UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION
8410 West Bryn Mawr Avenue
Suite 700
Chicago, Illinois 60631
Phone: (773) 399-8900
Fax: (773) 399-8936
April 15, 2008
Note: To increase the efficiency of our financial communications, U.S. Cellular® no longer produces a traditional printed annual report. The accompanying letter to shareholders and Appendix I containing Exhibit 13 to U.S. Cellular's Form 10-K serve as the company's annual report to shareholders and are available, along with other financial and supplemental information, on the U.S. Cellular website, www.uscellular.com.
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS
United States Cellular Corporation is the nation's sixth-largest full-service wireless carrier. U.S. Cellular operates on a customer satisfaction strategy, meeting customer needs by providing a comprehensive range of wireless products and services, superior customer support, and a high-quality network. This strategy is the foundation for the company's success, resulting in both loyal customers and profitable growth.
2007 Overview
We are pleased to report that U.S. Cellular achieved very strong operating and financial results in 2007, including record service revenues and operating income, and other highlights as follows:
Services and Products
The impressive gains in revenues related to data services, which represented 10 percent of total service revenues, were due to several factors:
Increases in revenues from data services helped drive monthly average revenue per unit to $51.13 for the year, an eight percent increase over 2006. Customers also responded well to phones like the
MOTORAZR2, which holds 1000 songs, and the MOTOROKR Z6m (a U.S. Cellular exclusive), which comes packaged with Napster to Go®. U.S. Cellular also introduced My Contacts Backup, a free data service that enables customers to coordinate their contacts list with Microsoft Outlook®, Outlook Express®, and Yahoo!® Mail. We believe that customer demand for data services and data-intensive, multi-use devices will continue to grow in the future.
Network and Infrastructure
The quality of U.S. Cellular's network enables the company to provide an excellent communications experience to its customers. In 2007, the company received its fourth consecutive award for "Highest Call Quality Performance Among Wireless Cell Phone Users in North Central Region" in J.D. Power and Associates' Wireless Call Quality Performance StudySMVolume 2. U.S. Cellular also was voted the top contract/postpay wireless provider by readers of PC Magazine.
To further improve the call experience for its customers, U.S. Cellular invested $565.5 million in its network and infrastructure in 2007, building 434 new cell sites, increasing capacity at existing cell sites and switches, building new retail stores and remodeling existing locations, and enhancing its office data systems.
As of December 31, 2007, U.S. Cellular had a total of 6,383 cell sites and 400 U.S. Cellular-operated retail stores, and 1,300 locations, representing agents, dealers, and non-company retailers.
Geographic Footprint
In 2007, U.S. Cellular strategically enhanced its geographic footprint through purchases, exchanges, and auction activities. As of the end of 2007, the total market population of the company's consolidated operating markets was 45 million, and U.S. Cellular owned or had rights to acquire interests in 260 wireless markets.
In February 2007, the company purchased all of the membership interests of Iowa 15 Wireless, LLC, and obtained the 25 megahertz (MHz) Federal Communications Commission (FCC) cellular license to provide wireless service in the Iowa Rural Service Area 15.
In the fourth quarter of 2007, U.S. Cellular agreed to deliver personal communication service spectrum in eight licenses covering portions of Illinois to Sprint Nextel in exchange for more strategically useful spectrum in eight licenses covering portions of Iowa, Oklahoma, West Virginia, and Maryland. The exchange transaction closed on March 19, 2008 and did not include any cash, customers, network assets, or other assets.
New spectrum from Auction 73
U.S. Cellular participated indirectly through its interest in King Street Wireless, L.P., in Auction 73, the FCC auction of spectrum in the 700 MHz band. King Street Wireless was the provisional winning bidder for 152 licenses for aggregate bids of approximately $300 million, net of its anticipated designated entity discount of 25 percent. As of March 31, 2008, the FCC had not yet awarded any of the licenses to winning bidders. The licenses expected to be awarded to King Street Wireless cover areas that overlap or are proximate or contiguous to areas covered by licenses that U.S. Cellular currently owns, operates, and/or consolidates in its financial statements.
Share Repurchases
To partially offset dilution from associate stock options, restricted stock, and various benefit plans, U.S. Cellular repurchased 1,006,000 shares in 2007 at a total cost of $83.3 million.
Gain on Investments
The forward contracts related to U.S. Cellular's investment in Vodafone American Depository Receipts (ADRs) matured on May 7, 2007. U.S. Cellular delivered the Vodafone ADRs in settlement of the
ii
forward contracts and sold the remaining shares, recording a $131.7 million pre-tax gain on the settlement of the forward contracts and sale of the remaining shares.
Remediation Progress and Credit Rating Upgrade
In the fourth quarter of 2007, U.S. Cellular and its parent, TDS, made significant progress in improving internal control over financial reporting. The material weaknesses related to personnel and accounting knowledge and fixed assets were reduced to the levels of deficiency and significant deficiency, respectively. In addition, the companies made progress toward remediating the remaining material weakness, related to income tax accounting.
We're pleased to report that, as a result of this remediation progress, Standard & Poor's (S&P) Ratings Services upgraded both companies' credit ratings to BBB- with a positive outlook, from BB+. S&P indicated that it will further upgrade the rating for TDS and U.S. Cellular to BBB when the remaining material weakness is remediated, assuming continuation of the companies' favorable operating trends and conservative balance sheets.
Associates
U.S. Cellular's 8,400 associates are committed to providing excellent servicethe foundation of our customer satisfaction strategy. In our 2007 Culture Survey (performed annually), 99 percent of participating associates agreed that serving customers was their highest priority. U.S. Cellular is equally committed to its associates. We believe that satisfied associates are the key to satisfied customers. Our commitment to associates was reflected in several workplace awards we received in 2007:
Diversity and Inclusion
At U.S. Cellular, we value differences and believe a diverse and inclusive workforce is critical to business success. Respect for our associates and customers creates an environment motivated by ethics, empowerment, and business performance. Our diversity and inclusion strategy focuses on five areas: workforce, workplace, marketplace, suppliers, and community. In 2007, U.S. Cellular was named Reader's Choice: Best Diversity Company by Diversity/Careers in Engineering and Information Technology.
Supplier Diversity
U.S. Cellular is committed to building solid vendor relationships, creating access to all vendors, and widening opportunities to include businesses owned by minorities and women. In 2007, we met with 300 such business owners, and participated in an outreach conference for minority- and woman-owned businesses to promote diversity among our suppliers.
Communities
U.S. Cellular focuses on improving the quality of life in the areas where we do business. We focus our community efforts on nonprofit organizations serving economically disadvantaged youth, families, and seniorsconnecting people with opportunities for a better life. Here are just a few of the ways U.S. Cellular contributed to our communities in 2007:
iii
Government Relations
In 2007, U.S. Cellular launched the Connecting Rural America campaign to protect both rural America's right to receive affordable wireless telecommunications services and the Universal Service Fund (USF) that helps U.S. Cellular provide those services, by opposing the imposition of a cap on the funds available to wireless carriers. The campaign reached out to members of the FCC and the U.S. Congress, and included our testimony at a special hearing of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Looking Forward
In 2008, our associates will continue to focus on delivering the very best in customer satisfaction through expanded product and service offerings, a high-quality network, and outstanding customer service at every point of contact.
2008 Objectives
We extend our heartfelt thanks to all of our associates for helping us achieve outstanding results in 2007, and to you, our shareholders, for your continued support. Customers expect it. And we deliver!
Cordially yours, | ||
John E. Rooney President and Chief Executive Officer |
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. Chairman |
iv
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION
8410 West Bryn Mawr Avenue
Suite 700
Chicago, Illinois 60631
Phone: (773) 399-8900
Fax: (773) 399-8936
April 15, 2008
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
You are cordially invited to attend our 2008 annual meeting on Tuesday, May 20, 2008, at 8:30 a.m., Chicago time, at The Westin O'Hare, 6100 North River Road, Rosemont, Illinois. At the meeting, we will report on the plans and accomplishments of United States Cellular Corporation.
The formal notice of the meeting and our board of directors' proxy statement are enclosed. Appendix I to the proxy statement contains audited financial statements and certain other financial information for the year ended December 31, 2007, as required by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). At the 2008 annual meeting, shareholders are being asked to take the following actions:
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" its nominees for election as directors, "FOR" the proposal to approve an amended Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, "FOR" the proposal to approve the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and "FOR" the proposal to ratify accountants.
Our board of directors and members of our management team will be at the annual meeting to meet with you and discuss our record of achievement and plans for the future. Your vote is important. Therefore, please sign and return the enclosed proxy card, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
We look forward to visiting with you at the annual meeting.
Very truly yours, | ||
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. Chairman |
John E. Rooney President and Chief Executive Officer |
Please sign and return the enclosed proxy card(s) promptly or
vote on the Internet using the instructions on the proxy card
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND PROXY STATEMENT
AND
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 20, 2008
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION
We will hold the 2008 annual meeting of the shareholders of United States Cellular Corporation ("U.S. Cellular") (American Stock Exchange symbol: "USM"), a Delaware corporation, at The Westin O'Hare, 6100 North River Road, Rosemont, Illinois, on Tuesday, May 20, 2008, at 8:30 a.m., Chicago time. At the meeting, we are asking shareholders to take the following actions:
We are first sending this notice of annual meeting of shareholders and Proxy Statement to you on or about April 15, 2008.
We have fixed the close of business on March 26, 2008 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting or any adjournments thereof.
The following additional information is being provided as required by new SEC rules:
The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at www.uscellular.com under Investor RelationsProxy Vote, or at www.uscellular.com/investor/2008proxy.
The following items have been posted to this Web site:
Any control/identification numbers that you need to vote are set forth on your proxy card if you are a record holder, or on your voting instruction card if you hold shares through a broker, dealer or bank.
The location where the annual meeting will be held is The Westin O'Hare Hotel. This is located in Rosemont, Illinois north of Interstate 90 and south of Higgins Road at 6100 North River Road, which is located east of Interstate 294 and west of Dee Road.
What is the record date for the meeting?
The close of business March 26, 2008 is the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting or any adjournments thereof.
A complete list of shareholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting, arranged in alphabetical order and by voting group, showing the address of and number of shares held by each shareholder, will be kept open at the offices of U.S. Cellular, 8410 West Bryn Mawr Avenue, Suite 700, Chicago, Illinois 60631, for examination by any shareholder during normal business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the annual meeting.
What shares of stock entitle holders to vote at the meeting?
We have the following classes or series of stock outstanding, each of which entitles holders to vote at the meeting:
The Common Shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange under the symbol "USM."
No public market exists for the Series A Common Shares, but the Series A Common Shares are convertible on a share-for-share basis into Common Shares.
On March 26, 2008, U.S. Cellular had outstanding 54,463,395 Common Shares, par value $1.00 per share (excluding 604,824 shares held by U.S. Cellular and a subsidiary of U.S. Cellular), and 33,005,877 Series A Common Shares, par value $1.00 per share. As of March 26, 2008, no shares of Preferred Stock, par value $1.00 per share, of U.S. Cellular were outstanding.
Telephone and Data Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (American Stock Exchange Listing Symbols TDS and TDS.S) ("TDS"), is the sole holder of Series A Common Shares and holds 37,782,826 Common Shares, representing approximately 69.4% of the Common Shares. By reason of such holdings, TDS has the voting power to elect all the directors of U.S. Cellular and has approximately 95.7% of the voting power with respect to matters other than the election of directors.
What is the voting power of the outstanding shares in the election of directors?
The following shows certain information relating to the outstanding shares and voting power of such shares in the election of directors as of the record date:
Class or Series of Common Stock |
Outstanding Shares |
Votes per Share |
Voting Power |
Number of Directors Elected by Class or Series |
Number of Directors Standing for Election |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series A Common Shares | 33,005,877 | 10 | 330,058,770 | 6 | 2 | ||||||
Common Shares | 54,463,395 | 1 | 54,463,395 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
Total | 9 | 3 | |||||||||
What is the voting power of the outstanding shares in matters other than the election of directors?
Class or Series of Common Stock |
Outstanding Shares |
Votes per Share |
Total Voting Power |
Percent |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series A Common Shares | 33,005,877 | 10 | 330,058,770 | 85.8 | % | |||||
Common Shares | 54,463,395 | 1 | 54,463,395 | 14.2 | % | |||||
Total | 384,522,165 | 100.0 | % | |||||||
2
How may shareholders vote in the election of directors in Proposal 1?
Holders of Common Shares may, with respect to the election of the one Class III director to be elected by the holders of Common Shares, vote FOR the election of such director nominee or WITHHOLD authority to vote for such director nominee.
TDS, as the sole holder of Series A Common Shares may, with respect to the election of the two Class III directors to be elected by the holder of Series A Common Shares, vote FOR the election of such director nominees or WITHHOLD authority to vote for such director nominees.
TDS has advised U.S. Cellular that it intends to vote FOR the board of directors' nominees for election as Class III directors.
How may shareholders vote with respect to the amended Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan in Proposal 2?
Shareholders may, with respect to the proposal to approve the amended Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan:
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
TDS has advised U.S. Cellular that it intends to vote FOR the approval of the amended Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan.
How may shareholders vote with respect to the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan in Proposal 3?
Shareholders may, with respect to the proposal to approve the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
TDS has advised U.S. Cellular that it intends to vote FOR the approval of the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
How may shareholders vote with respect to Proposal 4?
With respect to the proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008, shareholders may:
The board of directors recommends a vote FOR this proposal.
TDS has advised U.S. Cellular that it intends to vote FOR the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
How do I vote?
Proxies are being requested from the holders of Common Shares in connection with the election of one Class III director, the approval of the amended Non-Employee Director Plan, the approval of the
3
2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the ratification of independent registered public accountants. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please sign and mail your proxy in the enclosed self-addressed envelope to Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investor Services, P.O. Box 43126, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-5138. You have the power to revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted, and the giving of a proxy will not affect your right to vote in person if you attend the annual meeting.
How will proxies be voted?
All properly executed and unrevoked proxies received in the accompanying form in time for the 2008 annual meeting will be voted in the manner directed on the proxies.
If no direction is made, a proxy by any shareholder will be voted FOR the election of the named director nominee to serve as a Class III director, FOR the proposal to approve the amended Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, FOR the proposal to approve the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and FOR the proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008.
If a proxy indicates that all or a portion of the votes represented by such proxy are not being voted with respect to a particular matter, such non-votes will not be considered present and entitled to vote on such matter. However, the shares represented by such proxies may be considered present and entitled to vote on other matters and will count for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
What constitutes a quorum for the meeting?
In the election of directors, where a separate vote by a class or voting group is required, the holders of a majority of the votes of the stock of such class or voting group, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum entitled to take action with respect to that vote on that matter.
The holders of a majority of the votes of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote with respect to each of the other proposals, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting in connection with each of such other proposals.
What vote is required for the election of directors in Proposal 1?
The election of directors requires the affirmative vote of a plurality of the voting power of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on such matter at the annual meeting. Accordingly, if a quorum of such shares is present at the annual meeting, the person receiving the plurality of votes of the holders of shares entitled to vote with respect to the election of such directors will be elected to serve as a director. Because the election of each director requires only the affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote with respect to such matter, withholding authority to vote for the nominee and non-votes with respect to the election of the directors will not affect the outcome of the election of the directors.
What vote is required with respect to Proposals 2, 3 and 4?
If a quorum is present at the annual meeting, the proposals to approve the amended Non-Employee Director Plan and the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and to ratify independent registered public accountants will require the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting power of the Common Shares and Series A Common Shares voting together and present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on such matter at the annual meeting. A vote to abstain from voting on such proposals will be treated as a vote against such proposals. Non-votes with respect to such proposals will not affect the determination of whether such proposals are approved.
4
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The nominees for election as Class III directors are identified in the table below. In the event any nominee, who has expressed an intention to serve if elected, fails to stand for election, the persons named in the proxy presently intend to vote for a substitute nominee if one is designated by the board of directors.
Nominees
The following persons, if elected at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, will serve as Class III directors until the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders, or until their successors are elected and qualified:
Class III DirectorsTerms Scheduled to Expire in 2008
The following persons are current Class III directors whose terms will expire at the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders:
Elected by Holders of Common Shares
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular and Principal Occupation |
Served as Director since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Samuel Crowley | 57 | Director of U.S. Cellular and former Chief Operating Officer of Gold's Gym International | 1998 |
Elected by Holder of Series A Common Shares
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular and Principal Occupation |
Served as Director since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. | 61 | Chairman and Director of U.S. Cellular and President and Chief Executive Officer of TDS | 1984 | |||
Walter C.D. Carlson | 54 | Director of U.S. Cellular, non-executive Chairman of the Board of TDS and Partner, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois | 1989 |
Background of Class III Directors
J. Samuel Crowley. J. Samuel Crowley was the chief operating officer of Gold's Gym International, the nation's largest chain of co-ed fitness facilities, from November 2005 through August 2007. Between January 2004 and October 2005, Mr. Crowley was a private investor and prior to that, he was Senior Vice PresidentNew Ventures at Michaels Stores, Inc., a publicly-held national specialty retail company, from August 2002 until December 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Crowley was a business strategy consultant with Insider Marketing, a high tech marketing consulting firm, from April 2000 until July 2002. He was previously employed by CompUSA, Inc., a national retailer and reseller of personal computers and related products and services, for more than five years, most recently as executive vice president of operations between 1995 and 2000. Mr. Crowley is a current Class III director who was previously elected by holders of Common Shares.
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., has been the Chairman (an executive officer) of U.S. Cellular, and the President and Chief Executive Officer (an executive officer) of TDS, for more than five years. Mr. Carlson also serves on the board of directors of TDS. He is also a director and Chairman (an executive officer) of TDS Telecommunications Corporation ("TDS Telecom"), a subsidiary of TDS which operates local telephone companies. He is the son of LeRoy T. Carlson and the brother of Walter C.D.
5
Carlson. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. is a current Class III director who was previously elected by TDS as the sole holder of Series A Common Shares.
