rbs201111046k4.htm
 
FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549

 
 
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
 
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
For November 4, 2011
 
Commission File Number: 001-10306

 
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc

 
RBS, Gogarburn, PO Box 1000
Edinburgh EH12 1HQ

 
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
 
Form 20-F X
 
Form 40-F ___
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):_________

 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):_________


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


Yes
  ___
No X
 
 
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

 

 
The following information was issued as a Company announcement in London, England and is furnished pursuant to General Instruction B to the General Instructions to Form 6-K:

 

 
 






Risk and balance sheet management

 
Key terms and acronyms used in this section are defined in the glossary of terms.
 
Balance sheet management
 
Capital
The Group aims to maintain an appropriate level of capital to meet its business needs and regulatory requirements as capital adequacy and risk management are closely aligned. The Group's risk asset ratios calculated in accordance with Financial Services Authority (FSA) definitions are set out below.
 
 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Risk-weighted assets (RWAs)
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
       
Credit risk
346.8 
366.1 
385.9 
Counterparty risk
72.2 
66.1 
68.1 
Market risk
55.0 
58.6 
80.0 
Operational risk
37.9 
37.9 
37.1 
       
 
511.9 
528.7 
571.1 
Benefit of Asset Protection Scheme
(88.6)
(95.2)
(105.6)
       
 
423.3 
433.5 
465.5 
 
 
Risk asset ratio
       
Core Tier 1
11.3 
11.1 
10.7 
Tier 1
13.8 
13.5 
12.9 
Total
14.7 
14.4 
14.0 
 
Key points
 
·
The Core Tier 1 ratio increased in the quarter, due to a reduction in RWAs.
   
·
Credit risk RWAs decreased by £19.3 billion principally driven by asset run-off, disposals and restructurings.
   
·
Market risk RWAs decreased by £3.6 billion reflecting de-risking of the Non-Core portfolio and a reduction in VaR.
   
·
The reduction in APS RWA benefit mainly reflects the run-off of covered assets.
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Capital (continued)
 
The Group's capital resources in accordance with FSA definitions were as follows:
 
 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Composition of regulatory capital
£m 
£m 
£m 
       
Tier 1
     
Ordinary and B shareholders' equity
72,699 
70,000 
70,388 
Non-controlling interests
1,433 
1,498 
1,719 
Adjustments for:
     
  - goodwill and other intangible assets - continuing businesses
(14,744)
(14,592)
(14,448)
  - unrealised losses on available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities
379 
1,103 
2,061 
  - reserves arising on revaluation of property and unrealised gains on
    AFS equities
(88)
(76)
(25)
  - reallocation of preference shares and innovative securities
(548)
(548)
(548)
  - other regulatory adjustments*
(3,465)
(1,014)
(1,097)
Less excess of expected losses over provisions net of tax
(2,127)
(2,156)
(1,900)
Less securitisation positions
(2,164)
(2,404)
(2,321)
Less APS first loss
(3,545)
(3,810)
(4,225)
       
Core Tier 1 capital
47,830 
48,001 
49,604 
Preference shares
5,398 
5,372 
5,410 
Innovative Tier 1 securities
4,644 
4,564 
4,662 
Tax on the excess of expected losses over provisions
767 
777 
758 
Less material holdings
(303)
(327)
(310)
       
Total Tier 1 capital
58,336 
58,387 
60,124 
       
Tier 2
     
Reserves arising on revaluation of property and unrealised gains on AFS
  equities
88 
76 
25 
Collective impairment provisions
728 
715 
778 
Perpetual subordinated debt
1,837 
1,858 
1,852 
Term subordinated debt
14,999 
15,697 
16,745 
Non-controlling and other interests in Tier 2 capital
11 
11 
11 
Less excess of expected losses over provisions
(2,894)
(2,933)
(2,658)
Less securitisation positions
(2,164)
(2,404)
(2,321)
Less material holdings
(303)
(327)
(310)
Less APS first loss
(3,545)
(3,810)
(4,225)
       
Total Tier 2 capital
8,757 
8,883 
9,897 
       
Supervisory deductions
     
Unconsolidated investments
     
  - RBS Insurance
(4,292)
(4,176)
(3,962)
  - other investments
(262)
(354)
(318)
Other deductions
(311)
(419)
(452)
       
Deductions from total capital
(4,865)
(4,949)
(4,732)
       
Total regulatory capital
62,228 
62,321 
65,289 
       
* Includes reduction for own liabilities carried at fair value
(2,931)
(1,112)
(1,182)
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Capital(continued)
 
 
Movement in Core Tier 1 capital
£m 
   
At 1 January 2011
49,604 
Attributable loss net of movement in fair value of own debt
(1,355)
Foreign currency reserves
(304)
Decrease in capital deductions including APS first loss
76 
Decrease in non-controlling interests
(221)
Other movements
201 
   
At 30 June 2011
48,001 
Attributable loss net of movement in fair value of own debt
(593)
Foreign currency reserves
13 
Decrease in capital deductions including APS first loss
534 
Decrease in non-controlling interests
(65)
Other movements
(60)
   
At 30 September 2011
47,830 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Capital: Risk-weighted assets by division
Risk-weighted assets by risk category and division are set out below.
 
 
 
Credit 
risk 
Counterparty 
risk 
Market 
risk 
Operational 
risk 
Gross 
RWAs 
APS 
relief 
Net 
RWAs 
30 September 2011
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
               
UK Retail
41.4 
7.3 
48.7 
(9.9)
38.8 
UK Corporate
69.0 
6.7 
75.7 
(16.9)
58.8 
Wealth
11.0 
0.1 
1.9 
13.0 
13.0 
Global Transaction Services
13.7 
4.9 
18.6 
18.6 
Ulster Bank
32.0 
0.5 
0.1 
1.8 
34.4 
(6.7)
27.7 
US Retail & Commercial
51.0 
1.1 
4.4 
56.5 
56.5 
               
Retail & Commercial
218.1 
1.6 
0.2 
27.0 
246.9 
(33.5)
213.4 
Global Banking & Markets
46.1 
35.1 
37.6 
15.5 
134.3 
(10.4)
123.9 
Other
8.8 
0.3 
0.7 
9.8 
9.8 
               
Core
273.0 
37.0 
37.8 
43.2 
391.0 
(43.9)
347.1 
Non-Core
71.0 
35.2 
17.2 
(5.5)
117.9 
(44.7)
73.2 
               
Group before RFS MI
344.0 
72.2 
55.0 
37.7 
508.9 
(88.6)
420.3 
RFS MI
2.8 
0.2 
3.0 
3.0 
               
Group
346.8 
72.2 
55.0 
37.9 
511.9 
(88.6)
423.3 
               
30 June 2011
             
               
UK Retail
42.2 
7.3 
49.5 
(10.7)
38.8 
UK Corporate
71.2 
6.7 
77.9 
(19.3)
58.6 
Wealth
10.9 
0.1 
1.9 
12.9 
12.9 
Global Transaction Services
13.9 
4.9 
18.8 
18.8 
Ulster Bank
33.9 
0.5 
0.1 
1.8 
36.3 
(7.6)
28.7 
US Retail & Commercial
49.6 
0.8 
4.4 
54.8 
54.8 
               
Retail & Commercial
221.7 
1.3 
0.2 
27.0 
250.2 
(37.6)
212.6 
Global Banking & Markets
51.2 
31.4 
40.9 
15.5 
139.0 
(10.3)
128.7 
Other
10.7 
0.4 
0.7 
11.8 
11.8 
               
Core
283.6 
33.1 
41.1 
43.2 
401.0 
(47.9)
353.1 
Non-Core
79.7 
33.0 
17.5 
(5.5)
124.7 
(47.3)
77.4 
               
Group before RFS MI
363.3 
66.1 
58.6 
37.7 
525.7 
(95.2)
430.5 
RFS MI
2.8 
0.2 
3.0 
3.0 
               
Group
366.1 
66.1 
58.6 
37.9 
528.7 
(95.2)
433.5 
 
 
31 December 2010
             
               
UK Retail
41.7 
7.1 
48.8 
(12.4)
36.4 
UK Corporate
74.8 
6.6 
81.4 
(22.9)
58.5 
Wealth
10.4 
0.1 
2.0 
12.5 
12.5 
Global Transaction Services
13.7 
4.6 
18.3 
18.3 
Ulster Bank
29.2 
0.5 
0.1 
1.8 
31.6 
(7.9)
23.7 
US Retail & Commercial
52.0 
0.9 
4.1 
57.0 
57.0 
               
Retail & Commercial
221.8 
1.4 
0.2 
26.2 
249.6 
(43.2)
206.4 
Global Banking & Markets
53.5 
34.5 
44.7 
14.2 
146.9 
(11.5)
135.4 
Other
16.4 
0.4 
0.2 
1.0 
18.0 
18.0 
               
Core
291.7 
36.3 
45.1 
41.4 
414.5 
(54.7)
359.8 
Non-Core
91.3 
31.8 
34.9 
(4.3)
153.7 
(50.9)
102.8 
               
Group before RFS MI
383.0 
68.1 
80.0 
37.1 
568.2 
(105.6)
462.6 
RFS MI
2.9 
2.9 
2.9 
               
Group
385.9 
68.1 
80.0 
37.1 
571.1 
 (105.6)
465.5 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Capital (continued)
 
CRD 3 and Basel III impacts
The estimated impact of CRD 3 rules on the Group's RWAs post mitigation is an increase of c.£20 billion. This is lower than the initial estimates of £25 billion to £30 billion and reflects mitigation, restructuring and continuing risk reduction.
 
The implementation of the Basel III proposals in 2013 is now estimated to result in an increase in RWAs of £60 billion to £75 billion. This is lower than the previous estimate of £75 billion to £85 billion, due to risk reduction and mitigation in both GBM and Non-Core.
 
The combined impact of CRD 3 and Basel III on the Group's RWAs is now estimated to be some £20 billion or 20% lower than the previous estimates.
 
Funding and liquidity risk
The Group's balance sheet composition is a function of the broad array of product offerings and diverse markets served by its Core divisions. The structural composition of the balance sheet is augmented as needed through active management of both asset and liability portfolios. The objective of these activities is to optimise liquidity transformation in normal business environments while ensuring adequate coverage of all cash requirements under extreme stress conditions.
 
Diversification of the Group's funding base is central to its liquidity management strategy. The Group's businesses have developed large customer franchises based on strong relationship management and high quality service. These customer franchises are strongest in the UK, US and Ireland but extend into Europe and Asia. Customer deposits provide large pools of stable funding to support the majority of the Group's lending. It is a strategic objective to improve the Group's loan to deposit ratio to 100%, or better, by 2013.
 
The Group also accesses professional markets funding by way of public and private debt issuances on an unsecured and secured basis. These debt issuance programmes are spread across multiple currencies and maturities to appeal to a broad range of investor types and preferences around the world. This market based funding supplements the Group's structural liquidity needs and in some cases achieves certain capital objectives.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk (continued)
 
Funding sources
The table below shows the Group's primary funding sources, excluding repurchase agreements.
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
31 December 2010
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                 
Deposits by banks
               
  - central banks
3,568 
0.5 
 
4,469 
0.6 
 
6,655 
0.9 
  - derivative cash collateral
32,466 
4.4 
 
25,524 
3.5 
 
28,074 
3.8 
  - other
42,336 
5.8 
 
41,580 
5.6 
 
31,322 
4.3 
                 
 
78,370 
10.7 
 
71,573 
9.7 
 
66,051 
9.0 
                 
Debt securities in issue
               
  - conduit asset backed commercial paper
11,783 
1.6 
 
12,894 
1.7 
 
17,320 
2.3 
  - other commercial paper
8,680 
1.2 
 
9,475 
1.3 
 
8,915 
1.2 
  - certificates of deposits
25,036 
3.4 
 
35,305 
4.8 
 
37,855 
5.1 
  - medium-term notes (MTNs)
127,719 
17.4 
 
132,371 
17.9 
 
131,026 
17.7 
  - covered bonds
8,541 
1.2 
 
6,972 
0.9 
 
4,100 
0.6 
  - securitisations
12,752 
1.7 
 
16,780 
2.3 
 
19,156 
2.6 
                 
 
194,511 
26.5 
 
213,797 
28.9 
 
218,372 
29.5 
Subordinated liabilities
26,275 
3.6 
 
26,311 
3.5 
 
27,053 
3.6 
                 
Debt securities in issue and subordinated
  liabilities
220,786 
30.1 
 
240,108 
32.4 
 
245,425 
33.1 
                 
Wholesale funding
299,156 
40.8 
 
311,681 
42.1 
 
311,476 
42.1 
                 
Customer deposits
               
  - cash collateral
10,278 
1.4 
 
11,166 
1.5 
 
10,433 
1.4 
  - other
423,382 
57.8 
 
417,537 
56.4 
 
418,166 
56.5 
                 
Total customer deposits
433,660 
59.2 
 
428,703 
57.9 
 
428,599 
57.9 
                 
Total funding
732,816 
100.0 
 
740,384 
100.0 
 
740,075 
100.0 
 
 
 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
 
£bn 
£bn 
£bn 
       
Short-term wholesale funding
173.8 
173.5 
157.5 
Of which - bank deposits
74.0 
67.0 
62.5 
               - other
99.8 
106.5 
95.0 
       
Short-term wholesale funding excluding derivative collateral
141.3 
148.0 
129.4 
Of which - bank deposits
41.5 
41.5 
34.4 
               - other
99.8 
106.5 
95.0 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk: Funding sources (continued)
 
Key points
 
·
Customer deposits increased by £5.0 billion during the quarter from £428.7 billion to £433.7 billion, driven by growth in retail and corporate deposits. Customer deposits as a proportion of total funding increased slightly to 59.2% at 30 September 2011 compared with 57.9% at 30 June 2011 and 31 December 2010.
   
·
The proportion of funding from customer deposits excluding cash collateral increased slightly to 57.8% from 56.4% at 30 June 2011 and 56.5% at 31 December 2010.
   
·
Short-term wholesale funding excluding derivative collateral and bank deposits reduced in Q3 2011 to £99.8 billion compared with £106.5 billion at the half year. Term debt maturing within one year amounts to £54.6 billion (including £40 billion relating to the UK Credit Guarantee Scheme (CGS)) of which, £20.1 billion matures in Q4 2011.
 
The table below shows the Group's debt securities in issue and subordinated liabilities by remaining maturity.
 
