UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22323
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Kevin J. McCarthy
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 917-7700
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2012
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.
LIFE IS COMPLEX.
Nuveen makes things e-simple.
It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you’ll receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Fund information is ready. No more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you wish.
Free e-Reports right to your e-mail!
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements from your financial advisor or brokerage account.
OR
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements directly from Nuveen.
Table of Contents
|
Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders
|
4
|
|
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
|
5
|
|
Fund Leverage and Other Information
|
11
|
|
Dividend and Price Information
|
13
|
|
Performance Overviews
|
15
|
|
Shareholder Meeting Report
|
19
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
20
|
|
Portfolios of Investments
|
21
|
|
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
|
59
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
60
|
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
|
61
|
|
Financial Highlights
|
64
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
68
|
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement Approval Process
|
79
|
|
Board Members and Officers
|
89
|
|
Reinvest Automatically, Easily and Conveniently
|
94
|
|
Glossary of Terms Used in this Report
|
96
|
|
Additional Fund Information
|
99
|
Chairman’s
Letter to Shareholders
Dear Shareholders,
Investors have many reasons to remain cautious. The challenges in the Euro area continue to cast a shadow over global economies and financial markets. The political support for addressing fiscal issues is eroding as the economic and social impacts become more visible. Despite strong action by the European Central Bank, member nations appear unwilling to surrender sufficient sovereignty to unify the Euro area financial system or strengthen its banks. The gains made in reducing deficits, and the hard-won progress on winning popular acceptance of the need for economic austerity, are at risk. To their credit, European political leaders press on to find compromise solutions, but there is increasing concern that time is running out.
In the U.S., the extended period of increasing corporate earnings that enabled the equity markets to withstand the downward pressures coming from weakening job creation and slower economic growth appears to be coming to an end. The Fed remains committed to low interest rates and announced a third phase of quantitative easing (QE3) scheduled to continue until mid-2015. The recent election results have removed a major element of uncertainty in the U.S. political picture, but it remains to be seen whether the outcome will reduce the highly partisan atmosphere in Congress and enable progress on the many pressing fiscal and budgetary issues that must be resolved in the coming months.
During the last twelve months, U.S. investors have experienced a solid recovery in the domestic equity markets with increasing volatility as the “fiscal cliff” approaches. The experienced investment teams at Nuveen keep their eye on a longer time horizon and use their practiced investment disciplines to negotiate through market peaks and valleys to achieve long-term goals for investors. Experienced professionals pursue investments that will weather short-term volatility and at the same time, seek opportunities that are created by markets that overreact to negative developments. Monitoring this process is an important consideration for the Fund Board as it oversees your Nuveen Fund on your behalf.
As always, I encourage you to contact your financial consultant if you have any questions about your investment in a Nuveen Fund. On behalf of the other members of your Fund Board, we look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the months and years ahead.
Sincerely,
Robert P. Bremner
Chairman of the Board
December 20, 2012
|
4
|
Nuveen Investments
|
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (NUV)
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW)
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI)
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (NEV)
Portfolio managers Tom Spalding, Chris Drahn and Steve Hlavin discuss U.S. economic and municipal market conditions, key investment strategies and the twelve-month performance of these four national Funds. Tom has managed NUV since its inception in 1987, adding NUW at its inception in 2009, Chris assumed portfolio management responsibility for NMI in January 2011 and Steve has been involved in the management of NEV since its inception in 2009, taking on full portfolio management responsibility for this Fund in 2010.
What factors affected the U.S. economy and municipal market during the twelve-month reporting period ended October 31, 2012?
During this period, the U.S. economy’s progress toward recovery from recession continued at a moderate pace. The Federal Reserve (Fed) maintained its efforts to improve the overall economic environment by holding the benchmark fed funds rate at the record low level of zero to 0.25% that it established in December 2008. Subsequent to the reporting period, the central bank decided during its December 2012 meeting to keep the fed funds rate at “exceptionally low levels” until either the unemployment rate reaches 6.5% or expected inflation goes above 2.5%. The Fed also affirmed its decision, announced in September 2012, to purchase $40 billion of mortgage-backed securities each month in an effort to stimulate the housing market. In addition to this new, open-ended stimulus program, the Fed plans to continue its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities through the end of December 2012. The goals of these actions, which together will increase the Fed’s holdings of longer-term securities by approximately $85 billion a month through the end of the year, are to put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, make broader financial conditions more accommodative and support a stronger economic recovery as well as continued progress toward the Fed’s mandates of maximum employment and price stability.
In the third quarter 2012, the U.S. economy, as measured by the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), grew at an annualized rate of 2.7%, up from 1.3% in the second quarter, marking 13 consecutive quarters of positive growth. The Consumer Price Index (CPI)
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements. Discussions of specific investments are for illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein, are those of the portfolio managers as of the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The Funds disclaim any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
5
|
rose 2.2% year-over-year as of October 2012, while the core CPI (which excludes food and energy) increased 2.0% during the period, staying just within the Fed’s unofficial objective of 2.0% or lower for this inflation measure. As of November 2012 (subsequent to this reporting period), the national unemployment rate was 7.7%, the lowest unemployment rate since December 2008 and below the 8.7% level recorded in November 2011. The slight decrease in unemployment from 7.9% in October 2012 was primarily due to workers who are no longer counted as part of the workforce. The housing market, long a major weak spot in the economic recovery, showed signs of improvement, with the average home price in the S&P/Case-Shiller Index of 20 major metropolitan areas rising 3.0% for the twelve months ended September 2012 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared). This marked the largest annual percentage gain for the index since July 2010, although housing prices continued to be off approximately 30% from their mid-2006 peak. The outlook for the U.S. economy remained clouded by uncertainty about global financial markets as well as the impending “fiscal cliff,” the combination of tax increases and spending cuts scheduled to take effect beginning January 2013 and their potential impact on the economy.
Municipal bond prices generally rallied during this period, as strong demand and tight supply combined to create favorable market conditions for municipal bonds. Although the total volume of tax-exempt supply improved over that of the same period a year earlier, the issuance pattern remained light compared with long-term historical trends and new money issuance was relatively flat. This supply/demand dynamic served as a key driver of performance. Concurrent with rising prices, yields continued to decline across most maturities, especially at the longer end of the municipal yield curve and the curve flattened. In addition to the lingering effects of the Build America Bonds (BAB) program, which expired at the end of 2010 but impacted issuance well into 2012, the low level of municipal issuance reflected the current political distaste for additional borrowing by state and local governments facing fiscal constraints and the prevalent atmosphere of municipal budget austerity. During this period, we saw an increased number of borrowers come to market seeking to take advantage of the low rate environment through refunding activity, with approximately 60% of municipal paper issued by borrowers that were calling existing debt and refinancing at lower rates.
Over the twelve months ended October 31, 2012, municipal bond issuance nationwide totaled $379.6 billion, an increase of 18.6% over the issuance for the twelve-month period ended October 31, 2011. As previously discussed, the majority of this increase was attributable to refunding issues, rather than new money issuance. During this period, demand for municipal bonds remained consistently strong, especially from individual investors (as evidenced in part by flows into mutual funds) and also from banks and crossover buyers such as hedge funds.
|
6
|
Nuveen Investments
|
What key strategies were used to manage these Funds during this twelvemonth reporting period ended October 31, 2012?
In an environment characterized by tight supply, strong demand and lower yields, we continued to take a bottom-up approach to discovering sectors that appeared undervalued as well as individual credits that had the potential to perform well over the long term. During this period, NUV and NUW found value in health care and broad-based essential services bonds backed by taxes or other revenues. We also purchased tobacco credits when we found attractive valuation levels, which resulted in an increase in our allocation to these bonds, especially in NUW. NMI also emphasized health care bonds, as we increased our exposure to this sector over this period. In NEV, we added several corporate-backed, or industrial development revenue (IDR), credits, including bonds issued for Georgia-Pacific, Elizabeth River Crossing in Virginia, Anheuser Busch sewage facilities in New Jersey and Salt Verde Financial Corporation in Arizona for Citicorp-backed prepaid gas contracts.
During this period, each of these Funds took steps to enhance its positioning relative to risk, including credit risk and interest rate risk. In NUV and NUW, this involved purchasing higher credit quality bonds, with the goal of positioning the Funds slightly more defensively. NMI also increased its credit quality by slightly adding to weightings in higher grade bonds when reinvestment needs arose from calls and maturities. Our efforts in this area were based on the attractive values offered in higher quality sectors during this period and our belief that these Funds were already well positioned in the lower quality sectors. In NEV, we worked to reduce the interest rate risk of the Fund by allowing its duration to migrate lower until it was positioned neutrally relative to its benchmark. This was accomplished by taking advantage of opportunities to reinvest the proceeds from sales, bond calls, and matured bonds in segments of the yield curve other than the long end.
In NUV, NUW and NMI, cash for new purchases was generated primarily by the proceeds from an increased number of bond calls resulting from the growth in refinanc-ings. During this period, we worked to redeploy these proceeds as well as those from maturing bonds to keep the Funds as fully invested as possible. As the newest Fund, NEV had fewer maturing bonds and bond calls, especially during the second half of this period and trading activity was relatively light. Overall, selling in all of the Funds was rather limited because the bonds in our portfolios generally offered higher yields than those available in the current marketplace.
As of October 31, 2012, all four of these Funds continued to use inverse floating rate securities. We employ inverse floaters for a variety of reasons, including duration management and income and total return enhancement. As part of our duration management strategies, NEV also invested in forward interest rates swaps to help reduce the duration of the Fund’s portfolio. During this period, interest rates declined
|
Nuveen Investments
|
7
|
and therefore these swaps had a mildly negative impact on performance. These swaps remained in place at period end.
How did the Funds perform during the twelve-month period ended October 31, 2012?
Individual results for these Funds, as well as relevant index and peer group information, are presented in the accompanying table.
Average Annual Total Returns on Net Asset Value
For periods ended 10/31/12
|
Fund
|
1-Year
|
5-Year
|
10-Year
|
|||||||
|
NUV
|
12.62
|
%
|
5.68
|
%
|
5.63
|
%
|
||||
|
NMI
|
14.05
|
%
|
7.04
|
%
|
6.21
|
%
|
||||
|
S&P Municipal Bond Index**
|
9.56
|
%
|
5.83
|
%
|
5.35
|
%
|
||||
|
Lipper General & Insured Unleveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average**
|
12.81
|
%
|
5.48
|
%
|
5.11
|
%
|
||||
|
Fund
|
1-Year
|
Since
Inception*
|
|||||
|
NUW
|
13.23
|
%
|
11.79
|
%
|
|||
|
S&P Municipal Bond Index**
|
9.56
|
%
|
5.19
|
%
|
|||
|
Lipper General & Insured Unleveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average**
|
12.81
|
%
|
11.86
|
%
|
|||
|
NEV***
|
20.67
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
|||
|
S&P Municipal Bond Index**
|
9.56
|
%
|
6.19
|
%
|
|||
|
Lipper General & Insured Leveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average**
|
18.77
|
%
|
10.05
|
%
|
|||
For the twelve months ended October 31, 2012, the total returns on net asset value (NAV) for NUV, NUW and NMI exceeded the return on the S&P Municipal Bond Index. NUW and NMI also outperformed the average return for the Lipper General & Insured Unleveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average, while NUV trailed this Lipper average by a narrow margin. For the same period, NEV outperformed the S&P Municipal Bond Index and the Lipper General & Insured Leveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average.
Key management factors that influenced the Funds’ returns during this period included duration and yield curve positioning, the use of derivatives in NEV, credit exposure and sector allocation. In addition, NEV’s use of leverage was an important positive factor in its performance during this period. Leverage is discussed in more detail later in this report.
In an environment of declining rates and a flattening yield curve, municipal bonds with longer maturities generally outperformed those with shorter maturities during this
|
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown.Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares.
|
|
|
For additional information, see the Performance Overview Page for your Fund in this report.
|
|
|
*
|
Since inception returns for NUW and NEV and their comparative index and benchmarks are from 2/25/09 and 9/25/09, respectively.
|
|
**
|
Refer to Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for definitions. Indexes and Lipper averages are not available for direct investment.
|
|
***
|
NEV is a leveraged Fund through investments in inverse floating rate securities, as discussed later in this report. The remaining three Funds in this report use inverse floating rate securities primarily for duration management and both income and total return enhancement.
|
|
8
|
Nuveen Investments
|
period. Overall, credits at the longest end of the municipal yield curve posted the strongest returns, while bonds at the shortest end produced the weakest results. For this period, duration and yield curve positioning was a major positive contributor to the performance of these Funds. Overall, NEV was the most advantageously positioned in terms of duration and yield curve, with the longest duration among these Funds. All of the Funds tended to be overweight in the longer segments of the yield curve that performed well and underweight at the shorter end of the curve that underperformed. In particular, the Funds benefited from their holdings of long duration bonds, many of which had zero percent coupons, which generally outperformed the market. During this period, NUV, NUW and NMI were overweight in zero coupon bonds.
Although NEV benefited from its longer duration, this Fund used forward interest rate swaps to reduce duration and moderate interest rate risk, as previously described. Because the interest rate swaps were used to hedge against a potential rise in interest rates, the swaps performed poorly as interest rates fell. This had a negative impact on NEV’s total return performance for the period, which was offset by the Fund’s overall duration and yield curve positioning and the strong performance of its municipal bond holdings.
Credit exposure was another important factor in the Funds’ performance during these twelve months, as lower quality bonds generally outperformed higher quality bonds. This outperformance was due in part to the greater demand for lower rated bonds as investors looked for investment vehicles offering higher yields. As investors became more comfortable taking on additional investment risk, credit spreads or the difference in yield spreads between U.S. Treasury securities and comparable investments such as municipal bonds, narrowed through a variety of rating categories. As a result of this spread compression, all of these Funds benefited from their holdings of lower rated credits, especially NMI, which held the largest allocation of bonds rated BBB and the fewest combined AAA and AA bonds. Heavier weightings of AAA bonds in NUV and AA bonds in NEV detracted from these Funds’ performance, although this was offset to a large degree in NEV by the Fund’s strong exposure to non-rated and subinvestment grade credits.
During this period, revenue bonds as a whole outperformed the general municipal market. Holdings that generally made positive contributions to the Funds’ returns included health care (together with hospitals), transportation, education, water and sewer and IDR bonds. All of these Funds benefited from their overweighting in health care, with NUV and NUW having the heaviest weightings. In addition, NUV, NUW and NEV had good weightings in transportation, especially toll roads in NEV. NEV also was helped by its overweighting in higher education and IDRs. Tobacco credits backed by the 1998 master tobacco settlement agreement also performed extremely well, helped in part by their longer effective durations. These bonds also benefited from market developments, including increased demand for higher yielding investments by
|
Nuveen Investments
|
9
|
investors who had become less risk averse. In addition, based on recent data showing that cigarette sales had fallen less steeply than anticipated, the 46 states participating in the agreement stand to receive increased payments from the tobacco companies. As of October 31, 2012, all of these Funds, especially NUV and NUW, were overweight in tobacco bonds, which boosted their performance as tobacco credits rallied.
NEV’s performance also benefited from improvement in two distressed holdings: student housing revenue bonds issued by the Illinois Finance Authority for the Fullerton Village project at DePaul University in Chicago and insured sewer revenue bonds issued by Jefferson County, Alabama. Both of these issues recovered meaningfully from the price level at which they had been purchased, which was advantageous for the Fund’s performance.
In contrast, pre-refunded bonds, which are often backed by U.S. Treasury securities, were the poorest performing market segment during this period. The underperfor-mance of these bonds can be attributed primarily to their shorter effective maturities and higher credit quality. Although their exposure to pre-refunded bonds declined over this reporting period, NUV held a significantly heavier weighting of pre-refunded bonds than NMI. As newer Funds, NUW and NEV had substantially smaller allocations of pre-refunded bonds. General obligation (GO) bonds and housing and utilities (e.g., resource recovery, public power) credits also lagged the performance of the general municipal market for this period. All four of these Funds had relatively lighter exposures to GOs, which lessened the impact of these holdings.
Fund Policy Changes
On September 20, 2012, NUW’s Board of Trustees approved changes to the Fund’s investment policy regarding its practice of not investing in municipal securities that pay interest taxable under the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals (AMT Bonds). Effective October 15, 2012, the Fund’s investment policy was updated to state that the Fund will invest at least 80% of its managed assets in municipal securities that pay interest exempt from the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals (AMT). Concurrent with the investment policy changes, the Fund changed its name from Nuveen Municipal Value Fund 2 (NUW) to Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW).
|
10
|
Nuveen Investments
|
Fund Leverage and
Other Information
IMPACT OF THE FUNDS’ LEVERAGE STRATEGIES ON PERFORMANCE
One important factor impacting the returns of NEV, relative to its comparative index was its use of leverage. This was also a factor, although less significantly, for NUW, because its use of leverage is more modest and much less significantly for NUV and NMI, where the use of leverage is close to zero. The Fund’s use leverage because its managers believe that, over time, leveraging provides opportunities for additional income and total return for shareholders. However, use of leverage also can expose shareholders to additional volatility. For example, as the prices of securities held by the Fund decline, the negative impact of these valuation changes on net asset value and shareholder total return is magnified by the use of leverage. Conversely, leverage may enhance common share returns during periods when the prices of securities held by the Fund generally are rising. Leverage made a positive contribution to the performance of the Funds over this reporting period.
RISK CONSIDERATIONS
Fund shares are not guaranteed or endorsed by any bank or other insured depository institution, and are not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Fund common shares are subject to a variety of risks, including:
Investment and Market Risk. An investment in common shares is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. Your investment in common shares represents an indirect investment in the municipal securities owned by the Fund, which generally trade in the over-the-counter markets. Your common shares at any point in time may be worth less than your original investment, even after taking into account the reinvestment of Fund dividends and distributions.
Price Risk. Shares of closed-end investment companies like these Funds frequently trade at a discount to their NAV. Your common shares at any point in time may be worth less than your original investment, even after taking into account the reinvestment of Fund dividends and distributions.
Tax Risk. The tax treatment of Fund distributions may be affected by new IRS interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code and future changes in tax laws and regulations.
Issuer Credit Risk. This is the risk that a security in a Fund’s portfolio will fail to make dividend or interest payments when due.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
11
|
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income securities such as bonds, preferred, convertible and other debt securities will decline in value if market interest rates rise.
Reinvestment Risk. If market interest rates decline, income earned from a Fund’s portfolio may be reinvested at rates below that of the original bond that generated the income.
Call Risk or Prepayment Risk. Issuers may exercise their option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing a Fund to reinvest in lower-yielding securities.
Inverse Floater Risk. The Funds may invest in inverse floaters. Due to their leveraged nature, these investments can greatly increase a Fund’s exposure to interest rate risk and credit risk. In addition, investments in inverse floaters involve the risk that the Fund could lose more than its original principal investment.
Leverage Risk. Each Fund’s use of leverage creates the possibility of higher volatility for the Fund’s per share NAV, market price, distributions and returns. There is no assurance that a Fund’s leveraging strategy will be successful.
Derivatives Risk. The Funds may use derivative instruments which involve a high degree of financial risk, including the risk that the loss on a derivative may be greater than the principal amount investment.
|
12
|
Nuveen Investments
|
Dividend and
Price Information
DIVIDEND INFORMATION
During the twelve-month reporting period ended October 31, 2012, the monthly dividends of NMI and NEV remained stable throughout the period, while the dividend of NUV was reduced once, and the dividend of NUW was reduced twice.
Due to normal portfolio activity, shareholders of the following Funds received capital gains and/or net ordinary income distributions in December 2011 as follows:
|
Fund
|
Long-Term Capital Gains
(per share)
|
Short-Term Capital Gains
and/or Ordinary Income
(per share)
|
||||
|
NUV
|
$
|
0.0542
|
$
|
0.0111
|
||
|
NEV
|
—
|
$
|
0.0021
|
|||
All of the Funds in this report seek to pay stable dividends at rates that reflect each Fund’s past results and projected future performance. During certain periods, each Fund may pay dividends at a rate that may be more or less than the amount of net investment income actually earned by the Fund during the period. If a Fund has cumulatively earned more than it has paid in dividends, it holds the excess in reserve as undistributed net investment income (UNII) as part of the Fund’s NAV. Conversely, if a Fund has cumulatively paid dividends in excess of its earnings, the excess constitutes negative UNII that is likewise reflected in the Fund’s NAV. Each Fund will, over time, pay all of its net investment income as dividends to shareholders. As of October 31, 2012, all of the Funds in this report had positive UNII balances for both tax and financial reporting purposes.
SHARE REPURCHASES AND PRICE INFORMATION
Since the inception of the Funds’ repurchase programs, the Funds’ have not repurchased any of their outstanding shares.
As of October 31, 2012, and during the twelve-month reporting period, the Funds’ share prices were trading at (+) premiums or (-) discounts to their NAVs as shown in the accompanying table.
|
Fund
|
10/31/12
(+)Premium
|
Twelve-Month Average
(+)Premium/(-)Discount
|
|||||
|
NUV
|
(+)0.58
|
%
|
(+)0.90
|
%
|
|||
|
NUW
|
(+)4.95
|
%
|
(+)2.09
|
%
|
|||
|
NMI
|
(+)8.58
|
%
|
(+)5.23
|
%
|
|||
|
NEV
|
(+)2.15
|
%
|
(+)1.59
|
%
|
|||
|
Nuveen Investments
|
13
|
SHELF EQUITY PROGRAMS
NUV has filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) authorizing the Fund to issue additional shares through an equity shelf offering program. Under this equity shelf program, the Fund, subject to market conditions, may raise additional capital from time to time in varying amounts and offering methods at a net price at or above the Fund’s NAV per share.
As of October 31, 2012, NUV had cumulatively sold 4,978,008 shares.
During the twelve-month reporting period, the Fund sold shares through its shelf equity program at a weighted average premium to NAV per share as shown in the accompanying table.
|
Fund
|
Shares Sold through
Shelf Offering
|
Weighted Average
Premium to NAV
Per Share Sold
|
|||||
|
NUV
|
4,724,522
|
1.60
|
%
|
||||
On August 24, 2012, both NUW and NEV filed a registration statement with the SEC for an equity shelf offering, pursuant to which each Fund may issue additional shares. Each registration statement was declared effective subsequent to the close of this reporting period and each Fund is permitted to sell additional shares.
(Refer to Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 — General Information and Significant Accounting Policies for further details on the Funds’ Shelf Equity Programs.)
|
14
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
NUV
|
Nuveen Municipal
|
|
|
Performance
OVERVIEW
|
Value Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
as of October 31, 2012
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
|
Share Price
|
$
|
10.37
|
||
|
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$
|
10.31
|
||
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
0.58
|
%
|
||
|
Market Yield
|
4.28
|
%
|
||
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
5.94
|
%
|
||
|
Net Assets ($000)
|
$
|
2,105,323
|
||
|
Leverage
|
||||
|
Effective Leverage
|
1.81
|
%
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns
|
|||||||
|
(Inception 6/17/87)
|
|||||||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
||||||
|
1-Year
|
13.15
|
%
|
12.62
|
%
|
|||
|
5-Year
|
7.20
|
%
|
5.68
|
%
|
|||
|
10-Year
|
6.60
|
%
|
5.63
|
%
|
|||
|
States3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
California
|
14.4
|
%
|
||
|
Illinois
|
13.3
|
%
|
||
|
Texas
|
8.1
|
%
|
||
|
New York
|
5.9
|
%
|
||
|
Colorado
|
4.7
|
%
|
||
|
Washington
|
4.7
|
%
|
||
|
Florida
|
4.7
|
%
|
||
|
Michigan
|
4.2
|
%
|
||
|
Missouri
|
3.3
|
%
|
||
|
Ohio
|
3.2
|
%
|
||
|
Wisconsin
|
3.1
|
%
|
||
|
New Jersey
|
3.0
|
%
|
||
|
Louisiana
|
2.8
|
%
|
||
|
Puerto Rico
|
2.7
|
%
|
||
|
Indiana
|
2.3
|
%
|
||
|
South Carolina
|
2.1
|
%
|
||
|
Pennsylvania
|
1.6
|
%
|
||
|
Rhode Island
|
1.2
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
Health Care
|
22.5
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
20.7
|
%
|
||
|
U.S. Guaranteed
|
12.3
|
%
|
||
|
Transportation
|
10.2
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
10.1
|
%
|
||
|
Consumer Staples
|
7.4
|
%
|
||
|
Utilities
|
5.9
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
|
4
|
The Fund paid shareholders capital gains and net ordinary income distributions in December 2011 of $0.0653 per share.
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
15
|
|
NUW
|
Nuveen AMT-Free
|
|
|
Performance
OVERVIEW
|
Municipal Value Fund
|
|
|
as of October 31, 2012
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
|
Share Price
|
$
|
18.66
|
||
|
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$
|
17.78
|
||
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
4.95
|
%
|
||
|
Market Yield
|
4.31
|
%
|
||
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
5.99
|
%
|
||
|
Net Assets ($000)
|
$
|
231,140
|
||
|
Leverage
|
||||
|
Effective Leverage
|
7.10
|
%
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns
|
|||||||
|
(Inception 2/25/09)
|
|||||||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
||||||
|
1-Year
|
14.73
|
%
|
13.23
|
%
|
|||
|
Since Inception
|
11.90
|
%
|
11.79
|
%
|
|||
|
States3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
Illinois
|
10.6
|
%
|
||
|
Florida
|
9.2
|
%
|
||
|
California
|
8.8
|
%
|
||
|
Wisconsin
|
7.9
|
%
|
||
|
Louisiana
|
7.5
|
%
|
||
|
Ohio
|
6.8
|
%
|
||
|
Texas
|
5.9
|
%
|
||
|
Colorado
|
5.7
|
%
|
||
|
Indiana
|
5.4
|
%
|
||
|
Puerto Rico
|
4.8
|
%
|
||
|
Arizona
|
4.4
|
%
|
||
|
Michigan
|
4.1
|
%
|
||
|
Rhode Island
|
3.0
|
%
|
||
|
New Jersey
|
2.9
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
13.0
|
%
|
||
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
Health Care
|
22.8
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
19.6
|
%
|
||
|
Transportation
|
11.2
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
10.2
|
%
|
||
|
Utilities
|
8.9
|
%
|
||
|
Consumer Staples
|
8.4
|
%
|
||
|
Water and Sewer
|
6.3
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an regarded as having rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
|
16
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
NMI
|
Nuveen Municipal
|
|
|
Performance
OVERVIEW
|
Income Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
as of October 31, 2012
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
|
Share Price
|
$
|
12.66
|
||
|
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$
|
11.66
|
||
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
8.58
|
%
|
||
|
Market Yield
|
4.50
|
%
|
||
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
6.25
|
%
|
||
|
Net Assets ($000)
|
$
|
96,298
|
||
|
Leverage
|
||||
|
Effective Leverage
|
8.84
|
%
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns
|
|||||||
|
(Inception 4/20/88)
|
|||||||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
||||||
|
1-Year
|
19.51
|
%
|
14.05
|
%
|
|||
|
5-Year
|
9.38
|
%
|
7.04
|
%
|
|||
|
10-Year
|
7.93
|
%
|
6.21
|
%
|
|||
|
States3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
California
|
19.2
|
%
|
||
|
Illinois
|
11.4
|
%
|
||
|
Colorado
|
8.0
|
%
|
||
|
Texas
|
7.7
|
%
|
||
|
Missouri
|
7.3
|
%
|
||
|
Florida
|
5.2
|
%
|
||
|
New York
|
4.9
|
%
|
||
|
Ohio
|
4.1
|
%
|
||
|
Wisconsin
|
3.9
|
%
|
||
|
Kentucky
|
3.0
|
%
|
||
|
Pennsylvania
|
2.8
|
%
|
||
|
Maryland
|
2.4
|
%
|
||
|
South Carolina
|
1.8
|
%
|
||
|
Michigan
|
1.6
|
%
|
||
|
Alabama
|
1.6
|
%
|
||
|
Montana
|
1.2
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
13.9
|
%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
Health Care
|
19.6
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
17.7
|
%
|
||
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
11.6
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
10.1
|
%
|
||
|
Utilities
|
9.0
|
%
|
||
|
U.S. Guaranteed
|
7.0
|
%
|
||
|
Water and Sewer
|
6.3
|
%
|
||
|
Transportation
|
5.9
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, this Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an regarded as having rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change.
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
17
|
|
NEV
|
Nuveen Enhanced
|
|
|
Performance
OVERVIEW
|
Municipal Value Fund
|
|
|
as of October 31, 2012
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
||||
|
Share Price
|
$
|
16.16
|
||
|
Net Asset Value (NAV)
|
$
|
15.82
|
||
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
2.15
|
%
|
||
|
Market Yield
|
5.94
|
%
|
||
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield1
|
8.25
|
%
|
||
|
Net Assets ($000)
|
$
|
305,341
|
||
|
Leverage
|
||||
|
Effective Leverage
|
34.07
|
%
|
|
Average Annual Total Returns
|
|||||||
|
(Inception 9/25/09)
|
|||||||
|
On Share Price
|
On NAV
|
||||||
|
1-Year
|
25.68
|
%
|
20.67
|
%
|
|||
|
Since Inception
|
9.21
|
%
|
10.00
|
%
|
|||
|
States3
|
||||
|
(as a % of total municipal bonds)
|
||||
|
California
|
19.0
|
%
|
||
|
Illinois
|
10.7
|
%
|
||
|
Michigan
|
6.5
|
%
|
||
|
Georgia
|
6.5
|
%
|
||
|
Florida
|
6.2
|
%
|
||
|
Ohio
|
5.7
|
%
|
||
|
Pennsylvania
|
5.2
|
%
|
||
|
Wisconsin
|
5.0
|
%
|
||
|
Colorado
|
4.2
|
%
|
||
|
Arizona
|
4.0
|
%
|
||
|
Texas
|
3.8
|
%
|
||
|
New York
|
2.9
|
%
|
||
|
Washington
|
2.1
|
%
|
||
|
Massachusetts
|
1.9
|
%
|
||
|
Nevada
|
1.8
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
14.5
|
%
|
|
Portfolio Composition3,4
|
||||
|
(as a % of total investments)
|
||||
|
Tax Obligation/Limited
|
21.8
|
%
|
||
|
Health Care
|
15.1
|
%
|
||
|
Transportation
|
15.0
|
%
|
||
|
Education and Civic Organizations
|
11.3
|
%
|
||
|
Tax Obligation/General
|
10.4
|
%
|
||
|
Consumer Staples
|
5.3
|
%
|
||
|
Long-Term Care
|
4.8
|
%
|
||
|
Utilities
|
4.1
|
%
|
||
|
Other
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this Fund’s Performance Overview page.
|
|
|
1
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a federal income tax rate of 28%. When comparing this Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
|
|
2
|
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A, and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
|
|
3
|
Holdings are subject to change
|
|
4
|
Excluding investments in derivatives.
|
|
5
|
The Fund paid shareholders a net ordinary income distribution in December 2011 of $0.0021 per share.
|
|
18
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
NUV
NUW
NMI
NEV
|
Shareholder Meeting Report
|
|
|
The annual meeting of shareholders was held on July 31, 2012 in the Lobby Conference Room, 333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606; at this meeting the shareholders were asked to vote on the election of Board Members.
|
|
NUV
|
NUW
|
NMI
|
NEV
|
||||||||||
|
Common Shares
|
Common Shares
|
Common Shares
|
Common Shares
|
||||||||||
|
Approval of the Board Members was reached as follows:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Robert P. Bremner
|
|||||||||||||
|
For
|
175,260,805
|
12,140,730
|
7,206,118
|
18,463,992
|
|||||||||
|
Withhold
|
3,916,156
|
228,157
|
208,954
|
267,867
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
179,176,961
|
12,368,887
|
7,415,072
|
18,731,859
|
|||||||||
|
Jack B. Evans
|
|||||||||||||
|
For
|
175,390,107
|
12,137,208
|
7,204,602
|
18,477,804
|
|||||||||
|
Withhold
|
3,786,854
|
231,679
|
210,470
|
254,055
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
179,176,961
|
12,368,887
|
7,415,072
|
18,731,859
|
|||||||||
|
William J. Schneider
|
|||||||||||||
|
For
|
175,517,124
|
12,138,343
|
7,207,127
|
18,477,921
|
|||||||||
|
Withhold
|
3,659,837
|
230,544
|
207,945
|
253,938
|
|||||||||
|
Total
|
179,176,961
|
12,368,887
|
7,415,072
|
18,731,859
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
19
|
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors/Trustees and Shareholders
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc.
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (formerly known as Nuveen Municipal Value Fund 2)
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc., Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund, Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc., and Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (the “Funds”) as of October 31, 2012, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2012, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from brokers were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc., Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund, Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc., and Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund at October 31, 2012, and the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois
December 27, 2012
|
20
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc.
