UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.          )

 

---

Table of Contents

Annual Meeting — April 28, 2010

March 19, 2010

Dear Stockholder:

You are invited to attend the Company's 2010 Annual Meeting on Wednesday, April 28, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. local time in the DuPont Theatre, DuPont Building, Wilmington, Delaware.

The enclosed Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement provide information about the governance of our Company and describe the various matters to be acted upon during the meeting. In addition, there will be a report on the state of the Company's business and an opportunity for you to express your views on subjects related to the Company's operations.

To make it easier for you to vote your shares, you have the choice of voting over the Internet, by telephone, or by completing and returning the enclosed Proxy Card. The Proxy Card describes your voting options in more detail.

This year, we are using the Securities and Exchange Commission's Notice and Access model, allowing us to deliver proxy materials via the Internet. Notice and Access gives the Company a lower cost way to furnish stockholders with their proxy materials. On March 19, we mailed to certain stockholders of record a "Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials" with instructions on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet (or request a paper copy) and how to vote online.

If you requested a full set of proxy materials or if you hold DuPont Common Stock through a Company savings plan, your admission ticket for the Annual Meeting is included on your Proxy Card. A registered stockholder may also use the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials, received in the mail, as his or her admission ticket. If you hold shares in a brokerage account, please refer to page 1 of the Proxy Statement for information on how to attend the meeting. If you need special assistance, please contact the DuPont Stockholder Relations Office at 302-774-3034.

The past year was one of the most challenging in our Company's history. Throughout 2009 we moved with urgency and discipline to meet the directives we set for ourselves in response to economic challenges in markets throughout the world. We focused on what we could control. We stayed close to our customers. We did not let economic turmoil distract us from creating and protecting shareholder value.

The Annual Meeting gives us an opportunity to review our progress. We appreciate your ownership of DuPont, and I hope you will be able to join us on April 28.

Sincerely,




Ellen Kullman

E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

---

Table of Contents

March 19, 2010                             

To the Holders of Common Stock of
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY will be held on Wednesday, April 28, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. local time, in the DuPont Theatre in the DuPont Building, 1007 Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware. The meeting will be held to consider and act upon the election of directors, the ratification of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, two stockholder proposals described in the Proxy Statement and such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Holders of record of DuPont Common Stock at the close of business on March 3, 2010, are entitled to vote at the meeting.

This notice and the accompanying proxy materials are sent to you by order of the Board of Directors.

The DuPont 2009 Annual Review will also be available at the above website.

Stockholders may request their proxy materials be delivered to them electronically in 2011 by visiting http://enroll.icsdelivery.com/dd.

---

2010 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

---

---

Table of Contents

Proxy Statement

The enclosed proxy materials are being sent to stockholders at the request of the Board of Directors of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company to encourage you to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held April 28, 2010. This Proxy Statement contains information on matters that will be presented at the meeting and is provided to assist you in voting your shares.

The Company's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, containing management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations of the Company and the audited financial statements, and this Proxy Statement were distributed together beginning March 19, 2010.

General Information

Who May Vote

All holders of record of DuPont Common Stock as of the close of business on March 3, 2010 (the record date) are entitled to vote at the meeting. Each share of stock is entitled to one vote. As of the record date, 905,448,325 shares of DuPont Common Stock were outstanding. A majority of the shares voted in person or by proxy is required for the approval of each of the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. Abstentions and broker nonvotes are not counted in the vote. At least a majority of the holders of shares of DuPont Common Stock as of the record date must be present either in person or by proxy at the meeting in order for a quorum to be present.

How to Vote

Even if you plan to attend the meeting you are encouraged to vote by proxy. You may vote by proxy in one of the following ways:

•

By Internet at the address listed on the Proxy Card or Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials ("Proxy Notice").



•

By telephone using the toll-free number listed on the Proxy Card.



•

By returning the enclosed Proxy Card (signed and dated) in the envelope provided.

When you vote by proxy, your shares will be voted according to your instructions. If you sign your Proxy Card but do not specify how you want your shares to be voted, they will be voted as the Board of Directors recommends. You can change or revoke your proxy by Internet, telephone or mail at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting.

How to Attend the Annual Meeting

If you requested a full set of proxy materials or if you hold stock through one of the savings plans listed below, your admission ticket is attached to your Proxy Card. A registered stockholder may also use the Proxy Notice as his or her admission ticket. You will need to bring your admission ticket, along with picture identification, to the meeting. If you own shares in street name, please bring your most recent brokerage statement, along with picture identification, to the meeting. The Company will use your brokerage statement to verify your ownership of DuPont Common Stock and admit you to the meeting.

Please note that cameras, sound or video recording equipment, or other similar equipment, electronic devices, large bags or packages will not be permitted in the DuPont Theatre.

1

---

Table of Contents

Shares Held in Savings Plans

If you participate in one of the following plans, your voting instruction card will include the shares you hold in the plan:

•

DuPont 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan

•

DuPont Powder Coatings USA Profit Sharing Plan

•

DuPont Retirement Savings Plan

•

Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Savings Plan

•

Solae Savings Investment Plan

•

Thrift Plan for Employees of Sentinel Transportation, LLC

The plan trustees will vote according to the instructions received on your proxy. If proxies for shares in savings plans are not received by Internet, telephone or mail, those shares will be voted by the trustees as directed by the plan sponsor or by an independent fiduciary selected by the plan sponsor.

Proxy Statement Proposals

At each annual meeting stockholders are asked to elect directors to serve on the Board of Directors and to ratify the appointment of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year. Other proposals may be submitted by the Board of Directors or stockholders to be included in the proxy statement. To be considered for inclusion in the 2011 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement, stockholder proposals must be received by the Company no later than November 19, 2010.

For any proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year's proxy statement, but is instead sought to be considered as timely and presented directly at the 2011 Annual Meeting, Securities and Exchange Commission rules permit management to vote proxies in its discretion if the Company: (1) receives notice of the proposal before the close of business on February 2, 2011 and advises stockholders in the 2011 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement about the nature of the matter and how management intends to vote on such matter; or (2) does not receive notice of the proposal prior to the close of business on February 2, 2011.

Stockholder Nominations for Election of Directors

The Corporate Governance Committee recommends nominees to the Board of Directors for election as directors at each annual meeting. The Committee will consider nominations submitted by stockholders of record and received by the Corporate Secretary by the first Monday in December. Nominations must include a statement by the nominee indicating a willingness to serve if elected and disclosing principal occupations or employment for the past five years.

Proxy Committee

The Proxy Committee is composed of directors of the Company who vote as instructed the shares of DuPont Common Stock for which they receive proxies. Proxies also confer upon the Proxy Committee discretionary authority to vote the shares on any matter which was not known to the Board of Directors a reasonable time before solicitation of proxies, but which is properly presented for action at the meeting.

Solicitation of Proxies

The Company will pay all costs relating to the solicitation of proxies. Innisfree M&A Incorporated has been retained to assist in soliciting proxies at a cost of $10,000 plus reasonable expenses. Proxies may be solicited by officers, directors and employees of the Company personally, by mail, or by telephone or other electronic means. The Company will also reimburse brokers, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners of DuPont Common Stock.

2

---

Table of Contents

Secrecy in Voting

As a matter of policy, proxies, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual stockholders are held confidential by the Company. Such documents are available for examination only by the independent tabulation agents, the independent inspectors of election and certain employees associated with tabulation of the vote. The identity of the vote of any stockholder is not disclosed except as may be necessary to meet legal requirements.

Governance of the Company

DuPont is committed to having sound corporate governance principles and practices. Please visit the Company's website at www.dupont.com, under the "Investor Center" caption, for the Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board-approved Charters for the Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance Committees and related information. These Guidelines and Charters may also be obtained free of charge by writing to the Corporate Secretary.

3

---

Table of Contents

4

---

Table of Contents

5

---

Table of Contents

6

---

Table of Contents

7

---

Table of Contents

8

---

Table of Contents

Committee Membership

The following chart shows the current committee membership and the number of meetings that each committee held in 2009.

C = Chair

Directors fulfill their responsibilities not only by attending Board and committee meetings but also through communication with the Chair and CEO and other members of management relative to matters of mutual interest and concern to the Company.

In 2009, seven meetings of the Board were held. Each director attended at least 92% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and the committees of the Board on which the director served. Attendance at these meetings averaged 99% among all directors in 2009.

As provided in the Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the Company's Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All directors attended the 2009 Annual Meeting.

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Board of Directors has adopted written policies and procedures relating to the approval or ratification of "Related Person Transactions." Under the policies and procedures, the Corporate Governance Committee ("Governance Committee") (or its Chair, under some circumstances) reviews the relevant facts

9

---

Table of Contents

of all proposed Related Person Transactions and either approves or disapproves of the entry into the Related Person Transaction, by taking into account, among other factors it deems appropriate:

•

the commercial reasonableness of the transaction,

•

the materiality of the Related Person's direct or indirect interest in the transaction,

•

whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest, or the appearance of one, and

•

the impact of the transaction on the Related Person's independence under the Corporate Governance Guidelines and applicable regulatory and listing standards.