 
 
Conduit 
asset 
backed 
commercial 
paper 
Other 
CP and 
 CDs 
MTNs 
Covered 
bonds 
Securitisations 
Total 
Subordinated 
liabilities 
Total 
 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
30 September 2011
                 
Less than 1 year
11,783 
32,914 
54,622 
43 
99,362 
400 
99,762 
45.2 
1-3 years
795 
28,456 
2,800 
26 
32,077 
2,045 
34,122 
15.5 
3-5 years
18,049 
3,037 
33 
21,121 
8,265 
29,386 
13.3 
More than 5 years
26,592 
2,704 
12,650 
41,951 
15,565 
57,516 
26.0 
                   
 
11,783 
33,716 
127,719 
8,541 
12,752 
194,511 
26,275 
220,786 
100.0 
                   
30 June 2011
                 
Less than 1 year
12,894 
43,974 
49,174 
43 
106,085 
399 
106,484 
44.3 
1-3 years
788 
33,366 
1,114 
18 
35,286 
1,962 
37,248 
15.6 
3-5 years
13 
19,028 
3,154 
33 
22,228 
8,316 
30,544 
12.7 
More than 5 years
30,803 
2,704 
16,686 
50,198 
15,634 
65,832 
27.4 
                   
 
12,894 
44,780 
132,371 
6,972 
16,780 
213,797 
26,311 
240,108 
100.0 
                   
31 December 2010
                 
Less than 1 year
17,320 
46,051 
30,589 
88 
94,048 
964 
95,012 
38.7 
1-3 years
702 
47,357 
1,078 
12 
49,149 
754 
49,903 
20.3 
3-5 years
12 
21,466 
1,294 
34 
22,806 
8,476 
31,282 
12.8 
More than 5 years
31,614 
1,728 
19,022 
52,369 
16,859 
69,228 
28.2 
                   
 
17,320 
46,770 
131,026 
4,100 
19,156 
218,372 
27,053 
245,425 
100.0 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk: Funding sources (continued)
 
Long-term debt issuances
The table below shows debt securities issued by the Group with an original maturity of one year or more. The Group also executes other long-term funding arrangements (predominately term repos) which are not reflected in the following tables.
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
Nine months ended
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
2011 
30 September 
2010 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 September 
2010 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
             
Public
           
  - unsecured
1,808 
6,254 
 
5,085 
12,112 
  - secured
1,721 
2,211 
5,286 
 
6,584 
6,316 
Private
           
  - unsecured
3,255 
3,997 
6,299 
 
11,503 
12,827 
             
Gross issuance
4,976 
8,016 
17,839 
 
23,172 
31,255 
 
The table below shows the original maturity of public long-term debt securities issued in the nine months ended 30 September 2011 and 2010.
 
 
 
2-3 years 
3-5years 
5-10 years 
> 10 years 
Total 
Nine months ended 30 September 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
           
MTNs
904 
1,407 
1,839 
935 
5,085 
Covered bonds
1,721 
2,652 
4,373 
Securitisations
2,211 
2,211 
           
 
904 
3,128 
4,491 
3,146 
11,669 
           
% of total
8% 
27% 
38% 
27% 
100% 
           
Nine months ended 30 September 2010
         
           
MTNs
1,445 
1,541 
6,393 
2,733 
12,112 
Covered bonds
1,030 
1,244 
2,274 
Securitisations
4,042 
4,042 
           
 
1,445 
2,571 
7,637 
6,775 
18,428 
           
% of total
8% 
14% 
41% 
37% 
100% 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk: Funding sources (continued)
 
Long-term debt issuance (continued)
The table below shows the currency breakdown of public and private long-term debt securities issued in the nine months ended 30 September 2011 and 2010.
 
 
 
GBP 
EUR 
USD 
AUD 
Other 
Total 
Nine months ended 30 September 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
             
Public
           
  - MTNs
1,808 
2,181 
1,096 
5,085 
  - covered bonds
4,373 
4,373 
  - securitisations
258 
1,293 
660 
2,211 
Private
2,193 
3,513 
2,996 
280 
2,521 
11,503 
             
 
2,451 
10,987 
5,837 
1,376 
2,521 
23,172 
             
% of total
11% 
47% 
25% 
6% 
11% 
100% 
             
Nine months ended 30 September 2010
           
             
Public
           
  - MTNs
1,260 
3,969 
5,131 
1,040 
712 
12,112 
  - covered bonds
2,274 
2,274 
  - securitisations
663 
1,629 
1,750 
4,042 
Private
1,926 
7,671 
1,683 
106 
1,441 
12,827 
             
 
3,849 
15,543 
8,564 
1,146 
2,153 
31,255 
             
% of total
12% 
50% 
27% 
4% 
7% 
100% 
 
Key points
 
·
Despite the difficult economic environment gross term issuances in Q3 2011 were £5.0 billion, including €2.0 billion of covered bonds issued publicly. The Group has executed £3.5 billion of securitisation transactions in October 2011, and continues to access markets as opportunities arise.
   
·
The Group has continued to diversify its funding mix with 47% of issuance denominated in euros, 25% in US dollars and 28% in other currencies.
   
·
The Group has already met its full year target for long-term debt issuance of £23 billion.


 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk (continued)
 
Liquidity portfolio
The table below shows the composition of the Group's liquidity portfolio.
 
 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Liquidity portfolio
£m 
£m 
£m 
       
Cash and balances at central banks
76,833 
59,010 
53,661 
Treasury bills
4,037 
8,600 
14,529 
Central and local government bonds (1)
     
  - AAA rated governments and US agencies
29,850 
47,999 
41,435 
  - AA- to AA+ rated governments (2)
18,077 
1,399 
3,744 
  - governments rated below AA
700 
836 
1,029 
  - local government
4,700 
4,881 
5,672 
       
 
53,327 
55,115 
51,880 
Unencumbered collateral (3)
     
  - AAA rated
24,186 
18,335 
17,836 
  - below AAA rated and other high quality assets
11,444 
13,493 
16,693 
       
 
35,630 
31,828 
34,529 
       
Total liquidity portfolio
169,827 
154,553 
154,599 
 
Notes:
 
(1)
Includes FSA eligible government bonds of £36.8 billion at 30 September 2011 (30 June 2011 - £34.5 billion; 31 December 2010 - £34.7 billion).
(2)
Includes AAA rated US government guaranteed and US government sponsored agencies. The US government was downgraded from AAA to AA+ by S&P on 5 August 2011 and its debt securities carry a split credit rating; these securities are reflected here.
(3)
Includes secured assets eligible for discounting at central banks, comprising loans and advances and debt securities.
 
Key points
 
·
The Group's liquidity portfolio was £169.8 billion, an increase of £15.3 billion from 30 June 2011 and £15.2 billion from 31 December 2010, mainly due to an increase in cash at central banks. The Group strengthened its liquidity portfolio in response to the ongoing stress in global financial markets which worsened during Q3 2011.
   
·
The strategic target of £150 billion is unchanged.
   
·
The liquidity portfolio is actively managed and as such its composition varies over time in accordance with factors such as changing external market conditions. 


 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk (continued)
 
Net stable funding
The table below shows the Group's net stable funding ratio (NSFR) estimated by applying the Basel III guidance issued in December 2010; the Group is aiming to meet the minimum required NSFR of 100% over the longer term. This measure seeks to show the proportion of structural term assets which are funded by stable funding including customer deposits, long-term wholesale funding and equity. The Group's NSFR will continue to be refined over time in line with regulatory developments.
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
31 December 2010
   
   
ASF (1)
   
ASF (1)
   
ASF (1)
 
Weighting 
 
£bn 
£bn 
 
£bn 
£bn 
 
£bn 
£bn 
 
                     
Equity
79 
79 
 
76 
76 
 
77 
77 
 
100 
Wholesale funding > 1 year
125 
125 
 
138 
138 
 
154 
154 
 
100 
Wholesale funding < 1 year
174 
 
174 
 
157 
 
Derivatives
562 
 
388 
 
424 
 
Repurchase agreements
132 
 
124 
 
115 
 
Deposits
                   
  - Retail and SME - more stable
170 
153 
 
168 
151 
 
172 
155 
 
90 
  - Retail and SME - less stable
25 
20 
 
25 
20 
 
51 
41 
 
80 
  - Other
239 
120 
 
236 
118 
 
206 
103 
 
50 
Other (2)
102 
 
117 
 
98 
 
                     
Total liabilities and equity
1,608 
497 
 
1,446 
503 
 
1,454 
530 
   
                     
Cash
78 
 
64 
 
57 
 
Inter-bank lending
53 
 
53 
 
58 
 
Debt securities > 1 year
                   
  - central and local governments AAA
    to AA-
84 
 
87 
 
89 
 
  - other eligible bonds
75 
15 
 
85 
17 
 
75 
15 
 
20 
  - other bonds
17 
17 
 
19 
19 
 
10 
10 
 
100 
Debt securities < 1 year
54 
 
53 
 
43 
 
Derivatives
572 
 
395 
 
427 
 
Reverse repurchase agreements
102 
 
98 
 
95 
 
Customer loans and advances > 1 year
                   
  - residential mortgages
144 
94 
 
145 
94 
 
145 
94 
 
65 
  - other
176 
176 
 
182 
182 
 
211 
211 
 
100 
Customer loans and advances < 1 year
                   
  - retail loans
20 
17 
 
20 
17 
 
22 
19 
 
85 
  - other
146 
73 
 
143 
72 
 
125 
63 
 
50 
Other (3)
87 
87 
 
102 
102 
 
97 
97 
 
100 
                     
Total assets
1,608 
483 
 
1,446 
507 
 
1,454 
513 
   
                     
Undrawn commitments
245 
12 
 
250 
13 
 
267 
13 
 
                     
Total assets and undrawn commitments
1,853 
495 
 
1,696 
520 
 
1,721 
526 
   
                     
Net stable funding ratio
 
100% 
   
97% 
   
101% 
   
 
Notes:
 
(1)
Available stable funding.
(2)
Deferred tax, insurance liabilities and other liabilities.
(3)
Prepayments, accrued income, deferred tax and other assets.
 
Key point
 
·
The Group's net stable funding ratio improved to 100% during Q3 2011 from 97% mainly as a result of increased deposits and the reduction in GBM and Non-Core assets.

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk (continued)
 
Loan deposit ratio and funding gap
The table below shows quarterly trends in the loan to deposit ratio and customer funding gap. 
 
 
 
Loan to
deposit ratio (1)
 
Customer 
 funding gap 
 
Group 
Core 
 
Group 
 
 
£bn 
         
30 September 2011
112 
95 
 
52 
30 June 2011
114 
96 
 
61 
31 March 2011
115 
96 
 
66 
31 December 2010
117 
96 
 
74 
30 September 2010
126 
101 
 
107 
 
Note:
 
(1)
Loans are net of provisions.
 
Key points
 
·
The Group's loan to deposit ratio improved by 500 basis points to 112% in the nine months to 30 September 2011, including a 200 basis points improvement in Q3 2011. The customer funding gap narrowed by £22 billion in the nine months to 30 September 2011, including a £9 billion reduction in Q3 2011, primarily due to the reduction in Non-Core customer loans and an increase in customer deposits.
   
·
The loan to deposit ratio for the Group's Core business improved by 100 basis points during Q3 2011.
 

Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Balance sheet management: Funding and liquidity risk (continued)
 
Sensitivity of net interest income
The Group seeks to mitigate the effect of prospective interest rate movements which could reduce future net interest income through its management of interest rate risk in the Group's businesses, whilst balancing the cost of such activities on the current net revenue stream. Hedging activities also consider the impact on market value sensitivity under stress.
 
The following table shows the sensitivity of net interest income over the next twelve months to an immediate up and down 100 basis points change to all interest rates. In addition, the table includes the impact of a gradual 400 basis point steepening and a gradual 300 basis point flattening of the yield curve at tenors greater than a year.
 
 
30 September 
2011 
£m 
30 June 
2011 
£m 
     
+ 100bp shift in yield curves
188 
319 
- 100bp shift in yield curves
(74)
(141)
Bear steepener
487 
417 
Bull flattener
(248)
(309)
 
Key points
 
·
The Group's interest rate exposure remains slightly asset sensitive driven in part by changes to underlying business assumptions as rates rise. The impact of the steepening and flattening scenarios is largely driven by the investment of net free reserves.
   
·
The reported sensitivity will vary over time due to a number of factors such as changing market conditions and strategic changes to the balance sheet mix and should not therefore be considered predictive of future performance.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss due to the failure of customers or counterparties to meet payment obligations. The quantum and nature of credit risk assumed across the Group's different businesses varies considerably, while the overall credit risk outcome usually exhibits a high degree of correlation with the macroeconomic environment.
 
Loans and advances to customers by industry and geography
The table below shows loans and advances to customers excluding reverse repos and assets of disposal groups. All assets, including loans, of businesses held for disposal are included as one line on the balance sheet, as required by IFRS.
 