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Alaska – 0.7%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
3,335
|
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, General Housing Purpose Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 12/01/30 – FGIC Insured
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
$
|
3,461,130
|
||||
|
5,000
|
Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, General Housing Purpose Bonds, Series 2005B-2, 5.250%, 12/01/30 – NPFG Insured
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
5,235,600
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Anchorage, Alaska, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 9/01/23 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) – FGIC Insured
|
9/13 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
3,119,790
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 6/01/32
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
B+
|
2,224,675
|
||||||
|
13,835
|
Total Alaska
|
14,041,195
|
||||||||
|
Arizona – 0.6%
|
||||||||||
|
2,500
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 7/01/38
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,755,250
|
||||||
|
2,575
|
Quechan Indian Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation, Arizona, Government Project Bonds, Series 2008, 7.000%, 12/01/27
|
12/17 at 102.00
|
CCC
|
2,304,934
|
||||||
|
5,600
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
6,490,064
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Healthcare, Series 2008A, 5.250%, 9/01/30
|
9/13 at 100.00
|
A2
|
1,012,680
|
||||||
|
11,675
|
Total Arizona
|
12,562,928
|
||||||||
|
Arkansas – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
1,150
|
Benton Washington Regional Public Water Authority, Arkansas, Water Revenue Bonds, Refunding & Improvement Series 2007, 4.750%, 10/01/33 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,235,077
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Various Facilities Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 5.000%, 12/01/32 (Pre-refunded 12/01/12) – FGIC Insured
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
2,008,040
|
||||||
|
3,150
|
Total Arkansas
|
3,243,117
|
||||||||
|
California – 14.3%
|
||||||||||
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kaiser Permanante System, Series 2006:
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
5.000%, 4/01/37 – BHAC Insured
|
4/16 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
5,536,250
|
||||||
|
6,000
|
5.000%, 4/01/37
|
4/16 at 100.00
|
A+
|
6,333,840
|
||||||
|
2,335
|
California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2010A, 5.750%, 7/01/40
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
2,548,419
|
||||||
|
2,130
|
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Series 2004C, 4.750%, 12/01/23 – FGIC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
A3
|
2,328,559
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Corrections, Series 2003C, 5.500%, 6/01/22 (Pre-refunded 12/01/13)
|
12/13 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
2,642,600
|
||||||
|
California State, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003:
|
||||||||||
|
14,600
|
5.250%, 2/01/28
|
8/13 at 100.00
|
A1
|
15,050,848
|
||||||
|
11,250
|
5.000%, 2/01/33
|
8/13 at 100.00
|
A1
|
11,551,950
|
||||||
|
16,000
|
California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2007, 5.000%, 6/01/37
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
A1
|
17,371,040
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
California State, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2011, 5.000%, 10/01/41
|
10/21 at 100.00
|
A1
|
5,535,750
|
||||||
|
7,625
|
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Certificates of Participation, Internext Group, Series 1999, 5.375%, 4/01/17
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
7,654,051
|
||||||
|
3,295
|
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Health Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Memorial Health Services, Series 2003A, 5.500%, 10/01/33 (Pre-refunded 4/01/13)
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
AA– (4)
|
3,368,050
|
||||||
|
3,500
|
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Methodist Hospital Project, Series 2009, 6.750%, 2/01/38
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
4,283,230
|
||||||
|
3,600
|
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, St. Joseph Health System, Series 2007A, 5.750%, 7/01/47 – FGIC Insured
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
4,065,768
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
21
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
California (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
5,000
|
Coast Community College District, Orange County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 0.000%, 8/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
8/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
$
|
5,091,250
|
||||
|
4,505
|
Covina-Valley Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003B, 0.000%, 6/01/28 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
2,107,484
|
||||||
|
16,045
|
Desert Community College District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2004 Series 2007C, 0.000%, 8/01/33 – AGM Insured
|
8/17 at 42.63
|
Aa2
|
5,396,254
|
||||||
|
30,000
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, California, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Series 1995A, 0.000%, 1/01/22 (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aaa
|
25,031,400
|
||||||
|
21,150
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 6/01/38 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) – AMBAC Insured
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
21,740,931
|
||||||
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A:
|
||||||||||
|
7,435
|
5.000%, 6/01/29 – AMBAC Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A2
|
7,442,435
|
||||||
|
11,470
|
5.000%, 6/01/38 – FGIC Insured
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
A2
|
11,687,815
|
||||||
|
15,000
|
5.000%, 6/01/45
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
A2
|
15,270,150
|
||||||
|
3,540
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 6.750%, 6/01/39 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
3,674,343
|
||||||
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1:
|
||||||||||
|
8,060
|
4.500%, 6/01/27
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
7,213,619
|
||||||
|
7,870
|
5.000%, 6/01/33
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
6,747,187
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
5.125%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
1,215,600
|
||||||
|
4,500
|
Hemet Unified School District, Riverside County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008B, 5.125%, 8/01/37 – AGC Insured
|
8/16 at 102.00
|
AA–
|
4,985,685
|
||||||
|
6,280
|
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, California, Proposition A First Tier Senior Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 7/01/17 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) – AGM Insured
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
6,478,762
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Los Angeles Regional Airports Improvement Corporation, California, Sublease Revenue Bonds, Los Angeles International Airport, American Airlines Inc. Terminal 4 Project, Series 2002C, 7.500%, 12/01/24 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/12 at 102.00
|
N/R
|
3,952,520
|
||||||
|
Merced Union High School District, Merced County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1999A:
|
||||||||||
|
2,500
|
0.000%, 8/01/23 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
1,637,325
|
||||||
|
2,555
|
0.000%, 8/01/24 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
1,562,740
|
||||||
|
2,365
|
Montebello Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 0.000%, 8/01/27 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
1,163,911
|
||||||
|
3,550
|
M-S-R Energy Authority, California, Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2009C, 6.500%, 11/01/39
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
4,975,822
|
||||||
|
7,200
|
Napa Valley Community College District, Napa and Sonoma Counties, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2002 Series 2007C, 0.000%, 8/01/29 – NPFG Insured
|
8/17 at 54.45
|
Aa2
|
3,181,680
|
||||||
|
4,900
|
Ontario, California, Certificates of Participation, Water System Improvement Project, Refunding Series 2004, 5.000%, 7/01/29 – NPFG Insured
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
5,192,432
|
||||||
|
2,350
|
Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2009, 6.750%, 11/01/39
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
2,659,237
|
||||||
|
10,150
|
Placer Union High School District, Placer County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004C, 0.000%, 8/01/33 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
3,781,789
|
||||||
|
2,780
|
Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Certificates of Participation, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 1997B, 4.875%, 7/01/22 – NPFG Insured
|
7/15 at 102.00
|
Baa2
|
2,865,151
|
||||||
|
8,000
|
Rancho Mirage Joint Powers Financing Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, Eisenhower Medical Center, Series 2004, 5.625%, 7/01/34 (Pre-refunded 7/01/14)
|
7/14 at 100.00
|
Baa2 (4)
|
8,705,520
|
||||||
|
15,505
|
Riverside Public Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, University Corridor, Series 2007C, 5.000%, 8/01/37 – NPFG Insured
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
15,555,856
|
|
22
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
California (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
San Bruno Park School District, San Mateo County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2000B:
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,575
|
0.000%, 8/01/24 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
$
|
1,647,331
|
||||
|
2,660
|
0.000%, 8/01/25 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
1,621,110
|
||||||
|
250
|
San Francisco Redevelopment Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series 2011D, 7.000%, 8/01/41
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
288,000
|
||||||
|
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Orange County, California, Toll Road Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A:
|
||||||||||
|
11,605
|
0.000%, 1/15/25 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
6,291,071
|
||||||
|
14,740
|
0.000%, 1/15/35 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
4,427,896
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
San Jose, California, Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 6.000%, 3/01/47 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
3/17 at 100.00
|
A2
|
5,460,200
|
||||||
|
13,220
|
San Mateo County Community College District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006A, 0.000%, 9/01/28 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aaa
|
7,133,115
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
San Mateo Union High School District, San Mateo County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2000, Series 2002B, 0.000%, 9/01/24 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa1
|
3,250,650
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Tobacco Securitization Authority of Northern California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Refunding Series 2005A-2, 5.400%, 6/01/27
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B+
|
1,833,380
|
||||||
|
1,300
|
University of California, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009O, 5.250%, 5/15/39
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
1,515,696
|
||||||
|
349,395
|
Total California
|
301,055,702
|
||||||||
|
Colorado – 4.7%
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
Arkansas River Power Authority, Colorado, Power Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.250%, 10/01/40 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
10/16 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
5,089,100
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2006A, 4.500%, 9/01/38
|
9/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,224,300
|
||||||
|
1,700
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Poudre Valley Health System, Series 2005C, 5.250%, 3/01/40 – AGM Insured
|
9/18 at 102.00
|
AA–
|
1,866,549
|
||||||
|
15,925
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 1/01/40
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
17,358,250
|
||||||
|
750
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Longmont United Hospital, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 12/01/23 – RAAI Insured
|
12/16 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
777,375
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Colorado State Board of Governors, Colorado State University Auxiliary Enterprise System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 3/01/41
|
3/22 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
2,294,500
|
||||||
|
18,915
|
Denver, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 11/15/33 (Pre-refunded 11/15/13) – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
11/13 at 100.00
|
A+ (4)
|
19,835,404
|
||||||
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Senior Revenue Bonds, Series 2000B:
|
||||||||||
|
24,200
|
0.000%, 9/01/31 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
9,262,308
|
||||||
|
17,000
|
0.000%, 9/01/32 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
6,111,840
|
||||||
|
7,600
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Toll Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2006B, 0.000%, 9/01/39 – NPFG Insured
|
9/26 at 52.09
|
BBB
|
1,686,896
|
||||||
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Toll Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B:
|
||||||||||
|
7,500
|
0.000%, 9/01/27 – NPFG Insured
|
9/20 at 67.94
|
BBB
|
3,467,175
|
||||||
|
10,075
|
0.000%, 3/01/36 – NPFG Insured
|
9/20 at 41.72
|
BBB
|
2,726,094
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Ebert Metropolitan District, Colorado, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.350%, 12/01/37 – RAAI Insured
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
4,610,150
|
||||||
|
7,000
|
Northwest Parkway Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Senior Series 2001C, 5.700%, 6/15/21 (Pre-refunded 6/15/16) – AMBAC Insured
|
6/16 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
8,281,910
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Rangely Hospital District, Rio Blanco County, Colorado, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2011, 6.000%, 11/01/26
|
11/21 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
6,002,850
|
||||||
|
3,750
|
Regional Transportation District, Colorado, Denver Transit Partners Eagle P3 Project Private Activity Bonds, Series 2010, 6.000%, 1/15/41
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
4,354,800
|
||||||
|
136,415
|
Total Colorado
|
98,949,501
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
23
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Connecticut – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,500
|
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Hartford Healthcare, Series 2011A, 5.000%, 7/01/41
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
$
|
1,625,445
|
||||
|
8,670
|
Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribe, Connecticut, Subordinate Special Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.750%, 9/01/34 (5)
|
11/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,746,047
|
||||||
|
10,170
|
Total Connecticut
|
5,371,492
|
||||||||
|
District of Columbia – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
10,000
|
Washington Convention Center Authority, District of Columbia, Dedicated Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2007A, 4.500%, 10/01/30 – AMBAC Insured
|
10/16 at 100.00
|
A1
|
10,188,400
|
||||||
|
Florida – 4.6%
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
Cape Coral, Florida, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2011, 5.000%, 10/01/41 – AGM Insured
|
10/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,387,390
|
||||||
|
4,285
|
Escambia County Health Facilities Authority, Florida, Revenue Bonds, Ascension Health Credit Group, Series 2002C, 5.750%, 11/15/32
|
11/12 at 101.00
|
AA+
|
4,342,376
|
||||||
|
10,000
|
Florida State Board of Education, Public Education Capital Outlay Bonds, Series 2005E, 4.500%, 6/01/35 (UB)
|
6/15 at 101.00
|
AAA
|
10,820,200
|
||||||
|
2,650
|
Hillsborough County Industrial Development Authority, Florida, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Tampa General Hospital, Series 2006, 5.250%, 10/01/41
|
10/16 at 100.00
|
A3
|
2,778,207
|
||||||
|
2,250
|
Jacksonville, Florida, Guaranteed Entitlement Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 10/01/20 – FGIC Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,259,405
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
JEA, Florida, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series Three 2006A, 5.000%, 10/01/41 – AGM Insured
|
4/15 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
3,224,130
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Marion County Hospital District, Florida, Revenue Bonds, Munroe Regional Medical Center, Series 2007, 5.000%, 10/01/34
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
A3
|
5,206,300
|
||||||
|
4,090
|
Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority, Florida, Toll System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 7/01/40
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
4,480,513
|
||||||
|
9,500
|
Miami-Dade County Health Facility Authority, Florida, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Miami Children’s Hospital, Series 2010A, 6.000%, 8/01/46
|
8/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
11,334,640
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Aviation Revenue Bonds, Miami International Airport, Series 2010B, 5.000%, 10/01/29
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
A
|
4,534,320
|
||||||
|
9,340
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.000%, 10/01/39 – AGM Insured
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
10,476,024
|
||||||
|
2,900
|
Orange County, Florida, Tourist Development Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 10/01/31 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
10/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,069,273
|
||||||
|
9,250
|
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Southwest Annexation District 1B, Series 2007, 5.000%, 7/01/40 – NPFG Insured
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
9,568,015
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Seminole Tribe of Florida, Special Obligation Bonds, Series 2007A, 144A, 5.250%, 10/01/27
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
2,654,750
|
||||||
|
14,730
|
South Miami Health Facilities Authority, Florida, Hospital Revenue, Baptist Health System Obligation Group, Series 2007, 5.000%, 8/15/42 (UB)
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
AA
|
15,897,205
|
||||||
|
3,300
|
Tampa, Florida, Health System Revenue Bonds, Baycare Health System, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 11/15/33
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
3,768,897
|
||||||
|
89,795
|
Total Florida
|
97,801,645
|
||||||||
|
Georgia – 0.8%
|
||||||||||
|
10,240
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A, 5.000%, 11/01/38 – FGIC Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A1
|
10,269,389
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2001A, 5.000%, 11/01/33 – NPFG Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A1
|
2,507,175
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Augusta, Georgia, Water and Sewerage Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.250%, 10/01/39 – AGM Insured
|
10/14 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
4,293,360
|
||||||
|
16,740
|
Total Georgia
|
17,069,924
|
|
24
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Hawaii – 0.9%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
7,140
|
Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, Special Purpose Revenue Bonds, Hawaiian Electric Company Inc., Series 1997A, 5.650%, 10/01/27 – NPFG Insured
|
10/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
$
|
7,225,823
|
||||
|
1,735
|
Honolulu City and County, Hawaii, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 3/01/28 – NPFG Insured
|
3/13 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
1,760,799
|
||||||
|
10,590
|
Honolulu City and County, Hawaii, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 3/01/28 (Pre-refunded 3/01/13) – NPFG Insured
|
3/13 at 100.00
|
Aa1 (4)
|
10,768,653
|
||||||
|
19,465
|
Total Hawaii
|
19,755,275
|
||||||||
|
Illinois – 13.2%
|
||||||||||
|
2,060
|
Aurora, Illinois, Golf Course Revenue Bonds, Series 2000, 6.375%, 1/01/20
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
A+
|
2,067,334
|
||||||
|
17,205
|
Chicago Board of Education, Illinois, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Dedicated Tax Revenues, Series 1998B-1, 0.000%, 12/01/24 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
10,608,603
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Chicago Park District, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Limited Tax Series 2011A, 5.000%, 1/01/36
|
1/22 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,714,890
|
||||||
|
Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Project & Refunding Series 2006A:
|
||||||||||
|
2,585
|
4.750%, 1/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,772,697
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
4.625%, 1/01/31 – AGM Insured
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,317,800
|
||||||
|
285
|
Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.625%, 1/01/39 – AMBAC Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
286,049
|
||||||
|
2,825
|
Chicago, Illinois, Third Lien General Airport Revenue Bonds, O’Hare International Airport, Series 2003C-2, 5.250%, 1/01/30 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
1/14 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,886,924
|
||||||
|
3,320
|
Cook and DuPage Counties Combined School District 113A Lemont, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 0.000%, 12/01/20 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
2,301,590
|
||||||
|
3,020
|
Cook County High School District 209, Proviso Township, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 12/01/19 – AGM Insured
|
12/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,307,957
|
||||||
|
8,875
|
Cook County, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2010A, 5.250%, 11/15/33
|
11/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
10,098,241
|
||||||
|
3,260
|
Cook County, Illinois, Recovery Zone Facility Revenue Bonds, Navistar International Corporation Project, Series 2010, 6.500%, 10/15/40
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
B2
|
3,392,519
|
||||||
|
DuPage County Community School District 200, Wheaton, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2003B:
|
||||||||||
|
1,615
|
5.250%, 11/01/20 (Pre-refunded 11/01/13) – AGM Insured
|
11/13 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
1,695,508
|
||||||
|
385
|
5.250%, 11/01/20 (Pre-refunded 1/01/14) – AGM Insured
|
1/14 at 100.00
|
AA (4)
|
407,388
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Peoples Gas, Light and Coke Company, Series 2003E, 4.875%, 11/01/38 (Mandatory put 11/01/18) – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/13 at 101.00
|
A1
|
5,167,350
|
||||||
|
28,030
|
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Local Government Program Revenue Bonds, Kane, Cook and DuPage Counties School District U46 – Elgin, Series 2002, 0.000%, 1/01/19 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa3
|
23,548,564
|
||||||
|
1,800
|
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Local Government Program Revenue Bonds, Winnebago and Boone Counties School District 205 – Rockford, Series 2000, 0.000%, 2/01/19 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa3
|
1,507,554
|
||||||
|
3,180
|
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Chicago Charter School Foundation, Series 2002A, 6.250%, 12/01/32 (Pre-refunded 12/01/12)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
3,195,868
|
||||||
|
1,875
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Central DuPage Health, Series 2009B, 5.500%, 11/01/39
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
AA
|
2,116,594
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Central DuPage Health, Series 2009, 5.250%, 11/01/39
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
AA
|
3,332,310
|
||||||
|
5,245
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Loyola University of Chicago, Tender Option Bond Trust 1137, 9.102%, 7/01/15 (IF)
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa1
|
6,329,351
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Series 2004A, 5.500%, 8/15/43 (Pre-refunded 8/15/14)
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
5,460,200
|
||||||
|
4,910
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, OSF Healthcare System, Refunding Series 2010A, 6.000%, 5/15/39
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
A
|
5,711,852
|
||||||
|
4,800
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Provena Health, Series 2009A, 7.750%, 8/15/34
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
6,236,976
|
||||||
|
4,135
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sherman Health Systems, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 8/01/37
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
4,534,565
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
25
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Illinois (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,500
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, The University of Chicago Medical Center, Series 2011C, 5.500%, 8/15/41
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
$
|
2,850,150
|
||||
|
3,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Series 2008A, 5.500%, 8/15/30
|
8/18 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
3,204,720
|
||||||
|
8,435
|
Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sherman Health Systems, Series 1997, 5.250%, 8/01/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
2/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
8,448,918
|
||||||
|
3,180
|
Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, South Suburban Hospital, Series 1992, 7.000%, 2/15/18 (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
A (4)
|
3,728,327
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Illinois Sports Facility Authority, State Tax Supported Bonds, Series 2001, 5.500%, 6/15/30 – AMBAC Insured
|
6/15 at 101.00
|
A
|
5,438,450
|
||||||
|
655
|
Illinois State, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 8/01/25
|
8/22 at 100.00
|
A
|
736,574
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Lombard Public Facilities Corporation, Illinois, First Tier Conference Center and Hotel Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A-2, 5.500%, 1/01/36 – ACA Insured
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
CCC
|
3,249,950
|
||||||
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 1993A:
|
||||||||||
|
12,320
|
0.010%, 6/15/17 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A3
|
11,059,418
|
||||||
|
9,270
|
0.010%, 6/15/18 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A3
|
8,004,460
|
||||||
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 1993A:
|
||||||||||
|
7,010
|
0.010%, 6/15/17 – FGIC Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
A3 (4)
|
6,608,818
|
||||||
|
3,800
|
0.010%, 6/15/18 – FGIC Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
A3 (4)
|
3,479,584
|
||||||
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 1994B:
|
||||||||||
|
7,250
|
0.000%, 6/15/18 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
6,260,230
|
||||||
|
3,385
|
0.000%, 6/15/21 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
2,523,619
|
||||||
|
5,190
|
0.000%, 6/15/28 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
2,627,541
|
||||||
|
11,670
|
0.000%, 6/15/29 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
5,610,469
|
||||||
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 2002A:
|
||||||||||
|
10,000
|
0.000%, 6/15/24 – NPFG Insured
|
6/22 at 101.00
|
AAA
|
9,358,600
|
||||||
|
4,950
|
0.000%, 12/15/32 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,972,575
|
||||||
|
21,375
|
0.000%, 6/15/34 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
7,737,750
|
||||||
|
21,000
|
0.000%, 12/15/35 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
6,957,720
|
||||||
|
21,970
|
0.000%, 6/15/36 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
6,993,490
|
||||||
|
10,375
|
0.000%, 12/15/36 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
3,223,513
|
||||||
|
25,825
|
0.000%, 6/15/39 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
6,926,007
|
||||||
|
16,800
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Refunding Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 1996A, 0.000%, 12/15/21 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
12,252,912
|
||||||
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, Revenue Refunding Bonds, McCormick Place Expansion Project, Series 2002B:
|
||||||||||
|
3,775
|
5.500%, 6/15/20 – NPFG Insured
|
6/17 at 101.00
|
AAA
|
4,408,332
|
||||||
|
5,715
|
5.550%, 6/15/21 – NPFG Insured
|
6/17 at 101.00
|
AAA
|
6,631,515
|
||||||
|
6,095
|
Regional Transportation Authority, Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will Counties, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 6.000%, 7/01/32 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
8,221,667
|
||||||
|
1,160
|
Round Lake, Lake County, Illinois, Special Tax Bonds, Lakewood Grove Special Service Area 4, Series 2007, 4.700%, 3/01/33 – AGC Insured
|
3/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,217,988
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Springfield, Illinois, Electric Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2007, 5.000%, 3/01/22 – NPFG Insured
|
3/17 at 100.00
|
A
|
3,252,150
|
||||||
|
4,900
|
Springfield, Illinois, Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 3/01/26 – NPFG Insured
|
3/16 at 100.00
|
A
|
5,170,039
|
||||||
|
550
|
Tri-City Regional Port District, Illinois, Port and Terminal Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Delivery Network Project, Series 2003A, 4.900%, 7/01/14 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
509,790
|
||||||
|
1,575
|
Will County Community School District 161, Summit Hill, Illinois, Capital Appreciation School Bonds, Series 1999, 0.000%, 1/01/18 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R
|
1,310,180
|
|
26
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Illinois (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
720
|
Will County Community School District 161, Summit Hill, Illinois, Capital Appreciation School Bonds, Series 1999, 0.000%, 1/01/18 – FGIC Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R (4)
|
$
|
674,582
|
||||
|
3,680
|
Will County Community Unit School District 201U, Crete-Monee, Will County, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 2004, 0.000%, 11/01/16 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
3,405,141
|
||||||
|
370,040
|
Total Illinois
|
278,053,863
|
||||||||
|
Indiana – 2.3%
|
||||||||||
|
300
|
Anderson, Indiana, Economic Development Revenue Bonds, Anderson University, Series 2007, 5.000%, 10/01/24
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
255,162
|
||||||
|
Indiana Bond Bank, State Revolving Fund Program Bonds, Series 2001A:
|
||||||||||
|
8,010
|
5.375%, 2/01/19 (Pre-refunded 2/01/13) (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
2/13 at 101.00
|
N/R (4)
|
8,191,186
|
||||||
|
1,990
|
5.375%, 2/01/19 (Pre-refunded 2/01/13)
|
2/13 at 101.00
|
AAA
|
2,035,730
|
||||||
|
2,525
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Community Health Network Project, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 5/01/42 (WI/DD, Settling 11/27/12)
|
5/23 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,765,860
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Deaconess Hospital Inc., Series 2004A, 5.375%, 3/01/34 – AMBAC Insured
|
3/14 at 100.00
|
A+
|
3,059,730
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana, Series 2007, 5.500%, 3/01/37
|
3/17 at 100.00
|
A–
|
2,162,360
|
||||||
|
6,735
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Power Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/42 – NPFG Insured
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
A+
|
7,276,427
|
||||||
|
Indianapolis Local Public Improvement Bond Bank, Indiana, Series 1999E:
|
||||||||||
|
12,500
|
0.000%, 2/01/21 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
9,958,750
|
||||||
|
14,595
|
0.000%, 2/01/27 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
8,698,474
|
||||||
|
4,230
|
Whiting Redevelopment District, Indiana, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Lakefront Development Project, Series 2010, 6.750%, 1/15/32
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
4,577,325
|
||||||
|
55,885
|
Total Indiana
|
48,981,004
|
||||||||
|
Iowa – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
580
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007B, 4.800%, 1/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
597,342
|
||||||
|
7,000
|
Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Asset Backed Settlement Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.625%, 6/01/46
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
B+
|
6,612,550
|
||||||
|
7,580
|
Total Iowa
|
7,209,892
|
||||||||
|
Kansas – 1.1%
|
||||||||||
|
10,000
|
Kansas Department of Transportation, Highway Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 3/01/22 (Pre-refunded 3/01/14)
|
3/14 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
10,629,300
|
||||||
|
17,830
|
Wyandotte County-Kansas City Unified Government, Kansas, Sales Tax Special Obligation Capital Appreciation Revenue Bonds Redevelopment Project Area
B – Major Multi-Sport Athletic Complex Project, Subordinate Lien Series 2010B, 0.000%, 6/01/21 |
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
11,960,721
|
||||||
|
27,830
|
Total Kansas
|
22,590,021
|
||||||||
|
Kentucky – 0.1%
|
||||||||||
|
935
|
Greater Kentucky Housing Assistance Corporation, FHA-Insured Section 8 Mortgage Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1997A, 6.100%, 1/01/24 – NPFG Insured
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
937,188
|
||||||
|
1,750
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Louisville Arena Project Revenue Bonds, Louisville Arena Authority, Inc., Series 2008-A1, 6.000%, 12/01/38 – AGC Insured
|
6/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,936,883
|
||||||
|
2,685
|
Total Kentucky
|
2,874,071
|
||||||||
|
Louisiana – 2.8%
|
||||||||||
|
2,310
|
Louisiana Local Government Environment Facilities and Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Westlake Chemical Corporation Projects, Series 2009A, 6.500%, 8/01/29
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
2,723,444
|
||||||
|
5,450
|
Louisiana Local Government Environment Facilities and Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Westlake Chemical Corporation Projects, Series 2010A-1, 6.500%, 11/01/35
|
11/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
6,374,974
|
||||||
|
12,000
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities & Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Westlake Chemical Corporation Project, Series 2007, 6.750%, 11/01/32
|
11/17 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
13,528,440
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
27
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Louisiana (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
5,150
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System, Series 2005A, 5.250%, 8/15/32
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
$
|
5,346,215
|
||||
|
3,620
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Ochsner Clinic Foundation Project, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 5/15/38
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
3,786,954
|
||||||
|
26,095
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Louisiana, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2001B, 5.875%, 5/15/39
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A–
|
26,746,853
|
||||||
|
54,625
|
Total Louisiana
|
58,506,880
|
||||||||
|
Maine – 0.1%
|
||||||||||
|
1,050
|
Maine Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, MaineGeneral Medical Center, Series 2011, 6.750%, 7/01/41
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
1,266,059
|
||||||
|
Maryland – 0.6%
|
||||||||||
|
2,500
|
Baltimore, Maryland, Subordinate Lien Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.875%, 9/01/39
|
9/16 at 100.00
|
Ba2
|
2,562,550
|
||||||
|
3,500
|
Maryland Energy Financing Administration, Revenue Bonds, AES Warrior Run Project, Series 1995, 7.400%, 9/01/19 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,519,530
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Adventist Healthcare, Series 2011A, 6.125%, 1/01/36
|
1/22 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,730,055
|
||||||
|
4,600
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, MedStar Health, Series 2004, 5.500%, 8/15/33
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
A2
|
4,884,142
|
||||||
|
12,100
|
Total Maryland
|
12,696,277
|
||||||||
|
Massachusetts – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
1,720
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Revenue Bonds, Ogden Haverhill Associates, Series 1998B, 5.100%, 12/01/12 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,723,062
|
||||||
|
4,595
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Cape Cod Health Care Inc., Series 2001C, 5.250%, 11/15/31 – RAAI Insured
|
11/12 at 100.50
|
BBB+
|
4,621,605
|
||||||
|
500
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, CareGroup Inc., Series 2008E-1 &2, 5.125%, 7/01/38
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
A–
|
529,930
|
||||||
|
1,380
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northern Berkshire Community Services Inc., Series 2012A, 6.000%, 2/15/43
|
11/12 at 103.00
|
D
|
1,187,414
|
||||||
|
1,072
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northern Berkshire Community Services Inc., Series 2012B, 6.375%, 2/15/43
|
11/12 at 103.00
|
D
|
107,359
|
||||||
|
1,650
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northern Berkshire Community Services Inc., Series 2012C, 6.625%, 2/15/43
|
11/12 at 103.00
|
D
|
17
|
||||||
|
2,300
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Suffolk University Issue, Series 2009A, 5.750%, 7/01/39
|
7/19 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,569,698
|
||||||
|
12,200
|
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Housing Bonds, Series 2009F, 5.700%, 6/01/40
|
12/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
13,155,992
|
||||||
|
1,630
|
