e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
(Mark One)
     
þ   Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
     
o   Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number 001-33685
 
COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware   37-1434895
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
7625 Smetana Lane
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344
(952) 294-3300
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
 
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o    Accelerated filer þ    Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o 
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
     As of July 31, 2009, 30,881,720 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value, were outstanding.
 
 


 

COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
INDEX
         
    Page
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
 
       
    12  
 
       
    19  
 
       
    20  
 
       
       
 
       
    20  
 
       
    20  
 
       
    32  
 
       
    32  
 
       
    32  
 
       
    33  
 
       
    34  
 
       
    35  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1

2


Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (unaudited)     See Note  
    (in thousands, except share and  
    per share amounts)  
Assets
               
Current assets
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 33,142     $ 51,989  
Short-term investments
    32,757       29,146  
Accounts receivable, net
    29,449       19,167  
Inventories, net
    3,497       3,564  
Other current assets
    2,793       1,592  
 
           
Total current assets
    101,638       105,458  
 
               
Long-term investments
    38,743       19,153  
 
               
Property and equipment, net
    4,227       3,446  
 
           
 
               
Total assets
  $ 144,608     $ 128,057  
 
           
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
               
Current liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 8,255     $ 2,885  
Accrued compensation
    4,176       4,834  
Accrued liabilities
    1,185       1,480  
Deferred revenue
    20,108       15,128  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    33,724       24,327  
 
               
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
    8,509       5,464  
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Stockholders’ equity
               
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 30,879,688 and 30,768,706 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
    31       31  
Additional paid in capital
    150,740       147,974  
Accumulated deficit
    (48,595 )     (49,855 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    199       116  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    102,375       98,266  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 144,608     $ 128,057  
 
           
Note: Information derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
See notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
                                 
    For the Three Months     For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,     Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (in thousands, except     (in thousands, except  
    per share amounts)     per share amounts)  
Revenues
                               
Product
  $ 20,288     $ 17,039     $ 41,577     $ 31,915  
Support and services
    8,428       3,973       15,212       7,410  
 
                       
Total revenues
    28,716       21,012       56,789       39,325  
 
                               
Cost of revenues
                               
Cost of product
    10,306       8,031       21,132       15,378  
Cost of support and services
    2,983       1,606       5,407       3,014  
 
                       
Total cost of revenues
    13,289       9,637       26,539       18,392  
 
                               
 
                       
Gross profit
    15,427       11,375       30,250       20,933  
 
                               
Operating expenses
                               
Sales and marketing
    10,846       8,829       20,666       16,782  
Research and development
    3,074       2,311       5,884       4,659  
General and administrative
    1,550       1,459       2,950       3,204  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    15,470       12,599       29,500       24,645  
 
                               
 
                       
Income (loss) from operations
    (43 )     (1,224 )     750       (3,712 )
 
                               
Interest income
    419       621       915       1,493  
 
                       
 
                               
Income (loss) before taxes
    376       (603 )     1,665       (2,219 )
 
                               
Income tax expense
    (129 )           (405 )      
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 247     $ (603 )   $ 1,260     $ (2,219 )
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss) per weighted average share, basic
  $ 0.01     $ (0.02 )   $ 0.04     $ (0.07 )
 
                               
Weighted average shares, basic
    30,729       30,434       30,688       30,389  
 
                               
Net income (loss) per weighted average share, diluted
  $ 0.01     $ (0.02 )   $ 0.04     $ (0.07 )
 
                               
Weighted average shares, diluted
    32,840       30,434       32,634       30,389  
See notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
                 
    For the Six Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2009     2008  
    (in thousands)  
Operating activities
               
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,260     $ (2,219 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    1,076       700  
Stock-based compensation expense
    2,075       990  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (10,282 )     (5,711 )
Inventories, net
    67       (1,183 )
Other current assets
    (1,201 )     33  
Accounts payable
    5,370       889  
Accrued compensation and liabilities
    (908 )     1,322  
Deferred revenue
    8,025       5,040  
 
           
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    5,482       (139 )
 
               
Investing activities
               
Purchase of property and equipment
    (1,857 )     (1,227 )
Purchase of investments
    (54,119 )     (50,675 )
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
    31,014       26,150  
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (24,962 )     (25,752 )
 
               
Financing activities
               
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    633       535  
 
           
 
               
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (18,847 )     (25,356 )
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    51,989       82,382  
 
           
 
               
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 33,142     $ 57,026  
 
           
 
               
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for income taxes
  $ 443     $  
 
               
Supplemental non-cash disclosure:
               
Vesting of restricted common stock
  $ 58     $ 61  
Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments
  $ 96     $ (23 )
See notes to these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

COMPELLENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Business Description and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business Description
     Compellent Technologies, Inc., (“Compellent” or “Company”), develops, markets and services enterprise-class network storage solutions, which include software and hardware. The Company was incorporated in March 2002 and sells their products through an all-channel assisted sales model. Corporate headquarters are in Eden Prairie, Minnesota, and the Company has channel partners and end users located in the United States and in certain international markets.
Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company without audit and reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and accruals, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, for interim financial information. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any future operating periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual consolidated financial statements have been condensed or omitted, as permitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (or SEC). Accordingly, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009.
Revenue Recognition
     The Company applies the provisions of AICPA Statement of Position, or SOP, No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, or SOP No. 97-2, as amended by SOP No. 98-9, Modification of SOP No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition to its combined software and hardware product sales. The Company recognizes product revenue when:
    Persuasive Evidence of an Arrangement Exists. The Company determines that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists by receiving a purchase order or by obtaining a signed quote.
    Delivery has Occurred. Substantially all products are shipped to end users. Delivery is deemed to have occurred upon shipment when title has transferred. Products shipped with acceptance criteria are not recognized as revenue until all conditional criteria are satisfied.
    The Fee is Fixed or Determinable. Fees are considered to be fixed and determinable upon establishment of an arrangement that contains the final terms of sale including description, quantity and price of each product or service purchased, and the payment term is less than twelve months.
    Collectability is Probable. Probability of collection is assessed on a case-by-case basis. Customers are subject to a credit review process that evaluates the customers’ financial position and ultimately their ability to pay. If the Company is unable to determine from the outset of an arrangement that collectability is probable based upon its review process, revenue is recognized upon cash receipt.
     The Company uses channel partners, who act as brokers, to sell its products. Revenue under channel partners arrangements is not recognized until delivery occurs, the fee is fixed and determinable, collectability is probable and supported, and an end user has been identified. The Company maintains contractual arrangements with its channel partners, which contain provisions that specify that the risk of loss and title transfers upon shipment. In circumstances where the Company sells directly to an end user, the Company’s revenue is the price the Company charges the end user and revenue is recognized upon delivery to the end user.

6


Table of Contents

     A sale is typically a multiple element arrangement including software, hardware, software maintenance, hardware maintenance and, in certain cases, services. The Company’s determination of fair value of each element in these multiple element arrangements is based on vendor-specific objective evidence, or VSOE. The Company has analyzed all of the elements included in its multiple-element arrangements and has determined that it has sufficient VSOE to allocate revenue to all undelivered elements of a contract. VSOE is evaluated and determined by the Company based on separate sales of the specific elements. No software products remain undelivered at the inception of the arrangement. Accordingly, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met, revenue from software and hardware is recognized upon delivery using the residual method in accordance with SOP No. 97-2, and revenue from software maintenance and hardware maintenance is recognized ratably over the respective support period. For multiple element arrangements that include only hardware and hardware maintenance, the Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, or EITF No. 00-21. The Company has determined that it has objective and reliable evidence of fair value, in accordance with EITF No. 00-21, to allocate revenue separately to hardware and hardware maintenance.
     Product revenue consists of license fees for software applications and related hardware sales of disk drives, system controllers, host bus adapters, switches and enclosures. The Company also derives a portion of its product revenue from software and hardware upgrades, which generally includes new software applications and additional hardware components. Revenue from shipping and handling is included in product revenue and its related cost is included in cost of product revenue.
     Support and services revenue consists of software and hardware maintenance contracts and professional services for installation, training and consulting support. The Company offers software maintenance that includes telephone support, bug fixes and unspecified product updates and hardware maintenance that includes telephone support and on-site repairs and replacement. Revenue is deferred at the time the maintenance agreement is entered into and is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement, typically one to three years. The Company generally sells professional services on a time-and-materials basis and recognizes revenue when the services are performed.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 165, Subsequent Events, which establishes standards for accounting for and disclosing subsequent events (events which occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued). SFAS No. 165 requires an entity to disclose the date subsequent events were evaluated and whether that evaluation took place on the date financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.
     In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or SFAS No. 168. SFAS No. 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ™ (or the Codification) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. SFAS No. 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 168 and does not expect there to be an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operation.

