PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-133187
This
preliminary prospectus supplement relates to an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, but it
is not complete and may be changed. This preliminary prospectus
supplement is not an offer to sell these securities and it is
not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state
where the offer or sale is not permitted.
|
(Subject to Completion, Dated
May 24, 2006)
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated
April 10, 2006)
$320,000,000
2006-1 PASS THROUGH
TRUSTS
PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
SERIES 2006-1
Two classes of the Continental Airlines Pass Through
Certificates,
Series 2006-1,
are being offered under this prospectus supplement: Class G
and Class B. A separate trust will be established for each
class of certificates. Each trust will use the proceeds from the
sale of certificates to acquire an equipment note to be issued
by Continental. Payments on the equipment note held in each
trust will be passed through to the holders of certificates of
such trust.
The equipment notes will be secured by a lien on certain
aircraft spare parts owned by Continental. Interest on the
equipment notes will be payable quarterly on each March 2,
June 2, September 2 and December 2, beginning on
September 2, 2006. The entire principal amount of the
equipment notes will be due on June 2, 2013.
Continental may redeem the equipment notes at any time on
or after the third anniversary of original issuance (or earlier
under certain circumstances), in each case in whole or in part,
subject to certain restrictions, at a redemption price equal to
100% of the principal amount of the relevant equipment note,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, premium, if any, and LIBOR
break amount, if any.
The Class G certificates will rank senior to the
Class B certificates in right of distributions.
Morgan Stanley Bank will provide a primary liquidity
facility for the Class G Certificates and Morgan Stanley
Capital Services Inc. will provide an above-cap liquidity
facility for the Class G certificates. The primary
liquidity facility, together with the above-cap liquidity
facility, is expected to provide an amount sufficient to make
eight quarterly interest payments on the Class G
certificates. The Class B certificates will not have the
benefit of any liquidity facility.
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company will issue an
insurance policy to support the payment of interest on the
Class G certificates when due and the payment of principal
no later than the final maturity date. The Class B
certificates will not have the benefit of any insurance
policy.
The Class B certificates will be subject to transfer
restrictions. They may be sold only to qualified institutional
buyers, as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, for so long as they are outstanding.
Investing in the certificates involves risks. See
Risk Factors on
page S-20.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Final Expected
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
Pass Through Certificates
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Distribution Date
|
|
|
Investors (2)
|
|
|
Class G
|
|
$
|
190,000,000
|
|
|
USD 3-Month LIBOR
+ % (1)
|
|
|
June 2, 2013
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Class B
|
|
$
|
130,000,000
|
|
|
USD 3-Month LIBOR
+ %
|
|
|
June 2, 2013
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest rate for the
Class G Certificates is subject to a maximum rate
of %
for any interest period commencing on any regular distribution
date if a payment default by Continental occurs and is
continuing on such regular distribution date. |
|
(2) |
|
Plus accrued interest, if any,
from the date of issuance. |
The underwriter will purchase all of the certificates if any are
purchased. The aggregate proceeds from the sale of the
certificates will be $320,000,000. Continental will pay the
underwriter compensation totaling
$ . Delivery of the Class G
certificates in book-entry form only and the Class B
certificates in physical certificate form only will be made on
or about June , 2006.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus supplement or the
accompanying prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
MORGAN STANLEY
May , 2006
PRESENTATION
OF INFORMATION
These offering materials consist of two documents: (a) this
Prospectus Supplement, which describes the terms of the
certificates that we are currently offering, and (b) the
accompanying Prospectus, which provides general information
about our pass through certificates, some of which may not apply
to the certificates that we are currently offering. The
information in this Prospectus Supplement replaces any
inconsistent information included in the accompanying Prospectus.
We have given certain capitalized terms specific meanings for
purposes of this Prospectus Supplement. The Index of
Terms attached as Appendix I to this Prospectus
Supplement lists the page in this Prospectus Supplement on which
we have defined each such term.
At various places in this Prospectus Supplement and the
Prospectus, we refer you to other sections of such documents for
additional information by indicating the caption heading of such
other sections. The page on which each principal caption
included in this Prospectus Supplement and the Prospectus can be
found is listed in the Table of Contents below. All such cross
references in this Prospectus Supplement are to captions
contained in this Prospectus Supplement and not in the
Prospectus, unless otherwise stated.
S-2
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Prospectus
Supplement
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
S-5
|
|
|
S-6
|
|
|
S-7
|
|
|
S-8
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
|
S-20
|
|
|
S-22
|
|
|
S-24
|
|
|
S-28
|
|
|
S-28
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
|
S-29
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
|
S-30
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
S-32
|
|
|
S-34
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
S-35
|
|
|
S-37
|
|
|
S-39
|
|
|
S-39
|
|
|
S-40
|
|
|
S-41
|
|
|
S-42
|
|
|
S-43
|
|
|
S-43
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
|
S-45
|
|
|
S-46
|
|
|
S-46
|
|
|
S-48
|
|
|
S-50
|
|
|
S-50
|
|
|
S-55
|
|
|
S-58
|
|
|
S-58
|
|
|
S-60
|
|
|
S-61
|
|
|
S-62
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
S-63
|
|
|
S-64
|
|
|
S-66
|
|
|
S-67
|
|
|
S-67
|
|
|
S-68
|
|
|
S-69
|
|
|
S-70
|
|
|
S-70
|
|
|
S-70
|
|
|
S-70
|
|
|
S-71
|
|
|
S-72
|
|
|
S-72
|
|
|
S-77
|
|
|
S-77
|
|
|
S-78
|
|
|
S-79
|
|
|
S-79
|
|
|
S-80
|
|
|
S-80
|
|
|
S-80
|
|
|
S-81
|
|
|
S-81
|
|
|
S-81
|
|
|
S-82
|
|
|
S-82
|
|
|
S-84
|
|
|
S-84
|
|
|
S-85
|
|
|
S-86
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix I
|
|
|
Appendix II
|
|
|
Appendix III
|
S-3
Prospectus
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may be used only where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may be
accurate only on the date of this document.
S-4
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this
Prospectus Supplement and the accompanying Prospectus and may
not contain all of the information that is important to you. For
more complete information about the Certificates and
Continental, you should read this entire Prospectus Supplement
and the accompanying Prospectus, as well as the materials filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission that are considered
to be part of this Prospectus Supplement and the Prospectus. See
Incorporation of Certain Documents by Reference in
this Prospectus Supplement and the Prospectus.
Summary
of Terms of Certificates*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class G
|
|
Class B
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
$190,000,000
|
|
$130,000,000
|
Interest Rate
|
|
USD 3-Month
LIBOR + %
|
|
USD 3-Month
LIBOR + %
|
Ratings:
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Aaa
|
|
B1
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
AAA
|
|
B+
|
Loan to Collateral
Value(1)
|
|
43.9%
|
|
73.9%
|
Maximum Loan to Collateral Value
|
|
45.0%
|
|
75.0%
|
Regular Distribution Dates
|
|
March 2, June 2,
September 2 and
December 2
|
|
March 2, June 2,
September 2 and
December 2
|
Final Expected Distribution Date
|
|
June 2, 2013
|
|
June 2, 2013
|
Final Maturity Date
|
|
June 2, 2015
|
|
Not applicable
|
Minimum Denomination
|
|
$1,000
|
|
$1,000
|
Section 1110
Protection(2)
|
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
Liquidity Facility
Coverage(3)
|
|
8 quarterly interest
payments
|
|
None
|
Policy Provider Coverage
|
|
Interest when due and
principal no later than the
Final Maturity Date
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The amount and the terms of
Certificates offered are indicative only and subject to change.
|
|
(1)
|
|
These percentages have been
determined by dividing the initial principal amount of the
Series G Equipment Note plus, in the case of the percentage
applicable to the Series B Equipment Note, the initial
principal amount of the Series B Equipment Note by the
appraised value of the Collateral determined as of
December 25, 2005. Continental is required to provide to
the Policy Provider, the Mortgagee and the Rating Agencies a
semiannual appraisal of the Collateral. If any such subsequent
appraisal indicates that the loan to Collateral value is greater
than the applicable maximum loan to Collateral value,
Continental is required to provide additional collateral or to
reduce the principal amount of Equipment Notes so that the loan
to Collateral value is not greater than such applicable maximum.
An appraised value is only an estimate and reflects certain
assumptions. See Description of the Appraisal.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Section 1110 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code will be applicable to the spare parts of the
types initially included in the Collateral, but will not be
applicable to Cash Collateral (if any). In addition, in order to
satisfy the semiannual loan to Collateral value requirement
referred to in note (1) above, Continental may add other
collateral that may not be entitled to the benefits of
Section 1110, subject to certain limitations.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The amount available under the
Primary Liquidity Facility for the payment of accrued interest
on the Class G Certificates has been calculated utilizing
the Capped Interest Rate
of %
per annum, which is the maximum interest rate applicable to the
Series G Equipment Note only for interest periods
commencing on any Regular Distribution Date if a payment default
under the Indenture has occurred and is continuing on such
Regular Distribution Date.
|
S-5
Collateral
The Equipment Notes will be secured by a lien on spare parts
(including appliances) first placed in service after
October 22, 1994 and owned by Continental that are
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate for installation on or use in one or more of the
following aircraft models: Boeing model 737-700, 737-800,
737-900, 757-200, 757-300, 767-200, 767-400 or 777-200 aircraft,
any engine utilized on any such aircraft or any other spare part
included in the Collateral, and not appropriate for installation
on or use in any other model of aircraft currently operated by
Continental or engine utilized on any such other model of
aircraft;
|
|
|
|
rotables appropriate for installation on or use in a
Boeing model 737-300 or 737-500 aircraft (or both), any engine
utilized on any such aircraft or any other spare part included
in the Collateral; or
|
|
|
|
rotables appropriate for installation on or use in
more than one of the models of aircraft referred to above or any
engine utilized on any such aircraft.
|
The lien will not apply for as long as a spare part is installed
on or being used in any aircraft, engine or other spare part so
installed or being used. In addition, the lien will not apply to
a spare part not located at one of the designated locations
specified pursuant to the security agreement applicable to the
spare parts.
The spare parts included in the Collateral fall into two
categories, rotables and expendables.
Rotables are parts that wear over time and can be repeatedly
restored to a serviceable condition over a period approximating
the life of the flight equipment to which they relate.
Expendables consist of parts that can be restored to a
serviceable condition but have a life less than the life of the
related flight equipment and parts that generally are used once
and thereby consumed or thereafter discarded. Spare engines are
not included in the Collateral. Set forth below is certain
information about the spare parts included in the Collateral as
of December 25, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts
Quantity(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appraised
|
|
Aircraft Model
|
|
Expendables
|
|
|
Rotables
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Value(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
737-300/500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
$
|
31.07
|
|
737-700/800/900
|
|
|
331,796
|
|
|
|
5,841
|
|
|
|
337,637
|
|
|
|
160.04
|
|
757-200
|
|
|
190,992
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
193,643
|
|
|
|
72.11
|
|
757-300
|
|
|
19,368
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
19,504
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
767-200
|
|
|
26,113
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
26,326
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
767-400
|
|
|
59,739
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
61,199
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
|
777-200
|
|
|
113,167
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
115,417
|
|
|
|
86.65
|
|
Interchangeable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
741,175
|
|
|
|
18,618
|
|
|
|
759,793
|
|
|
$
|
432.84
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This quantity of spare parts used
in preparing the appraised value was determined as of
December 25, 2005. Because spare parts are regularly used,
refurbished, purchased, transferred and discarded in the
ordinary course of Continentals business, the quantity of
spare parts included in the Collateral and their appraised value
will change over time. Continental is required to provide to the
Policy Provider, the Mortgagee and the Rating Agencies a
semiannual appraisal of the Collateral.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The appraised value reflects the
opinion of Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, Inc., an
independent aviation appraisal and consulting firm, of the fair
market value of the spare parts. A report summarizing such
appraisal is annexed to this Prospectus Supplement as
Appendix II. The appraisal is subject to a number of
assumptions and limitations and was prepared based on certain
specified methodologies. An appraisal is only an estimate of
value and should not be relied upon as a measure of realizable
value.
|
S-6
Cash Flow
Structure
Set forth below is a diagram illustrating the structure for the
offering of the Certificates and certain cash flows.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The Primary Liquidity Facility,
together with the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility, is expected to
cover eight consecutive quarterly interest payments with respect
to the Class G Certificates. The Liquidity Facilities do
not cover amounts payable in respect of the Class B
Certificates.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amount available under the
Primary Liquidity Facility for the payment of accrued interest
on the Class G Certificates has been calculated utilizing
the Capped Interest Rate of % per
annum, which is the maximum interest rate applicable to the
Series G Equipment Note only for interest periods
commencing on any Regular Distribution Date if a payment default
under the Indenture has occurred and is continuing on such
Regular Distribution Date.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Policy covers regular interest
distributions and outstanding principal on the Final Maturity
Date (or earlier under some circumstances) relating to the
Class G Certificates, but does not cover any other amounts
payable in respect of the Class G Certificates. The Policy
does not cover amounts payable in respect of the Class B
Certificates.
|
S-7
The
Offering
|
|
|
Certificates Offered |
|
Class G Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Class B Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Each Class of Certificates will represent a fractional undivided
interest in the related Trust. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
The proceeds from the sale of the Certificates will be used at
the time of such sale to acquire Equipment Notes issued by
Continental. Continental will use most of the proceeds from the
sale of the Equipment Notes to redeem its outstanding Floating
Rate Secured Notes Due 2007 and Floating Rate Secured
Subordinated Notes Due 2007, which are secured by the
Collateral that will secure the Equipment Notes (or, if
Continental has funded such redemption prior to receipt of such
proceeds, to reimburse Continental for such funding). The
proceeds in excess of the amount used with respect to the
redemption of such outstanding notes will be used by Continental
for general corporate purposes. |
|
Subordination Agent, Trustees and Mortgagee
|
|
Wilmington Trust Company. |
|
Primary Liquidity Provider |
|
Morgan Stanley Bank. |
|
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider |
|
Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. |
|
Policy Provider |
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company. |
|
Trust Property |
|
The property of each Trust will include: |
|
|
|
An Equipment Note acquired by such Trust.
|
|
|
|
In the case of the Class G Trust, all
monies receivable under the Liquidity Facilities and the Policy.
|
|
|
|
Funds from time to time deposited with the
Trustee in accounts relating to such Trust.
|
|
Regular Distribution Dates |
|
March 2, June 2, September 2 and December 2,
commencing on September 2, 2006. |
|
Final Expected Distribution Date |
|
The entire principal amount of the Certificates is scheduled for
payment on June 2, 2013. |
|
Final Maturity Date for the Class G Certificates
|
|
June 2, 2015. |
|
Record Dates |
|
The fifteenth day preceding the related Distribution Date. |
|
Distributions |
|
The Trustee will distribute all payments of principal, LIBOR
break amount (if any), premium (if any) and interest received on
the Equipment Notes held in each Trust to the holders of the
Certificates of such Trust, subject to the subordination
provisions applicable to the Certificates. |
|
|
|
Scheduled payments of interest made on the Equipment Notes will
be distributed on the applicable Regular Distribution Dates, and
the scheduled payment of principal of the Equipment Notes will
be distributed on the Final Expected Distribution Date. |
S-8
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of principal, LIBOR break amount (if any), premium (if
any) and interest made on the Equipment Notes resulting from any
redemption of such Equipment Notes will be distributed on a
Special Distribution Date after not less than 15 days
notice to Certificateholders. |
|
Subordination |
|
Distributions on the Certificates will be made in the following
order: |
|
|
|
First, to the holders of the Class G
Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Second, to the holders of the Class B
Certificates.
|
|
|
|
However, so long as Continental is continuing to meet certain of
its obligations, the subordination provisions applicable to the
Certificates permit distributions to be made to the Class B
Certificates prior to making distributions in full on the
Class G Certificates, even if Continental is in bankruptcy
or certain other specified events have occurred. |
|
Control of Mortgagee |
|
The holders of at least a majority of the outstanding principal
amount of Equipment Notes will be entitled to direct the
Mortgagee in taking action as long as no Indenture Default is
continuing. Except under certain circumstances, for purposes of
determining who is entitled to act for the holder of the
Series G Equipment Note, the Policy Provider shall be
deemed the holder of the Series G Equipment Note. If an
Indenture Default is continuing, subject to certain conditions,
the Controlling Party will direct the Mortgagee
(including in exercising remedies, such as accelerating the
Equipment Notes or foreclosing the lien on the collateral
securing the Equipment Notes). |
|
|
|
The Controlling Party will be: |
|
|
|
Except as provided below, the Policy Provider.
|
|
|
|
If a Policy Provider Default is continuing or
if the Policy has been surrendered for cancellation as described
under Right to Buy Class G Certificates
and the Policy Provider Amounts (other than certain specified
amounts) have been paid in full, the Class G Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Upon payment of final distributions to the
holders of Class G Certificates and, unless a Policy
Provider Default is continuing, of the Policy Provider Amounts
(other than certain specified amounts) to the Policy Provider,
the Class B Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, the Primary
Liquidity Provider.
|
|
|
|
In exercising remedies during the nine months after the earlier
of (a) the acceleration of the Equipment Notes or
(b) the bankruptcy of Continental, the Controlling Party
may not direct the sale of the Pledged Spare Parts or the
Equipment Notes for less than certain specified minimums. |
|
Right to Buy Class G Certificates |
|
If Continental is in bankruptcy or certain other specified
events have occurred, the Class B Certificateholders and
the Policy Provider have the right to buy the Class G
Certificates on the following basis: |
|
|
|
The Class B Certificateholders will have
the right to purchase all of the Class G Certificates.
Following any such purchase, the
|
S-9
|
|
|
|
|
purchasing Class B Certificateholders will have the right
to surrender the Policy for cancellation (thereby releasing the
Policy Provider from its obligations under the Policy), to pay
to the Policy Provider all outstanding Policy Provider Amounts
(other than certain specified amounts) and to pay to the Primary
Liquidity Provider all outstanding Liquidity Obligations, and
upon such surrender and payments the Primary Liquidity Facility
will be terminated. After any such surrender and payments, the
Class G Certificates will no longer be entitled to the
benefits of the Policy or the Primary Liquidity Facility. |
|
|
|
Whether or not the Class B
Certificateholders have purchased or elected to purchase the
Class G Certificates, the Policy Provider will have the
right to purchase all of the Class G Certificates if it is
the Controlling Party and no Policy Provider Default is
continuing and 120 days have elapsed since the occurrence
of any of certain specified default or bankruptcy events
involving Continental, and such event is continuing, unless the
Policy has been surrendered as described in the preceding item
or the Class G Certificateholders elect to surrender the
Policy for cancellation and to pay to the Policy Provider all
outstanding Policy Provider Amounts (other than certain
specified amounts) and to pay to the Primary Liquidity Provider
all outstanding Liquidity Obligations. The Class G
Certificateholders electing to surrender the Policy and make
such payments may do so only upon the purchase of all
Class G Certificates (if any) of any Class G
Certificateholders that do not elect to surrender the Policy and
make such payments. After any such surrender and payments, the
Class G Certificates will no longer be entitled to the
benefits of the Policy or the Primary Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The purchase price in either case described above will be the
outstanding balance of the Class G Certificates plus
accrued and unpaid interest, without premium, but including any
other amounts then due and payable in respect of the
Class G Certificates. |
|
Liquidity Facilities For the Class G Certificates
|
|
Under the Primary Liquidity Facility for the Class G Trust,
the Primary Liquidity Provider will, if necessary, make advances
in an aggregate amount, together with amounts payable by the
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider under the Above-Cap Liquidity
Facility, expected to provide an amount sufficient to pay
interest on the Class G Certificates on up to eight
successive quarterly Regular Distribution Dates at the
applicable interest rate for the Class G Certificates.
Drawings under the Primary Liquidity Facility and payments under
the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility cannot be used to pay any other
amount in respect of the Class G Certificates or any amount
in respect of the Class B Certificates. Payments under the
Liquidity Facilities are not subject to the subordination
provisions applicable to the Certificates. |
|
|
|
Upon each drawing under the Primary Liquidity Facility to pay
interest on the Class G Certificates, the Subordination
Agent will be obligated thereafter to reimburse the Primary
Liquidity Provider for |
S-10
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of such drawing with any funds subsequently received
from Continental, the sale of the Equipment Notes or the
Collateral, or otherwise. Such reimbursement obligation and all
interest, fees and other amounts owing to the Primary Liquidity
Provider under the Primary Liquidity Facility and certain other
agreements will rank senior to the Certificates in right of
payment. |
|
Policy Coverage for the Class G Certificates
|
|
Under the Policy for the Class G Trust, the Policy Provider
will honor drawings to cover: |
|
|
|
Any shortfall on any Regular Distribution Date
in funds to be distributed as accrued and unpaid interest on the
Class G Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Any shortfall on the Final Maturity Date in
the Final Distributions (other than any unpaid premium or break
amount) on the Class G Certificates.
|
|
|
|
Any shortfall in the proceeds from the
disposition of the Series G Equipment Note or the remaining
Collateral on the related Special Distribution Date from the
amount required to pay in full the Pool Balance of the
Class G Certificates plus accrued and unpaid interest
thereon.
|
|
|
|
If certain payments with respect to the
Class G Certificates are by court order determined to be a
preferential transfer under the Bankruptcy Code or
otherwise required to be returned, the amount of such payments.
|
|
|
|
If a payment default exists with respect to
the Series G Equipment Note (without giving effect to any
acceleration or any payments by any Liquidity Provider or the
Policy Provider) for a period of eight consecutive interest
periods (regardless of whether the Subordination Agent has
received a Special Payment constituting proceeds from the sale
of the Series G Equipment Note or any Collateral during
such period) and continues to exist on the Regular Distribution
Date on which such eighth interest period ends, and on the 25th
day following such Regular Distribution Date (or if such 25th
day is not a Business Day, the next Business Day), which shall
be a Special Distribution Date for the Class G Trust, an
amount equal to the then outstanding principal amount of such
Equipment Notes (less the amount of any Policy Drawings
previously paid by the Policy Provider in respect of principal)
plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
|
|
|
|
The Policy Provider has the right at the end of the
24-month
period referred to above, so long as no Policy Provider Default
has occurred and is continuing, to elect instead (which election
shall be deemed to have been given unless the Policy Provider
affirmatively gives notice otherwise or a Policy Provider
Default shall have occurred and be continuing): |
|
|
|
To pay on such Special Distribution Date an
amount equal to any shortfall in the scheduled interest that
came due on the Series G Equipment Note (determined after
the application of proceeds from the sale of any Collateral in
connection with the exercise of
|
S-11
|
|
|
|
|
remedies under the Indenture) during the
24-month
period (after giving effect to the application of funds received
from the Policy Provider in connection with a disposition of the
Series G Equipment Note or any Collateral and from the
Primary Liquidity Facility, the Cash Collateral Account, the
Above-Cap Account or, in certain cases, the Policy Provider), and |
|
|
|
To permit, on each subsequent Regular
Distribution Date, drawings under the Policy for an amount equal
to the principal (taking into account any adjustments made on
account of redemptions, but without regard to any acceleration
thereof or any failure to consummate any optional redemption,
and determined after the application of proceeds from the sale
of any Collateral in connection with the exercise of remedies
under the Indenture) and interest that were to become due on the
Series G Equipment Note on the related payment date until
paid in full, taking into account certain prior payments of
interest by the Policy Provider.
|
|
|
|
After the Policy Provider has made (or been deemed to have made)
such election, (1) on any Business Day other than a Regular
Distribution Date elected by the Policy Provider upon
20 days notice (which shall be set as a Special
Distribution Date for the Class G Trust) or (2) if a
Policy Provider Default occurs on any Business Day specified by
the Subordination Agent upon 20 days notice (which
shall be set as a Special Distribution Date for the Class G
Trust), the Subordination Agent will request a Policy Drawing
for an amount equal to the then outstanding Pool Balance of the
Class G Certificates plus accrued and unpaid interest
thereon. |
|
|
|
Any shortfall for which a drawing under a Policy may be made as
described above (except in specified circumstances) will be
calculated after the application of funds available through the
subordination provisions applicable to the Certificates,
drawings under the Primary Liquidity Facility, withdrawals from
the Cash Collateral Account and withdrawals from the Above-Cap
Account. The Policy will not cover the Class B Certificates. |
|
|
|
The Policy Provider is required to honor drawings under the
Policy by the Subordination Agent on behalf of the Primary
Liquidity Provider for all outstanding drawings under the
Primary Liquidity Facility, together with interest thereon, on
or after the Business Day which is the earliest to occur of
(1) the date on which an Interest Drawing shall have been
made under the Primary Liquidity Facility and remains
unreimbursed for 24 months, (2) the date on which any
Downgrade Drawing, Non-Extension Drawing or Final Drawing that
was deposited into the Cash Collateral Account shall have been
applied to pay any scheduled payment of interest on the
Certificates and remains unreplenished to the Cash Collateral
Account or unreimbursed to the Primary Liquidity Provider, as
the case may be, for 24 months and (3) the date on
which all of the Equipment Notes have been accelerated and
remain unpaid for 24 months, in each case disregarding any
reimbursements from payments by the Policy Provider and from any
Special Payment constituting proceeds from |
S-12
|
|
|
|
|
the sale of the Equipment Notes or any Collateral during such
24-month
period. |
|
Equipment Notes |
|
|
|
(a) Issuer |
|
Continental. The Equipment Notes will be full recourse
obligations of Continental. |
|
(b) Interest |
|
The Equipment Note held in each Trust will accrue interest at
the rate per annum for the Certificates issued by such Trust set
forth on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement. The
interest rate on the Series G Equipment Note will be
subject to a maximum equal to the Capped Interest Rate only for
interest periods commencing on any interest payment date if a
payment default under the Indenture has occurred and is
continuing on such interest payment date. Interest will be
payable on March 2, June 2, September 2 and December 2
of each year, commencing on September 2, 2006. Interest on
the Equipment Notes is calculated on the basis of the actual
number of days elapsed over a
360-day
year. LIBOR is determined from time to time by the Reference
Agent as described in Description of the Equipment
NotesDetermination of LIBOR. |
|
(c) Principal |
|
The entire principal amount of the Series G and
Series B Equipment Notes is scheduled for payment on
June 2, 2013. |
|
(d) Optional Redemption |
|
Continental may elect to redeem all or (so long as no Payment
Default has occurred and is continuing) a portion of the
Equipment Notes of any series at any time prior to maturity,
except that no Equipment Notes may be redeemed by Continental
prior to the third anniversary of the Issuance Date (other than
in connection with a redemption to satisfy the maximum
Collateral Ratio requirements or minimum Rotable Ratio
requirement, or to the extent required as a result of certain
reductions in Continentals aircraft fleet). The redemption
price in such case will be the principal amount of the Equipment
Notes to be redeemed, together with accrued and unpaid interest
and LIBOR break amount, if any. |
|
|
|
In addition, in the case of an optional redemption of the
Series B Equipment Notes on or after the third anniversary
and prior to the fifth anniversary of the Issuance Date (except
in connection with a redemption to satisfy the maximum
Collateral Ratio requirements or the minimum Rotable Ratio
requirement, or to the extent required as a result of certain
reductions in Continentals aircraft fleet), the redemption
price will include a Premium equal to the following percentage
of the principal amount redeemed: |
|
|
|
|
|
If redeemed during the year
|
|
|
prior to the anniversary of
|
|
|
the Issuance Date indicated
|
|
|
below
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Premium
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
%
|
5th
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the case of an optional redemption of Equipment Notes prior
to the fifth anniversary of the Issuance Date required as a
result of certain reductions in Continentals aircraft
fleet, the redemption price will |
S-13
|
|
|
|
|
include a Premium equal to the following percentage of the
principal amount redeemed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If redeemed during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prior to the anniversary of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Issuance Date indicated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
below
|
|
Series G
|
|
|
Series B
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, so long as the Series G
Equipment Note and the obligations to the Policy Provider have
not been paid in full, unless the Controlling Party shall
otherwise agree, no optional redemption of the Series B
Equipment Note may be made unless: |
|
|
|
the maximum Senior Collateral Ratio
requirement is then satisfied (after giving effect to any
concurrent redemption of the Series G Equipment Note); or
|
|
|
|
the Series G Equipment Note is
simultaneously redeemed in full.
|
|
|
|
If Continental gives notice of redemption, it may revoke such
redemption by notice to the Mortgagee at least three Business
Days prior to the scheduled redemption date. |
|
(e) Security |
|
The Equipment Notes will be secured by a security interest in
certain spare parts, as described above in this Prospectus
Supplement Summary under Collateral. |
|
(f) Maintenance of Collateral Ratios |
|
Continental is required to provide to the Policy Provider, the
Mortgagee and the Rating Agencies a semiannual appraisal of the
Collateral. If any such appraisal indicates that: |
|
|
|
the ratio of the outstanding principal amount
of the Series G Equipment Note to the Collateral value is
greater than 45.0%;
|
|
|
|
the ratio of the sum of the outstanding
principal amount of the Series G Equipment Note and of the
Series B Equipment Note to the Collateral value is greater
than 75.0%; or
|
|
|
|
the ratio of the value of Rotables included in
the Collateral to the outstanding principal amount of the
Series G Equipment Note is less than 150.0%;
|
|
|
|
then Continental is required to provide additional collateral or
to redeem some or all of the Equipment Notes so that such ratios
comply with the applicable maximum Collateral value percentages
and the minimum Rotable value percentage. |
|
(g) Section 1110 Protection |
|
Continentals outside counsel will provide its opinion to
the Trustees that the benefits of Section 1110 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code will be available with respect to the Equipment
Notes. In order to satisfy the semiannual loan to Collateral
value requirement applicable to the Equipment Notes, Continental
may add cash or other collateral that may not be entitled to the
benefits of Section 1110, subject to certain limits. |
S-14
|
|
|
Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences
|
|
Each person acquiring an interest in Certificates generally
should report on its federal income tax return its pro rata
share of income from the Equipment Note and other property held
by the relevant Trust. See Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences. |
|
Certain ERISA Considerations |
|
Each person who acquires a Certificate will be deemed to have
represented that either: (a) no employee benefit plan
assets have been used to purchase such Certificate or
(b) the purchase and holding of such Certificate are exempt
from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 pursuant to one or more prohibited transaction
statutory or administrative exemptions. See Certain ERISA
Considerations. |
|
Transfer Restrictions for Class B Certificates
|
|
The Class B Certificates may be sold only to qualified
institutional buyers, as defined in Rule 144A under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for so long as they are
outstanding. |
|
Rating of the Certificates |
|
It is a condition to the issuance of the Certificates that they
be rated by Moodys and Standard & Poors not
less than the ratings set forth below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Poors
|
|
|
|
Class G
|
|
Aaa
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
B1
|
|
B+
|
|
|
|
|
|
A rating is not a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell
Certificates, because such rating does not address market price
or suitability for a particular investor. There can be no
assurance that such ratings will not be lowered or withdrawn by
a Rating Agency after the Certificates have been issued. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Poors
|
|
Threshold Rating for the Liquidity
Providers
|
|
Short Term
|
|
P-1
|
|
A-1
|
|
|
|
Primary Liquidity Provider Rating |
|
The Primary Liquidity Provider meets the Threshold Rating
requirement. |
|
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider Rating |
|
Morgan Stanley, the parent company of Morgan Stanley Capital
Services, meets the Threshold Rating requirement and will
guarantee Morgan Stanley Capital Services obligations
under the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard &
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
Poors
|
|
Policy Provider Rating
|
|
Financial Strength
|
|
Aaa
|
|
AAA
|
S-15
SUMMARY
FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
The following tables summarize certain consolidated financial
data and certain operating data with respect to Continental. The
following selected consolidated financial data for the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 are derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements of Continental
including the notes thereto incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus Supplement and should be read in conjunction with
those financial statements. The following selected consolidated
financial data for the years ended December 31, 2002 and
2001 are derived from the selected financial data contained in
Continentals Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, incorporated by
reference in this Prospectus Supplement, and the audited
consolidated financial statements of Continental for the years
ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 and should be read in
conjunction therewith. The consolidated financial data of
Continental for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005 are derived from the unaudited consolidated financial
statements of Continental incorporated by reference in this
Prospectus Supplement, which include all adjustments (consisting
solely of normal recurring accruals, except for nonrecurring
adjustments that are separately disclosed in the notes to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements) that Continental
considers necessary for the fair presentation of the financial
position and results of operations for these periods. Operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
year ending December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars, except
operating data, per share data and ratios)
|
|
|
Financial
DataOperations:(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,947
|
|
|
$
|
2,505
|
|
|
$
|
11,208
|
|
|
$
|
9,899
|
|
|
$
|
9,001
|
|
|
$
|
8,511
|
|
|
$
|
9,049
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
11,247
|
|
|
|
10,137
|
|
|
|
8,813
|
|
|
|
8,841
|
|
|
|
8,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
Non-operating Income (Expense), net
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(319
|
)
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) before Income Taxes,
Minority Interest, and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting
Principle
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Income (Loss) before Cumulative
Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
(409
|
)
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
(462
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (Loss) per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
(7.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.97
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.25
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
(7.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used for Computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
86.7
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
66.1
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
64.2
|
|
|
|
55.5
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
|
(In millions of dollars, except
operating data, per share data and ratios)
|
|
|
Statistical
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mainline
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers (thousands)(4)
|
|
|
11,486
|
|
|
|
10,598
|
|
|
|
44,939
|
|
|
|
42,743
|
|
|
|
40,613
|
|
|
|
41,777
|
|
|
|
45,064
|
|
Revenue passenger miles
(millions)(5)
|
|
|
18,018
|
|
|
|
16,159
|
|
|
|
71,261
|
|
|
|
65,734
|
|
|
|
59,165
|
|
|
|
59,349
|
|
|
|
61,140
|
|
Available seat miles (millions)(6)
|
|
|
20,035
|
|
|
|
20,845
|
|
|
|
89,647
|
|
|
|
84,672
|
|
|
|
78,385
|
|
|
|
80,122
|
|
|
|
84,485
|
|
Cargo ton miles (millions)
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
1,018
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Passenger load factor(7)
|
|
|
78.2
|
%
|
|
|
77.5
|
%
|
|
|
79.5
|
%
|
|
|
77.6
|
%
|
|
|
75.5
|
%
|
|
|
74.1
|
%
|
|
|
72.4
|
%
|
Passenger revenue per available
seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
9.43
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
|
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
8.82
|
|
|
|
8.79
|
|
|
|
8.67
|
|
|
|
9.03
|
|
Total revenue per available seat
mile (cents)
|
|
|
10.63
|
|
|
|
10.18
|
|
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
|
9.83
|
|
|
|
9.81
|
|
|
|
9.41
|
|
|
|
9.68
|
|
Average yield per revenue passenger
mile (cents)(8)
|
|
|
12.06
|
|
|
|
11.59
|
|
|
|
11.73
|
|
|
|
11.37
|
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
11.71
|
|
|
|
12.48
|
|
Average segment fare per revenue
passenger
|
|
$
|
191.29
|
|
|
$
|
179.51
|
|
|
$
|
188.67
|
|
|
$
|
177.90
|
|
|
$
|
172.83
|
|
|
$
|
169.37
|
|
|
$
|
172.50
|
|
Operating cost per available seat
mile including special charges (cents)(9)
|
|
|
10.35
|
|
|
|
10.57
|
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
|
|
9.84
|
|
|
|
9.53
|
|
|
|
9.63
|
|
|
|
9.34
|
|
Average price per gallon of fuel,
including fuel taxes (cents)
|
|
|
190.43
|
|
|
|
145.30
|
|
|
|
177.55
|
|
|
|
119.01
|
|
|
|
91.40
|
|
|
|
74.01
|
|
|
|
82.48
|
|
Fuel gallons consumed (millions)
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
Actual aircraft in fleet at end of
period(10)
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Average length of aircraft flight
(miles)
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
Average daily utilization of each
aircraft (hours)(11)
|
|
|
10:42
|
|
|
|
10:09
|
|
|
|
10:31
|
|
|
|
9:55
|
|
|
|
9:19
|
|
|
|
9:29
|
|
|
|
10:19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional
Operations(12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers (thousands)(4)
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
16,076
|
|
|
|
13,739
|
|
|
|
11,445
|
|
|
|
9,264
|
|
|
|
8,354
|
|
Revenue passenger miles
(millions)(5)
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
8,938
|
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
|
5,769
|
|
|
|
3,952
|
|
|
|
3,388
|
|
Available seat miles (millions)(6)
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
|
|
2,740
|
|
|
|
11,973
|
|
|
|
10,410
|
|
|
|
8,425
|
|
|
|
6,219
|
|
|
|
5,437
|
|
Passenger load factor(7)
|
|
|
75.2
|
%
|
|
|
71.3
|
%
|
|
|
74.7
|
%
|
|
|
71.3
|
%
|
|
|
68.5
|
%
|
|
|
63.5
|
%
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
Passenger revenue per available
seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
16.54
|
|
|
|
14.37
|
|
|
|
15.67
|
|
|
|
15.09
|
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
15.45
|
|
|
|
15.93
|
|
Actual aircraft in fleet at end of
period(10)
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Operations
(Mainline and Regional):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passengers (thousands)(4)
|
|
|
15,594
|
|
|
|
14,122
|
|
|
|
61,015
|
|
|
|
56,482
|
|
|
|
52,058
|
|
|
|
51,041
|
|
|
|
53,418
|
|
Revenue passenger miles
(millions)(5)
|
|
|
20,336
|
|
|
|
18,112
|
|
|
|
80,199
|
|
|
|
73,151
|
|
|
|
64,934
|
|
|
|
63,301
|
|
|
|
64,528
|
|
Available seat miles (millions)(6)
|
|
|
26,117
|
|
|
|
23,585
|
|
|
|
101,620
|
|
|
|
95,082
|
|
|
|
86,810
|
|
|
|
86,341
|
|
|
|
89,922
|
|
Passenger load factor(7)
|
|
|
77.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.8
|
%
|
|
|
78.9
|
%
|
|
|
76.9
|
%
|
|
|
74.8
|
%
|
|
|
73.3
|
%
|
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
Passenger revenue per available
seat mile (cents)
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
|
|
9.61
|
|
|
|
10.07
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
9.45
|
|
Average yield per revenue passenger
mile (cents)(8)
|
|
|
13.19
|
|
|
|
12.51
|
|
|
|
12.76
|
|
|
|
12.36
|
|
|
|
12.60
|
|
|
|
12.49
|
|
|
|
13.17
|
|
S-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions of
dollars)
|
|
|
Financial DataBalance
Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, Cash Equivalents, including
Restricted Cash, and Short-Term Investments
|
|
$
|
2,257
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
Other Current Assets
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
1,229
|
|
Total Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
6,168
|
|
|
|
6,086
|
|
Routes and Airport Operating
Rights, net
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
10,925
|
|
|
$
|
10,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity (Deficit):
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,162
|
|
|
$
|
3,399
|
|
Long-Term Debt and Capital Leases
|
|
|
4,671
|
|
|
|
5,057
|
|
Deferred Credits and Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
1,872
|
|
|
|
1,847
|
|
Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
10,925
|
|
|
$
|
10,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Consolidated amounts include ExpressJets operating results
for the years ended December 31, 2001 and December 31,
2002. In 2003, ExpressJet is consolidated through
November 12, 2003 and reported using the equity method of
accounting thereafter.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes the following special income (expense) items (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
Operating revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in expected redemption of
frequent flyer mileage credits sold
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating (expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet retirement and impairment
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Air Transportation Safety and
System Stabilization Act grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
Security fee reimbursement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension curtailment/settlement
charges
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance and other special charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Surrender of restricted stock units
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination of 1993 service
agreement with United Micronesia Development Association
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frequent flyer reward redemption
cost adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonoperating (expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
Cumulative Effect of Change in
Accounting Principle
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
For purposes of calculating this ratio, earnings consist of
income before income taxes and cumulative effect of changes in
accounting principles adjusted for undistributed income of
companies in which Continental has a minority equity interest
plus interest expense (net of capitalized interest), the portion
of rental expense representative of interest expense and
amortization of previously capitalized interest. Fixed charges
consist of interest expenses, the portion of rental expense
representative of interest expense, the amount amortized for
debt discount, premium and issuance expense and interest
previously capitalized. For the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
|
S-18
|
|
|
|
|
years ended December 31, 2005,
2004, 2002 and 2001, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed
charges and the coverage deficiency was $44 million,
$192 million, $102 million, $490 million,
$658 million and $161 million, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Revenue passengers measured by each flight segment flown.
|
|
|
(5)
|
The number of scheduled miles flown by revenue passengers.
|
|
|
(6)
|
The number of seats available for passengers multiplied by the
number of scheduled miles those seats are flown.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Revenue passenger miles divided by available seat miles.
|
|
|
(8)
|
The average revenue received for each passenger mile flown.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Includes operating expense special items noted in (2). These
special items increased (decreased) operating cost per available
seat mile by (0.03), 0.20, 0.07, 0.16, (0.11), 0.25 and (0.36)
cents in each of the periods, respectively.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Excludes aircraft that were removed from service.
|
|
(11)
|
The average number of hours per day that an aircraft flown in
revenue service is operated (from gate departure to gate
arrival).
|
|
(12)
|
These statistics reflect operations of Continental Express (as
operated by ExpressJet). Pursuant to a capacity purchase
agreement, Continental currently purchases all of
ExpressJets available seat miles for a negotiated price.
|
S-19
RISK
FACTORS
Risk
Factors Relating to the Company
Continental
Continues to Experience Significant Losses
Since September 11, 2001, Continental has incurred
significant losses. Continental reported a net loss of
$68 million in 2005 and a net loss of $66 million the
first quarter of 2006. Losses of the magnitude incurred by
Continental since September 11, 2001 are not sustainable if
they continue. These losses are primarily attributable to
decreased yields on passenger revenue since September 11,
2001 and record high fuel prices. Although the current
U.S. domestic network carrier environment is improving as
several of Continentals network competitors reduce
domestic capacity and as carriers have increased fares in
response to record-high fuel prices, those fare increases have
not fully offset the substantially higher fuel prices, which
continue to pressure all carriers. Further increases in jet fuel
prices or disruptions in fuel supplies, whether as a result of
natural disasters or otherwise, could have a material adverse
effect on Continentals results of operations, financial
condition or liquidity. Among the many factors that threaten
Continental are the continued rapid growth of low-cost carriers
and resulting pressure on domestic fares, high fuel costs,
excessive taxation and significant pension liabilities.
Record
High Fuel Prices Are Materially and Adversely Affecting
Continentals Operating Results
Fuel costs, which are currently at historically high levels,
constitute a significant portion of Continentals operating
expenses. Mainline fuel costs represented approximately 26.7%
and 27.7% of Continentals mainline operating expenses for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and the first quarter of
2006, respectively. Continental expects that fuel expense will
be its single largest operating expense item in 2006. Based on
gallons expected to be consumed in 2006, for every one dollar
increase in the price of a barrel of crude oil,
Continentals annual fuel expense would increase by
approximately $43 million. Continentals fuel expense
could further increase if the refining margin (the component of
the price of jet fuel attributable to the refining of crude oil
into jet fuel) increases above current levels.
Continental is also at risk for all of ExpressJets fuel
costs, as well as a margin on ExpressJets fuel costs up to
a negotiated cap of 71.2 cents per gallon, under
Continentals capacity purchase agreement and a related
fuel purchase agreement with ExpressJet.
Fuel prices and supplies are influenced significantly by
international political and economic circumstances, such as
increasing demand by developing nations, unrest in Iraq and
current diplomatic tension between the U.S. and Iran concerning
Irans nuclear energy development, as well as OPEC
production curtailments, a disruption of oil imports, other
conflicts or instability in the Middle East or other oil
producing regions, environmental concerns, weather and other
unpredictable events. Further, Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane
Rita caused widespread disruptions in 2005 to oil production,
refinery operations and pipeline capacity in portions of the
U.S. Gulf Coast. As a result of these disruptions, the
price of jet fuel increased significantly and the availability
of jet fuel supplies was diminished. A significant portion of
the increase in the price of jet fuel immediately following
Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita was attributable to an
increase in the refining margin.
From time to time Continental enters into petroleum swap
contracts, petroleum call option contracts and/or jet fuel
purchase commitments to provide some short-term hedge
protection (generally three to six months) against sudden
and significant increases in jet fuel prices. As of
March 31, 2006, Continental had hedged approximately 17% of
its projected fuel requirements for the second quarter of 2006.
Further increases in jet fuel prices or disruptions in fuel
supplies, whether as a result of natural disasters or otherwise,
could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Continentals
High Leverage May Affect its Ability to Satisfy its Significant
Financing Needs or Meet its Obligations
As is the case with its principal competitors, Continental has a
high proportion of debt compared to its equity capital.
S-20
As of March 31, 2006 Continental had approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
$5.4 billion (including current maturities) of long-term
debt and capital lease obligations.
|
|
|
|
$220 million of stockholders equity.
|
|
|
|
$2.3 billion in consolidated cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments (of which $245 million is restricted
cash).
|
Continentals combined long-term debt and capital lease
obligations coming due in the remainder of 2006 total
approximately $458 million, and Continental has significant
amounts coming due in 2007 and thereafter. Continental also has
significant operating lease and facility rental costs. For the
year ended December 31, 2005, annual aircraft and facility
rental expense under operating leases was $1.4 billion.
In addition, Continental has substantial commitments for capital
expenditures, including for the acquisition of new aircraft and
related spare engines. As of March 31, 2006, Continental
had firm commitments for 54 new aircraft from The Boeing Company
(Boeing), with an estimated cost of
$2.6 billion, and options to purchase 30 additional
Boeing aircraft. Continental is scheduled to take delivery of
six new 737-800 aircraft in 2006, with delivery of the remaining
48 new Boeing aircraft occurring from 2007 through 2011.
Continental has backstop financing for the six 737-800 aircraft
to be delivered in the remainder of 2006 and two 777-200ER
aircraft to be delivered in 2007. By virtue of these agreements,
Continental has financing available for all Boeing aircraft
scheduled to be delivered through 2007. However, Continental
does not have backstop financing or any other financing
currently in place for the remainder of the aircraft. Further
financing will be needed to satisfy Continentals capital
commitments for its firm aircraft and other related capital
expenditures. Continental can provide no assurance that
sufficient financing will be available for the aircraft on order
or other related capital expenditures, or for its capital
expenditures in general.
At March 31, 2006, Continentals senior unsecured debt
ratings were Caa2 by Moodys and CCC+ by
Standard & Poors. Reductions in
Continentals credit ratings may increase the cost and
reduce the availability of financing to Continental in the
future. Continental does not have any debt obligations that
would be accelerated as a result of a credit rating downgrade.
However, Continental would have to post additional collateral of
approximately $70 million under its bank-issued credit card
processing agreement if its senior unsecured debt rating falls
below Caa3 as rated by Moodys or CCC− as rated by
Standard & Poors. Continental would also be
required to post additional collateral of up to $27 million
under its workers compensation program if
Continentals senior unsecured debt rating falls below Caa2
as rated by Moodys or CCC+ as rated by Standard &
Poors.
Continentals bank-issued credit card processing agreement
also contains financial covenants which require, among other
things, that Continental maintain a minimum EBITDAR (generally,
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization,
aircraft rentals and income from affiliates, adjusted for
certain special items) to fixed charges (interest and aircraft
rentals) ratio of 0.9 to 1.0 through June 30, 2006 and 1.1
to 1.0 thereafter. The liquidity covenant requires Continental
to maintain a minimum level of $1.0 billion of unrestricted
cash and short-term investments and a minimum ratio of
unrestricted cash and short-term investments to current
liabilities at each month end of 0.27 to 1.0 through
June 30, 2006 and 0.29 to 1.0 thereafter. Although
Continental is currently in compliance with all of the
covenants, failure to maintain compliance would result in
Continentals being required to post up to an additional
$415 million of cash collateral, which would adversely
affect its liquidity. Depending on Continentals
unrestricted cash and short-term investments balance at the
time, the posting of a significant amount of cash collateral
could cause Continentals unrestricted cash and short-term
investments balance to fall below the $1.0 billion minimum
balance requirement under its $350 million secured loan
facility, resulting in a default under such facility.