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, Pooled Loan Program Bonds, Series 2000-6, 5.500%, 8/01/30
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,636,308
|
||||||
|
27,047
|
Total Massachusetts
|
25,531,385
|
||||||||
|
Michigan – 4.2%
|
||||||||||
|
3,100
|
Detroit City School District, Wayne County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002A, 5.250%, 5/01/28 (Pre-refunded 5/01/13) – FGIC Insured
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
3,177,810
|
||||||
|
10,740
|
Detroit Local Development Finance Authority, Michigan, Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1998A, 5.500%, 5/01/21
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
B–
|
9,663,637
|
||||||
|
1,415
|
Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2012A, 5.250%, 7/01/39
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,536,067
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Detroit Water Supply System, Michigan, Water Supply System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2006D, 4.625%, 7/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,111,350
|
||||||
|
3,700
|
Detroit, Michigan, Distributable State Aid General Obligation Bonds, Limited Tax Series 2010, 4.500%, 11/01/23
|
11/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
4,074,181
|
|
28
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Michigan (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
8,000
|
Detroit, Michigan, Second Lien Sewerage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 7/01/35 – NPFG Insured
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A
|
$
|
8,231,680
|
||||
|
3,000
|
Detroit, Michigan, Senior Lien Sewerage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 7/01/26 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) – AGM Insured
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
3,094,950
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Detroit, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Second Lien Series 2006A, 5.500%, 7/01/36 – BHAC Insured
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
3,402,240
|
||||||
|
7,305
|
Detroit, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 2001C-2, 5.250%, 7/01/29 – FGIC Insured
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
8,295,923
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Detroit, Michigan, Water Supply System Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2011A, 5.750%, 7/01/37
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
3,365,970
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Kalamazoo Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Series 2010, 5.250%, 5/15/36 – AGM Insured
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
2,252,000
|
||||||
|
4,500
|
Michigan Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Trinity Health Credit Group, Refunding Series 2011, 5.000%, 12/01/39
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
AA
|
5,011,965
|
||||||
|
5,140
|
Michigan Finance Authority, Unemployment Obligation Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, 2.000%, 1/01/13
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
5,155,728
|
||||||
|
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Public School Academy Revenue Bonds, Detroit Academy of Arts and Sciences Charter School, Series 2001A:
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
7.900%, 10/01/21
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
Caa2
|
4,449,750
|
||||||
|
3,500
|
8.000%, 10/01/31
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
Caa2
|
3,114,825
|
||||||
|
8,460
|
Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Bonds, Facilities Program, Series 2005I, 5.000%, 10/15/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
10/15 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
9,400,075
|
||||||
|
7,200
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Limited Obligation Resource Recovery Revenue Refunding Bonds, Detroit Edison Company, Series 2002D, 5.250%, 12/15/32 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
7,214,040
|
||||||
|
1,150
|
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, William Beaumont Hospital, Refunding Series 2009V, 8.250%, 9/01/39
|
9/18 at 100.00
|
A1
|
1,485,444
|
||||||
|
85,210
|
Total Michigan
|
88,037,635
|
||||||||
|
Minnesota – 0.9%
|
||||||||||
|
1,750
|
Breckenridge, Minnesota, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 5/01/30
|
5/14 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,840,563
|
||||||
|
6,375
|
Minneapolis Health Care System, Minnesota, Revenue Bonds, Fairview Hospital and Healthcare Services, Series 2008A, 6.625%, 11/15/28
|
11/18 at 100.00
|
A
|
7,695,454
|
||||||
|
2,300
|
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minnesota, Airport Revenue Bonds, Refunding Subordinate Lien Series 2005C, 5.000%, 1/01/31 – FGIC Insured
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,436,206
|
||||||
|
6,730
|
Saint Paul Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Minnesota, Health Care Facility Revenue Bonds, HealthPartners Obligated Group, Series 2006, 5.250%, 5/15/36
|
11/16 at 100.00
|
A–
|
7,075,384
|
||||||
|
17,155
|
Total Minnesota
|
19,047,607
|
||||||||
|
Missouri – 3.3%
|
||||||||||
|
6,000
|
Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District, Missouri, Mass Transit Sales Tax Appropriation Bonds, Metrolink Cross County Extension Project, Series 2002B, 5.000%, 10/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
10/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
6,196,560
|
||||||
|
40,000
|
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, BJC Health System, Series 2003, 5.250%, 5/15/32
|
5/13 at 100.00
|
AA
|
40,907,600
|
||||||
|
12,000
|
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, SSM Health Care System, Series 2010B, 5.000%, 6/01/30
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
13,551,600
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Sugar Creek, Missouri, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Lafarge North America Inc., Series 2003A, 5.650%, 6/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/13 at 101.00
|
BB+
|
4,017,160
|
||||||
|
West Plains Industrial Development Authority, Missouri, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Ozark Medical Center, Series 1997:
|
||||||||||
|
390
|
5.500%, 11/15/12
|
No Opt. Call
|
BB–
|
390,398
|
||||||
|
1,100
|
5.600%, 11/15/17
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
1,101,342
|
||||||
|
3,085
|
West Plains Industrial Development Authority, Missouri, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Ozark Medical Center, Series 1999, 6.750%, 11/15/24
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
3,089,597
|
||||||
|
66,575
|
Total Missouri
|
69,254,257
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
29
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Montana – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
3,750
|
Forsyth, Rosebud County, Montana, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Puget Sound Energy, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 3/01/31 – AMBAC Insured
|
3/13 at 101.00
|
A–
|
$
|
3,810,638
|
||||
|
Nebraska – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
Omaha Public Power District, Nebraska, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.500%, 2/01/39
|
2/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
5,795,650
|
||||||
|
Nevada – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
2,500
|
Carson City, Nevada, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Carson-Tahoe Hospital, Series 2003A, 5.125%, 9/01/29 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13) – RAAI Insured
|
9/13 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
2,599,200
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Clark County, Nevada, Airport Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Series 2010B, 5.750%, 7/01/42
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,760,400
|
||||||
|
863
|
Nevada State Las Vegas Monorail Company, Nevada, Series 2012A, 5.500%, 7/15/19 (6)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R
|
622,281
|
||||||
|
259
|
Nevada State Las Vegas Monorail Company, Nevada, Series 2012B, 3.000%, 6/30/55 (6)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R
|
107,435
|
||||||
|
10,000
|
North Las Vegas, Nevada, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/36 – NPFG Insured
|
5/16 at 100.00
|
A
|
10,256,300
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Reno, Nevada, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2007A, Trust 2634, 18.354%, 7/01/31 – BHAC Insured (IF) (7)
|
7/17 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
3,857,300
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Sparks Tourism Improvement District 1, Legends at Sparks Marina, Nevada, Senior Sales Tax Revenue Bonds Series 2008A, 6.750%, 6/15/28
|
6/18 at 100.00
|
B2
|
1,547,115
|
||||||
|
22,622
|
Total Nevada
|
24,750,031
|
||||||||
|
New Hampshire – 0.1%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Elliot Hospital Obligated Group Issue, Series 2009A, 6.125%, 10/01/39
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
1,699,110
|
||||||
|
New Jersey – 2.9%
|
||||||||||
|
9,000
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Continental Airlines Inc., Series 2000, 7.000%, 11/15/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
B
|
9,033,750
|
||||||
|
3,300
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, New Jersey, Revenue Bonds, Saint Peters University Hospital, Series 2007, 5.750%, 7/01/37
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
3,511,728
|
||||||
|
4,740
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Saint Barnabas Health Care System, Refunding Series 2006B, 0.000%, 7/01/34
|
1/17 at 41.49
|
BBB+
|
1,568,466
|
||||||
|
7,500
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System Bonds, Series 2003C, 5.500%, 6/15/24 (Pre-refunded 6/15/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
7,747,500
|
||||||
|
1,560
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System Bonds, Series 2004B, 5.250%, 12/15/12 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
1,569,750
|
||||||
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, Transportation System Bonds, Series 2006C:
|
||||||||||
|
30,000
|
0.000%, 12/15/30 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
13,815,000
|
||||||
|
27,000
|
0.000%, 12/15/32 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
11,308,680
|
||||||
|
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Revenue Bonds, Series 1991C:
|
||||||||||
|
105
|
6.500%, 1/01/16 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+ (4)
|
125,116
|
||||||
|
310
|
6.500%, 1/01/16 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+ (4)
|
362,111
|
||||||
|
1,150
|
6.500%, 1/01/16 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+ (4)
|
1,249,935
|
||||||
|
7,165
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New Jersey, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003, 6.250%, 6/01/43 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
7,418,068
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New Jersey, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007-1A, 4.750%, 6/01/34
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B2
|
4,335,950
|
||||||
|
96,830
|
Total New Jersey
|
62,046,054
|
||||||||
|
New Mexico – 0.1%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
University of New Mexico, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1992A, 6.000%, 6/01/21
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
1,795,215
|
|
30
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
New York – 5.8%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
10,000
|
Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, FHA Insured Mortgage Hospital Revenue Bonds, Kaleida Health, Series 2006, 4.700%, 2/15/35
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
$
|
10,421,500
|
||||
|
8,500
|
Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, FHA-Insured Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Kaleida Health, Series 2004, 5.050%, 2/15/25 (Pre-refunded 2/15/14)
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
9,009,235
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Long Island Power Authority, New York, Electric System General Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 12/01/35
|
6/16 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,119,860
|
||||||
|
1,510
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, New York, Civic Facility Revenue Bonds, Vaughn College of Aeronautics, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 12/01/31
|
12/16 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
1,569,781
|
||||||
|
10,000
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, New York, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, JFK Airport – American Airlines Inc., Series 2002B, 8.500%, 8/01/28 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
8/13 at 100.50
|
N/R
|
10,150,300
|
||||||
|
9,850
|
New York City Industrial Development Authority, New York, PILOT Revenue Bonds, Yankee Stadium Project, Series 2006, 4.750%, 3/01/46 – NPFG Insured
|
9/16 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
10,086,400
|
||||||
|
5,500
|
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, New York, Water and Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B, 5.000%, 6/15/36 – AGM Insured (UB)
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
5,950,945
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, New York, Future Tax Secured Bonds, Fiscal Series 2007B, 4.750%, 11/01/27
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
5,687,050
|
||||||
|
New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Fiscal Series 2003J:
|
||||||||||
|
1,450
|
5.500%, 6/01/21 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,494,878
|
||||||
|
385
|
5.500%, 6/01/22 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
396,916
|
||||||
|
New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Fiscal Series 2004C:
|
||||||||||
|
190
|
5.250%, 8/15/24
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
206,023
|
||||||
|
255
|
5.250%, 8/15/25
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
276,313
|
||||||
|
New York City, New York, General Obligation Bonds, Fiscal Series 2004C:
|
||||||||||
|
7,810
|
5.250%, 8/15/24 (Pre-refunded 8/15/14)
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
8,494,000
|
||||||
|
5,745
|
5.250%, 8/15/25 (Pre-refunded 8/15/14)
|
8/14 at 100.00
|
Aa2 (4)
|
6,248,147
|
||||||
|
10,355
|
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, State Clean Water and Drinking Water Revolving Funds Revenue Bonds, New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority Projects, Second Resolution Series 2012A, 2.000%, 6/15/13
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
10,478,535
|
||||||
|
820
|
New York State Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed and State Contingency Contract-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1C, 5.500%, 6/01/18
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
823,534
|
||||||
|
28,810
|
New York State Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed and State Contingency Contract-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 5.500%, 6/01/19
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
29,660,759
|
||||||
|
8,575
|
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
10,033,179
|
||||||
|
116,755
|
Total New York
|
123,107,355
|
||||||||
|
North Carolina – 0.7%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
Charlotte, North Carolina, Certificates of Participation, Governmental Facilities Projects, Series 2003G, 5.000%, 6/01/33
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
1,533,615
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Charlotte-Mecklenberg Hospital Authority, North Carolina, Health Care Revenue Bonds, DBA Carolinas HealthCare System, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 1/15/47
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,196,140
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Charlotte-Mecklenberg Hospital Authority, North Carolina, Health Care Revenue Bonds, DBA Carolinas HealthCare System, Series 2011A, 5.125%, 1/15/37
|
1/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,683,270
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, Power System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003D, 5.125%, 1/01/26 (Pre-refunded 1/01/13)
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
A– (4)
|
2,520,275
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
North Carolina Infrastructure Finance Corporation, Certificates of Participation, Correctional Facilities, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 2/01/20 (Pre-refunded 2/01/14)
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
1,588,635
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health System Revenue Bonds, Mission St. Joseph’s Health System, Series 2007, 4.500%, 10/01/31
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,106,660
|
||||||
|
1,930
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Healthcare Facilities Revenue Bonds, Duke University Health System, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 6/01/42
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
2,218,670
|
||||||
|
13,930
|
Total North Carolina
|
14,847,265
|
||||||||
|
North Dakota – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
7,820
|
Fargo, North Dakota, Health System Revenue Bonds, Sanford Health, Refunding Series 2011, 6.250%, 11/01/31
|
11/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
9,600,223
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
31
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Ohio – 3.2%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
10,000
|
American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., Ohio, General Revenue Bonds, Prairie State Energy Campus Project Series 2008A, 5.250%, 2/15/43
|
2/18 at 100.00
|
A1
|
$
|
10,936,200
|
||||
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2:
|
||||||||||
|
5,745
|
5.375%, 6/01/24
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B
|
5,133,789
|
||||||
|
1,775
|
5.125%, 6/01/24
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B
|
1,550,818
|
||||||
|
5,500
|
5.875%, 6/01/30
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B+
|
4,774,330
|
||||||
|
17,165
|
5.750%, 6/01/34
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB
|
14,523,993
|
||||||
|
3,520
|
6.000%, 6/01/42
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
3,051,347
|
||||||
|
11,940
|
5.875%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB
|
10,252,520
|
||||||
|
16,395
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-3, 0.000%, 6/01/37
|
6/22 at 100.00
|
B+
|
14,293,489
|
||||||
|
1,730
|
Lucas County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, ProMedica Healthcare Obligated Group, Series 2011A, 6.000%, 11/15/41
|
11/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,100,756
|
||||||
|
73,770
|
Total Ohio
|
66,617,242
|
||||||||
|
Oklahoma – 0.8%
|
||||||||||
|
1,400
|
Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Economic Development Authority, Gaming Enterprise Revenue Bonds, Fort Sill Apache Casino, Series 2011A, 8.500%, 8/25/26
|
8/21 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,548,330
|
||||||
|
9,955
|
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, St. John Health System, Series 2004, 5.125%, 2/15/31
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
A
|
10,149,620
|
||||||
|
5,045
|
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, St. John Health System, Series 2004, 5.125%, 2/15/31 (Pre-refunded 2/15/14)
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
5,361,624
|
||||||
|
16,400
|
Total Oklahoma
|
17,059,574
|
||||||||
|
Oregon – 0.1%
|
||||||||||
|
2,860
|
Oregon State Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Willamette University, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 10/01/32
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
A
|
3,082,279
|
||||||
|
Pennsylvania – 1.6%
|
||||||||||
|
10,300
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, Pennsylvania, Revenue Bonds, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 11/15/28
|
11/17 at 100.00
|
B–
|
7,317,120
|
||||||
|
6,500
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.500%, 12/01/31 – AMBAC Insured
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
7,048,470
|
||||||
|
8,000
|
Philadelphia School District, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004D, 5.125%, 6/01/34 (Pre-refunded 6/01/14) – FGIC Insured
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
AA (4)
|
8,606,880
|
||||||
|
10,075
|
State Public School Building Authority, Pennsylvania, Lease Revenue Bonds, Philadelphia School District, Series 2003, 5.000%, 6/01/33 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13) – AGM Insured
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
10,354,682
|
||||||
|
34,875
|
Total Pennsylvania
|
33,327,152
|
||||||||
|
Puerto Rico – 2.6%
|
||||||||||
|
8,340
|
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewerage Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008A, 6.000%, 7/01/44
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
8,727,643
|
||||||
|
13,000
|
Puerto Rico Highway and Transportation Authority, Highway Revenue Bonds, Series 2007N, 5.250%, 7/01/39 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Baa1
|
13,742,300
|
||||||
|
5,450
|
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Co-Generation Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 2000A, 6.625%, 6/01/26 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
Ba1
|
5,471,691
|
||||||
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, First Subordinate Series 2009A:
|
||||||||||
|
11,000
|
0.000%, 8/01/32
|
8/26 at 100.00
|
A+
|
11,180,730
|
||||||
|
4,985
|
6.000%, 8/01/42
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,521,187
|
||||||
|
4,310
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, First Subordinate Series 2010C, 5.250%, 8/01/41
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
4,561,144
|
||||||
|
76,485
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 0.000%, 8/01/54 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
6,433,918
|
||||||
|
123,570
|
Total Puerto Rico
|
55,638,613
|
|
32
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Rhode Island – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
6,250
|
Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corporation, Hospital Financing Revenue Bonds, Lifespan Obligated Group, Series 1996, 5.250%, 5/15/26 – NPFG Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
$
|
6,258,375
|
||||
|
19,205
|
Rhode Island Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2002A, 6.250%, 6/01/42
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
19,588,908
|
||||||
|
25,455
|
Total Rhode Island
|
25,847,283
|
||||||||
|
South Carolina – 2.1%
|
||||||||||
|
7,000
|
Dorchester County School District 2, South Carolina, Installment Purchase Revenue Bonds, GROWTH, Series 2004, 5.250%, 12/01/29
|
12/14 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
7,563,850
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, Hospitality and Accommodation Fee Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 6/01/36 – FGIC Insured
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
A+
|
3,073,530
|
||||||
|
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, South Carolina, Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A-2:
|
||||||||||
|
11,735
|
0.000%, 1/01/28 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
6,724,742
|
||||||
|
9,500
|
0.000%, 1/01/29 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
5,198,020
|
||||||
|
16,430
|
South Carolina JOBS Economic Development Authority, Economic Development Revenue Bonds, Bon Secours Health System Inc., Series 2002B, 5.625%, 11/15/30
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A
|
16,490,462
|
||||||
|
4,215
|
Spartanburg Sanitary Sewer District, South Carolina, Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 3/01/38 – NPFG Insured
|
3/14 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
4,410,028
|
||||||
|
51,880
|
Total South Carolina
|
43,460,632
|
||||||||
|
Tennessee – 0.7%
|
||||||||||
|
10,300
|
Jackson, Tennessee, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Jackson-Madison County General Hospital Project, Series 2008, 5.625%, 4/01/38
|
4/18 at 100.00
|
A+
|
11,716,662
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Sullivan County Health Educational and Housing Facilities Board, Tennessee, Revenue Bonds, Wellmont Health System, Series 2006C, 5.250%, 9/01/36
|
9/16 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
3,141,120
|
||||||
|
13,300
|
Total Tennessee
|
14,857,782
|
||||||||
|
Texas – 8.0%
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
Alliance Airport Authority, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, American Airlines Inc., Series 2007, 5.250%, 12/01/29 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (8)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,237,800
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Austin Convention Enterprises Inc., Texas, Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds, Second Tier Series 2006B, 5.750%, 1/01/34
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
Ba2
|
2,052,240
|
||||||
|
5,560
|
Beaumont Independent School District, Jefferson County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 2/15/38
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
6,280,020
|
||||||
|
5,110
|
Brazos River Authority, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, TXU Electric Company, Series 1999C, 7.700%, 3/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
4/13 at 101.00
|
Ca
|
714,225
|
||||||
|
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Travis and Williamson Counties, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Series 2005:
|
||||||||||
|
4,000
|
5.000%, 1/01/35 – FGIC Insured
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
4,072,840
|
||||||
|
31,550
|
5.000%, 1/01/45 – FGIC Insured
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
32,059,217
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Harris County Hospital District, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 2/15/42 – NPFG Insured
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
5,626,200
|
||||||
|
11,900
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Junior Lien Series 2001H, 0.000%, 11/15/27 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
5,155,556
|
||||||
|
3,880
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2001G, 5.250%, 11/15/30 – NPFG Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
3,885,277
|
||||||
|
13,870
|
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Third Lien Series 2004A-3, 0.000%, 11/15/33 – NPFG Insured
|
11/24 at 59.10
|
BBB
|
4,181,528
|
||||||
|
Houston, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax and Special Revenue Bonds, Convention and Entertainment Project, Series 2001B:
|
||||||||||
|
24,755
|
0.000%, 9/01/29 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A2
|
11,186,289
|
||||||
|
10,000
|
0.000%, 9/01/31 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A2
|
3,977,900
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Kerrville Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Sid Peterson Memorial Hospital Project, Series 2005, 5.375%, 8/15/35
|
2/16 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
5,186,950
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
33
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Texas (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,000
|
Love Field Airport Modernization Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest Airlines Company – Love Field Modernization Program Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 11/01/28 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
$
|
2,161,800
|
||||
|
1,750
|
Martin County Hospital District, Texas, Combination Limited Tax and Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 7.250%, 4/01/36
|
4/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,969,065
|
||||||
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 2008I:
|
||||||||||
|
30,000
|
0.000%, 1/01/42 – AGC Insured
|
1/25 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
32,699,700
|
||||||
|
5,220
|
0.000%, 1/01/43
|
1/25 at 100.00
|
A2
|
5,807,720
|
||||||
|
15,450
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008D, 0.000%, 1/01/36 – AGC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
5,320,517
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Richardson Hospital Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Richardson Regional Medical Center, Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/01/34
|
12/13 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,128,600
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Sabine River Authority, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, TXU Electric Company, Series 2003A, 5.800%, 7/01/22
|
7/13 at 101.00
|
CC
|
215,920
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
San Antonio, Texas, Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 4.750%, 5/15/37 – NPFG Insured
|
5/15 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
3,235,350
|
||||||
|
11,585
|
Tarrant County Cultural & Educational Facilities Financing Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Texas Health Resources Trust 1201, 9.101%, 2/15/30 (IF)
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
13,408,711
|
||||||
|
4,810
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Scott & White HealthCare Project, Series 2010, 5.500%, 8/15/45
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,451,846
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Christus Health, Series 2008, 6.500%, 7/01/37 – AGC Insured
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,887,400
|
||||||
|
213,440
|
Total Texas
|
168,902,671
|
||||||||
|
Utah – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
3,260
|
Eagle Mountain, Utah, Gas and Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 6/01/24 – RAAI Insured
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,371,525
|
||||||
|
70
|
Utah Housing Finance Agency, Single Family Mortgage Bonds, Series 1998G-2, Class I, 5.200%, 7/01/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
70,073
|
||||||
|
3,700
|
Utah State Board of Regents, Utah State University, Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 4/01/35 (Pre-refunded 4/01/14) – NPFG Insured
|
4/14 at 100.00
|
AA (4)
|
3,945,384
|
||||||
|
7,030
|
Total Utah
|
7,386,982
|
||||||||
|
Virginia – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
Fairfax County Economic Development Authority, Virginia, Residential Care Facilities Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Goodwin House, Inc., Series 2007A, 5.125%, 10/01/42
|
10/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,548,900
|
||||||
|
10,000
|
Metropolitan Washington DC Airports Authority, Virginia, Dulles Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Dulles Metrorail Capital Appreciation, Series 2010B, 0.000%, 10/01/44
|
10/28 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
8,785,300
|
||||||
|
6,675
|
Stafford County and Staunton Industrial Development Authority, Virginia, Revenue Bonds, Virginia Municipal League and Virginia Association of Counties Finance Program, Series 2007C, 5.000%, 2/01/37 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
7,035,851
|
||||||
|
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Elizabeth River Crossing, Opco LLC Project, Series 2012:
|
||||||||||
|
1,180
|
5.250%, 1/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,292,265
|
||||||
|
1,650
|
6.000%, 1/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,903,721
|
||||||
|
3,770
|
5.500%, 1/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
4,146,435
|
||||||
|
24,775
|
Total Virginia
|
24,712,472
|
||||||||
|
Washington – 4.7%
|
||||||||||
|
6,400
|
Cowlitz County Public Utilities District 1, Washington, Electric Production Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 9/01/34 – FGIC Insured
|
9/14 at 100.00
|
A1
|
6,588,864
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Energy Northwest, Washington, Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, Nuclear Project 3, Series 2003A, 5.500%, 7/01/17 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
Aa1 (4)
|
4,140,760
|
|
34
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Washington (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
3,475
|
Port of Seattle, Washington, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004B, 5.000%, 11/01/19 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/13 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
$
|
3,632,696
|
||||
|
2,400
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Kadlec Regional Medical Center, Series 2010, 5.375%, 12/01/33
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
2,575,344
|
||||||
|
3,780
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Series 2011A, 5.625%, 1/01/35
|
1/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
4,250,345
|
||||||
|
12,000
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Health & Services, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 10/01/33
|
10/22 at 100.00
|
AA
|
13,795,200
|
||||||
|
8,200
|
Washington Public Power Supply System, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Nuclear Project 3, Series 1989B, 0.000%, 7/01/14
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa1
|
8,109,800
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northwest Hospital and Medical Center of Seattle, Series 2007, 5.700%, 12/01/32
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,568,550
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Health Care Services, Series 2006A, 4.625%, 10/01/34 – FGIC Insured
|
10/16 at 100.00
|
AA
|
5,294,250
|
||||||
|
2,690
|
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 2/15/27 – NPFG Insured
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,812,476
|
||||||
|
6,400
|
Washington State Housing Finance Commission, Single Family Program Bonds, 2006 Series 3A, 5.000%, 12/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
6,594,368
|
||||||
|
23,185
|
Washington State Tobacco Settlement Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2002, 6.625%, 6/01/32
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
24,170,363
|
||||||
|
Washington State, Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002-03C:
|
||||||||||
|
9,000
|
0.000%, 6/01/29 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
5,217,389
|
||||||
|
16,195
|
0.000%, 6/01/30 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
8,975,429
|
||||||
|
105,225
|
Total Washington
|
98,725,834
|
||||||||
|
Wisconsin – 3.1%
|
||||||||||
|
7,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Ascension Health, Senior Credit Group, Series 2010E, 5.000%, 11/15/33
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
7,790,720
|
||||||
|
6,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Franciscan Sisters of Christian Charity Healthcare Ministry, Series 2003A, 5.875%, 9/01/33 (Pre-refunded 9/01/13)
|
9/13 at 100.00
|
BBB+ (4)
|
6,272,880
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Marshfield Clinic, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 2/15/17
|
2/16 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,100,880
|
||||||
|
2,375
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Marshfield Clinic, Series 2012B, 5.000%, 2/15/40
|
2/22 at 100.00
|
A–
|
2,570,083
|
||||||
|
4,390
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Mercy Alliance, Inc., Series 2012, 5.000%, 6/01/39
|
6/22 at 100.00
|
A2
|
4,734,659
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Meriter Hospital, Inc., Series 2009, 6.000%, 12/01/38
|
12/18 at 100.00
|
A+
|
2,817,100
|
||||||
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Meriter Hospital, Inc., Series 2011A:
|
||||||||||
|
3,500
|
5.750%, 5/01/35
|
5/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
4,039,910
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
6.000%, 5/01/41
|
5/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,790,700
|
||||||
|
6,600
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Ministry Health Care, Inc., Refunding 2012C, 5.000%, 8/15/32
|
8/22 at 100.00
|
A+
|
7,359,132
|
||||||
|
10,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, SSM Healthcare System, Series 2010, 5.000%, 6/01/30
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
11,121,400
|
||||||
|
245
|
Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority, Home Ownership Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 4.875%, 3/01/36 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
9/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
247,989
|
||||||
|
8,945
|
Wisconsin State, General Fund Annual Appropriation Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009A, 6.250%, 5/01/37
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
11,069,972
|
||||||
|
57,555
|
Total Wisconsin
|
64,915,425
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
35
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NUV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Wyoming – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,035
|
Campbell County, Wyoming Solid Waste Facilities Revenue Bonds, Basin Electric Power Cooperative – Dry Fork Station Facilities, Series 2009A, 5.750%, 7/15/39
|
7/19 at 100.00
|
A1
|
$
|
2,341,186
|
||||
|
1,850
|
West Park Hospital District, Wyoming, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 7.000%, 6/01/40
|
6/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,244,529
|
||||||
|
3,885
|
Total Wyoming
|
4,585,715
|
||||||||
|
$
|
2,412,149
|
Total Investments (cost $1,902,194,654) – 99.3%
|
2,090,659,327
|
|||||||
|
Floating Rate Obligations – (0.7)%
|
(14,380,000
|
) | ||||||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 1.4%
|
29,043,402
|
|||||||||
|
Net Assets – 100%
|
$
|
2,105,322,729
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(5)
|
On April 13, 2012, the Fund’s Adviser determined it was unlikely that this borrower would fulfill its entire obligation on this security, and therefore reduced the security’s interest rate of accrual from 5.75% to 4.26%. Additionally, the Adviser instructed the Fund’s custodian to reduce any corresponding current and past due receivable balances by an equal percentage amount.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board of Directors. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
|
(8)
|
At or subsequent to the end of the reporting period, this security is non-income producing. Non-income producing security, in the case of a bond, generally denotes that the issuer has (1) defaulted on the payment of principal or interest, (2) is under the protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court or (3) the Fund’s Adviser has concluded that the issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
WI/DD
|
Purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis.
|
|
|
(ETM)
|
Escrowed to maturity.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
|
|
(UB)
|
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
|
|
|
144A
|
Investment is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These investments may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, which are normally those transactions with qualified institutional buyers.
