The SEC and FINRA enforce various statutes and regulations intended to prevent manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of any security and carefully scrutinize trading patterns and company news and other communications for false or misleading information, particularly in cases where the hallmarks of “pump and dump” activities may exist, such as rapid share price increases or decreases. We and our shareholders may be subjected to enhanced regulatory scrutiny due to the small number of holders who initially will own the registered shares of our common stock publicly available for resale, and the limited trading markets in which such shares may be offered or sold which have often been associated with improper activities concerning penny-stocks, such as the OTC Bulletin Board or the OTCQB Marketplace (Pink OTC) or pink sheets. Until such time as the common stock sold in this offering is registered and until such time as our restricted shares are registered or available for resale under Rule 144, there will continue to be a small percentage of shares held by a small number of investors, many of whom acquired such shares in privately negotiated purchase and sale transactions, that will constitute the entire available trading market. The Supreme Court has stated that manipulative action is a term of art connoting intentional or willful conduct designed to deceive or defraud investors by controlling or artificially affecting the price of securities. Often times, manipulation is associated by regulators with forces that upset the supply and demand factors that would normally determine trading prices. A small percentage of our outstanding common stock is available for trading, held by a small number of individuals or entities. Accordingly, the supply of common stock for sale will be extremely limited for an indeterminate amount of time, which could result in higher bids, asks or sales prices than would otherwise exist. Securities regulators have often cited thinly-traded markets, small numbers of holders, and awareness campaigns as components of their claims of price manipulation and other violations of law when combined with manipulative trading, such as wash sales, matched orders or other manipulative trading timed to coincide with false or touting press releases. There can be no assurance that our or third-parties’ activities, or the small number of potential sellers or small percentage of stock in the “float,” or determinations by purchasers or holders as to when or under what circumstances or at what prices they may be willing to buy or sell stock, will not artificially impact (or would be claimed by regulators to have affected) the normal supply and demand factors that determine the price of stock.
Our management team will have immediate and broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from this offering and we may use the net proceeds in ways with which you disagree.
There is no minimum offering amount required as a condition to closing this offering and therefore net proceeds from this offering will be immediately available to our management to use at their discretion. We currently intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for repayment of debt, for sales, marketing and promotion, technology and platform engineering, establishment of strategic partnerships, potential acquisitions (which may include a transaction resulting from the non-binding letter of intent) and working capital and general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.” You will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of these net proceeds, and you will not have the opportunity, as part of your investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. It is possible that the net proceeds will be invested in a way that does not yield a favorable, or any, return for us or our stockholders. The failure of our management to use such funds effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operation.
If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the price of our common stock may be adversely affected.
Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, management's assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of management's assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a material weakness existed in our internal controls over financial reporting with respect to the incompletion of our assessment of the accounting impact of the issuance of complex and non-standard debt and equity instruments in May 2011. As a result of this material weakness, we were required to restate our financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2011. This material weakness was subsequently remediated as of September 30, 2011.
26
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering and may experience additional dilution in the future.
You will incur immediate and substantial dilution as a result of this offering. After giving effect to the sale by us of shares offered in this offering at an assumed public offering price of $ per share, and after deducting the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, investors in this offering can expect an immediate dilution of $ per share, or % at the assumed public offering price. In addition, in the past, we issued convertible preferred stock, options and warrants to acquire shares of common stock. To the extent these options are ultimately exercised, you will sustain future dilution. We may also acquire other technologies or finance strategic alliances by issuing equity, which may result in additional dilution to our stockholders.
If you are not an institutional investor, you may purchase securities in this offering only if you reside within the states in which we will apply to have the securities registered or are exempt from registration, and, if required, meet any requisite suitability standards.
Because our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and not listed on a national securities exchange, this offering must be registered, or be exempt from registration, in any state in which the securities are to be offered or sold. We will apply to register securities, or will seek to obtain an exemption from registration, only in certain states. If you are not an “institutional investor,” you must be a resident of these jurisdictions to purchase our securities in the offering. The definition of an “institutional investor” varies from state to state, but generally includes financial institutions, broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies and other qualified entities. If you are not an institutional investor, you may purchase securities in this offering only if you reside in the jurisdictions where there is an effective registration or exemption, and, if required, meet any requisite suitability standards.
Because we are seeking a limited offering qualification in California, sales of our units will be limited in California.
We are seeking a limited offering qualification of our securities in California. If the offering is approved in California on the basis of such limited offering qualification, in the absence of any other exemptions, offers and sales of our securities can only be made to proposed California purchasers based on their meeting certain suitability standards. California investors must meet at least one of the following criteria:
|
·
|
a $150,000 liquid net worth, (a net worth exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobile), plus estimated $70,000 gross income during the current tax year; or
|
|
·
|
a $250,000 liquid net worth and an investment limitation of not more than 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth.
|
If the offering is approved in California on the basis of a limited offering qualification, we will not have to demonstrate compliance with some of the merit regulations of the California Department of Corporations as found in Title 10, California Code of Regulations, Rule 260.140 et seq. In addition, the exemptions for secondary trading in California available under California Corporations Code Section 25104(h) will be withheld, although there may be other exemptions to cover private sales in California of a bona fide owner for his own account without advertising and without being effected by or through a broker dealer in a public offering.
Risks Related to Non-Binding Letter of Intent
|
There can be no assurance that a definitive agreement will be entered into and even if a definitive agreement is entered into, there can be no assurance that a transaction will be consummated.
On February 3, 2012, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent to acquire all the capital stock of Twelvefold Media, Inc. (“Twelvefold Media”) for shares of our common stock. Twelvefold Media is a privately held company, that creates customized digital media packages with proprietary technology utilizing emotive-based targeting at the page level and real-time bidding. We can offer no assurance that a definitive agreement will be executed on terms acceptable to the parties, or at all. Furthermore, even if a definitive agreement is entered into, all of the conditions to the merger would have to be satisfied or, if permissible, waived. Closing conditions are expected to include a requirement that the combined company have $7 million of net cash on its balance sheet, all or most of which is expected to be raised from this offering, and receipt of third party approvals. Even if a definitive agreement is entered into, we will not know whether the conditions to the closing of the transaction will be satisfied prior to the consummation of this offering and, accordingly, an investor purchasing shares in this offering cannot be assured that the transaction will in fact occur. Consequently, an investor in this offering should make an investment decision taking into consideration the possibility that the transaction will not be consummated.
The issuance of our securities to TwelvefoldMedia securityholders in connection with the transaction will substantially dilute the voting power of our stockholders and investors in this offering.
We expect to issue a significant percentage of our outstanding shares of capital stock to Twelvefold Media security holders as consideration for the acquisition of Twelvefold Media. The issuance of our securities to Twelvefold Media security holders in connection with the transaction will significantly reduce the relative voting power of each share of our common stock held by our current stockholders and of investors in this offering.
Failure to complete or delay in completing the transaction may have an adverse effect on both companies’ businesses due to uncertainty or operating restrictions while the merger is pending or cause the market price of our stock to drop.
The letter of intent entered into with Twelvefold Media is non-binding and is subject to, among other things, the negotiation of a definitive agreement. We cannot predict what the effect on the market price of our shares would be if the merger is not completed, but depending on market conditions at the time, it could result in a decline in market price. A substantial delay in completing the transaction due to the need to meet the net cash contingency or the need to satisfy other conditions to closing the merger, or the imposition of any unfavorable terms, conditions, or restrictions in obtaining a waiver to such conditions or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on the anticipated benefits of, or increase the costs associated with or delay the cost savings anticipated from, the transaction, thereby impacting our business, prospects, results of operation and financial condition or results of operations after the merger. In addition, the parties may be subject to restrictions on the operation of their business while the merger is pending, which could impair their ability to operate their business and prevent them from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the transaction. Any of these situations could also result in a decline in the market price of our common stock.
There is limited information about Twelvefold Media that is available and and investors will be required to make an investment decision without the benefit of reviewing financial statements and other information of Twelvefold Media.
Based upon limited unaudited information available provided by Twelvefold Media to us, for the year ended nine months ended September 30, 2011, Twelvefold Media realized $8,050,702 in revenues and a net loss of $3,327,301. We believe that Twelvefold Media is a synergistic acquisition that would permit the companies to realize economies of scale and reduce expenditures by consolidating sales efforts. Accordingly, investors in this offering should not place undue reliance upon Twelvefold Media’s information and investors will be required to make an investment decision without the benefit of reviewing financial statements and other information of Twelvefold Media.
We will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the transaction is pending.
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on our employees and customers or those of Twelvefold Media may have an adverse effect on us both on a pre-transaction and post-transaction basis. These uncertainties may impair our ability and the ability of Twelvefold Media to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is consummated, and could cause customers and others that deal with us and Twelvefold Media to seek to change existing business relationships. Retention of certain employees may be challenging during the pendency of the transaction, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with us following the transaction, our business following the transaction could be harmed.
The failure to integrate successfully our business and the business of Twelvefold Media in the expected timeframe could adversely affect the combined company’s future results following the completion of the transaction.
The success of the transaction will depend, in large part, on the ability of the combined company following the completion of the transaction to realize the anticipated benefits from combining our business and the business of Twelvefold Media. The failure to integrate successfully and to manage successfully the challenges presented by the integration process may result in the combined company’s failure to achieve some or all of the anticipated benefits of the transaction. Potential difficulties that may be encountered in the integration process include the following:
|
·
|
using the combined company’s cash and other assets efficiently to develop the business of the combined company;
|
|
·
|
appropriately managing the liabilities of the combined company;
|
|
·
|
limited experience of management in performing acquisitions and managing growth;
|
|
·
|
potential unknown and unforeseen expenses, delays or regulatory conditions associated with the transaction; and
|
|
·
|
performance shortfalls at one or both of the companies as a result of the diversion of management’s attention caused by completing the transaction and integrating the companies’ operations.
|
The transaction will result in changes to our board of directors and the combined company may pursue different strategies that we or Twelvefold Media may have pursued independently.
If the parties complete the transaction, the composition of our board of directors will change in accordance with the merger agreement. Currently, it is anticipated that the combined company will continue to pursue its advertising businesses as currently operated. However, because the composition of the board of directors of the combined company will consist of our directors and directors of Twelvefold Media, the combined company may determine to pursue certain business strategies that neither company would have pursued independently.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD -LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this prospectus may be “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements that express our intentions, beliefs, expectations, strategies, predictions or any other statements relating to our future activities or other future events or conditions. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may, and are likely to, differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements due to numerous factors, including those described above and those risks discussed in this prospectus, including the risks described under “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this prospectus and in other documents which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, our ability to raise additional funding, our ability to maintain and grow our business, variability of operating results, our ability to maintain and enhance our brand, our expansion and development of new products and services, marketing and other business development initiatives, competition in the industry, general government regulation, economic conditions, dependence on key personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of our clients, our ability to protect our intellectual property, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by our existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and other risks described herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this prospectus, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
USE OF PROCEEDS
Based on an assumed public offering price of $ per share, we estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of the shares that we are offering, assuming gross proceeds of $8,000,000, will be approximately $7,800,000, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses and without giving effect to the over-allotment option.
We intend to utilize the net proceeds of the offering as follows:
Purpose:
|
|
Approximate Dollar Amount
|
|
|
Approximate Percentage of Net Proceeds
|
|
Repayment of Debt (1)
|
|
$
|
2,950,000
|
|
|
|
7.1%
|
|
Sales and client relations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.9%
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
20.4%
|
|
Technology and platform engineering
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
10.6%
|
|
Potential acquisitions (which may include a transaction resulting from the non-binding letter of intent)
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
3.2%
|
|
Working capital and general corporate purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9%
|
|
(1)
|
Represents repayment of a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000 which, unless earlier converted, exchanged or prepaid, matures on August 2, 2012, subject to extension until February 2, 2013 upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. The note does not accrue interest.
|
The expected use of net proceeds of this offering represents our intention based on our current plans and business conditions. The amount and timing of our actual expenditures will depend on numerous factors, including increases in development costs and expenses and any unforeseen cash needs. As a result, we will retain broad discretion in the allocation and use of the net proceeds of this offering. We have no current plans, agreements or commitments for any material acquisitions of any technologies, products or businesses.
27
If we determine to accelerate our business plan or if our plans otherwise change or our assumptions prove inaccurate, we may need to seek financing sooner than currently anticipated, incur additional financing or reduce or curtail our operations. We cannot assure you that financing will become available as and when needed.
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full, we will realize additional net proceeds of approximately $ , which will be added to our working capital.
We will invest proceeds not immediately required for the purposes described above principally in United States government securities, short-term certificates of deposit, money market funds or other short-term interest-bearing investments.
We believe that our cash on hand, together with the net proceeds from this offering (without exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) would be adequate to fund operations through December 31, 2012.
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization, as of September 30, 2011:
|
•
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
•
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to the issuance and sale of the shares offered by this prospectus.
|
You should consider this table in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
As of September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As
Adjusted for this offering (1)
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
$
|
1,011,399
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A convertible preferred stock; $.0001 par value; 240 shares authorized; 230 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 38,648,450 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2011
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
16,261,469
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(16,990,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(725,456
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
285,943
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
(1)
|
Reflects the estimated net proceeds that we will receive from the sale of shares of common stock in this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.
|
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Since June 2011, our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "IZEA." Prior to that there was no trading of our common stock. The following table sets forth, for the calendar periods indicated the range of the high and low closing prices reported of our common stock, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. The quotations represent inter-dealer prices without retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The quotations may be rounded for presentation. As of February 13, 2012, the closing price of our common stock was $0.85 per share.
28
Fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
3.25
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
3.25
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
1.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
Fiscal year ending December 31, 2012
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
First quarter (through February 13, 2012)
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
As of February 13, 2012, we had approximately 43 shareholders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held in the names of various securities brokers, dealers and registered clearing agencies.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Rather, we expect to retain future earnings (if any) to fund the operation and expansion of our business and for general corporate purposes.
DILUTION
Our pro forma net tangible book value as of September 30, 2011 was $(747,439) or $(0.19) per share of common stock, based upon 38,648,450 shares outstanding as of that date. Net tangible book value per share is determined by dividing such number of outstanding shares of common stock, , into our net tangible book value, which is our total tangible assets less total liabilities. After giving effect to the sale of the shares in this offering at the assumed public offering price of $ per share, at September 30, 2011, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value at September 30, 2011 would have been approximately , or $ per share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of approximately $ per share to our existing stockholders, and an immediate dilution of $ per share to investors purchasing shares in the offering.