Continental has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans in
which substantially all of its U.S. employees participate,
other than employees of its subsidiaries Chelsea Food Services
and CMI employees. Continental contributed $6 million to
its defined benefit pension plans during the first quarter of
2006 and an additional $91 million on April 11, 2006.
Including these contributions, based on current assumptions and
applicable law, Continental will be required to contribute in
excess of $1.5 billion to its defined benefit pension plans
over the next ten years, including a total of $258 million
in 2006, to meet its minimum funding obligations.
S-21
Continentals
Labor Costs May Not be Competitive and Could Threaten Its Future
Liquidity
Labor costs constitute a significant percentage of
Continentals total operating costs. Labor costs (including
employee incentives) constituted 23.6% and 22.9% of
Continentals total operating expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the first quarter of 2006,
respectively. All of the major
hub-and-spoke
carriers with whom Continental competes have achieved
significant labor cost reductions, whether in or out of
bankruptcy. Even given the effect of pay and benefit cost
reductions Continental implemented beginning in April 2005,
Continental believes that its wages, salaries and benefits cost
per available seat mile, measured on a stage length adjusted
basis (labor CASM), will continue to be higher than
that of many of its competitors. Although Continental enjoys
generally good relations with its employees, Continental can
provide no assurance that it will not experience labor
disruptions in the future. Any disruptions which result in a
prolonged significant reduction in flights would have a material
adverse impact on Continentals results of operations or
financial condition.
A
Significant Failure or Disruption of the Computer Systems on
Which Continental Relies Could Adversely Affect Its
Business
Continental depends heavily on computer systems and technology
to operate its business, such as flight operations systems,
communications systems, airport systems and reservations systems
(including continental.com and third party global distribution
systems). These systems could suffer substantial or repeated
disruptions due to events beyond Continentals control,
including natural disasters, power failures, terrorist attacks,
equipment or software failures and computer viruses and hackers.
Any such disruptions could materially impair Continentals
flight and airport operations and its ability to market its
services, and could result in increased costs, lost revenue and
the loss or compromise of important data. Although Continental
has taken measures in an effort to reduce the adverse effects of
certain potential failures or disruptions, if these steps are
not adequate to prevent or remedy the risks, Continentals
business may be materially adversely affected.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Airline Industry
Additional
Terrorist Attacks or International Hostilities May Further
Adversely Affect Continentals Financial Condition, Results
of Operations and Liquidity
As described in greater detail in Continentals filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission), the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001 involving commercial aircraft severely
and adversely affected Continentals financial condition,
results of operations and liquidity, and the airline industry
generally. Additional terrorist attacks, even if not made
directly on the airline industry, or the fear of such attacks
(including elevated national threat warnings or selective
cancellation or redirection of flights due to terror threats),
could negatively affect Continental and the airline industry.
The potential negative effects include increased security,
insurance and other costs for Continental, higher ticket refunds
and decreased ticket sales. The war in Iraq further decreased
demand for air travel during the first half of 2003, especially
in transatlantic markets, and additional international
hostilities could potentially have a material adverse impact on
Continentals financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity. Continentals financial resources might not be
sufficient to absorb the adverse effects of any further
terrorist attacks or other international hostilities involving
the United States.
The
Airline Industry is Highly Competitive and Susceptible to Price
Discounting and Fluctuations in Passenger Demand
The U.S. airline industry is increasingly characterized by
substantial price competition, especially in domestic markets.
Carriers use discount fares to stimulate traffic during periods
of slack demand, to generate cash flow and to increase market
share. Some of Continentals competitors have substantially
greater financial resources, including hedges against fuel price
increases, or lower cost structures than Continental has, or
both. In recent years, the domestic market share held by low
cost carriers has increased significantly and is expected to
continue to increase, which is dramatically changing the airline
industry. The increased market presence of low cost carriers has
increased competition and impacted the ability of the network
carriers to maintain sufficient pricing structures in domestic
markets, which negatively affects profitability. This has
contributed to the dramatic losses for Continental and the
airline industry generally. For example, a low-cost carrier
began to directly compete with Continental on
S-22
flights between Liberty International and destinations in
Florida in 2005. Continental is responding vigorously to this
challenge, but has experienced decreased yields on affected
flights. Continental cannot predict whether or for how long
these trends will continue.
In addition to price competition, airlines also compete for
market share by increasing the size of their route system and
the number of markets they serve. Several of Continentals
domestic competitors have announced aggressive plans to expand
into international markets, including some destinations that
Continental currently serves. The increased competition in these
international markets, particularly to the extent
Continentals competitors engage in price discounting, may
have a material adverse effect on Continentals results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Airline profit levels are highly sensitive to changes in fuel
costs, fare levels and passenger demand. Passenger demand is
influenced by, among other things, the state of the global
economy and domestic and international events such as terrorism,
hostilities involving the United States or concerns about
exposure to contagious diseases (such as SARS or avian flu). The
September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the weak economy
prior to 2004, turbulent international events (including the war
in Iraq and the SARS outbreak), high fuel prices and extensive
price discounting by carriers have resulted in dramatic losses
for Continental and the airline industry generally. To the
extent that future events of this nature negatively impact
passenger travel behavior or fare levels, such events may have a
material adverse effect on Continentals results of
operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta), Northwest Airlines,
Inc. (Northwest Airlines) and several small
competitors have filed for bankruptcy protection, and other
carriers could file for bankruptcy or threaten to do so to
reduce their costs. US Airways Group, Inc. and, more recently,
United Air Lines, Inc., have emerged from bankruptcy. Carriers
operating under bankruptcy protection may be in a position to
operate in a manner adverse to Continental, and could emerge
from bankruptcy as more vigorous competitors with substantially
lower costs than Continentals.
Since its deregulation in 1978, the U.S. airline industry
has undergone substantial consolidation, and may experience
additional consolidation in the future. Continental routinely
monitors changes in the competitive landscape and engages in
analysis and discussions regarding its strategic position,
including alliances, asset acquisitions and business combination
transactions. Continental has had, and expects to continue to
have, discussions with third parties regarding strategic
alternatives. The impact of any consolidation within the
U.S. airline industry cannot be predicted at this time.
Additional
Security Requirements May Increase Continentals Costs and
Decrease Its Traffic
Since September 11, 2001, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) and Transportation Security
Administration have implemented numerous security measures that
affect airline operations and costs, and are likely to implement
additional measures in the future. Most recently, DHS has begun
to implement the US-VISIT program (a program of fingerprinting
and photographing foreign visa holders), announced that it will
implement greater use of passenger data for evaluating security
measures to be taken with respect to individual passengers,
expanded the use of federal air marshals on Continentals
flights (thus displacing additional revenue passengers and
causing increased customer complaints from displaced
passengers), begun investigating a requirement to install
aircraft security systems (such as active devices on commercial
aircraft as countermeasures against portable surface to air
missiles) and expanded cargo and baggage screening. DHS has also
required certain flights to be cancelled on short notice for
security reasons, and has required certain airports to remain at
higher security levels than other locations.
In addition, foreign governments also have begun to institute
additional security measures at foreign airports that
Continental serves, out of their own security concerns or in
response to security measures imposed by the U.S.
A large part of the costs of these security measures is borne by
the airlines and their passengers, and Continental believes that
these and other security measures have the effect of decreasing
the demand for air travel and the attractiveness of air
transportation as compared to other modes of transportation in
general. Security measures imposed by the U.S. and foreign
governments after September 11, 2001 have increased
Continentals costs and therefore adversely affected
Continentals financial results, and additional measures
taken in the future may result in similar adverse effects.
S-23
Expanded
Government Regulation Could Further Increase
Continentals Operating Costs and Restrict Its Ability to
Conduct Its Business
As evidenced by the security measures discussed above, airlines
are subject to extensive regulatory and legal compliance
requirements that result in significant costs. Additional laws,
regulations, taxes and airport rates and charges have been
proposed from time to time that could significantly increase the
cost of airline operations or reduce revenue. The Federal
Aviation Administration (the FAA) from time to time
issues directives and other regulations relating to the
maintenance and operation of aircraft that require significant
expenditures. Some FAA requirements cover, among other things,
retirement of older aircraft, security measures, collision
avoidance systems, airborne windshear avoidance systems, noise
abatement and other environmental concerns, commuter aircraft
safety and increased inspections and maintenance procedures to
be conducted on older aircraft. Continental expects to continue
incurring expenses to comply with the FAAs regulations.
Many aspects of airlines operations also are subject to
increasingly stringent federal, state and local laws protecting
the environment. Future regulatory developments in the U.S. and
abroad could adversely affect operations and increase operating
costs in the airline industry. For example, potential future
actions that may be taken by the U.S. government, foreign
governments, or the International Civil Aviation Organization to
limit the emission of greenhouse gases by the aviation sector
are unknown at this time, but the impact to Continental and its
industry is likely to be adverse and could be significant.
Restrictions on the ownership and transfer of airline routes and
takeoff and landing slots have also been proposed. The ability
of U.S. carriers to operate international routes is subject
to change because the applicable arrangements between the United
States and foreign governments may be amended from time to time,
or because appropriate slots or facilities are not made
available. Continental cannot provide assurance that current
laws and regulations, or laws or regulations enacted in the
future, will not adversely affect it.
Continentals
Results of Operations Fluctuate due to Seasonality and Other
Factors Associated with the Airline Industry
Due to greater demand for air travel during the summer months,
revenue in the airline industry in the second and third quarters
of the year is generally stronger than revenue in the first and
fourth quarters of the year for most U.S. air carriers.
Continentals results of operations generally reflect this
seasonality, but also have been impacted by numerous other
factors that are not necessarily seasonal, including excise and
similar taxes, weather, air traffic control delays and general
economic conditions, as well as the other factors discussed
above. For example, in the third quarter of 2005, Hurricanes
Katrina and Rita disrupted Continentals operations and
resulted in unprecedented high prices and diminished supplies of
jet fuel. As a result, Continentals operating results for
a quarterly period are not necessarily indicative of operating
results for an entire year, and historical operating results are
not necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Certificates and the Offering
Appraisal
and Realizable Value of Collateral
Simat, Helliesen & Eichner, Inc., an independent
aviation appraisal and consulting firm (SH&E),
has prepared an appraisal of the spare parts of the types
included in the Collateral owned by Continental as of
December 25, 2005. A report, dated February 16, 2006,
summarizing such appraisal is annexed to this Prospectus
Supplement as Appendix II. The appraisal is subject to a
number of assumptions and limitations and was prepared based on
certain specified methodologies. In preparing its appraisal,
SH&E conducted only a limited physical inspection of certain
locations at which Continental maintains the spare parts. An
appraisal that is subject to other assumptions and limitations
and based on other methodologies may result in valuations that
are materially different from those contained in SH&Es
appraisal. See Description of the Appraisal.
Continental is required to provide to the Policy Provider, the
Mortgagee and the Rating Agencies a semiannual appraisal of the
Collateral. If any such subsequent appraisal indicates that the
ratio of the outstanding principal amount of the Series G
Equipment Note to the Collateral value is greater than 45.0%,
that the ratio of the sum of the outstanding principal amount of
the Series G Equipment Note and of the Series B
Equipment Note to the Collateral
S-24
value is greater than 75.0% or that the ratio of Rotables
included in the Collateral to the outstanding principal amount
of the Series G Equipment Note is less than 150.0%,
Continental is required to provide additional collateral or to
redeem some or all of the Equipment Notes so that the loan to
collateral values are not greater than the applicable maximum
percentage and the Rotables to loan value is not less than the
applicable minimum percentage. See Description of the
Equipment NotesCollateral.
An appraisal is only an estimate of value. An appraisal should
not be relied upon as a measure of realizable value. The
proceeds realized upon a sale of any Collateral may be less than
its appraised value. The value of the Collateral if remedies are
exercised under the Indenture will depend on market and economic
conditions, the supply of similar spare parts, the availability
of buyers, the condition of the Collateral and other factors. In
addition, since spare parts are regularly used, refurbished,
purchased, transferred and discarded in the ordinary course of
business, the quantity of spare parts included in the Collateral
and their appraised value will change over time. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the proceeds realized upon any
such exercise of remedies with respect to Equipment Notes and
the Collateral would equal the appraised value of the Collateral
or be sufficient to satisfy in full payments due on such
Equipment Notes or the Certificates.
As discussed under Risk Factors Relating to the Airline
IndustryThe Airline Industry is Highly Competitive and
Susceptible to Price Discounting and Fluctuations in Passenger
Demand, in recent years the airline industry has suffered
substantial losses and several major U.S. air carriers have
filed for bankruptcy protection. In response to adverse market
conditions, many air carriers have reduced the number of
aircraft in operation, and there may be further reductions,
particularly by air carriers in bankruptcy. Any such reduction
of aircraft of the same models as the models of aircraft on
which the spare parts included in the Collateral may be
installed or used could adversely affect the value of the
Collateral.
Control
over Collateral; Sale of Equipment Notes
If an Indenture Default is continuing, subject to certain
conditions, the Mortgagee will be directed by the
Controlling Party in exercising remedies under the
Indenture, including accelerating the Equipment Notes or
foreclosing the lien on the Collateral. See Description of
the Certificates Indenture Defaults and Certain
Rights Upon an Indenture Default.
The Controlling Party will be:
|
|
|
|
|
The Policy Provider (except as provided below).
|
|
|
|
If a Policy Provider Default is continuing or if the Policy has
been surrendered for cancellation (thereby releasing the Policy
Provider from its obligations under the Policy) and the Policy
Provider Amounts (other than certain specified amounts) have
been paid in full, the Class G Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Upon payment of Final Distributions to Class G
Certificateholders and (unless a Policy Provider Default is
continuing) of the Policy Provider Amounts (other than certain
specified amounts) to the Policy Provider, the Class B
Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, the Primary Liquidity Provider.
|
During the continuation of any Indenture Default, the
Controlling Party may direct the sale of the Equipment Notes,
subject to certain limitations. See Description of the
Intercreditor AgreementIntercreditor RightsSale of
Pledged Spare Parts or Equipment Notes. The market for
Equipment Notes during any Indenture Default may be very
limited, and there can be no assurance as to the price at which
they could be sold. If the Controlling Party directs the sale of
any Equipment Notes for less than their outstanding principal
amount, the Class B Certificateholders (and, if payments
required to be made under the Policy are not made, perhaps the
Class G Certificateholders) will receive a smaller amount
of principal distributions than anticipated and will not have
any claim for the shortfall against Continental, any Liquidity
Provider, any Trustee or, in the case of the Class B
Certificateholders, the Policy Provider.
S-25
Influence
of the Policy Provider
Amendments, modifications and waivers of the Indenture and the
other Operative Agreements require the consent of the holders of
a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the Equipment
Notes, subject to certain limited exceptions. See
Description of the Equipment NotesModification of
Indenture and Other Operative Agreements. The
Series G Equipment Note will constitute a majority of the
outstanding principal amount of the Equipment Notes through the
Final Expected Distribution Date, unless prepaid earlier at the
option of Continental. See Description of the
CertificatesPool Factors. So long as the Final
Distributions on the Class G Certificates have not been
made or any Policy Provider Obligations or Policy Expenses
remain outstanding and no Policy Provider Default has occurred
and is continuing, the Policy Provider will direct the vote of
the Series G Equipment Note. See Description of the
Intercreditor AgreementVoting of Equipment Notes.
Accordingly, it is expected that the Policy Provider will have
control over any such amendments, modifications and waivers. In
addition, after the occurrence and during the continuance of an
Indenture Default, the Mortgagee will be directed in taking, or
refraining from taking, any action under the Indenture by the
Controlling Party. The Policy Provider will be the Controlling
Party, subject to certain exceptions. See Description of
the Intercreditor AgreementIntercreditor
RightsControlling Party.
Ratings
of the Certificates
It is a condition to the issuance of the Certificates that the
Class G Certificates be rated not lower than Aaa by
Moodys and AAA by Standard & Poors and the
Class B Certificates be rated not lower than B1 by
Moodys and B+ by Standard & Poors. A rating
is not a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell the
Certificates, because such rating does not address market price
or suitability for a particular investor. A rating may not
remain unchanged for any given period of time and may be lowered
or withdrawn entirely by a Rating Agency if, in its judgment,
circumstances in the future (including the downgrading of
Continental, any Liquidity Provider or the Policy Provider) so
warrant.
The Rating Agencies base (i) the rating of the Class G
Certificates solely on the rating of the Policy Provider and the
availability of the Policy and (ii) the rating of the
Class B Certificates primarily on the default risk of the
Series B Equipment Note, the value provided by the
Collateral securing the Equipment Notes and the subordination
provisions applicable to the Certificates. These ratings address
the likelihood of timely payment of interest (at the Stated
Interest Rate and without any Premium or Break Amount) when due
on the Certificates and the ultimate payment of principal
distributable under the Certificates by the Final Maturity Date.
The ratings do not address the possibility of certain defaults,
optional redemptions or other circumstances, which could result
in the payment of the outstanding principal amount of the
Certificates prior to the Final Expected Distribution Date.
Standard & Poors has indicated that its rating on
the Class G Certificates would be withdrawn if the Policy
Provider were released from its obligations under the Policy by
the Class B Certificateholders in connection with their
purchase of the Class G Certificates.
Maximum
Interest Rate on Class G Certificates if Continental
Defaults
If there is a Payment Default under the Indenture and such
Payment Default is continuing on a Regular Distribution Date,
the interest rate on the Series G Equipment Note for the
interest period commencing on such Regular Distribution Date
will be subject to a maximum equal to the Capped Interest Rate.
The amounts available for any such interest period under the
Liquidity Facilities and the Policy for the payment of accrued
interest with respect to the Class G Certificates are
limited by the same maximum rate. Accordingly, if Continental
fails to make a payment under the Indenture when due, the
interest rate on the Series G Equipment Note and,
accordingly, the amount that the Class G Trustee may draw
under the Liquidity Facilities and the Policy (or, if
applicable, withdraw from the Cash Collateral Account) to make
the next interest payment with respect to the Class G
Certificates will be capped at such maximum rate. The
Class G Certificateholders will not have a claim for
interest at a rate above the Capped Interest Rate with respect
to any period during which the Capped Interest Rate is in effect.
S-26
Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility for the Class G
Certificates
The Above-Cap Liquidity Facility provides that upon (i) a
downgrading of the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider below the
applicable Threshold Rating or (ii) the occurrence of
certain other events relating to certain changes in law or other
circumstances, unless the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility is
replaced by a replacement Above-Cap Liquidity Facility, the
Above-Cap Liquidity Facility shall be terminated. The Above-Cap
Liquidity Provider will have the right to replace the Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility by a replacement Above-Cap Liquidity Facility
or to terminate the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility upon the
occurrence of certain events relating to deduction or
withholding for tax. If the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility is so
terminated, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider is required to
deposit into the Above-Cap Collateral Account a termination
payment expected to be sufficient to cover one future payment
under the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility, assuming that LIBOR will
not exceed 20%. See Description of the Liquidity
Facilities for the Class G CertificatesAbove-Cap
Liquidity FacilityPayments. Thus, after the
Above-Cap Liquidity Facility has been terminated, if LIBOR at
any time exceeds 20% or if more than one payment is to be made
from the Above-Cap Collateral Account, there can be no assurance
that the amounts available in the Above-Cap Collateral Account
would be sufficient to cover any interest shortfall on the
Class G Certificates as otherwise described herein.
Certain
Limitations With Respect to the Collateral
The Equipment Notes will be secured by a lien on the Pledged
Spare Parts. See Description of the Equipment
NotesCollateral. However, the lien will not apply to
a spare part for as long as it is installed on or being used in
any aircraft, engine or other spare part so installed or being
used. In addition, since spare parts are regularly used,
refurbished, purchased, transferred and discarded in the
ordinary course of Continentals business, the quantity of
spare parts included in the Collateral and their appraised value
will change over time.
Continental is required to keep the Pledged Spare Parts at
certain Designated Locations, subject to certain exceptions. See
Description of the Equipment
NotesCollateralDesignated Locations. The lien
of the Equipment Notes will not apply to any spare part not
located at a Designated Location.
Continental is required to provide to the Policy Provider, the
Trustees and the Rating Agencies a semiannual appraisal of the
Collateral. If any such subsequent appraisal indicates that the
ratio of the outstanding principal amount of the Series G
Equipment Note to the Collateral value is greater than 45.0%,
that the ratio of the sum of the outstanding principal amount of
the Series G Equipment Note and of the Series B
Equipment Note to the Collateral value is greater than 75.0% or
that the ratio of Rotables included in the Collateral to the
outstanding principal amount of the Series G Equipment Note
is less than 150.0%, Continental is required to provide
additional collateral or to redeem some or all of the Equipment
Notes so that the loan to Collateral values are not greater than
the applicable maximum percentage and the Rotables to loan value
is not less than the applicable minimum percentage. In order to
satisfy this requirement, Continental may grant a lien on
additional Qualified Spare Parts, spare parts relating to Boeing
model 787 aircraft (in the first such instance, subject to the
approval of the Policy Provider), cash or certain investment
securities. In addition, Continental may grant a lien on other
collateral, provided that the Policy Provider agrees and each
Rating Agency confirms that the use of such additional
collateral will not result in a reduction of the rating of the
Class G Certificates or Class B Certificates below the
then current rating for such Certificates (determined in the
case of the Class G Certificates without regard to the
Policy) or a withdrawal or suspension of the rating of such
Certificates. See Description of the Equipment
NotesCollateral. Section 1110 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code, which provides special rights to
holders of liens with respect to certain equipment (see
Description of the Equipment NotesRemedies),
would apply to any such additional Qualified Spare Parts and
spare parts relating to Boeing model 787 aircraft but would not
apply to any such cash or investment securities. In addition,
Section 1110 may not apply to such other collateral,
depending on the circumstances.
Any such grant of a lien on cash, investment securities or other
collateral or redemption of Equipment Notes by Continental could
be subject to avoidance as a preference under
Section 547 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code if (1) it
occurred within 90 days of a bankruptcy filing by
Continental (or one year in the case of a redemption of
Equipment Notes held by an insider of Continental
within the meaning of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code) and
(2) it enabled the holders of such Equipment Notes to
receive more than they would receive if Continental were
liquidated under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code
and the grant of additional collateral or the redemption of such
Equipment
S-27
Notes had not occurred, which would likely be the case if, at
the time of the grant or redemption, such Equipment Notes are
undersecured.
Limited
Ability to Resell the Certificates
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for the
Certificates. Neither Continental nor either Trust intends to
apply for listing of the Certificates on any securities exchange
or otherwise. The Underwriter may assist in resales of the
Certificates, but it is not required to do so. A secondary
market for the Certificates may not develop. If a secondary
market does develop, it might not continue or it might not be
sufficiently liquid to allow you to resell any of your
Certificates.
In addition, the Class B Certificates will be subject to
transfer restrictions. They may be sold only to qualified
institutional buyers, as defined in Rule 144A under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for so long as they are
outstanding. This additional restriction may make it more
difficult for you to resell any of your Class B
Certificates, even if a secondary market does develop.
Risk
Factors Relating to the Policy Provider
If the
Financial Condition of the Policy Provider Declines, the Rating
of the Class G Certificates May Decline
The rating by each Rating Agency of the Class G
Certificates is based on the existence of the Policy that
insures the complete and timely payment of interest relating to
the Class G Certificates on each Regular Distribution Date
and the payment of outstanding principal of the Class G
Certificates no later than the Final Maturity Date. Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company, the Policy Provider, will issue the
Policy. If the Policy Providers financial condition
declines or if it becomes insolvent, the Subordination Agent may
be unable to recover the full amount due under the Policy. In
addition, such a decline or insolvency could lead a Rating
Agency to downgrade the ratings of the Class G Certificates
because of a concern that the Policy Provider may be unable to
make payments to the holders of the Class G Certificates
under the Policy. For a discussion of the financial information
generally available relating to the Policy Provider, see
Description of the Policy Provider. For certain
financial statements of the Policy Provider, see
Appendix III Policy Provider Financial
Statements.
Policy
Protection is Limited
Although the Subordination Agent may make drawings under the
Policy for interest payments relating to the Class G
Certificates on each Regular Distribution Date, the
Subordination Agent may not make drawings for principal payments
until the Final Maturity Date except in certain limited
circumstances. This limits the protection afforded to holders of
Class G Certificates by the Policy.
The Class B Certificates will not have the benefit of the
Policy or any other insurance policy covering payments on the
Certificates.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
The proceeds from the sale of the Certificates will be used at
the time of such sale to acquire Equipment Notes issued by
Continental. Continental will use most of the proceeds from the
sale of the Equipment Notes to redeem its outstanding Floating
Rate Secured Notes Due 2007, which bear interest at
USD 3-month
LIBOR plus 0.9% per annum, and Floating Rate Secured
Subordinated Notes Due 2007, which bear interest at
USD 3-month
LIBOR plus 7.5% per annum (or, if Continental has funded
such redemption prior to receipt of such proceeds, to reimburse
Continental for such funding). The outstanding principal amount
of the notes to be redeemed was $291.5 million as of
March 31, 2006, and the aggregate redemption price will be
approximately
$ million,
including accrued interest, LIBOR breakage costs and, in the
case of the Floating Rate Secured Subordinated Notes, a premium.
The notes to be redeemed are secured by the Collateral that will
secure the Equipment Notes. The proceeds in excess of the amount
used with respect to the redemption of the outstanding notes
will be used by Continental for general corporate purposes.
S-28
THE
COMPANY
Continental Airlines, Inc. (Continental or the
Company) is a major United States air carrier
engaged in the business of transporting passengers, cargo and
mail. Continental is the worlds sixth largest airline (as
measured by the number of scheduled miles flown by revenue
passengers, known as revenue passenger miles, in 2005). Together
with ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (operating as Continental Express
and referred to in this Prospectus Supplement as
ExpressJet), a wholly owned subsidiary of ExpressJet
Holdings, Inc., from which Continental purchases seat capacity,
and Continentals wholly owned subsidiary, Continental
Micronesia, Inc. (CMI), Continental operates more
than 2,500 daily departures. As of March 31, 2006,
Continental flew to 133 domestic and 123 international
destinations and offered additional connecting service through
alliances with domestic and foreign carriers. Continental
directly served 23 European cities, nine South American cities,
Tel Aviv, Delhi, Hong Kong, Beijing and Tokyo as of
March 31, 2006. In addition, Continental provides service
to more destinations in Mexico and Central America than any
other United States airline, serving 41 cities. Through its
Guam hub, CMI provides extensive service in the western Pacific,
including service to more Japanese cities than any other United
States carrier. The Companys executive offices are located
at 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002. The Companys
telephone number is
(713) 324-2950.
Domestic
Operations
Continental operates its domestic route system primarily through
its hubs in the New York metropolitan area at Newark Liberty
International Airport (Liberty International), in
Houston, Texas at George Bush Intercontinental Airport
(Bush Intercontinental) and in Cleveland, Ohio at
Hopkins International Airport (Hopkins
International). Continentals hub system allows it to
transport passengers between a large number of destinations with
substantially more frequent service than if each route were
served directly. The hub system also allows Continental to add
service to a new destination from a large number of cities using
only one or a limited number of aircraft. As of March 31,
2006, Continental operated 71% of the average daily departures
from Liberty International, 89% of the average daily departures
from Bush Intercontinental, and 66% of the average daily
departures from Hopkins International (in each case including
regional jets flown for Continental by ExpressJet). Each of
Continentals domestic hubs is located in a large business
and population center, contributing to a high volume of
origin and destination traffic.
International
Operations
Continental directly serves destinations throughout Europe,
Canada, Mexico, Central and South America and the Caribbean, as
well as Tel Aviv, Delhi, Hong Kong, Beijing and Tokyo.
Continental also provides service to numerous other destinations
through codesharing arrangements with other carriers and has
extensive operations in the western Pacific conducted by CMI. As
measured by 2005 available seat miles, approximately 45% of
Continentals mainline operations (flights using jets with
a capacity of greater than 100 seats), is dedicated to
international traffic.
Liberty International is a significant international gateway.
From Liberty International, Continental served 23 cities in
Europe, seven cities in Canada, five cities in Mexico, seven
cities in Central America, five cities in South America, 17
Caribbean destinations, Tel Aviv, Delhi, Hong Kong, Beijing and
Tokyo at March 31, 2006. During 2005, Continental added
service between Liberty International and Beijing, China;
Bristol, England; Belfast, Northern Ireland; Berlin, Germany;
Delhi, India; Hamburg, Germany; Stockholm, Sweden; Liberia,
Costa Rica, Curacao, Netherlands Antilles and Ponce, Puerto
Rico. In 2006, Continental will begin service between Liberty
International and Barcelona, Spain; Copenhagen, Denmark and
Cologne, Germany.
Bush Intercontinental is the focus of Continentals flights
to destinations in Mexico and Central America. As of
March 31, 2006, Continental flew from Bush Intercontinental
to 30 cities in Mexico, all seven countries in Central
America, nine cities in South America, eight Caribbean
destinations, three cities in Canada, three cities in Europe and
Tokyo. During 2005, Continental added service between Bush
Intercontinental and Buenos Aires, Argentina; Punta Cana,
Dominican Republic; and Bonaire, Netherlands Antilles.
From its hub operations based on the island of Guam, as of
March 31, 2006, CMI provided service to eight cities in
Japan, more than any other United States carrier, as well as
other Pacific Rim destinations, including the
S-29
Philippines, Hong Kong, Australia and Indonesia. In 2005, CMI
added new service between Guam and Hiroshima, Japan and between
Honolulu, Hawaii and Nagoya, Japan. CMI is the principal air
carrier in the Micronesian Islands, where it pioneered scheduled
air service in 1968. CMIs route system is linked to the
United States market through Hong Kong, Tokyo and Honolulu, each
of which CMI serves non-stop from Guam.
Alliances
Continental has alliance agreements, which are also referred to
as codeshare agreements or cooperative marketing agreements,
with other carriers. These relationships may include
(a) codesharing (one carrier placing its name and flight
number, or code, on flights operated by the other
carrier), (b) reciprocal frequent flyer program
participation, reciprocal airport lounge access and other joint
activities (such as seamless check-in at airports) and/or
(c) block space arrangements (carriers agree to share
capacity and bear economic risk for blocks of seats on certain
routes). Except for Continentals relationship with
ExpressJet, all of Continentals codeshare relationships
are free-sell codeshares, where the marketing carrier sells
seats on the operating carriers flights from the operating
carriers inventory, but takes no inventory risk. In
contrast, in a block space relationship or capacity purchase
agreement, such as Continental has with ExpressJet, the
marketing carrier is committed to purchase a set number of seats
on the operating carrier, sells seats to the public from this
purchased inventory and is at economic risk for the purchased
seats that it is unable to sell. Some alliance relationships may
include other cooperative undertakings such as joint purchasing,
joint corporate sale contracts, airport handling, facilities
sharing or joint technology development.
In September 2004, Continental joined SkyTeam, a global alliance
of airlines that offers greater destination coverage and the
potential for increased revenue. SkyTeam members include
Aeromexico, Air France, Alitalia, CSA Czech Airlines, Delta,
KLM, Korean Air and Northwest. As of December 31, 2005,
SkyTeam members served 344 million passengers with over
15,200 daily departures to 684 global destinations in more than
133 countries. In conjunction with joining SkyTeam, Continental
entered into bilateral codeshare, frequent flyer program
participation and airport lounge access agreements with each of
the SkyTeam members. Continental had long-term alliances with
Northwest, Delta and KLM prior to joining SkyTeam. Continental
began codeshare operations with many of the other SkyTeam
members in 2005, and Continental intends to implement codeshare
operations with the remaining carriers by the end of 2006.
Continental also has domestic codesharing agreements with
Hawaiian Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and Horizon Airlines.
Additionally, Continental has codeshare agreements with
Gulfstream International Airlines, Champlain Enterprises, Inc.,
Hyannis Air Service, Inc., Colgan Airlines, Inc., Hawaii Island
Air, Inc. and American Eagle Airlines, who provide us with
commuter feed traffic. Continental also has the first
train-to-plane
alliance in the United States with Amtrak.
In addition to its domestic alliances, Continental seeks to
develop international alliance relationships that complement its
own route system and permit expanded service through its hubs to
major international destinations. International alliances assist
in the development of its route structure by enabling
Continental to offer more frequencies in a market, provide
passengers connecting service from Continentals
international flights to other destinations beyond an alliance
airlines hub and expand the product line that Continental
may offer in a foreign destination. In addition to its
agreements with the SkyTeam member airlines, Continental also
currently has international codesharing agreements with Air
Europa of Spain, Emirates (the flag carrier of the United Arab
Emirates), EVA Airways Corporation (an airline based in Taiwan),
British European (flybe), Virgin Atlantic Airways,
Copa Airlines of Panama (Copa Airlines) and French
rail operator SNCF. As of March 31, 2006, Continental owned
27% of the common equity of Copa Holdings, S.A., the parent of
Copa Airlines.
Regional
Operations
Continentals mainline service at each of its domestic hub
cities is coordinated with ExpressJet, which operates
new-generation regional jets. As of March 31, 2006,
ExpressJet served 116 destinations in the U.S., 27 cities
in Mexico, six cities in Canada, one Caribbean destination and
one city in Guatemala. Since December 2002, ExpressJets
fleet has been comprised entirely of regional jets. Continental
believes ExpressJets regional jet service complements
Continentals operations by carrying traffic that connects
onto Continentals mainline jets and by
S-30
allowing more frequent flights to smaller cities than could be
provided economically with larger jet aircraft. The regional
jets also allow ExpressJet to serve certain routes that cannot
be served by turboprop aircraft. Additional commuter feed
traffic is currently provided to Continental by other alliance
airlines, as discussed above.
Continental purchases all of ExpressJets available seat
miles for a negotiated price under a capacity purchase agreement
with ExpressJet. The agreement covers all of ExpressJets
existing fleet, as well as the four Embraer regional jets
currently on order. Under the agreement, as amended, ExpressJet
has the right through December 31, 2006 to be
Continentals sole provider of regional jet service from
Continentals hubs. Continental is responsible for all
scheduling, pricing and seat inventories of ExpressJets
flights. Therefore, Continental is entitled to all revenue
associated with those flights and is responsible for all
revenue-related expenses, including commissions, reservations,
catering and passenger ticket processing expenses. In exchange
for ExpressJets operation of the flights and performance
of other obligations under the agreement, Continental pays
ExpressJet based on scheduled block hours (the hours from gate
departure to gate arrival) in accordance with a formula designed
to provide ExpressJet with an operating margin of approximately
10% before taking into account performance incentive payments
and variations in some costs and expenses that are generally
controllable by ExpressJet, primarily wages, salaries and
related costs. Continental assumes the risk of revenue
volatility associated with fares and passenger traffic, price
volatility for specified expense items such as fuel and the cost
of all distribution and revenue-related costs.
Under the capacity purchase agreement, Continental has the right
to give no less than 12 months notice to ExpressJet
of its intent to reduce the number of Continentals
aircraft covered by the contract. In December 2005, Continental
gave notice to ExpressJet that Continental would withdraw 69 of
the 274 regional jet aircraft (including 2006 deliveries) from
the capacity purchase agreement because the rates charged by
ExpressJet for regional capacity are above the current market.
Exercising its right under the capacity purchase agreement,
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. notified Continental on May 5,
2006 that ExpressJet will keep all 69 of the regional jet
aircraft that Continental elected to remove from the capacity
purchase agreement. As a result, Continental will continue to
sublease the aircraft to ExpressJet at increased lease rates,
and the aircraft will be withdrawn from the capacity purchase
agreement over a six-month period beginning in December 2006 and
ending in June 2007 and will no longer be flown for Continental.
Under Continentals agreement with ExpressJet, ExpressJet
may (1) fly any of the withdrawn aircraft for another
airline (subject to its ability to obtain facilities, such as
gates, ticket counters, hold rooms and other operations-related
facilities, and subject to its arrangement with Continental that
prohibits ExpressJet during the term of the agreement from
flying under its or another carriers code in or out of
Continentals hub airports), or (2) fly any of the
withdrawn aircraft under ExpressJets own flight designator
code, subject to its ability to obtain facilities and subject to
ExpressJets arrangement with Continental respecting its
hubs. Continental expects to replace some or all of the capacity
currently provided by the 69 regional jets. Continental believes
that there are other aircraft available to Continental to
replace this capacity at a lower cost.
S-31
DESCRIPTION
OF THE POLICY PROVIDER
General
The information set forth in this section, including any
financial statements incorporated herein, and in the financial
statements attached hereto as Appendix III has been
provided by Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, a New York
stock insurance corporation (FGIC or the
Policy Provider), for inclusion in this Prospectus
Supplement, and such information has not been independently
verified by Continental, the Underwriter, the Subordination
Agent or the Liquidity Providers. Accordingly, notwithstanding
anything to the contrary herein, none of Continental, the
Underwriter, the Subordination Agent or the Liquidity Providers
assumes any responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or
applicability of such information.
The Policy Provider is a New York stock insurance corporation
that writes financial guaranty insurance in respect of public
finance and structured finance obligations and other financial
obligations, including credit default swaps. The Policy Provider
is licensed to engage in the financial guaranty insurance
business in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands and
the United Kingdom.
The Policy Provider is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of FGIC
Corporation, a Delaware corporation. At March 31, 2006, the
principal owners of FGIC Corporation and the approximate
percentage of its outstanding common stock owned by each were as
follows: The PMI Group, Inc. 42%; affiliates of
the Blackstone Group L.P. 23%; and affiliates
of the Cypress Group L.L.C. 23%. Neither FGIC
Corporation nor any of its stockholders or affiliates is
obligated to pay any debts of the Policy Provider or any claims
under any insurance policy, including the Policy, issued by the
Policy Provider.
The Policy Provider is subject to the insurance laws and
regulations of the State of New York, where the Policy Provider
is domiciled, including New Yorks comprehensive financial
guaranty insurance law. That law, among other things, limits the
business of each financial guaranty insurer to financial
guaranty insurance (and related lines); requires that each
financial guaranty insurer maintain a minimum surplus to
policyholders; establishes limits on the aggregate net amount of
exposure that may be retained in respect of a particular issuer
or revenue source (known as single risk limits) and on the
aggregate net amount of exposure that may be retained in respect
of particular types of risk as compared to the
policyholders surplus (known as aggregate risk limits);
and establishes contingency, loss and unearned premium reserve
requirements. In addition, the Policy Provider is also subject
to the applicable insurance laws and regulations of all other
jurisdictions in which it is licensed to transact insurance
business. The insurance laws and regulations, as well as the
level of supervisory authority that may be exercised by the
various insurance regulators, vary by jurisdiction.
FGIC
Financial Information
The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Policy
Provider and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2006,
December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, on the basis
of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).
S-32
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED CAPITALIZATION TABLE
(Dollars in Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned Premiums
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
|
$
|
1,201
|
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Additional Paid-in Capital
|
|
|
1,896
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net
of tax
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
2,367
|
|
|
|
2,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and
Stockholders Equity
|
|
$
|
4,529
|
|
|
$
|
3,708
|
|
|
$
|
3,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The audited consolidated financial statements of the Policy
Provider and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
and for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for
the periods from December 18, 2003 through
December 31, 2003 and from January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, and the unaudited consolidated financial
statements of the Policy Provider and subsidiaries as of
March 31, 2006 and for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, are annexed to this Prospectus
Supplement as Appendix III. Any statement contained herein
under the heading Description of the Policy Provider
or in Appendix III shall be modified or superseded to the
extent required by any statement in any document subsequently
incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement with the
approval of the Policy Provider, and shall not be deemed, except
as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this
Prospectus Supplement.
All financial statements of the Policy Provider (if any)
included in documents filed by Continental with the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c),
14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, subsequent to the date of this
Prospectus Supplement and prior to the termination of the
offering of the Certificates shall be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into this Prospectus Supplement and to be a part
hereof from the respective dates of filing of such documents.
The New York State Insurance Department recognizes only
statutory accounting practices (SAP) for determining
and reporting the financial condition and results of operations
of an insurance company, for determining its solvency under the
New York Insurance Law, and for determining whether its
financial condition warrants the payment of a dividend to its
stockholders. Although the Policy Provider prepares both GAAP
and SAP financial statements, no consideration is given by the
New York State Insurance Department to financial statements
prepared in accordance with GAAP in making such determinations.
A discussion of the principal differences between SAP and GAAP
is contained in the notes to the Policy Providers audited
SAP financial statements.
Copies of the Policy Providers most recently published
GAAP and SAP financial statements are available upon request to:
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company, 125 Park Avenue, New York,
NY 10017, Attention: Corporate Communications Department. The
Policy Providers telephone number is
(212) 312-3000.
Neither the Policy Provider nor any of its affiliates accepts
any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of, nor have
they participated in the preparation of, the Prospectus, the
Prospectus Supplement or any information or disclosure that is
provided to potential purchasers of the Class G
Certificates, or omitted from such disclosure, other than with
respect to the accuracy of information regarding the Policy
S-33
Provider set forth under the heading Description of the
Policy Provider herein or in Appendix III. In
addition, the Policy Provider makes no representation regarding
the Class G Certificates or the advisability of investing
in the Class G Certificates.
The
Credit Ratings of FGIC
The financial strength of the Policy Provider is rated AAA by
Standard & Poors, a Division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. (Standard & Poors),
Aaa by Moodys Investor Service, Inc.
(Moodys) and AAA by Fitch Ratings
(Fitch). Each rating of the Policy Provider should
be evaluated independently. The ratings reflect the respective
ratings agencies current assessments of the insurance
financial strength of the Policy Provider. Any further
explanation of any rating may be obtained only from the
applicable rating agency. These ratings are not recommendations
to buy, sell or hold the Class G Certificates, and are
subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the rating
agencies. Any downward revision or withdrawal of any of the
above ratings may have an adverse effect on the market price of
the Class G Certificates. The Policy Provider does not
guarantee the market price or investment value of the
Class G Certificates nor does it guarantee that the ratings
on the Class G Certificates will not be revised or
withdrawn.
S-34
DESCRIPTION
OF THE CERTIFICATES
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Certificates. The summary does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to all of the provisions
of the Basic Agreement, which was filed with the Commission as
an exhibit to Continentals Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated September 25, 1997, and to all of the provisions of
the Certificates, the Trust Supplement for each Trust and
the Intercreditor Agreement, each of which will be filed as an
exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission.
Except as otherwise indicated, the following summary relates to
each of the Trusts and the Certificates issued by each such
Trust. The terms and conditions governing each of the Trusts
will be substantially the same, except as described under
Subordination and Purchase Rights
of Certificateholders below and except that the principal
amount of the Equipment Notes held by each Trust and the
interest rate of the Equipment Notes held by each Trust will
differ. The references to Sections in parentheses in the
following summary are to the relevant Sections of the Basic
Agreement unless otherwise indicated.
General
Each Pass Through Certificate (collectively, the
Certificates) will represent a fractional undivided
interest in one of two Continental Airlines 2006-1 Pass Through
Trusts (the Class G Trust and the
Class B Trust and, together, the
Trusts). The Trusts will be formed pursuant to a
pass through trust agreement between Continental and Wilmington
Trust Company, as trustee (the Trustee), dated as of
September 25, 1997 (the Basic Agreement), and
two separate supplements thereto (each, a
Trust Supplement and, together with the Basic
Agreement, collectively, the Pass Through
Trust Agreements) relating to such Trusts between
Continental and the Trustee, as trustee under each Trust. The
Certificates to be issued by the Class G Trust and the
Class B Trust are referred to herein, respectively, as the
Class G Certificates and the Class B
Certificates.
Each Certificate will represent a fractional undivided interest
in the Trust created by the Basic Agreement and the applicable
Trust Supplement pursuant to which such Certificate is
issued. (Section 2.01) The Trust Property of each
Trust (the Trust Property) will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to the Intercreditor Agreement, an Equipment Note issued
on a recourse basis by Continental.
|
|
|
|
The rights of such Trust under the Intercreditor Agreement and
the Note Purchase Agreement (including all monies
receivable in respect of such rights).
|
|
|
|
In the case of the Class G Trust, all monies receivable
under the Liquidity Facilities and the Policy.
|
|
|
|
Funds from time to time deposited with the applicable Trustee in
accounts relating to such Trust.
|
The Certificates will be issued in fully registered form only
and will be subject to the provisions described below under
Delivery and Form. Certificates will be issued
only in minimum denominations of $1,000 or integral multiples
thereof, except that one Certificate of each Trust may be issued
in a different denomination. (Section 3.01;
Trust Supplements, Section 3.01) The Class B
Certificates will be subject to transfer restrictions. They may
be sold only to qualified institutional buyers, as defined in
Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for
as long as they are outstanding. See Transfer
Restrictions for Class B Certificates.
The Certificates represent interests in the respective Trusts,
and all payments and distributions thereon will be made only
from the Trust Property of the related Trust.
(Sections 2.01 and 3.09) The Certificates do not represent
an interest in or obligation of Continental, the Trustees or the
Mortgagee or any affiliate of any thereof.
Subordination
On each Regular Distribution Date or Special Distribution Date
(each, a Distribution Date), all payments received
by the Subordination Agent in respect of Equipment Notes and
certain other payments under the Indenture will be distributed
under the Intercreditor Agreement in the following order:
|
|
|
|
|
To the Subordination Agent, any Trustee, any Certificateholder,
the Primary Liquidity Provider and the Policy Provider to the
extent required to pay Administration Expenses.
|
S-35
|
|
|
|
|
To the Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent required to pay
the Liquidity Expenses and to the Policy Provider to the extent
required to pay Policy Expenses.
|
|
|
|
To the Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent required to pay
interest accrued on the Liquidity Obligations (as determined
after giving effect to certain payments by the Policy Provider
to the Primary Liquidity Provider) and to the Policy Provider to
the extent required to pay interest accrued on certain Policy
Provider Obligations and, if the Policy Provider has paid to the
Primary Liquidity Provider all outstanding drawings and interest
thereon owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider, to the Policy
Provider to the extent required to reimburse the Policy Provider
for the amount of such payment made to the Primary Liquidity
Provider attributable to interest accrued on such drawings.
|
|
|
|
To (i) the Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent
required to pay the outstanding amount of all Liquidity
Obligations (as determined after giving effect to certain
payments by the Policy Provider to the Primary Liquidity
Provider), (ii) if applicable, unless (x) any
Equipment Note is a Non-Performing Equipment Note and a
Liquidity Event of Default shall have occurred and is continuing
or (y) a Final Drawing shall have occurred, to replenish
the Cash Collateral Account up to the Required Amount (less the
amount of any repayments of Interest Drawings while
sub-clause (x) of this clause is applicable) and
(iii) if the Policy Provider has paid to the Primary
Liquidity Provider all outstanding drawings and interest thereon
owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider or if the Policy
Provider has honored any Policy Drawings as a result of the
failure of the Primary Liquidity Provider to honor Interest
Drawings in accordance with the Primary Liquidity Facility, to
the Policy Provider to the extent required to reimburse the
Policy Provider for the amount of such payment made to the
Primary Liquidity Provider in respect of principal of drawings
under the Primary Liquidity Facility and the amount of such
Policy Drawings, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
If applicable, unless (x) any Equipment Note is a
Non-Performing Equipment Note and a Liquidity Event of Default
shall have occurred and is continuing or (y) a Final
Drawing shall have occurred, to replenish the Above-Cap
Collateral Account up to an amount equal to the Above-Cap
Collateral Amount as recalculated as of such date (less any
amount then on deposit in the Above-Cap Account).
|
|
|
|
To the Subordination Agent, any Trustee or any Certificateholder
to the extent required to pay certain fees, taxes, charges and
other amounts payable.
|
|
|
|
To the Trustee for the Class G Trust (the
Class G Trustee) to the extent required to pay
Expected Distributions on the Class G Certificates.
|
|
|
|
To the Policy Provider to the extent required to pay Policy
Provider Obligations (other than amounts payable pursuant to the
first four clauses above and any Excess Reimbursement
Obligations) and certain fees.
|
|
|
|
To the Trustee for the Class B Trust (the
Class B Trustee) to the extent required to pay
Expected Distributions on the Class B Certificates.
|
|
|
|
To the Policy Provider to the extent required to pay any Excess
Reimbursement Obligations.
|
|
|
|
If applicable, unless (x) any Equipment Note is a
Non-Performing Equipment Note and a Liquidity Event of Default
shall have occurred and is continuing or (y) a Final
Drawing shall have occurred, to replenish the Above-Cap
Collateral Account up to an amount equal to the Above-Cap
Collateral Amount as recalculated as of such date.
|
For purposes of calculating Expected Distributions with respect
to the Certificates of any Trust, any Premium or Break Amount
paid on the Equipment Note held in such Trust that has not been
distributed to the Certificateholders of such Trust (other than
such Premium or Break Amount or a portion thereof applied to the
payment of interest on the Certificates of such Trust or the
reduction of the Pool Balance of such Trust) shall be added to
the amount of Expected Distributions.