7


Table of Contents

2. Investments
Fair Value Measurements
     The Company’s available-for-sale investments are subject to fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurement. The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial assets (in thousands):
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using  
    June 30,                    
Description   2009     Level 1 (1)     Level 2 (2)     Level 3 (3)  
Available-for-sale investments:
                               
Corporate debt securities (4)
  $ 30,134     $ 25,469     $ 4,665     $  
Variable rate demand notes (4)
    7,291             7,291        
U.S. agency securities (4)
    25,071             25,071        
Municipal bonds (4)
    2,554             2,554        
Certificates of deposit (5)
    7,350             7,350        
Money market funds (6)
    25,014       25,014              
 
                       
Total
  $ 97,414     $ 50,483     $ 46,931     $  
 
                       
                                 
            Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using  
    December 31,                    
Description   2008     Level 1 (1)     Level 2 (2)     Level 3 (3)  
Available-for-sale investments:
                               
Corporate debt securities (4)
  $ 12,934     $ 11,363     $ 1,571     $  
Variable rate demand notes (4)
    7,291             7,291        
U.S. agency securities (4)
    23,612             23,612        
Certificates of deposit (5)
    7,406             7,406        
Money market funds (6)
    36,496       36,496              
 
                       
Total
  $ 87,739     $ 47,859     $ 39,880     $  
 
                       
 
(1)   Level 1 classification is applied to any asset that has a readily available quoted price from an active market where there is significant transparency in the executed/quoted price.
 
(2)   Level 2 classification is applied to assets that have evaluated prices received from fixed income vendors where the data inputs to these valuations, which are observable either directly or indirectly, but do not represent quoted prices from an active market for each individual security.
 
(3)   Level 3 classification is applied to assets when prices are not derived from existing market data.
 
(4)   Included in both short-term and long-term investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
(5)   Included in both cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
 
(6)   Included in cash and cash equivalents on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
     Investments with remaining effective maturities of 12 months or less from the balance sheet date are classified as short-term investments or cash equivalents. Investments with remaining effective maturities of more than 12 months from the balance sheet date are typically classified as long-term investments. However, the Company’s portfolio includes variable rate demand notes that have stated maturities beyond 12 months, but are priced and traded as short-term instruments due to the liquidity provided through the interest reset mechanism of 7 to 35 days. Any unrealized holding gains or losses on these investments are reported in other comprehensive income or loss, a component of stockholders’ equity, until realized.

8


Table of Contents

Investments
     The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair values and contractual maturities of available-for-sale investments consist of the following (in thousands):
                                     
                Gross Unrealized        
    Contractual Maturities   Cost     Gains     Losses     Fair Value  
Corporate debt securities
  Less than 3 years   $ 29,929     $ 223     $ (18 )   $ 30,134  
Variable rate demand notes
  Less than 12 months     7,291                   7,291  
U.S. agency securities
  Less than 3 years     25,046       30       (5 )     25,071  
Municipal bonds
  Less than 2 years     2,556             (2 )     2,554  
Certificates of deposit
  Less than 12 months     7,351             (1 )     7,350  
Money market funds
  Less than 12 months     25,014                   25,014  
 
                           
Total
      $ 97,187     $ 253     $ (26 )   $ 97,414  
 
                           
     Sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 resulted in $12,000 realized gains and no realized losses.
     Unrealized gains and losses on securities have not been recognized in the income statement because the Company has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, and the decline in fair value is deemed to be temporary. The unrealized gains and losses are reflected in other comprehensive income.
3. Inventories
     Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Component materials
  $ 450     $ 280  
Finished systems
    3,047       3,284  
 
           
Total
  $ 3,497     $ 3,564  
 
           
4. Property and Equipment
     Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Computer equipment
  $ 888     $ 698  
Office furniture and equipment
    7,181       5,632  
Computer software
    820       710  
Leasehold improvements
    1,038       1,065  
 
           
 
    9,927       8,105  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
    (5,700 )     (4,659 )
 
           
Total
  $ 4,227     $ 3,446  
 
           
5. Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
     During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, total comprehensive income amounted to $658,000 and $1.3 million. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, total comprehensive loss amounted to $694,000 and $2.2 million. The components of the Company’s comprehensive income/(loss) are net income/(loss), foreign currency translation adjustments, and the change in the fair market value of investments. Results of operations were translated using average exchange rates throughout the period. Translation gains or losses are accumulated as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and included in comprehensive income/(loss).

9


Table of Contents

6. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-Based Compensation Expense
     A summary of stock-based compensation expense that the Company recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, or SFAS No. 123(R) for stock options and shares purchased under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan for the periods shown is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Cost of product
  $ 12     $ 53     $ 26     $ 87  
Cost of support and services
    75             138        
Sales and marketing
    544       243       893       435  
Research and development
    267       106       413       194  
General and administrative
    389       135       605       274  
 
                       
 
                               
Effect on income (loss) before taxes
  $ 1,287     $ 537     $ 2,075     $ 990  
 
                       
 
                               
Effect on basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
  $ 0.04     $ 0.02     $ 0.06     $ 0.03  
     As of June 30, 2009, there was $10.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock option plans. This expense will be amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.6 years.
Stock Options Exercised for Unvested Restricted Common Stock
     Certain stock options granted under the 2002 Stock Option Plan provide the employee option holder the right to early exercise unvested options in exchange for shares of restricted common stock. The restrictions on such common stock lapse over a time frame on the same terms as the original underlying options vested. The Company has a right to repurchase any unvested restricted shares at the original exercise price in the event the respective optionee’s employment is terminated. In accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the cash received from employees for early exercise of unvested options is treated as a refundable deposit and is recorded as a liability in the Company’s financial statements. There were no early exercises of options during the year ended December 31, 2008 or during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
     A summary of activity for unvested restricted common stock is as follows:
         
    Number
    of Shares
Balance outstanding at December 31, 2008
    151,820  
 
Vested
    (59,160 )
 
       
 
       
Balance outstanding at June 30, 2009
    92,660  
 
       
7. Income Taxes
     The Company incurred tax expenses of $129,000, consisting of $18,000 for U.S. federal alternative minimum income tax expense, $109,000 for state income tax expense, and $2,000 for foreign income taxes during the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to no tax expense recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2008. The Company incurred tax expenses of $405,000, consisting of $160,000 for U.S. federal alternative minimum income tax expense, $238,000 for state income tax expense, and $7,000 for foreign income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to no tax expense recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2008. The Company has incurred annual net operating losses since inception, but has not reflected any benefit of such net operating loss carryforwards in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Given the Company’s history of losses and the uncertainty of projecting future taxable income, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
     In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes, the Company currently has no reserve for unrecognized tax benefits, and accordingly, there is no interest or penalties recorded

10


Table of Contents

on the balance sheet for such reserves. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and the appropriate state income taxing authorities from 2002 to 2007 due to the NOL carryforwards from those years.
8. Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
     The following table sets forth the computation of net income (loss) per common share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Net income (loss)
  $ 247     $ (603 )   $ 1,260     $ (2,219 )
 
                               
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic
    30,729       30,434       30,688       30,389  
 
Dilutive effect of stock options and unvested restricted common stock
    2,111             1,946        
 
                       
 
                               
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted
    32,840       30,434       32,634       30,389  
 
                       
 
                               
Net income (loss) per common share, basic and diluted
  $ 0.01     $ (0.02 )   $ 0.04     $ (0.07 )
     Potential common shares of 985,000 and 1.1 million related to the Company’s outstanding stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted net income per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, as inclusion of these shares would be anti-dilutive. All potential common stock equivalents for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as inclusion of these shares would be anti-dilutive.
9. Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification Obligations
     The Company has agreements with its channel partners and end users, which generally include certain provisions for indemnifying the channel partners and end users against liabilities if its products infringe a third party’s intellectual property rights. To date, the Company has not incurred any material costs as a result of such indemnification provisions and has not accrued any liabilities related to such obligations in its condensed consolidated financial statements. As permitted under Delaware law and to the maximum extent allowable under that law, the Company has certain obligations to indemnify its executive officers, directors and may indemnify other employees for certain events or occurrences while the executive officer, director or employee is or was serving at its request in such capacity. These indemnification obligations are valid as long as the executive officer, director or employee acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that mitigates its exposure and generally enables the Company to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
Legal Proceedings
     In April 2009, Data Network Storage LLC, or Data Networks, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging, among other things, patent infringement on a universal storage management system for which it holds an exclusive license against the Company and 14 other storage vendors. Data Networks is seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction against further infringement from the Company and the other defendants. The Company believes the claim in this lawsuit is without merit and the Company intends to defend itself vigorously. The Company has filed an answer denying liability.
     In the ordinary course of business, the Company is from time to time involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, proceedings, and threats of litigation consisting of intellectual property, commercial and other matters. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, there are no matters, as of June 30, 2009, that, in the opinion of management, might have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
10. Segment and Geographic Information
     The Company operates in one reportable industry segment: the design, marketing, and technical support of enterprise class network storage solutions. The following table is based on the geographic location of the channel partner or end user who purchased the Company’s products. For sales to channel partners, their geographic location may be different from the geographic locations of the