Walter C.D. Carlson. Walter C.D. Carlson has been a partner of the law firm of Sidley Austin LLP for more than five years and is a member of its executive committee. The law firm of Sidley Austin LLP provides legal services to U.S. Cellular and TDS on a regular basis. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" below. Mr. Carlson does not provide legal services to U.S. Cellular, TDS or their subsidiaries. Mr. Carlson serves on the board of directors of TDS and was elected non-executive Chairman of the Board of TDS in February 2002. He is the son of LeRoy T. Carlson and the brother of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. Walter C.D. Carlson is a current Class III director who was previously elected by TDS as the sole holder of Series A Common Shares.
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" the above nominees.
The following additional information is provided in connection with the election of directors.
Other Directors
Class I DirectorsTerms Scheduled to Expire in 2009
The following persons are current Class I directors whose terms expire at the 2009 annual meeting of shareholders:
Elected by Holders of Common Shares
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular and Principal Occupation |
Served as Director since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Harry J. Harczak, Jr. | 51 | Director of U.S. Cellular and former Executive Vice President of CDW Corporation | 2003 |
Elected by Holder of Series A Common Shares
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular and Principal Occupation |
Served as Director since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LeRoy T. Carlson | 91 | Director of U.S. Cellular and Chairman Emeritus of TDS | 1987 | |||
John E. Rooney | 65 | President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular | 2000 |
Background of Class I Directors
Harry J. Harczak, Jr. Mr. Harczak was an officer of CDW between 1994 and 2007, where he was successively the chief financial officer, executive vice president of sales and executive vice president. Prior to CDW, Mr. Harczak was a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. CDW is a provider of technology products and services and was a public company until it was acquired and became privately held in 2007. In 2007, U.S. Cellular purchased $276,986 and TDS purchased an additional $4,636 in products and services from CDW. This interest was not considered to be a direct or indirect material interest to Mr. Harczak under SEC rules, but is disclosed voluntarily, as discussed below.
LeRoy T. Carlson. LeRoy T. Carlson was appointed Chairman Emeritus (an executive officer) of TDS in February 2002. Prior to that time, he was the Chairman of TDS for more than five years. Mr. Carlson's term as a member of the TDS board of directors will expire at the TDS 2008 annual meeting on May 22, 2008, and Mr. Carlson is not standing for re-election as a TDS director. He will become a director emeritus of TDS following the TDS 2008 annual meeting. Mr. Carlson is the father of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. and Walter C.D. Carlson.
6
John E. Rooney. John E. Rooney has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular (an executive officer of U.S. Cellular and a deemed executive officer of TDS) for more than five years. Mr. Rooney is currently a director of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc., a diversified financial services company.
Class II DirectorsTerms Scheduled to Expire in 2010
The following persons are current Class II directors whose terms expire at the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders:
Elected by Holders of Common Shares
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular and Principal Occupation |
Served as Director since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul-Henri Denuit | 73 | Director of U.S. Cellular and former Chairman of the Board of Directors and Managing DirectorS.A. Coditel | 1988 |
Elected by Holder of Series A Common Shares
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular and Principal Occupation |
Served as Director since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ronald E. Daly | 61 | Director of U.S. Cellular and Private Investor | 2004 | |||
Kenneth R. Meyers | 54 | Director and Chief Accounting Officer of U.S. Cellular and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of TDS | 1999 |
Background of Class II Directors
Paul-Henri Denuit. Prior to retiring from S.A. Coditel at the end of May 2001, Paul-Henri Denuit served as managing director of S.A. Coditel for more than five years. He was also the chairman of its board of directors.
Ronald E. Daly. Mr. Daly is a private investor. Mr. Daly was the president and chief executive officer of Océ-USA Holding, Inc. between November 2002 and September 2004. Océ-USA Holding, Inc. is the North American operations of Netherlands based Océ-N.V., a publicly-held global supplier of high-technology digital document management and delivery solutions. Prior to joining Océ-USA Holding, Inc., Mr. Daly worked 38 years for R.R. Donnelley, most recently as president of R.R. Donnelley Printing Solutions. Mr. Daly also serves as a director of SuperValu, a major distributor, wholesaler and retailer in the food service industry.
Kenneth R. Meyers. Kenneth R. Meyers was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (an executive officer) of TDS and Chief Accounting Officer (an executive officer) of U.S. Cellular and of TDS Telecom, effective January 1, 2007. Prior to that, he was the Executive Vice PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (an executive officer) of U.S. Cellular for more than five years. Mr. Meyers was also appointed as a director of TDS and TDS Telecom effective January 1, 2007.
7
Board of Directors
The business and affairs of U.S. Cellular are managed by or under the direction of the board of directors. The board of directors consists of nine members. Holders of Common Shares elect 25% of the directors rounded up to the nearest whole number, or three directors based on a board size of nine directors. TDS, as the sole holder of Series A Common Shares, elects the remaining six directors. As of the record date, TDS has 100% of the voting power in the election of such six directors, approximately 69.4% of the voting power in the election of the remaining three directors and approximately 95.7% of the voting power in all other matters.
U.S. Cellular's Code of Ethics for directors is available on U.S. Cellular's web site, www.uscellular.com, under About UsInvestor RelationsCorporate GovernanceBOD Code of Ethics.
Director Independence and American Stock Exchange Listing Standards
Because the U.S. Cellular Common Shares are listed on the American Stock Exchange, U.S. Cellular is required to comply with listing standards applicable to companies that have equity securities listed on the American Stock Exchange.
Under the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange, U.S. Cellular is a "controlled company" as such term is defined by the American Stock Exchange. U.S. Cellular is a controlled company because over 50% of the voting power of U.S. Cellular is held by TDS. Accordingly, it is exempt from certain listing standards that require listed companies that are not controlled companies to (i) have a board composed of a majority of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the American Stock Exchange, (ii) have certain compensation approved by a compensation committee comprised solely of directors, or by a majority of directors, that qualify as independent under the rules of the American Stock Exchange, and (iii) have director nominations be made by a committee comprised solely of directors, or by a majority of directors, that qualify as independent under the rules of the American Stock Exchange.
As a controlled company, U.S. Cellular is required to have at least three directors who qualify as independent to serve on the Audit Committee. The U.S. Cellular board of directors has determined that all three members of the U.S. Cellular Audit Committee, J. Samuel Crowley, Paul-Henri Denuit and Harry J. Harczak, Jr., do not have any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and qualify as independent under the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange, as well as Section 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In addition, although not required to do so, the U.S. Cellular board of directors also has determined that Ronald E. Daly does not have any relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director and qualifies as independent under the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange, as well as the rules of the SEC. As a result, four of the nine directors, or 44% of the directors, have been determined to qualify as independent under the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange.
U.S. Cellular certifies compliance with specified listing standards to the American Stock Exchange on an annual basis. U.S. Cellular certified that it was in compliance with such American Stock Exchange listing standards in 2007 and expects to make a similar certification in 2008.
On January 17, 2008, the American Stock Exchange announced that it had entered into an agreement to be acquired by the New York Stock Exchange, subject to regulatory approvals. At this time, it is not known to what extent, if any, such an acquisition would affect U.S. Cellular's listing or listing requirements.
Meetings of Board of Directors
Our board of directors held six meetings during 2007. Each incumbent director attended at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings of the board of directors (held during 2007 at which time such person was a director) and at least 75 percent of the total number of meetings held by each
8
committee of the board on which such person served (during the periods of 2007 that such person served).
Audit Committee
The primary function of the Audit Committee is to assist the board of directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the quality, integrity and annual independent audit of U.S. Cellular's financial statements and other matters set forth in the charter for the Audit Committee, a copy of which is available on U.S. Cellular's web site, www.uscellular.com, under About UsInvestor RelationsCorporate GovernanceAudit Comm. Charter.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of three members who are not officers or employees of U.S. Cellular or any parent or subsidiary of U.S. Cellular and have been determined by the board of directors not to have any other relationship with U.S. Cellular that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The board of directors has also determined that such directors qualify as independent under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Except as required by listing standards or SEC rule, U.S. Cellular does not have any categorical standards of independence that must be satisfied. The current members of the Audit Committee are J. Samuel Crowley (chairperson), Paul-Henri Denuit and Harry J. Harczak, Jr. The board of directors has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is "independent" and "financially sophisticated" as such terms are defined by the American Stock Exchange.
In addition, although Mr. Harczak previously was an executive officer of CDW, which provides products and services to U.S. Cellular and its affiliates, this interest was not considered to be a direct or indirect material interest to Mr. Harczak under SEC rules. Nevertheless, U.S. Cellular has elected to disclose the dollar amount of such products and services in this proxy statement. As set forth above under "Election of Directors," U.S. Cellular purchased $276,986 and TDS purchased an additional $4,636 in products and services from CDW in 2007.
The board has made a determination that Harry J. Harczak, Jr. is an "audit committee financial expert" as such term is defined by the SEC.
In accordance with the SEC's safe harbor rule for "audit committee financial experts," no member designated as an audit committee financial expert shall (i) be deemed an "expert" for any other purpose or (ii) have any duty, obligation or liability that is greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on a member of the board or the audit committee not so designated. Additionally, the designation of a member or members as an "audit committee financial expert" shall in no way affect the duties, obligations or liability of any member of the audit committee, or the board, not so designated.
The Audit Committee held eleven meetings during 2007.
Pre-Approval Procedures
The Audit Committee adopted a policy, effective May 6, 2003, as amended as of February 17, 2004 and November 1, 2005, pursuant to which all audit and non-audit services must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee. Under no circumstances may U.S. Cellular's principal external accountant provide services that are prohibited by the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 or rules issued thereunder. Non-prohibited audit related services and certain tax and other services may be provided to U.S. Cellular, subject to such pre-approval process and prohibitions. The Audit Committee has delegated to the chairperson of the Audit Committee the authority to pre-approve services by the independent registered public accountants and to report such approvals to the full Audit Committee at each of its regularly scheduled meetings. The pre-approval policy relates to all services provided by U.S. Cellular's principal external auditor and does not include any de minimis exception.
9
Review, approval or ratification of transactions with related persons
The Audit Committee Charter provides that the Audit Committee shall "be responsible for the review and oversight of all related-party transactions, as such term is defined by the rules of the American Stock Exchange." Section 120 of the American Stock Exchange Company Guide, Certain Relationships And Transactions, provides that "Related party transactions must be subject to appropriate review and oversight by the company's Audit Committee or a comparable body of the Board of Directors."
In general, "related party transactions" include transactions required to be disclosed in U.S. Cellular's proxy statement pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the SEC. Pursuant to Item 404, U.S. Cellular is required to disclose any transaction, which includes any financial transaction, arrangement, or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) or a series of transactions, that has taken place since the beginning of U.S. Cellular's last fiscal year or any currently proposed transaction in which: 1. U.S. Cellular was or is to be a participant, 2. the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and 3. any "related person" had or will have a direct or indirect material interest in the transaction during any part of the fiscal year. For this purpose, in general, the term "related person" includes any director or executive officer of U.S. Cellular, any nominee for director, any beneficial owner of more than five percent of any class of U.S. Cellular's voting securities and any "immediate family member" of such persons, within the meaning of Item 404.
Accordingly, pursuant to such provisions, the U.S. Cellular Audit Committee has review and oversight responsibilities over transactions that are deemed to be related-party transactions under Section 120 of the American Stock Exchange Company Guide. Other than the foregoing provisions, U.S. Cellular has no further written document evidencing policies and procedures relating to (i) the types of transactions that are covered by such policies and procedures; (ii) the standards to be applied pursuant to such policies and procedures; or (iii) the persons or groups of persons on the board of directors or otherwise who are responsible for applying such policies and procedures.
Since the beginning of the last fiscal year, the U.S. Cellular Audit Committee exercised oversight over related-party transactions, but did not take any formal action to approve any related-party transactions.
Compensation Committee
U.S. Cellular does not have a formal standing compensation committee for all executive compensation, except that long-term equity compensation of executive officers is approved by the Stock Option Compensation Committee, as discussed below. However, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Chairman of U.S. Cellular, functions as the compensation committee for all matters not within the authority of the Stock Option Compensation Committee, but does not do so pursuant to a charter. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. does not approve any compensation to himself as Chairman. Mr. Carlson receives no compensation directly from U.S. Cellular. Mr. Carlson is compensated by TDS in connection with his services for TDS and TDS subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. A portion of Mr. Carlson's salary and bonus paid by TDS is allocated to U.S. Cellular by TDS, along with other expenses of TDS. This allocation by TDS to U.S. Cellular is done in the form of a single management fee pursuant to the Intercompany Agreement discussed below under "Intercompany Agreement." John E. Rooney, President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular, makes recommendations with respect to compensation for the other named executive officers. For further information, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" below.
The basis for the view of the board of directors that it is appropriate for U.S. Cellular not to have a formal independent compensation committee for all executive compensation is that it is controlled by TDS. As a controlled corporation, U.S. Cellular is not required to have an independent compensation committee under listing standards of the American Stock Exchange. As a controlled company, except with respect to matters within the authority of the Stock Option Compensation Committee, U.S. Cellular considers it sufficient and appropriate that LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., who is a director and president and chief executive officer of TDS, approves compensation decisions for U.S. Cellular. As a result of Mr. Carlson's position with TDS, which is the majority shareholder of TDS, he represents the interests of all shareholders of U.S. Cellular in his compensation decisions.
10
Stock Option Compensation Committee
Although it is not required to do so under American Stock Exchange listing standards, U.S. Cellular has a Stock Option Compensation Committee comprised solely of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the American Stock Exchange. In addition, the Stock Option Compensation Committee is comprised of at least two non-employee members of the U.S. Cellular board of directors, each of whom is an "outside director" within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and a "Non-Employee Director" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Stock Option Compensation Committee of our board of directors currently consists of J. Samuel Crowley, Ronald E. Daly and Paul-Henri Denuit. The principal functions of the Stock Option Compensation Committee are to consider and approve long-term compensation for executive officers and to consider and recommend to our board of directors new long-term compensation plans or changes in existing plans. The Compensation Committee held six meetings during 2007.
A copy of the current charter of the Stock Option Compensation Committee is not available on U.S. Cellular's web site and, accordingly, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
The Stock Option Compensation Committee may delegate power and authority to the Chairman of U.S. Cellular or any executive officer of U.S. Cellular or as otherwise permitted by any applicable long-term incentive plan, except that the Stock Option Compensation Committee may not delegate its power and authority with respect to the long-term compensation of executive officers of U.S. Cellular who are subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or as otherwise provided in any applicable long-term incentive plan.
The executive officers who are subject to Section 16 requirements are set forth under the caption "Executive Officers" in this proxy statement. Except with respect to such persons, the Company's long-term incentive plan does not otherwise currently restrict the ability of the Stock Option Compensation Committee to delegate its power and authority with respect to other persons. As a result, currently the Stock Option Compensation Committee may delegate its power and authority to the Chairman of the Company or any executive officer of the Company except with respect to the long-term stock compensation of the persons identified under the caption "Executive Officers".
The Stock Option Compensation Committee has not delegated any authority with respect to the executive officers identified in the below Summary Compensation Table.
Compensation Consultant
Towers-Perrin is U.S. Cellular's primary compensation consultant and is engaged by the U.S. Cellular Human Resources department, rather than by the Chairman who functions as the compensation committee, or the Stock Option Compensation Committee. U.S. Cellular's Human Resources Department supports the Chairman and the Stock Option Compensation Committee in their functions, and uses information produced by the consultant in such support. Such consultant did not provide any advice as to director compensation and only provided advice as to compensation to officers and employees.
In 2007, the role of such compensation consultant in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive officer compensation was to provide recommendations on the type and amount of compensation to be granted to officers and non-officers.
The nature and scope of the assignment, and the material elements of the instructions or directions given to such consultant with respect to the performance of their duties under its engagement, was to make recommendations based on external benchmarking data obtained from its executive compensation survey database. See "Benchmarking" in the below Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Director Compensation
Neither LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. nor the Stock Option Compensation Committee approves director compensation. It is the view of the U.S. Cellular board of directors that this should be the responsibility of the full board of directors. In particular, only non-employee directors receive compensation in their
11
capacity as directors and, as a result, the view of the U.S. Cellular board of directors is that all directors should participate in such decisions, rather than only the Chairman or only some or all of the non-employee directors. U.S. Cellular does not have any stock ownership guidelines for directors.
Other Committees
Pricing Committee. U.S. Cellular has a Pricing Committee, consisting of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. as Chairman, and John E. Rooney and Kenneth R. Meyers as members. The Pricing Committee does not have a charter. Pursuant to resolutions of the U.S. Cellular board of directors from time to time, the Pricing Committee is authorized to take certain action with respect to financing and capital transactions of U.S. Cellular, such as the issuance, redemption or repurchase of debt or the repurchase of shares of capital stock of U.S. Cellular.
Director Nomination Process
U.S. Cellular does not have a nominating committee and, accordingly, does not have a nominating committee charter. Under listing standards of the American Stock Exchange, U.S. Cellular is exempt from the requirement to have a nominating committee because it is a controlled company as such term is defined by the American Stock Exchange. Instead, the entire board of directors participates in the consideration of director nominees. Similarly, since U.S. Cellular is a controlled company, U.S. Cellular also is exempt from the listing standard that requires director nominations to be made by a nominating committee comprised solely of independent directors or by a majority of independent directors.
The U.S. Cellular board of directors does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by shareholders. Because TDS has sole voting power in the election of directors elected by holders of Series A Common Shares and a majority of the voting power in the election of directors elected by holders of Common Shares, nominations of directors for election by the holders of Series A Common Shares and Common Shares are generally based on the recommendation of TDS. With respect to candidates for director to be elected by the Common Shares, the U.S. Cellular board may from time to time informally consider candidates by shareholders that hold a significant number of Common Shares. The U.S. Cellular board has no formal procedures to be followed by shareholders in submitting recommendations of candidates for director.
The U.S. Cellular board of directors does not have any specific, minimum qualifications that the board believes must be met by a nominee for a position on the U.S. Cellular board of directors, or any specific qualities or skills that the board believes are necessary for one or more of the U.S. Cellular directors to possess. The U.S. Cellular board of directors has consistently sought to nominate to the board of directors eminently qualified individuals whom the board believes would provide substantial benefit and guidance to U.S. Cellular. The U.S. Cellular board believes that substantial judgment, diligence and care are required to identify and select qualified persons as directors and does not believe that it would be appropriate to place limitations on its own discretion.