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
31 December 2010
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
Central and local government
8,097 
1,507 
9,604 
 
6,574 
1,507 
8,081 
 
6,781 
1,671 
8,452 
Finance
48,094 
4,884 
52,978 
 
47,545 
5,038 
52,583 
 
46,910 
7,651 
54,561 
Residential mortgages
143,941 
5,319 
149,260 
 
144,400 
5,509 
149,909 
 
140,359 
6,142 
146,501 
Personal lending
32,152 
2,810 
34,962 
 
32,224 
3,229 
35,453 
 
33,581 
3,891 
37,472 
Property
44,072 
40,628 
84,700 
 
44,539 
42,862 
87,401 
 
42,455 
47,651 
90,106 
Construction
7,992 
3,062 
11,054 
 
8,525 
3,070 
11,595 
 
8,680 
3,352 
12,032 
Manufacturing
24,816 
5,233 
30,049 
 
24,068 
6,293 
30,361 
 
25,797 
6,520 
32,317 
Service industries and
  business activities
                     
  - retail, wholesale and repairs
22,207 
2,427 
24,634 
 
22,123 
2,598 
24,721 
 
21,974 
3,191 
25,165 
  - transport and storage
16,236 
6,009 
22,245 
 
15,243 
6,449 
21,692 
 
15,946 
8,195 
24,141 
  - health, education and
    recreation
16,224 
1,515 
17,739 
 
16,707 
1,547 
18,254 
 
17,456 
1,865 
19,321 
  - hotels and restaurants
7,841 
1,358 
9,199 
 
8,028 
1,452 
9,480 
 
8,189 
1,492 
9,681 
  - utilities
8,212 
1,725 
9,937 
 
7,487 
2,010 
9,497 
 
7,098 
2,110 
9,208 
  - other
24,744 
4,479 
29,223 
 
25,128 
4,966 
30,094 
 
24,464 
5,530 
29,994 
Agriculture, forestry and
  fishing
3,767 
135 
3,902 
 
3,791 
123 
3,914 
 
3,758 
135 
3,893 
Finance leases and
  instalment credit
8,404 
7,467 
15,871 
 
8,353 
7,920 
16,273 
 
8,321 
8,529 
16,850 
Interest accruals
661 
152 
813 
 
715 
176 
891 
 
831 
278 
1,109 
                       
Gross loans
417,460 
88,710 
506,170 
 
415,450 
94,749 
510,199 
 
412,600 
108,203 
520,803 
Loan impairment provisions
(8,748)
(11,849)
(20,597)
 
(8,621)
(12,006)
(20,627)
 
(7,740)
(10,315)
(18,055)
                       
Net loans
408,712 
76,861 
485,573 
 
406,829 
82,743 
489,572 
 
404,860 
97,888 
502,748 
 
 
Key point
 
·
Gross loans decreased by £4.0 billion in Q3 2011, across most sectors, including £2.7 billion in property, £0.5 billion in construction, £0.3 billion in manufacturing, £0.3 billion in hotels and restaurants reflecting run-offs, continued de-risking as well as subdued credit demand.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: REIL
The table below analyses the Group's risk elements in lending (REIL) which do not take account of the value of any security held that could reduce the eventual loss should it occur, nor of any provisions. REIL is split into UK and overseas, based on the location of the lending office.
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
31 December 2010
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
Impaired loans (1)
                     
  - UK
9,222 
7,471 
16,693 
 
9,229 
7,812 
17,041 
 
8,575 
7,835 
16,410 
  - Overseas
6,695 
16,274 
22,969 
 
6,326 
16,268 
22,594 
 
4,936 
14,355 
19,291 
                       
 
15,917 
23,745 
39,662 
 
15,555 
24,080 
39,635 
 
13,511 
22,190 
35,701 
                       
Accruing loans past due
  90 days or more (2)
                     
  - UK
1,648 
580 
2,228 
 
1,487 
583 
2,070 
 
1,434 
939 
2,373 
  - Overseas
580 
256 
836 
 
415 
230 
645 
 
262 
262 
524 
                       
 
2,228 
836 
3,064 
 
1,902 
813 
2,715 
 
1,696 
1,201 
2,897 
                       
Total REIL
18,145 
24,581 
42,726 
 
17,457 
24,893 
42,350 
 
15,207 
23,391 
38,598 
                       
REIL as a % of gross
  loans and advances (3)
4.3% 
27.4% 
8.4% 
 
4.2% 
26.1% 
8.3% 
 
3.7% 
20.7% 
7.3% 
Provisions as a % of REIL
49% 
48% 
49% 
 
50% 
48% 
49% 
 
52% 
44% 
47% 
 
Notes:
 
(1)
All loans against which an impairment provision is held.
(2)
Loans where an impairment event has taken place but no impairment provision recognised. This category is used for fully collateralised non-revolving credit facilities.
(3)
Gross loans and advances to customers include assets of disposal groups and exclude repos.
 
Key points
 
·
REIL increased marginally by £0.4 billion in Q3 2011, driven by an increase in mortgage and corporate defaults in Core Ulster Bank. REIL increased by £4.1 billion in 2011 mainly due to an increase in commercial real estate REIL in the first half of 2011.
   
·
There were decreases in Retail & Commercial (from 49% to 48%) and GBM (from 66% to 57%) provision coverage ratios whilst Non-Core coverage ratio was broadly flat at 48% compared with the position at 30 June 2011. Group provision coverage ratio was unchanged at 49%.
   
·
REIL as a percentage of loans and advances now stands at 27.4% for Non-Core and 4.3% for Core, increasing from 26.1% and 4.2% respectively at 30 June 2011.
 
For sector, geography and divisional analysis of loans, REIL and impairments, refer to Appendix 3.

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: REIL (continued)
The table below details the movement in REIL for the nine months ended 30 September 2011.
 
 
 
Impaired loans
 
Other loans (1)
 
REIL
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
At 1 January 2011
13,511 
22,190 
35,701 
 
1,696 
1,201 
2,897 
 
15,207 
23,391 
38,598 
Intra-group transfers
300 
(300)
 
81 
(81)
 
381 
(381)
Currency translation and
  other adjustments
165 
462 
627 
 
14 
12 
26 
 
179 
474 
653 
Additions
4,249 
5,383 
9,632 
 
1,362 
577 
1,939 
 
5,611 
5,960 
11,571 
Transfers
403 
284 
687 
 
(245)
(225)
(470)
 
158 
59 
217 
Disposals, repayments and
  restructurings
(2,055)
(3,027)
(5,082)
 
(1,006)
(671)
(1,677)
 
(3,061)
(3,698)
(6,759)
Amounts written-off
(1,018)
(912)
(1,930)
 
 
(1,018)
(912)
(1,930)
                       
At 30 June 2011
15,555 
24,080 
39,635 
 
1,902 
813 
2,715 
 
17,457 
24,893 
42,350 
Currency translation and
  other adjustments
(165)
(629)
(794)
 
(19)
(15)
(34)
 
(184)
(644)
(828)
Additions
2,012 
1,527 
3,539 
 
781 
250 
1,031 
 
2,793 
1,777 
4,570 
Transfers
(3)
28 
25 
 
28 
(10)
18 
 
25 
18 
43 
Disposals, repayments and
  restructurings
(889)
(764)
(1,653)
 
(464)
(202)
(666)
 
(1,353)
(966)
(2,319)
Amounts written-off
(593)
(497)
(1,090)
 
 
(593)
(497)
(1,090)
                       
At 30 September 2011
15,917 
23,745 
39,662 
 
2,228 
836 
3,064 
 
18,145 
24,581 
42,726 
 
 
 
Impaired loans
 
Other loans (1)
 
REIL
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
At 1 January 2011
13,511 
22,190 
35,701 
 
1,696 
1,201 
2,897 
 
15,207 
23,391 
38,598 
Intra-group transfers
300 
(300)
 
81 
(81)
 
381 
(381)
Currency translation and
  other adjustments
(167)
(167)
 
(5)
(3)
(8)
 
(5)
(170)
(175)
Additions
6,261 
6,910 
13,171 
 
2,143 
827 
2,970 
 
8,404 
7,737 
16,141 
Transfers
400 
312 
712 
 
(217)
(235)
(452)
 
183 
77 
260 
Disposals, repayments and
  restructurings
(2,944)
(3,791)
(6,735)
 
(1,470)
(873)
(2,343)
 
(4,414)
(4,664)
(9,078)
Amounts written-off
(1,611)
(1,409)
(3,020)
 
 
(1,611)
(1,409)
(3,020)
                       
At 30 September 2011
15,917 
23,745 
39,662 
 
2,228 
836 
3,064 
 
18,145 
24,581 
42,726 
 
Note:
 
(1)
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more (also see page 112).
 
Key point
 
·
Disposals and restructurings include £1,685 million of transfers to the performing book in the nine months ended September 2011 including £120 million in Q3 2011.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Impairment provisions
 
Movement in loan impairment provisions
The following tables show the movement in impairment provisions for loans and advances to banks and customers.
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
30 September 2010
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
RFS MI 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                         
At beginning of period
8,752 
12,007 
20,759 
 
8,416 
10,842 
19,258 
 
7,633 
8,533 
16,166 
Transfers to disposal groups
 
 
Intra-group transfers
 
 
(351)
351 
Currency translation and
  other adjustments
(90)
(285)
(375)
 
33 
145 
178 
 
116 
175 
291 
Disposals
 
11 
11 
 
Amounts written-off
(593)
(497)
(1,090)
 
(504)
(474)
(978)
 
(416)
(329)
(745)
Recoveries of amounts
  previously written-off
39 
55 
94 
 
41 
126 
167 
 
80 
85 
165 
Charge to income statement
                       
  - continued
817 
635 
1,452 
 
810 
1,427 
2,237 
 
779 
1,129 
1,908 
  - discontinued
 
(11)
(11)
 
Unwind of discount
(52)
(65)
(117)
 
(44)
(68)
(112)
 
(50)
(65)
(115)
                         
At end of period
8,873 
11,850 
20,723 
 
8,752 
12,007 
20,759 
 
7,791 
9,879 
17,670 
 
 
 
Nine months ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 September 2010
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
RFS MI 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
RFS MI 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
At beginning of period
7,866 
10,316 
18,182 
 
6,921 
8,252 
2,110 
17,283 
Transfers to disposal groups
 
(67)
(67)
Intra-group transfers
177 
(177)
 
(351)
351 
Currency translation and
  other adjustments
(1)
(45)
(46)
 
(163)
294 
131 
Disposals
11 
11 
 
(17)
(2,149)
(2,166)
Amounts written-off
(1,611)
(1,409)
(3,020)
 
(1,479)
(3,047)
(4,526)
Recoveries of amounts
  previously written-off
119 
261 
380 
 
184 
131 
315 
Charge to income statement
                 
  - continued
2,479 
3,108 
5,587 
 
2,825 
4,164 
6,989 
  - discontinued
(11)
(11)
 
39 
39 
Unwind of discount
(156)
(204)
(360)
 
(146)
(182)
(328)
                   
At end of period
8,873 
11,850 
20,723 
 
7,791 
9,879 
17,670 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Impairment provisions (continued)
 
Movement in loan impairment provisions (continued)
 
Key points
 
·
Overall the Q3 2011 impairment charge of £1.5 billion was £0.8 billion or 35% lower than the Q2 2011 charge as the latter reflected the impact of the re-assessment of Ulster Bank's Non-Core development land collateral values.
   
·
The year-to-date charge for 2011 of £5.6 billion was £1.5 billion lower than 2010, with reductions in both Core (£0.3 billion) and Non-Core (£1.1 billion).
   
·
The Group impairment charge as a percentage of loans and advances was 20 basis points lower at 1.5% in 2011 compared with 2010.
   
·
The loan impairment provision was broadly unchanged at £20.7 billion.
 
The following table analyses impairment provisions in respect of loans and advances to banks and customers.
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
31 December 2010
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
Latent loss
1,516 
751 
2,267 
 
1,568 
786 
2,354 
 
1,653 
997 
2,650 
Collectively assessed
4,675 
1,114 
5,789 
 
4,510 
1,100 
5,610 
 
4,139 
1,157 
5,296 
Individually assessed
2,557 
9,984 
12,541 
 
2,543 
10,120 
12,663 
 
1,948 
8,161 
10,109 
                       
Customer loans
8,748 
11,849 
20,597 
 
8,621 
12,006 
20,627 
 
7,740 
10,315 
18,055 
Bank loans
125 
126 
 
131 
132 
 
126 
127 
                       
Total provisions
8,873 
11,850 
20,723 
 
8,752 
12,007 
20,759 
 
7,866 
10,316 
18,182 
                       
% of loans (1)
2.1% 
13.2% 
4.1% 
 
2.1% 
12.6% 
4.0% 
 
1.9% 
9.1% 
3.4% 
 
Note:
 
(1)
Customer provisions as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers including assets of disposal groups and excluding reverse repos.
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Impairment charge
The following table analyses the impairment charge for loans and securities.
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
30 September 2010
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non- 
Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
Latent loss
(33)
(27)
(60)
 
(16)
(172)
(188)
 
132 
(92)
40 
Collectively assessed
548 
141 
689 
 
465 
126 
591 
 
450 
298 
748 
Individually assessed
302 
521 
823 
 
361 
1,473 
1,834 
 
197 
923 
1,120 
                       
Customer loans
817 
635 
1,452 
 
810 
1,427 
2,237 
 
779 
1,129 
1,908 
Securities - sovereign debt
  impairment and related
  interest rate hedge
  adjustments
202 
202 
 
842 
842 
 
Securities - other
37 
47 
84 
 
43 
(16)
27 
 
42 
45 
                       
Charge to income
  statement
1,056 
682 
1,738 
 
1,695 
1,411 
3,106 
 
782 
1,171 
1,953 
                       
Charge relating to customer
  loans as a % of gross
  customer loans (1)
0.8% 
2.8% 
1.1% 
 
0.8% 
6.0% 
1.8% 
 
0.7% 
3.9% 
1.4% 
 
 
 
Nine months ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 September 2010
 
Core 
Non-Core 
Total 
 
Core 
Non-Core 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
               
Latent loss
(165)
(190)
(355)
 
63 
(68)
(5)
Collectively assessed
1,597 
403 
2,000 
 
1,699 
642 
2,341 
Individually assessed
1,047 
2,895 
3,942 
 
1,063 
3,590 
4,653 
               
Customer loans
2,479 
3,108 
5,587 
 
2,825 
4,164 
6,989 
Securities - sovereign debt impairment and
  related interest rate hedge adjustments
1,044 
1,044 
 
Securities - other
100 
60 
160 
 
25 
101 
126 
               
Charge to income statement
3,623 
3,168 
6,791 
 
2,850 
4,265 
7,115 
               
Charge relating to customer loans as a %
  of gross customer loans (1)
0.8% 
4.6% 
1.5% 
 
0.9% 
4.7% 
1.7% 
 
Note:
 
(1)
Customer loan impairment charge as a percentage of gross loans and advances to customers including assets of disposal groups and excluding reverse repos.
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Impairment charge (continued)
 
Key points
 
·
The £60 million latent loss release in Q3 2011 reflects improving trends in US Retail & Commercial performing book metrics (Core and Non-Core).
   
·
Collectively assessed impairments increased primarily within US Retail & Commercial's home equity and corporate portfolios as well as in Ulster Bank, the latter driven by deteriorating mortgage credit metrics.
   
·
The £1.0 billion decrease in individually assessed impairments in Q3 2011 principally reflects higher impairments booked in Q2 2011 relating to Ulster Bank's development land portfolio in Non-Core.
   
·
Sovereign debt impairments in Q3 2011 reflect further declines in the market value of AFS Greek sovereign bonds.
 
Debt securities
The table below analyses debt securities by issuer and measurement classification. The categorisation of debt securities has been revised to include asset-backed securities (ABS) by class of issuer. The main changes are to US Central and local government which now includes US federal agencies and Financial institutions which now includes US government sponsored agencies and securitisation entities. 2010 data are presented on the revised basis.
 