No director may participate in any discussion or approval of a Related Person Transaction for which he/she or any of his/her immediate family members is the Related Person. Related Person Transactions are approved or ratified only if they are determined to be in the best interests of DuPont and its stockholders.

If a Related Person Transaction that has not been previously approved or previously ratified is discovered, the Related Person Transaction will be presented to the Governance Committee for ratification. If such Related Person Transaction is not ratified by the Governance Committee, then the Company shall either ensure all appropriate disclosures regarding the transaction are made or, if appropriate, take all reasonable actions to attempt to terminate the Company's participation in such transaction.

Under the Company's policies and procedures, a "Related Person Transaction" is generally any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which: (i) DuPont was, is or will be a participant; (ii) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000 in any fiscal year; and (iii) any Related Person had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A "Related Person" is generally any person who is, or at any time since the beginning of DuPont's last fiscal year was: (i) a director or an executive officer of DuPont or a nominee to become a director of DuPont; (ii) any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of DuPont's outstanding Common Stock; or (iii) any immediate family member of any of the foregoing persons.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

As discussed above, the Governance Committee is charged with reviewing issues involving independence and all Related Person Transactions. DuPont and its subsidiaries purchase products and services from and/or sell products and services to companies of which certain of the directors of DuPont, or their immediate family members, are executive officers. The Governance Committee and the Board have reviewed such transactions and relationships and do not consider the amounts involved in such transactions material. Such purchases from and sales to each company involve less than either $1,000,000 or two percent of the consolidated gross revenues of each of the purchaser and the seller and all such transactions are in the ordinary course of business. Some such transactions are continuing and it is anticipated that similar transactions will occur from time to time. The spouse of Mrs. Kullman, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, is Director-Corporate Marketing at DuPont and received total compensation in 2009 valued at $311,000 which is commensurate with that of his peers and reflects the Company-wide reduction in long-term incentive awards.

State Street Bank and Trust Company was the beneficial owner of 4.6% and 5.8% of DuPont Common Stock as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. DuPont Capital Management Corporation ("DCM"), a subsidiary of DuPont, has an unconsolidated joint venture with State Street Global Advisors, Inc. ("SSgA"), called Wilton Asset Management LLC ("Wilton"), which offers private equity investment advisory services to institutional and high net worth investors. Wilton manages a private equity fund from which DCM earned $202,800 in sub-advisory fees during 2009. SSgA earned the same amount for marketing, administrative and accounting services. For 2009, unaudited net income of the joint venture was $183,105, which was shared equally between DCM and SSgA. In addition, DCM and SSgA each received a cash dividend during 2009 of $225,000 which related to prior year earnings. State Street is also trustee of the DuPont Pension Trust Fund (covering the principal U.S. pension plan and the pension plan of a subsidiary) and custodian for DuPont UK's pension plan. Trade commissions and fees related to brokerage services totaling $165,164 were paid to State Street during 2009, of which $164,460 was paid by the DuPont UK pension plan and the remainder from other DuPont pension plans. DCM paid State Street $65,483 in

10

---

Table of Contents

transaction and maintenance fees for a product that links investment managers to custodians. DCM also executed foreign exchange transactions (traded net, without commissions) with State Street during 2009.

Communications with the Board and Directors

Stockholders and other parties interested in communicating directly with the Board, Chair, Presiding Director or other outside director may do so by writing in care of the Corporate Secretary, DuPont Company, 1007 Market Street, D9058, Wilmington, DE 19898. The Board's independent directors have approved procedures for handling correspondence received by the Company and addressed to the Board, Chair, Presiding Director or other outside director. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of the Company's internal audit function and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters, which include an anonymous toll-free hotline (1-800-476-3016) and a website through which to report issues (https://reportanissue.com/dupont/welcome).

Leadership Structure of the Board

The positions of Chair of the Board and CEO are held by the same person, except in specific circumstances. At this time, the Board believes that the best interests of the Company are served by having a single Chair/CEO.

The Chair establishes the agenda for Board meetings, in conjunction with the Chairs of the Board committees. As CEO, the Chair is best suited to ensure that critical business issues are brought before the Board, which enhances the Board's ability to develop and implement business strategies and oversee the Company's risk management efforts.

The Board appreciates that any advantages gained by having a single Chair/CEO must be weighed against any associated independence concerns. However, the Company has implemented adequate safeguards to address those concerns.

Regularly scheduled Board meetings include a session of all directors and the CEO. Each director is an equal participant in each decision made by the full Board. In addition, the Board meets in regularly scheduled executive sessions without the participation of the CEO or other senior executives. The Presiding Director is generally the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee, unless there is a matter within the responsibility of another committee, such as CEO evaluation and compensation, when the Chair of the responsible committee presides. The Presiding Director also serves as liaison between the Chair and independent directors and has authority to call meetings of the independent directors.

Eleven of the Board's twelve directors are independent directors in accordance with the standards of independence of the New York Stock Exchange and as described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Committee as well as the Board annually reviews relationships that directors may have with the Company to make a determination of whether there are any material relationships that would preclude a director from being independent.

Directors have access to the Company's management. As necessary and appropriate, the Board and its committees may also retain outside legal, financial or other advisors.

Board's Role in the Oversight of Risk Management

The Board has an active role, directly and through the Board's committee structure, in the oversight of the Company's risk management efforts. The Board regularly reviews and discusses with members of management information regarding the Company's business disruption, economic, environmental, legal, regulatory, reputational, strategic, technological and other risks, their potential impact, and the Company's risk mitigation efforts. Each Board committee plays a key role in overseeing the Company's management of risks that are within the committee's area of focus.

11

---

Table of Contents

By way of example: The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to the Company's executive compensation practices. The Audit Committee oversees management of accounting, auditing, external reporting and internal control risks. The Corporate Governance Committee addresses risks associated with director independence and potential conflicts of interest. The Environmental Policy Committee focuses on risks associated with emerging regulatory developments related to the environment. The Science and Technology Committee considers key research and development initiatives and the risks related to those programs.

Although each committee is responsible for overseeing the management of certain risks, the full Board is regularly informed by its committees about such risks. This enables the Board and its committees to coordinate risk oversight and the relationships among the various risks.

Board's Consideration of Diversity

The Board does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. However, the Board and the Corporate Governance Committee each believe that it is essential that the Board members represent diverse viewpoints, with a broad array of experiences, professions, skills, geographic representation and backgrounds that, when considered as a group, provide a sufficient mix of perspectives to allow the Board to best fulfill its responsibilities to the long-term interests of the Company's stockholders. See Corporate Governance Guidelines, page 4, under "Qualifications" and the Director Nomination Process at Appendix "A."

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors with provisions specifically applicable to directors. In addition, the Company has a Code of Conduct applicable to all employees of the Company, including executive officers, and a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for the DuPont Board of Directors, the DuPont Code of Conduct, and Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller are available on the Company's website (www.dupont.com) under Investor Center, Corporate Governance. Copies of these documents may also be obtained free of charge by writing to the Corporate Secretary.

Office of the Chief Executive

The Office of the Chief Executive (OCE) has responsibility for the overall direction and operations of all the businesses of the Company and broad corporate responsibility in such areas as corporate financial performance, environmental leadership and safety, development of global talent, research and development and global effectiveness. All eight members are executive officers.

12

---

Table of Contents

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee") assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the external reporting process and the adequacy of the Company's internal controls. Specific responsibilities of the Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter adopted by the Board and last amended and restated effective March 4, 2009. The Charter is available on the Company's website (www.dupont.com) under Investor Center, Corporate Governance.

The Committee is comprised of five directors, all of whom meet the standards of independence adopted by the New York Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Subject to stockholder ratification, the Committee appoints the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Committee approves in advance all services to be performed by the Company's independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with the Committee's Policy on Pre-approval of Services Performed by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. A summary of the Policy is included with this Proxy Statement as part of the proposal seeking ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm.

Management is responsible for the Company's financial statements and reporting process, for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, and for assessing the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC"), the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for auditing the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and for assessing the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. The Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, for the year ended December 31, 2009 with management and with representatives of PwC.

The Committee has also discussed with PwC matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Communications with Audit Committees), as amended, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"). The Committee has received from PwC the letter and written disclosures required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with PwC its independence.

The Committee has considered whether the provision to the Company by PwC of limited non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC. The Committee has satisfied itself as to the independence of PwC.