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
|
36
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund
|
||
|
|
(formerly known as Nuveen Municipal Value Fund 2)
|
|
|
NUW
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Alaska – 0.6%
|
||||||||||
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Alaska, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2006A:
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,050
|
4.625%, 6/01/23
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
Ba1
|
$
|
1,053,140
|
||||
|
350
|
5.000%, 6/01/46
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
B+
|
298,330
|
||||||
|
1,400
|
Total Alaska
|
1,351,470
|
||||||||
|
Arizona – 4.3%
|
||||||||||
|
1,520
|
Arizona School Facilities Board, Certificates of Participation, Series 2003A, 5.000%, 9/01/13 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
1,580,344
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, El Paso Electric Company, Refunding Series 2009A, 7.250%, 2/01/40
|
2/19 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
4,796,680
|
||||||
|
3,045
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/37
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
3,528,972
|
||||||
|
8,565
|
Total Arizona
|
9,905,996
|
||||||||
|
California – 8.7%
|
||||||||||
|
2,500
|
California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of General Services Buildings 8 & 9, Series 2009A, 6.250%, 4/01/34
|
4/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
2,966,950
|
||||||
|
500
|
California State, General Obligation Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3162, 19.775%, 3/01/18 – AGM Insured (IF)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
811,900
|
||||||
|
1,800
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 6/01/45
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
A2
|
1,832,418
|
||||||
|
3,635
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.000%, 6/01/33
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
3,116,395
|
||||||
|
1,750
|
Lodi Unified School District, San Joaquin County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Election 2002 Series 2004, 5.000%, 8/01/29 (Pre-refunded 8/01/13) – AGM Insured
|
8/13 at 100.00
|
AA– (4)
|
1,812,948
|
||||||
|
450
|
M-S-R Energy Authority, California, Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A, 6.500%, 11/01/39
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
630,738
|
||||||
|
10,200
|
Palomar Pomerado Health, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009A, 0.000%, 8/01/38 – AGC Insured
|
8/29 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
8,855,027
|
||||||
|
20,835
|
Total California
|
20,026,376
|
||||||||
|
Colorado – 5.6%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Cherry Creek School District 5, Arapahoe County, Colorado, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005B, 6.000%, 12/15/12
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
1,007,090
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Denver City and County, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 11/15/25 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
|
11/15 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,544,850
|
||||||
|
3,605
|
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Colorado, Toll Revenue Bonds, Series 2004B, 0.000%, 9/01/27 – NPFG Insured
|
9/20 at 67.94
|
BBB
|
1,666,555
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Park Creek Metropolitan District, Colorado, Senior Property Tax Supported Revenue Bonds, Series 2009, 6.375%, 12/01/37 – AGC Insured
|
12/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
4,692,520
|
||||||
|
13,605
|
Total Colorado
|
12,911,015
|
||||||||
|
Florida – 9.1%
|
||||||||||
|
9,500
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Aviation Revenue Bonds, Miami International Airport, Series 2009A, 5.500%, 10/01/41
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
A
|
10,867,999
|
||||||
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, General Obligation Bonds, Build Better Communities Program, Series 2009-B1:
|
||||||||||
|
2,500
|
6.000%, 7/01/38
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
2,970,450
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
5.625%, 7/01/38
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
2,336,880
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Orange County, Florida, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2002B, 5.125%, 1/01/32 (Pre-refunded 1/01/13) – FGIC Insured
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
AA+ (4)
|
2,016,180
|
||||||
|
300
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Convertible, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012A-2, 0.000%, 5/01/39
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
215,271
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
37
|
|
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NUW
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Florida (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
865
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Convertible, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012A-3, 0.000%, 5/01/40
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$
|
498,301
|
||||
|
375
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Convertible, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012A-4, 0.000%, 5/01/40
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
158,914
|
||||||
|
525
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Hope Note, Series 2007-3, 6.450%, 5/01/23 (5)
|
5/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
5
|
||||||
|
70
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Non Performing ParcelSeries 2007-1. RMKT, 6.450%, 5/01/23 (5)
|
5/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
37,586
|
||||||
|
910
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A-1, 6.450%, 5/01/23
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
889,498
|
||||||
|
2,120
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Southern/Forbearance Parcel Series 2007-2, 6.450%, 5/01/23 (5)
|
5/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
967,038
|
||||||
|
21,165
|
Total Florida
|
20,958,122
|
||||||||
|
Georgia – 0.8%
|
||||||||||
|
495
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, Beltline Project Series 2008A. Remarketed, 7.500%, 1/01/31
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
587,476
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Clayton County Development Authority, Georgia, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Delta Air Lines, Inc. Project, Series 2009A, 8.750%, 6/01/29
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
B–
|
1,249,990
|
||||||
|
1,495
|
Total Georgia
|
1,837,466
|
||||||||
|
Illinois – 10.4%
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, City Colleges, Series 1999, 0.000%, 1/01/37 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa3
|
902,010
|
||||||
|
725
|
Cook and DuPage Counties High School District 210 Lemont, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2006, 5.000%, 1/01/26 – NPFG Insured
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
802,104
|
||||||
|
1,885
|
Cook County Township High School District 225 Northfield, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation Refunding Series 2002B, 0.000%, 12/01/15 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
AAA
|
1,822,135
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Series 2009A, 6.000%, 8/15/39
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
5,886,300
|
||||||
|
3,500
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, OSF Healthcare System, Series 2009A, 7.125%, 11/15/37
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
A
|
4,259,710
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group, Series 2009A, 7.250%, 11/01/38
|
11/18 at 100.00
|
A2
|
6,308,649
|
||||||
|
3,970
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Student Housing Revenue Bonds, Educational Advancement Fund Inc., Refunding Series 2007A, 5.250%, 5/01/34
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
4,179,219
|
||||||
|
23,080
|
Total Illinois
|
24,160,127
|
||||||||
|
Indiana – 5.3%
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Deaconess Hospital Obligated Group, Series 2009A, 6.750%, 3/01/39
|
3/19 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,935,900
|
||||||
|
3,650
|
Indiana Health Facility Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Community Foundation of Northwest Indiana, Series 2007, 5.500%, 3/01/37
|
3/17 at 100.00
|
A–
|
3,946,307
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Power Supply System Revenue Bonds, Series 2009B, 6.000%, 1/01/39
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
A+
|
2,423,120
|
||||||
|
10,650
|
Total Indiana
|
12,305,327
|
||||||||
|
Iowa – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
3,025
|
Iowa Tobacco Settlement Authority, Asset Backed Settlement Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.375%, 6/01/38
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
B+
|
2,812,706
|
||||||
|
Kansas – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Wyandotte County-Kansas City Unified Government, Kansas, Sales Tax Special Obligation Capital Appreciation Revenue Bonds Redevelopment Project Area
B – Major Multi-Sport Athletic Complex Project, Subordinate Lien Series 2010B, 0.000%, 6/01/21 |
No Opt. Call
|
BBB
|
670,820
|
|
38
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Louisiana – 7.4%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
5,000
|
Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2006C-3, 6.125%, 6/01/25 – AGC Insured
|
6/18 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
$
|
5,876,250
|
||||
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Ochsner Clinic Foundation Project, Series 2007A:
|
||||||||||
|
7,000
|
5.375%, 5/15/43
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
7,343,909
|
||||||
|
275
|
5.500%, 5/15/47
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
290,934
|
||||||
|
3,255
|
St John Baptist Parish, Louisiana, Revenue Bonds, Marathon Oil Corporation, Series 2007A, 5.125%, 6/01/37
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
3,507,100
|
||||||
|
15,530
|
Total Louisiana
|
17,018,193
|
||||||||
|
Maine – 2.0%
|
||||||||||
|
3,335
|
Maine Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Bowdoin College, Tender Option Bond Trust 2009-5B, 13.484%, 7/01/39 (IF) (6)
|
7/19 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
4,628,380
|
||||||
|
Massachusetts – 0.7%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, Pooled Loan Program Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 2989, 13.074%, 8/01/38 (IF)
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,537,270
|
||||||
|
Michigan – 4.0%
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
Detroit Water Supply System, Michigan, Water Supply System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2006D, 5.000%, 7/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,146,610
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Detroit, Michigan, Second Lien Sewerage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 7/01/35 – NPFG Insured
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
A
|
5,144,800
|
||||||
|
1,050
|
Huron Valley School District, Oakland and Livingston Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/13 – AGM Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
1,074,308
|
||||||
|
9,050
|
Total Michigan
|
9,365,718
|
||||||||
|
Nevada – 2.8%
|
||||||||||
|
250
|
Clark County, Nevada, Senior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 7/01/40 – AMBAC Insured
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
268,578
|
||||||
|
5,415
|
Las Vegas Redevelopment Agency, Nevada, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A, 8.000%, 6/15/30
|
6/19 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
6,199,363
|
||||||
|
5,665
|
Total Nevada
|
6,467,941
|
||||||||
|
New Jersey – 2.8%
|
||||||||||
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Series 2009B:
|
||||||||||
|
2,135
|
7.125%, 12/01/23
|
6/19 at 100.00
|
A–
|
2,746,912
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
7.500%, 12/01/32
|
6/19 at 100.00
|
A–
|
3,783,570
|
||||||
|
5,135
|
Total New Jersey
|
6,530,482
|
||||||||
|
New York – 1.7%
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
Liberty Development Corporation, New York, Goldman Sachs Headquarters Revenue Bonds Series 2007, 5.500%, 10/01/37
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
3,691,950
|
||||||
|
130
|
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
152,107
|
||||||
|
3,130
|
Total New York
|
3,844,057
|
||||||||
|
North Carolina – 1.3%
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
North Carolina Municipal Power Agency 1, Catawba Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2003A, 5.250%, 1/01/19 – NPFG Insured
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
3,024,570
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
39
|
|
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NUW
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Ohio – 6.7%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
5,000
|
American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., General Revenue Bonds, Prairie State Energy Campus Project Series 2009A, 5.750%, 2/15/39 – AGC Insured
|
2/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
$
|
5,750,000
|
||||
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2:
|
||||||||||
|
2,115
|
5.875%, 6/01/30
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B+
|
1,835,947
|
||||||
|
5,885
|
6.500%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB
|
5,532,077
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds, University Hospitals Health System, Series 2009, 6.750%, 1/15/39 (Pre-refunded 1/15/15)
|
1/15 at 100.00
|
A (4)
|
2,278,240
|
||||||
|
15,000
|
Total Ohio
|
15,396,264
|
||||||||
|
Puerto Rico – 4.7%
|
||||||||||
|
4,390
|
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewerage Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008A, 6.000%, 7/01/44
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
4,594,047
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, First Subordinate Series 2009A, 6.000%, 8/01/42
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
A+
|
3,322,680
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 11851, 18.446%, 2/01/16 (IF)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
3,031,700
|
||||||
|
9,890
|
Total Puerto Rico
|
10,948,427
|
||||||||
|
Rhode Island – 3.0%
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
Rhode Island Health and Educational Building Corporation, Hospital Financing Revenue Bonds, Lifespan Obligated Group Issue, Series 2009A, 7.000%, 5/15/39
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
A–
|
3,548,280
|
||||||
|
3,240
|
Rhode Island Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2002A, 6.125%, 6/01/32
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
3,304,768
|
||||||
|
6,240
|
Total Rhode Island
|
6,853,048
|
||||||||
|
Texas – 5.8%
|
||||||||||
|
3,550
|
Ennis Independent School District, Ellis County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 0.000%, 8/15/31
|
8/16 at 46.64
|
Aaa
|
1,518,051
|
||||||
|
5,300
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Second Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2008F, 5.750%, 1/01/38
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A3
|
5,849,663
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Richardson Hospital Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Richardson Regional Medical Center, Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/01/34
|
12/13 at 100.00
|
A+
|
5,128,600
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Public Financing Authority, Refunding Series 2011, 4.000%, 10/01/13
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aaa
|
1,034,920
|
||||||
|
14,850
|
Total Texas
|
13,531,234
|
||||||||
|
Virgin Islands – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Revenue Loan Note – Diageo Project, Series 2009A, 6.750%, 10/01/37
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,184,460
|
||||||
|
Virginia – 1.1%
|
||||||||||
|
2,000
|
Washington County Industrial Development Authority , Virginia, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mountain States Health Alliance, Series 2009C, 7.750%, 7/01/38
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
2,494,700
|
|
40
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Wisconsin – 7.7%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
5,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Aurora Healthcare Inc., Series 2003, 6.400%, 4/15/33
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
A
|
$
|
5,069,700
|
||||
|
1,500
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, ProHealth Care, Inc. Obligated Group, Series 2009, 6.625%, 2/15/39
|
2/19 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,760,145
|
||||||
|
9,000
|
Wisconsin State, General Fund Annual Appropriation Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009A, 6.000%, 5/01/36
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
11,051,098
|
||||||
|
15,500
|
Total Wisconsin
|
17,880,943
|
||||||||
|
$
|
215,145
|
Total Investments (cost $183,350,011) – 98.5%
|
227,645,112
|
|||||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 1.5%
|
3,494,663
|
|||||||||
|
Net Assets – 100%
|
$
|
231,139,775
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(5)
|
At or subsequent to the end of the reporting period, this security is non-income producing. Non-income producing security, in the case of a bond, generally denotes that the issuer has (1) defaulted on the payment of principal or interest, (2) is under the protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court or (3) the Fund’s Adviser has concluded that the issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
41
|
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
|
|
|
NMI
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Alabama – 1.6%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,000
|
Courtland Industrial Development Board, Alabama, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, International Paper Company Project, Series 2005A, 5.200%, 6/01/25 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
$
|
1,034,110
|
||||
|
500
|
Jefferson County, Alabama, Limited Obligation School Warrants, Education Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.250%, 1/01/23 – AGM Insured
|
1/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
509,610
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Total Alabama
|
1,543,720
|
||||||||
|
Arizona – 0.6%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007, 5.250%, 12/01/28
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
590,755
|
||||||
|
California – 19.4%
|
||||||||||
|
5,530
|
Adelanto School District, San Bernardino County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1997A, 0.000%, 9/01/22 – NPFG Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
A+
|
3,938,245
|
||||||
|
Brea Olinda Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 1999A:
|
||||||||||
|
2,000
|
0.000%, 8/01/21 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
1,496,900
|
||||||
|
2,070
|
0.000%, 8/01/22 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
1,465,022
|
||||||
|
2,120
|
0.000%, 8/01/23 – FGIC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
1,407,616
|
||||||
|
450
|
California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Los Angeles County Securitization Corporation, Series 2006A, 5.250%, 6/01/21
|
12/18 at 100.00
|
B2
|
449,519
|
||||||
|
250
|
California Housing Finance Agency, California, Home Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007E, 4.800%, 8/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
238,423
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
California State Public Works Board, Lease Revenue Bonds, Department of Mental Health, Coalinga State Hospital, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 6/01/25
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
A2
|
2,634,200
|
||||||
|
375
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, American Baptist Homes of the West, Series 2010, 6.000%, 10/01/29
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
416,516
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
California Statewide Community Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Daughters of Charity Health System, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 7/01/39
|
7/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,025,640
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2003A-1, 6.750%, 6/01/39 (Pre-refunded 6/01/13)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,556,925
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1, 5.750%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
895,930
|
||||||
|
500
|
Lake Elsinore Public Finance Authority, California, Local Agency Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2003H, 6.375%, 10/01/33
|
10/13 at 102.00
|
N/R
|
515,525
|
||||||
|
250
|
Madera County, California, Certificates of Participation, Children’s Hospital Central California, Series 2010, 5.375%, 3/15/36
|
3/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
270,173
|
||||||
|
300
|
M-S-R Energy Authority, California, Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2009A, 7.000%, 11/01/34
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
437,016
|
||||||
|
250
|
Ridgecrest Redevelopment Agency, California, Ridgecrest Redevelopment Project Tax Allocation Bonds, Refunding Series 2010, 6.125%, 6/30/37
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
283,968
|
||||||
|
385
|
San Francisco Redevelopment Finance Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Mission Bay North Redevelopment Project, Series 2011C, 6.000%, 8/01/24
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
461,919
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Union City Community Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Redevelopment Project, Subordinate Lien Series 2011, 6.000%, 12/01/22
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,180,430
|
||||||
|
21,480
|
Total California
|
18,673,967
|
||||||||
|
Colorado – 8.1%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Adams State College, Colorado, Institutional Enterprise Revenue Bonds, Series 2012, 5.000%, 5/15/37
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
1,153,620
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Colorado, Revenue Bonds, Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health Services Corporation, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 1/01/40
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,090,000
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Series 2005, 5.000%, 6/01/35
|
6/16 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,038,970
|
|
42
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Colorado (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,400
|
Denver City and County, Colorado, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012B, 4.000%, 11/15/43
|
11/22 at 100.00
|
A+
|
$
|
1,415,582
|
||||
|
1,000
|
Denver West Metropolitan District, Jefferson County, Colorado, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A, 4.000%, 12/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
12/22 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,049,530
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Park Creek Metropolitan District, Colorado, Senior Limited Property Tax Supported Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2011, 6.125%, 12/01/41 – AGM Insured
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,176,840
|
||||||
|
520
|
Public Authority for Colorado Energy, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Colorado Springs Utilities, Series 2008, 6.125%, 11/15/23
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
636,085
|
||||||
|
250
|
Southlands Metropolitan District 1, Colorado, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.250%, 12/01/34 – RAAI Insured
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
243,675
|
||||||
|
7,170
|
Total Colorado
|
7,804,302
|
||||||||
|
Connecticut – 1.1%
|
||||||||||
|
825
|
Capitol Region Education Council, Connecticut, Revenue Bonds, Series 1995, 6.750%, 10/15/15
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
828,407
|
||||||
|
180
|
Eastern Connecticut Resource Recovery Authority, Solid Waste Revenue Bonds, Wheelabrator Lisbon Project, Series 1993A, 5.500%, 1/01/14 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
180,657
|
||||||
|
1,005
|
Total Connecticut
|
1,009,064
|
||||||||
|
Florida – 5.2%
|
||||||||||
|
105
|
Dade County Industrial Development Authority, Florida, Revenue Bonds, Miami Cerebral Palsy Residential Services Inc., Series 1995, 8.000%, 6/01/22
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
105,023
|
||||||
|
500
|
Florida Higher Educational Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Nova Southeastern University, Refunding Series 2011, 6.375%, 4/01/31
|
4/21 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
584,915
|
||||||
|
1,250
|
Martin County Industrial Development Authority, Florida, Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Indiantown Cogeneration LP, Series 1994A, 7.875%, 12/15/25 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
1,254,975
|
||||||
|
600
|
Martin County Industrial Development Authority, Florida, Industrial Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, Indiantown Cogeneration LP, Series 1995B, 8.050%, 12/15/25 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
602,388
|
||||||
|
660
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Aviation Revenue Bonds, Miami International Airport, Series 2010B, 5.000%, 10/01/35 – AGM Insured
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
734,917
|
||||||
|
525
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Transit System Sales Surtax Revenue Bonds, Series 2012, 5.000%, 7/01/42
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
AA
|
593,460
|
||||||
|
500
|
North Sumter County Utility Dependent District, Florida, Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.375%, 10/01/40
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
556,460
|
||||||
|
610
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2006, 5.400%, 5/01/37
|
5/14 at 101.00
|
BB
|
600,637
|
||||||
|
4,750
|
Total Florida
|
5,032,775
|
||||||||
|
Georgia – 1.0%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Water and Wastewater Revenue Bonds, Series 2009B, 5.250%, 11/01/34 – AGM Insured
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
572,425
|
||||||
|
300
|
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., Georgia, Gas Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 3/15/22
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
338,760
|
||||||
|
800
|
Total Georgia
|
911,185
|
||||||||
|
Illinois – 11.5%
|
||||||||||
|
550
|
Chicago, Illinois, Tax Increment Allocation Bonds, Irving/Cicero Redevelopment Project, Series 1998, 7.000%, 1/01/14
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
551,419
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds – CIPS Debt, Series 1993C-2, 5.950%, 8/15/26
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,501,320
|
||||||
|
500
|
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Chicago Charter School Foundation, Series 2002A, 6.125%, 12/01/22 (Pre-refunded 12/01/12)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
502,445
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Children’s Memorial Hospital, Tender Option Bond Trust 1098, 17.906%, 8/15/15 – AGC Insured (IF) (6)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
1,362,640
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
43
|
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
|
|
NMI
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Illinois (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
250
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Palos Community Hospital, Series 2010C, 5.125%, 5/15/35
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
$
|
274,713
|
||||
|
250
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rush University Medical Center Obligated Group, Series 2009C, 6.375%, 11/01/29
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
307,400
|
||||||
|
500
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Silver Cross Hospital and Medical Centers, Series 2009, 7.000%, 8/15/44
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
599,715
|
||||||
|
250
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Southern Illinois Healthcare Enterprises, Inc., Series 2005 Remarketed, 5.250%, 3/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
3/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
280,905
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare, Series 2002, 5.500%, 1/01/22
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,007,240
|
||||||
|
220
|
Lombard Public Facilities Corporation, Illinois, Second Tier Conference Center and Hotel Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B, 5.250%, 1/01/36
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
CCC
|
112,840
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Illinois, McCormick Place Expansion Project Refunding Bonds, Series 2012B, 5.000%, 6/15/52
|
6/22 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
1,664,805
|
||||||
|
1,305
|
North Chicago, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 11/01/25 – FGIC Insured
|
11/15 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,439,428
|
||||||
|
450
|
Quad Cities Regional Economic Development Authority, Illinois, Revenue Bonds, Augustana College, Series 2012, 5.000%, 10/01/27
|
10/22 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
501,341
|
||||||
|
800
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, Illinois, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 6.000%, 6/01/28
|
6/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
951,400
|
||||||
|
10,075
|
Total Illinois
|
11,057,611
|
||||||||
|
Indiana – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
525
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Drexel Foundation For Educational Excellence, Inc., Series 2009A, 7.000%, 10/01/39
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
576,728
|
||||||
|
500
|
Vigo County Hospital Authority, Indiana, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Union Hospital, Inc., Series 2011, 8.000%, 9/01/41
|
9/21 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
608,405
|
||||||
|
1,025
|
Total Indiana
|
1,185,133
|
||||||||
|
Iowa – 0.9%
|
||||||||||
|
835
|
Iowa Higher Education Loan Authority, Private College Facility Revenue Bonds, University of Dubuque Project, Refunding Series 2011, 5.625%, 10/01/26
|
10/21 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
903,336
|
||||||
|
Kansas – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Overland Park Development Corporation, Kansas, Second Tier Revenue Bonds, Overland Park Convention Center, Series 2007B, 5.125%, 1/01/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
513,345
|
||||||
|
Kentucky – 3.0%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Owensboro Medical Health System, Series 2010A, 6.500%, 3/01/45
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
599,315
|
||||||
|
360
|
Kentucky Housing Corporation, Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2010C, 4.625%, 7/01/33
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
AAA
|
384,988
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Louisville-Jefferson County Metropolitan Government, Kentucky, Health Facilities Revenue Bonds, Jewish Hospital & Saint Mary’s HealthCare Inc. Project, Series 2008, 6.125%, 2/01/37 (Pre-refunded 2/01/18)
|
2/18 at 100.00
|
Aaa
|
1,907,790
|
||||||
|
2,360
|
Total Kentucky
|
2,892,093
|
||||||||
|
Louisiana – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Louisiana Local Government Environmental Facilities and Community Development Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, City of Shreveport Airport System Project, Series 2008A, 5.750%, 1/01/28 – AGM Insured
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
563,215
|
||||||
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Extended Care Facilities Revenue Bonds, Comm-Care Corporation Project, Series 1994:
|
||||||||||
|
55
|
11.000%, 2/01/14 (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R (4)
|
59,011
|
||||||
|
525
|
11.000%, 2/01/14 (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R (4)
|
563,026
|
||||||
|
1,080
|
Total Louisiana
|
1,185,252
|
|
44
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Maryland – 2.5%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,000
|
Maryland Economic Development Corporation, Economic Development Revenue Bonds, Transportation Facilities Project, Series 2010A, 5.750%, 6/01/35
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
$
|
1,131,620
|
||||
|
1,000
|
Maryland Energy Financing Administration, Revenue Bonds, AES Warrior Run Project, Series 1995, 7.400%, 9/01/19 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,005,580
|
||||||
|
210
|
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Patterson Park Public Charter School Issue, Series 2010, 6.000%, 7/01/40
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
226,699
|
||||||
|
2,210
|
Total Maryland
|
2,363,899
|
||||||||
|
Massachusetts – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
40
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Revenue Bonds, Ogden Haverhill Associates, Series 1999A, 6.700%, 12/01/14 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/13 at 100.00
|
A–
|
40,383
|
||||||
|
270
|
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Resource Recovery Revenue Refunding Bonds, Ogden Haverhill Project, Series 1998A, 5.450%, 12/01/12 (Pre-refunded 11/30/12) (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
N/R (4)
|
270,400
|
||||||
|
310
|
Total Massachusetts
|
310,783
|
||||||||
|
Michigan – 1.6%
|
||||||||||
|
355
|
Detroit Water and Sewerage Department, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2012A, 5.250%, 7/01/39
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
A+
|
385,374
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Facilities Program, Series 2011-II-A, 5.375%, 10/15/36
|
10/21 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
1,161,840
|
||||||
|
1,355
|
Total Michigan
|
1,547,214
|
||||||||
|
Mississippi – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Mississippi Business Finance Corporation, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, System Energy Resources Inc. Project, Series 1998, 5.875%, 4/01/22
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
501,500
|
||||||
|
Missouri – 7.3%
|
||||||||||
|
265
|
Hanley Road Corridor Transportation Development District, Brentwood and Maplewood, Missouri, Transportation Sales Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009A, 5.875%, 10/01/36
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
A–
|
295,602
|
||||||
|
4,450
|
Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, Water Facility Revenue Bonds, Missouri-American Water Company, Series 2006, 4.600%, 12/01/36 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax) (UB) (6)
|
12/16 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
4,628,267
|
||||||
|
900
|
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest Baptist University Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 10/01/33
|
10/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
968,850
|
||||||
|
500
|
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rockhurst University, Series 1999, 6.000%, 10/01/25
|
10/18 at 103.00
|
BBB
|
573,820
|
||||||
|
500
|
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rockhurst University, Series 2011A, 5.250%, 10/01/20
|
10/18 at 103.00
|
BBB
|
574,615
|
||||||
|
6,615
|
Total Missouri
|
7,041,154
|
||||||||
|
Montana – 1.3%
|
||||||||||
|
1,200
|
Montana Board of Investments, Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds, Stillwater Mining Company, Series 2000, 8.000%, 7/01/20 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
B
|
1,204,140
|
||||||
|
Nebraska – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
400
|
Nebraska Educational Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Clarkson College Project, Refunding Series 2011, 5.050%, 9/01/30
|
5/21 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
455,108
|
||||||
|
New Jersey – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, New Jersey, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007-1A, 4.750%, 6/01/34
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B2
|
433,595
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
45
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NMI
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
New York – 5.0%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
630
|
Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation, New York, Payment in Lieu of Taxes Revenue Bonds, Barclays Center Project, Series 2009, 6.250%, 7/15/40
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
$
|
735,090
|
||||
|
1,000
|
Dormitory Authority of the State of New York, Revenue Bonds, Brooklyn Law School, Series 2003A, 5.500%, 7/01/15 (Pre-refunded 7/01/13) – RAAI Insured
|
7/13 at 100.00
|
BBB+ (4)
|
1,034,360
|
||||||
|
400
|
Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, Senior Fiscal 2012 Series 2011A, 5.750%, 2/15/47
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
473,056
|
||||||
|
265
|
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
310,063
|
||||||
|
2,100
|
Yates County Industrial Development Agency, New York, FHA-Insured Civic Facility Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Soldiers and Sailors Memorial Hospital, Series 2000A, 6.000%, 2/01/41
|
2/13 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,205,021
|
||||||
|
4,395
|
Total New York
|
4,757,590
|
||||||||
|
North Dakota – 0.4%
|
||||||||||
|
300
|
Fargo, North Dakota, Health System Revenue Bonds, Sanford Health, Refunding Series 2011, 6.250%, 11/01/31
|
11/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
368,295
|
||||||
|
Ohio – 4.1%
|
||||||||||
|
520
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2, 5.875%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB
|
446,508
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Erie County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Firelands Regional Medical Center Project, Series 2006, 5.250%, 8/15/46
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,034,700
|
||||||
|
1,750
|
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest General Health Center Project, Refunding Series 2011, 5.250%, 8/01/36
|
8/21 at 100.00
|
A2
|
1,942,098
|
||||||
|
500
|
Montgomery County, Ohio, Health Care and Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Saint Leonard, Refunding & improvement Series 2010, 6.375%, 4/01/30
|
4/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
562,395
|
||||||
|
3,770
|
Total Ohio
|
3,985,701
|
||||||||
|
Oregon – 1.0%
|
||||||||||
|
850
|
Portland, Oregon, River District Urban Renewal and Redevelopment Bonds, Series 2012C, 5.000%, 6/15/29
|
6/22 at 100.00
|
A1
|
987,675
|
||||||
|
Pennsylvania – 2.8%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Berks County Municipal Authority, Pennsylvania, Revenue Bonds, Reading Hospital and Medical Center Project, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 11/01/40
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,112,230
|
||||||
|
460
|
Cumberland County Municipal Authority Revenue Bonds, Pennsylvania, Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries Project, Series 2009, 6.125%, 1/01/29
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
517,468
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Foundation for Student Housing at Indiana University, Project Series 2012A, 5.000%, 7/01/41
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,074,480
|
||||||
|
2,460
|
Total Pennsylvania
|
2,704,178
|
||||||||
|
Puerto Rico – 0.7%
|
||||||||||
|
640
|
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, First Subordinate Series 2009A, 6.000%, 8/01/42
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
A+
|
708,838
|
||||||
|
Rhode Island – 1.1%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Rhode Island Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2002A, 6.250%, 6/01/42
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,019,990 | ||||||
|
South Carolina – 1.8%
|
||||||||||
|
475
|
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, South Carolina, Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 1991, 6.750%, 1/01/19 – FGIC Insured (ETM)
|
No Opt. Call
|
Baa1 (4)
|
629,408
|
||||||
|
1,105
|
South Carolina JOBS Economic Development Authority, Economic Development Revenue Bonds, Bon Secours Health System Inc., Series 2002B, 5.625%, 11/15/30
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,109,066
|
||||||
|
1,580
|
Total South Carolina
|
1,738,474
|
|
46
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Tennessee – 1.1%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,000
|
Sullivan County Health Educational and Housing Facilities Board, Tennessee, Revenue Bonds, Wellmont Health System, Series 2006C, 5.250%, 9/01/36
|
9/16 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
$
|
1,047,040
|
||||
|
500
|
Sumner County Health, Educational, and Housing Facilities Board, Tennessee, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Sumner Regional Health System Inc., Series 2007, 5.500%, 11/01/37 (5)
|
11/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
10,045
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Total Tennessee
|
1,057,085
|
||||||||
|
Texas – 7.8%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
Cameron Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Faith Family Academy Charter School, Series 2006A, 5.250%, 8/15/36 – ACA Insured
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,499,880
|
||||||
|
350
|
Houston Higher Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Education Revenue Bonds, Cosmos Foundation, Inc., Series 2011A, 6.500%, 5/15/31
|
5/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
438,970
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Matagorda County Navigation District 1, Texas, Collateralized Revenue Refunding Bonds, Houston Light and Power Company, Series 1995, 4.000%, 10/15/15 – NPFG Insured
|
10/13 at 101.00
|
A
|
1,033,540
|
||||||
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Second Tier System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 1015:
|
||||||||||
|
850
|
19.973%, 1/01/38 (IF) (6)
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A3
|
1,307,980
|
||||||
|
150
|
20.081%, 1/01/38 (IF) (6)
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
A3
|
234,842
|
||||||
|
200
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Special Projects System Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 0.000%, 9/01/43
|
9/31 at 100.00
|
AA
|
154,804
|
||||||
|
270
|
SA Energy Acquisition Public Facilities Corporation, Texas, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2007, 5.500%, 8/01/27
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
320,209
|
||||||
|
405
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corporation, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, NTE Mobility Partners LLC North Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project, Series 2009, 6.875%, 12/31/39
|
12/19 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
492,387
|
||||||
|
770
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corporation, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC IH-635 Managed Lanes Project, Series 2010, 7.000%, 6/30/40
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
952,721
|
||||||
|
500
|
Texas Public Finance Authority, Charter School Finance Corporation Revenue Bonds, Idea Public School Project, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 8/15/37 – ACA Insured
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
514,100
|
||||||
|
45
|
West Texas Independent School District, McLennan and Hill Counties, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1998, 0.000%, 8/15/25
|
8/13 at 51.84
|
AAA
|
23,142
|
||||||
|
955
|
West Texas Independent School District, McLennan and Hill Counties, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1998, 0.000%, 8/15/25 (Pre-refunded 8/15/13)
|
8/13 at 51.84
|
Aaa
|
493,620
|
||||||
|
6,995
|
Total Texas
|
7,466,195
|
||||||||
|
Virgin Islands – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
420
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Revenue Loan Note – Diageo Project, Series 2009A, 6.750%, 10/01/37
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
497,473
|
||||||
|
Virginia – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
250
|
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Elizabeth River Crossing, Opco LLC Project, Series 2012, 6.000%, 1/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
288,443
|
||||||
|
Washington – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northwest Hospital and Medical Center of Seattle, Series 2007, 5.700%, 12/01/32
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
513,710
|
||||||
|
Wisconsin – 3.9%
|
||||||||||
|
290
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Beloit Health System, Inc., Series 2010B, 5.000%, 4/01/30
|
4/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
303,421
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Carroll College Inc., Series 2001, 6.250%, 10/01/21
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,002,520
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
47
|
|
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (continued)
|
||
|
NMI
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Wisconsin (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
755
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Gundersen Lutheran, Series 2011A, 5.250%, 10/15/39
|
10/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
$
|
836,525
|
||||
|
500
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Marquette University, Series 2012, 4.000%, 10/01/32
|
10/22 at 100.00
|
A2
|
519,720
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Meriter Hospital, Inc., Series 2011A, 5.500%, 5/01/31
|
5/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
1,124,428
|
||||||
|
3,545
|
Total Wisconsin
|
3,786,614
|
||||||||
|
$
|
94,375
|
Total Investments (cost $86,462,286) – 100.8%
|
97,040,192
|
|||||||
|
Floating Rate Obligations – (3.5)%
|
(3,335,000
|
) | ||||||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.7%
|
2,592,409
|
|||||||||
|
Net Assets – 100%
|
$
|
96,297,601
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are given an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
|
|
|
(5)
|
At or subsequent to the end of the reporting period, this security is non-income producing. Non-income producing security, in the case of a bond, generally denotes that the issuer has (1) defaulted on the payment of principal or interest, (2) is under the protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court or (3) the Fund’s Adviser has concluded that the issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(ETM)
|
Escrowed to maturity.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
|
|
(UB)
|
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
48
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
|
||
|
NEV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Municipal Bonds – 104.4%
|
||||||||||
|
Alabama – 1.5%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,000
|
Jefferson County, Alabama, Limited Obligation School Warrants, Education Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2004A, 5.250%, 1/01/23 – AGM Insured
|
1/14 at 100.00
|
AA
|
$
|
2,038,440
|
||||
|
3,000
|
Jefferson County, Alabama, Sewer Revenue Warrants, Refunding Series 2003C-10, 0.000%, 2/01/42 – AGM Insured (4)
|
2/13 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,415,000
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Total Alabama