Monies drawn under a Liquidity Facility or the Policy will not
be subject to the subordination provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement.
S-36
Payments
and Distributions
Payments of principal, Premium (if any), Break Amount (if any)
and interest on the Equipment Notes or with respect to other
Trust Property held in each Trust will be distributed by
the applicable Trustee to Certificateholders of such Trust on
the date receipt of such payment is confirmed, except in the
case of certain types of Special Payments.
Interest
The Equipment Note held in each Trust will accrue interest at
the applicable variable rate per annum for the Certificates to
be issued by such Trust set forth on the cover page of this
Prospectus Supplement, subject, in the case of the Series G
Equipment Note, to a maximum equal to the Capped Interest Rate
only for any interest period commencing on any Regular
Distribution Date if a Payment Default under the Indenture shall
have occurred and is continuing on such Regular Distribution
Date (the Stated Interest Rates). Accrued interest
is scheduled to be paid on March 2, June 2, September
2 and December 2 of each year, commencing on September 2,
2006 (the Regular Distribution Dates). Such interest
payments will be distributed to Certificateholders of such Trust
on each such date until the final Distribution Date for such
Trust, subject to the Intercreditor Agreement. Interest on the
Equipment Notes is calculated on the basis of the actual number
of days elapsed over a
360-day year.
Interest payable on the Equipment Notes for each Interest Period
after the initial Interest Period will be determined based on
LIBOR. As promptly as practicable after the determination of
LIBOR for an Interest Period under the Reference Agency
Agreement, the Reference Agent will give notice of such
determination of LIBOR to Continental, the Trustees, the
Mortgagee, the Subordination Agent, the Primary Liquidity
Provider, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider and the Policy
Provider. Certificateholders may obtain such information from
the Trustees or otherwise in the statements included with each
distribution of a Scheduled Payment or Special Payment.
Payments of interest with respect to the Class G
Certificates will be supported by the Primary Liquidity Facility
and the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility to be provided by the
applicable Liquidity Provider for the benefit of the holders of
such Certificates. The Primary Liquidity Facility, together with
the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility, is expected to provide an
amount sufficient to pay interest on the Class G
Certificates at the Stated Interest Rate for the Class G
Certificates on up to eight successive Regular Distribution
Dates (without regard to any future payments of principal on
such Certificates and assuming that Continental will not cure
any payment default under the Indenture). The Liquidity
Facilities do not provide for drawings or payments thereunder to
pay for principal of or Break Amount or Premium on the
Class G Certificates, any interest on the Class G
Certificates in excess of the Stated Interest Rate for the
Class G Certificates, or, notwithstanding the subordination
provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement, any amount with
respect to the Class B Certificates. Therefore, only the
holders of the Class G Certificates will be entitled to
receive and retain the proceeds of drawings under the Primary
Liquidity Facility and withdrawals from the Above-Cap Account.
See Description of the Liquidity Facilities for the
Class G Certificates. The Class B Certificates
will not have the benefit of any liquidity facility.
In the case of the Class G Certificates, after use of any
available funds under the Primary Liquidity Facility, the Cash
Collateral Account and the Above-Cap Account, the payment of
interest at the Stated Interest Rate for the Class G
Certificates will be supported by the Policy provided by the
Policy Provider, except in specified circumstances. See
Description of the Policy and the Policy Provider
Agreement for the Class G CertificatesThe
Policy.
Principal
The entire principal amount of the Equipment Notes of each
Series is scheduled to be paid on June 2, 2013 (the
Final Expected Distribution Date). The Final
Maturity Date is June 2, 2015.
Payment of principal of the Class G Certificates on the
Final Maturity Date and, in certain limited circumstances,
earlier will be supported by the Policy provided by the Policy
Provider. See Description of the Policy and the Policy
Provider Agreement for the Class G CertificatesThe
Policy. The Class B Certificates will not have the
benefit of the Policy or any other insurance policy covering
payments on the Certificates.
S-37
Distributions
The Trustee of each Trust will distribute, subject to the
Intercreditor Agreement, on each Regular Distribution Date to
the Certificateholders of such Trust all Scheduled Payments
received in respect of the Equipment Note held on behalf of such
Trust, the receipt of which is confirmed by the Trustee on such
Regular Distribution Date. Each Certificateholder of each Trust
will be entitled to receive its proportionate share, based upon
its fractional undivided interest in such Trust and, subject to
the Intercreditor Agreement, of principal or interest on the
Equipment Note held on behalf of such Trust. Each such
distribution of Scheduled Payments will be made by the Trustee
to the Certificateholders of record of the relevant Trust on the
record date applicable to such Scheduled Payment subject to
certain exceptions. (Sections 4.01 and 4.02) If a Scheduled
Payment is not received by the Trustee on a Regular Distribution
Date but is received within five days thereafter, it will be
distributed on the date received to such holders of record. If
it is received after such five-day period, it will be treated as
a Special Payment and distributed as described below.
Any payment in respect of, or any proceeds of, any Equipment
Note or Collateral under (and as defined in) the Indenture other
than a Scheduled Payment (each, a Special Payment)
will be distributed on, in the case of a redemption of any
Equipment Note, the date of such redemption (which shall be a
Business Day), and otherwise on the Business Day specified for
distribution of such Special Payment pursuant to a notice
delivered by each Trustee as soon as practicable after the
Trustee has received funds for such Special Payment (each, a
Special Distribution Date). Any such distribution
will be subject to the Intercreditor Agreement.
Each Trustee will mail a notice to the Certificateholders of the
applicable Trust stating the scheduled Special Distribution
Date, the related record date, the amount of the Special Payment
and the reason for the Special Payment. In the case of a
redemption or purchase of the Equipment Note held in the related
Trust, such notice will be mailed not less than 15 days
prior to the date such Special Payment is scheduled to be
distributed, and in the case of any other Special Payment, such
notice will be mailed as soon as practicable after the Trustee
has confirmed that it has received funds for such Special
Payment. (Section 4.02(c); Trust Supplements,
Section 4.02(b)) If the redemption of an Equipment Note
held in a Trust is revoked after notice of the Special Payment
date for such redemption has been given to holders of
Certificates issued by such Trust, the Trustee will promptly
mail notice of such revocation to such Certificateholders. Each
distribution of a Special Payment, other than a final
distribution, on a Special Distribution Date for any Trust will
be made by the Trustee to the Certificateholders of record of
such Trust on the record date applicable to such Special
Payment. (Section 4.02(b)) See Indenture
Defaults and Certain Rights Upon an Indenture Default and
Description of the Equipment NotesOptional
Redemption.
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement requires that the Trustee
establish and maintain, for the related Trust and for the
benefit of the Certificateholders of such Trust, one or more
non-interest bearing accounts (the Certificate
Account) for the deposit of payments representing
Scheduled Payments received by such Trustee. Each Pass Through
Trust Agreement requires that the Trustee establish and
maintain, for the related Trust and for the benefit of the
Certificateholders of such Trust, one or more accounts (the
Special Payments Account) for the deposit of
payments representing Special Payments received by such Trustee,
which shall be non-interest bearing except in certain
circumstances where the Trustee may invest amounts in such
account in certain permitted investments. Pursuant to the terms
of each Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Trustee is
required to deposit any Scheduled Payments relating to the
applicable Trust received by it in the Certificate Account of
such Trust and to deposit any Special Payments so received by it
in the Special Payments Account of such Trust.
(Section 4.01; Trust Supplements,
Section 4.03(a)) All amounts so deposited will be
distributed by the Trustee on a Regular Distribution Date or a
Special Distribution Date, as appropriate. (Section 4.02;
Trust Supplements, Section 4.03(a))
The final distribution for each Trust will be made only upon
presentation and surrender of the Certificates for such Trust at
the office or agency of the Trustee specified in the notice
given by the Trustee of such final distribution. The Trustee
will mail such notice of the final distribution to the
Certificateholders of such Trust, specifying the date set for
such final distribution and the amount of such distribution.
(Section 11.01) See Termination of the
Trusts below. Distributions in respect of Certificates
issued in global form will be made as described in
Delivery and Form below.
If any Distribution Date is a Saturday, Sunday or other day on
which commercial banks are authorized or required to close in
New York, New York, Houston, Texas, or Wilmington, Delaware, or
which is not a day for
S-38
trading by and between banks in the London interbank Eurodollar
market (any other day being a Business Day),
distributions scheduled to be made on such Regular Distribution
Date or Special Distribution Date will be made on the next
succeeding Business Day, and interest shall be added for such
additional period. (Section 12.11)
Pool
Factors
The Pool Balance for each Trust or for the
Certificates issued by any Trust indicates, as of any date, the
original aggregate face amount of the Certificates of such Trust
less the aggregate amount of all payments made as of such date
in respect of the Certificates of such Trust other than payments
made in respect of interest, Break Amount or Premium or
reimbursement of any costs or expenses incurred in connection
therewith. The Pool Balance for each Trust or for the
Certificates issued by any Trust as of any date shall be
computed after giving effect to any payment of principal of the
Equipment Notes, any payment under the Policy (other than in
respect of interest on the Class G Certificates) or payment
with respect to other Trust Property held in such Trust and
the distribution thereof to be made on that date.
(Trust Supplements, Section 2.01)
The Pool Factor for each Trust as of any date is the
quotient (rounded to the seventh decimal place) computed by
dividing (i) the Pool Balance by (ii) the original
aggregate face amount of the Certificates of such Trust. The
Pool Factor for each Trust or for the Certificates issued by any
Trust as of any date shall be computed after giving effect to
any payment of principal of the Equipment Notes, payment under
the Policy (other than in respect of interest on the
Class G Certificates) or payment with respect to other
Trust Property held in such Trust and the distribution
thereof made on that date. (Trust Supplements,
Section 2.01) The Pool Factor for each Trust will be
1.0000000 on the date of issuance of the Certificates;
thereafter, the Pool Factor for each Trust will decline to
reflect reductions in the Pool Balance of such Trust. The amount
of a Certificateholders pro rata share of the Pool Balance
of a Trust can be determined by multiplying the par value of the
holders Certificate of such Trust by the Pool Factor for
such Trust as of the applicable Distribution Date. Notice of the
Pool Factor and the Pool Balance for each Trust will be mailed
to Certificateholders of such Trust on each Distribution Date.
(Trust Supplements, Section 4.02)
In the event of any optional redemption, a purchase or a default
in the payment of principal or interest in respect of the
Equipment Note held in a Trust, as described in
Indenture Defaults and Certain Rights Upon an
Indenture Default and Description of the Equipment
NotesOptional Redemption, the Pool Factors and the
Pool Balances of each Trust so affected will be recomputed after
giving effect thereto and notice thereof will be mailed to the
Certificateholders of such Trust promptly after the occurrence
of any such event. (Trust Supplements, Section 4.02(c))
Reports
to Certificateholders
On each Distribution Date, the applicable Trustee will include
with each distribution by it of a Scheduled Payment or Special
Payment to Certificateholders of the related Trust a statement
setting forth the following information (per $1,000 aggregate
principal amount of Certificate for such Trust, except as to the
amounts described in items (a), (d) and (e) below):
(a) The aggregate amount of funds distributed on such
Distribution Date under the Pass Through Trust Agreement,
indicating the amount allocable to each source, including, in
case of the Class G Certificates, any portion thereof paid
by the Primary Liquidity Provider, withdrawn from the Above-Cap
Account or paid by the Policy Provider.
(b) The amount of such distribution under the Pass Through
Trust Agreement allocable to principal and the amount allocable
to Premium and Break Amount, if any.
(c) The amount of such distribution under the Pass Through
Trust Agreement allocable to interest.
(d) The Pool Balance and the Pool Factor for such Trust.
(e) The LIBOR rates and the resulting Stated Interest Rates
for the current and immediately preceding Interest Periods, as
determined by the Reference Agent. (Trust Supplements,
Section 4.02(a))
So long as the Class G Certificates are registered in the
name of The Depository Trust Company (DTC) or its
nominee, on the record date prior to each Distribution Date, the
Class G Trustee will request from DTC a securities
S-39
position listing setting forth the names of all DTC Participants
reflected on DTCs books as holding interests in the
Class G Certificates on such record date. On each
Distribution Date, the Class G Trustee will mail to each
such DTC Participant the statement described above and will make
available additional copies as requested by such DTC Participant
for forwarding to Class G Certificate Owners.
(Trust Supplements, Section 4.02(a))
In addition, after the end of each calendar year, the applicable
Trustee will furnish to each Certificateholder of each Trust at
any time during the preceding calendar year a report containing
the sum of the amounts determined pursuant to clauses (a),
(b) and (c) above with respect to the Trust for such
calendar year or, in the event such person was a
Certificateholder during only a portion of such calendar year,
for the applicable portion of such calendar year, and such other
items as are readily available to such Trustee and which a
Certificateholder shall reasonably request as necessary for the
purpose of such Certificateholders preparation of its
U.S. federal income tax returns. (Trust Supplements,
Section 4.02(b)) Such report and such other items shall be
prepared on the basis of information supplied to the applicable
Trustee by the Certificateholders. So long as the Class G
Certificates are registered in the name of DTC or its nominee,
such report shall be delivered by the Class G Trustee to
DTC Participants to be available for forwarding by such DTC
Participants to Class G Certificate Owners in the manner
described above. (Trust Supplements, Section 4.02(b))
In the case of Certificates that are issued in the form of
definitive certificates, the applicable Trustee will prepare and
deliver the information described above to each
Certificateholder of record of each Trust as the name and period
of ownership of such Certificateholder appears on the records of
the registrar of the Certificates.
Indenture
Defaults and Certain Rights Upon an Indenture Default
Since the Equipment Notes issued under the Indenture will be
held in the two Trusts, a continuing event of default under the
Indenture (an Indenture Default) would affect the
Equipment Note held by each such Trust.
In the event that the same institution acts as Trustee of both
Trusts, in the absence of instructions from the
Certificateholders of any such Trust, such Trustee could be
faced with a potential conflict of interest upon an Indenture
Default. In such event, each Trustee has indicated that it would
resign as Trustee of one or both such Trusts, and a successor
trustee would be appointed in accordance with the terms of the
applicable Pass Through Trust Agreement. Wilmington Trust
Company will be the initial Trustee under each Trust.
Upon the occurrence and continuation of an Indenture Default,
the Controlling Party will direct the Mortgagee in the exercise
of remedies thereunder. See Description of the Equipment
NotesRemedies for a discussion of remedies available
under the Indenture. In addition, the Controlling Party may
direct that all (but not less than all) of the Equipment Notes
be sold to any person, subject to certain limitations. See
Description of the Intercreditor
AgreementIntercreditor RightsSale of Pledged Spare
Parts or Equipment Notes. The proceeds of such sale will
be distributed pursuant to the provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement. Any such proceeds so distributed to any Trustee upon
any such sale shall be deposited in the applicable Special
Payments Account and shall be distributed to the
Certificateholders of the applicable Trust on a Special
Distribution Date. (Sections 4.01 and 4.02) The market for
Equipment Notes at the time of the existence of an Indenture
Default may be very limited and there can be no assurance as to
the price at which they could be sold. If any such Equipment
Notes are sold for less than their outstanding principal amount,
the Class B Certificateholders (and, absent payments under
the Policy, perhaps the Class G Certificateholders) will
receive a smaller amount of principal distributions than
anticipated and would not have any claim for the shortfall
against Continental, any Liquidity Provider, any Trustee or, in
the case of the Class B Certificateholders, the Policy
Provider.
Any amount, other than Scheduled Payments received on a Regular
Distribution Date or within five days thereafter, distributed to
the Trustee of any Trust by the Subordination Agent on account
of any Equipment Note or Collateral under (and as defined in)
the Indenture held in such Trust following an Indenture Default
will be deposited in the Special Payments Account for such Trust
and will be distributed to the Certificateholders of such Trust
on a Special Distribution Date. (Sections 4.01 and 4.02;
Trust Supplements, Section 4.03(a))
Any funds representing payments received with respect to any
defaulted Equipment Note, or the proceeds from the sale of any
Equipment Note, held by the Trustee in the Special Payments
Account for such Trust will, to the extent practicable, be
invested and reinvested by such Trustee in certain permitted
investments pending the distribution of such funds on a Special
Distribution Date. (Section 4.04) Such permitted
investments are defined as
S-40
obligations of the United States or agencies or
instrumentalities thereof for the payment of which the full
faith and credit of the United States is pledged and which
mature in not more than 60 days after the date of
acquisition thereof or such lesser time as is required for the
distribution of any such funds on a Special Distribution Date.
(Section 1.01)
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement provides that the
applicable Trustee will, within 90 days after the
occurrence of any default known to the Trustee, give to the
Certificateholders of such Trust notice, transmitted by mail, of
such uncured or unwaived default with respect to such Trust
known to it, provided that, except in the case of default
in a payment of principal, Premium, if any, Break Amount, if
any, or interest on the Equipment Note held in such Trust, the
applicable Trustee will be protected in withholding such notice
if it in good faith determines that the withholding of such
notice is in the interests of such Certificateholders.
(Section 7.02) The term default as used in this
paragraph only means the occurrence of an Indenture Default,
except that in determining whether such Indenture Default has
occurred, any grace period or notice in connection therewith
will be disregarded.
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement contains a provision
entitling the applicable Trustee, subject to the duty of such
Trustee during a default to act with the required standard of
care, to be offered reasonable security or indemnity by the
holders of the Certificates of such Trust before proceeding to
exercise any right or power under such Pass Through
Trust Agreement or the Intercreditor Agreement at the
request of such Certificateholders. (Section 7.03(e))
Subject to certain qualifications set forth in each Pass Through
Trust Agreement and to the Intercreditor Agreement, the
Certificateholders of each Trust holding Certificates evidencing
fractional undivided interests aggregating not less than a
majority in interest in such Trust shall have the right to
direct the time, method and place of conducting any proceeding
for any remedy available to the Trustee with respect to such
Trust or pursuant to the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement,
or exercising any trust or power conferred on such Trustee under
such Pass Through Trust Agreement or the Intercreditor
Agreement, including any right of such Trustee as Controlling
Party under the Intercreditor Agreement or as holder of the
Equipment Notes. (Section 6.04)
In certain cases, the holders of the Certificates of a Trust
evidencing fractional undivided interests aggregating not less
than a majority in interest of such Trust may on behalf of the
holders of all the Certificates of such Trust waive any past
event of default under such Trust (i.e., any
Indenture Default) and its consequences or, if the Trustee of
such Trust is the Controlling Party, may direct the Trustee to
instruct the Mortgagee to waive any past Indenture Default and
its consequences, except (i) a default in the deposit of
any Scheduled Payment or Special Payment or in the distribution
thereof, (ii) a default in payment of the principal,
Premium or Break Amount, if any, or interest with respect to any
of the Equipment Notes and (iii) a default in respect of
any covenant or provision of the Pass Through
Trust Agreement that cannot be modified or amended without
the consent of each Certificateholder of such Trust affected
thereby. (Section 6.05) The Indenture will provide that,
with certain exceptions, the holders of the majority in
aggregate unpaid principal amount of the Equipment Notes may on
behalf of all such holders waive any past default or Indenture
Default thereunder. Notwithstanding such provisions of the
Indenture, pursuant to the Intercreditor Agreement only the
Controlling Party will be entitled to waive any such past
default or Indenture Default.
Purchase
Rights of Certificateholders
Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of a Triggering
Event, with ten days written notice to the Trustee and
each Certificateholder of the same Class:
|
|
|
|
|
The Class B Certificateholders will have the right to
purchase all of the Class G Certificates. Following any
such purchase, the purchasing Class B Certificateholders
will have the right to surrender the Policy for cancellation
(thereby releasing the Policy Provider from its obligations
under the Policy), to pay to the Policy Provider all outstanding
Policy Provider Amounts (other than any amount referred to in
clause (c) of the definition of Excess Reimbursement
Obligations) and to pay to the Primary Liquidity Provider all
outstanding Liquidity Obligations, and upon such surrender and
payments the Primary Liquidity Facility will be terminated.
After any such surrender and payments, the Class G
Certificates will no longer be entitled to the benefits of the
Policy or the Primary Liquidity Facility.
|
S-41
|
|
|
|
|
Whether or not the Class B Certificateholders have
purchased or elected to purchase the Class G Certificates,
the Policy Provider shall have the right to purchase all of the
Class G Certificates if it is the Controlling Party and no
Policy Provider Default is continuing and 120 days have
elapsed since the occurrence of a Triggering Event that is
continuing, unless the Policy has been surrendered as described
in the preceding item or the Class G Certificateholders
elect to surrender the Policy for cancellation (thereby
releasing the Policy Provider from its obligations thereunder),
to pay to the Policy Provider all outstanding Policy Provider
Amounts (other than any amount referred to in clause (c) of
the definition of Excess Reimbursement Obligations) and to pay
to the Primary Liquidity Provider all outstanding Liquidity
Obligations. The Class G Certificateholders electing to
surrender the Policy and make such payments may do so only upon
the purchase of the Class G Certificates of any
Class G Certificateholders that do not elect to surrender
the Policy and make such payments. After any such surrender and
payments, the Class G Certificates will no longer be
entitled to the benefits of the Policy or the Primary Liquidity
Facility.
|
In each case, the purchase price of the Class G
Certificates will be equal to the Pool Balance of the
Class G Certificates plus accrued and unpaid interest
thereon to the date of purchase, without premium, but including
any other amounts then due and payable in respect of the
Class G Certificates. Such purchase right may be exercised
by any Certificateholder of the Class entitled to such right. In
each case, if prior to the end of the ten-day notice period, any
other Certificateholder of the same Class notifies the
purchasing Certificateholder that the other Certificateholder
wants to participate in such purchase, then such other
Certificateholder may join with the purchasing Certificateholder
to purchase the Certificates pro rata based on the interest in
the Trust held by each Certificateholder. If Continental or any
of its Affiliates is a Certificateholder, it will not have the
purchase rights described above. By their acceptance of the
Class G Certificates, the Class G Certificateholders
will be deemed to agree that the surrender of the Policy to the
Policy Provider as contemplated in the preceding two
subparagraphs will (x) constitute an acknowledgement that
the Class G Certificates will no longer be entitled to the
benefits of the provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement that
relate to the Policy and (y) without any further action by
the Class G Certificateholders, have the immediate effect
of releasing the Policy Provider from its obligations under the
Policy. (Trust Supplements, Section 5.01)
Triggering Event means (x) the occurrence of an
Indenture Default resulting in a PTC Event of Default with
respect to the most senior Class of Certificates then
outstanding, (y) the acceleration of all of the outstanding
Equipment Notes or (z) certain bankruptcy or insolvency
events involving Continental.
PTC Event
of Default
A Pass Through Certificate Event of Default (a PTC Event
of Default) under each Pass Through Trust Agreement
means the failure to pay:
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding Pool Balance of the applicable Class of
Certificates within ten Business Days of the Final Maturity Date
(unless, in the case of the Class G Certificates, the
Subordination Agent shall have made a drawing under the Policy
in an aggregate amount sufficient to pay such outstanding Pool
Balance and shall have distributed such amount to the
Class G Trustee).
|
|
|
|
Interest due on such Class of Certificates within ten Business
Days of any Distribution Date (unless, in the case of the
Class G Certificates, the Subordination Agent shall have
made Interest Drawings, withdrawals from the Cash Collateral
Account, withdrawals from the Above-Cap Account or drawings
under the Policy with respect thereto in an aggregate amount
sufficient to pay such interest and shall have distributed such
amount to the Class G Trustee). (Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 1.1)
|
Any failure to make principal distributions with respect to a
Class of Certificates on any Regular Distribution Date (other
than the Final Maturity Date) will not constitute a PTC Event of
Default with respect to such Certificates. A PTC Event of
Default with respect to the most senior outstanding Class of
Certificates resulting from an Indenture Default will constitute
a Triggering Event.
S-42
Merger,
Consolidation and Transfer of Assets
Continental will be prohibited from consolidating with or
merging into any other corporation or transferring substantially
all of its assets as an entirety to any other corporation unless:
|
|
|
|
|
The surviving, successor or transferee corporation shall be
validly existing under the laws of the United States or any
state thereof or the District of Columbia.
|
|
|
|
The surviving, successor or transferee corporation shall be a
citizen of the United States (as defined in
Title 49 of the United States Code relating to aviation
(the Transportation Code)) holding an air carrier
operating certificate issued pursuant to Chapter 447 of
Title 49, United States Code, if, and so long as, such
status is a condition of entitlement to the benefits of
Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code.
|
|
|
|
The surviving successor or transferee corporation shall
expressly assume all of the obligations of Continental contained
in the Basic Agreement and any Trust Supplement, the
Note Purchase Agreement, the Indenture and any other
operative documents.
|
|
|
|
Continental shall have delivered a certificate and an opinion or
opinions of counsel indicating that such transaction, in effect,
complies with such conditions.
|
In addition, after giving effect to such transaction, no
Indenture Default shall have occurred and be continuing.
(Section 5.02; Indenture, Section 4.07)
The Basic Agreement, the Trust Supplements, the
Note Purchase Agreement, the Indenture and the other
operative documents will not contain any covenants or provisions
that may afford the applicable Trustee or Certificateholders
protection in the event of a highly leveraged transaction,
including transactions effected by management or affiliates,
which may or may not result in a change in control of
Continental.
Modifications
of the Pass Through Trust Agreements and Certain Other
Agreements
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement contains provisions
permitting, at the request of the Company, the execution of
amendments or supplements to such Pass Through
Trust Agreement or, if applicable, to the Intercreditor
Agreement or, in the case of the Class G Trust, the
Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the Policy Provider
Agreement, without the consent of the holders of any of the
Certificates of such Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
To evidence the succession of another corporation to Continental
and the assumption by such corporation of Continentals
obligations under such Pass Through Trust Agreement, or, in
the case of the Class G Trust, the Policy or the Policy
Provider Agreement.
|
|
|
|
To add to the covenants of Continental for the benefit of
holders of such Certificates or to surrender any right or power
conferred upon Continental in such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor Agreement or, in the
case of the Class G Trust, the Liquidity Facilities, the
Policy or the Policy Provider Agreement.
|
|
|
|
To correct or supplement any provision of such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor Agreement or, in the
case of the Class G Trust, the Liquidity Facilities, the
Policy or the Policy Provider Agreement which may be defective
or inconsistent with any other provision in such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor Agreement, the Liquidity
Facilities, the Policy or the Policy Provider Agreement, as
applicable, or to cure any ambiguity or to modify any other
provision with respect to matters or questions arising under
such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor
Agreement, the Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the Policy
Provider Agreement, provided that such action shall not
materially adversely affect the interests of the holders of such
Certificates; to correct any mistake in such Pass Through Trust
Agreement, the Intercreditor Agreement or, in the case of the
Class G Trust, the Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the
Policy Provider Agreement; or, as provided in the Intercreditor
Agreement, to give effect to or provide for a Replacement
Facility.
|
|
|
|
To comply with any requirements of the Commission, any
applicable law, rule or regulation of any exchange or quotation
system on which the Certificates are listed, or of any
regulatory body.
|
S-43
|
|
|
|
|
To modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of such Pass
Through Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor Agreement or, in
the case of the Class G Trust, the Liquidity Facilities,
the Policy or the Policy Provider Agreement to such extent as
shall be necessary to continue the qualification of such Pass
Through Trust Agreement (including any supplemental
agreement) under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended
(the Trust Indenture Act), or any similar federal
statute enacted after the execution of such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, and to add to such Pass Through
Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor Agreement or, in the
case of the Class G Trust, the Liquidity Facilities, the
Policy or the Policy Provider Agreement such other provisions as
may be expressly permitted by the Trust Indenture Act.
|
|
|
|
To evidence and provide for the acceptance of appointment under
such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor
Agreement or, in the case of the Class G Trust, the
Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the Policy Provider
Agreement by a successor Trustee and to add to or change any of
the provisions of such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the
Intercreditor Agreement or, in the case of the Class G
Trust, the Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the Policy
Provider Agreement as shall be necessary to provide for or
facilitate the administration of the Trusts under the Basic
Agreement by more than one Trustee.
|
In each case, such modification or supplement may not adversely
affect the status of the Trust as a grantor trust under Subpart
E, Part I of Subchapter J of Chapter 1 of Subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code), for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
(Section 9.01; Trust Supplements, Section 7.03)
Each Pass Through Trust Agreement also contains provisions
permitting the execution, with the consent of the holders of the
Certificates of the related Trust evidencing fractional
undivided interests aggregating not less than a majority in
interest of such Trust, of amendments or supplements adding any
provisions to or changing or eliminating any of the provisions
of such Pass Through Trust Agreement, the Intercreditor
Agreement or, in the case of the Class G Trust, the
Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the Policy Provider
Agreement to the extent applicable to such Certificateholders or
of modifying the rights and obligations of such
Certificateholders under such Pass Through Trust Agreement,
the Intercreditor Agreement or, in the case of the Class G
Trust, the Liquidity Facilities, the Policy or the Policy
Provider Agreement. No such amendment or supplement may, without
the consent of the holder of each Certificate so affected
thereby:
|
|
|
|
|
Reduce in any manner the amount of, or delay the timing of, any
receipt by the Trustee of payments with respect to the Equipment
Note held in such Trust or distributions in respect of any
Certificate related to such Trust or, in the case of the
Class G Trust, with respect to payments on the Policy, or
change the date or place of any payment in respect of any
Certificate, or make distributions payable in coin or currency
other than that provided for in such Certificates, or impair the
right of any Certificateholder of such Trust to institute suit
for the enforcement of any such payment when due.
|
|
|
|
Permit the disposition of any Equipment Note held in such Trust,
except as provided in such Pass Through Trust Agreement, or
otherwise deprive such Certificateholder of the benefit of the
ownership of the applicable Equipment Note.
|
|
|
|
Alter the priority of distributions specified in the
Intercreditor Agreement in a manner materially adverse to such
Certificateholders.
|
|
|
|
Reduce the percentage of the aggregate fractional undivided
interests of the Trust provided for in such Pass Through Trust
Agreement, the consent of the holders of which is required for
any such supplemental trust agreement or for any waiver provided
for in such Pass Through Trust Agreement.
|
|
|
|
Modify any of the provisions relating to the rights of the
Certificateholders in respect of the waiver of events of default
or receipt of payment.
|
|
|
|
Adversely affect the status of any Trust as a grantor trust
under Subpart E, Part I of Subchapter J of Chapter 1
of Subtitle A of the Code for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. (Section 9.02; Trust Supplements,
Section 7.07)
|
In the event that a Trustee, as holder (or beneficial owner
through the Subordination Agent) of any Equipment Note in trust
for the benefit of the Certificateholders of the relevant Trust
or as Controlling Party under the Intercreditor Agreement,
receives (directly or indirectly through the Subordination
Agent) a request for a consent to
S-44
any amendment, modification, waiver or supplement under the
Note Purchase Agreement, the Indenture, any Equipment Note
or any other related document, such Trustee shall forthwith send
a notice of such proposed amendment, modification, waiver or
supplement to each Certificateholder of the relevant Trust as of
the date of such notice. Such Trustee shall request from the
Certificateholders a direction as to:
|
|
|
|
|
Whether or not to take or refrain from taking (or direct the
Subordination Agent to take or refrain from taking) any action
which a holder of such Equipment Note or the Controlling Party
has the option to direct.
|
|
|
|
Whether or not to give or execute (or direct the Subordination
Agent to give or execute) any waivers, consents, amendments,
modifications or supplements as a holder of such Equipment Note
or as Controlling Party.
|
|
|
|
How to vote (or direct the Subordination Agent to vote) any
Equipment Note if a vote has been called for with respect
thereto.
|
Provided such a request for Certificateholder direction shall
have been made, in directing any action or casting any vote or
giving any consent as the holder of any Equipment Note (or in
directing the Subordination Agent in any of the foregoing):
|
|
|
|
|
Other than as Controlling Party, such Trustee shall vote for or
give consent to any such action with respect to such Equipment
Note in the same proportion as that of (x) the aggregate
face amount of all Certificates actually voted in favor of or
for giving consent to such action by such direction of
Certificateholders to (y) the aggregate face amount of all
outstanding Certificates of the relevant Trust.
|
|
|
|
As the Controlling Party, such Trustee shall vote as directed in
such Certificateholder direction by the Certificateholders
evidencing fractional undivided interests aggregating not less
than a majority in interest in the relevant Trust.
|
For purposes of the immediately preceding paragraph, a
Certificate shall have been actually voted if the
Certificateholder has delivered to the applicable Trustee an
instrument evidencing such Certificateholders consent to
such direction prior to one Business Day before such Trustee
directs such action or casts such vote or gives such consent.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, but subject to certain rights of
the Certificateholders under the relevant Pass Through
Trust Agreement and subject to the Intercreditor Agreement,
a Trustee may, in its own discretion and at its own direction,
consent and notify the Mortgagee of such consent (or direct the
Subordination Agent to consent and notify the Mortgagee of such
consent) to any amendment, modification, waiver or supplement
under the Note Purchase Agreement, the Indenture, any
relevant Equipment Note or any other related document, if an
Indenture Default shall have occurred and be continuing, or if
such amendment, modification, waiver or supplement will not
materially adversely affect the interests of the
Certificateholders. (Section 10.01; Trust Supplements,
Section 7.06)
Termination
of the Trusts
The obligations of Continental and the applicable Trustee with
respect to a Trust will terminate upon the distribution to
Certificateholders of such Trust of all amounts required to be
distributed to them pursuant to the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement and the disposition of all property held in
such Trust. The applicable Trustee will send to each
Certificateholder of such Trust notice of the termination of
such Trust, the amount of the proposed final payment and the
proposed date for the distribution of such final payment for
such Trust. The final distribution to any Certificateholder of
such Trust will be made only upon surrender of such
Certificateholders Certificates at the office or agency of
the applicable Trustee specified in such notice of termination.
(Section 11.01)
Governing
Law
The Pass Through Trust Agreements and the Certificates will
be governed by the laws of the State of New York.
(Section 12.05)
S-45
The
Trustees
The Trustee for each Trust will be Wilmington Trust Company. The
Trustees address is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney
Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware
19890-0001,
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.
Delivery
and Form
Book
Entry for Class G Certificates
Upon issuance, the Class G Certificates will be represented
by one or more fully registered global certificates. Each global
certificate will be deposited with, or on behalf of, DTC and
registered in the name of Cede & Co.
(Cede), the nominee of DTC. DTC was created to hold
securities for its participants (DTC Participants)
and facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities
transactions between DTC Participants through electronic
book-entry changes in accounts of the DTC Participants, thereby
eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. DTC
Participants include securities brokers and dealers, banks,
trust companies and clearing corporations and certain other
organizations. Indirect access to the DTC system is available to
others such as banks, brokers, dealers and trust companies that
clear through or maintain a custodial relationship with a
participant, either directly or indirectly (Indirect DTC
Participants). Interests in a global certificate may also
be held through the Euroclear System and Clearstream, Luxembourg.
So long as such book-entry procedures are applicable, no person
acquiring an interest in the Class G Certificates
(Class G Certificate Owner) will be entitled to
receive a certificate representing such persons interest
in such Class G Certificates. Unless and until definitive
Class G Certificates are issued under the limited
circumstances described below under Physical
Certificates, all references to actions by Class G
Certificateholders shall refer to actions taken by DTC upon
instructions from DTC Participants, and all references herein to
distributions, notices, reports and statements to Class G
Certificateholders shall refer, as the case may be, to
distributions, notices, reports and statements to DTC or Cede,
as the registered holder of such Class G Certificates, or
to DTC Participants for distribution to Class G Certificate
Owners in accordance with DTC procedures.
DTC is a limited purpose trust company organized under the laws
of the State of New York, a member of the Federal Reserve
System, a clearing corporation within the meaning of
the New York Uniform Commercial Code and clearing
agency registered pursuant to Section 17A of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Under the New York Uniform Commercial Code, a clearing
corporation is defined as:
|
|
|
|
|
a person that is registered as a clearing agency
under the federal securities laws;
|
|
|
|
a federal reserve bank; or
|
|
|
|
any other person that provides clearance or settlement services
with respect to financial assets that would require it to
register as a clearing agency under the federal securities laws
but for an exclusion or exemption from the registration
requirement, if its activities as a clearing corporation,
including promulgation of rules, are subject to regulation by a
federal or state governmental authority.
|
A clearing agency is an organization established for
the execution of trades by transferring funds, assigning
deliveries and guaranteeing the performance of the obligations
of parties to trades.
Under the rules, regulations and procedures creating and
affecting DTC and its operations, DTC is required to make
book-entry transfers of the Class G Certificates among DTC
Participants on whose behalf it acts with respect to the
Class G Certificates and to receive and transmit
distributions of principal, premium, if any, and interest with
respect to the Class G Certificates. DTC Participants and
Indirect DTC Participants with which Class G Certificate
Owners have accounts similarly are required to make book-entry
transfers and receive and transmit the payments on behalf of
their respective customers. Class G Certificate Owners that
are not DTC Participants or Indirect DTC Participants but desire
to purchase, sell or otherwise transfer ownership of, or other
interests in, the Class G Certificates may do so only
through DTC Participants and Indirect DTC Participants. In
addition, Class G
S-46
Certificate Owners will receive all distributions of principal,
premium, if any, and interest from the Class G Trustee
through DTC Participants or Indirect DTC Participants, as the
case may be.
Under a book-entry format, Class G Certificate Owners may
experience some delay in their receipt of payments, because
payments with respect to the Class G Certificates will be
forwarded by the Class G Trustee to Cede, as nominee for
DTC. DTC will forward payments in same-day funds to each DTC
Participant who is credited with ownership of the Class G
Certificates in an amount proportionate to the principal amount
of that DTC Participants holdings of beneficial interests
in the Class G Certificates, as shown on the records of DTC
or its nominee. Each such DTC Participant will forward payments
to its Indirect DTC Participants in accordance with standing
instructions and customary industry practices. DTC Participants
and Indirect DTC Participants will be responsible for forwarding
distributions to Class G Certificate Owners for whom they
act. Accordingly, although Class G Certificate Owners will
not possess physical Class G Certificates, DTCs rules
provide a mechanism by which Class G Certificate Owners
will receive payments on the Class G Certificates and will
be able to transfer their interests.
Unless and until physical Class G Certificates are issued
under the limited circumstances described under
Physical Certificates below, the only physical
Class G Certificateholder will be Cede, as nominee of DTC.
Class G Certificate Owners will not be recognized by the
Class G Trustee as registered owners of Class G
Certificates under the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement. Class G Certificate Owners will be
permitted to exercise their rights under the applicable Pass
Through Trust Agreement only indirectly through DTC. DTC
will take any action permitted to be taken by a Class G
Certificateholder under the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement only at the direction of one or more DTC
Participants to whose accounts with DTC the Class G
Certificates are credited. In the event any action requires
approval by Class G Certificateholders of a certain
percentage of the beneficial interests in the Class G
Trust, DTC will take action only at the direction of and on
behalf of DTC Participants whose holdings include undivided
interests that satisfy the required percentage. DTC may take
conflicting actions with respect to other undivided interests to
the extent that the actions are taken on behalf of DTC
Participants whose holdings include those undivided interests.
DTC will convey notices and other communications to DTC
Participants, and DTC Participants will convey notices and other
communications to Indirect DTC Participants in accordance with
arrangements among them. Arrangements among DTC and its direct
and indirect participants are subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
DTCs rules applicable to itself and DTC Participants are
on file with the SEC.
A Class G Certificate Owners ability to pledge its
Class G Certificates to persons or entities that do not
participate in the DTC system, or otherwise to act with respect
to its Class G Certificates, may be limited due to the lack
of a physical Class G Certificate to evidence ownership of
the Class G Certificates, and because DTC can only act on
behalf of DTC Participants, who in turn act on behalf of
Indirect DTC Participants.
Neither Continental nor the Trustees will have any liability for
any aspect of the records relating to or payments made on
account of beneficial ownership interests in the Class G
Certificates held by Cede, as nominee for DTC, for maintaining,
supervising or reviewing any records relating to the beneficial
ownership interests or for the performance by DTC, any DTC
Participant or any Indirect DTC Participant of their respective
obligations under the rules and procedures governing their
obligations.
As long as the Class G Certificates are registered in the
name of DTC or its nominee, Continental will make all payments
to the Mortgagee under the Indenture in immediately available
funds. The Class G Trustee will pass through to DTC in
immediately available funds all payments received from
Continental, including the final distribution of principal with
respect to the Class G Certificates.
Any Class G Certificates registered in the name of DTC or
its nominee will trade in DTCs Same-Day Funds Settlement
System until maturity. DTC will require secondary market trading
activity in the Class G Certificates to settle in
immediately available funds. We cannot give any assurance as to
the effect, if any, of settlement in same-day funds on trading
activity in the Class G Certificates.
S-47
Physical
Certificates
The Class B Certificates will be issued only as physical
Certificates in paper form. Physical Class G Certificates
will be issued in paper form to Class G Certificateholders
or their nominees, rather than to DTC or its nominee, only if:
|
|
|
|
|
Continental advises the Class G Trustee in writing that DTC
is no longer willing or able to discharge properly its
responsibilities as depository with respect to the Class G
Certificates and Continental is unable to locate a qualified
successor;
|
|
|
|
Continental elects to terminate the book-entry system through
DTC; or
|
|
|
|
after the occurrence of a PTC Event of Default, Class G
Certificate Owners owning at least a majority in interest in the
Class G Trust advise the Class G Trustee, Continental
and DTC through DTC Participants that the continuation of a
book-entry system through DTC or a successor to DTC is no longer
in the Class G Certificate Owners best interest.
|
Upon the occurrence of any of the events described in the three
subparagraphs above, the Class G Trustee will notify all
Class G Certificate Owners through DTC Participants of the
availability of physical Class G Certificates. Upon
surrender by DTC of the global Class G Certificates and
receipt of instructions for re-registration, the Class G
Trustee will reissue the Class G Certificates as physical
Class G Certificates to Class G Certificate Owners.
In the case of all physical Certificates that are issued, the
applicable Trustee or a paying agent will make distributions of
principal, premium, if any, and interest with respect to such
Certificates directly to holders in whose names the physical
Certificates were registered at the close of business on the
applicable record date. Except for the final payment to be made
with respect to a Certificate, the applicable Trustee or a
paying agent will make distributions by check mailed to the
addresses of the registered holders as they appear on the
register maintained by such Trustee. The applicable Trustee or a
paying agent will make the final payment with respect to any
Certificate only upon presentation and surrender of the
applicable Certificate at the office or agency specified in the
notice of final distribution to Certificateholders.
Physical Certificates will be freely transferable and
exchangeable at the office of the Trustee upon compliance with
the requirements set forth in the applicable Pass Through
Trust Agreement, subject in the case of the Class B
Certificates to certain transfer restrictions. See
Transfer Restrictions for Class B
Certificates. Neither the Trustee nor any transfer or
exchange agent will impose a service charge for any registration
of transfer or exchange. However, the Trustee or transfer or
exchange agent will require payment of a sum sufficient to cover
any tax or other governmental charge attributable to a transfer
or exchange.
Transfer
Restrictions for Class B Certificates
The Class B Certificates will be subject to transfer
restrictions. They may be sold or otherwise transferred only to
qualified institutional buyers (QIBs), as defined in
Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for
so long as they are outstanding.
Each purchaser of Class B Certificates (other than the
Underwriter), by such purchase, will be deemed to:
1. Represent that it is purchasing the Class B
Certificates for its own account or an account with respect to
which it exercises sole investment discretion and that it and
any such account is a QIB.
2. Agree that any sale or other transfer by it of any
Class B Certificate will only be made to a QIB.
3. Agree that it will deliver to each person to whom it
transfers Class B Certificates notice of these restrictions
on transfer of the Class B Certificates.
4. Agree that no registration of the transfer of a
Class B Certificate will be made unless the transferee
completes and submits to the Class B Trustee the form
included on the reverse of the Class B Certificate in which
it states that it is purchasing the Class B Certificate for
its own account or an account with respect to which it exercises
sole investment discretion and that it and any such account is a
QIB.
S-48
5. Understand that the Class B Certificates will bear
a legend substantially to the following effect:
THIS CERTIFICATE IS SUBJECT TO TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS. BY
ITS ACQUISITION HEREOF, THE HOLDER (1) REPRESENTS THAT IT
IS A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER (AS DEFINED IN
RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT); (2) AGREES THAT
IT WILL NOT RESELL OR OTHERWISE TRANSFER THIS CERTIFICATE EXCEPT
TO A QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYER (AS DEFINED IN
RULE 144A UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT); AND (3) AGREES
THAT IF IT SHOULD RESELL OR OTHERWISE TRANSFER THIS CERTIFICATE
IT WILL DELIVER TO EACH PERSON TO WHOM THIS CERTIFICATE IS
TRANSFERRED A NOTICE SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE EFFECT OF THIS LEGEND.
IN CONNECTION WITH ANY TRANSFER OF THIS CERTIFICATE, THE
TRANSFEREE MUST COMPLETE THE FORM ON THE REVERSE HEREOF RELATING
TO THE MANNER OF SUCH TRANSFER AND SUBMIT SUCH FORM TO THE PASS
THROUGH TRUSTEE. THE PASS THROUGH TRUST AGREEMENT CONTAINS
A PROVISION REQUIRING THE REGISTRAR TO REFUSE TO REGISTER ANY
TRANSFER OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN VIOLATION OF THE FOREGOING
RESTRICTIONS.
6. Acknowledge that Continental, the Class B Trustee,
the Underwriter, and others will rely on the truth and accuracy
of the foregoing acknowledgments, representations, warranties
and agreements and agrees that, if any of the acknowledgments,
representations, warranties and agreements deemed to have been
made by its purchase of the Class B Certificates is no
longer accurate, it shall promptly notify Continental, the
Class B Trustee and the Underwriter. If it is acquiring any
Class B Certificates as a fiduciary or agent of one or more
investor accounts, it represents that it has sole investment
discretion with respect to each such investor account and that
it has full power to make the foregoing acknowledgments,
representations and agreements on behalf of each such investor
account.
