UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
Filed by the Registrant x
|
||
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
||
|
Check the appropriate box:
|
||
|
o
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
|
|
o
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
|
o
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
|
|
x
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
|
|
o
|
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
|
|
|
AFLAC INCORPORATED
|
||
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
||
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
||
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
||||
|
x
|
No fee required.
|
|||
|
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|||
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|||
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|||
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|||
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|||
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|||
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|||
|
(1)
|
Amount Previously Paid:
|
|||
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|||
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|||
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|||
April 16, 2015
Supplemental Information Regarding Proposal 2 – Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation
Several weeks ago we provided our shareholders with the proxy statement for Aflac Incorporated’s 2015 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on May 4, 2015. The unanimous recommendation of our Board of Directors was that shareholders vote FOR Proposal 2 in the proxy statement—the advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”) proposal.
Our executive compensation program is described in considerable detail in the proxy statement, but we would like to further explain several aspects. We encourage you to read this supplement in conjunction with our proxy statement when considering how to vote on Proposal 2.
Non-equity Award Metrics Consistent with External Guidance; Payout Based on Actual Performance
The Board of Directors believes that it is important for the Company to manage the business for the long-term value of its shareholders. Therefore, performance goals are tailored to metrics that drive shareholder returns such as sales growth, earnings growth, and return on equity.
The annual non-equity incentive plan (“Management Incentive Plan” or “MIP”) payout is entirely dependent upon the level of achievement of performance goals. This methodology for setting MIP goals has been consistent for many years:
|
|
·
|
MIP segment metrics for Aflac U.S. and Aflac Japan are consistent with assumptions used in developing segment financial projections based on the Company's best estimates for the coming year
|
|
|
·
|
The segment projections are then consolidated into the corporate financial projection used to develop earnings per share guidance
|
Since 1991, the Company has communicated external earnings guidance that excludes foreign currency effects because currency changes are largely outside of management’s control. However, reported earnings do reflect the impact of foreign currency.
For 2014, management provided earnings guidance with the Company’s third quarter 2013 earnings release on October 29, 2013 as follows: “If the yen averages 95 to 100 to the dollar for the fourth quarter 2013 and full year 2014, we would expect 2014 operating earnings per diluted share to be in the range of $6.28 to $6.52, which is a growth rate of approximately 2% to 5% on a currency neutral basis.” Total operating EPS for 2013 was $6.18 as reported (or $6.94 excluding the negative impact of $.76 per share from the weaker yen). The reported result of $6.18 per diluted share became the base for setting the 2014 MIP operating earnings per share performance goals as noted in the table below:
|
Corporate Metric
|
Minimum Goal
|
Target
Goal
|
Maximum Goal
|
2014 Actual
|
|
Growth of operating earnings per diluted share on a consolidated basis for the company (excluding foreign currency effect) from a 2013 base of $6.18 per share
|
N/A
|
2% (or $6.31)
|
5% (or $6.49)
|
3.9% (or $6.42)
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of the corporate operating EPS goals as reported in the proxy statements for the 2013 and 2014 MIP:
|
Prior Year Base
|
Minimum Goal
|
Target
Goal
|
Maximum Goal
|
Actual Result
|
Currency Impact
|
Reported EPS
|
|
|
2013 EPS target
|
$6.60
|
N/A
|
4%
= $6.86
|
7%
= $7.06
|
5.2%
= $6.94
|
($.76)
|
$6.18
|
|
2014 EPS target
|
$6.18
|
N/A
|
2%
= $6.31
|
5%
= $6.49
|
3.9%
= $6.42
|
($.26)
|
$6.16
|
The reason the MIP objectives are set on a currency neutral basis is that Compensation Committee strongly believes that in a period of yen strengthening, which was experienced as recently as 2008 through 2012, the Company’s management should not be rewarded with MIP payments that benefit from reported results that were enhanced by currency changes or penalized in periods of yen weakening.
In addition to currency neutrality, the business environment in which the Company operates is taken into consideration when setting MIP objectives for each metric, which resulted in lower targets for direct premium growth and pretax operating earnings in Japan. The MIP goals were then approved by the Compensation Committee in February 2014.
2014 Total Direct Compensation for CEO Dropped by 51% Compared with 2013
Based on the Company’s relative performance ranking for 2014, the CEO’s total direct compensation was reduced by 51% from the prior year. This significant reduction is strong evidence that CEO compensation is tied directly to performance. The CEO’s total direct compensation consists of base salary, annual non-equity incentive awards, and grant-date fair value of long-term incentive awards.
Our executive compensation process is entirely transparent, performance-based and governed through comprehensive oversight by the independent directors sitting on our Compensation Committee in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, Mercer LLC. Importantly, we solicited shareholder input and made significant changes to the Company’s 2014 executive compensation program. In addition, the Compensation Committee determined that for 2015, there would be no increase in the CEO’s base salary (which has remained the same since 2012) or Management Incentive Plan target as a percentage of base salary.
We recommend that you vote FOR Proposal 2 (say-on-pay) in our 2015 proxy statement.
If you have any questions prior to your proxy voting decisions, please do not hesitate to contact Robin Y. Wilkey, Senior Vice President, Investor and Rating Agency Relations, at rwilkey@aflac.com or (706) 596-3264.
|
Respectfully submitted,
|
|
 |
|
|
Robert B. Johnson
|
|
|
Chairman of the Compensation Committee
|