Based on the Committee's review of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company, and on the Committee's discussions with management of the Company and with PwC, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited Consolidated Financial Statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Lois D. Juliber, Chair
Curtis J. Crawford
John T. Dillon
Eleuthère I. du Pont
Marillyn A. Hewson

13

---

Table of Contents

Directors' Compensation

Nonemployee directors receive compensation for Board service, which is designed to fairly compensate directors for their Board responsibilities and align their interests with the long-term interests of stockholders.

The Compensation Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, has the primary responsibility to review and consider any revisions to directors' compensation. The process for setting director pay is guided by the following principles:

•

Transparency

–

Director compensation is reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee, with recommendation to the full Board which approves changes to director pay.

–

Details of director compensation are disclosed in the proxy statement annually.

•

Fair and competitive compensation that aligns director behavior with the best interests of stockholders

–

A significant portion of the annual retainer is paid in restricted stock units ("RSUs"), the restrictions on which lapse over a three-year period.

–

Stock Ownership Guidelines exist to encourage ownership.

–

DuPont's goal is to assure competitive levels of director pay, reflective of the significant time commitment expected, through a director compensation program built upon an annual retainer and committee fees (in lieu of meeting fees).

–

Directors must act in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. DuPont's Stock Ownership Guidelines and use of RSUs support and reinforce this commitment.

–

Director compensation is monitored closely against Market trends and external practices, as well as against changes at the Peer Group companies. "Market" and "Peer Group" are defined on pages 24-25.

With the assistance of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc., the independent compensation consultant retained by the Compensation Committee, the Committee closely monitors trends in director compensation in the marketplace. The compensation program for nonemployee directors for 2009 and 2010 is described in detail in the chart below:

14

---

Table of Contents

The Company does not pay meeting fees, but does pay for or reimburse directors for reasonable travel expenses related to attending Board, committee, educational, and Company business meetings. Details are reflected in the 2009 Directors' Compensation table below. E. J. Kullman, Chair of the Board, received no additional compensation for her service as a director.

2009 DIRECTORS' COMPENSATION

15

---

Table of Contents

Stock Ownership Guidelines

Stock ownership guidelines require each nonemployee director to hold DuPont Common Stock equal to a multiple of two times the Annual Retainer. Directors have up to five years from date of election to achieve the required ownership. As of the end of 2009, ten of eleven nonemployee directors met or exceeded the ownership requirements. The remaining director is on track to achieve the ownership goal within the five-year period.

Deferred Compensation

Under the DuPont Stock Accumulation and Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, a director may defer all or part of the Board retainer and committee fees in cash or stock units until a specified year, until retirement as a director, or until death. Interest accrues on deferred cash payments and dividend equivalents accrue on deferred stock units. This deferred compensation is an unsecured obligation of the Company.

Retirement Income Plan

The Company's retirement income plan for nonemployee directors was discontinued in 1998. Nonemployee directors who began their service on the Board before the plan's elimination continue to be eligible to receive benefits under the plan. Annual benefits payable under the plan equal one-half of the annual Board retainer (exclusive of any committee compensation and stock, RSU or option grants) in effect at the director's retirement. Benefits are payable for the lesser of life or ten years.

Directors' Charitable Gift Plan

In October 2008, the Company discontinued its Charitable Gift Plan with respect to future directors. The Directors' Charitable Gift Plan was established in 1993. After the death of a director, the Company will donate five consecutive annual installments of up to $200,000 each to tax-exempt educational institutions or charitable organizations recommended by the director and approved by the Company.

A director is fully vested in the plan after five years of service as a director or upon death or disability. The plan is unfunded; the Company does not purchase insurance policies to satisfy its obligations under the plan. The directors do not receive any personal financial or tax benefit from this program because any charitable, tax-deductible donations accrue solely to the benefit of the Company. Employee directors may participate in the plan if they make a required annual contribution.

Accidental Death and Disability Insurance

The Company maintains $300,000 accidental death and disability insurance on nonemployee directors.

16

---

Table of Contents

1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The 12 nominees for election as directors are identified on pages 17 through 21. All nominees are now members of the Board of Directors. C. O. Holliday, Jr. retired as Chair of the Board on December 31, 2009.

The Board has determined that, except for E. J. Kullman, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, each of the nominees and each other person who served as director during 2009 (except Mr. Holliday) is or was, as the case may be, independent within the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards and in accordance with the Guidelines for Determining the Independence of DuPont Directors set forth in the Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines. See pages 6-7.

The Board knows of no reason why any nominee would be unable to serve as a director. If any nominee should for any reason become unable to serve, the shares represented by all valid proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may designate following recommendation by the Corporate Governance Committee, or the Board may reduce the number of directors to eliminate the vacancy.

The Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines describe qualifications for directors: Directors are selected for their integrity and character; sound, independent judgment; breadth of experience, insight and knowledge; and business acumen. Leadership skills, scientific or technology expertise, familiarity with issues affecting global businesses in diverse industries, prior government service, and diversity are among the relevant criteria, which will vary over time depending on the needs of the Board. Additionally, directors are expected to be willing and able to devote the necessary time, energy and attention to assure diligent performance of their responsibility.

When considering candidates for nomination, the Committee takes into account these factors to assure that new directors have the highest personal and professional integrity, have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment and will be most effective, in conjunction with other directors, in serving the long-term interest of all stockholders. The Committee will not nominate for election as a director a partner, member, managing director, executive officer or principal of any entity that provides accounting, consulting, legal, investment banking or financial advisory services to the Company.

The following material contains information concerning the nominees, including their period of service as director, their recent employment, other directorships, including those held during the past five years with a public company or registered investment company, and age as of the 2010 Annual Meeting.

17

---

Table of Contents

18

---

Table of Contents

19

---

Table of Contents

20

---

Table of Contents

21

---

Table of Contents

Ownership of Company Stock

As of December 31, 2009, there were no beneficial owners known to DuPont of more than five percent of DuPont's outstanding Common Stock. The following table includes shares of DuPont Common Stock beneficially owned by each director and nominee, by each executive officer named in the 2009 Summary Compensation Table on page 42 of this Proxy Statement and by all directors and executive officers as a group as of December 31, 2009. Under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, "beneficial ownership" includes shares for which the individual, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting or investment power, whether or not the shares are held for the individual's benefit.

(1)

These shares are held individually or jointly with others, or in the name of a bank, broker or nominee for the individual's account.



(2)

This column includes other shares over which directors and executive officers have or share voting or investment power, including shares directly owned by certain relatives with whom they are presumed to share voting and/or investment power, and shares held under the DuPont Retirement Savings Plan.



(3)

This column includes shares which directors and executive officers had a right to acquire beneficial ownership of within 60 days from December 31, 2009, through the exercise of stock options or through the conversion of restricted stock units or deferred stock units granted or held under DuPont's equity-based compensation plans.



(4)

Unless otherwise indicated, beneficial ownership of any named individual does not exceed 0.5% of the outstanding shares of the class.

22

---

Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Directors and executive officers are required to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of DuPont Common Stock with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All such filings were timely made except an amendment to Form 3 was filed on behalf of Mr. Fanandakis in January 2010 to reflect a holding that had been inadvertently omitted from his original Form 3 filed on September 10, 2009.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during 2009 an officer or employee of DuPont or any of the Company's subsidiaries nor was any such person a former officer of DuPont or any of the Company's subsidiaries. In addition, no Compensation Committee member is an executive officer of another entity at which one of the Company's executive officers serves on the board of directors.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") section included in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee has also reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management.

Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in this Proxy Statement.

The members of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors have provided this report.

                 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

                 John T. Dillon, Chair
                 Richard H. Brown
                 Curtis J. Crawford
                 Alexander M. Cutler
                 Eleuthère I. du Pont

23

---

Table of Contents

Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A)

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Core Principles

At DuPont (referred to throughout this CD&A as "Company", "we" or "our"), we are focused on delivering sustainable growth, increasing stockholder and societal value, and decreasing our environmental footprint. We strive to accomplish growth and innovation within our core values, which include safety and health, environmental stewardship, highest ethical behavior, and respect for people. The executive compensation programs at DuPont are designed to attract, motivate, reward and retain the high quality executives necessary for the leadership of the Company and accomplishment of our strategies. The following principles guide the design and administration of those compensation programs:

•

Programs should include a strong link between pay and performance, measured at all levels by placing a significant portion of compensation "at risk" based on Company, business unit and individual performance.

•

Programs should align executives with stockholders by creating a strong focus on stock ownership and be based on performance measures that drive long-term sustained stockholder value growth.

•

Programs should reinforce business strategies and reflect the Company's core values by rewarding improved business growth, promoting desired competencies and recognizing contributions to business success that are consistent with those core values.

•

Programs should ensure access to needed talent and protect against competitor recruitment of that talent by attracting, retaining, motivating, and rewarding senior executives through compensation opportunities that are market competitive and commensurate with the executive's responsibilities, experience and demonstrated performance.