11


Table of Contents

end user. Historically, channel partners located in the United States have generally sold the Company’s products to end users located in the United States. Revenue by geographic region was as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Revenues
                               
United States
  $ 22,997     $ 17,809     $ 46,643     $ 33,248  
International
    5,719       3,203       10,146       6,077  
 
                       
Total
  $ 28,716     $ 21,012     $ 56,789     $ 39,325  
 
                       
11. Subsequent Events
     The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through August 7, 2009, which represents the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission, to ensure that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes appropriate disclosure of events both recognized in the financial statements as of June 30, 2009, and events which occurred subsequent to June 30, 2009 but were not recognized in the financial statements. As of August 7, 2009, there were no subsequent events which required recognition or disclosure.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include all statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, statements about:
    our expectations regarding our revenue, gross margin and expenses;
    our ability to compete in our industry;
    our ability to maintain and grow our channel partner relationships;
    our growth strategy and our growth rate;
    our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;
 
    pricing and availability of our suppliers’ products; and
    assumptions underlying or related to any of the foregoing.
     In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “can,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, time frames or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, time frames or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks, uncertainties and other factors in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in greater detail in Part II, Item IA. “Risk Factors.” Given these risks, uncertainties and other factors, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Also, these forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date hereof. We hereby qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, filings, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009.

12


Table of Contents

Overview
     We are a leading provider of enterprise-class network storage solutions that are highly scalable, feature rich and designed to be easy to use and cost effective. Our Storage Center solution is a Storage Area Network, or SAN, that enables users to intelligently store, recover and manage large amounts of data by combining our sophisticated software with standards-based hardware into a single integrated solution. As of June 30, 2009, Storage Center was being utilized by 1,491 enterprises worldwide, across a wide variety of industries including education, financial services, government, healthcare, insurance, legal, media, retail, technology and transportation. We believe that Storage Center is the most comprehensive enterprise-class network storage solution available today, providing increased functionality and lower total cost of ownership when compared to traditional storage systems.
     We believe our business model is highly differentiated and provides us with several competitive advantages. We sell our products through an all-channel assisted sales model designed to enable us to quickly scale and cost effectively increase sales. Our sales team is spread geographically throughout the United States, and in certain international markets. We also employ a virtual manufacturing strategy, which significantly reduces inventory and eliminates the need for in-house and outsourced manufacturing. We believe these combined strategies create an efficient and scalable business model that enables us to reduce operating costs and improve capital efficiency.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     Our critical accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 of the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009. There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2009.
     The discussion of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, the allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory valuation, stock-based compensation and income taxes. We base our estimates of the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. In many cases, we could reasonably have used different accounting policies and estimates. In some cases, changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with the audit committee of our board of directors. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

13


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
     The following table sets forth a summary of our condensed consolidated statements of operations and the related changes for the periods shown (in thousands):
                                                                 
    Three Months Ended                     Six Months Ended        
    June 30,     Change     June 30,     Change  
    2009     2008     $     %     2009     2008     $     %  
    (unaudited)     (unaudited)  
Revenues
                                                               
Product
  $ 20,288     $ 17,039     $ 3,249       19.1 %   $ 41,577     $ 31,915     $ 9,662       30.3 %
Support and services
    8,428       3,973       4,455       112.1       15,212       7,410       7,802       105.3  
 
                                                   
Total revenues
    28,716       21,012       7,704       36.7       56,789       39,325       17,464       44.4  
 
                                                               
Cost of revenues
                                                               
Cost of product
    10,306       8,031       2,275       28.3       21,132       15,378       5,754       37.4  
Cost of support and services
    2,983       1,606       1,377       85.7       5,407       3,014       2,393       79.4  
 
                                                   
Total cost of revenues
    13,289       9,637       3,652       37.9       26,539       18,392       8,147       44.3  
 
                                                               
 
                                                   
Gross profit
    15,427       11,375       4,052       35.6       30,250       20,933       9,317       44.5  
 
                                                               
Operating expenses
                                                               
Sales and marketing
    10,846       8,829       2,017       22.8       20,666       16,782       3,884       23.1  
Research and development
    3,074       2,311       763       33.0       5,884       4,659       1,225       26.3  
General and administrative
    1,550       1,459       91       6.2       2,950       3,204       (254 )     (7.9 )
 
                                                   
Total operating expenses
    15,470       12,599       2,871       22.8       29,500       24,645       4,855       19.7  
 
                                                               
 
                                                   
Income (loss) from operations
    (43 )     (1,224 )     1,181       96.5       750       (3,712 )     4,462       120.0  
 
                                                               
Interest income
    419       621       (202 )     (32.5 )     915       1,493       (578 )     (38.7 )
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Income (loss) before taxes
    376       (603 )     979       162.4       1,665       (2,219 )     3,884       175.0  
 
                                                               
Income tax expense
    (129 )           (129 )           (405 )           (405 )      
 
                                                   
 
                                                               
Net income (loss)
  $ 247     $ (603 )   $ 850       141.0 %   $ 1,260     $ (2,219 )   $ 3,479       156.8 %
 
                                                   
Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
     Revenues and the related changes for the periods shown were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,        
    2009     2008        
            %             %        
            of Total             of Total     Change  
    $     Revenue     $     Revenue     $     %  
Revenues
                                               
Product
  $ 20,288       70.7 %   $ 17,039       81.1 %   $ 3,249       19.1 %
Support and services
    8,428       29.3       3,973       18.9       4,455       112.1  
 
                                   
Total revenues
  $ 28,716       100.0 %   $ 21,012       100.0 %   $ 7,704       36.7 %
 
                                   
     Product Revenue. Product revenue derived from system sales increased primarily due to a 9% increase in the number of systems sold. We believe the increase in systems sales was driven by an increase of 111 channel partners, an increase in sales and marketing headcount to 190 people from 146 people, and additional marketing programs. While we continued to experience lower revenue per megabyte for disk drives, we believe this was offset by increased revenue from enhanced capacity and complexity of systems purchased by our end users. Product revenue derived from upgrade sales increased due to the ongoing growth in the number of our total end users, which increased to 1,491 as of June 30, 2009 from 972 as of June 30, 2008.
     Support and Services Revenue. Support revenue increased 113% primarily due to the renewal of maintenance agreements by existing end users and the growth of the installed base. Services revenues increased 105% due to an increase in end user and channel

14


Table of Contents

partner training programs and an increase in Storage Center installations. These increases were due to both an increase in the number of products sold and our sales and marketing efforts to grow services revenue.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
     Cost of revenues and gross margin and the related changes for the periods shown were as follows were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,        
    2009     2008        
            %             %        
            of Related             of Related     Change  
    $     Revenue     $     Revenue     $     %  
Cost of revenues
                                               
Cost of product
  $ 10,306       50.7 %   $ 8,031       47.1 %   $ 2,275       28.3 %
Cost of support and services
    2,983       35.4       1,606       40.4       1,377       85.7  
 
                                         
Total cost of revenues
  $ 13,289       46.3 %   $ 9,637       45.9 %   $ 3,652       37.9 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Gross margin
            53.7 %             54.1 %                
     Cost of Product Revenue. Cost of product revenue increased primarily due to increased component hardware costs associated with the increased number of systems and upgrades purchased by our end users.
     Cost of Support and Services Revenue. Cost of support and services revenue increased primarily due to increased salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense of $497,000 related to growth in our customer service and technical support headcount to 50 people from 34 people and increased hardware service fees of $912,000 charged by our third-party hardware maintenance providers associated with the continuing growth of our installed base.
     Gross Margin. Gross margin decreased due to the growth in cost of revenues outpacing the growth in revenues.
Operating Expenses
     Operating expenses and the related changes for the periods shown were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,              
    2009     2008              
            %             %              
            of Total             of Total     Change  
    $     Revenue     $     Revenue     $     %  
Operating expenses
                                               
Sales and marketing
  $ 10,846       37.8 %   $ 8,829       42.0 %   $ 2,017       22.8 %
Research and development
    3,074       10.7       2,311       11.0       763       33.0  
General and administrative
    1,550       5.4       1,459       7.0       91       6.2  
 
                                   
Total operating expenses
  $ 15,470       53.9 %   $ 12,599       60.0 %   $ 2,871       22.8 %
 
                                   
     Sales and Marketing Expense. Sales and marketing expense increased primarily due to an increase in sales and marketing headcount to 190 people from 146 people, resulting in a $1.5 million increase in salaries, employee benefits, commissions and stock-based compensation expense, an increase in marketing expense of $378,000 related to partner programs, advertising campaigns and other promotional activities, and a $108,000 increase in channel partner referral fees due to increased third-party selling activities.
     Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense increased primarily due to an increase in research and development headcount to 68 people from 53 people, resulting in a $586,000 increase in salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense and an increase of $116,000 in depreciation costs.
     General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense increased primarily due to an increase in finance, information technology, and human resource staff headcount to 20 people from 15 people resulting in a $282,000 increase in salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense, offset by a decrease in professional fees of $237,000 for outside legal and consulting services and public company compliance fees.