|
4,453,440
|
||||||||
|
Arizona – 4.2%
|
||||||||||
|
2,000
|
Arizona State, Certificates of Participation, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 10/01/28 – AGM Insured
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,282,500
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Festival Ranch Community Facilities District, Town of Buckeye, Arizona, District General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009, 6.500%, 7/15/31
|
7/19 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,747,750
|
||||||
|
1,030
|
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Great Hearts Academies – Veritas Project, Series 2012, 6.600%, 7/01/47
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,135,688
|
||||||
|
320
|
Quechan Indian Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation, Arizona, Government Project Bonds, Series 2008, 7.000%, 12/01/27
|
12/17 at 102.00
|
CCC
|
286,438
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Quechan Indian Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation, Arizona, Tribal Economic Development Bonds, Series 2012A, 9.750%, 5/01/25
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,119,580
|
||||||
|
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007:
|
||||||||||
|
50
|
5.000%, 12/01/32
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
57,839
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
5.000%, 12/01/37
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
2,317,880
|
||||||
|
1,911
|
Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,834,503
|
||||||
|
11,811
|
Total Arizona
|
12,782,178
|
||||||||
|
California – 19.8%
|
||||||||||
|
5,000
|
Bay Area Toll Authority, California, Revenue Bonds, San Francisco Bay Area Toll Bridge, Series 2009F-1, 5.000%, 4/01/34
|
4/19 at 100.00
|
AA
|
5,747,900
|
||||||
|
920
|
California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, University of Southern California, Tender Option Bond Trust 3144, 19.155%, 10/01/16 (IF)
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa1
|
1,602,888
|
||||||
|
2,040
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Providence Health & Services, Tender Option Bond Trust 3878, 24.601%, 10/01/33 (IF) (5)
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
AA
|
3,514,186
|
||||||
|
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sutter Health, Tender Option Bond Trust 3248:
|
||||||||||
|
1,700
|
24.268%, 2/15/23 (IF) (5)
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,301,570
|
||||||
|
300
|
24.268%, 2/15/23 (IF) (5)
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
582,630
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Harbor Regional Center Project, Series 2009, 8.000%, 11/01/29
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
1,198,880
|
||||||
|
500
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, American Baptist Homes of the West, Series 2010, 5.750%, 10/01/25
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
547,340
|
||||||
|
400
|
Davis Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Davis Redevelopment Project, Subordinate Series 2011A, 7.000%, 12/01/36
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
A+
|
489,428
|
||||||
|
275
|
Eastern Municipal Water District, California, Water and Sewerage System Revenue Certificates of Participation, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 7/01/32 – NPFG Insured
|
7/16 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
296,183
|
||||||
|
490
|
Etiwanda School District, California, Coyote Canyon Community Facilties District 2004-1 Improvement Area 2 Special Tax Bonds, Series 2009, 6.500%, 9/01/32
|
9/19 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
537,702
|
||||||
|
845
|
Folsom Public Financing Authority, California, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2007A, 5.000%, 9/01/23 – AMBAC Insured
|
9/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
883,270
|
||||||
|
880
|
Folsom Public Financing Authority, California, Subordinate Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 9/01/24
|
9/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
962,086
|
||||||
|
3,030
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 6/01/35 – AGC Insured
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
AA
|
3,115,173
|
||||||
|
Nuveen Investments
|
49
|
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NEV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
California (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,065
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Enhanced Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 1011, 21.054%, 6/01/45 – AMBAC Insured (IF) (5)
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
A2
|
$
|
2,250,850
|
||||
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, California, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds, Series 2007A-1:
|
||||||||||
|
4,055
|
5.750%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
3,632,996
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
5.125%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB–
|
810,400
|
||||||
|
2,550
|
Grossmont Healthcare District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3253, 32.208%, 1/15/19 (IF) (5)
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
6,035,697
|
||||||
|
200
|
Jurupa Public Financing Authority, California, Superior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 9/01/33
|
9/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
217,744
|
||||||
|
1,710
|
Los Angeles Community College District, Los Angeles County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3237, 23.952%, 8/01/27 (IF)
|
8/18 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
3,107,532
|
||||||
|
1,600
|
Los Angeles County, California, Community Development Commission Headquarters Office Building, Lease Revenue Bonds, Community Development Properties Los Angeles County Inc., Tender Option Bond Trust Series 2011-23B, 23.257%, 9/01/42 (IF) (5)
|
9/21 at 100.00
|
Aa3
|
2,472,640
|
||||||
|
525
|
Los Angeles Department of Airports, California, Revenue Bonds, Los Angeles International Airport, Senior Lien Series 2010A, 5.000%, 5/15/31
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
606,281
|
||||||
|
100
|
Los Angeles Regional Airports Improvement Corporation, California, Sublease Revenue Bonds, Los Angeles International Airport, American Airlines Inc. Terminal 4 Project, Series 2002B, 7.500%, 12/01/24 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/12 at 102.00
|
C
|
98,813
|
||||||
|
1,080
|
National City Community Development Commission, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, National City Redevelopment Project, Series 2011, 7.000%, 8/01/32
|
8/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,346,544
|
||||||
|
1,165
|
Novato Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Hamilton Field Redevelopment Project, Series 2011, 6.750%, 9/01/40
|
9/21 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,356,083
|
||||||
|
1,400
|
Palm Drive Health Care District, Sonoma County, California, Certificates of Participation, Parcel Tax Secured Financing Program, Series 2010, 7.000%, 4/01/25
|
4/13 at 102.00
|
BB
|
1,433,334
|
||||||
|
265
|
Palomar Pomerado Health Care District, California, Certificates of Participation, Series 2009, 6.750%, 11/01/39
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
299,871
|
||||||
|
250
|
Ridgecrest Redevelopment Agency, California, Ridgecrest Redevelopment Project Tax Allocation Bonds, Refunding Series 2010, 6.125%, 6/30/37
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
283,968
|
||||||
|
San Francisco Redevelopment Finance Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Mission Bay North Redevelopment Project, Series 2011C:
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
6.500%, 8/01/27
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
607,165
|
||||||
|
700
|
6.750%, 8/01/33
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
840,350
|
||||||
|
500
|
San Francisco Redevelopment Financing Authority, California, Tax Allocation Revenue Bonds, Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Series 2011D, 6.625%, 8/01/27
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
577,725
|
||||||
|
360
|
Santee Community Development Commission, California, Santee Redevelopment Project Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2011A, 7.000%, 8/01/31
|
2/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
441,619
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Semitrophic Improvement District of Semitrophic Water Storage District, Kern County, California, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2009A, 5.000%, 12/01/38
|
12/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,118,960
|
||||||
|
2,400
|
Semitrophic Improvement District of Semitrophic Water Storage District, Kern County, California, Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3584, 21.709%, 6/01/17 (IF) (5)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
3,940,752
|
||||||
|
3,110
|
Stockton Unified School District, San Joaquin County, California, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 8/01/31 – AGM Insured
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,311,652
|
||||||
|
500
|
Tustin Community Redevelopment Agency, California, MCAS Project Area Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2010, 5.000%, 9/01/35
|
9/18 at 102.00
|
A
|
531,070
|
||||||
|
1,045
|
Ukiah Redevelopment Agency, California, Tax Allocation Bonds, Ukiah Redevelopment Project, Series 2011A, 6.500%, 12/01/28
|
6/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,208,511
|
||||||
|
1,020
|
Western Placer Unified School District, Placer County, California, Certificates of Participation, Refunding Series 2009, 5.250%, 8/01/35 – AGM Insured
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,119,042
|
||||||
|
46,480
|
Total California
|
60,428,835
|
|
50
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Colorado – 4.4%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,057
|
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Montessori School of Evergreen, Series 2005A, 6.500%, 12/01/35
|
12/15 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$
|
2,084,852
|
||||
|
845
|
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, Multifamily Housing Revenue Senior Bonds, Castle Highlands Apartments Project, Series 2000A-1, 5.900%, 12/01/20 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
845,355
|
||||||
|
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Confluence Energy LLC Project, Series 2007:
|
||||||||||
|
250
|
6.200%, 4/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R
|
212,213
|
||||||
|
53
|
5.000%, 9/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (6)
|
No Opt. Call
|
N/R
|
33,618
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Conservatory Metropolitan District, Aurora, Arapahoe County, Colorado, General Obligation Bonds, Limited Tax Series 2007, 5.125%, 12/01/37 – RAAI Insured
|
12/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,739,500
|
||||||
|
Plaza Metropolitan District 1, Lakewood, Colorado, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Series 2003:
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
7.600%, 12/01/16
|
6/14 at 101.00
|
N/R
|
1,036,380
|
||||||
|
500
|
7.700%, 12/01/17
|
6/14 at 101.00
|
N/R
|
518,170
|
||||||
|
Public Authority for Colorado Energy, Natural Gas Purchase Revenue Bonds, Colorado Springs Utilities, Series 2008:
|
||||||||||
|
475
|
6.250%, 11/15/28
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
592,415
|
||||||
|
4,030
|
6.500%, 11/15/38
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
5,379,768
|
||||||
|
815
|
Three Springs Metropolitan District 3, Durango, La Plata County, Colorado, Property Tax Supported Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 7.750%, 12/01/39
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
862,629
|
||||||
|
12,025
|
Total Colorado
|
13,304,900
|
||||||||
|
Connecticut – 0.8%
|
||||||||||
|
915
|
Hamden, Connecticut, Facility Revenue Bonds, Whitney Center Project, Series 2009A, 7.750%, 1/01/43
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,005,933
|
||||||
|
1,196
|
Harbor Point Infrastructure Improvement District, Connecticut, Special Obligation Revenue Bonds, Harbor Point Project, Series 2010A, 7.000%, 4/01/22
|
4/20 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,369,743
|
||||||
|
2,111
|
Total Connecticut
|
2,375,676
|
||||||||
|
Delaware – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,630
|
Wilmington, Delaware, Replacement Housing Factor Fund Securitization Revenue Bonds, Wilmington Housing Authority-Lincoln Towers Project, Series 2011, 5.750%, 7/15/16
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,630,782
|
||||||
|
District of Columbia – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
District of Columbia, Revenue Bonds, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Inc., Series 2011, 6.375%, 3/01/31
|
3/21 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,628,400
|
||||||
|
Florida – 6.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,900
|
Ave Maria Stewardship Community Development District, Florida, Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.125%, 5/01/38
|
5/16 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,720,982
|
||||||
|
960
|
Country Greens Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2003, 6.625%, 5/01/34
|
5/13 at 101.00
|
N/R
|
972,874
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Florida Development Finance Corporation, Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Renaissance Charter School, Inc. Projects, Series 2011A, 7.500%, 6/15/33
|
6/21 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
1,168,710
|
||||||
|
2,575
|
Florida Housing Finance Corporation, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2009-2, 4.650%, 7/01/29
|
7/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
2,721,209
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Miami-Dade County Health Facility Authority, Florida, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Miami Children’s Hospital, Series 2010A, 6.000%, 8/01/30
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,204,110
|
||||||
|
1,625
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Aviation Revenue Bonds, Miami International Airport, Series 2010A-1, 5.375%, 10/01/35
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
A
|
1,861,844
|
||||||
|
1,460
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Aviation Revenue Bonds, Miami International Airport, Series 2010B, 5.000%, 10/01/35 – AGM Insured
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,625,725
|
||||||
|
3,660
|
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Special Obligation Bonds, Capital Asset Acquisition Series 2009A, 5.125%, 4/01/34 – AGC Insured
|
4/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
4,051,144
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Mid-Bay Bridge Authority, Florida, Springing Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, 7.250%, 10/01/40
|
10/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
2,537,600
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
North Sumter County Utility Dependent District, Florida, Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.375%, 10/01/40
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,112,920
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
51
|
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NEV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
October 31, 2012
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Florida (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
80
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Convertible, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012A-2, 0.000%, 5/01/39
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
$
|
57,406
|
||||
|
230
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Convertible, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012A-3, 0.000%, 5/01/40
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
132,496
|
||||||
|
95
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Convertible, Capital Appreciation, Series 2012A-4, 0.000%, 5/01/40
|
5/22 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
40,258
|
||||||
|
135
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Hope Note, Series 2007-3, 6.650%, 5/01/40 (4)
|
5/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1
|
||||||
|
20
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Non Performing ParcelSeries 2007-1. RMKT, 6.650%, 5/01/40 (4)
|
5/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
10,714
|
||||||
|
245
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A-1, 6.650%, 5/01/40
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
240,852
|
||||||
|
565
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Florida, Special Assessment Bonds, Southern/Forbearance Parcel Series 2007-2, 6.650%, 5/01/40 (4)
|
5/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
256,663
|
||||||
|
18,550
|
Total Florida
|
19,715,508
|
||||||||
|
Georgia – 6.7%
|
||||||||||
|
12,000
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Airport General Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2010C, 5.250%, 1/01/30 (UB)
|
1/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
13,965,960
|
||||||
|
745
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, Beltline Project Series 2008A. Remarketed, 7.500%, 1/01/31
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
884,181
|
||||||
|
955
|
Atlanta, Georgia, Tax Allocation Bonds, Beltline Project Series 2008B. Remarketed, 6.750%, 1/01/20
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
A2
|
1,113,253
|
||||||
|
1,250
|
Clayton County Development Authority, Georgia, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Delta Air Lines, Inc. Project, Series 2009A, 8.750%, 6/01/29
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
B–
|
1,562,488
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Clayton County Development Authority, Georgia, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Delta Air Lines, Inc. Project, Series 2009B, 9.000%, 6/01/35 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
B–
|
2,796,250
|
||||||
|
90
|
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., Georgia, Gas Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B, 5.000%, 3/15/22
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
101,628
|
||||||
|
150
|
Main Street Natural Gas Inc., Georgia, Gas Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.500%, 9/15/26
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
178,467
|
||||||
|
17,690
|
Total Georgia
|
20,602,227
|
||||||||
|
Illinois – 11.2%
|
||||||||||
|
3,335
|
CenterPoint Intermodal Center Program Trust, Illinois, Series 2004 Class A Certificates, 5.950%, 6/15/23
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
3,337,868
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Chicago, Illinois, Chicago O’Hare International Airport Special Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, American Air Lines, Inc. Project, Series 2007, 5.500%, 12/01/30 (4)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,305,240
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Grundy County School District 54 Morris, Illinois, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2005, 6.000%, 12/01/24 – AGM Insured
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
2,459,960
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, Christian Homes, Inc., Refunding Series 2010, 6.125%, 5/15/27
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,116,500
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Recovery Zone Facility Revenue Bonds, Navistar International Corporation Project, Series 2010, 6.500%, 10/15/40
|
10/20 at 100.00
|
B2
|
3,121,950
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Admiral at Lake Project, Temps 65 Series 2010D-2, 6.375%, 5/15/17
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,001,210
|
||||||
|
4,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Illinois Institute of Technology, Refunding Series 2006A, 5.000%, 4/01/36
|
4/16 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
3,730,760
|
||||||
|
1,180
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Little Company of Mary Hospital and Health Care Centers, Series 2010, 5.250%, 8/15/36
|
8/15 at 105.00
|
A+
|
1,284,406
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Montgomery Place Project, Series 2006A, 5.500%, 5/15/26
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,022,090
|
||||||
|
1,975
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Tender Option Bonds Trust 11-16B, 26.909%, 8/15/39 (IF) (5)
|
8/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
3,725,443
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Palos Community Hospital, Series 2010C, 5.125%, 5/15/35
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,098,850
|
||||||
|
500
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Southern Illinois Healthcare Enterprises, Inc., Series 2005 Remarketed, 5.250%, 3/01/30 – AGM Insured
|
3/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
561,810
|
|
52
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Illinois (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
455
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, The Carle Foundation, Tender Option Bond Trust 3908, 26.191%, 2/15/19 – AGM Insured (IF) (5)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
$
|
839,912
|
||||
|
1,000
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Resurrection Health Care Corporation, Series 2009, 6.125%, 5/15/25
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,152,090
|
||||||
|
2,235
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Student Housing Revenue Bonds, MJH Education Assistance Illinois IV LLC, Fullerton Village Project, Series 2004A, 5.000%, 6/01/24 (4)
|
6/14 at 100.00
|
Ca
|
1,921,988
|
||||||
|
500
|
Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare, Series 2002, 5.500%, 1/01/22
|
1/13 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
503,620
|
||||||
|
Lombard Public Facilities Corporation, Illinois, Second Tier Conference Center and Hotel Revenue Bonds, Series 2005B:
|
||||||||||
|
2,685
|
5.250%, 1/01/30
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
CCC
|
1,390,723
|
||||||
|
1,515
|
5.250%, 1/01/36
|
1/16 at 100.00
|
CCC
|
777,059
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement Authority, Illinois, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 6.000%, 6/01/28
|
6/21 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,189,250
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Southwestern Illinois Development Authority, Illinois, Saint Clair County Comprehensive Mental Health Center, Series 2007, 6.625%, 6/01/37
|
6/17 at 103.00
|
N/R
|
1,540,740
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Springfield, Sangamon County, Illinois, Special Service Area, Legacy Pointe, Special Assessment Bonds, Series 2009, 7.875%, 3/01/32
|
3/17 at 102.00
|
N/R
|
1,082,110
|
||||||
|
33,880
|
Total Illinois
|
34,163,579
|
||||||||
|
Indiana – 1.3%
|
||||||||||
|
1,395
|
Indiana Finance Authority, Educational Facilities Revenue Bonds, Drexel Foundation For Educational Excellence, Inc., Series 2009A, 6.625%, 10/01/29
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
1,512,710
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Vigo County Hospital Authority, Indiana, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Union Hospital, Inc., Series 2011, 7.750%, 9/01/31
|
9/21 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,448,840
|
||||||
|
3,395
|
Total Indiana
|
3,961,550
|
||||||||
|
Iowa – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
650
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Iowa, Midwestern Disaster Area Revenue Bonds, Alcoa Inc. Project, Series 2012, 4.750%, 8/01/42
|
8/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
664,216
|
||||||
|
Kansas – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
Overland Park Development Corporation, Kansas, Second Tier Revenue Bonds, Overland Park Convention Center, Series 2007B, 5.125%, 1/01/22 – AMBAC Insured
|
1/17 at 100.00
|
BB+
|
1,540,035
|
||||||
|
Louisiana – 1.5%
|
||||||||||
|
2,710
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Lake Charles Charter Academy Foundation Project, Series 2011A, 7.750%, 12/15/31
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,884,470
|
||||||
|
1,165
|
Louisiana State, Gasoline and Fuels Tax Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 11899, 17.760%, 5/01/33 (IF)
|
5/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,828,433
|
||||||
|
3,875
|
Total Louisiana
|
4,712,903
|
||||||||
|
Massachusetts – 2.0%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, 100 Cambridge Street Redevelopment, M/SRBC Project, Series 2002A, 5.125%, 2/01/34 – NPFG Insured
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,001,000
|
||||||
|
625
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Issue I Series 2010A, 5.500%, 1/01/22
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
731,869
|
||||||
|
830
|
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Issue I Series 2010B, 5.500%, 1/01/23
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
907,671
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority Revenue Bonds, Quincy Medical Center Issue, Series 2008A, 6.250%, 1/15/28 (4)
|
1/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
15,360
|
||||||
|
2,385
|
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Emerson Hospital, Series 2005E, 5.000%, 8/15/35 – RAAI Insured
|
8/15 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,346,578
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, Housing Bonds, Series 2010C, 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
1,078,730
|
||||||
|
8,840
|
Total Massachusetts
|
6,081,208
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
53
|
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NEV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Michigan – 6.8%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
9,650
|
Detroit City School District, Wayne County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.250%, 5/01/27 – AGM Insured (UB) (5)
|
No Opt. Call
|
Aa2
|
$
|
11,789,695
|
||||
|
2,865
|
Marysville Public School District, St Claire County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/01/32 – AGM Insured
|
5/17 at 100.00
|
Aa2
|
3,213,298
|
||||||
|
2,100
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Henry Ford Health System, Refunding Series 2009, 5.750%, 11/15/39
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
A1
|
2,422,917
|
||||||
|
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Trinity Health Care Group, Tender Option Bond Trust 3244:
|
||||||||||
|
2,000
|
23.624%, 12/01/24 (IF)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
2,043,200
|
||||||
|
535
|
23.538%, 12/01/24 (IF)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
546,513
|
||||||
|
585
|
23.506%, 12/01/24 (IF)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
AA
|
597,572
|
||||||
|
17,735
|
Total Michigan
|
20,613,195
|
||||||||
|
Minnesota – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,500
|
Tobacco Securitization Authority, Minnesota, Tobacco Settlement Revenue Bonds, Tax-Exempt Series 2011B, 5.250%, 3/01/31
|
3/22 at 100.00
|
A–
|
1,673,850
|
||||||
|
Mississippi – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
485
|
Mississippi Business Finance Corporation, Gulf Opportunity Zone Revenue Bonds, Roberts Hotel of Jackson, LLC Project, Series 2010, 8.500%, 2/01/30 (4)
|
2/21 at 102.00
|
N/R
|
97,141
|
||||||
|
500
|
Mississippi Business Finance Corporation, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, System Energy Resources Inc. Project, Series 1998, 5.875%, 4/01/22
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
501,500
|
||||||
|
985
|
Total Mississippi
|
598,641
|
||||||||
|
Missouri – 0.6%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Cole County Industrial Development Authority, Missouri, Revenue Bonds, Lutheran Senior Services – Heisinger Project, Series 2004, 5.500%, 2/01/35
|
2/14 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,017,250
|
||||||
|
640
|
St. Louis County Industrial Development Authority, Missouri, Revenue Bonds, Friendship Village of West County, Series 2007A, 5.375%, 9/01/21
|
9/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
676,909
|
||||||
|
1,640
|
Total Missouri
|
1,694,159
|
||||||||
|
Nebraska – 1.2%
|
||||||||||
|
1,760
|
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, Single Family Housing Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bonds Trust 3853, 26.778%, 9/01/18 (IF) (5)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA+
|
2,424,875
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Omaha Public Power District, Nebraska, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 2/01/43
|
2/17 at 100.00
|
Aa1
|
1,133,320
|
||||||
|
2,760
|
Total Nebraska
|
3,558,195
|
||||||||
|
Nevada – 1.8%
|
||||||||||
|
2,000
|
Clark County, Nevada, Passenger Facility Charge Revenue Bonds, Las Vegas-McCarran International Airport, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 7/01/30
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
A+
|
2,243,120
|
||||||
|
1,670
|
Las Vegas, Nevada, General Obligation Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 3265, 32.047%, 4/01/17 (IF)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
3,386,693
|
||||||
|
3,670
|
Total Nevada
|
5,629,813
|
||||||||
|
New Hampshire – 0.5%
|
||||||||||
|
New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Rivermead Issue, Series 2011B:
|
||||||||||
|
400
|
5.550%, 7/01/17
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
403,124
|
||||||
|
1,100
|
5.300%, 7/01/17
|
4/13 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,107,414
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Total New Hampshire
|
1,510,538
|
||||||||
|
New Jersey – 1.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Continental Airlines Inc., Series 1999, 5.125%, 9/15/23 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
3/13 at 100.00
|
B
|
1,021,690
|
||||||
|
1,650
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Continental Airlines Inc., Series 1999, 5.250%, 9/15/29 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
3/13 at 100.00
|
B
|
1,695,062
|
|
54
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
New Jersey (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,750
|
New Jersey Higher Education Assistance Authority, Student Loan Revenue Bonds, Series 2010-1A, 5.000%, 12/01/26
|
12/19 at 100.00
|
AA
|
$
|
1,924,668
|
||||
|
4,400
|
Total New Jersey
|
4,641,420
|
||||||||
|
New York – 3.0%
|
||||||||||
|
Brooklyn Arena Local Development Corporation, New York, Payment in Lieu of Taxes Revenue Bonds, Barclays Center Project, Series 2009:
|
||||||||||
|
1,100
|
6.000%, 7/15/30
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,290,564
|
||||||
|
1,225
|
6.250%, 7/15/40
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,429,342
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
6.375%, 7/15/43
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
2,345,340
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation, New York, Revenue Bonds, St. John Fisher College, Series 2011, 6.000%, 6/01/34
|
6/21 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,128,560
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, New York, American Airlines-JFK International Airport Special Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 7.750%, 8/01/31 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
8/16 at 101.00
|
N/R
|
2,640,300
|
||||||
|
265
|
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Special Project Bonds, JFK International Air Terminal LLC Project, Eighth Series 2010, 6.000%, 12/01/42
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
310,063
|
||||||
|
8,090
|
Total New York
|
9,144,169
|
||||||||
|
Ohio – 6.0%
|
||||||||||
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2:
|
||||||||||
|
3,000
|
5.750%, 6/01/34
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB
|
2,538,420
|
||||||
|
6,500
|
5.875%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
BB
|
5,581,355
|
||||||
|
760
|
Franklin County, Ohio, Healthcare Facilities Revenue Bonds, Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services, Improvement Series 2010A, 5.625%, 7/01/26
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
852,796
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Lucas County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, ProMedica Healthcare Obligated Group, Series 2011A, 5.750%, 11/15/31
|
11/21 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,618,540
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Montgomery County, Ohio, Health Care and Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Saint Leonard, Refunding & improvement Series 2010, 6.375%, 4/01/30
|
4/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,124,790
|
||||||
|
1,670
|
Montgomery County, Ohio, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Tender Option Bond Trust 3260, 28.720%, 5/01/29 (IF)
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
3,069,894
|
||||||
|
1,200
|
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, Ohio, Revenue Bonds, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation Project, Series 2009E, 5.625%, 10/01/19
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB–
|
1,441,872
|
||||||
|
17,130
|
Total Ohio
|
18,227,667
|
||||||||
|
Pennsylvania – 5.5%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Allegheny Country Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania, Environmental Improvement Revenue Bonds, United States Steel Corporation Project, Refunding Series 2009, 6.750%, 11/01/24
|
11/19 at 100.00
|
BB
|
1,074,220
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Allegheny Country Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania, Environmental Improvement Revenue Bonds, United States Steel Corporation Project, Refunding Series 2011, 6.550%, 12/01/27
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
BB
|
1,615,785
|
||||||
|
1,335
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, Pennsylvania, Revenue Bonds, Ohio Valley General Hospital, Series 2005A, 5.125%, 4/01/35
|
4/15 at 100.00
|
Ba2
|
1,290,905
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Cumberland County Municipal Authority Revenue Bonds, Pennsylvania, Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries Project, Series 2009, 6.125%, 1/01/29
|
1/19 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,687,395
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Luzerne County Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania, Guaranteed Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2009, 7.750%, 12/15/27
|
12/19 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
2,110,000
|
||||||
|
1,125
|
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania, FHA Insured Mortgage Revenue Bonds, New Regional Medical Center Project, Tender Option Bond Trust 62B, 18.034%, 8/01/38 (IF) (5)
|
8/20 at 100.00
|
AA
|
1,797,559
|
||||||
|
25
|
Northumberland County Industrial Development Authority, Pennsylvania, Facility Revenue Bonds, NHS Youth Services Inc., Series 2002, 7.500%, 2/15/29
|
2/13 at 102.00
|
N/R
|
16,494
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds (USG Corporation Project) Series 1999, 6.000%, 6/01/31 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
12/12 at 100.00
|
B–
|
999,380
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Sewage Sludge Disposal Revenue Bonds, Philadelphia Biosolids Facility Project, Series 2009, 6.250%, 1/01/32
|
1/20 at 100.00
|
BBB+
|
1,145,970
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
55
|
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NEV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Pennsylvania (continued)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
1,200
|
Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Edinboro University Foundation Student Housing Project, Series 2010, 5.800%, 7/01/30
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
$
|
1,348,068
|
||||
|
525
|
Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2010-110A, 4.750%, 10/01/25
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
AA+
|
567,336
|
||||||
|
3,000
|
Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 2009E, 0.000%, 12/01/30
|
12/27 at 100.00
|
A–
|
3,075,210
|
||||||
|
15,210
|
Total Pennsylvania
|
16,728,322
|
||||||||
|
Puerto Rico – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, Special Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2005C, 5.500%, 7/01/27 – AMBAC Insured
|
No Opt. Call
|
BBB+
|
1,076,860
|
||||||
|
Tennessee – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
Memphis Health, Educational and Housing Facilities Board, Tennessee, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Goodwill Village Apartments, Series 2010A, 5.500%, 12/01/30
|
12/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
529,035
|
||||||
|
50
|
The Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corporation, Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.250%, 9/01/24
|
No Opt. Call
|
A
|
57,199
|
||||||
|
155
|
The Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corporation, Gas Revenue Bonds, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 2/01/24
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
171,397
|
||||||
|
705
|
Total Tennessee
|
757,631
|
||||||||
|
Texas – 4.0%
|
||||||||||
|
3,500
|
Brazos River Authority, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, TXU Electric Company, Series 2001D, 8.250%, 5/01/33 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/18 at 100.00
|
CCC
|
562,625
|
||||||
|
1,050
|
Houston Higher Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Education Revenue Bonds, Cosmos Foundation, Inc., Series 2011A, 6.500%, 5/15/31
|
5/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,316,910
|
||||||
|
265
|
Houston, Texas, Airport System Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Continental Airlines Inc. – Airport Improvement Project, Series 1997C, 6.125%, 7/15/27 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
11/12 at 100.00
|
B–
|
264,984
|
||||||
|
1,800
|
North Texas Tollway Authority, Special Projects System Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 11947, 24.765%, 3/01/19 (IF)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA
|
3,538,080
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Red River Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, First Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Eden Home Inc., Series 2012, 7.250%, 12/15/47
|
12/21 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
1,069,510
|
||||||
|
455
|
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation I, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008D, 6.250%, 12/15/26
|
No Opt. Call
|
A–
|
576,708
|
||||||
|
810
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corporation, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, NTE Mobility Partners LLC North Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project, Series 2009, 6.875%, 12/31/39
|
12/19 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
984,774
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corporation, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC IH-635 Managed Lanes Project, Series 2010, 7.000%, 6/30/34
|
6/20 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
1,248,760
|
||||||
|
1,500
|
Texas Public Finance Authority, Charter School Finance Corporation Revenue Bonds, Idea Public School Project, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 8/15/37 – ACA Insured
|
8/17 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,542,300
|
||||||
|
5,000
|
Texas Turnpike Authority, Central Texas Turnpike System Revenue Bonds, Second Tier Series 2002, 0.000%, 8/15/37 – AMBAC Insured
|
8/14 at 25.11
|
A–
|
1,141,050
|
||||||
|
16,380
|
Total Texas
|
12,245,701
|
||||||||
|
Utah – 0.3%
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
Utah State Charter School Finance Authority, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Paradigm High School, Series 2010A, 6.250%, 7/15/30
|
7/20 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,083,020
|
||||||
|
Vermont – 1.0%
|
||||||||||
|
Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, Revenue Bonds, Vermont Law School Project, Series 2011A:
|
||||||||||
|
1,000
|
6.125%, 1/01/28
|
1/21 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,143,750
|
||||||
|
1,760
|
6.250%, 1/01/33
|
1/21 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,991,546
|
||||||
|
2,760
|
Total Vermont
|
3,135,296
|
||||||||
|
Virgin Islands – 0.1%
|
||||||||||
|
250
|
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Loan Notes Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Series 2009A, 6.000%, 10/01/39
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
Baa3
|
276,208
|
|
56
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Principal
|
Optional Call
|
|||||||||
|
Amount (000)
|
Description (1)
|
Provisions (2)
|
Ratings (3)
|
Value
|
||||||
|
Virginia – 0.9%
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
2,000
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corporation of Virginia, Tobacco Settlement Asset Backed Bonds, Series 2007B1, 5.000%, 6/01/47
|
6/17 at 100.00
|
B2
|
$
|
1,542,200
|
||||
|
1,010
|
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Elizabeth River Crossing, Opco LLC Project, Series 2012, 5.500%, 1/01/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
|
7/22 at 100.00
|
BBB–
|
1,110,849
|
||||||
|
3,010
|
Total Virginia
|
2,653,049
|
||||||||
|
Washington – 2.2%
|
||||||||||
|
2,000
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Series 2011A, 5.375%, 1/01/31
|
1/21 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,214,100
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Washington State Health Care Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Series 2009A, 6.000%, 1/01/33
|
7/19 at 100.00
|
A
|
2,266,300
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Washington State Higher Education Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Whitworth University, Series 2009, 5.625%, 10/01/40
|
10/19 at 100.00
|
Baa1
|
2,180,119
|
||||||
|
6,000
|
Total Washington
|
6,660,519
|
||||||||
|
West Virginia – 0.2%
|
||||||||||
|
585
|
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Thomas Health System, Inc., Series 2008, 6.500%, 10/01/38
|
10/18 at 100.00
|
N/R
|
610,278
|
||||||
|
Wisconsin – 5.2%
|
||||||||||
|
3,500
|
Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Retail Sales Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 144A, 6.500%, 2/01/31
|
2/19 at 102.00
|
AA–
|
4,043,515
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Beloit College, Series 2010A, 6.000%, 6/01/30
|
6/15 at 100.00
|
Baa2
|
1,145,860
|
||||||
|
500
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Beloit Health System, Inc., Series 2010B, 5.000%, 4/01/30
|
4/20 at 100.00
|
A–
|
523,140
|
||||||
|
1,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Froedtert Community Health, Inc. Obligated Group, Tender Option Bond Trust 3592, 22.123%, 4/01/17 (IF) (5)
|
No Opt. Call
|
AA–
|
1,531,950
|
||||||
|
2,000
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare System, Series 2006, 5.250%, 8/15/21
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
A–
|
2,169,940
|
||||||
|
500
|
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Wheaton Franciscan Services Inc., Series 2006B, 5.125%, 8/15/30
|
8/16 at 100.00
|
A–
|
528,843
|
||||||
|
2,500
|
Wisconsin State, General Fund Annual Appropriation Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 10B, 32.514%, 5/01/36 (IF) (5)
|
5/19 at 100.00
|
AA–
|
5,918,498
|
||||||
|
11,000
|
Total Wisconsin
|
15,861,746
|
||||||||
|
Wyoming – 0.8%
|
||||||||||
|
Wyoming Community Development Authority, Student Housing Revenue Bonds, CHF-Wyoming, L.L.C. – University of Wyoming Project, Series 2011:
|
||||||||||
|
500
|
6.250%, 7/01/31
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
553,860
|
||||||
|
1,600
|
6.500%, 7/01/43
|
7/21 at 100.00
|
BBB
|
1,777,678
|
||||||
|
2,100
|
Total Wyoming
|
2,331,538
|
||||||||
|
$
|
288,347
|
Total Municipal Bonds (cost $266,545,358) – 104.4%
|
318,757,252
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
57
|
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (continued)
|
||
|
NEV
|
Portfolio of Investments
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
Shares
|
Description (1)
|
Value
|
||||
|
Promissory Note – 0.0%
|
||||||
|
10,795
|
Confluence Energy, LLC (6) (7)
|
$
|
3,778
|
|||
|
Total Promissory Note (cost $3,778)
|
3,778
|
|||||
|
Total Investments (cost $266,549,136) – 104.4%
|
318,761,030
|
|||||
|
Floating Rate Obligations – (5.9)%
|
(18,000,000
|
) | ||||
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 1.5% (8)
|
4,580,440
|
|||||
|
Net Assets – 100%
|
$
|
305,341,470
|
Investments in Derivatives at October 31, 2012
Forward Swaps outstanding:
|
Fund
|
Fixed Rate
|
Unrealized
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Notional
|
Pay/Receive
|
Floating Rate
|
Fixed Rate
|
Payment
|
Effective
|
Termination
|
Appreciation
|
|||||||||||
|
Counterparty
|
Amount
|
Floating Rate
|
Index
|
(Annualized)
|
Frequency
|
Date (9)
|
Date
|
(Depreciation) (8)
|
||||||||||
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
$ |
6,100,000
|
Receive
|
3-Month USD-LIBOR
|
3.054
|
% |
Semi-Annually
|
2/24/14
|
2/24/41
|
$
|
(396,911)
|
|||||||
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
6,500,000
|
Receive
|
3-Month USD-LIBOR
|
3.322
|
Semi-Annually
|
4/24/14
|
4/24/34
|
(693,348)
|
||||||||||
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
5,000,000
|
Receive
|
3-Month USD-LIBOR
|
2.773
|
Semi-Annually
|
6/30/14
|
6/30/41
|
(1,087)
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
(1,091,346)
|
|
(1)
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
|
|
|
(4)
|
At or subsequent to the end of the reporting period, this security is non-income producing. Non-income producing security, in the case of a bond, generally denotes that the issuer has (1) defaulted on the payment of principal or interest, (2) is under the protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court or (3) the Fund’s Adviser has concluded that the issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed the Fund’s custodian to cease accruing additional income on the Fund’s records.
|
|
| (5) | Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in derivatives and/or inverse floating rate transactions. | |
|
(6)
|
Investment valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by, or at the discretion of, the Board of Trustees. For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, investment categorized as Level 3. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Investment Valuation for more information.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Promissory Note entered into as part of the acquisition of competing creditor interests and claims in connection with the restructuring of Colorado State Housing and Finance Authority Revenue – Confluence Energy LLC Revenue Bonds, 6.20% coupon, maturity 4/1/2016, and the recapitalization of the bonds’ issuer.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities includes the Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of derivative instruments as noted within Investments in Derivatives at October 31, 2012.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Effective date represents the date on which both the Fund and Counterparty commence interest payment accruals on each forward swap contract.
|
|
|
N/R
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
(IF)
|
Inverse floating rate investment.
|
|
|
(UB)
|
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
|
|
|
144A
|
Investment is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These investments may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, which are normally those transactions with qualified institutional buyers.