The following table illustrates the per share dilution to investors purchasing shares in the offering:
Assumed public offering price per share
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of September 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
|
|
Increase per share attributable to sale of shares to investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after the offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
Dilution per share to investors
|
|
$
|
|
|
The foregoing illustration does not reflect potential dilution from the conversion of our outstanding convertible series A preferred stock or the exercise of outstanding stock options or warrants to purchase an aggregate of 17,765,251 shares of our common stock or 718,954 shares of common stock that may become issuable upon the conversion of a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000, assuming a conversion price of $0.765. The foregoing illustration also does not reflect the dilution that would result from the exercise of the underwriters' warrants.
Of the approximately 38,648,450 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 13, 2012, approximately 12,500,000 shares are freely tradable without restriction as of that date. At varying dates between May and August 2012, 11,090,899 shares of common stock (including shares issuable upon conversion of series A preferred stock) that had been issued in unregistered private placements are expected to become tradable pursuant to Rule 144. As of February 13, 2012, we have 10,825,561 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options and warrants and 718,954 shares of common stock that may become issuable upon the conversion of a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000, assuming a conversion price of $0.765 per share.
29
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
General
The following discussion and analysis is provided to increase the understanding of, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. Historical results and percentage relationships among any amounts in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of trends in operating results for any future period. This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements”. The statements, which are not historical facts contained in this prospectus, including this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation, and notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes,” or “plans” or comparable terminology are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on currently available operating, financial and competitive information, and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Future events and our actual results may differ materially from the results reflected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, our ability to raise additional funding, our ability to maintain and grow our business, variability of operating results, our ability to maintain and enhance our brand, our expansion and development of new products and services, marketing and other business development initiatives, competition in the industry, general government regulation, economic conditions, dependence on key personnel, the ability to attract, hire and retain personnel who possess the technical skills and experience necessary to meet the service requirements of our clients, our ability to protect our intellectual property, the potential liability with respect to actions taken by our existing and past employees, risks associated with international sales, and other risks described herein and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 excludes issuers of “penny stock” (as defined under Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our common stock currently falls within that definition.
All forward-looking statements in this document are based on information currently available to us as of the date of this prospectus, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Company History
IZEA, Inc. (the “Company” “we” or “us”) was incorporated as a Nevada corporation on March 22, 2010 for the purpose of entering the business of making loans which are fully secured by a first lien on a customer’s automobile. On May 11, 2011, we filed an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation in order to change our name from “Rapid Holdings, Inc.” to “IZEA Holdings, Inc.” and on November 23, 2011 we filed Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to further change our name from “IZEA Holdings, Inc.” to “IZEA, Inc.” On May 11, 2011, our board of directors declared a dividend of an additional 14.28117 shares of common stock on each share of our common stock outstanding on May 11, 2011 with a payment date of May 23, 2011.
On May 12, 2011, we entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with IZEA, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation (“IZEA”) and the shareholders of IZEA. Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Exchange Agreement, on May 12, 2011, the shareholders of IZEA transferred all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of IZEA to us in exchange for shares of our common stock. Such exchange caused IZEA to become our wholly-owned subsidiary. Immediately following the closing of the exchange, under an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations, the Company transferred all of its pre-exchange assets and liabilities to a wholly-owned subsidiary, RTL Holdings, Inc. (“SplitCo”) and thereafter, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, transferred all of the outstanding capital stock of SplitCo to Anthony Barron, our former officer and director, in exchange for the cancellation of shares of our common stock he owned. Upon closing of the exchange, the business of IZEA became our business.
IZEA, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Florida in February 2006 and reincorporated in the state of Delaware in September 2006.
Company Overview
We are a leader in social media sponsorships ("SMS"), a rapidly growing segment within social media that connects social media publishers with advertisers. We accomplish this through our five online marketplaces: SocialSpark, SponsoredTweets, WeReward, PayPerPost and InPostLinks . Our customers include a wide range of small and large businesses, including Fortune 500 companies, as well as advertising agencies. We generate our revenue through the sale of social media sponsorships to our customers. We fulfill these sponsorships through our marketplace platforms connecting social media publishers such as bloggers, tweeters and mobile application users.
Non-Binding Letter of Intent
On February 3, 2012, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent with respect to the proposed acquisition of all the capital stock of Twelvefold Media, Inc. (“Twelvefold Media”) for shares of our common stock. Twelvefold Media is a privately held company that creates customized digital media packages with proprietary technology utilizing emotive-based targeting at the page level and real-time bidding.
Based upon limited unaudited information available provided by Twelvefold Media to us, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Twelvefold Media realized approximately $8,050,700 in revenues and a net loss of approximately $3,327,300. We believe that Twelvefold Media is a synergistic acquisition that would permit the companies to realize economies of scale and reduce expenditures by consolidating sales efforts. Investors in this offering should not place undue reliance upon Twelvefold Media’s information and investors will be required to make an investment decision without the benefit of reviewing audited financial statements and other information of Twelvefold Media.
Consummation of the transaction is subject to certain conditions which are outside our control, including the negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement and the combined company having $7 million of net cash on its balance sheet at closing, all or most of which cash is to be raised in this offering. We cannot guarantee that a definitive agreement will be executed on the terms set forth in the letter of intent or otherwise on terms acceptable to the parties, or at all, or that there will be sufficient cash to meet the net cash condition above. If the parties enter into a definitive agreement, such agreement will be subject to a number of closing conditions, in addition to the net cash condition, such as third party consents and approvals. Thus, even if a definitive agreement is signed, we cannot guarantee that the transaction contemplated by such agreement will ever be completed. Finally, if the transaction contemplated by such agreement is completed, the expected benefits from the transaction and the resulting changes to our business plan may not be fully realized, or may take longer to realize than expected. For more information about possible risks of this transaction, see “Risks Factors – Risks Related to Non-Binding Letter of Intent.”
30
Results of Operations for Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to September 30, 2010
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,821,354
|
|
|
$
|
2,249,891
|
|
|
$
|
571,463
|
|
|
|
25.4
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,306,463
|
|
|
|
1,192,043
|
|
|
|
114,420
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,514,891
|
|
|
|
1,057,848
|
|
|
|
457,043
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,883,887
|
|
|
|
2,570,601
|
|
|
|
1,313,286
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
526,112
|
|
|
|
404,272
|
|
|
|
121,840
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4,409,999
|
|
|
|
2,974,873
|
|
|
|
1,435,126
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
%
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,895,108
|
)
|
|
|
(1,917,025
|
)
|
|
|
(978,083
|
)
|
|
|
51.0
|
%
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(17,060
|
)
|
|
|
(60,654
|
)
|
|
|
43,594
|
|
|
|
(71.9
|
)%
|
Change in fair value of warrant liability
|
|
|
73,571
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
73,571
|
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(276
|
)
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
56,511
|
|
|
|
(60,930
|
)
|
|
|
117,441
|
|
|
|
(192.7
|
)%
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,838,597
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,977,955
|
)
|
|
$
|
(860,642
|
)
|
|
|
43.5
|
%
|
Revenues
We derive revenue from two sources: revenue from an advertiser for the use of our network of social media publishers to fulfill an advertiser’s sponsor request for a blog post, tweet, click, purchase, or action (our “Sponsored Revenue”) and revenue derived from various service fees charged to advertisers for management, maintenance and enhancement of their accounts, and to publishers for maintenance and enhancement of their accounts (“Service Fee Revenue”).
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by $571,463, or 25.4%, compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was attributable to an approximately $51,000 increase in our Sponsored Revenue and a $520,000 increase in Service Fee Revenue. In the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Sponsored Revenue was 81% and Service Fee Revenue was 19% of total revenue compared to Sponsored Revenue of 99% and Service Fee Revenue of 1% in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in Sponsored Revenue was primarily attributable to increased sales from our expanded sales force and growth in our three core social media platforms, Social Spark, SponsoredTweets and WeReward . These products accounted for 65% of our revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to 48% of our revenue in the same period in 2010. The increase in Service Fee Revenue is primarily due to the growth in our managed customer base on which we receive management fee revenue and additional account maintenance fees received from advertisers and publishers. We expect that these fees will continue to increase over prior period levels as we continue to focus our sales efforts on our three core social media marketing platforms.
Cost of Sales and Gross Profit
Our cost of sales comprise primarily of amounts paid to our social media publishers for fulfilling an advertiser’s sponsor request for a blog post, tweet, click, purchase, or action.
Cost of sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by $114,420, or 9.6%, compared to the same period in 2010. Cost of sales increased as a direct result of the increase in our Sponsored Revenue and higher publisher costs to generate such revenue. Publisher costs typically range from 50% to 80% of the advertising campaign depending on the type of publisher used in the campaign. Celebrity publishers typically used in our SponsoredTweets marketplace cost more than our average publisher cost of 50% in other marketplaces.
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by $457,043, or 43.2%, compared to the same period in 2010. Our gross margin increased to 54% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to 47% for the same period in 2010. The gross margin increase was primarily attributable to the substantial increase in service fees received from advertisers and publishers that have minimal costs associated with the revenue.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of general and administrative, and sales and marketing expenses. Total operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by $1,435,126, or 48.2%, compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to increased payroll and operating expenses, costs of being a public company and increases in sales and marketing expenses.
31
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll, general operating costs, public company costs, facilities costs, insurance, depreciation, professional fees, and investor relations fees. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by $1,313,286 or 51.1%, compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to a $392,000 increase in payroll and related benefit expenses, a $156,000 increase in professional fees and reporting costs as a result the financing transactions and costs of being a public company in 2011, and investor relations costs of $677,500. We paid $1,190,000 and issued 500,000 shares of common stock valued at $165,000 in August 2011 for investor relation services, that included an investor marketing campaign, of which $677,500 was expensed in September 2011 and the remaining $677,500 will be expensed in the fourth quarter of 2011. The investor relations costs are being expensed in the third and fourth quarters of 2011 because the services rendered take place during such periods. We expect that professional fees will continue to increase over prior levels as we continue to work on financing transactions and expand our reporting and investor relations efforts as a public company.
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for sales and marketing and related support resources, sales commissions and trade show expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by $121,840 or 30.1%, compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was also attributable to marketing of our increased focus on our SocialSpark, SponsoredTweets and WeReward platforms .
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest expense and the change in the fair value of warrant liability.
Interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 decreased by $43,594 compared to the same period in 2010 as a result of the conversion of $1,444,800 of related party notes payable in May 2010 and principal payments made on our note payable to the bank.
We recognized other income for a change in fair value of our warrant liability of $73,571 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 related to warrants issued in connection with a financing arrangement as further discussed below.
Net Loss
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011was $2,838,597 which increased from the net loss of $1,977,955 for the same period in 2010, As discussed above, although gross profit increased over the prior quarter due to increased revenue and interest expense declined as a result of the conversion of debt in 2010, this was exceeded by an increase in operating expenses attributable to increased headcount, public company and investor relations costs, and other sales and marketing expenses.
Results of Operations for Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to December 31, 2009
|
|
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
3,821,538
|
|
|
$
|
2,834,359
|
|
|
$
|
987,179
|
|
|
|
34.8
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
1,819,031
|
|
|
|
1,343,159
|
|
|
|
475,872
|
|
|
|
35.4
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,002,507
|
|
|
|
1,491,200
|
|
|
|
511,307
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,318,701
|
|
|
|
3,383,636
|
|
|
|
(64,935
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
766,946
|
|
|
|
577,529
|
|
|
|
189,417
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
%
|
Loss on impairment of intangible assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
99,949
|
|
|
|
(99,949
|
)
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4,085,647
|
|
|
|
4,061,114
|
|
|
|
24,533
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(2,083,140
|
)
|
|
|
(2,569,914
|
)
|
|
|
486,774
|
|
|
|
(18.9
|
)%
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(74,511
|
)
|
|
|
(85,779
|
)
|
|
|
11,268
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
(105.6
|
)%
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
(74,619
|
)
|
|
|
(83,858
|
)
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
(11.0
|
)%
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,157,759
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,653,772
|
|
|
$
|
496,013
|
|
|
|
(18.7
|
)%
|
32
Revenues
Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased to $3,821,538 from $2,834,359 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of 34.8%. The increase was attributable to an approximately $712,000 increase in our Sponsored Revenue and a $275,000 increase in Service Fee Revenue. The increase is primarily attributable to growth of our customer base through our expanded sales force and through budget increases among existing customers. The primary drivers of this growth were the implementation of account maintenance fees in 2010 and an overall increase in customer base and product launches of SocialSpark and SponsoredTweets in 2008 and 2009 respectively. These products accounted for 51% of our revenue in 2010, an increase from 26% in 2009.
Given the continued overall growth in online advertising, coupled with other strategic initiatives undertaken by IZEA, including the continued enhancement of our technology platform and our continued ability to acquire bloggers, tweeters and other social media publishers, we expect to continue to increase our advertising customer base and revenues on a year-over-year basis.
Cost of Revenues and Gross Profit
Cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased to $1,819,031 from $1,343,159 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of 35.4%. The increase is primarily attributable to the growth in advertising campaigns requiring the purchase of appropriate levels of sponsorships from publishers. Cost of revenues is comprised primarily of the amounts we pay to social media publishers in IZEA’s online network. Cost of revenues represented 47.6% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 47.4% of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased to $2,002,507 from $1,491,200 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of 34.3%. Our gross margin remained steady at 52.4% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 52.6% for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses consist of general and administrative, sales and marketing and licenses and subscriptions related to technology support. Total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased to $4,085,647 from $4,016,114 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of 0.2%. The increase was primarily attributable to headcount expansion from 26 employees at December 31, 2009 to 34 employees at December 31, 2010 which was partially offset by a loss on impairment of intangible asset during 2009. We expect to hire up to 20 new employees in 2011 to support the growth of our business and the ongoing innovation, development and marketing of our platforms.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of executive, administrative, operations and product development and support compensation (including non-cash stock based compensation), facilities costs, insurance, depreciation, professional fees, investor relations fees and bad debt expense. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 decreased to $3,318,701 from $3,383,636 for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of 1.9% .
