PRER14A
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT DATED MAY 11, 2009
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. 2)
Filed by the
Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
(Name of Registrant as Specified
in Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o No
fee required.
|
|
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1)
and 0-11.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11
(Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
þ Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount previously paid:
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, schedule or registration statement no.:
|
PRELIMINARY
PROXY STATEMENT DATED MAY 11, 2009 SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON JUNE , 2009
May ,
2009
Notice is hereby given that a Special Meeting of Shareholders of
Validus Holdings, Ltd. will be held at 19 Par-La-Ville
Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda, on June , 2009,
at ,
Atlantic Time, for the following purposes:
to approve the issuance of Validus voting common
shares, par value $0.175 per share, in connection with the
acquisition of all of the outstanding common shares, par value
$0.01 per share, of IPC Holdings, Ltd. pursuant to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement (as defined in the proxy statement on the
following pages), the Scheme of Arrangement (as defined in the
proxy statement on the following pages), the Exchange Offer (as
defined in the proxy statement on the following pages) or
otherwise; and
|
|
|
|
|
to transact such further business, if any, as may be lawfully
brought before the meeting, including to approve the adjournment
of the meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in
favor of the above proposal.
|
For further information concerning matters to be acted upon at
the Validus special meeting, you are urged to read the proxy
statement on the following pages.
If you are a shareholder of record, please sign, date and return
the enclosed proxy in the return envelope furnished for that
purpose, as promptly as possible, whether or not you plan to
attend the meeting, or follow the instructions on the Validus
proxy card to complete your proxy card on the Internet at the
website indicated or by telephone. If you own your shares
through a bank, broker, or other nominee, you will receive
instructions from that institution on how to instruct them to
vote your shares, including by completing a voting instruction
form, or providing instructions by Internet or telephone. If you
do not receive such instructions, you may contact that
institution to request them. If you later desire to revoke your
proxy for any reason, you may do so in the manner described in
the attached proxy statement. Only shareholders of record as
shown on the transfer books of Validus at the close of business
on ,
2009 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Validus
special meeting or any adjournments thereof. See The Validus
Special Meeting beginning on
page 94 in the proxy
statement for more information.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Lorraine Dean
Secretary
-2-
PRELIMINARY
PROXY STATEMENT DATED MAY 11, 2009
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished to the holders of Validus
voting common shares, $0.175 par value per share (the
Validus Shares and, together with any non-voting
common shares, $0.175 par value per share, the common
shares) in connection with the solicitation of proxies by
the board of directors of Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) to be voted at a special meeting of
shareholders (the Validus special meeting)
on ,
2009, at , Atlantic
time, at the registered office of Validus, located at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda.
Validus shareholders will be asked at the Validus special
meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares (the Share
Issuance) in connection with the acquisition (the
Acquisition) of all of the outstanding common
shares, par value $0.01 per share (the IPC Shares)
of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC), pursuant to the
Amalgamation Agreement (as defined below), the Scheme of
Arrangement (as defined below), the Exchange Offer (as defined
below) or otherwise (the Share Issuance
Proposal); and
|
|
|
|
to transact such further business, if any, as may be lawfully
brought before the meeting, including to approve the adjournment
of the meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in
favor of the above proposal (an Adjournment
Proposal).
|
On March 1, 2009, IPC entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation, as amended on March 5, 2009, among Max
Capital Group Ltd. (Max), IPC and IPC Limited
(the
Max Amalgamation Agreement) which would result in
the amalgamation of Max with IPC Limited, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of IPC that was formed for the purpose of the
amalgamation (the Proposed Max Amalgamation).
On March 31, 2009, Validus announced that it had delivered
to IPC an offer (the Validus Amalgamation Offer,)
to
acquire each outstanding IPC Share in exchange for 1.2037
Validus Shares. In connection with the Validus Amalgamation
Offer, Validus also delivered a copy of the proposed agreement
and plan of amalgamation (the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement) signed by Validus so that, upon termination of
the Max Amalgamation Agreement, IPC would be able to sign the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement with the certainty of an agreed
transaction. As described in this proxy statement under The
Acquisition Background of the Acquisition, the
board of directors of IPC has determined that the Validus
Amalgamation Offer does not constitute a superior proposal to
the Proposed Max Amalgamation and Max has not released IPC from
the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that prevents
IPC from even discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer with
Validus. Therefore, in order to consummate the Acquisition
without the cooperation of IPCs board of directors,
Validus is pursuing a three-part plan.
First, Validus is asking IPC shareholders to vote
against the Proposed Max Amalgamation. If the Proposed Max Amalgamation is voted down by
IPC shareholders, IPC would be able to terminate the Max
Amalgamation Agreement and accept the Validus Amalgamation Offer.
Second, Validus intends to commence in the near future an
exchange offer (the Exchange Offer) for all of the
outstanding IPC Shares. The Exchange Offer would allow Validus
to complete the Acquisition of IPC shortly following the IPC
annual general meeting, if the IPC shareholders vote down the
Proposed Max Amalgamation and the other conditions to the
Exchange Offer are satisfied. Under the terms of the Exchange
Offer, IPC shareholders would receive 1.2037 Validus Shares for
each IPC Share. The Exchange Offer will be subject to certain
conditions described in the prospectus /offer to exchange
included in the Registration Statement on
Form S-4
(the Offer to Exchange) filed by Validus with the
SEC, including the tender of at least 90% of
the total
outstanding IPC Shares (on a fully diluted basis), termination
of the Max Amalgamation Agreement, and the consent of
Validus lenders. Under Bermuda law, if Validus acquires
90% or more of IPC
-3-
Shares in the Exchange Offer, Validus will have the right to
acquire the remaining IPC Shares in a second-step acquisition
under Bermuda law. The Exchange Offer will not be conditioned on
regulatory approvals or the elimination of the possible
termination fee to Max.
Third, Validus intends to petition the Supreme Court of Bermuda
to approve a scheme of arrangement (the Scheme
of Arrangement) under which Validus would acquire all IPC
Shares under the same economic terms as in the Validus
Amalgamation Offer. The Scheme of Arrangement can be
accomplished without the approval of IPCs
board of directors if approved by IPC shareholders
at two shareholder meetings and sanctioned by the Supreme Court
of Bermuda. The first shareholder meeting is a court-ordered
meeting (the court-ordered IPC meeting) at which IPC
shareholders can vote to approve the Scheme of Arrangement. In
addition, if IPCs board of directors continues to be
uncooperative despite shareholder approval at the court-ordered
IPC meeting, IPC shareholders can call a second meeting (the
IPC special general meeting) at which IPC
shareholders can require IPC to approve and be bound by the
Scheme of Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation
Agreement. Following IPC shareholder approval at both of these
meetings, and approval by the Supreme Court of Bermuda, the
Scheme of Arrangement would become effective and IPC would
become a subsidiary of Validus. The Scheme of Arrangement would
be approved with the vote of a majority in number of the
holders
of IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether
in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the
IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy. The required vote at the second meeting is
an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of IPC Shares
voting at the meeting.
Validus is soliciting proxies from holders of Validus Shares at
the Validus special meeting in order to be able to issue the
Validus Shares to IPC shareholders in connection with the
Acquisition. The Share Issuance will become effective only if it
is approved by Validus shareholders and the IPC Shares are
exchanged for Validus Shares, pursuant to the Acquisition. The affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast at the Validus special meeting at which a quorum is
present in accordance with Validus bye-laws is required to
approve each matter to be acted on at the Validus special
meeting, including the Adjournment Proposal.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to
acquire all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the same
economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these transaction
structures can be pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek
to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines
is most effective and efficient.
Assuming closing of the Acquisition, based on Validus and
IPCs capitalization as of December 31, 2008 and the
exchange ratio of 1.2037, Validus would issue 67,338,947 Validus
Shares in connection with the Acquisition and IPC shareholders
would own approximately 43% of the issued and outstanding common
shares of Validus on a fully-diluted basis.
Shareholders of record as of the close of business
on ,
2009 will be entitled to vote at the Validus special meeting. As
of March 13, 2009, there were 58,849,289 outstanding
Validus Shares entitled to vote at the Validus special meeting,
and 19,771,422 Validus non-voting common shares. Each Validus
Share entitles the holder of record thereof to one vote at the
Validus special meeting; however, if, and for so long as, the
Validus Shares of a shareholder, including any votes conferred
by controlled shares (as defined below), would
otherwise represent more than 9.09% of the aggregate voting
power of all Validus Shares entitled to vote on a matter, the
votes conferred by such Validus Shares will be reduced by
whatever amount is necessary such that, after giving effect to
any such reduction (and any other reductions in voting power
required by Validus bye-laws), the votes conferred by such
Validus Shares represent 9.09% of the aggregate voting power of
all Validus Shares entitled to vote on such matter.
Controlled shares include, among other things, all
shares that a person is deemed to own directly, indirectly or
constructively (within the meaning of Section 958 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 or Section 13(d)(3) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended).
Validus knows of no specific matter to be brought before the
Validus special meeting that is not referred to in the notice of
the Validus special meeting. If any such matter comes before the
Validus special meeting, including any shareholder proposal
properly made, the proxy holders will vote proxies in accordance
with their judgment.
Validus common shares are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange
(the NYSE) under the symbol VR. The
closing price of a Validus common share on the NYSE on
May 7, 2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing
of this proxy statement, was
$22.90.
IPC
-4-
Shares, which are currently quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol IPCR
and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the symbol IPCR
BH, would be delisted upon completion of the Acquisition.
The closing price of an IPC Share on NASDAQ on May 7, 2009,
the last practicable date prior to the filing of this proxy
statement, was
$25.43.
All references to dollars and $ in this
proxy statement refer to U.S. dollars.
Validus board of directors has unanimously adopted the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement and authorized and approved the
Share Issuance and deems it fair, advisable and in the best
interests of Validus and its shareholders to consummate the
Share Issuance, the Acquisition and the other transactions
contemplated thereby. Validus board of directors
recommends that Validus shareholders vote FOR the
proposals submitted to Validus shareholders on the attached
Validus proxy card. All of the officers and those directors and
shareholders who are qualified sponsors (as defined
in this proxy statement) and who own Validus Shares have indicated
that they intend to vote the Validus Shares owned by them in
favor of the Validus Share Issuance Proposal and the Adjournment
Proposal. As of March 13, 2009, these persons and entities
beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests relating to the
Validus Shares. All of our officers, directors and qualified
sponsors together own 57.4% of the economic interests relating to all
outstanding common shares of Validus.
This proxy statement provides Validus shareholders with detailed
information about the Validus special meeting and the
Acquisition. You can also obtain information from publicly
available documents filed by Validus and IPC with the SEC.
Validus encourages you to read this entire document
carefully, including the section entitled Risk Factors
beginning on page 42.
Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend
the Validus special meeting, please take time to vote by
completing and mailing your enclosed proxy card or by following
the voting instructions provided to you if you own your shares
through a bank, broker or other nominee. If you do not receive
such instructions, you may request them from that firm.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved the
Share Issuance, passed upon the merits or fairness of the Share
Issuance or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the
disclosure in this proxy statement. Any representation to the
contrary is a criminal offense.
This
proxy statement is dated May , 2009
and is first being mailed to Validus shareholders on or
about ,
2009
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
Validus
Special Meeting to be Held on June ,
2009
The proxy
statement and the related proxy materials are available free of
charge on Validus website at
www.validusre.bm.
-5-
SOURCES
OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement includes information, including important
business and financial information, also set forth in documents
filed by Validus and IPC with the SEC, and those documents
include information about Validus and IPC that is not included
in or delivered with this proxy statement. You can obtain any of
the documents filed by Validus or IPC, as the case may be, with
the SEC from the SEC or, without charge, from the SECs
website at
http://www.sec.gov.
Validus shareholders also may obtain documents filed by Validus
with the SEC or documents incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement free of cost, by directing a written or oral
request to Validus at:
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Attention: Jon Levenson
(441) 278-9000
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least ten business days
before the date of the meeting. This means you must request this
information no later
than ,
2009. Validus will mail properly requested documents to
requesting shareholders by first class mail, or another equally
prompt means, within one business day after receipt of such
request.
The information concerning IPC, its business, management and
operations presented or incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement has been taken from, or is based upon, publicly
available information on file with the SEC and other publicly
available information. Although Validus has no knowledge that
would indicate that statements and information relating to IPC
contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement,
in reliance upon publicly available information, are inaccurate
or incomplete, to date it has not had access to the full books
and records of IPC, was not involved in the preparation of such
information and statements and is not in a position to verify
any such information or statements.
The consolidated financial statements of IPC appearing in its
annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (including schedules
appearing therein), and IPC managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 included therein, have been audited by an
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in
their reports thereon, included therein, and included
and/or
incorporated herein by reference. Validus has not obtained the
authorization of IPCs independent auditors to incorporate
by reference the audit reports relating to this information.
Pursuant to
Rule 12b-21
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), Validus requested that IPC
provide Validus with information required for complete
disclosure regarding the businesses, operations, financial
condition and management of IPC. Validus will amend or
supplement this proxy statement to provide any and all
information Validus receives from IPC, if Validus receives the
information before the Validus special meeting and Validus
considers it to be material, reliable and appropriate.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 104.
-6-
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
-7-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
ANNEX A: AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX B: OPINION OF VALIDUS FINANCIAL
ADVISOR ADDRESSED TO VALIDUS BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
|
|
|
|
-8-
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ACQUISITION AND THE MEETING
The following questions and answers highlight selected
information from this proxy statement and may not contain all
the information that is important to you. Validus encourages you
to read this entire document carefully.
|
|
Q:
|
When and
where is the Validus special meeting?
|
A: The Validus special meeting will take place
at ,
Atlantic Time, on June , 2009, at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda.
|
|
Q:
|
What is
the purpose of the Validus special meeting?
|
A: The purpose of the meeting is to seek Validus
shareholder approval of:
|
|
|
|
|
the Share Issuance in connection with the Acquisition of all of
the outstanding IPC Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation
Agreement, the Scheme of Arrangement, the Exchange Offer or
otherwise; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such further business, if any, as may be lawfully
brought before the meeting, including to approve the adjournment
of the meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in
favor of the above proposal.
|
Even if shareholders approve the Share Issuance, the Share
Issuance will take effect only if and when the IPC Shares are
exchanged for Validus Shares pursuant to the Amalgamation
Agreement, the Scheme of Arrangement, the Exchange Offer or
otherwise.
|
|
Q:
|
Why is
shareholder approval of the Share Issuance required?
|
A: Based upon publicly available information about
the number of IPC Shares outstanding and the proposed exchange
ratio, Validus expects it would need to issue 67,338,947 Validus
Shares in exchange for all outstanding IPC Shares. This number
of Validus Shares will be greater than 20% of the total number
of Validus Shares outstanding prior to such issuance. The
listing requirements of the NYSE require that Validus
shareholders approve any issuance of Validus Shares or
securities convertible into or exercisable for Validus Shares if
(a) the Validus Shares or other securities being issued
will have voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the
voting power outstanding before such issuance or (b) the
number of Validus Shares to be issued is or will be equal to or
in excess of 20% of the number of Validus Shares or other
securities before such issuance.
If the Share Issuance Proposal is approved by Validus
shareholders, Validus will be permitted to issue Validus Shares
in exchange for IPC Shares, pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, the Scheme of Arrangement, the Exchange Offer or
otherwise. Shareholders are not being asked to vote on the
Acquisition and no vote of Validus shareholders is required on
such matter.
|
|
Q:
|
What
would happen in the amalgamation?
|
A: If the amalgamation is consummated, IPC would
amalgamate with Validus Ltd., a direct wholly owned subsidiary
of Validus, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. IPC shareholders
(including the shareholders that do not vote in favor of the
amalgamation but excluding Validus and its subsidiaries) would
have the right to receive 1.2037 Validus Shares and cash in lieu
of fractional shares in exchange for each IPC Share they hold,
unless they exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Bermuda law.
Upon the closing of the amalgamation, the separate corporate
existence of Validus Ltd. and IPC would cease and they would
continue as an amalgamated company and subsidiary of Validus
(the amalgamated company) and the name of the
amalgamated company would be Validus Ltd.
-9-
|
|
Q:
|
Why is
Validus proposing the Acquisition?
|
A: Based on a number of factors described below under
The Acquisition Reasons Why Validus Board
of Directors Recommends Approval of the Share Issuance,
Validus board of directors believes that the Acquisition
represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit
that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the
global reinsurance market. The Acquisition would allow IPC
shareholders to benefit from the superior growth potential of
Validus, which would be a leading carrier in Bermudas
short-tail reinsurance and insurance markets following the
Acquisition, with a strong balance sheet and quality
diversification in profitable business lines.
|
|
Q:
|
When do
you expect the Acquisition to be completed?
|
A: If IPCs board of directors was to enter into
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement following the termination of the
Max Amalgamation Agreement, Validus believes the amalgamation could
be completed in mid-to-late July.
Validus believes that if the conditions of the Exchange Offer
are satisfied, it would be able to acquire IPC Shares
under the Exchange Offer in June based on the following. If the
Exchange Offer is commenced as late as May 15 and held open for
20 business days, it would expire on June 15, 2009. If the
conditions to the Exchange Offer are satisfied, Validus will
acquire at least 90% of the then-outstanding number of IPC
Shares on a fully-diluted basis (excluding any IPC Shares
beneficially owned by Validus or its subsidiaries).
Validus believes that, under the Scheme of Arrangement,
it would
be able to close the Acquisition of IPC as early as mid-July
based on the assumptions that: (1) the Supreme Court of
Bermuda will be able to accommodate the preferred hearings
schedule and meeting dates and other procedural matters;
(2) IPC shareholders holding at least one-tenth of the
issued shares of IPC have requisitioned a special general
meeting to be held in late June or early July to approve and
have IPC be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement; and (3) the
IPC directors, following the rejection of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation, or IPC shareholders, convene the requisitioned
special general meeting, allowing it to be held by mid-July.
|
|
Q:
|
What
would IPC shareholders receive in the Acquisition?
|
A: Under the terms of the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, each outstanding IPC Share (including any shares held
by IPC shareholders that do not vote in favor of the
amalgamation, but excluding any dissenting shares as to which
appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law,
and excluding any shares held by Validus, IPC or any of their
respective subsidiaries)
would be cancelled and converted into the right to receive
1.2037 Validus Shares upon closing of the amalgamation. Under
the terms of the Scheme of Arrangement, each outstanding IPC
Share (excluding any IPC Shares beneficially owned by Validus,
its subsidiaries or IPC), would be transferred to Validus in
exchange for 1.2037 Validus Shares upon effectiveness of the
Scheme of Arrangement. Under the terms of the Exchange Offer,
each outstanding IPC Share (excluding any IPC Shares
beneficially owned by Validus, its subsidiaries or IPC) that is
validly tendered and not withdrawn would be exchanged for 1.2037
Validus Shares upon closing of the Exchange Offer.
IPC shareholders would not receive any fractional Validus Shares
in the Acquisition. Instead, IPC shareholders would be paid cash
in lieu of the fractional share interest to which such
shareholders would otherwise be entitled. We refer to the
exchange ratio and the cash in lieu of fractional shares as the
acquisition consideration.
|
|
Q:
|
What
percentage of Validus Shares will the former holders of IPC
Shares own after the Acquisition?
|
A: Based on Validus and IPCs
capitalization as of December 31, 2008 and the exchange
ratio of 1.2037, Validus would issue 67,338,947 Validus Shares
in connection with the Acquisition and IPC shareholders would
own approximately 43% of the issued and outstanding common shares, of Validus on a fully-diluted basis
following closing of the Acquisition.
-10-
|
|
Q:
|
Would the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement signed by IPC be the exact form
attached hereto as Annex A?
|
A: Validus delivered the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement to IPC on March 31, 2009 intending it to be
executed in the exact form provided. Since then, in response to
IPCs rejection of the Validus Amalgamation Offer, we are
proceeding with efforts to move forward with the transaction
without IPCs cooperation, including by soliciting your
votes to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection
with the Acquisition. These efforts will necessitate certain
updates to the form of Validus Amalgamation Agreement which we
believe are not material to Validus or IPC shareholders. We
cannot predict what other changes may become necessary due to
changed circumstances or as a result of negotiations with IPC
should that occur. If any changes are made to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement that Validus believes are material to
Validus shareholders, Validus will supplement this proxy
statement and, if necessary, resolicit proxies from its
shareholders.
|
|
Q:
|
Are
Validus shareholders able to exercise appraisal
rights?
|
A: The Validus shareholders will not be entitled to
exercise appraisal rights with respect to any matter to be voted
upon at the Validus special meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
Will I
have preemptive rights in connection with the Share
Issuance?
|
A: No. Validus shareholders will not be entitled
to any preemptive rights in connection with the Share Issuance.
|
|
Q:
|
What will
be the composition of the board of directors of Validus
following the effectiveness of the Acquisition?
|
A: Upon the effectiveness of the Acquisition,
Validus board of directors would consist of the directors
serving on the board of directors of Validus before the
Acquisition; however, Validus has expressed to the IPC directors
that if they desire to participate in the leadership of Validus
after the Acquisition, Validus would consider that.
|
|
Q:
|
How will
Validus be managed after the Acquisition?
|
A: Upon closing of the Acquisition, the officers of
Validus will be the officers serving Validus before the
Acquisition.
|
|
Q:
|
What
shareholder vote is required to approve the Share Issuance and
the Adjournment Proposal at the Validus special meeting and how
many votes must be present to hold the meeting?
|
A: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast at the Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is
present in accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required
to approve each of the Share Issuance Proposal and the
Adjournment Proposal. The Share Issuance will become effective
only if it is duly approved by Validus shareholders and all of
the other conditions to the Acquisition are satisfied or waived
and the Acquisition closes. The affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast at the Validus special meeting is required to
approve each other matter to be acted on, including any
Adjournment Proposal. As of March 13, 2009, 42.4% of the
outstanding Validus Shares were held by entities affiliated with
Validus directors and executive officers.
Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted
toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be considered
votes cast on any proposal brought before, the Validus special
meeting. Because the vote required to approve the proposals is
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast, assuming a
quorum is present, a broker non-vote with respect to any
proposal to be voted on at the Validus special meeting will not
have the effect of a vote for or against the relevant proposal,
but will reduce the number of votes cast and therefore increase
the relative influence of those shareholders voting. For the
Validus special meeting, a quorum consists
-11-
of two or more shareholders present in person and representing
in person or by proxy in excess of 50% of the
total issued Validus Shares throughout the meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
Does
Validus board of directors recommend approval of the
proposals?
|
A: Yes. Validus board of directors, taking into
consideration the reasons discussed under The
Acquisition Reasons Why Validus Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Share Issuance,
unanimously adopted the Validus Amalgamation Agreement and
authorized and approved the Share Issuance. Validus board
of directors deems it fair, advisable and in the best interests
of Validus to enter into the Validus Amalgamation Agreement and
to acquire all of the outstanding IPC Shares and to consummate
the Share Issuance. Validus board of directors
recommends that Validus shareholders vote FOR the
matters submitted on the Validus proxy card.
|
|
Q:
|
Have any
Validus shareholders agreed to support the proposals?
|
A: All of the officers and those directors and
shareholders who are qualified sponsors (as defined in
this proxy statement) and who own Validus Shares have indicated that
they intend to vote the Validus Shares owned by them in favor of the
Share Issuance Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal. As of
March 13, 2009, these persons and entities beneficially owned
42.4% of the voting interests relating to the Validus Shares. All of
our officers, directors and qualified sponsors together own 57.4% of
the economic interests relating to all outstanding common shares of
Validus.
|
|
Q:
|
Will any
other matters be voted on at the Validus special
meeting?
|
A: Validus knows of no specific matter to be brought
before the Validus special meeting that is not referred to in
the notice of the Validus special meeting. If any such matter
comes before the Validus special meeting, the proxy holders will
vote proxies in accordance with their judgment.
|
|
Q:
|
What is
the record date for the Validus special meeting?
|
A: Only shareholders of record, as shown by the
transfer books of Validus at the close of business
on ,
2009 (the Validus record date) are entitled to
receive notice of and to vote at the Validus special meeting or
any adjournment thereof.
|
|
Q:
|
How many
votes do I have and how many votes can be cast by all Validus
shareholders?
|
A: Shareholders of record as of the close of business
on ,
2009 will be entitled to vote at the Validus special meeting. As
of March 13, 2009, there were 58,849,289 outstanding
Validus Shares entitled to vote at the Validus special meeting,
and 19,771,422 non-voting common shares.
|
|
Q:
|
What do I
need to do now?
|
A: Validus urges you to read carefully this proxy
statement, including its annexes, schedules and the documents
incorporated by reference herein. You also may want to review
the documents referenced under Where You Can Find More
Information on
page 104 and consult with
your accounting, legal and tax advisors. Once you have
considered all relevant information, Validus encourages you to
fill in and return the attached proxy card (if you are a
shareholder of record) or voting instruction form you receive
from your bank, broker or other nominee (if you hold your
Validus Shares in street name).
-12-
|
|
Q:
|
How can I
vote my shares at the Validus special meeting?
|
A: If your shares are registered directly in your
name as of the record date with our transfer agent, Bank of New
York Mellon, you are considered the shareholder of
record with respect to those shares, and the proxy
materials and proxy card are being sent directly to you. As the
shareholder of record, you have the right to vote in person at
the meeting. If you choose to do so, you can bring the enclosed
proxy card. Most shareholders of Validus hold their shares
through a bank, broker or other nominee (that is, in
street name) rather than directly in their own name.
If you hold your shares in street name, you are a
beneficial holder, and the proxy materials are being
forwarded to you by your bank, broker or other nominee together
with a voting instruction form. Because a beneficial holder is
not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in
person at the meeting unless you obtain a valid proxy from the
bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who
has received a legal proxy, with a power of
subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as of the record
date) giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.
Even if you plan to attend the Validus special meeting, we
recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described
below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not
to attend the Validus special meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
How can I
vote my shares without attending the Validus special
meeting?
|
A: If you are the shareholder of record, you may
direct your vote without attending the Validus special meeting
by completing and mailing your proxy card in the enclosed
pre-paid envelope. In addition, if you are the shareholder of
record, you may grant a proxy to vote your shares at the Validus
special meeting by telephone by calling
866-367-5524
and following the simple recorded instructions, twenty-four
hours a day, seven days a week, at any time prior to
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on the day prior to the Validus
special meeting. Alternatively, as a shareholder of record, you
may vote via the Internet at any time prior to 11:59 p.m.,
Eastern Time, on the day prior to the Validus special meeting by
going to
http://proxy.georgeson.com,
entering the company number and control number on your proxy
card and following the instructions to submit an electronic
proxy. If you vote by telephone or the Internet, you will be
required to provide the control number contained on your proxy
card. If you hold your Validus Shares in street name you should
complete and return the voting instruction form you receive from
your bank, broker or other nominee in accordance with the
instructions you receive from your bank, broker or other
nominee. Your voting instruction form may contain instructions
from your bank, broker or other nominee that allow you to vote your
shares using the Internet or by telephone. Please consult with
your bank, broker or other nominee if you have any questions regarding
the voting of shares held in street name.
|
|
Q:
|
What do I
need for admission to the Validus special meeting?
|
A: You are entitled to attend the Validus special
meeting only if you are (i) a shareholder of record or (ii) a beneficial
owner or other person holding a valid proxy from the bank,
broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has
received a legal proxy, with a power of
subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as of the record
date). If you are the shareholder of record, your name will be
verified against the list of shareholders of record prior to
your admittance to the Validus special meeting. You should be
prepared to present photo identification for admission. If you
hold your shares in street name and would like to be admitted to
the meeting, you will need to provide a valid proxy from the
bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has received a legal proxy,
with a power of subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as
of the record date)
and proof of beneficial ownership on the record date, such as a
brokerage account statement showing that you owned Validus
Shares as of the record date, a copy of the voting instruction
form provided by your bank, broker or other nominee, or other
similar evidence of ownership as of the record date, as well as
your photo identification. If you do not comply with the
procedures outlined above, you may not be admitted to the
Validus special meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
If my
shares are held in a brokerage account or in street
name, will my broker vote my shares for me?
|
A: If you own your shares through a bank, broker or
other nominee, you will receive instructions from that
institution on how to instruct them to vote your shares,
including by completing a voting instruction form, or providing
instructions by Internet or telephone. If you do not receive
such instructions, you may contact
-13-
that institution to request them. In accordance with NYSE rules,
banks, brokers and other nominees who hold Validus Shares in
street-name for customers may not exercise their voting
discretion with respect to the Share Issuance. Accordingly, if
you do not provide your bank, broker or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your street name shares, your bank,
broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote them at
the Validus special meeting. Also, if your bank, broker or other
nominee has indicated on the relevant proxy that it does not
have discretionary authority to vote such street name shares,
your bank, broker or other nominee will not be permitted to vote
them. Either of these situations results in a broker
non-vote.
A broker non-vote with respect to the Validus
special meeting will not be considered as a vote cast with
respect to any matter presented at the Validus special meeting,
but will be counted for purposes of establishing a quorum,
provided that your bank, broker or nominee is in
attendance in person or by proxy. Because the vote required to
approve the proposals is the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes cast, assuming a quorum is present, a broker non-vote
with respect to any proposal to be voted on at the Validus
special meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or
against the relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of
votes cast and therefore increase the relative influence of
those shareholders voting.
Because your bank, broker or other nominee will not
have discretionary authority to vote your shares, you must provide your bank, broker or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your shares or arrange to attend the
Validus special meeting and vote your shares in person if you
want your shares to be voted and to avoid a broker non-vote. If
your bank, broker or other nominee holds your shares and you
attend the Validus special meeting in person, you should bring a
letter from your bank, broker or other nominee identifying you
as the beneficial owner of the shares and authorizing you to
vote your shares at the meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
What
effect do abstentions and broker non-votes have on the
proposals?
|
A: Abstentions and broker non-votes will
be counted toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not be
considered votes cast on any proposal brought before the Validus
special meeting. Because the vote required to approve the
proposals is the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast, assuming a quorum is present, a broker non-vote with
respect to any proposal to be voted on at the Validus special
meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the
relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and
therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders
voting. See also The Validus Special Meeting
Record Date and Shares Entitled to Vote.
|
|
Q:
|
How will
my shares be voted if I sign and return a proxy card or voting
instruction form without specifying how to vote my
shares?
|
A: If you sign and return a proxy card or voting
instruction form without giving specific voting instructions,
your shares will be voted FOR the Share Issuance
Proposal and FOR the Adjournment Proposal and as the
persons named as proxies may determine in their discretion with
respect to any other matters properly presented for a vote
before the Validus special meeting.
|
|
Q:
|
What do I
do if I want to change my vote or revoke my proxy?
|
A: You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at
any time before your proxy is voted at the Validus special
meeting. If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your
vote or revoke your proxy by: (1) delivering to Validus
(Attention: General Counsel) at 19 Par-La-Ville Road,
Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda, a written notice of revocation of your
proxy; (2) delivering to Validus an authorized proxy
bearing a later date (including a proxy by telephone or over the
Internet); or (3) attending the Validus special meeting and
voting in person as described above under the question entitled How can I vote my
shares at the Validus special meeting? Attendance at the
Validus special meeting in and of itself, without voting in
person at the Validus special meeting, will not cause your
previously granted proxy to be revoked. For shares you hold in
street name, you should follow the instructions of your bank,
broker or other nominee or, if you have obtained a valid proxy
from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has received a
-14-
legal proxy, with a power of subdelegation, from the
shareholder of record as of the record date) giving you the right to vote your shares
at the Validus special meeting, by attending the Validus special
meeting and voting in person.
|
|
Q:
|
Who can I
contact with any additional questions?
|
If you have additional questions about the Acquisition, if you
would like additional copies of this proxy statement, or if you
need assistance voting your Validus Shares, you should contact
Georgeson Inc. (Georgeson) at:
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokerage Firms Please Call:
(212) 440-9800
All Others Please Call Toll Free:
(888) 274-5146
E-mail
inquiries: validus@georgeson.com
|
|
Q:
|
Where can
I find more information about the companies?
|
A: You can find more information about Validus and
IPC in the documents described under Where You Can Find More
Information on page 104.
-15-
SUMMARY
This summary highlights the material information in this
proxy statement. To fully understand Validus proposals,
and for a more complete description of the terms of the
amalgamation, you should read carefully this entire document,
including the annexes and documents incorporated by
reference herein, and the other documents referred to herein.
For information on how to obtain the documents that are on file
with the SEC, see Where You Can Find More Information on
page 104.
Validus
(page 93)
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company with its principal
executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is
(441) 278-9000.
Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting
its operations worldwide through two wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Validus Reinsurance, Ltd. (Validus Re) and Talbot
Holdings Ltd. (Talbot). Validus Re is a Bermuda
based reinsurer focused on short-tail lines of reinsurance.
Talbot is the Bermuda parent of the specialty insurance group
primarily operating within the Lloyds insurance market
through Syndicate 1183. Validus common shares are traded on the
NYSE under the symbol VR and, as of May 7,
2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this
proxy statement, Validus had a market capitalization of
approximately $1.76 billion. Validus has approximately
280 employees.
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to Validus
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100
IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares
and Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
IPC
(page 93)
The following description of IPC is taken from the Registration
Statement on
Form S-4
filed by IPC with the SEC in connection with the Proposed Max
Amalgamation (as amended from time to time, the IPC/Max
S-4).
See Sources of Additional Information above.
IPC, a Bermuda exempted company, provides property catastrophe
reinsurance and, to a limited extent,
property-per-risk
excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93%
of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property
catastrophe reinsurance covers against unpredictable events such
as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms, earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, fires, industrial explosions, freezes, riots, floods
and other man-made or natural disasters. The substantial
majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe, IPCs
Bermuda-based property catastrophe reinsurance subsidiary, has
been, and continues to be, written on an excess of loss basis
for primary insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject to
aggregate limits on exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had
approximately 258 clients from whom it received either
annual/deposit or adjustment premiums, including many of the
leading insurance companies around the world. In 2008,
approximately 36% of those clients were based in the United
States, and approximately 53% of gross premiums written,
excluding reinstatement premiums, related primarily to
U.S. risks. IPCs
non-U.S. clients
and its
non-U.S. covered
risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and
New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for
more than 3.7% of its gross premiums written, excluding
reinstatement premiums. At December 31, 2008, IPC had total
shareholders equity of $1,851 million and total
assets of $2,389 million.
IPCs common shares are quoted on NASDAQ under the ticker
symbol IPCR and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the
symbol IPCR BH. IPCs principal executive
offices are located at American International Building, 29
Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda and its telephone number
is
(441) 298-5100.
-16-
The
Validus Special Meeting
(page 94)
The Validus special meeting will be held on
June , 2009,
at , Atlantic time, at
the registered office of Validus, located at
19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda. Validus
shareholders will be asked at the Validus special meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the
Acquisition of all of the outstanding IPC Shares, pursuant to
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, the Scheme of Arrangement,
the Exchange Offer or otherwise; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such further business, if any, as may be lawfully
brought before the meeting, including to approve the adjournment
of the meeting for the solicitation of additional proxies in
favor of the above proposal.
|
You can vote at the Validus special meeting only if you are a
shareholder of record, as shown by the transfer books of
Validus, at the close of business
on ,
2009, which is the record date for the Validus special meeting.
The
Acquisition
(page 45)
General
Description
(page 45)
If the Validus Amalgamation Agreement is signed by IPC, and all
conditions to the amalgamation have been satisfied or waived,
IPC will amalgamate with Validus Ltd., a direct, wholly owned
subsidiary of Validus, with the amalgamated company continuing
as the surviving company and succeeding to and assuming all of
the rights, properties, liabilities and obligations of IPC and
Validus Ltd. if the amalgamation is consummated. Upon the
closing of the amalgamation, the separate corporate existence of
each of IPC and Validus Ltd. will cease and they will continue
as an amalgamated company and subsidiary of Validus. The
amalgamated company will be named Validus Ltd. IPC
shareholders (including the shareholders that do not vote in
favor of the amalgamation) would have the right to receive
1.2037 Validus Shares and cash in lieu of fractional shares in
exchange for each IPC common share they hold, unless they
exercise appraisal rights pursuant to Bermuda law.
If the Scheme of Arrangement becomes effective, Validus will
effect the Acquisition of IPC by the transfer of all outstanding
IPC Shares (excluding any IPC Shares beneficially owned by
Validus or its subsidiaries or IPC) to Validus in exchange for
Validus Shares at a ratio of 1.2037 Validus Shares (together
with cash in lieu of the fractional Validus Share interest to
which such shareholders would otherwise be entitled) for each
IPC Share. IPC would thereby become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Validus.
If the Exchange Offer is consummated, each outstanding IPC Share
which is validly tendered and not withdrawn before the
expiration time of the Exchange Offer will be exchanged for
1.2037 Validus Shares. The Exchange Offer is subject to the
condition, among others, that a minimum of 90% of the then
outstanding IPC Shares on a fully-diluted basis be tendered
(excluding any IPC Shares beneficially owned by Validus, its
subsidiaries or IPC). If this condition is satisfied and the
Exchange Offer is completed, Validus intends, after
completion of the Exchange Offer, to acquire the IPC Shares of
those shareholders who choose not to tender their IPC Shares
pursuant to the Exchange Offer, in accordance with the Companies
Act.
Assuming closing of the Acquisition, based on Validus
capitalization as of December 31, 2008 and the exchange
ratio of 1.2037, Validus would issue 67,338,947 Validus Shares
in connection with the Acquisition and IPC shareholders would
own approximately 43% of the issued and outstanding common
shares of Validus on a
fully-diluted basis. The Validus Amalgamation Agreement is
attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. You should
read the Validus Amalgamation Agreement in its entirety because
it, and not this proxy statement, is the legal document that
would govern the amalgamation.
-17-
Completing
the Acquisition
On March 31, 2009, Validus announced that it had delivered
to IPC the Validus Amalgamation Offer. In connection with the
delivery of the Validus Amalgamation Offer to IPC, Validus also
delivered a copy of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement signed by
Validus so that, upon a termination of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement, IPC would be able to sign Validus Amalgamation
Agreement with the certainty of an agreed transaction. IPC
announced on April 7, 2009 that its board of directors has
determined that the Validus Amalgamation Offer does not
constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation
and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
Additionally, Max has not released IPC from the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that
prevents IPC from even discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer
with Validus. Therefore, in order to consummate the Acquisition
without the cooperation of IPCs board of directors,
Validus is pursuing a three-part plan.
First, Validus is asking IPC shareholders to vote
against the Proposed Max Amalgamation. If the Proposed Max Amalgamation is voted down by
IPC shareholders, IPC would be able to terminate the Max
Amalgamation Agreement and accept the Validus Amalgamation Offer.
Second, Validus intends to commence in the near future the
Exchange Offer for all of the outstanding IPC Shares. The
Exchange Offer would allow Validus to complete the Acquisition
of IPC shortly following the IPC annual general meeting, if the
IPC shareholders vote down the Proposed Max Amalgamation and the
other conditions to the Exchange Offer are satisfied. Under the
terms of the Exchange Offer, IPC shareholders would receive
1.2037 Validus Shares for each IPC Share. The Exchange Offer
will be subject to certain conditions described in the Offer to
Exchange filed by Validus with the SEC, including the tender of
at least 90% of the total outstanding IPC Shares (on a fully
diluted basis), termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement,
and the consent of Validus lenders. Under Bermuda law, if
Validus acquires 90% or more of IPC Shares in the Exchange
Offer, Validus will have the right to acquire the remaining IPC
Shares in a second-step acquisition under Bermuda law. The
Exchange Offer will not be conditioned on regulatory approvals
or the elimination of the possible termination fee to Max.
Third, Validus intends to petition the Supreme Court of Bermuda
to approve the Scheme of Arrangement under which Validus would
acquire all IPC Shares under the same economic terms as in the
Validus Amalgamation Offer. The Scheme of Arrangement can be
accomplished without the approval of IPCs
board of directors if approved by IPC shareholders
at two shareholder meetings and sanctioned by the Supreme Court
of Bermuda. The first shareholder meeting is the court-ordered
IPC meeting at which IPC shareholders can vote to approve the
Scheme of Arrangement. In addition, if IPCs board of
directors continues to be uncooperative despite shareholder
approval at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC shareholders can
call the IPC special general meeting at which IPC shareholders
can require IPC to approve and be bound by the Scheme of
Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
Following IPC shareholder approval at both of these meetings,
and approval by the Supreme Court of Bermuda, the Scheme of
Arrangement would become effective and IPC would become a
subsidiary of Validus. The Scheme of Arrangement would be
approved with the vote of a majority in number of the holders of
IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC
Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy. The required vote at the second meeting is
an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of IPC Shares
voting at the meeting.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to
acquire all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the same
economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these transaction
structures can be pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek
to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines
is most effective and efficient.
Recommendations
of the Validus Board of Directors
Validus board of directors has adopted the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement and authorized and approved the Share
Issuance, and deems it fair, advisable and in the best interests
of Validus to consummate the Share Issuance, the Acquisition and
the other transactions contemplated thereby. Validus board
of directors
-18-
recommends that Validus shareholders vote FOR the
proposals submitted to Validus shareholders on the attached
Validus proxy card.
Reasons
Why Validus Board of Directors Recommends Approval of the
Share Issuance
(page 67)
Validus board of directors recommends approval of the
Share Issuance in order to issue shares that are necessary to
effect the Acquisition. Validus board of directors
believes that the Acquisition represents a compelling
combination and excellent strategic fit that will enable Validus
to capitalize on opportunities in the global reinsurance market.
The Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the
superior growth potential of Validus that would be a leading
carrier in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and insurance
markets, with a strong balance sheet and quality diversification
in profitable business lines.
In reaching these conclusions and in determining that the Share
Issuance is fair, advisable and in the best interests of
Validus, and in recommending the approval of the Share Issuance,
Validus board of directors consulted with Validus
management as well as legal and financial advisors and
considered a number of factors. Those factors included, but were
not limited to, those set forth under The
Acquisition Reasons Why Validus Board of
Directors Recommends Approval of the Share Issuance below.
Opinion
of Validus Financial Advisor
(page 70)
Validus board of directors received an oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, from Greenhill &
Co., LLC, who we refer to as Greenhill, that,
based upon and subject to the various limitations and
assumptions described in the written opinion, as of
March 31, 2009, the exchange ratio pursuant to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement was fair, from a financial point of view,
to Validus.
The full text of the written opinion of Greenhill, dated
March 31, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limits on the opinion and the review undertaken in connection
with rendering the opinion, is attached as Annex B to this
proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Validus
shareholders are urged to read the opinion in its entirety, but
should note that it is not a recommendation as to how Validus
shareholders should vote with respect to the issuance of Validus
Shares pursuant to the Acquisition or any other matter.
Dividends
and Distributions
(page 78)
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash
dividend. Under the terms of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement,
before the amalgamation closes, Validus and IPC would both be
permitted to declare and pay ordinary course quarterly dividends
on their common shares with record and payment dates consistent
with past practice; provided that any such dividend is at
a rate no greater than the rate it paid during the fiscal
quarter immediately preceding the date of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, i.e., $0.20 per common share in
Validus case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs case.
Pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, Validus and IPC
would agree to coordinate the declaration of, and setting of
record dates and payment dates for, dividends on Validus common
shares and IPC common shares so that the IPC shareholders do not
receive dividends on both the IPC common shares and the Validus
Shares received in the amalgamation in respect of any calendar
quarter or fail to receive a dividend in respect of any calendar
quarter.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
(page 78)
The Acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (FAS 141(R)),
under
which the total consideration paid in the Acquisition will be
allocated among acquired tangible and intangible assets and
assumed liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event
there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition over the fair values, the excess will be accounted
for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting
from the Acquisition will not be amortized but instead
-19-
will be tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently
if certain indicators are present). In the event that management
of Validus determines that the value of goodwill has become
impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal
quarter in which such determination is made. In the event there
is an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition, the excess will be accounted in accordance with
FAS 141(R). The excess resulting from the Acquisition will
be recognized in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer
on the acquisition date. Validus anticipates the Acquisition
will result in an excess of the fair values of the acquired
assets and liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid
in the Acquisition.
The
Amalgamation Agreement
(page 79)
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement is attached as
Annex A to this proxy statement. This description of the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement assumes that it is signed by IPC
in the form delivered by Validus to IPC. You should read the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement in its entirety because it, and
not this proxy statement, is the legal document that would
govern the amalgamation if it were signed by IPC.
In response to IPCs rejection of the Validus Amalgamation
Offer, Validus is engaging in efforts to move forward with the
transaction without IPCs cooperation. These efforts will
necessitate certain changes to the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement which are not material to Validus or IPC shareholders.
For example, the Validus Amalgamation Agreement contemplates
Validus and IPC would cooperate in the preparation and filing of
a joint proxy statement/prospectus regarding the amalgamation
which would have included soliciting the votes we are seeking by
this proxy statement. Certain other provisions regarding timing
and process would need to be updated similarly.
Amalgamation
Consideration
(page 80)
Under the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, each outstanding IPC
Share (including any shares held by IPC shareholders that do not
vote in favor of the amalgamation, but excluding any dissenting
shares as to which appraisal rights have been exercised pursuant
to Bermuda law, and including any shares held by Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries) will
be cancelled and converted into the right to receive 1.2037
Validus Shares upon closing of the amalgamation and cash
consideration in lieu of any fractional Validus Shares.
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the amalgamation. Instead, any IPC shareholder
who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
Validus Share in connection with the amalgamation will be paid
an amount in cash determined by multiplying such fraction by the
average Validus price (such average Validus common share price
is determined by valuing Validus common shares based on the
volume weighted average price per Validus common share on the
NYSE for the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding
the second trading day prior to the closing of the amalgamation).
Restrictions
on Change in Recommendation by the Board of Directors of IPC or
Validus
(page 86)
Pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, the boards of
directors of IPC or Validus may not withdraw or modify, in any
manner adverse to the other party, its recommendations in
connection with the amalgamation except if such board has
concluded in good faith, after consultation with its outside
counsel and financial advisors, that such action is reasonably
likely to be required in order for the directors to comply with
their fiduciary duties under applicable law, and such party has
not materially breached its obligations with respect to changing
its recommendation. Before a party can change its recommendation
with respect to the amalgamation, it must provide advance
written notice of such change to the other party and give the
other party five business days to agree to alter the terms and
conditions of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement in a manner
that removes the need for the applicable board of directors to
change its recommendation in order to prevent a breach of its
fiduciary duties. Even if IPC or Validus has had a change in
recommendation, each will still be required to submit such
matters to the respective shareholders meeting. See The
Amalgamation Agreement Restrictions on Change in
Recommendation by the Boards of Directors of IPC or Validus
below.
-20-
Restrictions
on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC
(page 86)
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement precludes IPC and its
subsidiaries and advisors from, directly or indirectly,
initiating, soliciting, encouraging or facilitating (including
by providing information) any effort or attempt to make or
implement any proposal or offer with respect to an amalgamation,
reorganization, consolidation, business combination or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any
purchase or sale involving 10% or more of its consolidated
assets (including, without limitation, shares of its
subsidiaries), or 10% or more of its total voting power or the
voting power of any of its subsidiaries. There is no
fiduciary duty exception to this restriction. IPC
may withdraw or modify its recommendation as described under
The Amalgamation Agreement Restrictions on Change
in Recommendation by the Boards of Directors of IPC or Validus below. See
The Amalgamation Agreement Restrictions on
Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC below.
Conditions
to the Amalgamation (page 89)
Validus and IPCs respective obligations to complete
the amalgamation are subject to the fulfillment or waiver (by
both Validus and IPC) of certain conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
receipt of the required Validus shareholder approval of the
Share Issuance and the required IPC vote to adopt the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement and approve the amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
approval for listing on the NYSE of the Validus Shares to be
issued or reserved for issuance in connection with the
amalgamation, subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
certain regulatory filings, approvals or exemptions will have
been made, will have occurred or will have been obtained;
|
|
|
|
a registration statement registering the shares to be issued in
the amalgamation will have become effective under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and will not be the subject of any stop
order or proceedings seeking a stop order;
|
|
|
|
no injunction or other legal restraints or prohibitions
preventing the consummation of the amalgamation will be in
effect;
|
|
|
|
subject to the materiality standards provided in the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, the representations and warranties of
each other party in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement will be
true and correct, and each party will have performed its
obligations under the Validus Amalgamation Agreement (and each
party will have received a certificate from the other party to
such effect);
|
|
|
|
no governmental entity will have imposed any term, condition,
obligation or restriction that would reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on Validus and its subsidiaries
(including the amalgamated entity) after the effective time of
the amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
each of IPC and Validus will have received a tax opinion with
respect to certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the amalgamation.
|
Validus obligation to complete the amalgamation is also
subject to the fulfillment or waiver (by Validus) of the
following condition:
|
|
|
|
|
all amendments or waivers under (x) IPCs credit
facilities and (y) Validus credit facilities, in each
case, as determined by Validus to be necessary to consummate the
amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated thereby,
shall be in full force and effect.
|
At any time prior to the effective time of the amalgamation, the
parties may, to the extent legally permissible, waive compliance
with any of the conditions contained in the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, as described under The Amalgamation
Agreement Amendments and Waivers Under the
Amalgamation Agreement below.
-21-
Termination
of the Amalgamation Agreement
(page 90)
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement may be terminated, at any
time prior to the effective time of the amalgamation, by mutual
written consent of IPC and Validus, and, subject to certain
limitations described in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, by
either IPC or Validus, if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
a regulatory approval required by the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement to be obtained has been denied or any governmental
authority has taken any action permanently restraining or
prohibiting the amalgamation, and such denial or action has
become final and non-appealable (unless the failure to complete
the amalgamation by that date is due to a breach by the party
seeking to terminate the Validus Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the amalgamation has not been consummated on or before the later
of (x) November 30, 2009 or (
y) the date that is
five months after the date the Validus Amalgamation Agreement is
executed by all parties (unless the failure to complete the
amalgamation by that date is due to a breach by the party
seeking to terminate the Validus Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the other partys board of directors has (1) changed
its recommendation to its shareholders, (2) failed to
include such recommendation in this proxy statement, or
(3) with respect to IPC only, materially breached certain
of the non-solicitation obligations applicable to it under the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the other party has breached a covenant, agreement,
representation or warranty that would preclude the satisfaction
of certain closing conditions and such breach is not remedied in
the 45 days following written notice to the breaching party
or is not capable of being so remedied;
|
|
|
|
the Validus shareholders have not approved any of the matters
for which their approval is solicited for the required Validus
vote or the IPC shareholders have not approved and adopted the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement and approved the amalgamation at
the IPC shareholders meeting;
|
|
|
|
the other partys good-faith estimate of such partys
book value as of the day prior to the requesting partys
shareholder meeting indicates that since December 31, 2008,
either (1) the other partys book value has declined
by more than 50%, or (2) the other partys book value
has declined by more than 20 percentage points greater than
the decline in the terminating partys book value during
the same period (with any increase in a partys book value
since December 31, 2008, deemed to be no change for
purposes of measuring the 20 percentage point differential).
|
In addition, Validus may terminate the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement if the total number of dissenting IPC Shares for which
appraisal rights have been properly exercised in accordance with
Bermuda law exceeds 15% of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares
on the business day immediately following the last day on which
IPC shareholders can require appraisal of their common shares.
See The Amalgamation Agreement Termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement.
Effects
of Termination, Remedies
(page 91)
If either of the parties terminates the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, the non-terminating party will be required to pay the
other a termination fee of $16 million in certain
circumstances, as described under The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Effects of Termination; Remedies below.
-22-
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF VALIDUS
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to Validus. The financial data has been
derived from Validus annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the (Validus
10-K).
You should not take historical results as necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any future period. This
financial data should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and the related notes and other financial information
contained in the Validus
10-K, which
is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. More
comprehensive financial information, including
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,
is contained in the
Validus
10-K, and
the following summary is qualified in its entirety by reference
to the Validus
10-K and all
of the financial information and notes contained in the Validus
10-K. See
Where You Can Find More Information on
page 104.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
988,637
|
|
|
$
|
540,789
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(124,160
|
)
|
|
|
(70,210
|
)
|
|
|
(63,696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
1,238,324
|
|
|
|
918,427
|
|
|
|
477,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
(60,348
|
)
|
|
|
(170,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
1,256,518
|
|
|
|
858,079
|
|
|
|
306,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
139,528
|
|
|
|
112,324
|
|
|
|
58,021
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses) on investments
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
1,608
|
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
Net unrealized gains on investments(2)
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
|
|
12,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(49,397
|
)
|
|
|
6,696
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,279,367
|
|
|
|
994,372
|
|
|
|
365,590
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
772,154
|
|
|
|
283,993
|
|
|
|
91,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
234,951
|
|
|
|
134,277
|
|
|
|
36,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses(1)
|
|
|
123,948
|
|
|
|
100,765
|
|
|
|
38,354
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
Share compensation expenses
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
16,189
|
|
|
|
7,878
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
57,318
|
|
|
|
51,754
|
|
|
|
8,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
49,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
1,215,468
|
|
|
|
589,871
|
|
|
|
182,493
|
|
|
|
51,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before taxes
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
404,501
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
(49,708
|
)
|
Taxes
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
(1,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
53,111
|
|
|
|
402,996
|
|
|
|
183,097
|
|
|
|
(49,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains arising during the period(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
144
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(7,809
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for reclassification of losses realized in income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
45,302
|
|
|
$
|
402,947
|
|
|
$
|
183,867
|
|
|
$
|
(49,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-23-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Earnings per share(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
65,068,093
|
|
|
|
58,477,130
|
|
|
|
58,423,174
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
67,786,673
|
|
|
|
58,874,567
|
|
|
|
58,423,174
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
3.13
|
|
|
$
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
5.95
|
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
$
|
(0.85
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected financial ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses ratio(4)
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Policy acquisition cost ratio(5)
|
|
|
18.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense ratio(6)
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
13.3.
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio(7)
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio(8)
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
56.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average equity(9)
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth summarized balance sheet data as
of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
Summary Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,831,537
|
|
|
$
|
2,662,021
|
|
|
$
|
1,376,387
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
449,848
|
|
|
|
444,698
|
|
|
|
63,643
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,322,480
|
|
|
|
4,144,224
|
|
|
|
1,646,423
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
1,305,303
|
|
|
|
926,117
|
|
|
|
77,363
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
539,450
|
|
|
|
557,344
|
|
|
|
178,824
|
|
Junior subordinated deferrable debentures
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,383,746
|
|
|
|
2,209,424
|
|
|
|
453,900
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
|
1,934,800
|
|
|
|
1,192,523
|
|
Book value per common share(10)
|
|
|
25.64
|
|
|
|
26.08
|
|
|
|
20.39
|
|
Diluted book value per common share(11)
|
|
|
23.78
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
19.73
|
|
NM Not meaningful
|
|
|
(1) |
|
General and administrative expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 include $4,000,000 and
$1,000,000 respectively, related to our Advisory Agreement with
Aquiline. Our Advisory Agreement with Aquiline terminated upon
completion of our IPO, in connection with which Validus recorded
general and administrative expense of $3,000,000 in the year
ended December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Validus has early adopted FAS 157 and FAS 159 as of
January 1, 2007 and elected the fair value option on all
securities previously accounted for as available-for-sale.
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments at
December 31, 2006 of $875,000, previously included in
accumulated other comprehensive income, were treated as a
cumulative-effect adjustment as of January 1, 2007. The
cumulative-effect adjustment transferred the balance of
unrealized gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive
income to retained earnings and has no impact on the results of
operations for the annual |
-24-
|
|
|
|
|
or interim periods beginning January 1, 2007. Validus
investments were accounted for as trading for the annual or
interim periods beginning January 1, 2007 and as such all
unrealized gains and losses are included in net income. |
|
(3) |
|
FAS 123R requires that any unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense that will be recorded in future periods be
included as proceeds for purposes of treasury stock repurchases,
which is applied against the unvested restricted shares balance.
On March 1, 2007 we effected a 1.75 for one reverse stock
split of our outstanding common shares. The stock split does not
affect our financial statements other than to the extent it
decreases the number of outstanding shares and correspondingly
increases per share information for all periods presented. The
share consolidation has been reflected retroactively in these
financial statements. |
|
(4) |
|
The loss and loss expense ratio is calculated by dividing losses
and loss expenses by net premiums earned. |
|
(5) |
|
The policy acquisition cost ratio is calculated by dividing
policy acquisition costs by net premiums earned. |
|
(6) |
|
The general and administrative expense ratio is calculated by
dividing the sum of general and administrative expenses and
share compensation expenses by net premiums earned. The general
and administrative expense ratio for the year ended
December 31, 2007 is calculated by dividing the total of
general and administrative expenses plus share compensation
expenses less the $3,000,000 Aquiline termination fee by net
premiums earned. |
|
(7) |
|
The expense ratio is calculated by combining the policy
acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative
expense ratio. |
|
(8) |
|
The combined ratio is calculated by combining the loss ratio,
the policy acquisition cost ratio and the general and
administrative expense ratio. |
|
(9) |
|
Return on average equity is calculated by dividing the net
income for the period by the average shareholders equity
during the period. Annual average shareholders equity is
the average of the beginning, ending and intervening quarter end
shareholders equity balances. |
|
(10) |
|
Book value per common share is defined as total
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding as at the end of the period, giving no effect to
dilutive securities. |
|
(11) |
|
Diluted book value per common share is calculated based on total
shareholders equity plus the assumed proceeds from the
exercise of outstanding options and warrants, divided by the sum
of common shares, unvested restricted shares, options and
warrants out-standing (assuming their exercise). Diluted book
value per common share is a Non-GAAP financial measure as
described under Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Measures in the Validus
10-K. |
-25-
SELECTED
HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA OF IPC
The following disclosure is taken from IPCs annual report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, except in respect of
diluted book value per common share (as discussed in footnote 5
below). See Sources of Additional Information above.
Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated
financial data relating to IPC. The financial data has been
derived from IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. You should not take
historical results as necessarily indicative of the results that
may be expected for any future period.
This financial data should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and the related notes and other financial
information contained in IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is incorporated
by reference into this proxy statement. More comprehensive
financial information, including Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of
Operations, is contained in other documents filed by IPC
with the SEC, and the following summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such other documents and all of the
financial information and notes contained in those documents.