In general, the U.S. Cellular board of directors will nominate existing directors for re-election unless the board has a concern about the director's ability to perform his or her duties. In the event of a vacancy on the board of a director elected by the Series A Common Shares, nominations are based on the recommendation of TDS. In the event of a vacancy on the board of a Common Share director, U.S. Cellular may use various sources to identify potential candidates, including an executive search firm. In addition, the Chairman may consider recommendations by shareholders that hold a significant number of Common Shares. Potential candidates are initially screened by the Chairman and by other persons as the Chairman designates. Following this process, if appropriate, information about the candidate is presented to and discussed by the full board of directors.
Each of the nominees approved by the U.S. Cellular board for election at the 2007 annual meeting is an executive officer and/or director who is standing for re-election.
From time to time, U.S. Cellular may pay a fee to an executive search firm to identify potential candidates for election as directors. U.S. Cellular did not pay a fee in 2007 to any third party or parties to
12
identify or evaluate or assist in identifying or evaluating potential new nominees for election of directors at the 2008 annual meeting.
Shareholder Communication with Directors
Shareholders may send communications to the board of directors of U.S. Cellular or to specified individual directors at any time. Shareholders should direct their communication to the board or to specified individual directors, in care of the Secretary of U.S. Cellular at its corporate headquarters. Any shareholder communications that are addressed to the board of directors or specified individual directors will be delivered by the Secretary of U.S. Cellular to the board of directors or such specified individual directors.
Information on communicating with directors is available on U.S. Cellular's web site, www.uscellular.com, under About UsInvestor RelationsCorporate GovernanceContact the Board.
U.S. Cellular Policy on Attendance of Directors at Annual Meeting of Shareholders
All directors are invited and encouraged to attend the annual meeting of shareholders, which is normally followed by the annual meeting of the board of directors. In general, all directors attend the annual meeting of shareholders unless they are unable to do so because of unavoidable commitments or intervening events. Nine of the directors attended the 2007 annual meeting of shareholders.
Codes of Ethics for Directors
U.S. Cellular has adopted a Code of Ethics for its directors. This code has been posted to U.S. Cellular's web site, www.uscellular.com, under About UsInvestor RelationsCorporate Governance.
13
PROPOSAL 2
AMENDMENT OF COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
The U.S. Cellular board of directors approved amendments to the U.S. Cellular Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors and authorized the issuance of up to 50,000 additional Common Shares under the plan. The amended plan is subject to shareholder approval under the rules of the American Stock Exchange because the amendments are material and the plan involves the issuance of U.S. Cellular equity securities to directors of U.S. Cellular. A copy of the amended plan was filed as Exhibit 10.1 to U.S. Cellular's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
The U.S. Cellular board of directors determined that it would be desirable to make certain amendments to the Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors to increase the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance from 10,000 to 60,000 and to increase director compensation, based on a review of director compensation practices in the telecommunications industry and at other comparable companies. Accordingly, the U.S. Cellular Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended (the "Directors Plan"), is being submitted for approval by the shareholders at the 2008 Annual Meeting. If approved by shareholders, the Directors Plan will be effective upon such approval. The following is a description of the Directors Plan, as amended.
Description Of The Plan
Non-employee directors will receive an annual director's retainer fee of $45,000 paid in cash.
Non-employee directors will also receive an annual stock award of $45,000 paid in the form of U.S. Cellular Common Shares, which will be distributed in March on or prior to March 15 of each year, beginning March 2008, for services performed during the 12 month period that commenced on March 1 of the immediately preceding calendar year and ended on the last day of February of the calendar year of payment. The number of shares will be determined on the basis of the closing price of U.S. Cellular Common Shares for the last trading day in the month of February of each year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the annual stock award of $45,000 to be distributed in March 2008, shall be distributed in the form of cash. In addition, a director who is not a citizen of the United States may, at his or her discretion, receive such award in the form of cash in all subsequent years.
Each non-employee director who serves on the Audit Committee, other than the Chairperson, will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $11,000, and the Chairperson will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $22,000.
Each non-employee director who serves on the Stock Option Compensation Committee, other than the Chairperson, will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $7,000, and the Chairperson will receive an annual committee retainer fee of $14,000.
Non-employee directors also will receive a meeting fee of $1,750 for each board or committee meeting attended.
Under the Directors Plan, annual retainers will be paid in cash on a quarterly basis, as of the last day of each quarter. Fees for all board and committee meetings will be paid in cash on a quarterly basis, as of the last day of each quarter.
A total of 10,000 U.S. Cellular Common Shares were previously approved by shareholders for issuance under the Directors Plan, of which approximately 7,000 Common Shares have been issued. The board of directors authorized the issuance of an additional 50,000 Common Shares, which increases the maximum number of shares that may be issued under this plan to 60,000.
Federal Income Taxes
In general, a non-employee director who is issued Common Shares under the Directors Plan will recognize taxable compensation in the year of issuance in an amount equal to the fair market value of such Common Shares on the date of issuance, and U.S. Cellular will be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes at the time the non-employee director recognizes taxable compensation equal to the amount of compensation recognized by such non-employee director.
14
In general, a non-employee director's basis for Common Shares received under the Directors Plan will be the amount recognized as taxable compensation with respect to such Common Shares, and a non-employee director's holding period for such shares will begin on the date the non-employee director recognizes taxable compensation with respect to the shares.
The foregoing tax effects may be different if Common Shares are subject to restrictions imposed by Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act, unless the non-employee director makes an appropriate election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
In general, a non-employee director will recognize taxable compensation in the year of payment of the cash annual retainer or meeting fees in an amount equal to such cash payment, and in the year of payment U.S. Cellular will be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the compensation recognized by such non-employee director.
Plan Benefits
No disclosure is being made of the benefits or amounts that will be received by or allocated to any participants because the benefit or amount is not determinable until earned and paid.
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" approval of the Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, as amended.
15
PROPOSAL 3
2009 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
The U.S. Cellular board of directors has determined that it is in the best interests of U.S. Cellular and its shareholders to approve the U.S. Cellular 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Purchase Plan"). The U.S. Cellular board of directors approved the Purchase Plan on March 14, 2008 and the Purchase Plan is subject to shareholder approval. A copy of the Purchase Plan is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Purposes of Plan |
The purpose of the Purchase Plan is to: |
||
|
encourage and facilitate the purchase of Common Shares by eligible employees of U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries, |
||
|
provide an additional incentive to promote the best interests of U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries, and |
||
|
provide an additional opportunity to participate in U.S. Cellular's and its subsidiaries' economic progress. |
||
If approved by the shareholders, the effective date of the Purchase Plan will be January 1, 2009. A total of 125,000 Common Shares will be available for purchase under the Purchase Plan, subject to adjustment in the event of certain changes to U.S. Cellular's capital structure, as described in the Purchase Plan. |
|||
Administration |
The Purchase Plan will be administered by a three-person committee (the "Committee"). Subject to the express provisions of the Purchase Plan, the Committee will have complete authority to interpret the Purchase Plan, to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to it and to make all other determinations necessary or advisable for the administration of the Purchase Plan. The board of directors may at any time, and from time to time, amend the Purchase Plan in any respect, except that, without shareholder approval, no amendment may be made changing the number of shares to be reserved under the Purchase Plan (unless certain changes occur in U.S. Cellular's capital structure as described in the Purchase Plan), or that would otherwise require shareholder approval under applicable law. |
||
Purchase Periods/Termination |
The Purchase Plan will terminate on December 31, 2013, or, if earlier, upon the purchase by participants of all shares that may be issued under the Purchase Plan or any earlier time in the discretion of the board of directors. The Purchase Plan provides for consecutive calendar quarter "Purchase Periods." The last day of each Purchase Period is a "Purchase Date." In addition, the date on which the Purchase Plan terminates will be treated as a "Purchase Date." |
16
Eligibility and Participation |
In general, participation in the Purchase Plan is available to any Eligible Employee (as defined below) of U.S. Cellular or any of its participating subsidiaries that has adopted the Purchase Plan with the prior approval of U.S. Cellular. An "Eligible Employee" is any employee of U.S. Cellular, or a participating subsidiary, other than a leased employee (within the meaning of section 414(n) of the Internal Revenue Code). Each Eligible Employee can enroll in the Purchase Plan as of the first day of the calendar month (or any later calendar month) following the date on which the Eligible Employee completes the Purchase Plan's eligibility service requirement. The Purchase Plan's eligibility service requirement is satisfied if an employee completes at least three months of continuous service with U.S. Cellular or any subsidiary thereof (regardless of whether the subsidiary is a participating subsidiary). Under the Purchase Plan, an entry date occurs on January 1, 2009 and the first day of each subsequent calendar month. Upon enrollment, an Eligible Employee will become a "Participant" in the Purchase Plan. Approximately 8,000 employees are expected to be eligible to participate in the Purchase Plan as of January 1, 2009. |
||
Payroll Deductions |
Upon enrollment in the Purchase Plan, the Participant elects his or her rate of payroll deduction contributions in an amount equal to a whole percentage not less than 1 and not more than 15 percent of the Participant's compensation (as defined in the Purchase Plan) for each payroll period, effective as soon as administratively practicable after such election is made. A Participant can periodically elect to increase or decrease his or her rate of payroll deductions under the Purchase Plan, in the manner prescribed by the Committee. In addition, a Participant can elect to withdraw from the Purchase Plan for the remainder of any calendar year, as described below. |
||
Employee Stock Purchase Account |
All payroll deductions in the possession of U.S. Cellular shall be segregated from the general funds of U.S. Cellular. An "Employee Stock Purchase Account" will be established on behalf of each Participant which shall be credited with his or her payroll deduction contributions made under the Purchase Plan. Such Employee Stock Purchase Accounts shall be solely for accounting purposes, and there shall be no segregation of assets among the separate accounts. Subject to a Participant's right to withdraw as described below, the balance of each Participant's Employee Stock Purchase Account will be applied on each Purchase Date to purchase the number of Common Shares determined by dividing the balance of such account as of such date by the Purchase Price of a Common Share on such date. The "Purchase Price" under the Purchase Plan on a Purchase Date is 85 percent of the closing price of a Common Share on the American Stock Exchange or any successor thereto on such date, or if such date is not a trading day, 85 percent of the closing price of a Common Share on the next preceding trading day, rounded up to the nearest whole cent. The number of Common Shares to be purchased on a Purchase Date will be rounded to the nearest one ten-thousandth of a share (or such other fractional interest determined by the Committee). |
17
Purchase Limits |
A Participant's right to purchase Common Shares during any calendar year shall be limited to the extent necessary so that the Participant's right to purchase Common Shares under the Purchase Plan and shares of stock under all other employee stock purchase plans maintained by U.S. Cellular, TDS or any of their subsidiaries complies with Section 423(b)(8) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Pursuant to such Section, such right shall not accrue at a rate in excess of $25,000 of the total of the fair market value of Common Shares and the fair market value of shares of stock of TDS and subsidiaries of U.S. Cellular and TDS (determined on the grant date) for any calendar year. |
||
Stock Account |
A Stock Account will be established on behalf of each Participant by a custodian selected by U.S. Cellular. As of each Purchase Date, each Participant's Stock Account will be credited with the number of whole and fractional Common Shares purchased on the Participant's behalf under the Purchase Plan on such date. Common Shares credited to a Participant's Stock Account will be held by the custodian as nominee. The custodian will establish procedures pursuant to which a Participant can elect that Common Shares credited to such account be registered in the name of the Participant (or jointly in the name of a Participant and one other person), and that certificates representing such Common Shares be issued to the Participant. The Stock Account is a personal brokerage account established with a broker for the convenience of issuing shares electronically upon purchase by the Participant and is not part of the Purchase Plan. Common Shares in the Stock Account are owned by the Participant and the Participant may withdraw or sell any shares in such Participant's account at any time. |
||
Withdrawal |
A Participant can elect to withdraw from the Purchase Plan at any time. A Participant's election to withdraw will be made in the time and manner prescribed by the Committee. Upon withdrawal from the Purchase Plan, the balance of the Participant's Employee Stock Purchase Account promptly will be refunded to the Participant. A Participant who withdraws from the Purchase Plan will not be eligible to elect to recommence participation in the Purchase Plan until January 1 of the next calendar year. |
||
Termination of Eligibility |
In the event of a Participant's termination of employment for any reason, including death, the Participant's participation in the Purchase Plan will cease and the balance of the Participant's Employee Stock Purchase Account will promptly be refunded to the Participant. |
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
The following is a brief summary of the federal income tax consequences relating to the acquisition of Common Shares under the Purchase Plan. The following should not be relied upon as being a complete description of such consequences and does not address the state, local or other tax consequences of the acquisition of Common Shares under the Purchase Plan.
Section 423 |
U.S. Cellular believes that the Purchase Plan qualifies under section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code as an employee stock purchase plan. Under section 423 the Participant does not recognize any taxable income at the time Common Shares are purchased under the Purchase Plan. |
18
Dispositions |
If a Participant disposes of Common Shares purchased under the Purchase Plan within two years of the applicable Purchase Date (as defined above), the Participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in the amount of the excess of the fair market value of the Common Shares on such Purchase Date over the Purchase Price of the shares. The Participant's cost basis in the Common Shares will be increased by the amount of such ordinary compensation income. If the amount realized upon such disposition exceeds the Participant's cost basis in the Common Shares (as so increased), the Participant will recognize capital gain in the amount of the difference between the amount realized and such adjusted cost basis. Under current tax law, gain on capital assets held for 12 months or less is treated as "short-term" capital gain which is not eligible for certain preferential tax treatment afforded "long-term" capital gain. In the event the amount realized is less than the cost basis in the Common Shares (as so increased), the Participant will recognize capital loss in the amount of the difference between the adjusted cost basis and the amount realized. |
||
If a Participant disposes of Common Shares purchased under the Purchase Plan two years or more after the applicable Purchase Date, the tax treatment will be different. The Participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in the amount of the lesser of: |
|||
|
the excess of the fair market value of the Common Shares on the Purchase Date over the Purchase Price of the shares; and |
||
|
the excess of the amount realized upon disposition of the Common Shares over the Purchase Price of the Common Shares. |
||
The Participant's cost basis in the Common Shares will be increased by the amount of such ordinary compensation income. In addition, the Participant will recognize long-term capital gain equal to the difference (if any) between the amount realized upon such disposition and the adjusted cost basis in the Common Shares (as so increased). In the event the amount realized is less than the Purchase Price, the Participant will recognize long-term capital loss in the amount of the difference between the Purchase Price and the amount realized. |
|||
Section 401(a) |
The Purchase Plan is not intended to be qualified under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
||
Plan Benefits |
U.S. Cellular has not provided a table of the 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan benefits since the benefits to executive officers are not determinable. The benefits will depend on the number of Common Shares which the executive officers will subscribe for, if any, under the plan and the future price of such shares. |
This description of the Purchase Plan is a summary only and is qualified by the terms of the Purchase Plan itself.
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" approval of the U.S. Cellular 2009 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
19
PROPOSAL 4
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We anticipate continuing the services of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, who served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the last fiscal year, are expected to be present at the annual meeting of shareholders and will have the opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions raised by shareholders at the annual meeting or submitted in writing prior thereto.
We are not required to obtain shareholder ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm by the Bylaws or otherwise. However, we have elected to seek such ratification by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes cast by shares entitled to vote with respect to such matter at the annual meeting. Should the shareholders fail to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, the board of directors will consider whether to retain such firm for the year ending December 31, 2008.
The board of directors recommends a vote "FOR" ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.
FEES PAID TO PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANTS
The following sets forth the aggregate fees (including expenses) billed by U.S. Cellular's principal accountants, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, for 2007 and 2006:
|
2007 |
2006 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 1,938,301 | $ | 1,843,589 | ||
Audit Related Fees | | | ||||
Tax Fees | | | ||||
All Other Fees(2) | | 1,500 | ||||
Total Fees(3) | $ | 1,938,301 | $ | 1,845,089 | ||
The Audit Committee determined that the payment of fees for non-audit related services does not conflict with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's independence.
See "Corporate GovernanceAudit Committee Charter" for information relating to the Audit Committee's pre-approval policies.
20
This report is submitted by the current members of the Audit Committee of the board of directors of U.S. Cellular identified below. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the U.S. Cellular board of directors, a copy of which is available on U.S. Cellular's web site, www.uscellular.com, under About UsInvestor RelationsCorporate GovernanceAudit Comm. Charter.
Management is responsible for U.S. Cellular's internal controls and the financial reporting process. U.S. Cellular utilizes services from the TDS internal audit staff, which performs testing of internal controls and the financial reporting process. U.S. Cellular's independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of U.S. Cellular's consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.
In this context, the Audit Committee held meetings with management, the TDS internal audit staff and representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, U.S. Cellular's independent registered public accounting firm for 2007. In these meetings, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management represented to the Audit Committee that U.S. Cellular's consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
The discussions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP also included the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, relating to information regarding the scope and results of the audit. The Audit Committee also received from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP written disclosures and a letter regarding its independence as required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees, as amended, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) pursuant to Rule 3600T, and this information was discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
Based on and in reliance upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors that the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 be included in U.S. Cellular's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
By the members of the Audit Committee of the board of directors of U.S. Cellular:
J. Samuel Crowley Chairperson |
Paul-Henri Denuit | Harry J. Harczak, Jr. |
21
The following executive officers of U.S. Cellular were identified in the above tables regarding the election of directors: LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Chairman; John E. Rooney, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Kenneth R. Meyers, Chief Accounting Officer. The following table identifies the other executive officers who are currently serving but are not identified in the above tables regarding the election of directors. The age of the following persons is as of the date of this proxy statement.