 
 
Central and local government
Banks 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Total 
Of which 
ABS 
UK 
US 
Other 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                 
30 September 2011
               
Held-for-trading (HFT)
8,434 
20,120 
47,621 
4,216 
27,511 
4,666 
112,568 
24,123 
Designated as at fair value
140 
10 
162 
Available-for-sale
13,328 
20,032 
28,976 
17,268 
28,463 
2,334 
110,401 
41,091 
Loans and receivables
10 
274 
5,764 
478 
6,526 
5,447 
                 
 
21,773 
40,152 
76,737 
21,762 
61,745 
7,488 
229,657 
70,662 
                 
Of which US agencies
5,311 
27,931 
33,242 
30,272 
                 
Short positions (HFT)
(2,896)
(12,763)
(21,484)
(2,043)
(4,437)
(1,680)
(45,303)
(895)
                 
Available-for-sale
               
Gross unrealised gains
1,090 
1,240 
1,331 
310 
1,117 
81 
5,169 
1,242 
Gross unrealised losses
(989)
(1,039)
(2,371)
(24)
(4,423)
(3,114)


 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Debt securities (continued)
 
 
 
Central and local government
Banks 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Total 
Of which 
ABS 
UK 
US 
Other 
31 December 2010
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                 
Held-for-trading
5,097 
15,648 
42,828 
5,486 
23,711 
6,099 
98,869 
21,988 
Designated as at fair value
117 
262 
10 
402 
119 
Available-for-sale
8,377 
22,244 
32,865 
16,982 
29,148 
1,514 
111,130 
42,515 
Loans and receivables
11 
6,686 
381 
7,079 
6,203 
                 
 
13,486 
38,009 
75,955 
22,473 
59,553 
8,004 
217,480 
70,825 
                 
Of which US agencies
6,811 
21,686 
28,497 
25,375 
                 
Short positions (HFT)
(4,200)
(10,943)
(18,913)
(1,844)
(3,356)
(1,761)
(41,017)
(1,335)
                 
Available-for-sale
               
Gross unrealised gains
349 
525 
700 
143 
827 
51 
2,595 
1,057 
Gross unrealised losses
(10)
(2)
(618)
(786)
(2,626)
(55)
(4,097)
(3,396)
 
Key points
 
·
Held-for-trading bonds increased by £13.7 billion of which £12.6 billion relates to government bonds (principally G10).
   
·
Whilst the Group's AFS portfolio decreased by £0.7 billion, UK government bonds increased by £5.0 billion, principally in the Group's liquidity portfolio.
 
The table below analyses debt securities by issuer and external ratings; ratings are based on the lowest of S&P, Moody's and Fitch.
 
 
 
Central and local  government
Banks 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Total 
% of 
total 
Of which 
ABS 
UK 
US 
Other 
30 September 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
AAA
21,773 
27 
43,712 
9,363 
14,120 
553 
89,548 
39 
18,771 
AA to AA+
40,094 
4,247 
4,279 
31,785 
661 
81,066 
35 
35,954 
A to AA-
25,043 
5,087 
4,783 
1,894 
36,816 
16 
5,670 
BBB- to A-
2,460 
2,032 
3,873 
2,104 
10,469 
4,431 
Non-investment grade
1,242 
709 
5,242 
1,778 
8,971 
4,619 
Unrated
22 
33 
292 
1,942 
498 
2,787 
1,217 
                   
 
21,773 
40,152 
76,737 
21,762 
61,745 
7,488 
229,657 
100 
70,662 
                   
31 December 2010
                 
                   
AAA
13,486 
38,009 
44,123 
10,704 
39,388 
878 
146,588 
67 
51,235 
AA to AA+
18,025 
3,511 
6,023 
616 
28,175 
13 
6,335 
A to AA-
9,138 
4,926 
2,656 
1,155 
17,875 
3,244 
BBB- to A-
2,845 
1,324 
3,412 
2,005 
9,586 
3,385 
Non-investment grade
1,770 
1,528 
5,522 
2,425 
11,245 
4,923 
Unrated
54 
480 
2,552 
925 
4,011 
1,703 
                   
 
13,486 
38,009 
75,955 
22,473 
59,553 
8,004 
217,480 
100 
70,825 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Debt securities (continued)
 
Key points
 
·
The decrease in AAA rated debt securities relates to the downgrading of US government and agencies to AA+ by S&P in August 2011.
   
·
The proportion of debt securities rated A to AA- increased to 16%, principally reflecting the Japanese government downgrade in January 2011.
   
·
Non-investment grade and unrated debt securities now account for 5% of the debt securities portfolio down from 7% at the start of the year.
 
Asset-backed securities
 
 
 
RMBS (1)
         
 
Government 
sponsored 
or similar (2)
Prime 
Non- 
conforming 
Sub- 
prime 
MBS 
covered 
bond 
 
CMBS (3)
CDOs (4)
CLOs (5)
Other 
ABS (6)
Total 
30 September 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                     
AAA
4,391 
4,152 
1,509 
144 
3,462 
893 
194 
2,198 
1,828 
18,771 
AA to AA+
31,037 
117 
111 
97 
1,162 
839 
125 
1,496 
970 
35,954 
A to AA-
137 
603 
124 
175 
1,680 
1,326 
166 
569 
890 
5,670 
BBB- to A-
147 
295 
59 
1,553 
383 
92 
601 
1,301 
4,431 
Non-investment grade
768 
676 
486 
327 
1,516 
170 
676 
4,619 
Unrated
146 
47 
213 
67 
134 
331 
279 
1,217 
                     
 
35,565 
5,933 
2,762 
1,174 
7,857 
3,835 
2,227 
5,365 
5,944 
70,662 
                     
Of which in Non-Core
269 
463 
276 
1,158 
1,953 
4,698 
1,976 
10,793 
                     
31 December 2010
                   
                     
AAA
28,835 
4,355 
1,754 
317 
7,107 
2,789 
444 
2,490 
3,144 
51,235 
AA to AA+
1,529 
147 
144 
116 
357 
392 
567 
1,786 
1,297 
6,335 
A to AA-
67 
60 
212 
408 
973 
296 
343 
885 
3,244 
BBB- to A-
82 
316 
39 
500 
203 
527 
1,718 
3,385 
Non-investment grade
900 
809 
458 
296 
1,863 
332 
265 
4,923 
Unrated
196 
52 
76 
85 
596 
698 
1,703 
                     
 
30,364 
5,747 
3,135 
1,218 
7,872 
4,950 
3,458 
6,074 
8,007 
70,825 
 
Notes:
 
(1)
Residential mortgage-backed securities.
(2)
Includes US agency and Dutch government guaranteed securities.
(3)
Commercial mortgage-backed securities.
(4)
Collateralised debt obligations.
(5)
Collateralised loan obligations.
(6)
Other ABS includes £1.4 billion (31 December 2010 - £1.9 billion) of covered bonds.
 
For analyses of ABS by geography and measurement classification, refer to Appendix 3.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Available-for-sale debt securities and reserves
The table below analyses available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities by issuer and related AFS reserves, gross and net of tax, for countries exceeding £0.5 billion, together with the total in aggregate of those individually less than £0.5 billion.
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
31 December 2010
 
Central 
and local 
government 
Banks 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Total 
Of which 
ABS 
AFS 
 reserves 
(gross)
 
Central 
and local 
government 
Banks 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Total 
Of which 
ABS 
AFS 
 reserves 
(gross)
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                               
US
20,032 
394 
16,710 
169 
37,305 
19,907 
523 
 
22,244 
704 
15,973 
65 
38,986 
20,872 
(304)
UK
13,328 
4,053 
996 
891 
19,268 
3,830 
589 
 
8,377 
4,297 
1,662 
438 
14,774 
4,002 
158 
Germany
11,084 
1,518 
109 
99 
12,810 
1,083 
416 
 
10,648 
1,291 
386 
219 
12,544 
1,360 
(39)
Netherlands
2,749 
1,357 
6,163 
201 
10,470 
6,892 
(8)
 
3,469 
984 
6,238 
264 
10,955 
6,773 
(164)
Spain
81 
5,131 
1,632 
6,852 
6,724 
(1,408)
 
88 
5,264 
1,657 
7,018 
6,773 
(1,277)
France
4,605 
988 
561 
247 
6,401 
639 
52 
 
5,912 
774 
630 
71 
7,387 
575 
19 
Japan
3,575 
3,581 
 
4,354 
80 
4,436 
Australia
1,834 
262 
289 
2,385 
495 
(17)
 
1,659 
320 
93 
2,072 
486 
(33)
MDBs (1)
1,112 
1,112 
37 
 
912 
912 
30 
Italy
852 
168 
55 
1,081 
221 
(215)
 
906 
198 
54 
15 
1,173 
243 
(115)
Singapore
732 
180 
20 
932 
 
649 
189 
20 
858 
Belgium
771 
39 
813 
34 
(91)
 
763 
39 
803 
34 
(53)
India
627 
176 
803 
(6)
 
548 
139 
687 
Hong Kong
641 
641 
 
905 
913 
Denmark
433 
183 
616 
 
629 
172 
801 
Austria
296 
61 
105 
140 
602 
156 
(40)
 
274 
67 
131 
476 
51 
(26)
Sweden
39 
379 
141 
26 
585 
250 
 
30 
288 
131 
15 
464 
269 
Switzerland
323 
228 
558 
 
657 
148 
813 
11 
Greece
532 
532 
 
895 
895 
(694)
Republic of
  Ireland
115 
176 
91 
383 
151 
(83)
 
104 
435 
62 
88 
689 
177 
(99)
South Korea
138 
86 
224 
86 
 
261 
429 
690 
429 
(1)
< £0.5bn
1,383 
403 
510 
151 
2,447 
623 
(142)
 
1,773 
326 
590 
95 
2,784 
471 
(123)
                               
 
62,336 
17,268 
28,463 
2,334 
110,401 
41,091 
(390)
 
63,486 
16,982 
29,148 
1,514 
111,130 
42,515 
(2,705)
                               
Tax on AFS reserves
         
11 
             
644 
 
                               
AFS reserves net of tax
         
(379)
             
(2,061)
 
 
 
(1)
Represents multilateral development banks and other supranational organisations.
 

 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)
 
Risk management: Credit risk: Derivatives
The Group's derivative assets by internal grading scale and residual maturity are analysed below. Master netting arrangements in respect of mark-to-market (mtm) positions and collateral shown below do not result in a net presentation in the Group's balance sheet under IFRS.
 
 
   
30 September 2011
30 June 
2011 
Total 
31 December 
2010 
Total 
Asset
quality
Probability
of default range
0-3 
months 
3-6 
months 
6-12 
months 
1-5 
years 
Over 5 
years 
Total 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
AQ1
0% - 0.034%
41,121 
13,820 
19,858 
137,585 
304,713 
517,097 
357,031 
408,489 
AQ2
0.034% - 0.048%
591 
116 
347 
2,016 
4,195 
7,265 
5,600 
2,659 
AQ3
0.048% - 0.095%
2,618 
525 
939 
3,609 
6,832 
14,523 
10,908 
3,317 
AQ4
0.095% - 0.381%
1,135 
399 
828 
3,373 
4,670 
10,405 
6,624 
3,391 
AQ5
0.381% - 1.076%
4,469 
173 
341 
2,707 
6,019 
13,709 
6,933 
4,860 
AQ6
1.076% - 2.153%
282 
65 
78 
929 
1,117 
2,471 
3,595 
1,070 
AQ7
2.153% - 6.089%
327 
134 
93 
670 
2,144 
3,368 
2,072 
857 
AQ8
6.089% - 17.222%
11 
30 
160 
970 
1,174 
654 
403 
AQ9
17.222% - 100%
10 
12 
19 
402 
697 
1,140 
486 
450 
AQ10
100%
26 
11 
48 
713 
394 
1,192 
969 
1,581 
                   
   
50,582 
15,266 
22,581 
152,164 
331,751 
572,344 
394,872 
427,077 
Counterparty mtm netting
         
(473,256)
(323,455)
(330,397)
Cash collateral held against derivative exposures
     
(38,202)
(27,500)
(31,096)
                   
Net exposure
         
60,886 
43,917 
65,584 
                       
 
At 30 September 2011, the Group also held collateral in the form of securities of £5.5 billion (30 June 2011 - £4.2 billion; 31 December 2010 - £2.9 billion) against derivative positions.
 
The table below analyses the fair value of the Group's derivatives by type of contract.
 
 
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
31 December 2010
 
Assets 
Liabilities 
 
Assets 
Liabilities 
 
Assets 
Liabilities 
Contract type
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
                 
Interest rate contracts
424,130 
407,814 
 
283,966 
269,638 
 
311,731 
299,209 
Exchange rate contracts
107,024 
112,184 
 
72,682 
78,095 
 
83,253 
89,375 
Credit derivatives
33,884 
31,574 
 
32,507 
30,877 
 
26,872 
25,344 
Equity and commodity contracts
7,306 
10,218 
 
5,717 
9,199 
 
5,221 
10,039 
                 
 
572,344 
561,790 
 
394,872 
387,809 
 
427,077 
423,967 
 
Key points
 
30 September 2011 compared with 30 June 2011
 
·
Net exposure, after taking account of position and collateral netting arrangements, increased significantly (up 39%) due to higher derivative fair values (see below) primarily reflecting economic uncertainty and the eurozone crisis.
   
·
Continued reductions in interest rates and the depreciation of sterling against the US dollar resulted in an increase in fair values of interest rate contracts. This was partially offset by the effect of the appreciation of sterling against the euro.  All major five and ten year interest rate indices (sterling, euro, and the US dollar), moved down, decreasing by approximately 74 to 84 and 90 to 116 basis points respectively.

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Derivatives (continued)
 
Key points (continued)
 
30 September 2011 compared with 30 June 2011 (continued)
 
·
Exchange rate contracts increased due to increased volume, trading fluctuations and the depreciation of sterling against the US dollar, as the majority of exchange rate contracts are US dollar denominated.
   
·
Credit derivative fair values increased due to widening credit spreads.
 
30 September 2011 compared with 31 December 2010
 
·
Net exposure, after taking account of position and collateral netting arrangements, reduced by 7%, despite an increase in derivative carrying values primarily due to increased use of netting arrangements.
   
·
Interest rate contracts increased due to continued reductions in interest rate yields.  This was partially offset by the effect of marginal appreciation of sterling against the US dollar and the euro.
   
·
Exchange rate contracts increased due to trading fluctuations and movements in forward rates and volume.
   
·
Credit derivative fair values increased due to widening credit spreads.


 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Derivatives (continued)
The Group's exposures to monolines and CDPCs by credit rating are summarised below, ratings are based on the lower of S&P and Moody's. All of these exposures are held within Non-Core.
 