7. Acknowledge that the foregoing restrictions apply to
holders of beneficial interests in the Class B Certificates
as well as to registered holders of Class B Certificates.
8. Acknowledge that the Class B Trustee will not be
required to accept for registration of transfer any Class B
Certificate unless evidence satisfactory to Continental and the
Class B Trustee that the restrictions on transfer set forth
herein have been complied with is submitted to them.
S-49
DESCRIPTION
OF THE LIQUIDITY FACILITIES FOR THE CLASS G
CERTIFICATES
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Liquidity Facilities for the Class G Certificates and
certain provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement relating to
the Liquidity Facilities. The summary does not purport to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of
the provisions of the Liquidity Facilities and the Intercreditor
Agreement, each of which will be filed as an exhibit to a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission. The term
Liquidity Facilities refers to the Primary Liquidity
Facility and the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility.
Primary
Liquidity Facility
General
Morgan Stanley Bank (the Primary Liquidity Provider)
will enter into a revolving credit agreement (the Primary
Liquidity Facility) with the Subordination Agent with
respect to the Class G Trust. There will be no primary
liquidity facility with respect to the Class B Trust. On
any Regular Distribution Date, if, after giving effect to the
subordination provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement, the
Subordination Agent does not have sufficient funds for the
payment of interest on the Class G Certificates, the
Primary Liquidity Provider will make an advance (an
Interest Drawing) in the amount needed to fund such
interest shortfall up to the Maximum Available Commitment.
The maximum amount of Interest Drawings available under the
Primary Liquidity Facility, together with the amounts in the
Above-Cap Account (if any), are expected to provide an amount
sufficient to pay interest on the Class G Certificates on
up to eight consecutive quarterly Regular Distribution Dates at
the Stated Interest Rate for the Class G Certificates
(calculated without regard to expected future payments of
principal and assuming that Continental will not cure any
Payment Default). If interest payment defaults occur which
exceed the amount covered by and available under the Primary
Liquidity Facility and funds available in the Above-Cap Account,
the Class G Certificateholders will bear their allocable
share of the deficiencies to the extent that there are no other
sources of funds. The initial Primary Liquidity Provider may be
replaced by one or more other entities under certain
circumstances.
Drawings
The aggregate amount available under the Primary Liquidity
Facility at September 2, 2006, the first Regular
Distribution Date after the Issuance Date, will be
$ .
Except as otherwise provided below, the Primary Liquidity
Facility will enable the Subordination Agent to make Interest
Drawings thereunder promptly on or after any Regular
Distribution Date if, after giving effect to the subordination
provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement, there are
insufficient funds available to the Subordination Agent to pay
interest on the Class G Certificates at the Stated Interest
Rate for the Class G Certificates (calculated assuming that
Continental will not cure any Payment Default); provided,
however, that the maximum amount available to be drawn under
the Primary Liquidity Facility on any Regular Distribution Date
to fund any shortfall of interest on the Class G
Certificates will not exceed the then Maximum Available
Commitment.
The Maximum Available Commitment at any time is an
amount equal to the then Required Amount less the aggregate
amount of each Interest Drawing outstanding under the Primary
Liquidity Facility at such time, provided that following
a Non-Extension Drawing, a Downgrade Drawing or a Final Drawing,
the Maximum Available Commitment shall be zero.
The Required Amount will be equal, on any day, to
the sum of the aggregate amount of interest, calculated at the
rate per annum equal to the Capped Interest Rate that would be
payable on the Class G Certificates on each of the eight
consecutive quarterly Regular Distribution Dates immediately
following such day or, if such day is a Regular Distribution
Date, on such day and the succeeding seven quarterly Regular
Distribution Dates, in each case calculated on the basis of the
Pool Balance of the Class G Certificates on such day and
without regard to expected future payments of principal on the
Class G Certificates. In the event of any Policy Provider
Election, the Pool Balance for purposes of the definition of
Required Amount shall be deemed to be reduced to zero.
Capped Interest Rate means, at any time, Capped
LIBOR at such time
plus % per
annum.
S-50
Capped LIBOR means, at any time, 10.0% per
annum.
The Primary Liquidity Facility does not provide for drawings
thereunder to pay for principal of or Premium, if any, on, or
Break Amount, if any, with respect to, the Class G
Certificates or to pay any amount with respect to the
Class B Certificates. The Primary Liquidity Facility does
not provide for drawings thereunder to pay any interest on the
Class G Certificates in excess of an amount equal to eight
full quarterly installments of interest calculated at the Capped
Interest Rate. (Primary Liquidity Facility, Section 2.02;
Intercreditor Agreement, Section 3.5)
Each payment by the Primary Liquidity Provider reduces by the
same amount the Maximum Available Commitment, subject to
reinstatement as hereinafter described. With respect to any
Interest Drawing, upon reimbursement of the Primary Liquidity
Provider in full or in part for the amount of such Interest
Drawing plus interest thereon, the Maximum Available Commitment
under the Primary Liquidity Facility will be reinstated by an
amount equal to the amount of such Interest Drawing so
reimbursed but not to exceed the then Required Amount. However,
the Primary Liquidity Facility will not be so reinstated at any
time if (i) any Equipment Note is a Non-Performing
Equipment Note and a Liquidity Event of Default shall have
occurred and be continuing or (ii) a Final Drawing shall
have occurred. Any amounts paid by the Policy Provider to the
Primary Liquidity Provider as described in Description of
the Intercreditor AgreementIntercreditor
RightsControlling Party or Description of the
Policy and the Policy Provider Agreement for the Class G
CertificatesThe PolicyPrimary Liquidity Provider
Drawing will not reinstate the Primary Liquidity Facility
but any reimbursement of such amounts received by the Policy
Provider under the distribution provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement will reinstate the Primary Liquidity Facility to the
extent of such reimbursement unless (i) any Equipment Note
is a Non-Performing Equipment Note and a Liquidity Event of
Default shall have occurred and be continuing or (ii) a
Final Drawing shall have occurred. With respect to any other
drawings under the Primary Liquidity Facility, amounts available
to be drawn thereunder are not subject to reinstatement. The
Required Amount will be automatically reduced from time to time
to an amount equal to the next eight successive quarterly
interest payments due on the Class G Certificates (without
regard to expected future payments of principal) at the Capped
Interest Rate. (Primary Liquidity Facility,
Section 2.04(a); Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 3.5(j)). Upon the occurrence of the Liquidity
Provider Reimbursement Date, no further drawings under the
Primary Liquidity Facility will be permitted.
Non-Performing Equipment Note means an Equipment
Note, with respect to which a Payment Default has occurred and
is continuing thereunder (without giving effect to any
acceleration); provided that in the event of a bankruptcy
proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in which
Continental is a debtor any Payment Default existing during the
60-day
period under Section 1110(a)(2)(A) of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (or such longer period as may apply
under Section 1110(b) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
as may apply for the cure of such Payment Default under
Section 1110(a)(2)(B) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code)
shall not be taken into consideration until the expiration of
the applicable period. Performing Equipment Note
means any Equipment Note that is not a Non-Performing Equipment
Note.
If at any time the short-term unsecured debt rating or
short-term issuer credit rating, as the case may be, of the
Primary Liquidity Provider then issued by either Rating Agency
is lower than the Threshold Rating and the Primary Liquidity
Facility is not replaced with a Replacement Facility within ten
days after notice of such downgrading and as otherwise provided
in the Intercreditor Agreement, the Primary Liquidity Facility
will be drawn in full up to the then Maximum Available
Commitment (the Downgrade Drawing). The proceeds of
a Downgrade Drawing will be deposited into a cash collateral
account (the Cash Collateral Account) and used for
the same purposes and under the same circumstances and subject
to the same conditions as cash payments of Interest Drawings
under the Primary Liquidity Facility would be used. (Primary
Liquidity Facility, Section 2.02(c); Intercreditor
Agreement, Section 3.5(c)) If a qualified Replacement
Facility is subsequently provided, the balance of the Cash
Collateral Account will be repaid to the replaced Primary
Liquidity Provider.
A Replacement Facility will mean an irrevocable
liquidity facility (or liquidity facilities) in substantially
the form of the replaced Primary Liquidity Facility, including
reinstatement provisions, or in such other form (which may
include a letter of credit) as shall permit the Rating Agencies
to confirm in writing their respective ratings then in effect
for the Class G Certificates (before downgrading of such
ratings, if any, as a result of the downgrading of the replaced
Primary Liquidity Provider but without regard to the Policy),
which shall have been consented to by the
S-51
Policy Provider, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed, in a face amount (or in an aggregate face
amount) equal to the amount of interest payable on the
Class G Certificates (at the Capped Interest Rate and
without regard to expected future principal payments) on the
eight Regular Distribution Dates following the date of
replacement of the Primary Liquidity Facility and issued by a
person (or persons) having unsecured short-term debt rating or
issuer credit rating, as the case may be, issued by both Rating
Agencies which are equal to or higher than the Threshold Rating.
(Intercreditor Agreement, Section 1.1) The provider of any
Replacement Facility will have the same rights (including,
without limitation, priority distribution rights and rights as
Controlling Party) under the Intercreditor Agreement
as the Primary Liquidity Provider being replaced.
Threshold Rating means the short-term unsecured debt
rating of
P-1 by
Moodys and the short-term issuer credit rating of
A-1 by
Standard & Poors.
The Primary Liquidity Facility provides that the Primary
Liquidity Providers obligations thereunder will expire on
the earliest of:
|
|
|
|
|
364 days after the initial issuance date of the
Certificates (the Issuance Date) (counting from, and
including, the Issuance Date).
|
|
|
|
The date on which the Subordination Agent delivers to the
Primary Liquidity Provider a certification that all of the
Class G Certificates have been paid in full or are no
longer entitled to the benefits of the Primary Liquidity
Facility.
|
|
|
|
The date on which the Subordination Agent delivers to the
Primary Liquidity Provider a certification that a Replacement
Facility has been substituted for the Primary Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The fifth Business Day following receipt by the Subordination
Agent of a Termination Notice from the Primary Liquidity
Provider (see Liquidity Events of Default and
Termination).
|
|
|
|
The date on which no amount is or may (by reason of
reinstatement) become available for drawing under the Primary
Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of the Liquidity Provider Reimbursement Date.
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of a termination of the Primary Liquidity
Facility as described in the first or second bullet point under
Description of the CertificatesPurchase Rights of
Certificateholders.
|
The Primary Liquidity Facility provides that it may be extended
for additional
364-day
periods by mutual agreement of the Primary Liquidity Provider
and the Subordination Agent.
The Intercreditor Agreement will provide for the replacement of
the Primary Liquidity Facility if such Primary Liquidity
Facility is scheduled to expire earlier than 15 days after
the Final Maturity Date for the Class G Certificates and is
not extended at least 25 days prior to its then scheduled
expiration date. If the Primary Liquidity Facility is not so
extended or replaced by the 25th day prior to its then
scheduled expiration date, the Primary Liquidity Facility will
be drawn in full up to the then Maximum Available Commitment
(the Non-Extension Drawing). The proceeds of the
Non-Extension Drawing will be deposited in the Cash Collateral
Account as cash collateral to be used for the same purposes and
under the same circumstances, and subject to the same
conditions, as cash payments of Interest Drawings under the
Primary Liquidity Facility would be used. (Primary Liquidity
Facility, Section 2.02(b); Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 3.5(d))
Subject to certain limitations, Continental may, at its option,
arrange for a Replacement Facility at any time to replace the
Primary Liquidity Facility (including, without limitation, any
Replacement Facility described in the following sentence). In
addition, if the Primary Liquidity Provider shall determine not
to extend the Primary Liquidity Facility, the Primary Liquidity
Provider may, at its option, arrange for a Replacement Facility
to replace the Primary Liquidity Facility (i) during the
period no earlier than 40 days and no later than
25 days prior to the then scheduled expiration date of the
Primary Liquidity Facility and (ii) at any time after such
scheduled expiration date. The Primary Liquidity Provider may
also arrange for a Replacement Facility to replace any of its
Primary Liquidity Facility at any time after a Downgrade
Drawing. If any Replacement Facility is provided at any time
after a Downgrade Drawing or a Non-Extension Drawing, the funds
on deposit in the Cash Collateral Account will be returned to
the Primary Liquidity Provider being replaced. (Intercreditor
Agreement, Sections 3.5(c) and (e))
S-52
Upon receipt by the Subordination Agent of a Termination Notice
from the Primary Liquidity Provider, the Subordination Agent
shall request a final drawing (a Final Drawing)
under the Primary Liquidity Facility in an amount equal to the
then Maximum Available Commitment thereunder. The Subordination
Agent will hold the proceeds of the Final Drawing in the Cash
Collateral Account as cash collateral to be used for the same
purposes and under the same circumstances, and subject to the
same conditions, as cash payments of Interest Drawings under the
Primary Liquidity Facility would be used. (Primary Liquidity
Facility, Section 2.02(d); Intercreditor Agreement,
Section 3.5(i))
Drawings under the Primary Liquidity Facility will be made by
delivery by the Subordination Agent of a certificate in the form
required by the Primary Liquidity Facility. Upon receipt of such
a certificate, the Primary Liquidity Provider is obligated to
make payment of the drawing requested thereby in immediately
available funds. Upon payment by the Primary Liquidity Provider
of the amount specified in any drawing under the Primary
Liquidity Facility, the Primary Liquidity Provider will be fully
discharged of its obligations under the Primary Liquidity
Facility with respect to such drawing and will not thereafter be
obligated to make any further payments under the Primary
Liquidity Facility in respect of such drawing to the
Subordination Agent or any other person.
Reimbursement
of Drawings
The Subordination Agent must reimburse amounts drawn under the
Primary Liquidity Facility by reason of an Interest Drawing,
Final Drawing, Downgrade Drawing or Non-Extension Drawing and
interest thereon, but only to the extent that the Subordination
Agent has funds available therefor.
Interest
Drawings and Final Drawings
Amounts drawn by reason of an Interest Drawing or Final Drawing
under the Primary Liquidity Facility will be immediately due and
payable, together with interest on the amount of such drawing.
From the date of the drawing to (but excluding) the third
business day following the Primary Liquidity Providers
receipt of the notice of such Interest Drawing, interest will
accrue at the Base Rate plus 2.00% per annum. Thereafter,
interest will accrue at Liquidity Facility LIBOR for the
applicable interest period plus 2.00% per annum. In the
case of the Final Drawing, however, the Subordination Agent may
convert the Final Drawing into a drawing bearing interest at the
Base Rate plus 2.00% per annum on the last day of an
interest period for such Drawing.
Base Rate means a fluctuating interest rate per
annum in effect from time to time, which rate per annum shall at
all times be equal to (a) the weighted average of the rates
on overnight Federal funds transactions with members of the
Federal Reserve System arranged by Federal funds brokers, as
published for such day (or, if such day is not a business day,
for the next preceding business day) by the Federal Reserve Bank
of New York, or if such rate is not so published for any day
that is a business day, the average of the quotations for such
day for such transactions received by the Primary Liquidity
Provider from three Federal funds brokers of recognized standing
selected by it, plus (b) one-quarter of one percent (1/4 of
1%).
Liquidity Facility LIBOR means, with respect to any
interest period, (i) the rate per annum appearing on
display page 3750 (British Bankers AssociationLIBOR)
of the Telerate Service (or any successor or substitute
therefor) at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) two
business days before the first day of such interest period, as
the rate for dollar deposits with a maturity comparable to such
interest period, or (ii) if the rate calculated pursuant to
clause (i) above is not available, the average (rounded
upwards, if necessary, to the next 1/16 of 1%) of the rates per
annum at which deposits in dollars are offered for the relevant
interest period by three banks of recognized standing selected
by the Primary Liquidity Provider in the London interbank market
at approximately 11:00 a.m. (London time) two business days
before the first day of such interest period in an amount
approximately equal to the principal amount of the LIBOR Advance
to which such interest period is to apply and for a period
comparable to such interest period.
S-53
Downgrade
Drawings and Non-Extension Drawings
The amount drawn under the Primary Liquidity Facility by reason
of a Downgrade Drawing or a Non-Extension Drawing will be
treated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Such amount will be released on any Distribution Date to the
Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent that such amount
exceeds the Required Amount.
|
|
|
|
Any portion of such amount withdrawn from the Cash Collateral
Account to pay interest on the Certificates will be treated in
the same way as Interest Drawings.
|
|
|
|
The balance of such amount will be invested in certain specified
eligible investments.
|
Any Downgrade Drawing, other than any portion thereof applied to
the payment of interest on the Class G Certificates, will
bear interest (x) subject to clause (y) below, at
a rate equal to Liquidity Facility LIBOR for the applicable
interest period plus a specified margin on the outstanding
amount from time to time of such drawing and (y) from and
after the date, if any, on which it is converted into a Final
Drawing as described below under Liquidity Events of
Default and Termination, at a rate equal to Liquidity
Facility LIBOR for the applicable interest period (or, as
described in the first paragraph under Interest
Drawings and Final Drawings, the Base Rate) plus
2.00% per annum.
Any Non-Extension Drawing, other than any portion thereof
applied to the payment of interest on the Class G
Certificates, will bear interest (x) subject to
clause (y) below, in an amount equal to the investment
earnings on amounts deposited in the Cash Collateral Account
plus a specified margin on the outstanding amount from time to
time of such Non-Extension Drawing and (y) from and after
the date, if any, on which it is converted into a Final Drawing
as described below under Liquidity Events of Default
and Termination, at a rate equal to Liquidity Facility
LIBOR for the applicable interest period (or, as described in
the first paragraph under Interest Drawings and
Final Drawings, the Base Rate) plus 2.00% per annum.
Liquidity
Events of Default and Termination
Events of default under the Primary Liquidity Facility (each, a
Liquidity Event of Default) will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
The acceleration of all of the Equipment Notes.
|
|
|
|
Certain bankruptcy or similar events involving Continental.
(Primary Liquidity Facility, Section 1.01)
|
If (i) any Liquidity Event of Default has occurred and is
continuing and (ii) any Equipment Note is a Non-Performing
Equipment Note, the Primary Liquidity Provider may, in its
discretion, deliver a notice of termination of the Primary
Liquidity Facility (a Termination Notice) to the
Subordination Agent. The Termination Notice will have the
following consequences:
|
|
|
|
|
The Primary Liquidity Facility will expire on the fifth Business
Day after the date on which such Termination Notice is received
by the Subordination Agent.
|
|
|
|
The Subordination Agent will promptly request, and the Primary
Liquidity Provider will promptly make, a Final Drawing in an
amount equal to the then Maximum Available Commitment.
|
|
|
|
Any drawing remaining unreimbursed as of the date of termination
will be automatically converted into a Final Drawing.
|
|
|
|
All amounts owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider
automatically will be accelerated.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Subordination Agent will be
obligated to pay amounts owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider
only to the extent of funds available therefor after giving
effect to the payments in accordance with the provisions set
forth under Description of the Intercreditor
AgreementPriority of Distributions. (Liquidity
Facilities, Section 6.01) Upon the circumstances described
below under Description of the Intercreditor
AgreementIntercreditor Rights, the Primary Liquidity
Provider may become the Controlling Party with respect to the
exercise of remedies under the Indenture. (Intercreditor
Agreement, Section 2.6(c))
S-54
Upon the occurrence of the Liquidity Provider Reimbursement
Date, the Primary Liquidity Facility will automatically expire,
any drawing remaining unreimbursed as of such date will be
automatically converted into a Final Drawing and all amounts
owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider automatically will be
accelerated. On and after such date, no drawings under the
Primary Liquidity Facility will be permitted.
Primary
Liquidity Provider
The initial Primary Liquidity Provider will be Morgan Stanley
Bank. Morgan Stanley Bank is a Utah industrial bank with its
principal offices in West Valley City, Utah, and an indirect,
wholly owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware
corporation (Morgan Stanley). The obligations of
Morgan Stanley Bank are not guaranteed by Morgan Stanley. As a
state chartered nonmember of the Federal Reserve System, Morgan
Stanley Bank is subject to regulation and supervision by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Utah Department of
Financial Institutions.
Morgan Stanley Bank has a short-term unsecured debt rating of
P-1 from
Moodys, a short-term issuer credit rating of
A-1 from
Standard & Poors and a short-term credit rating
of F1+ from Fitch.
Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility
General
The Subordination Agent and the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
will enter into an irrevocable interest rate cap agreement with
respect to the Class G Trust (the Above-Cap Liquidity
Facility). There will be no above-cap liquidity facility
with respect to the Class B Trust.
Payments
Under the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility, the Above-Cap Liquidity
Provider will make payments on any Regular Distribution Date if
(i) after giving effect to the provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement (but without regard to drawings under
the Primary Liquidity Facility or withdrawals from the Cash
Collateral Account or Above-Cap Account), the Subordination
Agent does not have sufficient funds for the payment of interest
on the Class G Certificates, (ii) LIBOR for the
Interest Period ending on such Distribution Date (or, if such
Distribution Date is not the last day of an Interest Period,
LIBOR for the Interest Period including such Distribution Date)
exceeds Capped LIBOR and (iii) the Stated Interest Rate for
the Class G Certificates for the Interest Period ending on
such Distribution Date (or, if such Distribution Date is not the
last day of an Interest Period, the Stated Interest Rate for the
Class G Certificates for the Interest Period including such
Distribution Date) exceeds the Capped Interest Rate, in an
amount (an Above-Cap Payment) equal to (regardless
of whether any portion of such amount has been or is being
funded by the Primary Liquidity Provider as an Interest Drawing)
the excess of (1) the product of (x) the difference
between LIBOR for the Interest Period ending on such
Distribution Date (or, if such Distribution Date is not the last
day of an interest Period, LIBOR for the Interest Period
including such Distribution Date) and Capped LIBOR, multiplied
by (y) the Pool Balance of the Class G Certificates,
multiplied by (z) actual days elapsed in the applicable
Interest Period divided by 360 over (2) the amount, if any,
on deposit in the Above-Cap Account.
An Above-Cap Payment under the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility will
be made to the Subordination Agent which will immediately
deposit such Above-Cap Payment in the Above-Cap Account to be
available for withdrawals as described in Above-Cap
Account below.
The Above-Cap Liquidity Facility will be available to make
payments only as long as the Primary Liquidity Facility is
available to be drawn or there are amounts in the Cash
Collateral Account.
The Above-Cap Liquidity Facility does not provide for payments
thereunder to pay, directly or indirectly, principal of or
Premium, if any, on, or
Break-Amount,
if any, with respect to, the Class G Certificates or to pay
any amount with respect to the Class B Certificates.
(Intercreditor Agreement, Section 3.5) The Subordination
Agent will have no obligation to reimburse the Above-Cap
Liquidity Provider for any Above-Cap Payment.
S-55
Early
Termination
If at any time (i) the short-term unsecured debt rating or
short-term issuer credit rating, as the case may be, of the
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider or, in the case of the initial
Above-Cap Liquidity Facility, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
Guarantor then issued by either Rating Agency is lower than the
Threshold Rating, (ii) in the case of the initial Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
Guarantors guarantee ceases to be in full force and effect
(or becomes invalid or unenforceable or the Above-Cap Liquidity
Provider Guarantor denies its liability thereunder) or
(iii) certain other events occur relating to certain
changes in law or other circumstances, then the Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility may be replaced by a replacement Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility to be provided by one or more financial
institutions having such short-term unsecured debt ratings
issued by both Rating Agencies which are equal to or higher than
the Threshold Rating. If the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility is not
replaced within ten days (or, in the case of clause (iii)
above, 20 days) after such downgrading, the Above-Cap
Liquidity Provider will pay to the Subordination Agent for
deposit into an account (the Above-Cap Collateral
Account) for the benefit of the Class G Certificates
an amount in cash (the Above-Cap Collateral Amount)
equal to the product of:
|
|
|
|
|
0.256, multiplied by
|
|
|
|
10% per annum, multiplied by
|
|
|
|
the Pool Balance of the Class G Certificates,
|
plus all other unpaid amounts then due under the Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility. Upon such payment, the Above-Cap Liquidity
Facility shall terminate. The Above-Cap Liquidity Provider will
have the right to replace the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility by a
replacement Above-Cap Liquidity Facility or to terminate the
Above-Cap Liquidity Facility by paying the Above-Cap Collateral
Amount upon the occurrence of certain events relating to
deduction or withholding for tax.
The Above-Cap Collateral Amount will be used for the same
purposes and under the same circumstances, and subject to the
same conditions, as Above-Cap Payments under the Above-Cap
Liquidity Facility (were the Above-Cap Liquidity Facility still
in effect) would be used. Cash deposited into the Above-Cap
Collateral Account will be invested in certain specified
eligible investments.
The Above-Cap Liquidity Facility provides that the Above-Cap
Liquidity Providers obligations thereunder will expire on
the earlier of the first Business Day after (i) the Final
Maturity Date and (ii) the date on which the Pool Balance
of the Class G Certificates equals zero.
Above-Cap
Account
The Subordination Agent will maintain an account (the
Above-Cap Account) for the Class G Trust into
which Above-Cap Payments made by the Above-Cap Liquidity
Provider will be deposited.
If, on any Regular Distribution Date, after giving effect to the
subordination provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement and
after giving effect to any Interest Drawing under the Primary
Liquidity Facility or withdrawals from the Cash Collateral
Account, there are insufficient funds available to the
Subordination Agent to pay interest on the Class G
Certificates (regardless of whether LIBOR is lower or higher
than Capped LIBOR), the Subordination Agent shall make a
withdrawal from the Above-Cap Account to fund such shortfall to
the extent funds are available in the Above-Cap Account (after
giving effect to any Above-Cap Payment or equivalent transfer
from the Above-Cap Collateral Account).
Amounts deposited into the Above-Cap Account are not available
to pay principal of or Premium, if any, on or Break Amount, if
any, with respect to, the Class G Certificates or to pay
any amount with respect to the Class B Certificates. On the
first Business Day after the earlier of (i) the Final
Maturity Date and (ii) the date of payment of Final
Distributions with respect to the Class G Certificates, the
Subordination Agent will pay to the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
an amount equal to the sum of the amounts remaining in the
Above-Cap Account and the Above-Cap Collateral Account, if any.
S-56
Amounts in the Above-Cap Account (if any), together with the
maximum amount of Interest Drawings available under the Primary
Liquidity Facility, are expected to provide an amount sufficient
to pay interest (calculated at the Stated Interest Rate for the
Class G Certificates) on the Class G Certificates on
up to eight consecutive Regular Distribution Dates (without
regard to any expected future payments of principal on such
Certificates and assuming that Continental will not cure any
Payment Default).
Notwithstanding the subordination provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement, the holders of the Class G
Certificates will be entitled to receive and retain the proceeds
of withdrawals from the Above-Cap Account.
Initial
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
The initial Above-Cap Liquidity Provider will be Morgan Stanley
Capital Services Inc. (the Above-Cap Liquidity
Provider and, together with the Primary Liquidity
Provider, the Liquidity Providers). The obligations
of Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. will be guaranteed by
Morgan Stanley, its parent company (the Above-Cap
Liquidity Provider Guarantor). Morgan Stanley has a
short-term unsecured debt rating of P-1 from Moodys and a
short-term issuer credit rating of A-1 from Standard &
Poors.
S-57
DESCRIPTION
OF THE POLICY AND THE POLICY PROVIDER AGREEMENT FOR THE
CLASS G CERTIFICATES
The following summary describes the material terms of the Policy
for the Class G Certificates and certain provisions of the
Policy Provider Agreement. The summary does not purport to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to all of
the provisions of the Policy and the Policy Provider Agreement,
each of which will be filed as an exhibit to a Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission.
The
Policy
The Policy Provider will issue a financial guarantee insurance
policy (the Policy) in favor of the Subordination
Agent for the benefit of the Class G Trustee, the holders
of the Class G Certificates and the Primary Liquidity
Provider. The Policy does not cover any amounts payable on the
Class B Certificates. Drawings under the Policy may be made
under the following six circumstances:
Interest
Drawings
If on any Regular Distribution Date (other than the Final
Maturity Date) after giving effect to the application of
available funds in accordance with the subordination provisions
of the Intercreditor Agreement and to the application of any
drawing paid under the Primary Liquidity Facility in respect of
interest due on the Class G Certificates on such
Distribution Date, any withdrawal of funds from the Cash
Collateral Account in respect of such interest and any
withdrawal from the Above-Cap Account in respect of such
interest (collectively, Prior Funds), the
Subordination Agent does not then have sufficient funds
available for the payment of all amounts due and owing in
respect of accrued and unpaid interest on the Class G
Certificates at the Stated Interest Rate for the Class G
Certificates (calculated assuming that Continental will not cure
any Payment Default), the Subordination Agent is to request a
Policy Drawing under the Policy in an amount sufficient to
enable the Subordination Agent to pay such accrued interest.
Proceeds
Deficiency Drawing
If on any Special Distribution Date (other than the Election
Distribution Date or the Provider Distribution Date) established
by the Subordination Agent by reason of its receipt of a Special
Payment constituting the proceeds from the sale of the
Series G Equipment Note (as to which there has been a
payment default or which has been accelerated) or of the Pledged
Spare Parts comprising all of the Pledged Spare Parts subject to
the lien of the Indenture at the time of such sale, as the case
may be, after giving effect to the application of such proceeds
in accordance with the subordination provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement and to the application of any Prior
Funds, the Subordination Agent does not then have sufficient
funds available for the payment in full of the then outstanding
Pool Balance of the Class G Certificates, together with
accrued and unpaid interest thereon at the Stated Interest Rate
for the Class G Certificates for the period from the
immediately preceding Regular Distribution Date to such Special
Distribution Date (calculated assuming that Continental will not
cure any Payment Default) (collectively, the Relevant
Outstanding Amount), the Subordination Agent is to request
a Policy Drawing under the Policy in an amount sufficient to
enable the Subordination Agent to pay the Relevant Outstanding
Amount.
No
Proceeds Drawing
If a Payment Default exists with respect to the Series G
Equipment Note (without giving effect to any acceleration or any
payments by any Liquidity Provider or the Policy Provider) for a
period of eight consecutive Interest Periods (such period, the
Default Period) (regardless of whether the
Subordination Agent has received a Special Payment constituting
proceeds from the sale of the Series G Equipment Note or
any Collateral during such Default Period) and continues to
exist on the Regular Distribution Date on which such eighth
Interest Period ends, on the 25th day following such
Regular Distribution Date (or if such 25th day is not a
Business Day, the next Business Day), unless a Policy Provider
Election has been made (or deemed to have been made), the
Subordination Agent is to request a Policy Drawing in an amount
equal to the then outstanding principal amount of the
Series G Equipment Note (less the amount of any Policy
Drawings previously paid by the Policy Provider in respect of
principal) plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon at the
Stated Interest Rate for the Class G Certificates
(calculated
S-58
assuming that Continental will not cure any Payment Default)
from the immediately preceding Regular Distribution Date to that
Special Distribution Date. Unless a Policy Provider Election has
been made (or deemed to have been made), the Subordination Agent
is to give prompt notice to the Class G Trustee and the
Policy Provider setting forth the non-receipt of any such
Special Payment, which notice is to be given not less than
25 days prior to such Special Distribution Date. After the
payment by the Policy Provider in full of such amount of
principal and accrued interest for such Policy Drawing, the
Subordination Agent will have no right to request any further
Policy Drawing in respect of any subsequent sale or other
disposition of such Equipment Notes except for Preference
Amounts.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Policy Provider has the
right, so long as no Policy Provider Default shall have occurred
and be continuing, to make a Policy Provider
Election instead, which Policy Provider Election shall be
deemed to have been given on the day that is ten days prior to
the end of any such
24-month
period (unless the Policy Provider shall have affirmatively
elected by notice to the Subordination Agent to not make such
Policy Provider Election on or prior to such day or a Policy
Provider Default shall have occurred and be continuing as of
such day), in which case:
|
|
|
|
|
On the Special Distribution Date established pursuant to the
preceding paragraph, the Policy Provider shall pay an amount
equal to any shortfall in the scheduled interest payable but not
paid on the Series G Equipment Note (determined after the
application of proceeds from the sale of any Collateral in
connection with the exercise of remedies under the Indenture and
calculated assuming that Continental will not cure any Payment
Default) during such
24-month
period (reduced by the amount of funds received from the Policy
Provider in connection with any prior Policy Drawing as
described under Proceeds Deficiency Drawings
and from the Primary Liquidity Facility, the Cash Collateral
Account, the Above-Cap Account or the Policy Provider to the
extent of any Policy Drawings as described under
Interest Drawings made as a result of a
failure of the Primary Liquidity Provider to honor Interest
Drawings under the Primary Liquidity Facility or a failure of
the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider or the Above-Cap Liquidity
Provider Guarantor to make an Above-Cap Payment under the
Above-Cap Liquidity Facility).
|
|
|
|
On each Regular Distribution Date that occurs after such Special
Distribution Date, the Policy Provider shall permit drawings
under the Policy for an amount equal to the scheduled principal
and interest that were to become due on such Equipment Note on
the related payment date (taking into account any adjustments
made on account of redemptions, but without regard to any
acceleration thereof, any failure to consummate any optional
redemption or any funds available under the Primary Liquidity
Facility, the Cash Collateral Account or the Above-Cap Account
and calculated assuming that Continental will not cure any
Payment Default) until the establishment of an Election
Distribution Date or a Provider Distribution Date, except that
the Policy Provider shall not be required to pay (i) any
amount in respect of principal described in this subparagraph on
any such Regular Distribution Date if (x) it has
theretofore honored Policy Drawings as described under
Proceeds Deficiency Drawings or No
Proceeds Drawing or (y) in connection with the
exercise of remedies under the Indenture there has previously
been a reduction in the outstanding principal balance of the
Series G Equipment Note as a result of the application of
proceeds from the sale of Collateral, to the extent that, after
giving effect to the distribution of any such amount or proceeds
or both in accordance with the provisions of the Intercreditor
Agreement, the Pool Balance of the Class G Certificates as
of such Regular Distribution Date would be less than the Pool
Balance of the Class G Certificates as of such Regular
Distribution Date were all payments on the Series G
Equipment Note to have been made by Continental when due
(without regard to Acceleration, any failure to consummate any
optional redemption but taking into account any adjustments
previously made for redemptions) nor (ii) for the avoidance
of doubt, any amount in respect of interest under this
subparagraph on any such Regular Distribution Date other than
accrued and unpaid interest (at the applicable Stated Interest
Rate calculated assuming that Continental will not cure any
Payment Default) on the Pool Balance of the Class G
Certificates as of such Regular Distribution Date (calculated
without giving effect to any Policy Drawing in respect of
principal under this subparagraph on such Regular Distribution
Date).
|
|
|
|
On an Election Distribution Date or a Special Distribution Date
(other than a Regular Distribution Date) elected by the Policy
Provider upon 20 days notice (the Provider
Distribution Date), the Subordination Agent shall be
required to request a Policy Drawing for an amount (as
determined after giving effect to the application of available
funds in accordance with the subordination provisions of the
Intercreditor
|
S-59
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement) equal to the then outstanding Pool Balance of the
Class G Certificates and accrued and unpaid interest
thereon at the applicable Stated Interest Rate (calculated
assuming that Continental will not cure any Payment Default)
from the immediately preceding Regular Distribution Date to such
Election Distribution Date or Provider Distribution Date,
without derogation of the Policy Providers continuing
obligations for all previous requests for Policy Drawings that
remain unpaid in respect of the Series G Equipment Note.
|
The Intercreditor Agreement instructs the Subordination Agent to
make each such drawing under the Policy.
Final
Policy Drawing
If on the Final Maturity Date after giving effect to the
application of available funds in accordance with the
subordination provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement and to
the application of any Prior Funds, the Subordination Agent does
not then have sufficient funds available for the payment in full
of the Final Distributions (calculated as of such date and
calculated assuming that Continental will not cure any Payment
Default but excluding any accrued and unpaid Premium or Break
Amount) on the Class G Certificates, the Subordination
Agent is to request a Policy Drawing under the Policy in an
amount sufficient to enable the Subordination Agent to pay the
Final Distributions (calculated as of such date and calculated
assuming that Continental will not cure any Payment Default but
excluding any accrued and unpaid Premium or Break Amount) on the
Class G Certificates.
Avoidance
Drawing
If, at any time, the Subordination Agent has actual knowledge of
the issuance of any Order, the Subordination Agent is to give
prompt notice to the Class G Trustee, the Primary Liquidity
Provider and the Policy Provider of such Order and, prior to the
expiration of the Policy, to request a Policy Drawing for the
relevant Preference Amount and to deliver to the Policy Provider
a copy of the documentation required by the Policy with respect
to such Order. To the extent that any portion of such Preference
Amount is to be paid to the Subordination Agent (and not to any
receiver, conservator,
debtor-in-possession
or trustee in bankruptcy as provided in the Policy), the
Subordination Agent shall establish as a Special Distribution
Date the date that is the earlier of three Business Days after
the date of the expiration of the Policy and the Business Day
that immediately follows the 25th day after that notice for
distribution of such portion of the proceeds of such Policy
Drawing. With respect to that Special Distribution Date, the
Subordination Agent is to request a Policy Drawing for the
relevant Preference Amount and to deliver to the Policy Provider
a copy of the documentation required by the Policy with respect
to such Order.
Primary
Liquidity Provider Drawing
On or after the Business Day which is the earliest to occur of
(1) the date on which an Interest Drawing shall have been
made under the Primary Liquidity Facility and remains
unreimbursed for 24 months, (2) the date on which any
Downgrade Drawing, Non-Extension Drawing or Final Drawing that
was deposited into the Cash Collateral Account shall have been
applied to pay any scheduled payment of interest on the
Certificates and remains unreplenished to the Cash Collateral
Account or unreimbursed to the Primary Liquidity Provider, as
the case may be, for 24 months and (3) the date on
which all of the Equipment Notes have been accelerated and
remain unpaid for 24 months (in each case, disregarding any
reimbursements from payments by the Policy Provider and from any
Special Payment constituting proceeds from the sale of Equipment
Notes or any Collateral during such
24-month
period) (such Business Day, the Liquidity Provider
Reimbursement Date), the Policy Provider (upon
20 days prior notice from the Subordination Agent on
behalf of the Primary Liquidity Provider) will be required to
honor drawings under the Policy by the Subordination Agent on
behalf of the Primary Liquidity Provider for all outstanding
drawings under the Primary Liquidity Facility, together with
interest thereon.
General
All requests by the Subordination Agent for a Policy Drawing are
to be made by it no later than 12:00 p.m. (New York City
time) on the applicable Distribution Date and in the form
required by the Policy and delivered to the Policy Provider in
accordance with the Policy. All proceeds of any Policy Drawing
are to be deposited by the
S-60
Subordination Agent in a separate policy account and from there
paid to the Class G Trustee for distribution to the holders
of Class G Certificates without regard to the subordination
provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement. In the case of any
Preference Amounts, however, all or part of the Policy Drawing
will be paid directly to the bankruptcy receiver, conservator,
debtor-in-possession
or trustee to the extent such amounts have not been paid by the
holders of Class G Certificates. If any request for a
Policy Drawing is rejected as not meeting the requirements of
the Policy, the Subordination Agent is to resubmit such request
so as to meet such requirements.
The Policy provides that if such a request for a Policy Drawing
(other than a Policy Drawing as provided in The
PolicyAvoidance Drawing) is properly submitted or
resubmitted it will pay to the Subordination Agent for deposit
in a separate policy account the applicable payment under the
Policy no later than 3:00 p.m. on the later of the relevant
Distribution Date and the Business Day on which the request is
received by the Policy Provider (if the request is received by
12:00 p.m. on such date) or the next Business Day (if the
request is received after that time or on a day that is not a
Business Day).
Once any payment under the Policy is paid to the Subordination
Agent, the Policy Provider will have no further obligation in
respect of such payment. The Policy Provider shall not be
required to make any payment except at the times and in the
amounts and under the circumstances expressly set forth in the
Policy.
The Policy does not cover (i) shortfalls, if any,
attributable to the liability of the Class G Trust, the
Class G Trustee or the Subordination Agent for withholding
taxes, if any (including interest and penalties in respect of
that liability), (ii) interest in excess of the Stated
Interest Rate for the Class G Certificates (calculated
assuming that Continental will not cure any Payment Default),
(iii) interest on interest, (iv) default interest,
(v) any Premium or other acceleration payment payable in
respect of the Class G Certificates, (vi) any Break
Amount, (vii) any failure of the Subordination Agent or the
Class G Trustee to make any payment due to the holders of
the Class G Certificates from funds received or
(viii) any amount with respect to the Class B
Certificates.
The Policy Providers obligation under the Policy will be
discharged to the extent that funds are received by the
Subordination Agent for distribution to the Class G Trustee
and the holders of Class G Certificates, whether or not the
funds are properly distributed by the Subordination Agent or the
Class G Trustee.
The Policy is noncancellable, except that the Policy may be
surrendered for cancellation as described in Description
of the CertificatesPurchase Rights of
Certificateholders. The Policy expires and terminates
without any action on the part of the Policy Provider or any
other person on the later of (i) the day that is one year
and one day following the date on which Final Distributions are
made on the Class G Certificates (the Termination
Date) or (ii) if applicable, the date on which
drawings under the Policy referred to in Primary
Liquidity Provider Drawing are paid in full, unless an
Insolvency Proceeding has commenced and has not been concluded
or dismissed on the Termination Date, in which case on the later
of (i) the date of the conclusion or dismissal of such
Insolvency Proceeding without continuing jurisdiction by the
court in such Insolvency Proceeding and (ii) the date on
which the Policy Provider has made all payments required to be
made under the terms of such Policy in respect of Preference
Amounts. No portion of the premium under the Policy is
refundable for any reason including payment or provision being
made for payment.
The Policy is issued under and pursuant to, and shall be
construed under, the laws of the State of New York.
Definitions
Order means the order referred to in the definition
of the term Preference Amount.
Election Distribution Date means any Special
Distribution Date specified by the Subordination Agent upon
20 days notice, by reason of the occurrence of a
Policy Provider Default occurring after a Policy Provider
Election.
Insolvency Proceeding means the commencement, after
the Issuance Date, of any bankruptcy, insolvency, readjustment
of debt, reorganization, marshalling of assets and liabilities
or similar proceedings by or against Continental or any
Liquidity Provider and the commencement, after the Issuance
Date, of any proceedings by Continental or any Liquidity
Provider for the winding up or liquidation of its affairs or the
consent, after the Issuance Date, to the appointment of a
trustee, conservator, receiver or liquidator in any bankruptcy,
insolvency,
S-61
readjustment of debt, reorganization, marshalling of assets and
liabilities or similar proceedings of or relating to Continental
or any Liquidity Provider.
Preference Amount means any payment of principal of,
or interest at the applicable Stated Interest Rate on, the
Series G Equipment Note made to the Class G Trustee or
the Subordination Agent or (without duplication) any payment of
the Pool Balance of, or interest at the applicable Stated
Interest Rate on, the Class G Certificates or any payment
of the proceeds of any drawing under the Primary Liquidity
Facility or the Above-Cap Account made to a holder which has
become recoverable or been recovered from the Class G
Trustee, the Subordination Agent or the holders of the
Class G Certificates (as the case may be) as a result of
such payment being determined or deemed a preferential transfer
pursuant to the United States Bankruptcy Code or otherwise
rescinded or requested to be returned in accordance with a
final, nonappealable order of a court of competent jurisdiction
exercising jurisdiction in an insolvency proceeding.
The
Policy Provider Agreement
The Subordination Agent, Continental and the Policy Provider
will enter into an insurance and indemnity agreement (the
Policy Provider Agreement) to be dated as of the
Issuance Date pursuant to which Continental agrees to reimburse
the Policy Provider for amounts paid pursuant to claims made
under the Policy. Pursuant to the Policy Provider Agreement,
Continental agrees to pay the Policy Provider a premium based on
the Pool Balance of the Class G Certificates and a fee in
connection with any prepayment of the Class G Certificates
(including by reason of an acceleration of the underlying
Equipment Notes, but excluding a prepayment associated with an
Event of Loss or to comply with the Collateral Ratio
requirements) and to reimburse the Policy Provider for certain
expenses.
S-62
DESCRIPTION
OF THE INTERCREDITOR AGREEMENT
The following summary describes the material provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement (the Intercreditor
Agreement) among the Trustees, the Liquidity Providers,
the Policy Provider and Wilmington Trust Company, as
subordination agent (the Subordination Agent). The
summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to all of the provisions of the
Intercreditor Agreement, which will be filed as an exhibit to a
Current Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission.
Intercreditor
Rights
Controlling
Party
The Mortgagee will be directed in taking, or refraining from
taking, any action under the Indenture or with respect to the
Equipment Notes issued under the Indenture, by the holders of at
least a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the
Equipment Notes issued thereunder, so long as no Indenture
Default shall have occurred and be continuing thereunder. For so
long as the Subordination Agent is the registered holder of the
Equipment Notes, the Subordination Agent will act with respect
to the preceding sentence in accordance with the directions of
the Trustees for whom such Equipment Notes are held as
Trust Property, to the extent constituting, in the
aggregate, directions with respect to the required principal
amount of the Equipment Notes, except that so long as the Final
Distributions on the Class G Certificates have not been
made or any Policy Provider Amounts (other than any Excess
Reimbursement Obligations) remain outstanding and no Policy
Provider Default shall have occurred and be continuing, the
Subordination Agent shall request directions from the Policy
Provider rather than the Class G Trustee with respect to
the Series G Equipment Note (subject to the proviso
contained in Voting of Equipment Notes).
After the occurrence and during the continuance of an Indenture
Default, the Mortgagee will be directed in taking, or refraining
from taking, any action under the Indenture or with respect to
the Equipment Notes issued thereunder, including acceleration of
such Equipment Notes or foreclosing the lien on the Collateral,
by the Controlling Party, subject to the limitations described
below. See Description of the CertificatesIndenture
Defaults and Certain Rights Upon an Indenture Default for
a description of the rights of the Certificateholders of each
Trust to direct the respective Trustees.
The Controlling Party will be:
|
|
|
|
|
Except as provided below, the Policy Provider.
|
|
|
|
If a Policy Provider Default is continuing or if the Policy has
been surrendered for cancellation (thereby releasing the Policy
Provider from its obligations under the Policy) (as described in
Description of the CertificatesPurchase Rights of
Certificateholders) and the Policy Provider Amounts (other
than any amount referred to in clause (c) of the definition
of Excess Reimbursement Obligations) have been paid in full, the
Class G Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Upon payment of Final Distributions to the holders of
Class G Certificates and (unless a Policy Provider Default
is continuing) of the Policy Provider Amounts (other than Excess
Reimbursement Obligations) to the Policy Provider, the
Class B Trustee.
|
|
|
|
Under certain circumstances, and notwithstanding the foregoing,
the Primary Liquidity Provider, as discussed in the next
paragraph.
|
At any time after the Liquidity Provider Reimbursement Date, if
a Policy Provider Default attributable to a failure to make a
drawing to pay the Primary Liquidity Provider, as described
under Description of the Policy and the Policy Provider
Agreement for the Class G CertificatesThe
PolicyPrimary Liquidity Provider Drawing, is
continuing, the Primary Liquidity Provider (so long as the
Primary Liquidity Provider has not defaulted in its obligation
to make any advance under the Primary Liquidity Facility) shall
have the right to become the Controlling Party, provided
that if the Policy Provider pays to the Primary Liquidity
Provider all outstanding drawings and interest thereon owing to
the Primary Liquidity Provider under the Primary Liquidity
Facility including all interest accrued thereon to such date,
the person determined in accordance with the immediately
preceding paragraph shall be the Controlling Party.