15


Table of Contents

Interest Income
     Interest Income. Interest income decreased by $202,000 due to lower interest rates partially offset by interest income on increased cash and cash equivalents and investment balances.
Income Tax Expense
     Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense of $129,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 consisted of $18,000 for U.S. federal alternative minimum income tax expense, $109,000 for state income tax expense, and $2,000 for foreign income taxes compared to no tax expense recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2008. We have incurred net annual operating losses since inception, but have not reflected any benefit of such net operating loss carryforwards in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
     Revenues and the related changes for the periods shown were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,              
    2009     2008              
            %             %              
            of Total             of Total     Change  
    $     Revenue     $     Revenue     $     %  
Revenues
                                               
Product
  $ 41,577       73.2 %   $ 31,915       81.2 %   $ 9,662       30.3 %
Support and services
    15,212       26.8       7,410       18.8       7,802       105.3  
 
                                   
Total revenues
  $ 56,789       100.0 %   $ 39,325       100.0 %   $ 17,464       44.4 %
 
                                   
     Product Revenue. Product revenue derived from system sales primarily increased due to a 24% increase in the number of systems sold. We believe the increase in systems sales was driven by an increase of 111 channel partners, an increase in sales and marketing headcount to 190 people from 146 people, and additional marketing programs. While we continued to experience lower revenue per megabyte for disk drives, we believe this was offset by increased revenue from enhanced capacity and complexity of systems purchased by our end users. Product revenue derived from upgrade sales increased due to the ongoing growth in the number of our total end users, which increased to 1,491 as of June 30, 2009 from 972 as of June 30, 2008.
     Support and Services Revenue. Support revenue increased 107% primarily due to the renewal of maintenance agreements by existing end users and the growth of the installed base. Services revenues increased 95% due to an increase in end user and channel partner training programs and an increase in Storage Center installations. These increases were due to both an increase in the number of products sold and our sales and marketing efforts to grow services revenue.

16


Table of Contents

Cost of Revenues and Gross Margin
     Cost of revenues and gross margin and the related changes for the periods shown were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,              
    2009     2008              
            %             %              
            of Related             of Related     Change  
    $     Revenue     $     Revenue     $     %  
Cost of revenues
                                               
Cost of product
  $ 21,132       50.8 %   $ 15,378       48.2 %   $ 5,754       37.4 %
Cost of support and services
    5,407       35.5       3,014       40.7       2,393       79.4  
 
                                         
Total cost of revenues
  $ 26,539       46.7 %   $ 18,392       46.8 %   $ 8,147       44.3 %
 
                                         
 
                                               
Gross margin
            53.3 %             53.2 %                
     Cost of Product Revenue. Cost of product revenue increased due to increased component hardware costs associated with the increased number of systems and upgrades purchased by our end users.
     Cost of Support and Services Revenue. Cost of support and services revenue increased primarily due to increased salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense of $939,000 related to growth in our customer service and technical support headcount to 50 people from 34 people, increased hardware service fees of $1.3 million charged by our third-party hardware maintenance provider associated with the continuing growth of our installed base, and $83,000 increase in support and services related travel.
     Gross Margin. Gross margin increased due to the growth in revenues outpacing the growth in cost of revenues.
Operating Expenses
     Operating expenses and the related changes for the periods shown were as follows (in thousands):
                                                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,              
    2009     2008              
            %             %              
            of Total             of Total     Change  
    $     Revenue     $     Revenue     $     %  
Operating expenses
                                               
Sales and marketing
  $ 20,666       36.4 %   $ 16,782       42.7 %   $ 3,884       23.1 %
Research and development
    5,884       10.4       4,659       11.8       1,225       26.3  
General and administrative
    2,950       5.2       3,204       8.2       (254 )     (7.9 )
 
                                   
Total operating expenses
  $ 29,500       51.9 %   $ 24,645       62.7 %   $ 4,855       19.7 %
 
                                   
     Sales and Marketing Expense. Sales and marketing expense increased primarily due to an increase in sales and marketing headcount to 190 people from 146 people, resulting in a $2.6 million increase in salaries, employee benefits, commissions and stock-based compensation expense, an increase in marketing expense of $1.1 million related to partner programs, advertising campaigns and other promotional activities, and a $284,000 increase in channel partner referral fees due to increased third-party selling activities.
     Research and Development Expense. Research and development expense increased primarily due to an increase in research and development headcount to 68 people from 53 people, resulting in a $896,000 increase in salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense and an increase of $244,000 in facilities related and depreciation costs.
     General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense decreased primarily due to a decrease in professional fees of $636,000 for outside legal and consulting services spent in 2008 pertaining primarily to public company reporting and compliance requirements in 2008 as we completed an initial public offering in October 2007, offset by an increase in finance, information technology, and human resource staff headcount to 20 people from 15 people resulting in a $360,000 increase in salaries, employee benefits and stock-based compensation expense.

17


Table of Contents

Interest Income
     Interest Income. Interest income decreased by $578,000 due to lower interest rates partially offset by interest income on increased cash and cash equivalents and investment balances.
Income Tax Expense
     Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense of $405,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 consisted of $160,000 for U.S. federal alternative minimum income tax expense, $238,000 for state income tax expense, and $7,000 for foreign income taxes compared to no tax expense recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2008. We have incurred net annual operating losses since inception, but have not reflected any benefit of such net operating loss carryforwards in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
     Our cash and cash equivalents and investments available to fund operations were $104.6 million and $100.3 million at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. We completed an initial public offering of our common stock in October 2007, with cash proceeds of $84.6 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. We invested the cash proceeds in investment grade, interest bearing securities. We have used these funds for general corporate purposes since our initial public offering and expect to continue to do so. Cash in excess of immediate operating requirements is invested in accordance with our investment policy, primarily with a goal of maintaining liquidity and capital preservation.
Cash Flows
     The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods shown (in thousands):
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2009     2008  
     
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  $ 5,482     $ (139 )
 
               
Net cash used in investing activities
    (24,962 )     (25,752 )
 
               
Net cash provided by financing activities
    633       535  
 
               
 
           
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (18,847 )   $ (25,356 )
 
           
Operating Activities
     Cash provided by operating activities was $5.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We reported net income of $1.3 million, which included non-cash charges consisting of $1.1 million in depreciation and amortization expenses and $2.1 million in stock-based compensation expense related to employees. Other cash generating operating activities included an increase in accounts payable of $5.4 million and an increase in deferred revenue of $8.0 million, offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $10.3 million. The increase in accounts payable is primarily due to the timing of inventory purchases and corresponding payments at the end of the quarter. The increase in deferred revenue reflects an increase in our customer base and related increase in the purchase of our maintenance agreements, which are paid for in advance but recorded as revenue ratably over the term of the agreement. The increase in accounts receivable reflects an overall increase in revenue primarily due to the expansion of our operations.
     Cash used in operating activities was $139,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We incurred a net loss of $2.2 million, which included non-cash charges consisting of $700,000 in depreciation and $990,000 in stock-based compensation expense. Other uses of cash in operating activities included an increase in accounts receivable of $5.7 million, partially offset by an increase in deferred revenue of $5.0 million. The increase in accounts receivable reflects an overall increase in revenue primarily due to the

18


Table of Contents

expansion of our operations. The increase in deferred revenue reflects an increase in our customer base and related increase in the purchase of our maintenance agreements, which are paid for in advance but recorded as revenue ratably over the term of the agreement.
Investing Activities
     Cash used in investing activities was $25.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, consisting of $1.9 million for capital additions, which were primarily for computer lab equipment and $54.1 million for the purchase of investments, partially offset by the maturities of investments of $31.0 million.
     Cash used in investing activities was $25.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008, consisting of $1.2 million for capital additions, which were primarily for computer lab equipment and $50.7 million for the purchase of investments, partially offset by the sales and maturities of investments of $26.2 million.
Financing Activities
     Cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was due to stock option exercises and purchases of stock through our employee stock purchase plan.
Operating and Capital Expenditure Requirements
     We anticipate using available cash to fund growth in operations and to invest in capital equipment. For the remainder of 2009, capital expenditures are expected to be approximately $2.0 million, primarily for computer equipment to be used for product development. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents, investments and the interest we earn on these balances will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for at least the next 12 months. If these sources of cash are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements beyond the next 12 months, we may seek to sell additional equity or convertible debt securities or enter into a credit facility. The sale of additional equity and convertible debt securities may result in dilution to our stockholders. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of convertible debt securities, such securities could have rights senior to those of our common stock and could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. We may require additional capital beyond our currently forecasted amounts. Any such required additional capital may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all.
Contractual Obligations
     There were no material changes in our contractual obligations from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on March 16, 2009, other than scheduled payments through June 30, 2009. Please see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Contractual Obligations, contained in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a description of our contractual obligations.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     Since our inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     See Note 1 to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the respective expected dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
     Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since December 31, 2008. For more information on financial market risks related to changes in interest rates, reference is made to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk, contained in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

