low price of oil compared
to the prior year, which has led to a slow down in orders from
our energy market customers, resulting in $8.6 million
decrease in net sales compared to the prior year. In addition,
the general downturn in the commercial aerospace market,
combined with production inefficiencies at one of our
facilities, resulted in a reduction in net sales totaling
$10.2 million compared to the prior year.
The decrease in the Distribution Groups net sales was
principally related to lower demand resulting from the global
economic downturn and the slow down in the commercial aerospace
market which has resulted in higher levels of titanium inventory
throughout the supply chain. Lower demand and lower realized
pricing for the Groups titanium products resulted in a
$22.3 million reduction in net sales. Lower demand and
lower realized pricing for the Groups specialty alloys
products resulted in a $9.2 million reduction in net sales.
Gross Profit (Loss). Gross profit (loss) for
our reportable segments, for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
16.2
|
|
|
$
|
57.6
|
|
|
$
|
(41.4
|
)
|
|
|
(71.9
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
(19.1
|
)
|
|
|
(115.8
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)
|
|
|
(40.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated gross profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
29.8
|
|
|
$
|
101.3
|
|
|
$
|
(71.5
|
)
|
|
|
(70.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding the $2.5 million charge in the current period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, gross profit for the
Titanium Group decreased $38.9 million compared to the
prior year. The decrease in the Titanium Groups gross
margin was largely the result of lower sales levels, which
reduced gross profit $13.7 million. In addition, lower
average realized selling prices and a lower margin sales mix
reduced gross profit $9.5 million. Higher raw material
costs and lower absorption of production overhead due to the
26
lower level of production in the current period reduced gross
profit $4.9 million. Deterioration in ferro-alloys margins
due to weakening steel markets reduced gross profit
$2.1 million compared to the prior year. Furthermore, gross
profit at the Titanium Group was unfavorably impacted
$2.1 million by reduced sales of Titanium Group-sourced
inventory by our Fabrication Group and Distribution Group
businesses.
The decrease in gross profit for the Fabrication Group was
driven by several factors, including reduced sales volumes which
reduced gross profit by $4.3 million and continued cost
overruns related to certain energy market projects which
negatively impacted gross profit by $6.7 million. In
addition, production execution issues at one of the Fabrication
Groups facilities negatively impacted its ability to
deliver orders and lower than expected material yields at that
same location resulted in higher than expected material costs.
These issues, although largely corrected by the end of the
current period, reduced gross profit by $6.2 million
compared to the prior year. Additionally, ongoing uncertainty
and delays in the ramp up of the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program continue to result in lower utilization and other
operational inefficiencies despite significant actions taken to
manage costs in line with demand.
The decrease in gross profit for the Distribution Group was
principally related to lower sales coupled with a decrease in
realized selling prices for certain specialty metals that
exceeded our decline in product cost. This decrease was
partially offset by our actions taken to rationalize our
domestic Distribution Group facilities and to reduce logistics
costs.
Selling, General, and Administrative
Expenses. SG&A expenses for our reportable
segments for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
9.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(22.0
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated SG&A expenses
|
|
$
|
31.1
|
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
|
$
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $5.0 million decrease in SG&A was primarily
related to a $2.2 million reduction in salary and incentive
related expenses, driven by a reduction in expected cash
incentive compensation in the current year compared to the prior
year. Additionally there was a $1.9 million reduction in
professional and consulting expenses and a $0.8 million
reduction in pension related expenses. The decreases reflect
managements focus on reducing expenses during the current
economic downturn while continuing to position the Company for
growth in the future.
Research, Technical, and Product Development
Expenses. Research, technical, and product
development expenses (R&D) were $1.0 for both
the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2008. This spending reflects our continued focus on productivity
and quality enhancements to our operations.
Operating Income (Loss). Operating income
(loss) for our reportable segments for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
$ Increase/
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
(In millions except percents)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Titanium Group
|
|
$
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
46.8
|
|
|
$
|
(40.5
|
)
|
|
|
(86.5
|
)%
|
Fabrication Group
|
|
|
(13.6
|
)
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
(16.0
|
)
|
|
|
(666.7
|
)%
|
Distribution Group
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
(67.1
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
64.1
|
|
|
$
|
(66.5
|
)
|
|
|
(103.7
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Excluding the $2.5 million charge in the current period
associated with the U.S. Customs investigation of our
previously filed duty drawback claims, operating income for the
Titanium Group decreased $38.0 million. The decrease was
primarily attributable to lower gross profit, largely due to
unfavorable volume and lower realized selling prices, which were
partially offset by a reduction in SG&A expenses.