Exposures to monoline insurers
 
 
 
Notional: 
 protected 
 assets 
Fair value: 
reference 
 protected 
assets 
Gross 
 exposure 
Credit 
valuation 
adjustment 
(CVA)
Hedges 
Net 
 exposure 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
             
30 September 2011
           
A to AA-
5,411 
4,735 
676 
259 
417 
Non-investment grade
7,098 
3,684 
3,414 
2,568 
70 
776 
             
 
12,509 
8,419 
4,090 
2,827 
70 
1,193 
             
Of which:
           
CMBS
3,954 
1,879 
2,075 
1,599 
   
CDOs
988 
156 
832 
619 
   
CLOs
4,806 
4,348 
458 
183 
   
Other ABS
2,275 
1,758 
517 
309 
   
Other
486 
278 
208 
117 
   
             
 
12,509 
8,419 
4,090 
2,827 
   
             
30 June 2011
           
A to AA-
5,547 
4,936 
611 
166 
445 
Non-investment grade
7,079 
4,047 
3,032 
2,155 
68 
809 
             
 
12,626 
8,983 
3,643 
2,321 
68 
1,254 
             
Of which:
           
CMBS
3,853 
2,131 
1,722 
1,285 
   
CDOs
1,086 
230 
856 
596 
   
CLOs
4,946 
4,561 
385 
107 
   
Other ABS
2,241 
1,739 
502 
250 
   
Other
500 
322 
178 
83 
   
             
 
12,626 
8,983 
3,643 
2,321 
   
             
31 December 2010
           
A to AA-
6,336 
5,503 
833 
272 
561 
Non-investment grade
8,555 
5,365 
3,190 
2,171 
71 
948 
             
 
14,891 
10,868 
4,023 
2,443 
71 
1,509 
             
Of which:
           
CMBS
4,149 
2,424 
1,725 
1,253 
   
CDOs
1,133 
256 
877 
593 
   
CLOs
6,724 
6,121 
603 
210 
   
Other ABS
2,393 
1,779 
614 
294 
   
Other
492 
288 
204 
93 
   
             
 
14,891 
10,868 
4,023 
2,443 
   
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Derivatives (continued)
 
Exposure to monoline insurers (continued)
 
Key points
 
30 September 2011 compared with 30 June 2011
 
·
The gross exposure, principally to monolines, increased reflecting the effect of credit spread on  the underlying reference instruments and strengthening of the US dollar against sterling.
   
·
The increased CVA reflected the increase in exposure and the widened credit spreads of monoline insurers.
 
30 September 2011 compared with 31 December 2010
 
·
The increase in monoline CVA on a year-to-date basis was primarily attributable to wider monoline credit spreads.
 
Exposure to CPDCs
 
 
Notional: 
protected 
 assets 
Fair value: 
reference 
protected 
assets 
Gross 
exposure 
Credit 
valuation 
adjustment 
Net 
exposure 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
           
30 September 2011
         
AAA
211 
209 
   A to AA-
640 
614 
26 
15 
11 
Non-investment grade
19,294 
17,507 
1,787 
902 
885 
Unrated
3,985 
3,552 
433 
316 
117 
           
 
24,130 
21,882 
2,248 
1,233 
1,015 
           
   30 June 2011
         
   AAA
205 
205 
   A to AA-
622 
607 
15 
11 
   Non-investment grade
19,724 
18,759 
965 
427 
538 
   Unrated
3,927 
3,712 
215 
101 
114 
           
 
24,478 
23,283 
1,195 
532 
663 
           
31 December 2010
         
AAA
213 
212 
   A to AA-
644 
629 
15 
11 
Non-investment grade
20,066 
19,050 
1,016 
401 
615 
Unrated
4,165 
3,953 
212 
85 
127 
           
 
25,088 
23,844 
1,244 
490 
754 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Derivatives (continued)
 
Exposure to CPDCs (continued)
 
Key points
 
30 September 2011 compared with 30 June 2011
 
·
The increase in gross exposure to CDPCs was mainly driven by wider credit spreads of the underlying reference loans and bonds coupled with the increase in the relative value of senior tranches.
   
·
CVA as a percentage of gross exposures increased from 45% to 55% principally reflecting higher CVA on certain CDPCs due to increased risks in the portfolio.
 
30 September 2011 compared with 31 December 2010
 
·
The year-to-date increase in the gross exposure to CDPCs mainly in Q3 2011, resulted from wider credit spreads of the underlying reference loans and bonds coupled with the increase in the relative value of senior tranches.
   
·
CVA as a percentage of gross exposures increased from 39% to 55%, as noted above.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk
 
Background
All country exposures are covered by the Group's country risk framework. This framework includes active management of portfolios either when these have been identified as exhibiting signs of stress, using the Group's country risk watch list process, or when it is otherwise considered appropriate. Granular portfolio reviews are undertaken to align country risk profiles to the Group's country risk appetite in light of evolving economic and political developments. Accordingly, limit controls are tailored to the level of risk associated with each country.
 
Ongoing concern surrounding the most vulnerable eurozone economies has intensified the Group's vigilance and controls. This involves frequent, comprehensive and detailed reviews of exposures to each of these countries, including increased prudence in counterparty monitoring which has led to several divestments and exposure reductions. In addition to Greece, Portugal and Ireland, the Group has recently brought Italy and Spain under tighter controls, and country limits are being set in response to these countries' uncertain outlook.
 
Country events in North Africa and the Middle East, a tsunami plus nuclear disaster in Japan, and developments in the eurozone have placed crisis management on the daily agenda for country risk this year. Following on from sovereign related stress tests and a series of broad thematic reviews, a Group wide response plan has been prepared to position the Group against potential increased stress in the eurozone. The plan covers themes such as sovereign debt restructuring, various eurozone breakup scenarios and a re-examination of prospective financial sector support given ongoing public finance and political pressures.
 
The following tables show the Group's exposure to countries at 30 September 2011, where the on-balance sheet exposure to counterparties incorporated in the country exceeded £1 billion and where the country had an external rating of A+ or below from S&P, Moody's or Fitch, as well as selected other eurozone countries. The numbers are stated before taking into account the impact of mitigating action, such as collateral, insurance or guarantees that may have been taken to reduce or eliminate exposure to country risk events. Shipping related exposures are not included due to their multinational nature.
 
The following apply to the tables on pages 128 to 140:
 
Lending comprises loans and advances, gross of impairment provisions, to: central banks, including cash balances; other banks and financial institutions, incorporating overdraft and other short-term facilities; corporations, in large part loans and leases; and individuals, comprising mortgages, personal loans and credit card balances. Risk elements in lending (REIL) are included within lending and comprise impaired loans and loans where an impairment event has taken place.

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk (continued)
 
Background (continued)
Debt securities comprise securities classified as available-for-sale (AFS), loans and receivables (LAR), held-for-trading (HFT) and designated as at fair value through profit or loss (DFV). All debt securities other than LAR securities are carried at fair value; LAR debt securities are carried at amortised cost less impairment. HFT debt securities are presented net of short positions per country. Impairment losses and exchange differences relating to AFS debt securities, together with interest are recognised in the income statement; other changes in the fair value of AFS securities are reported within AFS reserves.
 
Derivatives comprise the marked-to-market (mtm) value of such contracts after the effect of enforceable netting agreements, but gross of collateral. Repos comprise the marked-to-market value of counterparty exposure arising from repo transactions net of collateral.
 
Off balance sheet amounts comprise the sum of contingent liabilities, including guarantees, and committed undrawn facilities.
 
Credit default swaps (CDS): Under a CDS contract the buyer is protected in the event of the default of the reference entity by the seller. Fair value or mtm value of CDS represents the carrying value on the balance sheet. The mtm value of CDSs is included within derivatives against the counterparty of the credit derivative, as opposed to the reference entity.
 

Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk (continued)
 
Summary
 
 
Lending
           
 
Central and 
 local 
 government 
Central 
 banks 
Other 
 banks 
 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Personal 
Total 
lending 
Of which
 
Debt 
securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
liabilities and 
commitments 
Core 
Non-Core 
30 September 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
Eurozone:
                             
Ireland
54 
2,235 
49 
542 
19,574 
19,606 
42,060 
31,549 
10,511 
 
900 
 
2,354 
 
3,340 
Spain
10 
554 
90 
6,599 
380 
7,636 
3,505 
4,131 
 
6,497 
 
2,521 
 
1,990 
Italy
               - 
76 
420 
472 
2,057 
25 
3,050 
1,437 
1,613 
 
1,180 
 
2,331 
 
3,168 
Greece
10 
32 
381 
14 
 445 
325 
120 
 
707 
 
335 
 
71 
Portugal
43 
                - 
57 
579 
684 
333 
351 
 
139 
 
443 
 
356 
Other
                             
  - Germany
               - 
15,483 
1,473 
334 
7,099 
166 
24,555 
18,832 
5,723 
 
17,434 
 
15,769 
 
7,752 
  - Netherlands
2,257 
7,393 
642 
1,896 
5,540 
21 
17,749 
15,003 
2,746 
 
11,729 
 
11,290 
 
14,536 
  - France
503 
56 
1,998 
695 
4,354 
79 
7,685 
5,218 
2,467 
 
11,125 
 
9,777 
 
11,303 
  - Luxembourg
               - 
27 
92 
1,087 
2,448 
3,657 
2,060 
1,597 
 
162 
 
3,663 
 
2,172 
  - Belgium
226 
13 
384 
399 
800 
20 
1,842 
1,273 
569 
 
920 
 
2,818 
 
1,435 
Rest of eurozone
120 
61 
115 
1,511 
26 
1,833 
1,494 
339 
 
1,152 
 
1,919 
 
1,362 
                               
Other selected countries
                           
                               
India
164 
1,382 
94 
3,295 
150 
5,085 
4,670 
415 
 
1,867 
 
194 
 
1,492 
China
23 
170 
2,226 
746 
55 
3,226 
3,033 
193 
 
444 
 
762 
 
1,365 
South Korea
39 
 1,024 
636 
1,703 
1,693 
10 
 
1,106 
 
589 
 
365 
Turkey
231 
27 
294 
55 
1,187 
15 
1,809 
1,330 
479 
 
386 
 
83 
 
498 
Russia
20 
986 
44 
852 
69 
1,971 
1,851 
120 
 
107 
 
93 
 
620 
Brazil
1,035 
273 
1,312 
1,201 
111 
 
659 
 
25 
 
172 
Romania
30 
174 
22 
15 
473 
410 
1,124 
13 
1,111 
 
302 
 
10 
 
161 
Mexico
207 
993 
1,201 
819 
382 
 
27 
 
127 
 
359 
Indonesia
77 
31 
288 
23 
311 
110 
840 
720 
120 
 
139 
 
365 
 
133 
Poland
37 
10 
635 
687 
639 
48 
 
294 
 
60 
 
709 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk (continued)
 
Summary(continued)
 
 
Lending
           
 
Central and 
 local 
 government 
Central 
 banks 
Other 
 banks 
 
Other 
financial 
institutions 
Corporate 
Personal 
Total 
lending 
Of which
 
Debt 
securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
liabilities and 
commitments 
Core 
Non-Core 
31 December 2010
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
Eurozone:
                             
Ireland
61 
2,119 
87 
813 
19,881 
20,228 
43,189 
32,432 
10,757 
 
1,323 
 
2,940 
 
4,311 
Spain
19 
166 
92 
6,962 
407 
7,651 
3,130 
4,521 
 
7,107 
 
2,047 
 
2,883 
Italy
45 
78 
668 
418 
2,483 
27 
3,719 
1,818 
1,901 
 
3,836 
 
2,030 
 
3,853 
Greece
14 
36 
18 
31 
188 
16 
303 
173 
130 
 
974 
 
203 
 
162 
Portugal
86 
63 
611 
766 
450 
316 
 
242 
 
393 
 
734 
Other
                             
  - Germany
10,894 
1,060 
422 
7,423 
162 
19,961 
13,586 
6,375 
 
14,747 
 
15,263 
 
8,904 
  - Netherlands
914 
6,484 
554 
1,801 
6,161 
81 
15,995 
12,792 
3,203 
 
12,523 
 
9,035 
 
17,914 
  - France
511 
1,095 
470 
4,376 
102 
6,557 
3,769 
2,788 
 
14,041 
 
8,606 
 
11,640 
  - Luxembourg
25 
26 
734 
2,503 
3,291 
1,773 
1,518 
 
378 
 
2,545 
 
2,383 
  - Belgium
102 
14 
441 
32 
893 
327 
1,809 
1,307 
502 
 
803 
 
2,207 
 
1,492 
Rest of eurozone
124 
142 
119 
1,503 
24 
1,913 
1,581 
332 
 
535 
 
1,351 
 
2,018 
                               
Other selected countries
                           
                               
India
1,307 
307 
2,590 
273 
4,477 
3,824 
653 
 
1,686 
 
177 
 
1,239 
China
17 
298 
1,223 
16 
753 
64 
2,371 
2,135 
236 
 
573 
 
251 
 
1,589 
South Korea
276 
1,033 
555 
1,871 
1,821 
50 
 
1,353 
 
457 
 
688 
Turkey
282 
68 
448 
37 
1,365 
12 
2,212 
1,520 
692 
 
550 
 
103 
 
686 
Russia
110 
244 
1,181 
58 
1,600 
1,475 
125 
 
124 
 
51 
 
596 
Brazil
825 
315 
1,145 
1,025 
120 
 
687 
 
15 
 
190 
Romania
36 
178 
21 
21 
426 
446 
1,128 
1,121 
 
310 
 
 
319 
Mexico
149 
999 
1,157 
854 
303 
 
144 
 
122 
 
840 
Indonesia
84 
42 
242 
19 
294 
131 
812 
658 
154 
 
356 
 
249 
 
249 
Poland
168 
655 
843 
735 
108 
 
271 
 
69 
 
1,020 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk (continued)
 
External risk environment
So far 2011 has seen heightened country risks, which have intensified in the past quarter. However, trends have been divergent. Conditions have deteriorated among vulnerable eurozone countries facing growth impediments and higher public debt burdens, with market risks rising sharply in the past quarter. Many emerging markets have continued to enjoy relative stability, seeing net inflows of capital and lower spreads despite the impact of higher risk aversion in Q3 2011. In the US, notwithstanding a sovereign downgrade from a rating agency, a deal was secured to increase the sovereign debt ceiling, and yields on government debt remain low.
 
Europe has been at the centre of rising global risks, owing to a combination of slower growth among some of its major economies and a further deepening of the ongoing sovereign crisis which has in turn, increasingly harmed financial sector health. Risks in Greece have risen as a deeper than expected contraction in GDP has adversely affected the fiscal adjustment programme and hit debt sustainability. Some private sector creditors have proposed a burden sharing agreement to reduce debt repayments somewhat, but market prices of sovereign debt have implied investor expectations of a broader debt restructuring and concerns over contagion have risen sharply.
 
Despite the announcement of significant new support proposals by eurozone leaders in July, investor worries over risks to their implementation rose and market conditions worsened markedly through Q3 2011 as a result. Risk aversion towards Spanish and Italian assets picked up and despite a policy response by both countries, yields remained elevated, prompting the European Central Bank (ECB) to intervene to support their bonds in secondary markets for the first time. Contagion affected bank stocks and asset prices. At the International Monetary Fund (IMF) annual meetings in September, eurozone leaders agreed to enhance anti-crisis measures. Some steps, including boosting the resources of the European Financial Stability Facility and a proposed 50% voluntary haircut by private sector investors holding Greek debt, were taken at two key summits in October, but implementation risks remain high. Within a week of the summit, Greece proposed a referendum on its commitments under the deal, resulting in renewed concerns over the possibility of a more comprehensive restructuring.
 