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of compensation for sales and marketing and related support resources, sales commissions and trade show expenses. Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 increased to $766,946 from $577,529 for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of 32.8%. The increase was primarily attributable to our increased sales-force expansion focusing primarily on SocialSpark and SponsoredTweets.
Loss on Impairment
Loss on impairment was $0 for the year ended December 31, 2010 and $99,949 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The impairment resulted from the discontinued use in January 2009 of certain intellectual property and a software license purchased in February 2007.
Net Loss
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $2,157,759 compared to a net loss of $2,653,772 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The reduction in our net loss was attributable to strong revenue growth, reduced operating expenses which grew at a slower pace than revenue and the loss from impairment of intangible assets during fiscal 2009 which did not reoccur in fiscal 2010.
33
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our cash position was $1,095,103 as of September 30, 2011 as compared to $1,503,105 as of December 31, 2010, a decrease of $408,002. We have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flow from operations since our inception. We incurred net losses of $2,653,772, $2,157,759 and $2,838,597 for the years ended December 31, 2009, December 31, 2010, and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively and we had an accumulated deficit of $16,990,789 as of September 30, 2011.
Cash used for operating activities was $3,163,169 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and was primarily a result of our net loss during the period of $2,838,597. Cash provided by financing activities was $2,790,916 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily as a result of net proceeds of $3,057,473 received from the issuance of common and preferred stock and warrants and exchange of promissory notes in a financing arrangement as further discussed below. Financing activities were reduced by principal payments of $268,156 on our bank note payable and capital leases.
To date, we have financed our operations through internally generated revenue from operations, the sale of our equity and the issuance of notes and loans from shareholders. From May until August 2011, we raised an aggregate of $3,330,000 through the sale of 333 units consisting of either (i) 30,303 shares of our common stock, or (ii) one share of our recently designated Series A Preferred Stock, which is convertible into 30,303 shares of common stock, plus a five-year warrant to purchase 18,182 shares of common stock for $9,091 or $0.50 per linked common share (the “May 2011 Offering”). Of the gross proceeds received, (i) $500,000 was received under a promissory note that was contractually exchangeable into 50 units under the May 2011 Offering, and (ii) $50,000 was received for the purchase of 5 units from our Chief Executive Officer. As a result of the offering, investors who purchased 230 units elected to receive preferred stock and investors who purchased 103 Units elected to receive common stock. Accordingly, we issued (i) 3,121,209 shares of common stock, (ii) 230 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which are linked by conversion to 6,969,690 shares of common stock, and (iii) 333 Warrant Contracts that are linked by exercise to an aggregate of 6,054,606 shares of common stock. Direct expenses associated with the offering amounted to $290,127 and included (i) placement agent, legal and other fees for cash of $272,527, and (ii) a warrant to the placement agent to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock under the same terms and conditions as the warrants. Accordingly, net cash proceeds from the May 2011 Offering amounted to $3,057,473.
We entered into registration rights agreements, as amended (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the investors in the May 2011 Offering (the "Investors"), pursuant to which we agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the SEC covering the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock and the shares of common stock underlying the Warrants within 12 months after the final closing date of the May 2011 Offering (i.e. August 15, 2012) (the “Filing Date”). We agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within 15 months after the final closing date of the May 2011 Offering (i.e. November 15, 2012) (the “Effectiveness Deadline”) and to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement from the effective date until all securities have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144 without restriction or limitation. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, we are obligated to pay to Investors a fee of 1% per month of the Investors’ investment, payable in cash, for every thirty (30) day period up to a maximum of 6%, (i) following the required Filing Date that the registration statement has not been filed and (ii) following the required Effectiveness Deadline that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that we shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if we are unable to fulfill our registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the SEC pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, provided we register at such time the maximum number of shares of common stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the SEC and provided further that we will not be obligated to pay liquidated damages at any time following the one year anniversary of the Final Closing Date (as defined in the Registration Rights Agreements) of the May 2011 Offering.
On May 24, 2011, we entered into an investor relations agreement with a consulting company to provide investor relations services for two months beginning September 1, 2011 (as amended). We paid $1,190,000 in cash with proceeds from the May 2011 Offering and issued 500,000 shares of our common stock valued at $165,000 based on $0.33 per common share in August 2011.
On February 3, 2012, we and our subsidiary, IZEA Innovations, Inc., jointly issued a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000 (the “Note”) to two of our existing shareholders for a purchase price of $500,000. Unless earlier converted, exchanged or prepaid, the Note matures on August 2, 2012, subject to extension until February 2, 2013 upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. The Note may be prepaid by us at any time and must be prepaid by us if we receive at least $1,500,000 in net proceeds from the sale of certain of our securities, which would include this offering. The obligations under the Note are first priority senior secured obligations (subject to an equipment lease) and are secured by substantially all of our assets and assets of our subsidiary. The face value of the Note may be exchanged at the option of the holders into the applicable dollar amount of equity securities issued by us in a subsequent private financing. If the Note is not fully paid by maturity and the term of the Note has been extended until February 2, 2013, then the holders may convert the outstanding principal amount of the Note at a conversion price of 90% of the closing price of our common stock on the trading day prior to the date that the Note becomes convertible, subject to further adjustment in the case of stock splits, reclassifications, reorganizations, certain issuances at less than the conversion price and the like. We are further subject to certain liquidated damages if we fail to timely effectuate a conversion under the terms of the Note. Until such time that the Note is no longer outstanding, without the consent of the holders, we are prohibited from incurring certain debt, selling any account receivable or declaring any dividend.
On July 15, 2008, we entered into a $1,000,000 Loan and Security Agreement (“Note Payable”) with Silicon Valley Bank, with an interest rate of 8% per annum, payable monthly. Interest only was payable through December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2011, the loan was repaid in full.
34
We have cash balances resulting from operations and short-term financings to fund our operating expenses through May 2012 if we continue our current sales growth and maintain expenses at their current levels. Therefore, we are seeking to raise additional funds that will result in gross proceeds of at least $8 million as a result of this offering. The proceeds from this offering are expected to provide us with funds that would enable us to expand our marketing efforts, make acquisitions, invest in technology and platform engineering, establish strategic partnerships and increase our workforce to support these endeavors and the additional customers and sales that are expected to be generated from these endeavors. Assuming that we raise gross proceeds of $8 million in this offering, we expect our operating expenses which include sales and marketing, product development and general and administrative expenses to increase to approximately $9 million in 2012, an estimated increase of over ____% when compared to 2011 operating expense levels. We further expect to increase our revenue by over 100% and to derive the majority of our revenue for the foreseeable future from our core social media marketing platforms, SocialSpark , SponsoredTweets and WeReward and related services.
As a result of the foregoing expansion efforts, we expect to continue to incur losses but believe that we will have sufficient capital to fund our operations through December 31, 2012. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising capital from financing transactions, increasing revenue by over 100% and keep operating expenses less than 50% of our revenue levels in order to achieve positive cash flows. If we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain it. Therefore, our future operations may continue to be dependent on our ability to secure additional financing. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and a downturn in the U.S. equity and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Furthermore, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. The inability to obtain additional capital may restrict our ability to grow and may reduce our ability to continue to conduct business operations. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may have to curtail our marketing and development plans and possibly cease our operations.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not engage in any activities involving variable interest entities or off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The preparation of the accompanying financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and the accompanying notes. The preparation of these financial statements requires managements to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. When making these estimates and assumptions, we consider our historical experience, our knowledge of economic and market factors and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.
Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms and are typically considered collectible since most customers are bound by contract and are required to fund us for all the costs of an “opportunity”, defined as an order created by an advertiser for a blogger to write about the advertiser’s product. If a portion of the account balance is deemed uncollectible, we will either write-off the amount owed or provide a reserve based on the uncollectible portion of the account. Management determines the collectibility of accounts by regularly evaluating individual customer receivables and considering a customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic conditions. We have not recorded a reserve for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011.
Stock based compensation is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. We estimate the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Options vest ratably over four years with one-fourth of options vesting one year from the date of grant and the remaining options vesting monthly, in equal increments over the remaining three-year period and generally have ten-year contract lives. We estimate the fair value of our common stock using recent independent valuations or the value paid in the most recent equity or financing transactions. We estimate the volatility of our common stock at the date of grant based on the volatility of comparable peer companies which are publicly traded. We determine the expected life based on historical experience with similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules and post-vesting forfeitures. We use the risk-free interest rate on the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with an equivalent remaining term approximately equal to the expected life of the award. We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We estimate forfeitures when recognizing compensation expense and this estimate of forfeitures is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures are recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which is recognized in the period of change. Changes also impact the amount of unamortized compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.
The tables below show the amount of options granted during each quarter of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2011 and the assumptions used to determine the fair value of those options.
2007 Plan Options Granted
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total Options Granted
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Common Stock
|
Weighted Average Expected Term
|
Weighted Average Volatility
|
Weighted Average Risk Free Interest Rate
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Options Granted
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
1,800
|
$ 1.10
|
5 years
|
55.04%
|
2.65%
|
$ 0.55
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
None
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
None
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
None
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
3,748,620
|
$ 0.03
|
5 years
|
54.96%
|
2.37%
|
$ 0.01
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
40,000
|
$ 0.33
|
5 years
|
55.08%
|
1.89%
|
$ 0.16
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
None
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
--
|
2011 Plan Options Granted
Quarter Ended
|
|
Total Options Granted
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Common Stock
|
Weighted Average Expected Term
|
Weighted Average Volatility
|
Weighted Average Risk Free Interest Rate
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Options Granted
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
4,042,365
|
$ 0.33
|
5 years
|
55.07%
|
1.88%
|
$ 0.16
|
September 30, 2011
|
|
733,000
|
$ 0.33
|
5 years
|
54.90%
|
1.64%
|
$ 0.11
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
11,800
|
$0.33
|
5 years
|
54.95%
|
1.05%
|
$ 0.06
|
To February 13, 2012
|
|
90,000
|
$0.33
|
5 years
|
54.87%
|
0.81%
|
$ 0.09
|
There were 4,627,631 options outstanding as of February 13, 2012 with a weighted average exercise price of $0.44 per share. The intrinsic value of these options is [$ ] or [$ ] per share assuming an offering price of [$ ] per share.
We account for derivative instruments in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging , which requires additional disclosures about the our objectives and strategies for using derivative instruments, how the derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and how the derivative instruments and related hedging items affect the financial statements. We do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible debt and equity instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under ASC 815 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results. Pursuant to ASC 815, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.
35
We record a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) related to the issuance of convertible debt and equity instruments that have conversion features at fixed rates that are in-the-money when issued, and the fair value of warrants issued in connection with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants, based on their relative fair value, and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion feature. The discounts recorded in connection with the BCF and warrant valuation are recognized a) for convertible debt as interest expense over the term of the debt, using the effective interest method or b) for preferred stock as dividends at the time the stock first becomes convertible.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") which are not yet effective. We do not believe any of these accounting pronouncements will be applicable and therefore will not have a material impact on our financial position or operating results.
36
BUSINESS
Overview
We believe we are a world leader in social media sponsorship, operating multiple marketplaces that include WeReward , SponsoredTweets , SocialSpark, PayPerPost and InPostLinks . WeReward , SponsoredTweets and SocialSpark are our premier platforms that are the focus of our current business and for which we are actively developing new features. PayPerPost and InPostLinks are legacy platforms that we still maintain but for which we have ceased to provide new features. We generate our revenue through the sale of Social Media Sponsorships (SMS) to our customers. A Social Media Sponsorship is when a company compensates a social media publisher to share sponsored content with their social network.
Our platforms take the concepts of product placement and endorsements commonly found in movies, television and radio and apply them to the social web. We democratize the brand sponsorship process, allowing everyone from college students and stay at home moms to celebrities an opportunity to monetize their content, creativity and influence in social media.
We believe we pioneered the concept of a marketplace for SMS in 2006 and have focused on the scalable monetization of social media ever since. We compensate bloggers, tweeters and mobile promoters (our social media publisher-partners) to share information about companies, products, websites and events within their social media content streams. Advertisers benefit from buzz, traffic, awareness and sales; social media publishers earn cash, points and product samples.
Each platform we operate is designed to facilitate SMS transactions in a way that is natural to its specific media format. Advertisers can utilize a single platform to fill a specific need or combine platforms with each other to execute an integrated social media campaign. All of our platforms can be activated and used with or without the assistance of our account management team.
We streamline the process of completing SMS through our proprietary technology, creating efficiencies and economies of scale for both advertisers and social media publishers. We utilize a common design methodology in each platform, which we have honed over our five years of operation. Each platform provides advertisers with access to a large network of publishers, workflow management, content control, payment processing, performance tracking and legal compliance. This methodology enables us to offer the most monetization opportunities to our publishers through a marketplace that provides an integrated FTC compliance framework, work-flow management, and automated transaction processing.
We do not have any contracts with any social media platform. Currently, access to the social media platforms that we connect with is through publicly available application program interfaces that allow the integration of our platform with the social media platform without the need to separately negotiate and enter into a contract.
We believe the value proposition we offer to both advertisers and social media publishers strengthens our position as a trusted partner and allows us to derive revenue from both customer bases. As more brand advertisers utilize our marketplaces, we thereby increase the breadth and depth of monetization opportunities for publishers, attracting more publishers and further enhancing the value of our service advertisers.