19


Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Based on their evaluations as of June 30, 2009, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of management, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations of Internal Controls
     Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
     In April 2009, Data Network Storage LLC, or Data Networks, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging, among other things, patent infringement on a universal storage management system for which it holds an exclusive license against us and 14 other storage vendors. Data Networks is seeking unspecified monetary damages and an injunction against further infringement from us and the other defendants. We believe the claim in this lawsuit is without merit and we intend to defend ourselves vigorously. We have filed an answer denying liability.
     In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, proceedings, and threats of litigation consisting of intellectual property, commercial and other matters. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, there are no matters, as of June 30, 2009, that, in the opinion of management, might have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
     We have identified the following risks and uncertainties that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also significantly impair our business operations. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

20


Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Business
Unfavorable economic and market conditions and a lessening demand in the information technology market could adversely affect our operating results.
     Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable global economic and market conditions as well as a lessening demand in the information technology, or IT, market. Customer demand for our products is intrinsically linked to the strength of the economy. A reduction in demand for storage and data management caused by weak and/or deteriorating economic conditions and customer decreases in corporate spending, deferral or delay of IT projects, longer time frames for IT purchasing decisions, inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and generally reduced capital expenditures for IT storage solutions will result in decreased revenues and lower revenue growth rates for us. If the storage and data management markets grow slower than anticipated or if IT spending is reduced, demand for our products could decline and our operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
We have a limited operating history and a history of losses, and we may not achieve or sustain profitability in the future on a quarterly or annual basis.
     We were established in March 2002 and sold our first product in February 2004. We have not achieved profitability on an annual basis since inception. We have achieved profitability on a quarterly basis only for the three months ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009. We reported net income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of $1.3 million and as of June 30, 2009 our accumulated deficit was $48.6 million. We expect to make significant expenditures related to the development of our products and expansion of our business, including research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses. We may also encounter unforeseen difficulties, complications, product delays and other unknown factors that require additional expenditures. As a result of these increased expenditures, we will have to generate and sustain substantially increased revenues to achieve and maintain profitability, which we may never do. In addition, the percentage growth rates we achieved in prior periods may not be sustainable and we may not be able to increase our revenues sufficiently in absolute dollars to ever reach annual profitability or sustain quarterly profitability.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly, which makes our future results difficult to predict.
     Our quarterly operating results fluctuate due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Our future revenues are difficult to predict. A significant portion of our sales typically occurs during the last month of a quarter. As a result, we typically cannot predict our revenues in any particular quarter with any certainty until late in that quarter. Our storage products typically are shipped shortly after orders are received. As a result, revenues in any quarter are substantially dependent on orders booked and shipped in that quarter. Revenues for any future period are not predictable with any significant degree of certainty. As a result, comparing our operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful. You should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. Moreover, spending on storage solutions has historically been cyclical in nature, reflecting overall economic conditions as well as budgeting and buying patterns of business enterprises. We believe our recent rapid growth has masked the cyclicality and seasonality of our business. The third quarter is generally the slowest sales quarter in the storage industry. Our expense levels are relatively fixed in the short term and are based, in part, on our expectations as to future revenues. If revenue levels are below our expectations, we may incur higher losses and may never reach annual profitability or sustain quarterly profitability. Our operating results may be disproportionately affected by a reduction in revenues because a proportionately smaller amount of our expenses varies with our revenues. As a result, our quarterly operating results are difficult to predict, even in the near term. If our revenue or operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts or below any guidance we may provide to the market, the price of our common stock would likely decline substantially.
     In addition to other risk factors listed in this “Risk Factors” section, factors that may affect our operating results include:
    reductions in end users’ budgets for information technology purchases and delays in their budgeting and purchasing cycles, given current macroeconomic conditions;
    hardware and software configuration and mix;
    fluctuations in demand, including due to seasonality, for our products and services;

21


Table of Contents

    changes in pricing by us in response to competitive pricing actions;
    the sale of Storage Center in the timeframes we anticipate, including the number and size of orders in each quarter;
    our ability to develop, introduce and ship in a timely manner new products and product enhancements that meet end user requirements;
    the timing of product releases or upgrades by us or by our competitors;
    any significant changes in the competitive dynamics of our market, including new entrants or substantial discounting of products;
    our ability to control costs, including our operating expenses and the costs of the components we purchase;
    the extent to which our end users renew their service and maintenance agreements with us;
    volatility in our stock price, which may lead to higher stock compensation expenses; and
    general economic conditions in our domestic and international markets.
The markets in which we compete are highly competitive and dominated by large corporations and we may not be able to compete effectively.
     The storage market is intensely competitive and is characterized by rapidly changing technology. This competition could make it more difficult for us to sell our products, and result in increased pricing pressure, reduced gross margin, increased sales and marketing expense and failure to increase, or the loss of, market share or expected market share which would likely result in lower revenue.
            Our ability to compete depends on a number of factors, including:
    our products’ functionality, scalability, performance, ease of use, reliability, availability and cost effectiveness relative to that of our competitors’ products;
    our success in utilizing new and proprietary technologies to offer products and features previously not available in the marketplace;
    our success in identifying new markets, applications and technologies;
    our ability to attract and retain value-added resellers, which we refer to as channel partners;
    our name recognition and reputation;
    our ability to recruit software engineers and sales and marketing personnel; and
    our ability to protect our intellectual property.
     Potential end users may prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather than a new supplier regardless of product performance or features. In the event a potential end user decides to evaluate a new storage system, the end user may be more inclined to select one of our competitors whose product offerings are broader than just storage systems. In addition, potential end users may prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather than a new supplier, regardless of product performance or features. Most of our new end users have installed storage systems, which gives an incumbent competitor an advantage in retaining an end user because it already understands the network infrastructure, user demands and information technology needs of the end user, and also because it is costly and time-consuming for end users to change storage systems.
     A number of very large corporations have historically dominated the storage market. We consider our primary competitors to be companies that provide Storage Area Network, or SAN products, such as 3Par, Inc., Dell, Inc., EMC Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Company, Hitachi Data Systems Corporation, IBM and NetApp, Inc., and Xiotech Corporation. Some of our competitors, including

22


Table of Contents

Dell, EMC and NetApp, have made acquisitions of businesses that allow them to offer more directly competitive and comprehensive solutions than they had previously offered. Most of our competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than we have. We expect to encounter new competitors as we enter new markets as well as increased competition, both domestically and internationally, from other established and emerging storage companies, original equipment manufacturers, and from systems and network management companies. In addition, there may be new technologies that are introduced that reduce demand for, or make our, storage solution architecture obsolete. Our current and potential competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties and rapidly acquire significant market share. Increased competition could also result in price reductions and loss of market share, any of which could result in lower revenue and reduced gross margins.
We are dependent on a single product and the lack of continued market acceptance of Storage Center would result in lower revenue.
     Storage Center accounts for all of our revenue and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. As a result, our revenue could be reduced by:
    any decline in demand for Storage Center;
    the failure of Storage Center to achieve continued market acceptance;
    the introduction of products and technologies that serve as a replacement or substitute for, or represent an improvement over, Storage Center;
    technological innovations or new communications standards that Storage Center does not address; and
    our inability to release enhanced versions of Storage Center on a timely basis.
     We are particularly vulnerable to fluctuations in demand for storage area network products in general and Storage Center in particular. If the storage markets grow more slowly than anticipated or if demand for Storage Center does not grow as quickly as anticipated, whether as a result of competition, product obsolescence, technological change, unfavorable economic conditions, uncertain geopolitical environment, budgetary constraints of our end users or other factors, we may not be able to increase our revenues sufficiently to ever reach annual profitability or sustain quarterly profitability and our stock price would decline.
Our products must meet exacting specifications, and defects and failures may occur, which may cause channel partners or end users to return or stop buying our products.
     Our channel partners and end users generally establish demanding specifications for quality, performance and reliability that our products must meet. However, our products are highly complex and may contain undetected defects and failures when they are first introduced or as new versions are released. We have in the past and may in the future discover software errors in new versions of Storage Center or new products or product enhancements after their release or introduction, which could result in lost revenue during the period required to correct such errors. Despite testing by us and by current and potential end users, errors may not be found in new releases or products until after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or delay in market acceptance. Storage Center may also be subject to intentional attacks by viruses that seek to take advantage of these bugs, errors or other weaknesses. If defects or failures occur in Storage Center, a number of negative effects in our business could result, including:
    lost revenue;
    increased costs, including warranty expense and costs associated with end user support;
    delays or cancellations or rescheduling of orders or shipments;
    product returns or discounts;
    diversion of management resources;
    damage to our reputation and brand equity;