Name |
Age |
Position with U.S. Cellular |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Steven T. Campbell | 56 | Executive Vice PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||
Jay M. Ellison | 55 | Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer | ||
Michael S. Irizarry | 46 | Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer | ||
Jeffrey J. Childs | 51 | Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources and Chief Human Resource Officer |
Steven T. Campbell. Steven T. Campbell has been the Executive Vice PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of U.S. Cellular since March 6, 2007. Prior to that time, he was Executive Vice PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller of U.S. Cellular since January 1, 2007. Prior to that time, he was Vice President and Controller since June 2005. Prior to that time, he was vice presidentfinancial operations at 3Com Corporation from 2003 to 2005 and vice president-finance and operations at CommWorks Corporation, a subsidiary of 3Com Corporation, from 2000 to 2003.
Jay M. Ellison. Jay M. Ellison was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer on March 3, 2005. He joined U.S. Cellular on September 5, 2000 as Executive Vice PresidentOperations.
Michael S. Irizarry. Michael S. Irizarry was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer on May 2, 2006. He joined U.S. Cellular as Executive Vice PresidentEngineering and Chief Technical Officer on February 18, 2002. Prior to that time, he was vice presidentnetwork, for the midwest area at Verizon Wireless from 2000 to 2001.
Jeffrey J. Childs. Jeffrey J. Childs joined U.S. Cellular and was appointed Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources on February 17, 2004. Prior to that time, he was president and owner of Childs Consulting Services, LLC and senior partner of Brimstone Consulting Group since May 2001. From November 1999 to February 2001, Mr. Childs was vice presidenthuman resources & corporate services at SecurityLink from Ameritech.
All of our executive officers devote all their employment time to the affairs of U.S. Cellular, except for LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Chairman, and Kenneth R. Meyers, Chief Accounting Officer. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., who is employed by TDS as its President and Chief Executive Officer, and Kenneth R. Meyers, who is employed by TDS as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, devote a portion of their time to the affairs of U.S. Cellular.
Codes of Conduct and Ethics
As required by Section 807 of the American Stock Exchange Company Guide, U.S. Cellular has adopted a Code of Business Conduct, applicable to all officers and employees of U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries, which includes a Code of Ethics for certain Senior Executives and Financial Officers, that complies with the definition of a "code of ethics" as set forth in Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the SEC. U.S. Cellular has also adopted a Code of Ethics for its directors. Each of the foregoing codes has been posted to U.S. Cellular's web site, www.uscellular.com, under About UsInvestor RelationsCorporate Governance.
U.S. Cellular intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding any amendment to its Code of Ethics for certain Senior Executives and Financial Officers, and will disclose all other amendments to any of the foregoing codes, by posting such information to such internet website. Any waivers of any of the foregoing codes for directors or executive officers, including any waiver of the Code of Ethics for certain Senior Executives and Financial Officers, will be approved by U.S. Cellular's board of directors, as applicable, and disclosed in a Form 8-K that is filed with the SEC within four business days of such waiver.
22
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion And Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis discusses the compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the executive officers identified in the below Summary Compensation Table.
Overview
U.S. Cellular's compensation policies for executive officers are intended to provide incentives for the achievement of corporate and individual performance goals and to provide compensation consistent with the financial performance of U.S. Cellular. U.S. Cellular's policies establish incentive compensation performance goals for executive officers based on factors over which such officers have substantial control and which are important to U.S. Cellular's long-term success. U.S. Cellular believes compensation should be related to the financial performance of U.S. Cellular and should be sufficient to enable U.S. Cellular to attract and retain individuals possessing the talents required for long-term successful performance. Nevertheless, although performance influences compensation and awards, all elements of compensation are discretionary and officers do not become entitled to any compensation or awards as a result of the achievement of performance levels. Compensation is not earned until approved and paid or awarded.
As a controlled corporation, U.S. Cellular is not required to have an independent compensation committee under listing standards of the American Stock Exchange or otherwise. Although U.S. Cellular does not have an independent compensation committee for all executive compensation, long-term equity compensation elements of executive officers are approved by a fully independent Stock Option Compensation Committee, as discussed below.
In addition, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Chairman of U.S. Cellular, functions as the compensation committee for all matters not within the authority of the Stock Option Compensation Committee, but does not do so pursuant to a charter. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. does not approve any compensation to himself as Chairman. Mr. Carlson receives no compensation directly from U.S. Cellular. Mr. Carlson is compensated by TDS in connection with his services for TDS and TDS subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. A portion of Mr. Carlson's salary and bonus paid by TDS is allocated to U.S. Cellular by TDS, along with other expenses of TDS. This allocation by TDS to U.S. Cellular is done in the form of a single management fee pursuant to the Intercompany Agreement discussed below under "Intercompany Agreement." U.S. Cellular directors or officers in such capacities do not have any participation in compensation paid or awarded by TDS to TDS officers.
As a controlled company, except with respect to matters within the authority of the Stock Option Compensation Committee, U.S. Cellular considers it sufficient and appropriate that LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr. as Chairman of U.S. Cellular, who receives no compensation directly from U.S. Cellular and who is a director and president of TDS, approves compensation decisions for U.S. Cellular. As a result of Mr. Carlson's position with TDS, the majority shareholder of U.S. Cellular, he represents the interests of all shareholders of U.S. Cellular in his compensation decisions with respect to U.S. Cellular.
As noted above, although it is not required to do so under American Stock Exchange listing standards, U.S. Cellular has a Stock Option Compensation Committee comprised solely of directors that qualify as independent under the rules of the American Stock Exchange. The Stock Option Compensation Committee currently consists of J. Samuel Crowley, Ronald E. Daly and Paul-Henri Denuit. The principal functions of the Stock Option Compensation Committee are to consider and approve long-term compensation for executive officers and to consider and recommend to the board of directors new long-term compensation plans or changes in existing plans.
Specifically, the charter of the Stock Option Compensation Committee provides that it shall consider, review and approve the long-term compensation of officers and key employees of U.S. Cellular, involving the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights and other long-term compensation or compensation based on performance under U.S. Cellular's stock option or other long-term compensation or incentive plans. The charter also provides that the committee shall consider, approve and recommend to the board of directors any new stock option or other long-term compensation or incentive plans and the
23
amendment or termination of U.S. Cellular's existing stock option or other long-term compensation or incentive plans
Under its charter, the Stock Option Compensation Committee may delegate power and authority to the Chairman of U.S. Cellular or any executive officer of U.S. Cellular or as otherwise permitted by any applicable long-term incentive plan, except that the Stock Option Compensation Committee may not delegate its power and authority with respect to the long-term compensation of executive officers of U.S. Cellular who are subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or as otherwise provided in any applicable long-term incentive plan. The Stock Option Compensation Committee has not delegated any authority with respect to the officers identified in the below Summary Compensation Table. The Stock Option Compensation Committee has delegated authority to the Chairman only with respect to persons who are not officers.
As discussed above, the Chairman and Stock Option Compensation Committee may also rely on the services of U.S. Cellular's compensation and employee benefits consultant.
Objectives and Reward Structure of U.S. Cellular's Compensation Programs
The above Overview generally describes the objectives and reward structure of U.S. Cellular's compensation programs. This section further discusses, with respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, (1) the objectives of U.S. Cellular's compensation programs and (2) what the compensation programs are designed to reward.
The objectives of U.S. Cellular's general compensation programs for executive officers of U.S. Cellular, and their relationship to the reward structure, are to:
The primary financial focus of U.S. Cellular is the increase of long-term shareholder value through growth, measured primarily in such terms as customer additions, customer disconnects, revenues, cash flow and return on capital. Compensation decisions are made subjectively, considering these performance measures, as well as all other appropriate facts and circumstances. U.S. Cellular's compensation policies for executive officers are designed to reward the achievement of such corporate performance goals, as discussed below.
U.S. Cellular's compensation programs are designed to reward for the performance of U.S. Cellular on both a short-term and long-term basis. With respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, the design of compensation programs and performance rewarded is similar but with some differences for (1) the President and CEO and (2) the other executive officers.
The compensation of the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular is approved by the Chairman, LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., functioning as the compensation committee. The Chairman evaluates the performance of the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular in light of the annual and ongoing objectives for U.S. Cellular and the attainment of those objectives, and sets, or recommends to the Stock Option Compensation Committee, the elements of compensation for the President and CEO based on such performance evaluation and compensation principles, as discussed below.
With respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table other than the President and CEO, the Chairman reviews the President's evaluation of the performance of such executive officers and sets the annual base and bonus compensation levels for such executive officers, and recommends long-term compensation to the Stock Option Compensation Committee based on such performance evaluations and compensation principles, as discussed below.
24
This section discusses, with respect to the officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, (i) each element of compensation paid to such officers, (ii) why U.S. Cellular chooses to pay each element of compensation, (iii) how U.S. Cellular determines the amount or formula for each element to pay and (iv) how each compensation element and U.S. Cellular's decisions regarding that element fit into U.S. Cellular's overall compensation objectives and affect decisions regarding other elements.
Each element of compensation paid to officers is as follows:
U.S. Cellular chooses to pay or provide these elements of compensation, considering common compensation practices of peers and other companies with similar characteristics, in order to support U.S. Cellular's overall business strategy and objectives. U.S. Cellular recognizes that it must compensate its executive officers in a competitive manner comparable to other similar companies in order to attract and retain high quality management, attain business objectives and financial performance and increase shareholder value. Executive compensation is intended to provide an appropriate balance between the long-term and short-term performance of U.S. Cellular, and also a balance between U.S. Cellular's financial performance and shareholder return.
Each element of compensation and total compensation is determined or recommended on the basis of an analysis of multiple factors rather than specific measures of performance. U.S. Cellular has not established permanent guidelines or formulae to be used in determining annual executive compensation or the mix of compensation elements. Instead, each year, based on input from its compensation consultant, including compensation survey information, U.S. Cellular develops a compensation program for that year and establishes elements of compensation and determines how they fit together overall and in the manner described in the following discussion.
As noted above, the elements of executive compensation consist of both annual cash and long-term equity compensation. Annual cash compensation consists of base salary and an annual bonus. Annual compensation decisions are based partly on individual and corporate short-term performance and partly on the individual and corporate cumulative long-term performance during the executive's tenure in his or her position, particularly with regard to the President and CEO. Long-term equity compensation is
25
intended to compensate executives primarily for their contributions to long-term increases in shareholder value and is generally provided through the grant of stock options and restricted stock units.
The process of approving or recommending the elements of compensation begins with an evaluation of the appropriate compensation elements for each officer, based on the particular duties and responsibilities of the officer, as well as compensation elements for comparable positions at other companies in the telecommunications and other industries. See "Benchmarking" below.
The President and Chairman also have access to numerous performance measures and financial statistics prepared by U.S. Cellular. This financial information includes the audited financial statements of U.S. Cellular, as well as internal financial reports such as budgets and actual results, operating statistics and other analyses. They also may consider such other factors that they deem appropriate in making their compensation recommendations or decisions. Ultimately, it is the informed judgment of the Chairman and/or the Stock Option Compensation Committee, after reviewing the compensation information provided by the Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources of U.S. Cellular and considering the recommendation of the President and/or Chairman, that determines the elements of compensation for executive officers.
Annually, the President recommends the base salary for the named executive officers other than the President, and the Chairman approves such base salaries and determines the base salary of the President. The 2007 rows under column (c), "Salary," in the below Summary Compensation Table includes the dollar value of base salary (cash and non-cash) earned by the identified officers during 2007, whether or not paid in such year.
In addition, the President recommends the annual bonus for the named executive officers other than the President, and the Chairman approves such bonuses and determines the bonus of the President, as discussed below. The 2007 rows under column (d), "Bonus," of the below Summary Compensation Table, represents the dollar value of bonus (cash and non-cash) earned by the identified officers during 2007, whether or not paid in such year. Bonuses for 2006 performance were not earned by the officers until they were approved and awarded in 2007. As a result, bonuses with respect to 2006 performance are included in the below Summary Compensation Table in the 2007 rows.
The Stock Option Compensation Committee also annually determines long-term equity compensation awards to the named executive officers under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which include stock options and restricted stock units.
The named executive officers received an award of restricted stock units in 2007 based on the achievement of certain levels of corporate and individual performance in 2006, as discussed below. The 2007 rows under column (e), "Stock Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table include the dollar amounts of expense recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to 2007.
The named executive officers also received an award of stock options in 2007 based primarily on the achievement of certain levels of individual performance in 2006, as discussed below. The 2007 rows under column (f), "Option Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table include the dollar amounts of expense recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to 2007.
Grants of equity awards to the President and CEO and the other executive officers are generally made at the same time each year. U.S. Cellular generally grants equity awards on the first business day in April each year. U.S. Cellular may also make grants of equity awards during other times of the year as it deems appropriate. U.S. Cellular does not backdate stock options and does not have any program, plan or practice to time the grant of awards in coordination with the release of material non-public information. The exercise price of stock options is based on the closing price on the date of grant.
In 2006, U.S. Cellular identified two stock option grants in prior years to then newly-hired executive officers where the grant date and exercise price had been inadvertently based on a date that was earlier than the date of approval of such stock option grants by the Stock Option Compensation Committee. After discovering these errors, U.S. Cellular entered into amendments of stock option award agreements with such executive officers to correct the exercise price to the closing price of the underlying Common Shares as of the date of approval of the original stock option by the Stock Option Compensation
26
Committee. In connection with such amendments, U.S. Cellular agreed to pay $7,784 to Mr. Ellison and $41,148 to Mr. Irizarry in 2007, representing the aggregate amount of a make-whole payment as a result of the increase in the exercise price of the original stock option. These amounts are reported in column (i) of the Summary Compensation Table below.
Benchmarking
U.S. Cellular engages in benchmarking with the companies in the peer group index included in the "Stock Performance Graph" that is included in the U.S. Cellular annual report to shareholders, as well as other companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries, to the extent considered appropriate, based on similar size, function, geography or otherwise.
The peer group companies included in the Stock Performance Graph for 2006 were ALLTEL Corp., Centennial Communications Corp., Dobson Communications Corp, and Sprint Nextel Corp, as well as U.S. Cellular. As a result of acquisitions of ALLTEL Corp. and Dobson Communications Corp. in 2007, U.S. Cellular believes that this peer group had too few participants and has selected the Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index, a published industry index, for purposes of the performance graph in 2007 and currently expects to use this index in subsequent years. The Dow Jones U.S. Telecommunications Index is currently composed of the following companies: AT&T Inc., CenturyTel Inc., Cincinnati Bell Inc., Citizens Communications Co. (Series B), Embarq Corp., IDT Corp. (Class B), Leap Wireless International Inc., Leucadia National Corp., Level 3 Communications Inc., MetroPCS Communications Inc., NII Holdings Inc., Qwest Communications International Inc., RCN Corp., Sprint Nextel Corp., Telephone and Data Systems, Inc. (TDS and TDS.S), Time Warner Telecom, Inc., U.S. Cellular, Verizon Communications Inc., Virgin Media Inc. and Windstream Corp.
For annual cash compensation for the named executive officers other than the President and CEO, market benchmark data was obtained from a component of the Towers Perrin 2006 Proxy Pay Level Database. This component database contained the pay levels of the top five executive officers of Fortune 500 companies with revenues of less than $5.9 billion. This database was used to benchmark the compensation of the named executive officers other than the President and CEO.
In addition, for the 2007 annual equity compensation awards, market benchmark data was obtained from the Towers Perrin 2006 Compensation Data Bank Executive Compensation Database. The database contained 375 companies that represented a diverse range of companies across all industries, including companies from the telecommunications, retail, financial, electronics, pharmaceutical, manufacturing and consumer products sectors. For comparison purposes, Towers Perrin provided market benchmark data based on a blended average basis with 67% of the total based on telecommunications industry data and 33% based on general industry data contained in the database. In addition, the benchmark data provided was based on only those companies that had approximate annual revenues in the $1 billion to $3 billion revenue range. This database was used to benchmark the equity compensation awards to the named executive officers, and also for the annual cash compensation of the President and CEO of U.S. Cellular.
U.S. Cellular believes that the Towers Perrin databases provide a reasonably accurate reflection of the competitive market for annual cash compensation and long-term equity incentives necessary to compensate and retain current executives and attract future executives to positions at U.S. Cellular. In addition, U.S. Cellular believes this methodology is more statistically valid than solely benchmarking these elements of compensation to the peer group of companies used for calculating the Stock Performance Graph in the Annual Report to Shareholders.
The identity of the individual component companies that are included in the Towers Perrin databases is neither disclosed to, nor considered by, U.S. Cellular, the Chairman or the Stock Option Compensation Committee. U.S. Cellular, the Chairman and the Stock Option Compensation Committee rely upon and consider to be material only the aggregated survey data prepared by Towers Perrin. They do not obtain or consider information on the identities of the individual companies included in the survey in connection with any compensation decisions because this information is not considered to be material and because they rely on the services of Towers Perrin for such purposes.
27
Company Performance
The degree to which performance measures and objectives were achieved are discussed below separately for those that are stated in quantitative terms and separately for those that are stated in non-quantitative terms.
The achievement levels of objectives and performance measures that are stated in quantitative terms and the assessment of how well U.S. Cellular did as a whole during the year includes primarily the performance measures used in connection with the bonus plan discussed below and, potentially to a lesser degree, other performance measures as well.
Each year, U.S. Cellular calculates an overall percentage of U.S. Cellular performance based on its Executive Bonus Plan. The following performance measures are considered in evaluating the achievements of the eligible participants for purposes of the Executive Bonus Plan: Customer Addition Equivalents; Consolidated Cash Flow; Consolidated Revenue; Postpay Customer Disconnects; and Return on Capital.
The following table shows the calculation of the overall performance percentage for 2006 based on the 2006 Executive Bonus Plan for bonuses approved and paid in 2007. The below amounts cannot be derived from the financial statements. The results of markets that are owned but not managed by U.S. Cellular are not included in the below amounts. The Actual and Target results include only the results of markets that are managed by U.S. Cellular and over which U.S. Cellular officers have influence. Certain targets were adjusted somewhat from the original targets to keep them aligned with business goals. Accordingly, the below table shows the adjusted final Targets that were approved by the Chairman for 2006.