The decrease in the Fabrication Groups operating income
was the result of lower sales to both the energy and aerospace
markets, along with continuing cost overruns on certain energy
market projects and manufacturing execution issues at one of the
Fabrication Groups facilities, although these issues were
largely corrected during the current period. Further, the
Fabrication Group experienced lower utilization as well as
increased operating inefficiencies, which in part were driven by
the ongoing delays in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
program and global economic slow down affecting the commercial
aerospace market, partially offset by reductions in
compensation, professional and consulting expenses during the
period.
The decrease in operating income for the Distribution Group was
largely due to lower demand in both the titanium and specialty
alloys markets. The lower demand resulted in decreased realized
selling prices for certain specialty metals that exceeded our
decline in product cost. This decrease was slightly offset by a
decrease in compensation-related expenses and other cost
management actions.
Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense)
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$1.8 million and $(0.7) million, respectively. Other
income (expense) consists primarily of foreign exchange gains
and losses from our international operations and fair value
adjustments related to our foreign currency forward contracts.
Interest Income and Interest Expense. Interest
income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was
$1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The
decrease was principally related to lower returns on invested
cash compared to the prior year period. Interest expense was
$4.8 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in
interest expense was primarily attributable to the increase in
our long-term debt compared to the prior year as a result of the
closing of our $225 million term loan in September 2008.
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes. We
recognized a provision for (benefit from) income taxes of
$(3.0)million, or 69.2% of pretax loss, and $23.3 million,
or 36.4% of pretax income, for federal, state, and foreign
income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Income tax, as a percentage of pretax income
or loss, increased year over year primarily as a result of the
mix of domestic income and foreign losses benefited at lower tax
rates. The lower level of income amplifies the rate impact of
these mix effects in the current period compared to the
comparable period. Discrete items totaling $0.6 million
reduced the benefit from income taxes for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and were comprised primarily of adjustments
to unrecognized tax benefits. Discrete items totaling
$0.5 million reduced the provision for income taxes for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and were comprised primarily
of adjustments to the prior year state income tax provision.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
In connection with our long-term mill product supply agreements
for the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program and the
Airbus family of commercial aircraft, including the A380 and
A350XWB programs, we are undertaking several capital expansions.
During 2007, we announced plans to construct a premium-grade
titanium sponge facility in Hamilton, Mississippi, with
anticipated capital spending of approximately $300 million.
To date, we have spent approximately $60 million on this
project and have additional commitments of up to approximately
$40 million related to this project. In light of current
economic uncertainties, the overall softening within the
industry, and the continued delays in the production schedules
of several of the programs driving titanium demand, we have
delayed the construction of this facility. We will continue to
monitor market conditions in relation to the timing of our
future capital expenditures associated with this project, as
well as continue to assess potential alternative sourcing
options for sponge supply. These market conditions include
expected future mill product demand volume and its impact on our
metallics requirements, which may result in further delay,
idling, or abandonment of the sponge plant project.
28
During 2007, we also announced plans to construct a new titanium
forging and rolling facility in Martinsville, Virginia, and new
melting facilities in Canton and Niles, Ohio, with anticipated
capital spending of approximately $100 million. While we
continually evaluate market conditions, we continue to move
forward with this project and presently anticipate the majority
of the capital expenditures related to these facilities to occur
in 2009 and 2010.
In connection with these capital expansion programs and the
continuing uncertainties in the credit markets, we completed the
first amendment of our $240 million credit agreement in
September 2008. The amendment replaced our $240 million
revolving credit facility with a $225 million term loan, on
which we have fully borrowed, and a $200 million revolving
credit facility. The principal on the term loan will be repaid
in quarterly installments beginning in 2010 with 20% of the
outstanding balance being repaid in each of 2010 and 2011 and
the remaining 60% being repaid in 2012. In order to reduce our
net interest expense, we prepaid $78.8 million of our
$225 million term loan on July 31, 2009.