|
|
|
USD-LIBOR
|
United States Dollar-London Inter-Bank Offered Rate.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
58
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Statement of
|
||
|
Assets & Liabilities
|
||
| October 31, 2012 |
|
Municipal Value
(NUV
|
)
|
AMT-Free
Municipal Value
(NUW
|
) |
Municipal Income
(NMI
|
) |
Enhanced
Municipal Value
(NEV
|
) | ||||||
|
Assets
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments, at value (cost $1,902,194,654, $183,350,011, $86,462,286 and $266,549,136, respectively)
|
$
|
2,090,659,327
|
$
|
227,645,112
|
$
|
97,040,192
|
$
|
318,761,030
|
|||||
|
Cash
|
4,731,111
|
463,765
|
889,698
|
281,776
|
|||||||||
|
Receivables:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Interest
|
30,108,291
|
3,964,465
|
1,433,606
|
6,920,795
|
|||||||||
|
Investments sold
|
4,547,323
|
—
|
715,122
|
290,734
|
|||||||||
|
Shares sold through shelf offering
|
301,685
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Other assets
|
225,543
|
2,339
|
2,080
|
7,801
|
|||||||||
|
Total assets
|
2,130,573,280
|
232,075,681
|
100,080,698
|
326,262,136
|
|||||||||
|
Liabilities
|
|||||||||||||
|
Floating rate obligations
|
14,380,000
|
—
|
3,335,000
|
18,000,000
|
|||||||||
|
Unrealized depreciation on forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,091,346
|
|||||||||
|
Payables:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Dividends
|
6,476,405
|
757,397
|
344,990
|
1,488,800
|
|||||||||
|
Investment purchased
|
2,742,983
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Management fees
|
855,632
|
118,129
|
50,371
|
237,027
|
|||||||||
|
Directors/Trustees fees
|
223,934
|
2,313
|
705
|
6,945
|
|||||||||
|
Shelf offering costs
|
65,604
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Other
|
505,993
|
58,067
|
52,031
|
96,548
|
|||||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
25,250,551
|
935,906
|
3,783,097
|
20,920,666
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets
|
$
|
2,105,322,729
|
$
|
231,139,775
|
$
|
96,297,601
|
$
|
305,341,470
|
|||||
|
Shares outstanding
|
204,219,607
|
13,000,075
|
8,259,299
|
19,297,928
|
|||||||||
|
Net asset value per share outstanding
|
$
|
10.31
|
$
|
17.78
|
$
|
11.66
|
$
|
15.82
|
|||||
|
Net assets consist of:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Shares, $.01 par value per share
|
$
|
2,042,196
|
$
|
130,001
|
$
|
82,593
|
$
|
192,979
|
|||||
|
Paid-in surplus
|
1,928,587,476
|
186,433,078
|
85,232,662
|
275,706,081
|
|||||||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
|
11,442,742
|
165,165
|
1,024,203
|
3,651,401
|
|||||||||
|
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
|
(25,214,358
|
)
|
116,430
|
(619,763
|
)
|
(25,329,539
|
)
|
||||||
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
188,464,673
|
44,295,101
|
10,577,906
|
51,120,548
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets
|
$
|
2,105,322,729
|
$
|
231,139,775
|
$
|
96,297,601
|
$
|
305,341,470
|
|||||
|
Authorized shares
|
350,000,000
|
Unlimited
|
200,000,000
|
Unlimited
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
59
|
|
Statement of
|
||
|
Operations
|
||
| Year Ended October 31, 2012 |
|
Municipal Value
(NUV
|
) |
AMT-Free
Municipal Value
(NUW
|
) |
Municipal Income
(NMI
|
) |
Enhanced
Municipal Value
(NEV
|
) | ||||||
|
Investment Income
|
$
|
105,317,553
|
$
|
12,411,235
|
$
|
5,451,047
|
$
|
22,738,538
|
|||||
|
Expenses
|
|||||||||||||
|
Management fees
|
10,113,403
|
1,366,158
|
579,061
|
2,797,408
|
|||||||||
|
Shareholders servicing agent fees and expenses
|
275,041
|
747
|
15,085
|
709
|
|||||||||
|
Interest expense
|
305,550
|
—
|
11,318
|
248,454
|
|||||||||
|
Custodian’s fees and expenses
|
282,099
|
35,521
|
23,005
|
59,942
|
|||||||||
|
Directors/Trustees fees and expenses
|
54,184
|
6,725
|
2,648
|
7,932
|
|||||||||
|
Professional fees
|
254,560
|
25,076
|
19,866
|
9,250
|
|||||||||
|
Shareholder reporting expenses
|
349,038
|
38,937
|
42,867
|
52,536
|
|||||||||
|
Stock exchange listing fees
|
67,855
|
8,873
|
8,596
|
9,400
|
|||||||||
|
Investor relations expense
|
223,010
|
22,902
|
12,462
|
27,942
|
|||||||||
|
Other expenses
|
73,164
|
10,659
|
8,524
|
25,281
|
|||||||||
|
Total expenses before custodian fee credit and legal fee refund
|
11,997,904
|
1,515,598
|
723,432
|
3,238,854
|
|||||||||
|
Custodian fee credit
|
(13,564
|
)
|
(4,972
|
)
|
(749
|
)
|
(613
|
)
|
|||||
|
Legal fee refund
|
(392,332
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||
|
Net expenses
|
11,592,008
|
1,510,626
|
722,683
|
3,238,241
|
|||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
93,725,545
|
10,900,609
|
4,728,364
|
19,500,297
|
|||||||||
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net realized gain (loss) from:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
(21,295,343
|
)
|
154,857
|
248,877
|
745,212
|
||||||||
|
Forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(6,106,000
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
165,538,735
|
16,545,579
|
7,177,012
|
36,071,836
|
|||||||||
|
Forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,012,405
|
|||||||||
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
144,243,392
|
16,700,436
|
7,425,889
|
34,723,453
|
|||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
$
|
237,968,937
|
$
|
27,601,045
|
$
|
12,154,253
|
$
|
54,223,750
|
|||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
60
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Statement of
|
||
|
Changes in Net Assets
|
|
AMT-Free
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Value (NUV)
|
Municipal Value (NUW)
|
||||||||||||
|
Year Ended
10/31/12
|
Year Ended
10/31/11
|
Year Ended
10/31/12
|
Year Ended
10/31/11
|
||||||||||
|
Operations
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
$
|
93,725,545
|
$
|
95,832,189
|
$
|
10,900,609
|
$
|
12,029,346
|
|||||
|
Net realized gain (loss) from:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
(21,295,343
|
)
|
10,965,310
|
154,857
|
(241,625
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
165,538,735
|
(43,836,146
|
)
|
16,545,579
|
(4,641,048
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
237,968,937
|
62,961,353
|
27,601,045
|
7,146,673
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions to Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(94,812,770
|
)
|
(92,912,256
|
)
|
(10,684,764
|
)
|
(11,593,491
|
)
|
|||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
(11,399,466
|
)
|
(4,178,829
|
)
|
—
|
(284,128
|
)
|
||||||
|
Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders
|
(106,212,236
|
)
|
(97,091,085
|
)
|
(10,684,764
|
)
|
(11,877,619
|
)
|
|||||
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs
|
47,880,152
|
2,306,239
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
|
10,454,655
|
2,960,267
|
1,350,059
|
1,458,520
|
|||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions
|
58,334,807
|
5,266,506
|
1,350,059
|
1,458,520
|
|||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
190,091,508
|
(28,863,226
|
)
|
18,266,340
|
(3,272,426
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net assets at the beginning of period
|
1,915,231,221
|
1,944,094,447
|
212,873,435
|
216,145,861
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets at the end of period
|
$
|
2,105,322,729
|
$
|
1,915,231,221
|
$
|
231,139,775
|
$
|
212,873,435
|
|||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period
|
$
|
11,442,742
|
$
|
12,956,050
|
$
|
165,165
|
$
|
152,061
|
|||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
61
|
|
Statement of
|
||
|
Changes in Net Assets (continued)
|
|
Enhanced Municipal
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Income (NMI)
|
Value (NEV)
|
||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31/12
|
Year Ended 10/31/11
|
Year Ended 10/31/12
|
Year Ended 10/31/11
|
||||||||||
|
Operations
|
|||||||||||||
|
Net investment income (loss)
|
$
|
4,728,364
|
$
|
4,806,831
|
$
|
19,500,297
|
$
|
19,364,228
|
|||||
|
Net realized gain (loss) from:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
248,877
|
288,183
|
745,212
|
(16,367,767
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
(6,106,000
|
)
|
(674,000
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Investments
|
7,177,012
|
(1,082,473
|
)
|
36,071,836
|
2,972,054
|
||||||||
|
Forward swaps
|
—
|
—
|
4,012,405
|
(2,979,589
|
)
|
||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations
|
12,154,253
|
4,012,541
|
54,223,750
|
2,314,926
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions to Shareholders
|
|||||||||||||
|
From net investment income
|
(4,699,960
|
)
|
(4,686,031
|
)
|
(18,547,985
|
)
|
(17,947,395
|
)
|
|||||
|
From accumulated net realized gains
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Decrease in net assets from distributions to shareholders
|
(4,699,960
|
)
|
(4,686,031
|
)
|
(18,547,985
|
)
|
(17,947,395
|
)
|
|||||
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|||||||||||||
|
Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
|
355,454
|
152,884
|
616,205
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions
|
355,454
|
152,884
|
616,205
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets
|
7,809,747
|
(520,606
|
)
|
36,291,970
|
(15,632,469
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Net assets at the beginning of period
|
88,487,854
|
89,008,460
|
269,049,500
|
284,681,969
|
|||||||||
|
Net assets at the end of period
|
$
|
96,297,601
|
$
|
88,487,854
|
$
|
305,341,470
|
$
|
269,049,500
|
|||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of)net investment income at the end of period
|
$
|
1,024,203
|
$
|
1,000,893
|
$
|
3,651,401
|
$
|
2,700,988
|
|||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
62
|
Nuveen Investments
|
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
|
Nuveen Investments
|
63
|
|
Financial
|
||
|
Highlights
|
||
| Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period: | ||
|
Investment Operations
|
Less Distributions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Premium
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
from
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
|
Net
|
Sold
|
Ending
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning
|
Investment
|
Realized/
|
Net
|
through
|
Net
|
Ending
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net Asset
|
Income
|
Unrealized
|
Investment
|
Capital
|
Offering
|
Shelf
|
Asset
|
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Value
|
(Loss
|
) |
Gain (Loss
|
) |
Total
|
Income
|
Gains
|
Total
|
Costs
|
Offering
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Municipal Value (NUV)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
$
|
9.65
|
$
|
.46
|
$
|
.71
|
$
|
1.17
|
$
|
(.47
|
) |
$
|
(.06
|
) |
$
|
(.53
|
) |
$
|
—
|
** |
$
|
.02
|
$
|
10.31
|
$
|
10.37
|
||||||||
|
2011
|
9.82
|
.48
|
(.16
|
) |
.32
|
(.47
|
) |
(.02
|
) |
(.49
|
) |
—
|
—
|
** |
9.65
|
9.66
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
9.51
|
.49
|
.30
|
.79
|
(.47
|
) |
(.01
|
) |
(.48
|
) |
—
|
—
|
9.82
|
10.02
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
8.60
|
.49
|
.89
|
1.38
|
(.47
|
) |
—
|
(.47
|
) |
—
|
—
|
9.51
|
9.91
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
10.12
|
.47
|
(1.49
|
) |
(1.02
|
) |
(.47
|
) |
(.03
|
) |
(.50
|
) |
—
|
—
|
8.60
|
8.65
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
16.47
|
.84
|
1.29
|
2.13
|
(.82
|
) |
—
|
(.82
|
) |
—
|
—
|
17.78
|
18.66
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
16.85
|
.93
|
(.39
|
) |
.54
|
(.90
|
) |
(.02
|
) |
(.92
|
) |
—
|
—
|
16.47
|
17.06
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
16.20
|
.91
|
.65
|
1.56
|
(.90
|
) |
(.01
|
) |
(.91
|
) |
—
|
—
|
16.85
|
17.57
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
2009(d)
|
14.33
|
.49
|
1.94
|
2.43
|
(.53
|
) |
—
|
(.53
|
) |
(.03
|
) |
—
|
16.20
|
15.84
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
64
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Returns
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets(b)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Based
on
Market
Value
|
(a) |
Based
on
Net
Asset
Value
|
(a) |
Ending
Net
Assets
(000
|
) |
Expenses
|
(c) |
Net
Investment
Income (Loss
|
) |
Portfolio
Turnover
Rate
|
||||||
|
13.15
|
%
|
12.62
|
%
|
$
|
2,105,323
|
.60
|
%
|
4.63
|
%
|
14
|
%
|
|||||
|
1.61
|
3.53
|
1,915,231
|
.65
|
5.15
|
10
|
|||||||||||
|
6.18
|
8.44
|
1,944,094
|
.61
|
5.05
|
8
|
|||||||||||
|
20.68
|
16.51
|
1,872,031
|
.66
|
5.49
|
5
|
|||||||||||
|
(3.93
|
) |
(10.51
|
)
|
1,684,418
|
.65
|
4.86
|
16
|
|||||||||
|
14.73
|
13.23
|
231,140
|
.68
|
4.90
|
10
|
|||||||||||
|
2.93
|
3.61
|
212,873
|
.71
|
5.92
|
1
|
|||||||||||
|
17.22
|
9.91
|
216,146
|
.69
|
5.55
|
4
|
|||||||||||
|
9.27
|
16.92
|
205,709
|
.67
|
* |
4.84
|
* |
2
|
|||||||||
|
(a)
|
Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
Total Return Based on Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank or legal fee refund, where applicable.
|
|
(c)
|
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities as follows:
|
|
Municipal Value (NUV)
|
||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
||||
|
2012
|
.02
|
%
|
||
|
2011
|
.01
|
|||
|
2010
|
.01
|
|||
|
2009
|
.02
|
|||
|
2008
|
.04
|
|||
|
AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW)
|
||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
||||
|
2012
|
—
|
|||
|
2011
|
—
|
|||
|
2010
|
—
|
|||
|
2009(d)
|
—
|
|
(d)
|
For the period February 25, 2009 (commencement of operations) through October 31, 2009.
|
|
*
|
Annualized.
|
|
**
|
Rounds to less than $.01 per share.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
65
|
|
Financial
|
||
|
Highlights (continued)
|
||
| Selected data for a share outstanding throughout each period: | ||
|
Investment Operations
|
Less Distributions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning
Net Asset
Value
|
Net
Investment
Income
(Loss
|
) |
Net
Realized/
Unrealized
Gain (Loss
|
) |
Total
|
Net
Investment
Income
|
Capital
Gains
|
Total
|
Offering
Costs
|
Ending
Net
Asset
Value
|
Ending
Market
Value
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Municipal Income (NMI)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
$
|
10.75
|
$
|
.57
|
$
|
.91
|
$
|
1.48
|
$
|
(.57
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
(.57
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
11.66
|
$
|
12.66
|
|||||||||
|
2011
|
10.84
|
.58
|
(.10
|
)
|
.48
|
(.57
|
)
|
—
|
(.57
|
)
|
—
|
10.75
|
11.13
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
10.38
|
.58
|
.45
|
1.03
|
(.57
|
)
|
—
|
(.57
|
)
|
—
|
10.84
|
11.24
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2009
|
9.28
|
.57
|
1.06
|
1.63
|
(.53
|
)
|
—
|
(.53
|
)
|
—
|
10.38
|
10.66
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
|
10.77
|
.53
|
(1.52
|
)
|
(.99
|
)
|
(.50
|
)
|
—
|
(.50
|
)
|
—
|
9.28
|
9.89
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2012
|
13.97
|
1.01
|
1.80
|
2.81
|
(.96
|
)
|
—
|
(.96
|
)
|
—
|
15.82
|
16.16
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
14.78
|
1.01
|
(.89
|
)
|
.12
|
(.93
|
)
|
—
|
(.93
|
)
|
—
|
13.97
|
13.70
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2010
|
13.73
|
.94
|
1.02
|
1.96
|
(.91
|
)
|
—
|
** |
(.91
|
)
|
—
|
** |
14.78
|
14.56
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
2009(d)
|
14.33
|
.04
|
(.61
|
)
|
(.57
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(.03
|
)
|
13.73
|
15.00
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
66
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total Returns
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets(b)
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Based
on
Market
Value
|
(a) |
Based
on
Net
Asset
Value
|
(a) |
Ending
Net
Assets
(000
|
) |
Expenses
|
(c) |
Net
Investment
Income (Loss
|
) |
Portfolio
Turnover
Rate
|
||||||
|
19.51
|
%
|
14.05
|
%
|
$
|
96,298
|
.78
|
%
|
5.09
|
%
|
15
|
%
|
|||||
|
4.62
|
4.73
|
88,488
|
.77
|
5.61
|
16
|
|||||||||||
|
11.14
|
10.12
|
89,008
|
.77
|
5.47
|
14
|
|||||||||||
|
13.72
|
18.06
|
84,883
|
.81
|
5.85
|
10
|
|||||||||||
|
(1.01
|
)
|
(9.53
|
)
|
75,553
|
.86
|
5.08
|
8
|
|||||||||
|
25.68
|
20.67
|
305,341
|
1.12
|
6.73
|
11
|
|||||||||||
|
1.02
|
1.28
|
269,050
|
1.17
|
7.47
|
33
|
|||||||||||
|
3.52
|
14.73
|
284,682
|
1.07
|
6.64
|
28
|
|||||||||||
|
—
|
(4.15
|
)
|
244,558
|
1.02
|
* |
3.25
|
* |
1
|
||||||||
|
(a)
|
Total Return Based on Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
Total Return Based on Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Ratios do not reflect the effect of custodian fee credits earned on the Fund’s net cash on deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable.
|
|
(c)
|
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund and/or the effect of the interest expense and fees paid on borrowings, where applicable, as described in Footnote 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, Inverse Floating Rate Securities and Footnote 8 – Borrowing Arrangements, respectively, as follows:
|
|
Municipal Income (NMI)
|
||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
||||
|
2012
|
.01
|
%
|
||
|
2011
|
.01
|
|||
|
2010
|
.02
|
|||
|
2009
|
.03
|
|||
|
2008
|
.10
|
|||
|
Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV)
|
||||
|
Year Ended 10/31:
|
||||
|
2012
|
.09
|
|||
|
2011
|
.08
|
|||
|
2010
|
.04
|
|||
|
2009(d)
|
—
|
|
(d)
|
For the period September 25, 2009 (commencement of operations) through October 31, 2009.
|
|
*
|
Annualized.
|
|
**
|
Rounds to less than $.01 per share.
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
67
|
|
Notes to
|
||
|
Financial Statements
|
1.General Information and Significant Accounting Policies
General Information
The funds covered in this report and their corresponding New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) symbols are Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (NUV), Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW), (formerly known as Nuveen Municipal Value Fund 2) Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) and Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (NEV) (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”). The Funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as diversified closed-end registered investment companies.
Each Fund’s primary investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax by investing primarily in a portfolio of municipal obligations issued by state and local government authorities or certain U.S. territories.
Fund Policy and Name Changes
On September 20, 2012, AMT-Free Municipal Value’s (NUW) Board of Trustees approved changes to the Fund’s investment policy regarding its practice of not investing in municipal securities that pay interest taxable under the federal alternative minimum tax applicable to individuals (“AMT bonds”). Effective October 15, 2012, the Fund’s investment policy was updated to state that the Fund will invest at least 80% of its managed assets (as defined within Footnote 7 – Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates) in AMT bonds. The new policy did not change the Fund’s practice of investing all of its managed assets in municipal securities that are not subject to the AMT, and there is no change to the Fund’s investment objectives of (1) offering current income exempt from regular federal income taxes and (2) offering attractive total return. Concurrent with the investment policy changes, the Fund changed its name from Nuveen Municipal Value Fund 2 (NUW) to Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (NUW) to better communicate and reflect the Fund’s AMT-free nature.
Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Investment Valuation
Prices of municipal bonds and forward swap contracts are provided by a pricing service approved by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 for fair value measurement purposes. The pricing service establishes a security’s fair value using methods that may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. In pricing certain securities, particularly less liquid and lower quality securities, the pricing service may consider information about a security, its issuer, or market activity provided by Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. (the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (“Nuveen”). These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs.
Promissory notes and other equity-type securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded and are generally classified as Level 1. Securities primarily traded on the NASDAQ National Market (“NASDAQ”) are valued, except as indicated below, at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price and are generally classified as Level 1. However, securities traded on a securities exchange or NASDAQ for which there were no transactions on a given day or securities not listed on a securities exchange or NASDAQ are valued at the quoted bid price and are generally classified as Level 2.
Certain securities may not be able to be priced by the pre-established pricing methods as described above. Such securities may be valued by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees or its designee at fair value. These securities generally include, but are not limited to, restricted securities (securities which may not be publicly sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) for which a pricing service is unable to provide a market price; securities whose trading has been formally suspended; debt securities that have gone into default and for which there is no current market quotation; a security whose market price is not available from a pre-established pricing source; a security with respect to which an event has occurred that is likely to materially affect the value of the security after the market has closed but before the calculation of a Fund’s net asset value (as may be the case in non-U.S. markets on which the security is primarily traded) or make it difficult or impossible to obtain a reliable market quotation; and a security whose price, as provided by the pricing service, is not deemed to reflect the security’s fair value. As a general principle, the fair value of
|
68
|
Nuveen Investments
|
a security would appear to be the amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for it in a current sale. A variety of factors may be considered in determining the fair value of such securities, which may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs. Regardless of the method employed to value a particular security, all valuations are subject to review by the Funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees or its designee.
Refer to Footnote 2 – Fair Value Measurements for further details on the leveling of securities held by the Funds as of the end of the reporting period.
Investment Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from transactions are determined on the specific identification method, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Investments purchased on a when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended settlement periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market fluctuation during this period. The Funds have instructed the custodian to earmark securities in the Funds’ portfolios with a current value at least equal to the amount of the when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments. At October 31, 2012, Municipal Value (NUV) had outstanding when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments of $2,742,983. There were no such outstanding purchase commitments in any of the other Funds.
Investment Income
Investment income, which reflects the amortization of premiums and includes accretion of discounts for financial reporting purposes, is recorded on an accrual basis. Investment income also includes paydown gains and losses, if any.
Professional Fees
Professional fees presented on the Statement of Operations consist of legal fees incurred in the normal course of operations, audit fees, tax consulting fees and, in some cases, workout expenditures. Workout expenditures are incurred in an attempt to protect or enhance an investment, or to pursue other claims or legal actions on behalf of Fund shareholders. Legal fee refund presented in the Statement of Operations reflects a refund of workout expenditures paid in a prior reporting period, when applicable.
Income Taxes
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net capital gains to shareholders and to otherwise comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies (“RICs”). Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Furthermore, each Fund intends to satisfy conditions that will enable interest from municipal securities, which is exempt from regular federal income tax, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders of the Funds. Net realized capital gains and ordinary income distributions paid by the Funds are subject to federal taxation.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e., generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then). Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders
Dividends from net investment income are declared monthly. Net realized capital gains and/or market discount from investment transactions, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the extent they exceed available capital loss carryforwards.
Distributions to shareholders of net investment income, net realized capital gains and/or market discount, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
Shelf Offering and Shelf Offering Costs
Municipal Value (NUV) has filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) authorizing the Fund to issue additional shares through an equity shelf offering program (“shelf offering”). Under this shelf offering, the Fund, subject to market conditions, may raise additional capital from time to time in varying amounts and offering methods at a net price at or above the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) per share.
As of October 31, 2012, Municipal Value (NUV) was authorized to issue an additional 19.6 million shares through its shelf offering.
Costs incurred by the Fund in connection with its initial shelf offering are recorded as a deferred charge, which are amortized over the period such additional shares are sold not to exceed the one-year life of the shelf offering period. Ongoing shelf offering costs incurred by the Fund are expensed as incurred.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, Nuveen Securities, LLC, the Fund’s distributor and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen, received commissions of $96,744, related to the sale of shares as a result of the Fund’s shelf offering.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
69
|
|
Notes to
|
||
|
Financial Statements (continued)
|
On August 24, 2012, both AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW) and Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV) filed a registration statement with the SEC for a shelf offering, pursuant to which each Fund may issue additional shares. New shares of AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW) and Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV) will not be sold until their registration statements are effective.
Inverse Floating Rate Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in inverse floating rate securities. An inverse floating rate security is created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. In turn, this trust (a) issues floating rate certificates, in face amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, that typically pay short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties, and (b) issues to a long-term investor (such as one of the Funds) an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) that represents all remaining or residual interest in the trust. The income received by the inverse floater holder varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the inverse floater holder bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk and also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. The price of an inverse floating rate security will be more volatile than that of the underlying bond because the interest rate is dependent on not only the fixed coupon rate of the underlying bond but also on the short-term interest paid on the floating rate certificates, and because the inverse floating rate security essentially bears the risk of loss of the greater face value of the underlying bond.
A Fund may purchase an inverse floating rate security in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond (referred to as an “externally-deposited inverse floater”), or instead by first selling a fixed-rate bond to a broker-dealer for deposit into the special purpose trust and receiving in turn the residual interest in the trust (referred to as a “self-deposited inverse floater”). The inverse floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right (a) to cause the holders of the floating rate certificates to tender their notes at par, and (b) to have the broker transfer the fixed-rate bond held by the trust to the Fund, thereby collapsing the trust. An investment in an externally-deposited inverse floater is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as “(IF) – Inverse floating rate investment.” An investment in a self-deposited inverse floater is accounted for as a financing transaction. In such instances, a fixed-rate bond deposited into a special purpose trust is identified in the Portfolio of Investments as “(UB) – Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction,” with the Fund accounting for the short-term floating rate certificates issued by the trust as “Floating rate obligations” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. In addition, the Fund reflects in “Investment Income” the entire earnings of the underlying bond and recognizes the related interest paid to the holders of the short-term floating rate certificates as a component of “Interest expense” on the Statement of Operations.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, each Fund invested in externally-deposited inverse floaters and/or self-deposited inverse floaters.
Each Fund may also enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements (sometimes referred to as a “recourse trust” or “credit recovery swap”) (such agreements referred to herein as “Recourse Trusts”) with a broker-dealer by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the broker-dealer, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the fixed-rate bond held by the trust and the liquidation value of the floating rate certificates issued by the trust plus any shortfalls in interest cash flows. Under these agreements, a Fund’s potential exposure to losses related to or on inverse floaters may increase beyond the value of a Fund’s inverse floater investments as a Fund may potentially be liable to fulfill all amounts owed to holders of the floating rate certificates. At period end, any such shortfall is recognized as “Unrealized depreciation on Recourse Trusts” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
At October 31, 2012, each Fund’s maximum exposure to externally-deposited Recourse Trusts was as follows:
|
Municipal
Value (NUV
|
)
|
AMT-Free
Municipal
Value (NUW
|
)
|
Municipal
Income (NMI
|
)
|
Enhanced
Municipal
Value (NEV
|
)
|
||||||
|
Maximum exposure to Recourse Trusts
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
$
|
17,665,000
|
$
|
6,005,000
|
$
|
135,815,000
|
The average floating rate obligations outstanding and average annual interest rate and fees related to self-deposited inverse floaters during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
|
Municipal
Value (NUV
|
)
|
Municipal
Income (NMI
|
)
|
Enhanced
Municipal
Value (NEV
|
)
|
|||||
|
Average floating rate obligations outstanding
|
$
|
15,032,186
|
$
|
3,335,000
|
$
|
18,00,000
|
||||
|
Average annual interest rate and fees
|
.37
|
%
|
.34
|
%
|
.66
|
%
|
Forward Swap Contracts
Each Fund is authorized to enter into forward interest rate swap contracts consistent with their investment objectives and policies to reduce, increase or otherwise alter its risk profile or to alter its portfolio characteristics (i.e. duration, yield curve positioning and credit quality).
Each Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Each Fund’s use of forward interest rate swap transactions is intended to help the Fund manage its overall interest rate sensitivity, either shorter or longer, generally to more closely align the Fund’s interest rate sensitivity with that of the broader market. Forward interest rate swap transactions involve a Fund’s agreement with a counterparty to pay, in the future, a fixed or variable rate payment in exchange for the counterparty paying the Fund a variable or fixed rate payment, the accruals for which would begin at a specified
|
70
|
Nuveen Investments
|
date in the future (the “effective date”). The amount of the payment obligation is based on the notional amount of the swap contract and the termination date of the swap (which is akin to a bond’s maturity). The value of a Fund’s swap commitment would increase or decrease based primarily on the extent to which long-term interest rates for bonds having a maturity of the swap’s termination date increases or decreases. Forward interest rate swap contracts are valued daily. The net amount recorded on these transactions for each counterparty is recognized on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a component of “Unrealized appreciation or depreciation on forward swaps (,net)” with the change during the reporting period recognized on the Statement of Operations as a component of “Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of forward swaps.”
Each Fund may terminate a swap contract prior to the effective date, at which point a realized gain or loss is recognized. When a forward swap is terminated, it ordinarily does not involve the delivery of securities or other underlying assets or principal, but rather is settled in cash on a net basis. Net realized gains and losses during the reporting period are recognized on the Statement of Operations as a component of “Net realized gain (loss) from forward swaps.” Each Fund intends, but is not obligated, to terminate its forward swaps before the effective date. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to the swap counterparty on such transactions is limited to the credit risk associated with a counterparty failing to honor its commitment to pay any realized gain to the Fund upon termination.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV) continued to invest in forward interest rate swap contracts to reduce the duration of its portfolio. The average notional amount of forward interest rate swap contracts outstanding during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, was as follows:
|
Enhanced
Municipal
Value (NEV
|
)
|
|||
|
Average notional amount of forward interest rate swap contracts outstanding*
|
$
|
18,560,000
|
|
*
|
The average notional amount is calculated based on the outstanding notional at the beginning of the fiscal year and at the end of each fiscal quarter within the current fiscal year.
|
Market and Counterparty Credit Risk
In the normal course of business each Fund may invest in financial instruments and enter into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the other party to the transaction to perform (counterparty credit risk). The potential loss could exceed the value of the financial assets recorded on the financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose each Fund to counterparty credit risk, consist principally of cash due from counterparties on forward, option and swap transactions, when applicable. The extent of each Fund’s exposure to counterparty credit risk in respect to these financial assets approximates their carrying value as recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Futures contracts, when applicable, expose a Fund to minimal counterparty credit risk as they are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse, which is counterparty to all exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts against default.
Each Fund helps manage counterparty credit risk by entering into agreements only with counterparties the Adviser believes have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by having the Adviser monitor the financial stability of the counterparties. Additionally, counterparties may be required to pledge collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) on behalf of each Fund with a value approximately equal to the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined threshold. Reciprocally, when each Fund has an unrealized loss, the Funds have instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the Funds as collateral with a value approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss above a pre-determined threshold. Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if and when the valuations fluctuate, either up or down, by at least the predetermined threshold amount.
Zero Coupon Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in zero coupon securities. A zero coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the security. Tax-exempt income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the security at issuance and the par value of the security at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the market prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
Custodian Fee Credit
Each Fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby certain custodian fees and expenses are reduced by net credits earned on each Fund’s cash on deposit with the bank. Such deposit arrangements are an alternative to overnight investments. Credits for cash balances may be offset by charges for any days on which a Fund overdraws its account at the custodian bank.
Indemnifications
Under the Funds’ organizational documents, their officers and directors/trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
71
|
|
Notes to
|
||
|
Financial Statements (continued)
|
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
2. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that the Funds would receive upon selling an investment or transferring a liability in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best information available in the circumstances. The following is a summary of the three-tiered hierarchy of valuation input levels.
|
Level 1 –
|
Inputs are unadjusted and prices are determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
|
|
|
Level 2 –
|
Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
|
|
|
Level 3 –
|
Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs (including management’s assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
|
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The following is a summary of each Fund’s fair value measurements as of the end of the reporting period:
|
Municipal Value (NUV)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Long-Term Investments*:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,089,929,611
|
$
|
729,716
|
$
|
2,090,659,327
|
|||||
|
AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Long-Term Investments*:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
227,645,112
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
227,645,112
|
|||||
|
Municipal Income (NMI)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Long-Term Investments*:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
97,040,192
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
97,040,192
|
|||||
|
Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV)
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||
|
Long-Term Investments*:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Bonds
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
318,723,634
|
$
|
33,618
|
$
|
318,757,252
|
|||||
|
Promissory Notes
|
—
|
—
|
3,778
|
3,778
|
|||||||||
|
Derivatives:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Forward Swaps**
|
—
|
(1,091,346
|
)
|
—
|
(1,091,346
|
)
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
317,632,288
|
$
|
37,396
|
$
|
317,669,684
|
|
*
|
Refer to the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments for state classifications and breakdown of Municipal Bonds and Promissory Notes classified as Level 3, where applicable.
|
|
**
|
Represents net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
|
The Nuveen funds’ Board of Directors/Trustees is responsible for the valuation process and has delegated the oversight of the daily valuation process to the Adviser’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee, pursuant to the valuation policies and procedures adopted by the Board of Directors/Trustees, is responsible for making fair value determinations, evaluating the effectiveness of the funds’ pricing policies, and reporting to the Board of Directors/Trustees. The Valuation Committee is aided in its efforts by the Adviser’s dedicated Securities Valuation Team, which is responsible for administering the daily valuation process and applying fair value methodologies as approved by the Valuation Committee. When determining the reliability of independent pricing services for investments owned by the funds, the Valuation Committee, among other things, conducts due diligence reviews of the pricing services and monitors the quality of security prices received through various testing reports conducted by the Securities Valuation Team.
The Valuation Committee will consider pricing methodologies it deems relevant and appropriate when making fair value determinations. Examples of possible methodologies include, but are not limited to, multiple of earnings; discount from market of a similar freely traded security; discounted cash-flow analysis; book value or a multiple thereof; risk premium/yield analysis; yield to maturity; and/or fundamental investment analysis. The Valuation Committee will also consider factors it deems relevant and appropriate in light of the facts and circumstances. Examples of possible factors include, but are not limited to, the type of security; the issuer’s financial statements; the purchase price of the security; the discount from market value of unrestricted securities of the same class at the time of purchase; analysts’ research and observations from financial institutions; information regarding
|
72
|
Nuveen Investments
|
any transactions or offers with respect to the security; the existence of merger proposals or tender offers affecting the security; the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable companies; and the existence of a shelf registration for restricted securities.
For each portfolio security that has been fair valued pursuant to the policies adopted by the Board of Directors/Trustees, the fair value price is compared against the last available and next available market quotations. The Valuation Committee reviews the results of such testing and fair valuation occurrences are reported to the Board of Directors/Trustees.
3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Funds record derivative instruments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized on the Statement of Operations, when applicable. Even though the Funds’ investments in derivatives may represent economic hedges, they are not considered to be hedge transactions for financial reporting purposes. For additional information on the derivative instruments in which each Fund was invested during and at the end of the reporting period, refer to the Portfolios of Investments, Financial Statements and Footnote 1 - General Information and Significant Accounting Policies.
The following table presents the fair value of all derivative instruments held by the Funds as of October 31, 2012, the location of these instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the primary underlying risk exposure. Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV) invested in derivative instruments during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012.
Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV)
|
Location on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Asset Derivatives
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Underlying
Risk Exposure
|
Derivative Instrument
|
Location
|
Value
|
Location
|
Value
|
|||||||||||
|
Interest Rate
|
Forward Swaps
|
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|
Unrealized depreciation
on forward swaps
|
$
|
1,091,346
|
|||||||
The following tables present the amount of net realized gain (loss) and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) recognized for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, on derivative instruments, as well as the primary risk exposure associated with each.
|
Enhanced
|
||||
|
Municipal
|
||||
|
Value
|
||||
|
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Forward Swaps
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||
|
Risk Exposure
|
||||
|
Interest Rate
|
$
|
(6,106,000
|
)
|
|
|
Enhanced
|
||||
|
Municipal
|
||||
|
Value
|
||||
|
Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Forward Swaps
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||
|
Risk Exposure
|
||||
|
Interest Rate
|
$
|
4,012,405
|
4. Fund Shares
Since the inception of the Funds’ repurchase programs, the Funds have not repurchased any of their outstanding shares.
Transactions in shares were as follows:
|
AMT-Free
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Value (NUV)
|
Municipal Value (NUW)
|
||||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31/12
|
Year Ended 10/31/11
|
Year Ended 10/31/12
|
Year Ended 10/31/11
|
||||||||||
|
Shares sold through shelf offering*
|
4,724,522
|
253,486
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
|
1,048,793
|
311,681
|
79,018
|
91,219
|
|||||||||
|
Weighted average premium per shelf offering share sold*
|
1.60
|
%
|
1.15
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
—
|
||||||
|
Enhanced Municipal
|
|||||||||||||
|
Municipal Income (NMI)
|
Value (NEV)
|
|
|||||||||||
|
Year Ended 10/31/12
|
Year Ended 10/31/11
|
Year Ended 10/31/12
|
Year Ended 10/31/11
|
||||||||||
|
Shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
|
31,313
|
14,327
|
41,066
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
*
|
Municipal Value (NUV) is the only Fund authorized to issue additional shares through a shelf offering at the end of the reporting period.