Performance Measures |
Actual Results for 2006 |
Final Adjusted Target for 2006 |
Actual as a % of Target |
Minimum Achievement of Target (%) for Payout (Threshold) |
Prorated % of Target Bonus Earned |
Weight |
Weighted Avg % of Target Bonus |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Customer Addition Equivalents (in thousands) |
1,207 | 1,373 | 87.9 | % | 92.0 | % | 0.00 | % | 17.5 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||
Consolidated Cash Flow (in millions) |
$ |
900.3 |
$ |
946.0 |
95.2 |
% |
92.0 |
% |
63.7 |
% |
17.5 |
% |
11.1 |
% |
|||
Consolidated Revenue (in millions) |
$ |
3,387.8 |
$ |
3,426.4 |
98.9 |
% |
95.0 |
% |
86.5 |
% |
20.0 |
% |
17.3 |
% |
|||
Postpay Customer Disconnects (in thousands) |
882 |
953 |
92.6 |
% |
110.0 |
% |
174.4 |
% |
20.0 |
% |
34.9 |
% |
|||||
Return on Capital Percent |
6.26 |
% |
6.44 |
% |
97.2 |
% |
92.0 |
% |
79.1 |
% |
25.0 |
% |
19.8 |
% |
|||
Overall Company Performance (prorated % of target bonus) |
100.0 |
% |
83.1 |
% |
|||||||||||||
As shown above, the minimum threshold was not achieved with respect to 2006 for Gross Customer Addition Equivalents.
Consolidated Cash Flow was 95.2% of target, which exceeded the threshold of 92%. Pursuant to the terms of the bonus plan, the achievement of 95.2% of target resulted in a prorated payout percentage of 63.7%, prior to weighting of this factor. Pursuant to the plan, this percentage was then weighted by 17.5% to obtain 11.1%.
Consolidated Revenue was 98.9% of target, which exceeded the threshold of 95%. Pursuant to the terms of the bonus plan, the achievement of 98.9% of target resulted in a prorated payout percentage of 86.5%, prior to weighting of this factor. Pursuant to the plan, this percentage was then weighted by 20% to obtain 17.3%.
28
Postpay Customer Disconnects were 92.6% of target, which exceeded the threshold of 110% (in this case a lower percentage is better). Pursuant to the terms of the bonus plan, the achievement of 92.6% of target resulted in a prorated payout percentage of 174.4%, prior to weighting of this factor. Pursuant to the plan, this percentage was then weighted by 20% to obtain 34.9%.
Return on Capital was 97.2% of target, which exceeded the threshold of 92%. Pursuant to the terms of the bonus plan, the achievement of 97.2% of target resulted in a prorated payout percentage of 79.1%, prior to weighting of this factor. Pursuant to the plan, this percentage was then weighted by 25% to obtain 19.8%.
The overall average percentage achieved with respect to 2006 was calculated to be 83.1%. Nevertheless, the entire amount of the bonus pool is discretionary and subject to approval by the Chairman. Pursuant to this discretionary authority, the Chairman adjusted the overall bonus pool to 90.25% of target, and then rounded this to 90.5%. This was done because certain strategic and other decisions subsequent to the time that the targets were set adversely affected performance compared to the targets.
The achievement levels of objectives and performance measures that are stated in non-quantitative terms (and the level of achievement of such objectives and measures) are discussed below under Performance Objectives and Accomplishment.
Performance Objectives and Accomplishments
In addition to Company and/or business unit performance, the Chairman and the President considers personal objectives and performance. The personal objectives that the President considered in his evaluation of each of the named executive officers other than the President are almost entirely composed of team objectives of the management group. There was no minimum level of achievement of any of those objectives required before salary could be increased. The following identifies the significant objectives as well as the accomplishment of these objectives in 2006. The Chairman also considered these team objectives and performance in his evaluation of the President, as discussed below.
29
Each of Jay M. Ellison, Michael S. Irizarry and Jeffrey J. Childs was considered to have made a significant contribution to the aforementioned performance achievements and, accordingly, each such named executive officer was considered to far exceed expectations. Steven T. Campbell's contribution to such Performance Objectives and Achievements in 2006 was considered to exceed expectations because he was the Vice President and Controller in 2006 and did not become the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer until 2007. The Chairman also considered these team objectives and performance achievements in his evaluation of John E. Rooney, as discussed below.
Annual Cash Compensation
Annually, the Chairman determines the President and CEO's base salary. With respect to the other executive officers, the President recommends and the Chairman approves annually each such executive officer's base salary based on his evaluation of the performance of U.S. Cellular and each executive officer. In connection with the foregoing, the President and/or Chairman consider such factors and circumstances as they may deem relevant, as discussed below.
Significant facts and circumstances that the Chairman considered in approving the annual cash compensation of all of the named executive officers, and that the President considered in recommending the annual cash compensation of named executive officers other than the President, are as follows: the fact that U.S. Cellular is a public company; the fact that U.S. Cellular is primarily a regional competitor and that some of its competitors are national or global telecommunications companies that are much larger than U.S. Cellular, possess greater resources, possess more extensive coverage areas and more spectrum within some coverage areas, and market other services with their communications services that U.S. Cellular does not offer; U.S. Cellular's performance in 2006, as discussed above; the performance objectives and achievements and the extent to which the officer was considered to have contributed to such achievements in 2006, as discussed above; the publicly-available benchmark information of cash compensation of U.S. Cellular's publicly-held peers and other publicly-held companies, as discussed above; certain ranges and metrics for the individual officers based on such benchmarks, as discussed below; and the overall views and feedback of U.S. Cellular personnel. In addition, the President and/or Chairman considered additional facts and circumstances with respect to each of the named executive officers as discussed below.
The Chairman uses the above sources and makes a determination of appropriate ranges of base salary for each named executive officer, based on the recommendations of the President of U.S. Cellular with respect to all named executive officers other than the President of U.S. Cellular. The base salary of each executive officer is set at a level considered to be appropriate in the judgment of the Chairman based on an assessment of the responsibilities and performance of such executive officer, taking into account the facts and circumstances discussed above. No specific performance measures are determinative in the base salary compensation decisions of executive officers. Instead, all such facts and circumstances are taken into consideration by the President and the Chairman in their executive compensation decisions. Ultimately, it is the informed judgment of the Chairman based on the recommendation of the President that determines an executive officer's base salary based on the total mix of information rather than on any specific measures of performance.
The following discusses annual cash compensation with respect to each of the named executive officers.
30
Base Salary
President and CEO. The 2006 base salary of John E. Rooney was $736,000. On February 27, 2007, the Chairman approved an increase in the base salary of John E. Rooney to $790,000 for 2007, representing an increase of approximately 7.3%.
The range considered to be appropriate in the judgment of the Chairman in approving John E. Rooney's base salary for 2007 as President was approximately $640,000 to $945,000. This range was based on a survey from U.S. Cellular's compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, and represented the 25th to 75th percentiles, respectively, of a population of comparable base salaries. The 50th percentile of this range was $765,000. The population of comparable base salaries was comprised one-half of the base salaries of the chief executive officers of public companies and one-half of the base salaries of the chief executive officers of subsidiaries of publicly-held companies, similar in size to U.S. Cellular, recognizing the fact that U.S. Cellular is both a public company as well as a subsidiary of a public company. See "Benchmarking" above. The base salary approved for Mr. Rooney for 2007 of $790,000 was approximately 103% of the 50th percentile. The salary of the President and CEO is believed to be within the median of the range considered to be appropriate in the judgment of the Chairman.
The Chairman also considered the achievement levels of objectives and performance measures that are stated in quantitative terms and the assessment of how well U.S. Cellular did as a whole during the year. As discussed above, the adjusted overall Company performance was 90.5% of target. See "Company Performance" above.
The Chairman also considered the extent to which the President contributed to U.S. Cellular's performance. As the President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular, John E. Rooney is the principal executive officer of U.S. Cellular and supervises and controls all of the business and affairs of U.S. Cellular. As a result, Mr. Rooney is primarily responsible for the performance of U.S. Cellular.
The Chairman also considered the achievement levels of objectives and performance measures that are stated in non-quantitative terms (and the level of achievement of such objectives and measures), which include the same items as discussed under "Performance Objective and Accomplishments" above. There was no minimum level of achievement of those objectives required before salary could be increased. As the President and Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Cellular, Mr. Rooney is primarily responsible for such objectives and accomplishments. As noted above, the achievement of such objectives was considered to far exceed expectations.
The Chairman also considered the general facts and circumstances discussed above under "Annual Cash Compensation." Additional significant facts and circumstances that the Chairman considered in determining John E. Rooney's annual cash compensation are as follows: Mr. Rooney's position and the fact that, as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Rooney is primarily responsible for the performance of U.S. Cellular; the fact that Mr. Rooney has held this position and has been employed by U.S. Cellular since 2000; the Chairman's view that Mr. Rooney significantly contributed to the growth and development of U.S. Cellular since that time and the performance of U.S. Cellular since that time.
For disclosure purposes, in 2008, the base salary of the President and CEO for 2008 was increased to $855,000, representing an increase of approximately 8.2% over the 2007 base salary. This will be reflected in next year's proxy statement.
Other Named Executive Officers. The base salary of each of the other named executive officers is also believed to be within the median of the range considered to be appropriate in the judgment of the Chairman. The ranges for each of the other named executive officers was based on a survey from U.S. Cellular's compensation consultant, Towers Perrin, based on, as applicable, the second highest paid, third highest paid, fourth highest paid and fifth highest paid executive officer in companies with revenues of less than $5.9 billion. See "Benchmarking" above. In addition, see generally "Company Performance", "Performance Objectives and Accomplishments" and "Annual Cash Compensation" above for other factors considered in setting the annual base salary. The following discusses the annual base salary with respect to each of the other named executive officers.
31
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Steven T. Campbell's base salary effective March 1, 2006 was $250,000. Upon his promotion from Vice President and Controller to Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer effective January 1, 2007, Mr. Campbell's base salary was increased to $325,000. The range considered to be appropriate for him for 2007 in his capacity as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer was approximately $340,200 to $467,500 based on the fourth highest paid executive in the benchmarking survey discussed above. The median of this range is approximately $405,900. Mr. Campbell's base salary was increased to $377,881 or by 16.3% effective March 1, 2007, reflecting his rating of exceeds expectations for the reasons discussed above and his additional responsibilities as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. The amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table represents two months at the prior salary and ten months at the new salary, or a total of $369,068.
Additional significant facts and circumstances that the President and Chairman considered in determining Steven T. Campbell's annual cash compensation are as follows: Mr. Campbell's promotion to and responsibilities as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of U.S. Cellular; the fact that Mr. Campbell has held these offices since January 1, 2007 and that prior to that time was employed by U.S. Cellular as its Vice President and Controller since June 1, 2005; and the President's and Chairman's subjective views regarding Mr. Campbell's contributions in such capacities to U.S. Cellular during that time.
For disclosure purposes, Mr. Campbell's base salary effective March 1, 2008 was increased to $423,000. This will be reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in next year's proxy statement.
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Jay M. Ellison's base salary effective March 1, 2006 was $475,200. The range considered to be appropriate for him for 2007 in his capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer was approximately $447,300 to $700,000 based on the second highest paid executive in the benchmarking survey discussed above. The median of this range is approximately $518,700. Mr. Ellison's base salary was increased to $508,464 or by 7.0% effective March 1, 2007, reflecting his rating of far exceeds expectations for the reasons discussed above. The amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table represents two months at the prior salary and ten months at the new salary, or a total of $502,920.
Additional significant facts and circumstances that the President and Chairman considered in determining Jay M. Ellison's annual cash compensation are as follows: Mr. Ellison's position and responsibilities as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of U.S. Cellular; the length of time that Mr. Ellison's has held this position and his employment by U.S. Cellular since 2000; and the President's and Chairman's subjective views regarding Mr. Ellison's contributions in such capacity to U.S. Cellular during that time.
For disclosure purposes, Mr. Ellison's base salary effective March 1, 2008 was increased to $549,000. This will be reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in next year's proxy statement.
Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer. Michael S. Irizarry's base salary effective March 1, 2006 was $399,600. The range considered to be appropriate for him for 2007 in his capacity as Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer was approximately $375,000 to $535,000 based on the third highest paid executive in the benchmarking survey discussed above. The median of this range is approximately $462,700. Mr. Irizarry's actual base salary was increased to $460,000 or by 15.1% effective March 1, 2007, reflecting his rating of far exceeds expectations for the reasons discussed above. In addition, the base pay increase for Mr. Irizarry reflects the addition of all Information Systems (IS) responsibilities to his existing engineering and network operation responsibilities and takes into consideration his performance and accomplishments since taking on such additional IS responsibilities. The amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table represents two months at the prior salary and ten months at the new salary, or a total of $449,933.
Additional significant facts and circumstances that the President and Chairman considered in determining Michael S. Irizarry's annual cash compensation are as follows: Mr. Irizarry's position and responsibilities as Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of U.S. Cellular; his increased IS responsibilities; the length of time that Mr. Irizarry has held his position and responsibilities since his
32
employment by U.S. Cellular since 2002; and the President's and Chairman's subjective views regarding Mr. Irizarry's contributions in such capacities to U.S. Cellular during that time.
For disclosure purposes, Mr. Irizarry's base salary effective March 1, 2008 was increased to $496,800. This will be reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in next year's proxy statement.
Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources and Chief Human Resources Officer. Jeffrey J. Childs' base salary effective March 1, 2006 was $353,160. The range considered to be appropriate for him for 2007 in his capacity as Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources was approximately $297,200 to $429,000 based on the fifth highest paid executive in the benchmarking survey discussed above. The median of this range is approximately $365,500. Mr. Childs' base salary was increased to $377,881 or by 7.0% effective March 1, 2007, reflecting his rating of far exceeds expectations for the reasons discussed above. The amount reported in the Summary Compensation Table represents two months at the prior salary and ten months at the new salary, or a total of $373,761.
Additional significant facts and circumstances that the President and Chairman considered in determining Jeffrey J. Childs' annual cash compensation are as follows: Mr. Childs' position and responsibilities as Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources of U.S. Cellular; the length of time that Mr. Childs' has held this position and his employment by U.S. Cellular since 2004; and the President's and Chairman's subjective views regarding Mr. Childs' contributions in such capacity to U.S. Cellular during that time.
For disclosure purposes, Mr. Childs' base salary effective March 1, 2008 was increased to $408,000. This will be reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in next year's proxy statement.
Bonus
On July 12, 2006, the U.S. Cellular 2006 Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan Effective January 1, 2006 ("Executive Bonus Plan") was approved by the Chairman, who does not participate in such incentive plan. This bonus plan measures performance with respect to 2006, relating to bonuses paid in 2007. A copy of this plan was filed with the SEC on a Form 8-K dated July 12, 2006.
The purposes of the Executive Bonus Plan are: to provide incentive for the executive officers of U.S. Cellular to extend their best efforts toward achieving superior results in relation to key business measures; to reward U.S. Cellular's executive officers in relation to their success in meeting and exceeding the performance targets; and to help U.S. Cellular attract and retain talented leaders in positions of critical importance to the success of U.S. Cellular. Eligible participants in the Executive Bonus Plan are executive vice presidents and senior vice presidents of U.S. Cellular. Each participant's target incentive is expressed as a percentage of base salary.
The officer bonus plans of U.S. Cellular are discretionary and are based, in part, on U.S. Cellular's performance, individual performance and individual bonus targets, which contribute to the formation and size of a bonus pool. The total pool is then divided into Executive Officer and Vice President annual plan pools, and allocated at the discretion of the President and CEO. The President and CEO considers performance measures and any other information that he deems relevant in determining the pools and allocations.
The following performance measures, using weights and definitions as approved by the Chairman, are considered in evaluating the achievements of the eligible participants for purposes of the Executive Bonus Plan: Customer Addition Equivalents; Customer Disconnects; Consolidated Revenue; Consolidated Cash Flow; and Return on Capital. U.S. Cellular sets target levels for such measures at levels that it believes are achievable with above average performance. U.S. Cellular believes it would require superior performance to achieve 200% of the target levels, which is the maximum for each factor and the plan. Nevertheless, although such performance measures may impact the amount of bonus an officer receives, all officer bonuses are discretionary, and individual performance and other factors contribute to the amount of bonus an officer receives. The President and CEO may consider the performance factors and any other information he deems relevant in determining the bonus. Bonuses are not earned, nor are payouts vested until a bonus has been approved and paid to an officer. As a result, the performance measures are one category of the factors used in determining the bonus, but do not
33
entitle the officer to any bonus until awarded. In addition, a bonus can be awarded based on judgment even if the performance measures are not met. Although performance measures influence the decision of the amount of the bonus, the entire amount of the bonus is discretionary and cannot be calculated in advance of approval and payment to the officer.
The President and CEO determines the actual payout that each officer will receive allocating the bonus pool among officers as he deems appropriate, and is not bound to adhere to any guideline, including any of the identified performance measures. However, the sum of all participants' actual awards may not deviate from the amount of the total officer pool by more than plus or minus 18%. In addition, the Chairman approves all officer bonuses prior to payout.
As noted above, the overall average percentage achieved with respect to 2006 was calculated to be 83.1%. Nevertheless, the entire amount of the bonus pool is discretionary and subject to approval by the Chairman. Pursuant to this discretionary authority, the Chairman increased the overall bonus pool to 90.5% of target. This was approved by the Chairman because certain strategic and other decisions subsequent to the time that the targets were set adversely affected performance compared to the targets. In addition, discretionary individual adjustments were made as discussed below.
The following shows certain information with respect to each named executive officer other than the President relating to the amount of the bonus for 2006 performance (paid in 2007) showing the amount of bonus awarded as a result of the achievement of the above performance measures and the amount awarded on a discretionary basis on an individual basis:
|
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allocation of 83.1% of bonus pool based on achievement of performance measures in 2006 | $ | 72,713 | $ | 236,935 | $ | 149,430 | $ | 117,390 | |||||
Discretionary adjustment of bonus pool to adjust to 90.5% | 6,475 | 21,099 | 13,307 | 10,454 | |||||||||
Discretionary individual bonus adjustment | 23,812 | 78,380 | 49,791 | 38,326 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 103,000 | $ | 336,414 | $ | 212,528 | $ | 166,170 | |||||
The discretionary individual adjustments were made based on the achievement of the team performance objectives discussed above under Performance Objectives and Accomplishments.