Our $425 million credit agreement and our Claro credit
agreement (collectively, the Credit Agreements)
contain identical restrictive covenants derived from our
Consolidated Financial Statements which, among other things,
include a leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio (our
financial covenants). A failure to maintain our
financial covenants may impair our ability to borrow under the
credit facilities. These financial covenants and ratios are
described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Our leverage ratio (the ratio of Net Debt to Consolidated
EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreements) was 0.7 at
June 30, 2009. If this ratio were to exceed 3.25 to 1, we
would be in default of our Credit Agreements and our ability to
borrow under our Credit Agreements would be impaired.
|
|
|
|
Our interest coverage ratio (the ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to
Net Interest, as defined in the Credit Agreements) was 6.9 at
June 30, 2009. If this ratio were to fall below 2.0 to 1,
we would be in default of our Credit Agreements and our ability
to borrow under the Credit Agreements would be impaired.
|
Consolidated EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreements, allows
for adjustments related to unusual gains and losses and certain
noncash items. At June 30, 2009, we were in compliance with
our financial covenants under the Credit Agreements.
While our current financial forecasts indicate we will maintain
our compliance with these covenants, certain events, some of
which are beyond our control, including further long-term delays
in the Boeing 787
Dreamliner®
production schedule, the failure of one or more of our
significant customers to honor the terms of their
take-or-pay
contracts, a future decision to indefinitely delay, idle, or
abandon the construction of the sponge plant, and deeper
reductions in global aircraft demand, may cause us to be in
default of one or more of these covenants in the future. In the
event of a default under our credit agreement, absent a waiver
from our lenders or an amendment to our credit agreement, our
$225 million term loan could become due immediately
and/or the
interest rate on the credit agreement could increase materially.
Either of these developments, or both in combination, could have
a material adverse impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements. If we default or anticipate an expected future
default under one or more of our credit facility covenants, we
will need to renegotiate our credit arrangements, seek other
sources of liquidity, or both.
Provided we continue to meet our financial covenants under our
Credit Agreements, we expect that our cash and cash equivalents,
coupled with our expected future cash flows and our undrawn
$200 million revolving credit facility, will provide us
sufficient liquidity to meet our operating needs, debt service
requirements, and capital expansion plans.
Cash provided by operating activities. Cash
provided by operating activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $19.0 million and
$33.5 million, respectively. This decrease is primarily due
to the decrease in our net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, partially offset by improvements in our
working capital, primarily driven by improvements in accounts
receivable.
29
Cash used in investing activities. Cash used
in investing activities for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was $45.2 million and $48.1 million,
respectively. This spending reflects our continued investments
related to our major capital expansion projects.
Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities. Cash provided by (used in) financing
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
was $0.9 million and $(7.4) million, respectively.
This increase was primarily due to the purchase of
176,976 shares of RTI Common Stock at an average price of
$50.83 per share during the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Duty
Drawback Investigation
We maintained a program through an authorized agent to recapture
duty paid on imported titanium sponge as an offset against
exports for products shipped outside the U.S. by the
Company or its customers. The agent, who matched the
Companys duty paid with the export shipments through
filings with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(U.S. Customs), performed the recapture process.
Historically, the Company recognized a credit to Cost of Sales
when it received notification from its agent that a claim had
been filed and received by U.S. Customs. For the period
January 1, 2001 through March 31, 2007, the Company
recognized a reduction to Cost of Sales totaling
$14.5 million associated with the recapture of duty paid.
This amount represents the total of all claims filed by the
agent on the Companys behalf.
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
that it was under formal investigation with respect to
$7.6 million of claims previously filed by the agent on the
Companys behalf. The investigation relates to
discrepancies in, and lack of supporting documentation for,
claims filed through the Companys authorized agent. The
Company revoked the authorized agents authority and is
fully cooperating with U.S. Customs to determine the extent
to which any claims may be invalid or may not be supportable
with adequate documentation. In response to the investigation
noted above, the Company suspended the filing of new duty
drawback claims through the third quarter of 2007. The Company
is fully engaged and cooperating with U.S. Customs in an
effort to complete the investigation in an expeditious manner.
Concurrent with the U.S. Customs investigation, we
performed an internal review of the entire $14.5 million of
drawback claims filed with U.S. Customs to determine to
what extent any claims may have been invalid or may not have
been supported with adequate documentation. As a result of this
review, we recorded charges totaling $8.0 million to Cost
of Sales through December 31, 2008. We recorded additional
charges totaling $0.2 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2009. During the three months ended June 30,
2009, we recorded additional charges totaling $2.3 million,
primarily as a result of U.S. Customs formal denial
of certain of our previously filed direct claims. While we
intend to continue to pursue these claims through the
administrative process, we have fully reserved for these claims
due to the inherent risks and uncertainties related to the
protest process.