Determining Executive Compensation

An important aspect of the Compensation Committee's annual work relates to the determination of compensation for the Company's Named Executive Officers ("NEOs") and other Section 16 officers. The NEOs are the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. The former Executive Chair and former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer are also NEOs for 2009.

In 2009, the Compensation Committee (the "Committee" for purposes of this CD&A) retained Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("Cook") to serve as an independent compensation consultant to the Committee on executive compensation matters. Cook performs work at the direction and under the supervision of the Committee, and provides advice, research and analytical services on a variety of subjects, including compensation of NEOs, nonemployee director compensation, and executive compensation trends. Cook provided no services to DuPont other than those provided to the Committee.

Base salary, short-term incentive ("STIP") awards under the cash-based component of the Company's Equity and Incentive Plan ("EIP") and long-term incentive ("LTI") awards issued under the EIP for the CEO are reviewed and recommended by the Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board of Directors. Base salary, STIP and LTI awards for the other NEOs (and other Section 16 officers) are reviewed and recommended by the CEO and approved by the Committee.

Competitive Analysis

All compensation elements are assessed primarily against published compensation surveys that represent large companies with median revenue comparable to DuPont's ("Market"), including surveys by Towers Perrin, Mercer, Hewitt, Watson Wyatt Data Services and Hay Group. We believe that this approach ensures a complete and robust picture of the overall compensation environment and consistent comparisons for the CEO and other NEOs.

24

---

Table of Contents

We also use a select group of peer companies ("Peer Group") to: (i) benchmark pay design (mix, performance criteria, etc.); (ii) measure financial performance; and (iii) test the link between pay and performance. Because of the smaller number of Peer Group companies, we occasionally find some volatility in compensation data year over year. For this reason, we use Peer Group information only to validate the results of our competitive Market analysis.

The Committee regularly reviews the Peer Group and last revised the companies comprising the Peer Group in 2007. The Peer Group represents the multiple markets in which we compete — including markets for executive talent, customers and capital — and is comprised of large, high-performing U.S.-based companies with a strong scientific focus and/or research intensity and a strong international presence. In 2009, The Dow Chemical Company completed the acquisition of Rohm and Haas Company. As a result, we have removed Rohm and Haas Company from our current Peer Group.

The Peer Group includes the following companies:

Total Compensation Review

In addition to reviewing external compensation practices, the Committee reviews all components (including perquisites) of the current and historic compensation of the NEOs. That review includes a comprehensive analysis of past compensation actions and the development of detailed tally sheets for the NEOs. Tally sheets permit the Committee to see all elements of actual and potential future compensation of the NEOs, as well as information about wealth accumulation. This assists the Committee's analysis of individual elements of compensation (including mix) as well as total actual and projected compensation.

Tally sheets include the following information: current base salary, current short and long-term incentives, cash compensation history (including short-term incentives), equity award history (with potential and

25

---

Table of Contents

realized values), cash flow history and stock option exercise history, and a review of the benefits that would become payable upon various termination scenarios.

Pay Equity Multiple

To ensure that NEOs are paid appropriately relative to each other and that we appropriately manage the pay differential between the CEO and the other NEOs, we apply a pay equity multiple to average total cash compensation ("TCC" equals base salary plus STIP awards) and average total direct compensation ("TDC" equals TCC plus LTI awards). The TCC pay multiple for the CEO is two to three times the average of the other NEOs. The TDC pay multiple for the CEO is three to four times the average of the other NEOs.

Using NEOs as the comparison group provides for a stable group not dependent on titles. It also offers transparency and the ability to compare to the Peer Group or other companies.

Executive Compensation Process Review

To confirm that DuPont's executive compensation decision-making process is appropriate and effective, the Committee engaged Soundboard Review Services, LLC ("Soundboard"), an independent firm that reviews public company board actions objectively on behalf of stockholders.

Soundboard interviewed members of management, the Committee and Cook. Soundboard also reviewed public and nonpublic documents including: Committee agendas, Committee charter and other administrative documents; Committee meeting minutes and communications; internal Company analyses and recommendations reviewed and acted upon by the Committee (including, but not limited to, risk assessments, tally sheets and process descriptions); compensation plans and programs and internal reports concerning their design, possible alternatives or modifications, payout factors and target levels; and executive and Committee performance reviews and self-evaluations. Soundboard's review did not address the relative merits of the Company's executive compensation programs or the amounts or forms of remuneration awarded to the Company's executives.

Based on this review, Soundboard concluded that with respect to executive compensation, the Board and Committee have adopted and implemented sound practices and processes for developing and reviewing pay plans and programs; setting executive compensation levels and performance targets; reporting to stockholders; selecting and using internal and external resources; determining the composition of the Committee and establishing and updating its charter and mandate; complying with relevant legal and regulatory requirements; and analyzing, preparing for, and responding to extraordinary events.

*  *  *

The Committee reviewed all components of each NEO's compensation and utilized Market and Peer Group data to perform a competitive compensation analysis. Based on this review, the Committee determined that the NEOs' compensation is consistent with the Market, the Company's financial performance and each individual's performance and experience. The Committee believes that the NEOs' total compensation in the aggregate is reasonable, competitive and not excessive.

Executive Compensation Overview

Our compensation programs support our business strategies by providing incentives to grow the business, increase earnings, generate and preserve cash, improve return on investments, and grow stockholder value, all in a manner consistent with our core values. In addition to aligning the NEOs' interests with those of our stockholders, we recognize the individual and team performance of each NEO in meeting our business objectives.

26

---

Table of Contents

Components of the Executive Compensation Program

We believe that a performance-oriented program, which provides competitive compensation, maintains internal equity and is cost effective, allows us to attract and retain superior executive talent and remain true to our executive compensation philosophy and core values.

Our executive compensation program consists of the following components:

•

base salary

•

annual short-term incentive ("STIP") awards

•

long-term incentive ("LTI") awards

-

stock options

-

performance-based restricted stock units ("PSUs")

-

time-vested restricted stock units ("RSUs")

•

benefits

•

limited perquisites

Compensation Practices and Risk

The Committee regularly monitors the Company's compensation programs to assess whether those programs are motivating the appropriate behaviors while driving the Company's performance. In 2009, the Committee conducted an additional in-depth analysis of the Company's executive compensation programs to ensure that those plans promote the appropriate level of risk-taking behavior. Based on that review, the Committee determined that the Company's executive compensation programs encourage the appropriate levels of risk-taking given the Company's risk profile. The Committee's review encompassed a broad range of design elements and the relationship of each to risk. A summary is provided below.

Mix of pay

The Committee determines each element of pay individually. Our executive programs are structured so that more than two-thirds of targeted TDC is contingent upon performance and, therefore, fluctuates with our financial results and share price, which we believe motivates executives to consider the impact of their decisions on stockholder value. To mitigate the possible risk inherent in the greater focus on LTI, executives receive an equal mix, by fair value on the date of grant, of stock options (rewards for stock price appreciation and direct link to stockholder experience), RSUs (intended as retention tool and linked to stock price) and PSUs (rewards key financial performance relative to peers in revenue growth and total stockholder return ["TSR"]). Overlapping performance cycles in the PSU program assure sustainability of performance.

For the CEO, 87% of TDC is at risk. Approximately 26% of the portion at risk is tied to achievement of annual incentive goals, and 74% is tied to achievement of share price or financial goals over a longer period. This allows us to motivate and reward in the short-term, while reinforcing the importance of maintaining the long-term perspective that has served our Company for over 208 years.

27

---

Table of Contents

The targeted pay mix for NEOs in 2009 is displayed below.

Mix of performance metrics

Our incentive plans incorporate top-line (e.g., revenue) and bottom-line (e.g., earnings) performance metrics to (i) assure that annual and long-term incentive plan objectives are aligned and (ii) encourage consistent behaviors and sustainable performance results.

Additional discussion regarding the objectives of the various performance metrics can be found under "Annual Short-Term Incentives" and "Long-Term Incentives" in this CD&A.

Leverage (pay/performance calibration)

Leverage represents the relationship between performance for a given metric and the corresponding payout factor for that metric. Leverage in the annual plan is in line with competitive practice and balances our internal approach to goal setting.

Other protections/controls

Payout limitations or "caps" play a vital role in risk mitigation and, with the exception of earnings per share ("EPS") growth, all metrics in the STIP and PSU programs are capped at 200% payout to protect against excessive payouts. Beginning in 2010, EPS growth will also be capped at 200% payout.

Clawback provisions, stock ownership guidelines and insider trading policies that prohibit executives from entering into derivative transactions also protect against excessive risk in the Company's incentive programs.

Base Salary

Base salaries serve as the foundation of our compensation program. Base salary provides a regular source of income for NEOs. The majority of other executive compensation elements, including annual STIP awards, LTI awards, and retirement benefits are driven from base salary or the midpoint of the salary structure. Consistent with our policy for all employees, base salaries for the NEOs (including the CEO) are targeted at the Market median.