S-63
For purposes of giving effect to the rights of the Controlling
Party, the Trustees (other than the Controlling Party) shall
irrevocably agree, and the Certificateholders (other than the
Certificateholders represented by the Controlling Party) will be
deemed to agree by virtue of their purchase of Certificates,
that the Subordination Agent, as record holder of the Equipment
Notes, shall exercise its voting rights in respect of the
Equipment Notes as directed by the Controlling Party.
(Intercreditor Agreement, Section 2.6) For a description of
certain limitations on the Controlling Partys rights to
exercise remedies, see Description of the Equipment
NotesRemedies.
Policy Provider Default shall mean the occurrence of
any of the following events: (a) the Policy Provider fails
to make a payment required under the Policy in accordance with
its terms and such failure remains unremedied for two Business
Days following the delivery of written notice of such failure to
the Policy Provider or (b) the Policy Provider
(i) files any petition or commences any case or proceeding
under any provisions of any federal or state law relating to
insolvency, bankruptcy, rehabilitation, liquidation or
reorganization, (ii) makes a general assignment for the
benefit of its creditors or (iii) has an order for relief
entered against it under any federal or state law relating to
insolvency, bankruptcy, rehabilitation, liquidation or
reorganization that is final and nonappealable, or (c) a
court of competent jurisdiction, the New York Department of
Insurance or another competent regulatory authority enters a
final and nonappealable order, judgment or decree
(i) appointing a custodian, trustee, agent or receiver for
the Policy Provider or for all or any material portion of its
property (ii) authorizing the taking of possession by a
custodian, trustee, agent or receiver of the Policy Provider (or
taking of possession of all or any material portion of the
Policy Providers property).
Final Distributions means, with respect to the
Certificates of any Trust on any Distribution Date, the sum of
(x) the aggregate amount of all accrued and unpaid interest
on such Certificates and (y) the Pool Balance of such
Certificates as of the immediately preceding Distribution Date.
For purposes of calculating Final Distributions with respect to
the Certificates of any Trust, any Premium paid on the Equipment
Note held in such Trust which has not been distributed to the
Certificateholders of such Trust (other than such Premium or a
portion thereof applied to the payment of interest on the
Certificates of such Trust or the reduction of the Pool Balance
of such Trust) shall be added to the amount of such Final
Distributions.
Sale
of Pledged Spare Parts or Equipment Notes
Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of any Indenture
Default, the Controlling Party may accelerate and, subject to
the provisions of the immediately following sentence, sell some
or all of the Pledged Spare Parts or all (but not less than all)
of the Equipment Notes issued under the Indenture. So long as
any Certificates are outstanding, during nine months after the
earlier of (x) the acceleration of the Equipment Notes and
(y) the bankruptcy or insolvency of Continental, without
the consent of each Trustee, no Pledged Spare Parts or Equipment
Notes may be sold, if the net proceeds from such sale would be
less than the Minimum Sale Price.
Minimum Sale Price means (a) in the case of any
Pledged Spare Parts proposed to be sold, 75% of the then current
aggregate Fair Market Value of such Pledged Spare Parts and
(b) in the case of the Equipment Notes the lesser of
(i) 75% of the current Fair Market Value of all Pledged
Spare Parts then subject to the Lien of the Indenture and
(ii) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the
Equipment Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
Priority
of Distributions
All payments in respect of the Equipment Notes and certain other
payments received on any Distribution Date will be promptly
distributed by the Subordination Agent on such Distribution Date
in the following order of priority:
|
|
|
|
|
To the Subordination Agent, any Trustee, any Certificateholder,
the Primary Liquidity Provider and the Policy Provider to the
extent required to pay certain
out-of-pocket
costs and expenses actually incurred by the Subordination Agent
or any Trustee or to reimburse any Certificateholder, the
Primary Liquidity Provider or the Policy Provider in respect of
payments made to the Subordination Agent or any Trustee in
connection with the protection or realization of the value of
the Equipment Notes or the Collateral under (and as defined in)
the Indenture (collectively, the Administration
Expenses).
|
S-64
|
|
|
|
|
To the Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent required to pay
the Liquidity Expenses and to the Policy Provider to the extent
required to pay Policy Expenses.
|
|
|
|
To the Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent required to pay
interest accrued on the Liquidity Obligations (as determined
after giving effect to certain payments by the Policy Provider
to the Primary Liquidity Provider) and to the Policy Provider to
the extent required to pay interest accrued on certain Policy
Provider Obligations and, if the Policy Provider has paid to the
Primary Liquidity Provider all outstanding drawings and interest
thereon owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider, to the Policy
Provider to the extent required to reimburse the Policy Provider
for the amount of the payment made to the Primary Liquidity
Provider attributable to interest accrued on the drawings.
|
|
|
|
To (i) the Primary Liquidity Provider to the extent
required to pay the outstanding amount of all Liquidity
Obligations (as determined after giving effect to certain
payments by the Policy Provider to the Primary Liquidity
Provider), (ii) if applicable, unless (x) any
Equipment Note is a Non-Performing Equipment Note and a
Liquidity Event of Default shall have occurred and is continuing
or (y) a Final Drawing shall have occurred, to replenish
the Cash Collateral Account up to the Required Amount (less the
amount of any repayments of Interest Drawings while
sub-clause (x) of this clause is applicable) and
(iii) if the Policy Provider has paid to the Primary
Liquidity Provider all outstanding drawings and interest thereon
owing to the Primary Liquidity Provider or if the Policy
Provider has honored any Policy Drawings as a result of the
failure of the Primary Liquidity Provider to honor Interest
Drawings in accordance with the Primary Liquidity Facility, to
the Policy Provider to the extent required to reimburse the
Policy Provider for the amount of such payment made to the
Primary Liquidity Provider in respect of principal of drawings
under the Primary Liquidity Facility and the amount of such
Policy Drawings, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
If applicable, unless (x) any Equipment Note is a
Non-Performing Equipment Note and a Liquidity Event of Default
shall have occurred and is continuing or (y) a Final
Drawing shall have occurred, to replenish the Above-Cap
Collateral Account up to an amount equal to the Above-Cap
Collateral Amount as recalculated as of such date (less any
amount then on deposit in Above-Cap Account).
|
|
|
|
To the Subordination Agent, any Trustee or any Certificateholder
to the extent required to pay certain fees, taxes, charges and
other amounts payable.
|
|
|
|
To the Class G Trustee to the extent required to pay
Expected Distributions on the Class G Certificates.
|
|
|
|
To the Policy Provider to the extent required to pay Policy
Provider Obligations (other than amounts payable pursuant to the
first four clauses above and any Excess Reimbursement
Obligations) and certain fees.
|
|
|
|
To the Class B Trustee to the extent required to pay
Expected Distributions on the Class B Certificates.
|
|
|
|
To the Policy Provider to the extent required to pay any Excess
Reimbursement Obligations.
|
|
|
|
If applicable, unless (x) any Equipment Note is a
Non-Performing Equipment Note and a Liquidity Event of Default
shall have occurred and is continuing or (y) a Final
Drawing shall have occurred, to replenish the Above-Cap
Collateral Account up to an amount equal to the Above-Cap
Collateral Amount as recalculated as of such date.
|
Liquidity Obligations means the obligations to
reimburse or to pay the Primary Liquidity Provider all
principal, interest, fees and other amounts owing to it under
the Primary Liquidity Facility or certain other agreements.
Liquidity Expenses means the Liquidity Obligations
other than any interest accrued thereon or the principal amount
of any drawing under the Primary Liquidity Facility.
Policy Provider Obligations means all reimbursement
and other amounts, including fees and indemnities (to the extent
not included in Policy Expenses), due to the Policy Provider
under the Policy Provider Agreement (except certain specified
fees and other amounts payable to the Policy Provider).
S-65
Policy Expenses means all amounts (including amounts
in respect of premiums, fees, expenses or indemnities) due to
the Policy Provider under the Policy Provider Agreement or
certain other agreements other than (i) the amount of any
Excess Reimbursement Obligations, (ii) any Policy Drawing,
(iii) any interest accrued on any Policy Provider
Obligation, (iv) certain specified fees and other amounts
payable to the Policy Provider, (v) any amounts that the
Policy Provider is entitled to receive by virtue of its
subrogation rights under the Intercreditor Agreement and
(vi) reimbursement of and interest on the Liquidity
Obligations in respect of the Primary Liquidity Facility paid by
the Policy Provider to the Primary Liquidity Provider,
provided that if, at the time of determination, a Policy
Provider Default exists, Policy Expenses will not include any
indemnity payments owed to the Policy Provider.
Policy Drawing means any payment of a claim under
the Policy.
Excess Reimbursement Obligations means, (a) in
the event of any Policy Provider Election, the portion of the
Policy Provider Obligations that represents, when added to that
portion of any Liquidity Obligations that represents, interest
on the Series G Equipment Note in excess of 24 months
of interest at the interest rate applicable to such Equipment
Note, (b) any interest on the Liquidity Obligations in
respect of the Primary Liquidity Facility paid by the Policy
Provider to the Primary Liquidity Provider from and after the
end of the
24-month
period referred to under the caption Description of the
Policy and the Policy Provider Agreement for the Class G
CertificatesThe PolicyNo Proceeds Drawing and
(c) interest on Policy Drawings as set forth in the Policy
Provider Agreement (other than such interest that constitutes a
Policy Provider Obligation).
Policy Provider Amounts means all Policy Provider
Obligations, Policy Expenses, certain fees due and payable to
the Policy Provider (without duplication of any Policy Provider
Obligations or Policy Expenses) and Excess Reimbursement
Obligations.
Expected Distributions means, with respect to the
Certificates of any Trust on any Distribution Date (the
Current Distribution Date), the sum of
(1) accrued and unpaid interest on the outstanding Pool
Balance of such Certificates and (2) the difference between:
(A) the Pool Balance of such Certificates as of the
immediately preceding Distribution Date (or, if the Current
Distribution Date is the first Distribution Date, as of the
Issuance Date) and
(B) the Pool Balance of such Certificates as of the Current
Distribution Date calculated on the basis that (i) the
principal of any Performing Equipment Note held in such Trust
has been paid when due (whether at stated maturity, upon
redemption, prepayment, purchase, acceleration or otherwise) and
such payments have been distributed to the holders of such
Certificates, (ii) the principal of any Non-Performing
Equipment Note held in such Trust has been paid in full and such
payments have been distributed to the holders of such
Certificates and (iii) the principal of any Equipment Note
formerly held in such Trust that has been sold pursuant to the
Intercreditor Agreement has been paid in full and such payments
have been distributed to the holders of such Certificates.
For purposes of determining the priority of distributions on
account of the redemption, purchase or prepayment of any
Equipment Note or Collateral, clause (1) of the definition
of Expected Distributions shall be deemed to read as follows:
(1) accrued, due and unpaid interest on the
outstanding Pool Balance of such Certificates together with
(without duplication) accrued and unpaid interest on a portion
of the outstanding Pool Balance of such Certificates equal to
the outstanding principal amount of the Equipment Notes held in
such Trust and being redeemed, purchased or prepaid (immediately
prior to such redemption, purchase or prepayment). For
purposes of calculating Expected Distributions with respect to
the Certificates of any Trust, any Premium or Break Amount paid
on the Equipment Notes held in such Trust that has not been
distributed to the Certificateholders of such Trust (other than
such Premium or Break Amount or a portion thereof applied to the
payment of interest on the Certificates of such Trust or the
reduction of the Pool Balance of such Trust) shall be added to
the amount of Expected Distributions.
Voting of
Equipment Notes
In the event that the Subordination Agent, as the registered
holder of any Equipment Note, receives a request for its consent
to any amendment, supplement, modification, approval, consent or
waiver under such Equipment Note or the Indenture or other
related document, (i) if no Indenture Default shall have
occurred and be continuing
S-66
with respect to such Indenture, the Subordination Agent shall
request directions from the Trustee(s) (except that, so long as
the Final Distributions on the Class G Certificates have
not been made or any Policy Provider Amounts (other than Excess
Reimbursement Obligations) remain outstanding and no Policy
Provider Default shall have occurred and be continuing, the
Subordination Agent shall request directions from the Policy
Provider rather than the Class G Trustee with respect to
the Series G Equipment Note) and shall vote or consent in
accordance with such directions and (ii) if any Indenture
Default shall have occurred and be continuing, the Subordination
Agent will exercise its voting rights as directed by the
Controlling Party, subject to certain limitations; provided
that no such amendment, modification, consent or waiver
shall, without the consent of the Primary Liquidity Provider,
the Policy Provider and each affected Certificateholder, among
other things (a) reduce the amount of principal or interest
payable by Continental, or change the time of payment or method
of calculation of any amount, under any Equipment Note,
(b) permit the creation of any security interest on the
Collateral or any part thereof, except as provided therein, or
deprive any holder of an Equipment Note of the benefit of the
lien of the Indenture on the Collateral or (c) modify the
percentage of holders of Equipment Notes issued under the
Indenture required to take or approve any action under the
Indenture. (Intercreditor Agreement, Section 9.1(b))
List of
Certificateholders
Upon the occurrence and during the continuation of an Indenture
Default, the Subordination Agent shall instruct the Class G
Trustee to, and the Class G Trustee shall, request that DTC
post on its internet bulletin board a securities position
listing setting forth the names of all the parties reflected on
DTCs books as holding interests in the Class G
Certificates.
Reports
Promptly after the occurrence of a Triggering Event or an
Indenture Default resulting from the failure of Continental to
make payments on any Equipment Note and on every Regular
Distribution Date while the Triggering Event or such Indenture
Default shall be continuing, the Subordination Agent will
provide to each Trustee, the Liquidity Providers, the Policy
Provider, the Rating Agencies and Continental a statement
setting forth the following information:
|
|
|
|
|
After a bankruptcy of Continental, whether the Pledged Spare
Parts are (i) subject to the
60-day
period of Section 1110 of the Bankruptcy Code,
(ii) subject to an election by Continental under
Section 1110(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, (iii) covered
by an agreement contemplated by Section 1110(b) of the
Bankruptcy Code or (iv) not subject to any of (i),
(ii) or (iii).
|
|
|
|
To the best of Subordination Agents knowledge, after
requesting such information from Continental, the location of
the Pledged Spare Parts.
|
|
|
|
The current Pool Balance of each Class of Certificates and the
outstanding principal amount of all Equipment Notes.
|
|
|
|
The expected amount of interest which will have accrued on the
Equipment Notes and on the Certificates as of the next Regular
Distribution Date.
|
|
|
|
The amounts paid to each person on such Distribution Date
pursuant to the Intercreditor Agreement.
|
|
|
|
Details of the amounts paid on such Distribution Date identified
by reference to the relevant provision of the Intercreditor
Agreement and source of payment (by party, if applicable).
|
|
|
|
If the Subordination Agent has made a Final Drawing under the
Primary Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The amounts currently owed to each Liquidity Provider.
|
|
|
|
The amounts drawn under each Liquidity Facility.
|
|
|
|
The amounts owed to the Policy Provider.
|
|
|
|
After a bankruptcy of Continental, any operational reports filed
by Continental with the bankruptcy court which are available to
the Subordination Agent on a non-confidential basis.
|
S-67
The
Subordination Agent
Wilmington Trust Company will be the Subordination Agent under
the Intercreditor Agreement. Continental and its affiliates may
from time to time enter into banking and trustee relationships
with the Subordination Agent and its affiliates. The
Subordination Agents address is Wilmington Trust Company,
Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street, Wilmington,
Delaware
19890-0001,
Attention: Corporate Trust Administration.
The Subordination Agent may resign at any time, in which event a
successor Subordination Agent will be appointed as provided in
the Intercreditor Agreement. The Controlling Party may remove
the Subordination Agent for cause as provided in the
Intercreditor Agreement. In such circumstances, a successor
Subordination Agent will be appointed as provided in the
Intercreditor Agreement. Any resignation or removal of the
Subordination Agent and appointment of a successor Subordination
Agent does not become effective until acceptance of the
appointment by the successor Subordination Agent. (Intercreditor
Agreement, Section 8.1)
S-68
DESCRIPTION
OF THE APPRAISAL
SH&E, an independent aviation appraisal and consulting firm,
has prepared an appraisal of the spare parts of the types
included in the Collateral owned by Continental as of
December 25, 2005. A report, dated February 16, 2006,
summarizing such appraisal is annexed to this Prospectus
Supplement as Appendix II. The appraisal is subject to a
number of assumptions and limitations and was prepared based on
certain specified methodologies. In preparing its appraisal,
SH&E conducted only a limited physical inspection of certain
locations at which Continental maintains the spare parts. An
appraisal that is subject to other assumptions and limitations
and based on other methodologies may result in valuations that
are materially different from those contained in SH&Es
appraisal.
The spare parts included in the Collateral fall into two
categories, rotables and expendables.
Rotables are parts that wear over time and can be
repeatedly restored to a serviceable condition over a period
approximating the life of the flight equipment to which they
relate. For example, thrust reversers, auxiliary power units and
landing gear are Rotables. Expendables consist of parts that can
be restored to a serviceable condition but have a life less than
the related flight equipment and parts that generally are used
once and thereby consumed or thereafter discarded. For example,
engine cowlings, engine blades and duct assemblies are
repairable expendable parts and bolts, screws, tubes and hoses
are consumable expendable parts. Spare engines are not included
in the Collateral. Set forth below is certain information about
the spare parts of the types included in the Collateral and the
appraised value of such spare parts set forth in SH&Es
appraisal referred to above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts
Quantity(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Model
|
|
Expendables
|
|
|
Rotables
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Appraised Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
737-300/500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
$
|
31.07
|
|
737-700/800/900
|
|
|
331,796
|
|
|
|
5,841
|
|
|
|
337,637
|
|
|
|
160.04
|
|
757-200
|
|
|
190,992
|
|
|
|
2,651
|
|
|
|
193,643
|
|
|
|
72.11
|
|
757-300
|
|
|
19,368
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
19,504
|
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
767-200
|
|
|
26,113
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
26,326
|
|
|
|
6.37
|
|
767-400
|
|
|
59,739
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
61,199
|
|
|
|
50.75
|
|
777-200
|
|
|
113,167
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
115,417
|
|
|
|
86.65
|
|
Interchangeable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
3,529
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
741,175
|
|
|
|
18,618
|
|
|
|
759,793
|
|
|
$
|
432.84
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This quantity of spare parts used
in preparing the appraised value was determined as of
December 25, 2005. Since spare parts are regularly used,
refurbished, purchased, transferred and discarded in the
ordinary course of Continentals business, the quantity of
spare parts included in the Collateral and their appraised value
will change over time. Continental is required to provide to the
Policy Provider, the Mortgagee and the Rating Agencies a
semiannual appraisal of the Collateral. See Description of
the Equipment NotesCollateral.
|
An appraisal is only an estimate of value. An appraisal should
not be relied upon as a measure of realizable value. The
proceeds realized upon a sale of any Collateral may be less than
its appraised value. The value of the Collateral if remedies are
exercised under the Indenture will depend on market and economic
conditions, the supply of similar spare parts, the availability
of buyers, the condition of the Collateral and other factors. In
addition, since spare parts are regularly used, refurbished,
purchased, transferred and discarded in the ordinary course of
business, the quantity of spare parts included in the Collateral
and their appraised value will change over time. Accordingly,
there can be no assurance that the proceeds realized upon any
such exercise of remedies with respect to Equipment Notes and
the Collateral would equal the appraised value of the Collateral
or be sufficient to satisfy in full payments due on such
Equipment Notes or the Certificates.
S-69
DESCRIPTION
OF THE EQUIPMENT NOTES
The following summary describes the material terms of the
Equipment Notes. The summary makes use of terms defined in and
are qualified in their entirety by reference to all of the
provisions of the Equipment Notes, the Indenture, the Collateral
Maintenance Agreement and the Note Purchase Agreement,
forms of each of which will be filed as an exhibit to a Current
Report on
Form 8-K
to be filed by Continental with the Commission.
General
The Equipment Notes will be issued in two series: the
Series G Equipment Note and the
Series B Equipment Note (each, a
Series of Equipment Notes and, collectively, the
Equipment Notes). The Equipment Notes will be full
recourse obligations of Continental.
On the Issuance Date, the Trustees will use the proceeds from
the sale of the Certificates to purchase the Equipment Notes
pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, among Continental,
Wilmington Trust Company, as mortgagee (the
Mortgagee), the Trustees and the Subordination Agent
(the Note Purchase Agreement). The Equipment
Notes will be issued pursuant to the Trust Indenture and
Mortgage between Continental and the Mortgagee (the
Indenture), which provides for a lien on the Pledged
Spare Parts and the other Collateral to secure
Continentals obligations with respect to the Equipment
Notes.
Principal
and Interest Payments
Subject to the provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement,
interest paid on the Equipment Notes held in each Trust will be
passed through to the Certificateholders of such Trust at the
rate per annum set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus
Supplement with respect to Certificates issued by such Trust
until the Final Expected Distribution Date. Interest will be
payable on the unpaid principal amount of each of the
Series G Equipment Note and the Series B Equipment
Note at the rate applicable to such Equipment Note on
March 2, June 2, September 2 and December 2 of each
year, commencing on September 2, 2006. Interest is
calculated on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed
over a
360-day year.
The entire principal amount of the Series G Equipment Note
and the Series B Equipment Note is scheduled to be paid on
the Final Expected Distribution Date.
Subject to the provisions of the Intercreditor Agreement,
principal paid on the redemption of the Equipment Note held in
each Trust will be passed through to the Certificateholders of
such Trust when paid. See Optional Redemption.
If any date scheduled for a payment of principal, Premium (if
any), Break Amount (if any) or interest with respect to the
Equipment Notes is not a Business Day, such payment will be made
on the next succeeding Business Day, and interest shall be added
for such additional period.
Determination
of LIBOR
LIBOR (LIBOR) for the period commencing on and
including the Issuance Date and ending on but excluding the
first Regular Distribution Date (the Initial Interest
Period and an Interest Period) will be
determined on the second Business Day preceding the Issuance
Date as the rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for a period
of three months that appears on the display designated as page
3750 on the Telerate Monitor.
For the purpose of calculating LIBOR for each subsequent period
from and including a Regular Distribution Date to but excluding
the next succeeding Regular Distribution Date (each, also an
Interest Period), Continental will enter into a
Reference Agency Agreement (the Reference Agency
Agreement) with Wilmington Trust Company, as reference
agent (the Reference Agent) and the Subordination
Agent. The Reference Agent will determine LIBOR for each
Interest Period following the Initial Interest Period, on a date
(the Reference Date) that is two London banking days
(meaning days on which commercial banks are open for general
business in London, England) before the Regular Distribution
Date on which such Interest Period commences.
S-70
On each Reference Date, the Reference Agent will determine LIBOR
as the rate for deposits in U.S. dollars for a period of
three months that appears on the display designated as page
3750 on the Telerate Monitor (or such other page or
service as may replace it) as of 11:00 a.m. (London time).
If the rate determined as described in the foregoing paragraph
does not appear on the Telerate Page 3750, the Reference
Agent will determine LIBOR on the basis of the rates at which
deposits in U.S. Dollars are offered by certain reference
banks as described in the Reference Agency Agreement at
approximately 11:00 a.m., London time, on the Reference
Date for such Interest Period to prime banks in the London
interbank market for a period of three months commencing on the
first day of such Interest Period and in an amount that is
representative for a single transaction in the London interbank
market at the relevant time. The Reference Agent will request
the principal London office of each of the reference banks to
provide a quotation of its rate. If at least two such quotations
are provided, the rate for that Interest Period will be the
arithmetic mean of the quotations. If fewer than two quotations
are provided, the interest rate for the next Interest Period
shall be the arithmetic mean of the rates quoted by major banks
in New York City, selected by the Reference Agent in good faith
and in a commercially reasonable manner, at approximately
11:00 a.m., New York City time, on the first day of such
Interest Period for loans in U.S. Dollars to leading
European banks for a period of three months commencing on the
first day of such Interest Period and in an amount that is
representative for a single transaction in the New York market
at the relevant time, except that, if the banks so selected by
the Reference Agent are not quoting as mentioned above, LIBOR
shall be the floating rate of interest in effect for the last
preceding Interest Period.
The Reference Agents determination of LIBOR (in the
absence of negligence, willful default, bad faith or manifest
error) will be conclusive and binding upon all parties.
As promptly as is practicable after the determination thereof,
the Reference Agent will give notice of its determination of
LIBOR for the relevant Interest Period to Continental, the
Trustees, the Mortgagee, the Subordination Agent, the Primary
Liquidity Provider, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider and the
Policy Provider. Certificateholders may obtain such information
from the Trustees or otherwise in the statements included with
each distribution of a Scheduled Payment or Special Payment.
Continental reserves the right to terminate the appointment of
the Reference Agent at any time on 30 days notice and
to appoint a replacement reference agent in its place. Notice of
any such termination will be given to the holders of the
Certificates. The Reference Agent may not be removed or resign
its duties without a successor having been appointed.
Break
Amount
Break Amount means, as of any date of payment,
redemption or acceleration for any Equipment Note (the
Applicable Date), an amount determined by the
Reference Agent on the date that is two Business Days prior to
the Applicable Date pursuant to the formula set forth below.
The Break Amount as of any Applicable Date will be calculated as
follows:
Break Amount = Z − Y
Where:
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
=
|
|
with respect to any applicable
Interest Period, the sum of (i) the amount of the
outstanding principal amount of such Equipment Note as of the
first day of the then applicable Interest Period and
(ii) interest payable thereon during such entire Interest
Period at then effective LIBOR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y
|
|
=
|
|
X, discounted to present value
from the last day of the then applicable Interest Period to the
Applicable Date, using then effective LIBOR as the discount rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z
|
|
=
|
|
X, discounted to present value
from the last day of the then applicable Interest Period to the
Applicable Date, using a rate equal to the applicable London
interbank offered rate for a period commencing on the Applicable
Date and ending on the last day of the then applicable Interest
Period, determined by the Reference Agent as of two Business
Days prior to the Applicable Date, as the discount rate.
|
S-71
No Break Amount will be payable (x) if the Break Amount, as
calculated pursuant to the formula set forth above, is equal to
or less than zero or (y) on or in respect of any Applicable
Date that is a Regular Distribution Date.
Optional
Redemption
The Equipment Notes may be redeemed at any time, in whole or (so
long as no Payment Default has occurred and is continuing) in
part by the Company at its sole option, except that no Equipment
Notes may be redeemed by the Company prior to the third
anniversary of the Issuance Date (other than in connection with
a redemption to satisfy the maximum Collateral Ratio
requirements or the minimum Rotable Ratio requirement or to the
extent required as a result of certain reductions in
Continentals aircraft fleet). The redemption price for any
such optional redemption will equal the sum of 100% of the
principal amount of the redeemed portion of the Equipment Notes
as of the date of redemption, plus accrued and unpaid interest
thereon and Break Amount, if any, with respect thereto.
In addition, if a Series B Equipment Note is redeemed on or
after the third anniversary and before the fifth anniversary of
the Issuance Date (except in connection with a redemption to
satisfy the maximum Collateral Ratio requirements or the minimum
Rotable Ratio requirement or to the extent required as a result
of certain reductions in Continentals aircraft fleet),
such redemption price will include a premium (the
Premium) equal to the following percentage of the
principal amount of such Equipment Note to be redeemed:
|
|
|
|
|
If redeemed during the
|
|
|
year prior to the
|
|
|
anniversary of the
|
|
|
Issuance Date indicated
|
|
Series B
|
below
|
|
Premium
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
%
|
5th
|
|
|
|
%
|
In the case of an optional redemption of Equipment Notes prior
to the fifth anniversary of the Issuance Date required as a
result of certain reductions in Continentals aircraft
fleet (see CollateralFleet Reduction
below), the redemption price will include a premium (also a
Premium) equal to the following percentage of the
principal amount redeemed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If redeemed during the
|
|
|
|
|
year prior to the
|
|
|
|
|
anniversary of the
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Date indicated
|
|
Series G
|
|
Series B
|
below
|
|
Premium
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing, so long as the Series G
Equipment Note and the Policy Provider Obligations have not been
paid in full, unless the Controlling Party shall otherwise
agree, no redemption of the Series B Equipment Note may be
made unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the maximum Senior Collateral Ratio requirement is then
satisfied (after giving effect to any concurrent redemption of
the Series G Equipment Note); or
|
|
|
|
the Series G Equipment Note is simultaneously redeemed in
full. (Indenture, Section 2.11)
|
If Continental gives notice of redemption, it may revoke such
redemption by notice to the Mortgagee at least three Business
Days prior to the scheduled redemption date.
Collateral
The Equipment Notes will be secured by a lien on spare parts
(including appliances) first placed in service after
October 22, 1994, and owned by Continental that are
S-72
|
|
|
|
|
appropriate for installation on or use in one or more of the
following aircraft models: Boeing model
737-700,
737-800,
737-900,
757-200,
757-300,
767-200,
767-400 or
777-200
aircraft, any engine utilized on any such aircraft or any other
spare part included in the Collateral, and not appropriate for
installation on or use in any other model of aircraft currently
operated by Continental or engine utilized on any such other
model of aircraft;
|
|
|
|
Rotables appropriate for installation on or use in a Boeing
model
737-300 or
737-500
aircraft (or both), any engine utilized on any such aircraft or
any other spare part included in the Collateral; or
|
|
|
|
Rotables appropriate for installation on or use in more than one
of the models of aircraft referred to above or engine utilized
on any such aircraft (collectively, the Qualified Spare
Parts);
|
together with certain records relating to such spare parts,
certain rights of Continental with respect to such spare parts
and certain proceeds of the foregoing (collectively, the
Collateral). The lien will not apply for as long as
a spare part is installed on or being used in any aircraft,
engine or other spare part so installed or being used. In
addition, the lien will not apply if a spare part is not located
at a Designated Location. (Indenture, Granting Clause) Spare
engines are not included in the Collateral.
Continental will grant a security interest in the Collateral
pursuant to the Indenture. In addition, on the Issuance Date,
Continental will enter into a Collateral Maintenance Agreement
(the Collateral Maintenance Agreement and, together
with the Note Purchase Agreement, the Indenture and the
Equipment Notes, the Operative Agreements) with the
Policy Provider and the Mortgagee, providing for appraisal
reports and certain other requirements with respect to the
Collateral. The following summarizes certain provisions of the
Indenture and Collateral Maintenance Agreement relating to the
spare parts included in the Collateral (the Pledged Spare
Parts).
|
|
|
Appraisals
and Maintenance of Ratios
|
Continental is required to furnish to the Policy Provider, the
Trustees and the Rating Agencies by the tenth Business Day of
April and the tenth Business Day of October in each year,
commencing in October 2006, so long as the Equipment Notes of
any Series are outstanding, a certificate of an independent
appraiser. Such certificates are required to state such
appraisers opinion of the fair market value of the
Collateral and Rotables included in the Collateral, determined
on the basis of a hypothetical sale negotiated in an arms
length free market transaction between a willing and able seller
and a willing and able buyer, neither of whom is under undue
pressure to complete the transaction, under then current market
conditions (the Fair Market Value). This appraisal
will not apply to any cash or permitted investment securities
(the Cash Collateral) then held as collateral for
the Equipment Notes, and any such securities will be valued by
the Trustees in accordance with customary financial market
practices. Such valuations will then be used to calculate the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the Senior Collateral Ratio applicable to the
Series G Equipment Note, which shall mean a percentage
determined by dividing (i) the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of the Series G Equipment Note minus the
sum of the Cash Collateral, if any, held by the Mortgagee by
(ii) the Fair Market Value of all Collateral (excluding any
Cash Collateral) as set forth in such independent
appraisers certificate;
|
|
|
|
the Subordinated Collateral Ratio applicable to the
Series B Equipment Note, which shall mean a percentage
determined by dividing (i) the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of the Series G Equipment Note and of the
Series B Equipment Note minus the sum of the Cash
Collateral, if any, held by the Mortgagee by (ii) the Fair
Market Value of all Collateral (excluding any Cash Collateral)
as set forth in such independent appraisers
certificate; and
|
|
|
|
the Rotable Ratio applicable to the Series G
Equipment Note, which shall mean a percentage determined by
dividing (i) the Fair Market Value of the Rotables as set
forth in such independent appraisers certificate by
(ii) the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the
Series G Equipment Note minus the sum of the Cash
Collateral, if any, held by the Mortgagee.
|
The calculation of the Senior Collateral Ratio, the Subordinated
Collateral Ratio (together, the Collateral Ratios)
and the Rotable Ratio will be set forth in a certificate
provided by Continental. (Collateral Maintenance Agreement,
Article 2)
S-73
If the Senior Collateral Ratio as so determined is greater than
45.0% or the Subordinated Collateral Ratio as so determined is
greater than 75.0%, Continental will be required, within
90 days after the date of Continentals certificate
calculating such Collateral Ratios, to:
|
|
|
|
|
subject to the lien of the Indenture additional Qualified Spare
Parts;
|
|
|
|
subject to the lien of the Indenture spare parts (including
appliances) first placed in service after October 22, 1994,
and owned by Continental appropriate for installation on or use
in any Boeing model 787 aircraft, any engine utilized on any
such aircraft or any other spare part included in the Collateral
(787 Spare Parts) (in the first instance of adding
787 Spare Parts, subject to the approval of the Policy Provider);
|
|
|
|
grant a security interest in other property to secure the
Equipment Notes for the benefit of the Mortgagee (which
thereafter will be included as Collateral for
purposes of the Equipment Notes), but only if the Policy
Provider agrees and Continental shall have received written
confirmation from each nationally recognized rating agency then
rating the Class G Certificates or the Class B
Certificates at Continentals request (a Rating
Agency) that the use of such additional collateral and the
related agreements to reduce the Collateral Ratios will not
result in a reduction of the rating for the Class G
Certificates or the Class B Certificates below the then
current rating for such Certificates (such rating in the case of
the Class G Certificates determined without regard to the
Policy) or a withdrawal or suspension of the rating of such
Certificates;
|
|
|
|
provide Cash Collateral to the Mortgagee under the Indenture
(provided that if Continentals cash, cash equivalents and
certain other marketable securities as of the applicable
determination date was less than $600,000,000, then the total
amount of Cash Collateral may not exceed $20,000,000);
|
|
|
|
redeem the Equipment Notes in whole or in part (provided that,
in the case of the Series B Equipment Note, any such
redemption before the fifth anniversary of the Issuance Date may
be made only to the extent necessary to satisfy the applicable
Collateral Ratio requirement); or
|
|
|
|
any combination of the foregoing;
|
such that the Senior Collateral Ratio and the Subordinated
Collateral Ratio, as recalculated giving effect to such action
(but otherwise using the information most recently used to
determine such Collateral Ratios), would not be greater than the
applicable maximum percentage. (Collateral Maintenance
Agreement, Section 3.1(a))
If the Rotable Ratio as so determined is less than 150.0%,
Continental will be required, within 90 days after the date
of Continentals certificate calculating such Rotable
Ratio, to:
|
|
|
|
|
subject to the lien of the Indenture additional Rotables
constituting Qualified Spare Parts;
|
|
|
|
subject to the lien of the Indenture additional Rotables
constituting 787 Spare Parts (in the first instance of adding
787 Spare Parts, subject to the approval of the Policy
Provider);
|
|
|
|
provide additional Cash Collateral to the Mortgagee under the
Indenture (provided that if Continentals cash, cash
equivalents and certain other marketable securities as of the
applicable determination date was less than $600,000,000, then
the total amount of Cash Collateral may not exceed $20,000,000);
|
|
|
|
redeem the Equipment Notes in whole or in part (provided that,
in the case of the Series B Equipment Note, any such
redemption before the fifth anniversary of the Issuance Date may
be made only to the extent necessary to satisfy the Rotable
Ratio requirement); or
|
|
|
|
any combination of the foregoing;
|
such that the Rotable Ratio, as recalculated giving effect to
such action (but otherwise using the information most recently
used to determine such Rotable Ratio), would not be less than
the applicable minimum percentage. (Collateral Maintenance
Agreement, Section 3.1(b))
If Continental provides additional Cash Collateral to comply
with any such maximum Collateral Ratio or minimum Rotable Ratio
requirement, it must, within 90 days after providing such
Cash Collateral, take additional action (other than providing
Cash Collateral) to cause the Collateral Ratios and Rotable
Ratio (calculated to exclude
S-74
such Cash Collateral) to comply with the applicable maximum and
minimum percentage. (Collateral Maintenance Agreement,
Section 3.1(e))
If the Senior Collateral Ratio and Subordinated Collateral Ratio
are less than the applicable maximum percentage and the Rotable
Ratio is greater than the applicable minimum percentage, in each
case as most recently determined as described above, and the
Mortgagee held Cash Collateral as of the relevant determination
date, Continental may withdraw Cash Collateral in excess of the
amount necessary to comply with such ratios. (Indenture,
Section 3.06(b)) In such case, so long as no Indenture
Default or any of certain other specified defaults is then
continuing, the Mortgagee will pay to Continental an amount of
Cash Collateral such that the Senior Collateral Ratio and the
Subordinated Collateral Ratio would not be greater than the
applicable maximum percentage and the Rotable Ratio would not be
less than the applicable minimum percentage.
Continental is required to furnish to the Policy Provider and
the Mortgagee, within ten Business Days after each January 1 and
July 1, commencing with January 1, 2007, a report
providing certain information regarding the quantity of Pledged
Spare Parts included in the Collateral and compliance with
certain requirements of the Collateral Maintenance Agreement.
(Collateral Maintenance Agreement, Section 2.3)
The Collateral Maintenance Agreement requires that the Equipment
Notes be redeemed if the total number of aircraft of any of the
five aircraft model groups listed below in Continentals
in-service fleet during any period of 60 consecutive days is
less than the minimum specified below for such group (other than
due to restrictions on operating such aircraft imposed by the
FAA or any other U.S. Government agency):
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Model
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Boeing 737-300
and Boeing 737-500 Aircraft
|
|
|
40 Aircraft
|
|
Boeing 737-700,
Boeing 737-800 and Boeing 737-900 Aircraft
|
|
|
63 Aircraft
|
|
Boeing 757-200
and Boeing 757-300 Aircraft
|
|
|
23 Aircraft
|
|
Boeing 767-200
and Boeing 767-400 Aircraft
|
|
|
13 Aircraft
|
|
Boeing 777-200
Aircraft
|
|
|
9 Aircraft
|
|
If any of the foregoing specified minimums is not so satisfied
with respect to any aircraft model group, then within
90 days after such occurrence, Continental must partially
redeem the Series G Equipment Note in a percentage of the
outstanding principal amount of the Series G Equipment Note
determined by dividing the appraised value of the Pledged Spare
Parts that are appropriate for installation on, or use in, only
the aircraft of such model group, or the engines utilized only
on such aircraft, by the appraised value of the Collateral. In
addition, Continental must partially redeem the Series B
Equipment Note in the same percentage of the outstanding
principal amount of the Series B Equipment Note.
(Collateral Maintenance Agreement, Section 3.3)
Continental is required to maintain the Collateral free of any
liens, other than the rights of the Mortgagee and Continental
arising under the Indenture or the other operative documents
related thereto, and other than certain limited liens permitted
under such documents, including but not limited to
(i) liens for taxes either not yet due or being contested
in good faith by appropriate proceedings;
(ii) materialmens, mechanics and other similar
liens arising in the ordinary course of business that either are
not yet delinquent for more than 60 days or are being
contested in good faith by appropriate proceedings;
(iii) judgment liens so long as such judgment is discharged
or vacated within 60 days or the execution of such judgment
is stayed pending appeal or discharged, vacated or reversed
within 60 days after expiration of such stay; and
(iv) any other lien as to which Continental has provided a
bond or other security adequate in the reasonable opinion of the
Mortgagee; provided that in the case of each of the liens
described in the foregoing clauses (i), (ii) and
(iii), such liens and proceedings do not involve any material
risk of the sale, forfeiture or loss of the Pledged Spare Parts
or the interest of the Mortgagee therein or impair the lien of
the Indenture. (Indenture, Section 4.02)
S-75
Continental is required to maintain the Pledged Spare Parts in
good working order and condition, excluding (i) Pledged
Spare Parts that have become worn out or unfit for use and not
reasonably repairable or obsolete, (ii) Pledged Spare Parts
that are not required for Continentals normal operations
and (iii) expendable parts that have been consumed or used
in Continentals operations. In addition, Continental must
maintain all records, logs and other materials required by the
FAA or under the Federal Aviation Act to be maintained in
respect of the Pledged Spare Parts. (Indenture,
Section 4.03)
Continental has the right to deal with the Pledged Spare Parts
in any manner consistent with its ordinary course of business.
This includes the right to install on, or use in, any aircraft,
engine or Qualified Spare Part leased to or owned by Continental
any Pledged Spare Part, free from the lien of the Indenture.
(Indenture Section 4.04)
Continental may not sell, lease, transfer or relinquish
possession of any Pledged Spare Part without the prior written
consent of the Policy Provider, except as permitted by the
Indenture or the Collateral Maintenance Agreement. (Indenture,
Section 4.04(c)) So long as no Event of Default has
occurred and is continuing, Continental may sell, transfer or
dispose of Pledged Spare Parts free from the Lien of the
Indenture. (Indenture, Section 4.04) However, as of any
date during the period between the dates of independent
appraisers certificates delivered pursuant to the
Collateral Maintenance Agreement, the aggregate appraised value
of all Pledged Spare Parts (x) previously during such
period sold, transferred or disposed of (with certain
exceptions) may not exceed 3% of the appraised value of the
Collateral, (y) then subject to leases or loans may not
exceed 3% of the appraised value of the Collateral or
(z) previously during such period moved from a Designated
Location to a location that is not a Designated Location (with
certain exceptions) may not exceed 3% of the appraised value of
the Collateral. (Collateral Maintenance Agreement,
Section 3.2) Such restrictions may be waived by the Policy
Provider, so long as after giving effect to a transaction
permitted as a result of such waiver the Subordinated Collateral
Ratio (using the information most recently used to determine
such ratio) would not be greater than 75.0%. (Collateral
Maintenance Agreement, Section 4.4)
In the ordinary course of business, Continental may transfer
possession of any Pledged Spare Part to the manufacturer thereof
or any other organization for testing, overhaul, repairs,
maintenance, alterations or modifications or to any person for
the purpose of transport to any of the foregoing. In addition,
Continental may dismantle any Pledged Spare Part that has become
worn out or obsolete or unfit for use and may sell or dispose of
any such Pledged Spare Part or any salvage resulting from such
dismantling, free from the lien of the Indenture. Continental
also may subject any Pledged Spare Part to a pooling, exchange,
borrowing or maintenance servicing agreement arrangement
customary in the airline industry and entered into in the
ordinary course of business; provided, however, that if
Continentals title to any such Pledged Spare Part shall be
divested under any such agreement or arrangement, such
divestiture shall be deemed to be a sale with respect to such
Pledged Spare Part. (Indenture, Section 4.04(c))
So long as no Event of Default shall have occurred and be
continuing, Continental may enter into a lease with respect to
any Pledged Spare Part to any U.S. air carrier that is not
then subject to any bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation,
reorganization, dissolution or similar proceeding and shall not
have substantially all of its property in the possession of any
liquidator, trustee, receiver or similar person. In the case of
any such lease, Continental will include in such lease
appropriate provisions which (i) make such lease expressly
subject and subordinate to all of the terms of the Indenture,
including the rights of the Mortgagee to avoid such lease in the
exercise of its rights to repossession of the Pledged Spare
Parts thereunder; (ii) require the lessee to comply with
the insurance requirements of the Indenture; and
(iii) require that the Pledged Spare Parts subject thereto
be used in accordance with the limitations applicable to
Continentals use, possession and location of such Pledged
Spare Parts provided in the Collateral Maintenance Agreement and
the Indenture (including, without limitation, that such Pledged
Spare Parts be kept at one or more Designated Locations).
(Indenture, Section 4.04(d))
S-76
Continental is required to keep the Pledged Spare Parts at one
or more of the designated locations specified in the Indenture
or added from time to time by Continental in accordance with the
Indenture (the Designated Locations), except as
otherwise permitted under the Indenture and Collateral
Maintenance Agreement. (Indenture, Section 4.04(b))
Continental will be entitled to hold Qualified Spare Parts at
locations other than Designated Locations. The lien of the
Indenture will not apply to any spare part not located at a
Designated Location.
Continental is required to maintain insurance covering physical
damage to the Pledged Spare Parts. Such insurance must provide
for the reimbursement of Continentals expenditure in
repairing or replacing any damaged or destroyed Pledged Spare
Part. If any such Pledged Spare Part is not repaired or
replaced, such insurance must provide for the payment of the
amount it would cost to repair or replace such Pledged Spare
Part, on the date of loss, with proper deduction for
obsolescence and physical depreciation. However, after giving
effect to self-insurance permitted as described below, the
amounts payable under such insurance may be less.
All insurance proceeds paid under such policies as a result of
the occurrence of an Event of Loss with respect to
any Pledged Spare Parts involving proceeds in excess of
$2 million, up to 110% of the outstanding principal amount
of the Equipment Notes (the Debt Balance), will be
paid to the Mortgagee. The entire amount of any insurance
proceeds not involving an Event of Loss with respect
to any Pledged Spare Parts or involving proceeds of
$2 million or less, and the amount of insurance proceeds in
excess of the Debt Balance, will be paid to Continental so long
as no Payment Default, Event of Default or Continental
Bankruptcy Event shall be continuing. For these purposes,
Event of Loss means, with respect to any Pledge
Spare Part, its destruction, damage beyond economic repair,
damage that results in the receipt of insurance proceeds on the
same basis as destruction, loss of possession by Continental for
90 consecutive days as a result of theft or disappearance or
requisition by a government entity (other than the
U.S. government) for more than 180 days. Any such
proceeds held by the Mortgagee will be disbursed to Continental
to reimburse it for the purchase of additional Qualified Spare
Parts after the occurrence of such Event of Loss. In addition,
such proceeds will be disbursed to Continental to the extent it
would not cause the Collateral Ratios, as subsequently
determined, to exceed the applicable maximum percentages.
Continental is also required to maintain third party liability
insurance with respect to the Pledged Spare Parts, in an amount
and scope as it customarily maintains for equipment similar to
the Pledged Spare Parts.
Continental may self-insure the risks required to be insured
against as described above in such amounts as shall be
consistent with normal industry practice. (Indenture,
Annex B)
Limitation
of Liability
Except as otherwise provided in the Indenture, the Mortgagee, in
its individual capacity, will not be answerable or accountable
under the Indenture or under the Equipment Notes under any
circumstances except, among other things, for its own willful
misconduct or gross negligence. (Indenture, Section 7.01)
Indenture
Defaults, Notice and Waiver
Indenture Defaults will include:
|
|
|
|
|
The failure by Continental to pay any interest, principal, Break
Amount, if any, or Premium, if any, when due (including when due
in connection with an optional redemption), under the Indenture
or under any Equipment Note that continues for more than ten
Business Days, or failure to pay any other amount payable by it
under the Indenture or Note Purchase Agreement when due,
which continues for a period in excess of ten Business Days
after Continental receives written demand from the Mortgagee or
holder of an Equipment Note (without giving effect to such
notice or grace period provisions, a Payment
Default).
|
|
|
|
Any representation or warranty made by Continental in such
Indenture or certain related documents furnished to the
Mortgagee or any holder of an Equipment Note pursuant thereto
being false or incorrect in
|
S-77
any material respect when made that continues to be material and
adverse to the interests of the Mortgagee or holder of an
Equipment Note and remains unremedied after notice and specified
cure periods.
|
|
|
|
|
Failure by Continental to carry required insurance, which
continues unremedied for a period of 30 days.
|
|
|
|
Failure by Continental to add collateral or redeem Equipment
Notes if a semiannual Collateral Ratio or Rotable Ratio
requirement is not satisfied within the relevant time period
specified in the Collateral Maintenance Agreement or to redeem
the Series G Equipment Note when required as a result of
certain reductions in Continentals aircraft fleet.
|
|
|
|
Failure by Continental to perform or observe any other covenant
or obligation for the benefit of the Mortgagee or holders of
Equipment Notes or certain related documents that continues
after notice and specified cure periods.