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
73
|
|
Notes to
|
||
|
Financial Statements (continued)
|
5. Investment Transactions
Purchases and sales (including maturities but excluding short-term investments and derivative transactions, where applicable) during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, were as follows:
|
|
AMT-Free
|
Enhanced
|
|||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||||||
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||||||
|
Purchases
|
$
|
298,790,194
|
$
|
25,608,711
|
$
|
14,171,044
|
$
|
34,322,284
|
|||||
|
Sales and maturities
|
283,149,213
|
20,759,097
|
15,280,034
|
36,846,314
|
6. Income Tax Information
The following information is presented on an income tax basis. Differences between amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes are primarily due to timing differences in recognizing taxable market discount, timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses on investment transactions and the treatment of investments in inverse floating rate securities reflected as financing transactions, if any. To the extent that differences arise that are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts as detailed below. Temporary differences do not require reclassification. Temporary and permanent differences do not impact the net asset values of the Funds.
At October 31, 2012, the cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments (excluding investments in derivatives, where applicable), as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
|
`
|
|
AMT-Free
|
Enhanced
|
||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||||||
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||||||
|
Cost of investments
|
$
|
1,887,163,661
|
$
|
182,584,893
|
$
|
82,914,657
|
$
|
249,002,030
|
|||||
|
Gross unrealized:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Appreciation
|
$
|
215,912,016
|
$
|
45,095,768
|
$
|
10,967,182
|
$
|
55,430,323
|
|||||
|
Depreciation
|
(26,796,507
|
)
|
(35,549
|
)
|
(176,302
|
)
|
(3,671,331
|
)
|
|||||
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
|
$
|
189,115,509
|
$
|
45,060,219
|
$
|
10,790,880
|
$
|
51,758,992
|
Permanent differences, primarily due to expiration of capital loss carryforwards, federal taxes paid, taxable market discount and distribution character reclassifications, resulted in reclassifications among the Funds’ components of net assets at October 31, 2012, the Funds’ tax year end, as follows:
|
AMT-Free
|
Enhanced
|
||||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||||||
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||||||
|
Paid-in-surplus
|
$
|
5,062
|
$
|
42
|
$
|
(662,788
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
||||
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
|
(426,083
|
)
|
(202,742
|
)
|
(5,094
|
)
|
(1,900
|
)
|
|||||
|
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
|
421,021
|
202,700
|
667,882
|
1,900
|
The tax components of undistributed net tax-exempt income, net ordinary income and net long-term capital gains at October 31, 2012, the Funds’ tax year end, were as follows:
|
AMT-Free
|
Enhanced
|
||||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||||||
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||||||
|
Undistributed net tax-exempt income *
|
$
|
13,285,954
|
$
|
271,049
|
$
|
1,190,603
|
$
|
4,711,161
|
|||||
|
Undistributed net ordinary income **
|
724,419
|
—
|
12,943
|
59,986
|
|||||||||
|
Undistributed net long-term capital gains
|
—
|
116,431
|
—
|
—
|
|
*
|
Undistributed net tax-exempt income (on a tax basis) has not been reduced for the dividend declared on October 1, 2012, paid on November 1, 2012.
|
|
**
|
Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
|
|
74
|
Nuveen Investments
|
The tax character of distributions paid during the Funds’ tax years ended October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011, was designated for purposes of the dividends paid deduction as follows:
|
AMT-Free
|
Enhanced
|
||||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||||||
|
2012
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
|||||
|
Distributions from net tax-exempt income**
|
$
|
93,396,470
|
$
|
10,782,724
|
$
|
4,698,473
|
$
|
18,504,251
|
|||||
|
Distributions from net ordinary income *
|
2,233,875
|
114
|
—
|
40,449
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions from net long-term capital gains***
|
10,779,851
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
AMT-Free
|
Enhanced
|
||||||||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||||||
|
2011
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
|||||
|
Distributions from net tax-exempt income
|
$
|
92,772,285
|
$
|
11,586,650
|
$
|
4,685,350
|
$
|
17,870,368
|
|||||
|
Distributions from net ordinary income*
|
138,634
|
36,024
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
|
Distributions from net long-term capital gains
|
4,159,024
|
248,104
|
—
|
—
|
|
*
|
Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
|
|
**
|
The Funds hereby designate these amounts paid during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, as Exempt Interest Dividends.
|
|
***
|
The Funds designated as a long-term capital gain dividend, pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 852(b)(3), the amount necessary to reduce earnings and profits of the Funds related to net capital gain to zero for the tax year ended October 31, 2012.
|
At October 31, 2012, the Funds’ tax year end, the following Funds had unused capital loss carryforwards available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as follows:
|
Enhanced
|
|||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||
|
Income
|
Value
|
||||||
|
(NMI
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||||
|
Expiration:
|
|||||||
|
October 31, 2013
|
$
|
165,764
|
$
|
—
|
|||
|
October 31, 2016
|
164,175
|
—
|
|||||
|
October 31, 2017
|
289,822
|
—
|
|||||
|
October 31, 2018
|
—
|
2,946,811
|
|||||
|
October 31, 2019
|
—
|
16,146,849
|
|||||
|
Total
|
$
|
619,761
|
$
|
19,093,660
|
During the Funds’ tax year ended October 31, 2012, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards as follows:
|
AMT-Free
|
|||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||
|
Value
|
Income
|
||||||
|
(NUW
|
)
|
(NMI
|
)
|
||||
|
Utilized capital loss carryforwards
|
$
|
241,126
|
$
|
249,645
|
During the Funds’ tax year ended October 31, 2012, the following Fund had capital loss carryforwards expire as follows:
|
Municipal
|
||||
|
Income
|
||||
|
(NMI
|
)
|
|||
|
Expired capital loss carryforwards
|
$
|
667,114
|
On December 22, 2010, the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”) was enacted, which changed various technical rules governing the tax treatment of RICs. The changes are generally effective for taxable years beginning after the date of enactment. One of the more prominent changes addresses capital loss carryforwards. Under the Act, each Fund will be permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after the date of enactment for an unlimited period. However, any losses incurred during those future taxable years will be required to be utilized prior to the losses incurred in pre-enactment taxable years, which carry an expiration date. As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment capital loss carryforwards may be more likely to expire unused. Additionally, post-enactment capital loss carryforwards will retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than being considered all short-term as permitted under previous regulation.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
75
|
|
Notes to
|
||
|
Financial Statements (continued)
|
The Act also contains several provisions aimed at preserving the character of distributions made by a fiscal year RIC during the portion of its taxable year ending after October 31 or December 31, reducing the circumstances under which a RIC might be required to file amended Forms 1099 to restate previously reported distributions.
Capital losses incurred that will be carried forward under the provisions of the Act are as follows:
|
|
Enhanced
|
||||||
|
Municipal
|
Municipal
|
||||||
|
Value
|
Value
|
||||||
|
(NUV
|
)
|
(NEV
|
)
|
||||
|
Post-enactment losses:
|
|||||||
|
Short-term
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|||
|
Long-term
|
20,892,275
|
5,358,888
|
7. Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Each Fund’s management fee consists of two components – a fund-level fee, based only on the amount of assets within the Fund, and a complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all eligible fund assets managed by the Adviser. This pricing structure enables Fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within their respective Fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets managed by the Adviser.
The annual fund-level fee for Municipal Value (NUV), payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedule:
| Municipal Value (NUV) | ||||
|
Average Daily Net Assets
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
|||
|
For the first $500 million
|
.1500
|
%
|
||
|
For the next $500 million
|
.1250
|
|||
|
For net assets over $1 billion
|
.1000
|
|||
In addition, Municipal Value (NUV) pays an annual management fee, payable monthly, based on gross interest income (excluding interest on bonds underlying a “self-deposited inverse floater” trust that is attributed to the Fund over and above the net interest earned on the inverse floater itself) as follows:
| Municipal Value (NUV) | ||
|
Gross Interest Income
|
Gross Income Fee Rate
|
|
|
For the first $50 million
|
4.125
|
%
|
|
For the next $50 million
|
4.000
|
|
|
For gross income over $100 million
|
3.875
|
|
The annual fund-level fee for AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW), Municipal Income (NMI) and Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV), payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedules:
| AMT-Free Municipal Value (NUW) | ||
|
Average Daily Managed Assets*
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
|
|
For the first $125 million
|
.4000
|
%
|
|
For the next $125 million
|
.3875
|
|
|
For the next $250 million
|
.3750
|
|
|
For the next $500 million
|
.3625
|
|
|
For the next $1 billion
|
.3500
|
|
|
For managed assets over $2 billion
|
.3375
|
|
|
76
|
Nuveen Investments
|
| Municipal Income (NMI) | ||||
|
Average Daily Net Assets
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
|||
|
For the first $125 million
|
.4500
|
%
|
||
|
For the next $125 million
|
.4375
|
|||
|
For the next $250 million
|
.4250
|
|||
|
For the next $500 million
|
.4125
|
|||
|
For the next $1 billion
|
.4000
|
|||
|
For the next $3 billion
|
.3875
|
|||
|
For net assets over $5 billion
|
.3750
|
|||
| Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV) | ||||
|
Average Daily Managed Assets*
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
|||
|
For the first $125 million
|
.4500
|
%
|
||
|
For the next $125 million
|
.4375
|
|||
|
For the next $250 million
|
.4250
|
|||
|
For the next $500 million
|
.4125
|
|||
|
For the next $1 billion
|
.4000
|
|||
|
For managed assets over $2 billion
|
.3875
|
|||
The annual complex-level fee for each Fund, payable monthly, is calculated according to the following schedule:
|
Complex-Level Managed Asset Breakpoint Level*
|
Effective Rate at Breakpoint Level
|
|
|
$55 billion
|
.2000
|
%
|
|
$56 billion
|
.1996
|
|
|
$57 billion
|
.1989
|
|
|
$60 billion
|
.1961
|
|
|
$63 billion
|
.1931
|
|
|
$66 billion
|
.1900
|
|
|
$71 billion
|
.1851
|
|
|
$76 billion
|
.1806
|
|
|
$80 billion
|
.1773
|
|
|
$91 billion
|
.1691
|
|
|
$125 billion
|
.1599
|
|
|
$200 billion
|
.1505
|
|
|
$250 billion
|
.1469
|
|
|
$300 billion
|
.1445
|
|
|
*
|
For the fund-level and complex-level fees, managed assets include closed-end fund assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to financial leverage. For these purposes, financial leverage includes the funds’ use of preferred stock and borrowings and certain investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities, subject to an agreement by the Adviser as to certain funds to limit the amount of such assets for determining managed assets in certain circumstances. The complex-level fee is calculated based upon the aggregate daily managed assets of all Nuveen Funds that constitute “eligible assets.” Eligible assets do not include assets attributable to investments in other Nuveen Funds or assets in excess of $2 billion added to the Nuveen Fund complex in connection with the Adviser’s assumption of the management of the former First American Funds effective January 1, 2011. As of October 31, 2012, the complex-level fee rate for these Funds was .1691%.
|
The management fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and administrative services and general office facilities. The Adviser is responsible for each Fund’s overall strategy and asset allocation decisions. The Adviser has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, (the “Sub-Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser, under which the Sub-Adviser manages the investment portfolios of the Funds. The Sub-Adviser is compensated for its services to the Funds from the management fees paid to the Adviser.
The Funds pay no compensation directly to those of its directors/trustees who are affiliated with the Adviser or to its officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the Funds from the Adviser or its affiliates. The Board of Directors/Trustees has adopted a deferred compensation plan for independent directors/trustees that enables directors/trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from certain Nuveen-advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of select Nuveen-advised funds.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
77
|
|
Notes to
|
||
|
Financial Statements (continued)
|
8. Borrowing Arrangements
As part of its investment strategy, Enhanced Municipal Value (NEV) may use borrowings as a means of financial leverage. The Fund has entered into a $100 million (maximum commitment amount) committed, unsecured, 364-day line of credit (“Borrowings”) with its custodian bank. Interest charged on the used portion of the Borrowings is calculated at a rate per annum equal to the higher of (i) the overnight Federal Funds rate plus 1.25% or (ii) the overnight London Inter-bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.25%. In addition, the Fund accrues a commitment fee of .15% per annum on the unused portion of the Borrowings.
Borrowings outstanding are recognized as “Borrowings” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Interest expense incurred on the borrowed amount and undrawn balance is recognized as a component of “Interest expense” on the Statement of Operations.
On June 15, 2012, the Fund renewed its Borrowings and increased its maximum commitment amount from $75 million to $100 million. All other terms of the Borrowings, which expire on June 14, 2013, remain unchanged.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2012, the Fund did not utilize its Borrowings.
9. New Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities
In December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11 (“ASU No. 2011-11”) to enhance disclosures about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are subject to offsetting (“netting”) on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. This information will enable users of the entity’s financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of netting arrangements on the entity’s financial position. ASU No. 2011-11 is effective prospectively during interim or annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of this guidance and the impact it will have to the financial statements amounts and footnote disclosures, if any.
10. Subsequent Events
Shelf Offering
During December 2012, AMT-Free Municipal Value’s (NUW) and Enhanced Municipal Value’s (NEV) registration statements became effective and each Fund is permitted to sell an additional 1.2 million and 1.9 million shares, respectively, through its shelf offering.
|
78
|
Nuveen Investments
|
Annual Investment Management
Agreement Approval Process (Unaudited)
The Board of Trustees or Directors (as the case may be) (each, a “Board” and each Trustee or Director, a “Board Member”) of the Funds, including the Board Members who are not parties to the Funds’ advisory or sub-advisory agreements or “interested persons” of any such parties (the “Independent Board Members”), is responsible for approving the advisory agreements (each, an “Investment Management Agreement”) between each Fund and Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. (the “Advisor”) and the sub-advisory agreements (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) between the Advisor and Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (the “Sub-Advisor”) (the Investment Management Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements are referred to collectively as the “Advisory Agreements”) and their periodic continuation. Pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), the Board is required to consider the continuation of the Advisory Agreements on an annual basis. Accordingly, at an in-person meeting held on May 21-23, 2012 (the “May Meeting”), the Board, including a majority of the Independent Board Members, considered and approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for the Funds for an additional one-year period.
In preparation for its considerations at the May Meeting, the Board requested and received extensive materials prepared in connection with the review of the Advisory Agreements. The materials provided a broad range of information regarding the Funds, the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor (the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor are collectively, the “Fund Advisers” and each, a “Fund Adviser”). As described in more detail below, the information provided included, among other things, a review of Fund performance, including Fund investment performance assessments against peer groups and appropriate benchmarks, a comparison of Fund fees and expenses relative to peers, a description and assessment of shareholder service levels for the Funds, a summary of the performance of certain service providers, a review of product initiatives and shareholder communications and an analysis of the Advisor’s profitability with comparisons to comparable peers in the managed fund business. As part of its annual review, the Board also held a separate meeting on April 18-19, 2012, to review the Funds’ investment performance and consider an analysis provided by the Advisor of the Sub-Advisor which generally evaluated the Sub-Advisor’s investment team, investment mandate, organizational structure and history, investment philosophy and process, performance of the applicable Fund, and significant changes to the foregoing. As a result of its review of the materials and discussions, the Board presented the Advisor with questions and the Advisor responded.
The materials and information prepared in connection with the annual review of the Advisory Agreements supplement the information and analysis provided to the Board
|
Nuveen Investments
|
79
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
during the year. In this regard, throughout the year, the Board, acting directly or through its committees, regularly reviews the performance and various services provided by the Advisor and the Sub-Advisor. The Board meets at least quarterly as well as at other times as the need arises. At its quarterly meetings, the Board reviews reports by the Advisor which include, among other things, Fund performance, a review of the investment teams and reports on compliance, regulatory matters and risk management. The Board also meets with key investment personnel managing the Fund portfolios during the year. In October 2011, the Board also created two new standing committees (the Open-end Fund Committee and the Closed-end Fund Committee) to assist the full Board in monitoring and gaining a deeper insight into the distinctive issues and business practices of open-end and closed-end funds.
In addition, the Board continues its program of seeking to have the Board Members or a subset thereof visit each sub-advisor to the Nuveen funds at least once over a multiple year rotation, meeting with key investment and business personnel. In this regard, the Board visited with the Sub-Advisor’s municipal team in Minneapolis in September 2011, and with the Sub-Advisor’s municipal team in Chicago in November 2011. Further, an ad hoc committee of the Board visited the then-current transfer agents of the Nuveen funds in 2011 and the audit committee of the Board visited the various pricing agents for the Nuveen funds in January 2012. The Board considers factors and information that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of the Advisory Agreements at the meetings held throughout the year. Accordingly, the Board considers the information provided and knowledge gained at these meetings when performing its annual review of the Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members are assisted throughout the process by independent legal counsel who provided materials describing applicable law and the duties of directors or trustees in reviewing advisory contracts and met with the Independent Board Members in executive sessions without management present. In addition, it is important to recognize that the management arrangements for the Nuveen funds are the result of many years of review and discussion between the Independent Board Members and fund management and that the Board Members’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of fee arrangements and other factors developed in previous years.
The Board considered all factors it believed relevant with respect to each Fund, including among other factors: (a) the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Fund Advisers, (b) the investment performance of the Fund and Fund Advisers, (c) the advisory fees and costs of the services to be provided to the Fund and the profitability of the Fund Advisers, (d) the extent of any economies of scale, (e) any benefits derived by the Fund Advisers from the relationship with the Fund and (f) other factors. Each Board Member may have accorded different weight to the various factors in reaching his or her conclusions with respect to a Fund’s Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor as all important or controlling. The Independent Board Members’ considerations were instead based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information presented. The principal factors considered by the Board and its conclusions are described below.
|
80
|
Nuveen Investments
|
A. Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the Independent Board Members considered the nature, extent and quality of the Fund Adviser’s services, including advisory services and the resulting Fund performance and administrative services. The Independent Board Members further considered the overall reputation and capabilities of the Advisor and its affiliates, the commitment of the Advisor to provide high quality service to the Funds, their overall confidence in the Advisor’s integrity and the Advisor’s responsiveness to questions and concerns raised by them. The Independent Board Members reviewed materials outlining, among other things, the Fund Adviser’s organization and business; the types of services that the Fund Adviser or its affiliates provide to the Funds; the performance record of the applicable Fund (as described in further detail below); and any initiatives Nuveen had taken for the applicable fund product line.
In considering advisory services, the Board recognized that the Advisor provides various oversight, administrative, compliance and other services for the Funds and the Sub-Advisor generally provides the portfolio investment management services to the Funds. In reviewing the portfolio management services provided to each Fund, the Board reviewed the materials provided by the Nuveen Investment Services Oversight Team analyzing, among other things, the Sub-Advisor’s investment team and changes thereto, organization and history, assets under management, Fund objectives and mandate, the investment team’s philosophy and strategies in managing the Fund, developments affecting the Sub-Advisor or Fund and Fund performance. The Independent Board Members also reviewed portfolio manager compensation arrangements to evaluate each Fund Adviser’s ability to attract and retain high quality investment personnel, preserve stability, and reward performance but not provide an inappropriate incentive to take undue risks. In addition, the Board considered the Advisor’s execution of its oversight responsibilities over the Sub-Advisor. Given the importance of compliance, the Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s compliance program, including the report of the chief compliance officer regarding the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures; the resources dedicated to compliance; and the record of compliance with the policies and procedures.
In addition to advisory services, the Board considered the quality and extent of administrative and other non-investment advisory services the Advisor and its affiliates provide to the Funds, including product management, investment services (such as oversight of investment policies and procedures, risk management, and pricing), fund administration, oversight of service providers, shareholder services and communications, administration of Board relations, regulatory and portfolio compliance, legal support, managing leverage and promoting an orderly secondary market for common shares. The Board further recognized Nuveen’s additional investments in personnel, including in compliance and risk management.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
81
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
In reviewing the services provided, the Board also reviewed materials describing various notable initiatives and projects the Advisor performed in connection with the closed-end fund product line. These initiatives included completion of the refinancing of auction rate preferred securities; efforts to eliminate product overlap with fund mergers; elimination of the insurance mandate on several funds; ongoing services to manage leverage that has become increasingly complex; continued secondary market offerings, share repurchases and other support initiatives for certain funds; and continued communications efforts with shareholders, fund analysts and financial advisers. With respect to the latter, the Independent Board Members noted Nuveen’s continued commitment to supporting the secondary market for the common shares of its closed-end funds through a comprehensive secondary market communication program designed to raise investor and analyst awareness and understanding of closed-end funds. Nuveen’s support services included, among other things: continuing communications concerning the refinancing efforts related to auction rate preferred securities; supporting and promoting munifund term preferred shares (MTP) including by launching a microsite dedicated to MTP shares; sponsoring and participating in conferences; communicating with closed-end fund analysts covering the Nuveen funds throughout the year; providing marketing and product updates for the closed-end funds; and maintaining and enhancing a closed-end fund website.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members found that, overall, the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the respective Funds under each applicable Advisory Agreement were satisfactory.
B. The Investment Performance of the Funds and Fund Advisers
The Board, including the Independent Board Members, reviewed and considered the performance history of each Fund over various time periods. The Board reviewed, among other things, each Fund’s historic investment performance as well as information comparing the Fund’s performance information with that of other funds (the “Performance Peer Group”) based on data compiled by Nuveen that was provided by an independent provider of mutual fund data and with recognized and/or customized benchmarks (i.e., benchmarks derived from multiple recognized benchmarks).
The Board reviewed reports, including a comprehensive analysis of the Funds’ performance and the applicable investment team. In this regard, the Board reviewed each Fund’s total return information compared to its Performance Peer Group for the quarter, one-, three- and five-year periods ending December 31, 2011, as well as performance information reflecting the first quarter of 2012 (or for the periods available for the Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund (the “AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund”) and the Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund (the “Enhanced Municipal Value Fund”), which did not exist for part of the foregoing time frame). In addition, the Board reviewed each Fund’s total return information compared to recognized and/or customized benchmarks for the quarter, one- and three-year periods ending December 31, 2011, as well as performance information reflecting the first quarter of 2012 (or for the periods available
|
82
|
Nuveen Investments
|
for the AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund and the Enhanced Municipal Value Fund, which did not exist for part of the foregoing time frame).
The Independent Board Members also reviewed historic premium and discount levels, including a summary of actions taken to address or discuss other developments affecting the secondary market discounts of various funds. This information supplemented the fund performance information provided to the Board at each of its quarterly meetings.
In reviewing performance comparison information, the Independent Board Members recognized that the usefulness of the comparisons of the performance of certain funds with the performance of their respective Performance Peer Group may be limited because the Performance Peer Group may not adequately represent the objectives and strategies of the applicable funds or may be limited in size or number. In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that the Performance Peer Groups of the Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (the “Municipal Income Fund”), the Nuveen Municipal Value Fund, Inc. (the “Municipal Value Fund”), and the AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund were classified as having significant differences from such Funds based on various considerations such as special fund objectives, potential investable universe and the composition of the peer set (e.g., the number and size of competing funds and number of competing managers). The Independent Board Members also noted that the investment experience of a particular shareholder in the Nuveen funds will vary depending on when such shareholder invests in the applicable fund, the class held (if multiple classes are offered in a fund) and the performance of the fund (or respective class) during that shareholder’s investment period. In addition, although the performance below reflects the performance results for the time periods ending as of the most recent calendar year end (unless otherwise indicated), the Board also recognized that selecting a different ending time period may derive different results. Furthermore, while the Board is cognizant of the relevant performance of a fund’s peer set and/or benchmark(s), the Board evaluated fund performance in light of the respective fund’s investment objectives, investment parameters and guidelines and recognized that the objectives, investment parameters and guidelines of peers and/or benchmarks may differ to some extent, thereby resulting in differences in performance results. Nevertheless, with respect to any Nuveen funds that the Board considers to have underperformed their peers and/or benchmarks from time to time, the Board monitors such funds closely and considers any steps necessary or appropriate to address such issues.
In considering the results of the comparisons, the Independent Board Members observed, among other things, that the Enhanced Municipal Value Fund was relatively new with a shorter performance history available, thereby limiting the ability to make a meaningful assessment of performance. As noted above, the Municipal Income Fund, the Municipal Value Fund and the AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund had significant differences from their respective Performance Peer Groups. Therefore, the Independent Board Members considered each such Fund’s performance compared to its benchmark and noted that the Municipal Income Fund and the Municipal Value Fund outperformed their respective benchmarks in the one- and three-year periods, while the AMT-Free
|
Nuveen Investments
|
83
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
Municipal Value Fund was relatively new with a shorter performance history available, thereby limiting the ability to make a meaningful assessment of performance (although such Fund outperformed its benchmark in the one-year period).
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s investment performance had been satisfactory.
|
C.
|
Fees, Expenses and Profitability
|
|
1. Fees and Expenses
|
|
|
The Board evaluated the management fees and expenses of each Fund reviewing, among other things, such Fund’s gross management fees, net management fees and net expense ratios in absolute terms as well as compared to the fee and expenses of a comparable universe of funds provided by an independent fund data provider (the “Peer Universe”) and any expense limitations.
|
|
|
The Independent Board Members further reviewed the methodology regarding the construction of the applicable Peer Universe. In reviewing the comparisons of fee and expense information, the Independent Board Members took into account that in certain instances various factors such as: the limited size and particular composition of the Peer Universe (including the inclusion of other Nuveen funds in the peer set); expense anomalies; changes in the funds comprising the Peer Universe from year to year; levels of reimbursement or fee waivers; the timing of information used; and the differences in the type and use of leverage may impact the comparative data, thereby limiting somewhat the ability to make a meaningful comparison with peers.
|
|
|
In reviewing the fee schedule for a Fund, the Independent Board Members also considered the fund-level and complex-wide breakpoint schedules (described in further detail below) and any fee waivers and reimbursements provided by Nuveen (applicable, in particular, for certain closed-end funds launched since 1999). In reviewing fees and expenses (excluding leverage costs and leveraged assets), the Board considered the expenses and fees to be higher if they were over 10 basis points higher, slightly higher if they were approximately 6 to 10 basis points higher, in line if they were within approximately 5 basis points higher than the peer average and below if they were below the peer average of the Peer Universe. In reviewing the reports, the Board noted that the overwhelming majority of the Nuveen funds were at, close to or below their peer set average based on the net total expense ratio.
|
|
|
The Independent Board Members noted that the Enhanced Municipal Value Fund had higher net management fees and a slightly higher net expense ratio compared to its peer averages. In this regard, the Board noted that the slightly higher net expense ratio of such Fund compared to its peer average was generally due to, among other things, an increase in the leverage ratio. In addition, the Independent Board Members noted that each of the other Funds had net management fees and
|
|
84
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
net expense ratios (including fee waivers and expense reimbursements) below their respective peer averages.
|
|
|
Based on their review of the fee and expense information provided, the Independent Board Members determined that each Fund’s management fees were reasonable in light of the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund.
|
|
|
2. Comparisons with the Fees of Other Clients
|
|
|
The Independent Board Members further reviewed information regarding the nature of services and range of fees offered by the Advisor to other clients, including municipal separately managed accounts and passively managed exchange traded funds (ETFs) sub-advised by the Advisor. In evaluating the comparisons of fees, the Independent Board Members noted that the fee rates charged to the Funds and other clients vary, among other things, because of the different services involved and the additional regulatory and compliance requirements associated with registered investment companies, such as the Funds. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members considered the differences in the product types, including, but not limited to, the services provided, the structure and operations, product distribution and costs thereof, portfolio investment policies, investor profiles, account sizes and regulatory requirements. The Independent Board Members noted, in particular, that the range of services provided to the Funds (as discussed above) is much more extensive than that provided to separately managed accounts. Given the inherent differences in the various products, particularly the extensive services provided to the Funds, the Independent Board Members believe such facts justify the different levels of fees.
|
|
|
In considering the fees of the Sub-Advisor, the Independent Board Members also considered the pricing schedule or fees that the Sub-Advisor charges for similar investment management services for other Nuveen funds, funds of other sponsors (if any), and other clients (such as retail and/or institutional managed accounts).
|
|
|
3. Profitability of Fund Advisers
|
|
|
In conjunction with their review of fees, the Independent Board Members also considered the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities and its financial condition. The Independent Board Members reviewed the revenues and expenses of Nuveen’s advisory activities for the last two calendar years, the allocation methodology used in preparing the profitability data and an analysis of the key drivers behind the changes in revenues and expenses that impacted profitability in 2011. The Independent Board Members noted this information supplemented the profitability information requested and received during the year to help keep them apprised of developments affecting profitability (such as changes in fee waivers and expense reimbursement commitments). In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that they have an Independent Board Member serve as a point person to review and keep them apprised of changes to the profitability analysis and/or methodologies during the year. The Independent Board Members also considered Nuveen’s revenues for advisory activities, expenses, and profit margin
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
85
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
|
compared to that of various unaffiliated management firms with comparable assets under management (based on asset size and asset composition).
|
|
|
In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members recognized the Advisor’s continued investment in its business to enhance its services, including capital improvements to investment technology, updated compliance systems, and additional personnel in compliance, risk management, and product development as well as its ability to allocate resources to various areas of the Advisor as the need arises. In addition, in evaluating profitability, the Independent Board Members also recognized the subjective nature of determining profitability which may be affected by numerous factors including the allocation of expenses. Further, the Independent Board Members recognized the difficulties in making comparisons as the profitability of other advisers generally is not publicly available and the profitability information that is available for certain advisers or management firms may not be representative of the industry and may be affected by, among other things, the adviser’s particular business mix, capital costs, types of funds managed and expense allocations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Independent Board Members reviewed Nuveen’s methodology and assumptions for allocating expenses across product lines to determine profitability. In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members recognized Nuveen’s investment in its fund business. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the Advisor’s level of profitability for its advisory activities was reasonable in light of the services provided.
|
|
|
With respect to sub-advisers affiliated with Nuveen, including the Sub-Advisor, the Independent Board Members reviewed the sub-adviser’s revenues, expenses and profitability margins (pre- and post-tax) for its advisory activities and the methodology used for allocating expenses among the internal sub-advisers. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members were satisfied that the Sub-Advisor’s level of profitability was reasonable in light of the services provided.
|
|
|
In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the Independent Board Members also considered other amounts paid to a Fund Adviser by the Funds as well as any indirect benefits (such as soft dollar arrangements, if any) the Fund Adviser and its affiliates receive, or are expected to receive, that are directly attributable to the management of the Funds, if any. See Section E below for additional information on indirect benefits a Fund Adviser may receive as a result of its relationship with the Funds. Based on their review of the overall fee arrangements of each Fund, the Independent Board Members determined that the advisory fees and expenses of the respective Fund were reasonable.
|
|
|
D.
|
Economies of Scale and Whether Fee Levels Reflect These Economies of Scale
|
With respect to economies of scale, the Independent Board Members have recognized the potential benefits resulting from the costs of a fund being spread over a larger asset base, although economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict with precision,
|
86
|
Nuveen Investments
|
particularly on a fund-by-fund basis. One method to help ensure the shareholders share in these benefits is to include breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule. Generally, management fees for funds in the Nuveen complex are comprised of a fund-level component and a complex-level component, subject to certain exceptions. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members reviewed and considered the applicable fund-level breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules that reduce advisory fees as asset levels increase. Further, the Independent Board Members noted that although closed-end funds may from time-to-time make additional share offerings, the growth of their assets will occur primarily through the appreciation of such funds’ investment portfolio.
In addition to fund-level advisory fee breakpoints, the Board also considered the Funds’ complex-wide fee arrangement. Pursuant to the complex-wide fee arrangement, the fees of the funds in the Nuveen complex are generally reduced as the assets in the fund complex reach certain levels. The complex-wide fee arrangement seeks to provide the benefits of economies of scale to fund shareholders when total fund complex assets increase, even if assets of a particular fund are unchanged or have decreased. The approach reflects the notion that some of Nuveen’s costs are attributable to services provided to all its funds in the complex and therefore all funds benefit if these costs are spread over a larger asset base. In addition, with the acquisition of the funds previously advised by FAF Advisors, Inc., the Board noted that a portion of such funds’ assets at the time of acquisition were deemed eligible to be included in the complex-wide fee calculation in order to deliver fee savings to shareholders in the combined complex and such funds were subject to differing complex-level fee rates.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that the breakpoint schedules and complex-wide fee arrangement were acceptable and reflect economies of scale to be shared with shareholders when assets under management increase.
E. Indirect Benefits
In evaluating fees, the Independent Board Members received and considered information regarding potential “fall out” or ancillary benefits the respective Fund Adviser or its affiliates may receive as a result of its relationship with each Fund. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered any revenues received by affiliates of the Advisor for serving as co-manager in initial public offerings of new closed-end funds as well as revenues received in connection with secondary offerings.
In addition to the above, the Independent Board Members considered whether the Fund Advisers received any benefits from soft dollar arrangements whereby a portion of the commissions paid by a Fund for brokerage may be used to acquire research that may be useful to the Fund Adviser in managing the assets of the Funds and other clients. The Independent Board Members recognized that each Fund Adviser has the authority to pay a higher commission in return for brokerage and research services if it determines in good faith that the commission paid is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided and may benefit from such soft dollar arrangements. Similarly, the Board recognized that the research received pursuant to
|
Nuveen Investments
|
87
|
Annual Investment Management Agreement
Approval Process (Unaudited) (continued)
soft dollar arrangements by a Fund Adviser may also benefit a Fund and shareholders to the extent the research enhances the ability of the Fund Adviser to manage the Fund. The Independent Board Members noted that the Fund Advisers’ profitability may be somewhat lower if they did not receive the research services pursuant to the soft dollar arrangements and had to acquire such services directly.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded that any indirect benefits received by a Fund Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Funds were reasonable and within acceptable parameters.