The Committee reviews CEO Market and Peer Group data provided by Cook and, in executive session without management present, develops a recommended base salary increase for the CEO, based on performance, competitiveness, tally sheet review and internal equity. Final compensation actions for the CEO are approved by the independent Board members.

28

---

Table of Contents

Management establishes salary rates and develops recommended salary increases for NEOs based on the factors identified for the CEO salary determination. The Committee reviews management's recommendations and approves base salary changes for each NEO.

For 2009, the merit budget was set at zero, and no merit increases were given to NEOs. Further, the Company implemented a Voluntary Unpaid Time Off Program asking its exempt/salaried/professional employees to voluntarily take time off without pay. The NEOs and other officers were asked to take three weeks off without pay, and other exempt/salaried/professionals were asked to take the equivalent of two weeks off without pay during 2009. All NEOs and other officers voluntarily took three weeks off without pay.

The 2010 base salary increase was 8.3% for the CEO, in recognition of her performance and additional responsibilities as Chair of the Board, and averaged 3.1% for the other NEOs. The increases fell within the Company's merit and promotion budget guidelines for all employees, reflected market adjustments as well as expansions of roles and responsibilities, and resulted in competitive positioning versus the Market at approximately the Market median.

Annual Short-Term Incentives

NEOs are eligible for STIP awards designed to align participants with our annual goals and objectives and stockholders' interests by creating a direct link to our financial and operational performance for the year. STIP targets are set as a percent of the salary structure midpoint.

At the beginning of each performance year, the STIP target percent for the CEO is reviewed by the Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board based on competitive Market data provided by Cook. At the conclusion of each performance period, the CEO's STIP award is calculated based on financial results and on her performance against critical operating tasks, reviewed by the Committee and approved by the independent members of the Board. Further, the Committee approves STIP targets for all participants, including the other NEOs, based on competitive Market data.

At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Committee approves the performance measures and weightings assigned to each measure. For 2009, STIP awards were based on the same metrics as 2008. However, in response to the importance of managing cash in the current economic environment, the Committee approved a change in weightings for 2009 to specifically focus the organization on the importance of maximizing cash, by doubling the weight of the cash flow from operations ("CFFO") metric to 20% and decreasing the revenue and after-tax operating income ("ATOI") metrics to 15% each.

In addition to financial metrics, the STIP design includes a "dynamic planning factor" ("DPF") to assess how well a business unit anticipates and responds to the business environment in a way that creates value for the Company. To determine the DPF payout factor, business units are assessed, both qualitatively and quantitatively, on a number of items, such as headwinds, tailwinds and other external factors, business period cost, inventory before last-in, first-out (LIFO) adjustment, free cash flow, and core values. The DPF performance analysis assures that our plan payouts are relevant to the current business strategy and recognize the external economic environment.

Our performance measures were selected to drive sustainable, profitable growth and return on investment in the business markets in which the Company competes.

29

---

Table of Contents

For 2009, the STIP awards were determined based on the following formula, measures and weightings:

Target STIP = Salary Level Midpoint × Target STIP Percent
Final STIP = Target STIP × [Corporate Performance Payout Factor + Business Unit Performance Payout Factor + Individual Performance Payout Factor]

The measures of EPS and business unit ATOI that are used for calculation of STIP awards exclude significant items, as defined for our internal reporting purposes. Although not in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America ("GAAP"), we believe that these non-GAAP measures are appropriate because they provide insight with respect to ongoing operating results of the Company.

For the CEO and other NEOs, the final payout determination for 2009 is outlined below.

30

---

Table of Contents

Corporate Performance in the table above was based on EPS (excluding significant items) of $2.03 and $2.78 for 2009 and 2008, respectively. The reconciliation below shows how EPS (excluding significant items) was calculated from EPS as reported in the Company's audited financial statements for the respective year.

Total annual STIP award payout is limited to 20% of consolidated net income before significant items after deducting six percent of net capital employed. Each year the Committee reviews operating results, excluding all significant items, in determining the overall limit on STIP awards. This ensures that the amount available for STIP awards fluctuates in relation to the Company's operating results. Over the past ten years, the Committee has approved payments on average of 48% of the maximum available, ranging from 31% to 87%. The final 2009 STIP award payout pool of $145 million was 47% of the maximum available amount.

In 2009, the Committee also conducted a comprehensive review of the STIP design to assure that it aligns participants with our annual goals and objectives and stockholders' interests by creating a direct link to our financial and operational performance. The review found the following:

•

Current metrics (EPS, Revenue, CFFO) balance top line and bottom line performance, are commonly used and have shown a strong correlation with increases in TSR (in normal markets);

•

The performance/payout leverage is slightly less than competitive practice, reflecting our risk profile as a company, and our rigor in setting performance targets; and

•

Performance on a number of financial metrics versus our Peer Group for 2008 generally fell in the second quartile (between 33^rd and 42^nd percentile); STIP payouts for the NEOs as a group versus Peer Group NEOs also fell in the second quartile at the 39^th percentile, and aligned with our performance relative to the Peer Group.

The analysis showed that our plan:

•

Is well-balanced with a strong link between pay and performance (at corporate, business unit and individual levels);

•

Places significant portions of compensation "at risk";

•

Reinforces our business strategy; and

•

Supports the link between pay and performance, without encouraging excessive risk-taking behaviors.

Long-Term Incentives

Objectives

NEOs are eligible for LTI awards designed to accomplish the following objectives:

•

Provide more significant incentive for those who are responsible for our long-term growth and success

•

Link pay and performance — accelerate growth and balance this growth with productivity, profitability, and capital management

•

Align the interests of executives with stockholders

–

Increase stockholder value

–

Incorporate key metrics that drive stockholder value

•

Attract, retain, motivate and reward executive talent

•

Balance plan costs, such as accounting and dilution, with employee-perceived value, potential wealth creation opportunity and employee share ownership expectations

•

Ensure rewards pay out over multiple years to keep executives focused on longer-term results

31

---

Table of Contents

Award Practices

All equity-based awards must be approved by the independent members of the Board or the appropriate Board committee. LTI awards are established as a dollar value, which is translated into an equal mix, by fair value on the date of grant, of stock options, RSUs and PSUs.

Annual awards to employees, including NEOs, are made at a pre-established Committee meeting in early February. This allows sufficient time for the market to absorb announcement of annual earnings, which is typically made during the fourth week of January. We do not time equity awards in coordination with the release of material nonpublic information. The grant price is the closing price on the date of grant.

Any occasional special awards to employees who are not executive officers are approved by the Special Stock Performance Committee (consisting of the Chairs of the Board and the Compensation Committee), to which the Board of Directors has delegated the authority to approve special equity grants. Awards are effective on the date of approval by the Special Stock Performance Committee.

Equity Vehicle Mix

To achieve the various long-term incentive objectives outlined above, and to offset any possible risk inherent in the greater focus on LTI, our program for NEOs consists of an equal mix, by fair value on the date of grant, of stock options, PSUs and RSUs. This balanced program allows us to reinforce specific business objectives, address business circumstances, talent needs and philosophical considerations and support our culture. The following table summarizes the performance drivers, mix and objectives for the various LTI components as they relate to NEOs:

32

---

Table of Contents

Award Target

The Committee establishes LTI targets for each NEO at approximately the competitive Market median. LTI awards made to NEOs and other executives in February 2009 were reduced by 20% from 2008 values. In arriving at this decision, the Committee took into consideration the significant reduction in our share price and the anticipated fundamental changes to the competitive Market, while addressing the Company's objectives to motivate and retain employees for the long-term, link pay to performance and appropriately align our program with stockholder interests. Actual awards can range from 0% to 200% of the target. The range reflects an NEO's contribution to the achievement of longer-term critical operating tasks such as driving research productivity, developing sales capability and growing revenue in emerging markets. In 2009, individual LTI awards for NEOs ranged from 90% to 110% of the reduced target.

Stock Options

Nonqualified stock option grants are typically made annually at the closing price on the date of grant, vest in one-third increments over three years and, starting in 2009, carry a term of seven years (increased from six-year term for previous awards), which we believe creates a strong performance and retention incentive.

We do not reprice stock options. A reload feature is available for options granted from 1997 through 2003. Effective with options granted in 2004, option grants do not include a reload feature and we do not intend to add this feature in the future.

RSUs and PSUs

RSUs offer a retentive feature to our LTI program and provide further alignment with stockholders through increased ownership levels. RSUs are typically granted annually and vest in one-third increments over a three-year period.

The PSU program ensures both stockholder alignment and focus on business priorities by clearly communicating what is most important in driving business performance and creating stockholder value. Typically, PSUs are awarded to each NEO at the beginning of a three-year performance cycle. At the conclusion of the performance cycle, payouts can range from 0% to 200% of the target grant based on pre-established, performance-based corporate objectives. For awards granted in 2009, those objectives are revenue growth and TSR (both on a relative basis versus the Peer Group) over the three-year performance period. The payout on PSUs granted in 2009 will be determined based on the table below.