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of certain events of bankruptcy, reorganization
or insolvency of Continental (each, a Continental
Bankruptcy Event). (Indenture, Section 5.01)
|
The holders of a majority in principal amount of the outstanding
Equipment Notes, by notice to the Mortgagee, may on behalf of
all the holders waive any existing default and its consequences
under the Indenture, except a default in the payment of the
principal of, or Premium, Break Amount or interest on, any such
Equipment Notes or a default in respect of any covenant or
provision of the Indenture that cannot be modified or amended
without the consent of each holder of Equipment Notes.
(Indenture, Section 5.06) See Description of the
Intercreditor AgreementVoting of Equipment Notes
regarding the persons entitled to direct the vote of Equipment
Notes.
Remedies
If an Indenture Default (other than a Continental Bankruptcy
Event) occurs and is continuing, the Mortgagee or the holders of
a majority in principal amount of the Equipment Notes
outstanding may declare the principal of all such Equipment
Notes issued thereunder immediately due and payable, together
with all accrued but unpaid interest thereon and Break Amount,
if any. If a Continental Bankruptcy Event occurs, such amounts
shall be due and payable without any declaration or other act on
the part of the Mortgagee or holders of Equipment Notes. The
holders of a majority in principal amount of Equipment Notes
outstanding may rescind any declaration of acceleration of such
Equipment Notes at any time before the judgment or decree for
the payment of the money so due shall be entered if
(i) there has been paid to the Mortgagee an amount
sufficient to pay all principal, interest, Break Amount, if any,
and Premium, if any, on any such Equipment Notes, to the extent
such amounts have become due otherwise than by such declaration
of acceleration and (ii) all other Indenture Defaults and
incipient Indenture Defaults with respect to any covenant or
provision of such Indenture have been cured. (Indenture,
Section 5.02)
The Indenture provides that if an Indenture Default has occurred
and is continuing, the Mortgagee may exercise certain rights or
remedies available to it under the Indenture or under applicable
law.
In the case of Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in which
an air carrier is a debtor, Section 1110 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Section 1110)
provides special rights to holders of security interests with
respect to equipment (defined as described below).
Under Section 1110, the right of such holders to take
possession of such equipment in compliance with the provisions
of a security agreement is not affected by any provision of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code or any power of the bankruptcy court.
Such right to take possession may not be exercised for
60 days following the date of commencement of the
reorganization proceedings. Thereafter, such right to take
possession may be exercised during such proceedings unless,
within the
60-day
period or any longer period consented to by the relevant
parties, the debtor agrees to perform its future obligations and
cures all existing and future defaults on a timely basis.
Defaults resulting solely from the financial condition,
bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization of the debtor need not
be cured.
Equipment is defined in Section 1110, in part,
as an aircraft, aircraft engine, propeller, appliance or spare
part (as defined in Section 40102 of Title 49 of the
U.S. Code) that is subject to a security interest granted
by, leased to, or conditionally sold to a debtor that, at the
time such transaction is entered into, holds an air carrier
operating certificate issued pursuant to chapter 447 of
Title 49 of the U.S. Code for aircraft capable of
carrying ten or more individuals or 6,000 pounds or more of
cargo.
S-78
It is a condition to the Trustees obligation to purchase
the Equipment Notes that outside counsel to Continental, Hughes
Hubbard & Reed LLP, provide its opinion that the
Mortgagee will be entitled to the benefits of Section 1110
with respect to the Pledged Spare Parts as of the Issuance Date,
assuming that, at such time, Continental holds an air carrier
operating certificate issued pursuant to chapter 447 of
Title 49 of the U.S. Code for aircraft capable of
carrying ten or more individuals or 6,000 pounds or more of
cargo. For a description of certain limitations on the
Mortgagees exercise of rights contained in the Indenture,
see Indenture Defaults, Notice and Waiver.
If an Indenture Default occurs and is continuing, any sums held
or received by the Mortgagee may be applied to reimburse the
Mortgagee for any tax, expense or other loss incurred by it and
to pay any other amounts due to the Mortgagee prior to any
payments to holders of the Equipment Notes issued under the
Indenture. (Indenture, Section 5.03(b))
Modification
of Indenture and Other Operative Agreements
Without the consent of holders of a majority in principal amount
of the Equipment Notes outstanding under the Indenture, the
provisions of the Indenture and the other Operative Agreements
may not be amended or modified, except to the extent indicated
below.
The Indenture may be amended without the consent of the holders
of Equipment Notes to, among other things, cure any defect or
inconsistency in such Indenture or the Equipment Notes issued
thereunder, provided that such change does not adversely affect
the interests of any such holder. (Indenture,
Section 10.01(b))
Without the consent of the Liquidity Providers, the Policy
Provider and the holder of each Equipment Note outstanding
affected thereby, no amendment or modification of the Indenture
may among other things (a) reduce the principal amount of,
or Break Amount, if any, Premium, if any, or interest payable
on, any Equipment Notes or change the date on which any
principal, Break Amount, if any, Premium, if any, or interest is
due and payable, (b) permit the creation of any security
interest with respect to the property subject to the lien of the
Indenture, except as provided therein, or deprive any holder of
an Equipment Note of the benefit of the lien of the Indenture
upon the property subject thereto or (c) modify the
percentage of holders of Equipment Notes issued under the
Indenture required to take or approve any action under the
Indenture. (Indenture, Section 10.01(a))
The provisions of the Collateral Maintenance Agreement requiring
that appraisals of the Collateral be obtained for purposes of
determining the Subordinated Collateral Ratio by the tenth
Business Day in April and October of each year and that the
maximum Subordinated Collateral Ratio be complied with in
connection with such appraisals may be amended, supplemented or
waived only by agreement of Continental and the Mortgagee,
acting with the consent of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding principal amount of the Series B Equipment
Note. (Collateral Maintenance Agreement, Section 4.4)
Indemnification
Continental will be required to indemnify the Mortgagee, the
Primary Liquidity Provider, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider,
the Subordination Agent, the Policy Provider and each Trustee,
but not the holders of Certificates, for certain losses, claims
and other matters.
S-79
CERTAIN
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
General
The following summary describes all material generally
applicable U.S. federal income tax consequences to
Certificateholders of the purchase, ownership and disposition of
the Certificates and in the opinion of Hughes Hubbard &
Reed LLP, special tax counsel to Continental (Tax
Counsel), is accurate in all material respects with
respect to the matters discussed therein. This summary
supplements (and, to the extent inconsistent therewith,
replaces) the summary of U.S. federal income tax
consequences set forth in the Prospectus. Except as otherwise
specified, the summary is addressed to beneficial owners of
Certificates that are citizens or residents of the United
States, corporations created or organized in or under the laws
of the United States or any state therein or the District of
Columbia, estates the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or
trusts that meet the following two tests: (a) a
U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the
administration of the trust and (b) one or more
U.S. fiduciaries have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust
(U.S. Persons) that will hold the Certificates
as capital assets (U.S. Certificateholders).
This summary does not address the tax treatment of
U.S. Certificateholders that may be subject to special tax
rules, such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities
or commodities, partnerships, holders subject to the
mark-to-market
rules, tax-exempt entities, holders that will hold Certificates
as part of a straddle or holders that have a functional
currency other than the U.S. Dollar, nor, except as
otherwise specified, does it address the tax treatment of
U.S. Certificateholders that do not acquire Certificates at
the public offering price as part of the initial offering. The
summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of
all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision
to purchase Certificates. This summary does not describe any tax
consequences arising under the laws of any state, locality or
taxing jurisdiction other than the United States.
The summary is based upon the tax laws and practice of the
United States as in effect on the date of this Prospectus
Supplement, as well as judicial and administrative
interpretations thereof (in final or proposed form) available on
or before such date. All of the foregoing are subject to change,
which change could apply retroactively. We have not sought any
ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the
IRS) with respect to the tax consequences described
below, and we cannot assure you that the IRS will not take
contrary positions. The Trusts are not indemnified for any
U.S. federal income taxes that may be imposed upon them,
and the imposition of any such taxes on a Trust could result in
a reduction in the amounts available for distribution to the
Certificateholders. Prospective investors should consult
their own tax advisors with respect to the federal, state, local
and foreign tax consequences to them of the purchase, ownership
and disposition of the Certificates.
U.S. Certificateholders
Taxation
of U.S. Certificateholders Generally
In the opinion of Tax Counsel, while there is no authority
addressing the characterization of entities that are similar to
the Trusts in all material respects, the Trusts will be
classified as grantor trusts for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. A U.S. Certificateholder will be treated as
owning its pro rata undivided interest in the Equipment Note
held by the Trust and any other property held by the Trust.
Accordingly, each U.S. Certificateholders share of
interest paid on an Equipment Note will be taxable as ordinary
income, as it is paid or accrued, in accordance with such
U.S. Certificateholders method of accounting for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. Any amounts received by a
Trust under a Liquidity Facility or Policy in order to make
interest payments will be treated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes as having the same characteristics as the payments
they replace.
A U.S. Certificateholder who is treated as purchasing an
interest in an Equipment Note at a market discount (generally,
at a cost less than its remaining principal amount) that exceeds
a statutorily defined de minimis amount will be subject to the
market discount rules of the Code. These rules
provide, in part, that gain on the sale or other disposition of
a debt instrument with a term of more than one year and partial
principal payments (including partial redemptions) on such a
debt instrument are treated as ordinary income to the extent of
accrued but unrecognized market discount. The market discount
rules also provide for deferral of interest deductions with
respect to debt incurred to purchase or carry a debt instrument
that has market discount. A U.S. Certificateholder who
purchases an interest in an Equipment Note at a premium may
elect to amortize the premium as an offset to interest income on
the Equipment Note under rules prescribed by the Code and
Treasury regulations promulgated under the Code.
S-80
Each U.S. Certificateholder will be entitled to deduct,
consistent with its method of accounting, its pro rata share of
fees and expenses paid or incurred by the corresponding Trust as
provided in Section 162 or 212 of the Code. Certain fees
and expenses, including fees paid to the Trustee, the Primary
Liquidity Provider, the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider and the
Policy Provider, will be borne by parties other than the
Certificateholders. It is possible that such fees and expenses
will be treated as constructively received by the Trust, in
which event a U.S. Certificateholder will be required to
include in income and will be entitled to deduct its pro rata
share of such fees and expenses. If a
U.S. Certificateholder is an individual, estate or trust,
the deduction for such holders share of such fees or
expenses will be allowed only to the extent that all of such
holders miscellaneous itemized deductions, including such
holders share of such fees and expenses, exceed 2% of such
holders adjusted gross income. In addition, in the case of
U.S. Certificateholders who are individuals, certain
otherwise allowable itemized deductions will be subject
generally to additional limitations on itemized deductions under
applicable provisions of the Code.
Redemption
of Equipment Notes
In the event an Equipment Note is redeemed in whole or in part,
a U.S. Certificateholder generally will recognize capital
gain or loss based upon the difference between such
U.S. Certificateholders share of the principal amount
and Premium and Break Amount, if any, paid with respect to such
Equipment Note and such U.S. Certificateholders basis
in its interest in the Equipment Note (or, in the case of a
partial redemption, an allocable portion thereof).
Sale or
Other Disposition of the Certificates
Upon the sale, exchange or other disposition of a Certificate, a
U.S. Certificateholder generally will recognize capital
gain or loss (subject to the possible recognition of ordinary
income under the market discount rules) equal to the difference
between the amount realized on the disposition (other than any
amount attributable to accrued interest which will be taxable as
ordinary income) and the U.S. Certificateholders
adjusted tax basis in the Equipment Notes and any other property
held by the corresponding Trust. Any gain or loss will be
long-term capital gain or loss to the extent attributable to
property held by the Trust for more than one year. In the case
of individuals, estates and trusts, the maximum rate of tax on
net long-term capital gains generally is 15%. After
December 31, 2010, this maximum rate is scheduled to return
to the previous maximum rate of 20%.
Foreign
Certificateholders
Subject to the discussion of backup withholding below, payments
of principal and interest on an Equipment Note to, or on behalf
of, any beneficial owner of a Certificate that is for
U.S. federal income tax purposes a nonresident alien (other
than certain former United States citizens or residents),
foreign corporation, foreign trust, or foreign estate (a
non-U.S. Certificateholder)
will not be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax
provided that:
|
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. Certificateholder
does not actually or constructively own 10% or more of the total
combined voting power of all classes of stock of Continental;
|
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. Certificateholder
is not a bank receiving interest pursuant to a loan agreement
entered into in the ordinary course of its trade or business, or
a controlled foreign corporation for U.S. tax purposes that
is related to Continental; and
|
|
|
|
certain certification requirements (including identification of
the beneficial owner of the Certificate) are complied with.
|
Any capital gain realized upon the sale, exchange, retirement or
other disposition of a Certificate or upon receipt of Premium or
Break Amount paid on an Equipment Note by a
non-U.S. Certificateholder
will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding
taxes if (i) such gain is not effectively connected with a
U.S. trade or business of the holder and (ii) in the
case of an individual, such holder is not present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the
sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition or receipt.
Backup
Withholding
Payments made on the Certificates and proceeds from the sale of
Certificates will not be subject to a backup withholding tax
(currently at the rate of 28%) unless, in general, the
Certificateholder fails to comply with certain reporting
procedures or otherwise fails to establish an exemption from
such tax under applicable provisions of the Code.
S-81
CERTAIN
DELAWARE TAXES
The Trustee is a Delaware banking corporation with its corporate
trust office in Delaware. In the opinion of Richards,
Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware, counsel to the
Trustee, under currently applicable law, assuming that the
Trusts will not be taxable as corporations, but, rather, will be
classified as grantor trusts under subpart E, Part I of
Subchapter J of the Code or as partnerships under Subchapter K
of the Code, (i) the Trusts will not be subject to any tax
(including, without limitation, net or gross income, tangible or
intangible property, net worth, capital, franchise or doing
business tax), fee or other governmental charge under the laws
of the State of Delaware or any political subdivision thereof
and (ii) Certificateholders that are not residents of or
otherwise subject to tax in Delaware will not be subject to any
tax (including, without limitation, net or gross income,
tangible or intangible property, net worth, capital, franchise
or doing business tax), fee or other governmental charge under
the laws of the State of Delaware or any political subdivision
thereof as a result of purchasing, holding (including receiving
payments with respect to) or selling a Certificate.
Neither the Trusts nor the Certificateholders will be
indemnified for any state or local taxes imposed on them, and
the imposition of any such taxes on a Trust could result in a
reduction in the amounts available for distribution to the
Certificateholders of such Trust. In general, should a
Certificateholder or any Trust be subject to any state or local
tax which would not be imposed if the Trustee were located in a
different jurisdiction in the United States, the Trustee will
resign and a new Trustee in such other jurisdiction will be
appointed.
CERTAIN
ERISA CONSIDERATIONS
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
(ERISA), imposes certain requirements on employee
benefit plans subject to Title I of ERISA (ERISA
Plans), and on those persons who are fiduciaries with
respect to ERISA Plans. Investments by ERISA Plans are subject
to ERISAs general fiduciary requirements, including, but
not limited to, the requirement of investment prudence and
diversification and the requirement that an ERISA Plans
investments be made in accordance with the documents governing
the Plan.
Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Code
prohibit certain transactions involving the assets of an ERISA
Plan (as well as those plans that are not subject to ERISA but
which are subject to Section 4975 of the Code, such as
individual retirement accounts (together with ERISA Plans,
Plans)) and certain persons (referred to as
parties in interest or disqualified
persons) having certain relationships to such Plans,
unless a statutory or administrative exemption is applicable to
the transaction. A party in interest or disqualified person who
engages in a prohibited transaction may be subject to excise
taxes and other penalties and liabilities under ERISA and the
Code.
The Department of Labor has promulgated a regulation,
29 CFR
Section 2510.3-101
(the Plan Asset Regulation), describing what
constitutes the assets of a Plan with respect to the Plans
investment in an entity for purposes of ERISA and
Section 4975 of the Code. Under the Plan Asset Regulation,
if a Plan invests (directly or indirectly) in a Certificate, the
Plans assets will include both the Certificate and an
undivided interest in each of the underlying assets of the
corresponding Trust, including the Equipment Notes held by such
Trust, unless it is established that equity participation in the
Trust by benefit plan investors (including but not limited to
Plans and entities whose underlying assets include Plan assets
by reason of an employee benefit plans investment in the
entity) is not significant within the meaning of the
Plan Asset Regulation. In this regard, the extent to which there
is equity participation in a particular Trust by, or on behalf
of, employee benefit plans will not be monitored. If the assets
of a Trust are deemed to constitute the assets of a Plan,
transactions involving the assets of such Trust could be subject
to the prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and
Section 4975 of the Code unless a statutory or
administrative exemption is applicable to the transaction.
The fiduciary of a Plan that proposes to purchase and hold any
Certificates should consider, among other things, whether such
purchase and holding may involve (i) the direct or indirect
extension of credit to a party in interest or a disqualified
person, (ii) the sale or exchange of any property between a
Plan and a party in interest or a disqualified person, and
(iii) the transfer to, or use by or for the benefit of, a
party in interest or a disqualified person, of any Plan assets.
Such parties in interest or disqualified persons could include,
without limitation, Continental and its affiliates, the
Underwriter, the Mortgagee, the Trustees, the Policy Provider
and the Liquidity Providers. In addition, whether or not the
assets of a Trust are deemed to be Plan assets under the Plan
Asset Regulation, if Certificates are purchased by a Plan and
Certificates of a subordinate Class are held by a party in
interest or a disqualified person with respect to such Plan, the
exercise by the holder of the subordinate Class of Certificates
of its right to purchase the senior Classes of Certificates upon
the occurrence and during the continuation of a Triggering Event
could be considered to constitute a prohibited transaction
unless a statutory or administrative exemption were
S-82
applicable. Depending on the identity of the Plan fiduciary
making the decision to acquire or hold Certificates on behalf of
a Plan, Prohibited Transaction Class Exemption
(PTCE) 91-38 (relating to investments by bank
collective investment funds), PTCE 84-14 (relating to
transactions effected by a qualified professional asset
manager), PTCE 95-60 (relating to investments by an
insurance company general account), PTCE 96-23 (relating to
transactions directed by an in-house professional asset manager)
or PTCE 90-1 (relating to investments by insurance company
pooled separate accounts) (collectively, the Class
Exemptions) could provide an exemption from the prohibited
transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the
Code. However, there can be no assurance that any of these Class
Exemptions or any other exemption will be available with respect
to any particular transaction involving the Certificates.
Governmental plans and certain church plans, while not subject
to the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA or the
prohibited transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975
of the Code, may nevertheless be subject to state or other
federal laws that are substantially similar to the foregoing
provisions of ERISA and the Code. Fiduciaries of any such plans
should consult with their counsel before purchasing any
Certificates.
Any Plan fiduciary which proposes to cause a Plan to purchase
any Certificates should consult with its counsel regarding the
applicability of the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited
transaction provisions of ERISA and Section 4975 of the
Code to such an investment, and to confirm that such purchase
and holding will not constitute or result in a non-exempt
prohibited transaction or any other violation of an applicable
requirement of ERISA.
In addition to the Class Exemptions referred to above, an
individual exemption may apply to the purchase, holding and
secondary market sale of Class G Certificates by Plans,
provided that certain specified conditions are met. In
particular, the Department of Labor has issued an individual
administrative exemption, as most recently amended, Prohibited
Transaction Exemption 90-24 (55 Fed. Reg. 20,548 (1990)),
as amended, to the Underwriter (the Underwriter
Exemption). The Underwriter Exemption generally exempts
from the application of certain, but not all, of the prohibited
transaction provisions of Section 406 of ERISA and
Section 4975 of the Code certain transactions relating to
the initial purchase, holding and subsequent secondary market
sale of pass through certificates which represent an interest in
a trust that holds secured credit instruments that bear interest
or are purchased at a discount in transactions by or between
business entities (including equipment notes secured by leases)
and certain other assets, provided that certain conditions set
forth in the Underwriter Exemption are satisfied.
The Underwriter Exemption sets forth a number of general and
specific conditions which must be satisfied for a transaction
involving the initial purchase, holding or secondary market sale
of certificates representing a beneficial ownership interest in
a trust to be eligible for exemptive relief thereunder. In
particular, the Underwriter Exemption requires that the
acquisition of certificates by a Plan be on terms that are at
least as favorable to the Plan as they would be in an arms
length transaction with an unrelated party; the rights and
interests evidenced by the certificates not be subordinated to
the rights and interests evidenced by other certificates of the
same trust estate; the certificates at the time of acquisition
by the Plan be rated in one of the three highest generic rating
categories by Moodys, Standard & Poors,
Duff & Phelps Inc. or Fitch; and the investing Plan be
an accredited investor as defined in Rule 501(a)
(1) of Regulation D of the Commission under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
In addition, the trust corpus generally must be invested in
qualifying receivables, such as the Equipment Notes, but may not
in general include a pre funding account (except for a limited
amount of pre funding which is invested in qualifying
receivables within a limited period of time following the
closing not to exceed three months). There can be no assurance
that the Department of Labor would determine that the
Underwriter Exemption would be applicable to Class G
Certificates. Even if all of the conditions of the Underwriter
Exemption are satisfied with respect to the Class G
Certificates, no assurance can be given that the Underwriter
Exemption would apply with respect to all transactions involving
the Class G Certificates or the assets of the Class G
Trust. Therefore, the fiduciary of a Plan considering the
purchase of a Class G Certificate should consider the
availability of the exemptive relief provided by the Underwriter
Exemption, as well as the availability of any other exemptions
that may be applicable, such as the Class Exemptions.
Each person who acquires or accepts a Certificate or an interest
therein, will be deemed by such acquisition or acceptance to
have represented and warranted that either: (i) no Plan
assets have been used to purchase such Certificate or an
interest therein or (ii) the purchase and holding of such
Certificate or an interest therein are exempt from the
prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and the Code
pursuant to one or more prohibited transaction statutory or
administrative exemptions.
S-83
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated May , 2006 between
Continental and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (the
Underwriter), Continental has agreed to cause each
Trust to sell to the Underwriter, and the Underwriter has agreed
to purchase, the Certificates in the aggregate principal amount
of $320,000,000.
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
Underwriter are subject to certain conditions precedent and that
the Underwriter is obligated to purchase all of the Certificates
if any are purchased.
The underwriting agreement provides that Continental will
indemnify the Underwriter against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Underwriter proposes initially to offer the Certificates at
the public offering prices stated on the cover page of this
Prospectus Supplement.
The Certificates are a new issue of securities with no
established trading market. Continental does not intend to apply
for the listing of the Certificates on a national securities
exchange. The Underwriter has advised Continental that it
presently intends to make a market in the Certificates, as
permitted by applicable laws and regulations. The Underwriter is
not obligated, however, to make a market in the Certificates and
any such market making may be discontinued at any time at the
sole discretion of the Underwriter. Accordingly, no assurance
can be given as to the liquidity of, or the trading markets for,
the Certificates.
Morgan Stanley Bank, Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. and
Morgan Stanley, each an affiliate of the Underwriter, will act
as the Primary Liquidity Provider, the Above-Cap Liquidity
Provider and the Above-Cap Liquidity Provider Guarantor,
respectively. From time to time, the Underwriter or its
affiliates perform investment banking and advisory services for,
and provide general financing and banking services to,
Continental and its affiliates.
Continental expects that delivery of the Certificates will be
made against payment therefor on or about the closing date
specified on the cover page of this Prospectus Supplement, which
will be the business day following the date hereof
(this settlement cycle being referred to as T+ ).
Under
Rule 15c6-1
of the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
trades in the secondary market generally are required to settle
in three business days, unless the parties to the trade
expressly agree otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers who wish to
trade Certificates on the date hereof or the next
succeeding business days will be required, by virtue
of the fact that the Certificates initially will settle in
T+ , to specify an alternate settlement cycle at the
time of any trade to prevent a failed settlement and should
consult their own advisor.
To facilitate the offering of the Certificates, the Underwriter
may engage in transactions that stabilize, maintain or otherwise
affect the price of the Certificates. Specifically, the
Underwriter may overallot in connection with the offering,
creating a short position in the Certificates for its own
account. In addition, to cover overallotments or to stabilize
the price of the Certificates, the Underwriter may bid for, and
purchase, Certificates in the open market. Finally, the
Underwriter may reclaim selling concessions allowed to an agent
or a dealer for distributing Certificates in the offering, if
the Underwriter repurchases previously distributed Certificates
in transactions to cover syndicate short positions, in
stabilization transactions or otherwise. Any of these activities
may stabilize or maintain the market price of the Certificates
above independent market levels. The Underwriter is not required
to engage in these activities, and may end any of these
activities at any time.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the Certificates is being passed upon for
Continental by Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York, New
York, and for the Underwriter by Milbank, Tweed,
Hadley & McCloy LLP, New York, New York. Milbank,
Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP will rely on the opinion of
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware,
counsel for Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, as to matters
of Delaware law relating to the Pass Through
Trust Agreement.
S-84
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Continental Airlines,
Inc. appearing in Continental Airlines, Inc.s Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (including the
schedule appearing therein), and Continental Airlines,
Inc.s managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005 included therein, and the consolidated
financial statements of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. appearing in
the exhibits to Continental Airlines, Inc.s Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, and ExpressJet
Holdings, Inc.s managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005 included therein, have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in its reports thereon, which are
incorporated herein by reference. Such financial statements and
managements assessment are incorporated by reference in
reliance upon such reports given on the authority of
Ernst & Young LLP as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Copa Holdings, S.A. for
the year ended December 31, 2004 appearing in the exhibits
to Continental Airlines, Inc.s Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been audited by
Ernst & Young, Panama, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in its report thereon, which is
incorporated by reference herein. The financial statements of
Copa Holdings, S.A. are incorporated by reference in reliance
upon such reports given on the authority of Ernst &
Young, Panama as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Financial Guaranty
Insurance Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the periods
from December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and
from January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003
included in Appendix III, have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon included
therein. Such financial statements are included in
Appendix III in reliance upon such report given on the
authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The references to SH&E, and to its appraisal report, dated
as of February 16, 2006, are included herein in reliance
upon the authority of such firm as an expert with respect to the
matters contained in its appraisal report.
S-85
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The following documents filed by Continental with the Commission
are incorporated by reference in this Prospectus Supplement:
|
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Date Filed
|
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
February 28, 2006
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
March 13, 2006
|
|
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2006
|
|
|
April 20, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
January 4, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
January 30, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
February 1, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
February 2, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
March 2, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
April 4, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
April 18, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
May 2, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
May 8, 2006
|
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
|
May 24, 2005
|
|
Our Commission file number is 1-10323.
Reference is made to the information under Incorporation
of Certain Documents by Reference in the accompanying
Prospectus.
S-86
APPENDIX IINDEX
OF TERMS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Above-Cap Account
|
|
S-56
|
Above-Cap Collateral Account
|
|
S-56
|
Above-Cap Collateral Amount
|
|
S-56
|
Above-Cap Liquidity Facility
|
|
S-55
|
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
|
|
S-57
|
Above-Cap Liquidity Provider
Guarantor
|
|
S-57
|
Above-Cap Payment
|
|
S-55
|
Administration Expenses
|
|
S-64
|
Applicable Date
|
|
S-71
|
Base Rate
|
|
S-53
|
Basic Agreement
|
|
S-35
|
Boeing
|
|
S-21
|
Break Amount
|
|
S-71
|
Bush Intercontinental
|
|
S-29
|
Business Day
|
|
S-39
|
Capped Interest Rate
|
|
S-50
|
Capped LIBOR
|
|
S-51
|
Cash Collateral
|
|
S-73
|
Cash Collateral Account
|
|
S-51
|
Cede
|
|
S-46
|
Certificate Account
|
|
S-38
|
Certificates
|
|
S-35
|
Class B Certificates
|
|
S-35
|
Class B Trust
|
|
S-35
|
Class B Trustee
|
|
S-36
|
Class Exemptions
|
|
S-83
|
Class G Certificate Owner
|
|
S-46
|
Class G Certificates
|
|
S-35
|
Class G Trust
|
|
S-35
|
Class G Trustee
|
|
S-36
|
CMI
|
|
S-29
|
Code
|
|
S-44
|
Collateral
|
|
S-73
|
Collateral Maintenance Agreement
|
|
S-73
|
Collateral Ratios
|
|
S-73
|
Commission
|
|
S-22
|
Company
|
|
S-29
|
Continental
|
|
S-29
|
Continental Bankruptcy Event
|
|
S-78
|
Controlling Party
|
|
S-63
|
Copa Airlines
|
|
S-30
|
Current Distribution Date
|
|
S-66
|
Debt Balance
|
|
S-77
|
Default Period
|
|
S-58
|
Delta
|
|
S-23
|
Designated Locations
|
|
S-77
|
DHS
|
|
S-23
|
Distribution Date
|
|
S-35
|
Downgrade Drawing
|
|
S-51
|
DTC
|
|
S-39
|
DTC Participants
|
|
S-46
|
Election Distribution Date
|
|
S-61
|
Equipment
|
|
S-78
|
Equipment Notes
|
|
S-70
|
ERISA
|
|
S-82
|
ERISA Plans
|
|
S-82
|
Event of Loss
|
|
S-77
|
Excess Reimbursement Obligations
|
|
S-66
|
Expected Distributions
|
|
S-66
|
ExpressJet
|
|
S-29
|
FAA
|
|
S-24
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
S-73
|
FGIC
|
|
S-32
|
Final Distributions
|
|
S-64
|
Final Drawing
|
|
S-53
|
Final Expected Distribution Date
|
|
S-37
|
Final Maturity Date
|
|
S-37
|
Fitch
|
|
S-34
|
flybe
|
|
S-30
|
GAAP
|
|
S-32
|
Hopkins International
|
|
S-29
|
Indenture
|
|
S-70
|
Indenture Default
|
|
S-40
|
Indirect DTC Participants
|
|
S-46
|
Initial Interest Period
|
|
S-70
|
Insolvency Proceeding
|
|
S-61
|
Intercreditor Agreement
|
|
S-63
|
Interest Drawing
|
|
S-50
|
Interest Period
|
|
S-70
|
IRS
|
|
S-80
|
Issuance Date
|
|
S-52
|
Liberty International
|
|
S-29
|
LIBOR
|
|
S-70
|
Liquidity Event of Default
|
|
S-54
|
Liquidity Expenses
|
|
S-65
|
Liquidity Facilities
|
|
S-50
|
I-1
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Liquidity Facility LIBOR
|
|
S-53
|
Liquidity Obligations
|
|
S-65
|
Liquidity Provider Reimbursement
Date
|
|
S-60
|
Liquidity Providers
|
|
S-57
|
Maximum Available Commitment
|
|
S-50
|
Minimum Sale Price
|
|
S-64
|
Moodys
|
|
S-34
|
Morgan Stanley
|
|
S-55
|
Mortgagee
|
|
S-70
|
Non-Extension Drawing
|
|
S-52
|
Non-Performing Equipment Note
|
|
S-51
|
non-U.S. Certificateholder
|
|
S-81
|
Northwest Airlines
|
|
S-23
|
Note Purchase Agreement
|
|
S-70
|
Operative Agreements
|
|
S-73
|
Order
|
|
S-61
|
Pass Through Trust Agreements
|
|
S-35
|
Payment Default
|
|
S-77
|
Performing Equipment Note
|
|
S-51
|
Plan Asset Regulation
|
|
S-82
|
Plans
|
|
S-82
|
Pledged Spare Parts
|
|
S-73
|
Policy
|
|
S-58
|
Policy Drawing
|
|
S-66
|
Policy Expenses
|
|
S-66
|
Policy Provider
|
|
S-32
|
Policy Provider Agreement
|
|
S-62
|
Policy Provider Amounts
|
|
S-66
|
Policy Provider Default
|
|
S-64
|
Policy Provider Election
|
|
S-59
|
Policy Provider Obligations
|
|
S-65
|
Pool Balance
|
|
S-39
|
Pool Factor
|
|
S-39
|
Preference Amount
|
|
S-62
|
Premium
|
|
S-72
|
Primary Liquidity Facility
|
|
S-50
|
Primary Liquidity Provider
|
|
S-50
|
Prior Funds
|
|
S-58
|
Provider Distribution Date
|
|
S-59
|
PTC Event of Default
|
|
S-42
|
PTCE
|
|
S-83
|
QIBs
|
|
S-48
|
Qualified Spare Parts
|
|
S-73
|
Rating Agency
|
|
S-74
|
Reference Agency Agreement
|
|
S-70
|
Reference Agent
|
|
S-70
|
Reference Date
|
|
S-70
|
Regular Distribution Dates
|
|
S-37
|
Relevant Outstanding Amount
|
|
S-58
|
Replacement Facility
|
|
S-51
|
Required Amount
|
|
S-50
|
Rotable Ratio
|
|
S-73
|
Rotables
|
|
S-69
|
SAP
|
|
S-33
|
Section 1110
|
|
S-78
|
Senior Collateral Ratio
|
|
S-73
|
Series
|
|
S-70
|
Series B Equipment Note
|
|
S-70
|
Series G Equipment Note
|
|
S-70
|
787 Spare Parts
|
|
S-74
|
SH&E
|
|
S-24
|
Special Distribution Date
|
|
S-38
|
Special Payment
|
|
S-38
|
Special Payments Account
|
|
S-38
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
S-34
|
Stated Interest Rates
|
|
S-37
|
Subordinated Collateral Ratio
|
|
S-73
|
Subordination Agent
|
|
S-63
|
Tax Counsel
|
|
S-80
|
Termination Date
|
|
S-61
|
Termination Notice
|
|
S-54
|
Threshold Rating
|
|
S-52
|
Transportation Code
|
|
S-43
|
Triggering Event
|
|
S-42
|
Trust Indenture Act
|
|
S-44
|
Trust Property
|
|
S-35
|
Trust Supplement
|
|
S-35
|
Trustee
|
|
S-35
|
Trusts
|
|
S-35
|
U.S. Certificateholders
|
|
S-80
|
U.S. Persons
|
|
S-80
|
Underwriter
|
|
S-84
|
Underwriter Exemption
|
|
S-83
|
I-2
Appraisal of Selected Spare Parts Prepared for: Prepared by: SH&E, Inc. February 16, 2006 |
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
Page i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix A Summary of Inventory Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
Page ii |
1.1 Introduction
Continental Airlines, Inc. (Continental, the Airline or the Client) has retained Simat,
Helliesen & Eichner, Inc. (SH&E) to conduct an appraisal of selected spare parts owned by
Continental (collectively, the Subject Assets). This appraisal provides SH&Es opinion as to the
Current (or Fair) Market Value (CMV) of the Subject Assets.
1.2 Determination
SH&E has determined the adjusted1 Current Market Value of the Subject Assets to be:
$432.84 million
|
|
|
1 |
|
The adjusted CMV represents the value of the
Subject Assets after adjustments for part condition and inventory accuracy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 1 |
Figure 1.1 below provides the value of the spare parts inventory by aircraft type. Figure 1.2
represents the inventory value by part type.
Figure 1-1: Inventory Value by Aircraft Type (CMV in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Group |
|
Lines |
|
Qty |
|
CMV |
777-200 |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
115,417 |
|
|
$ |
86.65 |
|
737-3/5 |
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
$ |
31.07 |
|
737-7/8/9 |
|
|
6,982 |
|
|
|
337,637 |
|
|
$ |
160.04 |
|
757-200 |
|
|
7,711 |
|
|
|
193,645 |
|
|
$ |
72.11 |
|
757-300 |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
19,504 |
|
|
$ |
4.26 |
|
767-200 |
|
|
1,373 |
|
|
|
26,326 |
|
|
$ |
6.37 |
|
767-400 |
|
|
4,302 |
|
|
|
61,199 |
|
|
$ |
50.75 |
|
Interchangeable |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
$ |
21.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total |
|
|
27,459 |
|
|
|
759,795 |
|
|
$ |
432.84 |
|
Source: CO & SH&E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 1 |
Figure 1-2: Inventory Value by Aircraft Type (millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part Type |
|
Aircraft Group |
|
Serviceable CMV |
|
Unserviceable CMV |
|
Total CMV |
Expendable |
|
|
737-7/8/9 |
|
|
$ |
33.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
33.96 |
|
|
|
|
757-200 |
|
|
$ |
19.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
19.45 |
|
|
|
|
757-300 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
767-200 |
|
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.39 |
|
|
|
|
767-400 |
|
|
$ |
11.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
11.30 |
|
|
|
|
777-200 |
|
|
$ |
24.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
24.34 |
|
Subtotal: |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
92.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
92.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rotable |
|
|
737-3/5 |
|
|
$ |
28.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.78 |
|
|
$ |
31.07 |
|
|
|
|
737-7/8/9 |
|
|
$ |
111.84 |
|
|
$ |
14.24 |
|
|
$ |
126.08 |
|
|
|
|
757-200 |
|
|
$ |
46.74 |
|
|
$ |
5.92 |
|
|
$ |
52.66 |
|
|
|
|
757-300 |
|
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
|
|
767-200 |
|
|
$ |
3.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
3.98 |
|
|
|
|
767-400 |
|
|
$ |
36.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
|
$ |
39.45 |
|
|
|
|
777-200 |
|
|
$ |
56.29 |
|
|
$ |
6.02 |
|
|
$ |
62.31 |
|
|
|
Interchangeable |
|
|
$ |
19.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
21.60 |
|
Subtotal: |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
306.03 |
|
|
$ |
34.12 |
|
|
$ |
340.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
398.72 |
|
|
$ |
34.12 |
|
|
$ |
432.84 |
|
Source: CO & SH&E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 2 |
1.3 Assumptions
SH&E relied on the following assumptions while performing this valuation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
The Subject Assets meet all relevant specifications and performance capabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
SH&E relied upon Continentals determination as to the serviceability or
unserviceability of the Subject Assets. Any variation in status would affect the values
referenced herein. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
SH&E relied upon Continentals determination as to ineligible assets such as parts
located at international locations and parts deemed to have entered service before October
1994. Continental represented that the data provided to SH&E for this appraisal did not
include ineligible assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
SH&E has not addressed any ownership rights and has assumed that the Subject Assets are
owned by the Client. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
The Subject Assets records are in compliance with International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) standards and, furthermore, all Life Limited Parts (LLPs) records
are traceable back to birth.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
All normally required maintenance has been performed, including compliance with all
mandatory U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Airworthiness Directives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
The Subject Assets will continue to be certified for operations under the Joint
Airworthiness Authority (JAA), the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) or a comparable authority, and have maintenance
performed, as necessary, that is in accordance with industry-recognized standards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
All of the data and information provided by Continental Airlines is an accurate
representation the actual conditions or circumstances of the Subject Assets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n
|
|
The Subject Assets have not been involved in any major incident or accident that
resulted in significant damage to the asset. |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Back-to-birth records are those
that provide operating history information for each LLP from the date of its
first delivery by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) to
its first operator and for each subsequent installation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 3 |
2.1 Spare Parts Nomenclature
2.1.1 Part Types
Rotables
Rotable parts are those components that can be repeatedly and economically restored to a
serviceable condition over a period approximating the life of the flight equipment to which they
are related. When in need of overhaul, rotable components are generally worth 30-50% of new and,
after overhaul, they are typically worth 70-85% of new, depending on the age of the aircraft type.
Examples of rotable parts include thrust reversers, auxiliary power units, landing gears,
generators, valves and actuators. Rotable parts normally have a unique serial number.
Repairables
Repairables are those components or parts that can be economically restored to a serviceable or
overhauled condition but that have a life that is considerably shorter than the life of the flight
equipment to which they are related. In addition, they can be overhauled or repaired only a
limited number of times. When in need of overhaul or repair, repairable parts are typically worth
30-50% of new and after overhaul 60-80% of new.
Examples of repairable parts include engine cowlings, fairings, and engine blades, flap track
assemblies, certain bearings, duct assemblies and fittings.
Expendables
Expendables are parts or material that, once used, cannot be re-used. If not serviceable, they
generally cannot be overhauled or repaired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 4 |
Life Limited Parts
Life Limited Parts (LLPs) are parts that have a finite operating life that is defined by hours,
cycles or calendar limit and are usually found in engines and landing gear assemblies. When an LLP
reaches its life limit, it cannot be overhauled or repaired and typically is destroyed.
Back-to-birth records provide operating history information for each LLP from the date of its
first delivery by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) to its first operator and for each
subsequent installation. Such records, although not specifically mandated by regulatory
authorities, are considered commercially essential, and absence or incompleteness of such records
can render an engine unmarketable.
Interchangeable Parts
Many airlines systems also employ a subcategory of parts called interchangeable parts. This
designation refers to parts that can be used on multiple aircraft or engine types. Interchangeable
parts can further be designated as rotable, expendable or Life Limited Parts.
Examples of interchangeable parts include communications radios and certain hydraulic pumps as well
as many interior items such as galley equipment.
The condition of aircraft and engine parts is classified as follows:
New
New parts have never been used and are normally in the manufacturers original packaging
Overhauled
Overhauled parts have been repaired and tested to defined overhaul standards specified by the
manufacturer, an airline or the repair vendor. The overhaul process restores the part to near new
service standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 5 |
Serviceable
Serviceable spare parts are in condition satisfactory for incorporation in, installation on,
attachment or appurtenance to or use in an aircraft, engine or another spare part or appliance.
As Removed
An as removed part is in the condition that it was in when it was removed from an operators
aircraft or engine. Such a part can be installed, if operating normally prior to removal, without
prior testing on an aircraft or engine only in the same operators fleet. In all other cases, an
as removed part must be inspected and tested in an approved manner before it can be declared
serviceable.
Unserviceable
Unserviceable parts have been removed from service, either because they did not work correctly, or
because, upon inspection and testing, they were found not to meet certain prescribed standards.
Such parts can be sent to suitably qualified facilities for repair or overhaul as required.
Beyond Economic Repair
An unserviceable part that, when inspected and tested, is found to require repairs that are
estimated to cost more than the part is worth is declared Beyond Economic Repair (BER) and is
usually scrapped.
Airworthiness of Parts
All parts, regardless of whether they are classified as New, Overhauled or Serviceable,
remain airworthy only as long as the part continues to comply with all approved storage,
maintenance and FAA Airworthiness Directives requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 6 |
2.2 The Subject Assets
The Subject Assts consist of airframe, avionic and engine spare parts for Continentals fleet
of Boeing 737, 757, 767 and 777 aircraft. The inventory includes rotable, expendable and
repairable spare parts, although it should be noted that repairable parts are classified as
expendables in the Continental inventory. The Subject Assets do not include expendable parts for
the 737-300, 737-500 and interchangeable categories.
Continental represented that the inventory listing provided to SH&E excluded parts located at
international locations and parts deemed to have entered service before October 1994.
SH&E was provided with an electronic inventory listing dated December 25, 2005 from Continentals
SCEPTRE/ICS inventory management system. The inventory listing identified each part by
Continental part number (MEPN). For each MEPN, Continental provided information including
manufacturers part number, fleet, category (expendable or rotable), historic average cost, total
quantity, in-scope quantity3 and percentage of serviceable parts. The total inventory
before adjustments consisted of 31,046 line items representing an in-scope quantity of 992,848
individual parts.
SH&E excluded additional parts from the appraisal, namely obsolete parts, parts not owned by
Continental, such as brake and tire sets, and branded parts specific to Continental Airlines, such
as seat covers, carpet, and fabric. SH&E also excluded wing tip assemblies that have been removed
from certain Boeing 737 aircraft operated by Continental. The wing tips are in the process of
being replaced by performance-enhancing winglets and the removed units are to be sold as surplus.
After exclusions the appraised inventory consisted of 27,459 line items and 759,795 individual
parts. Appendix A summarizes these inventory adjustments.
|
|
|
3 |
|
In-scope quantity represents quantity of
inventory after adjustments for ineligible material (parts located at
international locations and parts deemed to have entered service before October
1994). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 7 |
Figure 2-1: Line Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part Type |
|
Aircraft Group |
|
|
Lines |
|
|
Qty |
|
Expendable |
|
|
737-7/8/9 |
|
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
331,796 |
|
|
|
|
757-200 |
|
|
|
7,212 |
|
|
|
190,992 |
|
|
|
|
757-300 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
19,368 |
|
|
|
|
767-200 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
26,113 |
|
|
|
|
767-400 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
59,739 |
|
|
|
|
777-200 |
|
|
|
4,777 |
|
|
|
113,167 |
|
Subtotal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,353 |
|
|
|
741,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rotable |
|
|
737-3/5 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
|
737-7/8/9 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
5,841 |
|
|
|
|
757-200 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
|
757-300 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
767-200 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
767-400 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
|
777-200 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
|
|
Interchangeable |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
Subtotal: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,106 |
|
|
|
18,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,459 |
|
|
|
759,793 |
|
Source: CO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 8 |
3.1 Definition of Terms
Current Market Value
The Current (or Fair) Market Value is the appraisers opinion of the most likely trading price that
may be generated for an individual asset under the market circumstances that are perceived to exist
at the time. CMV assumes that the asset is valued for its highest, best use, that the parties to
the hypothetical sale transaction are willing, able, prudent and knowledgeable. It further assumes
that neither party is under any unusual pressure for a prompt sale, that the transaction would be
negotiated in an open and unrestricted market on an arms-length basis, for cash or equivalent
consideration, and given an adequate amount of time for effective exposure to prospective buyers.
Unless stated otherwise, the total CMV of multiple assets represents the aggregate of the
individual assets Current Market Values were they to be sold on an asset-by-asset basis and not
the value of the asserts if sold in bulk.
3.2 Spare Parts Appraisal Methodology
Since SH&E was formed in 1963, the firm has appraised virtually every major type of commercial
jet and turboprop aircraft, together with engines, spare parts, flight simulators, maintenance
tooling, hangar facilities and ground equipment. SH&Es appraisals are performed in accordance with
the Principles of Appraisal Practice and Code of Ethics established by the International Society of
Transport Aircraft Trading (ISTAT).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 9 |
Spare Parts Methodology
The CMV of the individual parts that make up each sample is determined by investigating the current
sale price for overhauled or serviceable parts, based on information from independent third
parties, manufacturers parts lists and SH&E files.
The sample size for some strata is increased until the ratio of standard deviation to estimated
value is reduced to acceptable values.
This dollar-weighted stratification sampling technique has the benefit of capturing a large dollar
volume of parts while sampling a reasonable number of line items.
Sometimes appraisals are obtained for a small proportion of single part numbers, usually about 1%
to 3% of the total number of line items but representing approximately 35% of inventory value. The
sample is supplemented with information from SH&E files of other recent valuations including known
sales histories of certain parts and the actual buying history of other airlines.
Condition Adjustment
The CMV of unserviceable parts is calculated using ratios of serviceable to unserviceable values
obtained from prior SH&E parts appraisals and applied to SH&Es findings made during the physical
inspection and audit.
Quantity Adjustment
The aggregate CMV is further adjusted to reflect the observed accuracy of the inventory reporting
system and to account for quantity deficiencies.