37
Our core platforms are described below:
|
SocialSpark
|
SponsoredTweets
|
WeReward
|
Media Format
|
Blog Posts
|
Status Updates
|
Actions / Check-Ins
|
Content
|
Long form text/video content
|
Short form text content
|
Short form text & photo content
|
Best used for
|
• In-depth reviews
• Buzz
• Long term traffic generation
• E-commerce "Deals"
|
• Short term traffic generation
• Buzz
• Awareness
|
• Driving purchases
• Customer data
• Short term traffic generation
|
Payment Model
|
• Cost per blog post
• Cost per purchase
|
• Cost per tweet
• Cost per click
|
• Cost per action
|
Targeting
|
• Blog traffic
• Blog category / keywords
• Blogger country
|
• Tweeter followers
• Tweeter category / keywords
• Tweeter country
|
• Mobile user current location
• Mobile user age / sex
|
Metrics Gathered
|
• Impressions / CPM
• Clicks / CPC
• CTR
• Cost per action / sale
|
• Followers / CPMF
• Clicks / CPC
• Engagement
• Cost per action / sale
|
• Cost per action / sale
• Revenue generated / ROI
• Loyalty
|
Effective Media Lifespan
|
Years
|
1-2 Days
|
1-2 Days (media)
Years (data)
|
Works best for
|
• Complex products
• Distribution of embeds
• Evergreen products/brands
• E-commerce "Deals"
|
• Time sensitive product launches
• Celebrity engagement
• Viral content
|
• Driving specific actions
• Customer data gathering
• Building loyalty
|
We have more than 50,000 registered advertisers in 157 different countries (of which approximately 6,000 advertisers created a social media sponsorship opportunity during 2011) including top brands such as Coca-Cola, at&t, Microsoft, Kraft, HP, LG, Audi, Volvo, Hilton, Walgreens, Hershey and Sony. We have over 600,000 registered social media publishers (of which approximately 80,000 have performed an SMS transaction during 2011) in 179 different countries including high-profile celebrities such as Kim Kardashian, Diddy, Rainn Wilson, Mario Lopez, Tyrese, Michael Ian Black and Bow Wow. Our total number of registered publishers may be higher than the number of our actual individual publishers because some publishers have multiple registrations, other publishers may have died or become incapacitated and others may have registered under fictitious names. Our publishers currently publish sponsored content to blogs, Twitter, Facebook and Foursquare and reach other existing platforms such as Tumblr, LinkedIn, Google and Bing through syndication of that content.
To date, we completed over 2.7 million social media transactions for customers ranging from small local businesses to Fortune 50 organizations.
We derive over 80% of our revenue from advertisers for the use of our network of social media publishers to fulfill an advertiser sponsor requests for a blog post, tweet, click, purchase, or action. We derive the remaining 20% of our revenue from various service fees charged to advertisers and publishers. Service fees to advertisers include fees charged for management of advertising campaigns through our platforms and inactivity fees for dormant accounts. Service fees to publishers include upgrade account fees for obtaining greater visibility to advertisers in advertiser searches in our platforms, early cash out fees if a publisher wishes to be paid sponsorship fees without having met certain minimum balance thresholds and inactivity fees for dormant accounts.
Non-Binding Letter of Intent
On February 3, 2012, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent with respect to the proposed acquisition of all the capital stock of Twelvefold Media, Inc. (“Twelvefold Media”) for shares of our common stock. Twelvefold Media is a privately held company that creates customized digital media packages with proprietary technology utilizing emotive-based targeting at the page level and real-time bidding.
Consummation of the transaction is subject to certain conditions which are outside our control, including the negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement and the combined company having $7 million of net cash on its balance sheet at closing, all or most of which cash is to be raised in this offering. We cannot guarantee that a definitive agreement will be executed on the terms set forth in the letter of intent or otherwise on terms acceptable to the parties, or at all, or that there will be sufficient cash to meet the net cash condition above. If the parties enter into a definitive agreement, such agreement will be subject to a number of closing conditions, in addition to the net cash condition, such as third party consents and approvals. Thus, even if a definitive agreement is signed, we cannot guarantee that the transaction contemplated by such agreement will ever be completed. Finally, if the transaction contemplated by such agreement is completed, the expected benefits from the transaction and the resulting changes to our business plan may not be fully realized, or may take longer to realize than expected. For more information about possible risks of this transaction, see “Risks Factors – Risks Related to Non-Binding Letter of Intent.”
Industry Background and Trends
Social media advertising was estimated to reach $1.7 billion in 2010 by Emarketer (August 2010), an independent digital intelligence firm, and is projected by Forrester Research (April 2009), an independent research company, to reach $3.1 billion by 2014. Despite the inherently conversational nature of social media, the majority of brand budgets are currently allocated towards display advertising (banner ads and text links) on social sites. While most advertisers understand the value of word of mouth marketing, peer recommendations and product reviews, few understand how to efficiently engage social media users for these purposes. Those who effectively attempt an approach are quickly limited by the amount of effort required to effectively manage and measure a truly integrated campaign.
The SMS space has been limited primarily by the current inefficiencies of the market. The social media publisher and advertiser universe is large and highly fragmented among topic, quality and platform. Despite the size of this market, most advertisers and social media publishers lack an efficient way to identify and engage each other. Instead, we believe brands have been forced to utilize a variety of highly inefficient sources and processes to navigate the complicated landscape of social media sponsorship, often resulting in low returns on their time investment or worse-yet, questionable results.
At the same time, social media publishers that would like to monetize their community are faced with significant challenges in finding quality advertisers who are motivated to sponsor them and making them aware of their blog, twitter or Facebook profile. In addition, smaller publishers simply lack the individual influence and audience needed to warrant the processing of a micro-transaction. In many cases it costs an advertiser more money to cut a check to a small publisher than the value of the sponsorship payment itself.
Further complicating the SMS process for both parties are FTC regulations around social media endorsements, IRS tax reporting generally applicable to anyone receiving income for services, and the associated campaign tracking required to provide compliance. While many advertisers would prefer to be “part of the conversation,” based on our experience, we believe the complexity and cost of individual social media sponsorship often deters them from doing so.
We believe that the current state of SMS represents a significant corporate opportunity for us. We address these common problems with targeted, scalable marketplaces that aggregate social media publishers and advertisers. We offer an efficient, innovative way for publishers and advertisers of all sizes to find each other and complete a sponsorship transaction.
Our Platforms
Below is an overview of our platforms:
• SocialSpark is our premier blog marketing platform. Through SocialSpark we provide robust targeting and detailed analytics to advertisers. The site allows advertisers to develop large lists of high-quality blogs based on various criteria, such as relevancy, traffic and demographic data. The platform also enables advertisers to create targeted, large-scale social media campaigns with the click of a button and to observe campaign results in real time. SocialSpark is also used by larger brands interested in engaging in conversations with their consumer bases. This platform is an automated, scalable version of other blogger outreach services conducted by public relations agencies such as Porter Novelli, Edelman and Ketchum.
• SponsoredTweets is an online marketplace that allows consumers to connect directly with advertisers to engage in sponsored conversations through Twitter. Marketers pay for Twitter advertising campaigns on either a cost per tweet (CPT) or cost per click (CPC) basis. SponsoredTweets allows advertisers to hand pick individual tweeters, including celebrities, to participate in Twitter advertising campaigns. This platform is similar to Adly's celebrity endorsements.
• WeReward is a social-mobile incentive platform that allows brands to drive purchases, reward loyalty and better understand their customers. WeReward promotes businesses, consumer products and mobile applications through our proprietary application, which can be downloaded on iPhone and Android devices. Consumers are currently able to earn WeReward points at more than 15 million businesses in the United States. WeReward points act as a cash rebate via PayPal to create tangible value for users. This platform is similar to CheckPoints.
• PayPerPost and InPostLinks are online marketplaces designed to facilitate search engine optimization efforts and allow advertisers to connect directly with bloggers to develop relevant blog post content and place text link advertising within blog posts. Both systems allow advertisers to compensate bloggers with cash in exchange for content and links back to websites. These platforms are similar to eBay for content generation and text link advertising.
• IZEAMedia (in Pilot) allows advertisers to place display advertising next to sponsored blog content.
39
• Staree (in Development) is an online platform designed to help celebrities better monetize multimedia content through SMS.
SocialSpark and SponsoredTweets, our premier social media platforms released in 2008 and 2009, respectively, together represented 26%, 51% and 62 % of our total revenue in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Large brand advertisers use a combination of these platforms to fulfill advertising campaigns depending on their advertising goals. WeReward , our mobile incentive platform, was launched at the end of May 2010 and generated $10,853 in revenue in 2010 and $82,186 in revenue (3% of our total revenue) in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Our first product launch in 2006, PayPerPost , and complementary product InPostLinks, are legacy platforms. These products together represented 69%, 48%, and 35% of our total revenue in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Revenue from these legacy products is expected to decline as a percentage of our total revenue and is not the focus of our business moving forward.
Our Growth Strategy
After five years of development, we believe our core platforms are market-tested and poised for significant revenue growth. Our development efforts have included assembling an industry-experienced senior management team, launching and optimizing our online marketplaces, developing a cross-platform sales force and refining our message to the market. Key elements of our strategy to accelerate revenue growth and continue product development include:
• Bolster our sales force and locations . We expect growth of our client development team to be the primary driver of near term revenues. We intend to add additional target-driven sales personnel to more effectively target and service clients throughout the U.S. and the world. Experienced, senior team members are expected to cultivate deep relationships with agencies and brands in our recently opened New York, Los Angeles and Chicago offices as well as smaller satellite locations in key markets. We intend to add inside sales personnel to our Orlando headquarters to service smaller clients over the telephone and Internet. In addition to our expanded presence in the U.S., we intend to open offices in Asia, Latin America and Europe by the end of 2013. Our goal is to employ over 30 target-driven sales personnel by the end of 2013, with an aggregate sales target of $50 million leading into 2014.
• Develop strategic partnerships . Establishing strategic partnerships with companies that can provide additional growth in our base of publishers and brand advertisers. In August 2011, we announced an exclusive alliance with India's UTV to create new monetization opportunities for the estimated 12 million Twitter users in India. Under the terms of the UTV agreement, UTV and the Company have agreed to collaborate on an exclusive basis to develop a co-branded SponsoredTweets service for India whereby the Company is responsible for operating the co-branded service and UTV is responsible for promoting the co-branded service. The UTV agreement provides that revenue generated from the co-branded service will be shared between the Company and UTV. UTV's Indian celebrities including Lara Dutta, Mahesh Bhupati, Anurag Kashyap, Rohan Bopanna and Neetu Chandra, among others, have already signed up for the co-branded SponsoredTweets service.
• Continue emphasis on product innovation . Recruiting additional engineering and product development team members to enhance our various marketplaces while developing new technology platforms that complement our mission as a company.
• Seek complementary acquisitions . Identifying and acquiring companies, technologies and assets add to our portfolio of software services and drive additional near and long-term revenue. In July 2011, we acquired Germany's Magpie Twitter advertising network that included over 12,000 advertisers and 16,000 Twitter publishers in 124 countries.
• Expand WeReward marketing . Investing in consumer and channel marketing for WeReward is expect to result in an increase in our user base to meet growing demand for mobile and local campaigns.
40
Customers
We currently have more than 50,000 registered advertisers across our platforms, of which approximately 6 ,000 advertisers created a social media sponsorship opportunity during 2011 . We typically enter into a master agreement, which incorporates the online terms of service of the specified IZEA website, with each of our advertiser customers. Under the master agreement, the advertiser may submit one or more insertion orders pursuant to which such advertiser provides advertising submissions relating to its website, product or service for posting through the specified IZEA website or service. The master agreement is terminable by us or our customers upon 30 days’ prior written notice or immediately if a material breach has occurred and is not promptly cured. Each party indemnifies the other with regard to various representations made by such party, including the advertiser’s representations that its content does not violate any law, or infringe any intellectual property right of another, is not false or deceptive, or defamatory or libelous, and is free of viruses and other computer programming that could damage any system data or personal information, and that it is not engaging in spamming. Fees under the master agreement are payable within 30 days after the date of our invoice in accordance with the terms agreed to in the applicable insertion order. The master agreement additionally provides for standard service disclaimers and limitations of liability for our benefit, as well as a reciprocal confidentiality provision. We also enter into browsewrap and clickwrap agreements with “self service customers” that agree to the terms of service available on the applicable IZEA website but do not separately enter into a master agreement with us.
We provide services to customers in multiple industry segments, including consumer products, retail/eTail, technology and travel. Our customers are predominantly located in the United States followed by the United Kingdom, Canada, Europe, Russia and 50 other countries. None of our customers accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
Our business services advertising and public relations agencies as well as brands and businesses directly. Below are our top customers in each category based on 2011 booked business:
Agencies Representing Brands
|
Brands Direct
|
Alcone Marketing Group
|
Deal Fun
|
m80
|
Dollar General Store
|
MindShare
|
H.J. Heinz Co
|
Rivet
|
Meridian Auto Parts
|
Rosetta Marketing Group
|
Microsoft
|
Starcom Worldwide SMG
|
Pier 1
|
The Food Group
|
Sunbelt Software
|
The Stockwire Group
|
Symantec
|
VML
|
The Neilsen Company
|
Ziptech Media
|
Tivo
|
In many cases, social media marketing dollars flow through the advertising or public relations agency, even when we are have a direct relationship with the brand. In addition to the agencies listed above, we have done business with these agencies in 2011:
|
·
|
1080 Communications, Acquirgy, Bernstein-Rein, Bolin Marketing & Advertising, Chemistry Group, Cole & Weber United, Digitaria, Digitas, Edleman, Engauge Digital, Euro RSCG Edge, EVOK Advertising, FKM, FRWD, Garden City Group Communications, Geary Interactive, Geile Leon Marketing Communications, GMLV, Golin Harris, Ignited LLC, Jacobson Rost, JB Chicago, MindSmack, Momentum, Moroch Partners, Moxie Interactive, Neo@Ogilvy, Night Agency, PBM , PHD, Reputation Managers. Rhino Marketing Inc, Run Communications, Inc., SEOinc, Sitelab, The Mcmilker Group, Triad Retail Media, Vision Creative Group, Inc., Watauga Group, Web.com Search Agency, Wyse Advertising, Zimmerman and others.
|
Sales and Marketing
We primarily sell social media sponsorships through our self-service platforms, directly through our sales team and, to a lesser extent, by utilizing distribution relationships such as resellers, affiliates and white label partners. We target local, national and global brands and advertising agencies in the following ways:
41
• Self-Service Platforms. Each of our platforms has been developed as a self-service platform to enable advertisers and agencies of all sizes to independently access the IZEA network of social media publishers and implement their own social media sponsorships. Self-service customers extend our global reach.
• Client Development Team. We have developed a Client Development organization of team members who are each assigned a geographic region or specific brands, primarily within the United States. This team is responsible for identifying and managing sales opportunities in their respective target areas.