In addition, the Chairman determines annually the President and CEO's bonus. There is no written bonus plan for the President. The bonus of the U.S. Cellular President is determined in a manner similar to the foregoing, but with some differences. In addition to the factors described above for all executive officers in general, the Chairman considers total cash compensation paid to chief executive officers of other comparable companies, including those which are divisions or subsidiaries of parent companies. These companies include the peer companies included in the "Stock Performance Graph" in the 2007 annual report to shareholders and as discussed above under "Benchmarking".
No specific measures of performance are considered determinative in the compensation of the President. As with the other executive officers, all facts and circumstances are taken into consideration by the Chairman in his executive compensation decisions for the President. Ultimately, it is the informed judgment of the Chairman that determines the cash compensation for the President.
With respect to the President's bonus, the Chairman does consider the results of the Executive Bonus Plan and bases the amount of the bonus to some degree upon the results of U.S. Cellular as measured by the performance objectives set by the Executive Bonus Plan. However, with respect to the President, the relationship of the bonus to such performance measures also involves a substantial amount of judgment and discretion on the part of the Chairman based on the total mix of information. The entire amount of the bonus is discretionary and the President and CEO does not become entitled to any amount of bonus as a result of performance measures or otherwise unless and until approved by the Chairman and paid.
With respect to the bonus determination for the President, the Chairman considered the achievement of the performance measures as discussed above for the other named executive officers. As noted
34
therein, the percentage of overall achievement of the target bonus for 2006 was 83.1%, which was adjusted on a discretionary basis to 90.5%. This percentage was considered by the Chairman, but was not applied mechanically to calculate any portion of the President's bonus. All of the President's bonus is discretionary.
The informal target for Mr. Rooney's bonus was 70% of his base salary for that year. Based on the 2006 base salary of $736,000, Mr. Rooney's target bonus was $515,000. Using a percentage of 90.5% of target, Mr. Rooney's bonus, prior to any discretionary individual adjustment, would be approximately $466,000 if he participated in the Executive Bonus Plan. In determining the amount of the bonus for the President to be paid in 2007, the Chairman considered the facts and circumstances, personal objectives, achievement of such objectives, how well U.S. Cellular performed in the prior year, and the extent to which the President contributed to U.S. Cellular's performance, as discussed above. Based on these factors, on February 27, 2007, the Chairman approved a bonus to John E. Rooney of $525,000 with respect to 2006 performance. This was 102% of his target bonus amount reflecting the Chairman's subjective views regarding U.S. Cellular's performance and achievements and Mr. Rooney's contributions to such performance and achievements in 2006.
On August 8, 2007, U.S. Cellular's Chairman approved an Executive Bonus Plan for 2007. A copy of this plan was filed with the SEC on a Form 8-K dated August 9, 2007. Performance and bonuses under this plan will be reflected in next year's proxy statement.
For disclosure purposes, the amount of bonus paid on March 14, 2008 with respect to 2007 performance is as follows:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Bonus for 2007 paid in 2008 | $ | 675,000 | $ | 252,000 | $ | 401,000 | $ | 275,000 | $ | 204,000 | |||||
The amount of the bonus for 2007 paid in 2008 is only provided for disclosure purposes. These amounts were not earned until paid in 2008 and will be reported in next year's Summary Compensation Table with respect to 2008.
Long-Term Equity Compensation
In addition to the process for determining base salary and bonus above, the Chairman recommends and the Stock Option Compensation Committee approves long-term equity compensation awards to the named executive officers under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, which include stock options and restricted stock units.
Long-term compensation decisions for the named executive officers are evaluated in a manner similar to that described for annual base salary and bonus decisions above, except that the stock options and restricted stock units are generally intended to vest over several years, in order to reflect the goal of relating long-term compensation of the named executive officers to increases in shareholder value over the same period.
The Stock Option Compensation Committee may establish performance measures and restriction periods, and determine the form, amount and timing of each grant of an award, the number of shares of stock subject to an award, the purchase price or base price per share of stock associated with the award, the exercise price of a stock option award, the time and conditions of exercise or settlement of the award and all other terms and conditions of the award.
Although the Stock Option Compensation Committee has the discretion to grant various awards, it generally only grants service-based restricted stock units and service-based stock options. The restricted stock units generally vest in full (cliff vesting) on the third anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment. For the last several years, the stock options granted generally became exercisable with respect to 25% of the shares underlying the stock option each year over a four year period and were exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the date of grant, subject to continued employment. However, beginning with awards made in April 2008, stock options will become exercisable
35
with respect to 331/3% of the shares underlying the stock option each year over a three year period, and will be exercisable until the tenth anniversary of the date of grant subject to continued employment.
Officers receive an award of restricted stock units in the current year based on the achievement of certain levels of corporate and individual performance in the immediately preceding year and stock options based primarily on individual performance in the preceding year. However, all stock option and restricted stock unit awards are granted in consideration for future service and are expensed over the applicable vesting periods.
The Stock Option Compensation Committee measured corporate and individual performance as follows to determine the amount of restricted stock units and stock options to award to the named executive officers in 2007. The following first discusses the general approach used for the named executive officers other than the President. Following that is a discussion of how this approach was modified with respect to the President.
The target allocation of long-term compensation awards in 2007 was 60% in stock options and 40% in restricted stock units for named executive officers other than the President. This allocation was based on information from U.S. Cellular's compensation consultant, Towers Perrin. See "Benchmarking" above.
Although the target allocation was based on such benchmark data, the stock option grant was adjusted by an officer performance multiple and the restricted stock unit award was adjusted by the officer performance multiple as well as a U.S. Cellular performance factor, as discussed below.
Based on information from Towers Perrin, the formula for determining the number of stock options to award was (a) 60% × the officer's March 1, 2007 salary × the officer performance multiple divided by (b) the product of (i) an option vesting discount factor and (ii) the Black Scholes value of an option on U.S. Cellular's stock based on the closing stock price on the grant date. This result was rounded to the nearest 25 shares (or multiple thereof).
Based on information from Towers Perrin, the formula for determining the number of restricted stock units to award was (a) 40% × the officer's March 1, 2007 salary × the officer performance multiple × U.S. Cellular performance factor divided by (b) the product of (i) the value of a U.S. Cellular Common Share based on the closing stock price on the grant date and (ii) a vesting discount factor to account for forfeitures. The Company performance multiple used was 90.25%. This is slightly less than the adjusted percentage of achievement of the target bonus pool for 2006 of 90.50%, as discussed above, because the Chairman rounded the performance multiple used for the bonus pool to 90.5%, whereas this additional 0.25% adjustment was not included in the performance multiple for long-term equity awards.
The officer performance multiple represents a number based on information from Towers Perrin derived from benchmarking data from a population of companies that were 2/3 telecommunications companies and 1/3 general corporations as discussed under "Benchmarking" above, provided that U.S. Cellular does not increase or decrease the multiple by more than 15% from the multiple used for the immediately preceding year. The amount of this multiple related to the officer's relative position in the Company and whether the officer's performance was considered to have failed to meet expectations, met expectations, exceeded expectations or far exceeded expectations. In 2006, all named executive officers were considered to have exceeded expectations or far exceeded expectations. The multiples based on information provided by Towers Perrin were intended to provide awards at the 50th percentile for an officer that meets expectations, at the 60th percentile for an officer who exceeds expectations and at the 65th percentile for an officer that far exceeds expectations. In recognition of the fact that U.S. Cellular's corporate parent provides certain administrative and similar services, the multiple actually used for far exceeds expectations for the named executive officer was set to be the same as the multiple for exceeds expectations at the 60th percentile. Based on information from Towers Perrin, the named executive officers other than the President were assigned the multiples disclosed below for the reasons disclosed below.
36
Steven T. Campbell's performance multiple was 1.46 based on information from Towers Perrin for an officer at Mr. Campbell's level and performance, which is intended to provide awards at the 60th percentile. Mr. Campbell's performance was considered to exceed expectations as discussed above under Performance Objectives and Accomplishments.
Jay M. Ellison's performance multiple was 2.53 based on information from Towers Perrin for an officer at Mr. Ellison's level and performance, which is intended to provide awards at the 60th percentile. Mr. Ellison's performance was considered to far exceed expectations as discussed above under Performance Objectives and Accomplishments.
Michael S. Irizarry's performance multiple was 2.01 based on information from Towers Perrin for an officer at Mr. Irizarry's level and performance, which is intended to provide awards at the 60th percentile. Mr. Irizarry's performance was considered to far exceed expectations as discussed above under Performance Objectives and Accomplishments.
Jeffrey J. Childs' performance multiple was 1.46 based on information from Towers Perrin for an officer at Mr. Childs' level and performance, which is intended to provide awards at the 60th percentile. Mr. Childs' performance was considered to far exceed expectations as discussed above under Performance Objectives and Accomplishments.
As a result of the foregoing formulas and individual performance factors, the following stock options and restricted stock units were granted to the other named executive officers in 2007:
Name |
Number of Shares Underlying Stock Options |
Number of Shares Underlying Restricted Stock Units |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Steven T. Campbell | 17,200 | 3,123 | ||
Jay M. Ellison | 40,100 | 7,281 | ||
Michael S. Irizarry | 28,825 | 5,233 | ||
Jeffrey J. Childs | 17,200 | 3,123 |
The following shows the calculation of stock options and restricted stock units.
|
|
Formula |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a | March 1, 2007 Base Salary | $ | 377,881 | $ | 508,464 | $ | 460,000 | $ | 377,881 | ||||||||
b | Performance Multiple | 1.46 | 2.53 | 2.01 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||
c | Long Term Incentive Target Value | a × b | $ | 551,706 | $ | 1,286,414 | $ | 924,600 | $ | 551,706 | |||||||
d | Option Value | c × 60% | $ | 331,024 | $ | 771,848 | $ | 554,760 | $ | 331,024 | |||||||
e | Closing Stock Price on April 2, 2007 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 73.84 | ||||||||
f | Closing Price × Black-Scholes Ratio | e × 29.4% | $ | 21.71 | $ | 21.71 | $ | 21.71 | $ | 21.71 | |||||||
g | Adj. Price × Option Vesting Discount Factor | f × .8865 | $ | 19.24 | $ | 19.24 | $ | 19.24 | $ | 19.24 | |||||||
h | Options Granted (rounded) | d / g | 17,200 | 40,100 | 28,825 | 17,200 | |||||||||||
i | RSU Value | c × 40% | $ | 220,683 | $ | 514,566 | $ | 369,840 | $ | 220,683 | |||||||
j | Company Performance % | 90.25 | % | 90.25 | % | 90.25 | % | 90.25 | % | ||||||||
k | Adjusted RSU Value | $ | 199,186 | $ | 464,395 | $ | 333,781 | $ | 199,166 | ||||||||
l | Price × RSU Vesting Discount Factor | e × .8638 | $ | 63.78 | $ | 63.78 | $ | 63.78 | $ | 63.78 | |||||||
RSUs Granted | k / l | 3,123 | 7,281 | 5,233 | 3,123 |
John E. Rooney's stock option and restricted stock unit awards were made using a different approach compared to the calculations shown above for the other named executive officers.
The value of Mr. Rooney's target long-term incentive value awards was based on benchmark information from Towers Perrin based on the combined value of stock option and restricted stock grants for comparable persons. As discussed above for the President's base salary, the population of comparable values of grants was comprised one-half of grant values for the chief executive officers of public companies and one-half of grant values for the chief executive officers of subsidiaries of
37
publicly-held companies, similar in size to U.S. Cellular. The total of this target allocation was approximately $2,951,360 at the 50th percentile and $3,238,400 at the 60th percentile with respect to grants in 2007.
Mr. Rooney's target allocation with respect to restricted stock units was approximately 15% of his total long-term target award. This allocation is based on a long-standing fixed dollar target approach to this portion of his compensation. Mr. Rooney's fixed dollar target restricted stock unit value was $411,290. This was multiplied by the Company Performance percentage of 90.25% to derive an adjusted restricted stock unit value of approximately $371,190. This amount was then divided by the closing stock price on April 2, 2007 of $73.84 to arrive at an award of 5,027 restricted stock units in 2007.
Mr. Rooney's target allocation with respect to stock options was approximately 85% of his total long-term target award. The target allocation was approximately $2,540,070 at the 50th percentile and $2,827,110 at the 60th percentile with respect to stock option grants in 2007. Using the Black-Scholes adjusted price of $21.71, the target stock option awards would be approximately 117,000 at the 50th percentile and 130,000 at the 60th percentile. However, of the 85% allocation, 60% was based on the position's long-term incentive multiple and 25% was based on the position's long-term incentive multiple adjusted for the U.S. Cellular performance factor of 90.25%, as discussed above. Based on the foregoing approach, the Chairman recommended and the Stock Option Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Rooney stock options with respect to 121,000 shares in 2007.
The stock options and restricted stock units granted in 2007 vested on October 2, 2007 pursuant to the executory portions of an offer letter which was accepted by John E. Rooney on March 28, 2000 relating to his employment as President and Chief Executive Officer.
As with the annual salary and bonus, executive officers do not become entitled to any stock options or restricted stock units as a result of the achievement of any corporate or individual performance levels. The award of stock options and restricted stock units is entirely discretionary and executive officers have no right to any stock option or restricted stock unit awards unless and until they are awarded. As a result, the awards relating to 2006 performance were not earned by the executive officers until they were approved and awarded in 2007. Accordingly, awards with respect to 2006 performance are included in the Summary Compensation Table below with respect to compensation earned in 2007.
For disclosure purposes, the stock options and restricted stock unit awards granted on April 1, 2008 with respect to 2007 performance are as follows:
Name |
Number of Shares Underlying Stock Options |
Number of Shares Underlying Restricted Stock Units |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
John E. Rooney | 136,000 | 7,695 | ||
Steven T. Campbell | 27,175 | 6,120 | ||
Jay M. Ellison | 61,250 | 13,794 | ||
Michael S. Irizarry | 44,150 | 9,943 | ||
Jeffrey J. Childs | 26,225 | 5,903 |
The foregoing amounts are only provided for disclosure purposes. These amounts were not earned until awarded in 2008 and will be reflected in next year's Summary Compensation Table with respect to 2008.
38
Analysis of Compensation
The following table identifies the percentage of each element of total compensation of each of the named executive officers based on the Summary Compensation Table for 2007:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Salary | 20.2 | % | 50.1 | % | 26.2 | % | 31.3 | % | 34.3 | % | |
Bonus | 13.4 | % | 14.0 | % | 17.5 | % | 14.8 | % | 15.3 | % | |
Stock Awards | 13.0 | % | 9.4 | % | 23.0 | % | 20.3 | % | 21.2 | % | |
Stock Options | 51.5 | % | 21.9 | % | 30.0 | % | 27.4 | % | 25.8 | % | |
Other | 1.9 | % | 4.6 | % | 3.3 | % | 6.2 | % | 3.4 | % | |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||
The above percentages reflect the effects of SEC and accounting rules in computing total compensation, as discussed below.
The total 2007 compensation of the President and CEO pursuant to the Summary Compensation Table was $3,911,429. The total 2007 compensation of the other named executive officers ranged from a high of $1,920,452 to a low of $736,122. The reasons for the disparities in compensation include: 1. the effects of SEC and accounting rules in computing total compensation, and 2. differences in U.S. Cellular's policies or decision-making regarding the executives' compensation.
U.S. Cellular does not consider the technicalities of when and how accounting expense is recorded under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share Based Payments (which we refer to as "FAS 123R") as relevant in its executive compensation decisions. Accordingly, the following table reconciles the compensation expense reported in the Summary Compensation Table using the FAS 123R expense of the awards to the amount of compensation that would be reported using the grant date values of awards instead:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Total per Summary Compensation Table | $ | 3,911,429 | $ | 736,122 | $ | 1,920,452 | $ | 1,428,918 | $ | 1,089,327 | ||||||
Less FAS 123R Expense for Stock Awards | (508,779 | ) | (69,243 | ) | (442,648 | ) | (292,093 | ) | (230,607 | ) | ||||||
Less FAS 123R Expense for Options | (2,013,137 | ) | (161,182 | ) | (575,979 | ) | (394,040 | ) | (280,822 | ) | ||||||
Total FAS 123R Expense for all Awards | (2,521,916 | ) | (230,425 | ) | (1,018,627 | ) | (686,133 | ) | (511,429 | ) | ||||||
Add Grant Date Value of Awards from Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table | 2,537,474 | 516,767 | 1,204,793 | 865,981 | 516,767 | |||||||||||
Total Compensation using Grant Date Values | $ | 3,926,987 | $ | 1,022,464 | $ | 2,106,618 | $ | 1,608,766 | $ | 1,094,665 | ||||||
For comparison purposes, the following shows the total compensation for 2006 calculated on a comparable basis, except for Steven T. Campbell, whose compensation was not reported in 2006:
2006 | ||||||||||||||
Total Compensation using Grant Date Values | $ | 3,311,762 | N/A | $ | 1,442,796 | $ | 1,009,249 | $ | 879,698 | |||||
As indicated above, if 2007 compensation is instead calculated using the grant date value of awards, rather than the FAS 123R expense of award, Mr. Rooney's total compensation would have been
39
$3,926,987 and the total compensation for the other named executive officers would have ranged from a high of $2,106,618 to a low of $1,022,464. Using this approach, Mr. Rooney's total compensation is approximately 1.86 times the total compensation of the next highest compensated named executive officer.