Meanwhile, Portugal's new government has continued to remain on track with implementation of the European Union - International Monetary Fund (EU-IMF) deal agreed in May after a sharp deterioration in sovereign liquidity. Ireland's performance under its EU-IMF programme has been good and the announcement of a bank restructuring deal without defaults on senior debt obligations has helped improve market confidence. This was reflected in a compression in bond spreads in Q3 2011.
 
Emerging markets have meanwhile continued to perform relatively well. In Asia, despite growth slowing, China and India have continued to post strong overall expansion, while generally large external savings levels have reinforced balance of payments stability. In China specifically, measures to curb house price growth have proven effective, though concerns over bank asset quality linked to rapid lending growth in 2009 have risen.
 
In Emerging Europe, Russia has seen some contagion into asset markets from weaker commodity prospects and a challenging investment climate, but the sovereign balance sheet remains quite robust. Foreign exchange exposures remain a risk factor in a number of Eastern European economies. Elsewhere, Turkey's economy cooled in Q3 2011, helping to narrow the current account deficit sharply, though external vulnerabilities remain.
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)
 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk (continued)
 
External risk environment (continued)
The Middle East and North Africa has been characterised by political instability in a number of the relatively lower income countries. Excluding Bahrain, pressures for change have been more contained in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries.
 
Latin America continues to be characterised by relative stability owing to balance sheet repair by a number of countries following crises in previous decades. Capital inflows have contributed to currency appreciation, but overheating pressures have so far proven contained, including in Brazil where credit growth has slowed from high levels.
 
Overall, the outlook for the rest of the year remains challenging, with risks likely to remain elevated but divergent. Much will depend on the success of EU efforts to contain contagion from the sovereign crisis and whether growth headwinds in larger advanced economies persist. Emerging market balance sheet risks remain lower, despite ongoing structural and political constraints, but these economies will continue to be affected by events elsewhere through financial markets and trade channels.
 
Key points
 
·
Currency movements had a significant impact on exposures in the third quarter as sterling fell by 2.8% against the US dollar and rose by 5.0% against the euro. However, they had less impact on exposures year-to-date as sterling rose by only 0.6% against the US dollar and 0.2% against the euro over the first three quarters of 2011.
·
Total exposure to over half of the countries shown in the table decreased over the nine months since 31 December 2010, driven partly by clients' debt reduction efforts and partly by a restrictive stance on the part of the Group. Reductions were seen particularly in off-balance sheet exposures and in lending. Exposures generally increased in (collateralised) derivatives and repos.
·
India - Continued strong economic growth led total exposure to grow by £1.1 billion so far this year, largely due to increases in lending to corporate clients (£0.7 billion) and in debt securities (£0.2 billion).
·
China - Lending to Chinese banks increased by £1.0 billion to £2.4 billion in 2011. This reflects increased activity with the top tier banks, partially driven by on-shore regulatory needs, and an increase in trade finance activity. These credit facilities support trade within the Asia-Pacific region as well as a number of key UK clients with trade finance requirements in China.
·
South Korea - Total exposure deceased by £0.6 billion, largely due to reductions in debt securities reflecting a hedge against a derivatives position which decreased over the course of the year and a reduction in off-balance exposures reflecting the expiration of a large medium-term guarantee and the Group's cautious stance given the current global economic downturn.
·
Eurozone - Portfolio composition and trends in a number of vulnerable eurozone countries are discussed in more detail below. Here, most peripheral eurozone exposure decreased, with derivatives and repos being the only component that still saw some gross increases in the third quarter. The CDS positions referencing sovereign debt are generally collateralised and are with large international banks or large international asset management companies outside the country of the referenced sovereign.
·
In the rest of the eurozone, exposure in the first nine months of 2011 increased mainly in lending to central banks (in Germany and the Netherlands, largely deposits of excess liquidity), to governments (the Netherlands) and to banks, particularly in the first half of the year (France and the Netherlands), as well as in derivatives and repos (the Netherlands, France and Luxembourg).
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Ireland
 
 
 
Lending 
REIL 
Impairment 
 provisions 
 
AFS and 
LAR debt 
 securities 
AFS 
 reserves 
 
HFT debt securities
 
Total debt 
 securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
 liabilities and 
 commitments 
Long 
Short 
Issuer
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
30 September 2011
                             
Central and local government
54 
 
115 
(40)
 
30 
30 
 
115 
 
20 
 
Central banks
2,235 
 
                 -   
 
               - 
              -   
 
              - 
 
 
Other banks
49 
 
176 
(44)
 
67 
              - 
 
243 
 
901 
 
52 
Other financial institutions
542 
 
57 
 
250 
52 
 
255 
 
1,024 
 
691 
Corporate
19,574 
10,195 
5,667 
 
148 
 
139 
 
287 
 
407 
 
2,061 
Personal
19,606 
2,210 
954 
 
                -   
 
               - 
              - 
 
              -   
 
 
535 
                               
 
42,060 
12,405 
6,621 
 
496 
(83)
 
486 
82 
 
900 
 
2,354 
 
3,340 
                               
31 December 2010
                             
                               
Central and local government
61 
 
104 
(45)
 
93 
88 
 
109 
 
20 
 
Central banks
2,119 
 
 
 
 
126 
 
Other banks
87 
 
435 
(51)
 
96 
45 
 
486 
 
1,523 
 
83 
Other financial institutions
813 
 
291 
(1)
 
205 
 
496 
 
837 
 
1,050 
Corporate
19,881 
8,291 
4,072 
 
91 
(2)
 
140 
 
225 
 
434 
 
2,633 
Personal
20,228 
1,638 
534 
 
 
 
 
 
544 
                               
 
43,189 
9,929 
4,606 
 
921 
(99)
 
541 
139 
 
1,323 
 
2,940 
 
4,311 
 
Fair values of CDS referencing sovereign exposures were:
 
 
30 September 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Fair value
£m 
£m 
     
Bought protection
511 
360 
Sold protection
523 
387 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Ireland (continued)
 
Key points
 
The Group has significant exposure to Ireland, largely through Ulster Bank. The portfolio is predominantly personal lending of £19.6 billion (largely mortgages) and corporate lending of £19.6 billion. In addition, the Group has lending and derivatives exposure to the Central Bank of Ireland, financial institutions and large international clients with funding units based in Ireland.
   
Total Group exposure (including off-balance sheet) declined by £3.1 billion to less than £50 billion from December 2010 to September 2011. Ulster Bank currently represents 87% of the Group's total Irish exposure.
 
Central and local government and central bank
 
Exposure to the government is modest at £0.2 billion.
   
Exposure to the central bank fluctuates, driven by reserve requirements and by placings of excess liquidity as part of the Group's assets and liabilities management. At 30 September 2011, exposure was £2.2 billion.
 
Financial institutions
 
Interbank lending, which is provided to the largest, systemically important Irish banks, is approximately £50 million.
   
Derivatives and repos exposure in GBM to banks and other financial institutions increased by £0.8 billion over the year to date. Transactions are typically collateralised.
 
Corporations
 
Corporate lending exposure decreased by approximately £0.3 billion in the nine months ended 30 September 2011. Exposure in this area is highest in the property sector £12.5 billion, which also experienced the biggest reduction, £160 million, in the same period. Risk elements in lending of £10.2 billion and impairment provisions of £5.7 billion, up since December 2010 by £1.9 billion and £1.6 billion respectively, are further discussed in the Ulster Bank section.
 
Personal
 
The Ulster Bank retail portfolio mainly consists of mortgages (approximately 92%), with the remainder comprising other personal lending and credit card exposure (see also page 142).
 
Non-Core
 
Of the total Irish exposure, £11.5 billion is designated Non-Core, £10.0 billion of which is related to commercial real estate.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Spain
 
 
 
Lending 
REIL 
Impairment 
 provisions 
 
AFS and 
LAR debt 
 securities 
AFS 
 reserves 
 
HFT debt securities
 
Total debt 
 securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
 liabilities and 
 commitments 
Long 
Short 
Issuer
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
30 September 2011
                             
Central and local government
10 
 
81 
(9)
 
864 
1,271 
 
(326)
 
40 
 
30 
Central banks
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
554 
 
5,131 
(820)
 
137 
178 
 
5,090 
 
1,904 
 
40 
Other financial institutions
90 
 
1,694 
(579)
 
71 
55 
 
1,710 
 
32 
 
228 
Corporate
6,599 
1,438 
690 
 
 
18 
 
23 
 
545 
 
1,635 
Personal
380 
 
 
 
 
 
57 
                               
 
7,636 
1,439 
690 
 
6,914 
(1,408)
 
1,090 
1,507 
 
6,497 
 
2,521 
 
1,990 
                               
31 December 2010
                             
                               
Central and local government
19 
 
88 
(7)
 
1,172 
1,248 
 
12 
 
53 
 
Central banks
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
166 
 
5,264 
(834)
 
147 
118 
 
5,293 
 
1,482 
 
41 
Other financial institutions
92 
 
1,724 
(474)
 
34 
 
1,751 
 
22 
 
285 
Corporate
6,962 
1,871 
572 
 
38 
 
50 
 
51 
 
490 
 
2,494 
Personal
407 
 
 
 
 
 
62 
                               
 
7,651 
1,872 
572 
 
7,085 
(1,277)
 
1,403 
1,381 
 
7,107 
 
2,047 
 
2,883 
 
Fair values of CDS referencing sovereign exposures were:
 
 
30 September 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Fair value
£m 
£m 
     
Bought protection
562 
436 
Sold protection
547 
435 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Spain (continued)
 
Key points
 
The Group's exposure to Spain consists primarily of lending to major investment grade corporations and a large covered bond portfolio.
   
Total (on and off-balance sheet) exposure decreased by £1.0 billion in the nine months ended 30 September 2011 to £18.6 billion, the majority of which consists of exposure to the property, natural resource and banking sectors.
 
Central and local government and central bank
 
The Group's exposure to the government is negative owing to a net short position in held-for-trading debt securities.
 
Financial institutions
 
A sizeable covered bond portfolio of £6.8 billion is the Group's largest exposure to Spanish banks and other financial institutions. Stress analysis on the AFS debt securities indicates that this exposure is unlikely to suffer material credit losses.
   
A further £1.9 billion of the Group's exposure to financial institutions consists of fully collateralised derivatives exposure to the top banks and a few of the largest regional banks. Lending to banks of almost £0.6 billion consists mainly of short-term money market lines with the top two international Spanish banks.
 
Corporations
 
Total exposure to corporate clients declined by £1.2 billion in the nine months ended 30 September 2011, driven by reductions in exposure to corporations in the property and telecom, media and technology sectors. REIL relates to commercial real estate lending and decreased reflecting disposals and restructurings; however provision increased due to declining collateral values.
 
Non-Core
 
Of the total Spanish exposure, £4.9 billion is in Non-Core, the majority of which is related to either real estate or project finance. Current Spanish property market conditions present significant disposal challenges. Despite this, Non-Core continues to seek divestment opportunities across the portfolio.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Italy
 
 
 
Lending 
REIL 
Impairment 
 provisions 
 
AFS and 
LAR debt 
 securities 
AFS 
 reserves 
 
HFT debt securities
 
Total debt 
 securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
 liabilities and 
 commitments 
Long 
Short 
Issuer
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
30 September 2011
                             
Central and local government
 
852 
(191)
 
5,076 
5,634 
 
294 
 
103 
 
Central banks
76 
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
420 
 
168 
(16)
 
88 
 
251 
 
1,143 
 
26 
Other financial institutions
472 
 
538 
(8)
 
49 
81 
 
506 
 
672 
 
957 
Corporate
2,057 
451 
139 
 
68 
 
61 
 
129 
 
413 
 
2,172 
Personal
25 
 
 
 
 
 
13 
                               
 
3,050 
451 
139 
 
1,626 
(215)
 
5,274 
5,720 
 
1,180 
 
2,331 
 
3,168 
                               
31 December 2010
                             
                               
Central and local government
45 
 
906 
(99)
 
5,113 
3,175 
 
2,844 
 
71 
 
Central banks
78 
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
668 
 
198 
(11)
 
67 
16 
 
249 
 
782 
 
161 
Other financial institutions
418 
 
646 
(5)
 
49 
 
695 
 
759 
 
1,217 
Corporate
2,483 
314 
141 
 
20 
 
36 
 
48 
 
418 
 
2,456 
Personal
27 
 
 
 
 
 
13 
                               
 
3,719 
314 
141 
 
1,770 
(115)
 
5,265 
3,199 
 
3,836 
 
2,030 
 
3,853 
 
Fair values of CDS referencing sovereign exposures were:
 
 
30 September 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Fair value
£m 
£m 
     
Bought protection
1,815 
641 
Sold protection
1,691 
551 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Italy (continued)
 
Key points
 
The Group is an active market maker in Italian government bonds, resulting in substantial long positions in held-for-trading securities against approximately equal short positions.
   
The Group maintains relationships with government entities, banks, other financial institutions and large corporate clients, in the case of the latter predominantly with subsidiaries of multinationals. Since the start of 2011 the Group has taken steps to reduce and mitigate its risks through increased collateral requirements, additional security and strategic exits where appropriate, in line with its evolving appetite for Italian risk. Total exposure to entities incorporated in Italy declined by £3.7 billion in the nine months ended 30 September 2011, to £9.7 billion, much of which was lending to corporate clients, banks and other financial institutions.
 
Central and local government and central bank
 
Total exposure to the government including net debt securities positions was significantly reduced by £2.6 billion to £0.4 billion.
 
Financial institutions
 
The majority of the Group's exposure to Italian financial institutions is concentrated on the two largest, systemically important groups and consists of collateralised derivatives and, to a lesser extent, short-term interbank lending.
 
Corporations
 
Since 31 December 2010, total exposure has declined by approximately £0.6 billion, driven in part by reductions in lending to the property industry. However, the Group has maintained lending facilities to the manufacturing and natural resource sectors.
 
Non-Core
 
Of the total Italian exposure, £1.8 billion is in Non-Core, the majority of which is related to real estate or project finance. The key risk in the portfolio is the availability of refinancing options for current clients.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Greece
 
 
 
Lending 
REIL 
Impairment 
 provisions 
 
AFS and 
LAR debt 
 securities 
AFS 
 reserves 
 
HFT debt securities
 
Total debt 
 securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
 liabilities and 
 commitments 
Long 
Short 
Issuer
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
30 September 2011
                             
Central and local government
 
532 
 
180 
 
705 
 
 
Central banks
10 
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
 
 
 
 
299 
 
Other financial institutions
32 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate
381 
335 
249 
 
 
 
 
34 
 
60 
Personal
14 
 
 
 
 
 
10 
                               
 
445 
335 
249 
 
532 
 
182 
 
707 
 
335 
 
71 
                               
31 December 2010
                             
                               
Central and local government
14 
 
895 
(694)
 
118 
39 
 
974 
 
 
Central banks
36 
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
18 
 
 
 
 
167 
 
Other financial institutions
31 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate
188 
48 
48 
 
 
 
 
26 
 
141 
Personal
16 
 
 
 
 
 
10 
                               
 
303 
48 
48 
 
895 
(694)
 
118 
39 
 
974 
 
203 
 
162 
 
Fair values of CDS referencing sovereign exposures were:
 
 
30 September 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Fair value
£m 
£m 
     
Bought protection
1,832 
854 
Sold protection
1,720 
871 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Greece (continued)
 
Key points
 
Given the continued economic distress in Greece, the Group is actively managing its exposure to this country.
   