• Resellers and Distribution Partners. We have developed a group of independent resellers and distribution partners which are responsible for selling one or more of our platforms under an independent contractor relationship. We maintain two types of reseller relationships -local resellers and distribution partners. Local resellers focus their efforts on distributing our WeReward platform to small businesses in local communities throughout the United States. Our distribution partners are complementary relationships that may involve cross-selling activities.
• Affiliates. Three of our platforms, SocialSpark , SponsoredTweets and WeReward contain self-service affiliate programs designed to compensate social media publishers for referring other publishers to join these platforms. In these programs, we incur the cost to pay a referral fee to the referrer equal to 10% of the referee’s earnings for a two year period. To date, this has proven to be an efficient method of attracting new social media publishers into our publisher network.
• White Label Partners. The SocialSpark and SponsoredTweets platforms have also been developed to support white label partners. These partners can operate their own branded or co-branded version of either of these platforms, enabling them to develop their own sales efforts, implement SMS initiatives and tap into our publisher network on a revenue-sharing basis. Currently, Valassis is operating a white label version of SponsoredTweets under its Red Plum Tweets brand.
We focus our corporate marketing efforts on increasing brand awareness, communicating each of our platform advantages, generating qualified leads for our sales team and growing our social media publisher network. Our corporate marketing plan is designed to continually elevate awareness of our brand and generate demand for social media sponsorships. We rely on a number of channels in this area, including tradeshows, third party social media platforms (e.g., Facebook and Twitter), IZEA hosted community events, paid search, public relations and our website.
Revenue Model
We derive over 80% of our revenue from advertisers for the use of our network of social media publishers to fulfill an advertiser sponsor requests for a blog post, tweet, click, purchase, or action.
The marketplace model of our platforms generates revenue in a manner similar to other online business transaction “matchmaking” services such as Google AdWords and eBay. Typically, for each dollar a marketer or advertiser spends with us for sponsored services, approximately 50%-80% goes to social media publishers. Celebrity publishers typically used in our SponsoredTweets marketplace cost more than our average publisher cost of 50% in other marketplaces.
A fulfillment of an advertiser request is considered successful after the requested post, click or action is approved or verified (either by the advertiser, the IZEA platforms automatically or by an IZEA customer service representative, if we are managing the advertiser account) and listed for the requisite period of time, as applicable (i.e., 30 days for a blog and three days for a tweet or other action). Revenue is only recorded upon successful completion of these actions. If the action was not successful, the advertiser’s account would not be charged or invoiced.
We derive the remaining 20% of our revenue from various service fees charged to advertisers and publishers. Service fees to advertisers include fees charged for management of advertising campaigns through our platforms and inactivity fees for dormant accounts. Service fees to publishers include “pro” account fees for obtaining greater visibility to advertisers in advertiser searches in our platforms, early cash out fees if a publisher wishes to be paid sponsorship fees without having met certain minimum balance thresholds and inactivity fees for dormant accounts. These service fees have minimal costs associated with them.
We were able to achieve gross margins on all our products of approximately 52% for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 54% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We are constantly reviewing methods to further increase margins through technology advancements, rebalancing our revenue mix to focus on newer releases, such as WeReward , and entering new high-margin social media markets.
Technology
Our solutions span from blogs to status updates to mobile applications. We aggregate social media publishers into online marketplaces creating scale and targeting. We provide the ability to target publishers based on software rules. We provide self-service platforms that service all business types and sizes. Advertisers can choose the model that best fits their marketing objective: cost per post (CPP) for buzz, cost per click (CPC) for traffic, or cost per action (CPA) for sales. Unlike traditional public relations, advertisers only pay for completed posts, clicks or individual actions as determined by the advertiser. We provide trackable results by automatically embedding tracking links and pixels, as well as support, for third-party tracking (such as DART). We also provide dashboards for real-time reporting, providing immediate feedback. We have the ability to seed thousands of conversations overnight, with room to grow.
42
Product Development
Our product development team is responsible for platform and infrastructure development, application development, user interface and application design, enterprise connectivity, Internet applications and design, quality assurance, documentation and release management. A core strength of our company is our knowledge and experience launching and operating scalable social media marketplaces. Our product development expenses were $813,591, $870,030 and $574,809, consisting primarily of salaries paid to development personnel and included in general and administrative expenses, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
Competition
We face competition from multiple companies in the SMS industry. Direct and indirect competitors in the SMS space include Facebook, Glam Media, Federated Media, BlogHer, Ad.ly, Mom Central, Foursquare and Groupon. In addition, there are a number of agencies, public relations firms and niche consultancies that provide social media programs and conduct blogger outreach programs.
Competition for advertising placements among current and future suppliers of Internet navigational and informational services, high traffic websites and social media sponsorship providers, as well as competition with other media for advertising placements, could result in significant price competition, declining margins and reductions in advertising revenue. In addition, as we continue our efforts to expand the scope of our services, we may compete with a greater number of other media companies across an increasing range of different services, including in vertical markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition and other areas. If existing or future competitors develop or offer products or services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over those offered by us, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be negatively affected. We also compete with traditional advertising media, such as direct mail, television, radio, cable and print for a share of advertisers’ total advertising budgets. Many current and potential competitors enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, greater access to advertising space on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater financial, technical, sales and marketing resources. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully. If we fail to compete successfully, we could lose customers or advertising inventory and our revenue and results of operations could decline.
Proprietary Rights
Proprietary rights are important to our success and our competitive position. To protect our proprietary rights, we rely on copyright, service marks and trade secret laws, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions.
We do not have patents on any of our technology and we have not filed any patent applications to date because we have determined that the costs of patent prosecution outweigh the benefits given the alternative of reliance upon copyright law to protect our computer code and other proprietary technology and properties. We have registered eight service marks to date, including “IZEA,” “SocialSpark,” "We Reward", "PayPerPost", "InPostLinks", “Blogger’s Choice Awards,” “Get Everyone Talking” and “Postie,” and have applied for several other registrations including "Staree", “Blogroll” and “SponsoredPics,” in the United States and intend to seek to register additional service marks as appropriate. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining the service marks for which we have applied. Even if these applications are approved, the marks may be successfully challenged by others or invalidated. If the applications are not approved because third parties own the service marks, the use of the marks will be restricted unless we enter into arrangements with the third parties which may be unavailable on commercially reasonable terms. We also own more than 700 domain names.
We cannot assure you that any of our proprietary rights with respect to our products or services will be viable or of value in the future since the validity, enforceability and type of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still evolving.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and while we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States, and effective copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may not be available in those jurisdictions. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate to protect us from the infringement or misappropriation of such rights by others.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the United States involving patents and other intellectual property rights, particularly in the software and Internet-related industries. We could become subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of our competitors grows and our products and services overlap with competitive offerings. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend and could divert management’s attention from operating our company. If we become liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, we could be required to pay a substantial award of damages and to develop non-infringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the products that contain the infringing intellectual property. We may be unable to develop non-infringing technology or obtain a license on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
Government Regulation
We are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business on the Internet, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. In the United States and abroad, laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims. These regulations and laws may involve taxation, tariffs, publisher privacy, data protection, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, the provision of online payment services and the characteristics and quality of services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales and other taxes, libel and personal privacy apply to the internet as the vast majority of these laws were adopted prior to the advent of the internet and do not contemplate or address the unique issues raised by the internet or e-commerce. In addition, it is possible that governments of one or more countries may seek to censor content available on our platforms or may even attempt to completely block access to our platforms. Accordingly, adverse legal or regulatory developments could substantially harm our business.
43
Many states have passed laws requiring notification to subscribers when there is a security breach of personal data. There are also a number of legislative proposals pending before the U.S. Congress, various state legislative bodies and foreign governments concerning data protection. In addition, data protection laws in Europe and other jurisdictions outside the United States may be more restrictive, and the interpretation and application of these laws are still uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act has provisions that limit, but do not necessarily eliminate, our liability for linking to third-party websites that include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights, so long as we comply with the statutory requirements of this act. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.
We and the advertisers and publishers that use our platforms are subject to Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and state rules on advertising and marketing on the Internet, including truth-in advertising rules and online advertising disclosures. In 2009, the FTC revised its Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (the "Guides"). These new Guides significantly extend the scope of potential liability associated with the use of testimonials, endorsements, and new media methods, such as blogging, in advertising. In particular, the Guides provide that in a service that matches up advertisers with bloggers who will promote the advertiser’s products on their personal blogs, the advertiser and blogger are both subject to liability for misleading or unsubstantiated representations made through the blogger’s endorsement and the blogger is also liable if he or she fails to disclose clearly and conspicuously that he or she is being paid for his or her services. The Guides further provide that in order to limit its potential liability, the advertiser should ensure that the advertising service provides guidance and training to its bloggers concerning the need to ensure that statements they make are truthful and substantiated. If consumers are not advised of the paid relationship between advertiser and publisher with respect to the endorsements that they are relying on or if we do not otherwise comply with the FTC and state rules on advertising and marketing, then we could be subject to penalties that could include monetary damages and an order to cease our operations. In certain cases, we are retained by the advertiser to manage an advertising campaign that is operated through our platforms, increasing our exposure as not only the service provider but also the advertiser. More generally, if there is negative consumer perception and mistrust of the practice of undisclosed compensation to bloggers and publishers to endorse the advertisers' specific products, then this could result in a reduction by advertisers in the use of social media marketing platforms like ours as a means for advertising which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
As a governing member of a leading ethical word of mouth marketing industry association, Word of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA), we are committed to ethical social media sponsorship and have established codes of ethics for our platforms which include one or more of the following:
We mandate disclosure of the sponsored relationship between the advertiser and publisher. In the case of Sponsored Tweets, SocialSpark and WeReward a sponsorship cannot be published through the applicable platform unless a phrase or paragraph disclosing the sponsored relationship is included. For example, in SponsoredTweets, a publisher is required to select one of a number of disclosure phrases such as “sponsored,” “advertisement,” or “ad” prior to the publication of the tweet. Additionally, each SocialSpark campaign includes a Disclosure Audit tool for advertisers that provides them with a report that monitors posts on an ongoing basis to make sure that posts continue to include disclosure after the initial posts are approved. In the case of PayPerPost and InPostLinks publication is made outside of the platform however, as is the case with SponsoredTweets and Social Spark, failure to disclose the sponsored relationship is an infringement of our terms of service, may result in the withholding of payment for the sponsorship, and may result in the publisher being removed from our network.
Publishers are free to choose which sponsorships to publish. Our platforms never auto-inject an advertiser’s message into a publisher’s social media network.
We encourage honesty of opinion in the selection of sponsorships by a publisher and similarly we encourage advertisers to create opportunities that allow the publisher to write the sponsorship in their own words.
|
·
|
Transparency of Identity
|
Our platforms are designed to be an open, safe place for our participants. We do not cloak the identities of advertisers or publishers. Both parties involved in a potential transaction can see each other’s profiles and make informed decisions before engaging with each other.
|
·
|
Pre-Publication Advertiser Review
|
In the case of Sponsored Tweet and, SocialSpark, advertisers have the ability to review the sponsored content before it is published and to request a change prior to publication in the case of factual inaccuracy.
We have zero tolerance for violation of our code of ethics and encourage the reporting of violations through a special page on our websites dedicated to reporting violations. If violations are reported, they are investigated by us and in appropriate cases, advertisers or publishers are removed from our network. In addition, we take an active role in reporting spam accounts to Twitter.
To date, we have not been materially impacted by the rules governing social media sponsorship however we cannot predict the impact of future regulations on either us, our advertisers or publishers that use our platforms or attempts to circumvent our mechanisms that are designed to ensure compliance.
In addition, we have created an FTC Survival Guide as well as our website called IZEA University dedicated to educating users with respect to social media sponsorship, and we are currently updating the content with a course on Disclosure and Compliance.
Employees
As of February 13, 2012, we had a total of 37 full-time employees, including 10 in product engineering, 24 in sales and marketing and 3 in administration and finance. None of our employees is represented by a collective bargaining agreement, nor have we experienced any work stoppage. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified engineers, graphic designers, computer scientists, sales and marketing and senior management personnel.
Property
Our principal executive offices occupy approximately 8,000 square feet in Orlando, Florida under a lease that expires in December 2012. Total rent payments for 2010 at this location were approximately $226,000, were approximately $250,000 in 2011 and are anticipated to be approximately $260,000 in 2012. We believe that our facilities are adequate to meet our needs for the foreseeable future.
We also maintain sales offices in New York City, Chicago and Los Angeles. Total rent payments for 2011 were approximately $32,000 and are expected to be $104,000 in 2012.
Legal Proceedings
We are not a party to any pending or threatened legal proceeding.
44
MANAGEMENT
The names and ages of our executive officers, directors and key employees, and their positions with us, are as follows:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy
|
35
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Donna L. Mackenzie
|
51
|
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
|
Ryan Schram
|
31
|
Chief Marketing Officer
|
Dean Proctor
|
27
|
Vice President of Engineering
|
Jerry Biuso
|
47
|
Vice President of Sales
|
45
The principal occupations for the past five years (and, in some instances, for prior years) of each of our executive officers, directors and key employees are as follows :
Edward H. (Ted) Murphy, Founder, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director , founded IZEA in February 2006 as part of MindComet Corp., an interactive advertising agency that he started in 1999 and served as Chief Executive Officer. IZEA was later spun out of MindComet in September 2006. Mr. Murphy is a serial entrepreneur who is recognized as a pioneer in paid blogging and a catalyst behind the social media sponsorship industry. As the Founder, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Murphy leads our company, both with his day-to-day operational leadership and with his strategic vision for the company and its products. His efforts have received recognition from media outlets including The Wall Street Journal, CNBC, Wired, USA Today, Forbes, The New York Times, Business Week, PC World, CNN Money, Fortune, Fortune Small Business and Business 2.0. In addition to media coverage, Mr. Murphy has spoken and keynoted panels at a variety of events including Blog World Expo, Always On, Florida Venture Forum, SMX and Dow Jones Venture One Summit. Mr. Murphy attended Florida State University before starting MindComet and several other earlier Internet-related businesses. Mr. Murphy was appointed as a director based on his extensive SMS industry knowledge and a deep background in social media, mobile technology and e-commerce, as well as significant experience in financing technology growth companies.