Performance Targets (2009 — 2011 Performance Period)

 

2006 PSU Program (payable in 2009)

The performance period for PSUs awarded in 2006 ended on December 31, 2008. The final number of shares earned was based on revenue growth relative to the Peer Group (at the time of award), return on invested capital ("ROIC") relative to the Peer Group for performance year 2006 and an absolute ROIC target for performance years 2007 and 2008. The final payout determination was made in March of 2009 after a review of the Company's performance. Revenue growth fell at the 31^st percentile rank versus the

33

---

Table of Contents

Peer Group. ROIC performance fell at the 62nd percentile rank versus the Peer Group at that time for 2006. For 2007 and 2008, ROIC results were 16.2% and 12.1% respectively. This resulted in an overall payout of 35%.

*

Average of 2006-2008 Payout Percentages

Further details are provided in the 2009 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table on page 51.

2007 PSU Program (payable in 2010)

The performance period for PSUs awarded in 2007 ended on December 31, 2009. The final number of shares earned was based on absolute ROIC target for each year of the three-year performance period and revenue growth relative to the Peer Group. The final payout determination was made in March of 2010 after a review of the Company's performance. Revenue growth fell at the 50th percentile relative to the Peer Group. ROIC results were 16.2%, 12.1% and 8.8%, respectively. This resulted in an overall payout of 30%.

*

Average of 2007-2009 Payout Percentages

Further details are provided in the 2009 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table on page 51. Target units and year-end values for PSUs awarded in 2007 through 2009 are included in the Outstanding Equity Awards table.

Payout levels at 35% and 30% for the 2006 and 2007 PSU programs, respectively, demonstrate strong alignment of pay to long-term performance.

Benefits

Our global benefit philosophy for employees, including the NEOs and other executive officers, is to provide a package of benefits consistent with local practices and competitive within individual markets.

NEOs participate in the same health and welfare and retirement programs on the same terms and conditions as other employees. For U.S. parent company employees, this offering consists of the following:

•

Standard range of medical, dental and vacation benefits, as well as life insurance and disability coverage

•

Participation in the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan and the DuPont Retirement Savings Plan ("RSP")

The DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan under which benefits are based primarily on an employee's years of service and final average pay near retirement. Employees hired after December 31, 2006 do not participate in the plan. Employees hired or rehired after

34

---

Table of Contents

December 31, 2006 participate only in the RSP, a tax-qualified defined contribution plan with a 401(k) feature.

In addition to these tax-qualified retirement plans, executive officers may participate in nonqualified retirement plans that restore those benefits that cannot be paid as a result of Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") limits applicable to tax-qualified retirement plans, including:

•

The Pension Restoration Plan. The purpose of the plan is to restore those benefits that cannot be paid by the Pension Plan as a result of IRC limits applicable to tax-qualified pension plans.

•

The Retirement Savings Restoration Plan ("RSRP"). The purpose of this plan is to provide eligible employees the opportunity to defer salary and receive a Company match and savings contribution on compensation that is ineligible to be considered in calculating benefits under the RSP due to IRC limits on compensation. A Company match and savings contribution is credited in an equivalent amount to what would have been provided under the tax-qualified savings plan absent IRC limits.

These plans, generally, apply to all eligible employees who exceed the IRC limits. Retirement benefits in excess of these limits are paid from our operating cash flows.

Starting in 2009, NEOs were eligible to participate in the DuPont Management Deferred Compensation Plan ("MDCP"), which allows eligible participants to defer a portion of base salary, STIP awards and LTI awards.

Perquisites and Personal Benefits

As a matter of business philosophy, we provide very limited perquisites or personal benefits to NEOs. Employees who receive LTI awards are occasionally provided financial education services such as seminars, which are focused on assisting employees to achieve the highest value from our compensation and benefits programs. In addition, personal financial counseling (excluding tax counseling) is provided to senior leaders, including NEOs. The cost of such financial counseling is generally less than $10,000 per NEO.

Company Aircraft

The Company aircraft are dedicated primarily to senior management support and are intended for business travel only. Consistent with the Company's policy, the CEO travels on Company aircraft for business and personal travel. Commercial travel is permitted when security risk is considered minimal and such travel is approved by the Office of the Director of Corporate Security.

Costs associated with nonbusiness travel are treated as personal benefits for Mrs. Kullman and are disclosed as such in the "All Other Compensation" column in the 2009 Summary Compensation Table.

Our policy regarding use of the Company aircraft by executive officers is driven by business efficiency considerations and security concerns. The policy is reviewed periodically in light of emerging developments concerning those areas. Changes in levels of security risks in certain countries could, for example, result in modifications regarding use of Company aircraft to those destinations.

Compensation of the Chair and CEO

The evaluation of the Chair and CEO is one of the fundamental duties of the Board of Directors. The performance evaluation consists of a self-evaluation by the CEO, the completion of a number of performance-specific questions by each member of the Board, summarized by Cook, and further assessment by the independent Board members in executive session.

The Board considers competitive Market information and reviews the compensation of Peer Group CEOs. The Board also reviews pay equity multiples and tally sheets prior to finalizing CEO pay decisions.

35

---

Table of Contents

Mr. Holliday

On January 1, 2009, Mr. Holliday became Executive Chair of the Board with Mrs. Kullman's appointment as CEO. Mr. Holliday's compensation information for January is presented in the 2009 Summary Compensation Table and other tables as appropriate. Compensation related to his service on the Board of Directors during the remainder of 2009 is reflected in the 2009 Directors' Compensation table.

Consistent with existing policy, Mr. Holliday will be provided with office space and secretarial support for five years following his retirement from the Board.

Mrs. Kullman

The Board named Mrs. Kullman CEO effective January 1, 2009 and Chair of the Board effective January 1, 2010.

In evaluating Mrs. Kullman's performance and determining her compensation, the Board considered the Company's overall financial, strategic and operational performance for 2009, given a highly challenging environment. The Board also recognized that Mrs. Kullman:

•

swiftly responded to the challenging business environment implementing actions that

–

drove execution

–

delivered strong operating results

–

generated cash in excess of goals

–

cut fixed costs significantly

–

aligned all aspects of the business to achieve goals;

•

seamlessly transitioned to the position of CEO while maintaining her core leadership team, both during a time of great economic uncertainty; and

•

expertly managed the reorganization of the Company, streamlining its many businesses, and focusing on emerging markets.

1.

Base Pay

The Board approved an increase in Mrs. Kullman's base salary to $1.2 million effective January 1, 2009. The new salary was targeted at the Market 25th percentile for Chair and CEO, reflecting Mrs. Kullman's tenure in the role of CEO and the absence of responsibilities as Chair of the Board.

For 2009, the merit budget was set at zero. Consistent with the treatment of all employees, Mrs. Kullman did not receive a merit salary increase for 2009.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Board named Mrs. Kullman Chair of the Board, concurrent with the retirement of Mr. Holliday as Chair of the Board. The Board approved an increase in Mrs. Kullman's base salary to $1.3 million in recognition of her performance and additional responsibilities as Chair of the Board. The new salary was targeted just below the Market median.

2.

STIP Award

Mrs. Kullman's STIP award for 2009 was calculated at $1.698 million, reflecting the final payout factors based on corporate and business unit financial results (56% and 94%, respectively), and an IPA of 100%. The combination of corporate, business unit and individual performance resulted in a STIP award that was 88% of target. However, in recognition of the difficult conditions challenging our Company, employees, and stakeholders, Mrs. Kullman requested that her STIP payment be granted at $1.5 million, or 78% of target, compared to an overall weighted payout factor for the organization at 91%.

36

---

Table of Contents

3.

LTI Award

The Board approved a 2009 LTI award of $5.2 million, which was below the 25th percentile of the Market for CEO and Chair, and reflects the Committee's decision to reduce LTI values by 20% for all executives. The LTI award was delivered in the form of 646,767 stock options (at a grant date price of $23.28 and a Black-Scholes value of $2.68), 74,456 RSUs and 74,456 PSUs (both at the closing price on grant date of $23.28).

After comprehensive review of the Market data and considering Mrs. Kullman's successful first year as CEO, the Board approved a 2010 LTI award of $6.5 million, which is approximately 30% below Market median and reflects the Committee's desire to move Mrs. Kullman's LTI award above the 25th percentile of the Market median. The LTI award was delivered in the form of 336,439 stock options (at a grant date price of $33.49 and a Black-Scholes value of $6.44), 64,696 RSUs and 64,696 PSUs (both at the closing price on grant date of $33.49).

The compensation decisions reflected the Board's objective to provide 2010 CEO target compensation in the second quartile of the Market (between the 25th and 50th percentile) and progress toward median with additional experience and contribution as both Chair of the Board and CEO.