This disparity between the compensation of the President and the other named executive officers, and the disparities in compensation among the other named executive officers, can be explained by differences in U.S. Cellular's policies or decision-making regarding executive compensation. As noted herein, U.S. Cellular's overall compensation objectives are to (i) support U.S. Cellular's overall business strategy and objectives; (ii) attract and retain high quality management; (iii) link individual compensation with attainment of individual performance goals and with attainment of business unit and U.S. Cellular objectives; and (iv) provide competitive compensation opportunities consistent with the financial performance of U.S. Cellular. Also as noted herein, U.S. Cellular determines the amount of compensation to pay or provide to each named executive officer considering compensation practices of peers and other companies with similar characteristics, in order to support U.S. Cellular's overall business strategy and objectives. As noted herein, U.S. Cellular recognizes that it must compensate its executive officers in a competitive manner comparable to other similar companies in order to attract and retain high quality management, attain business objectives and financial performance and increase shareholder value. Considering the foregoing, U.S. Cellular recognizes that it needs to and believes that it should compensate the President and CEO at a level that considers the compensation of presidents and CEOs of similar companies, which compensation is higher than the compensation of other named executive officers of such companies. The Company believes that this is necessary to attract and retain a highly qualified person to serve as President and CEO and to compete successfully against other companies. A level of compensation similar to that paid to the President and CEO is not necessary to attract and retain and is not appropriate for the other named executive officers. However, U.S. Cellular recognizes that it needs to and believes that it should compensate the other named executive officers at levels that reflect the compensation of similarly situated positions at similar companies in order to attract and retain high quality persons for such positions at U.S. Cellular. In addition, other factors have an impact on the amount of compensation of each particular executive officer, as discussed in detail above. For instance, an officer who far exceeds expectations would generally have a higher relative level of compensation for his particular function than an executive officer who did not exceed expectations, all other things being equal. Further discussion of the basis for compensation levels of the individual executive officers based on U.S. Cellular's performance, the executive officer's contribution to such performance, and the executive officer's individual performance is set forth elsewhere in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
The Chairman and the Stock Option Compensation Committee believe that the elements of compensation and total compensation of the named executive officers have been set at appropriate levels considering the foregoing principles.
Other Benefits and Plans Available to Identified Officers
The identified executive officers participate in certain benefits and plans, as described below.
As noted above, U.S. Cellular's overall compensation objectives for executive officers are to (i) support U.S. Cellular's overall business strategy and objectives; (ii) attract and retain high quality management; (iii) link individual compensation with attainment of individual performance goals and with attainment of business unit and U.S. Cellular objectives; and (iv) provide competitive compensation opportunities consistent with the financial performance of U.S. Cellular.
To achieve these objectives, the Chairman and the Stock Option Compensation Committee believe that the named executive officers must be offered a competitive compensation package, including benefits and plans. U.S. Cellular's compensation packages are designed to compete with other companies for talented employees. U.S. Cellular's benefits and plans are part of this package and enable U.S. Cellular to attract and retain eligible employees, including the named executive officers. Thus, the benefits and plans fit into U.S. Cellular's overall compensation objectives primarily by helping U.S. Cellular achieve the second objective of U.S. Cellular's overall compensation objectives, which is to
40
attract and retain high quality management. Benefits and plans are an important part of the mix of compensation used to attract and retain management, but do not otherwise significantly affect decisions relating to other elements of annual or long-term compensation, which are provided consistent with the above compensation objectives, including to (i) support U.S. Cellular's overall business strategy and objectives; (ii) attract and retain high quality management, (iii) link individual compensation with attainment of individual performance goals and with attainment of business unit and U.S. Cellular objectives and (iv) provide competitive compensation opportunities consistent with the financial performance of U.S. Cellular.
General Provisions under Plans and Certain Agreements
Deferred Salary and Bonus
Deferred Salary. The named executive officers are permitted to defer salary pursuant to deferred salary compensation agreements. The entire amount of the salary earned is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (c) under "Salary," whether or not deferred. Pursuant to the agreement, the officer's deferred compensation account is credited with interest compounded monthly, computed at a rate equal to one-twelfth of the sum of the average twenty-year Treasury Bond rate plus 1.25 percentage points until the deferred compensation amount is paid to such person. As required by SEC rules, column (h) includes the portion of any interest that exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code), at the time each monthly interest rate is set. The officer makes an election as to when to receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account.
Messrs. Rooney and Ellison are parties to executive deferred compensation agreements, pursuant to which they have deferred a specified portion of their salaries. The executive is always 100% vested in all salary amounts that have been deferred and any interest credited with respect thereto. Accordingly, the executive is entitled to 100% of the amount deferred and all earnings thereon upon any termination. Such amounts are reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table below and, because there would not be any increased benefit or accelerated vesting in the event of any termination or change in control, are not included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.
Deferred Bonus. The named executive officers are also permitted to defer bonus pursuant to deferred bonus compensation agreements under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as discussed below. The entire amount of the bonus earned is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (d) under "Bonus," whether or not deferred. Deferred bonus will be deemed invested in phantom U.S. Cellular Common Shares. The named executive officers make an election as to when to receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account.
Mr. Rooney is a party to an executive deferred compensation agreement, pursuant to which he has deferred a specified portion of his bonus. The executive is always 100% vested in all bonus amounts that have been deferred and any dividends credited with respect thereto. Such amounts are reported in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table and, because there would not be any increased benefit or accelerated vesting in the event of any termination or change in control, are not included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.
41
U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Long-term compensation awards under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan were discussed above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The following provides certain additional information relating to deferred bonus, restricted stock units and stock options.
Pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, each officer may elect to defer all or a portion of his annual bonus. U.S. Cellular will allocate a match award to the employee's deferred compensation account in an amount equal to the sum of (i) 25% of the deferred bonus amount which is not in excess of one-half of the employee's gross bonus for the year and (ii) 331/3% of the deferred bonus amount which is in excess of one-half of the employee's gross bonus for the year. The matched stock units vest ratably at a rate of one-third per year over three years. Column (e), "Stock Awards," of the above Summary Compensation Table includes the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with FAS 123R.
Restricted stock units may be granted under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Column (e), "Stock Awards," of the Summary Compensation Table includes the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with FAS 123R, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
Stock options may be granted under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Column (f), "Options," of the Summary Compensation Table includes the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the fiscal year in accordance with FAS 123R, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions.
The phantom stock units, restricted stock units and stock options are not credited with any dividends because U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends.
The U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and related stock option and restricted stock unit award agreements provide various rights upon termination and/or change in control, as summarized below.
Stock Options. The U.S. Cellular stock option agreements with named executive officers provide as follows:
Disability. If the officer's employment terminates by reason of disability (a total physical disability which, in the Stock Option Compensation Committee's judgment, prevents the officer from performing substantially such officer's employment duties and responsibilities for a continuous period of at least six months), then the stock option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's termination of employment or service and after such date may be exercised by the stock option holder (or the holder's legal representative) for a period of 12 months after the effective date of the holder's termination of employment or service, or until the stock option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter.
Special Retirement. If the officer's employment terminates by reason of Special Retirement (termination of employment or service on or after the later of (i) the officer's attainment of age 62 and (ii) the officer's early retirement date or normal retirement date under the TDS Pension Plan), then the stock option immediately will become exercisable in full and after such date may be exercised by the stock option holder (or the holder's legal representative) for a period of 12 months after the effective date of the Special Retirement, or until the stock option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter. However, effective for stock options granted in April 2008, acceleration of vesting will occur only if at the time of termination, the officer has attained age 66 and the termination occurs subsequent to the year of grant.
Retirement. If the officer's employment terminates by reason of Retirement (termination of employment or service on or after the holder's attainment of age 65 that does not satisfy the definition of "Special Retirement"), then the stock option immediately will become exercisable in full and after such date may be exercised by the holder (or the holder's legal representative) for a period of 90 days after the effective date of the Retirement, or until the stock option's expiration date, whichever period is
42
shorter. However, effective for stock options granted in April 2008, acceleration of vesting will occur only if at the time of termination, the officer has attained age 66 and the termination occurs subsequent to the year of grant.
Resignation with Prior Consent of the Board. If the officer's employment terminates by reason of the officer's resignation of employment or service with the prior consent of the U.S. Cellular board of directors, then the stock option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the holder's resignation and after such date may be exercised by the holder (or the holder's legal representative) for a period of 90 days after the effective date of the holder's resignation, or until the stock option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter.
Death. If the officer's employment terminates by reason of death, then the stock option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the date of death and after such date may be exercised by the beneficiary or beneficiaries designated by the holder for a period of 180 days after the date of death, or until the stock option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter. However, effective for stock options granted in April 2008, the stock option will be exercisable by the beneficiary or beneficiaries for a period of 180 days after the date of death.
Other Termination of Employment or Service. If the officer's employment terminates for any reason other than Disability, Special Retirement, Retirement, resignation of employment or service with the prior consent of the U.S. Cellular board of directors or death, then the stock option will be exercisable only to the extent it is exercisable on the effective date of the officer's termination of employment or service and after such date may be exercised by the holder (or the holder's legal representative) for a period of 30 days after the effective date of the holder's termination of employment or service, or until the stock option's expiration date, whichever period is shorter.
Extension of Option Exercise Period. The stock option exercise period may be extended 30 days beyond the blackout period or legally required plan suspension in the event that the stock option would otherwise expire during a blackout period or legally-required plan suspension.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards. The U.S. Cellular restricted stock unit agreements with named executive officers provide as follows:
Retirement at or after Attainment of Age 65, Disability or Death. If the officer's employment terminates prior to the third anniversary of the date of grant by reason of retirement at or after attainment of age 65, disability or death, the award will become fully vested. However, effective for awards granted in April 2008, acceleration of vesting upon retirement only will occur if at the time of termination, the officer has attained age 66 and the termination occurs subsequent to the year of grant.
Other Termination of Employment or Service. If the officer's employment terminates prior to the third anniversary of the date of grant for any reason other than retirement at or after attainment of age 65, disability or death, the award will be forfeited.
Deferred Compensation Accounts and Company Match Awards. An employee will be fully vested in the deferred bonus amounts credited to his or her deferred compensation account. One-third of the company match award credited to the employee's deferred compensation account will become vested on each of the first three anniversaries of the last day of the year for which the applicable bonus is payable, provided that such employee is an employee of U.S. Cellular or an affiliate on such date and the deferred bonus amount has not been withdrawn or distributed before such date. The company match award immediately shall become fully vested in the event of the employee's permanent disability or separation from service on account of his or her retirement or death. Amounts credited to an employee's deferred compensation account will be deemed to be invested in phantom Common Shares at the time the amounts are credited to the deferred compensation account.
Payment of deferred compensation generally will be in accordance with the employee's payment method and distribution date elections, provided that if an employee is a "key employee" within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, and is entitled to payment by reason of a separation from service for a reason other than permanent disability or death, no portion of his or her deferred compensation
43
account subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be paid before the date which is six months after the date of separation from service (or if earlier, the date of the employee's death).
All payments of deferred compensation will be made in whole Common Shares and cash equal to the fair market value of any fractional share.
Forfeiture of Award Upon Competition with or Misappropriation of Confidential Information of U.S. Cellular or its Affiliates. If a recipient of an award enters into competition with, or misappropriates confidential information of, U.S. Cellular or any affiliate thereof, including TDS and its affiliates, then all awards granted shall terminate and be forfeited.
Change in Control
The following summarizes the Change in Control provisions of the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan:
Notwithstanding any provision in the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan or any agreement, in the event of a Change in Control, the board of directors may, but will not be required to, make such adjustments to outstanding awards under the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan as it deems appropriate, including, without limitation:
For the definition of Change in Control, see U.S. Cellular's 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, attached as Exhibit B to U.S. Cellular's Notice of Annual Meeting to Shareholders and Proxy Statement dated April 5, 2005.
Because certain termination events and/or a Change in Control would or may result in the acceleration of vesting of stock options, restricted stock units and bonus match units, the effects of such accelerated vesting in such event is included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.
SERP
Each of the identified executive officers participates in a supplemental executive retirement plan or SERP, which is a non-qualified defined contribution plan. The SERP does not provide substantial benefits and is intended to replace the benefits which cannot be provided under the TDS Pension Plan as a result of tax law limitations on the amount and types of annual employee compensation which can be taken into account under a tax qualified pension plan. The SERP is unfunded. The amount of the contribution with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table is included in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. Participants are credited with interest on balances of the SERP. Pursuant to SEC rules, column (h) of the Summary Compensation Table includes any portion of interest earned under the SERP to the extent the rate exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate, with compounding (as prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code), at the time the rate is set.
44
A participant is entitled to distribution of his entire account balance under the SERP if the participant's employment is terminated, without cause, after either (a) his or her attainment of age 65; or (b) his or her completion of at least ten years of service. If a participant terminates employment under circumstances other than those set forth in preceding sentence, without cause, the participant will be entitled to distribution of 10% of his or her account balance for each year of service up to ten years. Upon termination under circumstances that permit payments under the SERP, the participant may elect to take payments in (a) a single lump sum or (b) annual installments over a period of years. The SERP does not include any provision that would increase benefits or accelerate amounts upon any termination or change in control and, accordingly, no amount is included in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. The balance of the SERP as of December 31, 2007 for each named executive officer is set forth in the "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" table below.
Perquisites
U.S. Cellular does not provide any significant perquisites to its executive officers. In addition, U.S. Cellular has no formal plan, policy or procedure relating to providing perquisites to any executive officers following termination or change in control. However, in connection with any termination, U.S. Cellular may enter into a retirement, severance or similar agreement that may provide for perquisites.
Perquisites and personal benefits represent a relatively insignificant portion of the named executive officers' total compensation. Accordingly, they do not materially influence the Chairman's or Stock Option Compensation Committee's consideration in setting compensation.
Other Generally Applicable Benefits and Plans
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
TDS sponsors an Employee Stock Purchase Plan that permits eligible employees of TDS and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular, to purchase a limited number of TDS Special Common Shares on a quarterly basis. The per share cost to each participant is at 85% of the market value of the Special Common Shares as of the issuance date. Pursuant to SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table does not include the discount amount because such discount is available generally to all salaried employees of TDS.
U.S. Cellular also sponsors an Employee Stock Purchase Plan that permits eligible employees of U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries to purchase a limited number of U.S. Cellular Common Shares on a quarterly basis. The per share cost to each participant is at 85% of the market value of the Common Shares as of the issuance date. Pursuant to SEC rules, the Summary Compensation Table does not include the discount amount because such discount is available generally to all salaried employees of U.S. Cellular.
Under the TDS and U.S. Cellular Employee Stock Purchase Plans, all shares purchased are distributed quarterly and no shares are retained for distribution upon retirement or otherwise. These plans do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and are available generally to all employees of TDS or U.S. Cellular, as applicable, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.
Tax-Deferred Savings Plan
TDS sponsors the Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, a qualified defined contribution plan pursuant to Sections 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. This plan is available to employees of TDS and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. Employees contribute amounts and U.S. Cellular makes matching contributions in part. U.S. Cellular and participating employers make matching contributions to the plan in cash equal to 100% of an employee's contributions up to the first 3% and 40% of an employee's contributions up to the next 2% of such employee's compensation. Participating employees have the option of investing their contributions and U.S. Cellular's contributions in a TDS Common Share
45
fund, a TDS Special Common Share fund, a U.S. Cellular Common Share fund or certain unaffiliated funds. The amount of the contribution with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table is included in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. SEC rules do not require the Summary Compensation Table to include earnings or other amounts with respect to tax-qualified defined contribution plans.
Under the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan, vesting is not accelerated upon a Change in Control or other termination event. The vested portion of an employee's account becomes payable following the employee's termination of employment as (a) a lump sum or (b) in a series of annual or more frequent installments. This plan does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and is available generally to all employees, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Pension Plan
TDS sponsors a qualified noncontributory defined contribution Pension Plan for the employees of TDS and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. Under this plan, pension costs are calculated separately for each participant and are funded currently. The Pension Plan is designed to provide retirement benefits for eligible employees of TDS and certain of its affiliates which adopted the Pension Plan. TDS and its subsidiaries make annual employer contributions for each participant. The amount of the contribution with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table is included in column (i), "All Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. SEC rules do not require the Summary Compensation Table to include earnings or other amounts with respect to tax-qualified defined contribution plans.
Under the TDS Pension Plan, vesting is not accelerated upon a Change in Control or other termination event. The vested portion of an employee's account becomes payable following the employee's termination of employment as (a) an annuity or (b) a lump sum payment. This plan does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers and is available generally to all employees, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.
Health and Welfare Benefits
TDS also provides customary health and welfare and similar plans for the employees of TDS and its subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. These group life, health, hospitalization, disability and/or medical reimbursement plans do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation, in favor of executive officers or directors of U.S. Cellular and are available generally to all employees, and benefits are not enhanced upon any termination or change in control. Accordingly, no amounts are reported in the below table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.
Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatments of Particular Forms of Compensation
The Chairman and the Stock Option Compensation Committee consider the accounting and tax treatments of particular forms of compensation. Accounting treatments do not significantly impact the determinations of the appropriate compensation. The Chairman and the Stock Option Compensation Committee consider the accounting treatments primarily to be informed and to confirm that company personnel understand and recognize the appropriate accounting that will be required with respect to compensation decisions.
U.S. Cellular places more significance on the tax treatments of particular forms of compensation, because these may involve actual cash expense to the company or the executive. One objective of U.S. Cellular is to maximize tax benefits to the company and executives to the extent feasible within the overall goals of the compensation policy discussed above. In particular, one consideration is the effect of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
46
Subject to certain exceptions, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally provides a $1 million annual limit on the amount that a publicly held corporation is allowed to deduct as compensation paid to each of the corporation's principal executive officer and the corporation's other three most highly compensated officers, exclusive of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer. U.S. Cellular does not believe that the $1 million deduction limitation should have a material adverse effect on U.S. Cellular's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in the near future. If the $1 million deduction limitation is expected to have a material adverse effect on U.S. Cellular in the future, U.S. Cellular will consider ways to maximize the deductibility of executive compensation, while retaining the discretion U.S. Cellular deems necessary to compensate executive officers in a manner commensurate with performance and the competitive environment for executive talent.
U.S. Cellular does not have any arrangements with its executive officers pursuant to which it has agreed to "gross-up" payments due to taxes or to otherwise reimburse officers for the payment of taxes, except with respect to certain perquisites.