See Where You Can Find More Information on
page 104.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(In thousand, except per share amounts)
|
|
Statement of Income (Loss) Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
404,096
|
|
|
$
|
429,851
|
|
|
$
|
472,387
|
|
|
$
|
378,409
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
387,367
|
|
|
|
391,385
|
|
|
|
397,132
|
|
|
|
452,522
|
|
|
|
354,882
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
94,105
|
|
|
|
121,842
|
|
|
|
109,659
|
|
|
|
71,757
|
|
|
|
51,220
|
|
Net (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(168,208
|
)
|
|
|
67,555
|
|
|
|
12,085
|
|
|
|
(10,556
|
)
|
|
|
5,946
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
5,234
|
|
|
|
4,296
|
|
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred
|
|
|
155,632
|
|
|
|
124,923
|
|
|
|
58,505
|
|
|
|
1,072,662
|
|
|
|
215,608
|
|
Net acquisition costs
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
|
|
39,856
|
|
|
|
37,542
|
|
|
|
39,249
|
|
|
|
37,682
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,314
|
|
|
|
30,510
|
|
|
|
34,436
|
|
|
|
27,466
|
|
|
|
23,151
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange loss (gain)
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
|
|
1,167
|
|
|
|
(2,635
|
)
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
90,447
|
|
|
$
|
385,412
|
|
|
$
|
394,585
|
|
|
$
|
(623,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
138,613
|
|
Preferred dividend
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
17,128
|
|
|
|
17,176
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss), available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
75,508
|
|
|
$
|
368,284
|
|
|
$
|
377,409
|
|
|
$
|
(626,063
|
)
|
|
$
|
438,613
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
5.53
|
|
|
$
|
5.54
|
|
|
$
|
(12.30
|
)
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding(1)
|
|
|
59,301,939
|
|
|
|
69,728,229
|
|
|
|
71,212,287
|
|
|
|
50,901,296
|
|
|
|
48,376,865
|
|
Cash dividend per common share
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.64
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense ratio(2)
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
237.0
|
%
|
|
|
60.8
|
%
|
Expense ratio(2)
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
Combined ratio(2)
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
|
|
251.8
|
%
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
Return on average equity(3)
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)%
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
-26-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(In thousand, except per share amounts)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and investments
|
|
$
|
2,235,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,473,244
|
|
|
$
|
2,485,525
|
|
|
$
|
2,560,146
|
|
|
$
|
1,901,094
|
|
Reinsurance premiums receivable
|
|
|
108,033
|
|
|
|
91,393
|
|
|
|
113,811
|
|
|
|
180,798
|
|
|
|
85,086
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,388,688
|
|
|
|
2,627,691
|
|
|
|
2,645,429
|
|
|
|
2,778,281
|
|
|
|
2,028,290
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
355,893
|
|
|
|
395,245
|
|
|
|
548,627
|
|
|
|
1,072,056
|
|
|
|
274,463
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
85,473
|
|
|
|
75,980
|
|
|
|
80,043
|
|
|
|
66,311
|
|
|
|
68,465
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
537,741
|
|
|
|
501,946
|
|
|
|
654,474
|
|
|
|
1,161,881
|
|
|
|
359,851
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,850,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,125,745
|
|
|
$
|
1,990,955
|
|
|
$
|
1,616,400
|
|
|
$
|
1,668,439
|
|
Diluted book value per common share(4)
|
|
$
|
32.85
|
(5)
|
|
$
|
32.42
|
|
|
$
|
27.94
|
|
|
$
|
22.26
|
|
|
$
|
34.44
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income per common share is calculated upon the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the relevant
year. The weighted average number of shares includes common
shares and the dilutive effect of employee stock options and
stock grants, using the treasury stock method and convertible
preferred shares. The net loss per common share for the year
ended December 31, 2005 is calculated on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding
the anti-dilutive effect of employee stock options, stock grants
and convertible preferred shares. The net income per common
share for the year ended December 31, 2008 is calculated on
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the
year, excluding the anti-dilutive effect of stock-based
compensation and convertible preferred shares. |
|
(2) |
|
The loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is calculated by
dividing the net losses and loss expenses incurred by the net
premiums earned. The expense ratio is calculated by dividing the
sum of acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses
by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the
loss and loss expense ratio and the expense ratio. |
|
(3) |
|
Return on average equity is calculated as the annual net income
(loss), available to common shareholders divided by the average
of the common shareholders equity, which is total
shareholders equity, excluding convertible preferred
shares, on the first and last day of the respective year. |
|
(4) |
|
Diluted book value per common share is calculated as
shareholders equity divided by the number of common shares
outstanding on the balance sheet date, after considering the
dilutive effects of stock-based compensation, calculated using
the treasury stock method. At December 31, 2008 the average
weighted number of shares outstanding, including the dilutive
effect of employee stock-based compensation and convertible
preferred shares (which were converted on November 15,
2008) using the treasury stock method was 59,301,939. |
|
(5) |
|
IPC reported diluted book value per common share as $33.07 in
its annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and amended it to
$32.85 in the first amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4. |
-27-
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION
You should read the following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information in conjunction with the Validus 10-K and IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma financial information for the year ended December 31,
2008 is intended to provide you with information about how the
Acquisition of IPC might have affected the historical financial
statements of Validus if the Acquisition had been consummated as
of December 31, 2008. For a summary of the proposed
business combination contemplated by the Acquisition, see the
section of this proxy statement entitled The
Acquisition. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro
forma financial information has been prepared using IPCs publicly
available financial statements and disclosures, without the
benefit of inspection of IPCs books and records.
Therefore, certain pro forma adjustments, such as recording fair
value of assets and liabilities and adjustments for consistency
of accounting policy, are not reflected in these unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial statements. The
following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information does not necessarily reflect the financial position
or results of operations that would have actually resulted had
the Acquisition occurred as of the dates indicated, nor should
they be taken as necessarily indicative of the future financial
position or results of operations of Validus.
The following table presents unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma balance sheet data at December 31, 2008
(expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and
per share data).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, at fair value
|
|
$
|
2,454,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,793,020
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,247,521
|
|
Short-term investments, at fair value
|
|
|
377,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,036
|
|
Equity investments, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,147
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
449,848
|
|
|
|
77,020
|
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
3(a)
|
|
|
441,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and cash
|
|
|
3,281,385
|
|
|
|
2,235,187
|
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
5,431,572
|
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
408,259
|
|
|
|
108,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,292
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
108,156
|
|
|
|
9,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,497
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
22,459
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,624
|
|
Securities lending collateral
|
|
|
98,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,954
|
|
Loss reserves recoverable
|
|
|
208,796
|
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,567
|
|
Paid losses recoverable
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
Net receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
20,433
|
|
|
|
27,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,150
|
|
Current taxes recoverable
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
127,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,217
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,393
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
23,185
|
|
|
|
3,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,322,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,688
|
|
|
$
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,626,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Historical IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
$
|
539,450
|
|
|
$
|
85,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
624,923
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expense
|
|
|
1,305,303
|
|
|
|
355,893
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,661,196
|
|
Reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
33,042
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,670
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
21,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,779
|
|
Securities lending payable
|
|
|
105,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,688
|
|
Bank loan payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
74,184
|
|
|
|
20,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,931
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,383,746
|
|
|
|
537,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,921,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
13,235
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
11,328
|
|
|
3(a), 3(b), 3(c)
|
|
|
25,124
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,412,635
|
|
|
|
1,089,002
|
|
|
|
591,431
|
|
|
3(a), 3(b), 3(c)
|
|
|
3,093,068
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(7,858
|
)
|
|
|
(876
|
)
|
|
|
876
|
|
|
3(c)
|
|
|
(7,858
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
520,722
|
|
|
|
762,260
|
|
|
|
(688,635
|
)
|
|
3(a), 3(c), 3(e)
|
|
|
594,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
|
1,850,947
|
|
|
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
3,704,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,322,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,388,688
|
|
|
$
|
(85,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,626,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
75,624,697
|
|
|
|
55,943,297
|
|
|
|
67,338,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,963,644
|
|
Common shares and common share equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
90,091,403
|
|
|
|
56,440,530
|
|
|
|
67,937,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,028,870
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
25.64
|
|
|
$
|
33.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
25.91
|
|
Diluted book value per share
|
|
$
|
23.78
|
|
|
$
|
32.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
$
|
24.73
|
|
Diluted tangible book value per share
|
|
$
|
22.14
|
|
|
$
|
32.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
23.80
|
|
-29-
The following table sets forth unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma results of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (expressed in thousands of
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Notes
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
(d)
|
|
$
|
1,765,628
|
|
Reinsurance premiums ceded
|
|
|
(124,160
|
)
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
3
|
(d)
|
|
|
(130,031
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
1,238,324
|
|
|
|
397,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635,597
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
18,194
|
|
|
|
(9,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
1,256,518
|
|
|
|
387,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,643,885
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
139,528
|
|
|
|
94,105
|
|
|
|
(2,438
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
(a)
|
|
|
231,195
|
|
Realized gain on repurchase of debentures
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,752
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
(168,208
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169,799
|
)
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on investments
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,707
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,264
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,329
|
|
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
|
|
|
(49,397
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,279,367
|
|
|
|
311,481
|
|
|
|
(2,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,588,410
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expense
|
|
|
772,154
|
|
|
|
155,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927,786
|
|
Policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
234,951
|
|
|
|
36,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,380
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
123,948
|
|
|
|
20,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,637
|
|
Share compensation expense
|
|
|
27,097
|
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,722
|
|
Finance expenses
|
|
|
57,318
|
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
(1,215,468
|
)
|
|
|
(221,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,436,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
63,899
|
|
|
|
90,447
|
|
|
|
(2,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,908
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
$
|
53,111
|
|
|
$
|
90,447
|
|
|
$
|
(2,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred dividend and warrant dividend
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
|
|
14,939
|
|
|
|
(14,939
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
(f)
|
|
|
6,947
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
46,164
|
|
|
$
|
75,508
|
|
|
$
|
12,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares and common share
equivalents outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
52,124,034
|
|
|
|
67,338,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,016,850
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
59,301,939
|
|
|
|
67,937,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,756,880
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-30-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Statements
(unaudited)
(Expressed
in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share
data)
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information gives effect to the proposed Acquisition as if it
had occurred at December 31, 2008 for the purposes of the
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet and at
January 1, 2008 for the purposes of the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma statement of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information has been prepared
by Validus management and is based on Validus
historical consolidated financial statements and IPCs
historical consolidated financial statements. Certain amounts
from IPCs historical consolidated financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the Validus presentation.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
statements have been prepared using IPCs publicly
available financial statements and disclosures, without the
benefit of inspection of IPCs books and records or
discussion with the IPC management team. Therefore, certain pro
forma adjustments, such as recording fair value of assets and
liabilities and adjustments for consistency of accounting
policy, are not reflected in these unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial statements. Additional
reclassifications of IPC data to conform to the Validus
presentation may also be required.
This unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information is prepared in conformity with US GAAP. The
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and the unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2008 have been prepared using the following
information:
(a) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of
Validus as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008;
(b) Audited historical consolidated financial statements of
IPC as of December 31, 2008 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008;
(c) Such other known supplementary information as
considered necessary to reflect the Acquisition in the unaudited
condensed consolidated pro forma financial information.
The pro forma adjustments reflecting the Acquisition of IPC
under the purchase method of accounting are based on certain
estimates and assumptions. The unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma adjustments may be revised as additional information
becomes available. The actual adjustments upon consummation of
the Acquisition and the allocation of the final purchase price
of IPC will depend on a number of factors, including additional
financial information available at such time, changes in values
and changes in IPCs operating results between the date of
preparation of this unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma
financial information and the effective date of the Acquisition.
Therefore, it is likely that the actual adjustments will differ
from the pro forma adjustments and it is possible the
differences may be material. Validus management believes
that its assumptions provide a reasonable basis for presenting
all of the significant effects of the transactions contemplated
based on information available to Validus at the time and that
the pro forma adjustments give appropriate effect to those
assumptions and are properly applied in the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma financial information.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information does not include any financial benefits, revenue
enhancements or operating expense efficiencies arising from the
Acquisition. In addition, the unaudited condensed consolidated
pro forma financial information does not include any additional
expenses that may result from the IPC Acquisition. Estimated
costs of the transaction as well as the benefit of the negative
goodwill have been reflected in the unaudited condensed
consolidated pro forma balance sheets, but have not been
included on the pro forma income statement due to their
non-recurring nature.
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information is not intended to reflect the results of operations
or the financial position that would have resulted had the
Acquisition been effected on
-31-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
the dates indicated and if the companies had been managed as one
entity. The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information should be read in conjunction with Validus
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
2.
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
which is effective for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15,
2008. On April 1, 2009 the FASB finalized and issued FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 which amended and clarified FAS 141(R)
and is effective for business combinations whose acquisition
date is on or after January 1, 2009.
FSP FAS 141(R)-1 has amended FAS 141(R)s
guidance on the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent
measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets acquired
and liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise
from contingencies.
Significant changes arising from FAS 141(R) and FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 and impacting these pro forma financial
statements include the determination of the purchase price,
treatment of transaction expenses, restructuring costs and
negative goodwill as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Price Previously, the date the business
combination was announced could be used as the effective date in
determining the purchase price. Under FAS 141(R), the
purchase price is determined as of the acquisition date, which
is the date that the acquirer obtains control;
|
|
|
|
Transaction Expenses Previously, costs associated
with purchase transactions could be capitalized and included as
part of transaction purchase price, adding to the amount of
goodwill recognized. Under FAS 141(R), all such costs must
be expensed as incurred;
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Costs Previously, restructuring costs
that were planned to occur after the closing of the transaction
were recognized and recorded at the closing date as a liability.
Under FAS 141(R), expected restructuring costs are not
recorded at the closing date, but rather after the transaction.
The only costs to be included as a liability at the closing
date, and therefore included as transaction costs,
are those for which an acquirer is obligated at the time of the
closing; and
|
|
|
|
Negative Goodwill/Bargain Purchases Previously, if
the total fair value of net assets acquired (assets less
liabilities assumed) exceeded the consideration paid, there was
a pro rata reduction of the assets assumed to allow the net
assets acquired to equal the consideration paid. Under
FAS 141(R), instead of allocating this negative
goodwill to reduce the carrying value of assets assumed,
the acquirer will book a gain as a result of the bargain
purchase, to be recognized through the income statement at the
close of the transaction.
|
On March 31, 2009, Validus announced that it delivered an
offer letter (the Offer Letter) to the Board of
Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC) pursuant to
which Validus and IPC would amalgamate (the
Amalgamation) in a share-for-share exchange valuing
IPC Shares at an 18.0% premium to IPCs closing market
price on March 30, 2009, subject to the terms and
conditions set forth in the Offer Letter and in an Agreement and
Plan of Amalgamation (the Amalgamation Agreement)
that was signed by Validus and delivered to IPC with the Offer
Letter.
Validus proposed an amalgamation with IPC at an exchange ratio
of 1.2037 Validus Shares per outstanding IPC Share, providing a
value per IPC Share of $29.98 or an 18.0% premium to IPCs
closing share price as of March 30, 2009 (the date
immediately preceding the deliverance of the Offer Letter).
-32-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
The Board of Directors of Validus has unanimously approved the
submission of its offer and the delivery of the signed
Amalgamation Agreement so that, upon a termination of IPCs
Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation with Max Capital Group Ltd.,
dated as of March 1, 2009 and amended as of March 5,
2009 (the Max Plan of Amalgamation), IPC will be
able to sign the Amalgamation Agreement with the certainty of an
agreed transaction. Validus offer is structured as a
tax-free share-for-share transaction and does not require any
external financing. It is not conditioned on due diligence. As
of the date of this proxy statement, we have not withdrawn our
offer, but have reserved the right to do so.
On April 30, 2009, Validus announced a three-part plan to
acquire IPC. The three-part plan, involves (1) soliciting IPC
shareholders to vote against the Proposed Max Amalgamation,
(2) commencing an exchange offer for all IPC Shares and
(3) petitioning the Supreme Court of Bermuda to approve a Scheme
of Arrangement under Bermuda Law.
In connection with the IPC Acquisition, transaction costs
currently estimated at $35,000 will be incurred and expensed. Of
this amount, $15,000 relates to Validus expenses as set forth in
The Amalgamation Sources of Funds, Fees and
Expenses and $20,000 is our estimate of IPCs
expenses based on the IPC/Max
S-4. In
addition, upon termination of IPCs Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation with Max Capital Group Ltd., a
break-up fee
of $50,000 (the Max Termination Fee) will be
incurred and expensed.
As discussed above, these pro forma purchase adjustments are
based on certain estimates and assumptions made as of the date
of the unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
information. The actual adjustments will depend on a number of
factors, including changes in the estimated fair value of net
balance sheet assets and operating results of IPC between
December 31, 2008 and the effective date of the
Acquisition. Validus expects to make such adjustments at the
effective date of the Acquisition. These adjustments are likely
to be different from the adjustments made to prepare the
unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial information
and such differences may be material.
The share prices for both Validus and IPC used in determining
the preliminary estimated purchase price are based on the
closing share prices on March 30, 2009 (the date
immediately preceding the deliverance of the Offer Letter). The
preliminary total purchase price is calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of Total Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
IPC common shares outstanding as of February 23, 2009
|
|
|
55,943,297
|
|
IPC Shares issued pursuant to option exercises
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
IPC Shares issued following vesting of restricted shares, RSUs
and PSUs
|
|
|
493,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IPC common shares prior to transaction
|
|
|
56,440,530
|
|
Exchange ratio
|
|
|
1.2037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Validus common shares to be issued
|
|
|
67,937,467
|
|
Validus closing share price on March 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
24.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price(a)
|
|
$
|
1,692,322
|
|
The allocation of the purchase price is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Purchase Price
|
|
|
|
|
IPC shareholders equity(b)
|
|
$
|
1,850,947
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
1,692,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative goodwill (a b)
|
|
$
|
158,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In connection with the IPC Acquisition, 67,937,467 shares
are expected to be issued resulting in additional share capital
of $11,889 and Additional Paid-In Capital of $1,680,433. |
|
|
|
In addition, transaction costs currently estimated at $35,000
and the Max Termination Fee of $50,000 will be incurred and
expensed by the consolidated entity. Based on an expected
investment return of 3.75%, investment income of $2,438 would
have been foregone during 2008 had these payments been made. |
-33-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Employees of IPC hold 526,000 options to purchase IPC Shares.
These options would vest upon a change in control, and would be
exercisable. The exercise price range of these options is from
$13 to $49, with a weighted average of $34.31. It is expected
that 3,818 net shares would be issued upon exercise of
these options. |
|
(c) |
|
Elimination of IPCs Ordinary Shares of $561, Additional
Paid in Capital of $1,089,002, Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Loss of $876 and Retained Earnings of $762,260. |
|
(d) |
|
A related party balance of $251 representing reinsurance ceded
to IPC by Validus was eliminated from gross premiums written and
reinsurance ceded. These policies were fully earned and expensed
respectively at year end and had no other effect on the pro
forma financial statements. |
|
(e) |
|
The unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma financial
statements have been prepared using IPCs publicly
available financial statements and disclosures, without the
benefit of inspection of IPCs books and records.
Therefore, the carrying value of assets and liabilities in
IPCs financial statements are considered to be a proxy for
fair value of those assets and liabilities, with the difference
between the net assets and the total purchase price considered
to be negative goodwill. In addition, certain pro forma
adjustments, such as recording fair value of assets and
liabilities and adjustments for consistency of accounting
policy, are not reflected in these unaudited pro forma
consolidated financial statements. In December 2007, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations
(FAS 141(R)) This Statement defines a bargain
purchase as a business combination in which the total
acquisition-date fair value of the identifiable net assets
acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred
plus any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and it
requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in earnings as a
gain attributable to the acquirer. Negative goodwill of $158,625
has been recorded as a credit to retained earnings as upon
completion of the amalgamation negative goodwill will be treated
as a gain in the consolidated statement of operations. |
|
(f) |
|
On November 15, 2008, IPCs 9,000,000 Series A
Mandatory Convertible preferred shares automatically converted
pursuant to their terms into 9,129,600 common shares. Therefore,
dividends of $14,939 on these preferred shares of IPC have been
eliminated from the unaudited pro forma results of operations. |
|
|
4.
|
Gross
Premiums Written
|
The following table sets forth the gross premiums written by
Validus, IPC and pro forma combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Validus Re
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC(a)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Property Cat XOL(b)
|
|
$
|
328,216
|
|
|
$
|
333,749
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
661,965
|
|
Property Per Risk XOL
|
|
|
54,056
|
|
|
|
10,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,722
|
|
Property Proportional(c)
|
|
|
110,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,695
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
117,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,744
|
|
Aerospace
|
|
|
39,323
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
57,297
|
|
Life and A&H
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,318
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
8,218
|
|
Terrorism
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,502
|
|
Workers Comp
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,101
|
|
Total Validus Re Segment
|
|
|
687,771
|
|
|
|
370,858
|
|
|
|
(251
|
)
|
|
|
1,058,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-34-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
|
|
Validus Re
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC(a)
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Talbot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
152,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,143
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
287,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287,694
|
|
Aviation & Other
|
|
|
40,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,028
|
|
Accident & Health
|
|
|
18,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,314
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
42,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,263
|
|
War
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,693
|
|
Contingency
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,924
|
|
Bloodstock
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Talbot Segment
|
|
|
708,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708,996
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
|
|
|
(21,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,724
|
)
|
Marine
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,543
|
)
|
Specialty
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
Total Intersegment Revenue Eliminated
|
|
|
(34,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for reinstatement premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,362,484
|
|
|
$
|
403,395
|
|
|
$
|
(251
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,765,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For IPC, this includes annual (deposit) and adjustment premiums.
Excludes reinstatement premiums of $32,537 which are not
classified by class of business by IPC. |
|
(b) |
|
For Validus, Cat XOL is comprised of Catastrophe XOL, Aggregate
XOL, RPP, Per Event XOL, Second Event and Third Event covers.
For IPC, this includes Catastrophe XOL and Retrocessional. |
|
(c) |
|
Proportional is comprised of Quota Share and Surplus Share. |
Selected ratios of Validus, IPC and pro forma combined are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
combined
|
|
Losses and loss expenses ratios
|
|
|
61.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
Policy acquisition costs ratios
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
General and administrative cost ratios
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
92.2
|
%
|
|
|
56.4
|
%
|
|
|
83.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Factors affecting the Validus 2008 Loss Ratio |
|
|
|
The loss ratio, which is defined as losses and loss expenses
divided by net premiums earned, for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was 61.5%. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the frequency and severity of worldwide
losses that materially affected Validus loss ratio
increased. During the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus
incurred $260,567 and $22,141 of loss expense attributable to
Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, which represent 20.7 and
1.8 percentage points of the loss ratio, respectively.
Other notable loss events added $45,895 of 2008 loss expense or
3.7 percentage points of the loss ratio bringing the |
-35-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
total effect of aforementioned events on the 2008 loss ratio to
26.2 percentage points. Favorable loss development on prior
years totaled $69,702. Favorable loss reserve development
benefited Validus loss ratio for the year ended
December 31, 2008 by 5.5 percentage points. |
|
(b) |
|
Factors affecting the IPC 2008 Loss Ratio |
|
|
|
The data in the following paragraph is taken from
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in
IPCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Such disclosure was
not made in thousands of U.S. dollars, and the data
has been reproduced here as it was originally presented. |
|
|
|
IPCs loss ratio, which is defined as losses and loss
expenses divided by net premiums earned, for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was 40.2%. IPC incurred net losses and
loss adjustment expenses of $155.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Total net losses for the year
ended December 31, 2008 relating to the current year were
$206.6 million, while reductions to estimates of ultimate
net loss for prior year events were $50.9 million. During
2008, IPCs incurred losses included: $23.0 million
from the Alon Refinery explosion in Texas, a storm that affected
Queensland, Australia, and Windstorm Emma that affected parts of
Europe, which all occurred in the first quarter of 2008;
$10.5 million from the flooding in Iowa in June and
tornadoes that affected the mid-west United States in May 2008;
together with $160.0 million from Hurricane Ike and
$7.6 million from Hurricane Gustav, which both occurred in
September 2008. The impact on IPCs 2008 loss ratio from
these events was 51.9 percentage points. The losses from
these events were partly offset by reductions to IPCs
estimates of ultimate loss for a number of prior year events,
including $11.0 million for Hurricane Katrina,
$18.6 million for the storm and flooding that affected New
South Wales, Australia in 2007 and $22.8 million for the
floods that affected parts of the U.K. in June and July 2007.
The cumulative $52.4 million of favorable loss reserve
development benefited the IPCs loss ratio for the year
ended December 31, 2008 by 13.5 percentage points. |
|
|
6.
|
Earnings
per Common Share
|
(a) Pro forma earnings per common share for the year ended
December 31, 2008 has been calculated based on the
estimated weighted average number of common shares outstanding
on a pro forma basis, as described in 6(b) below. The historical
weighted average number of common shares outstanding of Validus
was 74,677,903 and 75,819,413 basic and diluted, respectively,
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
(b) The pro forma weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2008, after
giving effect to the exchange of shares as if the acquisition
shares had been issued and outstanding for the whole year, is
142,016,850 and 143,756,880, basic and diluted, respectively.
-36-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
(c) The following table sets forth the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
46,164
|
|
|
$
|
134,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic ordinary shares
outstanding
|
|
|
74,677,903
|
|
|
|
142,016,850
|
|
Share equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Shares
|
|
|
1,004,809
|
|
|
|
1,598,733
|
|
Options
|
|
|
136,701
|
|
|
|
141,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted
|
|
|
75,819,413
|
|
|
|
143,756,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus calculates diluted book value per share using the
as-if-converted method, where all proceeds received
upon exercise of warrants and stock options would be retained by
Validus and the resulting common shares from exercise remain
outstanding. In its public records, IPC calculates diluted book
value per share using the treasury stock method,
where proceeds received upon exercise of warrants and stock
options would be used by IPC to repurchase shares from the
market, with the net common shares from exercise remaining
outstanding. Accordingly, for the purposes of the Pro Forma
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto,
IPCs diluted book value per share has been recalculated
based on the as-if-converted method to be consistent
with Validus calculation.
-37-
Validus
Holdings, Ltd.
Notes To
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Pro Forma
Financial Statements
(unaudited) (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of book value and
diluted book value per share adjusted for the Amalgamation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Book value per common share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
$
|
3,704,681
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
75,624,697
|
|
|
|
142,963,644
|
|
Book value per common share
|
|
$
|
25.64
|
|
|
$
|
25.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per common share calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
$
|
3,704,681
|
|
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding warrants
|
|
$
|
152,315
|
|
|
$
|
152,316
|
|
Proceeds of assumed exercise of outstanding stock options
|
|
$
|
51,043
|
|
|
$
|
51,043
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,142,093
|
|
|
$
|
3,908,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
75,624,697
|
|
|
|
142,963,644
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
8,680,149
|
|
|
|
8,680,149
|
|
Options
|
|
|
2,799,938
|
|
|
|
2,804,534
|
|
Unvested restricted shares
|
|
|
2,986,619
|
|
|
|
3,580,543
|
|
|
|
|
90,091,403
|
|
|
|
158,028,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per common share
|
|
$
|
23.78
|
|
|
$
|
24.73
|
|
The following table sets forth the computation of debt to total
capitalization and debt (excluding debentures payable) to total
capitalization, adjusted for the Amalgamation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan payable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
304,300
|
|
|
$
|
379,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,938,734
|
|
|
$
|
3,704,681
|
|
Bank loan payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Borrowings drawn under credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures payable
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
304,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
2,243,034
|
|
|
$
|
4,083,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capitalization
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
Debt (excluding debentures payable) to total capitalization
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
-38-
COMPARATIVE
PER SHARE DATA
The IPC historical per share data is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above. The pro forma
combined data is taken from the Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information above.
The historical earnings per share, dividends, and book value of
Validus and IPC shown in the table below are derived from their
respective audited consolidated financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The unaudited pro
forma comparative basic and diluted earnings per share data give
effect to the Acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting as if the Acquisition had been completed on
January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma book value and
diluted book value per share information was computed as if the
Acquisition had been completed on December 31, 2008. You
should read this information in conjunction with the historical
financial information of Validus and of IPC included or
incorporated elsewhere in this proxy statement, including
Validus and IPCs financial statements and related
notes. The unaudited pro forma data is not necessarily
indicative of actual results had the Acquisition occurred during
the period indicated. The unaudited pro forma data is not
necessarily indicative of future operations of Validus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Per IPC
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
Share(2)
|
|
|
|
(For The Year Ended December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
0.62
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
1.13
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share(1)
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
Book value per common share (at period end)
|
|
$
|
25.64
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
25.91
|
|
|
$
|
31.19
|
|
Diluted book value per common share
|
|
$
|
23.78
|
|
|
$
|
32.85
|
(3)
|
|
$
|
24.73
|
|
|
$
|
29.77
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Anti-dilution provisions apply to 2008. There is no effect of
stock-based compensation and preference shares because they are
anti-dilutive. |
|
(2) |
|
Equivalent per share amounts are calculated by multiplying
Validus pro forma per share amounts by the exchange ratio of
1.2037. |
|
(3) |
|
IPC reported diluted book value per common share as $33.07 in
its annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and amended it to
$32.85 in the amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4. |
-39-
COMPARATIVE
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
Validus and IPCs common shares are quoted on the
NYSE and NASDAQ, respectively, under the ticker symbol
VR and IPCR, respectively. The following
table sets forth the high and low closing prices per share
of Validus common shares and IPC common shares for the periods
indicated (commencing, in the case of Validus, from
Validus initial public offering on July 25,
2007) as reported on the consolidated tape of the NYSE or
NASDAQ, as applicable, as well as cash dividends per common
share, as reported in the Validus
10-K and
IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively, with
respect to the years 2007 and 2008, and thereafter as reported
in publicly available sources. The IPC dividend information was
taken from the IPC/Max
S-4. See
Sources of Additional Information above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividend
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.30
|
|
|
$
|
21.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
30.25
|
|
|
$
|
20.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Second Quarter (through
[ ],
2009)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.22
|
|
|
$
|
23.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
28.25
|
|
|
$
|
24.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
23.72
|
|
|
$
|
20.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
30.38
|
|
|
$
|
26.55
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
24.70
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
33.00
|
|
|
$
|
26.58
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.16
|
|
|
$
|
14.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
29.90
|
|
|
$
|
19.52
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
31.53
|
|
|
$
|
27.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
32.53
|
|
|
$
|
28.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
25.28
|
|
|
$
|
21.11
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
33.01
|
|
|
$
|
24.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
26.59
|
|
|
$
|
24.73
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
30.13
|
|
|
$
|
26.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
The following table sets out the trading information for Validus
common shares and IPC common shares on March 30, 2009, the
last full trading day before Validus announcement of
delivery of the Validus Amalgamation Offer to the board of
directors of IPC,
and ,
2009, the last practicable trading day for which information was
available before first mailing of this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
IPC
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
common share
|
|
common share
|
|
Per-Share
|
|
|
close
|
|
close
|
|
Amount
|
|
March 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
24.91
|
|
|
$
|
25.41
|
|
|
$
|
29.98
|
|
,
2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Equivalent per-share amounts are calculated by multiplying
Validus per-share amounts by the exchange ratio of 1.2037.
-40-
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This proxy statement may include forward-looking statements,
both with respect to Validus and its industry, that reflect
Validus current views with respect to future events and
financial performance. Statements that include the words
expect, intend, plan,
believe, project,
anticipate, will, may and
similar statements of a future or forward-looking nature
identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements address matters that involve risks and uncertainties,
many of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there are or
will be important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those indicated in such statements and, therefore, you should
not place undue reliance on any such statements. Validus
believes that these factors include, but are not limited to, the
following: 1) uncertainty as to whether Validus will be
able to enter into and to consummate the proposed Acquisition;
2) uncertainty as to the long-term value of Validus common
shares; 3) unpredictability and severity of catastrophic
events; 4) rating agency actions; 5)
adequacy of
Validus or IPCs risk management and loss limitation
methods; 6) cyclicality of demand and pricing in the
insurance and reinsurance markets; 7) Validus limited
operating history; 8) Validus ability to implement
its business strategy during soft as well as
hard markets; 9) adequacy of Validus or
IPCs loss reserves; 10) continued availability of
capital and financing; 11) retention of key personnel;
12) competition; 13)
potential loss of business from
one or more major insurance or reinsurance brokers;
14) Validus or IPCs ability to implement,
successfully and on a timely basis, complex infrastructure,
distribution capabilities, systems, procedures and internal
controls, and to develop accurate actuarial data to support the
business and regulatory and reporting requirements;
15) general economic and market conditions (including
inflation, volatility in the credit and capital markets,
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates);
16) the integration of Talbot or other businesses we may
acquire or new business ventures Validus may start; 17) the
effect on Validus or IPCs investment portfolios of
changing financial market conditions including inflation,
interest rates, liquidity and other factors; 18) acts of
terrorism or outbreak of war; 19) availability of
reinsurance and retrocessional coverage; 20) failure to
realize the anticipated benefits of the proposed acquisition,
including as a result of failure or delay in integrating the
businesses of Validus and IPC; and 21) the outcome of
litigation arising from Validus offer for IPC, as well as
managements response to any of the aforementioned factors.
The foregoing review of important factors should not be
construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with
the other cautionary statements that are included herein and
elsewhere, including the Risk Factors included in Validus
most recent reports on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and the risk factors included in IPCs most recent reports
on
Form 10-K
and
Form 10-Q
and other documents of Validus and IPC on file with the SEC. Any
forward-looking statements made in this proxy statement are
qualified by these cautionary statements, and there can be no
assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by
Validus will be realized or, even if substantially realized,
that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on,
Validus or its business or operations. Except as required by
law, Validus undertakes no obligation to update publicly or
revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
-41-
RISK
FACTORS
In addition to the other information included or incorporated
by reference in this proxy statement (including the matters
addressed under Forward-Looking Statements above), you should
carefully consider the following risk factors before deciding
whether to vote to approve the Share Issuance Proposal and the
Adjournment Proposal. Each proposal is described in this proxy
statement under Proposals to Be Submitted to Validus
Shareholders Vote; Voting Requirements and Recommendations
beginning on page 97. In
addition to the risk factors set forth below, you should read
and consider other risk factors specific to each of the Validus
and IPC businesses that will also affect Validus after the
Acquisition, described in Part I, Item 1A of each
companys annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the other
documents that have been filed with the SEC and all of which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. If any of
the risks described below or in the reports incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement actually occurs, the
respective businesses, financial results, financial conditions,
operating results or share prices of Validus or IPC could be
materially adversely affected.
Risks
Related to the Validus Amalgamation Offer
The
Validus Amalgamation Offer remains subject to conditions that
Validus cannot control.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer is subject to a number of
conditions, including the termination of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement, receipt of regulatory approvals, receipt of
amendments or waivers under Validus and IPCs credit
facilities and the approval of the amalgamation by IPCs
shareholders. There are no assurances that all of the conditions
to the Validus Amalgamation Offer will be satisfied. If the
conditions to the Validus Amalgamation Offer are not met, the
ongoing business of Validus may be adversely affected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the attention of management of Validus will have been diverted
to the Validus Amalgamation Offer instead of being directed
solely to Validus own operations and pursuit of other
opportunities that could have been beneficial to Validus;
|
|
|
|
Validus will have to pay certain costs relating to the Validus
Amalgamation Offer, including certain legal, accounting and
financial and capital market advisory fees.
|
Risks
Related to the Acquisition
Failure
to complete the Amalgamation could negatively impact
Validus.
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement has not yet been signed by
IPC and contains a number of conditions precedent that must be
satisfied or waived prior to the consummation of the
amalgamation. In addition, the Validus Amalgamation Agreement
may be terminated under certain circumstances. In addition to
customary termination provisions contained in agreements of this
nature, Validus may terminate the Validus Amalgamation Agreement
if the total number of dissenting IPC Shares for which appraisal
rights have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law exceeds 15%
of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the business day
immediately following the last day on which IPC shareholders can
require appraisal for their common shares. See The
Amalgamation Agreement Termination of the
Amalgamation Agreement on
page 90 for a complete
description of the circumstances under which the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement can be terminated.
If the amalgamation agreement is signed by IPC but the
amalgamation is not completed, the ongoing business of Validus
may be adversely affected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the attention of management of Validus will have been diverted
to the amalgamation instead of being directed solely to
Validus own operations and pursuit of other opportunities
that could have been beneficial to Validus;
|
|
|
|
Validus will have to pay certain costs relating to the
amalgamation, including certain legal, accounting and financial
advisory fees; and
|
-42-
|
|
|
|
|
Validus may be required, in certain circumstances, if the
amalgamation agreement is signed by IPC, to pay a termination
fee of $16 million to IPC.
|
Validus
may waive one or more of the conditions to the Acquisition
without resoliciting or seeking additional shareholder approval
for the Share Issuance.
Each of the conditions to Validus obligations to complete
the Acquisition, may be waived, in whole or in part by Validus.
The board of directors of Validus will evaluate the materiality
of any such waiver to determine whether resolicitation of
proxies is necessary or, if shareholder approval of the Share
Issuance has been received, whether further shareholder approval
is necessary. In the event that any such waiver is not
determined to be significant enough to require resolicitation or
additional approval of shareholders, the Acquisition may be
consummated without seeking further shareholder approval of the
Share Issuance.
A
termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement could under
certain circumstances result in the payment of the Max
termination fee.
While Validus believes the provision of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement providing for the payment of the Max termination fee
is invalid and is seeking a ruling of the Supreme Court of
Bermuda to that effect, if the proposals related to the Max
Amalgamation Agreement are not approved by IPC shareholders, a
court may determine that IPC is required, or IPC may otherwise
be bound, to pay all, or a portion, of the Max termination fee,
including in the circumstance where IPC subsequently agrees to
enter into a business combination with Validus or the
Acquisition is completed.
If the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement is signed by IPC, potential payments made
to dissenting IPC shareholders in respect of their rights to
appraisal of their shares could exceed the amount of
consideration otherwise due to them under the terms of the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
Any IPC shareholder may apply, within one month after the date
of giving of notice convening an IPC special meeting in
connection with the Validus Amalgamation Offer, for an appraisal
of the fair value of its IPC Shares. Unless Validus has
terminated the Validus Amalgamation Agreement because the number
of dissenting shares is greater than 15% of the issued and
outstanding IPC Shares (see The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Termination on
page 90), then Validus may be
required to pay the fair value appraised by the court to such
dissenting shareholder. Any such payments may have a material
adverse effect on Validus business, financial condition
and operating results.
Risks
Related to Validus Following the Acquisition
Validus
may experience difficulties integrating IPCs businesses,
which could cause Validus to fail to realize the anticipated
benefits of the Acquisition.
If the Acquisition is consummated, achieving the anticipated
benefits of the Acquisition will depend in part upon whether the
two companies integrate their businesses in an effective and
efficient manner. The companies may not be able to accomplish
this integration process smoothly or successfully. The
integration of certain operations following the Acquisition will
take time and will require the dedication of significant
management resources, which may temporarily distract
managements attention from the routine business of Validus.
Any delay or inability of management to successfully integrate
the operations of the two companies could compromise
Validus potential to achieve the long-term strategic
benefits of the Acquisition and could have a material adverse
effect on the business, financial condition, operating results
and market value of Validus common shares after the Acquisition.
-43-
Validus
has only conducted a review of IPCs publicly available
information and has not had access to IPCs non-public
information. Therefore, Validus may be subject to unknown
liabilities of IPC which may have a material adverse effect on
Validus profitability, financial condition and results of
operations.
To date, Validus has only conducted a due diligence review of
IPCs publicly available information. The consummation of
the Acquisition may constitute a default, or an event that, with
or without notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute a
default, or result in the acceleration or other change of any
right or obligation (including, without limitation, any payment
obligation) under agreements of IPC that are not publicly
available. As a result, after the consummation of the
Acquisition, Validus may be subject to unknown liabilities of
IPC, which may have a material adverse effect on Validus
profitability, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, the Acquisition may also permit a counter-party to
an agreement with IPC to terminate that agreement because
completion of the Acquisition would cause a default or violate
an anti-assignment, change of control or similar clause. If this
happens, Validus may have to seek to replace that agreement with
a new agreement. Validus cannot assure you that it will be able
to replace a terminated agreement on comparable terms or at all.
Depending on the importance of a terminated agreement to
IPCs business, failure to replace that agreement on
similar terms or at all may increase the costs to Validus of
operating IPCs business or prevent Validus from operating
part or all of IPCs business.
In respect of all information relating to IPC presented in,
incorporated by reference into or omitted from, this proxy
statement, Validus has relied upon publicly available
information, including information publicly filed by IPC with
the SEC. Although Validus has no knowledge that would indicate
that any statements contained herein regarding IPCs
condition, including its financial or operating condition (based
upon such publicly filed reports and documents) are inaccurate,
incomplete or untrue, Validus was not involved in the
preparation of such information and statements. For example,
Validus has made adjustments and assumptions in preparing the
pro forma financial information presented in this proxy
statement that have necessarily involved Validus estimates
with respect to IPCs financial information. Any financial,
operating or other information regarding IPC that may be
detrimental to Validus following the Acquisition that has not
been publicly disclosed by IPC, or errors in Validus
estimates due to the lack of access to IPC, may have a material adverse
effect on Validus financial condition or the benefits
Validus expects to achieve through the consummation of the
Acquisition.
The
Acquisition may result in ratings downgrades of one or more of
Validus insurance or reinsurance subsidiaries (including
the newly acquired IPC insurance and reinsurance operating
companies) which may adversely affect Validus business,
financial condition and operating results, as well as the market
price of its common shares.
Ratings with respect to claims paying ability and financial
strength are important factors in maintaining customer
confidence in Validus and its ability to market insurance and
reinsurance products and compete with other insurance and
reinsurance companies. Rating organizations regularly analyze
the financial performance and condition of insurers and
reinsurers and will likely place the ratings of Validus and its
reinsurance subsidiaries under review following an agreement by
Validus to acquire IPC. While each of Standard &
Poors and A.M. Best have stated that they will not
take any current action with respect to Validus ratings
following the announcement of the Validus Amalgamation Offer to
IPC, Moodys has changed the outlook to negative with
respect to the A3 insurance financial strength rating of
Validus reinsurance subsidiary, Validus Reinsurance, Ltd.,
and the Baa2 long-term issuer rating of Validus. Additionally,
although A.M. Best has assigned the reinsurance
subsidiaries of IPC (including IPCRe Limited and IPCRe Europe
Limited) the financial strength rating of A
(Excellent) and issuer credit ratings of a and IPC
the issuer credit rating of bbb, A.M. Best has
also indicated that each of these IPC ratings is under review
with negative implications in connection with the Proposed Max
Amalgamation. A.M. Best and the other ratings agencies
would most likely provide similar scrutiny and analysis of the
Acquisition. Following the Acquisition, any ratings downgrades,
or the potential for ratings downgrades, of Validus or its
subsidiaries (including the newly acquired IPC operating
companies) could adversely affect Validus ability to
market and distribute products
-44-
and services and successfully compete in the marketplace, which
could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial
condition and operating results, as well as the market price for
Validus common shares.
The
occurrence of severe catastrophic events after the Acquisition
may cause Validus net income to be more volatile than if
the Acquisition did not take place.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, Validus gross
premiums written (excluding reinstatement premiums) on property
catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total
gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31,
2008, 93% of IPCs gross premiums written covered property
catastrophe reinsurance risks. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, after giving effect to the Acquisition
as if it had been consummated on December 31, 2008, gross
premiums written on property catastrophe business would have
been $661.9 or 37.5% of total gross premiums of Validus on a pro
forma basis. Because Validus after the Acquisition will, among
other things, have larger aggregate exposures to natural and
man-made disasters than it does today, Validus aggregate
loss experience could have a significant influence on
Validus net income. See Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Information.
Risk
Related to IPCs Businesses
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to
IPCs businesses that will also affect Validus after the
Acquisition, described in Part I, Item 1A of
IPCs annual report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and other documents
that have been filed by IPC with the SEC and which are
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Risk
Related to Validus Businesses
You should read and consider other risk factors specific to
Validus businesses that will also affect Validus after the
Acquisition, described in Part I, Item 1A of the
Validus 10-K
and other documents that have been filed by Validus with the SEC
and which are incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement.
THE
ACQUISITION
General
Description
In order to consummate the Acquisition, Validus is
simultaneously pursuing the following alternative transaction
structures, pursuant to which IPC shareholders will receive
1.2037 Validus Shares for each outstanding IPC Share:
(1) the Validus Amalgamation Offer;
(2) the Exchange Offer; and
(3) the Scheme of Arrangement.
The Validus Amalgamation Offer, the Exchange Offer and the
Scheme of Arrangement are alternative methods for Validus to
acquire all of the issued and outstanding IPC Shares on the same
economic terms. Ultimately, only one of these transaction
structures can be pursued to completion. Validus intends to seek
to acquire all IPC Shares by whichever method Validus determines
is most effective and efficient.
On March 31, 2009, Validus announced that it had delivered
to IPC the Validus Amalgamation Offer. In connection with the
delivery of the Validus Amalgamation Offer to IPC, Validus also
delivered a copy of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement signed by
Validus so that, upon a termination of the Max Amalgamation
Agreement, IPC would be able to sign the
Validus Amalgamation
Agreement with the certainty of an agreed transaction. IPC
announced on April 7, 2009 that its board of directors has
determined that the Validus Amalgamation Offer does not
constitute a superior proposal to the Proposed Max Amalgamation
and reaffirmed its support of the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
Additionally, Max has not released IPC from the prohibition in the Max Amalgamation Agreement that
prevents IPC from even
-45-
discussing the Validus Amalgamation Offer with Validus.
Therefore, in order to consummate the Acquisition without the
cooperation of IPCs board of directors, Validus is
pursuing a three-part plan.
First, Validus is asking IPC shareholders to vote
against the Proposed Max Amalgamation. If the Proposed Max Amalgamation is voted down by
IPC shareholders, IPC would be able to terminate the Max
Amalgamation Agreement and accept the Validus Amalgamation Offer.
Second, Validus intends to commence in the near future the
Exchange Offer for all of the outstanding IPC Shares. The
Exchange Offer would allow Validus to complete the Acquisition
of IPC shortly following the IPC annual general meeting, if the
IPC shareholders vote down the Proposed Max Amalgamation and the
other conditions to the Exchange Offer are satisfied.
Under the
terms of the Exchange Offer, IPC shareholders would receive
1.2037 Validus Shares for each IPC Share. The Exchange Offer
will be subject to certain conditions described in the Offer to
Exchange filed by Validus with the SEC, including the tender of
at least 90% of the total outstanding IPC Shares (on a fully
diluted basis), termination of the Max Amalgamation Agreement,
and the consent of Validus lenders. Under Bermuda law, if
Validus acquires 90% or more of IPC Shares in the
Exchange
Offer, Validus will have the right to acquire the remaining IPC
Shares in a second-step acquisition under Bermuda law. The
Exchange Offer will not be conditioned on regulatory approvals
or the elimination of the possible termination fee to Max.
Validus believes that if the conditions of the Exchange Offer
are satisfied, it would be able to acquire IPC Shares
under the Exchange Offer in June based on the following. If the
Exchange Offer is commenced as late as May 15 and held open for
20 business days, it would expire on June 15, 2009. If the
conditions to the Exchange Offer are satisfied, Validus will
acquire at least 90% of the then-outstanding number of IPC Shares on a fully-diluted basis (excluding any IPC
Shares beneficially owned by Validus or its subsidiaries).
Third, Validus intends to petition the Supreme Court of Bermuda
to approve the Scheme of Arrangement under which Validus would
acquire all IPC Shares under the same economic terms as in the
Validus Amalgamation Offer. The Scheme of Arrangement can be
accomplished without the approval of IPCs
board of directors if approved by IPC shareholders
at two shareholder meetings and sanctioned by the Supreme Court
of Bermuda. The first shareholder meeting is the court-ordered
IPC meeting at which IPC shareholders can vote to approve the
Scheme of Arrangement. In addition, if IPCs board of
directors continues to be uncooperative despite shareholder
approval at the court-ordered IPC meeting, IPC shareholders can
call the IPC special general meeting at which IPC shareholders
can require IPC to approve and be bound by the Scheme of
Arrangement and to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement.
Following IPC shareholder approval at both of these meetings,
and approval by the Supreme Court of Bermuda, the Scheme of
Arrangement would become effective and IPC would become a
subsidiary of Validus. The Scheme of Arrangement would be
approved with the vote of a majority in number of the holders of
IPC Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of the IPC
Shares voting at the court-ordered IPC meeting, whether in
person or by proxy. The required vote at the second meeting is
an affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of IPC Shares
voting at the meeting. Validus believes that, under the Scheme
of Arrangement, it would be able to close an acquisition of IPC
as early as mid-July based on the assumptions that: (1) the
Supreme Court of Bermuda will be able to accommodate the
preferred hearings schedule and meeting dates and other
procedural matters; (2) IPC shareholders holding at least
one-tenth of the issued shares of IPC have requisitioned a
special general meeting to be held in late June or early July to
approve and have IPC be bound by the Scheme of Arrangement; and
(3) the IPC directors, following the rejection of the
Proposed Max Amalgamation, or IPC shareholders, convene the
requisitioned special general meeting, allowing it to be held by
mid-July.
Assuming closing of the Acquisition, based on Validus
capitalization as of December 31, 2008 and the exchange
ratio of 1.2037, Validus would issue 67,338,947 Validus Shares
in connection with the Acquisition and IPC shareholders would
own approximately 43% of the issued and outstanding common
shares of Validus on a fully-diluted basis.
-46-
Background
of the Acquisition
On March 2, 2009, IPC and Max announced that they had
entered into the Max Amalgamation Agreement. The IPC/Max
S-4 provides
a summary of the events leading to Max and IPC entering into the
Max Amalgamation Agreement.
In the morning of March 31, 2009, Edward J. Noonan, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors
of Validus, placed a telephone call to James P. Bryce, the Chief
Executive Officer and President of IPC. Mr. Noonan spoke
with Mr. Bryce and explained that Validus intended to make
an Offer to Exchange each outstanding IPC Share for 1.2037
Validus Shares, subject to the termination of the Max
Amalgamation Agreement.
Following this telephone call, in the morning of March 31,
2009, Validus delivered a proposal letter containing the Validus
Amalgamation Offer to IPCs board of directors in care of
Mr. Bryce and issued a press release announcing the Validus
Amalgamation Offer. The letter reads as follows:
March 31,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Re: Superior Amalgamation Proposal by Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) to IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC)
Dear Sirs:
On behalf of Validus, I am writing to submit a binding
offer2
pursuant to which Validus and IPC would amalgamate in a
share-for-share exchange valuing IPC Shares at an 18.0% premium
to yesterdays closing market price. We believe that an
amalgamation of Validus and IPC would represent a compelling
combination and excellent strategic fit and create superior
value for our respective shareholders.
We unquestionably would have preferred to work cooperatively
with you to complete a negotiated transaction. However, it was
necessary to communicate our binding offer to you by letter
because of the provisions of the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation between IPC and Max Capital Group Ltd.
(Max), dated as of March 1, 2009, as amended on
March 5, 2009 (the Max Plan of Amalgamation).
We have reviewed the Max Plan of Amalgamation and see that it
contemplates your receipt of acquisition proposals. Given the
importance of our binding offer to our respective shareholders,
we have decided to make this letter public.
Our binding offer involves a share-for-share exchange valuing
IPC Shares at an 18.0% premium to yesterdays closing
market price. Consistent with that, we are prepared to
amalgamate with IPC at a fixed exchange ratio of 1.2037 Validus
shares per IPC share.
Our board of directors has unanimously approved the submission
of our binding offer and delivery of the enclosed signed
amalgamation agreement, so that, upon termination of the Max
Plan of Amalgamation, you will be able to sign the enclosed
agreement with the certainty of an agreed transaction. Our offer
is structured as a tax-free share-for-share transaction and does
not require any external financing. It is not conditioned on due
diligence. The only conditions to our offer are those contained
in the enclosed executed amalgamation agreement.
2 Throughout
this letter we refer to our binding offer because,
as of the date of this letter, we had indicated to IPC that our
offer could not be withdrawn prior to April 15, 2009. As of
the date of this proxy statement, we have not withdrawn our
offer, but have reserved the right to do so.
-47-
Our binding offer is clearly superior to the Max transaction for
your shareholders and is a Superior Proposal as defined in
section 5.5(f) of the Max Plan of Amalgamation for the
reasons set forth below.
Superior Current Value. Our proposed transaction will
provide superior current value for your shareholders. Our fixed
exchange ratio of 1.2037 represents a value of $29.98 per IPC
share, which is a premium of 18.0% to the closing price of
IPCs common shares on March 30, 2009.
Superior Trading Characteristics. Validus common
shares have superior trading characteristics to those of Max as
noted in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validus
|
|
|
Max
|
|
|
Share Price Change Since Validus IPO(1)
|
|
|
+13.2
|
%
|
|
|
−36.5
|
%
|
Mkt. Cap as of 3/30/09
|
|
$
|
2.0 billion
|
|
|
$
|
0.9 billion
|
|
Average Daily Trading Volume(2)
|
|
$
|
11.3 million
|
|
|
$
|
6.7 million
|
|
Price/Book(3)
|
|
|
1.05 x
|
|
|
|
0.76 x
|
|
Price/Tangible Book(3)
|
|
|
1.13 x
|
|
|
|
0.77 x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the closing prices on March 30, 2009 and
July 24, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Three months prior to March 2, 2009, date of announcement
of Max and IPC amalgamation. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on December 31, 2008 GAAP book value per diluted
share and diluted tangible GAAP book value per share using
closing prices on March 30, 2009. |
Less Balance Sheet
Risk.3
The combined investment portfolio of IPC/Validus is more stable
than that of IPC/Max. Pro forma for the proposed IPC/Max
combination, alternative investments represent 12%
of investments and 29% of shareholders equity. In
contrast, Validus does not invest in alternatives
and pro forma for a Validus/IPC combination, alternative
investments represent 3% of investments and 4% of
shareholders equity, providing greater safety for
shareholders and clients.
Superior Long-term Prospects. A combined Validus and IPC
would be a superior company to IPC/Max with greater growth
prospects and synergies with:
1. Superior size and scale, with pro forma
December 31, 2008 shareholders equity of
$3.7 billion and total GAAP capitalization of
$4.1 billion;
2. Superior financial flexibility, with debt/total
capitalization of only 1.8% and total leverage including hybrid
securities of only 9.1%;
3. A global platform, with offices and underwriting
facilities in Bermuda, at Lloyds in London, Dublin,
Singapore, New York and Miami;
4. Superior diversified business mix, with lines of
business concentrated in short-tail lines where pricing momentum
is strongest; and
5. An experienced, proven and stable management team with
substantial expertise operating in IPCs core lines of
business.
3 The
occurrence of severe catastrophic events after an amalgamation
with IPC could cause Validus net income to be more
volatile than if the amalgamation did not take place. For the
year ended December 31, 2008, Validus gross premiums
written (excluding reinstatement premiums) on property
catastrophe business were $328.2 million or 24.1% of total
gross premiums written. For the year ended December 31,
2008, 93% of IPCs gross premiums written (excluding
reinstatement premiums) covered property catastrophe reinsurance
risks. For the year ended December 31, 2008, after giving
effect to the Validus amalgamation as if it had been consummated
on December 31, 2008, gross premiums written on property
catastrophe business would have been $661.9 million or
37.5% of total gross premiums of Validus on a pro forma basis.
Because Validus after the amalgamation will, among other things,
have larger aggregate exposures to natural and man-made
disasters than it does today, Validus aggregate loss
experience could have a significant influence on Validus
net income.
-48-
Our superior growth prospects are evidenced by our historical
track record. Between December 31, 2005 and
December 31, 2008, Validus grew its book value per share
(including accumulated dividends) at a 13.2% compound annual
rate vs. Maxs 8.8% growth over the same period. In 2008,
we grew our book value per share (including accumulated
dividends) by 2.4% vs. Maxs 10.8% decline over the same
period.
Expedited Closing Process. We will be able to close an
amalgamation with IPC more quickly than Max because we will not
require the approval of U.S. insurance
regulators.4
Substantially the Same Contractual Terms and Conditions.
Our proposed amalgamation agreement contains substantially the
same terms and conditions as those in the Max Plan of
Amalgamation, and for your convenience we have included a markup
of our amalgamation agreement against the Max Plan of
Amalgamation.
Superior Outcome for Bermuda Community. The combination
of Validus and IPC creates a larger, stronger entity than a
combination of Max and IPC which will benefit the Bermuda
community.5
Superior Outcome for IPC Clients. Validus has a greater
commitment to the lines of business underwritten by IPC and has
superior technical expertise and capacity to provide IPC
customers with continuing reinsurance coverage. Max has
consistently stated its intention to reduce its commitment to
IPCs business. Therefore, a combination with Validus will
be less disruptive to IPCs client base.
Our binding offer is clearly a Superior Proposal, within the
meaning of the Max Plan of Amalgamation. We and our financial
advisors, Greenhill & Co., LLC, and our legal
advisors, Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp, are prepared
to move forward immediately. We believe that our offer presents
a compelling opportunity for both our companies and our
respective shareholders, and look forward to your prompt
response. We respectfully request that the Board of IPC reach a
determination by 5:00 p.m., Bermuda time, on Wednesday,
April 15, 2009, that (i) our binding offer constitutes
a Superior Proposal, (ii) it is withdrawing its
recommendation for the transaction contemplated by the Max Plan
of Amalgamation and (iii) it is making a recommendation for
the transaction contemplated by this binding offer.
We reserve the right to withdraw this offer if the Board of IPC
has not reached a determination (i) that our binding offer
constitutes a Superior Proposal, (ii) to withdraw its
recommendation for the transaction contemplated by the Max Plan
of Amalgamation and (iii) to make a recommendation for the
transaction contemplated by this binding offer by
5:00 p.m., Bermuda time, on Wednesday, April 15, 2009.
We further reserve the right to withdraw this binding offer if
you subsequently withdraw your recommendation in favor of our
offer or if you do not sign the enclosed amalgamation agreement
within two business days after the termination of the Max Plan
of Amalgamation.
We look forward to your prompt response.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Greenhill & Co., LLC
4 As
of the date of this letter, our belief that we could close an
amalgamation with IPC more quickly than Max was based on the
observation that the Validus amalgamation with IPC would not
require the approval of U.S. insurance regulators because
neither IPC nor Validus operates a
U.S.-regulated
insurance business that would require any such approval while
the Proposed Max Amalgamation requires such approvals.
5 We
believe that a larger, stronger entity will benefit the Bermuda
community because it offers greater stability.
-49-
John J. Schuster
Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp
In the afternoon on March 31, 2009, IPC issued a press
release acknowledging receipt of the letter from Validus
outlining the Validus Amalgamation Offer. The text of the press
release reads as follows:
IPC Holdings, Ltd. (NASDAQ: IPCR) (IPC) acknowledges
receipt of an unsolicited letter dated today, March 31,
2009, from Validus Holdings, Ltd. (NYSE: VR)
(Validus) outlining a proposed transaction.
On March 2, 2009, IPC entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation (the Amalgamation Agreement) with its
wholly-owned subsidiary IPC Limited and Max Capital Group Ltd.