Donna L. Mackenzie, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director and Vice President of Operations, joined us in September 2007, as a senior executive leading our financial, operational and customer service areas. Ms. Mackenzie was previously the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Channel Intelligence, Inc. from 2003 to June 2007. Ms. Mackenzie currently serves as the President of the Central Florida Chapter of Financial Executives Institute (FEI), and also serves on the CFO Conference Committee and the Operational Finance and Accounting advisory group of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and past service on the AICPA Business and Industry Executive Committee. She is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the State of Florida. Ms. Mackenzie holds a B.B.A. degree in accounting from the University of Alaska, Anchorage. Ms. Mackenzie was appointed as a director based on her extensive knowledge of financial, accounting and operational issues highly relevant to our business. She also brings transactional expertise in mergers and acquisitions, equity offerings and bank financings.
Key Employees
Ryan S. Schram, Chief Marketing Officer, and Board Observer, joined us in September 2011 as a senior executive leading our client development, account management, brand marketing, public relations, and publisher alliance organizations. Prior to joining us, from 2005 to 2011, Mr. Schram served in various leadership roles, most recently as Group Vice President, at ePrize, the industry leader in integrated engagement marketing. Prior to that Mr. Schram held roles of increasing responsibility at CBS/Westwood One and Clear Channel Interactive. Mr. Schram holds a B.A. degree in management from the Eli Broad College of Business at Michigan State University.
Dean Proctor, Vice President of Engineering , joined us in July 2011 as an executive leading our software engineering, quality assurance and systems engineering groups. Prior to joining us, from December 2010 to July 2011 Mr. Proctor served as Information Security Officer at Acquia, Inc., which provides commercial support and hosting services for the Drupal Web Content Management System. Between Prior to that from 2006 until 2010, Mr. Proctor served as Director of Information Systems position at interactive marketing agency MindComet Corporation. Prior to that Mr. Proctor led the network, systems, and support teams for Vortech, Inc. Mr. Proctor holds a B.S. degree in computer science from the University of Central Florida.
Jerry Biuso, Vice President of Sales , joined us in September 2010. Mr. Biuso is a seasoned sales strategist and marketing manager with 25 years of experience driving sales growth and business development for leading U.S. companies. Before joining us from May 2010 to September 2010, he was a Sales Consultant and Professional Coach serving businesses in the Orlando area. Prior to that from 2000 to 2010 he worked for Banco Popular as a Regional Manager for Central Florida and was the head of Sales and Marketing Management for their U.S. operations out of Chicago. Mr. Biuso holds a B.A. degree in economics from St. Lawrence University, and is a Certified Coach, given by the Institute for Professional Empowerment Coaching.
All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected annually by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board.
46
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
To our knowledge, during the past ten years, none of our directors, executive officers, promoters, control persons or nominees has been:
|
•
|
the subject of any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
•
|
convicted in a criminal proceeding or is subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);
|
|
•
|
subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or
|
|
•
|
found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law.
|
Code of Ethics
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all our directors, officers (including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and any person performing similar functions) and employees. We have made our Code of Ethics available on our website at www.izea.com.
Corporate Governance
We have established an audit committee, compensation committee and nominating committee however we have not nominated any members to such committees and intend to make such nominations prior to the closing of this offering in compliance with Nasdaq's listing rules. To date, our entire board has performed all of the duties and responsibilities which might be contemplated by a committee.
Audit Committee . The audit committee will be composed of three independent directors , one of whom that meets the requirements of an “Audit Committee Financial Expert.” The audit committee's duties will be to recommend to the board of directors the engagement of independent auditors to audit our financial statements and to review our accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee will review the scope and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee will at all times to be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.
Compensation Committee. The compensation committee will be composed of at least two independent directors. The compensation committee will review and approve our compensation policies, including compensation of executive officers. The compensation committee will also review and administer our stock option plans, and recommend and approve grants of stock options under that plan.
Nominating Committee . The nominating committee will be composed of at least two independent directors. The purpose of the nominating committee will be to select, or recommend for our entire board's selection, the individuals to stand for election as directors at the annual meeting of stockholders and to oversee the selection and composition of committees of our board. The nominating committee's duties will also include considering the adequacy of our corporate governance and overseeing and approving management continuity planning processes.
We do not currently have specified procedures in place pursuant to which security holders may recommend nominees to the board of directors.
47
Summary Executive Compensation Table
The table below sets forth, for the last two fiscal years, the compensation earned by our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Marketing Officer.
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock Awards ($)
|
Option Awards ($) (1)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
|
All Other Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Edward H. Murphy
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
2011
|
181,875
|
0
|
0
|
37,046
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
218,921
|
|
2010
|
160,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
160,000
|
Donna Mackenzie
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary/Treasurer
|
2011
|
189,375
|
0
|
0
|
3,771
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
193,146
|
|
2010
|
180,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
180,000
|
Ryan Schram
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Marketing Officer (2)
|
2011
|
82,621
|
0
|
0
|
61,080
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
144,301
|
|
2010
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Daniel R. Rua, Executive Chairman (3)
|
2011
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2010
|
30,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
30,000
|
Daniel Brandt Former Chief Executive Officer (4)
|
2011
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2010
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Anthony Barron, Former Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (3)
|
2011
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
2010
|
1,000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1,000
|
(1) Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options issued during the year as calculated in accordance with ASL 718. See our Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates under Management’s Discussion and Analysis for additional information, including valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the awards.
(2) Appointed on July 30, 2011.
|
(3) Appointed in May 2008 and resigned from all positions on April 23, 2010.
|
(4) Appointed on April 23, 2010 and resigned from all positions on May 12, 2011.
|
48
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
Listed below is information with respect to unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2011 pursuant to the incentive stock plan of IZEA, Inc.:
Name
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: (#) Exercisable (3)
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: (#) Unexercisable (3)
|
|
Option Exercise Price ($)(3)
|
|
Option Expiration Date
|
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Murphy (1)
|
|
1,5757,574
|
|
931,091
|
|
$0.50
|
|
5/12/2016
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donna Mackenzie (2)
|
|
200,229
|
|
94,771
|
|
$0.50
|
|
5/12/2016
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ryan Schram (3)
|
|
--
|
|
500,000
|
|
$0.50
|
|
7/1/2016
|
|
--
|
_______________
(1)
|
Options to acquire 1,795 shares of common stock were originally issued under IZEA, Inc’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and vest equally over 4 years from the grant date of April 3, 2008. In connection with the share exchange, such options were cancelled and subsequently issued by us pursuant to our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan resulting in the issuance of options to acquire 1,795 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share expiring May 12, 2016. On May 12, 2011, Mr. Murphy was issued additional options to acquire 2,504,870 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share expiring May 12, 2016. The option vests as to 1,208,599 shares upon issuance and approximately 52,185 shares per month thereafter.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Options to acquire 40,000 shares of common stock were originally issued under IZEA, Inc.’s 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and vest equally over 4 years from the grant date of September 16, 2007. In connection with the share exchange, such options were cancelled and subsequently issued by us pursuant to our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan resulting in the issuance of options to acquire 40,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 expiring May 12, 2016. On May 12, 2011, Ms. Mackenzie was issued additional options to acquire 255,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share expiring May 12, 2016. The option vests as to 123,038 shares upon issuance and approximately 5,313 shares per month thereafter.
|
|
|
(3)
|
On July 1, 2011, Mr. Schram was issued a five-year option to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, which will vest as to 125,000 on July 1, 2012 and the remaining balance in equal monthly installments over a period of three years beginning one year from the date of issuance.
|
|
|
Employment Agreements
On May 14, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Edward Murphy pursuant to which Mr. Murphy will serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and with Donna Mackenzie pursuant to which Ms. Mackenzie will serve as our Chief Financial Officer.
Pursuant to the employment agreement with Mr. Murphy, Mr. Murphy will serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer until December 31, 2014 in consideration for an annual salary of $195,000 and, at the discretion of our board, a cash bonus in an amount to be determined by the board of up to 50% of his annual base salary and an options bonus of up to 200% of his annual base salary, based on Mr. Murphy meeting and exceeding mutually agreed upon annual performance goals. The bonus will be issued no later than March 1 of the following year.
Pursuant to the employment agreement with Ms. Mackenzie, Ms. Mackenzie will serve as our Chief Financial Officer until December 31, 2014 in consideration for an annual salary of $195,000 and, at the discretion of our board, a cash bonus in an amount to be determined by the board of up to 50% of her annual base salary and an options bonus of up to 200% of her annual base salary, based on Ms. Mackenzie meeting and exceeding mutually agreed upon annual performance goals. The bonus will be issued no later than March 1 of the following year.
Both employment agreements are subject to early termination for any reason upon written notice to the executive and in the case of death, disability and cause. If terminated, for any reason other than death, disability or cause, the executive will be entitled to a severance of six months current salary and in the case of termination in the case of the executive’s disability, severance of current salary until such time (but no more than 120 days after such disability) that disability insurance plan payments commence. If there is a change of control (as defined in the employment agreements) and the executive’s employment terminates within six months following the change of control for reasons other than for cause, then the executive will be entitled to such amount equal to the executive’s then current compensation and the time remaining between the change of control and the six month anniversary of the change of control subject to reduction by compensation received by the executive from any other permitted employment.
49
On July 30, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Ryan Schram pursuant to which Mr. Schram will serve as our Chief Marketing Officer. Pursuant to the employment agreement with Mr. Schram, Mr. Schram will serve as our Chief Marketing Officer until December 31, 2014 subject to renewal in consideration for an annual salary of $230,000. Mr. Schram also received a signing bonus of $12,000 and will be eligible for a bonus and override bonus based on meeting certain performance indicators set forth in the employment agreement.
The employment agreement also provides that Mr. Schram may be an observer of our board of directors and that under certain conditions he may either be appointed or nominated to the board of directors.
We also issued Mr. Schram an option to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, which will vest in equal monthly installments over a period of four years beginning one year from the date of issuance, in each case. Mr. Schram will also be eligible for to receive, at the discretion of the board, option grants to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock, vesting in equal monthly installments, each year starting December 31, 2012, based on meeting the performance indicators set forth in the employment agreement. If terminated for any reason other than death, disability or cause, of if Mr. Schram resigns for good reason (as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Schram shall be entitled to a severance of 6 months current salary and bonus and override bonus as in effect on the date of termination. A change of control, under which Mr. Schram fails to retain his title and responsibilities, will be deemed good reason under the employment agreement.
Director Compensation
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2011, we did not compensate our directors for their services. In the future, we expect to compensate our non-employee directors through stock option grants.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
In February 2007, the board of directors of our predecessor entity, IZEA, Inc., adopted the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan allowed us to provide options as an incentive for employees and consultants. On May 11, 2011, the 2007 Plan was amended to increase the number available for issuance under the 2007 Plan from 231,332 shares to 488,983 shares of IZEA, Inc.'s series A common stock. In connection with our reverse merger on May 12, 2011, all of the outstanding stock options under the 2007 Plan were cancelled, effectively terminating the 2007 Plan.
We simultaneously issued new options to the same employees under a new 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of IZEA Holdings, Inc. adopted on May 12, 2011 (the “May 2011 Plan”). We reserved for issuance an aggregate of 7,100,000 shares of common stock under the May 2011 Plan. The cancellation and replacement of the stock options under the 2007 Plan were accounted for as a modification of the terms of the canceled awards. There was no incremental difference required to be recorded in the financial statements since the fair value of the canceled options exceeded the fair value of the options replaced at the date of cancellation and replacement. As of February 13, 2012, unforfeited options to acquire an aggregate of 4,654,871 shares of common stock have been granted to our directors, officers, consultants, advisors or employees of which 27,240 have been exercised, leaving an aggregate of 2,445,129 shares of common stock available for future grants under our May 2011 Plan.
On August 22, 2011, we adopted the 2011 B Equity Incentive Plan of IZEA Holdings, Inc. (the “August 2011 Plan”) reserving for issuance an aggregate of 3,500,000 shares of common stock under the August 2011 Plan. As of February 13, 2012, no grants have been made under the August 2011 Plan.
50
Under both the May 2011 Plan and the August 2011 Plan, our board of directors determines the exercise price to be paid for the shares, the period within which each option may be exercised, and the terms and conditions of each option. The exercise price of the incentive stock options will be equal to or exceed 100% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the grant date. If an individual owns stock representing more than 10% of the outstanding shares, the price of each share of an incentive stock option will be equal to or exceed 110% of fair market value. The exercise price for nonqualified stock options may be less than fair market value of the stock, as determined by our board of directors.