Total Compensation Review

The tally sheet review confirmed that decisions made by the Committee in the past resulted in compensation aligned with our performance and external benchmarks (including Market and Peer Group comparisons). The analysis also confirmed that there were no unexpected consequences flowing from past compensation decisions.

Pay Equity Multiple

To further validate its compensation decisions, the Board reviewed CEO pay equity multiples relative to the other NEOs and found them to be within the established range for TCC and TDC. The final 2009 pay equity multiples and the target 2010 pay equity multiples are as follows:

Roles and Compensation of the Other NEOs

Effective October 1, 2009, the Company implemented actions that were aimed at driving decision-making closer to our customers, with greater regional responsibility within our businesses. This restructuring affected the NEOs as follows:

•

Mr. Fanandakis succeeded Mr. Keefer as the Company's Chief Financial Officer effective November 1, 2009. Mr. Keefer remained Executive Vice President and took on responsibilities for the Performance Coatings business, Corporate Plans, IT, and the Company's portfolio management process and functional cost efficiency project.

•

Mr. Goodmanson retired effective September 30, 2009.

•

Mr. Connelly continues to lead science and technology and the regions and has added responsibility for Applied BioSciences, Nutrition & Health, and DuPont Performance Polymers and Packaging and Industrial Polymers.

The Committee approves compensation actions for the NEOs, excluding the CEO. The Committee's decisions are based on a review of an individual NEO's contributions during the year and Market competitiveness. In making its determinations regarding compensation for NEOs in 2009, the Committee

37

---

Table of Contents

reviewed such factors as achievement of cost goals, preservation and generation of cash, reduction in working capital, the challenges created by the reorganization, and performance on the Company's core values.

Specifically, the Compensation Committee and the CEO assessed the personal performance of the NEOs and took the following into consideration.

Mr. Fanandakis

•

effectively completed joint ventures in his role prior to the CFO role

•

successfully initiated two pilot plants and met financial targets

•

drove important Applied BioSciences portfolio work concentrating on exploring market opportunities

•

smoothly transitioned into role of CFO with exceptional collaboration from Mr. Keefer

•

reorganized Finance function to respond to the new corporate organization, contributing to the financial results delivered in 2009

Mr. Keefer

•

proactively led Finance function in preparing for and responding to the economic crisis

•

acted in role of CFO to strengthen the financial position and preserve the Company's liquidity as the credit markets began to deteriorate

•

successfully managed transition to Mr. Fanandakis

•

steered Company's strategic planning efforts for 2010 and beyond, building capability of the planning function

•

assumed responsibility for productivity efforts (after retirement of Mr. Goodmanson) and continued discipline and focus on successful achievement of those objectives

Mr. Connelly

•

effectively undertook key role implementing new organizational structure

•

translated unique global experience into stronger Company position in regions outside of the United States

•

skillfully piloted critical technology efforts with focus on current and future needs

•

led organization to record year in patents filed and new product introductions

Mr. Borel

•

led outperformance of financial targets in Agriculture & Nutrition business, driving the organization to outstanding achievement in seed share gain

•

strategically led Company's biotech efforts

Mr. Goodmanson

•

consistently sustained focus on productivity opportunities and drove accomplishment of fixed cost reductions and productivity improvements in excess of $1 billion throughout the organization in 2009

•

led improved operating performance and achieved significant cost savings for several of the Company's Business Units, enhancing business strategy and position for the future, with strong leadership on streamlining inventory projects

38

---

Table of Contents

NEO compensation for 2009 is shown in the table below, which is not intended to be a substitute for the 2009 Summary Compensation Table ("SCT") or Grants of Plan-Based Awards table ("GPBAT"). Base salary and STIP, as shown below, are reflected in the SCT. STIP and LTI targets for 2009 are shown in the GPBAT. The value of LTI awards reflected in the table below differs from the value of equity awards shown in the SCT and GPBAT because those tables reflect the probable outcome of the performance conditions for PSUs. The LTI amounts shown in the table below value PSUs at the closing price of DuPont Common Stock on the date of grant, and reflect the value the Committee considered when making LTI awards for 2009.

Employment/Severance Arrangements

DuPont generally does not enter into employment agreements (including severance agreements) with executives. The Company's Career Transition Financial Assistance Plan ("CTP") currently provides termination benefits equal to one month's pay for each two years of service, with a maximum of twelve months' pay. For purposes of the CTP, pay equals base salary plus last actual STIP award. The program applies to substantially all U.S. parent company employees terminated for lack of work, including executives. On occasion, the Company may negotiate individual arrangements for senior executives and has entered into an agreement with R. R. Goodmanson. For details of this agreement, see Retention Agreement on page 40 of this Proxy Statement. Mr. Goodmanson retired on September 30, 2009.

Change in Control Arrangements

DuPont does not currently have change in control arrangements in place. As part of the overall review of compensation policies and programs, this subject is periodically reviewed against market place practices and business necessity.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

The federal tax laws impose requirements in order for compensation payable to the CEO and certain executive officers to be fully deductible. The Company believes it has taken appropriate actions to maximize its income tax deduction.

IRC Section 162(m) generally precludes a public corporation from taking a deduction for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 for its CEO or any of its three other highest-paid executive officers (other than the CEO or Chief Financial Officer), unless certain specific and detailed criteria are satisfied.

Annually, the Company reviews all compensation programs and payments to determine the tax impact on the Company as well as on the executive officers. In addition, the Company reviews the impact of its programs against other considerations, such as accounting impact, stockholder alignment, market competitiveness, effectiveness and perceived value to employees. Because many different factors influence a well-rounded, comprehensive executive compensation program, some compensation may not be deductible under IRC Section 162(m).

39

---

Table of Contents

The Company will continue to monitor developments and assess alternatives for preserving the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits to the extent reasonably practicable, consistent with its compensation policies and as determined to be in the best interests of DuPont and its stockholders.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Company believes NEOs and senior executives should have a significant equity position in the Company. Stock ownership guidelines are in place to align NEOs and other senior executives with the interests of stockholders and to encourage a longer-term focus in managing the Company. The guidelines require that NEOs and other senior executives accumulate and hold, within three years of the date of achieving the various executive levels, shares of DuPont Common Stock with a value equal to a specified multiple of base pay. The multiples for specific executive levels are set forth below:

An annual review is conducted to assess compliance with the guidelines. The CEO and other NEOs either exceed the ownership guidelines or are on track to achieve the ownership goal within the timeframe established.

DuPont Common Stock may be held in various forms to achieve the applicable ownership guidelines, including: direct ownership, shares held in the RSP, stock units held in the RSRP, deferred stock units and RSUs. Unexercised stock options, including vested options, as well as PSUs are not included in determining whether an executive has achieved the ownership levels.

Compensation Recovery Policy (Clawbacks)

The EIP contains a "clawback" provision under which: (1) a grantee forfeits the right to receive future awards under the EIP; and (2) the Company may demand repayment of awards if the grantee engages in misconduct, including grantee's conduct that (a) results in termination for cause (as defined in the plan), (b) breaches a noncompete or confidentiality clause between the Company and grantee or (c) results in the Company restating financial statements due to material noncompliance and the grantee either (i) had knowledge of the material noncompliance or the circumstances that gave rise to such noncompliance and failed to take reasonable steps to bring it to the attention of appropriate individuals within the Company or (ii) personally and knowingly engaged in practices which materially contributed to the circumstances that enabled a material noncompliance to occur. A grantee is entitled to a hearing before the full Committee at which the grantee may be represented by counsel. Consistent with the standard applicable to other Board and Committee actions, the decision of the Committee is effective if approved by the majority of the Committee's members.

Awards granted under the DuPont Stock Performance Plan (awards made prior to 2008) are subject to forfeiture if the Committee determines, after a hearing, that the grantee willfully engaged in any activity harmful to the interest of the Company. The DuPont Stock Performance Plan does not define specific instances of misconduct. Rather, what constitutes "activity harmful to the interest of the Company" is a determination made by the Committee based on the facts and circumstances in the situation at issue.

Retention Agreement

R. R. Goodmanson

In April 1999, the Company entered into a retention agreement with R. R. Goodmanson. Mr. Goodmanson joined the Company as an external executive hire in the position of Executive Vice President. Mr. Goodmanson retired from the Company effective September 30, 2009.

40

---

Table of Contents

Mr. Goodmanson's retention agreement provided for a special award of $1,000,000 if he remained with the Company through May 1, 2009 or was terminated by the Company (other than for cause) before that date. Mr. Goodmanson is also eligible for retiree medical, dental and life insurance coverage pursuant to the retention agreement.

In consideration of these benefits, Mr. Goodmanson is subject to a noncompete agreement for one year following retirement and requirements that he not disparage the Company or, for one year following retirement, solicit Company employees or customers. He is also subject to a confidentiality agreement covering Company trade secrets and proprietary information.