(Max) which provides that Max will amalgamate with
IPC Limited. IPC continues to be bound by the terms of the
Amalgamation Agreement and the parties have recently filed a
joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities &
Exchange Commission.
IPCs Board of Directors will review the terms of the
proposal submitted by Validus in a manner consistent with its
obligations under the Amalgamation Agreement and applicable
Bermuda law.
IPC will have no further comment on this matter until IPCs
Board of Directors makes a determination regarding Validus
offer.
Also in the afternoon on March 31, 2009, Max issued a press
release announcing that it had received from IPC a copy of the
letter from Validus outlining the Validus Amalgamation Offer.
The text of the press release reads as follows:
Max Capital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: MXGL; BSX: MXGL BH) today
announced that it has received a copy of Validus Holdings,
Ltd.s unsolicited, stock-for-stock, proposal for IPC
Holdings, Ltd.
As previously announced on March 2, 2009, Max and IPC
entered into an Agreement and Plan of Amalgamation pursuant to
which Max will amalgamate with IPC Limited. The Boards of both
companies have previously stated that the combination of Max
with IPC would create a strong company with a balanced,
diversified portfolio of risk across a mix of geographies and
business lines with the opportunity to generate more stable and
attractive returns on capital. Maxs pending merger with
IPC is expected to be completed late in the second quarter or
early in the third quarter of this year.
W. Marston (Marty) Becker, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Max Capital, said: In todays
unprecedented business environment and cycle, we believe that
diversification, in terms of global presence and both short and
long-tail exposures, significantly reduces risk and provides a
more solid platform for building sustained long-term value. The
merger of IPC and Max was founded on a shared vision of allowing
the combined group of shareholders to enjoy the benefits of a
strong, diversified operating platform with a proven track
record. While we have not yet had the opportunity to review
Validus proposal carefully, we believe that combining two
short-tailed property catastrophe oriented companies would
appear to do little for true shareholder diversification. By
contrast, Maxs track record of building a diversified
platform without diluting shareholder value should lead to
better long-term growth prospects and value creation following
completion of the pending IPC-Max merger.
In the morning on April 2, 2009, Max sent a letter to
IPCs Board of Directors purporting to outline the relative
advantages of the pending Proposed Max Amalgamation as well as
the business and financial issues raised by the Validus
Amalgamation Offer and issued a press release announcing the
letter. The text of the letter reads as follows:
Dear Members of the Board:
We are writing regarding the many business and financial issues
raised by the public proposal by Validus Holdings Ltd.
(Validus) to acquire IPC Holdings, Ltd.
(IPC) in lieu of the pending IPC amalgamation with
Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max). The IPC/Max
amalgamation was founded on a shared vision of allowing
-50-
our combined group of shareholders to enjoy the benefits of a
strong, diversified operating platform with a proven track
record. The Validus proposal does not offer that.
Rather, in light of the Validus proposal, the IPC Board faces
two starkly contrasting choices:
A. You can agree to be taken over by Validus at a price
that is below IPCs book value. The result of this takeover
for your shareholders would be a minority equity stake in an
entity that offers substantially similar product lines to those
offered by IPC today, with little risk diversification, and
apparently no ability by the IPC Board to steward the
longer
term prospects of the company.
OR
B. You can complete the planned merger of equals with Max
at a price that is below Maxs book value. We believe that
this transaction will create a more stable entity that will
provide significant product, geographic and risk diversification
and over which IPCs Board will continue to have
significant influence, which in turn will provide superior
shareholder value.
For the reasons set forth below, and in the accompanying
exhibits, we do not agree with Validus that its proposal
represents a Superior Proposal or is a proposal that
can reasonably be expected to lead to a Superior Proposal
pursuant to the IPC/Max Plan of Amalgamation dated March 1,
2009 (the IPC/Max Plan).
1. A combination with Max delivers 29% more tangible
book value per share to IPC. As we operate in an
industry where the primary valuation driver is a multiple of
book value (and tangible book value), we believe that a
transaction that maximizes the book value to shareholders
provides the best opportunity to generate shareholder value. The
IPC combination with Max is a truly superior proposal versus the
takeover proposal by Validus. The takeover proposal by Validus
would result in IPC receiving only $28.35 in diluted book value
per IPC share and $26.19 of diluted tangible book value per IPC
share from Validus. In contrast, our combination delivers $34.93
of diluted book value per IPC share (a 23.2% premium to Validus)
and $33.83 of diluted tangible book value per IPC share from Max
(a 29.2% premium to Validus). A combination with Max provides
greater underlying value to IPCs shareholders, which we
believe will result in greater upside for both IPC and Max
shareholders.
2. The IPC/Max Plan creates significant value for IPC
shareholders. As we indicated during our
discussions, we believe that the IPC/Max Plan provides an
attractive financial outcome for IPC. The IPC/Max Plan is
expected to be accretive to both earnings per share and return
on equity. In addition, as you consider the historical trading
multiples of Max and IPC, there is significant opportunity to
create substantial value for all shareholders of the combined
company. We believe the Validus proposal prioritizes an
immediate premium in the form of stock for IPC
shareholders, while compromising a value creation opportunity
for IPC shareholders. Importantly, the written proposal by
Validus does not contemplate any participation by the IPC board
of directors, whose participation remains an important
consideration for Max in the amalgamation and provides
continuity to shareholders and clients.
3. Max is a truly diversified underwriting
platform. The IPC/Max Plan offers IPCs
shareholders superior current and future value by combining IPC
with a truly diversified underwriting platform, with a strong
and well established track record. Max enjoys a diversified
portfolio of business across many dimensions by
class, geography, customers and distribution. We believe that
Maxs diversified underwriting platform, with its strong
emphasis on profitable longer-tail casualty business, will
generate more stable returns on capital through underwriting
cycles, compared to the volatility embedded in the Validus
short-tail portfolio. Validus, whose 2008 gross premiums
written are 94% concentrated in short- tail lines of business,
claims that its portfolio represents
diversification. Validus ability to deliver
anything approaching true diversification seems to be
constrained by its limited underwriting platforms in Bermuda and
at Lloyds and lack of underwriting capabilities in
longer-tail casualty classes.
Combining two short-tailed property catastrophe companies as
proposed by Validus does little for shareholder diversification.
Validus stated intention to take advantage of currently
strong rates in the property market is a short-term strategy
that is capital intensive, creates greater volatility for
shareholders, and is one which IPC could have continued on a
stand-alone basis but elected not to do so. By contrast, Max
remains
-51-
committed to an underwriting strategy that produces attractive
results across market cycles, by continuing to expand its
specialty insurance business in selected underwriting classes
and limiting volatility in its underwriting results.
4. Max has a proven, long-term, operating
history. Maxs underwriting has been tested
through the tragic events of 9/11, the active 2004 hurricane
season and the confluence of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma
in 2005. Validus operating history, by contrast, does not
extend beyond the past three years, during which time the
industry as a whole has experienced both strong property
catastrophe pricing and limited catastrophe activity. The first
test of Validus portfolio of business and risk management
capabilities since its formation three years ago came in 2008
with Hurricanes Ike and Gustav. In our view, the results speak
for themselves: the net loss reported by Validus for these
events represented 12.4% of its June 30,
2008 shareholders equity, the largest percentage loss
of its broad peer group which averaged 7.2% of
shareholders equity. The loss was almost double the net
loss incurred by IPC, which represented just 6.7% of IPCs
June 30, 2008 shareholders equity. The losses
recorded by Validus included a 42% increase in its initial loss
estimate for Hurricane Ike (from $165 million to
$235 million) during the fourth quarter of 2008. By
comparison, Maxs net incurred losses from Hurricanes Ike
and Gustav were limited to 3.4% of June 30,
2008 shareholders equity, the lowest among the
broader peer group, demonstrating the lower embedded volatility
of Maxs underwriting results versus Validus.
5. IPC and Max can complete an amalgamation more
quickly, and with greater certainty.
(a) IPC and Max can close our amalgamation
expeditiously. Max believes that the IPC/Max Plan
can close as soon as June 2009. By contrast, we believe that
Validus would not be in a position to close a transaction with
IPC until September 2009 at the earliest, notwithstanding its
public prediction of a second quarter close. As you are well
aware, the IPC/Max Plan requires that shareholders have the
opportunity to vote on our amalgamation before IPCs Board
can terminate our agreement and thereafter begin discussions
with a bidder such as Validus. We anticipate that we will be
able to hold our respective shareholder meetings in June, and
only after those shareholder votes would Validus be able to
pursue its proposal. Validus inability to close before
September 2009, the middle of hurricane season, adds meaningful
uncertainly to Validus proposal, as IPC shareholders and
the transaction itself would be put at risk by the significant
catastrophe exposures of Validus and Validus ability to
terminate the transaction based upon changes in
shareholders equity. Much has been made by Validus
regarding US regulatory approvals required to complete the
IPC/Max amalgamation. As you know, these approvals are well
underway and we do not foresee such requisite approvals
adversely impacting a possible June closing.
(b) IPC has conducted extensive diligence on
Max. IPC was given complete and open access to
Max to afford you and your outside advisors and consultants with
the ability to conduct extensive due diligence on Max. The
Validus proposal seeks to have IPC enter into a transaction for
which IPC has not conducted due diligence. We also note that
certain of Validus disclosure schedules will not be
provided to IPC until after IPC and Maxs shareholders have
the opportunity to vote upon our amalgamation.
6. Maxs business is complementary to
IPC. Clients seek a diversified program of
reinsurers. As you were able to confirm in your due diligence,
Max has very limited overlap with the customers of IPC and
neither party expects a combination of IPC and Max to lead to
any meaningful disruption of either business. In addition, the
continuity of the underwriters at IPC will maximize the
opportunity for IPC to continue to write this business in the
future, assuming market conditions support it. By contrast,
Validus acknowledges that it writes business with many of the
same clients as IPC, which we would expect to result in a loss
of business as clients seek to diversify their reinsurance
placements.
7. Maxs complementary and diversified platform is
appreciated by our ratings agencies. Max
currently has a financial strength rating of A- by
A.M. Best, with its outlook changed to positive in December
2008. As IPC and Max have jointly presented to our ratings
agencies, IPCs Board has the comfort of knowing that the
ratings agencies view our combination, and its diversifying
impact on IPCs business, positively. In contrast, we
believe that the agencies would not look as favorably on
combining two short-tailed property-oriented platforms.
-52-
8. Max maintains less underwriting volatility through
greater diversification of its portfolio of
risks. Max seeks to limit its exposure to
catastrophic events (probable maximum loss based on a 1 in
250 year event) to a maximum of 20% of its
shareholders equity, often operating below this level. As
part of the IPC/Max Plan, we have discussed continuing to have a
significant presence in the property catastrophe market while on
a combined equity basis adhering to this same 20% risk
tolerance. In contrast, Validus maintains peak exposures where
the probable maximum loss based on a 1 in 250 year event
runs at a stated 33% of shareholders equity. Max believes
that combining this risk profile with IPC would expose IPC
shareholders to an even greater level of volatility than at
present and would not change the markets perception of IPC as
being a property catastrophe company. The volatility of
Validus results would also seem to be cause for concern,
particularly when the net losses from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav
(which approximated a 1 in 15 year event) was 12.4% of
shareholders equity, the highest among its broader peer
group. This compared to a net loss of 6.7% of shareholders
equity for IPC and 3.4% for Max.
9. Max has a proven, long-term history of successful
acquisitions without incurring goodwill. We
believe IPCs shareholders can take comfort in Maxs
demonstrated history of successfully entering new business lines
through acquisitions and
start-ups
without incurring meaningful goodwill. For example, when Max
entered the Lloyds market, we booked intangible assets of
$8 million upon closing our acquisition of Imagine Group
(UK) Limited, which stands in contrast to the $154 million
of intangible assets booked by Validus in their acquisition of
Talbot.
10. Max has a diversified shareholder
base. We believe having a shareholder base
dominated by five private equity owners controlling 64.9% of
Validus total beneficial ownership (as of March 13,
2009) will limit the potential upside in the value of
Validus over time as these private shareholders seek to exit
their investment. Max has a diversified shareholder base with an
84% public float. In addition, Max has a well diversified
shareholder base of high quality institutional shareholders.
11. IPC and Max have compatible
cultures. IPC and Max have compatible cultures
that will help ease the integration of the two companies. IPC
and Max share a common focus on underwriting, claims and
actuarial disciplines, and on running our respective businesses
as meritocracies.
12. Maxs higher asset leverage provides greater
investment income over time. Max believes that
investment leverage (invested assets as a multiple of
shareholders equity) is a positive in driving earnings and
stability of returns on capital over time. Based on 2008
figures, Max had total investment to equity of 4.2x versus 1.7x
for Validus. As Validus continues to pursue a short-tail
strategy, Validus will be limited in its ability to increase its
asset leverage. This deprives IPC of the meaningful investment
income derived from longer-tail casualty lines and continues to
leave IPC shareholders exposed to increased volatility from
catastrophes. Validus has commented on Maxs investment
portfolio, particularly its alternative investment portfolio.
Maxs year end allocation to alternative investments was
14% of total invested assets, which is expected to reduce to 10%
to 12% in 2009. In looking at results, Maxs total
investment return, including realized and unrealized gains and
losses, during the very volatile period of 2007 / 2008
has outperformed Validus in 6 of the last 8 quarters.
We believe that the facts regarding the proposal submitted by
Validus and the attempt by Validus to present a one-sided
proposal to IPC shareholders make it clear that Validus has not
presented a Superior Proposal, nor one that can be reasonably
expected to lead to a Superior Proposal. We believe Validus has
created an unnecessary and unproductive disruption for its own
opportunistic purposes, which should not distract either
IPCs or Maxs employees and customers from our
amalgamation, which we both believe to be in the best interests
of our shareholders.
-53-
Lastly, Max remains both steadfast in its commitment and excited
to complete its planned amalgamation with IPC. We continue to
believe that the amalgamation of IPC and Max represents the best
strategic and financial opportunity for our collective
shareholders.
Very truly yours,
W. Marston Becker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Max Capital Group Ltd.
-54-
In the afternoon on April 2, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
IPCs board of directors addressing the claims made by Max
in its letter to IPCs board of directors in the morning on
April 2, 2009. The text of our letter reads as follows:
April 2,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Members of the Board:
We are writing to respond to the letter sent to you by
Mr. Becker of Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max)
dated April 2, 2009, regarding the purported benefits of
the proposed combination of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC)
with Max (pursuant to an Amalgamation Agreement between Max and
IPC dated as of March 2, 2009 (the Amalgamation
Agreement)), as compared to the benefits presented by a
combination of IPC with Validus Holdings, Ltd.
(Validus) on the terms we proposed to you in our
letter dated March 31, 2009 (the Validus
Proposal).
First, we would like to reiterate our sincere belief that the
Validus Proposal is in every respect a Superior Proposal as
defined in the Amalgamation Agreement. In fact, as you have
undoubtedly seen, the markets have already endorsed our
proposal: the IPC share price has increased significantly since
the announcement of our proposal, in recognition of the fact
that our proposal delivers superior value to the IPC
shareholders an irrefutable fact. Our proposal
offers the IPC shareholders superior value (an 18% premium to
the value of the IPC stock on the date prior to our
announcement), a currency with superior trading characteristics
(Validus shares trade at a premium to book value, as opposed to
the Max shares, which trade at a discount to book value), less
balance sheet risk, and most importantly, superior long term
prospects.
Max suggests that the choice you are facing is between
(i) a combined company based on a shared vision in which
you, the IPC Board, can continue your stewardship, and
(ii) an entity which offers you few benefits over what you
have today, with no ability to continue your stewardship. We
view the choice quite differently: you can choose to combine
with a company which, on almost every metric, is a worse choice
for your shareholders, or ours, which delivers, immediately and
in the long term, superior value for your shareholders. To the
extent that you, the members of the IPC Board, have an interest
in continuing involvement in the affairs of the combined
company, we would be happy to discuss continued Board
representation with you.
Turning now to the assertions in the Max letter, we note that
Max has made a number of statements which distort the facts and
present an incomplete picture. We would like to respond to each
of these in turn.
1. A combination with Max delivers 29% more
tangible book value per share to IPC. Max believes
book value per share is a very important measure in our
industry, and we do not disagree. The relevant question for the
IPC Board, however, is not, as Max suggests, the relative
percentage of book value being delivered to IPC shareholders in
the two proposals, but the absolute value of the shares
themselves. On this measure, the Validus proposal is clearly
superior, as it offers IPC shareholders a significant premium
over the current value of their shares. Moreover, Max does not
explain in its letter why Maxs shares are trading at such
a deep discount to its book value. We can only guess that the
market assigns such a discount because of Maxs stewardship
of its business or because so much of Maxs investment
portfolio is tied up in risky alternative assets. Indeed, of
Maxs $1.2 billion of tangible common equity,
$754 million is in alternative assets, which in 2008
generated mark downs of $233 million, greater than the
entirety of Maxs underwriting income, and
$476 million is in non-agency asset/mortgage backed
securities. We believe it is a far better value proposition for
the IPC shareholders to receive Validus shares, a currency which
the market values at a premium to book.
-55-
2. The IPC/Max Plan creates significant value for
IPC shareholders. This statement is simply incorrect.
According to data calculated from the proxy statement filed by
IPC on March 27, 2009, IPCs book value per share
would decrease from $33.00 to $32.30, or 2.1% as a result of the
combination with Max (this obviously implies the deal is
accretive to Max at your expense). That can hardly be described
as the best opportunity to deliver shareholders
value. Moreover, while it is true that the Validus
proposal delivers an immediate premium for IPC shareholders, it
wrong of Max to suggest that such a premium will compromise
value creation for IPC shareholders in the longer term. We
believe that receiving a better currency, in a stronger, better
capitalized company, offers a more likely starting point for
long term value creation than retaining shares in IPC, whose
previously conservatively managed balance sheet will be
negatively impacted by assets of questionable value in the
IPC/Max combination.
3. Max is a truly diversified underwriting
platform. We think the relevant question for IPC is
not whether its merger partner has a diversified platform, but
rather the quality of that diversification. In terms of the
quality of diversification, Validus offers far superior
characteristics than Max, as evidenced by 2008 results for
Maxs diversified businesses. Maxs 2008
reported 91.9% property and casualty GAAP combined ratio
benefited from $107.0 million of prior-year reserve
releases. The true 2008 accident-year GAAP combined ratio was
103.4%.6Maxs
diversified businesses represent diversification
without profit. Maxs chief source of diversifying growth,
Max US Specialty, generated a 138.5% combined ratio in 2008.
Results such as those cannot create value for
shareholders.7
Max is not a leader in any category of business, and moreover,
it has chosen to focus on volatile lines of business which yield
low
margins.8
In contrast, Validus is a global leader in very profitable
business lines, including marine, energy and war and
terrorism.9
Furthermore, Maxs statement that Validus is constrained by
its limited underwriting platforms is demonstrably untrue.
Validus has the global licenses and other capabilities in place
to write long tail insurance if and when it believes doing so
would be profitable. In fact, today, Validus writes
non-catastrophe business in 143 countries around the
world.10And,
as demonstrated by Validus superior financial results and lower
combined ratio, Validus does so profitably.
4. Max has a proven, long-term, operating
history. Max may have a longer history than Validus,
but even a cursory look at the decline in Maxs book value,
its weak growth, volatile results and general underperformance
will quash any notion that the length of its operating history
trumps the superior abilities of the deeply experienced Validus
management team to generate best in class performance.
By focusing on the net loss reported by Validus based on
hurricanes Ike and Gustav, Max is yet again ignoring the larger
benefit of Validus conservative risk management and
diversification. Validus assumed that
6 Upon
verification of the calculations used to prepare this letter we
have determined that Maxs true 2008 accident year GAAP
combined ratio is in fact 110.6% rather than 103.4% as set forth
in our letter reprinted above. The combined ratio, expressed as
a percentage, is a key measurement of profitability
traditionally used in the property-casualty insurance business.
The combined ratio, also referred to as the calendar year
combined ratio, is the sum of the losses and loss
adjustment expense ratio and the underwriting and other
operating expense ratio. The losses and loss adjustment expense
ratio is the percentage of net losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred to net premiums earned. The underwriting and
other operating expense ratio is the percentage of underwriting
and other operating expenses to net premiums earned. When the
calendar year combined ratio is adjusted to exclude prior period
items, such as loss reserve development, it becomes the
accident year combined ratio.
7 As
described elsewhere in this proxy statement, a combined ratio of
greater than 100% indicates that premiums are less than
aggregate claims and expenses. Validus believes that
unprofitable operations do not create value for shareholders.
8 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be
qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry.
9 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be
qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry.
10 Upon
verification, the statement should refer to 134 countries,
rather than 143.
-56-
the hurricane season in 2008 would generate a market loss of $18
to $21 billion, and we set our reserve levels accordingly.
IPC, by contrast, assumed $14.5 billion of losses.
Notwithstanding the severity of the events of that hurricane
season, Validus was easily able to absorb the loss (yielding a
combined ratio of 92.2%, with a corresponding combined ratio at
Validus Re of 86.0%). As a result, Validus was profitable,
notwithstanding the losses associated with hurricanes Gustav and
Ike. Its highly touted diversification notwithstanding, Max
sustained a loss for the year in excess of $200 million,
demonstrating beyond a shadow of a doubt that its greater
diversification is not a guarantee of profitability.
We at Validus believe that our diversification is of a higher
quality, our underwriting decisions are made more carefully, our
risks are managed more prudently, and we exercise a more
conservative stewardship over our capital, all of which would
inure to the long term benefit of the IPC shareholders in our
proposed combination.
5. IPC and Max can complete an amalgamation more
quickly, with greater certainty. Max now claims
(contrary to the statements it made prior to the Validus
Proposal)11
that Max and IPC will be able to close their amalgamation in
June 2009. Max freely admits, however, that it does not control
the time table: the SEC must clear the proxy
statement/prospectus filed by IPC, it must clear the proxy
statement for Max, and the parties must obtain shareholders
approval (which we believe will be difficult to do while our
Superior Proposal is pending). Most importantly, the closing of
the IPC/Max transaction requires regulatory approvals from
several different state insurance departments in the United
States. Implicit in Maxs prediction of a closing date is a
presumption of the receipt of regulatory approvals, which simply
cannot be taken for granted given the likely timing of
regulatory review and the public hearing process. Thus there is
absolutely no guarantee that the IPC/Max deal can be consummated
in the second quarter. Finally, it is important for the IPC
Board not to lose sight of the fact that the Amalgamation
Agreement cedes to Max the power to delay the closing of a
Validus/IPC
combination.12
Max also tries to make an issue of the fact that IPC has not had
a chance to conduct due diligence on Validus. Validus would
welcome the opportunity to provide IPC with customary due
diligence information. Validus stands ready to respond to any
requests IPC may make on an expedited basis, and would be more
than happy to meet with IPC to answer any questions IPC may have
about Validus, its operations, its financial health or any other
matter relevant to the Board of IPC in considering Validus
Superior Proposal. We call upon Max to permit IPCs Board
to exercise its fiduciary duties by releasing IPC from the
extraordinarily restrictive prohibition in the Amalgamation
Agreement which prevents it from even talking to Validus
regarding the terms of its Superior
Proposal.13
6. Maxs business is complementary to
IPC. Maxs assertions that a combination of
Validus and IPC would result in a loss of customers are without
merit and are particularly surprising, given that Max has
publicly stated its intention to significantly reduce IPCs
core reinsurance activities. As we are both aware, the
11 IPC
and Max may update their predictions as to timing as new
information becomes available to each party. For example, in a
recent letter to shareholders filed on May 1, 2008, Max
discloses that it expects the transaction to close late in
the second quarter or early in the third quarter of 2009.
12 As
of the date of this proxy statement, the Max Amalgamation
Agreement cedes to Max the power to delay the closing of a
Validus/IPC combination because IPC has no right to terminate
the Max Amalgamation Agreement until after the vote of the IPC
shareholders at IPCs Annual General Meeting, even if
IPCs board of directors changes its recommendation and
recommends a vote FOR the Validus Amalgamation
Offer. Accordingly, should IPCs board of directors choose
to recommend a vote FOR the Validus Amalgamation
Offer, Max would have the power to delay the closing of a
Validus/IPC combination by not terminating the IPC/Max agreement
until after the shareholders vote down the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
13 The
agreement governing the Validus Amalgamation Offer retained this
restrictive prohibition. Validus board of directors
determined that proposing substantially similar agreement terms
with what we believed to be improved economic terms would
facilitate IPCs board of directors evaluation of the
Validus Amalgamation Offer.
-57-
current reinsurance market is in the midst of a capacity
shortage.14
As a result, we do not believe that clients will actively seek
to diversify their reinsurance placements away from our combined
company. In fact, our combined financial strength and clout
should only serve to make a combined Validus/IPC a
go-to player for reinsurance
placements.15
7. Maxs complementary and diversified
platform is appreciated by our ratings agencies. We
have been in dialogue with our ratings agencies with regard to
our proposal. We encourage the Board of IPC to focus its
attention on what the ratings agencies actually say, rather than
on Maxs
speculations.16
8. Max maintains less underwriting volatility
through greater diversification in its portfolio of risks.
Due to the significant investment losses Max sustained in
2008, it is unsurprising that Max is attempting to focus on
underwriting volatility alone. Selectively focusing on
underwriting volatility wholly ignores the other various risks
and uncertainties that IPCs shareholders would be assuming
by combining with Max and its risky balance sheet. With respect
to underwriting performance, in 2008, Validus successfully
weathered its exposures from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav with a
combined ratio of 92.2% and net income of $63.9 million.
This performance was generated despite the fact that Validus
reserved for those events more conservatively than its industry
peers, as discussed in paragraph 4 above. Validus
disclosures offer the highest level of transparency with regard
to its probable maximum losses, zonal aggregates and realistic
disaster scenarios and we would challenge Max to provide the
same level of transparency to its shareholders before
presumptuously speculating on the impacts of various potential
events.
9. Max has a proven, long term history of
successful acquisitions without incurring good will.
Validus has a proven track record of acquiring a high
quality premier business with a leading position in its market.
Maxs pointing to its acquisition of Imagine Group (UK)
Limited as an example of a successful acquisition is ironic,
especially relative to our successful acquisition of Talbot. In
that transaction, Validus acquired a strong balance sheet with
excess reserves at a multiple of 3.1x earnings demonstrating
Validus commitment to creating value for our shareholders.
When we acquired Talbot, Validus booked $154 million of
goodwill and intangible assets; however, from acquisition
closing until December 31, 2008, we benefited from
$105 million in reserve releases from the Talbot business,
emanating from periods prior to the acquisition. Maxs
acquisition history, on the other hand, is that of acquiring
subscale small businesses that significantly lag the leaders in
their respective
markets.17
10. Max has a diversified shareholder base.
Maxs attempt to characterize our shareholder base as a
liability is baseless. What is relevant is the relative
liquidity of Max and Validus shares. As previously mentioned in
our letter dated March 31, 2009, Validus daily
average trading volume was $11.3 million vs.
$6.7 million for Max for the three months prior to
announcement of the IPC/Max transaction. Additionally, since our
shareholder base is publicly disclosed, if the market viewed it
as an overhang, such information would already be
embedded in the market price of our common shares. The
combination of our trading
14 A
reinsurance industry commentator has recently stated that,
taking reinsurer capital as the nearest proxy for capacity, it
is estimated that reinsurer capital, which was down 8 to
10 percent from January 1, 2008 through
September 30, 2008, will be down 15 to 20 percent for
the year ending December 31, 2008 when reported. In
addition, the same commentator observed that capital markets
capacity for insurance risk has declined in similar proportions.
15 We
believe that a combined Validus/IPC would be a go-to
player for reinsurance placements because Validus will be better
capitalized (as measured by pro forma shareholders equity) than
many of the members of its peer group.
16 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement is intended
to emphasize that Validus believes the statement being referred
to, in the April 2, 2009 Max letter to IPCs board of
directors, is based upon speculation by Max, since, to Validus
knowledge, the rating agencies have not made a determination in
this regard.
17 As
of the date of this proxy statement, we are aware of only three
small acquisitions by Max and we believe, based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry, that the acquired
entities were not leaders in their markets.
-58-
volume and the premium pricing of our shares compared to either
Max or IPC should put to rest any concerns IPC shareholders may
have regarding liquidity of the combined company.
11. IPC and Max have compatible cultures.
Max has mentioned that it has a compatible culture with IPC.
If that is in fact the case, we find the paucity of IPC
management that will continue in senior roles at IPC/Max curious
and an indication that such cultural fit may be only skin deep.
We have successfully integrated large acquisitions in the past,
and believe that experience is most relevant in this regard.
12. Maxs higher asset leverage provides
greater investment income over time. Maxs asset
leverage has been a significant liability given its risky
investment
strategy.18
This leverage would similarly expose a combined IPC/Max to
significant volatility. Maxs alternative investments and
non-agency asset/mortgage backed securities alone comprise 99%
of its tangible equity, indicating a massive amount of embedded
risk. Maxs $233 million loss in 2008 on their
alternative investment portfolio is entirely indicative of that
risk.19Its
so-called outperformance in 6 of the last 8 quarters
ignores the abject underperformance it experienced in other
periods.20
In 2007, when the global credit crisis began, Maxs current
management had the opportunity to liquidate its alternative
assets. Max chose to continue holding those risky investments,
which have led to massive losses. Combined, we believe these
factors highlight Maxs poor history as stewards of
shareholder capital.
* * *
In closing, I would like to reiterate that we have submitted to
you a proposal which we are confident the IPC Board will agree
is a Superior Proposal as defined in your
Amalgamation Agreement. We have submitted this proposal because
we deeply and honestly believe that the combination of IPC and
Validus will result in a far better value proposition for the
IPC shareholders than the combination of IPC and Max. Validus is
absolutely committed to our Superior Proposal and we simply do
not understand how Max can characterize our actions as
opportunistic. If Max truly believes its combination
with IPC is superior, we call upon Max to free the IPC Board
from the shackles that your Amalgamation Agreement has placed on
the ability of the members of the IPC Board to exercise their
fiduciary duties under Bermuda law, so as to create a level
playing field on which the shareholders of IPC will be able to
decide which of the two proposals is indeed superior.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
18 As
of the date of this proxy statement, we believe that the
investment strategy that has been employed by Max, Max
management who will enter, and is expected to be employed by the
combined IPC/Max, and that according to Maxs public
information is expected to include a 10% to 12% concentration in
alternative investments, should be considered a risky investment
strategy that could amount to a significant liability when
compared with an investment strategy, like Validus, that
does not allow for such investments in alternative investments.
19 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement is intended
to emphasize that Maxs alternative investments alone
comprised 61% of tangible equity, indicating what we believe to
be a significant amount of embedded risk.
20 As
of the date of this proxy statement, this statement should be
qualified as an expression of our opinion based on our
experience and knowledge of the industry and on Maxs
investment performance in the third and fourth quarters of 2008,
which was worse than the average for its peer group but better
than the investment performance of several of its peers.
-59-
In the afternoon on April 5, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
IPCs Board of Directors regarding an error that Max had
made in its calculation of pro forma tangible book value under
the terms of the Validus Amalgamation Offer. The text of our
letter reads as follows:
April 5,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Members of the Board:
We are writing to call to your attention an error contained in
the publicly disseminated letter sent to you by Mr. Becker
of Max Capital Group Ltd. (Max) dated April 2,
2009 and the accompanying presentation materials, regarding the
purported benefits of the proposed combination of IPC Holdings,
Ltd. (IPC) with Max (pursuant to an Amalgamation
Agreement between Max and IPC dated as of March 2, 2009
(the Amalgamation Agreement)), as compared to the
benefits presented by a combination of IPC with Validus
Holdings, Ltd. (Validus) on the terms we proposed to
you in our letter dated March 31, 2009 (the Validus
Proposal).
In his letter, Mr. Becker states (and he has been widely
quoted in the media stating) that [a] combination with
Max delivers 29% more tangible book value per share to
IPC. This is not correct. We, and our financial
advisors and SEC counsel, have reviewed this calculation and we
would like to provide you with the correct figures.
Specifically, Mr. Beckers calculation understates the
pro forma IPC share of Validus tangible book value per share by
$2.74, which results in overstating the premium calculated on
this basis quite significantly. We have attached some materials
that illustrate the correct calculation. Our SEC counsel has
advised us that this error is material and that Max will be
required to amend its SEC filings to correct its error.
As we noted in our letter dated April 2, 2009, putting
aside this error, we believe that this measure is the wrong
framework on which to analyze whether the IPC/Max plan is
superior to the IPC/Validus plan, and refer you to the analysis
in our earlier letter. We remain confident that the IPC Board
will agree the Validus Proposal is a Superior
Proposal as defined in your Amalgamation Agreement.
We look forward to your response to the Validus Proposal.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
cc: Marty Dolan, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
In the afternoon on April 5, 2009, Validus also posted the
material referenced in the letter on its website.
On the morning of April 6, 2009, Max issued a press release
reaffirming its prior disclosure regarding the Validus
Amalgamation Offer and stating that it continues to
believe that Validus had not presented a Superior Proposal, nor
one that can be reasonably expected to lead to a Superior
Proposal (as such term is defined in the Max Amalgamation
Agreement). The text of the press release reads as follows:
Max Capital Group Ltd. (NASDAQ:MXGL; BSX: MXGL BH) today
confirmed that the calculations of diluted book value per IPC
share and diluted tangible book value per IPC share included in
-60-
Maxs April 2, 2009 letter to the Board of Directors
of IPC Holdings, Ltd. (IPC) are true and correct.
Max has consulted with its financial advisors and SEC counsel.
In a press release dated April 5, 2009, Validus alleged
that Max had made a substantial error in its
calculation of pro forma tangible book value under
the proposed terms of Validuss unsolicited takeover of
IPC. However, Validuss allegation is incorrect and
misleading. The calculations that Max presented accurately
represent what an IPC shareholder would receive on a stand alone
basis from either Max or Validus, without giving effect to what
IPC itself contributes to a transaction. The Max presentation
allows IPC shareholders to compare the value received under each
transaction on an apples-to-apples basis. Max
believes this is an important measure in comparing the value
received today by an IPC shareholder under the agreement with
Max and the proposed Validus transaction. The pro forma
calculations Validus is utilizing include the additional benefit
derived from issuing Validus shares to purchase IPC at a
discount to book value.
One has to question whether the IPC shareholders are being
well served by the non-substantive claims being initiated by
Validus. They have made certain statements that completely
misrepresent and falsely characterize the information presented
by Max. Since Validus initially made its below book value,
unsolicited takeover offer for IPC, it has demonstrated a lack
of understanding of what is important to the shareholders of IPC
in allowing them to assess the relative value being delivered by
Max versus Validus, stated W. Marston (Marty) Becker, Max
Chairman and CEO.
The facts presented in Maxs April 2, 2009 letter to
IPC have not changed and are clear:
(i) Max delivers to IPC $33.83 of diluted tangible book
value per IPC share a 29.2% premium versus $26.19
delivered by Validus, and
(ii) Max delivers to IPC $34.93 of diluted book value per
IPC share a 23.2% premium versus $28.35 delivered by
Validus.
As noted above, these figures represent the book value per IPC
share being delivered to IPCs shareholders on a standalone
basis, without giving effect to what IPC itself contributes to a
transaction.
The conclusion remains clear a combination with Max
provides greater underlying value to IPCs shareholders
today, with true diversification of underwriting exposures and
without an over-concentration in short-tail catastrophe oriented
business, and will result in greater upside for IPC shareholders
as compared to the hostile takeover proposal by Validus.
Max continues to believe that Validus has not presented a
Superior Proposal, nor one that can be reasonably expected to
lead to a Superior Proposal (as such term is defined in the
IPC/Max Plan of Amalgamation dated March 1, 2009).
Additional details on the Max calculations referred to above are
posted on [Maxs] website: www.maxcapgroup.com.
-61-
In the afternoon on April 6, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
IPCs board of directors regarding the Max press release
and issued a press release announcing the letter. The text of
our letter reads as follows:
April 6,
2009
The Board of Directors of IPC Holdings, Ltd.
c/o James
P. Bryce, President and Chief Executive Officer
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Members of the Board:
The difficulty of being unable to speak directly has lead to an
exchange of press releases, which is unfortunate. In this
context, we would like to respond to the Max statement issued
this morning by describing the analytical framework we believe
is appropriate.
In todays press release, Max modified its description of
its calculation of pro forma book value per share. In essence,
the Max calculation now describes what an IPC shareholder would
receive on a standalone basis from either Validus or Max. We
disagree with this basis for valuation. Our approach is focused
on a comparison of what an IPC shareholder would own as a result
of either transaction.
However, if we were to follow the Max approach, we would note
that there are a number of adjustments contemplated in the
proposed IPC/Max Amalgamation Agreement, which would reduce the
standalone21
value that Max delivers by $117.4 million. The joint proxy
statement/prospectus filed by IPC and Max references, among
other adjustments, the need to increase Max loss reserves
for annuity claims as well as property and casualty claims by
$130.0 million. As a result, the Max book value delivered
would be reduced by $2.06 per Max share, resulting in a book
value delivered of $20.40 per share, on the basis of Maxs
calculation of diluted book value.
I would also note that Validus and Max use differing accounting
conventions for calculating diluted book value per share. While
each is valid, on the basis upon which Validus calculates
diluted book value per share, the Max value delivered would be
$19.68 after a $1.81 per share reduction in book value.
We have provided the attached schedule of our calculations in an
effort to be as transparent as possible in our communication
with you.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
cc: Marty Dolan, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
21 If
the adjustments to reduce the net asset value of Max were made,
it would reduce by $117.4 million the book value that Max
contributes to the combined company at closing.
-62-
Adjustments
to Max Book Value Upon Combination with IPC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share values)
|
|
|
Net book value of net assets acquired prior to fair value
adjustments(1)
|
|
$
|
1,280.3
|
|
Preliminary adjustments for fair value
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to deferred acquisitions costs(2)
|
|
|
(51.3
|
)
|
Adjustment to goodwill and intangible assets(3)
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to reserve for property and casualty losses and loss
adjustment expenses(4)
|
|
|
(60.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to life and annuity benefits(4)
|
|
|
(70.0
|
)
|
Adjustment to unearned property and casualty premiums(5)
|
|
|
51.3
|
|
Adjustment to senior notes(6)
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
(117.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
1,162.9
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
$
|
(117.4
|
)
|
Max diluted shares outstanding(7)
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment per diluted share
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Note 1 to unaudited pro forma consolidated
financial information of IPC in
Form S-4
filed 3/27/2009
(S-4).
Notes 1-6
are excerpts from the
S-4.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents historical net book value of Max. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents adjustment to reduce the deferred acquisition costs
of Max to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents adjustment to reduce goodwill and intangible assets
of Max to their estimated fair value at December 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
The fair value of Maxs reserve for property and casualty
losses and loss adjustment expenses, life and annuity benefits,
and loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable were estimated
based on the present value of the underlying cash flows of the
loss reserves and recoverables. In determining the fair value
estimate, IPCs management estimated a risk premium deemed
to be reasonable and consistent with expectations in the
marketplace given the nature and the related degree of
uncertainty of such reserves. Such risk premium exceeded the
discount IPCs management would use to determine the
present value of the underlying cash flows. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the estimated fair value of the profit within
Maxs unearned property and casualty premiums. In
determining fair value, IPCs management estimated the
combined ratio associated with Maxs net unearned property
and casualty premiums. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents adjustment to record Maxs senior notes to their
estimated fair value at December 31, 2008. |
|
(7) |
|
Common shares outstanding plus the gross amount of all warrants,
options, restricted shares, RSUs, restricted common shares and
performance share units outstanding as of the 12/31/2008 balance
sheet date (Source: Max 2008
Form 10-K) |
-63-
In the afternoon on April 7, 2009, Kenneth L. Hammond,
Chairman of IPCs board of directors, sent a letter to
Mr. Noonan indicating that IPCs board of
directors
had reaffirmed its recommendation to combine with Max. The text
of the letter reads as follows:
April 7,
2009
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Validus Holdings Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
Dear Mr. Noonan:
I am writing to respond to your letter of March 31, 2009,
submitting an offer pursuant to which Validus would combine with
IPC.
IPCs board of directors, after careful consultation with
management and our financial and legal advisors, has unanimously
concluded that the Validus proposal does not constitute a
Superior Proposal as defined in the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation with Max Capital Group Ltd. dated March 1,
2009. Furthermore, IPCs board of directors has unanimously
reaffirmed its recommendation that IPC shareholders vote in
favor of the transaction with Max.
In reaching its decision, IPCs board of directors
considered several factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Validus Offer Fails to Meet IPCs Diversification
Goals During 2008, IPCs board of directors
concluded that it would be in IPCs best interest to
diversify beyond its monoline property catastrophe business
model in order to reduce the volatility inherent in focusing on
catastrophe reinsurance and to spread our risk base across less
correlated risks. A key factor in our decision to choose Max
over other options is our belief that Maxs diversified
operations offer the best path to achieve this goal. The
decision was the result of a robust and thorough review of
strategic alternatives. A transaction with Validus would not
accomplish that strategic objective given Validus
substantial correlated catastrophe exposure.
|
|
|
|
The Max Transaction Has Significant Value Creation Potential and
Upside for IPC Shareholders The combination with Max
has the potential to create significant value for IPC
shareholders, as detailed in the filed
S-4
registration statement dated March 27, 2009. It also
provides greater book value per share to IPC shareholders.
Furthermore, Maxs balance sheet has significantly lower
goodwill and intangibles, resulting in an even greater tangible
book value per share to IPCs shareholders. We are
concerned that Validuss proposal enables Validus to raise
capital at a discount to book value at the expense of IPC
shareholders, on the other hand, the combination with Max allows
deployment of capital under a combined business plan that
benefits IPCs shareholders. Maxs diversified book,
when combined with IPCs, has the potential to reduce
earnings volatility. Earnings volatility affects share price
volatility, ratings and other important financial measures. A
combination with Max carries less risk, as this combination is
less exposed to catastrophe events and other risk
concentrations. On the other hand, Validus earnings and
share price are more affected by catastrophe losses. At the time
of the Validus offer, its share price was near the high end of
its 52-week trading range, resulting in an exchange ratio that
poses potential downside risk to IPC shareholders. In contrast,
we entered into the transaction with Max at an exchange ratio
determined at a time that Max was trading at 53% of its 52-week
high.
|
|
|
|
The Validus Amalgamation Proposal Is Less Certain, Is
Riskier for IPCs Shareholders and Would Take Longer to
Close We currently expect to be able to complete the
transaction with Max in June, with all regulatory approvals
obtained. In contrast, in our view, any transaction with Validus
likely could not be completed before September, right in the
middle of the wind season. Our transaction with Max would have
to be rejected by IPC shareholders before IPC would be able to
conduct due diligence on
|
-64-
|
|
|
|
|
and negotiate with Validus. There is no assurance IPC would, at
that time, choose to enter into a transaction with Validus. Even
if IPC were to proceed with Validus at that time, Validus and
IPC would both need to obtain consents under their credit
facilities before the deal could close, whereas no such
additional consents would be necessary to close the IPC/Max
transaction. Validus and IPC would also need to achieve
satisfactory indications from the ratings agencies regarding the
ratings outcomes of such a combination.
|
Given these considerations and others, the board of directors
unanimously determined that the Validus proposal does not
constitute a Superior Proposal as defined in our amalgamation
agreement with Max. IPC remains committed to completing our
transaction with Max, which we believe will create a diversified
and balanced platform for growth that should drive stronger
performance and value for shareholders for many years.
Sincerely,
Kenneth L. Hammond
Chairman of the Board of Directors
On Behalf of the IPC Holdings Board of Directors
In the afternoon on April 8, 2009, Validus sent a letter to
Mr. Hammond, the Chairman of IPCs board of directors,
regarding the IPC press release and letter and issued a press
release announcing the letter. The text of the letter reads as
follows:
April 8, 2009
Kenneth L. Hammond
Chairman
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
American International Bldg.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke, HM 08
Bermuda
Dear Mr. Hammond,
I am writing in response to your letter of April 7, 2009,
in which you confirm the continuing support of the IPC board for
the Max takeover of IPCs operations.
I am disappointed with the Boards decision and
respectfully disagree with your assessment of our Superior
Proposal. I am confident that had your Amalgamation Agreement
with Max allowed you to engage in dialogue with us, you would
have instead supported the Validus Superior Proposal on behalf
of your shareholders. In particular, although you cite a
robust and thorough review of strategic
alternatives, I am greatly disappointed that you never invited
us to participate in that process, although you spoke with
numerous potential buyers. To the extent that Max will release
you from the restrictive terms of the Amalgamation Agreement, we
continue to stand ready to discuss your objectives and how our
business meets those objectives. Until you agree to discuss our
proposal with us, we have no choice except to communicate
directly with your shareholders. We believe the facts will
demonstrate that our proposal is truly a Superior Proposal.
We hereby advise the shareholders of IPC that:
1. We have retained Georgeson as our proxy solicitor. We
will shortly file proxy solicitation materials with the SEC and
those materials will contain, among other things, the many
reasons why we believe you should vote against the Max takeover.
Once the proxy is effective, Georgeson will be in touch
-65-
with IPCs shareholders to solicit their votes AGAINST the
Max takeover. If, as we
[hope],22IPCs
shareholders vote down the Max takeover, you will be
unencumbered by the restrictive Amalgamation Agreement and free
to execute the Validus Agreement.
2. In our capacity as an IPC shareholder, we object to the
punitive nature of the $50 million Max Termination Fee. The
Termination Fee is an unenforceable penalty under Bermuda law
and we are commencing litigation to reduce this penalty. If
successful,23
we will permit IPC to pay the amount by which such penalty is
reduced as a dividend to IPC shareholders, so that IPC
shareholders and not Max or Validus
shareholders will share in the value obtained.
I regret that the terms of the Max takeover preclude the
management teams of IPC and Validus from cooperating in
delivering a superior outcome for IPC shareholders, but we are
pleased to work directly with your shareholders to achieve the
same end. We remain fully committed to our proposal.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Noonan
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
On April 9, 2009, Validus filed a preliminary proxy
statement with the SEC with respect to soliciting votes from IPC
shareholders against the approval of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On April 13, 2009, IPC filed an amendment (Amendment
No. 1) to the IPC/Max
S-4, which,
among other things, added to the disclosure regarding the
background to the Proposed Max Amalgamation including the
reasons as to why Validus was excluded from the process that
resulted in the Proposed Max Amalgamation. Amendment No. 1
also contained a correction to IPCs diluted book value for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
On April 16, 2009, Validus filed this preliminary proxy
statement with
respect to soliciting votes from Validus shareholders to approve
the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the
Acquisition.
On April 21, 2009, Validus filed an amendment with the SEC
to the preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting
votes from IPC shareholders against the approval of the
proposals related to the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On April 28, 2009, IPC filed a second amendment to the
IPC/Max S-4
with the SEC.
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed a claim in the Supreme
Court of Bermuda against IPC, IPC Limited and Max (the
Bermuda Claim). The Bermuda Claim challenges the
validity of the Max termination fee and provisions which
restrict the ability of IPC to discuss competing proposals with
third parties (the no talk provisions) in the Max
Amalgamation Agreement. Further, the Bermuda Claim alleges that
by entering into the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the
Max termination fee and no talk provisions and continuing to act
in accordance with the terms of these provisions, the directors
of IPC acted in breach of their fiduciary and other duties and
not in accordance with the constitution of IPC.
On April 30, 2009, Validus issued a press release outlining
its three-part plan to expedite the Acquisition.
22 As
of the date of this proxy statement, the word hope
has been inserted to replace the word expect in this
sentence.
23 As
of the date of this proxy statement, the reference to
success in this sentence relates to Validus
success in pursuing the litigation strategy referenced in the
immediately prior sentence followed by the successful
consummation of the acquisition.
-66-
On April 30, 2009, IPC issued a press release reaffirming
its belief that the Validus Amalgamation Offer does not
represent a superior proposal and that IPCs board of
directors continues to recommend IPC shareholders vote in favor
of the Proposed Max Amalgamation.
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed with the SEC an amendment to
its preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from IPC shareholders against the approval of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to expedite the
trial of the Bermuda Claim
On May 4, 2009, IPC filed a third amendment to the IPC/Max
S-4 with the
SEC.
On May 5, 2009, Validus filed an investor presentation
titled Superior Proposal for IPC Shareholders with
the SEC and on May 6, 2009 filed a revised investor
presentation with the SEC.
On May 6, 2009, Validus filed an amendment with the SEC to
the
preliminary proxy statement with respect to soliciting votes
from IPC shareholders against the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 7, 2009, IPC and Max filed a joint proxy
statement/prospectus for the IPC/Max
S-4 with the
SEC and stated that they would mail the joint proxy
statement/prospectus on Thursday, May 7, 2009 to their
respective shareholders of record as of the close of business on
April 28, 2009.
On May 8, 2009, Validus filed the definitive proxy
statement with the SEC with respect to soliciting votes from IPC
shareholders against the approval of the Proposed Max
Amalgamation.
On May 8, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to this
proxy statement with the SEC.
On May 11, 2009, Validus filed an amendment to this
proxy statement with the SEC.
Reasons
Why Validus Board of Directors Recommends Approval of the
Share Issuance
By approving the Share Issuance, you will be enabling Validus to
issue the shares necessary to effect the Acquisition.
Validus board of directors believes that the Acquisition
represents a compelling combination and excellent strategic fit
that will enable Validus to capitalize on opportunities in the
global reinsurance market. Successful completion of the
Acquisition would allow IPC shareholders to benefit from the
superior growth potential of Validus, which would be a
leading
carrier in Bermudas short-tail reinsurance and insurance
markets following the Acquisition, with a strong balance sheet
and quality diversification in profitable business lines. In
reaching these conclusions and in determining that the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, the Acquisition and the Share Issuance
are fair, advisable and in the best
interests of Validus, and in recommending the approval of the
Share Issuance, Validus board of directors consulted with
Validus management as well as legal and financial advisors and
considered a number of factors. The factors included, but were
not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus board of directors analysis and
understanding of the business, operations, financial
performance, financial condition, earnings and future prospects
of Validus and its assessment, based on such analysis and
understanding, that Validus will have:
|
|
|
|
|
|
lines of business concentrated in short-tail lines where pricing
momentum is strongest;
|
|
|
|
enhanced market position and client penetration that will make
Validus a more significant player in short-tail reinsurance
placements globally;
|
|
|
|
ability to add a significant amount of short-tail reinsurance
premium to Validus existing Bermuda infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
global and diversified operating platforms, with offices and
underwriting facilities in Bermuda, at Lloyds in London,
Dublin, Singapore, New York and Miami;
|
|
|
|
enhanced size and scope, with GAAP capitalization of
approximately $4.1 billion and shareholders equity of
approximately $3.7 billion (on a pro forma basis as of
December 31, 2008);
|
|
|
|
continuing financial flexibility, with debt/total capitalization
of only 1.8% and total leverage including hybrid securities of
only 9.3%; and
|
|
|
|
the opportunity to reduce costs associated with running two
separate public companies, including IPCs NASDAQ listing
fees, transfer agent fees, legal and accounting fees related to
SEC filings and
|
-67-
|
|
|
|
|
shareholder mailings, printing and mailing expenses for periodic
reports and proxy statements, annual meeting expenses and other
investor relations related expenses;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus will experience accretion to its book
value and tangible book value per share as a result of the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus would remain within its stated limitations
of reinsurance aggregates by exposure zone;
|
|
|
|
Validus board of directors understanding of the
business, operations, and financial condition of IPC;
|
|
|
|
the ongoing representation by all of Validus existing
directors on Validus board of directors after the
Acquisition, and the fact that Validus senior management
will continue to manage Validus;
|
|
|
|
the written opinion from Greenhill, delivered to Validus
board of directors on March 31, 2009, to the effect that,
based upon and subject to the various limitations and
assumptions described therein, as of the date thereof, the
exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of view, to
Validus, as described in Opinion of Validus
Financial Advisor below;
|
|
|
|
the fact that no external financing is required for the
transaction;
|
|
|
|
Validus board of directors belief, based on advice
from legal counsel, that the Acquisition is likely to receive
necessary regulatory approvals in a relatively timely manner
without material adverse conditions;
|
|
|
|
the terms of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the requirement that the Share Issuance be approved by holders
of a majority of the outstanding Validus Shares casting votes at
the Validus special meeting, as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Conditions to the Amalgamation below;
|
|
|
|
Validus may terminate the Validus Amalgamation Agreement if the
total number of dissenting IPC Shares for which appraisal rights
have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law exceeds 15% of the
outstanding IPC Shares, as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Termination below.
|
Validus board of directors considered other factors in
making its determination and recommendation, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that IPC would have to pay a termination fee of
up to $50 million to terminate the Max Amalgamation
Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fact that, in order to agree to a transaction with IPC,
Validus board of directors thought the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement would need to be substantially similar to
the Max Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the restrictions on the conduct of Validus business
imposed by the Validus Amalgamation Agreement prior to the
consummation of the amalgamation, requiring Validus to conduct
its business in the ordinary course, subject to specific
limitations, which may delay or prevent Validus from undertaking
business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the
amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the inability to control IPCs conduct of business before
the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
that Validus shareholders and IPC shareholders may not react
favorably to the Validus Amalgamation Offer or the Acquisition,
and the execution risk and additional costs that would be
required to complete the Acquisition as a result of any legal
actions and appraisal actions brought by IPC shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the effect of the announcement of the Acquisition on
Validus share price if Validus shareholders do not view
the Acquisition positively or if the Acquisition is not
completed;
|
|
|
|
the potential disruption to Validus business that could
result from the announcement and pursuit of the amalgamation,
including the diversion of management and employee attention;
|
-68-
|
|
|
|
|
that Validus may wish to purchase retrocessional protection for
the 2009 wind season and the cost and availability of that
protection;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that IPC would not find the Validus Amalgamation
Offer to be a superior proposal under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, which would entail additional costs in
order to enable IPC shareholders to consider the Validus
Amalgamation Offer;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the amalgamation might not be completed due
to difficulties with terminating the Max Amalgamation Agreement,
obtaining sufficient shareholder approval, the occurrence of a
material adverse effect on either companys business, or
the inability to obtain required credit facility consents;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Validus may be required to pay IPC a termination
fee of $16 million, as described in The Amalgamation
Agreement Termination of the Amalgamation
Agreement Effects of Termination; Remedies below
in certain circumstances;
|
|
|
|
the risk that A.M. Best, S&P or Moodys might
lower the ratings of Validus or any of its reinsurance
subsidiaries following the Acquisition;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that after consummation of the amalgamation
Validus might find a material adverse fact or circumstance
affecting IPC that was not disclosed by IPC in its publicly
available financial and other information, which could have a
material adverse effect on Validus; and
|
|
|
|
the risks described in this proxy statement under the section
entitled Risk Factors.
|
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by Validus board of directors is not intended
to be exhaustive, but is believed to include the material
factors considered by Validus board of directors. In view
of the variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, the Share
Issuance and the other transactions contemplated by the
amalgamation and the Validus Amalgamation Agreement,
Validus board of directors did not find it practicable to,
and did not, quantify or otherwise assign specific weights to
the factors considered in reaching its determination and
recommendation. In addition, each of the members of
Validus board of directors may have given differing
weights to different factors. Validus board of directors
believed that the positive factors discussed above outweighed
the negative factors discussed above, especially after giving
weight to the likelihood of occurrence.
Litigation
On April 28, 2009, Validus filed the Bermuda Claim. On
March 1, 2009, IPC and Max entered into the Max
Amalgamation Agreement providing for the amalgamation of Max
with IPC Limited. The Bermuda Claim challenges the validity of
the Max termination fee and the no-talk provisions in the Max
Amalgamation Agreement. Further, the Bermuda Claim alleges that
by entering into the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the
Max termination fee and no talk provisions and continuing to act
in accordance with the terms of these provisions, the directors
of IPC acted in breach of their fiduciary or other duties and not in
accordance with the constitution of IPC.
First, pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, in the event
of an unsolicited alternate offer from a third party, the board
of directors of IPC is required to consider whether such a
proposal amounts to a superior proposal. The Bermuda
Claim alleges however, that without the ability to engage in any
discussions or information exchange with the offeror as a result
of the no-talk provisions, the board of directors of IPC is
restricted
and/or
precluded from properly exploring or evaluating whether in fact
the alternate offer is a superior proposal. Second,
in the event that a superior proposal is being made
and the directors of IPC vary or alter their recommendation of
the Proposed Max Amalgamation within the contractual closing
deadline, pursuant to the Max Amalgamation Agreement, Max would
be entitled to terminate the Max Amalgamation Agreement and
collect the Max termination fee from IPC. Under the Max
Amalgamation Agreement, the Max termination fee is $50,000,000.
The Bermuda Claim alleges that this is equivalent to
4.97% of the aggregate consideration value of
$1,005,915,920 of the Proposed Max Amalgamation, based on the
price of Max common shares on February 27, 2009, the last
trading day before the signing of the
-69-
Max Amalgamation Agreement. The Bermuda Claim also alleges that
the quantum of the Max termination fee is wholly excessive and
was not calculated by reference to the costs and expenses that
would be expected to be incurred by Max in the event that the
Max Amalgamation Agreement was terminated and substantially
exceeds Maxs anticipated liability in respect of such
costs and expenses, which, based upon disclosure in the IPC/Max
Form S-4,
is likely to be little more than $10 million. Therefore,
the Max Amalgamation Agreement constitutes an unlawful penalty
whose predominant function, the Bermuda Claim alleges, is to
deter IPC or IPC Limited from breaching the Max Amalgamation
Agreement (including by way of recommending a superior
proposal to its board of directors).
By agreeing to the Max Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max
termination fee and no-talk provisions, as well as by continuing
to act in accordance with their terms, the Bermuda Claim alleges
that the directors of IPC have failed to retain sufficient
flexibility to consider and, if thought fit, recommend an offer
which may be more advantageous to IPC shareholders, improperly
fettering their ability to exercise the powers conferred upon
them by the constitution of IPC
and/or act
in the best interests of IPC
and/or its
shareholders. And by doing so, the directors of IPC have acted
other than bona fide in the best interest of IPC
and/or for
an improper or collateral purpose, and the Max termination fee
and no-talk provisions were therefore beyond the actual or
implied authority of the board of directors of IPC, and as such,
not binding on IPC and unenforceable by Max.
The Bermuda Claim requests: (1) declaratory relief that:
(a) the Max termination fee constitutes an unlawful and
unenforceable penalty, (b) in entering into the Max
Amalgamation Agreement containing the Max termination fee and
no-talk provisions, the directors of IPC acted in breach of duty
and otherwise than in accordance with the constitution of IPC,
(c) in continuing to act in accordance with the Max
termination fee and no-talk provisions in the Max Amalgamation
Agreement the directors of IPC continue to act in breach of duty
and otherwise than in accordance with the constitution of IPC;
(2) an injunction restraining IPC or IPC Limited from
making any direct or indirect payment to Max pursuant to the Max
termination fee
and/or
taking any steps, whether itself, or by its directors, servants,
agents or otherwise to give effect to the no-talk provisions of
the Max Amalgamation Agreement
and/or the
Max termination fee; (3) an order that IPC pay the costs of
the proceedings; and (4) any other or further relief the
Supreme Court of Bermuda may deem just and proper.