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information as of February 13, 2012 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each person or entity who, to our knowledge, owns more than 5% of our common stock; (ii) our executive officers; (iii) each director; and (iv) all of our executive officers and directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the following table, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power and that person’s address is c/o IZEA, Inc., 150 N. Orange Avenue, Suite 412, Orlando, FL 32801. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants, or other rights currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 13, 2012 are deemed to be beneficially owned and outstanding for computing the share ownership and percentage of the stockholder holding such options, warrants or other rights, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other stockholder.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
|
|
|
Percentage
Beneficially Owned Before this Offering (1)(2)
|
|
|
Percentage
Beneficially Owned After this Offering(1)(3)
|
Edward H. Murphy (4)
|
|
|
13,077,346
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
%
|
|
|
Donna Mackenzie (5)
|
|
|
10,359,945
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
|
|
Sandor Capital Master Fund LP (6)
|
|
|
3,522,738
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
Barry Honig (7)
|
|
|
3,896,604
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
Michael Brauser (8)
|
|
|
5,176,322
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
Frost Gamma Investments Trust (9)
|
|
|
2,624,250
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (2 persons)
|
|
|
23,437,291
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
|
|
_____________
|
|
(1)
|
We are prohibited from effecting the conversion of the series A preferred stock or exercise of the warrants to the extent that, as a result of the conversion or exercise, the holder of such shares beneficially owns more than 4.99% (or, if this limitation is waived by the holder upon no less than 61 days prior notice to us, 9.99%) in the aggregate of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon such conversion or exercise. The ownership limitation, however, does not prevent a stockholder from selling some of its holdings and then receiving additional shares. In this way, a stockholder could sell more than the ownership limitation while never holding more than this limit. The number of shares and the percentage, as the case may be, in this column does not reflect the ownership limitation.
|
51
(2)
|
Based on 38,648,450 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 13, 2012.
|
(3)
|
Percentage ownership calculations for beneficial ownership after this offering are based on shares outstanding after this offering, assuming no exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares and no purchase of shares in the offering by any existing stockholders.
|
(4)
|
Mr. Murphy is our President and Chief Executive Officer. Includes (a) exercisable options to purchase 1,784,429 shares of common stock under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, (b) 60,606 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 2 shares of series A preferred stock, (c) 36,364 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants, (d) 90,909 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 3 shares of series A preferred stock owned by MindComet Corp (“MindComet”) over which Mr. Murphy holds voting and dispositive power, and (e) 54,546 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants owned by MindComet.
|
(5)
|
Ms. Mackenzie is our Chief Financial Officer. Includes options to purchase 221,481 shares of common stock under our 2011 Equity Incentive Plan. Ms. Mackenzie has executed an agreement to sell 7,000,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.075 per share for purchase by our existing shareholders or their affiliates or designees.
|
(6)
|
Includes (a) 2,045,452 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 67.5 shares of series A preferred stock, and (b) 1,227,285 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. John S. Lemak has the voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of the referenced person.
|
(7)
|
Includes (a) 1,136,362 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 37.5 shares of series A preferred stock owned by GRQ Consultants Inc. (“GRQ”) and GRQ Consultants Inc., 401K FBO Barry Honig (“GRQ 401K”) over which Mr. Honig holds voting and dispositive power, and (b) 681,825 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants owned by GRQ and GRQ 401K.
|
(8)
|
Includes (a) 1,136,362 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 37.5 shares of series A preferred stock owned by Michael and Betsy Brauser TBE, (b) 681,825 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants owned by Michael and Betsy Brauser TBE.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Includes (a) 1,515,150 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of 50 shares of series A preferred stock, and (b) 909,100 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants. Phillip Frost has the voting and dispositive power over the securities held for the account of the referenced person.
|
CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
Except as described below, during the past three years, there have been no transactions, whether directly or indirectly, between us and any of their respective officers, directors, beneficial owners of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock or their family members, that exceeded $120,000.
In 2006, we entered into a General Services Agreement (“GSA”) with an entity owning 100% of IZEA’s then outstanding Series B common stock. The GSA consisted of the purchase of certain marketing deliverables and equipment, as well as marketing consulting services. Cash paid to this related party during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 was $15,545 and $8,757 respectively. Cash paid to this related party during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $33,000 and $40,000, respectively. Expenses associated with the GSA were $15,545 and $14,885 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011, respectively, and are included in sales and marketing expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. Expenses associated with the GSA were approximately $36,000 and $33,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included in sales and marketing expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. The contract is on a month-to-month basis until terminated by either party.
The amount due to this related party was $3,358 and $6,128 at December 31, 2010 and September 30, 2011, respectively. The amount due to this related party was $3,358 and $5,793 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
On March 22, 2010, we issued Daniel Brandt 1,000,000 shares of common stock in consideration for founder services provided. On March 22, 2010, we issued Mr. Brandt an additional 1,000,000 shares of common stock in connection with a stock purchase agreement and share exchange with Rapid Title Loans, Inc. On April 23, 2010, Mr. Brandt sold his 2,000,000 shares of common stock to Anthony Barron in consideration for $1,500.
On February 3, 2012, we and our subsidiary, IZEA Innovations, Inc., jointly issued a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000 (the “Note”) to two of our existing shareholders for a purchase price of $500,000. Unless earlier converted, exchanged or prepaid, the Note matures on August 2, 2012, subject to extension until February 2, 2013 upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. The Note may be prepaid by us at any time and must be prepaid by us if we receive at least $1,500,000 in net proceeds from the sale of certain of our securities, which would include this offering. The obligations under the Note are first priority senior secured obligations (subject to an equipment lease) and are secured by substantially all of our assets and assets of our subsidiary. The face value of the Note may be exchanged at the option of the holders into the applicable dollar amount of equity securities issued by us in a subsequent private financing. If the Note is not fully paid by maturity and the term of the Note has been extended until February 2, 2013, then the holders may convert the outstanding principal amount of the Note at a conversion price of 90% of the closing price of our common stock on the trading day prior to the date that the Note becomes convertible, subject to further adjustment in the case of stock splits, reclassifications, reorganizations, certain issuances at less than the conversion price and the like. We are further subject to certain liquidated damages if we fail to timely effectuate a conversion under the terms of the Note. Until such time that the Note is no longer outstanding, without the consent of the holders, we are prohibited from incurring certain debt, selling any account receivable or declaring any dividend.
52
As part of the May 2011 Offering, we sold an aggregate of $50,000 worth of units to our Chief Executive Officer and an entity under the control of the Chief Executive Officer, at the same terms as the other issuances.
Director Independence
We currently have two directors serving on our board of directors, Mr. Murphy and Ms. Mackenzie. We are not currently listed issuer and, as such, are not subject to any director independence standards. Using the definition of independence set forth in the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules, neither Mr. Murphy nor Ms. Mackenzie would be considered an independent director of the Company.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES
Authorized Capital Stock
We have 510,000,000 authorized shares of capital stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of which 500,000,000 shares are common stock and 10,000,000 shares are “blank-check” preferred stock.
Capital Stock Issued and Outstanding
We have issued and outstanding securities as of February 13, 2012:
|
•
|
230 shares of series A preferred stock convertible into an aggregate of 6,969,688 shares of common stock;
|
|
•
|
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,167,930 shares of common stock;
|
|
•
|
stock options to purchase an aggregate 4,627,631 shares of common stock;
|
|
•
|
718,954 shares of common stock that may become issuable upon the conversion of a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000, assuming a conversion price of $0.765 per share. The face value of the note may be exchanged at the option of the holders into the applicable dollar amount of equity securities issued by us in a subsequent private financing.
|
Common Stock
The holders of our common stock have equal ratable rights to dividends from funds legally available if and when declared by our board of directors and are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution to holders of common stock upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs. Our common stock does not provide the right to a preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions or rights. Our common stockholders are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which shareholders may vote, meaning that shareholders may not give more than one vote per share to any single nominee for election to our board of directors.
We refer you to our Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and the applicable statutes of the state of Nevada for a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.
Preferred Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorize the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock with designations, rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our board of directors.
We are authorized to issue up to 240 shares of series A preferred stock.
Each share of series A preferred stock has a stated value of $0.0001 per share and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our business, each holder of series A preferred stock is entitled to receive for each share of series A preferred stock an amount equal to the stated value prior to the holders of common stock and any other class or series of capital stock whose terms provide that series A preferred stock should receive preferential payment.
53
Each share of our series A preferred stock is convertible at the option of the holder into 3,031 shares of our common stock (subject to adjustment for stock splits, combinations and other similar events). We are prohibited from effecting the conversion of the series A preferred stock to the extent that, as a result of the conversion, the holder of such shares beneficially owns more than 4.99% (or, if this limitation is waived by the holder upon no less than 61 days prior notice to us, 9.99%) in the aggregate of the outstanding shares of our common stock calculated immediately after giving effect to the issuance of shares of common stock upon conversion of the series A preferred stock.
Holders of series A preferred stock are entitled to vote their shares on an as-converted to common stock basis, and shall vote together with the holders of the common stock, and not as a separate class. Holders of series A preferred stock shall also have any voting rights to which they are entitled by law.
Senior Secured Promissory Note
On February 3, 2012, we and our subsidiary, IZEA Innovations, Inc., jointly issued a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000 (the “Note”) to two of our existing shareholders for a purchase price of $500,000. Unless earlier converted, exchanged or prepaid, the Note matures on August 2, 2012, subject to extension until February 2, 2013 upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. The Note may be prepaid by us at any time and must be prepaid by us if we receive at least $1,500,000 in net proceeds from the sale of certain of our securities, which would include this offering. The obligations under the Note are first priority senior secured obligations (subject to an equipment lease) and are secured by substantially all of our assets and assets of our subsidiary. The face value of the Note may be exchanged at the option of the holders into the applicable dollar amount of equity securities issued by us in a subsequent private financing. If the Note is not fully paid by maturity and the term of the Note has been extended until February 2, 2013, then the holders may convert the outstanding principal amount of the Note at a conversion price of 90% of the closing price of our common stock on the trading day prior to the date that the Note becomes convertible, subject to further adjustment in the case of stock splits, reclassifications, reorganizations, certain issuances at less than the conversion price and the like. We are further subject to certain liquidated damages if we fail to timely effectuate a conversion under the terms of the Note. Until such time that the Note is no longer outstanding, without the consent of the holders, we are prohibited from incurring certain debt, selling any account receivable or declaring any dividend.
Registration Rights
We entered into registration rights agreements, as amended (the “Registration Rights Agreements”) with the investors in the May 2011 Offering, pursuant to which we agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the SEC covering the Shares, the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of Series A Preferred Stock and shares of Common Stock underlying the Warrants within 12 months of the final closing date of the May 2011 Offering (i.e. August 15, 2012) (the “Filing Date”). We agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within 15 months of the final closing date of the May 2011 Offering (i.e. November 15, 2012) (the “Effectiveness Deadline”) and to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement from the effective date until all securities have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144 without restriction or limitation.
Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreements, we are obligated to pay to the investors in the May 2011 Offering a fee of 1% per month of the investors’ investment, payable in cash, for every 30 day period up to a maximum of 6%, (i) following the Filing Date that the registration statement has not been filed and (ii) following the Effectiveness Deadline that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that we shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if we are unable to fulfill our registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the SEC pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, provided we register at such time the maximum number of shares of common stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the SEC and provided further that we shall not be obligated to pay liquidated damages at any time following the one year anniversary of the final closing date (i.e. August 15, 2012).
Transfer Agent
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Island Stock Transfer, St. Petersburg, Florida.
Anti-Takeover Provisions
The provisions of Nevada law and our bylaws may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing another party from acquiring control of the company. These provisions, summarized below, may discourage and prevent coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids.
Nevada Law
Nevada law contains a provision governing “acquisition of controlling interest.” This law provides generally that any person or entity that acquires 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of a publicly-held Nevada corporation in the secondary public or private market may be denied voting rights with respect to the acquired shares, unless a majority of the disinterested shareholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights in whole or in part. The control share acquisition act provides that a person or entity acquires “control shares” whenever it acquires shares that, but for the operation of the control share acquisition act, would bring its voting power within any of the following three ranges: 20 to 33-1/3%; 33-1/3 to 50%; or more than 50%.
A “control share acquisition” is generally defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of either ownership or voting power associated with issued and outstanding control shares. The shareholders or board of directors of a corporation may elect to exempt the stock of the corporation from the provisions of the control share acquisition act through adoption of a provision to that effect in the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not exempt our common stock from the control share acquisition act.
54
The control share acquisition act is applicable only to shares of “Issuing Corporations” as defined by the Nevada law. An Issuing Corporation is a Nevada corporation which (i) has 200 or more shareholders, with at least 100 of such shareholders being both shareholders of record and residents of Nevada, and (ii) does business in Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation.
At this time, we do not believe we have 100 shareholders of record resident of Nevada and we do not conduct business in Nevada directly. Therefore, the provisions of the control share acquisition act are believed not to apply to acquisitions of our shares and will not until such time as these requirements have been met. At such time as they may apply, the provisions of the control share acquisition act may discourage companies or persons interested in acquiring a significant interest in or control of us, regardless of whether such acquisition may be in the interest of our shareholders.
The Nevada “Combination with Interested Stockholders Statute” may also have an effect of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of us. This statute prevents an “interested stockholder” and a resident domestic Nevada corporation from entering into a “combination,” unless certain conditions are met. The statute defines “combination” to include any merger or consolidation with an “interested stockholder,” or any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition, in one transaction or a series of transactions with an “interested stockholder” having (i) an aggregate market value equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of the assets of the corporation, (ii) an aggregate market value equal to 5% or more of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the corporation, or (iii) representing 10% or more of the earning power or net income of the corporation.
An “interested stockholder” means the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting shares of a resident domestic corporation, or an affiliate or associate thereof. A corporation affected by the statute may not engage in a “combination” within three years after the interested stockholder acquires its shares unless the combination or purchase is approved by the board of directors before the interested stockholder acquired such shares. If approval is not obtained, then after the expiration of the three-year period, the business combination may be consummated with the approval of the board of directors or a majority of the voting power held by disinterested stockholders, or if the consideration to be paid by the interested stockholder is at least equal to the highest of (i) the highest price per share paid by the interested stockholder within the three years immediately preceding the date of the announcement of the combination or in the transaction in which he became an interested stockholder, whichever is higher, (ii) the market value per common share on the date of announcement of the combination or the date the interested stockholder acquired the shares, whichever is higher, or (iii) if higher for the holders of preferred stock, the highest liquidation value of the preferred stock.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
Our articles of incorporation are silent as to cumulative voting rights in the election of our directors. Nevada law requires the existence of cumulative voting rights to be provided for by a corporation's articles of incorporation. As such, the combination of the present ownership by a few stockholders of a significant portion of our issued and outstanding common stock and lack of cumulative voting makes it more difficult for other stockholders to replace our board of directors or for a third party to obtain control of us by replacing our board of directors. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not contain any explicit provisions that would have an effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us.
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Upon completion of this offering, there will be approximately shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Of these shares, we believe that approximately would be freely transferable immediately. Our executive officers and directors beneficially own shares, which would be eligible for resale subject to the volume and manner of sale limitations of Rule 144 of the Securities Act. An additional shares are “restricted securities,” as that term is defined in Rule 144, and are eligible for sale under the provisions of Rule 144.
Series A preferred stock convertible into an aggregate of 6,969,690 shares of common stock were outstanding as of February 13, 2012. Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,167,930 shares of common stock were outstanding as of February 13, 2012. Stock options to purchase an aggregate of 4,627,631 shares of common stock were outstanding under our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan as of February 13, 2012. 718,954 shares of common stock that may become issuable upon the conversion of a senior secured promissory note in the principal amount of $550,000, assuming a conversion price of $0.765 per share.