F. Other Considerations
The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor discussed previously as all-important or controlling. The Board Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously concluded that the terms of each Advisory Agreement are fair and reasonable, that the respective Fund Adviser’s fees are reasonable in light of the services provided to each Fund and that the Advisory Agreements be renewed.
|
88
|
Nuveen Investments
|
Board Members & Officers (Unaudited)
|
The management of the Funds, including general supervision of the duties performed for the Funds by the Adviser, is the responsibility of the board members of the Funds. The number of board members of the Funds is currently set at ten. None of the board members who are not “interested” persons of the Funds (referred to herein as “independent board members”) has ever been a director or employee of, or consultant to, Nuveen or its affiliates. The names and business addresses of the board members and officers of the Funds, their principal occupations and other affiliations during the past five years, the number of portfolios each oversees and other directorships they hold are set forth below.
|
|
Name,
Birthdate
& Address
|
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
|
Year First
Elected or
Appointed
and Term(1)
|
Principal
Occupation(s)
including other
Directorships
During Past 5 Years
|
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Board Member
|
|||||
| Independent Board Members: | |||||||||
| ■ |
ROBERT P. BREMNER
8/22/40333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Chairman of
the Board
and Board Member
|
1996
Class III
|
Private Investor and Management Consultant; Treasurer and Director, Humanities Council of Washington, D.C.; Board Member, Independent Directors Council affiliated with the Investment Company Institute.
|
217
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
JACK B. EVANS
10/22/48333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
1999
Class III
|
President, The Hall-Perrine Foundation, a private philanthropic corporation (since 1996); Director and Chairman, United Fire Group, a publicly held company; member of the Board of Regents for the State of Iowa University System; Director, Source Media Group; Life Trustee of Coe College and the Iowa College Foundation; formerly, Director, Alliant Energy; formerly, Director, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; formerly, President and Chief Operating Officer, SCI Financial Group, Inc., a regional financial services firm.
|
217
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
WILLIAM C. HUNTER
3/6/48333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
2004
Class I
|
Dean Emeritus (since June 30, 2012), formerly, Dean, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa (2006-2012); Director (since 2004) of Xerox Corporation; Director (since 2005), and President (since July 2012) Beta Gamma Sigma, Inc., The International Honor Society; Director of Wellmark, Inc. (since 2009); formerly, Dean and Distinguished Professor of Finance, School of Business at the University of Connecticut (2003-2006); previously, Senior Vice President and Director of Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (1995-2003); formerly, Director (1997-2007), Credit Research Center at Georgetown University.
|
217
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
DAVID J. KUNDERT
10/28/42333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
2005
Class II
|
Director, Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Company; retired (since 2004) as Chairman, JPMorgan Fleming Asset Management, President and CEO, Banc One Investment Advisors Corporation, and President, One Group Mutual Funds; prior thereto, Executive Vice President, Banc One Corporation and Chairman and CEO, Banc One Investment Management Group; Member, Board of Regents, Luther College; member of the Wisconsin Bar Association; member of Board of Directors, Friends of Boerner Botanical Gardens; member of Board of Directors and Chair of Investment Committee, Greater Milwaukee Foundation.
|
217
|
||||
|
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER
9/24/44333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
1996
Class III
|
Chairman of Miller-Valentine Partners Ltd., a real estate investment company; formerly, Senior Partner and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2004) of Miller-Valentine Group; member, University of Dayton Business School Advisory Council;member, Mid-America Health System Board; formerly, member and chair, Dayton Philharmonic Orchestra Association; formerly, member, Business Advisory Council, Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank.
|
217
|
||||
|
Nuveen Investments
|
89
|
Board Members & Officers (Unaudited) (continued)
|
Name,
|
Position(s) Held
|
Year First
|
Principal
|
Number
|
|||||
|
Birthdate
|
with the Funds
|
Elected or
|
Occupation(s)
|
of Portfolios
|
|||||
|
& Address
|
Appointed
|
Including other
|
in Fund Complex
|
||||||
|
and Term(1)
|
Directorships
|
Overseen by
|
|||||||
|
During Past 5 Years
|
Board Member
|
||||||||
|
Independent Board Members:
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
JUDITH M. STOCKDALE
12/29/47
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
1997
Class I
|
Executive Director, Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation (since 1994); prior thereto, Executive Director, Great Lakes Protection Fund (1990-1994).
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
CAROLE E. STONE
6/28/47
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
2007
Class I
|
Director, Chicago Board Options Exchange (since 2006); Director, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (since 2009); formerly, Commissioner, New York State Commission on Public Authority Reform (2005-2010); formerly, Chair, New York Racing Association Oversight Board (2005-2007).
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
VIRGINIA L. STRINGER
8/16/44
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
2011
Class I
|
Board Member, Mutual Fund Directors Forum; former governance consultant and non-profit board member; former Owner and President, Strategic Management Resources, Inc. a management consulting firm; former Member, Governing Board, Investment Company Institute’s Independent Directors Council; previously, held several executive positions in general management, marketing and human resources at IBM and The Pillsbury Company; Independent Director, First American Fund Complex (1987-2010) and Chair (1997-2010).
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
TERENCE J. TOTH
9/29/59
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
2008
Class II
|
Director, Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. (since 2008); Managing Partner, Promus Capital (since 2008); formerly, CEO and President, Northern Trust Global Investments (2004-2007); Executive Vice President, Quantitative Management & Securities Lending (2000-2004); prior thereto, various positions with Northern Trust Company (since 1994); member: Chicago Fellowship Board (since 2005), Catalyst Schools of Chicago Board (since 2008) and Mather Foundation Board (since 2012), and a member of its investment committee; formerly,Member, Northern Trust Mutual Funds Board (2005-2007), Northern Trust Global Investments Board (2004-2007), Northern Trust Japan Board (2004-2007), Northern Trust Securities Inc. Board (2003-2007) and Northern Trust Hong Kong Board (1997-2004).
|
217
|
||||
|
Interested Board Member:
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
JOHN P. AMBOIAN(2)
6/14/61
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Board Member
|
2008
Class II
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (since 2007) and Director (since 1999) of Nuveen Investments, Inc., formerly, President (1999-2007); Chief Executive Officer (since 2007) of Nuveen Investments Advisers, Inc.; Director (since 1998) formerly, Chief Executive Officer (2007-2010) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.
|
217
|
||||
|
90
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Name,
|
Position(s) Held
|
Year First
|
Principal
|
Number
|
|||||
|
Birthdate
|
with the Funds
|
Elected or
|
Occupation(s)
|
of Portfolios
|
|||||
|
and Address
|
|
Appointed(3)
|
During Past 5 Years
|
in Fund Complex
|
|||||
|
Overseen
|
|||||||||
|
by Officer
|
|||||||||
|
Officers of the Funds:
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
GIFFORD R. ZIMMERMAN
9/9/56
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Chief
Administrative
Officer
|
1988
|
Managing Director (since 2002), and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2004) and Assistant Secretary (since 1994) of Nuveen Investments, Inc.; Managing Director (since 2002), Assistant Secretary (since 1997) and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (since 2011); Managing Director, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, of Symphony Asset Management LLC (since 2003); Vice President and Assistant Secretary of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC (since 2002), Nuveen Investments Advisers Inc. (since 2002), Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC (since 2006), and of Winslow Capital Management, LLC, (since 2010); Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Compliance Officer (since 2006) of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC; Chartered Financial Analyst.
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
WILLIAM ADAMS IV
6/9/55
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
|
2007
|
Senior Executive Vice President, Global Structured Products (since 2010), formerly, Executive Vice President (1999-2010) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Co-President of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. (since 2011); President (since 2011), formerly, Managing Director (2010-2011) of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC.
|
117
|
||||
| ■ |
CEDRIC H. ANTOSIEWICZ
1/11/62
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
|
2007
|
Managing Director of Nuveen Securities, LLC.
|
117
|
||||
| ■ |
MARGO L. COOK
4/11/64
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
|
2009
|
Executive Vice President (since 2008) of Nuveen Investments, Inc. and of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. (since 2011); Managing Director-Investment Services of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC (since August 2011), previously, Head of Institutional Asset Management (2007-2008) of Bear Stearns Asset Management; Head of Institutional Asset Management (1986-2007) of Bank of NY Mellon; Chartered Financial Analyst.
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
LORNA C. FERGUSON
10/24/45
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
|
1998
|
Managing Director (since 2005) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc. and Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2004).
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
STEPHEN D. FOY
5/31/54
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
and Controller
|
1998
|
Senior Vice President (since 2010), formerly, Vice President (2005-2010) and Funds Controller of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Vice President of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC (since 2010); Certified Public Accountant.
|
217
|
||||
|
Nuveen Investments
|
91
|
Board Members & Officers (Unaudited) (continued)
|
Name,
|
Position(s) Held
|
Year First
|
Principal
|
Number
|
|||||
|
Birthdate
|
with the Funds
|
Elected or
|
Occupation(s)
|
of Portfolios
|
|||||
|
and Address
|
Appointed(3)
|
During Past 5 Years
|
in Fund Complex
|
||||||
|
Overseen
|
|||||||||
|
by Officer
|
|||||||||
|
Officers of the Funds:
|
|||||||||
| ■ |
SCOTT S. GRACE
8/20/70
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
and Treasurer
|
2009
|
Managing Director, Corporate Finance & Development, Treasurer (since 2009) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director and Treasurer (since 2009) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc., Nuveen Investments Advisers, Inc., Nuveen Investments Holdings Inc. and (since 2011) Nuveen Asset Management, LLC; Vice President and Treasurer of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Tradewinds Global Investors, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC and Winslow Capital Management, LLC.; Vice President of Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC; formerly, Treasurer (2006-2009), Senior Vice President (2008-2009), previously, Vice President (2006-2008) of Janus Capital Group, Inc.; formerly, Senior Associate in Morgan Stanley’s Global Financial Services Group (2000-2003); Chartered Accountant Designation.
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
WALTER M. KELLY
2/24/70
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Chief Compliance
Officer and
Vice President
|
2003
|
Senior Vice President (since 2008) and Assistant Secretary (since 2003) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.; Senior Vice President (since 2008) of Nuveen Investment Holdings, Inc.; formerly, Senior Vice President (2008-2011) of Nuveen Securities, LLC.
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
TINA M. LAZAR
8/27/61
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
|
2002
|
Senior Vice President (since 2010), formerly, Vice President (2005-2010) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.
|
217
|
||||
| ■ |
KEVIN J. MCCARTHY
3/26/66
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
Vice President
and Secretary
|
2007
|
Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2008), formerly, Vice President (2007-2008), Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2008), Assistant Secretary (since 2007) and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC; Managing Director (since 2008), and Assistant Secretary, Nuveen Investment Holdings, Inc.; Vice President (since 2007) and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Investments Advisers Inc., NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, NWQ Holdings, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC, Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC, and of Winslow Capital Management, Inc. (since 2010); Vice President and Secretary (since 2010) of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC; prior thereto, Partner, Bell, Boyd & Lloyd LLP (1997-2007).
|
217
|
||||
|
92
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
Name,
|
Position(s) Held
|
Year First
|
Principal
|
Number
|
|||||
|
Birthdate
|
with the Funds
|
Elected or
|
Occupation(s)
|
of Portfolios
|
|||||
|
and Address
|
Appointed(3)
|
During Past 5 Years
|
in Fund Complex
|
||||||
|
Overseen
|
|||||||||
|
by Officer
|
|||||||||
| Officers of the Funds: | |||||||||
| ■ |
KATHLEEN L. PRUDHOMME
3/30/53
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
|
Vice President and
Assistant Secretary
|
2011
|
Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC; Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2011) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; formerly, Deputy General Counsel, FAF Advisors, Inc. (2004-2010).
|
217
|
||||
|
(1)
|
Board Members serve three year terms. The Board of Trustees is divided into three classes. Class I, Class II, and Class III, with each being elected to serve until the succeeding annual shareholders’ meeting subsequent to its election or thereafter in each case when its respective successors are duly elected or appointed. The first year elected or appointed represents the year in which the board member was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Nuveen Complex.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr. Amboian is an interested trustee because of his position with Nuveen Investments, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, which are affiliates of the Nuveen Funds.
|
|
(3)
|
Officers serve one year terms through August of each year. The year first elected or appointed represents the year in which the Officer was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Nuveen Complex.
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
93
|
Reinvest Automatically,
Easily and Conveniently
Nuveen makes reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set up your reinvestment account.
Nuveen Closed-End Funds Automatic Reinvestment Plan
Your Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest distributions in additional Fund shares.
By choosing to reinvest, you’ll be able to invest money regularly and automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of compounding. Just like distributions in cash, there may be times when income or capital gains taxes may be payable on distributions that are reinvested.
It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a declining market.
Easy and convenient
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you’ll receive a statement showing your total distributions, the date of investment, the shares acquired and the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
How shares are purchased
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of the net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price. If the shares are trading at less than net asset value, shares for your account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent begins purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares are trading below net asset value, but the Fund’s shares subsequently trade at or above their net asset value before the Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases, the Plan Agent may cease open-market purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a price equal to the greater of the shares’ net asset value or 95% of the shares’ market value on the last business day immediately prior to the purchase date. Distributions received to purchase shares in the open market will normally be invested shortly after the distribution payment date. No interest will be paid on distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of the shares may increase before purchases are completed, the average purchase price per share may
|
94
|
Nuveen Investments
|
exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those charged on individual transactions.
Flexible
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at any time, should your needs or situation change.
You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your name, or in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. Ask your investment advisor if his or her firm will participate on your behalf. Participants whose shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the Plan.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan at this time.
Call today to start reinvesting distributions
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial advisor or call us at (800) 257-8787.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
95
|
Glossary of Terms
Used in this Report
|
■
|
Auction Rate Bond: An auction rate bond is a security whose interest payments are adjusted periodically through an auction process, which process typically also serves as a means for buying and selling the bond. Auctions that fail to attract enough buyers for all the shares offered for sale are deemed to have “failed,” with current holders receiving a formula-based interest rate until the next scheduled auction.
|
|
■
|
Average Annual Total Return: This is a commonly used method to express an investment’s performance over a particular, usually multi-year time period. It expresses the return that would have been necessary each year to equal the investment’s actual cumulative performance (including change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being considered.
|
|
■
|
Average Effective Maturity: The market-value-weighted average of the effective maturity dates of the individual securities including cash. In the case of a bond that has been advance-refunded to a call date, the effective maturity is the date on which the bond is scheduled to be redeemed using the proceeds of an escrow account. In most other cases the effective maturity is the stated maturity date of the security.
|
|
■
|
Effective Leverage: Effective leverage is a Fund’s effective economic leverage, and includes both regulatory leverage (see Leverage) and the leverage effects of certain derivative investments in the Fund’s portfolio. Currently, the leverage effects of Tender Option Bond (TOB) inverse floater holdings are included in effective leverage values, in addition to any regulatory leverage.
|
|
■
|
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): The total market value of all final goods and services produced in a country/region in a given year, equal to total consumer, investment and government spending, plus the value of exports, minus the value of imports.
|
|
■
|
Inverse Floating Rate Securities: Inverse floating rate securities, also known as inverse floaters or tender option bonds (TOBs), are created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust created by a broker-dealer. This trust, in turn, (a) issues floating rate certificates typically paying short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties in amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) issues an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) to an investor (such as a Fund) interested in gaining investment exposure to a long-term municipal bond. The income received by the holder of the inverse floater varies inversely with the short term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the holder of the inverse floater bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk. The holder of the inverse floater typically also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s
|
|
96
|
Nuveen Investments
|
|
value. Hence, an inverse floater essentially represents an investment in the underlying bond on a leveraged basis.
|
|
|
■
|
Leverage: Using borrowed money to invest in securities or other assets, seeking to increase the return of an investment or portfolio.
|
|
■
|
Leverage-Adjusted Duration: Duration is a measure of the expected period over which a bond’s principal and interest will be paid, and consequently is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s or bond Fund’s value to changes when market interest rates change. Generally, the longer a bond’s or Fund’s duration, the more the price of the bond or Fund will change as interest rates change. Leverage-adjusted duration takes into account the leveraging process for a Fund and therefore is longer than the duration of the Fund’s portfolio of bonds.
|
|
■
|
Lipper General & Insured Leveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average: Calculated using the returns of all closed-end funds in this category. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges.
|
|
■
|
Lipper General & Insured Unleveraged Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average: Calculated using the returns of all closed-end funds in this category. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges.
|
|
■
|
Market Yield (also known as Dividend Yield or Current Yield): An investment’s current annualized dividend divided by its current market price.
|
|
■
|
Net Asset Value (NAV): The net market value of all securities held in a portfolio.
|
|
■
|
Net Asset Value (NAV) Per Share: The market value of one share of a mutual fund or closed-end fund. For a Fund, the NAV is calculated daily by taking the Fund’s total assets (securities, cash, and accrued earnings), subtracting the Fund’s liabilities, and dividing by the number of shares outstanding.
|
|
■
|
Pre-Refunding: Pre-Refunding, also known as advanced refundings or refinancings, is a procedure used by state and local governments to refinance municipal bonds to lower interest expenses. The issuer sells new bonds with a lower yield and uses the proceeds to buy U.S. Treasury securities, the interest from which is used to make payments on the higher-yielding bonds. Because of this collateral, pre-refunding generally raises a bond’s credit rating and thus its value.
|
|
■
|
Regulatory Leverage: Regulatory Leverage consists of preferred shares issued by or borrowings of a Fund. Both of these are part of a Fund’s capital structure. Regulatory leverage is sometimes referred to as “‘40 Act Leverage” and is subject to asset coverage limits set in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
|
|
■
|
S&P Municipal Bond Index: An unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade U.S. municipal bond market. Index returns assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges or management fees.
|
|
Nuveen Investments
|
97
|
Glossary of Terms
Used in this Report (continued)
|
■
|
Taxable-Equivalent Yield: The yield necessary from a fully taxable investment to equal, on an after-tax basis, the yield of a municipal bond investment.
|
|
■
|
Zero Coupon Bond: A zero coupon bond does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the bond. Income to the holder of the bond comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the bond at issuance and the par value of the bond at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon bonds generally are more volatile than the market prices of bonds that pay interest periodically.
|
|
98
|
Nuveen Investments
|
Additional Fund Information
Board of
Directors/Trustees
John P. Amboian
Robert P. Bremner
Jack B. Evans
William C. Hunter
David J. Kundert
William J. Schneider
Judith M. Stockdale
Carole E. Stone
Virginia L. Stringer
Terence J. Toth
Fund Manager
Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Custodian
State Street Bank
& Trust Company
Boston, MA
Transfer Agent and
Shareholder Services
State Street Bank & Trust
Company
Nuveen Funds
P.O. Box 43071
Providence, RI 02940-3071
(800) 257-8787
Legal Counsel
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Chicago, IL
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
Quarterly Portfolio of Investments and Proxy Voting Information
You may obtain (i) each Fund’s quarterly portfolio of investments, (ii) information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, and (iii) a description of the policies and procedures that the Funds used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen Investments toll-free at (800) 257-8787 or on Nuveen’s website at www.nuveen.com.
You may also obtain this and other Fund information directly from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC may charge a copying fee for this information. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC at (202) 942-8090 for room hours and operation. You may also request Fund information by sending an e-mail request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC’s Public References Section at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
CEO Certification Disclosure
Each Fund’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
Each Fund has filed with the SEC the certification of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Share Information
Each Fund intends to repurchase shares of its own stock in the future at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. During the period covered by this report, the Funds did not repurchase any of their shares.
Any future repurchases will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semi-annual report.
|
Nuveen Investments
|
99
|
Nuveen Investments:
Serving Investors for Generations
Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on Nuveen Investments to provide dependable investment solutions through continued adherence to proven, long-term investing principles. Today, we offer a range of high quality equity and fixed-income solutions designed to be integral components of a well-diversified core portfolio.
Focused on meeting investor needs.
Nuveen Investments provides high-quality investment services designed to help secure the long-term goals of institutional and individual investors as well as the consultants and financial advisors who serve them. Nuveen Investments markets a wide range of specialized investment solutions which provide investors access to capabilities of its high-quality boutique investment affiliates—Nuveen Asset Management, Symphony Asset Management, NWQ Investment Management Company, Santa Barbara Asset Management, Tradewinds Global Investors, Winslow Capital Management and Gresham Investment Management. In total, Nuveen Investments managed $220 billion as of September 30, 2012.
Find out how we can help you.
To learn more about how the products and services of Nuveen Investments may be able to help you meet your financial goals, talk to your financial advisor, or call us at (800) 257-8787. Please read the information provided carefully before you invest. Investors should consider the investment objective and policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of any investment carefully. Where applicable, be sure to obtain a prospectus, which contains this and other relevant information. To obtain a prospectus, please contact your securities representative or Nuveen Investments, 333 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/cef
Distributed by
Nuveen Securities, LLC
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
www.nuveen.com/cef
EAN-A-1012D
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There were no amendments to or waivers from the Code during the period covered by this report. The registrant has posted the code of ethics on its website at www.nuveen.com/CEF/Shareholder. (To view the code, click on Fund Governance and then click on Code of Conduct.)
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
The registrant's Board of Directors or Trustees (“Board”) determined that the registrant has at least one “audit committee financial expert” (as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR) serving on its Audit Committee. The registrant's audit committee financial expert is Carole E. Stone, who is “independent” for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Ms. Stone served for five years as Director of the New York State Division of the Budget. As part of her role as Director, Ms. Stone was actively involved in overseeing the development of the State's operating, local assistance and capital budgets, its financial plan and related documents; overseeing the development of the State's bond-related disclosure documents and certifying that they fairly presented the State's financial position; reviewing audits of various State and local agencies and programs; and coordinating the State's system of internal audit and control. Prior to serving as Director, Ms. Stone worked as a budget analyst/examiner with increasing levels of responsibility over a 30 year period, including approximately five years as Deputy Budget Director. Ms. Stone has also served as Chair of the New York State Racing Association Oversight Board, as Chair of the Public Authorities Control Board, as a Commissioner on the New York State Commission on Public Authority Reform and as a member of the Boards of Directors of several New York State public authorities. These positions have involved overseeing operations and finances of certain entities and assessing the adequacy of project/entity financing and financial reporting. Currently, Ms. Stone is on the Board of Directors of CBOE Holdings, Inc., of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and of C2 Options Exchange. Ms. Stone's position on the boards of these entities and as a member of both CBOE Holdings' Audit Committee and its Finance Committee has involved, among other things, the oversight of audits, audit plans and preparation of financial statements.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
The following tables show the amount of fees that Ernst & Young LLP, the Fund's auditor, billed to the Fund during the Fund's last two full fiscal years. For engagements with Ernst & Young LLP the Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that Ernst & Young LLP provided to the Fund, except for those non-audit services that were subject to the pre-approval exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (the “pre-approval exception”). The pre-approval exception for services provided directly to the Fund waives the pre-approval requirement for services other than audit, review or attest services if: (A) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid by the Fund to its accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; (B) the Fund did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and (C) the services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee's attention, and the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before the audit is completed.
The Audit Committee has delegated certain pre-approval responsibilities to its Chairman (or, in his absence, any other member of the Audit Committee).
SERVICES THAT THE FUND'S AUDITOR BILLED TO THE FUND
|
Audit Fees Billed
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
Tax Fees
|
All Other Fees
|
|||||||||||||
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
to Fund 1
|
Billed to Fund 2
|
Billed to Fund 3
|
Billed to Fund 4
|
||||||||||||
|
October 31, 2012
|
$ | 21,200 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
|
Percentage approved
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||
|
pursuant to
|
||||||||||||||||
|
pre-approval
|
||||||||||||||||
|
exception
|
||||||||||||||||
|
October 31, 2011
|
$ | 18,200 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||
|
Percentage approved
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||
|
pursuant to
|
||||||||||||||||
|
pre-approval
|
||||||||||||||||
|
exception
|
||||||||||||||||
|
1 "Audit Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of the Fund's annual financial statements and services provided in
|
||||||||||||||||
|
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
2 "Audit-Related Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
|
||||||||||||||||
|
financial statements that are not reported under "Audit Fees". These fees include leverage offerings as well as comfort letters for seed and shelf offerings.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
3 "Tax Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax advice, tax compliance, and tax planning. These fees include: all global withholding
|
||||||||||||||||
|
tax services; excise and state tax reviews; and capital gain, tax equalization and taxable basis calculations performed by the principal accountant.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
4 "All Other Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for products and services other than "Audit Fees", "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees". These fees
|
||||||||||||||||
|
represent all "Agreed-Upon Procedures" engagements pertaining to preferred stock, commercial paper and registration statements.
|
||||||||||||||||
SERVICES THAT THE FUND'S AUDITOR BILLED TO THE ADVISER AND AFFILIATED FUND SERVICE PROVIDERS
The following tables show the amount of fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP to Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (formerly Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.) (the “Adviser” or “NFA”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund's operations and financial reporting, during the Fund's last two full fiscal years.
The tables also show the percentage of fees subject to the pre-approval exception. The pre-approval exception for services provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider (other than audit, review or attest services) waives the pre-approval requirement if: (A) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to Ernst & Young LLP by the Fund, the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee; (B) the Fund did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and (C) the services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee's attention, and the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before the Fund's audit is completed.
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
Audit-Related Fees
|
Tax Fees Billed to
|
All Other Fees
|
|||||||||
|
Billed to Adviser
|
Adviser and
|
Billed to Adviser
|
||||||||||
|
and Affiliated Fund
|
Affiliated Fund
|
and Affiliated Fund
|
||||||||||
|
Service Providers
|
Service Providers
|
Service Providers
|
||||||||||
|
October 31, 2012
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
|
Percentage approved
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
|
pursuant to
|
||||||||||||
|
pre-approval
|
||||||||||||
|
exception
|
||||||||||||
|
October 31, 2011
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
|
Percentage approved
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
|
pursuant to
|
||||||||||||
|
pre-approval
|
||||||||||||
|
exception
|
||||||||||||
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The following table shows the amount of fees that Ernst & Young LLP billed during the Fund's last two full fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve non-audit services that Ernst & Young LLP provides to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Services Provider, if the engagement related directly to the Fund's operations and financial reporting (except for those subject to the pre-approval exception described above). The Audit Committee requested and received information from Ernst & Young LLP about any non-audit services that Ernst & Young LLP rendered during the Fund's last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The Committee considered this information in evaluating Ernst & Young LLP's independence.
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
Total Non-Audit Fees
|
|||
|
billed to Adviser and
|
||||
|
Affiliated Fund Service
|
Total Non-Audit Fees
|
|||
|
Providers (engagements
|
billed to Adviser and
|
|||
|
related directly to the
|
Affiliated Fund Service
|
|||
|
Total Non-Audit Fees
|
operations and financial
|
Providers (all other
|
||
|
Billed to Fund
|
reporting of the Fund)
|
engagements)
|
Total
|
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
|
October 31, 2011
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
$ 0
|
|
"Non-Audit Fees billed to Fund" for both fiscal year ends represent "Tax Fees" and "All Other Fees" billed to Fund in their respective
|
||||
|
amounts from the previous table.
|
||||
|
Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were
|
||||
|
attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees.
|
||||
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. Generally, the Audit Committee must approve (i) all non-audit services to be performed for the Fund by the Fund's independent accountants and (ii) all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the Fund's independent accountants for the Affiliated Fund Service Providers with respect to operations and financial reporting of the Fund. Regarding tax and research projects conducted by the independent accountants for the Fund and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (with respect to operations and financial reports of the Fund) such engagements will be (i) pre-approved by the Audit Committee if they are expected to be for amounts greater than $10,000; (ii) reported to the Audit Committee chairman for his verbal approval prior to engagement if they are expected to be for amounts under $10,000 but greater than $5,000; and (iii) reported to the Audit Committee at the next Audit Committee meeting if they are expected to be for an amount under $5,000.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
The registrant's Board has a separately designated Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). The members of the audit committee are Robert P. Bremner, Terence J. Toth, William J. Schneider, Carole E. Stone and David J. Kundert.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
a) See Portfolio of Investments in Item 1.
b) Not applicable.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, formerly known as Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc., is the registrant’s investment adviser (also referred to as the “Adviser”). The Adviser is responsible for the on-going monitoring of the Fund’s investment portfolio, managing the Fund’s business affairs and providing certain clerical, bookkeeping and administrative services. The Adviser has engaged Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Sub-Adviser”) as Sub-Adviser to provide discretionary investment advisory services. As part of these services, the Adviser has delegated to the Sub-Adviser the full responsibility for proxy voting on securities held in the registrant’s portfolio and related duties in accordance with the Sub-Adviser's policy and procedures. The Adviser periodically monitors the Sub-Adviser's voting to ensure that it is carrying out its duties. The Sub-Adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures are attached to this filing as an exhibit and incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, formerly known as Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc., is the registrant’s investment adviser (also referred to as the “Adviser”). The Adviser is responsible for the selection and on-going monitoring of the Fund’s investment portfolio, managing the Fund’s business affairs and providing certain clerical, bookkeeping and administrative services. The Adviser has engaged Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Nuveen Asset Management” or “Sub-Adviser”) as Sub-Adviser to provide discretionary investment advisory services. The following section provides information on the portfolio manager at the Sub-Adviser:
The Portfolio Manager
The following individual has primary responsibility for the day-to-day implementation of the registrant’s investment strategies:
|
Name
|
Fund
|
|
Steven Hlavin
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
|
Other Accounts Managed. In addition to managing the registrant, the portfolio managers are also primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the following accounts:
|
Portfolio Manager
|
Type of Account
Managed
|
Number of
Accounts
|
Assets*
|
|
Steven Hlavin
|
Registered Investment Company
|
10
|
$3.743 billion
|
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
$0
|
|
|
Other Accounts
|
0
|
$0
|
|
*
|
Assets are as of October 31, 2012. None of the assets in these accounts are subject to an advisory fee based on performance.
|
POTENTIAL MATERIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple accounts are presented a number of potential conflicts, including, among others, those discussed below.
The management of multiple accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each account. Nuveen Asset Management seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most accounts managed by a portfolio manager in a particular investment strategy are managed using the same investment models.
If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one account, an account may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible accounts. To deal with these situations, Nuveen Asset Management has adopted procedures for allocating limited opportunities across multiple accounts.
With respect to many of its clients’ accounts, Nuveen Asset Management determines which broker to use to execute transaction orders, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, with respect to certain other accounts, Nuveen Asset Management may be limited by the client with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a particular broker. In these cases, Nuveen Asset Management may place separate, non-simultaneous, transactions for a Fund and other accounts which may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the detriment of the Fund or the other accounts.
Some clients are subject to different regulations. As a consequence of this difference in regulatory requirements, some clients may not be permitted to engage in all the investment techniques or transactions or to engage in these transactions to the same extent as the other accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Finally, the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where Nuveen Asset Management has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of some accounts, with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.
Nuveen Asset Management has adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts common among investment managers. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
|
Item 8(a)(3).
|
FUND MANAGER COMPENSATION
|
Portfolio manager compensation consists primarily of base pay, an annual cash bonus and long term incentive payments.
Base pay. Base pay is determined based upon an analysis of the portfolio manager’s general performance, experience, and market levels of base pay for such position.
Annual cash bonus. The Fund’s portfolio managers are eligible for an annual cash bonus based on investment performance, qualitative evaluation and financial performance of Nuveen Asset Management.
A portion of each portfolio manager’s annual cash bonus is based on the Fund’s investment performance, generally measured over the past one- and three or five-year periods unless the portfolio manager’s tenure is shorter. Investment performance for the Fund generally is determined by evaluating the Fund’s performance relative to its benchmark(s) and/or Lipper industry peer group.
A portion of the cash bonus is based on a qualitative evaluation made by each portfolio manager’s supervisor taking into consideration a number of factors, including the portfolio manager’s team collaboration, expense management, support of personnel responsible for asset growth, and his or her compliance with Nuveen Asset Management’s policies and procedures.
The final factor influencing a portfolio manager’s cash bonus is the financial performance of Nuveen Asset Management based on its operating earnings.
Long-term incentive compensation. Certain key employees of Nuveen Investments and its affiliates, including certain portfolio managers, have received equity interests in the parent company of Nuveen Investments. In addition, certain key employees of Nuveen Asset Management, including certain portfolio managers, have received profits interests in Nuveen Asset Management which entitle their holders to participate in the firm’s growth over time.
There are generally no differences between the methods used to determine compensation with respect to the Fund and the Other Accounts shown in the table above.
Beneficial Ownership of Securities. As of October 31, 2012, the portfolio manager beneficially owned the following dollar range of equity securities issued by the Fund and other Nuveen Funds managed by Nuveen Asset Management’s municipal investment team.
|
Name of Portfolio Manager
|
Fund
|
Dollar range of equity securities
beneficially owned in Fund
|
Dollar range of equity securities
beneficially owned in the remainder
of Nuveen funds managed by Nuveen
Asset Management’s municipal
investment team
|
|
Steven Hlavin
|
Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
|
$0
|
$0
|
PORTFOLIO MANAGER BIOGRAPHY:
Steven M. Hlavin is a Vice President at Nuveen Asset Management, LLC. He manages several open-end, closed-end and exchange-traded funds as well as a number of institutional portfolios. In addition to his portfolio management duties, he manages the firm’s tender option bond program. Prior to his current position, Mr. Hlavin was a senior analyst responsible for the firm’s risk management and performance reporting process. Mr. Hlavin joined the firm in 2003.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant's Board implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
(a)
|
The registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).
|
|
(b)
|
There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
|
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form.
|
(a)(1)
|
Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable because the code is posted on registrant's website at www.nuveen.com/CEF/Shareholder and there were no amendments during the period covered by this report. (To view the code, click on Fund Governance and then Code of Conduct.)
|
|
(a)(2)
|
A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: Ex-99.CERT Attached hereto.
|
|
(a)(3)
|
Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.
|
|
(b)
|
If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Nuveen Enhanced Municipal Value Fund
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Kevin J. McCarthy
Kevin J. McCarthy
Vice President and Secretary
Date: January 7, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Gifford R. Zimmerman
Gifford R. Zimmerman
Chief Administrative Officer
(principal executive officer)
Date: January 7, 2013
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Stephen D. Foy
Stephen D. Foy
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer)
Date: January 7, 2013