On May 1, 2009, Validus filed an application to expedite the
trial of the Bermuda Claim. Validus requested that the Supreme Court
of Bermuda set a schedule permitting a trial to be conducted
commencing on an earlier date than any date on which IPC seeks to
hold its annual general meeting to consider the proposals related to
the Proposed Max Amalgamation. The application
to expedite the trial is currently scheduled to be heard by the
Supreme Court of Bermuda on May 11, 2009. Max and IPC have
opposed the application and have now scheduled the annual general
meeting of IPC shareholders for June 12, 2009.
Opinion
of Validus Financial Advisor
Validus board of directors received an oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing, from Greenhill that, based
upon and subject to the various limitations and assumptions
described in the written opinion, as of March 31, 2009, the
exchange ratio pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement
was fair, from a financial point of view, to Validus.
The full text of the written opinion of Greenhill, dated
March 31, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limits on the opinion and the review undertaken in connection
with rendering the opinion, is attached as Annex B to this
proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Greenhills opinion is not a recommendation as to how
Validus shareholders should vote with respect to the issuance of
Validus Shares pursuant to the amalgamation or any other matter.
The summary of Greenhills opinion that is set forth below
is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
the opinion. Validus shareholders are urged to read the opinion
in its entirety.
In connection with rendering its opinion, Greenhill, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the Validus Amalgamation Agreement dated as of
March 31, 2009 as executed by Validus and Validus Ltd. (but
not IPC as of the date of the opinion), and certain related
documents;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements of IPC
and Validus;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other publicly available business and financial
information relating to IPC and Validus that Greenhill deemed
relevant;
|
-70-
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain information, including financial forecasts and
other financial and operating data concerning Validus prepared
by the management of Validus;
|
|
|
|
discussed the past and present operations and financial
condition and the prospects of Validus with senior executives of
Validus;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the historical market prices and trading activity for
IPC Shares and Validus common shares and analyzed their implied
valuation multiples;
|
|
|
|
compared the value of the amalgamation consideration with that
received in certain publicly available transactions that
Greenhill deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the value of the amalgamation consideration with the
trading valuations of certain publicly traded companies that
Greenhill deemed relevant;
|
|
|
|
compared the value of the amalgamation consideration with the
relative contribution of IPC to the pro forma combined company
based on a number of metrics that Greenhill deemed
relevant; and
|
|
|
|
performed such other analyses and considered such other factors
as Greenhill deemed appropriate.
|
Given the unsolicited nature of the proposed amalgamation with
IPC, Greenhills review and analysis of IPC and its
business and financial information were necessarily limited to
information that was publicly available as of the date of the
opinion. Greenhill did not review financial forecasts and other
financial and operating data concerning IPC prepared by
management of IPC or other non-public information regarding IPC,
nor did Greenhill participate in discussions or negotiations
among representatives of IPC and its legal or financial advisor
and representatives of Validus or its legal advisor.
In giving its opinion, Greenhill assumed and relied upon,
without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness
of the information publicly available, supplied or otherwise
made available to it by representatives and management of
Validus for the purposes of its opinion. Greenhill further
relied upon the assurances of the representatives and management
of Validus that they were not aware of any facts or
circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or
misleading. With respect to the financial forecasts and
projections and other data that were furnished or otherwise
provided to it, Greenhill assumed that such financial forecasts
and projections and other data were reasonably prepared on a
basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and good
faith judgments of the management of Validus as to those
matters, and Greenhill relied upon such financial forecasts and
projections and other data in arriving at its opinion. Greenhill
expressed no opinion with respect to such financial forecasts
and projections and other data or the assumptions upon which
they were based. Greenhill did not make any independent
valuation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of IPC, nor
was Greenhill furnished with any such appraisals. Greenhill
assumed, with the consent of Validus board of directors,
that the amalgamation will be treated as a tax-free
reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Greenhill
assumed that the amalgamation will be consummated in accordance
with the terms set forth in the final, fully executed Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, which Greenhill further assumed will be
identical in all material respects to the proposed Validus
Amalgamation Agreement that Greenhill reviewed, and without
amendment or waiver of any material terms or conditions set
forth in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. Greenhill further
assumed that all material governmental, regulatory and other
consents, approvals and waivers necessary for the consummation
of the amalgamation will be obtained without any effect on IPC,
Validus, the amalgamation or the contemplated benefits of the
amalgamation meaningful to Greenhills analysis.
Greenhills opinion was necessarily based on financial,
economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to it as of, March 31, 2009. It
should be understood that subsequent developments may affect
Greenhills opinion, and Greenhill does not have any
obligation to update, revise, or reaffirm its opinion.
Greenhills opinion was for the information of
Validus board of directors and was not intended to be and
is not a recommendation as to how Validus shareholders should
vote with respect to the issuance of Validus Shares pursuant to
the amalgamation or as to whether the Validus shareholders
should take any other action at any meeting of the Validus
shareholders convened in connection with the amalgamation or any
other matter. Greenhills opinion did not address the
underlying business decision of Validus to engage in the
amalgamation
-71-
or the relative merits of the amalgamation as compared to any
other alternative strategies that might exist for Validus, and
as such was not intended to be and did not constitute a
recommendation to Validus board of directors as to whether
they should approve the amalgamation, the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement or any related matters. Greenhill did not express an
opinion as to any aspect of the amalgamation, other than the
fairness to Validus of the exchange ratio from a financial point
of view. In particular, Greenhill did not express any opinion as
to the prices at which Validus common shares will trade at any
future time. Greenhill further did not express any opinion with
respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any
officers, directors or employees of Validus, or any class of
such persons relative to the exchange ratio or with respect to
the fairness of any such compensation.
Summary
of Greenhills Financial Analyses
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
provided by Greenhill to Validus board of directors in
connection with rendering its opinion described above. The
summary set forth below does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by Greenhill, nor does the
order of analyses as set forth below represent the relative
importance or weight given to those analyses by Greenhill. Some
of the summaries of the financial analyses include information
presented in tabular format. The tables must be read together
with the full text of each summary and are not alone a complete
description of Greenhills financial analyses.
Exchange
Ratio Analysis
Greenhill calculated the historical range and average of
exchange ratios (the price of an IPC common share divided by the
price of a Validus common share). Using the daily closing prices
of Validus common shares and IPC Shares, the low, high and
average exchange ratios for the three-month, six-month and
twelve-month periods ending on March 30, 2009 are set forth
in the table below. The percent premium that the exchange ratio
pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement represents over
the average exchange ratios for each period is set forth in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
March 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
%
|
Previous 3 Months
|
|
|
0.9304
|
x
|
|
|
1.1120
|
x
|
|
|
1.2414
|
x
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Previous 6 Months
|
|
|
0.9304
|
x
|
|
|
1.1944
|
x
|
|
|
1.5564
|
x
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
Previous 12 Months
|
|
|
0.9304
|
x
|
|
|
1.2598
|
x
|
|
|
1.5564
|
x
|
|
|
(4.5
|
%)
|
Transaction
Multiple Analysis
Greenhill calculated the multiple of a range of assumed offer
values per IPC common share to several operating metrics for
calendar years 2009 and 2010, including estimated earnings per
share based upon mean estimates obtained from Institutional
Brokers Estimate System, which we refer to as IBES. The
calculations were based upon IPC Shares outstanding as of
December 31, 2008 on a fully diluted basis. This analysis
indicated the following multiples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Value per
|
|
2009E P/E
|
|
2010E P/E
|
|
Price / Book
|
|
Price / Tangible
|
IPC Share
|
|
IBES Estimate
|
|
IBES Estimate
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
Book Value(1)
|
|
$26.96
|
|
|
5.9
|
x
|
|
|
5.6
|
x
|
|
|
0.81
|
x
|
|
|
0.81
|
x
|
$27.00
|
|
|
5.9
|
x
|
|
|
5.7
|
x
|
|
|
0.82
|
x
|
|
|
0.82
|
x
|
$28.00
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
5.9
|
x
|
|
|
0.85
|
x
|
|
|
0.85
|
x
|
$29.00
|
|
|
6.3
|
x
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
0.88
|
x
|
|
|
0.88
|
x
|
$30.00
|
|
|
6.5
|
x
|
|
|
6.3
|
x
|
|
|
0.91
|
x
|
|
|
0.91
|
x
|
$31.27
|
|
|
6.8
|
x
|
|
|
6.5
|
x
|
|
|
0.95
|
x
|
|
|
0.95
|
x
|
-72-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed Value per
|
|
2009E P/E
|
|
2010E P/E
|
|
Price / Book
|
|
Price / Tangible
|
IPC Share
|
|
IBES Estimate
|
|
IBES Estimate
|
|
Value(1)
|
|
Book Value(1)
|
|
$32.27
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
|
|
6.8
|
x
|
|
|
0.98
|
x
|
|
|
0.98
|
x
|
$33.27
|
|
|
7.2
|
x
|
|
|
7.0
|
x
|
|
|
1.01
|
x
|
|
|
1.01
|
x
|
$34.27
|
|
|
7.4
|
x
|
|
|
7.2
|
x
|
|
|
1.04
|
x
|
|
|
1.04
|
x
|
$35.27
|
|
|
7.7
|
x
|
|
|
7.4
|
x
|
|
|
1.07
|
x
|
|
|
1.07
|
x
|
$36.27
|
|
|
7.9
|
x
|
|
|
7.6
|
x
|
|
|
1.10
|
x
|
|
|
1.10x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Book value per IPC common share is calculated as of
December 31, 2008 and does not reflect the impact of
493,000 unvested restricted stock units, restricted common
shares and performance share units to be issued upon a change of
control of IPC. |
Dividend
Discount Analysis
Greenhill performed a dividend discount analysis of IPC to
determine a range of implied present values per IPC common share
assuming that IPC continues to operate as a stand-alone company.
This range was determined by adding the present value of the
estimated future excess capital of IPC available to be
dividended in each period and the present value of the estimated
terminal value of IPC Shares. To estimate present values,
Greenhill discounted the estimated future excess capital of IPC
available to be dividended in each period through 2013 and the
estimated terminal value of IPC Shares by a range of discount
rates that take into account risk, the opportunity cost of
capital, expected returns and other appropriate factors.
In connection with this analysis, Greenhill utilized
5-year net
income and revenue projections based on IBES estimates for 2009
and 2010, extrapolated by Greenhill to 2013. In calculating
these extrapolations, Greenhill assumed, among other things, a
4.0% return on total assets, with projections based on an
assumed total assets to total equity ratio of 1.30x. In
addition, Greenhill assumed that 493,000 unvested restricted
shares of IPC would vest at the end of 2009, and that IPC would
continue to pay an aggregate annual dividend equal to $0.88 per
IPC common share throughout the
5-year
projection period.
Greenhill then calculated a range of implied present values per
IPC common share by applying:
|
|
|
|
|
a range of terminal multiples of 0.70x to 0.90x to year 2013
estimated book value of IPC Shares; and
|
|
|
|
a range of discount rates of 9.0% to 11.0% to each of the
estimated future excess capital of IPC available to be
dividended in each period through 2013 and the estimated
terminal value of IPC Shares.
|
This analysis resulted in a range of implied present values per
IPC common share from $25.99 to $35.34.
Comparable
Company Analysis
Greenhill reviewed and compared specific financial multiples,
ratios and operating statistics of IPC to corresponding
financial multiples, ratios and operating statistics for
selected publicly traded reinsurance companies and compared the
trading value of IPC to the trading values of the selected
companies. The companies chosen by Greenhill were:
|
|
|
|
|
ACE Limited
|
|
|
|
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings Ltd
|
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Axis Capital Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Everest Re Group, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Flagstone Reinsurance Holdings Limited
|
-73-
|
|
|
|
|
Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Max Capital Group Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Munich Re Group
|
|
|
|
Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
|
|
|
|
PARIS RE Holdings Limited
|
|
|
|
PartnerRe Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
|
|
RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd.
|
|
|
|
TransAtlantic Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
XL Capital Ltd
|
For each of the companies identified above, Greenhill calculated
and compared various financial multiples, ratios and operating
statistics based on publicly available financial data and
closing share prices as of March 25, 2009.
Although none of the companies are directly comparable to IPC
(other than IPC), Greenhill selected these companies because
they had publicly traded equity securities and were deemed to be
similar to IPC in one or more respects including the nature of
their business, size, diversification, financial performance and
geographic concentration. This analysis indicated the following
mean and median trading multiples for the selected companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price /
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price /
|
|
Tangible Book
|
|
Price / EPS Last
|
|
Price / EPS
|
|
Price / EPS
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Value
|
|
12 Months
|
|
2009E
|
|
2010E
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.83
|
x
|
|
|
0.90
|
x
|
|
|
7.9
|
x
|
|
|
6.1
|
x
|
|
|
5.9
|
x
|
Median
|
|
|
0.83
|
x
|
|
|
0.85
|
x
|
|
|
7.5
|
x
|
|
|
5.7
|
x
|
|
|
5.6
|
x
|
Greenhill then applied a range of selected multiples derived
from the selected companies to corresponding financial data of
IPC for the corresponding periods. This analysis indicated the
following ranges of implied equity value and per share value for
IPC:
|
|
|
|
|
Statistic
|
|
Implied Per Share Value(2)
|
|
2009E Net Income(1)
|
|
$
|
23.01 - $29.92
|
|
2010E Net Income(1)
|
|
$
|
23.88 - $28.66
|
|
Book Value
|
|
$
|
26.47 - $28.12
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
$
|
26.47 - $29.78
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimates are mean IBES. |
|
(2) |
|
Assumes 55,943,297 fully diluted IPC Shares outstanding. |
Precedent
Transaction Analysis
Global Reinsurance Transactions. Using publicly available
information, Greenhill analyzed selected merger and acquisition
transactions with transaction values over $100 million in
the global reinsurance
-74-
industry beginning in February 1999. The following table
identifies the global reinsurance transactions reviewed by
Greenhill in this analysis:
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement Date
|
|
Target
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
August 4, 2008
|
|
CastlePoint Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
Tower Group, Inc.
|
January 7, 2008
|
|
Helicon Re Holdings, Ltd.
|
|
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.
|
November 5, 2007
|
|
PXRE Reinsurance Company
|
|
TAWA plc
|
December 9, 2003
|
|
ABB Insurance Holding Sweden AB
|
|
White Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd.
|
October 24, 2003
|
|
ERC Life Reinsurance Corporation
|
|
Scottish Re Group Limited
|
December 19, 1999
|
|
LaSalle Re Holdings Limited
|
|
Trenwick Group Inc.
|
August 15, 1999
|
|
Terra Nova (Bermuda) Holdings Ltd.
|
|
Markel Corporation
|
June 21, 1999
|
|
Chartwell Re Corporation
|
|
Trenwick Group Inc.
|
May 27, 1999
|
|
Capital Re Corporation
|
|
ACE Limited
|
February 15, 1999
|
|
NAC Re Corp.
|
|
XL Capital Ltd.
|
For the selected global reinsurance transactions, to the extent
this information was available, Greenhill calculated the
multiples implied by each transaction relative to a number of
metrics, including the target companys book value and
tangible book value at the time of such transaction. This
analysis indicated the following mean and median multiples for
the selected global reinsurance transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Multiples
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.99
|
x
|
|
|
1.03
|
x
|
Median
|
|
|
0.95
|
x
|
|
|
0.96
|
x
|
Greenhill then applied a range of selected multiples derived
from the selected global reinsurance transactions to
corresponding financial data of IPC for the corresponding date.
This analysis indicated the following ranges of implied equity
value and per share value for IPC:
|
|
|
|
|
Statistic
|
|
Implied Per Share Value(1)
|
|
Book Value
|
|
$
|
29.52-$39.36
|
|
Tangible Book Value
|
|
$
|
29.52-$39.36
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes 55,943,297 fully diluted IPC Shares outstanding and
493,000 unvested restricted stock units, restricted common
shares and performance share units, for a total share count of
56,436,297. |
Stock Transaction Premium Analysis. Greenhill analyzed
the premiums paid in stock-for-stock merger and acquisition
transactions since March 2004 with a transaction value of
between $500 million and $5 billion. Greenhill
calculated, for each of these transactions, the premium of the
transaction exchange ratio over the historical closing prices
for each of the
one-day,
one-week and one-month periods prior to announcement of such
transaction. Greenhill then applied the medians and ranges of
such premiums, shown in the table below, to corresponding
closing prices per IPC common share, using the day immediately
prior to the announcement of IPCs proposed merger with Max
as the corresponding announcement date. This analysis indicated
a range of implied values per IPC share shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Per
|
Timing
|
|
Median Premium
|
|
Premium Range
|
|
Share Value
|
|
One Day Prior
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
14.0% - 19.0%
|
|
$28.97-$30.24
|
One Week Prior
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
15.0% - 20.0%
|
|
$32.20-$33.60
|
One Month Prior
|
|
|
18.1
|
%
|
|
16.0% - 21.0%
|
|
$29.77-$31.05
|
-75-
It should be noted that no transaction utilized in the analyses
above is identical to the proposed amalgamation. A complete
analysis involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating
characteristics of the companies involved in these transactions
and other factors that could affect the premiums and multiples
in these transactions to which the proposed amalgamation is
being compared.
Book
Value Growth Analysis
Using mean Bloomberg estimates of IPC net income and book value
through the end of year 2009, Greenhill calculated the implied
price to book value multiple that a range of assumed offer
values per IPC common share would represent at the end of each
quarter during the projection period. For purposes of these
calculations, Greenhill assumed that IPC would continue to pay
its current quarterly dividend of $0.22 through the projection
period. This analysis indicated that due to IPCs projected
book value growth, the implied price to book value multiple
would decrease over time, as illustrated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
December 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
December 31,
|
Per Share Value
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
$29.97
|
|
|
0.906x
|
|
|
|
0.875
|
x
|
|
|
0.847
|
x
|
|
|
0.835
|
x
|
|
|
0.811
|
x
|
$30.23
|
|
|
0.914x
|
|
|
|
0.883
|
x
|
|
|
0.854
|
x
|
|
|
0.843
|
x
|
|
|
0.818
|
x
|
$30.49
|
|
|
0.922x
|
|
|
|
0.891
|
x
|
|
|
0.861
|
x
|
|
|
0.850
|
x
|
|
|
0.825
|
x
|
$30.75
|
|
|
0.929x
|
|
|
|
0.898
|
x
|
|
|
0.869
|
x
|
|
|
0.857
|
x
|
|
|
0.832
|
x
|
$31.01
|
|
|
0.937x
|
|
|
|
0.906
|
x
|
|
|
0.876
|
x
|
|
|
0.865
|
x
|
|
|
0.839
|
x
|
$31.27
|
|
|
0.945x
|
|
|
|
0.913
|
x
|
|
|
0.884
|
x
|
|
|
0.872
|
x
|
|
|
0.846
|
x
|
Pro
Forma Combined Company Analysis
Greenhill analyzed certain financial data on a pro forma basis
for IPC and Validus as a combined company following the
amalgamation. Greenhill based its analyses on publicly available
information and information and projections provided by Validus
as described above.
Greenhill compared, among other things, the book value per
share, tangible book value per share and projected earnings per
share for Validus on a standalone basis and for the pro forma
combined company. Greenhill then analyzed the accretive or
dilutive effects of the amalgamation to Validus shareholders for
a range of assumed exchange ratios. This analysis indicated the
following accretive or dilutive effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion / (Dilution)
|
Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tangible Book
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
2009E EPS
|
|
2010E EPS
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Value Per Share
|
|
1.156x
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
1.177x
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
1.198x
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
1.219x
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
1.240x
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(7.5
|
)%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
1.261x
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
1.282x
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.0
|
)%
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
1.303x
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
1.324x
|
|
|
(10.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(10.4
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
1.345x
|
|
|
(10.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
1.366x
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
In addition, Greenhill analyzed the pro forma combined
companys business lines, investment portfolio, balance
sheet and capital base relative to each of Validus and IPC on a
standalone basis. Further, Greenhill conducted a comparison
regarding the pro forma combined companys equity as of
December 31, 2008 relative to certain of its peers and each
of Validus and IPC on a standalone basis. Greenhill also
performed a
-76-
contribution analysis of the relative contributions of each of
Validus and IPC with respect to the pro forma combined
companys balance sheet, gross written premiums and other
items.
The summary set forth above does not purport to be a complete
description of the analyses performed by Greenhill, but
describes, in summary form, the material analyses that Greenhill
conducted in connection with rendering its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is
not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In arriving at its opinion, Greenhill did not
attribute any particular weight to any analyses or factors it
considered and did not form an opinion as to whether any
individual analysis or factor, considered in isolation,
supported or failed to support its opinion. Rather, Greenhill
considered the totality of the factors and analyses performed in
determining its opinion. Accordingly, the summary set forth
above and the analyses of Greenhill must be considered as a
whole and selecting portions thereof, without considering all of
its analyses, could create an incomplete view of the processes
underlying Greenhills analyses and opinion. Greenhill
based its analyses on assumptions that it deemed reasonable,
including assumptions concerning general business and economic
conditions and industry-specific factors. Analyses based on
forecasts or projections of future results are inherently
uncertain, as they are subject to numerous factors or events
beyond the control of the parties or their advisors.
Accordingly, Greenhills analyses are not necessarily
indicative of actual values or actual future results that might
be achieved, which values may be higher or lower than those
indicated. Moreover, Greenhills analyses are not and do
not purport to be appraisals or otherwise reflective of the
prices at which businesses actually could be bought or sold. In
addition, no company (other than IPC) or transaction used in
Greenhills analysis as a comparison is directly comparable
to IPC, Validus or the contemplated transaction. Because these
analyses are inherently subject to uncertainty, being based upon
numerous factors or events beyond the control of the parties or
their respective advisors, none of Validus or Greenhill or any
other person assumes responsibility if future results are
materially different from those forecasts or projections.
Greenhills opinion and analyses were provided to
Validus board of directors in connection with its
consideration of the proposed amalgamation and were among many
factors considered by Validus board of directors in
evaluating the proposed amalgamation. While Greenhill provided
advice to Validus during this process, it did not recommend any
specific amount of consideration to Validus or Validus
board of directors or that any specific amount of consideration
would constitute the only appropriate consideration for the
amalgamation. Neither Greenhills opinion nor its analyses
should be viewed as determinative of the consideration or the
views of Validus board of directors with respect to the
proposed amalgamation.
Engagement
of Greenhill
Validus selected Greenhill as its financial advisor in
connection with the proposed amalgamation based on its
qualifications and expertise in providing financial advice to
acquirors, target companies and their respective boards of
directors in merger and acquisition transactions. Greenhill will
receive an aggregate fee of $10.0 million for their
services
rendered in connection with the Acquisition, $2.75 million
of which has already been paid and $7.25 million of which
is contingent on the consummation of the Acquisition. In
addition, Validus has agreed to indemnify Greenhill for certain
liabilities arising out of its engagement, including liabilities
under U.S. federal securities laws.
During the two years preceding the date of its opinion,
Greenhill was not previously engaged by, did not perform any
services for, and did not receive any compensation from, Validus
or any other parties to the amalgamation (other than any amounts
that were paid to Greenhill under its engagement in connection
with the proposed amalgamation). As of the date of
Greenhills opinion, four merchant banking funds affiliated
with Greenhill owned an aggregate of 2,571,427 Validus Shares,
and certain employees of Greenhill and its affiliates had
interests in one or more of such funds.
Interests
of Validus Directors and Executive Officers in the
Acquisition
The consummation of the Acquisition will not be deemed to be a
change in control impacting grants under any of Validus
long-term incentive or stock option plans, or a change in
control under any employment
-77-
agreement between Validus and any of its employees. As a result,
no options or other equity grants held by such persons will vest
as a result of the Acquisition.
Validus
Shareholder Approval of Share Issuance
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is present in
accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required to approve
the Share Issuance, as described below under Proposals to Be
Submitted to Validus Shareholders Vote; Voting Requirements and
Recommendations Proposal 1: Share Issuance
on page 97. All of the
officers and those directors and shareholders who are qualified
sponsors (as defined in this proxy statement) and who own
Validus Shares have indicated that they intend to vote the Validus
Shares owned by them in favor of the Share Issuance Proposal
and the Adjournment Proposal. As of March 13, 2009, these
persons and entities beneficially owned 42.4% of the voting interests
relating to the Validus Shares. All of our officers, directors and
qualified sponsors together own 57.4% of the economic interests
relating to all outstanding common shares of Validus.
Listing
of Validus Shares
It is a condition to the closing of the Acquisition that the
Validus Shares issuable to IPC shareholders in the Acquisition
and the Validus Shares to be reserved for issuance upon the
exercise of IPC options and the vesting of IPC Shares authorized
to be issued under IPCs outstanding equity compensation
plans shall have been authorized for listing on the NYSE,
subject to official notice of issuance.
Dividends
and Distributions
Each of Validus and IPC regularly pays a quarterly cash
dividend. Under the terms of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement,
before the amalgamation closes, Validus and IPC are permitted to
declare and pay ordinary course quarterly dividends on their
common shares with record and payment dates consistent with past
practice; provided that any such dividend is at a rate no
greater than the rate it paid during the fiscal quarter
immediately preceding the date of the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, i.e., $0.20 per common share in Validus
case and $0.22 per common share in IPCs case.
Pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, Validus and IPC
will coordinate the declaration of, and setting of record dates
and payment dates for, dividends on Validus common shares and
IPC Shares so that the IPC shareholders do not receive dividends
on both the IPC Shares and the Validus Shares received in the
amalgamation in respect of any calendar quarter or fail to
receive a dividend in respect of any calendar quarter.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
The Acquisition will be accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business
Combinations, (FAS 141(R)) under
which the total consideration paid in the Acquisition will be
allocated among acquired tangible and intangible assets and
assumed liabilities based on the fair values of the tangible and
intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In the event
there is an excess of the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition over the fair values, the excess will be accounted
for as goodwill. Intangible assets with definite lives will be
amortized over their estimated useful lives. Goodwill resulting
from the Acquisition will not be amortized but instead will be
tested for impairment at least annually (more frequently if
certain indicators are present). In the event that management of
Validus determines that the value of goodwill has become
impaired, an accounting charge will be taken in the fiscal
quarter in which such determination is made. In the event there
is an excess of the fair values of the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid in the
Acquisition, the excess will be accounted for in accordance with
FAS 141(R). The excess resulting from the Acquisition will
be recognized in earnings as a gain attributable to the acquirer
on the acquisition date. Validus anticipates the Acquisition
will result in an excess of the fair values of the acquired
assets and liabilities assumed over the total consideration paid
in the Acquisition.
-78-
Sources
of Funds, Fees and Expenses
The aggregate acquisition consideration paid to IPC shareholders
will consist of a number of shares of Validus Shares determined
in accordance with the exchange ratio and cash in lieu of
fractional shares.
It is anticipated that Validus will incur an aggregate of
approximately $20.0 million in expenses in connection with
the Acquisition, including:
|
|
|
|
|
approximately $19.0 million in financial, legal, accounting
and tax advisory fees;
|
|
|
|
approximately $90,000 in SEC filing fees;
|
|
|
|
approximately $350,000 in printing, solicitation and mailing
expenses associated with this proxy statement; and
|
|
|
|
approximately $560,000 in miscellaneous expenses.
|
These amounts do not include the expenses IPC would incur in the
Acquisition.
Validus engaged Greenhill as financial advisor with respect to
its strategic process and the Acquisition. In connection with
Greenhills services to Validus,
Validus has agreed to pay Greenhill an aggregate fee
of $10.0 million, $2.75 million of which has already
been paid and $7.25 million of which is contingent upon the
closing of the Acquisition.
Validus has also engaged Dowling & Partners Securities, LLC
(Dowling) as capital markets advisor with respect to the
Acquisition. In connection with Dowlings services, Validus
agreed to pay Dowling an aggregate fee of $2.0 million. Payment
of the fee to Dowling is not conditioned on the successful
acquisition of IPC Shares by Validus in the Acquisition. In addition,
Validus will reimburse Dowling for its reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses, including the reasonable fees and expenses of its legal
counsel. Validus has also agreed to indemnify Dowling and its
affiliates in connection with Dowlings services against certain
liabilities in connection with their engagement, including
liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws.
THE
AMALGAMATION AGREEMENT
The following section contains summaries of selected material
provisions of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement. These
summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement which is incorporated by
reference in its entirety and attached to this proxy statement
as Annex A. You should read that document in
its entirety
because it, and not this proxy statement, is the legal document
that would govern the amalgamation. In response to IPCs
rejection of the Validus Amalgamation Offer, Validus is engaging
in efforts to move forward with the transaction without
IPCs cooperation. These efforts will necessitate certain
changes to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement which are not
material to Validus or IPC shareholders. For example, the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement contemplates Validus and IPC
would cooperate in the preparation and filing of a joint proxy
statement/prospectus regarding the amalgamation which would have
included soliciting the votes we are seeking by this proxy
statement. Certain other provisions regarding timing and process
would need to be updated similarly.
The representations, warranties and covenants contained in
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement would be made only for
purposes of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement and as of a
specific date and may be subject to more recent developments,
will be solely for the benefit of the parties to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, may be subject to limitations agreed
upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by
disclosures made for the purposes of allocating risk between the
parties to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement instead of
establishing these matters as facts, and may apply standards of
materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed
as material by you or by other investors. For the foregoing
reasons, you should not rely on the representations, warranties
and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations
of the actual state of facts or condition of IPC, Validus or
Validus Ltd. or any of their respective subsidiaries or
affiliates.
-79-
Structure
of the Amalgamation
Pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, IPC will
amalgamate with Validus Ltd., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary
of Validus, with the amalgamated company continuing as the
surviving company and succeeding to and assuming all of the
rights, properties, liabilities and obligations of IPC and
Validus Ltd., if all the conditions provided in the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, which are summarized in
Conditions to the Amalgamation below, are satisfied or
waived. The name of the amalgamated company will be
Validus Ltd.
Upon closing of the amalgamation, Validus board of
directors would consist of the directors serving on the board of
directors of Validus before the amalgamation; however, Validus
has expressed to the IPC directors that if they desire to
participate in the leadership of Validus after the amalgamation,
Validus would consider that. Upon closing of the amalgamation,
the officers of Validus will be the officers serving Validus
before the amalgamation.
Closing;
Completion of the Amalgamation
The closing is expected to occur on the third business day after
the satisfaction or waiver of all closing conditions, which are
summarized in Conditions to the Amalgamation
below, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties,
except that the closing may be postponed if either party
requests a book value estimate from the other party pursuant to
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, as described in
Book Value Calculations below.
The amalgamation will become effective on the date on which the
certificate of amalgamation is issued by the Registrar of
Companies in Bermuda or such other time as the certificate of
amalgamation may provide. The application for the certificate of
amalgamation will be filed by IPC and Validus Ltd. with the
Registrar of Companies in Bermuda on or prior to the closing
date of the amalgamation.
Amalgamation
Consideration
At the effective time of the amalgamation, the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement provides that each IPC common share
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time
of the amalgamation (including any shares held by IPC
shareholders that do not vote in favor of the amalgamation, but
excluding any dissenting shares as to which appraisal rights
have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law, and excluding
any
shares held by Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries) will be converted
into the right to receive, subject to adjustment as described
below, for each IPC common share:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus Shares equal to the exchange ratio; and
|
|
|
|
cash consideration in lieu of fractional shares.
|
This consideration is collectively referred to as the
amalgamation consideration.
Exchange
Ratio
The exchange ratio is 1.2037. Each IPC Share issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the
amalgamation (including any shares held by IPC shareholders that
do not vote in favor of the amalgamation, but excluding any
dissenting shares as to which appraisal rights have been
exercised pursuant to Bermuda law, and excluding any shares
held
by Validus, IPC or any of their respective subsidiaries) will be cancelled and converted
into the right to receive Validus Shares equal to this exchange
ratio.
Fractional
Shares
Validus will not issue any fractional Validus Shares in
connection with the amalgamation. Instead, any IPC shareholder
who would otherwise have been entitled to a fraction of a
Validus Share in connection with the amalgamation will be paid,
upon surrender of title to all IPC Shares held by such
shareholder, an amount in cash determined by multiplying such
fraction by the average Validus share price (such average
Validus common share price is determined by valuing Validus
Shares based on the volume weighted average price per
-80-
Validus common share on the NYSE for the five consecutive
trading days immediately preceding the second trading day prior
to the closing of the amalgamation).
Example
of Amalgamation Consideration
For example, with the exchange ratio being 1.2037, an IPC
shareholder owning 100 IPC Shares will receive total
consideration valued at 120.37 Validus Shares. Under the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, such shareholders amalgamation
consideration would be 120 Validus Shares and for the fractional
remainder, an amount of cash equal to the value of one Validus
Share (determined in the manner described above) times
.37.
Unless otherwise required by law or Validus agreement with
the exchange agent, any portion of the exchange fund held by the
exchange agent that has not been distributed to IPC shareholders
six months following the effective time of the amalgamation will
be delivered to Validus, upon demand, and after such transfer,
any IPC shareholder may look only to Validus for payment of the
amalgamation consideration and any dividends or distributions
with respect to Validus Shares.
Treatment
of IPC Share Options and Other IPC Equity Awards
At the effective time of the amalgamation, all outstanding
options to purchase IPC Shares will cease to represent a right
to acquire IPC Shares and will automatically be converted into
new options to purchase, on substantially similar terms, such
number of Validus Shares and at an exercise price per share
determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares: the number of Validus Shares
subject to new options will be equal to the product of
(1) the number of IPC Shares subject to IPC share options
immediately before the effective time of the amalgamation and
(2) the exchange ratio, the product being rounded, if
necessary, to the nearest whole share; and
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price: the exercise price per Validus
Share purchasable upon exercise of the new options will be equal
to (1) the per share exercise price of the IPC share option
divided by (2) the exchange ratio, the quotient being
rounded, if necessary, to the nearest cent.
|
At the effective time of the amalgamation, any holder of an
outstanding right of any kind to acquire IPC Shares or benefits
measured by the value of IPC Shares (other than share options)
will have such right automatically converted into the right to
acquire or receive benefits measured by the value of the number
of Validus Shares equal to the product of (1) the number of
IPC Shares subject to the outstanding right immediately before
the effective time of the amalgamation and (2) the exchange
ratio (rounded down, if necessary, to the nearest number of
whole shares). The Validus Shares received for such IPC Shares
will remain subject to the same restrictions that applied before
the amalgamation was effective and will otherwise have the same
terms and conditions (taking into account any accelerated
vesting thereunder) as were applicable before the effective time
of the amalgamation.
Representations
and Warranties of the Parties in the Amalgamation
Agreement
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement contains various customary
representations and warranties of IPC and Validus (and Validus
Ltd. with respect to specified sections) relating to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, good standing and corporate power;
|
|
|
|
capital structure;
|
|
|
|
authorization to enter into, and enforceability of, the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the absence of conflicts with, or violations of,
(1) organizational documents, (2) applicable law or
(3) material agreements, indentures or other instruments,
in each case as a result of the amalgamation or entry into the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the filing, accuracy and completeness of SEC reports, the
preparation and presentation of financial statements, and the
absence of undisclosed liabilities;
|
-81-
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws and reporting requirements;
|
|
|
|
absence of material pending or threatened legal and arbitration
proceedings and investigations;
|
|
|
|
tax matters;
|
|
|
|
absence of certain changes or events in the business or
condition of each party;
|
|
|
|
approvals of the boards of directors in connection with the
amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
the required vote of shareholders;
|
|
|
|
agreements with regulatory agencies or governmental authorities;
|
|
|
|
insurance matters, including statements and reports filed with
applicable insurance regulatory authorities;
|
|
|
|
investments and derivatives;
|
|
|
|
material and intercompany contracts;
|
|
|
|
employee benefits and executive compensation;
|
|
|
|
labor relations and other employment matters;
|
|
|
|
intellectual property;
|
|
|
|
real and leased properties;
|
|
|
|
brokers fees payable in connection with the amalgamation;
|
|
|
|
investment advisor status;
|
|
|
|
the opinion of each partys financial advisor as to
fairness from a financial point of view; and
|
|
|
|
inapplicability of takeover statutes to the amalgamation.
|
Some of the representations and warranties of Validus, Validus
Ltd. and IPC in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement are qualified
by materiality thresholds, or a material adverse
effect clause. For purposes of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, the material adverse effect
clause and its related definition contemplate any change, state
of facts, circumstance, event or effect that is materially
adverse to the financial condition, properties, assets,
liabilities, obligations (whether accrued, absolute, contingent
or otherwise), businesses or results of operations of a party
and its subsidiaries, taken as whole, except any such effect to
the extent resulting from any of the following is excluded from
the definition of material adverse effect:
|
|
|
|
|
the execution, delivery and announcement of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
|
|
|
changes in economic, market, business, regulatory or political
conditions generally in the United States or in Bermuda or any
other jurisdiction in which such party operates or in the
Bermudian, U.S. or global financial markets except to the
extent such changes have a materially disproportionate effect on
a party relative to other similarly situated persons in the
property and casualty reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
changes, circumstances or events generally affecting the
property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industries in
the geographic areas in which such party operates, except to the
extent such changes have a materially disproportionate effect on
a party relative to other similarly situated persons in the
property and casualty reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
changes, circumstances or events resulting in liabilities under
property catastrophe reinsurance, including any effects
resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado, windstorm,
terrorist act, act of war or other natural or man-made disaster;
|
-82-
|
|
|
|
|
changes in any applicable law, except to the extent such changes
have a materially disproportionate effect on a party relative to
other similarly situated persons in the property and casualty
reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
changes in generally accepted accounting principles or in
statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the
applicable jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance
regulatory authority, including accounting and financial
reporting pronouncements by the Bermuda Monetary Authority (the
BMA), the SEC, the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners and the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
except to the extent such changes have a materially
disproportionate effect on a party relative to other similarly
situated persons in the property and casualty reinsurance
industry;
|
|
|
|
any change or announcement of a potential change in its or any
of its subsidiaries credit or claims-paying rating or
A.M. Best rating or the ratings of any of its or its
subsidiaries businesses or securities, but not excluding
the underlying cause of such change or announcement;
|
|
|
|
a change in the trading prices or volume of such partys
capital shares, but not excluding the underlying cause of such a
change;
|
|
|
|
the failure to meet any revenue, earnings or other projections,
forecasts or predictions for any period ending after the date of
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, but not excluding the
underlying cause of such failure;
|
|
|
|
the commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war or armed
hostilities except to the extent any such changes have a
materially disproportionate effect on a party relative to other
similarly situated persons in the property and casualty
reinsurance industry;
|
|
|
|
any action or failure to act required to be taken by a party
pursuant to the terms of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement;
and/or
|
|
|
|
a partys ability to perform its obligations under the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement or to consummate the transactions
contemplated thereby.
|
In most instances, the representations and warranties of
Validus, Validus Ltd. and IPC in the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement that are qualified by material adverse
effect are qualified only to the extent the failure of
such representations or warranties to be true and correct would
not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to
have a material adverse effect on Validus, Validus
Ltd. or IPC, as the case may be.
Conduct
of Business Pending the Closing of the Amalgamation
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement requires that each of IPC and
Validus, subject to certain exceptions, as consented to in
writing by the other party or as expressly noted below as solely
applicable to IPC and its subsidiaries during the period from
the signing of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement to the
effective time of the amalgamation, it and its subsidiaries,
among other things, (1) will conduct its respective
businesses in the ordinary course consistent with past practice
and use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its
business organization, maintain permits and licenses and
preserve relationships with its employees, customers, investment
advisors and managers, regulators, financing providers and
others having business dealings with it and (2) will not:
|
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividend or make other distributions, with
limited exceptions including ordinary course quarterly dividends
on its common shares with record and payment dates consistent
with past practice and at a rate no greater than the rate it
paid in the fiscal quarter immediately preceding the date of the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify, or propose to split, combine or
reclassify, any of its share capital, or issue or authorize or
propose the issuance or authorization of any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its
share capital;
|
-83-
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of IPC and its subsidiaries, repurchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any shares of its or any of its
subsidiaries share capital or any securities convertible
into or exercisable for any such shares, other than repurchases,
redemptions or acquisitions by a wholly owned subsidiary of
share capital or such other securities, as the case may be, of
another of its wholly owned subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell any shares of any class of its capital
shares, any voting debt, any share appreciation rights or any
securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for,
any rights, warrants or options to acquire such shares or voting
debt, other than as required by its existing equity benefit
plans and issuances by any of its wholly owned subsidiaries to
it or to another of its wholly owned subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
amend or propose to amend its organizational documents or those
of any of its subsidiaries, except as provided in the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
with limited exceptions, acquire or agree to acquire any equity
interests in or a substantial portion of the assets of any other
entity or any material assets, rights or properties, or sell,
dispose or otherwise encumber any of its assets, rights or
properties;
|
|
|
|
modify or terminate any material contract (as defined in the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement), or cancel, modify or waive any
debts or claims held by it under, or in connection with, any
material contract;
|
|
|
|
enter into any contract that would have been a material contract
had it been entered into before entering into the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
fail to comply with its investment policy, or modify its
investment policy in any material respect, except as may be
required by (or, in its reasonable good-faith judgment,
advisable under) generally accepted accounting principles or in
statutory accounting principles prescribed by applicable law;
|
|
|
|
enter into, purchase, sell, amend or modify any derivative
contract other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and its investment policy;
|
|
|
|
voluntarily forfeit, abandon, modify, waive or terminate any of
its material permits;
|
|
|
|
take any action with the knowledge and intent that it would
result in any of the conditions to the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement not being satisfied;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would materially adversely affect the
ability of the parties to obtain any of the regulatory approvals;
|
|
|
|
change its methods of accounting except as required by changes
in applicable laws, generally accepted accounting principles or
in applicable statutory accounting principles;
|
|
|
|
make, change or revoke any material tax election, file any
amended tax return, settle any tax matters or change its method
of tax accounting (except, with respect to any amended return or
any change in the accounting method, as required by changes in
law (or any taxing authoritys interpretation thereof)), in
each case, if such action would increase any of its tax
liabilities by a material amount;
|
|
|
|
alter or amend in any material respect its investment policy or
any existing underwriting, claim handling and related financial
protection, or the methods, guidelines or policies or any
material assumptions underlying such practices, except as may be
required by (or, in its reasonable good-faith judgment,
advisable under) generally accepted accounting principles or in
applicable statutory accounting principles or any governmental
entity or applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
adopt any plan of complete or partial liquidation or
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;
|
|
|
|
incur, create or assume any indebtedness for borrowed money (or
modify any of the material terms of any such outstanding
indebtedness), other than (1) in replacement of existing or
maturing debt, (2) in connection with amending existing
indebtedness agreements in connection with the Validus
|
-84-
|
|
|
|
|
Amalgamation Agreement, (3) in the ordinary course of the
insurance or reinsurance business and (4) draw-downs
pursuant to existing credit facilities and letters of credit;
|
|
|
|
|
|
modify or waive any material rights in or dispose of any
material intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
settle or compromise any legal proceedings for an amount in
excess of $1 million (excluding any amounts previously
reserved for such matters in its latest audited balance sheet
filed with the SEC and any insurance coverage applicable
thereto) or involving any non-monetary relief;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, enter into, adopt,
amend or terminate any of its benefit plans, subject to limited
exceptions;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, except as required by
its existing benefit plans, increase compensation or fringe
benefits of any director, officer, employee, independent
contractor or consultant, or pay any benefit not required by any
benefit plan, subject to certain limited exceptions;
|
|
|
|
with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries, enter into or renew
any contract providing for payment to any director, officer,
employee, independent contractor or consultant of compensation
or benefits contingent upon the occurrence of the
amalgamation; or
|
|
|
|
agree to or make any commitment to take or authorize, any of the
actions described above.
|
Existing
Credit Facilities
IPC and Validus must mutually agree to any changes in either
partys existing credit facilities and will use
commercially reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other in
connection with the arrangement or modification of any such
financing; provided that (1) neither party is
required to cooperate if such cooperation would unreasonably
interfere with the ongoing operations of itself or its
subsidiaries prior to the effective time of the amalgamation,
(2) no party or any of its subsidiaries will be required to
incur any liability under such financing prior to the effective
time of the amalgamation unless such liability is contingent
upon the occurrence of the amalgamation and not material to IPC
and its subsidiaries (after giving effect to the amalgamation),
and (3) IPC and Validus will be solely responsible for
their respective costs and expenses incurred in connection with
such cooperation.
Access to
Information; Confidentiality
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement requires that each of Validus
and IPC provide to the officers, employees and representatives
of the other party access, during normal business hours prior to
the effective time of the amalgamation, to all of its
properties, books, contracts, records and officers and all other
information concerning its business, properties and personnel as
such other party may reasonably request, subject to certain
restrictions. The parties will hold any such information in
confidence to the extent required by, and in accordance with,
the confidentiality provisions of the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement.
Agreements
to Use Commercially Reasonable Efforts
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, the Validus Amalgamation Agreement requires that each
of Validus and IPC use commercially reasonable efforts to take,
or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be
done, all things necessary or advisable under the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement and applicable laws to consummate the
amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated by the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement as promptly as practicable after
the date of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, including:
|
|
|
|
|
preparing and filing all documentation to effect all necessary
applications, notices, filings and other documents and to obtain
all required regulatory approvals and all other consents;
|
|
|
|
supplying any additional information and documentary material
that may be requested pursuant to applicable laws or by
applicable authorities and causing the expiration of applicable
waiting periods, or
|
-85-
|
|
|
|
|
cause the receipt of all consents from governmental entities or
required under applicable law as soon as practicable;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cooperating in all respects with the other party in connection
with any filing or submission and in connection with any
investigation or other inquiry, including any proceeding
initiated by any private party;
|
|
|
|
keeping the other party apprised of the status of matters
relating to completion of the transactions contemplated by the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement and promptly informing the other
party of (and upon reasonable request providing copies of) any
communication in connection with any governmental entity and of
any material communication in connection with any proceeding by
any private party;
|
|
|
|
consulting with the other party in advance of, and to the extent
possible allowing the other party to participate in, any
meeting, conference, conference call, discussion or
communication with, any such governmental entity or, in
connection with any proceeding by any private party, with any
other person; and
|
|
|
|
taking all reasonable actions to ensure that no takeover statute
or similar regulation is or becomes applicable to the
amalgamation, and if such regulation becomes applicable,
ensuring that the amalgamation is consummated as soon as
possible as to minimize the effect of such regulation.
|
Additionally, IPC will take such actions as are necessary to
amend its bye-laws to reflect the IPC bye-law amendment as
outlined in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement; provided
that such bye-law amendment is approved by IPCs
shareholders.
However, neither IPC nor Validus or their respective
subsidiaries (1) may, without the prior written consent of
the other party, consent to any action for the purpose of
obtaining the regulatory approvals or (2) be required to
consent to any restriction for the purpose of obtaining the
regulatory approvals, in each case, which would be effective
prior to the effective time of the amalgamation or which would
not be immaterial to Validus and its subsidiaries taken together
after the amalgamation.
Restrictions
on Change in Recommendation by the Boards of Directors of IPC or
Validus
The boards of directors of IPC or Validus may not withdraw or
modify, in any manner adverse to the other party, its
recommendations in connection with the amalgamation except if
such board has concluded in good faith, after consultation with
its outside counsel and financial advisors, that such action is
reasonably likely to be required in order for the directors to
comply with their fiduciary duties under applicable law, and
such party has not materially breached its obligations with
respect to changing its recommendation. Before a party can
change its recommendation with respect to the amalgamation, it
must provide advance written notice of such change to the other
party and give the other party five days to agree to alter the
terms and conditions of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement in a
manner that removes the need for the applicable board of
directors to change its recommendation in order to prevent a
breach of its fiduciary duties.
Even if IPC or Validus has had a change in recommendation, each
will still be required to submit such matters to the respective
shareholders meeting.
Restrictions
on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement precludes IPC and each of its
subsidiaries and advisors from, directly or indirectly,
initiating, soliciting, encouraging or facilitating (including
by providing information) any effort or attempt to make or
implement any proposal or offer with respect to an amalgamation,
reorganization, consolidation, business combination or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any
purchase or sale involving 10% or more of its consolidated
assets (including, without limitation, shares of its
subsidiaries), or 10% or more of its total voting power or the
voting power of any of its subsidiaries (an Acquisition
Proposal). Additionally, except as described below, IPC
and each of its subsidiaries may not, and each shall use its
respective commercially reasonable efforts to prevent its
advisors from, directly or indirectly: (1) having,
participating or otherwise engaging in any discussions or
negotiations with, or providing
-86-
any confidential information or data to, any person relating to
an Acquisition Proposal; (2) approving or recommending, or
proposing to approve or recommend, any Acquisition Proposal or
submitting an Acquisition Proposal to a vote of its
shareholders; or (3) approving, recommending or proposing
to approve or recommend, or executing or entering into, any
letter of intent, agreement in principle, merger agreement, or
other similar agreement related to, any Acquisition Proposal.
IPC must provide the other party with written notice within
24 hours of the receipt of any Acquisition Proposal or
request that could reasonably be related to an Acquisition
Proposal from a third party indicating the identity of the third
party making such Acquisition Proposal and the material terms
and conditions of any such Acquisition Proposal and any related
documentation and correspondence. In addition, IPC must keep
Validus reasonably informed of the status and terms of any such
Acquisition Proposal or request (including any material changes
to the terms of the Acquisition Proposal).
If, prior to the required shareholder vote of IPC, the board of
directors of IPC concludes that an unsolicited bona fide written
Acquisition Proposal in respect of IPC is a superior proposal
(as defined below), after giving effect to all adjustments to
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement that may be offered by
Validus, it may make a change to its recommendation; provided
that it must first (1) give the other party written
notice indicating that it has received an Acquisition Proposal
that could reasonably be likely to constitute a superior
proposal and specifying the identity of the person making such
Acquisition Proposal as well as the material terms of such
Acquisition Proposal and (2) allow Validus five business
days to agree to alter the terms and conditions of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement in a manner that removes the need for the
applicable board of directors to change its recommendation in
order to prevent a breach of its fiduciary duties. The term
superior proposal means a bona fide
unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal, which did not result
from a breach by IPC of its obligations under the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement regarding Acquisition Proposals (as
summarized above), that would result in any person beneficially
owning securities representing 50% or more of the voting power
of IPC, the voting power of any of its subsidiaries or all or
substantially all of IPCs assets which the board of
directors of IPC concludes in good faith (after consultation
with its outside legal and financial advisors) is in the
long-term best interests of IPC, including its shareholders,
employees, communities and other stakeholders and (1) is
more favorable to its shareholders and other constituencies,
(2) is fully financed or reasonably capable of being fully
financed, reasonably likely to receive all required governmental
approvals and otherwise reasonably capable of being completed on
the terms proposed, and (3) is reasonably likely to require
the board of directors of IPC to change its recommendation with
respect to the amalgamation, in order to comply with its
fiduciary duties under applicable law.
As summarized below in Termination of
Amalgamation Agreement Effects of Termination;
Remedies, under certain circumstances (among others) as
described in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, if within
12 months of the termination of the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, either IPC or Validus enters into or consummates an
acquisition transaction (as defined below) with a person (or
such persons affiliate) that made an Acquisition Proposal
to IPC or Validus, as the case may be, after the date of the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement and prior to the relevant
partys shareholder meeting, then the party entering such
acquisition transaction with such person will be liable to the
other party for a termination fee of $16 million upon the
earlier of the date of execution or consummation of such
agreement for the acquisition transaction. The term
acquisition transaction means, with respect
to any person, any amalgamation, merger, combination or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any
purchase or sale of 35% of more of the consolidated assets
(including, without limitation, stock of its subsidiaries) of it
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or any purchase or sale
of, or tender or Exchange Offer for, its voting securities that,
if consummated, would result in any person (or the shareholders
of such person) beneficially owning securities representing 35%
or more of its total voting power or the voting power of any of
its subsidiaries.
Expenses
Whether or not the amalgamation is consummated, with the
exception of the expenses described in the next sentence, all
costs and expenses incurred in connection with the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement will be paid by the party
incurring such expense, except as otherwise described in the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement, and except that IPC and
-87-
Validus will share equally any expenses incurred in connection
with the filing, printing and mailing of a joint proxy
statement/prospectus. IPC and Validus will share equally the
fees payable to the lenders in connection with the contingent
amendments to and consents under their respective credit
facilities.
Directors
and Officers Insurance and Indemnification
Validus will purchase a tail policy covering Validus and
IPCs current officers and directors with regard to any
actions occurring prior to the effective time of the
amalgamation for six years from the effective time of the
amalgamation. Subject to certain limitations set forth in the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement, such tail policy will cover
IPCs directors and officers to the same extent such
persons are indemnified or have the right to advancement of
expenses as of the date of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
Employee
Benefits
As of the effective time of the amalgamation, Validus will (or
will cause its subsidiaries to) continue to employ each person
employed by IPC or Validus and any of their respective
subsidiaries as of the effective time of the amalgamation.
Except as outlined below, nothing contained in the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement will restrict Validus in the future in
the exercise of its independent, good faith business judgment as
to the terms and conditions under which such employment will
continue, the duration of such employment, the basis on which
such employment is terminated or the benefits provided to any
employees.
For a period of not less than one year following the closing
date of the amalgamation, Validus will (or will cause its
subsidiaries to) make available employee benefits and
compensation opportunities substantially comparable in the
aggregate to the employee benefits and compensation
opportunities in effect for such individuals that have been
employed by Validus from IPC or the applicable IPC subsidiary
immediately prior to the closing of the amalgamation.
Validus and its subsidiaries will ensure that any compensation
and benefit plan in which employees are eligible to participate
after the closing of the amalgamation will give credit (except
for purposes of qualifying for subsidized early retirement
benefits or to the extent it would result in a duplication of
benefits) to service by the employees with IPC and any of its
subsidiaries, before the closing of the amalgamation, to the
same extent such service was credited prior to the closing of
the amalgamation under a comparable compensation and benefit
plan of IPC.
From and after the closing of the amalgamation, Validus will
honor all IPC benefit plans, in each case in accordance with
their terms as in effect immediately before the closing of the
amalgamation; provided that nothing in the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement will limit the right of Validus to amend
or terminate any such plan in accordance with its terms.
NYSE
Listing and NASDAQ Delisting; Reservation for Issuance
Validus will use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause
all the following shares to be approved for listing and
quotation on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance,
no later than the closing date of the amalgamation (1) all
Validus Shares to be issued in the amalgamation to IPC
shareholders and (2) all Validus Shares to be reserved for
issuance upon exercise or vesting of the IPC share options or
other awards (the Listed Validus Shares). Validus
will take all action necessary to reserve for issuance, prior to
the amalgamation, any Listed Validus Shares that, by their terms
and in accordance with Validus Amalgamation Agreement, will not
be issued until after the effective time of the amalgamation.
Validus will also use its commercially reasonable efforts to
cause the IPC Shares to no longer be listed or quoted on NASDAQ
and to be deregistered under the Exchange Act as soon as
practicable following the effective time of the amalgamation.
Dividends
IPC and Validus will coordinate the declaration, setting of
record dates and payment dates of dividends on IPC Shares and
Validus Shares so that holders of IPC Shares do not either
receive or fail to receive,
-88-
dividends on both IPC Shares and the Validus Shares received in
the amalgamation in respect of any calendar quarter. This is to
ensure that the holders of the Validus Shares and IPC Shares
each receive the same number of quarterly dividends after
execution of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement and prior to the
effective time of the amalgamation with respect to such shares.
Book
Value Calculations
On the first business day after the date of its shareholder
meeting, either IPC or Validus may request in writing that the
other party prepare an estimate of its book value as of one
business day prior to such shareholder meeting (the
measurement date). Within five calendar days of such
written request, each of IPC and Validus must provide the other
with an estimate of its book value (calculated in the manner
specified in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement) as of the
measurement date (together with any reasonable supporting
analysis). Each of IPC and Validus will then have five calendar
days to review the other partys book value estimate and
supporting analysis, together with such other information it may
reasonably request. Once either IPC or Validus has requested
that the other provide an estimate of its book value as of the
measurement date, the closing will be delayed until the
covenants and agreements contained in the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement related to the book value calculations have been
satisfied or waived.
The party that requested the book value estimates has the right
to terminate the agreement if the estimates indicate that, since
December 31, 2008, the other partys book value has
declined more than 50% or more than 20 percentage points
greater than the decline in the requesting partys book
value (if any) over the same period (with any increase in a
partys book value since December 31, 2008, to the
measurement date deemed to be no change for purposes of
measuring the 20 percentage point differential).