23


Table of Contents

    payment of damages for performance failures;
    reduced orders from existing channel partners and end users; and
    declining interest from potential channel partners or end users.
     In addition, delays in our ability to fill product orders as a result of quality control issues may negatively impact our relationship with our channel partners and end users. Our revenue could be lower and our expenses could increase if any of the foregoing occurs.
     Our end users utilize Storage Center to manage their data. As a result, we could face claims resulting from any loss or corruption of our end users’ data due to a product defect. Our contracts with end users contain provisions relating to warranty disclaimers and liability limitations, which may not be upheld. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, is costly and may divert management’s attention and could result in public perception that our products are not effective, even if the occurrence is unrelated to the use of our products or services. In addition, if our business liability insurance coverage proves inadequate or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or at all, our costs to defend and cover such claims, if any, will increase.
We may not sustain our percentage growth rate, and we may not be able to manage any future growth effectively.
     We have experienced significant growth in a short period of time. Our revenues increased from $3.9 million in 2004 to $90.9 million in 2008, and revenue was $56.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We may not experience growth rates in future periods to the same degree as in past periods. You should not rely on our operating results for any prior quarterly or annual periods as an indication of our future operating performance. If we are unable to maintain adequate revenue growth in dollars, we may never achieve annual profitability or sustain quarterly profitability and our stock price could decline.
     Our future operating results depend to a large extent on our ability to successfully manage our anticipated expansion and growth. To manage our growth successfully and handle the responsibilities of being a public company, we believe we must effectively, among other things:
    increase our channel partners and end users in the mid-size enterprise market;
    address new markets, such as large enterprise end users and end users outside the United States;
    control expenses;
    recruit, hire, train and manage additional qualified engineers;
    add additional sales and marketing personnel;
    expand our international operations; and
    implement and improve our administrative, financial and operational systems, procedures and controls.
     We intend to increase our investment in research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative and other functions to grow our business. We are likely to recognize the costs associated with these increased investments earlier than some of the anticipated benefits and the return on these investments may be lower, or may develop more slowly, than we expect, which could increase our annual net losses.
     If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities or develop new products or enhancements to existing products and we may fail to satisfy end user requirements, maintain product quality, execute on our business plan or respond to competitive pressures, which could result in lower revenue and a decline in our stock price.
Our gross margin may vary and such variation may make it more difficult to forecast our earnings.
     Our gross margin has been and may continue to be affected by a variety of other factors, including:

24


Table of Contents

    demand for Storage Center and related services;
    discount levels and price competition;
    average order system size and end user mix;
    hardware and software component mix;
    the cost of components;
    level of fixed costs of customer service personnel;
    the mix of services as a percentage of revenue;
    new product introductions and enhancements; and
    geographic sales mix.
     Changes in gross margin may result from various factors such as continued investments in our Copilot Services, increases in our fixed costs, changes in the mix between technical support services and professional services, as well as the timing and amount of maintenance agreement initiations and renewals.
We receive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of channel partners, and the loss of, or a significant reduction in, orders from one or more of our major channel partners would result in lower revenue.
     Our future success is highly dependent upon establishing and maintaining successful relationships with a variety of channel partners. We market and sell Storage Center through an all-channel assisted sales model and we derive substantially all of our revenue from these channel partners. We generally enter into agreements with our channel partners outlining the terms of our relationship, including channel partner sales commitments, installation and configuration training requirements, and the channel partners’ acknowledgement of the existence of our sales registration process for registering potential systems sales to end users. These contracts typically have a term of one year and are terminable without cause upon written notice to the other party. Our reseller agreements with our channel partners do not prohibit them from offering competitive products or services. Many of our channel partners also sell our competitors’ products. If our channel partners give higher priority to our competitors’ storage products, we may be unable to grow our revenue and we may continue to incur annual net losses.
     We receive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited number of channel partners. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, our top ten channel partners accounted for 34% and 29% of our revenue, respectively. We anticipate that we will continue to be dependent upon a limited number of channel partners for a significant portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future and, in some cases, a portion of our revenue attributable to individual channel partners may increase in the future. The loss of one or more key channel partners or a reduction in sales through any major channel partner would reduce our revenue. Further, in order to develop and expand our channels, we must continue to scale and improve our processes and procedures that support our channel partners, including investments in systems and training, and those processes and procedures may become increasingly complex and difficult to manage. If we fail to maintain existing channel partners or develop relationships with new channel partners, our revenue opportunities will be reduced.
The loss of any key suppliers or the failure to accurately forecast demand for our products or successfully manage our relationships with our key suppliers could negatively impact our ability to sell our products.
     We maintain relatively low inventory, generally only for repairs and evaluation and demonstration units, and acquire components only as needed on a purchase order basis, and neither we nor our key suppliers enter into supply contracts for these components. As a result, our ability to respond to channel partner or end user orders efficiently may be constrained by the then-current availability, terms and pricing of these components. Our industry has experienced component shortages and delivery delays in the past, and we may experience shortages or delays of critical components in the future as a result of strong demand in the industry or other factors. If we or our suppliers inaccurately forecast demand for our products, our suppliers may have inadequate inventory, which could increase the prices we must pay for substitute components or result in our inability to meet demand for our products, as well as damage our channel partner or end user relationships.

25


Table of Contents

     We currently rely on a limited number of suppliers for components such as system controllers, enclosures, disk drives and switches utilized in the assembly of Storage Center. We generally purchase components on a purchase order basis and do not have long-term supply contracts with these suppliers. In particular, we rely on Bell Microproducts, Inc., a value-added distributor, to provide us with customized system controllers, which Bell Microproducts generally obtains from Supermicro Computer, Inc., a server and component manufacturer. We also rely on Xyratex Corporation, a provider of data storage subsystems, to provide us with their custom enclosures and disk drives. Xyratex purchases most of the disk drives that it supplies to us from Seagate Technology, Inc., a disk drive manufacturer. Our reliance on these key suppliers reduces our control over the manufacturing process, exposing us to risks, including reduced control over product quality, production costs, timely delivery and capacity. It also exposes us to the potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components, because we do not have long-term supply commitments and generally purchase our products on a purchase order basis. Component quality is particularly significant with respect to our suppliers of disk drives. To meet our product performance requirements, we must obtain disk drives of extremely high quality and capacity. In addition, there are periodic supply-and-demand issues for disk drives that could result in component shortages, selective supply allocations and increased prices of such components. We may not be able to obtain our full requirements of components, including disk drives, that we need for our storage products or the prices of such components may increase. If we fail to effectively manage our relationships with our key suppliers, or if our key suppliers increase prices of components, experience delays, disruptions, capacity constraints, or quality control problems in their manufacturing operations, our ability to ship products to our channel partners or end users could be impaired and our competitive position and reputation could be adversely affected. Qualifying a new key supplier is expensive and time-consuming. If we are required to change key suppliers or assume internal manufacturing operations, we may lose revenue and damage our channel partner or end user relationships.
If our third-party repair service fails to timely and correctly resolve hardware failures experienced by our end users, our reputation will suffer, our competitive position will be impaired and our expenses could increase.
     We rely upon Anacomp Inc., or Anacomp, a third-party hardware maintenance provider, which specializes in providing vendor-neutral support of storage equipment, network devices and peripherals, to provide repair services to our end users. We currently have limited capabilities in-house to resolve hardware failures or other issues experienced by our end users. If Anacomp fails to timely and correctly resolve hardware failures or issues experienced by our end users, our reputation will suffer our competitive position will be impaired and our expenses could increase. In May 2008, we entered into a five year agreement with Anacomp. Our agreement with Anacomp will automatically renew for successive one-year terms, unless either party notifies the other, in writing, of its intention to terminate or renegotiate the agreement at least 180 days prior to the end of the initial five-year term or any successive one-year term. In addition, either party may immediately terminate the agreement for a material default by the other party that is not cured within 30 days. If our relationship with Anacomp were to end, we would have to engage a new third-party provider of hardware support, and the transition could result in delays in effecting repairs and damage our reputation and competitive position as well as increase our operating expenses.
If we are unsuccessful in developing and selling new products, services and product enhancements, our competitive position will be adversely affected and our ability to grow our revenue will be impaired.
     We operate in a dynamic environment characterized by rapid technological change, changing end user needs, frequent new product introductions and evolving industry standards. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards could render our existing products obsolete and unmarketable. Our competitiveness and future success depend on our ability to anticipate, develop, market and support new products and product enhancements on a timely and cost effective basis that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards and that address the increasingly sophisticated needs of our end users. We may fail to develop and market products and services that respond to technological changes or evolving industry standards, experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction and marketing of these products and services, or fail to develop products and services that adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace or achieve market acceptance. Our failure to develop and market such products and services on a timely basis would erode our competitive position and impair our ability to grow our revenue.
If our channel partners fail to timely and correctly install and configure our storage systems, or face disruptions in their business, our reputation will suffer, our competitive position could be impaired and we could lose customers.
     In addition to our small team of installation personnel, we rely upon some of our channel partners to install Storage Center at our end user locations. Our channel partner agreements generally contain provisions requiring installation and configuration training by the channel partners, which we may waive at our discretion. Although we train and certify our channel partners on the installation and configuration of Storage Center, end users have in the past encountered installation and configuration difficulties. In addition, if one or