These abovementioned charges were determined in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and represent
the Companys current best estimate of probable loss. Of
this amount, $9.5 million was recorded as a contingent
current liability and $1.0 million was recorded as a
write-off of an outstanding receivable representing claims filed
which had not yet been paid by U.S. Customs. Through
December 31, 2008, the Company repaid to U.S. Customs
$1.1 million for invalid claims. The Company made
additional repayments totaling $0.2 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009. As a result of these payments,
the Companys liability totaled $8.1 million as of
June 30, 2009.
While the ultimate outcome of the U.S. Customs
investigation and the Companys own internal review is not
yet known, the Company believes there is an additional possible
risk of loss between $0 and $3.0 million based on current
facts, exclusive of amounts imposed for interest and penalties,
if any, which cannot be quantified at this time. This possible
risk of future loss relates primarily to indirect duty drawback
claims filed with U.S. Customs by several of our customers
as the ultimate exporter of record in which we shared in a
portion of the revenue.
30
Backlog
The Companys order backlog for all markets was
approximately $320 million as of June 30, 2009, as
compared to $400 million at December 31, 2008. Of the
backlog at June 30, 2009, approximately $188 million
is likely to be realized over the remainder of 2009. We define
backlog as firm business scheduled for release into our
production process for a specific delivery date. We have
numerous requirement contracts that extend multiple years,
including the Airbus, JSF and Boeing 787 long-term supply
agreements, that are not included in backlog until a specific
release into production or a firm delivery date has been
established.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to environmental laws and regulations as well as
various health and safety laws and regulations that are subject
to frequent modifications and revisions. While the costs of
compliance for these matters have not had a material adverse
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements in the past, it
is impossible to accurately predict the ultimate effect these
changing laws and regulations may have in the future. We
continue to evaluate our obligation for environmental-related
costs on a quarterly basis and make adjustments in accordance
with provisions of Statement of Position
96-1,
Environmental Remediation Liabilities and
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Given the status of the proceedings at certain of our sites and
the evolving nature of environmental laws, regulations, and
remediation techniques, our ultimate obligation for
investigative and remediation costs cannot be predicted. It is
our policy to recognize environmental costs in the financial
statements when an obligation becomes probable and a reasonable
estimate of exposure can be determined. When a single estimate
cannot be reasonably made, but a range can be reasonably
estimated, we accrue the amount we determine to be the most
likely amount within that range.
Based on available information, we believe our share of possible
environmental-related costs is in a range from $1.1 million
to $2.6 million in the aggregate. At June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the amounts accrued for future
environmental-related costs were $1.8 million and
$2.3 million, respectively. Of the total amount accrued at
June 30, 2009, $1.5 million is expected to be paid out
within one year and is included in the other accrued liabilities
line of the balance sheet. The remaining $0.2 million
recorded in other noncurrent liabilities. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, we made payments totaling
$0.6 million related to its environmental liabilities.
As these proceedings continue toward final resolution, amounts
in excess of those already provided may be necessary to
discharge us from our obligations for these sites, which include
the Ashtabula River and the Reserve Environmental Services
Landfill.
New
Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)).
SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how
an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and the goodwill
acquired. SFAS 141(R) also establishes additional
disclosure requirements related to the financial effects of a
business combination. SFAS 141(R) became effective as of
January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) did not
have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 establishes
accounting and reporting standards for ownership interest in
subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount
of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership
interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity
investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS 160
also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify
and distinguish between the interest of the parent and the
31
interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS 160 became
effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 160 did not have a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161
provides for additional disclosure requirements for derivative
instruments and hedging activities, including disclosures as to
how and why a company uses derivative instruments, how
derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for under SFAS 133 and how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect a companys financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 became
effective as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 161 did not have a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP
EITF 03-6-1).
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
clarifies that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents,
whether paid or unpaid, are participating securities to be
included in the computation of earnings per share under the
two-class method described in SFAS 128. The provisions of
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
became effective as of January 1, 2009, and require
retrospective application. The adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No
FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosure about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP
SFAS 132(R)-1). FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 provides
guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of
a defined benefit or other postretirement plan, to include
investment policies and strategies; associated and concentrated
risks; major asset categories and their fair values; inputs and
valuation techniques used to measure fair-value of plan assets;
and the net periodic benefit costs recognized for each annual
period. FSP SFAS 132(R)-1 is effective for reporting
periods ending after December 15, 2009. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact the adoption of FSP
SFAS 132(R)-1 will have on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 107-1
and APB Opinion
No. 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB
28-1).
FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments in interim financial
statements as well as in annual financial statements and amends
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to
require disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
is effective for interim reporting periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption of FSP
SFAS 107-1
and APB 28-1
did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165).
SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting for
and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available
to be issued. Additionally, SFAS requires disclosure of the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The
adoption of SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The
FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162
(SFAS 168). SFAS 168 identifies the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the
Codification) as the sole source of U.S. GAAP
recognized by the FASB. The Codification identifies only two
levels of GAAP: authoritative and nonauthoritative.
SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after September 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of
SFAS 168 to have a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
32
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
|
There have been no significant changes in our exposure to market
risk from the information provided in Item 7A. Quantitative
Disclosures about Market Risk on our
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on February 18, 2009.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
As of June 30, 2009, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys
management concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2009.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30,
2009 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
33
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any
of these individual risks described below, or any number of
these risks occurring simultaneously, could have a material
effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements, business or
results of operation. You should carefully consider these
factors, as well as the other information contained in this
document, when evaluating your investment in our securities.
We are
subject to risks associated with global economic and political
uncertainties
Like other companies, we are susceptible to macroeconomic
downturns in the United States and abroad that may affect our
performance and the performance of our customers and suppliers.
Further, the global financial crisis may have an impact on our
business and financial condition in ways that we currently
cannot predict. The credit crisis and related turmoil in the
global financial system has had and may continue to have an
impact on our business and our financial condition. In addition
to the impact that the global financial crisis has already had,
we may face significant financial and operational challenges if
conditions in the financial markets do not improve or continue
to worsen. For example, an extension of the credit crisis to
other industries (for example, the availability of financing for
the purchase of commercial aircraft) could adversely impact
overall demand for our products, which could have a negative
effect on our revenues. In addition, our ability to access the
traditional bank and capital markets may be severely restricted,
which could have an adverse impact on our ability to react to
changing economic and business conditions.
In addition, we are subject to various domestic and
international risks and uncertainties, including changing social
conditions and uncertainties relating to the current and future
political climate. Changes in policy resulting from the new
Presidential administration could have an adverse effect on the
financial condition and the level of business activity of the
defense industry or other market segments in which we
participate. This may reduce our customers demand for our
products
and/or
depress pricing of those products, resulting in a material
adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of
operations, revenues, and cash flows.
A
significant amount of our future revenue is based on long-term
contracts for new aircraft programs
We have signed several long-term contracts in recent years to
produce titanium mill products and complex engineered assemblies
for several new aircraft programs, including the Boeing 787,
Lockheed Martins F-35 Joint Strike Fighter or
JSF, and the Airbus family of aircraft, including
the A380 and the A350XWB. In order to meet the delivery
requirements of these contracts, we have invested in significant
capital expansion projects. Because of the current global
economic slowdown and production problems experienced by many of
our customers, we have experienced significant delays in these
programs. Further delays or program cancellations could have a
material adverse impact on our business, prospects, results of
operations, revenues, cash flows, and financial standing. In
addition, several of our customer contracts are
take-or-pay
contracts that require our customers to take a minimum amount of
product in a period. As program delays continue, some of our
customers may not meet their contractual minimum amount of
product. While we intend to bill these customers for their
contractual minimum amount, if they fail to pay as required by
their contracts, we may suffer a material adverse impact on our
liquidity and results of operations.
The
ability to successfully expand our operations in a timely and
cost effective manner
In connection with several of our long-term commercial
contracts, we have undertaken several major capital expansion
projects which are currently estimated to continue through 2011,
including the construction of our new titanium sponge plant and
titanium rolling mill and forging press facilities. Construction
of the sponge plant has been delayed because of the current
global economic slowdown, and may be further delayed, idled, or
abandoned. Our inability to successfully complete the
construction of these facilities in a timely and cost effective
manner, or at all, or obtain titanium sponge (our principle raw
material) from an alternative source, could have a material
adverse
34
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. If we were to indefinitely delay or abandon the
construction of the sponge plant, we could suffer an adverse
effect on our liquidity and our ability to meet our financial
covenants under our credit agreement. Further, our undertaking
of these significant initiatives places a significant demand on
management, financial, and operational resources. Our success in
these projects will depend upon the ability of key financial and
operational management to ensure the necessary internal and
external resources are in place to properly complete and operate
these facilities.