55
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person (or persons whose shares are required to be aggregated), including a person who may be deemed an “affiliate” of the company, who has beneficially owned restricted securities for at least six months may sell, within any three-month period, a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of: (1) 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, or (2) the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the date on which notice of such sale was filed under Rule 144. Sales of shares held by our affiliates that are not “restricted” are subject to such volume limitations, but are not subject to the holding period requirement. Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to certain requirements as to the manner of sale, notice and availability of current public information about our company. A person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of our company at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale by such person, and who has beneficially owned the restricted shares for at least one-year, is entitled to sell such shares under Rule 144 without regard to any of the restrictions described above.
Holders of shares of our common stock, on an as-converted basis, and holders of options and warrants exercisable for an aggregate of shares of our common stock are subject to lock-up agreements under which they have agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, for a period of 90 days after the date of this prospectus other than sales of shares of common stock in this offering.
For a description of the lock-up agreements with the underwriters that restrict us, our directors, our executive officers and certain of our other stockholders, see "Underwriting.”
For a description of registration rights with respect to our common stock, see "Description of capital stock-Registration rights."
Following this offering, we cannot predict the effect, if any, that the availability for sale of shares held by our current stockholders will have on the market price from time to time. Nevertheless, sales by our current stockholders of a substantial number of shares of common stock in the public market could materially and adversely affect the market price for our common stock. In addition, the availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock acquired through the exercise of outstanding stock options or warrants or conversion of convertible debentures could materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
56
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions of an underwriting agreement, dated , 2012, we have agreed to sell to each of the underwriters named below, and each of the underwriters, for which Aegis Capital Corp. is acting as representative, have severally, and not jointly, agreed to purchase on a firm commitment basis the number of shares offered in this offering set forth opposite their respective names below, at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page of this prospectus. We expect additional underwriters to be named in an amendment to this registration statement
Name
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
Aegis Capital Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
__________
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of Underwriting Commitment
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are committed to purchase on a several but not joint basis all shares of common stock offered in this offering, other than those covered by the over-allotment option described below, if the underwriters purchase any of these shares. The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the underwriters to purchase the shares offered hereby are conditional and may be terminated at their discretion based on their assessment of the state of the financial markets. The obligations of the underwriters may also be terminated upon the occurrence of other events specified in the underwriting agreement. Furthermore, pursuant to the underwriting agreement, the underwriters' obligations are subject to the authorization and the validity of the shares and to various other customary conditions, representations and warranties contained in the underwriting agreement, such as receipt by the underwriters of officers' certificates and legal opinions of our counsel.
57
Pricing of Securities
The underwriters have advised us that they propose to offer the shares of common stock directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and to certain dealers that are members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), at such price less a concession not in excess of $ per share. The underwriters may allow, and the selected dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $ per share to certain brokers and dealers. After this offering, the offering price and concessions and discounts to brokers and dealers and other selling terms may from time to time be changed by the underwriters. These prices should not be considered an indication of the actual value of our shares and are subject to change as a result of market conditions and other factors. No variation in those terms will change the amount of proceeds to be received by us as set forth on the cover page of this prospectus.
The public offering price for the shares was determined by negotiation between us and the representative. The principal factors considered in determining the public offering price of the shares included the demand for our common stock, as well as the market price of such shares, the level of trading volume in our common stock, the general market for social media companies and market conditions in general.
We cannot be sure that the public offering price will correspond to the price at which our shares will trade in the public market after this offering or that an active trading market for our shares will develop and continue after this offering.
Commissions and Discounts
The following table summarizes the compensation to be paid to the underwriters by us and the proceeds, before expenses, payable to us, at the public offering price of $ per share. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of the over-allotment option.
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
|
|
Without
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
With
Over-Allotment
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount (1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non-accountable expense allowance (2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accountable expenses (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us (4)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
__________
(1)
|
Underwriting discount is $ per share (7% of the price of the shares sold in this offering).
|
(2)
|
The non-accountable expense allowance of 1% is not payable with respect to the shares sold upon exercise of the underwriters' over-allotment option.
|
(3)
|
The accountable expenses relating to officer and director background checks ($ ), book building software ($20,000) and road show expenses ($20,000).
|
(4)
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering, excluding the underwriting discount, the non-accountable expense allowance and accountable expenses, are approximately $ .
|
Over-allotment Option
We will grant a 45-day option to the representative of the underwriters to purchase additional shares of common stock up to an additional 15% of common stock sold in this offering (additional shares) solely to cover over-allotments, if any, at the same price as the initial shares offered. If the underwriters fully exercise the over-allotment option, the total public offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and net proceeds (before expenses) to us will be $ , $ , and $ , respectively.
58
Lock-ups
All of our directors, executive officers and principal stockholders will enter into lock-up agreements that prevent them from selling any shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of our common stock, subject to certain exceptions, for a period of not less than 90 days after the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Aegis Capital Corp., as representative of the underwriters. The representative may in its sole discretion and at any time without notice release some or all of the shares subject to lock-up agreements prior to the expiration of the lock-up period. When determining whether or not to release shares from the lock-up agreements, the representative will consider, among other factors, the stockholder's reasons for requesting the release, the number of shares for which the release is being requested and market conditions at the time.
Underwriters’ Warrants
We have agreed to sell Aegis Capital Corp. for $100 warrants to purchase up to a total of shares of common stock (5% of the shares sold in this offering). The shares issuable upon exercise of these warrants are identical to those offered by this prospectus. The warrants are exercisable at $ per share (125% of the price of the shares sold in this offering), commencing on a date which is one year after the effective date of the registration statement and expiring five years after the effective date of the registration statement. The warrants may also be exercised on a cashless basis. The warrants and the shares of common stock underlying the warrants have been deemed compensation by FINRA and are, therefore, subject to a 180-day lock -up pursuant to Rule 5110(g)(1) of FINRA. Aegis Capital Corp. (or permitted assignees under the Rule) will not sell, transfer, assign, pledge or hypothecate these warrants or the securities underlying these warrants, nor will it engage in any hedging, short sale, derivative, put or call transaction that would result in the effective economic disposition of these warrants or the underlying securities for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. Additionally, the warrants may not be sold transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated for a one-year period (including the foregoing 180-day period) following the effective date of the registration statement except to any underwriter and selected dealer participating in this offering and their bona fide officers or partners. The warrants grant holders one demand and unlimited “piggy back” registration rights for periods of four and six years, respectively, from the first anniversary of the date of this prospectus. These rights apply to all of the securities directly and indirectly issuable upon exercise of the warrants. We will bear all fees and expenses attendant to registering the securities issuable on exercise of the warrants, other than underwriting commissions incurred and payable by the holders. The exercise price and number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a stock dividend, extraordinary cash dividend or our recapitalization, reorganization, merger or consolidation. However, the warrant exercise price or underlying shares will not be adjusted for issuances of common stock at a price below the warrant exercise price.
Right of First Refusal
If at least $10,000,000 in shares of common stock are sold in this offering, then for a period of 12 months after the closing of this offering, the representative shall have a right of first refusal to purchase for its account or to sell for our account, or any subsidiary or successor, any securities of our company or any such subsidiary or successor which we or any subsidiary or successor may seek to sell in public or private equity and public debt offerings during such 12-month period.
We may, however, in lieu of granting a right of first refusal, designate the representative as lead underwriter or co-manager of any underwriting group or co-placement agent of any proposed financing, and the representative shall be entitled to receive as its compensation 50% of the compensation payable to the underwriting or placement agent group when serving as co-manager or co-placement agent, and 33% of the compensation payable to the underwriting or placement agent group when serving as co-manager or co-placement agent with respect to a proposed financing in which there are three co-managing or lead underwriters or co-placement agents.
Other Underwriters’ Compensation
In addition to the compensation we have agreed to pay the underwriters in connection with this offering, and as additional compensation to the underwriters, we have agreed to pay the following:
|
·
|
all fees, expenses and disbursements relating to background checks of our officers and directors in an amount not to exceed $3,500 per individual and an aggregate amount of $ ;
|
|
·
|
$20,000 for the cost associated with the use of Ipreo’s book building, prospectus tracking and compliance software for this offering; and
|
|
·
|
up to $20,000 of the underwriters’ actual accountable “road show” expenses.
|
Other Terms
In connection with this offering, the underwriters or certain of the securities dealers may distribute prospectuses electronically. No forms of prospectus other than printed prospectuses and electronically distributed prospectuses that are printable in Adobe .pdf format will be used in connection with this offering.
59
The representative has informed us that it does not expect to confirm sales of shares offered by this prospectus to accounts over which it exercises discretionary authority without obtaining the specific approval of the account holder.
Stabilization
Until the distribution of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus is completed, rules of the SEC may limit the ability of the underwriters to bid for and to purchase our securities. As an exception to these rules, the underwriters may engage in transactions effected in accordance with Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that are intended to stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the price of our common stock. The underwriters may engage in over-allotment sales, syndicate covering transactions, stabilizing transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M.
· Stabilizing transactions permit bids or purchases for the purpose of pegging, fixing or maintaining the price of the common stock, so long as stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.
· Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to purchase, which creates a short position. The short position may be either a covered short position or a naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their over-allotment option or purchasing shares in the open market.
· Covering transactions involve the purchase of securities in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover short positions. In determining the source of securities to close out the short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of securities available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase securities through the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares of common stock than could be covered by the over-allotment option, creating a naked short position, the position can only be closed out by buying securities in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of the securities in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in this offering.
· Penalty bids permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a selected dealer when the shares of common stock originally sold by the selected dealer are purchased in a stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction.
These stabilizing transactions, covering transactions and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result, the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market.
Neither we nor the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our shares. These transactions may occur on the OTC Bulletin Board or on any other trading market. If any of these transactions are commenced, they may be discontinued without notice at any time.
State Securities Laws
State securities laws require either that a company’s securities be registered for sale or that the securities themselves or the transaction under which they are issued, be exempt from registration. Because our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and not listed on a national securities exchange, exemptions will generally not be available and this offering must be registered in nearly all states and jurisdictions in which the securities are to be offered or sold. We will apply to register the securities, or will seek to obtain an exemption from registration, only in certain states. In the states that require registration, and in which applications are filed, securities will not be sold to retail customers until such registration is effective. In addition, if we register the shares and warrants in the State of California, sales will only be made to residents of California who have not less than (i) a $150,000 liquid net worth, (a net worth exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobile), plus estimated $70,000 gross income during the current tax year, or (ii) a $250,000 liquid net worth and an investment limitation of not more than 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth.
Institutional investors may purchase securities in the offering pursuant to exemptions provided for sales to such entities under the laws of various states. The definition of an “institutional investor” varies from state to state, but generally includes financial institutions, broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies and other qualified entities. If you are not an institutional investor, you may purchase securities in this offering only if you reside in the jurisdictions where there is an effective registration or exemption, and, if required, meet any requisite suitability standards.
Offer Restrictions Outside the United States
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us or the underwriters that would permit a public offering of the shares of common stock offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required. The shares offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale of any such shares be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any shares offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.
60
Indemnification
The underwriting agreement provides for indemnification between us and the underwriters against specified liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, and for contribution by us and the underwriters to payments that may be required to be made with respect to those liabilities. We have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is therefore, unenforceable.
The foregoing does not purport to be a complete statement of the terms and conditions of the underwriting agreement. Reference is made to a copy of the underwriting agreement, which is on file as an exhibit to the registration statement or an amendment to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a part.
COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES
Neither our articles of incorporation nor bylaws prevent us from indemnifying our officers, directors and agents to the extent permitted under the Nevada Revised Statute ("NRS"). NRS Section 78.7502, provides that a corporation may indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with any defense to the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to Section 78.7502(1) or 78.7502(2), or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein.
NRS 78.7502(1) provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suit or proceeding if he: (a) is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138; or (b) acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful.
NRS Section 78.7502(2) provides that a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys' fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he: (a) is not liable pursuant to NRS 78.138; or (b) acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals there from, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.
NRS Section 78.747 provides that except as otherwise provided by specific statute, no director or officer of a corporation is individually liable for a debt or liability of the corporation, unless the director or officer acts as the alter ego of the corporation. The court as a matter of law must determine the question of whether a director or officer acts as the alter ego of a corporation.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling us pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed hereby in the Securities Act and we will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
61
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the shares offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP, New York, New York. In addition, certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Greenberg Traurig LLP, New York, New York.
EXPERTS
Our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 have been included in this prospectus in reliance on the report of Cross, Fernandez & Riley, LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act, with respect to the common stock offered hereby. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules thereto. Some items are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information with respect to us and the common shares offered hereby, we refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract, agreement or any other document referred to are summaries of the material terms of the respective contract, agreement or other document. With respect to each of these contracts, agreements or other documents filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, reference is made to the exhibits for a more complete description of the matter involved. A copy of the registration statement, and the exhibits and schedules thereto, may be inspected without charge at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of these materials may be obtained by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facilities. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov.
We file periodic reports and other information with the SEC. Such periodic reports and other information are available for inspection and copying at the public reference room and website of the SEC referred to above. We maintain a website at http:// w ww.izea.com/ . You may access our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC free of charge at our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information and other content contained on our website are not part of the prospectus.
62
FINANCIAL INFORMATION INDEX
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010
|
F-2
|
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-21
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2010
|
F-22
|
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2010
|
F-27
|
F-1
IZEA Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,095,103
|
|
|
$
|
1,503,105
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
883,004
|
|
|
391,114
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
742,672
|
|
|
63,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
2,720,779
|
|
|
1,957,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
164,733
|
|
|
140,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
21,983
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
Security deposits
|
21,038
|
|
|
8,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
2,928,533
|
|
|
$
|
2,110,945
|
|
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-2
IZEA Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
September 30,
2011
|
|
December 31,
2010
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
886,127
|
|
|
$
|
636,864
|
|
Accrued payroll
|
140,251
|
|
|
81,014
|
|
Unearned revenue
|
1,471,852
|
|
|
1,097,466
|
|
Current portion of notes payable
|
112,614
|
|
|
351,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
2,610,844
|
|
|
2,166,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable, less current portion
|
31,746
|
|
|
10,569
|
|
Deferred rent
|
—
|
|
|
9,220
|
|
Warrant liability
|
1,011,399
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
3,653,989
|
|
|
2,186,701
|
|
|
|