Much of the exposure is collateralised or guaranteed. As a result, the Group has reduced its effective exposure to Greece in line with the de-risking strategy that has been in place since early 2010.
 
Central and local government and central bank
 
As a result of the continued deterioration in Greece's fiscal position, coupled with the potential for the restructuring of Greek sovereign debt, the Group recognised an impairment charge in respect of available-for-sale Greek government bonds in H1 2011. These bonds continue to represent a significant proportion of the total Greek portfolio.
 
Financial institutions
 
Exposure to Greek banks remains under close scrutiny and is actively managed. Lending exposures to banks are very small.
   
The gross derivatives exposure to banks increased by slightly over £0.1 billion in the third quarter but is largely collateralised; the remainder consists for the most part of transactions conducted with Greek subsidiaries of non-Greek banks.
 
Corporations
 
At the start of the year, a number of defaulted clients re-incorporated in Greece causing a £0.2 billion increase in lending as well as increases in the risk elements in lending and in impairment provisions.
   
The ongoing deterioration in Greek sovereign credit quality led to some further increase in provisions and to a rigorous review of Greek corporate exposure.
   
Accordingly, and allowing for the effect described above, the Group's total corporate exposure is declining. The focus is now on short-term trade facilities to the domestic subsidiaries of international clients, increasingly supported by parental guarantees.
 
Non-Core
 
Of the total Greek exposure, £0.2 billion is in Non-Core.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Portugal
 
 
 
Lending 
REIL 
Impairment 
 provisions 
 
AFS and 
LAR debt 
 securities 
AFS 
 reserves 
 
HFT debt securities
 
Total debt 
 securities 
 
Derivatives 
(gross of 
collateral)
 and repos 
 
Contingent 
 liabilities and 
 commitments 
Long 
Short 
Issuer
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
 
£m 
                               
30 September 2011
                             
Central and local government
43 
 
66 
(53)
 
70 
152 
 
(16)
 
19 
 
Central banks
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
57 
 
91 
(37)
 
14 
11 
 
94 
 
338 
 
Other financial institutions
 
 
13 
 
18 
 
12 
 
Corporate
579 
27 
27 
 
43 
 
 
43 
 
74 
 
348 
Personal
 
 
 
 
 
                               
 
684 
27 
27 
 
205 
(90)
 
97 
163 
 
139 
 
443 
 
356 
                               
31 December 2010
                             
                               
Central and local government
86 
 
92 
(26)
 
68 
122 
 
38 
 
29 
 
211 
Central banks
 
 
 
 
 
Other banks
63 
 
106 
(24)
 
46 
 
150 
 
307 
 
Other financial institutions
 
47 
 
 
54 
 
 
Corporate
611 
27 
21 
 
 
 
 
50 
 
512 
Personal
 
 
 
 
 
                               
 
766 
27 
21 
 
245 
(49)
 
121 
124 
 
242 
 
393 
 
734 
 
Fair values of CDS referencing sovereign exposures were:
 
 
30 September 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
Fair value
£m 
£m 
     
Bought protection
1,053 
471 
Sold protection
1,041 
460 
 
For definitions refer to pages 126 and 127.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Country risk: Portugal (continued)
 
Key points
 
Following the closure of its local branch in early 2011, the Group has modest exposure overall. The portfolio is focused on corporate lending and derivatives trading with the largest local banks.
 
Central and local government and central bank
 
In the first nine months of 2011, the sovereign risk position was reduced, largely the result of decreases in contingent exposures to three public sector entities in addition to bond sales and maturities. Overall, the exposure shrank to less than £50 million in the nine months.
 
Financial institutions
 
As the Portuguese economy deteriorated, the Group reduced its exposure in all areas.
   
Approximately 90% of remaining counterparty exposures are focused on the top four systemically important financial groups. Exposures generally consist of collateralised trading products and short-term treasury lines.
 
Corporations
 
The Group's exposure is concentrated on large highly creditworthy clients. The largest exposure is to corporations active in the energy and transport sectors.
   
Trade finance exposure was nearly halved in the third quarter to £50 million.
 
Non-Core
 
Of the total Portuguese exposure, £0.6 billion is in Non-Core, 87% of which is related to project finance.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Ulster Bank Group (Core and Non-Core)
 
Overview
Ulster Bank Group accounts for 9.8% of the Group's total gross customer loans (30 June 2011 - 10.2%; 31 December 2010 - 9.9%) and 8.5% of the Group's Core gross customer loans (30 June 2011 - 8.8%; 31 December 2010 - 8.9%). The Q3 2011 impairment charge was £608 million (Q3 2010 - £962 million) with commercial real estate and mortgage sectors accounting for £314 million (52%) and £126 million (21%) of the total Q3 2011 impairment charge respectively. The impairment charge in Q3 2011 was driven by a combination of new defaulting customers and deteriorating security values.  Provisions as a percentage of REIL has increased from 51.4% at 30 June 2011 to 51.6% at 30 September 2011 (30 September 2010 - 39%).
 
The impairment charge of £608 million for Q3 2011 was £638 million lower than the £1,246 million impairment charge for Q2 2011. Non-Core was the main driver for this reduction with its impairment charge £696 million lower in Q3 2011 compared with Q2 2011 due to a slower rate of deterioration in security values and a decrease in the value of loans defaulting in the quarter. The Core portfolio quarterly impairment charge increased by £58 million to £327 million (Q2 2011- £269 million), with the mortgage portfolio accounting for £48 million of the increase. Impairments remain elevated as high unemployment coupled with higher taxation and less liquidity in the economy continues to depress the property market and domestic spending.
 
Core
The Q3 2011 impairment charge was £327 million (Q3 2010 - £286 million) with the mortgage sector accounting for £126 million (39%) of the total Q3 2011 impairment charge. These impairment losses reflect the difficult economic climate in Ireland with elevated default levels across both mortgage and other corporate portfolios.
 
Ulster Bank Group is assisting customers in this difficult environment. Mortgage forbearance policies which are deployed through the 'Flex' initiative are aimed at assisting customers in financial difficulty.
 
Non-Core
The Q3 2011 impairment charge was £281 million (Q3 2010 - £676 million) with the commercial real estate sector accounting for £236 million (84%) of the total Q3 2011 charge. The impairment charge decreased from £977 million in Q2 2011 to £281 million in Q3 2011, primarily reflecting a slower rate of deterioration in security values and a reduction in the value of loans defaulting.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Ulster Bank Group (Core and Non-Core) (continued)
 
Loans, REIL and impairments by sector
 
 
 
Gross 
 loans (1)
REIL 
Provisions 
REIL 
as a % of 
gross 
 loans 
Provisions 
 as a % of 
 REIL 
Provisions 
 as a % of 
 gross loans 
 
Q3 
Impairment 
charge 
Q3 
Amounts 
 written-off 
30 September 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                 
Core
               
Mortgages
20,692 
2,138 
852 
10.3 
40 
4.1 
126 
Personal unsecured
1,557 
201 
182 
12.9 
91 
11.7 
12 
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
4,241 
1,163 
373 
27.4 
32 
8.8 
58 
  - development
923 
261 
135 
28.3 
52 
14.6 
20 
Other corporate
8,133 
1,793 
1,025 
22.0 
57 
12.6 
111 
37 
                 
 
35,546 
5,556 
2,567 
15.6 
46 
7.2 
327 
              41 
                 
Non-Core
               
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
3,937 
2,684 
1,247 
68.2 
47 
31.7 
74 
  - development
8,703 
7,687 
4,342 
88.3 
57 
49.9 
162 
Other corporate
1,670 
1,176 
674 
70.4 
57 
40.4 
45 
                 
 
14,310 
11,547 
6,263 
80.7 
54 
43.8 
281 
11 
                 
Ulster Bank Group
               
Mortgages
20,692 
2,138 
852 
10.3 
40 
4.1 
126 
Personal unsecured
1,557 
201 
182 
12.9 
91 
11.7 
12 
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
8,178 
3,847 
1,620 
47.0 
42 
19.8 
132 
  - development
9,626 
7,948 
4,477 
82.6 
56 
46.5 
182 
Other corporate
9,803 
2,969 
1,699 
30.3 
57 
17.3 
156 
46 
                 
 
49,856 
17,103 
8,830 
34.3 
52 
17.7 
608 
52 
 
Note:
 
(1)
Funded customer loans.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Ulster Bank Group (Core and Non-Core) (continued)
 
Loans, REIL and impairments by sector (continued)
 
 
 
Gross 
 loans 
REIL 
Provisions 
REIL 
as a % of 
gross 
 loans 
Provisions 
 as a % of 
 REIL 
Provisions 
 as a % of 
 gross loans 
 
H1 
Impairment 
charge 
H1 
Amounts 
 written-off 
30 June 2011
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                 
Core
               
Mortgages
21,778 
2,014 
769 
9.2 
38 
3.5 
311 
Personal unsecured
1,605 
201 
181 
12.5 
90 
11.3 
33 
15 
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
4,338 
838 
331 
19.3 
40 
7.6 
115 
  - development
955 
241 
120 
25.2 
50 
12.6 
48 
Other corporate
8,699 
1,822 
1,000 
20.9 
55 
11.5 
223 
                 
 
37,375 
5,116 
2,401 
13.7 
47 
6.4 
730 
21 
                 
Non-Core
               
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
4,076 
2,662 
1,231 
65.3 
46 
30.2 
384 
  - development
9,002 
7,847 
4,367 
87.2 
56 
48.5 
1,313 
Other corporate
1,811 
1,226 
661 
67.7 
54 
36.5 
113 
                 
 
14,889 
11,735 
6,259 
78.8 
53 
42.0 
1,810 
                 
Ulster Bank Group
               
Mortgages
21,778 
2,014 
769 
9.2 
38 
3.5 
311 
Personal unsecured
1,605 
201 
181 
12.5 
90 
11.3 
33 
15 
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
8,414 
3,500 
1,562 
41.6 
45 
18.6 
499 
  - development
9,957 
8,088 
4,487 
81.2 
56 
45.1 
1,361 
Other corporate
10,510 
3,048 
1,661 
29.0 
55 
15.8 
336 
                 
 
52,264 
16,851 
8,660 
32.2 
51 
16.6 
2,540 
23 
 

 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Ulster Bank Group (Core and Non-Core) (continued)
 
Loans, REIL and impairments by sector (continued)
 
 
 
Gross 
 loans 
REIL 
Provisions 
REIL 
as a % of 
gross 
 loans 
Provisions 
 as a % of 
 REIL 
Provisions 
 as a % of 
 gross loans 
Q4 
Impairment 
charge 
Q4 
Amounts 
 written-off 
31 December 2010
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                 
Core
               
Mortgages
21,162 
1,566 
439 
7.4 
28 
2.1 
159 
Personal unsecured
1,282 
185 
158 
14.4 
85 
12.3 
13 
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
4,284 
598 
332 
14.0 
56 
7.7 
79 
  - development
1,090 
65 
37 
6.0 
57 
3.4 
(10)
Other corporate
9,039 
1,205 
667 
13.3 
55 
7.4 
135 
                 
 
36,857 
3,619 
 1,633 
9.8 
45 
4.4 
376 
10 
                 
Non-Core
               
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
3,854 
2,391 
1,000 
62.0 
42 
25.9 
206 
  - development
8,760 
6,341 
2,783 
72.4 
44 
31.8 
596 
Other corporate
1,970 
 1,310 
561 
66.5 
43 
28.5 
(19)
                 
 
14,584 
 10,042 
 4,344 
68.9 
43 
29.8 
783 
                 
Ulster Bank Group
               
Mortgages
21,162 
1,566 
439 
7.4 
28 
2.1 
159 
Personal unsecured
1,282 
185 
158 
14.4 
85 
12.3 
13 
Commercial real estate
               
  - investment
8,138 
2,989 
1,332 
36.7 
45 
16.4 
285 
  - development
9,850 
6,406 
2,820 
65.0 
44 
28.6 
586 
Other corporate
11,009 
2,515 
1,228 
22.8 
49 
11.2 
116 
                 
 
51,441 
13,661 
5,977 
26.6 
44 
11.6 
1,159 
10 
 
Key points
 
·
The REIL increase of £252 million in Q3 2011 reflects continuing difficult conditions in both the commercial and residential sectors in the Republic of Ireland partially offset by currency movements. Of the REIL at 30 September 2011, 68% was in Non-Core (30 June 2011 - 70%).
   
·
The majority of Non-Core commercial real estate development portfolio (88%) is REIL with a 57% provision coverage.
   
·
REIL mortgages represented 10.3% of gross lending at 30 September 2011 compared with 9.2% at 30 June 2011 and 7.4% at 31 December 2010.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Ulster Bank Group (Core and Non-Core) (continued)
 
Residential mortgages
The table below shows how the continued decrease in property values has affected the distribution of residential mortgages by loan-to-value (LTV) (indexed). LTV is based upon gross loan amounts and, whilst including defaulted loans, does not take account of provisions made.
 
 
 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
 2011 
31 December 
2010 
By average LTV (1)
       
<= 50%
33.7 
35.1 
35.9 
> 50% and <= 70%
12.5 
13.0 
13.5 
> 70% and <= 90%
12.4 
13.0 
13.5 
> 90%
41.4 
38.9 
37.1 
       
Total portfolio average LTV
77.6 
74.5 
71.2 
       
Average LTV on new originations during the period
66.7 
65.0 
75.9 
 
Note:
 
(1)
LTV averages calculated by transaction volume.
 
Key points
 
·
The residential mortgage portfolio across Ulster Bank Group totalled £20.7 billion at 30 September 2011 with 89% in the Republic of Ireland and 11% in Northern Ireland. At constant exchange rates, the portfolio remained at similar levels to 31 December 2010 (c.£21.2 billon) with little growth due to low new business volumes.
   