We may
be affected by our ability or inability to obtain
financing
Our ability to access the traditional bank or capital markets in
the future for additional financing, if needed, and our future
financial performance could be influenced by our ability to meet
current covenant requirements associated with our existing
credit agreement, our credit rating, or other factors.
The
demand for our products and services may be adversely affected
by demand for our customers products and
services
Our business is substantially derived from titanium mill
products and fabricated metal parts, which are primarily used by
our customers as components in the manufacture of their
products. The ability or inability to meet our financial
expectations could be directly impacted by our customers
abilities or inabilities to meet their own financial
expectations. A continued downturn in demand for our
customers products and services could occur for reasons
beyond their control such as unforeseen spending constraints,
competitive pressures, rising prices, the inability to contain
costs, and other domestic as well as global economic,
environmental or political factors. A continued slowdown in
demand by or complete loss of business from these customers
could have a material impact on our financial position.
A
substantial amount of revenue is derived from the commercial
aerospace and defense industries and a limited number of
customers
More than 80% of our annual revenue is derived from the
commercial aerospace and defense industries. Within those
industries are a relatively small number of consumers of
titanium products. Those industries have historically been
highly cyclical, resulting in the potential for sudden and
dramatic changes in expected production and spending that, as a
partner in the supply chain, can negatively impact our
operational plans and, ultimately, the demand for our products
and services. Some of our customers are particularly sensitive
to the level of government spending on defense-related products.
Sudden reductions in defense spending could occur due to
economic or political changes which could result in a downturn
in demand for defense-related titanium products. In addition,
changes to existing defense procurement laws and regulations,
such as the domestic preference for specialty metals, could
adversely affect our results of operations. Many of our
customers are dependent on the commercial airline industry which
has shown to be subject to significant economic and political
challenges due to threats or acts of terrorism, rising or
volatile fuel costs, pandemics, or other outbreaks of infectious
diseases, aggressive competition, global economic slowdown, and
other factors. Any one or combination of these factors could
occur suddenly and result in a reduction or cancellation in
orders of new airplanes and parts which could have an adverse
impact on our business. Neither the Company nor its customers
may be able to project or plan in a timely manner for the impact
of these events.
We may
be subject to competitive pressures
The titanium metals industry is highly competitive on a
worldwide basis. Our competitors are located primarily in the
U.S., Japan, Russia, Europe, and China. Our Russian competitor,
in particular, has significantly greater capacity than us and
others in our industry. Not only do we face competition for a
limited number of customers with other producers of titanium
products, but we also must compete with producers of other
generally less expensive materials of construction including
stainless steel, nickel-based high temperature and corrosion
resistant alloys, and composites.
35
Our competitors could experience more favorable operating
conditions than us including lower raw materials costs, more
favorable labor agreements, or other factors which could provide
them with competitive cost advantages in their ability to
provide goods and services. Changes in costs or other factors
related to the production and supply of titanium mill products
compared to costs or other factors related to the production and
supply of other types of materials of construction may
negatively impact our business and the industry as a whole. New
competitive forces unknown to us today could also emerge which
could have an adverse impact on our financial performance. Our
foreign competitors in particular may have the ability to offer
goods and services to our customers at more favorable prices due
to advantageous economic, environmental, political, or other
factors.
We may
experience a lack of supply of raw materials at costs that
provide us with acceptable margin levels
The raw materials required for the production of titanium mill
products (primarily titanium sponge and scrap) are acquired from
a number of domestic and foreign suppliers. Although we have
long-term contracts in place for the procurement of certain
amounts of raw material and have begun the process of
constructing a titanium sponge plant (which has been delayed due
to the current global economy), we cannot guarantee that our
suppliers can fulfill their contractual obligations nor can we
guarantee that the construction of our sponge plant will not be
further delayed, idled, or abandoned due to the global economic
slowdown or other circumstances. Our suppliers may be adversely
impacted by events within or outside of their control that may
adversely affect our business operations. We cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain adequate amounts of raw materials
from other suppliers in the event that our primary suppliers are
unable to meet our needs. We may experience an increase in
prices for raw materials which could have a negative impact on
our profit margins if we are unable to adequately increase
product pricing, and we may not be able to project the impact
that an increase in costs may cause in a timely manner. We may
be contractually obligated to supply products to our customers
at price levels that do not result in our expected margins due
to unanticipated increases in the costs of raw materials. We may
experience dramatic increases in demand and we cannot guarantee
that we will be able to obtain adequate levels of raw materials
at prices that are within acceptable cost parameters in order to
fulfill that demand.