3.3 Appraisal of the Subject Assets
SH&E obtained an itemized database of the parts to be valued from Continental. The data
identified each part by aircraft type, part type (rotable or expendable category), description,
manufacturers part number, quantity, and average acquisition cost for each part. Parts listed
with zero cost were further researched and valued separately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 10 |
SH&E compiled a single database of the Continental inventory that contained 27,459 line items. The
inventory was grouped by aircraft type and part type. Each grouping was sorted by descending unit
cost value and then divided into separate strata of approximately equal total value based on
Continentals reported cost for each line item. An additional stratum was created to provide
consideration for parts with a reported zero average acquisition cost.
A detailed pricing survey was performed on all manufacturer part numbers using SH&Es internal
resources containing over six million price records from independent third parties, airlines, and
spare part suppliers. SH&E was successful in determining market prices for approximately 21,175
individual line items representing approximately 77% of total line items and 89% of the historic
cost.
The current market value of each individual part was determined by reviewing airline purchase
records from several major U.S. airlines and sales transactions from aftermarket parts companies.
SH&E determined market prices for the parts based on an assumption that each part would be
purchased separately, as a single unit in overhauled condition for rotable parts and in a new
condition for expendable parts.
For those parts that had been successfully matched and priced, SH&E calculated the ratio between
the researched price and the unit cost. The weighted average ratio of priced parts in each stratum
was applied to the entire population of parts in that group. Parts listed at very low cost or zero
cost could not be valued by applying a market ratio. Such parts were further researched and priced
individually.
3.4 Quantity and Condition Adjustment
Although Continental provided SH&E with a percentage of serviceable quantity for each parts
number, no audits or surveys were made to validate the percentages provided by the airline. The
CMV of unserviceable parts was calculated using ratios of serviceable to unserviceable values
obtained from prior SH&E parts appraisals.
As part of each appraisal, SH&E conducts a limited physical inspection to validate the reported
quantities and condition of the Subject Assets. For this appraisal, visited Continentals
warehouse facilities in Liberty International Airport, Newark and George Bush Intercontinental
Airport, Houston.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 11 |
SH&Es audit sample included 1,115 line items, representing 1,557 individual parts and represents
over 50% of each stations reported cost basis. SH&Es previous audits of Continentals inventory
had quantity discrepancies representing an average variance of less than 1% of audited value.
The results of previous audits indicate that Continentals inventory accuracy is well above
industry standards and within SH&E standard quantity adjustment applied to the entire population of
parts to for inventory accuracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 12 |
|
|
|
4
|
|
Current Market Assessment |
4.1 The Commercial Aviation Industry
As much of the global commercial aviation industry outside the United States has begun to
recover from the combined effects of recession, terrorism, war, and health issues, the disparity in
financial performance between the U.S. industry and the rest of the world has widened considerably.
U.S. legacy carriers face intense pricing pressure from low-cost carrier (LCC) competition and,
despite intensive efforts to reduce their cost structures, the legacy carriers have not effectively
lowered unit costs to a level approaching that of their LCC competitors. The escalating cost of
jet fuel (which is priced in U.S. dollars) has significantly impaired the profitability of U.S.
carriers, but has proven somewhat less problematic for many non-U.S. carriers, given the weakness
of the U.S. dollar and also their ability to pass along costs to customers by virtue of their
greater pricing discipline.
In the United States most recently, both Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines have sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, while Flyi Inc.s Independence Air unit
ceased operations in early January 2006 after it failed to draw a firm offer from a buyer or
investor. United has further delayed its exit from bankruptcy, as the airline arranges a $3 billion
debt-based exit-financing package. Part of the package will go to repay a $1.3 billion
debtor-in-possession loan that has helped keep United flying through its extended Chapter 11
period.
Northwest and Delta have lobbied heavily for legislation, now pending in the U.S. Senate (the
Employee Pension Preservation Act of 2005) that would allow the carriers 21 years to replenish
their under-funded pension plans. Analysts believe that it is still likely that Delta and Northwest
will terminate their pension plans while in bankruptcy.
Some analysts have also questioned the viability of a combined US Airways/America West, arguing
that the merged entity would be profitable only if US Airways made substantial cuts to its capacity
or if fuel prices fell significantly. Meanwhile, Continental reported a profitable third quarter in
2005, while United and Northwest continue to post sizable losses due to uncompetitive labor costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 13 |
In the global aircraft market, demand has firmed up considerably to the point where there is often
insufficient supply of suitable aircraft, resulting in firmer lease rates and the likelihood of
higher trading prices. However, two other factors have magnified the apparent improvement in lease
rates: the increased interest rates over the last nine months and the weakness of the U.S. dollar
compared to many other currencies.
4.2 Recent Trends
4.2.1 North American Trends
Although many trends have not changed materially in the last few months, it is worth reviewing
those that have been previously noted in the North American aviation industry. A number of these
trends have also been observed in the European, Asian and Australian markets.
|
|
|
n
|
|
Low-cost carriers have reached critical mass and continue to grow, with service in
most U.S. markets. Approximately 80% of the routes flown by the U.S. legacy airlines
are in competition with LCCs. |
|
|
|
n
|
|
Network carriers have increased their reliance on regional jets, which are capable
of providing point-to-point service more efficiently, although there is a growing
belief that fundamental changes for this segment of the industry lie ahead. |
|
|
|
n
|
|
Network carriers are shifting a substantial amount of capacity away from domestic
markets and into international operations, where yields are higher and competition is
reduced. |
|
|
|
n
|
|
Access to low fares via the Internet has allowed for cheaper air travel. |
|
|
|
n
|
|
Travel agencies are now compensated mainly by fee rather than commission. |
|
|
|
n
|
|
Business travelers are more price-conscious, and all of the major airlines now
offer significant discounts for advance purchases, even on the highly lucrative
long-haul international segments. |
United has reallocated more aircraft to international markets and has continued to optimize its
domestic schedule, as it moves closer to exiting Chapter 11. As with the other network carriers,
United relies on its regional partners to provide services on smaller aircraft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 14 |
The airline also plans to hire 2,000 flight attendants in the coming year, which demonstrates its
intent to expand after a three-year restructuring.4
However, United and Delta have further segmented their operations. Both have created subsidiaries
that compete against LCCs in low-yield leisure markets. Uniteds low-cost subsidiary, TED, operates
a dedicated fleet of A320 aircraft, primarily on leisure routes to Las Vegas, Phoenix and Florida.
With TED, United can compete directly with Southwest and JetBlue, using a minimal service product
without compromising the quality of its mainline service. TED now plans to expand its operations
internationally and is seeking to begin nonstop service between Los Angeles and Puerto Vallarta,
Mexico.
Recognizing that LCCs are established in transcontinental markets and that it cannot compete solely
on price, United has introduced p.s. (premium service) on routes between JFK and Los Angeles and
San Francisco. With the goal of attracting higher-yield business passengers by providing an
enhanced level of service, United has equipped a number of Boeing 757s with amenities usually
available only on international routes. The newly configured aircraft have only 110 seats, with
flat beds in first class and laptop power ports in all classes. Previously United served these
markets with 204-seat Boeing 767-200s, a fleet United will soon retire. Uniteds p.s service
accounts for 2.8% of its weekly ASMs.5
In contrast, Delta decided to close its low-fare unit Song in May 2006, as part of its court
protected restructuring. The move will end a three-year experiment by the U.S. major, which had
attempted to combat low-cost competition on the east coast with its own one-class low-fare
offering. In May 2005, Deltas subsidiary Song added 12 additional 757s to its fleet, expanding
into transcontinental service from New York to Los Angeles.
The low-cost phenomenon pioneered by Southwest still prevails in the North American market.
Southwest launched flights out of Denver in January 2006 as it continues to expand its presence.
Beginning March 4, 2006, Southwest will add one daily nonstop flight to Baltimore and four to Salt
Lake City along with an additional flight to Las Vegas and to Phoenix. Fares have been pushed down
by 40% to 50% as a result of Southwests new flights out of Denver.6
|
|
|
4 |
|
Wall Street Journal, November 11, 2005 |
|
5 |
|
OAG, March 2005 |
|
6 |
|
Southwest News Release, January 1, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 15 |
4.3 World Trends
Over the past two decades, there had been a strong correlation between world airline profits
and global GDP. Figure 6-1 above illustrates the relationship between world airline profits and
GDP from 1984 through 2004: as the global economy grew so did world airline profits and vice versa.
It seems that the trend is being maintained, for as world GDP began to recover after 2001, the
very significant losses by the airline industry began to diminish, and the industry showed a profit
in 2004.
Additionally, in the U.S. market, airline revenues, which have historically represented 0.90% of
national output, have recently dropped to roughly 0.75% of national output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 16 |
4.4 Latest Quarterly Airline Results, U.S. Carriers
SH&E tracks the operating and financial performance of a wide selection of global airlines.
The figure below depicts operating margins for those U.S. carriers that have already reported
financial results for the quarter ending 30 September 2005.
ATA and Independence have not reported their third quarter results and certain other carriers that
are in bankruptcy are not listed.
Overall, U.S. carriers reported improved operating margins. However Northwest, JetBlue and
Midwest Air reported lower operating margins in the third quarter of 2005 compared to the same
period in 2004. Sharply higher fuel prices affected the operating performance of all carriers.
Only Southwest was able to significantly offset high fuel costs with hedging positions.
Southwests average fuel price increased only marginally, and remained by far the lowest in the
domestic industry. United, like its peers, was hurt by a 45% higher average fuel price, but
benefited from a 3% reduction in capacity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 17 |
The effect of Hurricane Katrina on the U.S. airline industry in September 2005 has principally
been indirect. Although airlines reduced scheduled capacity to and from New Orleans by
approximately three quarters following the hurricane (comparing November to August 2005), the lost
service was not great enough to affect airline results. The dominant carrier at New Orleans,
Southwest Airlines, for example, reported that the hurricane would not measurably affect the
companys profitability even as it reduced its daily flights from 57 to just two.
Instead, Katrina contributed to a severe and sudden increase in jet fuel prices. The cost of fuel
is a major component of operating expenses, and the dramatic rise in fuel prices has severely
impacted carrier results. With much of the nations jet fuel refining capacity located along the
Gulf Coast, the storm immediately pushed jet fuel prices into the high $90s per barrel. Since
then, the price premium for jet fuel over the cost of crude oil, called the crack spread, has
remained elevated. In one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 18 |
estimate provided shortly after the hurricane, the U.S. airline industry group projected that 2005
fuel costs would total over $9 billion more than in 2004.7
Prices reached a high of over $2.42 per gallon in September 2005, but have receded slightly since
then. Fuel expenses were up by 101.5% and 98% for JetBlue and Air Tran, respectively, in the third
quarter.
Excluding fuel, mainline revenue per available seat mile (RASM) for the U.S. industry rose
by 3.6% as a result of better yields and higher load factors that partially offset higher fuel
prices.
|
|
|
7 |
|
Statement of James C. May, President and CEO,
Air Transport Association of America, Inc., before the Aviation Subcommittee
Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, United States Senate,
September 14, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 19 |
Although fuel can explain much of the general increase in operational expenses, other factors
contribute to the airlines worsening performance. Four carriers, Northwest, Midwest, US Airways
and JetBlue, had higher non-fuel cost per available seat mile (CASM) than during the previous
quarter (Fig 6-5). Higher non-fuel CASM for these carriers is the result of higher maintenance CASM
for Northwest (+ 71.9%), JetBlue (+72%) and US Airways (+18.5%), while higher depreciation and
aircraft rentals CASM were reported for Midwest (+ 127.4%).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 20 |
As illustrated above, total CASM was higher for all carriers. Southwest was greatly aided by
its timely fuel hedging strategy, while Continentals CASM rose by only 3%, partially due to an
8.1% drop in its labor expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 21 |
RASM also improved across the board, with Air Tran reporting a 16.4% increase in RASM over the
previous year that can be explained by a (+ 6.1%) yield change. Analysts expect RASM for LCCs to
exceed that of the industry as a whole in 2006 as the main carriers will start reducing capacity
(October ATA-basis system capacity estimated at -2.2% vs. +1.4% in September).
Although the merged US Airways reported an $87 million third quarter loss, RASM was up 2% in June,
4% in July and 11% in September, which may turn the company to a profit in 2006.8
Of the airlines that have reported thus far, the strongest results have come from LCCs. Although
JetBlues margin again fell in the quarter, it remained profitable.
|
|
|
8 |
|
Refer to US Airways press release and comments
of CEO Doug Parker. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 22 |
As a whole, U.S. industry net margins fell 13.7 points last year, driven largely by larger
losses at Delta, Northwest and United. However, Frontier, Continental and Southwest remained
profitable, while American improved its net margin. In spite of Uniteds marginal non-fuel cost
reduction, its net margin fell, mainly as a result of the increased fuel costs but also as a result
of other, unspecified, cost increases.
4.5 Cost Reduction
Every one of the U.S. major airlines continues to desperately seek ways to reduce costs. Those
carriers that succeeded in obtaining wage and benefit savings two years ago (United and US Airways)
are now looking for additional savings, and the other carriers are all in negotiations with their
unions. Productivity gains have accompanied labor cost savings at U.S. legacy carriers, but the gap
in labor productivity between legacy carriers and LCCs remains striking. Airline management ranks
have been significantly reduced at most major carriers, and the remaining management staff has
taken substantial salary reductions.
Most carriers are expecting lower CASMs in the fourth quarter due to further labor agreements,
pension funds alleviations and an expectation that oil will remain near $60 a barrel. United
recently reached a broad settlement agreement (which requires
court approval) with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), under which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 23 |
the PBGC would
assume all four-employee retirement plans, which are underfunded by nearly $10 billion. It is
estimated that terminating the defined benefit plans would save United an average of $645 million
annually over five years.
Airline analysts believe that Delta and Northwest face the greatest pension-related liquidity risk,
which is borne out by metrics such as pension shortfalls and pension cash contributions to
operating cash flow. Airline analysts place Continental only marginally better than Delta and
Northwest, while American is generally regarded as being in a considerably stronger position
regarding its pensions. Some observers have speculated that, despite their comparative success,
both Continental and American may eventually be forced into Chapter 11 bankruptcy to permit them to
restructure their public debt obligations.
4.6 Yield
Despite the restructuring efforts and the extensive cost savings being made by the legacy
carriers, it appears that a robust recovery for these airlines is still questionable in the
short-term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 24 |
In constant terms, historic airline yields per revenue passenger mile (RPM) have declined
globally since the inception of the industry, and it is likely that the trend will continue for the
foreseeable future. With continuous pressure from LCCs to keep fares low, the remaining avenues
for airlines to improve yield are filling more seats and fine-tuning pricing and revenue management
strategies to obtain the maximum possible revenue for each flight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 25 |
Although U.S. carriers domestic and Latin American yields have declined steadily, long-haul
transoceanic yields have been on the rise. Nonetheless, yields to Latin America remain the highest
among all operating regions.
To take advantage of growing international yields, better economics and reduced competition, the
legacy carriers are expanding international operations. In 2005, Continental introduced nonstop
service from New York to Guayaquil, Stockholm, Hamburg, Berlin, Belfast, Bristol and, most
importantly, Beijing and Delhi.
Delta has also made the development of its international operation a focal point of its turnaround
plan, recently announcing major service expansions to Europe and Latin America. The carrier will
launch 11 new transatlantic routes in 2006, including service from Atlanta to Athens, Copenhagen,
Düsseldorf, Edinburgh, Nice, Tel Aviv, and Venice, and from New York to Budapest, Dublin, Kiev, and
Manchester. In addition, Delta is expanding its service offering to business and leisure
destinations in Mexico and Central America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 26 |
With the exception of Midwest, all U.S. airlines had an increased yield in the year ending
September 2005. This resulted from the industrys efforts to cut costs and increase productivity.
The carriers in court protection from their creditors are finally tackling their high labor costs
issues, which account for 40% of total operating expenses, compared with 20% in Asia and around 30%
in Europe. Additionally, an increase by 5.4% of total traffic and an alteration of network routes
in response to short-haul competition also helped the overall increase in yields in the U.S.
airline market.9
|
|
|
9 |
|
A Surprising Boom: The
Economist, November 10, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 27 |
Load factors improved across the board, with the highest increases at Midwest (+14.3%),
JetBlue (+1.8%), and Air Tran (+6.1%). The gains at Air Tran, Midwest and JetBlue came in tandem
with large increases in capacity (+31.4%, +20.5% and +28.2%, respectively), a testament to
continuing strength in demand despite calls for a cut in capacity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 28 |
The chart below shows the continued growth trend among LCCs. AirTran reported the greatest
capacity increase (+31.4%) that, according to analysts, was possibly attributable to an
anticipation of Independence Airs cessation of service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 29 |
4.7 Stock Performance
Stock prices for U.S. carriers in the quarter ended September 2005 were mixed. LCCs, as well
as legacy carriers on a stronger financial footing (American and Continental), held firm.
Northwest and Delta are not shown, due to the sharp declines in their share prices as a result of
their bankruptcy filing. Deltas stock was de-listed from the New York Stock Exchange on 13
October. Air Trans stock price continued to rise on the back of break-even third quarter results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 30 |
4.8 Market for the Subject Assets
There continues to be a strong secondary market for the Subject Assets due to the limited
supply and increasing demand for material supporting current in-production aircraft and continued
demand for second-generation aircraft parts.
Demand for both 777-200 and 737 NG aircraft parts remain strong due to increased maintenance
requirements as newer aircraft reach specified service levels requiring overhaul. Due to the very
limited supply of this material in the secondary market, most airlines and maintenance providers
are required to purchase parts directly from the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM).
Demand for 767-400 parts is very limited with only two carriers operating the type. Likewise,
demand for 767-200 parts has weakened as airlines have retired aircraft increasing the aftermarket
supply of 767 parts. Although some parts share commonality with the Boeing 757, 767-300 and 777
aircraft, there remains a limited market for 767-200 and 767-400 parts.
The market for 757-200 and 737 Classic parts is expected to remain constant as many carriers
continue to operate these popular aircraft. The 757 is expected to continue operating with charter
carriers and is an attractive candidate for freighter conversion. Both aircraft are expected to
remain in service for years to come. The aftermarket supply of 757 and 737 Classic parts is
limited to a few teardown candidates acquired at a significantly low price for disassembly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 31 |
Founded in 1963 and with offices in New York, Boston, Washington and London, SH&E is the
worlds largest consulting firm specializing in commercial aviation. Its staff of over 90
personnel encompasses expertise in all disciplines of the industry and the firm has provided
appraisal, consulting, strategic planning and technical services to airlines, leasing companies,
government agencies, airframe and engine manufacturers, and financial institutions.
SH&Es appraisal staff are all members of the International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading
(ISTAT), the internationally recognized body for the certification of aircraft appraisers. SH&E
performs all appraisals in accordance with the definitions, guidelines and standards set forth by
ISTAT. SH&Es officer responsible for all appraisals is an ISTAT Senior Appraiser.
SH&E annually values approximately $20 billion of aviation assets including commercial and military
equipment, airline fleets and lease portfolios. The appraisals range from full appraisals involving
detailed aircraft and record inspections conducted by SH&Es technical staff to the valuation of
tax-based leases. SH&Es proprietary aircraft residual value model is widely accepted by the rating
agencies as a reliable forecasting tool. In addition to the above aircraft valuations, SH&E
annually values in excess of $3 billion worth of aircraft spare parts and spare engines. SH&E
routinely values flight simulators, hangar tooling, ground equipment, gates, slots, maintenance
facilities and Fixed Base Operations.
A related service that SH&E offers its Clients is Asset Management. Over the last few years, SH&E
has been the principal asset manager responsible for the recovery and subsequent re-marketing of a
number of individual aircraft and some significant portfolios.
This active participation in the market place provides SH&E with practical and first hand knowledge
of the values and lease rates of aircraft, engines and parts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 32 |
SH&E used information supplied by the Client together with in-house data accumulated through
other recent studies of aircraft parts transactions.
SH&Es opinions are based upon historical relationships and expectations that it believes are
reasonable.
Some of the underlying assumptions, including those described above are detailed explicitly or
implicitly elsewhere in this report, may not materialize because of unanticipated events and
circumstances. SH&Es opinions could, and would, vary materially, should any of the above
assumptions prove to be inaccurate.
The opinions expressed herein are not given for, or as an inducement or endorsement for, any
financial transaction. They are prepared for the exclusive use of the addressee. SH&E accepts no
responsibility for damages, if any, that result from decisions made or actions taken based on this
report.
This report does not address the validity of title or ownership of the items discussed herein.
This report reflects SH&Es expert opinion and best judgment based upon the information available
to it at the time of its preparation. SH&E does not have, and does not expect to have, any
financial interest in the appraised property.
For SH&E:
Clive G. Medland, FRAeS
Senior Vice President
Senior Appraiser
International Society of
Transport Aircraft Trading
February 16, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 Feb 06
|
|
Page 33 |
Summary of Inventory Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Inventory |
|
|
SH&E Adjustments |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obsolete |
|
|
Parts Not |
|
|
Wing Tip |
|
|
Branded |
|
|
Qualified |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Group |
|
Owned Qty |
|
|
Parts |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
Assemblies |
|
|
Parts |
|
|
Parts |
|
|
Net Qty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
737-3/5 |
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
737-7/8/9 |
|
|
467,129 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
129,056 |
|
|
|
129,492 |
|
|
|
337,637 |
|
757-200 |
|
|
222,814 |
|
|
|
3,526 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,556 |
|
|
|
29,169 |
|
|
|
193,645 |
|
757-300 |
|
|
35,168 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,573 |
|
|
|
15,664 |
|
|
|
19,504 |
|
767-200 |
|
|
28,143 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
26,326 |
|
767-400 |
|
|
88,977 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,758 |
|
|
|
27,778 |
|
|
|
61,199 |
|
777-200 |
|
|
144,373 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,645 |
|
|
|
28,956 |
|
|
|
115,417 |
|
Interchangeable |
|
|
3,533 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
992,848 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
228,393 |
|
|
|
233,053 |
|
|
|
759,795 |
|
|
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2005
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-3
|
|
|
|
|
III-4
|
|
|
|
|
III-5
|
|
|
|
|
III-6
|
|
|
|
|
III-7
|
|
|
|
|
III-8
|
|
III-2
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of
Directors and Stockholder
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries (the
Company) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the periods from
December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and from
January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2005
and 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and
their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004 and the periods from December 18, 2003 through
December 31, 2003 and from January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New York, New York
January 23, 2006
III-3
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
Fixed maturity securities, at fair
value (amortized cost of $3,277,291 in 2005 and $2,921,320 in
2004)
|
|
$
|
3,258,738
|
|
|
$
|
2,938,856
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
159,334
|
|
|
|
140,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
3,418,072
|
|
|
|
3,079,329
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
45,077
|
|
|
|
69,292
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
42,576
|
|
|
|
36,580
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on losses
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
110,636
|
|
|
|
109,292
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
63,330
|
|
|
|
33,835
|
|
Receivable from related parties
|
|
|
9,539
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
Property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $885 in 2005 and $164 in 2004
|
|
|
3,092
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
10,354
|
|
|
|
7,826
|
|
Federal income taxes receivable
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,708,105
|
|
|
$
|
3,342,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
$
|
1,201,163
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,334
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
54,812
|
|
|
|
39,181
|
|
Ceded reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
3,826
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses
and other liabilities
|
|
|
36,359
|
|
|
|
22,874
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
4,262
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
Federal income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
42,463
|
|
|
|
38,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,340,674
|
|
|
|
1,164,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value
$1,500 per share; 10,000 shares authorized, issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,894,983
|
|
|
|
1,882,772
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
(loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(13,597
|
)
|
|
|
15,485
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
471,045
|
|
|
|
264,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,367,431
|
|
|
|
2,177,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,708,105
|
|
|
$
|
3,342,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
III-4
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 17,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
410,202
|
|
|
$
|
323,575
|
|
|
$
|
12,213
|
|
|
$
|
248,112
|
|
Reassumed ceded premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,959
|
|
|
|
6,300
|
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
Ceded premiums written
|
|
|
(29,148
|
)
|
|
|
(14,656
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(14,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
381,054
|
|
|
|
313,878
|
|
|
|
18,474
|
|
|
|
247,560
|
|
Increase in net unearned premiums
|
|
|
(156,485
|
)
|
|
|
(138,929
|
)
|
|
|
(9,892
|
)
|
|
|
(105,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
224,569
|
|
|
|
174,949
|
|
|
|
8,582
|
|
|
|
141,749
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
117,072
|
|
|
|
97,709
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
112,619
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,506
|
|
Net
mark-to-market
losses on credit derivative contracts
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
342,337
|
|
|
|
273,953
|
|
|
|
12,895
|
|
|
|
286,454
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
18,506
|
|
|
|
5,922
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
(6,757
|
)
|
Underwriting expenses
|
|
|
82,064
|
|
|
|
73,426
|
|
|
|
7,622
|
|
|
|
54,481
|
|
Policy acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
(38,069
|
)
|
|
|
(32,952
|
)
|
|
|
(2,931
|
)
|
|
|
(23,641
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
70,803
|
|
|
|
48,434
|
|
|
|
4,937
|
|
|
|
39,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense
(benefit)
|
|
|
271,534
|
|
|
|
225,519
|
|
|
|
7,958
|
|
|
|
246,808
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
32,370
|
|
|
|
42,510
|
|
|
|
1,191
|
|
|
|
57,071
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
32,738
|
|
|
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
|
65,108
|
|
|
|
55,433
|
|
|
|
1,764
|
|
|
|
55,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item
|
|
|
206,426
|
|
|
|
170,086
|
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
191,349
|
|
Extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
206,426
|
|
|
$
|
170,086
|
|
|
$
|
20,046
|
|
|
$
|
191,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
III-5
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
(Loss) Income,
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2003
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
383,511
|
|
|
$
|
49,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,740,885
|
|
|
$
|
2,188,895
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,349
|
|
|
|
191,349
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fixed maturities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
Change in foreign currency
translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,192
|
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284,300
|
)
|
|
|
(284,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 17, 2003
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
383,511
|
|
|
|
53,342
|
|
|
|
1,647,934
|
|
|
|
2,099,787
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,474,261
|
|
|
|
(53,342
|
)
|
|
|
(1,573,447
|
)
|
|
|
(152,528
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,046
|
|
|
|
20,046
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fixed maturities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,105
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1,857,772
|
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
94,533
|
|
|
|
1,969,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,086
|
|
|
|
170,086
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fixed maturities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,340
|
|
Change in foreign currency
translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
183,512
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
1,882,772
|
|
|
|
15,485
|
|
|
|
264,619
|
|
|
|
2,177,876
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,426
|
|
|
|
206,426
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fixed maturities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,550
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,550
|
)
|
Change in foreign currency
translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,344
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,894,983
|
|
|
$
|
(13,597
|
)
|
|
$
|
471,045
|
|
|
$
|
2,367,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
III-6
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 17,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
206,426
|
|
|
$
|
170,086
|
|
|
$
|
20,046
|
|
|
$
|
191,349
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,852
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
15,563
|
|
Policy acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
(38,069
|
)
|
|
|
(32,952
|
)
|
|
|
(2,931
|
)
|
|
|
(23,641
|
)
|
Depreciation of property and
equipment
|
|
|
721
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Amortization of fixed maturity
securities
|
|
|
31,504
|
|
|
|
37,013
|
|
|
|
693
|
|
|
|
21,129
|
|
Amortization of short-term
investments
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains on investments
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,506
|
)
|
Change in accrued investment income
and prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(8,504
|
)
|
|
|
(5,545
|
)
|
|
|
(5,065
|
)
|
|
|
6,292
|
|
Change in net
mark-to-market
losses on credit derivative contracts
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in federal income taxes
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
(2,407
|
)
|
Change in reinsurance recoverable
on losses
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
5,011
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
410
|
|
Change in prepaid reinsurance
premiums
|
|
|
(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
14,476
|
|
|
|
7,432
|
|
|
|
19,725
|
|
Changes in other reinsurance
receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,295
|
|
|
|
(5,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in receivable from related
parties
|
|
|
(8,737
|
)
|
|
|
8,957
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(9,811
|
)
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
157,829
|
|
|
|
124,452
|
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
86,250
|
|
Change in loss and loss adjustment
expenses
|
|
|
15,631
|
|
|
|
(1,286
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
(7,644
|
)
|
Change in ceded reinsurance
balances payable and accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
8,923
|
|
|
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
6,485
|
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
Change in current federal income
taxes payable
|
|
|
(6,559
|
)
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97,477
|
)
|
Change in deferred federal income
taxes
|
|
|
19,252
|
|
|
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
385,977
|
|
|
|
351,977
|
|
|
|
10,440
|
|
|
|
168,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and maturities of fixed
maturity securities
|
|
|
122,638
|
|
|
|
284,227
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
1,028,103
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity
securities
|
|
|
(520,089
|
)
|
|
|
(546,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(877,340
|
)
|
Purchases, sales and maturities of
short-term investments, net
|
|
|
(19,342
|
)
|
|
|
(126,125
|
)
|
|
|
(12,736
|
)
|
|
|
41,504
|
|
Receivable for securities sold
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
(5,715
|
)
|
|
|
5,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,333
|
)
|
Purchase of fixed assets
|
|
|
(1,405
|
)
|
|
|
(2,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by
investing activities
|
|
|
(423,933
|
)
|
|
|
(384,613
|
)
|
|
|
(10,418
|
)
|
|
|
187,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to common
stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
12,211
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
(1,717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and
cash equivalents
|
|
|
(24,215
|
)
|
|
|
(9,353
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
71,363
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
69,292
|
|
|
|
78,645
|
|
|
|
78,623
|
|
|
|
7,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period
|
|
$
|
45,077
|
|
|
$
|
69,292
|
|
|
$
|
78,645
|
|
|
$
|
78,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash
flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
49,613
|
|
|
$
|
40,890
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
156,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
III-7
|
|
1.
|
Business
and Organization
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (the Company)
is a wholly owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (FGIC
Corp.). The Company provides financial guaranty insurance
and other forms of credit enhancement for public finance and
structured finance obligations. The Company began insuring
public finance obligations in 1984 and structured finance
obligations in 1988. The Companys financial strength is
rated Aaa by Moodys Investors Service, Inc.,
AAA by Standard & Poors Rating
Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and
AAA by Fitch Ratings, Inc. The Company is licensed
to engage in writing financial guaranty insurance in all
50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and, through a
branch, in the United Kingdom. In addition, a United Kingdom
subsidiary of the Company is authorized to write financial
guaranty business in the United Kingdom and has passport rights
to write business in other European Union member countries. FGIC
Corp. and the Company have formed subsidiaries to facilitate
geographic and business expansion.
On December 18, 2003, an investor group consisting of The
PMI Group, Inc. (PMI), affiliates of the Blackstone
Group L.P. (Blackstone), affiliates of the Cypress
Group L.L.C. (Cypress) and affiliates of CIVC
Partners L.P. (CIVC), collectively, the
Investor Group, completed the acquisition of FGIC
Corp. from a subsidiary of General Electric Capital Corporation
(GE Capital) in a transaction valued at
approximately $2,200,000 (the Transaction). GE
Capital retained 2,346 shares of FGIC Corp. Senior
Preferred Mandatorily Convertible Modified Preferred Stock
(Senior Preferred Shares) with an aggregate
liquidation preference of $234,600, and approximately 5% of FGIC
Corp.s outstanding common stock. PMI is the largest
stockholder of FGIC Corp., owning approximately 42% of its
common stock at December 31, 2005 and 2004. Blackstone,
Cypress and CIVC own approximately 23%, 23% and 7% of FGIC
Corp.s common stock, respectively, at December 31,
2005 and 2004.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the
basis of GAAP, which differs in certain respects from the
accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the New York
State Insurance Department (see Note 4). Certain 2004 and
2003 information has been reclassified to conform to the 2005
presentation.
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
The Companys significant accounting policies are as
follows:
a. Investments
All the Companys fixed maturity securities are classified
as
available-for-sale
and are recorded on the trade date at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses are recorded as a separate component of
accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of applicable
income taxes, in the consolidated statements of
stockholders equity. Short-term investments are carried at
cost, which approximates fair value.
III-8
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Bond discounts and premiums are amortized over the remaining
term of the securities. Realized gains or losses on the sale of
investments are determined based on the specific identification
method.
Securities that have been determined to be other than
temporarily impaired are reduced to realizable value,
establishing a new cost basis, with a charge to realized loss at
such date.
b. Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all bank deposits, highly liquid
securities and certificates of deposit with maturities of three
months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
These cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates
fair value.
c. Premium
Revenue Recognition
Premiums are received either up-front or over time on an
installment basis. The premium collection method is determined
at the time the policy is issued. Up-front premiums are paid in
full at the inception of the policy and are earned over the
period of risk in proportion to the total amount of principal
and interest amortized in the period as a proportion of the
original principal and interest outstanding. Installment
premiums are collected periodically and are reflected in income
pro-rata over the period covered by the premium payment,
including premiums received on credit default swaps (see
Note 6). Unearned premiums represent the portion of
premiums received applicable to future periods on insurance
policies in force. When an obligation insured by the Company is
refunded prior to the end of the expected policy coverage
period, any remaining unearned premium is recognized at that
time. A refunding occurs when an insured obligation is called or
legally defeased prior to stated maturity. Premiums earned on
advanced refundings were $54,795, $42,695, $5,013 and $39,858
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the
periods from December 18, 2003 through December 31,
2003 and January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003,
respectively.
Ceded premiums are recognized in a manner consistent with the
premium earned on the underlying policies.
d. Policy
Acquisition Costs
Policy acquisition costs include only those expenses that relate
directly to and vary with premium production. Such costs include
compensation of employees involved in marketing, underwriting
and policy issuance functions, rating agency fees, state premium
taxes and certain other expenses. In determining policy
acquisition costs, the Company must estimate and allocate the
percentage of its costs and expenses that are attributable to
premium production, rather than to other activities. Policy
acquisition costs, net of ceding commission income on premiums
ceded to reinsurers, are deferred and amortized over the period
in which the related premiums are earned. Anticipated loss and
loss adjustment expenses, future maintenance costs on the
in-force business and net investment income are considered in
determining the recoverability of acquisition costs.
e. Loss
and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Provision for loss and loss adjustment expenses fall into two
categories: case reserves and watchlist reserves. Case reserves
are established for the value of estimated losses on particular
insured obligations that are presently or likely to be in
payment default and for which future loss is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. These reserves represent an estimate of
the present value of the anticipated shortfall between
(1) payments on insured obligations plus anticipated loss
adjustment expenses and (2) anticipated cash flow from, and
proceeds to be received on, sales of any collateral supporting
the obligation
and/or other
anticipated recoveries. The discount rate used in calculating
the net present value of estimated losses is based upon the
risk-free rate for the time period of the anticipated
III-9
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
shortfall. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, discounted
case-basis loss and loss adjustment expense reserves totaled
$33,328 and $15,700, respectively. Loss and loss adjustment
expenses included amounts discounted at an approximate interest
rate of 4.5% in 2005 and 2004. The amount of the discount at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 was $15,015 and $2,500,
respectively.
The Company establishes watchlist reserves to recognize the
potential for claims against the Company on insured obligations
that are not presently in payment default, but which have
migrated to an impaired level, where there is a substantially
increased probability of default. These reserves reflect an
estimate of probable loss given evidence of impairment, and a
reasonable estimate of the amount of loss given default. The
methodology for establishing and calculating the watchlist
reserve relies on a categorization and assessment of the
probability of default, and loss severity in the event of
default, of the specifically identified impaired obligations on
the watchlist based on historical trends and other factors. The
watchlist reserve is adjusted as necessary to reflect changes in
the loss expectation inherent in the group of impaired credits.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, such reserves were
$21,484 and $23,500, respectively.
The reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses is reviewed
regularly and updated based on claim payments and the results of
ongoing surveillance. The Company conducts ongoing insured
portfolio surveillance to identify all impaired obligations and
thereby provide a materially complete recognition of losses for
each accounting period. The reserves are necessarily based upon
estimates and subjective judgments about the outcome of future
events, and actual results will likely differ from these
estimates.
Reinsurance recoverable on losses is calculated in a manner
consistent with the calculation loss and loss adjustment
expenses.
f. Income
Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using statutory
tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in
which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period in
which a change occurs.
The Company is a financial guaranty insurance writer and is
permitted a tax deduction, subject to certain limitations under
Section 832(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, for amounts
required to be set aside in statutory contingency reserves by
state law or regulation. The deduction is allowed only to the
extent the Company purchases U.S. Government non-interest
bearing tax and loss bonds in an amount equal to the tax benefit
attributable to such deductions. Purchases of tax and loss bonds
are recorded as a reduction of current tax expense. For the
years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company
purchased $13,565 and $10,810, respectively, of tax and loss
bonds. For the period from January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, there were no tax and loss bonds
purchased and $102,540 of tax and loss bonds were redeemed.
g. Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of office furniture, fixtures,
computer equipment and software and leasehold improvements that
are reported at cost less accumulated depreciation. Office
furniture and fixtures are depreciated straight-line over five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated
service lives or over the life of the lease, whichever is
shorter. Computer equipment and software are depreciated over
three years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as
incurred.
III-10
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
h. Goodwill
In accounting for the Transaction in 2003, the Company applied
purchase accounting, as prescribed by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141) and
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting
Bulletin 54. Under these accounting methods, the purchase
price was pushed down into the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, with the difference between the purchase
price and the sum of the fair value of tangible and identifiable
intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed resulting in
negative goodwill of $27,300 at December 18, 2003. In
accordance with SFAS 141, the Company reduced the value
assigned to non-financial assets, and the remaining negative
goodwill of $13,852 was recorded as an extraordinary gain in the
consolidated statement of income.
As a result of the purchase accounting, effective
December 18, 2003, the basis of the Companys assets
and liabilities changed, necessitating the presentation of
Predecessor Company and Successor Company columns in the
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
cash flows.
i. Foreign
Currency Translation
The Company has an established foreign branch and three
subsidiaries in the United Kingdom and insured exposure from a
former branch in France. The Company has determined that the
functional currencies of these operations are their local
currencies. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of these
operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of
exchange at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and revenues and
expenses are translated at average monthly exchange rates. The
cumulative translation (loss) gain at December 31, 2005 and
2004 was $(1,446) and $4,086, respectively, net of tax benefit
(expense) of $723 and $(2,200), respectively, and is reported as
a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income
in the consolidated statements of stockholders equity.
j. Stock
Compensation Plan
The Company has an incentive stock plan that provides for
stock-based compensation, including stock options, restricted
stock awards and restricted stock units of FGIC Corp. Stock
options are granted for a fixed number of shares with an
exercise price equal to or greater than the fair value of the
shares at the date of the grant. Restricted stock awards and
restricted stock units are valued at the fair value of the stock
on the grant date, with no cost to the grantee. FGIC Corp.
accounts for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value
method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and,
accordingly, if the exercise price is equal to the fair value of
the shares at the date of the grant, no compensation expense
related to stock options is allocated to the Company by FGIC
Corp. For grants to employees of the Company of restricted stock
and restricted stock units, unearned compensation, equivalent to
the fair value of the shares at the date of grant, is allocated
to the Company. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only
provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123), as amended.
III-11
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
Had FGIC Corp. determined compensation expense for stock options
granted to employees and management based on the fair value of
the options at the grant dates consistent with the method of
accounting under SFAS 123, the Companys estimated pro
forma net income would have been as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18, 2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income
|
|
$
|
206,426
|
|
|
$
|
170,086
|
|
|
$
|
20,046
|
|
Add: Allocated stock-based
compensation related to restricted stock units, net of tax
included in reported net income
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Allocated total stock-based
compensation determined under the fair value method for all
awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(2,138
|
)
|
|
|
(1,249
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$
|
204,317
|
|
|
$
|
168,886
|
|
|
$
|
20,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no stock options prior to December 18, 2003.
k. Variable
Interest Entities
Financial Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46-R)
provides accounting and disclosure rules for determining whether
certain entities should be consolidated in the Companys
consolidated financial statements. An entity is subject to
FIN 46-R,
and is called a Variable Interest Entity (VIE), if
it has (i) equity that is insufficient to permit the entity
to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support or (ii) equity investors that cannot make
significant decisions about the entitys operations or that
do not absorb the majority of expected losses or receive the
majority of expected residual returns of the entity. A VIE is
consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that
has a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the
expected residual returns of the VIE, or both.
FIN 46-R
requires disclosures for companies that have either a primary or
significant variable interest in a VIE. All other entities not
considered VIEs are evaluated for consolidation under
SFAS No. 94, Consolidation of all Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries.
As part of its structured finance business, the Company insures
debt obligations or certificates issued by special purpose
entities. The Company has evaluated the transactions, and does
not believe any such transactions require consolidation or
disclosure under
FIN 46-R.
During 2004, FGIC arranged the issuance of contingent preferred
trust securities by a group of special purpose trusts. These
trusts are considered VIEs under
FIN 46-R.
However, the Company is not considered a primary beneficiary and
therefore is not required to consolidate the trusts (see
Note 16).
l. Derivatives
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued and subsequently amended SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133). Under SFAS 133, as
amended, all derivative instruments are recognized on the
consolidated balance sheet at their fair value, and changes in
fair value are recognized immediately in earnings unless the
derivatives qualify as hedges.
In 2005, the Company sold credit default swaps (CDS)
to certain buyers of credit protection. It considers these
agreements to be a normal extension of its financial guaranty
insurance business, although they are considered
III-12
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
|
derivatives for accounting purposes. These agreements are
recorded at fair value. Changes in fair value are recorded in
net
mark-to-market
gains (losses) on credit derivative instruments in the
consolidated statements of income and in other assets or other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company uses
dealer-quoted market values, when available, to determine fair
value. If market prices are not available, management uses
internally developed estimates of fair value.
m. New
Accounting Pronouncements
On December 16, 2004, FASB issued SFAS 123(R) which
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants
of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial
statements based on their fair values. Following the effective
date, pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. In April
2005, the SEC announced the adoption of a rule allowing public
companies to defer the adoption of SFAS 123(R) until the
beginning of their fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2005. Non-public entities will be required to adopt the
provisions of the new standard in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2005.
Under SFAS 123(R), the Company must determine the
transition method to be used at the date of adoption, the
appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing share-based
payments and the amortization method for compensation cost. The
transition methods include retroactive and prospective adoption
options. Under the retroactive option, prior periods may be
restated either as of the beginning of the year of adoption or
for all periods presented. The prospective method requires that
compensation expense be recorded for all outstanding share-based
awards for which the requisite service has not yet been
rendered. The retroactive method would record compensation for
all unvested stock options and restricted stock beginning with
the first period restated. The Company anticipates adopting the
prospective method and expects that the adoption of
SFAS 123(R) will have an impact similar to the current pro
forma disclosure for existing options under SFAS 123(R). In
addition, the Company does not expect that the expense
associated with future grants (assuming grant levels consistent
with 2005) derived from the fair value model selected will
have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
n. Review
of Financial Guaranty Industry Accounting Practices
The FASB staff is considering whether additional accounting
guidance is necessary to address loss reserving and certain
other practices in the financial guaranty industry.
SFAS No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance
Enterprises, was developed prior to the emergence of the
financial guaranty industry. As it does not specifically address
financial guaranty contracts, there has been diversity in the
accounting for these contracts. In 2005, the FASB added a
project to consider accounting by insurers for financial
guaranty insurance. The objective of the project is to develop
an accounting model for financial guaranty contracts issued by
insurance companies that are not accounted for as derivative
contracts under SFAS 133. A financial guaranty contract
guarantees the holder of a financial obligation the full and
timely payment of principal and interest when due and is
typically issued in conjunction with municipal bond offerings
and certain structured finance transactions. The goal of this
project is to develop a single model for all industry
participants to apply.
The FASB is expected to meet in 2006 to consider the accounting
model for issuers of financial guaranty insurance. Proposed and
final pronouncements are expected to be issued in 2006. When the
FASB reaches a conclusion on this issue, the Company, along with
other companies in the financial guaranty industry, may be
required to change certain aspects of accounting for loss
reserves, premium income and deferred acquisition costs. It is
not possible to predict the impact the FASBs review may
have on the Companys accounting practices.
III-13
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
4.
|
Statutory
Accounting Practices
|
Statutory-basis surplus of the Company at December 31, 2005
and 2004 was $1,162,904 and $1,172,600, respectively.
Statutory-basis net income (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the periods from
December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and
January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003 was
$192,009, $144,100, $(1,669), and $180,091, respectively.
The amortized cost and fair values of investments in fixed
maturity securities and short-term investments classified as
available-for-sale
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
2,777,807
|
|
|
$
|
12,718
|
|
|
$
|
26,410
|
|
|
$
|
2,764,115
|
|
Asset- and mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
209,148
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
205,793
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
|
|
|
148,785
|
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
148,136
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
91,422
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
1,486
|
|
|
|
90,437
|
|
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments
|
|
|
30,930
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
31,270
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
18,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity securities
|
|
|
3,277,291
|
|
|
|
15,513
|
|
|
|
34,066
|
|
|
|
3,258,738
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
159,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
3,436,625
|
|
|
$
|
15,513
|
|
|
$
|
34,066
|
|
|
$
|
3,418,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-14
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
5.
|
Investments
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
2,461,087
|
|
|
$
|
19,569
|
|
|
$
|
3,090
|
|
|
$
|
2,477,566
|
|
Asset- and mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
214,895
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
215,467
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies
|
|
|
131,771
|
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
943
|
|
|
|
131,387
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
54,655
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
55,082
|
|
Debt securities issued by foreign
governments
|
|
|
39,713
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
39,868
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
19,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
|
2,921,320
|
|
|
|
22,545
|
|
|
|
5,009
|
|
|
|
2,938,856
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
140,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
3,061,793
|
|
|
$
|
22,545
|
|
|
$
|
5,009
|
|
|
$
|
3,079,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows gross unrealized losses and the fair
value of fixed maturity securities, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been
in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31,
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and
political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
1,622,119
|
|
|
$
|
16,646
|
|
|
$
|
463,156
|
|
|
$
|
9,764
|
|
|
$
|
2,085,275
|
|
|
$
|
26,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset- and mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
133,196
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
56,824
|
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
|
|
190,020
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies
|
|
|
47,872
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
76,380
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
124,252
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
42,379
|
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
28,026
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
70,405
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,860
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired
securities
|
|
$
|
1,858,426
|
|
|
$
|
20,334
|
|
|
$
|
624,386
|
|
|
$
|
13,732
|
|
|
$
|
2,482,812
|
|
|
$
|
34,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unrealized losses in the Companys investments were
caused by interest rate increases. The Company evaluated the
credit ratings of these securities and noted no deterioration.
Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes
in interest rates and not credit quality and because the Company
has the ability and intent to hold these
III-15
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
5.
|
Investments
(continued)
|
investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be
maturity, the Company did not consider these investments to be
other than temporarily impaired at December 31, 2005.
Investments in fixed maturity securities carried at fair value
of $4,625 and $4,049 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively, were on deposit with various regulatory
authorities as required by law.
The amortized cost and fair values of investments in fixed
maturity securities,
available-for-sale
at December 31, 2005, are shown below by contractual
maturity date. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or
prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due one year later or less
|
|
$
|
77,668
|
|
|
$
|
77,071
|
|
Due after one year through five
years
|
|
|
472,292
|
|
|
|
463,162
|
|
Due after five years through ten
years
|
|
|
1,463,806
|
|
|
|
1,448,990
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
1,263,525
|
|
|
|
1,269,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,277,291
|
|
|
$
|
3,258,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the
periods from December 18, 2003 through December 31,
2003 and January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003,
proceeds from sales of
available-for-sale
securities were $31,380, $178,030, $0, and $855,761
respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004 and for the periods from December 18, 2003 through
December 31, 2003 and January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, gross gains of $185, $1,900, $0, and
$31,700, respectively, and gross losses of $84, $1,300, $0, and
$200, respectively, were realized on such sales.