·
Repossession levels remain low at 134 cases in the nine months ended 30 September 2011, of which 111 were in the Republic of Ireland, primarily due to voluntary surrender or abandonment of the property.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Risk management: Credit risk: Ulster Bank Group (Core and Non-Core) (continued)
 
Commercial real estate
The commercial real estate lending portfolio in Ulster Bank Group reduced during the quarter to £17.8 billion, primarily due to exchange rate movements. The Non-Core portion of the portfolio totalled £12.6 billion (71% of the portfolio). Of the total Ulster Bank Group commercial real estate portfolio, the geographic split remains similar to last quarter with, 62% relating to the Republic of Ireland, 26% to Northern Ireland and 12% to the rest of the UK.
 
 
 
Development
 
Investment
   
 
Commercial  
Residential 
 
Commercial 
Residential 
 
Total 
Exposure by geography
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
               
30 September 2011
             
Ireland (ROI & NI)
2,674 
6,479 
 
5,225 
1,174 
 
15,552 
UK (excluding Northern Ireland)
97 
357 
 
1,659 
108 
 
2,221 
RoW
19 
 
 
31 
               
 
2,771 
6,855 
 
6,892 
1,286 
 
17,804 
               
30 June 2011
             
Ireland (ROI & NI)
2,762 
6,701 
 
5,378 
1,210 
 
16,051 
UK (excluding Northern Ireland)
104 
358 
 
1,702 
112 
 
2,276 
RoW
28 
 
 
44 
               
 
2,870 
7,087 
 
7,088 
1,326 
 
18,371 
               
31 December 2010
             
Ireland (ROI & NI)
2,785 
6,578 
 
5,072 
1,098 
 
15,533 
UK (excluding Northern Ireland)
110 
359 
 
1,831 
115 
 
2,415 
RoW
18 
 
22 
 
40 
               
 
2,895 
6,955 
 
6,925 
1,213 
 
17,988 
 
Note:
 
(1)
The above table does not include rate risk management or contingent obligations.
 
Key point
 
·
Commercial real estate remains the primary driver of the increase in the defaulted loan book for Ulster Bank. The outlook for the sector remains uncertain with the possibility of further declines in values. Proactive management of the portfolio has resulted in further transfers of stressed customers to the specialised management of Global Restructuring Group.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Market risk
Market risk arises from changes in interest rates, foreign currency, credit spread, equity prices and risk related factors such as market volatilities. The Group manages market risk centrally within its trading and non-trading portfolios through a comprehensive market risk management framework. This framework includes limits based on, but not limited to, value-at-risk (VaR), stress testing, position and sensitivity analyses.
 
For a description of the Group's basis of measurement and methodology limitations, refer to the 2010 Annual Report and Accounts, Market risk, page 193.
 
Daily distribution of GBM trading revenues
 
 
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4912R_-2011-11-3.pdf
 
Note:
 
(1)
The effect of any month end adjustments, not attributable to a specific daily market move, is spread evenly over the days in the month in question.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Market risk (continued)
 
Key points
 
Nine months ended 30 September 2011 compared with nine months ended 30 September 2010
 
·
GBM traded revenue decreased during 2011 due to the ongoing European sovereign debt crisis and heightened concerns about growth expectations for the world economy.
   
·
The average daily revenue earned from Core trading activities in 2011 was £22 million, compared with £29 million in 2010. The standard deviation of these daily revenues was £21 million, unchanged period on period.
   
·
The number of days with negative revenue increased from 11 days in 2010 to 24 days in 2011 due to market and economic conditions referred to above.
   
·
The most frequent result is daily revenue in the range of £25 million to £30 million with 24 occurrences in 2011, compared with 32 occurrences in 2010.
 
The table below details VaR for the Group's trading portfolio, segregated by type of market risk exposure, and between Core and Non-Core, Counterparty Exposure Management (CEM) and Core excluding CEM.
 
 
Quarter ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Trading VaR
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
Interest rate
51.3 
73.0 
73.1 
33.1 
 
39.4 
36.8 
75.7 
27.5 
Credit spread
56.2 
69.8 
69.8 
47.4 
 
73.2 
64.6 
95.0 
60.0 
Currency
8.7 
6.5 
12.5 
6.1 
 
9.4 
9.3 
14.2 
5.2 
Equity
7.9 
7.7 
13.1 
4.6 
 
10.4 
12.0 
17.3 
5.2 
Commodity
0.9 
3.6 
3.6 
0.1 
 
0.2 
0.3 
1.6 
Diversification
 
(54.3)
       
(61.0)
   
                   
Total
78.3 
106.3 
114.2 
59.7 
 
78.7 
62.0 
117.9 
60.8 
                   
Core
58.3 
83.1 
91.0 
41.7 
 
60.2 
42.5 
86.0 
42.5 
Core CEM
34.4 
38.0 
45.2 
23.5 
 
26.5 
23.2 
33.2 
21.9 
Core excluding CEM
44.3 
62.2 
71.4 
35.3 
 
57.1 
39.4 
78.4 
39.2 
                   
Non-Core
40.4 
38.7 
53.0 
33.2 
 
69.3 
51.4 
110.1 
47.5 
 
Key points
 
Q3 2011 compared with Q2 2011
 
·
The Group's total trading VaR and interest rate VaR were significantly higher at the end of Q3 2011 than at end Q2 2011. This was largely driven by hedge positions for a large and successful UK gilt syndication in which RBS participated.
   
·
Average credit spread VaR and Non-Core trading VaR was considerably lower in Q3 2011 than in Q2 2011. Non-Core VaR decreased substantially during Q2 primarily due to a significant de-risking of the portfolios in line with the overall business strategy. The VaR continued to decline as the period of high volatility relating to the 2008/2009 credit crisis dropped out of the VaR calculations.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Market risk (continued)
 
Key points (continued)
 
·
The credit spread period end VaR was slightly higher in Q3 2011 than in Q2 2011. This was largely due to the recent volatility in the European sovereign peripheral time series entering the VaR window.
   
·
The CEM trading VaR increased in Q3 2011 due to the implementation of an enhanced discounting methodology for cross-currency trades.
 
 
 
 
Nine months ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 September 2010
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Trading VaR
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
Interest rate
50.3 
73.0 
79.2 
27.5 
 
47.7 
74.3 
74.3 
32.5 
Credit spread
87.4 
69.8 
151.1 
47.4 
 
177.1 
190.8 
243.2 
113.0 
Currency
10.1 
6.5 
18.0 
5.2 
 
18.9 
16.7 
28.0 
9.3 
Equity
9.8 
7.7 
17.3 
4.6 
 
9.3 
5.4 
17.9 
2.7 
Commodity
0.4 
3.6 
3.6 
 
10.1 
13.8 
15.8 
3.2 
Diversification
 
(54.3)
       
(119.2)
   
                   
Total
104.1 
106.3 
181.3 
59.7 
 
173.3 
181.8 
252.1 
103.0 
                   
Core
75.3 
83.1 
133.9 
41.7 
 
105.1 
115.0 
153.4 
58.9 
Core CEM
33.6 
38.0 
47.6 
21.9 
 
55.1 
73.0 
82.4 
30.3 
Core excluding CEM
62.9 
62.2 
106.2 
35.3 
 
83.2 
78.4 
108.7 
53.6 
                   
Non-Core
74.2 
38.7 
128.6 
33.2 
 
105.7 
101.8 
169.4 
63.2 
 
Key point
 
Nine months ended 30 September 2011 compared with nine months ended 30 September 2010
 
·
The Group's market risk profile in 2010 was equally split across Non-Core and Core divisions with a concentrated exposure to the credit spread risk factor. In line with the business strategy to wind down the Group's interest in Sempra and other Non-Core activities, the trading portfolio has now been re-balanced such that the Non-Core exposure has been significantly reduced and the trading portfolio is less concentrated in the credit risk factor.
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Market risk (continued)
The table below details VaR for the Group's non-trading portfolio, excluding the structured portfolio  (SCP) and loans and receivables (LAR), segregated by type of market risk exposure and between Core and Non-Core.
 
 
 
Quarter ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 June 2011
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Non-trading VaR
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
Interest rate
9.6 
10.3 
11.1 
8.2 
 
8.3 
8.3 
9.2 
5.7 
Credit spread
16.0 
14.8 
 18.0 
14.1 
 
19.1 
18.0 
24.2 
16.1 
Currency
3.0 
4.1 
5.9 
1.1 
 
1.7 
3.3 
3.3 
0.2 
Equity
1.9 
1.8 
2.0 
1.6 
 
2.2 
2.0 
2.4 
2.0 
Diversification
 
(13.5)
       
(13.1)
   
                   
Total
17.6 
17.5 
18.9 
15.7 
 
18.7 
18.5 
22.5 
16.7 
                   
Core
17.4 
18.6 
20.1 
15.2 
 
18.5 
19.4 
24.6 
15.7 
Non-Core
3.9 
3.7 
4.3 
3.2 
 
3.7 
4.3 
4.3 
2.8 
 
Key point
 
Q3 2011 compared with Q2 2011
 
·
The maximum credit spread VaR was lower in Q3 2011 than in Q2 2011. This was primarily due to the increased market volatility experienced during the 2008/2009 credit crisis, dropping out of the two year time series used by the VaR model. This volatility was particularly pronounced in respect of credit spreads and had a marked impact on historic credit spread VaR.
 
 
 
Nine months ended
 
30 September 2011
 
30 September 2010 (1)
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
 
Average 
Period end 
Maximum 
Minimum 
Non-trading VaR
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                   
Interest rate
8.6 
10.3 
11.1 
5.7 
 
8.9 
4.4 
20.5 
4.4 
Credit spread
19.6 
14.8 
39.3 
14.1 
 
37.1 
19.4 
101.2 
19.4 
Currency
1.8 
4.1 
5.9 
0.1 
 
2.1 
2.0 
7.6 
0.3 
Equity
2.2 
1.8 
3.1 
1.6 
 
0.6 
0.4 
3.5 
0.2 
Diversification
 
(13.5)
       
(6.8)
   
                   
Total
20.9 
17.5 
41.6 
13.4 
 
35.8 
19.4 
98.0 
19.4 
                   
Core
20.4 
18.6 
38.9 
13.5 
 
35.5 
19.3 
98.1 
19.3 
Non-Core
3.4 
3.7 
4.3 
2.2 
 
0.8 
0.3 
3.6 
0.2 
 
Note:
 
(1)
Revised to exclude LAR portfolios.
 
Key point
 
Nine months ended 30 September 2011 compared with nine months ended 30 September 2010
 
·
The maximum credit spread VaR was considerably lower in 2011 than in the same period in 2010. This was due to a change in the time series used for the Dutch RMBS portfolio in RBS N.V. where more relevant and granular market data had become available and provided a better reflection of the risk in the portfolio. The VaR decreased through the period as the volatile market data continued to drop out of the 500 day time series used in the VaR calculation.
 
 
 
Risk and balance sheet management (continued)

 
Market risk (continued)
 
Structured Credit Portfolio (SCP)
 
 
 
Drawn notional
 
Fair value
 
CDOs 
CLOs 
MBS (1)
Other 
 ABS 
Total 
 
CDOs 
CLOs 
MBS (1)
Other 
 ABS 
Total 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
£m 
                       
30 September 2011
                     
1-2 years
29 
36 
65 
 
28 
31 
59 
2-3 years
172 
177 
 
160 
164 
3-4 years
43 
55 
 
40 
50 
4-5 years
39 
95 
134 
 
36 
88 
124 
5-10 years
32 
517 
317 
277 
1,143 
 
30 
469 
230 
242 
971 
>10 years
1,296 
454 
470 
593 
2,813 
 
228 
394 
314 
349 
1,285 
                       
 
1,334 
1,010 
827 
1,216 
4,387 
 
263 
899 
581 
910 
2,653 
                       
30 June 2011
                     
1-2 years
45 
46 
91 
 
44 
41 
85 
2-3 years
11 
183 
194 
 
10 
170 
180 
3-4 years
11 
48 
64 
 
10 
46 
61 
4-5 years
15 
56 
71 
 
14 
53 
67 
5-10 years
95 
396 
315 
365 
1,171 
 
84 
370 
245 
322 
1,021 
>10 years
390 
498 
551 
526 
1,965 
 
167 
420 
391 
388 
1,366 
                       
 
501 
909 
922 
1,224 
3,556 
 
266 
804 
690 
1,020 
2,780 
                       
31 December 2010
                     
1-2 years
47 
47 
 
42 
42 
2-3 years
85 
19 
44 
98 
246 
 
81 
18 
37 
91 
227 
3-4 years
41 
20 
205 
266 
 
-  
37 
19 
191 
247 
4-5 years
16 
16 
 
15 
15 
5-10 years
98 
466 
311 
437 
1,312 
 
87 
422 
220 
384 
1,113 
>10 years
412 
663 
584 
550 
2,209 
 
161 
515 
397 
367 
1,440 
                       
 
611 
1,189 
959 
1,337 
4,096 
 
344 
992 
673 
1,075 
3,084 
 
Note:
 
(1)
MBS include sub-prime RMBS with a notional amount of £406 million (30 June 2011 - £451 million; 31 December 2010 - £471 million) and a fair value of £274 million (30 June 2011 - £325 million; 31 December 2010 - £329 million), all with residual maturities of greater than 10 years.
 
The SCP non-trading risk in Non-Core is not measured using VaR as the Group believes this is not an appropriate tool for this portfolio of illiquid debt securities. The fair value and drawn notional are represented on a net basis.
 
The increase in drawn notional for CDOs and CLOs at the quarter ended 30 September 2011 was due to the exposure to legacy positions in the banking book portfolio. These positions were previously hedged, with both positions and hedges marked at fair value, well below their notional values. The hedges that were considered to be ineffective were removed in Q3 2011, resulting in a large increase in net notional values but only a small increase in net fair values.
 
 
Additional information
 
 
 
 
30 September 
2011 
30 June 
2011 
31 December 
2010 
       
Ordinary share price
£0.235 
£0.385 
£0.391 
       
Number of ordinary shares in issue
59,228m 
59,226m 
58,458m 
       
Market capitalisation (including B shares)
£25.9bn 
£42.4bn 
£42.8bn 
 
 
Statutory results
Financial information contained in this document does not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of section 434 of the Companies Act 2006 ('the Act'). The statutory accounts for the year ended 31 December 2010 have been filed with the Registrar of Companies. The report of the auditor on those statutory accounts was unqualified, did not draw attention to any matters by way of emphasis and did not contain a statement under section 498(2) or (3) of the Act.
 
These third quarter 2011 results have not been audited or reviewed by the auditors.
 
Financial calendar 
 
   
2011 annual results announcement                                                  
Thursday 23 February 2012
   
2012 first quarter interim management statement                                                  
Friday 4 May 2012

 

 
 
 


 

Signatures


 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





 
 
Date: 4 November 2011
 
 
THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND GROUP plc (Registrant)
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Jan Cargill
 
 
Name:
Title:
Jan Cargill
Deputy Secretary