We are
subject to changes in product pricing
The titanium industry is highly cyclical. Consequently, excess
supply and competition may periodically result in fluctuations
in the prices at which we are able to sell certain of our
products. Price reductions may have a negative impact on our
operating results. In addition, our ability to implement price
increases is dependent on market conditions, often beyond our
control. Given the long manufacturing lead times for certain
products, the realization of financial benefits from increased
prices may be delayed.
We may
experience a shortage in the supply of energy or an increase in
energy costs to operate our plants
We own twenty-four natural gas wells which provide some but not
all of the non-electrical energy required by our Niles, Ohio
operations. Because our operations are reliant on energy sources
from outside suppliers, we may experience significant increases
in electricity and natural gas prices, unavailability of
electrical power, natural gas, or other resources due to natural
disasters, interruptions in energy supplies due to equipment
failure or other causes, or the inability to extend expiring
energy supply contracts on favorable economical terms.
Our
business could be harmed by strikes or work
stoppages
Approximately 350 hourly, clerical and technical employees
at our Niles, Ohio facility are represented by the United
Steelworkers of America. Our current labor agreement with this
union expires June 30, 2013. Approximately 160 hourly
employees at our RTI Tradco facility in Washington, Missouri are
represented by the International Association of Machinists and
Aerospace Workers. Our current labor agreement with this union
expires February 19, 2011.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to negotiate new
bargaining agreements upon expiration of the existing agreements
on the same or more favorable terms as the current agreements,
or at all, without production
36
interruptions caused by a labor stoppage. If a strike or work
stoppage were to occur in connection with the negotiation of a
new collective bargaining agreement, or as a result of a dispute
under our collective bargaining agreements with the labor
unions, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected.
Our
business is subject to the risks of international
operations
We operate subsidiaries and conduct business with suppliers and
customers in foreign countries which exposes us to risks
associated with international business activities. We could be
significantly impacted by those risks, which include the
potential for volatile economic and labor conditions, political
instability, expropriation, and changes in taxes, tariffs, and
other regulatory costs. We are also exposed to and can be
adversely affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate of the
United States Dollar against other foreign currencies,
particularly the Canadian Dollar, the Euro and the British
Pound. Although we are operating primarily in countries with
relatively stable economic and political climates, there can be
no assurance that our business will not be adversely affected by
those risks inherent to international operations.
We are
dependent on services that are subject to price and availability
fluctuations
We often depend on third parties to provide outside material
processing services that may be critical to the manufacture of
our products. Purchase prices and availability of these services
are subject to volatility. At any given time, we may be unable
to obtain these critical services on a timely basis, at
acceptable prices or on other acceptable terms, if at all.
Further, if an outside processor is unable to produce to
required specifications, our additional cost to cure may
negatively impact our margins.
Our
success depends largely on our ability to attract and retain key
personnel
Much of our future success depends on the continued service and
availability of skilled personnel, including members of our
executive team, management, materials engineers and other
technical specialists, and staff positions. The loss of key
personnel could adversely affect our Companys ability to
perform until suitable replacements are found. There can be no
assurance that the Company will be able to continue to
successfully attract and retain key personnel.
The
demand for our products and services may be affected by factors
outside of our control
War, terrorism, natural disasters, and public health issues
including pandemics, whether in the U.S. or abroad, have
caused and could cause damage or disruption to international
commerce by creating economic and political uncertainties that
may have a negative impact on the global economy as a whole. Our
business operations, as well as our suppliers and
customers business operations, are subject to interruption
by those factors as well as other events beyond our control such
as governmental regulations, fire, power shortages, and others.
Although it is impossible to predict the occurrences or
consequences of any such events, they could result in a decrease
in demand for the Companys products, make it difficult or
impossible for us to deliver products to our customers or to
receive materials from our suppliers, and create delays and
inefficiencies in our supply chain. Our operating results and
financial condition may be adversely affected by these events.