26


Table of Contents

more of our channel partners suffers an interruption in its business, or experiences delays, disruptions or quality control problems in its operations, or we have to change or add additional channel partners, installation and configuration of Storage Center to our end users could be delayed, our revenue could be reduced and our ability to compete could be impaired. As a significant portion of our sales occur in the last month of a quarter, our end users may also experience installation delays following a purchase if we or our channel partners have too many installations in a short period of time. If we or our channel partners fail to timely and correctly install and configure Storage Center, end users may not purchase additional products and services from us, our reputation could suffer and our revenue could be reduced. In addition, we will incur additional expenses to correctly install and configure Storage Center to meet the expectations of our end users.
If we fail to attract or retain engineering or sales and marketing personnel or if we lose the services of our founders or key management, our ability to grow our business and our competitive position would be impaired.
     We believe our future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled managerial, research and development, sales and marketing personnel. Our management, research and development, sales and marketing personnel represent a significant asset and serve as the source of our business strategy, technological and product innovations, and sales and marketing initiatives. As a result, our success is substantially dependent upon our ability to attract additional personnel for all areas of our organization, particularly in our research and development department and our sales and marketing department. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel on a timely basis or on competitive terms. Any failure to adequately expand our management, research and development, sales and marketing personnel will impede our growth. In addition, many qualified personnel are located outside of the Minneapolis geographic area where our headquarters are located, and some qualified personnel that we may recruit may not be interested in relocating. If we are unable to attract and retain the necessary personnel on a cost-effective basis, our ability to grow our business and our competitive position would be impaired.
     In particular, we are highly dependent on the contributions of our three founders, Philip E. Soran, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, John P. Guider, our Chief Operating Officer, and Lawrence E. Aszmann, our Chief Technology Officer. The loss of any of our founders could make it more difficult to manage our operations and research and development activities, reduce our employee retention and revenue and impair our ability to compete. If any of our founders were to leave us unexpectedly, we could face substantial difficulty in hiring qualified successors and could experience a loss in productivity during the search for and while any such successor is integrated into our business and operations. The loss of any of our founders or the inability to attract, retain or motivate qualified personnel, including research and development and sales and marketing personnel, could delay the development and introduction of, and impair our ability to, sell our products.
We expect to face numerous challenges as we attempt to grow our operations, and our channel partner and end user base internationally.
     Historically, we have conducted little business internationally. We have two international offices and revenue from international sales was 20% and 18% of total revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Although we expect that part of our future revenue growth will be from channel partners and end users located outside of the United States, we may not be able to increase international market demand for Storage Center. In January 2008, we entered into a marketing agreement with AMEX, Inc., an export firm, pursuant to which we granted AMEX exclusive distribution rights to resell Storage Center to resellers and end users internationally, except in Canada. In January 2009, we entered into a new marketing agreement with AMEX containing similar exclusive distribution rights as the January 2008 agreement. AMEX agrees to use its best efforts to further the promotion, marketing and sale of Storage Center. The marketing agreement is renewable on an annual basis each January unless either party notifies the other party in writing of an intention to discontinue the relationship at least 90 days prior to the renewal date. If AMEX is not successful in helping us expand our international distribution channel, our revenue and our ability to compete internationally could be impaired.
     We expect to face numerous challenges as we attempt to grow our operations, channel partner relationships and end user base internationally, in particular attracting and retaining channel partners with international capabilities or channel partners located in international markets. Our revenue and expenses could be adversely affected by a variety of factors associated with international operations some of which are beyond our control, including:
    difficulties of managing and staffing international offices, and the increased travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with international locations;

27


Table of Contents

    greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
    difficulty in contract enforcement;
    regulatory, political or economic conditions in a specific country or region;
    compliance with local laws and regulations and unanticipated changes in local laws and regulations, including tax laws and regulations;
    export and import controls; trade protection measures and other regulatory requirements;
    effects of changes in currency exchange rates;
    potentially adverse tax consequences;
    service provider and government spending patterns;
    reduced protection of our intellectual property and other assets in some countries;
    greater difficulty documenting and testing our internal controls;
    differing employment practices and labor issues; and
    man-made problems such as computer viruses and acts of terrorism and international conflicts.
     In addition, we expect that we may encounter increased complexity and costs of managing international operations, including longer and more difficult collection of receivables, difficulties in staffing international operations, local business and cultural factors that differ from our normal standards and practices, differing employment practices and labor issues, and work stoppages, any of which could result in lower revenue and higher expenses.
If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our ability to compete effectively or to defend ourselves from litigation could be impaired which could reduce our revenue and increase our costs.
     We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary technologies and know-how. We have three issued patents in the United States, one international patent and additional patents pending in the United States and in foreign countries. Even if the pending patent applications are granted, the rights granted to us under those applications and under our other issued patents may not be meaningful or provide us with any commercial advantage and they could be opposed, contested, circumvented or designed around by our competitors or be declared invalid or unenforceable in judicial or administrative proceedings. The failure of our patents to adequately protect our technology might make it easier for our competitors to offer similar products or technologies. Foreign patent protection is generally not as comprehensive as U.S. patent protection and may not protect our intellectual property in some countries where our products are sold or may be sold in the future. Many U.S.-based companies have encountered substantial intellectual property infringement in foreign countries, including countries where we sell or intend to sell products. Even if foreign patents are granted, effective enforcement in foreign countries may not be available.
     Monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult and costly. Although we are not aware of any unauthorized use of our intellectual property in the past, it is possible that unauthorized use of our intellectual property may have occurred or may occur without our knowledge. The steps we have taken may not prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property. Our failure to effectively protect our intellectual property could reduce the value of our technology in licensing arrangements or in cross-licensing negotiations, and could impair our ability to compete. We may in the future need to initiate infringement claims or litigation. Litigation, whether we are a plaintiff or a defendant, can be expensive, time-consuming and may divert the efforts of our technical staff and managerial personnel, which could result in lower revenue and higher expenses, whether or not such litigation results in a determination favorable to us.

28


Table of Contents

Assertions by third parties of infringement by us of their intellectual property rights could result in a significant diversion of management’s time and increased expenses.
     The storage industry is characterized by vigorous protection and pursuit of intellectual property rights and positions, which has resulted in protracted and expensive litigation for many companies. Litigation can be expensive, lengthy, and disruptive to ordinary business operations. Moreover, the results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. We have received and expect that in the future we may receive, particularly as a public company, communications from various industry participants alleging our infringement of their patents, trade secrets or other intellectual property rights and/or offering licenses to such intellectual property. Any lawsuits resulting from such allegations could subject us to significant liability for damages and invalidate our proprietary rights. Any intellectual property litigation also could force us to do one or more of the following:
    stop selling products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property;
    lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property against others;
    incur significant legal expenses;
    pay substantial damages to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing;
    redesign those products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property; or
    attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property from third parties, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.
     We expect that companies in the storage market will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. Our channel partners and end users could also become the target of litigation relating to patent and other intellectual property rights of others. This could trigger technical support and indemnification obligations in our licenses and maintenance agreements. These obligations could results in substantial expenses, including the payment by us of costs and damages.
If we fail to comply with the terms of our open source software license agreement, we could be required to release portions of our software codes, which could impair our ability to compete and result in lower revenue.
     Storage Center utilizes a software application called eCos, an “open source,” royalty-free, real-time operating system intended for embedded applications. eCos is licensed to us under a modified version of version 2.0 of the GNU General Public License. Open source software is often made available to the public by its authors and/or other third parties under licenses, such as the GNU General Public License, which impose certain obligations on licensees in the event such licensees re-distribute and/or make derivative works of the open source software. The terms of our license to the eCos application require us to make source code for the derivative works freely available to the public, and/or license such derivative works under a particular type of license, rather than the forms of commercial license customarily used to protect our intellectual property. In addition, there is little or no legal precedent for interpreting the terms of certain of these open source licenses, including the determination of which works are subject to the terms of such licenses. While we believe we have complied with our obligations under the various applicable licenses for open source software to avoid subjecting our proprietary products to conditions we do not intend, in the event the copyright holder of any open source software were to successfully establish in court that we had not complied with the terms of a license for a particular work, we could be required to release the source code of that work to the public, stop distribution of that work and/or recall our products that include that work. In this event, we could be required to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our products, to make generally available, in source code form, proprietary code that links to certain open source modules, to re-engineer our products, or to recall and/or discontinue the sale of our products if re-engineering could not be accomplished on a timely basis, any of which could impair our ability to compete, result in lower revenue and increase our expenses.
We may need to raise additional funds in the future, which may not be available to us on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
     We may need to raise additional funds in the future. Any required additional financing may not be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities or convertible debt, investors may experience significant dilution of their ownership interest, and the newly-issued securities may have rights senior to those of the holders of our common stock. If we