Further, to ensure Mr. Goodmanson's active participation on behalf of the Company in ongoing litigation and other business matters, in 2008, the Company entered into a three-year consulting agreement with Mr. Goodmanson, effective as of October 1, 2009, pursuant to which he will be paid a $200,000 annual retainer plus a $2,000 per diem payment when actively involved in litigation support and business projects on behalf of the Company. The agreement with Mr. Goodmanson contains customary provisions, including a restriction on his ability to take on any work that may create a conflict of interest, protection of confidential information and reimbursement of all expenses associated with his performance under the agreement.

The retention agreement also provided that if Mr. Goodmanson retired at or after age 62, but was not otherwise eligible for an immediate unreduced pension from the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan, he would receive a supplemental lump sum payment equal to the difference between the value of what the plan pays and the value of full pension eligibility. Additionally, the agreement called for Mr. Goodmanson to be treated as a full DuPont pensioner for purposes of outstanding LTI awards.

41

---

Table of Contents

Compensation of Executive Officers

2009 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table summarizes the compensation of the Named Executive Officers ("NEOs") for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. The NEOs are: (i) the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") and any other individual who served in one of those roles during the last fiscal year; (ii) the three other most highly compensated individuals other than the CEO and CFO serving as executive officers as of the end of the fiscal year ranked by their total compensation (reduced by the amount of change in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings) in the 2009 Summary Compensation Table; and (iii) up to two additional individuals who would have been included in (ii) but for the fact that he/she was not an executive officer as of the end of the fiscal year. For a complete understanding of the table, refer to the narrative discussion that follows.

42

---

Table of Contents

Narrative Discussion of Summary Compensation Table

Salary

Amounts shown in the "Salary" column of the table above represent base salary earned during 2009. Base salary rate changes, if any, for the CEO are effective January 1 of the relevant fiscal year. Base salary rate changes for all other NEOs are effective March 1. There were no merit increases in 2009 and NEOs participated in the Company's Voluntary Unpaid Time Off Program. Base salary for 2009 represented 14% of total direct compensation (base salary, STIP awards and long-term incentive ("LTI") awards) for the CEO and, on average, 24% of total direct compensation for the other NEOs (excluding Mr. Holliday) in 2009, which is consistent with the Compensation Committee's goal of placing more emphasis on "at risk" compensation. In connection with the corporate reorganization during the fall of 2009, promotion increases were given to Mr. Fanandakis (29%), Mr. Connelly (9%) and Mr. Borel (9%). See further discussion on page 37.

43

---

Table of Contents

Stock Awards

Amounts shown in the "Stock Awards" column of the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs and PSUs computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For PSUs, the grant date fair value is based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. This amount is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. Refer to page 47 for a detailed discussion of the grant date fair value of stock awards.

Option Awards

Amounts shown in the "Option Awards" column of the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of stock options computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Refer to page 47 for a detailed discussion of the grant date fair value of option awards.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

Amounts shown in the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column of the table above represent cash-based short-term incentive, or STIP, awards paid for a given year.

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

Amounts shown in the "Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings" column of the table above represent the estimated change in the actuarial present value of accumulated benefits for each of the NEOs at the earlier of age 65 or the age at which the NEO is eligible for an unreduced pension. Key actuarial assumptions for the present value of accumulated benefit calculation can be found in Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. Assumptions are further described in the narrative discussion following the Pension Benefits table.

There were no above-market or preferential earnings during 2009 on nonqualified deferred compensation. Generally, earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation include returns on investments in seven core investment alternatives, interest accruals on cash balances, DuPont Common Stock returns and dividend reinvestments. Interest is accrued on cash balances based on a rate that is traditionally less than 120% of the applicable federal rate and dividend equivalents are accrued at a non-preferential rate. In addition, the other core investment alternatives are a subset of the investment alternatives available to all employees under the qualified plan. Accordingly, these amounts are not considered above-market or preferential earnings for purposes of, and are not included in, the 2009 Summary Compensation Table.

As such, all amounts shown in this column reflect the change in the actuarial pension value under the Pension Plan and Pension Restoration Plan and, in the case of Mr. Goodmanson, his retention agreement. Generally, the change in pension value represents the changes from 2008 to 2009 in the present value of an NEO's accumulated benefit as of the applicable pension measurement date. For Mr. Goodmanson, the amount shown in this column represents the change in present value of accumulated pension benefits, adjusted for distributions made during the year. For Mr. Holliday, the amount shown in this column represents: (i) the change in present value of his accumulated pension benefit under the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan ("Pension Plan"), adjusted for distributions made during the year; plus (ii) the increase in present value of accumulated benefit under the DuPont Pension Restoration Plan ("Pension Restoration Plan") through his date of retirement. Such increases were primarily due to changes in the actuarial assumptions used to calculate the present value of pension benefits. If the change in pension value is negative, it is not shown in the table above.

All Other Compensation

Amounts shown in the "All Other Compensation" column of the table above include: (a) perquisites and personal benefits (if greater than or equal to $10,000); (b) registrant (Company) contributions to qualified

44

---

Table of Contents

defined contribution plans; and (c) registrant (Company) contributions to nonqualified defined contribution plans. The following table details those amounts.

45

---

Table of Contents

2009 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The following table provides information on STIP awards, stock options, RSUs and PSUs granted in 2009 to each of the Company's NEOs. For a complete understanding of the table, refer to the narrative discussion that follows.

Narrative Discussion of Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards

Amounts shown in this column of the table above represent STIP award opportunities for 2009 under the EIP. A target STIP award is established for each NEO at the beginning of the relevant fiscal year based on a percentage of the midpoint of the NEO's salary guide level. The actual STIP payout for NEOs, which can range from 0% to 200% of target, is based on corporate and weighted average business unit performance and individual performance. The metrics and weightings for 2009, which are discussed in greater detail on pages 29-31 of this Proxy Statement, are: corporate earnings per share (20%); business unit after-tax operating income (15%), revenue (15%), cash flow from operations (20%), dynamic planning factor (10%); and individual performance (20%).

Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards

Amounts shown in this column of the table above represent the potential payout range of PSUs granted in 2009. Vesting for PSUs granted in 2009 is equally based upon corporate revenue growth relative to the Peer Group and total stockholder return ("TSR") relative to the Peer Group. Performance and payouts are determined independently for each metric. At the conclusion of the three-year performance period, the actual award, delivered as DuPont Common Stock, can range from zero percent to 200 percent of the original grant. Dividend equivalents are applied after the final performance determination.

Any termination of employment, including retirement, within six months of grant results in a forfeiture of the award. For a discussion of the impact on PSUs of any subsequent termination, refer to the tables on pages 56-60 of this Proxy Statement.

46

---

Table of Contents

All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units

Amounts shown in this column of the table above represent RSUs granted in 2009 that are paid out in shares of DuPont Common Stock and vest ratably over a three-year vesting period, one-third on each anniversary date. Dividend equivalents are applied and are subject to the same restrictions as the RSUs.

Any termination of employment, including retirement, within six months of grant results in a forfeiture of the award. For a discussion of the impact on RSUs of a subsequent termination, refer to the tables on pages 56-60 of this Proxy Statement.

All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options

Amounts shown in this column of the table above represent nonqualified stock options granted in 2009 with a seven-year term and ratable vesting over a three-year period, one-third on each anniversary date. The exercise price of options granted, as shown in the table above, is based on the closing price of DuPont Common Stock on the date of grant.

Any termination of employment, including retirement, within six months of grant results in a forfeiture of the award. For a discussion of the impact on options of a subsequent termination, refer to the tables on pages 56-60 of this Proxy Statement.

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards

Except with respect to PSUs, amounts shown in this column of the table above reflect the grant date fair value of the equity award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For PSUs, the grant date fair value is based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. This amount is consistent with the estimate of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the service period determined as of the grant date under FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. The grant date fair value of the PSUs, subject to the TSR metric, was $27.87, estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The grant date fair value of the PSUs, subject to the revenue metric, was based upon the closing price of the underlying DuPont Common Stock as of the grant date, which was $23.28.

The grant date fair value of RSUs reflected in this column is based on the closing price of DuPont Common Stock as of the grant date, which was $23.28.

For purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions set forth in the table below. The grant date fair value of options granted in 2009 was $2.68. The Company determines the dividend yield by dividing the current annual dividend on the Company's Common Stock by the option exercise price. A historical daily measurement of volatility is determined based on the expected life of the option granted. The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the yield on an outstanding U.S. Treasury Note with a term equal to the expected life of the option granted. Expected life is determined by reference to the Company's historical experience.

47

---

Table of Contents

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS

The following table shows the number of shares underlying exercisable and unexercisable options and unvested and, as applicable, unearned RSUs and PSUs held by the Company's NEOs at December 31, 2009. Market or payout values in the table below are based on the closing price of DuPont Common Stock as of that date.