The
outcome of the U.S. Customs investigation of our previously
filed duty drawback claims is uncertain
During 2007, the Company received notice from U.S. Customs
indicating that certain duty drawback claims previously filed by
the Companys agent, on behalf of the Company, are under
formal investigation. The investigation relates to discrepancies
in, and lack of supporting documentation for, claims filed
through the Companys prior drawback broker. For additional
detail regarding this investigation, see Duty Drawback
Investigation in Item 3. Legal Proceedings, in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The ultimate outcome
of the U.S. Customs investigation cannot be determined,
however, the outcome of this investigation could have an adverse
impact on our financial performance.
37
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
The Company may repurchase shares of Common Stock under the RTI
International Metals, Inc. share repurchase program approved by
the Companys Board of Directors on April 30, 1999,
and which authorizes the repurchase of up to $15 million of
RTI Common Stock. No shares were repurchased under this program
during the three months ended June 30, 2009. At
June 30, 2009, approximately $3 million of the
$15 million remained available for repurchase. There is no
expiration date specified for the share repurchase program.
In addition to the share repurchase program, employees may
surrender shares to the Company to pay tax liabilities
associated with the vesting of restricted stock awards under the
2004 Stock Plan. The number of shares of Common Stock
surrendered to satisfy tax liabilities during the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were 226 and 99 shares,
respectively.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
The annual meeting of shareholders was held on April 24,
2009. In connection with the meeting, proxies were solicited
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The following
are the voting results on proposals considered and voted upon at
the meeting, all of which were described in the Companys
proxy statement for such meeting.
All nominees for directors listed in the proxy statement were
elected. Listed below are the names of each director elected,
together with their individual vote totals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee
|
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Craig R. Andersson
|
|
|
19,790,313
|
|
|
|
1,613,601
|
|
Daniel I. Booker
|
|
|
19,791,484
|
|
|
|
1,612,430
|
|
Donald P. Fusilli, Jr.
|
|
|
20,801,970
|
|
|
|
601,944
|
|
Ronald L. Gallatin
|
|
|
20,776,292
|
|
|
|
627,622
|
|
Charles C. Gedeon
|
|
|
19,819,524
|
|
|
|
1,584,390
|
|
Robert M. Hernandez
|
|
|
20,655,544
|
|
|
|
748,370
|
|
Dawne S. Hickton
|
|
|
20,701,606
|
|
|
|
702,308
|
|
Edith E. Holiday
|
|
|
19,647,092
|
|
|
|
1,756,822
|
|
Bryan T. Moss
|
|
|
19,845,531
|
|
|
|
1,558,383
|
|
Michael C. Wellham
|
|
|
20,807,270
|
|
|
|
596,644
|
|
James A. Williams
|
|
|
20,794,739
|
|
|
|
609,175
|
|
The appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the
Companys independent registered public accounting firm for
2009 was ratified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Ratification of independent registered public accounting firm
|
|
|
21,231,233
|
|
|
|
138,477
|
|
|
|
34,206
|
|
The proposed RTI International Metals, Inc Employee Stock
Purchase Plan was approved by the shareholders and the total
vote on the plan is listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain
|
|
Approval of the RTI International Metals, Inc Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
|
|
|
16,711,377
|
|
|
|
1,363,115
|
|
|
|
824,671
|
|
The exhibits listed on the Index to Exhibits are filed herewith
and incorporated herein by reference.
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
RTI INTERNATIONAL METALS, INC.
Dated: August 10, 2009
William T. Hull
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
39
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated September 8,
2008.
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Credit Agreement Between RTI Claro, Inc., as borrower, RTI
International Metals, Inc., as guarantor, and National City
Bank, Canada Branch, as lender, dated December 27, 2006.
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Credit Amending Agreement, dated September 27, 2007,
related to the Credit Agreement between RTI Claro, Inc., as
borrower, RTI International Metals, Inc., as guarantor, and
National City Bank, Canada Branch, as lender.
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Second Credit Amending Agreement, dated September 8, 2008,
related to the Credit Agreement between RTI Claro, Inc., as
borrower, RTI International Metals, Inc., as guarantor, and
National City Bank, Canada Branch, as lender, incorporated by
reference to exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Current
Report on
Form 8-K
for the event dated September 8, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
RTI International Metals, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
incorporated by reference to Annex A to the Companys
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement,
Form 14A, dated February 23, 2009.
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Item 307 of
Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, filed herewith.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer required by Item
307 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission and pursuant to Section 302 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
|
40