Conditions
to the Amalgamation
Validus and IPCs respective obligations to complete
the amalgamation are subject to the fulfillment or waiver (by
both Validus and IPC) of certain conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
IPC shall have obtained the required affirmative vote of its
shareholders to (1) approve the bye-law amendment described
in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement and (2) adopt the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement and approve the amalgamation
(collectively, the required IPC vote);
|
|
|
|
Validus shall have obtained the required affirmative vote of its
shareholders to approve the issuance of Validus Shares to IPC
shareholders as contemplated by the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the Validus Shares to be issued or reserved for issuance in
connection with the amalgamation shall have been authorized for
listing on the NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance;
|
|
|
|
certain regulatory filings, approvals or exemptions shall have
been made, have occurred or been obtained; and
|
|
|
|
no injunction or other legal restraints or prohibitions
preventing the consummation of the amalgamation shall be in
effect.
|
Each of IPCs and Validus obligations to complete the
amalgamation is also separately subject to the satisfaction or
waiver of a number of conditions including:
|
|
|
|
|
the truth and correctness of the representations and warranties
of each other party in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement,
subject to the materiality standards provided in the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, and the performance, subject to the
materiality standards provided in the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, by each party of its obligations under the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement (and the receipt by each party of a
certificate from the other party to such effect);
|
|
|
|
no governmental entity shall have imposed by law, or any other
action, any term, condition, obligation or restriction upon IPC,
the amalgamated company or their respective subsidiaries that
would, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected
to have a material adverse effect on Validus
|
-89-
|
|
|
|
|
and its subsidiaries (including the amalgamated company) after
the effective time of the amalgamation; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
receipt by each IPC and Validus of a tax opinion with respect to
certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
amalgamation.
|
Validus obligation to complete the amalgamation is also
subject to the fulfillment or waiver (by Validus) of the
following condition:
|
|
|
|
|
all amendments or waivers under (x) IPCs credit
facilities and (y) Validus credit facilities, in each
case, as determined by Validus to be necessary to consummate the
amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated thereby,
shall be in full force and effect.
|
Termination
of the Amalgamation Agreement
Termination
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement may be terminated, at any
time prior to the effective time of the amalgamation, by mutual
written consent of IPC and Validus, and, subject to certain
limitations described in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, by
either IPC or Validus, if any of the following occurs:
|
|
|
|
|
a regulatory approval required by the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement to be obtained has been denied or any governmental
authority has taken any action permanently restraining or
prohibiting the amalgamation and such denial or action has
become final and non-appealable (unless the failure to complete
the amalgamation by that date is due to a breach by the party
seeking to terminate the Validus Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the amalgamation has not been consummated on or before the later
of (x) November 30, 2009 or (y) the date that is
five months after the date of execution of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement by all parties thereto (unless the
failure to complete the amalgamation by that date is due to a
breach by the party seeking to terminate the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement);
|
|
|
|
the other partys board of directors has (1) changed
its recommendation to its shareholders, (2) failed to
include such recommendation in this proxy statement or
(3) with respect to IPC only, materially breached certain
of the non-solicitation obligations applicable to it under the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement, as summarized in
Restrictions on Change in Recommendation by the Boards of
Directors of IPC or Validus and Restrictions
on Solicitation of Acquisition Proposals by IPC above;
|
|
|
|
the other party has breached a covenant, agreement,
representation or warranty that would preclude the satisfaction
of certain closing conditions and such breach is not remedied in
the 45 days following written notice to the breaching party
or is not capable of being so remedied;
|
|
|
|
the IPC shareholders have not approved any of the matters for
which their approval is solicited for the required IPC vote or
the Validus shareholders have not approved the issuance of
Validus Shares to IPC shareholders as contemplated by the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
by either IPC or Validus after its respective shareholder
meeting to vote on the amalgamation if the other partys
good-faith estimate of such partys book value as of the
day prior to the requesting partys shareholder meeting
indicates that since December 31, 2008, either (1) the
other partys book value has declined by more than 50%, or
(2) the other partys book value has declined by more
than 20 percentage points greater than the decline in the
terminating partys book value during the same period (with
any increase in a partys book value since
December 31, 2008, deemed to be no change for purposes of
measuring the 20 percentage point differential), as
summarized in Book Value Calculations
above; or
|
|
|
|
by Validus if the total number of dissenting IPC Shares for
which appraisal rights have been properly exercised in
accordance with Bermuda law exceeds 15% of the issued and
outstanding IPC Shares on the business day immediately following
the last day on which IPC shareholders can require appraisal of
their common shares.
|
-90-
Effects
of Termination; Remedies
If the Validus Amalgamation Agreement is terminated as described
in Termination above, the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement will become void, and there will be no
liability or obligation of any party or its officers and
directors under the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, except as to
certain limited provisions relating to confidentiality, the
payments of termination fees in connection with a termination
(as applicable), and other transaction expenses, which will
survive the termination of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement,
and except that no party shall be relieved or released from any
liabilities or damages arising out of its willful breach of the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
If either of the parties terminates the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement, the non-terminating party will be required to pay the
other a termination fee of $16 million under the following
circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
if the non-terminating partys board of directors has
changed or failed to include in the proxy statement its
recommendation to shareholders to vote in favor of the
amalgamation, or has approved or recommended an Acquisition
Proposal or submitted an Acquisition Proposal to its
shareholders for approval prior to the termination of the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement;
|
|
|
|
if the Validus Amalgamation Agreement is terminated for failure
to complete the amalgamation on or before the later of
(x) November 30, 2009 or (y) the date that is
five months after the date of execution of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement by all parties thereto and, within
12 months of the termination date, the non-terminating
party enters into or consummates an acquisition transaction with
the person (or affiliate) that made an Acquisition Proposal that
was publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the officers
or directors of the non-terminating party prior to the later of
(x) November 30, 2009 or (y) the date that is
five months after the date of execution of the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement by all parties thereto; and
|
|
|
|
if the Validus Amalgamation Agreement is terminated on the basis
of certain specified breaches (as provided therein) and, within
12 months of the termination date, the non-terminating
party enters into or consummates an acquisition transaction with
the person (or affiliate) that made an Acquisition Proposal that
was publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the officers
or directors of the non-terminating party prior to the
non-terminating partys shareholder meeting.
|
In addition to the foregoing:
|
|
|
|
|
Validus will pay the termination fee to IPC if either party has
terminated the agreement for failure to obtain the required vote
of Validus shareholders (and if IPC is the terminating party,
its required shareholder vote has either been obtained or not
yet taken) and within 12 months of the termination date,
Validus or any of its subsidiaries enters into or consummates an
acquisition transaction with the person (or affiliate) that made
an Acquisition Proposal that was publicly announced or otherwise
communicated to Validus officers or directors prior to the
date of Validus shareholder meeting; and
|
|
|
|
IPC will pay the termination fee to Validus if either party has
terminated the agreement for failure to obtain the required vote
of IPC shareholders (and if Validus is the terminating party,
its required shareholder vote has either been obtained or not
yet taken) and if within 12 months of the termination date,
IPC or any of its subsidiaries enters into or consummates an
acquisition transaction with the person (or affiliate) that made
an Acquisition Proposal that was publicly announced or otherwise
communicated to IPCs officers or directors prior to the
date of IPCs shareholder meeting.
|
Amendments
and Waivers Under the Validus Amalgamation Agreement
Amendments
The Validus Amalgamation Agreement may be amended in writing by
the parties by action taken or authorized by their respective
boards of directors, at any time before or after the approval of
matters presented in connection with the amalgamation by the IPC
shareholders and Validus shareholders. Following such approval,
however, no amendment may be made that by law would require
further approval of IPC shareholders or Validus shareholders,
without obtaining such further approval.
-91-
Waiver
To the extent legally permissible, the parties may at any time
before the effective time of the amalgamation do any of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time of performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party;
|
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties
contained in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement or in any
document delivered pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation
Agreement; or
|
|
|
|
waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions
contained in the Validus Amalgamation Agreement.
|
Any extension or waiver will be valid only if set forth in
writing and signed by the party granting the waiver.
REGULATORY
MATTERS
Validus is not aware of any governmental license or
regulatory
permit that appears to be material to IPCs business that
might be adversely affected by the Acquisition pursuant to
the
Acquisition or, except as described below, of any approval or
other action by any government or governmental administrative or
regulatory authority or agency, domestic or foreign, that
would
be required for the Acquisition or ownership of IPC Shares
pursuant to the Acquisition. Should any of these approvals or
other actions be required, Validus currently contemplates that
these approvals or other actions will be sought. There can be no
assurance that any such approvals or other actions, if
required,
will be obtained (with or without substantial conditions) or
that if these approvals were not obtained or these other actions
were not taken adverse consequences might not result to
IPCs business or certain parts of IPCs or
Validus, or any of their respective subsidiaries,
businesses might not have to be disposed of or held separate.
Insurance
Regulations
Applications or notifications in connection with the Acquisition
and the changes in control of various subsidiaries of IPC that
may be deemed to occur as a result of the Acquisition may be
required to be filed with various
non-U.S. regulatory
authorities.
In addition, under the Bermuda Insurance Act of 1978,
(i) Validus is required to file a notification regarding
the acquisition of IPC Shares with the BMA within 45 days
after the date that Validus becomes a 10 percent,
20 percent, 33 percent or 50 percent shareholder
of IPC and (ii) any person who, directly or indirectly,
becomes a holder of at least 10 percent, 20 percent,
33 percent or 50 percent of the Validus common shares
must notify the BMA in writing within 45 days of such
acquisition.
Although Validus does not expect these regulatory authorities to
raise any significant concerns in connection with their review
of the Acquisition, there is no assurance that Validus will
obtain all required regulatory approvals or that these approvals
will not include terms, conditions or restrictions that are
adverse to Validus or to IPC.
The consummation of the Acquisition will not require the
approval of any U.S. insurance regulators because neither
Validus nor IPC operates a
U.S.-regulated
insurance business that would require any such approval.
Other than the approvals and notifications described above,
Validus is not aware of any material regulatory approvals
required to be obtained, or waiting periods required to expire
after the making of a filing. If Validus discovers that other
approvals or filings
and/or
waiting periods are necessary, it will seek to obtain or comply
with them, although there can be no assurance that they will be
obtained, as is the case with the regulatory approvals described
above.
-92-
INFORMATION
ABOUT VALIDUS AND IPC
Validus
Validus is a Bermuda exempted company, with its principal
executive offices located at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda. The telephone number of Validus is
(441) 278-9000.
Validus is a provider of reinsurance and insurance, conducting
its operations worldwide through two wholly-owned subsidiaries,
Validus Re and Talbot. Validus Re is a Bermuda based reinsurer
focused on short-tail lines of reinsurance. Talbot is the
Bermuda parent of the specialty insurance group primarily
operating within the Lloyds insurance market through
Syndicate 1183. Validus common shares are traded on the
NYSE under the symbol VR and, as of May 7,
2009, the last practicable date prior to the filing of this
proxy statement, Validus had a market capitalization of
approximately $1.76 billion. Validus has approximately
280 employees.
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to Validus
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100
IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and
Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
Validus files periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC. The public may read and copy any
materials filed with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference
Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The
public may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and
information statements, and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the SEC. The SECs website
address is
http://www.sec.gov.
Validus common shares are traded on the NYSE with the
symbol VR. Similar information concerning Validus
can be reviewed at the office of the NYSE at 20 Broad
Street, New York, New York, 10005. Validus website address
is
http://www.validusre.bm.
Information contained in this website is not part of this report.
Validus annual report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available
free of charge, including through its website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after such material is electronically
filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Copies of the charters for
the audit committee, the compensation committee, the corporate
governance and nominating committee, the finance committee and
the underwriting committee, as well as Validus Corporate
Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for
Directors, Officers and Employees (the Code),
which applies to all of Validus directors, officers and
employees, and Code of Ethics for Senior Officers, which applies
to Validus principal executive officer, principal
accounting officer and other persons holding a comparable
position, are available free of charge on Validus website
at www.validusre.bm or by writing to Investor Relations, Validus
Holdings, Ltd., 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11,
Bermuda. Validus will also post on its website any amendment to
the Code and any waiver of the Code granted to any of its
directors or executive officers to the extent required by
applicable rules.
IPC
The following description of IPC is taken from the IPC/Max
S-4.
See Sources of Additional Information above. IPC provides
property catastrophe reinsurance and, to a limited extent,
property-per-risk
excess, aviation (including satellite) and other short-tail
reinsurance on a worldwide basis. During 2008, approximately 93%
of its gross premiums written, excluding reinstatement premiums,
covered property catastrophe reinsurance risks. Property
catastrophe reinsurance covers against
-93-
unpredictable events such as hurricanes, windstorms, hailstorms,
earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, fires, industrial explosions,
freezes, riots, floods and other man-made or natural disasters.
The substantial majority of the reinsurance written by IPCRe has
been, and continues to be, written on an excess of loss basis
for primary insurers rather than reinsurers, and is subject to
aggregate limits on exposure to losses. During 2008, IPC had
approximately 258 clients from whom it received either
annual/deposit or adjustment premiums, including many of the
leading insurance companies around the world. In 2008,
approximately 36% of those clients were based in the United
States, and approximately 53% of gross premiums written,
excluding reinstatement premiums, related primarily to
U.S. risks. IPCs
non-U.S. clients
and its
non-U.S. covered
risks are located principally in Europe, Japan, Australia and
New Zealand. During 2008, no single ceding insurer accounted for
more than 3.7% of its gross premiums written, excluding
reinstatement premiums. At December 31, 2008, IPC had total
shareholders equity of $1,851 million and total
assets of $2,389 million.
In response to a severe imbalance between the global supply of
and demand for property catastrophe reinsurance that developed
during the period from 1989 through 1993, IPC and IPCRe were
formed as Bermuda companies and commenced operations in June
1993 through the sponsorship of American International Group,
Inc. (AIG). On August 15, 2006, AIG sold
its entire shareholding in an underwritten public offering. As
from August 15, 2006, to IPCs knowledge, AIG no
longer has any direct ownership interest in IPC.
IPCs common shares are quoted on NASDAQ under the ticker
symbol IPCR and the Bermuda Stock Exchange under the
symbol IPCR BH. IPCRe Europe Limited, a subsidiary
of IPCRe incorporated in Ireland, underwrites select reinsurance
business. Currently, IPCRe Europe Limited retrocedes 90% of the
business it underwrites to IPCRe.
Internet Address: IPCs Internet address
is www.ipcre.bm and the investor relations section of its
website is located at
www.ipcre.bm/financials/quarterly-index.html. IPC makes
available free of charge, through the investor relations section
of its website, annual reports on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and current reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 as soon
as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed
with, or furnished to, the SEC.
THE
VALIDUS SPECIAL MEETING
This proxy statement is being provided to the Validus
shareholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies by
Validus board of directors to be voted at the Validus
special meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Date,
Time and Place
The Validus special meeting will be held
at ,
Atlantic Time, on June , 2009, at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda.
Purposes
of the Validus Special Meeting
At the Validus special meeting, Validus shareholders will be
asked to consider and vote on the following proposals:
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in connection with the
Acquisition of all of the outstanding IPC Shares, pursuant to
the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, the Scheme of Arrangement,
the Exchange Offer or otherwise; and
|
|
|
|
to transact such other further business, if any, as may lawfully
be brought before the meeting, including to approve the
adjournment of the meeting for the solicitation of additional
proxies in favor of the above proposal.
|
The board of directors of Validus has unanimously adopted the
Validus Amalgamation Agreement, and authorized and approved the
Share Issuance and deems it fair, advisable and in the best
interests of Validus and its shareholders to consummate the
Share Issuance, the Acquisition and the other
-94-
transactions contemplated thereby. Validus board of
directors unanimously recommends that Validus shareholders vote
FOR each of the items above.
If you sign and return a proxy card or voting instruction
form without giving specific voting instructions, your shares
will be voted FOR the Share Issuance Proposal and
FOR the Adjournment Proposal and as the persons
named as proxies may determine in their discretion with respect
to any other matters properly presented for a vote before the
Validus special meeting.
The Share Issuance will become effective only if such proposal
is approved by Validus shareholders and the IPC Shares are
exchanged for Validus Shares, pursuant to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, the Scheme of Arrangement, the Exchange
Offer or otherwise but based on an exchange ratio no less
favorable to Validus shareholders than the exchange ratio set
forth in the Validus Amalgamation Offer, and all the other
conditions of the Validus Amalgamation Agreement, the Scheme of
Arrangement, the Exchange Offer or similar agreement are
satisfied or waived.
Record
Date and Shares Entitled to Vote
Shareholders of record, as shown on the transfer books of
Validus at the close of business
on ,
2009 will be entitled notice of, and to vote at, the Validus
special meeting or any adjournments thereof. As of
March 13, 2009, there were 58,849,289 outstanding Validus
Shares entitled to vote at the Validus special meeting, and
19,771,422 non-voting common shares. Each Validus Share entitles
the holder of record thereof to one vote at the Validus special
meeting; however, if, and for so long as, the Validus Shares of
a shareholder, including any votes conferred by controlled
shares, would otherwise represent more than 9.09% of the
aggregate voting power of all Validus Shares entitled to vote on
a matter, the votes conferred by such Validus Shares will be
reduced by whatever amount is necessary such that, after giving
effect to any such reduction (and any other reductions in voting
power required by Validus bye-laws), the votes conferred
by such Validus Shares represent 9.09% of the aggregate voting
power of all Validus Shares entitled to vote on such matter.
How to
Vote Your Validus Shares
The manner in which your shares may be voted depends on how your
Validus Shares are held.
|
|
|
|
|
If you are a shareholder of record, meaning that your Validus Shares
are represented by certificates or book entries in your name so
that you appear as a shareholder in the transfer books
maintained by the share transfer agent, Bank of New York Mellon,
a proxy card for voting those Validus Shares included with this
proxy statement may be used. You may direct how your Validus
Shares are to be voted by
|
|
|
|
|
|
completing, signing, dating and returning the proxy card in the
enclosed envelope; or
|
|
|
|
voting in person at the Validus special meeting by bringing the
enclosed proxy card or using the ballot provided at the meeting.
You should be prepared to present photo identification for
admission upon request or you will not be admitted to the
Validus special meeting; or
|
|
|
|
alternatively, you may use the toll-free telephone number
indicated on the proxy card to vote by telephone or visit the
website indicated in the proxy card to vote on the Internet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you own Validus Shares through a bank, broker or other
nominee (in street name), you should, instead of a
proxy card, receive from your bank, broker or other nominee a
voting instructions form. You can use such voting instructions
form to instruct how your Validus Shares are to be voted. As
with a proxy card, you may direct how your Validus Shares are to
be voted by completing, signing and returning the voting
instructions form in accordance with the instructions from your
bank, broker or other nominee. In addition, many banks and
brokerage firms have arranged for Internet or telephonic
instructions regarding how shares are to be voted and provide
instructions for using those services on the voting instruction
form. Please consult with your broker, bank or nominee if you
have any questions regarding the electronic voting of Validus
Shares held in street name. Validus has requested that brokerage
and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries forward
solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of IPC Shares
and will reimburse those persons for their
reasonable out-of-
|
-95-
|
|
|
|
|
pocket expenses for forwarding the materials. Only shareholders
of record may vote their shares in person at the Validus special
meeting. Therefore, if you own your shares in street name, you
will be entitled to attend the Validus special meeting and vote
your Validus Shares only if you have previously either arranged
for the Validus Shares to be transferred of record into your
name by the record date for the Validus special meeting or
secured a valid proxy from the bank, broker or other nominee
that holds your shares for the Validus
special meeting (and who has received a legal proxy,
with a power of subdelegation, from the shareholder of record as
of the record date).
|
Validus has requested that brokerage and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries forward solicitation materials to the
beneficial owners of Validus Shares and it will reimburse the
brokers and other fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses for forwarding the materials.
Quorum;
Required Vote; Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
The quorum required at the Validus special meeting is two or
more shareholders present in person and representing in person
or by proxy in excess of 50% of the total issued
Validus Shares throughout the meeting. An affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at the Validus special meeting, at
which a quorum is present in accordance with Validus
bye-laws, is required to approve the Share Issuance Proposal and
the Adjournment Proposal. In accordance with NYSE rules, banks,
brokers and other nominees who hold Validus Shares in street-name
for customers may not exercise their voting discretion with
respect to the Share Issuance. Accordingly, if you do not
provide your bank, broker or other nominee with instructions on
how to vote your street name shares, your bank, broker or other
nominee will not be permitted to vote them at the Validus
special meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes
will be counted toward the presence of a quorum at, but will not
be considered votes cast on any proposal brought before, the
Validus special meeting. Because the vote required to approve
the proposals is the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast, assuming a quorum is present, a broker non-vote with
respect to any proposal to be voted on at the Validus special
meeting will not have the effect of a vote for or against the
relevant proposal, but will reduce the number of votes cast and
therefore increase the relative influence of those shareholders
voting.
How to
Revoke a Proxy
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before
your proxy is voted at the Validus special meeting. If you are a
shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your
proxy by: (1) delivering to Validus (Attention: General
Counsel) at 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM11, Bermuda,
a written notice of revocation of your proxy;
(2) delivering to Validus an authorized proxy bearing a
later date (including a proxy by telephone or over the
Internet); or (3) attending the Validus special meeting and
voting in person as described above under
How to Vote Your Validus Shares. Attendance at the
Validus special meeting in and of itself, without voting in
person at the Validus special meeting, will not cause your
previously granted proxy to be revoked. For shares you hold in
street name, you should follow the instructions of your bank,
broker or other nominee or, if you have obtained a legal proxy
from the bank, broker or other nominee that holds your shares (and who has received a legal
proxy, with a power of subdelegation, from the shareholder
of record as of the record date) giving you the right to vote your shares at the
Validus special meeting, by attending the Validus special
meeting and voting in person.
Other
Matters
Validus knows of no specific matter to be brought before the
Validus special meeting that is not referred to in the notice of
the Validus special meeting. If any such matter comes before the
Validus special meeting, including any shareholder proposal
properly made, the proxy holders will vote proxies in accordance
with their judgment.
Validus
Auditors
Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers are not expected to be
present at the Validus special meeting and accordingly will not
make any statement or be available to respond to any questions.
-96-
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your Validus Shares, please contact:
199 Water
Street
26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokers should call:
(212) 440-9800
or
Toll Free: at
(888) 274-5146
Email: validus@georgeson.com
PROPOSALS TO
BE SUBMITTED TO VALIDUS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE; VOTING
REQUIREMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposal 1:
Share Issuance
Validus board of directors unanimously adopted, subject to
Validus shareholder approval at the Validus special meeting, a
resolution to approve the issuance of Validus Shares in
connection with the Acquisition of all outstanding IPC Shares,
pursuant to the Validus Amalgamation Agreement or otherwise.
Under the terms of the Acquisition, IPC shareholders (including
IPC shareholders that do not vote in favor of the amalgamation,
but excluding holders of any shares as to which appraisal rights
have been exercised pursuant to Bermuda law and excluding any
shares beneficially owned by Validus and its subsidiaries) will
receive a fraction of a Validus Share equal to the exchange
ratio of 1.2037 and cash in lieu of fractional shares as
consideration for the exchange of their IPC Shares in connection
with the Acquisition.
The Listed Company Manual for companies listed on the NYSE, on
which Validus common shares are listed, requires the approval of
Validus shareholders in connection with the issuance of common
shares or securities convertible into or exercisable for common
shares if (a) the common shares or other securities being
issued will have voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of
the voting power outstanding before such issuance or
(b) the number of common shares to be issued in or will be
equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of common shares or
other securities outstanding before such issuance. The minimum
vote that will constitute shareholder approval under the NYSE
rules is a majority of the total votes cast on the proposal.
Assuming closing of the Acquisition, pursuant to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, the Exchange Offer, the Scheme of
Arrangement or otherwise, based on Validus and IPCs
capitalization as of December 31, 2008, and an exchange
ratio of 1.2037, Validus would issue approximately 67,338,947
Validus Shares to shareholders of IPC in connection with the
Acquisition in exchange for IPC Shares. Upon closing of the
Acquisition, current Validus shareholders will own approximately
57% of the common shares of Validus on a
fully-diluted basis and IPC shareholders will own approximately
43% of the common shares of Validus on a
fully-diluted basis.
-97-
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is present in
accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required to approve
this proposal regarding the Share Issuance. The Acquisition
will not close unless the Validus shareholders approve the Share
Issuance Proposal.
Validus
board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR
this proposal.
Proposal 2:
Adjournment Proposal
Validus shareholders are being asked to consider and vote on a
proposal to adjourn or postpone the Validus special meeting, in
the discretion of the persons named as proxies, to solicit
additional proxies.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
Validus special meeting, at which a quorum is present in
accordance with Validus bye-laws, is required to approve
this proposal regarding the Adjournment Proposal.
Validus
board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR
this proposal.
-98-
BENEFICIAL
OWNERSHIP OF VALIDUS COMMON SHARES
The following table sets forth information as of April 30,
2009 regarding the beneficial ownership of Validus common
shares by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person known by Validus to beneficially own more than 5% of
our outstanding common shares,
|
|
|
|
each of Validus directors,
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers, and
|
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group.
|
The information provided in the table below with respect to each
principal shareholder has been obtained from that shareholder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
|
Shares Subject
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
|
to Exercise of
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Owner(1)(16)(17)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
(%)(2)
|
|
|
(%)(2)
|
|
|
Investment funds affiliated with The Goldman Sachs Group,
Inc.(3),(4)
|
|
|
14,057,137
|
|
|
|
1,604,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.23
|
%
|
|
|
17.38
|
%
|
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages(5)
|
|
|
6,886,342
|
|
|
|
3,193,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
11.19
|
%
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital Partners(6)
|
|
|
8,571,427
|
|
|
|
972,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.43
|
%
|
|
|
10.59
|
%
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital, LLC(7)
|
|
|
6,986,241
|
|
|
|
784,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
|
|
8.62
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Bank of America Corp. or managed by
Bank of America Corp affiliates(3),(8)
|
|
|
6,134,530
|
|
|
|
1,067,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.37
|
%
|
|
|
7.99
|
%
|
Edward J. Noonan(9)
|
|
|
421,564
|
|
|
|
29,039
|
|
|
|
920,779
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
George P. Reeth(9)
|
|
|
133,084
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
523,767
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
C. N. Rupert Atkin(9)
|
|
|
90,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,680
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
Michael E. A. Carpenter(9)
|
|
|
291,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,910
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
Jeff Consolino(9)
|
|
|
59,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,964
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Matthew J. Grayson(10),(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Jeffrey W. Greenberg(10),(12)
|
|
|
6,886,342
|
|
|
|
3,203,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.77
|
%
|
|
|
11.20
|
%
|
John J. Hendrickson(10)
|
|
|
57,142
|
|
|
|
72,598
|
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
Sumit Rajpal(3),(4),(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.23
|
%
|
|
|
17.38
|
%
|
Sander M. Levy(10),(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.43
|
%
|
|
|
10.59
|
%
|
Jean-Marie Nessi(10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mandakini Puri(10),(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.82
|
%
|
|
|
7.53
|
%
|
Alok Singh(10),(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
|
|
8.62
|
%
|
Christopher E. Watson(10),(11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Directors and Executive Officers as a group(19 persons)(16)
|
|
|
1,211,483
|
|
|
|
128,934
|
|
|
|
3,338,034
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
|
|
5.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All holdings in this beneficial ownership table have been
rounded to the nearest whole share. |
|
(2) |
|
The percentage of beneficial ownership for all holders has been
rounded to the nearest 1/10th of a percentage. Total beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and includes common shares
issuable within 60 days of March 13, 2009 upon the
exercise of all options and warrants and other rights
beneficially owned by the indicated person on that |
-99-
|
|
|
|
|
date. Fully diluted total beneficial ownership is based upon all
common shares and all common shares subject to exercise of
options and warrants outstanding at March 13, 2009. Under
our Bye-laws, if, and for so long as, the common shares of a
shareholder, including any votes conferred by controlled
shares, would otherwise represent more than 9.09% of the
aggregate voting power of all common shares entitled to vote on
a matter, including an election of directors, the votes
conferred by such shares will be reduced by whatever amount is
necessary such that, after giving effect to any such reduction
(and any other reductions in voting power required by our
Bye-laws), the votes conferred by such shares represent 9.09% of
the aggregate voting power of all common shares entitled to vote
on such matter. |
|
(3) |
|
All of the common shares beneficially owned by funds affiliated
with or managed by The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman,
Sachs & Co. (Goldman Sachs) are
non-voting. Common shares beneficially owned by entities
affiliated with Bank of America Corp. (Bank of
America) (the parent corporation of Merrill
Lynch & Co, Inc. (Merrill Lynch)) or
managed by Bank of America affiliates are non-voting. |
|
(4) |
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by Goldman Sachs (collectively,
the Goldman Sachs Funds) are GSCP V AIV, L.P.
(4,798,022 shares and 638,458.3 warrants), GS Capital
Partners V Employees Fund, L.P. (1,550,787 shares and
206,358.9 warrants), GS Capital Partners V Offshore, L.P.
(3,279,530 shares and 436,397.5 warrants), GS Capital
Partners V GmbH & Co. KG (251,708 shares and
33,495.5 warrants), GSCP V Institutional AIV, Ltd.
(2,177,093 shares and 289,698.7 warrants), GS Private
Equity Partners 1999, L.P. (1,039,607 shares), GS Private
Equity Partners 1999 Offshore, L.P. (166,143 shares), GS
Private Equity Partners 1999 Direct Investments
Funds, L.P. (29,720 shares), GS Private Equity Partners
2000, L.P. (439,293 shares), GS Private Equity Partners
2000 Offshore Holdings, L.P. (154,627 shares) and GS
Private Equity Partners 2000 Direct Investment Fund,
L.P. (170,607 shares). The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and
certain affiliates, including Goldman Sachs, which is a
broker-dealer, and the Goldman Sachs Funds may be deemed to
directly or indirectly beneficially own in the aggregate
14,057,137 of our common shares and 1,604,410 warrants which are
owned directly or indirectly by the Goldman Sachs Funds.
Affiliates of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs
are the general partner, managing general partner or managing
limited partner of the Goldman Sachs Funds. Goldman Sachs is the
investment manager for certain of the Goldman Sachs Funds.
Goldman Sachs is a direct and indirect, wholly owned subsidiary
of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.,
Goldman Sachs and the Goldman Sachs Funds share voting power and
investment power with certain of their respective affiliates.
Sumit Rajpal, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs
each disclaim beneficial ownership of the common shares owned
directly or indirectly by the Goldman Sachs Funds, except to the
extent of their pecuniary interest therein, if any. The address
for the Goldman Sachs Funds and their affiliates is 85 Broad
Street, 10th Floor, New York, New York 10004. |
|
(5) |
|
Funds managed by Aquiline Capital Partners LLC are Aquiline
Financial Services Fund L.P. (4,420,420 shares) and
Aquiline Financial Services Fund (Offshore) L.P.
(2,465,922 shares). Aquiline Capital Partners LLC owns the
warrants shown. Matthew J. Grayson and Christopher E. Watson are
senior principals at Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and Jeffrey
W. Greenberg is the managing principal of Aquiline Capital
Partners LLC. |
|
(6) |
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital Partners are
Vestar AIV Employees Validus Ltd. (90,419 shares and
10,236.3 warrants), Vestar AIV Holdings B L.P.
(71,538 shares and 8,130.9 warrants), and Vestar AIV
Holdings A L.P. (8,409,470 shares and 954,442.4 warrants).
Sander M. Levy is a managing director of Vestar Capital Partners. |
|
(7) |
|
Funds affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital, LLC
are New Mountain Partners II (Cayman), L.P.
(6,391,468 shares and 716,031.5 warrants), Allegheny New
Mountain Partners (Cayman), L.P. (484,642 shares and
55,392.1 warrants) and New Mountain Affiliated Investors II
(Cayman), L.P. (110,131 shares and 12,632.0 warrants). Alok
Singh is a managing director of New Mountain Capital, LLC. |
|
(8) |
|
Entities affiliated with Bank of America or managed by Bank of
America affiliates are ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P.
(4,285,714 shares and 364,803.6 warrants), Merrill Lynch
Ventures L.P. 2001 (1,428,571 shares and 121,601.2
warrants), GMI Investments, Inc. (580,781.9 warrants) and
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
(420,245 shares). |
-100-
|
|
|
|
|
The general partner of ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P. is
MLGPE LTD., a Cayman Islands exempted company whose sole
shareholder is ML Global Private Equity Partners, L.P., a Cayman
Islands exempted limited partnership (ML Partners).
The investment committee of ML Partners, which is composed of
Merrill Lynch GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as the general
partner of ML Partners, and certain investment professionals who
are actively performing services for ML Global Private Equity
Fund, L.P., retains decision-making power over the disposition
and voting of shares of portfolio investments of ML Global
Private Equity Fund, L.P. The consent of Merrill Lynch GP, Inc.,
as ML Partners general partner, is required for any such
vote. Merrill Lynch GP, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Merrill Lynch Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, which in turn
is a wholly owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch, which in turn is
a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America. MLGPE LTD., as
general partner of ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P.; ML
Partners, the special limited partner of ML Global Private
Equity Fund, L.P.; Merrill Lynch GP, Inc., by virtue of its
right to consent to the voting of shares of portfolio
investments of ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P.; the
individuals who are members of the investment committee of ML
Partners; and each of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc. and Merrill
Lynch, because they control Merrill Lynch GP, Inc., may
therefore be deemed to beneficially own the shares that ML
Global Private Equity Fund, L.P. holds of record or may be
deemed to beneficially own. Each such entity or individual
expressly disclaims beneficial ownership of these shares. |
|
|
|
The general partner of Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001 is
Merrill Lynch Ventures, L.L.C. (ML Ventures), which
is a wholly owned subsidiary of Merrill Lynch Group, Inc.
Decisions regarding the voting or disposition of shares of
portfolio investments of Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001 are
made by the management and investment committee of the board of
directors of ML Ventures, which is composed of three
individuals. Each of ML Ventures, because it is the general
partner of Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001; Merrill Lynch
Group, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, because they control ML Ventures;
and the three members of the ML Ventures investment committee,
by virtue of their shared decision making power, may be deemed
to beneficially own the shares held by Merrill Lynch Ventures
L.P. 2001. Such entities and individuals expressly disclaim
beneficial ownership of the shares that Merrill Lynch Ventures
L.P. 2001 holds of record or may be deemed to beneficially own. |
|
|
|
Merrill Lynch Ventures L.P. 2001 disclaims beneficial ownership
of the shares that ML Global Private Equity Fund, L.P. holds of
record or may be deemed to beneficially own. ML Global Private
Equity Fund, L.P. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares
that Merrill Lynch Ventures, L.P. 2001 holds of record or may be
deemed to beneficially own. The address for the Merrill Lynch
Funds and their affiliates is 4 World Financial Center, 23rd
Floor, New York, NY 10080. Mandakini Puri is a senior vice
president of Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity. |
|
(9) |
|
Unvested restricted shares held by our named executive officers
and included in common shares accumulate dividends and may be
voted. Unvested restricted shares held by our named executive
officers are Mr. Noonan (180,938 shares),
Mr. Reeth (153,847 shares), Mr. Atkin
(319,680 shares), Mr. Consolino (138,350 shares),
Mr. Carpenter (22,910). |
|
(10) |
|
See the section entitled Election of Directors in
Validus Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on
March 25, 2009 for biographies of the directors, including
their relationships with certain beneficial owners of common
shares listed in this table. |
|
(11) |
|
Does not include shares and warrants beneficially owned by
Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages.
Mr. Grayson and Mr. Watson each disclaim existence of
a group and beneficial ownership of the shares and warrants
owned by Aquiline Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages. |
|
(12) |
|
Includes shares and warrants beneficially owned by Aquiline
Capital Partners LLC and the funds it manages.
Mr. Greenberg disclaims existence of a group and disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned
by entities affiliated with or managed by Aquiline Capital
Partners LLC. |
|
(13) |
|
Includes shares and warrants beneficially owned by entities
affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital Partners.
Mr. Levy disclaims existence of a group and disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned
by entities affiliated with or managed by Vestar Capital
Partners. |
|
(14) |
|
Includes shares and warrants beneficially owned by entities
affiliated with Bank of America or managed by Bank of America
affiliates. Ms. Puri disclaims existence of a group and
disclaims beneficial |
-101-
|
|
|
|
|
ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned by Bank of
America or managed by Bank of America affiliates. |
|
(15) |
|
Includes shares, options and warrants beneficially owned by
entities affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital LLC.
Mr. Singh disclaims existence of a group and disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares, options and warrants owned
by entities affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital
Group, LLC. |
|
(16) |
|
Excludes shares as to which beneficial ownership is disclaimed. |
|
(17) |
|
The addresses of each beneficial owner are as follows: Funds
affiliated with or managed by Goldman, Sachs &
Company,
c/o Goldman,
Sachs & Co., 85 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004;
Aquiline Financial Services Fund L.P.,
c/o Aquiline
Capital Partners LLC, 535 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10022;
Funds affiliated with or managed by Vestar,
c/o Vestar
Capital Partners, 245 Park Avenue, 41st Floor, New York, NY
10167; Funds affiliated with or managed by New Mountain Capital,
LLC,
c/o New
Mountain Capital, LLC, 787 Seventh Avenue, 49th Floor, New York,
NY 10019; Funds affiliated with or managed by Bank of America,
c/o Merrill
Lynch Global Private Equity, 4 World Financial Center, 23rd
Floor, New York, NY 10080. The address of each other beneficial
owner listed is
c/o Validus
Holdings, Ltd., 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton HM11 Bermuda. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Validus
and IPC
As of the date this proxy statement was first mailed to IPC
shareholders, Validus was the registered holder of 100 IPC
Shares, or less than 1% of the outstanding IPC Shares, and
Validus was entitled to vote as to all of the IPC Shares it owns.
Validus
Validus has established written procedures for the review of
transactions between Validus and any company affiliated with
funds managed by any of Validus sponsors (a
portfolio company) or any other company in which
Validus officers or directors have a material interest.
Any such transaction must be reviewed and approved by our
management or the management of the operating subsidiary
entering into the transaction, and the terms of such transaction
should be arms-length or on terms that are otherwise fair
to Validus. Any such transaction will also require prior
approval of the audit committee, except reinsurance assumed
transactions with a portfolio company that senior management has
determined are ordinary course. Furthermore, the effect, if any,
of such a transaction on the independence of any director will
be considered.
The employers of or entities associated with certain directors
or their affiliates have purchased or may in the future purchase
insurance
and/or
reinsurance from Validus on terms Validus believes were and will
be no more favorable to these insureds than those made available
to other customers.
Certain members of Validus management and staff have
provided guarantees to 1384 Capital Ltd, a company formed to
indirectly facilitate the provision of Funds at Lloyds
(FAL).
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Validus compensation committee is composed of John J.
Hendrickson, Sander M. Levy, Mandakini Puri, Sumit Rajpal and
Alok Singh. Each member of Validus compensation committee,
other than Messrs. Hendrickson and Singh, has a
relationship with entities with which Validus has engaged in
certain transactions described below. Entities affiliated with
Messrs. Hendrickson and Singh acquired common shares at the
time of Validus formation and are parties to Validus
shareholder agreement described below.
Shareholders
Agreement and Related Provisions
Certain of Validus shareholders who acquired Validus
common shares prior to the date of Validus initial public
offering (the existing shareholders) and Validus
have entered into a shareholders agreement dated as
-102-
of December 12, 2005 that governs certain relationships
among, and contains certain rights and obligations of, such
existing shareholders.
In connection with any future public offerings of common shares
by Validus, the shareholders agreement grants those
existing shareholders certain rights to participate in
registered offerings by Validus of its common shares, including
demand and piggyback registration
rights. The shareholders agreement defines Aquiline
Capital Partners, LLC, which. together with its related
companies, we refer to as Aquiline, Goldman
Sachs Capital Partners, Vestar Capital Partners, New Mountain
Capital, LLC and Merrill Lynch Global Private Equity as
sponsors. So long as a sponsor continues to
beneficially hold at least
1/3
of its original common shares, a sponsor is deemed to be a
qualified sponsor. The shareholders agreement
permits qualified sponsors to make up to four demand
registrations.
These demand and piggyback registration rights are subject to
limitations as to the maximum number of shares that may be
registered if the managing underwriter in such an offering
advises that the number of common shares offered should be
limited due to market conditions or otherwise. Validus is
required to pay all expenses incurred in connection with demand
and piggyback registrations, excluding, in the case of demand
registrations, underwriting discounts and commissions.
Each of Goldman Sachs Capital Partners and Merrill Lynch Global
Private Equity is entitled to require pursuant to the
shareholders agreement that Validus appoint each of
Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch to act as a lead managing
underwriter for certain demand registrations; provided
that each of Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch individually is
recognized at the time as a leading underwriter for such
securities and affiliates of Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch are
qualified sponsors at such time and the terms offered are market
terms.
Additionally, the shareholders agreement provides that
existing shareholders as well as affiliates, directors,
officers, employees and agents of existing shareholders are
permitted to engage in activities or businesses that are
competitive with us. This section of the shareholders
agreement also specifically releases existing shareholders from
any obligation to refer business opportunities to Validus and
establishes that no existing shareholder has any fiduciary duty
to Validus.
Relationships
with Our Founder and Sponsoring Investors and Their Related
Parties
Validus Re entered into agreements on December 8, 2005 with
BlackRock Financial Management, Inc. (BlackRock)
under which BlackRock provides investment management services of
part of its investment portfolio, as well as certain reporting
and related services in connection therewith. Accounting and
investment management fees earned by BlackRock for the year
ended December 31, 2008 were $2,243,000. During 2008,
Merrill Lynch (whose parent company is Bank of America) owned a
substantial equity interest in BlackRock.
Validus Re entered into an agreement on December 8, 2005
with Goldman Sachs Asset Management and its affiliates
(GSAM) under which GSAM was appointed as an
investment manager of part of Validus investment
portfolio. Investment management fees earned by GSAM for year
ended December 31, 2008 were $1,404,000.
Pursuant to a reinsurance agreement, Validus has ceded premiums
to Group Ark Insurance Holdings Ltd. (Group Ark) of
$1,348,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. A balance
due to Group Ark of $60,000 was included in reinsurance balances
payable December 31, 2008. The contract terms were
negotiated on an arms-length basis. Aquiline and its
affiliates own a majority of the ordinary shares of, and
Mr. Watson is a director of, Group Ark.
Certain members of Validus management and staff have provided
guarantees to 1384 Capital Ltd, a company formed to indirectly
facilitate the provision of FAL. Validus paid $803,000 of
finance expenses to such management and staff in respect of such
provision of FAL for the year ended December 31, 2008, all
of which was included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
at December 31, 2008. An amount of $66,000 was included in
general and administrative expenses in respect of the
reimbursement of expenses relating to such FAL provision for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
-103-
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Except as set forth below, Validus will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust
company or other nominee for the solicitation of proxies in
connection with this solicitation.
Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, facsimile,
telegraph, the internet,
e-mail,
newspapers and other publications of general distribution and in
person. Directors and officers of Validus listed on
Schedule I hereto may assist in the solicitation of proxies
without any additional remuneration (except as otherwise set
forth in this proxy statement).
Validus has retained Georgeson for solicitation and advisory
services in connection with solicitations relating to the
Validus special meeting, for which Georgeson may receive a fee
of up to $75,000 in connection with the solicitation of proxies
for the Validus special meeting. Up to 50 people may be
employed by Georgeson in connection with the solicitation of
proxies for the Validus special meeting. Validus has also agreed
to reimburse Georgeson for out-of-pocket expenses and to
indemnify Georgeson against certain liabilities and expenses,
including reasonable legal fees and related charges. Georgeson
will solicit proxies for the Validus special meeting from
individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other
institutional holders. The entire expense of soliciting
proxies for the Validus special meeting by or on behalf of
Validus is being borne by Validus.
If you have any questions concerning this proxy statement or the
procedures to be followed to execute and deliver a proxy, please
contact Georgeson at the address or phone number specified above
or on the back cover of this proxy statement.
OTHER
MATTERS
Validus knows of no specific matter to be brought before the
Validus special meeting that is not referred to in the notice of
the Validus special meeting. If any such matter comes before the
Validus special meeting, including any shareholder proposal
properly made, the proxy holders will vote proxies in accordance
with their judgment.
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR VALIDUS 2010 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Shareholder proposals intended for inclusion in the proxy
statement for the Validus 2010 annual general meeting should be
submitted in accordance with the procedures prescribed by
Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Exchange Act and sent to the General
Counsel at Validus Holdings, Ltd., Suite 1790,
48 Par-la-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM 11 Bermuda
.. Such
proposals must be received by November 26, 2009.
In addition, a Validus shareholder may present a proposal at the
Validus 2010 annual general meeting other than pursuant to
Rule 14a-8
promulgated under the Exchange Act. Any such proposal will not
be included in the proxy statement for the Validus 2010 annual
general meeting and must be received by the General Counsel at
Validus Holdings, Ltd., Suite 1790, 48 Par-la-Ville
Road, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda by February 10, 2010. If any
such proposal is not so received, such proposal will be deemed
untimely and, therefore, the persons appointed by Validus
board of directors as its proxies will have the right to
exercise discretionary voting authority with respect to such
proposal.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
Validus and IPC file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy any reports, statements or other information that
Validus and IPC file with the SEC at the SECs public
reference room at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the operation of the public reference
room. These SEC filings are also available to the public from
the Internet worldwide website maintained by the SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
Reports, proxy statements and other information, with respect to
Validus, may also be
-104-
inspected at the offices of the New York Stock Exchange,
20 Broad Street, New York, New York, 10005, and, with
respect to IPC, may also be inspected at the offices of The
NASDAQ Stock Market, One Liberty Plaza, 165 Broadway, New York,
NY 10006.
If you are a Validus shareholder, some of the documents
previously filed with the SEC may have been sent to you, but you
can also obtain any of them through Validus, the SEC or the
SECs Internet website as described above. Documents filed
with the SEC are available from Validus without charge,
excluding all exhibits, except that, if Validus has specifically
incorporated by reference an exhibit in this proxy statement,
the exhibit will also be provided without charge.
You may obtain documents filed with the SEC by requesting them
in writing or by telephone from Validus at the following
addresses:
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton HM11
Bermuda
(441) 278-9000
Attention: Jon Levenson
If you would like to request documents, in order to ensure
timely delivery, you must do so at least ten business days
before the date of the Validus special meeting. This means
you must request this information no later
than ,
2009. Validus will mail properly requested documents to
requesting shareholders by first class mail, or another equally
prompt means, within one business day after receipt of such
request.
You can also get more information by visiting Validus
website at
http://www.validusre.bm
and IPCs website at
http://www.ipcre.bm.
Materials from these websites and other websites mentioned in
this proxy statement are not incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement. If you are viewing this proxy statement in
electronic format, each of the URLs mentioned in this proxy
statement is an active textual reference only.
The SEC allows Validus to incorporate by reference
information in this proxy statement, which means that Validus
can disclose important information to you by referring you to
another document filed separately with the SEC. The information
incorporated by reference is considered to be a part of this
proxy statement, except for any information that is superseded
by information included directly in this proxy statement. This
proxy statement incorporates by reference the documents set
forth below that Validus and IPC have previously filed with the
SEC. These documents contain important information about Validus
and IPC and their financial condition, business and results.
|
|
|
Validus Filings
(Commission File
No. 001-33606)
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on: February 9, 2009, March 31, 2009, April 3, 2009,
April 9, 2009, April 16, 2009, April 29, 2009, April 30, 2009,
May 5, 2009 and May 6, 2009 (other than the portions of those
documents not deemed to be filed)
|
The description of Validus common shares contained in its
registration statement on
Form S-3,
including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating the description.
|
|
Filed on August 7, 2008
|
-105-
|
|
|
IPC Filings
(Commission File
No. 000-27662)
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
|
|
For fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (as amended on Form
10-K/A filed on April 30, 2009)
|
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
|
|
Filed on: March 2, 2009; March 10, 2009, March 11, 2009, March
31, 2009, April 7, 2009 and May 1, 2009 (other than the portions
of those documents not deemed to be filed)
|
The description of IPC Shares contained in its registration
statement on
Form S-3,
including any amendment or report filed for the purpose of
updating the description.
|
|
Filed on April 27, 2006
|
Validus also incorporates by reference into this proxy statement
each document filed by Validus or IPC with the SEC pursuant to
Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after
the date of this proxy statement, but before the date of the
Validus special meeting. To the extent, however, required by the
rules and regulations of the SEC, Validus will amend this proxy
statement to include information filed after the date of this
proxy statement.
Validus has supplied all of the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement relating to
Validus, as well as all unaudited pro forma financial
information. All information contained or incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement relating to IPC has been
obtained from public filings filed by IPC with the SEC.
-106-
Annex A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION
Dated as of March 31, 2009
Between
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.,
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
And
VALIDUS LTD.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE I
|
THE AMALGAMATION
|
1.1 The Amalgamation; Effective Time
|
|
|
1
|
|
1.2 Closing
|
|
|
1
|
|
1.3 Effects of the Amalgamation
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.4 Amalgamated Company Bye-laws
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.5 [Reserved]
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.6 Directors and Officers of the Amalgamated Company
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.7 Amalgamated Company Name
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
|
CONVERSION OF IPC SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
|
2.1 Effect on Share Capital
|
|
|
2
|
|
2.2 Exchange Procedures
|
|
|
3
|
|
2.3 IPC Equity Awards
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
|
3.1 Organization, Standing and Power
|
|
|
7
|
|
3.2 Capital Structure
|
|
|
7
|
|
3.3 Authority; Non-Contravention
|
|
|
8
|
|
3.4 SEC Documents; Regulatory Reports; Undisclosed
Liabilities
|
|
|
9
|
|
3.5 Compliance with Applicable Laws and Reporting
Requirements
|
|
|
10
|
|
3.6 Legal and Arbitration Proceedings and Investigations
|
|
|
11
|
|
3.7 Taxes
|
|
|
11
|
|
3.8 Absence of Certain Changes or Events
|
|
|
13
|
|
3.9 Board Approval
|
|
|
13
|
|
3.10 Vote Required
|
|
|
13
|
|
3.11 Agreements with Regulators
|
|
|
14
|
|
3.12 Insurance Matters
|
|
|
14
|
|
3.13 Investments; Derivatives
|
|
|
18
|
|
3.14 Material Contracts; Intercompany Contracts
|
|
|
18
|
|
3.15 Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
|
|
|
19
|
|
3.16 Labor Relations and Other Employment Matters
|
|
|
20
|
|
3.17 Intellectual Property
|
|
|
21
|
|
3.18 Properties
|
|
|
22
|
|
3.19 Brokers or Finders
|
|
|
22
|
|
3.20 Investment Advisor
|
|
|
22
|
|
3.21 Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
22
|
|
3.22 Takeover Laws
|
|
|
22
|
|
-i-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
|
COVENANTS RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
|
4.1 Covenants of Validus and IPC
|
|
|
22
|
|
4.2 Financing
|
|
|
25
|
|
4.3 Bermuda Required Actions
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
|
ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS
|
5.1 Preparation of Proxy Statements; Shareholders Meetings
|
|
|
25
|
|
5.2 Access to Information; Confidentiality
|
|
|
27
|
|
5.3 Commercially Reasonable Efforts
|
|
|
28
|
|
5.4 No Change in Recommendation
|
|
|
29
|
|
5.5 Acquisition Proposals
|
|
|
30
|
|
5.6 Section 16 Matters
|
|
|
32
|
|
5.7 Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
32
|
|
5.8 Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance
|
|
|
32
|
|
5.9 Public Announcements
|
|
|
33
|
|
5.10 Additional Agreements
|
|
|
33
|
|
5.11 Shareholder Litigation
|
|
|
33
|
|
5.12 Employee Benefits
|
|
|
33
|
|
5.13 Listing and Delisting; Reservation for Issuance
|
|
|
33
|
|
5.14 Dividends
|
|
|
34
|
|
5.15 Tax Treatment
|
|
|
34
|
|
5.16 Book Value Calculations
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
|
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
|
6.1 Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect
the Amalgamation
|
|
|
35
|
|
6.2 Conditions to Obligation of IPC
|
|
|
36
|
|
6.3 Conditions to Obligation of Validus
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
|
TERMINATION AND AMENDMENT
|
7.1 Termination
|
|
|
37
|
|
7.2 Effect of Termination
|
|
|
38
|
|
-ii-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
|
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
8.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and
Agreements
|
|
|
39
|
|
8.2 Notices
|
|
|
40
|
|
8.3 Interpretation
|
|
|
40
|
|
8.4 Counterparts
|
|
|
41
|
|
8.5 Entire Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
41
|
|
8.6 Governing Law
|
|
|
41
|
|
8.7 Severability
|
|
|
41
|
|
8.8 Assignment
|
|
|
41
|
|
8.9 Enforcement
|
|
|
41
|
|
8.10 Submission to Jurisdiction
|
|
|
42
|
|
8.11 Amendment
|
|
|
42
|
|
8.12 Extension; Waiver
|
|
|
42
|
|
8.13 Defined Terms
|
|
|
42
|
|
Exhibit A Amalgamation Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit B [Reserved]
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit C [Reserved]
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit D [Reserved]
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit E IPC Bye-Law Amendment
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit F Supplement to Section 4.1 of IPC Disclosure
Letter
|
|
|
|
|
-iii-
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF AMALGAMATION, dated as of March 31,
2009 (this Agreement), between IPC HOLDINGS,
LTD., a Bermuda exempted company (IPC),
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD., a Bermuda exempted company
(Validus) and VALIDUS LTD., a Bermuda
exempted company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Validus
(Amalgamation Sub).
WHEREAS, the board of directors of IPC has adopted this
Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement (as defined in
Section 1.1) and authorized and approved the amalgamation
of IPC with Amalgamation Sub upon the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth herein (the
Amalgamation), authorized and approved the
IPC Bye-Law Amendment (as defined in Section 3.9(a)) and
deems it fair to, advisable to and in the best interests of IPC
to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of Validus has adopted this
Agreement, authorized and approved the issuance of Validus
Common Shares (as defined in Section 2.1(a)) in the
Amalgamation (the Share Issuance) and deems
it fair, advisable and in the best interests of Validus to enter
into this Agreement and to consummate the Share Issuance and the
other transactions contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, the board of directors of Amalgamation Sub has adopted
this Agreement, authorized and approved the Amalgamation, and
deems it advisable and in the best interests of Amalgamation Sub
to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby;
WHEREAS, this Agreement is being entered into in accordance with
the Bermuda Companies Act of 1981, as amended (the
Companies Act);
WHEREAS, IPC, Validus, and Amalgamation Sub desire to make
certain representations, warranties and agreements in connection
with the Amalgamation and also to prescribe various conditions
to the Amalgamation; and
WHEREAS, it is intended that this Agreement shall constitute a
plan of reorganization, within the meaning of
Section 354 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code).
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the
respective representations, warranties, covenants and agreements
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
THE
AMALGAMATION
1.1 The Amalgamation; Effective Time. Subject to the
provisions of this Agreement and the amalgamation agreement
attached as Exhibit A (the Amalgamation
Agreement), Amalgamation Sub and IPC will cause an
application for registration of an amalgamated company (the
Amalgamation Application) to be prepared,
executed and delivered to the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda
(the Registrar) as provided under S.108 of
the Companies Act on or prior to the Closing Date and will cause
the Amalgamation to become effective pursuant to the Companies
Act. The Amalgamation shall become effective upon the issuance
of a Certificate of Amalgamation by the Registrar or such other
time as the Certificate of Amalgamation may provide. The parties
agree that they will request the Registrar provide in the
Certificate of Amalgamation that the Effective Time will be the
time when the Amalgamation Application is filed with the
Registrar or another time mutually agreed by the parties (the
Effective Time).
1.2 Closing. The closing of the Amalgamation (the
Closing) will take place at 10:00 a.m.
on the date (the Closing Date) that is the
third business day after the satisfaction or waiver (if such
waiver is permitted and effective under applicable Law (as
defined in Section 3.5(a)) of the latest to be satisfied or
waived of the conditions set forth in ARTICLE VI (excluding
conditions that, by their terms, are to be satisfied on the
Closing Date), unless another time or date is agreed to in
writing by the parties. The Closing shall be held at the offices
of Cahill Gordon & Reindel
llp, 80 Pine
Street, in New York, NY, unless another place is agreed to in
writing by the parties.
-1-
1.3 Effects of the Amalgamation. As of the Effective
Time, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and
the Amalgamation Agreement, IPC shall be amalgamated with
Amalgamation Sub and the amalgamated company (the
Amalgamated Company) shall continue after the
Amalgamation. The parties acknowledge and agree that for
purposes of Bermuda Law (a) the Amalgamation shall be
effected so as to constitute an amalgamation and
(b) the Amalgamated Company shall be deemed to be an
amalgamated company in accordance with
section 104 of the Companies Act. Under Section 109 of
the Companies Act, from and after the Effective Time: (i)
the Amalgamation of IPC and Amalgamation Sub and their
continuance as one company shall become effective; (ii)
the property of each of IPC and Amalgamation Sub shall become
the property of Amalgamated Company; (iii) Amalgamated
Company shall continue to be liable for the obligations and
liabilities of each of IPC and Amalgamation Sub; (iv) any
existing cause of action, claim or liability to prosecution
shall be unaffected; (v) a civil, criminal or
administrative action or proceeding pending by or against IPC or
Amalgamation Sub may be continued to be prosecuted by or against
Amalgamated Company; and (vi) a conviction against, or
ruling, order or judgment in favor of or against, IPC or
Amalgamation Sub may be enforced by or against Amalgamated
Company.
1.4 Amalgamated Company Bye-laws. The bye-laws of
the Amalgamated Company shall be the bye-laws of the
Amalgamation Sub.
1.5 [Reserved].
1.6 Directors and Officers of the Amalgamated
Company.
(a) The parties hereto shall take all actions necessary so
that the board of directors of Amalgamation Sub at the Effective
Time shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the directors
of the Amalgamated Company until the earlier of their
resignation or removal or until their respective successors are
duly elected or appointed.
(b) The parties hereto shall take all actions necessary so
that the officers of Amalgamation Sub at the Effective Time
shall, from and after the Effective Time, be the officers of the
Amalgamated Company until the earlier of their resignation or
removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or
appointed.
1.7 Amalgamated Company Name. IPC and Validus shall
take all actions reasonably necessary so that immediately after
the Effective Time the name of the Amalgamated Company shall be
Validus Ltd.
ARTICLE II
CONVERSION
OF IPC SECURITIES; EXCHANGE OF CERTIFICATES
2.1 Effect on Share Capital. Subject to the terms
and conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time, by
virtue of the Amalgamation and without any action on the part of
the holder of any common shares in IPC, each having a par value
of $0.01 (each, an IPC Common Share), as
evidenced by way of entry in the register of shareholders of IPC
(the IPC Share Register) or by share
certificates registered in the name of a shareholder and
representing outstanding IPC Common Shares (each, a IPC
Certificate):
(a) Conversion of IPC Common Shares. Each IPC Common
Share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective
Time (other than Dissenting Shares) shall be cancelled and
converted into the right to receive shares in the share capital
of Validus, each having a par value of $0.175 (each, a
Validus Common Share) equal to 1.2037 (the
Exchange Ratio) (the Exchange Ratio, together
with any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares in accordance
with Section 2.2(e), the Amalgamation
Consideration). Upon such conversion, each IPC Common
Share shall be cancelled and each holder of shares registered in
the IPC Share Register or holding a valid IPC Certificate
immediately prior to the Effective Time shall thereafter cease
to have any rights with respect to such shares except the right
to receive the Amalgamation Consideration. The Amalgamation
Consideration shall be appropriately adjusted to reflect fully
the effect of any stock split, reverse stock split, stock
dividend (including any dividend or distribution of securities
convertible into Validus Common Shares or IPC Common Shares),
reorganization, recapitalization, reclassification or other like
change with respect to Validus Common Shares or IPC Common
Shares having a record date on or after the date hereof and
prior to the Effective Time.
-2-
(b) Cancellation of Validus-Owned Securities.
Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, all
IPC Common Shares that are owned by Validus or by any subsidiary
of Validus immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by
virtue of the Amalgamation, and without any action on the part
of the holder thereof, automatically be cancelled and retired
without any conversion thereof and shall cease to exist, and no
payment shall be made in respect thereof.
(c) Shares of Dissenting Shareholders.
Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any
issued and outstanding IPC Common Shares held by a person who
did not vote in favor of the Amalgamation and who complies with
all the provisions of the Companies Act concerning the right of
holders of IPC Common Shares to require appraisal of their IPC
Common Shares pursuant to Bermuda Law (such shareholder, a
Dissenting Shareholder, and such shares,
Dissenting Shares) shall, at the Effective
time, be cancelled and converted into the right to receive the
Amalgamation Consideration as described in Section 2.1(a),
and the right to receive the excess thereof, if any, as
appraised by the Supreme Court of Bermuda under Section 106
of the Companies Act. In the event that a Dissenting Shareholder
fails to perfect, effectively withdraws or otherwise waives any
right to appraisal, its IPC Common Shares shall be cancelled and
converted as of the Effective Time into the right to receive the
Amalgamation Consideration for each such Dissenting Share. IPC
shall give Validus (i) prompt notice of (A) any
written demands for appraisal of Dissenting Shares or
withdrawals of such demands received by IPC and (B) to
the extent that IPC has actual knowledge, any applications to
the Supreme Court of Bermuda for appraisal of the fair value of
the Dissenting Shares, and (ii) the opportunity to
participate with IPC in all negotiations and proceedings with
respect to any demands for appraisal under the Companies Act.
Neither IPC nor Validus shall, without the prior written consent
of the other party (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed),
voluntarily make any payment with respect to, or settle, offer
to settle or otherwise negotiate, any such demands.
2.2 Exchange Procedures.
(a) Exchange Agent. Prior to the Effective Time,
Validus shall designate an exchange agent reasonably acceptable
to IPC (the Exchange Agent) for the purpose
of exchanging IPC Common Shares outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time. Prior to or at the Effective Time, Validus
shall deposit, or shall cause to be deposited, with the Exchange
Agent in accordance with this ARTICLE II, certificates, or
at Validuss option, shares in book entry form representing
the Validus Common Shares to be exchanged in the Amalgamation,
cash in an amount sufficient to pay any cash payable in lieu of
fractional shares pursuant to Section 2.2(e) and any
dividends or distributions to which the shareholders of IPC may
be entitled pursuant to Section 2.2(c). Such Amalgamation
Consideration and cash so deposited are hereinafter referred to
as the Exchange Fund. No interest shall be
paid or accrued for the benefit of holders of the IPC
Certificates on cash amounts payable upon the surrender of such
certificates pursuant to this Section 2.2.
(b) Exchange Procedures. As promptly as practicable
following the Effective Time, Validus or the Amalgamated Company
shall cause the Exchange Agent to mail, to each shareholder of
IPC, (i) a letter of transmittal (which shall be in such
form and have such other provisions as the parties may
reasonably specify) and (ii) where applicable,
instructions for use in effecting the surrender of IPC
Certificates, to the extent available and in issue, in exchange
for the Amalgamation Consideration. After the Effective Time,
upon surrender of title to the IPC Common Shares previously held
by a shareholder of IPC in accordance with this
Section 2.2, together with such letter of transmittal duly
executed if such shareholder holds IPC Certificates, and such
other documents as the Exchange Agent may reasonably require, a
holder of IPC Common Shares shall be entitled to receive in
exchange therefor a certificate or book-entry representing that
number of whole Validus Common Shares and any cash in lieu of
fractional shares that such shareholder has the right to receive
pursuant to this ARTICLE II, and any IPC Certificate
surrendered in respect thereof shall forthwith be marked as
cancelled. In the event of a transfer of ownership of IPC Common
Shares that is not registered in the transfer records of IPC, a
certificate or book-entry representing the proper number of
Validus Common Shares may be issued to a transferee if the IPC
Certificate representing such IPC Common Shares (if any) is
presented to the Exchange Agent, accompanied by all documents
required to evidence and effect such transfer and by evidence
that any applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid.
-3-
(c) Distributions with Respect to Unexchanged
Shares. No dividends or other distributions declared or made
with respect to Validus Common Shares with a record date on or
after the Effective Time shall be paid to any shareholder of IPC
holding any unsurrendered IPC Certificate with respect to the
Validus Common Shares represented thereby, nor shall the cash
payment in lieu of fractional shares be paid to any such
shareholder pursuant to Section 2.2(e), until such
shareholder shall surrender such IPC Certificate in accordance
with the procedures set forth in this ARTICLE II. Following
the surrender of any such IPC Certificate in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this ARTICLE II, such shareholder
shall be entitled to receive, in addition to the consideration
set forth in Section 2.1(a), without interest, (i)
at the time of such surrender, the amount of any dividends or
other distributions with a record date on or after the Effective
Time theretofore paid (but withheld pursuant to the immediately
preceding sentence) with respect to such whole Validus Common
Shares which a shareholder of IPC holding such IPC Certificate
is entitled to receive hereunder, and (ii) at the
appropriate payment date, the amount of dividends or other
distributions with a record date after the Effective Time but
prior to surrender and a payment date subsequent to surrender
payable with respect to such whole Validus Common Shares which
such shareholder is entitled to receive hereunder.
(d) No Further Rights in IPC Common Shares. All
Amalgamation Consideration paid or issued upon the surrender of
title to IPC Common Shares in accordance with the terms of this
ARTICLE II (including any cash paid pursuant to this
ARTICLE II) shall be deemed to have been issued (and
paid) in full satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the
shareholders of IPC, in their capacity as shareholders of IPC
prior to the Effective Time. There shall be no further
registration of transfers on the stock transfer books of the
Amalgamated Company of the IPC Common Shares which were
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time. If, after
the Effective Time, IPC Certificates are presented to Validus or
to the Amalgamated Company or to the Exchange Agent for any
reason, they shall be marked as cancelled and exchanged in
accordance with this ARTICLE II, except as otherwise
required by Law.
(e) No Fractional Shares. Notwithstanding anything
in this Agreement to the contrary, no fraction of a Validus
Common Share will be issued in connection with the Amalgamation,
and in lieu thereof any shareholder of IPC who would otherwise
have been entitled to a fraction of a Validus Common Share,
shall be paid upon surrender of title to IPC Common Shares for
exchange (and after taking into account and aggregating IPC
Common Shares represented by all IPC Certificates surrendered by
such holder, or as set out in the IPC Share Register, as
applicable) cash in an amount (without interest) equal to the
product obtained by multiplying (i) the fractional share
interest to which such shareholder (after taking into account
and aggregating all IPC Common Shares represented by all IPC
Certificates surrendered by such shareholder or as set out in
the IPC Share Register, as applicable) would otherwise be
entitled by (ii) the Average Validus Share Price (as
defined in Section 8.13(a)).
(f) Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates. In the
event any IPC Certificates shall have been lost, stolen or
destroyed, the Exchange Agent shall issue in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed certificates, upon the making of an
affidavit of that fact by the holder thereof, the Amalgamation
Consideration and any dividends or other distributions as may be
required pursuant to this ARTICLE II in respect of the IPC
Common Shares represented by such lost, stolen or destroyed
certificates; provided that Validus may, in its
reasonable discretion and as a condition precedent to the
issuance thereof, require the owner of such lost, stolen or
destroyed certificates to deliver a bond in such sum as it may
reasonably direct as indemnity against any claim that may be
made against Validus or the Exchange Agent with respect to the
certificates alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed.
(g) Termination of Exchange Fund. Unless a longer
period is prescribed by applicable Law or Validuss
agreement with the Exchange Agent, any portion of the Exchange
Fund that remains undistributed to the shareholders of IPC for
six months after the Effective Time shall be delivered to
Validus, upon demand, and any shareholders of IPC who have not
theretofore complied with this ARTICLE II shall thereafter
look only to Validus for payment of their claim for the
Amalgamation Consideration and any dividends or distributions
with respect to Validus Common Shares.
(h) No Liability. To the extent allowed under
applicable Law, any Amalgamation Consideration and any dividends
or distributions with respect to Validus Common Shares
comprising the Amalgamation Consideration
-4-
that remain undistributed to the shareholders of IPC shall be
delivered to and become the property of Validus on the day
immediately prior to the day that such property is required to
be delivered to any public official pursuant to any applicable
abandoned property, escheat or similar Law. None of Validus,
Amalgamation Sub, Amalgamated Company or the Exchange Agent
shall be liable to any shareholder of IPC for any such property
delivered to Validus or to a public official pursuant to any
applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar Law.
(i) Withholding. The Exchange Agent, Validus and the
Amalgamated Company shall be entitled to deduct and withhold
from the consideration otherwise payable pursuant to this
Agreement to any shareholder of IPC such amounts as it is
required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of
such payment under any provision of applicable tax Law. To the
extent that amounts are so withheld by the Exchange Agent,
Validus or the Amalgamated Company, such withheld amounts shall
be treated for all purposes of this Agreement as having been
paid to the holder of the IPC Common Shares in respect of which
such deduction and withholding was made. The parties agree to
cooperate with each other for purposes of determining whether
any taxes are required to be withheld with respect to the
Amalgamation.
2.3 IPC Equity Awards.
(a) IPC Stock Options. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, at the Effective Time, by virtue
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and without
any action on the part of any holder of any outstanding option
to purchase IPC Common Shares under any IPC Share Plan (as
defined in Section 3.2(a)), whether vested or unvested,
exercisable or unexercisable (each, an IPC Share
Option), each IPC Share Option that is outstanding and
unexercised immediately prior thereto shall cease to represent a
right to acquire IPC Common Shares and shall be converted into
an option (a New Option) to purchase, on the
same terms and conditions as were applicable under the terms of
the IPC Share Plan under which the IPC Share Option was granted
and the applicable award agreement thereunder (taking into
account any accelerated vesting thereunder), such number of
Validus Common Shares and at an exercise price per share
determined as follows:
(1) Number of Shares. The number of IPC Common
Shares subject to a New Option shall be equal to the product of
(A) the number of IPC Common Shares subject to such IPC
Share Option immediately prior to the Effective Time and
(B) the Exchange Ratio, the product being rounded, if
necessary, to the nearest whole share; and
(2) Exercise Price. The exercise price per Validus
Common Share purchasable upon exercise of a New Option shall be
equal to (A) the per share exercise price of the IPC
Share Option divided by (B) the Exchange Ratio, the
quotient being rounded, if necessary, to the nearest cent.
The foregoing adjustments shall (i) in the case of any
IPC Share Option that is intended to be an incentive stock
option under Section 422 of the Code, be determined
in a manner consistent with the requirements of
Section 424(a) of the Code and (ii) in the case of
any IPC Share Option that is not intended to be an
incentive stock option, be determined in a manner
consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the
Code.
(b) IPC Other Awards. Subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement:
(1) at the Effective Time, by virtue of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and without any action on the
part of any holder of any outstanding right of any kind,
contingent or accrued, to acquire or receive IPC Common Shares
or benefits measured by the value of IPC Common Shares, each
outstanding award of any kind consisting of IPC Common Shares or
benefits measured by the value of IPC Common Shares (including
performance share units where the performance period has ended
prior to the Effective Date), in each case that may be held,
awarded, outstanding, payable or reserved for issuance under any
IPC Share Plan and any other IPC Benefit Plan (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)), but excluding IPC Share Options and IPC
performance share units for which the performance period expires
on or after the Effective Time (the IPC Non-Performance
Awards), shall be deemed to be converted into the
right to acquire or receive benefits measured by the value of
(as the case may be) the number of Validus Common Shares equal
to the product (rounded, if necessary, to the nearest whole
number) of (x) the
-5-
number of IPC Common Shares subject to such IPC Non-Performance
Award immediately prior to the Effective Time and (y) the
Exchange Ratio. Except as specifically provided above, following
the Effective Time, each such right shall otherwise be subject
to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to the
rights under the relevant IPC Share Plan or other IPC Benefit
Plan and the applicable award agreement thereunder (taking into
account any accelerated vesting thereunder) immediately prior to
the Effective Time; and
(2) immediately prior to the Effective Time, by virtue of
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and without any
action on the part of any holder of any IPC performance share
unit for which the performance period expires on or after the
Effective Time (each a Non-Vested PSU), the
number of IPC Common Shares to which each Non-Vested PSU relates
shall be calculated based on the original grant date target
value of the Non-Vested PSU, as pro-rated on a daily basis to
each year of the original vesting period (the IPC
Performance Awards) and, at the Effective Time, each
IPC Performance Award shall be deemed to be converted into the
right to acquire or receive benefits measured by the value of
(as the case may be) the number of Validus Common Shares equal
to the product (rounded, if necessary, to the nearest whole
number) of (x) the number of IPC Common Shares to which
each IPC Performance Award relates immediately prior to the
Effective Time and (y) the Exchange Ratio. Except as
specifically provided above, following the Effective Time, each
such right shall otherwise be subject to the same terms and
conditions as were applicable to the rights under the relevant
IPC Share Plan or other IPC Benefit Plan and the applicable
award agreement thereunder (taking into account any accelerated
vesting thereunder) immediately prior to the Effective Time. IPC
Performance Awards and IPC Non-Performance Awards shall be,
collectively, referred to as the IPC Other
Awards.
(c) Corporate Actions. Before the Effective Time,
IPC, or its board of directors or an appropriate committee
thereof, shall take all action necessary on its part to give
effect to the provisions of Sections 2.3(a) and
(b) and shall take such other actions reasonably requested
by Validus to give effect to the foregoing (including obtaining
the consent of the holder of or amending the terms of any IPC
Share Options, IPC Other Awards or any IPC Share Plan). IPC
shall take all actions necessary to ensure that, from and after
the Effective Time, none of IPC, Validus, the Amalgamated
Company or any of their respective subsidiaries will be required
to deliver IPC Common Shares or other capital stock of IPC to
any person pursuant to or in settlement of IPC Share Options or
IPC Other Awards at or after the Effective Time.
(d) Registration. If registration of any interests
in the IPC Share Plans or any other IPC Benefit Plan or the
Validus Common Shares issuable thereunder is required under the
Securities Act, Validus shall file with the SEC within five
business days after the Effective Time a registration statement
on
Form S-8
(or any successor or other appropriate forms) with respect to
such interests of Validus Common Shares, and shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of
such registration statement (and maintain the current status of
the prospectus or the prospectuses contained therein) for so
long as the relevant IPC Share Plans or other IPC Benefit Plans,
as applicable, remain in effect and such registration of
interests therein or the Validus Common Shares issuable
thereunder continues to be required.
(e) Notice to Equity Award Holders. As soon as
practicable after the Effective Time, Validus shall deliver to
the holders of IPC Share Options and IPC Other Awards
appropriate notices setting forth such holders rights
pursuant to any IPC Share Plan or IPC Benefit Plan and
agreements evidencing such IPC Share Options and IPC Other
Awards and stating that the IPC Share Plans or IPC Benefit Plans
and such IPC Share Options and IPC Other Awards and agreements
have been assumed by Validus and shall continue in effect on the
same terms and conditions (subject to the adjustments required
by this Section 2.3 after giving effect to the Amalgamation
and the terms of the IPC Share Plans or IPC Benefit Plans).
ARTICLE III
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES
Except as (i) set forth in the correspondingly identified
subsection of the disclosure letter delivered by Validus to IPC
simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement by Validus
(the Validus Disclosure
-6-
Letter) or the disclosure letter delivered by IPC
to Validus simultaneously with the execution of this Agreement
by IPC, which shall be identical in all respects to the
Disclosure Letter delivered by IPC to Max Capital Group Ltd. at
the time the IM Agreement was signed (the IPC
Disclosure Letter and each of the Validus Disclosure
Letter and the IPC Disclosure Letter, a Disclosure
Letter), as the case may be, or (ii) disclosed
in the relevant partys SEC Documents filed with the SEC on
or after January 1, 2008 and prior to the date of this
Agreement (excluding any disclosures set forth in any risk
factor section or forward-looking statements contained therein),
IPC hereby represents and warrants to Validus, and Validus (and
Amalgamation Sub with respect to Sections 3.1(a), 3.1(c),
3.3 and 3.9(c)) hereby represents and warrants to IPC, to the
extent applicable, in each case with respect to itself and its
subsidiaries, as follows:
3.1 Organization, Standing and Power.
(a) Each of it and its subsidiaries is a company or other
legal entity duly organized and validly existing and in good
standing (with respect to jurisdictions which recognize such
concept) under the Laws of its jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization, has all requisite power and authority to own,
lease and operate its properties and to carry on its business as
now being conducted, and is duly qualified to do business in
each jurisdiction in which the nature of its business or the
ownership or leasing of its properties makes such qualification
necessary, except where the failure to be so qualified has not
had and would not be reasonably expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(b) The copies of its memorandum of association and
bye-laws incorporated by reference in its
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, are true, complete
and correct copies of such documents, are in full force and
effect and have not been amended or otherwise modified, except
as they may be or have been amended or otherwise modified
pursuant to the IPC Bye-Law Amendment (as defined in
Section 3.9(a)).
(c) Validus and Amalgamation Sub represent to IPC that:
(i) true and complete copies of the memorandum of
association and bye-laws of Amalgamation Sub, each as in effect
as of the date of this Agreement, will be made available to IPC,
upon request, within one (1) business day of the
termination of the IM Agreement, (ii) Amalgamation Sub
was formed by Validus solely for the purpose of effecting the
Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement, and (iii) Amalgamation Sub has not conducted
any business prior to the date hereof and has no, and
immediately prior to the Effective Time will have no, assets,
liabilities or obligations of any nature other than those
incident to its formation and pursuant to this Agreement.
3.2 Capital Structure.
(a) Its authorized share capital and outstanding common
shares as of the date set forth in the corresponding section of
its Disclosure Letter, including any shares reserved for
issuance upon the exercise or payment of outstanding warrants
and outstanding stock options or other equity related awards
(such stock option and other equity-based award plans,
agreements and programs, collectively, in the case of Validus,
the Validus Share Plans and, in the case of
IPC, the IPC Share Plans), is described in
the corresponding section of its Disclosure Letter. In the case
of Validus, none of its Common Shares are held by it or by its
subsidiaries. In the case of IPC, its Common Shares that are
held by it and its subsidiaries are described in the
corresponding section of its Disclosure Letter. All of its
outstanding Common Shares have been duly authorized and validly
issued and are fully paid and non-assessable and not subject to
preemptive rights. Section 3.2(a) of its Disclosure Letter
sets forth a list of all warrants, options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units or other equity awards outstanding as of
the date hereof.
(b) From January 1, 2009 to the date hereof, it has
not issued or permitted to be issued any common shares, share
appreciation rights or securities exercisable or exchangeable
for or convertible into shares in its or any of its
subsidiaries share capital.
(c) It or one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries owns all of
the issued and outstanding shares in the share capital of its
subsidiaries, beneficially and of record, and all such shares
are fully paid and nonassessable, are not subject to preemptive
rights and are free and clear of any claim, lien or encumbrance.
-7-
(d) No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness
having the right to vote (or which are convertible into or
exercisable for securities having the right to vote) on any
matters on which shareholders may vote (Voting
Debt) of it or any of its subsidiaries are issued or
outstanding.
(e) Except for options or other equity-based awards issued
or to be issued under the Validus Share Plans (in the case of
Validus) or the IPC Share Plans (in the case of IPC), there are
no options, warrants, calls, convertible or exchangeable
securities, rights, commitments or agreements of any character
to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a party or by which it
or any such subsidiary is bound (i) obligating it or any
of its subsidiaries to issue, deliver or sell, or cause to be
issued, delivered or sold, additional shares of the share
capital or any Voting Debt or other equity rights of it or any
of its subsidiaries, (ii) obligating it or any of its
subsidiaries to grant, extend or enter into any such option,
warrant, call, convertible or exchangeable security, right,
commitment or agreement or (iii) that provide the
economic equivalent of an equity ownership interest in it or any
of its subsidiaries.
(f) None of it or any of its subsidiaries is a party to any
member or shareholder agreement, voting trust agreement or
registration rights agreement relating to any equity securities
of it or any of its subsidiaries or any other agreement relating
to disposition, voting or dividends with respect to any equity
securities of it or any of its subsidiaries. There are no
outstanding contractual obligations of it or any of its
subsidiaries to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any
shares in the share capital of it or any of its subsidiaries.
(g) Since January 1, 2009 through the date of this
Agreement, it has not declared, set aside, made or paid to its
shareholders dividends or other distributions on the outstanding
shares in its share capital.
(h) It has not waived any voting cut-back, transfer
restrictions or similar provisions of its or its
subsidiaries bye-laws with respect to any of its or their
shareholders, except for such waivers set forth in its bye-laws.
3.3 Authority; Non-Contravention.
(a) It has all requisite corporate power and authority to
enter into this Agreement and, subject to obtaining the Required
Validus Vote (as defined in Section 3.10(a)) (in the case
of Validus) or the Required IPC Vote (as defined in
Section 3.10(b)) (in the case of IPC), to consummate the
transactions contemplated hereby. The execution and delivery of
this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on its part and no other corporate proceedings
on its part are necessary to authorize this Agreement and
consummate the transactions contemplated hereby, subject to the
Required Validus Vote (in the case of Validus) or the Required
IPC Vote (in the case of IPC). This Agreement has been duly
executed and delivered by it and (assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery by the other parties
hereto) constitutes a valid and binding obligation of it,
enforceable against it in accordance with its terms, except to
the extent enforcement is limited by bankruptcy, insolvency,
fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws
of general applicability relating to or affecting
creditors rights and by general equitable principles.
(b) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement by
it nor the consummation by it of the transactions contemplated
hereby, nor compliance by it with any of the terms or provisions
hereof, will (i) violate any provision of the memorandum
of association or bye-laws of it (as they may be or have been
modified, in the case of IPC, pursuant to the IPC Bye-Law
Amendment) or the memorandum of association, bye-laws or
equivalent organizational documents of any of its subsidiaries
or (ii) assuming that the consents, approvals, orders,
authorizations, registrations, declarations and filings referred
to in Section 3.3(c) are duly obtained or made, (A)
violate any Law applicable to it or any of its subsidiaries or
any of their respective properties or assets or (B)
violate, conflict with, result in a breach of any provision of
or the loss of any benefit under, constitute a default (or an
event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would
constitute a default) under, result in the cancellation,
suspension, non-renewal or termination of or a right of
termination or cancellation under, accelerate the performance
required by, or result in the creation of any lien, pledge,
security interest, charge or other encumbrance upon (1)
any Permit (as defined in Section 3.5(a)) or (2) any
of the respective properties or assets of it or any of its
subsidiaries under, any of the terms, conditions or provisions
of any loan or credit agreement, note, mortgage, indenture,
lease, Validus Benefit Plan (as defined
-8-
in Section 8.13(a)) (in the case of Validus) or IPC Benefit
Plan (as defined in Section 8.13(a)) (in the case of IPC)
or other agreement, obligation or instrument to which it or any
of its subsidiaries is a party, or by which they or any of their
respective properties or assets may be bound or affected, except
(with respect to clause (ii)) for such violations, conflicts or
breaches that have not had and would not be reasonably expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect.
(c) No consent, approval, order or authorization of, or
registration, declaration or filing with, any court,
administrative agency or commission or other governmental
authority, body, agency, official or instrumentality, domestic
or foreign, or self-regulatory organization or other similar
non-governmental regulatory body (each, a Governmental
Entity), is required to be made or obtained by it or
any of its subsidiaries in connection with the execution and
delivery of this Agreement by it or the consummation by it of
the transactions contemplated hereby, except for (i) the
filing of the Amalgamation Application and related attachments
with the Registrar, (ii) the written notification to the
Bermuda Monetary Authority regarding Validuss acquisition
of the IPC Common Shares, (iii) such other applications,
filings, authorizations, orders and approvals as may be required
under applicable Laws (including all applicable Insurance Laws)
of any jurisdiction and any approvals thereof, which are set
forth in Section 3.3(c) of its Disclosure Letter,
(iv) the filing with the SEC of such registrations,
prospectuses, reports and other materials as may be required in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby, including the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus (as
defined in Section 5.1(a)), and the obtaining from the SEC
of such orders as may be required in connection therewith,
(v) compliance with any applicable requirements of NASDAQ
or the NYSE, as applicable, (vi) in the case of Validus,
such filings and approvals as are required to be made or
obtained under the securities or Blue Sky Laws of
various jurisdictions in connection with the issuance of the
Validus Common Shares pursuant to this Agreement, and
(vii) for any other such consent, approval, order or
authorization of, or registration, declaration or filings, the
failure of which to obtain or make would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
3.4 SEC Documents; Regulatory Reports; Undisclosed
Liabilities.
(a) It and its subsidiaries have timely filed all required
reports, schedules, registration statements and other documents
with the SEC since January 1, 2008 (the SEC
Documents). As of their respective dates of filing
with the SEC (or, if amended or superseded by a filing prior to
the date hereof, as of the date of such filing), the SEC
Documents complied in all material respects with the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
Securities Act), or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act),
as the case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
thereunder applicable to such SEC Documents, and none of its or
its subsidiaries SEC Documents when filed contained any
untrue statement of a material fact or omitted to state a
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make
the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under
which they were made, not misleading. The financial statements
of it and its subsidiaries included in its SEC Documents
complied, as of their respective dates of filing with the SEC
(or, if amended or superseded by a filing prior to the date
hereof, as of the date of such filing), with all applicable
accounting requirements and with the published rules and
regulations of the SEC with respect thereto, have been prepared
in accordance with GAAP applied on a consistent basis during the
periods involved (except as may be disclosed therein) and fairly
present in all material respects the consolidated financial
position of it and its consolidated subsidiaries and the
consolidated results of operations, changes in
shareholders equity and cash flows of such companies as of
the dates and for the periods shown. As of the date hereof,
there are no outstanding written comments from the SEC with
respect to its SEC Documents.
(b) Except for (i) those liabilities that are
reflected or reserved for in its consolidated financial
statements included in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the SEC
prior to the date of this Agreement, (ii) liabilities and
obligations incurred pursuant to this Agreement,
(iii) liabilities incurred since December 31, 2008
(1) in the ordinary course of business (including claims
and any related litigation or arbitration arising in the
ordinary course of business under Policies (as defined in
Section 3.12(g)) or (2) pursuant to any Reinsurance
Agreements (as defined in Section 3.12(e)) issued or
assumed, as the case may be, by one of its Insurance Entities
(as defined in Section 3.12(a)) for which adequate claims
reserves have been established), and (iv) liabilities which
have not had and would not be
-9-
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect, it and its subsidiaries do not have,
and since December 31, 2008, it and its subsidiaries have
not incurred, any liabilities or obligations of any nature
whatsoever (whether accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise
and whether or not required to be reflected in its financial
statements in accordance with GAAP).
3.5 Compliance with Applicable Laws and Reporting
Requirements. Except as has not had and would not be
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect:
(a) It and its subsidiaries hold in full force and effect
all permits, certifications, registrations, permissions,
consents, franchises, concessions, licenses, variances,
exemptions, orders, approvals and authorizations of all
Governmental Entities necessary for the ownership and conduct of
the business of it and its subsidiaries (including any insurance
licenses or permissions from insurance regulatory authorities)
in each of the jurisdictions in which it or its subsidiaries
currently conduct or operate its business (the
Permits), and it and its subsidiaries are in
compliance with the terms and requirements of its Permits and
any applicable law, statute, ordinance, common law, arbitration
award, or any rule, regulation, judgment, order, writ,
injunction, decree, agency requirement or published
interpretation of any Governmental Entity, including all
relevant bye-laws and regulations of the Council and Society of
Lloyds incorporated under the Lloyds Act of 1871 to
1982 of England and Wales (Lloyds) in
each of the jurisdictions in which it or its subsidiaries
currently conduct business or operate (collectively
Laws). The businesses of it and its
subsidiaries have not been, and are not being, conducted in
violation of any applicable Laws (including the USA PATRIOT Act
of 2001, as amended, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,
15 U.S.C. § 78dd 1 et seq., as amended (or
any other similar applicable foreign, federal, or state legal
requirement), anti-money laundering laws, anti-terrorism laws,
all applicable requirements relating to the sale, issuance,
marketing, advertising and administration of insurance products
(including licensing and appointments) and all Laws regulating
the business and products of insurance and all applicable orders
and directives of insurance regulatory authorities (the
Insurance Laws) and all applicable laws or
other legal requirements relating to the retention of
e-mail and
other information). It and its subsidiaries have not received,
at any time since January 1, 2007, any written notice or
communication from any Governmental Entity regarding any actual,
alleged, or potential violation of, or a failure to comply with,
any Laws or the terms and requirements of any Permit or any
actual or potential revocation, withdrawal, suspension,
cancellation, modification, or termination of any Permit. All
applications required to have been filed for the renewal of each
Permit or other filings required to be made with respect to each
Permit held by it or its subsidiaries have been duly filed on a
timely basis with the appropriate Governmental Entity.
(b) It has established and maintains disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15
under the Exchange Act). Such disclosure controls and procedures
are designed to ensure that material information relating to it,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to its
principal executive officer and its principal financial officer
by others within those entities, particularly during the periods
in which the periodic reports required under the Exchange Act
are being prepared. Such disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting its principal executive officer and
principal financial officer to material information required to
be included in its periodic reports under the Exchange Act and
ensure that the information required to be disclosed in its SEC
Documents is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms. It
and its subsidiaries maintain a system of internal controls over
financial reporting sufficient to provide reasonable assurances
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. The
records, systems, controls, data and information of it and its
subsidiaries are recorded, stored, maintained and operated under
means (including any electronic, mechanical or photographic
process, whether computerized or not) that are under the
exclusive ownership and direct control of it or its subsidiaries
or accountants (including all means of access thereto and
therefrom) and are held or maintained in such places as may be
required under all applicable Laws (including Insurance Laws).
It has disclosed, based on its most recent evaluation of
internal controls prior to the date hereof, to its auditors and
audit committee (i) any significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect its
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information and (ii) any fraud that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in internal controls.
-10-
(c) There are no outstanding loans or other extensions of
credit made by it or any of its subsidiaries to any of its
executive officers (as defined in
Rule 3b-7
under the Exchange Act) or directors.
(d) Since January 1, 2007, it has complied with the
applicable listing and corporate governance rules and
regulations of NASDAQ (in the case of IPC) or the NYSE (in the
case of Validus).
(e) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to,
or has any commitment to become a party to, any joint venture,
off-balance sheet partnership or any similar contract (including
any contract relating to any transaction or relationship between
or among it and any of its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and
any unconsolidated affiliate, including any structured finance,
special purpose or limited purpose entity, on the other hand, or
any off-balance sheet arrangement (as defined in
Item 303(a) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC)), where the result, purpose or intended effect of
such contract is to avoid disclosure of any material transaction
involving, or material liabilities of, it or any of its
subsidiaries in the SEC Documents.
3.6 Legal and Arbitration Proceedings and
Investigations. Except for litigation or arbitration arising
in the ordinary course of business from claims under Policies or
Reinsurance Agreements issued or assumed, as the case may be, by
one of its Insurance Entities for which adequate claims reserves
have been established, there are no claims, suits, actions,
proceedings, arbitrations or other proceedings whether judicial,
arbitral or administrative, civil or criminal (Legal
Proceedings) pending or, to its knowledge, threatened,
against it or any of its subsidiaries, any present or former
officer, director or employee thereof in his or her capacity as
such or any person for whom it or its subsidiaries may be liable
or any of their respective properties, that, if determined or
resolved adversely against it, would be reasonably expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect, nor are there any writs, judgments, decrees,
injunctions, rules or orders of any Governmental Entity or
arbitrator binding upon it or any of its subsidiaries or any of
their respective assets or properties that would be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect. To its knowledge, since January 1, 2007,
there have been no formal or informal SEC inquiries,
investigations or subpoenas, other Governmental Entity inquiries
or investigations or internal investigations or material
whistle-blower complaints pending or otherwise threatened
involving it or its subsidiaries or any current or former
officer or director thereof in his or her capacity as such,
other than, in each case, those that if determined or resolved
adversely against it would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
3.7 Taxes.
(a) All material Tax Returns (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)) required by applicable Law to be filed
with any Taxing Authority (as defined in Section 8.13(a))
by, or on behalf of, it or any of its subsidiaries have been
filed when due (taking into account extensions of time to file)
in accordance with all applicable Laws, and all such Tax Returns
are true, correct and complete in all material respects. All
such Tax Returns have been examined by the appropriate Taxing
Authority or the period for assessment of the Taxes (as defined
in Section 8.13(a)) in respect of which such Tax Returns
were required to be filed has expired.
(b) There are no liens for any Taxes upon the assets of it
or any of its subsidiaries, other than (i) statutory
liens for Taxes not yet due and payable or (ii) liens
which are being contested in good faith by appropriate
proceedings, for which adequate reserves have been established
on its financial statements in accordance with GAAP and
Applicable SAP.
(c) It and each of its subsidiaries have paid or have
withheld and remitted to the appropriate Taxing Authority all
material Taxes due and payable, and have established in
accordance with GAAP and Applicable SAP an adequate accrual for
all material Taxes not yet due and payable.
(d) There is no claim, audit, action, suit, proceeding,
examination or investigation now pending or, to its knowledge,
threatened against or with respect to it or any of its
subsidiaries in respect of any Tax or Tax Asset (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)), and any deficiencies asserted or
assessments made as a result of any claim, audit, suit,
proceeding, examination or investigation have been paid in full.
(e) It and each of its subsidiaries have withheld all
material amounts required to have been withheld by them in
connection with amounts paid or owed to (or any benefits or
property provided to) any employee,
-11-
independent contractor, creditor, shareholder or any other third
party; such withheld amounts were either duly paid to the
appropriate Taxing Authority or set aside in accounts for such
purpose. It and each of its subsidiaries have reported such
withheld amounts to the appropriate Taxing Authority and to each
such employee, independent contractor, creditor, shareholder or
any other third party, as required under Law.
(f) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to a
Tax allocation, sharing, indemnity or similar agreement (other
than indemnities included in ordinary course employment
contracts or leases) that will require any payment by it or any
of its subsidiaries of any Tax of another person after the
Closing Date.
(g) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has entered into
a reportable transaction within the meaning of
Treasury Regulations
Section 1.6011-4,
and neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has been a
material advisor to any such transactions within the
meaning of Section 6111 of the Code.
(h) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries (i) has
filed any extension of time within which to file any Tax Returns
that have not been filed, (ii) has entered into any
agreement or other arrangement waiving or extending the statute
of limitations or the period of assessment or collection of any
material Taxes, (iii) has granted any power of attorney
that is in force with respect to any matters relating to any
material Taxes, (iv) has applied for a ruling from a
Taxing Authority relating to any material Taxes that has not
been granted or has proposed to enter into an agreement with a
Taxing Authority that is pending, or (v) has entered into
any closing agreement as described in
Section 7121 of the Code (or any similar provision of
state, local or foreign Tax Law) or been issued any private
letter rulings, technical advance memoranda or similar agreement
or rulings by any Taxing Authority.
(i) None of its subsidiaries is now or has ever been a
United States real property holding corporation within the
meaning of Section 897(c)(2) of the Code.
(j) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has agreed to,
requested, or is required to include any adjustment under
Section 481 of the Code (or any corresponding provision of
applicable Law) by reason of a change in accounting method or
otherwise.
(k) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has elected to
be a pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
(l) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries organized
outside the United States, has ever been engaged in a trade or
business in the United States within the meaning of
Section 864(b) of the Code or has ever had a permanent
establishment in the United States within the meaning of the tax
treaty between the United States and Bermuda.
(m) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has ever been a
member of an affiliated, combined, consolidated or unitary Tax
group for purposes of filing any Tax Return.
(n) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has been a
distributing corporation or a controlled corporation in a
transaction intended to be governed by Section 355 of the
Code.
(o) It and each of its subsidiaries currently satisfies
(assuming the relevant taxable year ended on the date this
representation is being given), and expects to satisfy with
respect to the taxable year in which the Closing Date falls,
either or both of the exceptions described in
Sections 953(c)(3)(A) and (B) of the Code so that none
of its United States shareholders (within the
meaning of Section 953(c) of the Code) will be required to
include in income any of its or its subsidiaries
related person insurance income (within the meaning
of Section 953(c)(2) of the Code) by operation of
Sections 951(a) and 953(c)(5) of the Code.
(p) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has received any
notice or inquiry from any Governmental Entity outside of
Bermuda to the effect that any of it or its subsidiaries that
are domiciled or formed in Bermuda are subject to any Tax other
than excise taxes or any Tax assessed by Bermuda.
(q) Other than as disclosed with respect to
Section 3.7(l), Section 3.7(p) or this
Section 3.7(q), it and each of its subsidiaries has never
been subject to net basis taxation in any country, or been tax
resident or tax domiciled in any country, other than the country
in which it and each of its subsidiaries, respectively, is
organized.
-12-
(r) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries organized
outside the United Kingdom has or has ever had a permanent
establishment in the United Kingdom for United Kingdom Tax
purposes.
(s) No material transaction or arrangement involving it or
any of its subsidiaries has taken place or is in existence which
is such that it has resulted, or is reasonably likely to result,
in the income, profits or gains of it or of any subsidiary being
adjusted for Tax purposes in any jurisdiction in accordance with
applicable transfer pricing or thin capitalization laws.
(t) As of the date of this Agreement, neither it nor any of
its subsidiaries has taken or agreed to take any action, or is
aware of any agreement, plan or circumstance, that, to its
knowledge, would reasonably be expected to prevent the
Amalgamation from constituting a reorganization,
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.
3.8 Absence of Certain Changes or Events. Since
January 1, 2009, (i) there has not been any event,
change, circumstance, state of facts or effect, alone or in
combination, that has had or would be reasonably likely to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect and
(ii) it has not taken any action or failed to take any
action that would have resulted in a breach in any material
respect of Section 4.1 had such section been in effect
since January 1, 2009.
3.9 Board Approval.
(a) In the case of IPC, the board of directors of IPC, by
resolutions duly adopted by unanimous vote at a meeting duly
called and held, has (i) determined that the Amalgamation
Consideration and the Exchange Ratio constitutes fair value for
each IPC Common Share in accordance with the Companies Act and
deemed it fair to, advisable to and in the best interests of IPC
to enter into this Agreement and to consummate, the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, (ii)
adopted this Agreement and the Amalgamation Agreement and
authorized and approved the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement and
(iii) recommended that the shareholders of IPC vote in
favor of matters constituting the Required IPC Vote (as defined
in Section 3.10(b)) (the IPC
Recommendation) and (iv) determined that the
amendments to IPCs bye-laws set forth in
Exhibit E (the IPC Bye-Law
Amendment) are advisable to and in the best interests
of IPC, and directed that such matters be submitted for
consideration by IPC shareholders at the IPC Shareholders
Meeting (as defined in Section 5.1(c)).
(b) In the case of Validus, the board of directors of
Validus, by resolutions duly adopted unanimously, has (i)
deemed it fair to, advisable and in the best interests of
Validus to enter into this Agreement and to consummate the Share
Issuance and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
(ii) adopted this Agreement and authorized and approved
the Share Issuance, and (iii) recommended that the
shareholders of Validus vote in favor of the matters
constituting the Required Validus Vote (the Validus
Recommendation) and directed that such matters be
submitted for consideration by Validus shareholders at the
Validus Shareholders Meeting (as defined in Section 5.1(b)).
(c) In the case of Validus, the board of directors of
Amalgamation Sub, by unanimous written consent without a
meeting, has (i) determined that this Agreement and the
Amalgamation are advisable and in the best interests of
Amalgamation Sub and its sole shareholder, (ii) adopted
this Agreement and authorized and approved the Amalgamation and
(iii) recommended that the sole shareholder of
Amalgamation Sub approve such matters. The sole shareholder of
Amalgamation Sub has approved this Agreement, the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby.
3.10 Vote Required.
(a) In the case of Validus, the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders of
Validus at which a quorum is present in accordance with the
bye-laws of Validus to approve the Share Issuance (the
Required Validus Vote) is the only vote of
the holders of any class or series of Validus capital stock
necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby.
(b) In the case of IPC, the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast at a meeting of the shareholders of IPC at
which a quorum is present in accordance with the bye-laws of
IPC, in each case, to approve the IPC Bye-Law Amendment and,
assuming approval of the IPC Bye-Law Amendment, adopt this
Agreement and
-13-
approve the Amalgamation (provided, however, if
the IPC Bye-Law Amendment is not approved, the affirmative vote
of three-fourths of the votes cast at such meeting shall be
required to adopt this Agreement and approve the Amalgamation)
(the Required IPC Vote and, together with the
Required Validus Vote, the Required Shareholder
Votes) is the only vote of the holders of any class or
series of IPC share capital necessary to approve this Agreement
and consummate the transactions contemplated hereby (including
the Amalgamation).
3.11 Agreements with Regulators. Except as required
by Insurance Laws of general applicability and the insurance
licenses maintained by its Insurance Entities or as does not
have and would not be reasonably expected to have, individually
or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect, there are no
written agreements, memoranda of understanding, commitment
letters or similar undertakings binding on it or any of its
subsidiaries or to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a
party, on one hand, and any Governmental Entity is a party or
addressee, on the other hand, or any orders or directives by, or
supervisory letters or
cease-and-desist
orders from, any Governmental Entity, nor has it nor any of its
subsidiaries adopted any board resolution at the request of any
Governmental Entity, in each case specifically with respect to
it or any of its subsidiaries, which (a) limit the
ability of it or any of its Insurance Entities to issue Policies
or enter into Reinsurance Agreements; (b) require any
divestiture of any investment of any subsidiary; (c) in
any manner relate to the ability of any of its subsidiaries to
pay dividends; (d) require any investment of its
Insurance Entities to be treated as non-admitted assets (or the
local equivalent) or (e) otherwise restrict the conduct
of business of it or any subsidiary, nor has it been advised by
any Governmental Entity that it is contemplating any such
undertakings.
3.12 Insurance Matters.
(a) Each of its subsidiaries which by virtue of its
operations and activities is required to be licensed as an
insurance company, insurance intermediary, Lloyds
corporate member or Lloyds managing agent (collectively,
the Insurance Entities) is listed in
Section 3.12 of its Disclosure Letter, together with the
jurisdiction of domicile thereof. None of its Insurance Entities
is commercially domiciled in any other jurisdiction or is
otherwise treated as domiciled in a jurisdiction other than that
of its incorporation. It conducts all of its insurance
operations that are required to be conducted through a licensed
insurance company or insurance intermediary, through its
Insurance Entities, each of which is duly licensed or authorized
as an insurance company, and/or, where applicable, a reinsurer,
insurance intermediary, Lloyds corporate member or
Lloyds managing agent, in its jurisdiction of
incorporation and each other jurisdiction where it is required
to be so licensed or authorized and is duly licensed or
authorized in each such jurisdiction for each line of business
written therein, except where the failure to so conduct its
insurance operations or the failure of its Insurance Entities to
be so licensed or authorized has not had and would not be
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Material Adverse Effect.
(b) Since January 1, 2007, each of its Insurance
Entities has timely filed or submitted all annual and, to the
extent applicable Law requires, quarterly and other periodic
statements, together with all exhibits, interrogatories, notes,
schedules and any actuarial opinions, affirmations or
certifications or other supporting documents in connection
therewith, required to be filed with or submitted to the
appropriate insurance regulatory authorities of the jurisdiction
in which it is domiciled or commercially domiciled on forms
prescribed or permitted by such authority (as filed through the
date hereof and thereafter, collectively, the Statutory
Statements), except, in each case, as has been cured
or resolved to the satisfaction of such insurance regulatory
authority without imposition of any material penalty or as would
not, individually or in the aggregate, be reasonably expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect.
It will deliver or make available to the other parties, upon
request, within one (1) business day of the termination of
the IM Agreement, to the extent permitted by applicable Laws,
(i) true and complete copies of all annual Statutory
Statements filed with Governmental Entities for each of its
Insurance Entities for the periods beginning January 1,
2007 through the date hereof and, once duly and timely filed,
thereafter, and the quarterly Statutory Statements for each of
its Insurance Entities for the quarterly periods ended September
30, 2008 through the date hereof and, once duly and timely
filed, thereafter, each in the form (including exhibits, annexes
and any amendments thereto) filed with the applicable insurance
regulatory authority and (ii) true and
-14-
complete copies of all examination reports (and has notified the
other party of any pending examinations) of any insurance
regulatory authorities received by it on or after
January 1, 2007 through the date hereof relating to its
Insurance Entities. Financial statements included in its
Statutory Statements were prepared in conformity with Applicable
SAP, consistently applied for the periods covered thereby, were
prepared in accordance with the books and records of the
applicable Insurance Entity, and present fairly in all material
respects the statutory financial position of the relevant
Insurance Entity as of the respective dates thereof and the
results of operations, cash flows, and changes in capital and
surplus (or stockholders equity, as applicable) of such
Insurance Entity for the respective periods then ended. Its
Statutory Statements complied in all material respects with all
applicable Laws when filed or submitted and no material
violation or deficiency has been asserted in writing by any
Governmental Entity with respect to any of its Statutory
Statements that have not been cured or otherwise resolved to the
satisfaction of such Governmental Entity. The statutory balance
sheets and income statements included in its annual Statutory
Statements have been audited by its independent auditors, and it
has delivered or made available to the other party true and
complete copies of all audit opinions related thereto for
periods beginning January 1, 2007 through the date hereof.
Except as is indicated therein, all assets that are reflected on
its subsidiaries Statutory Statements comply in all
material respects with all applicable Insurance Laws regulating
the investments of Insurance Entities and all applicable
Insurance Laws with respect to admitted assets and are in amount
at least equal to the minimum amount required by applicable
Insurance Laws. The financial statements included in its
Statutory Statement accurately reflect in all material respects
the extent to which, pursuant to applicable Laws and Applicable
SAP, the applicable Insurance Entity is entitled to take credit
for reinsurance (or any local equivalent concept).
(c) The loss reserves and other actuarial amounts of each
of its Insurance Entities contained in its Statutory Statements:
(i) were determined in accordance with generally accepted
actuarial standards and principles and other qualitative methods
materially consistently applied (except as otherwise noted in
such financial statements), (ii) complied in all material
respects with applicable Laws and were computed on the basis of
methodologies materially consistent with those used in computing
the corresponding reserves in the prior fiscal years, except as
otherwise noted in the financial statements and notes thereto
included in such Statutory Statements, and (iii) include
provisions for all actuarial reserves and related items which
are required to be established in accordance with applicable
Law. To its knowledge, no facts or circumstances exist which
would necessitate any material increase in the statutorily
required reserves above those reflected in the most recent
balance sheet included in the Statutory Statements.
(d) Within one (1) business day of the termination of
the IM Agreement, it will, upon request, make available to the
other party true and complete copies of all actuarial reports
used as the basis for establishing the reserves for each of its
subsidiary Insurance Entities from and after January 1,
2007, and all material attachments, addenda, supplements and
modifications thereto. To its knowledge, any information and
data to be furnished by it or any of its subsidiaries to
independent actuaries in connection with the preparation of such
actuarial reports will be accurate in all material respects. To
its knowledge, such actuarial reports will have been based upon
an accurate inventory of Policies and Reinsurance Agreements in
force for it and its subsidiaries, as the case may be, at the
relevant time of preparation and will have been prepared in
conformity in all material respects with generally accepted
actuarial principles and other qualitative methods in effect at
such time (except as may be noted therein) and the projections
contained therein will have been properly prepared in accordance
with the assumptions stated therein.
(e) As of the date of this Agreement, all reinsurance or
retrocession treaties or agreements, slips, binders, cover notes
or other similar arrangements to which it or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or under which it or any of its
subsidiaries has any existing rights, obligations or liabilities
(the Reinsurance Agreements) are, and after
the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby will
continue to be, valid and binding obligations of it and its
subsidiaries (to the extent they are parties thereto or bound
thereby) and, to its knowledge, each other party thereto, in
accordance with their terms and are in full force and effect,
and it and each of its subsidiaries (to the extent they are
party thereto or bound thereby) and, to its knowledge, each
other party thereto has performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under each
Reinsurance Agreement, except as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries has received
-15-
notice, nor does it have knowledge, of any violation or default
in respect of any obligation under (or any condition which, with
the passage of time or the giving of notice or both, would
result in such a violation or default), or any intention to
cancel, terminate or change the scope of rights and obligations
under, or not to renew, any Reinsurance Agreement, except, in
each case, as has not had and would not reasonably be expected
to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect. Since January 1, 2007, (i) neither it nor
its subsidiaries have received any written notice from any party
to a Reinsurance Agreement that any amount of reinsurance ceded
by it or such subsidiary to such counterparty will be
uncollectible or otherwise defaulted upon, (ii) to its
knowledge, no party to a Reinsurance Agreement under which it or
its subsidiary is the cedent is insolvent or the subject of a
rehabilitation, liquidation, conservatorship, receivership,
bankruptcy or similar proceeding, (iii) to its knowledge,
the financial condition of any party to a Reinsurance Agreement
under which it or its subsidiary is the cedent is not impaired
to the extent that a default thereunder is reasonably
anticipated, (iv) there are no disputes under any
Reinsurance Agreement other than disputes in the ordinary course
for which adequate loss reserves have been established and
(v) its relevant subsidiary is entitled under any
applicable Law and Applicable SAP to take full credit in its
Statutory Statements for all amounts recoverable by it pursuant
to any Reinsurance Agreement under which it is the cedent and
all such amounts recoverable have been properly recorded in its
books and records of account (if so accounted therefor) and are
properly reflected in its Statutory Statements, except as has
not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(f) Except as has not had and would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect, with respect to any Reinsurance Agreement for
which the ceding insurer party thereto is taking credit on its
most recent Statutory Statements, to its knowledge, from and
after January 1, 2007 (i) there has been no separate
written or oral agreement between such ceding insurer and the
assuming reinsurer that would under any circumstances reduce,
limit, mitigate or otherwise affect any actual or potential loss
to the parties under any such Reinsurance Agreement, other than
inuring contracts that are explicitly defined in any such
Reinsurance Agreement, (ii) for each such Reinsurance
Agreement entered into, renewed or amended on or after
January 1, 2007, for which risk transfer is not reasonably
considered to be self-evident to the extent required by any
applicable provisions of SSAP No. 62, documentation
concerning the economic intent of the transaction and the risk
transfer analysis evidencing the proper accounting treatment is
available for review by the relevant Governmental Entities for
each of it and its subsidiaries, (iii) its subsidiary
that is a party thereto, and to its knowledge, any other party
thereto, complies and has complied from and after
January 1, 2007 with any applicable requirements set forth
in SSAP No. 62, and (iv) such Insurance Entity has
and had since January 1, 2007 appropriate controls in place
to monitor the use of reinsurance and comply with the provisions
of SSAP No. 62.
(g) All policies, policy forms, binders, slips, treaties,
certificates, insurance or reinsurance contracts or
participation agreements and other agreements of insurance or
reinsurance, whether individual or group (including all
applications, supplements, endorsements, riders and ancillary
agreements in connection therewith) and all amendments,
applications, brochures, illustrations and certificates
pertaining thereto (the Policies), in effect
as of the date of this Agreement, that are issued by it or its
subsidiaries and any and all marketing materials have been, to
the extent required under applicable Law, filed with or
submitted to and not objected to by such Governmental Entity
within the period provided for objection, and such Policies and
marketing materials comply with the Insurance Laws applicable
thereto and have been administered in accordance therewith,
except as has not had and would not be reasonably expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse
Effect. All premium rates established by it or its subsidiaries
that are required to be filed with or submitted to or approved
by Governmental Entities have been so filed, submitted or
approved, the premiums charged conform thereto and such premiums
comply with the Insurance Laws applicable thereto, except as has
not had and would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(h) To its knowledge, each insurance agent, general agent,
agency, producer, broker, reinsurance intermediary, program
manager, managing general agent and managing general underwriter
currently selling, issuing or underwriting business for or on
behalf of it or its subsidiaries (including it and its
subsidiaries salaried employees) (each, an
Agent) was duly licensed for the type of
activity and business conducted or
-16-
written, sold, produced, underwritten or managed. To its
knowledge, each program manager, managing general agent, third
party administrator or claims adjuster or manager, at the time
such person managed or administered business (including without
limitation the administration, handling or adjusting of claims)
for or on behalf of it or its subsidiaries (each, an
Administrator) was duly licensed for the type
of activity conducted. To its knowledge, no Agent or
Administrator has materially violated or is currently in
violation in any material respect of any term or provision of
any Law applicable to the writing, sale, production,
underwriting or administration of business for it or its
subsidiaries, except for such failures or such violations which
have been cured, that have been resolved or settled through
agreements with applicable Governmental Entities or that are
barred by an applicable statute of limitations. Each Agent was
appointed and compensated by it or its subsidiaries in
compliance in all material respects with applicable Law and all
processes and procedures used in making inquiries with respect
of such Agent were undertaken in compliance in all material
respects with applicable Law. No Agent has binding authority on
behalf of it or its subsidiaries. As of the date of this
Agreement, no Agent accounting individually for 1% or more of
the total gross premiums of all of its Insurance Entities for
the year ended December 31, 2008 has indicated to it or its
subsidiaries in writing or, to its knowledge, orally that such
Agent will be unable or unwilling to continue its relationship
as an Agent with it or its subsidiary within twelve months after
the date hereof.
(i) Each of its Insurance Entities has duly and timely
filed all reports or other filings required to be filed with any
insurance regulatory authority in the manner prescribed therefor
under applicable Laws and Permits and no Governmental Entity has
asserted any deficiency or violation with respect thereto,
except as has been cured or resolved to the satisfaction of the
Government Entity or except, in each case, as has not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. Without limiting the
foregoing, each of its and its subsidiaries submissions,
reports or other filings under applicable insurance holding
company statutes or other applicable Insurance Laws with respect
to contracts, agreements, arrangements and transactions between
or among Insurance Entities and their affiliates, and all
contracts, agreements, arrangements and transactions in effect
between any subsidiary that is an Insurance Entity and any
affiliate are in compliance with the requirements of all
applicable insurance holding company statutes or other such
Insurance Laws and all required approvals or deemed approvals of
insurance regulatory authorities with respect thereto have been
received or obtained, except as has not had and would not
reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
(j) Copies (which are complete and correct in all material
respects) of all analyses, reports and other data prepared by or
on behalf of any of its Insurance Entities or submitted by or on
behalf of any such Insurance Entity to any insurance regulatory
authority relating to risk based capital calculations or
Insurance Regulatory Information Systems ratios will provide to
the other party, upon request, within one (1) business day
of the termination of the IM Agreement.
(k) Except for regular periodic assessments in the ordinary
course of business, there are no material unpaid claims and
assessments against it or its subsidiaries, whether or not due,
by any insurance guaranty association (in connection with that
associations fund relating to insolvent insurers), joint
underwriting association, residual market facility or assigned
risk pool. No such material claim or assessment is pending and
neither it nor any subsidiary has received written notice of any
such material claim or assessment against it or its subsidiaries
by any insurance guaranty association, joint underwriting
association, residual market facility or assigned risk pool.
(l) Since July 2, 2007, Validus
and/or any
of its subsidiaries which participate in Lloyds:
(i) has not participated on any Lloyds syndicate
other than syndicate 1183; (ii) has not agreed to sell,
transfer or drop any of its rights to participate in
a Lloyds syndicate or offered to acquire rights to
participate on a Lloyds syndicated; (iii) has
complied with the franchise standards (including principles and
minimum standards, guidance and advice) issued by Lloyds
and (iv) all documents relating to the participation of it
or any of its subsidiaries participation at Lloyds
are in Lloyds standard form and have not been amended in
any way, including the standard managing agents agreement,
in each case, except as had not had and would not reasonably be
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
-17-
(m) Since July 2, 2007: (i) all funds held on
behalf of Lloyds syndicate 1183 are held in accordance
with the terms of the relevant premiums trust deed or other
deposit arrangement as required by the bye-laws, regulations,
codes of practice and mandatory directions and requirements
governing the conduct and management of underwriting business at
Lloyds from time to time and the provisions of any deed,
agreement or undertaking executed, made or given for compliance
with Lloyds requirements from time to time
(Lloyds Regulations) and
(ii) Validus
and/or any
of its subsidiaries required to do so have complied in all
material respects with all relevant regulations, directions,
notices and requirements in relation to the maintenance of Funds
at Lloyds (as defined in the Lloyds Membership
Byelaw (No. 5 of 2005)) in accordance with Lloyds
Regulations and any directions imposed on it or any of its
subsidiaries by Lloyds.
3.13 Investments; Derivatives.
(a) The information provided by each party to the SEC in
its Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, related to its
investment assets, including, without limitation, bonds, notes,
debentures, mortgage loans, real estate, collateral loans,
derivatives (including swaps, swaptions, caps, floors, foreign
exchange, and options or forward agreements) and all other
instruments of indebtedness, stocks, partnership or joint
venture interests and all other equity interests, certificates
issued by or interests in trusts, alternative investments and
direct or indirect investments in hedge funds, whether entered
into for its own or its subsidiaries or their customers
accounts (such investment assets, together with all investment
assets held between such date and the Closing Date are referred
to herein as the Investment Assets) is true
and complete in all material respects as of December 31,
2008.
(b) As of the date of this Agreement, to its knowledge,
none of the Investment Assets is in default in the payment of
principal or interest or dividends.
(c) As of the date of this Agreement, to its knowledge, the
Investment Assets comply in all material respects with, and the
acquisition thereof complied in all material respects with, any
and all investment restrictions under applicable Law and its
Investment Policy (as hereinafter defined). Except for
Investment Assets sold in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice or as contemplated by this
Agreement, each of it and its subsidiaries, as applicable, has
good and marketable title to all of the Investment Assets it
purports to own, free and clear of all encumbrances except
Permitted Encumbrances (as defined in Section 8.13(a)).
Upon request, it will provide a copy of its and its
subsidiaries policies with respect to the investment of
the Investment Assets (its Investment Policy)
to the other party within one (1) business day of the
termination of the IM Agreement.
(d) To its knowledge, none of its Investment Assets is
subject to any capital calls or similar liabilities, or any
restrictions or suspensions on redemptions,
lock-ups,
gates, side-pockets,
stepped-up
fee provisions or other penalties or restrictions relating to
withdrawals or redemptions, except as would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect.
(e) Each agreement with each investment manager or
investment advisor providing services to it or any of its
subsidiaries was entered into, and the performance of each
investment manager is evaluated, in a commercially reasonable,
arms length manner.
(f) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries holds any
derivative instruments, including swaps, swaptions, caps,
floors, foreign exchange and option or forward agreements,
whether entered into for its account, or for the account of any
of its subsidiaries or their customers.