29


Table of Contents

raise additional funds by obtaining loans from third parties, the terms of those financing arrangements may include negative covenants or other restrictions on our business that could impair our operational flexibility, and would also require us to fund additional interest expense. If additional financing is not available when required or is not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop or enhance our storage products in order to take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, which could result in lower revenue and reduce the competitiveness of our storage product offerings.
We may engage in future acquisitions that could disrupt our business, cause dilution to our stockholders, reduce our financial resources and result in increased expenses.
     In the future, we may acquire other businesses, products or technologies. We have not made any acquisitions to date. Accordingly, our ability as an organization to make acquisitions is unproven. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete acquisitions, we may not strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, or these acquisitions may be viewed negatively by channel partners, end users, financial markets or investors. In addition, any acquisitions that we make could lead to difficulties in integrating personnel, technologies and operations from the acquired businesses and in retaining and motivating key personnel from these businesses. Acquisitions may disrupt our ongoing operations, divert management from day-to-day responsibilities and increase our expenses. Future acquisitions may reduce our cash available for operations and other uses, and could result in an increase in amortization expense related to identifiable assets acquired, potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities or the incurrence of debt. We cannot forecast the number, timing or size of future acquisitions, or the effect that any such acquisitions might have on our operating or financial results.
Risks Related to the Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our stock price is volatile and purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
     The market price of our common stock and the securities of other technology companies has been and may continue to be highly volatile. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, including:
    quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors;
    fluctuations in the valuation of companies perceived by investors to be comparable to us;
    economic developments in the storage industry as a whole;
    general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets;
    changes in financial estimates including our ability to meet our future revenue and operating profit or loss projections;
    changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts;
    announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments;
    our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis;
    commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation;
    disruption to our operations;
    any major change in our board of directors or management; and
    changes in governmental regulations.
     In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry factors may cause the market price of our common stock to decrease, regardless of our actual operating performance. These trading price fluctuations may also make it more difficult for us to use our common stock as a means to make

30


Table of Contents

acquisitions or to use options to purchase our common stock to attract and retain employees. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
If securities analysts or industry analysts downgrade our stock, publish negative research or reports, or do not publish reports about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
     The trading market for our common stock will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts publish about us, our business and our market. If one or more analysts adversely change their recommendation regarding our stock or our competitors’ stock, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more analysts cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.
A limited number of stockholders will have the ability to influence the outcome of director elections and other matters requiring stockholder approval.
     As of July 31, 2009, our directors and executive officers and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 43% of our outstanding common stock. These stockholders, if they acted together, could exert substantial influence over matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including electing directors, adopting new compensation plans and approving mergers, acquisitions or other business combination transactions. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of our company, which could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their stock as part of a sale of our company and might reduce our stock price. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by our other stockholders.
Delaware law and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that could delay or discourage takeover attempts that stockholders may consider favorable and result in a lower market price for our common stock.
     Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include the following:
    the division of our board of directors into three classes;
    the right of the board of directors to elect a director to fill a vacancy created by the expansion of the board of directors or due to the resignation or departure of an existing board member;
    the prohibition of cumulative voting in the election of directors, which would otherwise allow less than a majority of stockholders to elect director candidates;
    the requirement for the advance notice of nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon at a stockholders’ meeting;
    the ability of our board of directors to alter our bylaws without obtaining stockholder approval;
    the ability of the board of directors to issue, without stockholder approval, up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock with terms set by the board of directors, which rights could be senior to those of our common stock;
    the elimination of the rights of stockholders to call a special meeting of stockholders and to take action by written consent in lieu of a meeting; and
    the required approval of at least 66 2/3% of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors to adopt, amend or repeal our bylaws or repeal the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation regarding the election and removal of directors.
     In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These provisions may prohibit large stockholders, particularly those owning 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock, from merging or combining with us. These provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws and under Delaware law could discourage potential takeover attempts, could reduce the price that investors are willing

31


Table of Contents

to pay for shares of our common stock in the future and could potentially result in the market price being lower than they would without these provisions.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
     Not applicable.
Use of Proceeds from the Sale of Registered Securities
     Our initial public offering of common stock was effected through a Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-144255), that was declared effective by the SEC on October 9, 2007. We registered 6,900,000 shares of our common stock with a proposed maximum aggregate offering price of $93.1 million. The offering did not terminate until after the sale of all of the shares registered on the Registration Statement. All of the shares of common stock issued pursuant to the registration statement were sold at a price to the public of $13.50 per share. The managing underwriters were Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Needham & Company, LLC, Piper Jaffray & Co., RBC Capital Markets and Thomas Weisel Partners LLC.
     As a result of our initial public offering, we raised a total of approximately $84.6 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $6.5 million and offering expenses of $2.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, $5.0 million of the $84.6 million in net proceeds has been utilized as working capital in support of operations, with the remainder included in our investment portfolio. No payments for such expenses were made directly or indirectly to (i) any of our officers or directors or their associates, (ii) any persons owning 10% or more of any class of our equity securities, or (iii) any of our affiliates.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
     Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
     At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders, held on May 21, 2009, the following proposals were adopted. Proxies for the Annual Meeting were solicited pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There were 30,800,023 shares of common stock entitled to vote at the annual meeting and a total of 23,288,032 shares were represented at the annual meeting.
     1. The proposal to elect three (3) directors to serve for a three-year term until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The results of the voting were as follows:
                 
Directors   For   Withheld
Neel Sarkar
    23,086,366       201,666  
R. David Spreng
    22,345,097       942,935  
Duston M. Williams
    23,086,366       201,666  
     Charles Beeler and John P. Guider will each continue to serve as directors until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is elected and has qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal. Philip E. Soran and Sven A. Wehrwein will each continue to serve as directors until the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is elected and has qualified, or until his earlier death, resignation or removal.
     2. The proposal to ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. The results of the voting were as follows:
         
For   Against   Abstain
23,156,501
  108,201   23,330

32


Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information.
     Not applicable.

33


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.
                         
        Incorporated by Reference    
Exhibit                       Filed
Number   Exhibit Description   Form   Date   Number   Herewith
 
3.1
  Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Compellent Technologies, Inc.   8-K   10/16/07     3.1      
 
                       
3.2
  Amended and Restated Bylaws of Compellent Technologies, Inc.   S-1   07/02/07     3.4      
 
                       
4.1
  Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.                    
 
                       
4.2
  Specimen Common Stock Certificate.   S-1/A   09/21/07     4.2      
 
                       
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Compellent Technologies, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).                   X
 
                       
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Compellent Technologies, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).                   X
 
                       
32.1
  Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 36 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350).*                   X
 
*   The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Compellent Technologies, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

34


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: August 7, 2009
         
  Compellent Technologies, Inc.
 
 
  /s/ John. R. Judd    
  John R. Judd   
  Chief Financial Officer   
 

35


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
                                 
            Incorporated by Reference    
Exhibit
Number
  Exhibit Description   Form   Date       Number   Filed
Herewith
  3.1    
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Compellent Technologies, Inc.
  8-K   10/16/07         3.1      
       
 
                       
  3.2    
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Compellent Technologies, Inc.
  S-1   07/02/07         3.4      
       
 
                       
  4.1    
Reference is made to Exhibits 3.1 and 3.2.
                       
       
 
                       
  4.2    
Specimen Common Stock Certificate.
  S-1/A   09/21/07         4.2      
       
 
                       
  31.1    
Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Compellent Technologies, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
                      X
       
 
                       
  31.2    
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Compellent Technologies, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a).
                      X
       
 
                       
  32.1    
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 36 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350).*
                      X
 
*   The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Compellent Technologies, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

36