Net investment income of the Company was derived from the
following sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 17,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from fixed maturity
securities
|
|
$
|
112,616
|
|
|
$
|
97,720
|
|
|
$
|
4,294
|
|
|
$
|
111,075
|
|
Income from short-term investments
|
|
|
6,801
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
119,417
|
|
|
|
99,170
|
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
113,401
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
|
(1,461
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(782
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
117,072
|
|
|
$
|
97,709
|
|
|
$
|
4,269
|
|
|
$
|
112,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-16
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
5.
|
Investments
(continued)
|
As of December 31, 2005, the Company did not have more than
3% of its investment portfolio concentrated in a single issuer
or industry; however, the Company had the following investment
concentrations by state:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
New York
|
|
$
|
302,290
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
220,150
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
217,145
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
193,315
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
169,635
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
155,922
|
|
California
|
|
|
139,742
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
113,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,511,239
|
|
All other states
|
|
|
1,326,785
|
|
All other investments
|
|
|
580,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$
|
3,418,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
The Company provides CDSs to certain buyers of credit protection
by entering into contracts that reference collateralized debt
obligations from cash and synthetic structures backed by pools
of corporate, consumer or structured finance debt. It also
offers credit protection on other public finance and structured
finance obligations in CDS form. The Company considers these
agreements to be a normal extension of its financial guaranty
insurance business, although they are considered derivatives for
accounting purposes. These agreements are recorded at fair
value. The Company believes that the most meaningful
presentation of the financial statement impact of these
derivatives is to reflect premiums as installments are received,
and to record losses and loss adjustment expenses and changes in
fair value as incurred. The Company recorded $3,036 of net
earned premium, $0 in losses and loss adjustment expenses, and
net
mark-to-market
losses of $167 in changes in fair value under these agreements
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The gains or losses recognized by recording these contracts at
fair value are determined each quarter based on quoted market
prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available,
the determination of fair value is based on internally developed
estimates. Management applies judgments to estimate fair value
which are based on changes in expected loss of the underlying
assets as well as changes in current market prices for similar
products.
Consideration is given to current market spreads and on
evaluation of the current performance of the assets. The Company
does not believe that the fair value adjustments are an
indication of potential claims under the Companys
guarantees. The
inception-to-date
net
mark-to-market
loss on the CDS portfolio was $167 at December 31, 2005 and
was recorded in other liabilities.
For periods subsequent to the closing date of the Transaction,
the Company files its own consolidated federal income tax
returns with FGIC Corp. The method of allocation between FGIC
Corp. and its subsidiaries is
III-17
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
7.
|
Income
Taxes (continued)
|
determined under a tax sharing agreement approved by FGIC
Corp.s Board of Directors and the New York State Insurance
Department, and is based upon a separate return calculation. For
periods ended on or prior to December 18, 2003, the Company
filed its federal income tax return as part of the consolidated
return of GE Capital. Under a tax sharing agreement with GE
Capital, tax was allocated to the Company based upon its
contributions to GE Capitals consolidated net income.
The following is a reconciliation of federal income taxes
computed at the statutory income tax rate and the provision for
federal income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 17,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes computed on income
before provision for Federal income taxes, at the statutory
income tax rate
|
|
$
|
95,037
|
|
|
$
|
78,932
|
|
|
$
|
2,785
|
|
|
$
|
86,383
|
|
State and local income taxes, net
of Federal income taxes
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
Tax effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt interest
|
|
|
(31,072
|
)
|
|
|
(28,015
|
)
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
(26,112
|
)
|
Prior period adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,978
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
65,108
|
|
|
$
|
55,433
|
|
|
$
|
1,764
|
|
|
$
|
55,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-18
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
7.
|
Income
Taxes (continued)
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the net deferred tax liability at
December 31, 2005 and 2004 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax and loss bonds
|
|
$
|
24,375
|
|
|
$
|
10,810
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expense
reserves
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
7,472
|
|
AMT credit carryforward
|
|
|
7,140
|
|
|
|
8,107
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
Capital lease
|
|
|
2,483
|
|
|
|
2,539
|
|
Net operating loss on foreign
subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
44,958
|
|
|
|
29,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingency reserves
|
|
|
42,656
|
|
|
|
18,917
|
|
Unrealized gains on fixed maturity
securities,
available-for-sale
|
|
|
12,883
|
|
|
|
29,156
|
|
Deferred acquisition costs
|
|
|
19,639
|
|
|
|
11,842
|
|
Premium revenue recognition
|
|
|
10,359
|
|
|
|
3,076
|
|
Profit commission
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
2,343
|
|
Foreign currency
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
Other
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax
liabilities
|
|
|
87,421
|
|
|
|
68,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
42,463
|
|
|
$
|
38,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net operating losses on foreign subsidiaries of $10,863 as
of December 31, 2005 were generated by FGIC Corp.s
United Kingdom subsidiaries. The United Kingdom does not allow
net operating losses to be carried back, but does permit them to
be carried forward indefinitely. Based upon the level of
historical taxable income, projections of future taxable income
over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible
and the estimated reversal of future taxable temporary
differences, the Company believes it is more likely than not
that it will realize the benefits of these deductible
differences and has not established a valuation allowance at
December 31, 2005 and 2004.
In the opinion of management, an adequate provision has been
made for any additional taxes that may become due pending any
future examinations by tax authorities.
Reinsurance is the commitment by one insurance company (the
reinsurer) to reimburse another insurance company (the ceding
company) for a specified portion of the insurance risks under
policies issued by the ceding company in
III-19
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
8.
|
Reinsurance
(continued)
|
consideration for a portion of the related premiums received.
The ceding company typically will receive a ceding commission
from the reinsurer.
The Company uses reinsurance to increase its capacity to write
insurance for obligations of large, frequent issuers, to meet
internal, rating agency or regulatory single risk limits, to
diversify risk, and to manage rating agency and regulatory
capital requirements. The Company currently arranges reinsurance
primarily on a facultative
(transaction-by-transaction)
basis. Prior to 2003, the Company also had treaty reinsurance
agreements, primarily for the public finance business, that
provided coverage for a specified portion of the insured risk
under all qualifying policies issued during the term of the
treaty.
The Company seeks to place reinsurance with financially strong
reinsurance companies since, as a primary insurer, the Company
is required to fulfill all its obligations to policyholders even
where a reinsurer fails to perform its obligations under the
applicable reinsurance agreement. The Company regularly monitors
the financial condition of its reinsurers. Under most of the
Companys reinsurance agreements, the Company has the right
to reassume all the exposure ceded to a reinsurer (and receive
all the remaining unearned premiums ceded) in the event of a
ratings downgrade of the reinsurer or the occurrence of certain
other events. In certain of these cases, the Company also has
the right to impose additional ceding commissions.
In recent years, some of the Companys reinsurers were
downgraded by the rating agencies, thereby reducing the
financial benefits of using reinsurance under rating agency
capital adequacy models, because the Company must allocate
additional capital to the related reinsured exposure. However,
the Company still receives regulatory credit for this
reinsurance. In connection with such a downgrade, the Company
reassumed $0, $4,959, $6,300, and $14,300 of ceded premiums for
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the periods
from December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and
January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003,
respectively, from the reinsurers.
Under certain reinsurance agreements, the Company holds
collateral in the form of letters of credit and trust
agreements. Such collateral totaled $62,394 at December 31,
2005, and can be drawn on in the event of default by the
reinsurer.
The effect of reinsurance on the balances recorded in the
consolidated statements of income is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 17,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
$
|
25,921
|
|
|
$
|
24,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,236
|
|
|
$
|
20,300
|
|
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
(4,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
III-20
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
9.
|
Loss and
Loss Adjustment Expenses
|
Activity in the reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses is
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 18,
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 17,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
39,181
|
|
|
$
|
40,467
|
|
|
$
|
40,224
|
|
|
$
|
47,868
|
|
Less reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
(3,054
|
)
|
|
|
(8,065
|
)
|
|
|
(8,058
|
)
|
|
|
(8,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance
|
|
|
36,127
|
|
|
|
32,402
|
|
|
|
32,166
|
|
|
|
39,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period
|
|
|
23,985
|
|
|
|
11,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,843
|
|
Prior periods
|
|
|
(5,479
|
)
|
|
|
(5,834
|
)
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
(27,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred
|
|
|
18,506
|
|
|
|
5,922
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
(6,757
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period
|
|
|
(1,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior periods
|
|
|
(1,099
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid
|
|
|
(3,092
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance
|
|
|
51,541
|
|
|
|
36,127
|
|
|
|
32,402
|
|
|
|
32,166
|
|
Plus reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
8,065
|
|
|
|
8,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
54,812
|
|
|
$
|
39,181
|
|
|
$
|
40,467
|
|
|
$
|
40,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the increase in
incurred expense was primarily related to issuers impacted by
Hurricane Katrina. Case reserves and credit watchlist reserves
at December 31, 2005 include $8,511 and $13,322,
respectively, of estimated losses related to obligations
impacted by Hurricane Katrina (see Note 10).
During the year ended December 31, 2004, the increase in
incurred expense related to several structured finance
transactions of one particular issuer.
During the period from January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, the overall decrease in incurred expense
was driven by a reduction in reserves previously established on
several structured finance transactions of one particular
issuer. In addition, prior to the closing of the Transaction,
rather than watchlist reserves, the Company established
portfolio reserves based upon the aggregate average net par
outstanding of the Companys insured mortgage-backed
securities portfolio.
At December 31, 2005, the Company insured public finance
obligations with a net par in force (NPIF) of
approximately $4,011,871 in locations impacted by Hurricane
Katrina. Approximately $2,023,315 of these obligations relate to
locations designated by the U.S. Federal Emergency
Management Administration (FEMA) as eligible for
both public and individual assistance (FEMA-dual
designated locations); the remainder, or $1,988,556, of
these obligations relate to locations designated by FEMA as
eligible for individual assistance only. The Company believes
that insured obligations in FEMA-dual designated locations are
more likely to be impaired than obligations eligible for
individual assistance only. Consequently, since the
III-21
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
10.
|
Hurricane
Katrina (continued)
|
occurrence of Hurricane Katrina, the Company has focused its
portfolio surveillance efforts related to Hurricane Katrina on
evaluating its insured public finance obligations in the
FEMA-dual designated locations. These FEMA-dual designated
locations consist primarily of counties and parishes in Alabama,
Mississippi and Louisiana.
As a result of this evaluation, the Company placed insured
public finance obligations with an NPIF totaling $979,153 on its
credit watchlist of which reserves were recorded on obligations
with an NPIF of $585,303. These obligations relate to locations
in the Parish of Orleans (in which New Orleans is located) and
the immediately surrounding parishes. At December 31, 2005,
the Company recorded case reserves of $8,511, watchlist reserves
of $13,322 and estimated reinsurance recoverables of $1,740
related to insured public finance obligations placed on the
credit watchlist. The case reserves of $8,511 relate to an
investor-owned utility, for which the Company has insured public
finance obligations with an NPIF of $75,000, that has entered
into bankruptcy proceedings. The watchlist reserves of $13,322
were based on managements assessment that the associated
insured public finance obligations have experienced impairment
due to diminished revenue sources. The NPIF for the insured
public finance obligations for which watchlist reserves of
$13,322 have been established totals $510,303. The $510,303 (a
subset of the $979,153) is supported by the revenue sources
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Par
|
Revenue Source
|
|
in Force
|
|
|
General obligation
|
|
$
|
90,079
|
|
Hotel tax
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
Sales tax
|
|
|
117,141
|
|
Municipal utility
|
|
|
119,657
|
|
Public higher
education
|
|
|
18,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
510,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the unprecedented nature of the events and magnitude of
damage in the affected areas, the loss reserves were necessarily
based upon estimates and subjective judgments about the outcome
of future events, including without limitation the amount and
timing of any future federal and state aid. The loss reserves
will likely be adjusted as additional information becomes
available, and such adjustments may have a material impact on
future results of operations. However, the Company believes that
the losses ultimately incurred as result of Hurricane Katrina
will not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position.
For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company paid
claims totaling $5,910 related to insured public finance
obligations impacted by Hurricane Katrina. During 2005, the
Company subsequently received reimbursements of $4,855 for these
claims payments.
The Companys structured finance insured portfolio was not
significantly impacted by Hurricane Katrina, reflecting the
geographic diversification of the credits comprising the insured
structured finance obligations.
|
|
11.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Prior to the Transaction, the Company had various service
agreements with subsidiaries of General Electric Company and GE
Capital. These agreements provided for the payment by the
Company of certain payroll and office expenses, investment fees
pertaining to the management of the Companys investment
portfolio and telecommunication service charges. In addition, as
part of the Transaction, the Company entered into a transitional
services agreement under which GE Capital continued to provide
certain administrative and
III-22
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
11.
|
Related
Party Transactions (continued)
|
support services, in exchange for certain scheduled fees during
the 12 months following the date of the agreement.
Approximately $0, $179, $0 and $1,600 in expenses were incurred
during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for
the periods from December 18, 2003 through
December 31, 2003 and January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, respectively, related to such agreements
and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
At the end of the first quarter of 2004, the Company transferred
investment management services from GE Capital to Blackrock
Financial Management, Inc. and Wellington Management Company,
LLP.
In connection with the Transaction, the Company entered into a
capital lease agreement with a subsidiary of GE Capital. The
lease agreement covers leasehold improvements made to the
Companys headquarters as well as furniture and fixtures,
computer hardware and software used by the Company (see
Note 17).
In connection with the Transaction, FGIC entered into a $300,000
soft capital facility, with GE Capital as lender and
administrative agent. The soft capital facility, which replaced
the capital support facility that FGIC previously had with GE
Capital, had an initial term of eight years. FGIC paid GE
Capital $1,132 and $70 under this agreement for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the period from December 18,
2003 through December 31, 2003, respectively. This
agreement was terminated by FGIC in July 2004 and was replaced
by a new soft capital facility (see Note 15).
The Company also insures certain non-municipal issues with GE
Capital involvement as sponsor of the insured securitization
and/or
servicer of the underlying assets. For some of these issues, GE
Capital also provides first loss protection in the event of
default. Gross premiums written on these issues amounted to $3,
$6, $0 and $20 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
2004 and for the periods from December 18, 2003 through
December 31, 2003 and January 1, 2003 through
December 17, 2003, respectively. As of December 31,
2005, par outstanding on these deals before reinsurance was
$6,142. Issues sponsored by affiliates of GE accounted for
approximately 1% of gross premiums written in 2003.
During 2005 FGIC, in the normal course of operations, entered
into reinsurance transactions with PMI-affiliated companies.
Ceded premiums were $582 for the year ended December 31,
2005 and accounts payable due to PMI were $102 at
December 31, 2005.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no receivables
due from GE Capital.
During 2005 and 2004, the Company allocated certain overhead
costs to FGIC Corp. which amounted to $540 and $317,
respectively.
All employees of the Company participate in an incentive
compensation plan. In addition, the Company offers a deferred
compensation plan for eligible employees. Expenses incurred by
the Company under compensation plans amounted to $21,824,
$15,493, $3,996, and $10,087 for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the periods from
December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and
January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003,
respectively, and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements. During 2005 and 2004, compensation
increased primarily due to an increase in employee headcount.
For 2003, compensation for certain employees was part of an
allocation of expenses of affiliates and was therefore recorded
as an allocated expense rather than compensation expense. In
2005 and 2004, these expenses were directly recorded by the
Company. In 2003, compensation levels were driven in part by
Transaction-related costs, including retention bonuses and
sign-on bonuses to new hires post-acquisition.
III-23
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
12.
|
Compensation
Plans (continued)
|
Commencing effective January 1, 2004, the Company has
offered a defined contribution savings plan under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan
covers substantially all employees who meet minimum age and
service requirements and allows participants to defer a portion
of their annual compensation on a pre-tax basis (for 2005, up to
$14 for employees under age 50, plus an additional
catch up contribution of up to $4 for employees 50
and older). The Company may also make discretionary
contributions to the plan on behalf of employees. The Company
contributed $3,429 and $2,532 to the plan on behalf of employees
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Under New York insurance law, the Company may pay dividends to
FGIC Corp. only from earned surplus, subject to the following
limitations: (a) statutory surplus after any dividend may
not be less than the minimum required paid-in capital, which was
$72,500 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, and (b) dividends may not
exceed the lesser of 10% of the Companys surplus or 100%
of adjusted net investment income, as defined by New York
insurance law, for the twelve-month period ended on the
preceding December 31, without the prior approval of the
New York State Superintendent of Insurance.
During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for
the period from December 18, 2003 through December 31,
2003, the Company did not declare and pay dividends. During the
period from January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003,
the Company declared and paid dividends to FGIC Corp. of
$284,300. These dividends were approved by the New York State
Superintendent of Insurance.
|
|
14.
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
During December 2005, FGIC Corp. and the Company entered into a
$250,000 senior unsecured revolving credit facility that matures
on December 11, 2010. The facility is provided by a
syndicate of banks and other financial institutions led by
JPMorgan Chase, as administrative agent and sole lead arranger.
In connection with the facility, $150 in syndication costs was
prepaid and will be amortized into income over the term of the
facility. The facility replaced a similar one-year facility that
matured in December 2005. No draws have been made under either
facility.
|
|
15.
|
Preferred
Trust Securities
|
On July 19, 2004, the Company closed a $300,000 facility,
consisting of Money Market Committed Preferred Custodial
Trust Securities (CPS Securities). This
facility replaced a $300,000 Soft Capital facility
previously provided by GE Capital. Under the new facility, each
of six separate newly organized Delaware trusts (the
Trusts), issues $50,000 in perpetual CPS Securities
on a rolling
28-day
auction rate basis. Proceeds from these securities are invested
in high quality, short-term securities and are held in the
respective Trusts. Each Trust is solely responsible for its
obligations and has been established for the purpose of entering
into a put agreement with the Company, which obligates the
Trusts, at the Companys discretion, to purchase perpetual
Preferred Stock of the Company. In this way, the program
provides capital support to the Company by allowing it to obtain
immediate access to new capital at its sole discretion at any
time through the exercise of the put options. In connection with
the establishment of the Trusts, the Company incurred $4,638 of
expenses which is included in other operating expenses for the
year ended December 31, 2004. The Company recorded expenses
for the right to put its shares to the Trusts of $1,806 and $905
for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
III-24
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
16.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
|
|
(a)
|
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
|
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company
in estimating the fair values of financial instruments:
Fixed Maturity Securities: Fair values for fixed
maturity securities are based on quoted market prices, if
available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair
values are estimated using quoted market prices for similar
securities. Fair value disclosure for fixed maturity securities
is included in the consolidated balance sheets and in
Note 5.
Short-Term Investments: Short-term investments are
carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accrued Investment Income, Prepaid
Expenses and Other Assets, Receivable from Related Parties,
Ceded Reinsurance Balances Payable, Accounts Payable and Accrued
Expenses and Payable for Securities Purchased: The
carrying amounts of these items approximate their fair values.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial
instruments at December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on hand and in-demand accounts
|
|
$
|
45,077
|
|
|
$
|
45,077
|
|
|
$
|
69,292
|
|
|
$
|
69,292
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
159,334
|
|
|
|
159,334
|
|
|
|
140,473
|
|
|
|
140,473
|
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
|
|
3,258,738
|
|
|
|
3,258,738
|
|
|
|
2,938,856
|
|
|
|
2,938,856
|
|
Financial Guaranties: The carrying value of the
Companys financial guaranties is represented by the
unearned premium reserve, net of deferred acquisition costs,
loss and loss adjustment expense reserves and prepaid
reinsurance premiums. Estimated fair values of these guaranties
are based on an estimate of the balance that is necessary to
bring the future returns for the Companys embedded book of
business to a market return. The estimated fair values of such
financial guaranties was $1,098,165 compared to a carrying value
of $1,099,045 as of December 31, 2005, and is $965,992
compared to a carrying value of $936,334 as of December 31,
2004.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the net present value of
future installment premiums was approximately $393,000 and
$192,000, respectively, both discounted at 5%.
Derivatives: For fair value adjustments on
derivatives, the carrying amount represents fair value. The
Company uses quoted market prices when available, but if quoted
market prices are not available, management uses internally
developed estimates.
|
|
(b)
|
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
|
The Company considers its role in providing insurance to be
credit enhancement rather than credit substitution. The Company
insures only those securities that, in its judgment, are of
investment grade quality. The Company has established and
maintains its own underwriting standards that are based on those
aspects of credit that the Company deems important for the
particular category of obligations considered for insurance.
Credit criteria include economic and social trends, debt
management, financial management and legal and administrative
factors, the adequacy of anticipated cash flows, including the
historical and expected performance of assets pledged to secure
payment of securities under varying economic scenarios, and
underlying levels of protection such as insurance or
over-collateralization.
III-25
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
16.
|
Financial
Instruments (continued)
|
In connection with underwriting new issues, the Company
sometimes requires, as a condition to insuring an issue, that
collateral be pledged or, in some instances, that a third-party
guaranty be provided for a term of the obligation issued by a
party of acceptable credit quality obligated to make payment
prior to any payment by the Company. The types and extent of
collateral varies, but may include residential and commercial
mortgages, corporate debt, government debt and consumer
receivables.
As of December 31, 2005, the Companys total
outstanding principal insured was $275,327,000, net of
reinsurance of $22,711,000. The Companys insured portfolio
as of December 31, 2005 was broadly diversified by
geographic and bond market sector, with no single obligor
representing more than 1% of the Companys insured
principal outstanding, net of reinsurance. The insured portfolio
includes exposure under credit derivatives. The par written for
credit derivatives was $15,640,000 at December 31, 2005.
As of December 31, 2005, the composition of principal
insured by type of issue, net of reinsurance, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Principal
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Municipal:
|
|
|
|
|
Tax supported
|
|
$
|
134,762,000
|
|
Water and sewer
|
|
|
34,859,000
|
|
Healthcare
|
|
|
4,216,000
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
24,956,000
|
|
Education
|
|
|
9,939,000
|
|
Housing
|
|
|
1,234,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,153,000
|
|
Non-municipal and international
|
|
|
60,208,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
275,327,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, the composition of principal
insured ceded to reinsurers was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded Principal
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Reinsurer:
|
|
|
|
|
Radian Reinsurance Company
|
|
$
|
7,808,000
|
|
Ace Guaranty Inc.
|
|
|
6,367,000
|
|
American Re-Insurance Company
|
|
|
2,231,000
|
|
RAM Reinsurance Company
|
|
|
2,024,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,281,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,711,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company did not have recoverables in excess of 3% of
stockholders equity from any single reinsurer.
The Companys insured gross and net principal and interest
outstanding was $472,161,000 and $433,587,000, respectively, as
of December 31, 2005.
III-26
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
16.
|
Financial
Instruments (continued)
|
FGIC is authorized to do business in 50 states, the
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
U.S. Virgin Islands and in the United Kingdom. Principal
insured outstanding at December 31, 2005 by state, net of
reinsurance, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Principal
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
California
|
|
$
|
32,882,000
|
|
New York
|
|
|
21,265,000
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
15,952,000
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
15,483,000
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
13,049,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
12,223,000
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
10,883,000
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
8,311,000
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
6,903,000
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
6,359,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,310,000
|
|
All other states
|
|
|
71,809,000
|
|
Mortgage and asset-backed
|
|
|
54,262,000
|
|
International
|
|
|
5,946,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
275,327,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company leases office space and equipment under operating
lease agreements in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Rent expense under operating leases for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the period from
December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003 and
January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003 was $3,631,
$3,070, $90, and $3,210, respectively. Future payments
associated with these leases are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease
|
|
|
|
Commitment Amount
|
|
|
Year:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
3,141
|
|
2007
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,968
|
|
2009
|
|
|
412
|
|
2010
|
|
|
412
|
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum future rental
payments
|
|
$
|
10,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-27
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
17.
|
Commitments
(continued)
|
In connection with the Transaction, the Company entered into a
capital lease with a related party (an affiliate of GE Capital),
covering leasehold improvements and computer equipment to be
used at its headquarters. At the lease termination date of
June 30, 2009, the Company will own the leased equipment.
Future payments associated with this lease are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease
|
|
|
|
Commitment Amount
|
|
|
Year ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
1,570
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,545
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
2009
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
Less interest
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease
payments
|
|
$
|
4,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income of the Company
consists of net unrealized gains on investment securities,
foreign currency translation adjustments, and a cash flow hedge.
The components of other comprehensive income for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the periods from
December 18, 2003 through December 31, 2003, and
January 1, 2003 through December 17, 2003 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising
during the year
|
|
$
|
(36,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,566
|
|
|
$
|
(23,484
|
)
|
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
(36,151
|
)
|
|
|
12,601
|
|
|
|
(23,550
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
(8,454
|
)
|
|
|
2,922
|
|
|
|
(5,532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(44,605
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,523
|
|
|
$
|
(29,082
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-28
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
18.
|
Comprehensive
Income (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising
during the year
|
|
$
|
14,928
|
|
|
$
|
(5,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,703
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(559
|
)
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
14,369
|
|
|
|
(5,029
|
)
|
|
|
9,340
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
6,286
|
|
|
|
(2,200
|
)
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
20,655
|
|
|
$
|
(7,229
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from December 18,
2003
|
|
|
|
through December 31,
2003
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising
during the period
|
|
$
|
3,168
|
|
|
$
|
(1,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains realized in net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
|
(1,109
|
)
|
|
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
3,168
|
|
|
$
|
(1,109
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from January 1,
2003
|
|
|
|
through January 17,
2003
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising
during the period
|
|
$
|
30,853
|
|
|
$
|
(10,798
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,055
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(31,506
|
)
|
|
|
11,027
|
|
|
|
(20,479
|
)
|
Unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
(653
|
)
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
(424
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
6,565
|
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
4,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
5,912
|
|
|
$
|
(2,069
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-29
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
19. Quarterly
Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
84,404
|
|
|
$
|
131,335
|
|
|
$
|
96,787
|
|
|
$
|
97,676
|
|
|
$
|
410,202
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
82,609
|
|
|
|
113,305
|
|
|
|
92,331
|
|
|
|
92,809
|
|
|
|
381,054
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
52,633
|
|
|
|
61,907
|
|
|
|
54,794
|
|
|
|
55,235
|
|
|
|
224,569
|
|
Net investment income and net
realized gains
|
|
|
27,558
|
|
|
|
28,389
|
|
|
|
30,117
|
|
|
|
31,109
|
|
|
|
117,173
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
595
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
80,617
|
|
|
|
90,386
|
|
|
|
85,313
|
|
|
|
86,021
|
|
|
|
342,337
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(2,611
|
)
|
|
|
(3,066
|
)
|
|
|
20,693
|
|
|
|
3,490
|
|
|
|
18,506
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
71,100
|
|
|
|
81,377
|
|
|
|
48,783
|
|
|
|
70,274
|
|
|
|
271,534
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
53,306
|
|
|
|
59,992
|
|
|
|
39,407
|
|
|
|
53,721
|
|
|
|
206,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
56,395
|
|
|
$
|
106,457
|
|
|
$
|
87,869
|
|
|
$
|
72,854
|
|
|
$
|
323,575
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
53,649
|
|
|
|
105,645
|
|
|
|
87,072
|
|
|
|
67,512
|
|
|
|
313,878
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
31,202
|
|
|
|
53,151
|
|
|
|
49,760
|
|
|
|
40,836
|
|
|
|
174,949
|
|
Net investment income and net
realized gains
|
|
|
24,198
|
|
|
|
22,611
|
|
|
|
24,466
|
|
|
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
98,268
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
55,717
|
|
|
|
76,002
|
|
|
|
74,343
|
|
|
|
67,891
|
|
|
|
273,953
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
(1,070
|
)
|
|
|
6,725
|
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
5,922
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
48,208
|
|
|
|
64,839
|
|
|
|
56,713
|
|
|
|
55,759
|
|
|
|
225,519
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
38,304
|
|
|
|
48,393
|
|
|
|
41,954
|
|
|
|
41,435
|
|
|
|
170,086
|
|
III-30
Financial
Statements
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
March 31,
2006
III-31
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Financial
Statements
March 31,
2006
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-33
|
|
|
|
|
III-34
|
|
|
|
|
III-35
|
|
|
|
|
III-36
|
|
III-32
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities,
available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost of $3,355,155
in 2006 and $3,277,291 in 2005)
|
|
$
|
3,302,181
|
|
|
$
|
3,258,738
|
|
Variable interest entity fixed
maturity securities, held to maturity at amortized cost
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
151,806
|
|
|
|
159,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
4,203,987
|
|
|
|
3,418,072
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
70,719
|
|
|
|
45,077
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
46,465
|
|
|
|
42,576
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on losses
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
112,546
|
|
|
|
110,636
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
72,754
|
|
|
|
63,330
|
|
Receivable from related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,539
|
|
Property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation of $1,151 in 2006 and $885 in 2005
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
3,092
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
17,637
|
|
|
|
10,354
|
|
Federal income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,529,300
|
|
|
$
|
3,708,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
$
|
1,226,597
|
|
|
$
|
1,201,163
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
50,228
|
|
|
|
54,812
|
|
Ceded reinsurance balances payable
|
|
|
3,968
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
20,229
|
|
|
|
36,359
|
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
19,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
4,328
|
|
|
|
4,262
|
|
Variable interest entity floating
rate notes
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued investment income -
variable interest entity
|
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes payable
|
|
|
16,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
29,350
|
|
|
|
42,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,121,826
|
|
|
|
1,340,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value
$1,500 per share; 10,000 shares authorized, issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,896,460
|
|
|
|
1,894,983
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss, net of tax
|
|
|
(33,750
|
)
|
|
|
(13,597
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
529,763
|
|
|
|
471,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,407,473
|
|
|
$
|
2,367,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
4,529,300
|
|
|
$
|
3,708,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited interim financial
statements.
III-33
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
89,281
|
|
|
$
|
84,404
|
|
Ceded premiums written
|
|
|
(6,423
|
)
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
82,858
|
|
|
|
82,609
|
|
Increase in net unearned premiums
|
|
|
(23,394
|
)
|
|
|
(29,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
59,464
|
|
|
|
52,633
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
32,319
|
|
|
|
27,440
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Net mark to market losses on
credit derivative contracts
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
92,091
|
|
|
|
80,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(1,933
|
)
|
|
|
(2,611
|
)
|
Underwriting expenses
|
|
|
24,117
|
|
|
|
20,650
|
|
Policy acquisition cost deferred
|
|
|
(12,513
|
)
|
|
|
(10,671
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
14,518
|
|
|
|
9,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
77,573
|
|
|
|
71,100
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
18,862
|
|
|
|
17,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
58,711
|
|
|
$
|
53,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited interim financial
statements.
III-34
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
58,711
|
|
|
$
|
53,306
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy
acquisition costs
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
Policy acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
(12,513
|
)
|
|
|
(10,671
|
)
|
Depreciation of property and
equipment
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Amortization of fixed maturity
securities
|
|
|
8,314
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
Amortization of short-term
investments
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Amortization of stock compensation
expense
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accrued investment
income, prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(11,251
|
)
|
|
|
(6,716
|
)
|
Change in
mark-to-market
losses on credit derivative contracts
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in reinsurance receivable
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Change in prepaid reinsurance
premiums
|
|
|
(1,910
|
)
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
Change in unearned premiums
|
|
|
25,434
|
|
|
|
25,593
|
|
Change in losses and loss
adjustment expenses
|
|
|
(4,584
|
)
|
|
|
(3,183
|
)
|
Change in receivable from related
parties
|
|
|
9,539
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
Change in ceded reinsurance
balances payable and accounts payable and accrued expenses and
other liabilities
|
|
|
(12,763
|
)
|
|
|
(10,936
|
)
|
Change in current federal income
taxes receivable
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in current federal income
taxes payable
|
|
|
16,585
|
|
|
|
12,676
|
|
Change in deferred federal income
taxes
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
4,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
83,951
|
|
|
|
82,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and maturities of fixed
maturity securities
|
|
|
34,741
|
|
|
|
68,181
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity
securities
|
|
|
(120,095
|
)
|
|
|
(166,715
|
)
|
Purchases, sales and maturities of
short-term investments, net
|
|
|
7,528
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Receivable for securities sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Payable for securities purchased
|
|
|
19,366
|
|
|
|
9,320
|
|
Purchases of fixed assets
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(58,484
|
)
|
|
|
(89,449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
|
25,642
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
|
|
45,077
|
|
|
|
69,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of period
|
|
$
|
70,719
|
|
|
$
|
70,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited interim financial
statements.
III-35
|
|
1.
|
Business
and Organization
|
Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (the Company)
is a wholly owned subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (FGIC
Corp.). The Company provides financial guaranty insurance
and other forms of credit enhancement for public finance and
structured finance obligations. The Company began insuring
public finance obligations in 1984 and structured finance
obligations in 1988. The Companys financial strength is
rated Aaa by Moodys Investors Service, Inc.,
AAA by Standard & Poors Rating
Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and
AAA by Fitch Ratings, Inc. The Company is licensed
to engage in writing financial guaranty insurance in all
50 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and, through a
branch, the United Kingdom. In addition, a United Kingdom
subsidiary of the Company is authorized to write financial
guaranty business in the United Kingdom and has passport rights
to write business in other European Union member countries.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
balances have been eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) for interim financial information.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2006. These unaudited interim consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005, including accompanying notes.
Certain 2005 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
2006 presentation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
|
|
3.
|
Review of
Financial Guaranty Industry Accounting Practices
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
staff is considering whether additional accounting guidance is
necessary to address loss reserving and certain other practices
in the financial guaranty industry. Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 60,
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises, was
developed prior to the emergence of the financial guaranty
industry. As it does not specifically address financial guaranty
contracts, there has been diversity in the accounting for these
contracts. In 2005, the FASB added a project to consider
accounting by providers of financial guaranty insurance. The
objective of the project is to develop an accounting model for
financial guaranty contracts issued by insurance companies that
are not accounted for as derivative contracts under
SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities. The goal of this project
is to develop a single model for all industry participants to
apply.
The FASB is expected to issue proposed and final pronouncements
on this matter in 2006. When the FASB issues a final
pronouncement, the Company, along with other companies in the
financial guaranty industry, may be required to change certain
aspects of accounting for loss reserves, premium income and
deferred acquisition costs. It is not possible to predict the
impact the FASBs review may have on the Companys
accounting practices.
III-36
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
When an obligation insured by the Company is refunded prior to
the end of the expected policy coverage period, any remaining
unearned premium is recognized. A refunding occurs when an
insured obligation is called or legally defeased prior to the
stated maturity. Premiums earned for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 include $7,311 and $15,539,
respectively, related to the accelerated recognition of unearned
premiums in connection with refundings.
|
|
6.
|
Loss and
Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
|
Loss reserves and loss adjustment expenses are regularly
reviewed and updated based on claim payments and the results of
ongoing surveillance. The Companys insured portfolio
surveillance is designed to identify impaired obligations and
thereby provide a materially complete recognition of losses for
each accounting period. The reserves are necessarily based upon
estimates and subjective judgments about the outcome of future
events, and actual results will likely differ from these
estimates. At March 31, 2006, the Company had case reserves
of $30,278, credit watchlist reserves of $18,603 and an
unallocated loss adjustment expense reserve of $1,347.
At December 31, 2005, the Company had case reserves of
$31,981, credit watchlist reserves of $21,484 and a loss
adjustment expense reserve of $1,347.
Case reserves and credit watchlist reserves at March 31,
2006 included $6,855 and $12,672, respectively, of estimated
losses related to obligations impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Case reserves and credit watchlist reserves at December 31,
2005 included $8,511 and $13,322, respectively, of estimated
losses related to obligations impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Given the unprecedented nature of the events and magnitude of
damage in the affected areas, the loss reserves were necessarily
based upon estimates and subjective judgments about the outcome
of future events, including without limitation the amount and
timing of any future federal and state aid. The loss reserves
will likely be adjusted as additional information becomes
available, and such adjustments may have a material impact on
future results of operations. However, the Company believes that
the losses ultimately incurred as result of Hurricane Katrina
will not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial position.
The Companys effective federal corporate tax rates of
24.3% and 25.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively, were less than the statutory corporate
tax rate (35%) on income due to permanent differences between
financial and taxable income, principally tax-exempt interest.
Net premiums earned are shown net of ceded premiums earned of
$4,868 and $6,200 for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005, respectively.
|
|
9.
|
Variable
Interest Entities
|
Financial Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities
(FIN 46-R),
provides accounting and disclosure rules for determining whether
certain entities should be consolidated in the Companys
consolidated financial statements. An entity is subject to
FIN 46-R,
and is called a variable interest entity (VIE), if
it has (i) equity that is insufficient to permit the entity
to finance its activities without additional subordinated
financial support or (ii) equity investors that cannot make
significant decisions about the entitys operations or that
do not absorb the majority of expected losses or receive the
majority of expected residual returns of the entity. A VIE is
consolidated by its primary beneficiary, which is the party that
has a majority of the VIEs expected losses or a
III-37
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
9.
|
Variable
Interest Entities (continued)
|
majority of its expected residual returns, or both.
Additionally,
FIN 46-R
requires disclosures for companies that have either a primary or
significant variable interest in a VIE. All other entities not
considered VIEs are evaluated for consolidation under
SFAS No. 94, Consolidation of all Majority-Owned
Subsidiaries.
As part of its structured finance business, the Company insures
debt obligations or certificates issued by special purpose
entities. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company
consolidated a third party VIE as a result of financial
guarantees provided by the Company on one transaction related to
the securitization of life insurance reserves. This third party
VIE had assets of $750,000 and an equal amount of liabilities at
March 31, 2006, which are shown under
AssetsVariable interest entity fixed maturity
securities, held to maturity at amortized cost and
LiabilitiesVariable interest entity floating rate
notes, respectively, on the Companys consolidated
balance sheet at March 31, 2006. In addition, accrued
investment income includes $1,176 related to the variable
interest entity fixed income maturity securities and the
corresponding liability is shown under Accrued investment
expense-variable interest entity on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2006. Although the
third party VIE is included in the consolidated financial
statements, its creditors do not have recourse to the general
assets of the Company outside of the financial guaranty policy
provided to the VIE. The Company has evaluated its other
structured finance transactions and does not believe any of the
third party entities involved in these transactions requires
consolidation or disclosure under
FIN 46-R.
FGIC has arranged the issuance of contingent preferred trust
securities by a group of special purpose trusts. Each Trust is
solely responsible for its obligations, and has been established
for the purpose of entering into a put agreement with FGIC that
obligates the Trusts, at FGICs discretion, to purchase
Perpetual Preferred Stock of FGIC. The purpose of this
arrangement is to provide capital support to FGIC by allowing it
to obtain immediate access to new capital at its sole discretion
at any time through the exercise of the put options. These
trusts are considered VIEs under
FIN 46-R.
However, the Company is not considered a primary beneficiary and
therefore is not required to consolidate the trusts.
|
|
9.
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
The Company provides credit default swaps (CDSs) to
certain buyers of credit protection by entering into contracts
that reference collateralized debt obligations from cash and
synthetic structures backed by pools of corporate, consumer or
structured finance debt. It also offers credit protection on
public finance and structured finance obligations in CDS form.
The Company considers these agreements to be a normal extension
of its financial guaranty insurance business, although they are
considered derivatives for accounting purposes. These agreements
are recorded at fair value. The Company believes that the most
meaningful presentation of the financial statement impact of
these derivatives is to reflect premiums as installments are
received, and to record losses and loss adjustment expenses and
changes in fair value as incurred. The Company recorded $4,235
of net earned premium, $0 in losses and loss adjustment
expenses, and net
mark-to-market
losses of $228 in changes in fair value under these agreements
for the three months ended March 31, 2006. The gains or
losses recognized by recording these contracts at fair value are
determined each quarter based on quoted market prices, if
available. If quoted market prices are not available, the
determination of fair value is based on internally developed
estimates. The
inception-to-date
mark-to-market
gain and (loss) on the CDS portfolio were $890 and $(1,831) at
March 31, 2006 and $545 and ($712) at December 31,
2005, recorded in other assets and in other liabilities,
respectively. The Company did not enter into any CDS contracts
during the three months ended March 31, 2005.
III-38
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
10.
|
Stock
Compensation Plan
|
Employees of the Company participate in a stock incentive plan
that provides for stock-based compensation, including stock
options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock units of
FGIC Corp. Stock options are granted for a fixed number of
shares with an exercise price equal to or greater than the fair
value of the shares at the date of the grant. Restricted stock
awards and restricted stock units are valued at the fair value
of the stock on the grant date, with no cost to the grantee.
Prior to January 1, 2006, FGIC Corp. and the Company
accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement
provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations, as
permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. No stock-based employee
compensation cost related to stock options was allocated to the
Company by FGIC Corp. for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2005, as all options granted through that date
had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. For grants of
restricted stock and restricted stock units to employees of the
Company, unearned compensation, equivalent to the fair value of
the shares at the date of grant, is allocated to the Company.
Effective January 1, 2006, the FGIC Corp. and the Company
adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, using the
modified-prospective-transition method. Under that transition
method, compensation cost allocated to the Company for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2006 included
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to,
but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R). Results for prior periods have not
been restated. As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R)
effective January 1, 2006, the Companys income before
income taxes and net income for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2006 were reduced by $1,308 and $850,
respectively, than if it had continued to account for
share-based compensation under Opinion 25.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income of the
Company if the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to options granted under
the Companys plan for all periods presented. For purposes
of this pro forma disclosure, the value of the options is
estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula
and amortized to expense over the options vesting periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
Net Income, as reported
|
|
$
|
53,306
|
|
Add: Stock-based director
compensation expense included in reported net income, net of
related tax effects
|
|
|
20
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value-based method
for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income
|
|
$
|
52,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-39
Financial
Guaranty Insurance Company and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
Unaudited
(Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss of the Company consists of
net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, foreign
currency translation adjustments and a cash flow hedge. The
components of total comprehensive income for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
58,711
|
|
|
$
|
53,306
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(20,153
|
)
|
|
|
(32,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
38,558
|
|
|
$
|
21,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of other comprehensive loss for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising
during the period
|
|
$
|
(31,497
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,022
|
|
|
$
|
(20,475
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(31,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,850
|
|
|
$
|
(20,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding losses arising
during the period
|
|
$
|
(48,536
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,988
|
|
|
$
|
(31,548
|
)
|
Less reclassification adjustment
for gains realized in net income
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on investments
|
|
|
(48,654
|
)
|
|
|
17,029
|
|
|
|
(31,625
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
|
|
(918
|
)
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(597
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(49,572
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,350
|
|
|
$
|
(32,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
III-40
PROSPECTUS
CONTINENTAL AIRLINES,
INC.
Pass Through
Certificates
This prospectus relates to pass through certificates to be
issued by one or more trusts that we will form, as creator of
each pass through trust, with a national or state bank or trust
company, as trustee. The trustee will hold all property owned by
a trust for the benefit of holders of pass through certificates
issued by that trust. Each pass through certificate issued by a
trust will represent a beneficial interest in all property held
by that trust.
We will describe the specific terms of any offering of pass
through certificates in a prospectus supplement to this
prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the applicable
prospectus supplement carefully before you invest.
This prospectus may not be used to consummate sales of pass
through certificates unless accompanied by a prospectus
supplement.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this prospectus is April 10, 2006.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This prospectus, any prospectus supplement delivered with this
prospectus and the documents we incorporate by reference may
contain statements that constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include any
statements that predict, forecast, indicate or imply future
results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words
believe, anticipate, expect,
estimate, project, will be,
will continue, will result, or words or
phrases of similar meaning.
Any such forward-looking statements are not assurances of future
performance and involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results
may vary materially from anticipated results for a number of
reasons, including those stated in our SEC reports incorporated
in this prospectus by reference or as stated in a prospectus
supplement to this prospectus under the caption Risk
Factors.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. You may read and copy this information at the
Public Reference Room of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
(800) SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an internet world wide web site that
contains reports, proxy statements and other information about
issuers, like us, who file reports electronically with the SEC.
The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-3,
which registers the securities that we may offer under this
prospectus. The registration statement, including the exhibits
and schedules thereto, contains additional relevant information
about us and the securities offered.
INCORPORATION
OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS BY REFERENCE
The SEC allows us to incorporate by reference information into
this prospectus. This means that we can disclose important
information to you by referring you to another document filed
separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by
reference is considered to be part of this prospectus, except
for any information that is superseded by subsequent
incorporated documents or by information that is included
directly in this prospectus or any prospectus supplement.
1
This prospectus incorporates by reference the documents listed
below that we previously have filed with the SEC and that are
not delivered with this prospectus. They contain important
information about our company and its financial condition.
|
|
|
Filing
|
|
Date Filed
|
|
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
February 28, 2006
|
Amendment No. 1 to Annual
Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2005
|
|
March 13, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
January 4, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
January 30, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
February 1, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
February 2, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
March 2, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
Current Report on
Form 8-K
|
|
April 4, 2006
|
Our SEC file number is 1-10323.
We incorporate by reference additional documents that we may
file with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act (excluding any information
furnished under Items 2.02 or 7.01 in any Current Report on
Form 8-K)
between the date of this prospectus and the termination of the
offering of securities under this prospectus. These documents
include our periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as our proxy statements.
You may obtain any of these incorporated documents from us
without charge, excluding any exhibits to those documents unless
the exhibit is specifically incorporated by reference in such
document. You may obtain documents incorporated by reference in
this prospectus by requesting them from us in writing or by
telephone at the following address:
Continental Airlines, Inc.
1600 Smith Street, Dept. HQSEO
Houston, Texas 77002
Attention: Secretary
(713) 324-2950.
RATIO OF
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
The ratio of our earnings to our fixed
charges for the year 2003 was 1.14. For the years 2001,
2002, 2004 and 2005, earnings were inadequate to
cover fixed charges, and the coverage deficiency was
$161 million in 2001, $658 million in 2002,
$490 million in 2004 and $102 million in 2005.
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges is based on continuing
operations. For purposes of the ratio, earnings
means the sum of:
|
|
|
|
|
our pre-tax income (loss) adjusted for undistributed income of
companies in which we have a minority equity interest; and
|
|
|
|
our fixed charges, net of interest capitalized.
|
Fixed charges represent:
|
|
|
|
|
the interest expense we record on borrowed funds;
|
|
|
|
the amount we amortize for debt discount, premium and issuance
expense and interest previously capitalized; and
|
|
|
|
that portion of rentals considered to be representative of the
interest expense.
|
2
LEGAL
OPINIONS
Unless otherwise indicated in the applicable prospectus
supplement, our counsel, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New
York, New York, will render an opinion with respect to the
validity of the certificates being offered by such prospectus
supplement.
EXPERTS
Our consolidated financial statements and schedule appearing in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, and our
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005
included therein, and the consolidated financial statements of
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc. appearing in the exhibits to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, and ExpressJet
Holdings, Inc.s managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005 included therein, have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in its reports thereon, which are
incorporated by reference herein. Our financial statements and
managements assessment and ExpressJet Holdings,
Inc.s financial statements and managements
assessment are incorporated by reference in reliance upon such
reports given on the authority of Ernst & Young LLP as
experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Copa Holdings, S.A.
appearing in the exhibits to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been audited by
Ernst & Young, Panama, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in its report thereon, which is
incorporated by reference herein. The financial statements of
Copa Holdings, S.A. are incorporated by reference in reliance
upon such reports given on the authority of Ernst &
Young, Panama as experts in accounting and auditing.
3
$320,000,000
2006-1
PASS THROUGH TRUSTS
PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
SERIES 2006-1
PROSPECTUS
SUPPLEMENT
May , 2006
MORGAN
STANLEY