3.14 Material Contracts; Intercompany Contracts.
(a) As of the date of this Agreement, neither it nor any of
its subsidiaries is a party to or bound by any contract (other
than any Policy or Reinsurance Agreement) (i) that is or
will be required to be filed by it as a material contract
pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC that is not already so filed; (ii) that limits
or purports to limit in any material respect either the type of
business in which it or any of its subsidiaries (or, after
giving effect to the Amalgamation, Validus or any of its
subsidiaries) may engage or the manner or locations in which any
of them may so engage in any business; (iii) that creates
a partnership, joint venture, strategic alliance or similar
arrangement with respect to any of its or its subsidiaries
material business
-18-
or assets; (iv) that is an indenture, credit agreement,
loan agreement, security agreement, guarantee, note, mortgage or
other agreement providing for or guaranteeing indebtedness in
excess of $5,000,000; (v) that, individually or together
with related contracts, provides for any acquisition,
disposition, lease, license or use after the date of this
Agreement of assets, services, rights or properties with a value
or requiring annual fees in excess of $5,000,000 or that
comprise more than 15% of its business on a consolidated basis;
(vi) that is a collective bargaining agreement;
(vii) that involves or could reasonably be expected to
involve aggregate payments by or to it
and/or its
subsidiaries in excess of $5,000,000 in any twelve month period,
except for any contract that may be cancelled without penalty or
termination payments by it or its subsidiaries upon notice of
60 days or less; (viii) that includes an
indemnification obligation of it or any of its subsidiaries with
a maximum potential liability in excess of $5,000,000;
(ix) that is an investment advisory or investment
management agreement or arrangement to which it or any of its
subsidiaries is a party or under which any Investment Asset is
invested or managed or any third party has the right or power to
make discretionary or investment decisions with respect to any
Investment Asset or (x) that would or would reasonably be
expected to, individually or in the aggregate, prevent,
materially delay or materially impede its ability to consummate
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or Validus
and its subsidiaries ability to own
and/or to
conduct the businesses after the Closing. Each such contract
described in clauses (i)-(x) is referred to herein
as a Material Contract.
(b) Each Material Contract is, and after the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will continue
to be, a valid and binding obligation of it and its subsidiaries
(to the extent they are parties thereto or bound thereby)
enforceable against it and, to its knowledge, each other party
thereto, in accordance with its terms and is in full force and
effect, and it and each of its subsidiaries (to the extent they
are party thereto or bound thereby) and, to its knowledge, each
other party thereto has performed in all material respects all
obligations required to be performed by it under each Material
Contract, except where such failure to be valid and binding or
such non-performance has not had and would not be reasonably
expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect. Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
received written notice, nor does it have knowledge, of any
material violation or default in respect of any material
obligation under (or any condition which with the passage of
time or the giving of notice or both would result in such a
violation or default), or any intention to cancel, terminate,
change the scope of rights and obligations under or not to
renew, any Material Contract.
(c) Validus Annual Report filed with the SEC on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, sets forth all
contracts, agreements, notes, leases, licenses and other
instruments between Validus and any of its affiliates or between
two or more affiliates of Validus. Section 3.14(c) of
IPCs Disclosure Letter sets forth all contracts,
agreements, notes, leases, licenses and other instruments
between IPC and any of its affiliates or between two or more
affiliates of IPC. Each Validus intercompany agreement or IPC
intercompany agreement, as the case may be, to which any
Insurance Entity is a party has been duly approved by each
Governmental Entity whose approval is required therefor, except
where the failure to obtain such approval has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
3.15 Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation.
(a) It has disclosed its Compensation and Benefits Plans in
Section 3.15(a) of its Disclosure Letter and it will
deliver or make available, to the extent requested, to the other
party within one (1) business day of the termination of the
IM Agreement correct and complete copies of, (i) each of
its material Compensation and Benefit Plans (as defined in
Section 8.13(a)), (ii) each applicable trust
agreement or other funding arrangement for each such
Compensation and Benefit Plan (including insurance contracts),
and all amendments thereto, (iii) with respect to any
such Compensation and Benefit Plan that is intended to be
tax-qualified or tax-preferred under applicable Law, any
applicable determination letter issued by the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service and any other applicable determination document
issued by any equivalent
non-U.S. taxing
or regulatory authority, in each case, confirming the
tax-qualified or tax-preferred status of such Compensation and
Benefit Plan, (iv) annual reports or returns, audited or
unaudited financial statements, actuarial valuations and
reports, and summary annual reports or other reports prepared
for any Compensation and Benefit Plan with respect to the two
most recently completed plan years, and (v) the most
recent summary plan description for any Compensation and Benefit
Plan and summary of any material modifications thereto.
-19-
(b) Each of its Compensation and Benefit Plans is in
compliance with applicable Laws in all material respects and has
been administered in all material respects in accordance with
its terms. There are no actions, suits, investigations or claims
pending, or to its knowledge, threatened or anticipated (other
than routine claims for benefits) relating to any Compensation
and Benefit Plan.
(c) Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has any
obligations for retiree health and retiree life benefits under
any Compensation and Benefit Plan other than with respect to
benefit coverage mandated by applicable Law. There has been no
amendment to, announcement by it or any of its subsidiaries
relating to, or change in employee participation in coverage
under, any Compensation and Benefit Plan which would materially
increase the expense of maintaining such plan above the level of
the expense incurred therefor for the most recent fiscal year.
(d) None of the execution and delivery of this Agreement,
the shareholder approval of the transactions contemplated
hereby, the termination of the employment of any of its or its
subsidiaries employees within a specified time of the
Effective Time or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby will (i) result in any payment
(including severance, golden parachute, or otherwise), whether
or not in conjunction with a termination of employment, becoming
due to any director or any employee of it or any of its
subsidiaries from it or any of its subsidiaries under any
Compensation and Benefit Plan or otherwise, other than by
operation of Law, (ii) increase any benefits otherwise
payable under any Compensation and Benefit Plan, (iii)
result in any acceleration of the time of payment or vesting of
any such benefit or funding (through a grantor trust or
otherwise) of any such payment or benefit, (iv) limit or
restrict the right of it to merge, amend or terminate any
Compensation and Benefit Plan or any related trust, (v)
cause a trust for any Compensation and Benefit Plan to be
required to be funded, or (vi) result in payments under
any Compensation and Benefit Plan which would not be deductible
under Section 280G of the Code or any equivalent
non-U.S. tax
Law.
(e) Each of its Compensation and Benefit Plans that is
intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code
has received a favorable determination letter from the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service and nothing has occurred that
could reasonably be expected to cause the loss of such
qualification. Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
engaged in a transaction with respect to any Compensation and
Benefit Plan that would subject it or any of its subsidiaries to
a Tax or penalty imposed by either Section 4975 of the Code
or Section 502(i) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).
Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries (i) has an
obligation to contribute (as defined in ERISA
Section 4212) nor have they ever had an obligation to
contribute to a multiemployer plan (as defined in
ERISA Sections 4001(a)(3) and 3(37)(A)) or
(ii) maintains or contributes to, or has, within six years
preceding the date of this Agreement, maintained or contributed
to, an employee pension benefit plan (as defined in
Section 3(2) of ERISA) subject to Title IV of ERISA or
Section 412 of the Code.
3.16 Labor Relations and Other Employment Matters.
(a) None of its or its subsidiaries employees are
represented by any union with respect to their employment by it
or its subsidiaries, and no labor organization or group of
employees of it or any of its subsidiaries has made a pending
demand for recognition or certification to it or any of its
subsidiaries and there are no representation or certification
proceedings or petitions seeking a representation proceeding
presently pending or, to its knowledge, threatened to be brought
or filed with any labor relations tribunal or authority. Since
January 1, 2007, neither it nor any of its subsidiaries has
experienced any material labor disputes, union organization
attempts or work stoppages, slowdowns or lockouts due to labor
disagreements.
(b) (i) No unfair labor practice charges, grievances
or complaints are pending or, to its knowledge, threatened
against it or any of its subsidiaries, (ii) no employee
of it at the officer level or above has given written notice to
it or any of its subsidiaries that any such employee intends to
terminate his or her employment with it or any of its
subsidiaries, (iii) to its knowledge, no employee or
former employee of it or any of its subsidiaries is in any
respect in violation of any term of any employment contract,
nondisclosure agreement (including any agreement relating of
trade secrets or proprietary information) or non-competition
agreement with it or any of its subsidiaries, and (iv) it
and its subsidiaries have materially complied with all
-20-
applicable Laws, contracts, policies, plans and programs
relating to employment, employment practices, compensation,
benefits, hours, terms and conditions of employment and the
termination of employment.
(c) Each of its employees has all work permits, immigration
permits, visas or other authorizations required by Law for such
employee given the duties and nature of such employees
employment and Section 3.16(c) of its Disclosure Letter
sets forth a true and complete list of such work permits,
immigration permits, visas or other authorizations currently
held by its employees.
3.17 Intellectual Property
(a) It and each of its subsidiaries has sufficient rights
to use all of the Intellectual Property used in its and each of
its subsidiaries respective businesses as presently
conducted and as proposed to be conducted, all of which rights
shall survive unchanged the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement. The Intellectual Property owned
by it or its subsidiaries is (i) owned free and clear of
any claim, lien or encumbrance (other than Permitted
Encumbrances), and (ii) valid and subsisting, and is not
subject to any outstanding order, judgment or decree adversely
affecting its or its subsidiaries use thereof, or rights thereto.
(b) Section 3.17 of its Disclosure Letter, which, with
respect to Validus, shall be provided within one
(1) business day of the termination of the IM Agreement,
sets forth a true list of (i) all registered trademarks and
service marks, all trademark and service mark applications, and
all domain names owned by it
and/or its
subsidiaries, (ii) all registered copyrights and copyright
applications owned by it
and/or its
subsidiaries, and (iii) all patents and patent applications
owned by it
and/or its
subsidiaries.
(c) Any underwriting model it has created or uses in its
business that, among other things, assesses policy risk and
premium (each an Underwriting Model) is
based, in all material respects, on information that is
confidential
and/or
proprietary to it (other than third-party vendor model
information contained therein). It owns exclusively, free and
clear of any claim, lien or encumbrance (other than Permitted
Encumbrances), all of the proprietary information (including all
Intellectual Property rights) upon which each Underwriting Model
is based.
(d) All of the rights in the Intellectual Property created
by its or any of its subsidiaries employees during the
course of their employment, including any software developed to
use the Underwriting Model, have been validly and irrevocably
assigned to it.
(e) It and each of its subsidiaries has taken all
reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of all Trade
Secrets (as hereinafter defined) that are owned, used or held by
it or each of its subsidiaries, and to its knowledge, such Trade
Secrets have not been used, disclosed to or discovered by any
person except pursuant to valid and appropriate non-disclosure
agreements which have not been breached.
(f) To its knowledge, neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise
violated the Intellectual Property rights of any third party
during the five (5) year period immediately preceding the
date of this Agreement. There is no litigation, opposition,
cancellation, proceeding, reexamination, objection or claim
pending, asserted or, to its knowledge, threatened against it or
any of its subsidiaries concerning the ownership, validity,
registerability, enforceability, infringement or use of, or
licensed right to use, any Intellectual Property. To its
knowledge, no valid basis exists for any such litigation,
opposition, cancellation, proceeding, objection or claim. To its
knowledge, no person is infringing, misappropriating or
otherwise violating any of its or its subsidiaries rights
in any Intellectual Property.
(g) It and its subsidiaries has each complied in all
material respects with (i) all applicable Laws, rules and
regulations regarding data protection and the privacy and
security of personal information, and (ii) their
respective privacy policies or commitments to their customers
and consumers.
3.18 Properties. Neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries owns any real property. It or one of its
subsidiaries has (a) a valid leasehold or sublease interest
or other comparable contract right in the real property that it
or any of its subsidiaries leases, subleases or otherwise
occupies without owning and (b) good, valid and marketable
title to, or has a valid leasehold, sublease interest or other
comparable contract right in, the other tangible assets and
properties necessary to the conduct of the business as currently
conducted, except (i) as
-21-
have been disposed of in the ordinary course of business, in
each case free and clear of all encumbrances except for
Permitted Encumbrances, or (ii) as has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect. It and its subsidiaries
have complied in all material respects with the terms of all
such leases, and to its knowledge, all such leases are in full
force and effect.
3.19 Brokers or Finders. Other than, in the case of
IPC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JP
Morgan) and, in the case of Validus,
Greenhill & Co., LLC (Greenhill),
no agent, broker, investment banker, financial advisor or other
firm or person is or will be entitled to any brokers or
finders fee or any other similar commission or fee in
connection with any of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement based upon arrangements made by or on behalf of it or
any of its subsidiaries. Prior to the date of execution of this
Agreement by IPC, IPC has provided a true and complete copy of
its engagement letter with its financial advisor to Validus.
3.20 Investment Advisor. Neither it nor any of its
subsidiaries conducts activities of or is required to be
registered as an investment advisor as such term is
defined in Section 2(a)(2) of the Investment Company Act of
1940. Neither it nor any of its subsidiaries is required to be
registered as an investment company as defined under
the Investment Company Act of 1940.
3.21 Opinion of Financial Advisor.
(a) In the case of IPC, the board of directors of IPC has
received the opinion of its financial advisor, JP Morgan, dated
the date of execution of this Agreement by all parties, to the
effect that, as of such date, the Amalgamation Consideration to
be paid by Validus to the shareholders of IPC pursuant to
Section 2.1(a) is fair, from a financial point of view, to
the holders of IPC Common Shares (other than Validus and its
subsidiaries).
(b) In the case of Validus, the board of directors of
Validus has received the opinion of its financial advisor,
Greenhill, dated as of March 31, 2009, to the effect that,
as of such date, the Exchange Ratio is fair, from a financial
point of view, to Validus.
3.22 Takeover Laws. To its knowledge as of the date
of this Agreement, no fair price,
moratorium, control share acquisition,
interested shareholder or other anti-takeover
statute or regulation would reasonably be expected to restrict
or prohibit this Agreement, the Amalgamation or the other
transactions contemplated hereby by reason of it being a party
to this Agreement, performing its obligations hereunder and
consummating the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated hereby.
ARTICLE IV
COVENANTS
RELATING TO CONDUCT OF BUSINESS
4.1 Covenants of Validus and IPC. During the period
from the date of this Agreement and continuing until the
Effective Time, Validus and IPC agree as to themselves and their
respective subsidiaries that, except as expressly contemplated
or permitted by this Agreement, as required by applicable Law,
as set forth in Section 4.1 of the Validus Disclosure
Letter (in the case of Validus) or Section 4.1 of the IPC
Disclosure Letter, including the supplement thereto attached as
Exhibit F hereto (in the case of IPC) or to the
extent that IPC (in the case of Validus) or Validus (in the case
of IPC) shall otherwise consent in writing, that it and its
subsidiaries shall carry on their respective businesses in the
usual, regular and ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice (including, for the avoidance of doubt, adhering
to any operating guidelines and policies, whether or not
written) and use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve
intact their present business organizations, maintain their
Permits and preserve their relationships with employees,
investment advisers and managers, customers, policyholders,
reinsureds, retrocedents, regulators, Agents, Administrators,
lenders and financing providers and others having business
dealings with them. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as expressly required by applicable Law or as
set forth in Section 4.1 of the Validus Disclosure Letter
(in the case of Validus) or Section 4.1 of the IPC
Disclosure Letter (in the case of IPC),
-22-
Validus and IPC shall not, and shall not permit any of their
respective subsidiaries, except as expressly noted in a
subsection or clause that it is solely applicable to IPC and its
subsidiaries, to:
(a) (i) declare or pay, or propose to declare or
pay, any dividends on or make other distributions in respect of
any of its share capital (whether in cash, shares or property or
any combination thereof), except for (A) dividends paid
by a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary to it or its
subsidiaries and (B) subject to Section 5.14,
ordinary course quarterly dividends on its common shares with
record and payment dates consistent with past practice;
provided that any such dividend shall be at a rate no
greater than the rate paid by it during the fiscal quarter
immediately preceding the date of Agreement, (ii) split,
combine or reclassify, or propose to split, combine or
reclassify, any of its share capital, or issue or authorize or
propose the issuance or authorization of any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of or in substitution for, shares of its
share capital, or (iii) in the case of IPC and its
subsidiaries, repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, propose
to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, any shares of its
(or any of its subsidiaries) share capital or any
securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of its
(or any of its subsidiaries) share capital, other than
repurchases, redemptions or acquisitions by a wholly-owned
subsidiary of share capital or such other securities, as the
case may be, of another of its wholly-owned subsidiaries;
(b) issue, deliver or sell, or authorize or propose the
issuance, delivery or sale of, any shares of its (or any of its
subsidiaries) share capital of any class, any Voting Debt,
any share appreciation rights or any securities convertible into
or exercisable or exchangeable for, or any rights, warrants or
options to acquire, any such shares or Voting Debt, or enter
into any agreement with respect to any of the foregoing (it
being understood that no such issuance, delivery or sale shall
result in a net credit to either partys Book Value
Estimate made in connection with Section 5.16), other than
(i) the issuance of common shares required to be issued
upon the exercise or settlement of share options or other equity
related awards outstanding on the date hereof under the Validus
Share Plans the IPC Share Plans, as the case may be, as in
effect on the date hereof, (ii) issuances by a
wholly-owned subsidiary of share capital or capital stock, as
the case may be, to it or another of its wholly-owned subsidiary
and (iii) the issuance of Validus Common Shares in
connection with the consummation of this Agreement;
(c) amend or propose to amend its memorandum of association
or bye-laws or equivalent organizational documents of any of its
subsidiaries (except in accordance with the IPC Bye-Law
Amendment) and shall not waive any requirement thereof;
(d) (i) other than in connection with transactions
related to its Investment Assets entered into in accordance with
its Investment Policy or after obtaining the written consent of
the other parties hereto (which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), acquire or agree to acquire,
by amalgamating, merging or consolidating with, by purchasing a
substantial equity interest in or a substantial portion of the
assets of, by forming a partnership or joint venture with, or by
any other manner, any corporation, partnership, association or
other business organization or division thereof, or any material
assets, rights or properties (it being understood that no such
acquisition shall result in a net credit to either partys
Book Value Estimate made in connection with Section 5.16)
or (ii) other than in connection with transactions related
to its Investment Assets entered into in accordance with its
Investment Policy or that results in the creation or incurrence
of a Permitted Encumbrance, sell, lease, assign, transfer,
license, encumber, abandon or otherwise dispose of, or agree to
sell, lease, assign, transfer, license, encumber, abandon or
otherwise dispose of, any of its assets, product lines,
businesses, rights or properties (including capital stock of its
subsidiaries and indebtedness of others held by it and its
subsidiaries);
(e) other than any Validus Benefit Plan, as applicable,
other than any IPC Benefit Plan, as applicable (which is subject
to paragraph (k) below) or as contemplated by
Section 6.3(f): amend, modify or terminate any Material
Contract, or cancel, modify or waive any debts or claims held by
it under, or waive any rights in connection with, any Material
Contract, or enter into any contract or other agreement of any
type, whether written or oral, that would have been a Material
Contract had it been entered into prior to this Agreement;
-23-
(f) do or permit any of its subsidiaries, investments
managers or advisers, or Agents or Administrators to do any of
the following: (i) fail to comply with the Investment
Policy, or amend, modify or otherwise change the Investment
Policy in any material respect, except as may be required by
(or, in its reasonable good faith judgment, advisable under)
GAAP, Applicable SAP or any Governmental Entity or applicable
Laws, (ii) enter into, purchase, sell, amend or modify any
derivative other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice and its Investment Policy or
(iii) voluntarily forfeit, abandon, modify, waive,
terminate or otherwise change any of its material Permits;
(g) take any action with the actual knowledge and intent
that it would result in any of the conditions to the
Amalgamation set forth in ARTICLE VI not being satisfied or
take any action that would materially adversely affect the
ability of the parties to obtain any of the Requisite Regulatory
Approvals (as defined in Section 6.1(c)) without imposition
of a condition or restriction of the type referred to in
Section 6.2(d) or Section 6.3(d), as the case may be);
(h) (i) except as disclosed in any of its SEC
Documents filed prior to the date of this Agreement, change its
methods of accounting in effect at December 31, 2008,
except as required by changes in applicable Laws, GAAP or
Applicable SAP as concurred to by its independent auditors,
(ii) make, change or revoke any material Tax election, file
any amended Tax Return, settle any Tax claim, audit, action,
suit, proceeding, examination or investigation or change its
method of tax accounting (except, with respect to any amended
Tax Return or any change in tax accounting method, as required
by changes in applicable Law (or any Taxing Authoritys
interpretation thereof)), in each case, if such action would
have the effect of increasing any of its Tax liabilities by an
amount that is material or (iii) alter or amend in any
material respect its Investment Policy or any existing
underwriting, claim handling, loss control, investment,
actuarial or financial reporting practices, methods, guidelines
or policies or any material assumption underlying an actuarial
policy or practice (including compliance policies), except as
may be required by (or, in its reasonable good faith judgment,
advisable under) GAAP, Applicable SAP or any Governmental Entity
or applicable Laws;
(i) adopt any plan of complete or partial liquidation or
dissolution, restructuring, recapitalization or reorganization;
(j) settle or compromise any Legal Proceedings other than
settlements or compromises of Legal Proceedings (i) where
the amount paid (less the amount reserved for such matters by it
in the latest audited balance sheet included in its SEC
Documents and any insurance coverage applicable thereto) in
settlement or compromise, in each case, does not exceed
$1,000,000 and such settlement or compromise only involves
monetary relief or (ii) arising from ordinary course
claims for insurance under contracts of insurance or reinsurance
issued by one of its subsidiaries;
(k) with respect to IPC and its subsidiaries only,
(i) enter into, adopt, amend or terminate any IPC Benefit
Plan, as the case may be, or any other employee benefit plan or
any agreement, arrangement, plan or policy between it or one of
its subsidiaries and one or more of its employees, directors or
officers other than as required by this Agreement or in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice,
(ii) except as required by any IPC Benefit Plan, as the
case may be, as in effect as of the date hereof, increase in any
manner the compensation or fringe benefits of any director,
officer, employee, independent contractor or consultant or pay
any benefit not required by any IPC Benefit Plan, as the case
may be, as in effect as of the date hereof or enter into any
contract, agreement, commitment or arrangement to do any of the
foregoing, except for normal payments, awards and increases to
employees who are not directors or officers in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, or
(iii) enter into or renew any contract, agreement,
commitment or arrangement (other than a renewal occurring in
accordance with the terms of a IPC Benefit Plan, as the case may
be) providing for the payment to any director, officer,
employee, independent contractor or consultant of compensation
or benefits contingent, or the terms of which are materially
altered, upon the occurrence of any of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement;
(l) incur, create or assume any indebtedness for borrowed
money (or modify any of the material terms of any such
outstanding indebtedness), including by way of an intercompany
loan to it, guarantee
-24-
any such indebtedness or issue or sell any debt securities or
warrants or rights to acquire any debt securities of it or any
of its subsidiaries or guarantee any debt securities of others,
other than (i) in replacement of existing or maturing debt,
(ii) in connection with amending existing indebtedness
agreements in connection with the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) in the ordinary
course of the insurance or reinsurance business and
(iv) draw-downs pursuant to existing credit facilities and
letters of credit;
(m) grant, extend, amend, waive or modify any material
rights in or to, nor sell, assign, lease, transfer, license, let
lapse, abandon, cancel or otherwise dispose of, any material
Intellectual Property rights; or
(n) agree to, or make any commitment to, take, or
authorize, any of the actions prohibited by this
Section 4.1.
4.2 Financing.
(a) In the event that the parties mutually determine that
it is desirable to obtain new, or amend or obtain waivers under
any of their existing, credit facilities or other existing
financing arrangements (Financing) in
connection with the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated hereby, then the parties shall, and shall cause
each of their respective subsidiaries to, use commercially
reasonable efforts to cooperate with each other and to cause
their respective directors, officers, employees, agents and
representatives to cooperate in connection with the arrangement
of such Financing, including with respect to the giving
(effective as of the Effective Time) of any mutually acceptable
guarantees required by the lenders in connection therewith;
provided that (i) such requested cooperation does
not unreasonably interfere with the ongoing operations of a
party and its subsidiaries prior to the Effective Time,
(ii) no party or any of its subsidiaries shall be
required to incur any liability under the Financing prior to the
Effective Time unless contingent upon the occurrence of the
Closing and not material to Validus and its subsidiaries (after
giving effect to the Amalgamation), and (iii) IPC and
Validus shall be responsible for their respective costs and
expenses incurred in connection with such cooperation. For the
avoidance of doubt no failure of any party to obtain Financing
shall be deemed to be a failure of any condition set forth in
Article VI of this Agreement, except as specifically
provided by Section 6.3(f) of this Agreement.
4.3 Bermuda Required Actions. Prior to the Closing,
(a) IPC shall (i) procure that the statutory
declaration required by Section 108(3) of the Companies Act
is duly sworn by one of its officers; (ii) prepare a duly
certified copy of the IPC shareholder resolutions evidencing the
Required IPC Vote and deliver such documents to Validus; and
(b) Amalgamation Sub shall (and Validus, as the sole
shareholder of Amalgamation Sub shall cause Amalgamation Sub to)
(i) procure that the statutory declarations required by
Section 108(3) of the Companies Act is duly sworn by one of
Amalgamation Subs officers; (ii) prepare a duly
certified copy of the shareholder resolutions evidencing the
approval of Validus, as the sole shareholder of the Amalgamation
Sub, of the Amalgamation; and (iii) prepare a notice
advising the Registrar of the registered office of the
Amalgamated Company.
ARTICLE V
ADDITIONAL
AGREEMENTS
5.1 Preparation of Proxy Statements; Shareholders
Meetings.
(a) At IPCs option, after consultation with Validus,
IPC may elect to combine the IPC Shareholders Meeting with
IPCs 2009 annual general meeting, and at Validuss
option, after consultation with IPC, Validus may elect to
combine the Validus Shareholders Meeting with Validuss
2009 annual general meeting. As promptly as reasonably
practicable following the date hereof, IPC and Validus shall
cooperate in preparing and each shall cause to be filed with the
SEC mutually acceptable proxy materials which shall constitute
the proxy statement/prospectus relating to the matters to be
submitted to the shareholders of Validus at the Validus
Shareholders Meeting and to the IPC shareholders at the IPC
Shareholders Meeting and, subject to the first sentence of this
paragraph (a), such other matters as IPC and Validus elect to
submit to their respective
-25-
shareholders in the ordinary course consistent with past
practice in connection with their respective annual general
meetings, including the election of directors, the receipt of
audited financial statements, the appointment of an auditor and
the transaction of such other further business, if any, as may
lawfully be brought before the meeting (such proxy
statement/prospectus, proxy and any amendments or supplements
thereto, the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus), and Validus shall prepare,
together with IPC, and file with the SEC a registration
statement on
Form S-4
(of which the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall be a part)
with respect to the issuance of Validus Common Shares in the
Amalgamation (such
Form S-4, and any amendments or supplements thereto, the
Form S-4).
Each of IPC and Validus shall take all actions reasonably
necessary to prepare and file the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4 no later than 30 days following the date of execution of
this Agreement by all parties. In addition, each of IPC and
Validus shall:
(i) use commercially reasonable efforts to have the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus cleared by the SEC and the
Form S-4
declared effective by the SEC, to keep the
Form S-4
effective as long as is necessary to consummate the Amalgamation
and the other transactions contemplated hereby, and to mail the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus to their respective
shareholders as promptly as practicable after the
Form S-4
is declared effective. IPC and Validus shall, on the same day of
receipt thereof (and if not possible, as promptly as practicable
after receipt thereof), provide the other party with copies of
any written comments and advise the other party of any oral
comments with respect to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or
Form S-4
received from the SEC;
(ii) cooperate and provide the other party with a
reasonable opportunity to review and comment on any amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
prior to filing such with the SEC, and each party will provide
the other party with a copy of all such filings made with the
SEC. None of the information supplied or to be supplied by
Validus or IPC for inclusion or incorporation by reference in
the (A)
Form S-4
will, at the time the
Form S-4
is filed with the SEC and at the time it becomes effective under
the Securities Act, contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated
therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading,
and (B) Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus will, at the
date of mailing to shareholders and at the times of the meetings
of shareholders to be held in connection with the Amalgamation,
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
provided that, in each case of (A) and (B), neither
party shall be responsible or liable for any statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by the other party for inclusion or incorporation by reference
therein;
(iii) cause the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
to comply as to form in all material respects with the
requirements of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act, as the
case may be, and the rules and regulations of the SEC
thereunder, except that no representation or warranty shall be
made by either such party with respect to statements made or
incorporated by reference therein based on information supplied
by the other party for inclusion or incorporation by reference
in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or
Form S-4.
IPC and Validus shall make any necessary filings with respect to
the Amalgamation under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act
and the rules and regulations thereunder;
(iv) use commercially reasonable efforts to take any action
required to be taken under any applicable securities Laws in
connection with the Amalgamation and each party shall furnish
all information concerning it and the holders of its capital
stock as may be reasonably requested in connection with any such
action;
(v) advise the other party, promptly after it receives
notice thereof, of the time when the
Form S-4
has become effective, the issuance of any stop order, the
suspension of the qualification of the Validus Common Shares
issuable in connection with the Amalgamation for offering or
sale in any jurisdiction, or any request by the SEC for
amendment of the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the
Form S-4; and
(vi) promptly notify the other party if at any time prior
to the Effective Time it discovers any information relating to
either of the parties, or their respective affiliates, officers
or directors, which
-26-
should be set forth in an amendment or supplement to any of the
Form S-4
or the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus so that such documents
would not include any misstatement of a material fact or omit to
state any material fact necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading, and an appropriate amendment or supplement
describing such information shall be promptly filed with the SEC
and disseminated to the shareholders of Validus and IPC, to the
extent required by Law.
(b) Validus shall take all action necessary to call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its shareholders as
promptly as practicable, and in any event within 45 days,
following the date upon which the
Form S-4
becomes effective (the Validus Shareholders
Meeting) for the purpose of obtaining the Required
Validus Vote, provided that the Validus Shareholders
Meeting shall not be held prior to the third business day
immediately following the last day on which the holders of IPC
Common Shares can require appraisal of their IPC Common Shares
pursuant to the Companies Act. Subject to Section 5.4,
(i) Validus shall use commercially reasonable efforts to
solicit and secure the Required Validus Vote in accordance with
applicable legal requirements and (ii) the board of
directors of Validus shall include the Validus Recommendation in
the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
(c) IPC shall take all action necessary to call, give
notice of, convene and hold a meeting of its shareholders as
promptly as practicable, and in any event within 45 days,
following the date upon which the
Form S-4
becomes effective (the IPC Shareholders
Meeting) for the purpose of obtaining the Required IPC
Vote, provided that the IPC Shareholders Meeting shall
not be held prior to the third business day immediately
following the last day on which the holders of IPC Common Shares
can require appraisal of their IPC Common Shares pursuant to the
Companies Act. Subject to Section 5.4, (i) IPC shall
use commercially reasonable efforts to solicit and secure the
Required IPC Vote in accordance with applicable legal
requirements and (ii) the board of directors of IPC shall
include the IPC Recommendation in the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
(d) Validus and IPC shall coordinate and each shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the Validus
Shareholders Meeting and the IPC Shareholders Meeting to be held
on the same date.
(e) Validus and IPC may determine, after consultation with
each other, that each of them shall file separate proxy
statements rather than a joint proxy statement, in which case
each of the references in this Agreement to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus shall include each partys separate
proxy statement.
5.2 Access to Information; Confidentiality.
(a) Upon reasonable notice, each of Validus and IPC shall
(and shall cause each of its subsidiaries to) (i) afford
to the officers, employees, accountants, counsel, financial
advisors and other representatives of the other party, access,
during normal business hours during the period prior to the
Effective Time, to all its properties, books, contracts, records
and officers and (ii) during such period, make available
all other information concerning its business, properties and
personnel, in each case, as such other party may reasonably
request. Notwithstanding anything in this Section 5.2 or
Section 5.3 to the contrary, neither party nor any of its
subsidiaries shall be required to provide access to or to
disclose information where such access or disclosure would
jeopardize any legally recognized privilege applicable to such
information or violate or contravene any applicable Laws or
binding agreement entered into prior to the date of this
Agreement (including any Laws relating to privacy). The parties
will make appropriate substitute disclosure arrangements under
circumstances in which the restrictions of the preceding
sentence apply, including adopting additional specific
procedures to protect the confidentiality of certain sensitive
material and to ensure compliance with applicable Law, and, if
necessary, restricting review of certain sensitive material to
the receiving partys financial advisors or outside legal
counsel. No information or knowledge obtained in any
investigation pursuant to this Section 5.2 shall affect or
be deemed to modify any representation or warranty made by any
party hereunder.
(b) The parties will hold any such information in
confidence and neither of the parties nor any of their
respective affiliates, directors, officers, employees, advisors,
agents or other representatives (including, without limitation,
attorneys, accountants, consultants, bankers and financial
advisors) (collectively, Representatives) will
disclose any of the information in any manner whatsoever;
provided, however, that (i) any of such
-27-
information may be disclosed to Representatives who need to know
such information for the sole purpose of assisting the parties
in effecting the Amalgamation (it being understood that such
Representatives shall be informed by the party hereto that they
represent of your obligations under this Section 5.2(b) and
shall be required by you to comply with all such obligations)),
(ii) any of such information may be disclosed as required
by applicable law or the rules of a national securities exchange
and (iii) any other disclosure of such information may be
made only with the other partys prior written consent.
Each party hereto agrees to be responsible for any breach of
this Section 5.2(b) by any of its Representatives and, at
its sole expense, to take all commercially reasonable measures
(including, but not limited to, court proceedings) to restrain
its Representatives from breaching this Section 5.2(b).
5.3 Commercially Reasonable Efforts.
(a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each party will cooperate and consult with the other party with
respect to, and will use its commercially reasonable efforts to
take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to
be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under this
Agreement and applicable Laws to consummate the Amalgamation and
the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement as
promptly as practicable after the date hereof, including
preparing and filing as promptly as practicable all
documentation to effect all necessary applications, notices,
filings and other documents and to obtain as promptly as
practicable all Requisite Regulatory Approvals and all other
consents, waivers, licenses, registrations, orders, approvals,
permits, rulings, requests, authorizations and clearances
necessary or advisable to be obtained from any third party or
any Governmental Entity in order to consummate the Amalgamation
or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) In furtherance and not in limitation of
Section 5.3(a), to the extent permissible under applicable
Laws, each party shall, in connection with the above referenced
efforts to obtain all Requisite Regulatory Approvals and any
other requisite approvals, clearances and authorizations for the
transactions contemplated hereby under applicable Laws or any
approval of a Governmental Entity, use its commercially
reasonable efforts to (i) supply as promptly as
practicable any additional information and documentary material
that may be requested pursuant to applicable Laws or by any
Governmental Entity and to use commercially reasonable efforts
to cause the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting
periods and the receipt of all such consents, waivers, licenses,
registrations, orders, approvals, permits, rulings, requests,
authorizations and clearances under applicable Laws or from such
Governmental Entities as soon as practicable, (ii)
cooperate in all respects with the other party in connection
with any filing or submission and in connection with any
investigation or other inquiry, including any proceeding
initiated by any private party, (iii) keep the other
party apprised of the status of matters relating to completion
of the transactions contemplated hereby and promptly inform the
other party of (and upon reasonable request provide copies of)
any communication received by such party from, or given by such
party to, any Governmental Entity and of any material
communication received or given in connection with any
proceeding by any private party, in each case regarding any
other transactions contemplated hereby, (iv) permit the
other parties, or the other parties legal counsel, to
review prior to its submission any communication given by it to
any Governmental Entity or, in connection with any proceeding by
any private party, with any other person, (v) consult
with the other party in advance of any meeting, conference,
conference call, discussion or communication with, any such
Governmental Entity or, in connection with any proceeding by any
private party, with any other person and (vi) to the
extent permitted by such Governmental Entity or other person,
give the other party the opportunity to attend and participate
in such meetings, conferences, conference calls, discussions and
communications.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, none of IPC (and its subsidiaries) or
Validus (and its subsidiaries) may, without the prior written
consent of the other party, (i) consent to, take or agree
or commit to take, any action for the purpose of obtaining the
Requisite Regulatory Approvals or (ii) consent to or agree
to any restriction or limitation for the purpose of obtaining
the Requisite Regulatory Approvals (including with respect to
divesting, selling, licensing, transferring, holding separate or
otherwise disposing of any business or assets or conducting its
(or its subsidiaries) business in any specified manner),
in each case, which would be effective prior to the Effective
Time or which would, after the Effective Time, not be immaterial
to Validus and its subsidiaries taken together (after giving
effect to the Amalgamation).
-28-
(d) In connection with and without limiting the foregoing,
Validus and IPC shall (i) take all reasonable actions
necessary to ensure that no takeover statute or similar statute
or regulation is or becomes applicable to the Amalgamation, this
Agreement, or any of the other transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and (ii) if any takeover statute or similar
statute or regulation becomes applicable to the Amalgamation,
this Agreement, or any other transaction contemplated by this
Agreement, use their respective commercially reasonable efforts
to ensure that the Amalgamation and the other transactions
contemplated by this Agreement may be consummated as promptly as
practicable on the terms contemplated by this Agreement and
otherwise to minimize the effect of such statute or regulation
on the Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(e) Subject to receipt of the Required IPC Vote, IPC shall
take such actions as are necessary to amend its bye-laws to
reflect the IPC Bye-Law Amendment.
5.4 No Change in Recommendation.
(a) The board of directors of Validus shall not withhold,
withdraw, qualify or modify (including by amendment or
supplement to the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), in any
manner adverse to IPC, the Validus Recommendation, or publicly
propose to, or publicly announce that its board of directors has
resolved to take any such action (any of the foregoing, with
respect to the Validus Recommendation, a Change in
Validus Recommendation). The board of directors of IPC
shall not withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify (including by
amendment or supplement to the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus), in any manner adverse to Validus, the IPC
Recommendation, or publicly propose to, or publicly announce
that its board of directors has resolved to take any such action
(any of the foregoing, with respect to the IPC Recommendation, a
Change in IPC Recommendation).
(b) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Required Validus
Vote, in the case of Validus, or the Required IPC Vote, in the
case of IPC, the board of directors of Validus or IPC, as the
case may be, may withhold, withdraw, qualify or modify (or
publicly announce that its board of directors has resolved to
take any such action) the Validus Recommendation, in the case of
Validus, or the IPC Recommendation, in the case of IPC, other
than, with respect to IPC only, in connection with an
Acquisition Proposal (as defined in Section 5.5(a)) (for
the avoidance of doubt, the conditions under which IPC may make
a Change of IPC Recommendation as a result of an Acquisition
Proposal are as set forth in Section 5.5), if the board of
directors of Validus or IPC, as the case may be, after
consultation with its outside counsel and financial advisors,
concludes in good faith that such action is reasonably likely to
be required in order for the relevant directors to comply with
such directors fiduciary duties under applicable Law;
provided that no Change in Validus Recommendation or
Change in IPC Recommendation, as the case may be, may be made
unless the party seeking to make such Change in Validus
Recommendation or Change in IPC Recommendation, as the case may
be, (i) has not breached in any material respect its
obligations under this Section 5.4, and (ii) has
provided a written notice to the other party advising it of its
intention to make a Change in Validus Recommendation or a Change
in IPC Recommendation, as the case may be, and such other party
does not, within five business days following its receipt of
such notice, agree to make adjustments in the terms and
conditions of this Agreement which obviate the need for the
Change in Validus Recommendation or the Change in IPC
Recommendation, as the case may be, as determined in good faith
by the board of directors of Validus or IPC, as the case may be,
after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial
advisors (provided that, during such five business day
period, the party seeking to make such Change in Validus
Recommendation or Change in IPC Recommendation, as the case may
be, shall, and shall cause its outside legal counsel and its
financial advisors to, negotiate in good faith with the other
party (to the extent the other party desires to negotiate) with
respect to any proposed adjustments to the terms and conditions
of this Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing
contained herein shall be deemed to relieve either of Validus or
IPC of its obligation(s) under Section 5.1 to submit
matters to obtain the Required Validus Vote at the Validus
Shareholders Meeting or the Required IPC Vote at the IPC
Shareholders Meeting, as the case may be; provided,
however, that if the board of directors of Validus (in
the case of a Change in Validus Recommendation) or IPC (in the
case of a Change in IPC Recommendation) shall have effected a
Change in Validus Recommendation or a Change in IPC
Recommendation, as the case may be, then in submitting such
matters to the applicable shareholders meeting, the applicable
board of
-29-
directors may submit such matters without recommendation, in
which event the applicable board of directors shall communicate
the basis for its lack of a recommendation to the applicable
shareholders in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or an
appropriate amendment or supplement thereto to the extent it
determines after consultation with its legal counsel, that such
action is compelled by applicable Law.
5.5 Acquisition Proposals.
(a) IPC agrees that neither it nor any of its subsidiaries
nor any of the officers and directors of it or its subsidiaries
shall, and that it shall cause (and use commercially reasonable
efforts to instruct) its and its subsidiaries employees,
agents, representatives and advisors (including any investment
banker, attorney or accountant retained by it or any of its
subsidiaries) not to, directly or indirectly:
(i) initiate, solicit, encourage or facilitate (including
by providing information) any effort or attempt to make or
implement any proposal or offer with respect to, or a
transaction to effect, an amalgamation, merger, reorganization,
share exchange, consolidation, business combination,
recapitalization, liquidation, dissolution or similar
transaction involving it or any of its subsidiaries or any
purchase or sale of 10% or more of the consolidated assets
(including, without limitation, stock of its subsidiaries) of it
and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or any purchase or sale
of, or tender or exchange offer for, its voting securities that,
if consummated, would result in any person (or the shareholders
of such person) beneficially owning securities representing 10%
or more of its total voting power (or of the surviving Validus
entity in such transaction) or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries (any such proposal, offer or transaction (other
than a proposal or offer made by Validus) being hereinafter
referred to as an Acquisition Proposal);
(ii) have, participate or otherwise engage in any
discussions or negotiations with or provide any confidential
information or data to any person relating to an Acquisition
Proposal;
(iii) approve or recommend, or propose to approve or
recommend, any Acquisition Proposal or submit to the vote of its
shareholders any Acquisition Proposal prior to the termination
of this Agreement; or
(iv) approve or recommend, or propose to approve or
recommend, or execute or enter into, any letter of intent,
agreement in principle, merger agreement, amalgamation
agreement, asset purchase or share exchange agreement, option
agreement or other similar agreement related to any Acquisition
Proposal.
(b) IPC agrees that (i) it shall, and shall cause
its subsidiaries and its and their respective officers,
directors, employees, agents, representatives and advisors to,
cease immediately and terminate any and all existing activities,
discussions or negotiations with any third parties conducted
heretofore with respect to any Acquisition Proposal, and
(ii) it shall not release any third party from, or waive
any provisions of, any confidentiality or standstill agreement
to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a party with respect
to any Acquisition Proposal. IPC agrees that it shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to promptly inform its and its
subsidiaries respective directors, officers, employees,
agents, representatives and advisors of the obligations
undertaken in this Section 5.5.
(c) IPC shall promptly notify Validus of any
(i) Acquisition Proposal, (ii) request for information
that could reasonably be expected to be related to an
Acquisition Proposal received by it, any of its subsidiaries or
any of their respective directors, officers, employees, agents,
representatives or advisors (including any investment bankers,
attorneys or accountants), and (iii) request that could
reasonably be expected to be related to an Acquisition Proposal
for discussions with or negotiations by, it, any of its
subsidiaries or any of their respective directors, officers,
employees, agents, representatives or advisors (including any
investment bankers, attorneys or accountants), indicating, in
connection with such notice, the identity of the person making
such Acquisition Proposal or request and the material terms and
conditions thereof (including a copy thereof and any related
available documentation and correspondence), and in any event
IPC shall provide written notice to Validus of any Acquisition
Proposal, request for information or request for such
discussions or negotiations within 24 hours of such event.
IPC will (A) inform the person making such Acquisition
Proposal, request for information or request for discussions or
negotiations of its obligations under this Agreement and
(B) keep Validus reasonably informed on a reasonably
current basis of the terms of any such Acquisition Proposal or
-30-
request for information or request for discussions or
negotiations (including whether such Acquisition Proposal or
request for information or request for discussions or
negotiations is withdrawn and any material change to the terms
thereof).
(d) Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the
contrary, if, at any time prior to obtaining the Required IPC
Vote, in the case of IPC (after the expiration of the Notice
Period (as hereinafter defined)), the board of directors of IPC
concludes that an unsolicited bona fide written Acquisition
Proposal that did not result from a breach of this
Section 5.5 could be reasonably likely to constitute a
Superior Proposal (after giving effect to all the adjustments to
this Agreement which may be offered by Validus prior to or
during the Notice Period), the board of directors of IPC may
make a Change in IPC Recommendation; provided that the
board of directors of IPC may not make a Change in IPC
Recommendation unless (i) IPC has provided a written
notice to Validus (a Notice of Superior
Proposal) advising Validus that it has received an
Acquisition Proposal that could be reasonably likely to
constitute a Superior Proposal and specifying the identity of
the person making such Acquisition Proposal and the material
terms thereof (including a copy thereof and any related
available documentation and correspondence) and (ii)
Validus does not, within five business days following its
receipt of the Notice of Superior Proposal (the Notice
Period), make an offer that, as determined in good
faith by the board of directors of IPC after consultation with
its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, results in the
applicable Acquisition Proposal no longer being a Superior
Proposal (provided that, during the Notice Period, IPC
shall, and shall cause its outside legal counsel and its
financial advisors to, negotiate in good faith with Validus (to
the extent Validus desires to negotiate) with respect to such
proposal). The parties understand and agree that to comply with
this Section 5.5(d) any revisions to the terms of such
Superior Proposal which, individually or in the aggregate would
be material when considering such Superior Proposal in its
totality, shall require IPC to deliver to Validus a new Notice
of Superior Proposal and the commencement of a new Notice Period.
(e) Nothing contained in this Section 5.5 shall
prohibit IPC, from (i) complying with
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2
promulgated under the Exchange Act to the extent applicable with
regard to an Acquisition Proposal (provided that, in the
case of an Acquisition Proposal made by way of a tender offer or
exchange offer, any failure by IPC or its board of directors to
recommend that the shareholders of IPC reject such offer within
the time period specified in
Rule 14e-2(a)
shall be deemed to be a Change in IPC Recommendation), or making
any legally required disclosure to its shareholders with regard
to an Acquisition Proposal (provided that any disclosure
(other than a stop, look and listen or similar
communication of the type contemplated by
Rule 14d-9(f)
under the Exchange Act) made pursuant to
Rule 14d-9
or 14e-2(a)
shall be deemed to be a Change in IPC Recommendation unless the
board of directors of IPC expressly reaffirms its recommendation
to its shareholders in favor of approval of this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby) or (ii) informing
any person of the existence of the provisions contained in this
Section 5.5.
(f) Superior Proposal means a bona fide
unsolicited written Acquisition Proposal from any person (other
than Validus or its subsidiaries) that did not result from a
breach by IPC of this Section 5.5, which the board of
directors of IPC concludes in good faith, after consultation
with its outside legal counsel and its financial advisors,
taking into account the legal, financial, regulatory, timing and
other aspects of the Acquisition Proposal and the person making
the Acquisition Proposal (including any
break-up
fees, expense reimbursement provisions and conditions to
consummation) is in the long-term best interests of IPC
including its shareholders, employees, communities and other
stakeholders, taking into account the long-term strategic
prospects and other benefits of the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement, and (i) is more favorable to IPC, its
shareholders and other constituencies than the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (after giving effect to all
adjustments to this Agreement which may be offered by Validus
under Section 5.5(d) in response to such Acquisition
Proposal), (ii) is fully financed or reasonably capable
of being fully financed, reasonably likely to receive all
required governmental approvals and otherwise reasonably capable
of being completed on the terms proposed and (iii) that
could be reasonably likely to require the board of directors of
IPC to make a Change in IPC Recommendation in order to comply
with its directors fiduciary duties under applicable Law;
provided that, for purposes of this definition of
Superior Proposal, the term Acquisition
Proposal shall have the meaning assigned to such term in
Section 5.5(a)(i), except that the reference to 10%
or more of its voting power or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries in the definition of Acquisition
-31-
Proposal shall be deemed to be a reference to 50% or
more of its total voting power or the voting power of any of its
subsidiaries and the reference to 10% or more of the
consolidated assets in the definition of Acquisition
Proposal shall be deemed to be a reference to all or
substantially all of the consolidated assets.
5.6 Section 16 Matters. Prior to the Effective
Time, each of Validus and IPC shall use its commercially
reasonable efforts to cause to be exempt under Rule 16b -3
promulgated under the Exchange Act any dispositions of IPC
Common Shares or acquisitions of Validus Common Shares
(including, in each case, derivative securities) resulting from
the transactions contemplated hereby by each director or officer
of IPC who is subject to the reporting requirements of
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act with respect to IPC.
5.7 Fees and Expenses. Whether or not the
Amalgamation is consummated, all costs and expenses incurred in
connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby shall be paid by the party incurring such expense, except
as otherwise provided herein, and except that expenses incurred
in connection with filing, printing and mailing the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and the
Form S-4
shall be shared equally by IPC and Validus.
5.8 Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance.
(a) From and after the Effective Time, Validus shall cause
the Amalgamated Company to, to the fullest extent permitted by
applicable Law (and, in the case of former officers and
directors, to the extent permitted by the bye-laws of IPC and
the Amalgamated Company prior to the Closing), indemnify, defend
and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, each
person who is now, or has been at any time prior to the date
hereof or who becomes prior to the Effective Time, a director or
officer of IPC (the Indemnified Parties)
against all losses, claims, damages, costs, expenses,
liabilities or judgments or amounts that are paid in settlement
of or in connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation based in whole or in part on or arising in whole
or in part out of the fact that such person is or was a director
or officer of IPC or any of its respective subsidiaries, and
pertaining to any matter existing or occurring, or any acts or
omissions occurring, at or prior to the Effective Time, whether
asserted or claimed prior to, at or after, the Effective Time
(including matters, acts or omissions occurring in connection
with the approval of this Agreement and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby) to the same extent such
persons are indemnified or have the right to advancement of
expenses as of the date of this Agreement by IPC or any of its
respective subsidiaries pursuant to the relevant entitys
memorandum of association, bye-laws and indemnification
agreements and resolutions, if any, in existence on the date
hereof.
(b) For a period of six years after the Effective Time,
Validus shall purchase as of the Effective Time, a tail policy
to the existing directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by IPC with respect to claims arising from
facts or events which occurred at or before the Effective Time,
and which tail policy shall contain substantially the same
coverage and amounts as, and contain terms and conditions no
less advantageous than the coverage provided by the existing
policy of IPC as of the date of this Agreement; provided,
however, that in no event shall Validus be required to
expend for the entire tail policy, in excess of 350% of the
annual premium currently provided by IPC for its existing policy
of directors and officers liability insurance; and
provided further that, if the premium of such
insurance coverage exceeds such amount, Validus shall be obliged
to obtain a policy with the greatest coverage available for a
cost not to exceed such amount. At the request of Validus, IPC
shall cooperate with Validus to obtain such a tail policy
effective as of the Effective Time.
(c) In the event that Validus or the Amalgamated Company or
any of its successors or assigns (i) consolidates or
amalgamates with or merges into any other person and is not the
continuing or surviving corporation or entity of such
consolidation or amalgamation or (ii) transfers or conveys
all or substantially all of its properties and assets to any
person (including by dissolution), then, and in each such case,
Validus shall cause proper provision to be made so that the
successors and assigns of Validus or the Amalgamated Company
assume and honor the obligations set forth in this
Section 5.8.
(d) [Reserved].
(e) The provisions of this Section 5.8: (i) are
intended to be for the benefit of, and shall be enforceable by,
each Indemnified Party, his or her heirs and legal
representatives and (ii) are in addition to, and not in
-32-
substitution for, any other rights to indemnification or
contribution that any such person may have by contract or
otherwise.
5.9 Public Announcements. The press release to be
issued after the execution of this Agreement by all parties
regarding the Amalgamation shall be a joint press release and
thereafter each of Validus and IPC shall, except as may be
required by applicable Law or by obligations pursuant to any
listing agreement with or rules of NASDAQ or the NYSE, as
applicable, or by request of any Governmental Entity, consult
with the other party before issuing any press release or
otherwise making any public statement with respect to this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby;
provided, however, that this consultation
obligation shall not apply to any press release or other public
statement relating to any actual or contemplated litigation
between the parties to this Agreement.
5.10 Additional Agreements. In case any further
action is necessary or desirable to carry out the purposes of
this Agreement or to vest the Amalgamated Company with full
title to all properties, assets, rights, approvals, permits,
authorizations, immunities and franchises of IPC and its
subsidiaries, the parties shall use commercially reasonable
efforts to cause their respective officers and directors to take
all such necessary action.
5.11 Shareholder Litigation. IPC shall give Validus
the reasonable opportunity to participate in the defense of any
shareholder litigation against IPC or its directors or officers
relating to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated
hereby.
5.12 Employee Benefits.
(a) [Reserved].
(b) As of the Closing Date, Validus shall, or shall cause
one of its subsidiaries to, continue to employ each person
employed by Validus or IPC or any of their respective
subsidiaries as of the Closing Date (such employees,
collectively, the Employees). Except as
expressly provided below, nothing contained herein shall
restrict Validus in the future in the exercise of its
independent, good-faith business judgment as to the terms and
conditions under which such employment shall continue, the
duration of such employment, the basis on which such employment
is terminated or the benefits provided to any Employee.
(c) For a period of not less than one year following the
Closing Date, Validus shall (or shall cause its subsidiaries to)
make available to the Employees that immediately prior to the
Closing were employed by IPC, employee benefits and compensation
opportunities (including salary, wages and bonus opportunity)
substantially comparable in the aggregate to the employee
benefits and compensation opportunities in effect for IPC
employees immediately prior to the Closing.
(d) Validus and its subsidiaries shall ensure that any
Compensation and Benefit Plan in which the Employees are
eligible to participate after the Closing Date shall take into
account for purposes of eligibility and vesting thereunder,
except for purposes of qualifying for subsidized early
retirement benefits or to the extent it would result in a
duplication of benefits, service by the Employees with IPC and
any of its subsidiaries prior to the Closing Date, to the same
extent such service was credited prior to the Closing Date under
a comparable Compensation and Benefit Plan of IPC.
(e) From and after the Closing Date, Validus shall honor
all IPC Benefit Plans, in accordance with their terms as in
effect immediately before the Closing Date; provided that
nothing herein shall limit the right of Validus to amend or
terminate any such plan in accordance with its terms.
(f) Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall
(i) be treated as an amendment of any Compensation and
Benefit Plan or (ii) give any third party any right to
enforce the provisions of this Section 5.12.
5.13 Listing and Delisting; Reservation for
Issuance. Validus shall use its commercially reasonable
efforts to cause all the following shares to be approved for
listing and quotation on the NYSE, subject to official notice of
issuance, no later than the Closing Date: (i) all Validus
NYSE, subject to official notice of issuance, no later than the
Closing Date: (i) all Validus Common Shares to be issued
in the Amalgamation to IPC shareholders and (ii) all
Validus Common Shares to be reserved for issuance upon exercise
or vesting of the
-33-
IPC Share Options or IPC Other Awards (collectively, the
Listed Validus Common Shares). Validus shall
take all action necessary to reserve for issuance, prior to the
Closing Date, any Listed Validus Common Shares that, by their
terms and in accordance with this Agreement, will not be issued
until after the Effective Time. Validus shall use its
commercially reasonable efforts to cause the IPC Common Shares
to no longer be listed or quoted on NASDAQ and to be
deregistered under the Exchange Act as soon as practicable
following the Effective Time.
5.14 Dividends. IPC and Validus shall coordinate the
declaration, setting of record dates and payment dates of
dividends of IPC Common Shares and Validus Common Shares so that
holders of IPC Common Shares do not receive dividends on both
IPC Common Shares and the Validus Common Shares received in the
Amalgamation in respect of any calendar quarter or fail to
receive a dividend on either the IPC Common Shares or the
Validus Common Shares received in the Amalgamation in respect of
any calendar quarter. For the avoidance of doubt, the purpose of
this Section 5.14 is to ensure that the holders of the
Validus Common Shares and IPC Common Shares each receive the
same number of quarterly dividends after execution of this
Agreement and prior to the Effective Time with respect to such
shares.
5.15 Tax Treatment.
(a) The parties intend the Amalgamation to qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Code and to obtain the opinions described in
Sections 6.2(e) and 6.3(e) of this Agreement. Each of IPC,
Amalgamation Sub and Validus and each of their respective
affiliates shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause
the Amalgamation to so qualify and to obtain such opinions, and
unless otherwise required by applicable Law or by any other
provision of this Agreement, shall not take any actions, or
cause any actions to be taken, which would reasonably be
expected to cause the Amalgamation to fail so to qualify or the
opinions to fail to be delivered.
(b) Validus shall cause (i) Amalgamation Sub to file
with the United States Internal Revenue Service a properly
completed Form 8832, so as to elect to be treated as a
disregarded entity for U.S. federal tax purposes effective
at least one day prior to the Closing Date, and (ii) the
Amalgamated Company to file, after the Closing Date, with the
United States Internal Revenue Service a properly completed
Form 8832, so as to cause it to be treated for
U.S. federal tax purposes as a disregarded entity effective
as of the Closing Date.
5.16 Book Value Calculations.
(a) On the first business day after the date of its
shareholder meeting held pursuant to Section 5.1, unless
this Agreement is earlier terminated pursuant to
Section 7.1, either Validus or IPC (the Requesting
Party) may request, by providing notice in writing
delivered to the other party (the Non-Requesting
Party), that the Non-Requesting Party prepare an
estimate of the Non-Requesting Partys book value as of the
date that is one (1) business day prior to such shareholder
meeting (such date, the Measurement Date, and
such estimate of book value, a Book Value
Estimate).
(b) If a Requesting Party makes a request pursuant to
Section 5.16(a), then both the Requesting Party and the
Non-Requesting Party shall each promptly, and in any event
within five (5) calendar days, prepare Book Value Estimates
and provide such Book Value Estimates, together with reasonable
supporting analysis, to each other. If the Requesting Party
fails to provide such Book Value Estimate within such five
(5) calendar day period, then the Requesting Party shall
have no further rights under this Section 5.16 or
Sections 7.1(h) or 7.1(i), as the case may be. For the
avoidance of doubt, the parties hereby agree that, if either
party requests a Book Value Estimate, the Closing Date shall not
occur until the agreements and covenants set forth in this
Section 5.16 have been satisfied or waived.
(c) From and after the time that the Book Value Estimates
have both been delivered, each party shall have five
(5) calendar days to review the other partys Book
Value Estimate and supporting analysis and such other
information as the party may reasonably request in connection
with its review of the other partys Book Value Estimate.
The parties understand and agree that no reserve development
occurring from and after the Measurement Date shall increase or
reduce either partys Book Value Estimate.
-34-
(d) If either partys Book Value Estimate indicates
that such party has experienced a decline in book value of more
than 50% from December 31, 2008 to the Measurement Date (a
50% Book Value Decline), then the other party
shall have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to and
in accordance with Section 7.1(h) or Section 7.1(i),
as appropriate.
(e) If the parties Book Value Estimates indicate that
the percentage decline in either partys book value from
December 31, 2008 to the Measurement Date is more than
20 percentage points greater than the percentage decline of
the other partys book value from December 31, 2008 to
the Measurement Date (a 20% Differential Book Value
Decline), then the party with the lesser decline in
book value over such period shall have the right to terminate
this Agreement pursuant to and in accordance with
Section 7.1(h) or Section 7.1(i), as appropriate;
provided that, for purposes of measuring the 20%
Differential Book Value Decline, if any, the book value of any
party that has experienced an increase in book value from
December 31, 2008 to the Measurement Date shall be deemed
to have experienced no change in its book value.
(f) If, after complying with this Section 5.16,
neither party has experienced a 50% Book Value Decline or a 20%
Differential Book Value Decline, then (i) in accordance
with the terms this Agreement, each party shall cooperate and
consult with the other party with respect to, and will use its
commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken,
all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary, proper or advisable under this Agreement and
applicable Laws to consummate the Amalgamation and the other
transactions contemplated by this Agreement as promptly as
practicable and (ii) if all other conditions to Closing set
forth in Article VI (excluding conditions that, by their
terms, are to be satisfied on the Closing Date) have been
satisfied or waived as of the third business day after the
condition in Section 6.1(a) was satisfied, then
notwithstanding the provisions of Section 6.2(a) or
Section 6.3(a) (as the case may be) or any other provision
of this Agreement, no representations or warranties of the
Non-Requesting Party set forth in this Agreement need be true
and correct as of any date after the third business day after
the date on which the condition in Section 6.1(a) was
satisfied and any certificate of the Non-Requesting Party
delivered pursuant to Section 6.2(c) or Section 6.3(c)
(as the case may be) shall reflect the foregoing.
ARTICLE VI
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
6.1 Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect
the Amalgamation. The respective obligation of each party to
effect the Amalgamation shall be subject to the satisfaction
prior to the Closing of the following conditions, unless waived
by both IPC and Validus:
(a) Shareholder Approval. Validus shall have
obtained the Required Validus Vote, and IPC shall have obtained
the Required IPC Vote.
(b) NYSE Listing. The Listed Validus Common Shares
shall have been authorized for listing on NYSE, subject to
official notice of issuance.
(c) Requisite Regulatory Approvals. The
authorizations, consents, orders or approvals of, or
declarations or filings with, and the expirations of waiting
periods required from, any Governmental Entity set forth in
Section 6.1(c) of the Validus Disclosure Letter and
Section 6.1(c) of the IPC Disclosure Letter, to the extent
required, shall have been filed, have occurred or been obtained
(all such permits, approvals, filings and consents and the lapse
of all such waiting periods being referred to as the
Requisite Regulatory Approvals).
(d) Form S-4.
The
Form S-4
shall have become effective under the Securities Act and shall
not be the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a
stop order.
(e) No Injunctions or Restraints; Illegality. No
temporary restraining order, preliminary or permanent injunction
or other order issued by any court of competent jurisdiction
preventing the consummation of the Amalgamation shall be in
effect. There shall not be any action taken, or any Law enacted,
entered, enforced or made applicable to the Amalgamation, by any
Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction that makes the
consummation of the Amalgamation illegal or otherwise restrains,
enjoins or prohibits the Amalgamation.
-35-
6.2 Conditions to Obligation of IPC. The obligation
of IPC to effect the Amalgamation is subject to the satisfaction
of the following conditions unless waived by IPC:
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) The
representations and warranties of Validus set forth in
Section 3.8 shall be true and correct in all respects as of
the date hereof and the Closing Date as though made on and as of
the Closing Date, (ii) the representations and warranties
of Validus (and Amalgamation Sub, as applicable) set forth in
Sections 3.2, 3.3(a), 3.9(b) (other than in the case of a
Change in Validus Recommendation pursuant to
Section 5.4(b)), 3.10(a) and 3.22 shall be true and correct
in all material respects as of the date hereof and the Closing
Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for
such representations and warranties made only as of a specified
date, which shall be true and correct in all material respects
as of such date) and (iii) each of the other
representations and warranties of Validus set forth in
ARTICLE III of this Agreement shall be true and correct in
all respects as of the date hereof and the Closing Date as
though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for such
representations and warranties made only as of a specified date,
which shall be true and correct as of such date), except where
the failure of any such representations and warranties to be
true and correct (without giving effect to any
materiality or Material Adverse Effect
or similar qualifier set forth therein) has not had and would
not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on Validus.
(b) Performance of Obligations of Validus. Validus
shall have performed or complied in all respects with all
agreements and covenants required to be performed by it under
this Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date that are
qualified as to materiality or Material Adverse Effect, and
shall have performed or complied in all material respects with
all other obligations required to be performed by it under this
Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Certification. IPC shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of Validus by the Chief Executive
Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of Validus, certifying
that the conditions set forth in Section 6.2(a) and
Section 6.2(b) have been satisfied.
(d) Burdensome Regulatory Condition. There shall not
be any action taken, or any Law enacted, entered, enforced or
deemed applicable to the Amalgamation or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement by any Governmental Entity of
competent jurisdiction (including any Requisite Regulatory
Approval), which imposes any term, condition, obligation or
restriction upon Validus, the Amalgamated Company or their
respective subsidiaries that would, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on Validus and its subsidiaries (including the
Amalgamated Company and its subsidiaries) on a consolidated
basis after the Effective Time.
(e) Opinion of Tax Counsel. IPC shall have received
an opinion from Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, special
counsel to IPC, dated the Closing Date, to the effect that, on
the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions set
forth or referred to in such opinion, (i) the
Amalgamation will be treated for U.S. federal income tax
purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of IPC and
Validus will be a party to that reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code and (iii) IPC
will be treated, in respect of any shareholder who will own
after the Amalgamation less than five percent of the issued IPC
Common Shares (as determined under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.367(a)-3(b)(1)(i)),
as a corporation under Section 367(a) of the Code with
respect to each transfer of property thereto pursuant to the
Amalgamation. In rendering its opinion, Sullivan &
Cromwell LLP may require and rely upon representations contained
in letters from each of IPC and Validus.
6.3 Conditions to Obligation of Validus. The
obligation of Validus to effect the Amalgamation is subject to
the satisfaction of the following conditions unless waived by
Validus:
(a) Representations and Warranties. (i) The
representations and warranties of IPC set forth in
Section 3.8 shall be true and correct in all respects as of
the date hereof and the Closing Date as though made on and as of
the Closing Date, (ii) the representations and warranties
of IPC set forth in Sections 3.2, 3.3(a), 3.9(a) (other
than in the case of a Change in IPC Recommendation pursuant to
Section 5.4(b)), 3.10(b) and 3.22 shall be true and correct
in all material respects as of the date hereof and the Closing
Date as though made on and as of the Closing Date (except for
such representations and warranties made only as of a specified
date,
-36-
which shall be true and correct in all material respects as of
such date) and (iii) each of the other representations and
warranties of IPC set forth in ARTICLE III of this
Agreement shall be true and correct in all respects as of the
date hereof and the Closing Date as though made on and as of the
Closing Date (except for such representations and warranties
made only as of a specified date, which shall be true and
correct as of such date), except where the failure of any such
representations and warranties to be true and correct (without
giving effect to any materiality or Material
Adverse Effect or similar qualifier set forth therein) has
not had, and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect on
IPC.
(b) Performance of Obligations of IPC. IPC shall
have performed or complied in all respects with all agreements
and covenants required to be performed by it under this
Agreement at or prior to the Closing Date that are qualified as
to materiality or Material Adverse Effect, and shall have
performed or complied in all material respects with all other
obligations required to be performed by it under this Agreement
at or prior to the Closing Date.
(c) Certification. Validus shall have received a
certificate signed on behalf of IPC by the Chief Executive
Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of IPC, certifying that
the conditions set forth in Section 6.3(a) and
Section 6.3(b) have been satisfied.
(d) Burdensome Regulatory Condition. There shall not
be any action taken, or any Law enacted, entered, enforced or
deemed applicable to the Amalgamation or the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement by any Governmental Entity of
competent jurisdiction (including any Requisite Regulatory
Approval), which imposes any term, condition, obligation or
restriction upon Validus, the Amalgamated Company or their
respective subsidiaries that would, individually or the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on Validus and its subsidiaries (including the
Amalgamated Company and its subsidiaries) on a consolidated
basis after the Effective Time.
(e) Opinion of Tax Counsel. Validus shall have
received an opinion from Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP,
special counsel to Validus, dated the Closing Date, to the
effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations and
assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, (i)
the Amalgamation will be treated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, (ii) each of IPC and
Validus will be a party to that reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(b) of the Code and (iii) IPC
will be treated, in respect of any shareholder who will own
after the Amalgamation less than five percent of the issued IPC
Common Shares (as determined under Treasury Regulations
Section 1.367(a)-3(b)(1)(i)),
as a corporation under Section 367(a) of the Code with
respect to each transfer of property thereto pursuant to the
Amalgamation. In rendering its opinion, Cahill
Gordon & Reindel LLP may require and rely upon
representations contained in letters from each of IPC and
Validus.
(f) Credit Facility Waivers. All amendments or
waivers under (x) IPCs credit facilities and
(y) Validus credit facilities, in each case, as
determined by Validus to be necessary to consummate the
Amalgamation and the other transactions contemplated hereby,
shall be in full force and effect.
ARTICLE VII
TERMINATION
AND AMENDMENT
7.1 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated,
at any time prior to the Effective Time, by action taken or
authorized by the board of directors of the terminating party or
parties, whether before or after any Required Shareholder Vote
has been obtained only:
(a) by mutual consent of IPC, Amalgamation Sub and Validus
in a written instrument;
(b) by either IPC or Validus, upon written notice to the
other party, if a Governmental Entity of competent jurisdiction
that must grant a Requisite Regulatory Approval has denied such
Requisite Regulatory Approval and such denial has become final
and non-appealable; or any Governmental Entity of competent
jurisdiction shall have issued an order, judgment, decision,
decree or ruling or taken any other action permanently
restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the
Amalgamation, and such order, decree, ruling
-37-
or other action has become final and non-appealable;
provided that the right to terminate this Agreement under
this Section 7.1(b) shall not be available to any party
whose failure to comply in any material respect with
Section 5.3 or any other provision of this Agreement has
been the direct cause of, or resulted directly in, such action;
(c) by either IPC or Validus, upon written notice to the
other party, if the Amalgamation shall not have been consummated
on or before the later of (x) November 30, 2009 or
(y) the date that is five months after the date of
execution of this Agreement by all parties; provided that
the right to terminate this Agreement under this
Section 7.1(c) shall not be available to any party whose
failure to comply in any material respect with any provision of
this Agreement has been the direct cause of, or resulted
directly in, the failure of the Effective Time to occur on or
before such date;
(d) by IPC or Validus, upon written notice to the other
party, if the non-terminating partys board of directors
shall have (i) effected a Change in Validus
Recommendation or Change in IPC Recommendation, as the case may
be (including by amending or supplementing the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus to effect a Change in Validus
Recommendation or Change in IPC Recommendation, as the case may
be), (ii) failed to include the Validus Recommendation or
IPC Recommendation, as the case may be, in the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus in accordance with Section 5.1(b) or
5.1(c), or (iii) with respect to IPC only, materially
breached its obligations under Section 5.5(a)(iii) or
5.5(d);
(e) by either IPC or Validus if the terminating party is
not in material breach of its obligations under this Agreement,
upon written notice to the other party, if there shall have been
a breach by the other party of any of the covenants or
agreements or any of the representations or warranties set forth
in this Agreement on the part of such other party, which breach
would, individually or in the aggregate, result in, if occurring
or continuing on the Closing Date, the failure of the conditions
set forth in Section 6.2(a) or 6.2(b) or
Section 6.3(a) or 6.3(b), as the case may be, and which
breach has not been cured within 45 days following written
notice thereof to the breaching party or, by its nature, cannot
be cured within such time period;
(f) by either IPC or Validus, if the Required IPC Vote or
Required Validus Vote shall not have been obtained upon a vote
taken thereon at the duly convened IPC Shareholders Meeting or
Validus Shareholders Meeting, as the case may be, or any
adjournment or postponement thereof at which the applicable vote
was taken;
(g) by Validus, if the total number of Dissenting Shares
exceeds 15% of the issued and outstanding IPC Common Shares on
the business day immediately following the last day on which the
holders of IPC Common Shares can require appraisal of their IPC
Common Shares pursuant to Bermuda Law;
(h) by IPC, after the IPC Shareholders Meeting, if
(i) IPC is a Requesting Party and (ii) it is
determined, in accordance with Section 5.16, that
(A) Validus has experienced a 50% Book Value Decline or
(B) there is a 20% Differential Book Value Decline and
Validuss book value has declined by a greater percentage
than IPCs book value; or
(i) by Validus, after the Validus Shareholders Meeting, if
(i) Validus is a Requesting Party and (ii) it is
determined, in accordance with Section 5.16, that
(A) IPC has experienced a 50% Book Value Decline or
(B) there is a 20% Differential Book Value Decline and
IPCs book value has declined by a greater percentage than
Validuss book value.
7.2 Effect of Termination.
(a) In the event of termination of this Agreement by either
Validus or IPC as provided in Section 7.1, this Agreement
shall forthwith become void, and there shall be no liability or
obligation on the part of IPC, Amalgamation Sub or Validus or
their respective officers or directors under or arising from
this Agreement, except with respect to Section 5.2(b)
(Confidentiality), Section 5.7 (Fees and Expenses), this
Section 7.2 (Effect of Termination), and ARTICLE VIII
(General Provisions), which shall survive such termination,
except that no party shall be relieved or released from any
liabilities or damages arising out of its willful breach of this
Agreement.
-38-
(b) If IPC or Validus, as the case may be, terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(d), then the
non-terminating party shall, as promptly as reasonably
practicable (and, in any event, within three business days
following such termination), pay to the terminating party, by
wire transfer of immediately available funds, $16,000,000 (the
Termination Fee).
(c) If either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(c), and (i) prior to the later of
(x) November 30, 2009 or (y) the date that is
five months after the date of execution of this Agreement by all
parties, an Acquisition Proposal (which for the purposes of this
Section 7.2(c) shall apply to an Acquisition Proposal for
either IPC or Validus) shall have been publicly announced or
otherwise communicated to the officers of the non-terminating
party or its board of directors, and (ii) within
12 months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, the non-terminating party enters into or consummates
an Acquisition Transaction with the person (or its affiliate)
that made such Acquisition Proposal, then the non-terminating
party shall pay to the terminating party upon the earlier of the
date of such execution or such consummation, by wire transfer of
immediately available funds, the Termination Fee.
(d) If either party terminates this Agreement pursuant to
Section 7.1(e) and (i) at any time after the date of
this Agreement and at or before the date of the Validus
Shareholders Meeting (if Validus is the non-terminating party)
or the IPC Shareholders Meeting (if IPC is the non-terminating
party), as the case may be, an Acquisition Proposal (which for
the purposes of this Section 7.2(d) shall apply to an
Acquisition Proposal for either IPC or Validus) shall have been
publicly announced or otherwise communicated to the officers of
the non-terminating party or its board of directors, and
(ii) within 12 months of the date of such termination
of this Agreement, the non-terminating party enters into or
consummates an Acquisition Transaction with the person (or its
affiliate) that made such Acquisition Proposal, then the
non-terminating party shall pay to the terminating party upon
the earlier of the date of such execution or such consummation,
by wire transfer of immediately available funds, the Termination
Fee.
(e) If IPC or Validus, as the case may be, terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) because the Required
Validus Vote has not been obtained (and, if IPC is the
terminating party, the Required IPC Vote has not been taken yet
or has already been obtained), and if (i) at any time on
or after the date of this Agreement and at or before the date of
the Validus Shareholders Meeting, an Acquisition Proposal (which
for the purposes of this Section 7.2(e) shall apply to an
Acquisition Proposal for Validus) shall have been publicly
announced or otherwise communicated to the officers of Validus
or Validuss board of directors, and (ii) within
12 months of the date of such termination of this
Agreement, Validus or any of its subsidiaries enters into or
consummates an Acquisition Transaction with the person (or its
affiliate) that made such Acquisition Proposal, then Validus
shall pay the Termination Fee to IPC upon the earlier of the
date of such execution or such consummation.
(f) If IPC or Validus, as the case may be, terminates this
Agreement pursuant to Section 7.1(f) because the Required
IPC Vote has not been obtained (and, if Validus is the
terminating party, the Required Validus Vote has not been taken
yet or has already been obtained) and (i) at any time on or
after the date of this Agreement and at or before the date of
the IPC Shareholders Meeting, an Acquisition Proposal (which for
the purposes of this Section 7.2(f) shall apply to an
Acquisition Proposal for IPC) is publicly announced or otherwise
communicated to the officers of IPC or IPCs board of
directors, and (ii) within 12 months of the date of
such termination of this Agreement, IPC or any of its
subsidiaries enters into or consummates an Acquisition
Transaction with the person (or its affiliate) that made such
Acquisition Proposal, then IPC shall pay the Termination Fee to
Validus upon the earlier of the date of such execution or such
consummation.
ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
8.1 Non-Survival of Representations, Warranties and
Agreements. Except for Section 5.8 and any provision of
this ARTICLE VIII to the extent it is related to a claim
under Section 5.8, none of the representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements in this Agreement or in any instrument
delivered pursuant to this Agreement, including any rights
arising out of any breach of such representations, warranties,
-39-
covenants, and agreements, shall survive the Effective Time,
except for those covenants and agreements contained herein and
therein that by their terms apply or are to be performed in
whole or in part after the Effective Time.
8.2 Notices. All notices and other communications
hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given
(a) on the date of delivery if delivered personally, or
by email, telecopy or facsimile, upon confirmation of receipt,
(b) on the first business day following the date of
dispatch if delivered by a recognized
next-day
courier service, or (c) on the third business day
following the date of mailing if delivered by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid. All
notices hereunder shall be delivered as set forth below or
pursuant to such other instructions as may be designated in
writing by the party to receive such notice.
(a) If to IPC, to
|
|
|
|
IPC Holdings, Ltd.
29 Richmond Road
Pembroke HM 08
Bermuda
Attention:
|
James P. Bryce
John R. Weale
Facsimile: +1
(441) 292-8085
|
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
|
|
|
|
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Attention:
|
Andrew S. Rowen, Esq.
Melissa Sawyer, Esq.
Facsimile: +1
(212) 558-3588
|
(b) If to Validus, to
|
|
|
|
Validus Holdings Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton, HM 11
Bermuda
Attention:
|
C. Jerome Dill
Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
Facsimile: +1
(441) 278-9000
|
with a copy to (which shall not constitute notice):
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
80 Pine Street
New York, NY 10005
Attention: John Schuster, Esq.
Facsimile: +1
(212) 701-3000
8.3 Interpretation. When a reference is made in this
Agreement to sections or subsections, such reference shall be to
a section or subsection of this Agreement unless otherwise
indicated. The table of contents and headings contained in this
Agreement are for reference purposes only and shall not affect
in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
Whenever the words include, includes or
including are used in this Agreement, they shall be
deemed to be followed by the words without
limitation. The words herein,
hereof, hereunder and words of similar
import shall be deemed to refer to this Agreement as a whole,
including the schedules and exhibits hereto, and not to any
particular provision of this Agreement. Any pronoun shall
include the corresponding masculine, feminine and neuter forms.
References to party or parties in this
Agreement mean IPC, Amalgamation Sub
and/or
Validus, as the case may be. References to
-40-
person in this Agreement mean an individual, a
company, a corporation, a limited liability company, a
partnership, an association, a trust or any other entity or
organization, including a government or political subdivision or
any agency or instrumentality thereof. References to
subsidiary in this Agreement means, as to any
person, any other person of which more than 50% of the effective
voting power or equity or other ownership interests is directly
or indirectly owned by such person. References to
affiliate in this Agreement means, as to any person,
any other person which, directly or indirectly, controls, or is
controlled by, or is under common control with, such person. As
used in this Agreement, control (including, with its
correlative meanings, controlled by and under
common control with) means the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of
management or policies of a person, whether through the
ownership of securities or partnership or other ownership
interests, by contract or otherwise. As used in this Agreement,
knowledge means the actual knowledge, without due
inquiry, of the officers of Validus set forth in
Section 8.3 of the Validus Disclosure Letter or the
officers of IPC set forth in Section 8.3 of the IPC
Disclosure Letter, as the case may be. References to US
dollar, dollars, US$ or
$ in this Agreement are to the lawful currency of
the United States of America. As used in this Agreement,
business day means any day other than a Saturday,
Sunday or other day on which banking institutions in New York or
Bermuda are obligated by Law or executive order to be closed.
8.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
separate counterparts, each of which shall be considered one and
the same agreement and shall become effective when each of the
parties has delivered a signed counterpart to the other parties,
it being understood that all parties need not sign the same
counterpart. Such counterpart executions may be transmitted to
the parties by facsimile or electronic transmission, which shall
have the full force and effect of an original signature.
8.5 Entire Agreement; No Third Party Beneficiaries.
This Agreement (including the Validus Disclosure Letter and the
IPC Disclosure Letter) (a) constitutes the entire agreement
and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both
written and oral, between the parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof which shall survive the execution and
delivery of this Agreement and shall terminate in accordance
with its terms and (b) is not intended to confer upon any
person other than the parties any rights or remedies hereunder,
except (i) for the rights of the holders of IPC Common
Shares to receive the Amalgamation Consideration pursuant to and
subject to this Agreement if the Effective Time occurs, and
(ii) as provided in Section 5.8(c).
8.6 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed
in all respects, including as to validity, interpretation and
effect, by the Laws of Bermuda, without giving effect to its
principles or rules of conflict of laws.
8.7 Severability. Any term or provision of this
Agreement which is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction
shall, as to that jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of
such invalidity or unenforceability and, unless the effect of
such invalidity or unenforceability would prevent the parties
from realizing the major portion of the economic benefits of the
Amalgamation that they currently anticipate obtaining therefrom,
shall not render invalid or unenforceable the remaining terms
and provisions of this Agreement or affect the validity or
enforceability of any of the terms or provisions of this
Agreement in any other jurisdiction. If any provision of this
Agreement is so broad as to be unenforceable, the provision
shall be interpreted to be only so broad as is enforceable.
8.8 Assignment. Neither this Agreement nor any of
the rights, interests or obligations of the parties hereunder
shall be assigned by any of the parties (whether by operation of
Law or otherwise) without the prior written consent of the other
parties, which may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion
of the other parties. Any attempt to make any such assignment
without such consent shall be null and void. Subject to the
preceding sentence, this Agreement will be binding upon, inure
to the benefit of and be enforceable by the parties and their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
8.9 Enforcement. The parties agree that money
damages would be both incalculable and an insufficient remedy
and that irreparable damage would occur in the event that any of
the provisions of this Agreement were not performed in
accordance with their specific terms on a timely basis or were
otherwise breached. It is accordingly agreed that, subject to
the discretion of the Chosen Court (as defined in
Section 8.10), the parties shall be entitled to an
injunction or other equitable relief to prevent breaches of this
Agreement and to enforce
-41-
specifically the terms and provisions of this Agreement in any
court identified in Section 8.10, this being in addition to
any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in equity.
8.10 Submission to Jurisdiction. Each party
irrevocably and unconditionally consents, agrees and submits to
the exclusive jurisdiction of the Bermuda Supreme Court (and
appropriate appellate courts therefrom) (the Chosen
Courts), for the purposes of any litigation, action,
suit or other proceeding arising out of or relating to this
Agreement or any transaction contemplated hereby. Each party
agrees to commence any litigation, action, suit or proceeding
relating hereto only in the Bermuda Supreme Court, or if such
litigation, action, suit or other proceeding may not be brought
in such court for reasons of subject matter jurisdiction, in the
other appellate courts therefrom or other courts of Bermuda.
Each party irrevocably and unconditionally waives any objection
to the laying of venue of any litigation, action, suit or
proceeding arising out of this Agreement or the transactions
contemplated hereby in the Chosen Courts, and hereby further
irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead
or claim in any such court that any such action, suit or
proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum. Each party further irrevocably consents to
and grants any such court jurisdiction over the person of such
parties and, to the extent legally effective, over the subject
matter of any such dispute and agrees that mailing of process or
other papers in connection with any such action or proceeding in
the manner provided in Section 8.2 or in such other manner
as may be permitted by Law, shall be valid and sufficient
service thereof. The parties agree that a final judgment in any
such suit, action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be
enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in
any other manner provided by Law.
8.11 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the
parties, by action taken or authorized by their respective
Boards of Directors, at any time before or after approval of the
matters presented in connection with the Amalgamation by the
shareholders of Validus or of IPC, but, after any such approval,
no amendment shall be made which by Law requires further
approval by such shareholders without such further approval.
This Agreement may not be amended except by an instrument in
writing signed on behalf of each of the parties by their duly
authorized representatives.
8.12 Extension; Waiver. At any time prior to the
Effective Time, the parties may, to the extent legally allowed,
(i) extend the time for the performance of any of the
obligations or other acts of the other party, (ii) waive
any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained
herein or in any document delivered pursuant hereto and
(iii) waive compliance with any of the agreements or
conditions contained herein. Any agreement on the part of a
party to any such extension or waiver shall be valid only if set
forth in a written instrument signed on behalf of such party.
The failure of a party to assert any of its rights under this
Agreement or otherwise shall not constitute a waiver of those
rights. No single or partial exercise of any right, remedy,
power or privilege hereunder shall preclude any other or further
exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, remedy,
power or privilege. Any waiver shall be effective only in the
specific instance and for the specific purpose for which given
and shall not constitute a waiver to any subsequent or other
exercise of any right, remedy, power or privilege hereunder.
8.13 Defined Terms.
(a) For purposes of this Agreement, each of the following
terms shall have the meaning set forth below.
Acquisition Transaction means with respect to
any person, any amalgamation, merger, reorganization, share
exchange, consolidation, business combination, recapitalization,
liquidation, dissolution or similar transaction involving it or
any of its subsidiaries or any purchase or sale of 35% or more
of the consolidated assets (including, without limitation, stock
of its subsidiaries) of it and its subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, or any purchase or sale of, or tender or exchange offer
for, its voting securities that, if consummated, would result in
any person (or the shareholders of such person) beneficially
owning securities representing 35% or more of its total voting
power or the voting power of any of its subsidiaries.
Average Validus Share Price means the volume
weighted average price per Validus Common Share on the NYSE (as
reported by Bloomberg L.P. or, if not reported thereby, by
another authoritative source mutually agreed by the parties) for
the five consecutive trading days immediately preceding the
second trading day prior
-42-
to the Closing Date. For all purposes of this Agreement, the
Average Validus Share Price shall be calculated to the nearest
one-hundredth of one cent.
Compensation and Benefit Plan means any
pension, retirement, profit-sharing, deferred compensation,
stock option, restricted stock unit, equity-based compensation,
performance units, employee stock ownership, severance pay,
vacation, retention or other bonus or incentive plan, any other
employee program or agreement, any medical, vision, dental, or
other health plan, any life insurance plan, and any other
employee benefit plan or fringe benefit plan, whether or not
tax-qualified or otherwise tax-preferred, maintained by,
sponsored in whole or in part by, or contributed to by IPC or
Validus or their subsidiaries, as the case may be, for the
benefit of their employees, former employees, retirees,
dependents, spouses, directors, independent contractors, or
other beneficiaries and under which such employees, former
employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, independent
contractors, or other beneficiaries are eligible to participate
and any employment, retention, change in control, severance,
termination, consulting or retirement agreement with their
current or former employees.
IM Agreement means the Agreement and Plan of
Amalgamation, dated as of March 1, 2009, between IPC, IPC
Limited, a Bermuda exempted company and Max Capital Group Ltd.,
a Bermuda exempted company, as amended on March 5, 2009.
Intellectual Property means (i)
trademarks, service marks, Internet domain names, logos, trade
dress, trade names, corporate names and any and every other form
of trade identity or indicia of origin, and the goodwill
associated therewith and symbolized thereby; (ii)
inventions, discoveries and patents, and the improvements
thereto; (iii) published and unpublished works of
authorship and the copyrights therein and thereto (including
databases and other compilations of information, computer and
electronic data processing programs and software, in both source
code and object code); (iv) trade secrets, confidential
business and technical information and any other confidential
information (including ideas, research and development,
know-how, formulae, calculations, algorithms, models, designs,
processes, business methods, customer lists and supplier lists)
(Trade Secrets); (v) all rights in
data and data bases; (vi) all other intellectual property
or similar proprietary rights; and (vii) all
applications, registrations and renewals for the foregoing.
IPC Benefit Plan means only those
Compensation and Benefit Plans maintained by, sponsored in whole
or in part by, or contributed to by IPC or its subsidiaries for
the benefit of their employees, former employees, retirees,
dependents, spouses, directors, independent contractors, or
other beneficiaries and under which such employees, former
employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, independent
contractors, or other beneficiaries are eligible to participate
or with respect to which IPC or any of its subsidiaries has any
liability.
Material Adverse Effect means, with respect
to any party, any change, state of facts, circumstance, event or
effect that is materially adverse to (A) the financial
condition, properties, assets, liabilities, obligations (whether
accrued, absolute, contingent or otherwise), businesses or
results of operations of such party and its subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, excluding any such change, state of facts,
circumstance, event or effect to the extent caused by or
resulting from:
(i) the execution, delivery and announcement of this
Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby,
(ii) changes in economic, market, business, regulatory or
political conditions generally in the United States or in
Bermuda or any other jurisdiction in which such party operates
or in Bermudian, U.S. or global financial markets,
(iii) changes, circumstances or events generally affecting
the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry in
the geographic areas in which such party operates,
(iv) changes, circumstances or events resulting in
liabilities under property catastrophe reinsurance, including
any effects resulting from any earthquake, hurricane, tornado,
windstorm, terrorist act, act of war or other natural or
man-made disaster,
(v) changes in any Law,
-43-
(vi) changes in generally accepted accounting principles or
in statutory accounting principles (or local equivalents in the
applicable jurisdiction) prescribed by the applicable insurance
regulatory authority (GAAP and
Applicable SAP, respectively), including
accounting and financial reporting pronouncements by the Bermuda
Monetary Authority, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC), the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners and the Financial Accounting Standards Board,
(vii) any change or announcement of a potential change in
its or any of its subsidiaries credit or claims paying
rating or A.M. Best rating or the ratings of any of its or
its subsidiaries businesses or securities (provided
that this exception shall not prevent or otherwise affect a
determination that any changes, state of facts, circumstances,
events or effects underlying a change described in this
clause (vii) has resulted in, or contributed to, a Material
Adverse Effect),
(viii) a change in the trading prices or volume of such
partys capital stock (provided that this exception
shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any
changes, state of facts, circumstances, events or effects
underlying a change described in this clause (viii) has
resulted in, or contributed to, a Material Adverse Effect),
(ix) the failure to meet any revenue, earnings or other
projections, forecasts or predictions for any period ending
after the date of this Agreement (provided that this
exception shall not prevent or otherwise affect a determination
that any state of facts, circumstances, events or effects
underlying a failure described in this clause (ix) has
resulted in, or contributed to, a Material Adverse Effect),
(x) the commencement, occurrence or continuation of any war
or armed hostilities, or
(xi) any action or failure to act required to be taken by a
party pursuant to the terms of this Agreement,
except in the case of the foregoing clauses (ii), (iii), (v),
(vi) and (x) to the extent those changes, state of
facts, circumstances, events, or effects have a materially
disproportionate effect on such party and its subsidiaries taken
as a whole relative to other similarly situated persons in the
property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry,
and/or
(B) the ability of such party to perform its obligations
under this Agreement or to consummate the transactions
contemplated hereby on a timely basis.
Permitted Encumbrance means (i)
statutory liens securing payments not yet due, (ii) such
imperfections or irregularities of title, claims, liens,
charges, security interests or encumbrances as do not affect the
use of the properties or assets subject thereto or affected
thereby or otherwise impair business operations at such
properties, (iii) restrictions on transfer imposed by
Law, (iv) assets pledged or transferred to secure
reinsurance or retrocession obligations, (v)
ordinary-course securities lending and short-sale transactions,
(vi) investment securities held in the name of a nominee,
custodian or other record owner, (vii) statutory
deposits, or (viii) any failure to hold good title, in
each case, that would not be reasonably expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Material Adverse Effect.
Tax means (i) all federal, state,
local or foreign taxes, charges, fees, imposts, levies or other
assessments, including all income, gross receipts, capital,
sales, use, ad valorem, value added, transfer, franchise,
profits, inventory, capital stock, license, withholding,
payroll, employment, social security, unemployment, excise,
premium, severance, stamp, occupation, property and estimated
taxes, customs duties, fees, assessments and charges of any kind
whatsoever, (ii) all interest, penalties, fines,
additions to tax or additional amounts imposed by any Taxing
Authority in connection with any item described in clause (i),
and (iii) any transferee liability in respect of any
items described in clauses (i) or (ii) payable by
reason of contract, assumption, transferee liability, operation
of Law, Treasury
Regulation Section 1.1502-6(a)
(or any predecessor or successor thereof of any analogous or
similar provision under Law) or otherwise.
Tax Asset means any loss, net operating loss,
net capital loss, investment tax credit, foreign tax credit,
charitable deduction, or any other credit or Tax attribute that
could be carried forward or carried back to reduce Taxes.
Tax Return means any return, report or
statement filed or required to be filed with respect to any Tax
(including any elections, declarations, schedules or attachments
thereto, and any amendment thereof) including
-44-
any information return, claim for refund, amended return or
declaration of estimated Tax, and including, where permitted or
required, combined, consolidated or unitary returns for any
group of entities that includes IPC, Validus or any subsidiaries
thereof.
Taxing Authority means the Internal Revenue
Service or any other Governmental Entity responsible for the
administration of any Tax.
Validus Benefit Plan means only those
Compensation and Benefit Plans maintained by, sponsored in whole
or in part by, or contributed to by Validus or its subsidiaries
for the benefit of their employees, former employees, retirees,
dependents, spouses, directors, independent contractors, or
other beneficiaries and under which such employees, former
employees, retirees, dependents, spouses, directors, independent
contractors, or other beneficiaries are eligible to participate
or with respect to which Validus or any of its subsidiaries has
any liability.
(b) Each of the following terms is defined in the provision
listed opposite such term:
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
20% Differential Book Value Decline
|
|
5.16(e)
|
50% Book Value Decline
|
|
5.16(d)
|
Acquisition Proposal
|
|
5.5(a)(i)
|
Acquisition Transaction
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Administrator
|
|
3.12(h)
|
affiliate
|
|
8.3
|
Agent
|
|
3.12(h)
|
Agreement
|
|
Introduction
|
Amalgamated Company
|
|
1.3
|
Amalgamation
|
|
Recitals
|
Amalgamation Agreement
|
|
1.1
|
Amalgamation Application
|
|
1.1
|
Amalgamation Consideration
|
|
2.1(a)
|
Amalgamation Sub
|
|
Introduction
|
Applicable SAP
|
|
8.13(a) (See Material Adverse Effect)
|
Average Validus Share Price
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Book Value Estimate
|
|
5.16(a)
|
business day
|
|
8.3
|
Change in Validus Recommendation
|
|
5.4(a)
|
Change in IPC Recommendation
|
|
5.4(a)
|
Chosen Courts
|
|
8.10
|
Closing
|
|
1.2
|
Closing Date
|
|
1.2
|
Code
|
|
Recitals
|
Companies Act
|
|
Recitals
|
Compensation and Benefit Plan
|
|
8.13(a)
|
control
|
|
8.3
|
Disclosure Letter
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
Dissenting Shareholder
|
|
2.1(c)
|
Dissenting Shares
|
|
2.1(c)
|
-45-
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Effective Time
|
|
1.1
|
Employees
|
|
5.12(b)
|
ERISA
|
|
3.15(e)
|
Exchange Act
|
|
3.4(a)
|
Exchange Agent
|
|
2.2(a)
|
Exchange Fund
|
|
2.2(a)
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
2.1(a)
|
Financing
|
|
4.2(a)
|
Form S-4
|
|
5.1(a)
|
GAAP
|
|
8.13(a) (See Material Adverse Effect)
|
Governmental Entity
|
|
3.3(c)
|
Greenhill
|
|
3.19
|
IM Agreement
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Indemnified Parties
|
|
5.8(a)
|
Insurance Entities
|
|
3.12(a)
|
Insurance Laws
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Intellectual Property
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Investment Assets
|
|
3.13(a)
|
Investment Policy
|
|
3.13(c)
|
IPC
|
|
Introduction
|
IPC Benefit Plan
|
|
8.13(a)
|
IPC Bye-Law Amendment
|
|
3.9(a)
|
IPC Certificate
|
|
2.1
|
IPC Common Share
|
|
2.1
|
IPC Disclosure Letter
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
IPC Non-Performance Awards
|
|
2.3(b)
|
IPC Other Awards
|
|
2.3(b)
|
IPC Performance Awards
|
|
2.3(b)
|
IPC Recommendation
|
|
3.9(a)
|
IPC Share Option
|
|
2.3(a)
|
IPC Share Plans
|
|
3.2(a)
|
IPC Share Register
|
|
2.1
|
IPC Shareholders Meeting
|
|
5.1(c)
|
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
|
|
5.1(a)
|
JP Morgan
|
|
3.19
|
knowledge
|
|
8.3
|
Laws
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
3.6
|
Listed Validus Common Shares
|
|
5.13
|
Lloyds
|
|
3.5(a)
|
-46-
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Lloyds Regulations
|
|
3.12(m)
|
Material Adverse Effect
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Material Contract
|
|
3.14(a)
|
Measurement Date
|
|
5.16(a)
|
multiemployer plan
|
|
3.15(e)
|
New Option
|
|
2.3(a)
|
Non-Requesting Party
|
|
5.16(a)
|
Non-Vested PSU
|
|
2.3(b)
|
Notice of Superior Proposal
|
|
5.5(d)
|
Notice Period
|
|
5.5(d)
|
NYSE
|
|
2.1(a)
|
party; parties
|
|
8.3
|
Permits
|
|
3.5(a)
|
Permitted Encumbrance
|
|
8.13(a)
|
person
|
|
8.3
|
Policies
|
|
3.12(g)
|
Registrar
|
|
1.1
|
Reinsurance Agreements
|
|
3.12(e)
|
Representatives
|
|
5.2(b)
|
Requesting Party
|
|
5.16(a)
|
Required IPC Vote
|
|
3.10(b)
|
Required Shareholder Votes
|
|
3.10(b)
|
Required Validus Vote
|
|
3.10(a)
|
Requisite Regulatory Approvals
|
|
6.1(c)
|
SEC
|
|
8.13(a) (See Material Adverse Effect)
|
SEC Documents
|
|
3.4(a)
|
Securities Act
|
|
3.4(a)
|
Share Issuance
|
|
Recitals
|
Statutory Statements
|
|
3.12(b)
|
subsidiary
|
|
8.3
|
Superior Proposal
|
|
5.5(f)
|
Tax
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Tax Asset
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Tax Return
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Taxing Authority
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Termination Fee
|
|
7.2(b)
|
Trade Secrets
|
|
8.13(a) (See Intellectual Property)
|
Underwriting Model
|
|
3.17(c)
|
Validus
|
|
Introduction
|
Validus Benefit Plan
|
|
8.13(a)
|
Validus Common Share
|
|
2.1(a)
|
-47-
|
|
|
Defined Term
|
|
Section
|
|
Validus Disclosure Letter
|
|
ARTICLE III
|
Validus Recommendation
|
|
3.9(b)
|
Validus Share Plans
|
|
3.2(a)
|
Validus Shareholders Meeting
|
|
5.1(b)
|
Voting Debt
|
|
3.2(d)
|
[Remainder
of this page intentionally left blank]
-48-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, IPC, Amalgamation Sub and Validus have
caused this Agreement to be signed by their respective officers
thereunto duly authorized, all as of the date first set forth
above.
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD.
Name: James P. Bryce
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
-49-
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
Name: Edward J. Noonan
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
VALIDUS LTD
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
Name: Joseph E. (Jeff) Consolino
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
-50-
Exhibit A
DATED
[ l ],
2009
VALIDUS LTD. [AMAL 1]
IPC HOLDINGS, LTD. [AMAL 2]
AMALGAMATION
AGREEMENT
THIS AMALGAMATION AGREEMENT is made as of
[ l ],
2009 BETWEEN:
(1) Validus Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda having its registered office at 19 Par-La-Ville
Road, Hamilton, Bermuda (hereinafter called AMAL
1); and
(2) IPC Holdings, Ltd., a company also incorporated under
the laws of Bermuda having its registered office at 29 Richmond
Road, Pembroke, Bermuda (hereinafter called AMAL
2).
WHEREAS:
(A) AMAL 1 was incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda pursuant to the Companies Act 1981, as evidenced by a
memorandum of association dated
[ l ],
2009 and is a company in good standing with the laws of Bermuda;
(B) AMAL 2 was incorporated under the laws of
Bermuda pursuant to the Companies Act 1981, as evidenced by a
memorandum of association dated May 17, 1993 and is a
company in good standing under the laws of Bermuda;
(C) AMAL 1 and AMAL 2, acting under the
authority contained in Section 104 of the Companies Act
1981, have each, by a special general meeting of their Members
held on
[ l ],
200[ l ],
agreed to amalgamate upon the terms and conditions hereinafter
set out;
(D) AMAL 1 and AMAL 2 have each made full
disclosure to the other of all their respective assets and
liabilities;
(E) AMAL 1 has an authorised and issued share
capital of
[ l ]
consisting of
[ l ]
ordinary shares having a par value of
[ l ],
all of which are fully paid;
(F) AMAL 2 has an authorised and issued share
capital of
[ l ]
consisting of
[ l ]
ordinary shares having a par value of
[ l ],
all of which are fully paid;
(G) It is desired by the parties that the said amalgamation
shall be effected.
NOW THEREFORE THE PARTIES HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. In this Agreement:
Amalgamating Companies means AMAL 1
and AMAL 2, the parties hereto;
Amalgamated Company means the Company
continuing from the amalgamation of the Amalgamating Companies;
Amalgamation Agreement or
Agreement means this Amalgamation Agreement;
the Act means the Companies Act 1981, as
amended up to and including the date of this Agreement; and
the Effective Date means
[ l ],
2009, which date is deemed to be the Effective Date of
Amalgamation.
2. Each of the Amalgamating Companies does hereby agree to
amalgamate, as of the close of business on the Effective Date,
under the provisions of the Act and to continue as one company
under the terms and conditions hereinafter set out.
3. The name of the Amalgamated Company shall be
Validus Ltd. (that is, the present name of AMAL
1) and the registered office of the Amalgamated Company
shall be 19 Par-La-Ville Road, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda.
4. The Amalgamated Company shall be governed by the
Memorandum of Association of AMAL 1.
5. The Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company shall, to the
extent that they are not inconsistent with this Agreement, be
the Bye-Laws of AMAL 1, until repealed, amended or
altered.
-2-
6. The Board of Directors of the Amalgamated Company (the
Board of Directors) shall consist of not more than
[ l ] directors,
and the first directors of the Amalgamated Company shall be the
persons whose names and addresses are set out in
Schedule 1, attached hereto, who shall hold office until
the first annual meeting of the Amalgamated Company or until
their successors are elected or appointed.
7. The management and supervision of the business and
affairs of the Amalgamated Company shall be under the control of
the Board of Directors from time to time subject to the
provisions of the Act and the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated
Company.
8. The Amalgamated Company shall have a minimum share
capital of
[ l ]
and an authorised share capital of
[ l ]
divided into
[ l ] shares
having a par value of
[ l ]
each, having all the rights, conditions, restrictions and
limitations set out in the Bye-Laws of the Amalgamated Company.
Such shares shall be allotted or issued to the Shareholders of
the Amalgamated Company on the basis set out in the attached
Schedule 2.
9. After the issue of the Certificate of Amalgamation
giving effect to the Amalgamation contemplated by this
Agreement, the Shareholders of the Amalgamating Companies shall,
at the request of the Amalgamated Company, surrender the
certificates evidencing the shares held by them in the
Amalgamating Companies and, in return, shall be entitled to
receive certificates representing shares of the Amalgamated
Company on the basis set out in the attached Schedule B.
10. AMAL 1 shall contribute to the Amalgamated
Company all its property and assets, subject to all its
liabilities, as more particularly set out in the balance sheet
of AMAL 1 as of
[ l ],
200[ l ],
subject to changes occurring since that date in the ordinary
course of business.
11. AMAL 2 shall contribute to the Amalgamated
Company all its property and assets, subject to all its
liabilities, as more particularly set out in the balance sheet
of AMAL 2 as of
[ l ],
200[ l ],
subject to changes occurring since that date in the ordinary
course of business.
12. The Amalgamated Company shall possess all the property,
assets, rights and privileges and shall be subject to all the
contracts, liabilities, debts and obligations of the
Amalgamating Companies.
13. All the rights of creditors against the property,
assets, rights and privileges of the Amalgamating Companies and
all liens upon their property, rights and assets shall be
unimpaired by such amalgamation and all debts, contracts,
liabilities and duties of the Amalgamating Companies shall
henceforth attach to and may be enforced against the Amalgamated
Company.
14. No action or proceeding by or against the Amalgamating
Companies shall abate or be affected by such amalgamation but,
for the purposes of such action or proceeding, the name of the
Amalgamated Company shall be substituted in such action or
proceeding in place of AMAL 1 and AMAL 2.
15. AMAL 1 and AMAL 2 agree to execute and do
all such acts deeds and things as shall or may be necessary to
give effect to their respective undertakings pursuant to this
Agreement.
-3-
Schedule 1
-
Board of Directors of Amalgamated Company
-4-
Schedule 2
|
|
1.
|
Total
Common Shares to be issued by Amalgamated Company
|
[[ l ]
(insert number of shares in words) Common Shares of the par
value
$[ l ]
([ l ]
dollar) each.]
|
|
2.
|
Share
Issuance Methodology
|
[Each Shareholder of AMAL 1 will receive one share of
Common Stock of the Amalgamated Company for each share of Common
Stock of AMAL 1 which he holds. The Shareholders of
AMAL 2 will receive no shares in the Amalgamated Company
and each of their shares in AMAL 2 (irrespective of
class) will be cancelled.]
|
|
3.
|
Valuation
of Shares in the Amalgamated Company
|
[Each share of the Amalgamated Company shall be entitled to a
pro rata share of the assets of the Amalgamated Company
net of the accumulated liabilities of the Amalgamated Company,
as determined from time to time.]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been duly executed
by the parties hereto under their respective seals as witnessed
by the signatures of their proper officers.
The
Common Seal of AMAL 1 )
is hereunto affixed in the
presence )
of: )
The Common Seal of AMAL 2 )
is hereunto affixed in the
presence )
of: )
-5-
Exhibit E
IPC
Bye-Law Amendment
The following shall be inserted as bye-law 100 under the caption
MEMBER VOTE TO APPROVE AN AMALGAMATION:
90. Amalgamation
A resolution proposed for consideration at a general meeting to
approve the amalgamation of the Company with any other company
shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast by Members present or represented by proxy and voting at
such general meeting and the quorum for such general meeting
shall be as set out in Bye-Law 39.
Exhibit F
Supplement
to Section 4.1 of IPC Disclosure Letter
1. IPC shall be permitted to pay to Max Capital Group Ltd.
the termination fee required to be paid by IPC to Max Capital
Group Ltd. under the IM Agreement, using (i) cash on hand
or (ii) the proceeds of (x) indebtedness incurred
under its existing credit facility or (y) other unsecured
indebtedness reasonably acceptable to Validus, or (iii) the
proceeds from the sale of Investment Assets reasonably
acceptable to Validus.
Annex B
Greenhill & Co., LLC
300 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 389-1500
(212) 389-1700
Fax
CONFIDENTIAL
March 31, 2009
Board of Directors
Validus Holdings, Ltd.
19 Par-La-Ville Road
Hamilton, Bermuda HM 11
Members of the Board of Directors:
We understand that Validus Holdings, Ltd. (the
Parent) and Validus Ltd. (the Amalgamation
Subsidiary) propose to execute and deliver to IPC
Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) an Agreement and Plan
of Amalgamation (the Amalgamation Agreement), which
would provide, among other things, for the amalgamation (the
Amalgamation) of the Company with the Amalgamation
Subsidiary, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Parent. In the
Amalgamation, each issued and outstanding share of common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the Company
Common Stock), other than shares of Company Common Stock
that are owned by Parent or any of its subsidiaries and
Dissenting Shares (as defined in the Amalgamation Agreement),
shall be cancelled and converted into the right to receive a
number of shares of common stock, par value $0.175 per share, of
the Parent (the Parent Common Shares) equal to the
Exchange Ratio (as defined in the Amalgamation Agreement),
together with any cash paid in lieu of fractional shares in
accordance with the terms of the Amalgamation Agreement. The
terms and conditions of the Amalgamation are more fully set
forth in the Amalgamation Agreement.
The Company, IPC Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, and Max Capital Group Ltd. entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Amalgamation, dated as of March 1, 2009, and an
amendment thereto dated as of March 5, 2009.
You have asked for our opinion as to whether, as of the date
hereof, the Exchange Ratio pursuant to the Amalgamation
Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view, to the Parent.
For purposes of the opinion set forth herein, we have:
1. reviewed the Amalgamation Agreement dated as of the date
hereof as executed by Parent and the Amalgamation Subsidiary
(but not the Company as of the date hereof), and certain related
documents;
2. reviewed certain publicly available financial statements
of the Company and Parent;
3. reviewed certain other publicly available business and
financial information relating to the Company and Parent that we
deemed relevant;
4. reviewed certain information, including financial
forecasts and other financial and operating data concerning the
Parent prepared by the management of the Parent;
5. discussed the past and present operations and financial
condition and the prospects of the Parent with senior executives
of the Parent;
6. reviewed the historical market prices and trading
activity for the Company Common Stock and Parent Common Shares
and analyzed their implied valuation multiples;
7. compared the value of the consideration with that
received in certain publicly available transactions that we
deemed relevant;
8. compared the value of the consideration with the trading
valuations of certain publicly traded companies that we deemed
relevant;
9. compared the value of the consideration with the
relative contribution of the Company to the pro forma combined
company based on a number of metrics that we deemed
relevant; and
10. performed such other analyses and considered such other
factors as we deemed appropriate.
However, given the unsolicited nature of the proposed
Amalgamation with the Company, our review and analysis of the
Company and its business and financial information are
necessarily limited to information that is publicly available as
of the date hereof. We have not reviewed financial forecasts and
other financial and operating data concerning the Company
prepared by management of the Company or other nonpublic
information regarding the Company, nor have we participated in
discussions or negotiations among representatives of the Company
and its legal or financial advisor and representatives of the
Parent or its legal advisor.
In giving our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon, without
independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of the
information publicly available, supplied or otherwise made
available to us by representatives and management of the Parent
for the purposes of this opinion and have further relied upon
the assurances of the representatives and management of the
Parent that they are not aware of any facts or circumstances
that would make such information inaccurate or misleading. With
respect to the financial forecasts and projections and other
data that have been furnished or otherwise provided to us, we
have assumed that such financial forecasts and projections and
other data were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the
best currently available estimates and good faith judgments of
the management of the Parent as to those matters, and we have
relied upon such financial forecasts and projections and other
data in arriving at our opinion. We express no opinion with
respect to such financial forecasts and projections and other
data or the assumptions upon which they are based. We have not
made any independent valuation or appraisal of the assets or
liabilities of the Company, nor have we been furnished with any
such appraisals. We have assumed, with your consent, that the
Amalgamation will be treated as a tax-free reorganization for
federal income tax purposes. We have assumed that the
Amalgamation will be consummated in accordance with the terms
set forth in the final, fully executed Amalgamation Agreement,
which we have further assumed will be identical in all material
respects to the proposed Amalgamation Agreement we have
reviewed, and without amendment or waiver of any material terms
or conditions set forth in the Amalgamation Agreement. We have
further assumed that all material governmental, regulatory and
other consents, approvals and waivers necessary for the
consummation of the Amalgamation will be obtained without any
effect on the Company, the Parent, the Amalgamation or the
contemplated benefits of the Amalgamation meaningful to our
analysis. Our opinion is necessarily based on financial,
economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to us as of, the date hereof. It
should be understood that subsequent developments may affect
this opinion, and we do not have any obligation to update,
revise, or reaffirm this opinion.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
the Parent (the Board) in connection with the
Amalgamation and will receive a fee for services rendered in
connection with the Amalgamation, a portion of which is
contingent on the consummation of the Amalgamation. In addition,
the Parent has agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities
arising out of our engagement. During the two years preceding
the date of this opinion, we have not been engaged by, performed
any services for or received any compensation from the Parent or
any other parties to the Amalgamation (other than any amounts
that were paid to us under the letter agreement pursuant to
which we were retained as a financial advisor to the Parent in
connection with the Amalgamation). As of the date of this
opinion, four merchant banking funds affiliated with
Greenhill & Co., LLC owned an aggregate of 2,571,427
Parent Common Shares, and certain employees of
Greenhill & Co., LLC and its affiliates have interests
in one or more of such funds.
-2-
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board, and is rendered to the Board in connection with its
consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amalgamation
Agreement and may not be used for any other purpose without our
prior written consent, except that this opinion may, if required
by law, be included in its entirety in any proxy or other
information statement or registration statement to be mailed to
the stockholders of the Parent in connection with the
Amalgamation. We are not expressing an opinion as to any aspect
of the Amalgamation, other than the fairness to the Parent of
the Exchange Ratio from a financial point of view. In
particular, we express no opinion as to the prices at which the
Parent Common Shares will trade at any future time. We express
no opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any
compensation to any officers, directors or employees of the
Parent, or any class of such persons relative to the Exchange
Ratio or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.
This opinion has been approved by our fairness committee. This
opinion does not address the underlying business decision of the
Parent to engage in the Amalgamation or the relative merits of
the Amalgamation as compared to any other alternative business
strategies that might exist for the Parent and as such is not
intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to the
members of the Board as to whether they should approve the
Amalgamation, or the Amalgamation Agreement or any related
matters. In addition, this opinion is not intended to be and
does not constitute a recommendation as to whether the
stockholders of the Parent should approve the issuance of the
Parent Common Shares in the Amalgamation or take any other
action at any meeting of the shareholders of the Parent convened
in connection with the Amalgamation.
Based on and subject to the foregoing, including the limitations
and assumptions set forth herein, we are of the opinion that as
of the date hereof the Exchange Ratio pursuant to the
Amalgamation Agreement is fair, from a financial point of view,
to the Parent.
Very best regards,
GREENHILL & CO., LLC
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert
F. Greenhill
|
Robert F. Greenhill
Managing Director
-3-
IMPORTANT
If your shares are held in your own name, please sign, date and
return the enclosed proxy card today. If your shares are held in
Street-Name, only your broker or bank can vote your
shares and only upon receipt of your specific instructions.
Please return the enclosed proxy card to your broker or bank and
contact the person responsible for your account to ensure that a
proxy card is voted on your behalf.
If you have any questions or need assistance, please contact:
199 Water Street, 26th Floor
New York, New York 10038
Banks and Brokerage Firms Please Call:
(212) 440-9800
All Others Please Call Toll Free:
(888) 274-5146
Email inquiries: validus@georgeson.com
-4-
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please complete, date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the envelope provided
as soon as possible.
TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE
PROXY
VALIDUS HOLDINGS, LTD.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned holder of voting common shares, $0.175 par
value per share (the Validus Shares), of Validus Holdings,
Ltd. hereby appoints Edward J. Noonan and C.
Jerome Dill, and/or each of them with full power of substitution, to be its proxy and to vote for the undersigned on
all matters arising at the Validus Special Meeting of
Shareholders of Validus Shares or any adjournment thereof, and
to represent the undersigned at such meeting or any
adjournment thereof to be held at , Atlantic
Time, on , 2009 at the registered office of
Validus Holdings, Ltd. at 19 Par-La-Ville Road located in
Hamilton, Bermuda.
THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY WILL BE VOTED WITH THE
INSTRUCTIONS CONTAINED HEREIN. IF A SIGNED PROXY CARD IS
RETURNED AND NO INSTRUCTION IS GIVEN, THE SHARES WILL BE VOTED
FOR THE PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, ALL SAID ITEMS
BEING FULLY DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF SUCH MEETING, DATED
, 2009, AND THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT, RECEIPT
OF WHICH ARE ACKNOWLEDGED. THE UNDERSIGNED RATIFIES AND
CONFIRMS ALL THAT SAID PROXIES OR THEIR SUBSTITUTES MAY
LAWFULLY DO BY VIRTUE HEREOF. THIS PROXY WILL REVOKE (OR BE USED BY THE PROXIES TO REVOKE) ANY PRIOR PROXY DELIVERED IN CONNECTION
WITH THE VALIDUS SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
-114-
THERE ARE THREE WAYS TO AUTHORIZE THE PROXIES TO CAST YOUR VOTES
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you had returned your proxy card. We encourage you to use these cost effective and convenient
ways of voting, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
|
|
|
|
|
TELEPHONE VOTING
|
|
INTERNET VOTING
|
|
VOTING BY MAIL |
|
|
|
|
|
On a touch tone
telephone, call TOLL FREE
(866) 367-5524, 24 hours
a day, 7 days a week.
You will be asked to
enter ONLY the CONTROL
NUMBER shown below. Have
your instruction card
ready, and then follow
the prerecorded
instructions. Your
instructions will be
confirmed and votes cast
as you direct. This
method is available until
11:59 p.m., Eastern
Daylight Time on
, 2009.
|
|
Visit the Internet website at
http://proxy.georgeson.com.
Enter the COMPANY NUMBER and CONTROL
NUMBER shown below and follow the
instructions on your screen. You
will incur only your usual Internet
charges. This method is available
until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight
Time on , 2009.
|
|
Simply complete,
sign and date your
proxy card and
return it in the
postage-paid
envelope. If you
are using telephone
or the Internet,
please do not mail
your proxy card. |
|
|
|
COMPANY NUMBER |
|
CONTROL NUMBER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSALS BELOW. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote on Proposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
(1) To approve the issuance of voting common
shares, $0.175 par value per share of Validus
Holdings, Ltd., in connection with the
acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of
IPC Holdings, Ltd. Pursuant to the Validus
Amalgamation Agreement, the Exchange Offer, the
Scheme of Arrangement (each, as defined in the
enclosed proxy statement) or otherwise.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) To adjourn or postpone the Validus Special
Meeting of Shareholders of Validus Shares, in the
proxies discretion, to solicit additional
proxies.
|
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote and otherwise represent the undersigned on such
other matters as may properly come before the Validus Special Meeting of Shareholders of Validus Shares
or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. If you are acting as an attorney-in-fact, corporate
officer, or in a fiduciary capacity, please indicate the capacity in which you are signing.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] |
Date |
|
Signature (Joint Owners) |
Date |
-115-