Financial Restatement
Depending on the facts and circumstances, U.S. Cellular may seek to adjust or recover awards or payments if the relevant U.S. Cellular performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment. In 2006 and 2007, U.S. Cellular restated financial statements and financial information for the three years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively, including quarterly information for the two fiscal years then ended, and certain financial data for prior fiscal years. This resulted in U.S. Cellular being late in certain SEC filings. The company has not identified any facts that would suggest that the restatements involved any fraud, misrepresentation, misconduct or improprieties. The restatements related to unintentional misapplication of technical accounting rules or errors in calculations or posting of entries. The restatements had little effect on operating metrics and little effect on financial measures that are the primary measures that were used to determine the level of bonuses. In particular, the most significant areas of adjustment in the restatements were derivatives accounting and income tax accounting, which have no relationship to metrics or measures used to determine bonuses. Accordingly, there was no adjustment of prior year bonuses due to the restatements. The restatement announced in 2005 and completed in 2006 was considered in approving compensation elements in 2006 for certain officers responsible for accounting matters and the restatement announced in 2006 and completed in 2007 was considered in approving compensation elements in 2007 for certain officers responsible for accounting matters.
Policy on Stock Ownership
U.S. Cellular does not have a formal policy relating to stock ownership by executive officers. TDS's Policy Regarding Insider Trading and Confidentiality, which is applicable to U.S. Cellular, provides that persons subject to the blackout policy may not, under any circumstances, trade options for, pledge, or sell "short," any securities of TDS or U.S. Cellular, and may not enter into any hedging, monetization or margin transactions with respect to any such securities.
Compensation Consultant
Information relating to U.S. Cellular's primary compensation consultant is discussed under "Corporate GovernanceStock Option Compensation Committee."
The undersigned directors oversee U.S. Cellular's compensation programs on behalf of the board of directors. In fulfilling their oversight responsibilities, the undersigned reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above in this proxy statement.
In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the undersigned recommended to the board of directors that the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in U.S. Cellular's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and U.S. Cellular's proxy statement related to the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
47
The above Compensation Committee Report is submitted by LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., who functions as the compensation committee, except with respect to long-term compensation, and by Paul-Henri Denuit, J. Samuel Crowley and Ronald E. Daly, the members of the Stock Option Compensation Committee, which has responsibility with respect to long-term compensation.
Because U.S. Cellular does not have a formal independent compensation committee, the foregoing Compensation Committee Report is also submitted by the full Board of Directors: LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., John E. Rooney, Kenneth R. Meyers, LeRoy T. Carlson, Walter C.D. Carlson, Paul-Henri Denuit, J. Samuel Crowley, Harry J. Harczak, Jr. and Ronald E. Daly.
Summary of Compensation
The following table summarizes the compensation paid by U.S. Cellular to the identified officers for 2007 and, except as indicated, 2006.
Name and Principal Position (a) |
Year (b) |
Salary $ (c) |
Bonus ($) (d) |
Stock Awards ($) (e) |
Option Awards ($) (f) |
Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (g) |
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (h) |
All Other Compensation ($) (i) |
Total ($) (j) |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John E. Rooney(1) President and Chief Executive Officer |
2007 2006 |
$ $ |
790,000 734,084 |
$ $ |
525,000 300,000 |
$ $ |
508,779 1,185,929 |
$ $ |
2,013,137 3,158,606 |
|
$ $ |
3,655 3,335 |
$ $ |
70,858 51,921 |
$ $ |
3,911,429 5,433,875 |
|||||||||
Steven T. Campbell(2) Executive Vice PresidentFinance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since January 1, 2007 |
2007 |
$ |
369,068 |
$ |
103,000 |
$ |
69,243 |
$ |
161,182 |
|
|
$ |
33,629 |
$ |
736,122 |
||||||||||
Jay M. Ellison(3) Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer |
2007 2006 |
$ $ |
502,920 467,867 |
$ $ |
336,414 176,000 |
$ $ |
442,648 480,214 |
$ $ |
575,979 535,037 |
|
$ $ |
1,157 1,201 |
$ $ |
61,334 43,727 |
$ $ |
1,920,452 1,704,046 |
|||||||||
Michael S. Irizarry(4) Executive Vice President and Chief Technical Officer |
2007 2006 |
$ $ |
449,933 393,434 |
$ $ |
212,528 110,000 |
$ $ |
292,093 305,673 |
$ $ |
394,040 388,879 |
|
$ |
35 |
$ $ |
80,289 27,380 |
$ $ |
1,428,918 1,225,366 |
|||||||||
Jeffrey J. Childs(5) Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources and Chief Human Resources Officer |
2007 2006 |
$ $ |
373,761 347,710 |
$ $ |
166,170 86,000 |
$ $ |
230,607 238,273 |
$ $ |
280,822 258,849 |
|
$ |
8 |
$ $ |
37,959 23,197 |
$ $ |
1,089,327 954,029 |
Explanation of Column:
LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Chairman of U.S. Cellular, and LeRoy T. Carlson, a director of U.S. Cellular and executive officers of TDS, receive no compensation from U.S. Cellular. In addition, Kenneth R. Meyers, a director of U.S. Cellular and executive
48
officer of TDS, received no compensation from U.S. Cellular in 2007. LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., is compensated, and in 2007, Kenneth R. Meyers was compensated, by TDS in connection with their services for TDS and TDS subsidiaries, including U.S. Cellular. A portion of their compensation expense incurred by TDS is allocated to U.S. Cellular by TDS, along with the allocation of other compensation expense and other expenses of TDS. This allocation by TDS to U.S. Cellular is done in the form of a single management fee pursuant to the Intercompany Agreement discussed below under "Intercompany Agreement." There is no identification or quantification of the compensation of such persons to U.S. Cellular, or of any other allocated expense in this management fee. The management fee is recorded as a single expense by U.S. Cellular. U.S. Cellular does not obtain details of the components that make up this fee and does not segregate this fee or allocate any part of the management fee to other accounts such as compensation expense. Accordingly, the compensation expenses incurred by TDS with respect to such persons are not reported in the above table. However, for purposes of disclosure, approximately 76% of LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr.'s compensation expense in 2007, approximately 77% of Kenneth R. Meyers' compensation expense in 2007 and approximately 76% of LeRoy T. Carlson's compensation expense in 2007 incurred by TDS is included by TDS in the total management fee to U.S. Cellular. Information with respect to compensation from TDS to LeRoy T. Carlson, Jr., Kenneth R. Meyers and LeRoy T. Carlson is included in TDS' proxy statement related to its 2008 annual meeting of shareholders.
For disclosure purposes, the amount of bonus paid on March 14, 2008 with respect to 2007 is as follows:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Bonus for 2007 paid in 2008 | $ | 675,000 | $ | 252,000 | $ | 401,000 | $ | 275,000 | $ | 204,000 | |||||
The amount of the Bonus for 2007 paid in 2008 is only provided for disclosure purposes. These amounts were not earned until paid in 2008 and will be reported in next year's Summary Compensation Table with respect to 2008.
Includes the amount of FAS 123R expense related to restricted stock units under the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. U.S. Cellular restricted stock units granted in 2007 will become vested on the third anniversary of the grant date, or on April 2, 2010, except with respect to Mr. Rooney whose restricted stock units became vested on October 2, 2007.
Also includes the amount of FAS 123R expense related to phantom stock bonus match units in U.S. Cellular Common Shares credited to such officer with respect to deferred bonuses. Deferred bonus is deemed invested in phantom U.S. Cellular Common Shares. U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends. Mr. Rooney deferred 100% of his 2006 bonus, which was paid in 2007. Accordingly, Mr. Rooney received a phantom stock bonus match with respect to such deferred bonus in 2007. As a result, he received a matching stock grant having a grant date value of $153,143. However, column (e) above includes
49
the amount of FAS 123R expense recognized in 2007 of $137,585. See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below.
The following is a summary of the amount of FAS 123R expense related to stock awards reflected in column (e) above:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 Restricted Stock Units | $ | | $ | | $ | 20,794 | $ | 13,411 | $ | 12,059 | ||||||
2005 Restricted Stock Units | | | 210,993 | 133,559 | 118,045 | |||||||||||
2006 Restricted Stock Units | | 11,648 | 76,546 | 48,614 | 42,908 | |||||||||||
2007 Restricted Stock Units | 371,194 | 57,595 | 134,315 | 96,509 | 57,595 | |||||||||||
Amount of restricted stock expense in 2007 | $ | 371,194 | $ | 69,243 | $ | 442,648 | $ | 292,093 | $ | 230,607 | ||||||
Amount of bonus match expense in 2007 | 137,585 | | | | | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 508,779 | $ | 69,243 | $ | 442,648 | $ | 292,093 | $ | 230,607 | ||||||
For reference purposes, the following is a summary of the grant date value of stock awards in 2007 reflected in column (l) of the Grants of Plan Based Awards Table below:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 Restricted Stock Units | $ | 371,194 | $ | 230,602 | $ | 537,629 | $ | 386,405 | $ | 230,602 | ||||||
2007 Bonus Match Awards | 153,143 | | | | | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 524,337 | $ | 230,602 | $ | 537,629 | $ | 386,405 | $ | 230,602 | ||||||
If an award ultimately vests in full, the amount cumulatively recognized in the Summary Compensation Table over a period of years should equal 100% of the grant date fair value of the equity award or the total fair value at the date of settlement for a liability award.
The following is a summary of the amount of FAS 123R expense relating to stock options reflected in column (f) above:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 Options | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,343 | $ | | |||||
2003 Options | | | 11,412 | 7,183 | | ||||||||||
2004 Options | | | 48,756 | 31,452 | 25,929 | ||||||||||
2005 Options | | 14,171 | 81,085 | 51,321 | 45,387 | ||||||||||
2006 Options | | 35,540 | 174,848 | 110,935 | 98,034 | ||||||||||
2007 Options | 2,013,137 | 111,471 | 259,878 | 186,806 | 111,472 | ||||||||||
Amount of stock option expense in 2007 | $ | 2,013,137 | $ | 161,182 | $ | 575,979 | $ | 394,040 | $ | 280,822 | |||||
For reference purposes, the following is a summary of the grant date value of stock options in 2007 reflected in column (l) of the Grants of Plan Based Awards Table below:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grant date value of stock options awarded in 2007 | $ | 2,013,137 | $ | 286,165 | $ | 667,164 | $ | 479,576 | $ | 286,165 | |||||
If a stock option ultimately vests in full, the amount cumulatively recognized in the Summary Compensation Table over a period of years should equal 100% of the grant date fair value of the equity award or the total fair value at the date of settlement for a liability award.
50
disclosed in other columns under SEC rules. Although the 2007 Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan Effective January 1, 2007 provides incentives to executive officers other than the Chairman and the President, this plan does not function in a way which permits the determination of the bonus based on achievement of performance measures, and is based on the judgment and discretion of the President and Chairman, as discussed above. Amounts under this plan are not earned until they are awarded and paid in the following year. There is no way under such plan to determine the amount to be paid prior to such time. Accordingly, amounts paid under such plan are set forth above under Bonus in column (d). See the discussion under "Bonus" in the above Compensation Discussion and Analysis.
Column (h) does not include any changes in pension values because U.S. Cellular does not have any defined benefit pension plans or pension plans (including supplemental plans) where the retirement benefit is actuarially determined that cover executive officers. The named executive officers only participate in tax-qualified defined contribution plans and a non-qualified defined contribution plan which, under SEC rules, are not required to be reflected in column (h). Both the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (TDSP) and the TDS Pension Plan are qualified defined contribution plans and the supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) is a non-qualified defined contribution plan.
Does not include perquisites and other personal benefits, or property, unless the aggregate amount of such compensation is $10,000 or more.
Column (i) includes the following: (1) if applicable, the total of perquisites and personal benefits if they equal or exceed $10,000, summarized by type, or specified for any perquisite or personal benefit that exceeds the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits for each officer, which are referred to as Specified Perquisites, in each case, valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost of such perquisite or personal benefit to U.S. Cellular, including any related tax gross up, and (2) contributions by U.S. Cellular for the benefit of the named executive officer under (a) the TDS tax-deferred savings plan which is referred to as the TDSP, (b) the TDS Pension Plan, and (c) the TDS supplemental executive retirement plan, which is referred to as the SERP, and (3) an Option Make-whole Payment as explained below:
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Perquisites: | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate automobile allowance and other personal travel and related expenses | $ | 10,480 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Tax gross up relating to corporate automobile allowance | 6,828 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Total Perquisites if $10,000 or more | $ | 17,308 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Other Compensation | |||||||||||||||||
TDSP | $ | 8,550 | $ | 8,550 | $ | 8,550 | $ | | $ | 8,550 | |||||||
Pension Plan | 10,575 | 10,575 | 10,575 | 10,575 | 10,575 | ||||||||||||
SERP | 34,425 | 14,504 | 34,425 | 28,566 | 18,834 | ||||||||||||
Option Make-whole Payment | | | 7,784 | 41,148 | | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 70,858 | $ | 33,629 | $ | 61,334 | $ | 80,289 | $ | 37,959 | |||||||
Only John E. Rooney had perquisites or personal benefits that equaled or exceeded $10,000 in 2007. The corporate automobile allowance is valued at actual cost to U.S. Cellular, plus taxes reimbursed to the officer relating to such allowance.
The TDSP is a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers or directors of TDS and that is available generally to all employees. Employees contribute amounts to the plan and U.S. Cellular makes matching contributions in part.
The Pension Plan is a tax-qualified defined contribution retirement plan that does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers or directors of U.S. Cellular and that is available generally to all employees. U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries make annual employer contributions for each participant.
51
The SERP is a non-qualified defined contribution plan that is available only to certain officers. This plan provides supplemental benefits under the Pension Plan to offset the reduction of benefits caused by the limitation on annual employee compensation which can be considered for tax qualified pension plans under the Internal Revenue Code. U.S. Cellular and its subsidiaries make annual employer contributions for each participant.
In connection with amendments to certain stock option awards in 2006, U.S. Cellular agreed to pay $7,784 to Mr. Ellison and $41,148 to Mr. Irizarry in 2007, representing the aggregate amount of a make-whole payment as a result of the increase in the exercise price of the original stock option. For further information, see the footnotes to the Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End table below for Mr. Ellison and the footnotes to the Option Exercises and Stock Vested table for Mr. Irizarry.
Footnotes:
52
Information Regarding Plan-Based Awards Table
The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding plan-based awards in 2007.
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) (i) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) (j) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) (k) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards (l) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Name (a) |
Grant Date (b) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c) |
(d) |
(e) |
(f) |
(g) |
(h) |
||||||||||||||||||||
John E. Rooney | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards in U.S. Cellular Common Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phantom Stock Bonus Match Units(2) | 03/15/07 | 2,171 | $ | 153,143 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units | 04/02/07 | 5,027 | $ | 371,194 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Stock Awards | 7,198 | $ | 524,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 04/02/07 | 121,000 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 2,013,137 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Grant Date Fair Value | $ | 2,537,474 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Steven T. Campbell | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards in U.S. Cellular Common Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units | 04/02/07 | 3,123 | $ | 230,602 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 04/02/07 | 17,200 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 286,165 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Grant Date Fair Value | $ | 516,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Jay M. Ellison | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards in U.S. Cellular Common Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units | 04/02/07 | 7,281 | $ | 537,629 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 04/02/07 | 40,100 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 667,164 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Grant Date Fair Value | $ | 1,204,793 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael S. Irizarry | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards in U.S. Cellular Common Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units | 04/02/07 | 5,233 | $ | 386,405 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 04/02/07 | 28,825 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 479,576 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Grant Date Fair Value | $ | 865,981 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey J. Childs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards in U.S. Cellular Common Shares(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units | 04/02/07 | 3,123 | $ | 230,602 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock Options | 04/02/07 | 17,200 | $ | 73.84 | $ | 286,165 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Grant Date Fair Value | $ | 516,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Explanation of Columns:
(a) | Includes the persons identified in the Summary Compensation Table. | |
(b) |
Represents the date on which the Stock Option Compensation Committee took action to grant the awards. |
|
(c)-(e) |
These columns as set forth in SEC rules are not applicable because the identified officers did not receive any non-equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules. |
|
(f)-(h) |
These columns as set forth in SEC rules are not applicable because the identified officers did not receive any equity incentive plan awards, as defined by SEC rules. |
53
(i) |
Includes the number of U.S. Cellular Common Shares underlying restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. Such restricted stock units become vested on April 2, 2010, except that the restricted stock unit award became fully vested on October 2, 2007 with respect to Mr. Rooney. |
|
Also includes the number of phantom stock bonus match units in U.S. Cellular Common Shares credited to such officer with respect to deferred bonus compensation. Mr. Rooney deferred part of his bonus earned in 2006 under the U.S. Cellular long-term incentive plan. The U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan permits the above officers to defer all or a portion of their annual bonus to a deferred compensation account. Deferred compensation will be deemed invested in phantom U.S. Cellular Common Shares. The phantom stock units are not credited with dividends because U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends. The officer makes an election as to when to receive a distribution of the deferred compensation account. If an officer elects to defer all or a portion of his annual bonus, U.S. Cellular will allocate a match award to the employee's deferred compensation account in an amount equal to the sum of (i) 25% of the deferred bonus amount which is not in excess of one-half of the employee's gross bonus for the year and (ii) 331/3% of the deferred bonus amount which is in excess of one-half of the employee's gross bonus for the year. The entire amount of the bonus is included in the Summary Compensation Table in column (d) under "Bonus," whether or not deferred. The FAS 123R expense of the matched stock units is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) under "Stock Awards." See "Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation" below. |
||
(j) |
Represents the number of U.S. Cellular Common Shares underlying stock options awarded during the fiscal year pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The U.S. Cellular stock options were granted at an exercise price of $73.84 per share, which was the closing price of a U.S. Cellular Common Share on April 2, 2007. Such stock options become exercisable with respect to 25% of the shares underlying the stock option on April 2, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, except that the stock options vested on October 2, 2007 with respect to Mr. Rooney, and are exercisable until April 2, 2017. |
|
(k) |
Represents the per-share exercise price of the stock options granted in column (j). Such exercise price is not less than the closing market price of the underlying security on the date of the grant. |
|
(l) |
Represents the grant date fair value of each equity award computed in accordance with FAS 123R or, in the case of any adjustment or amendment of the exercise or base price of stock options, SARs or similar option-like instruments previously awarded to a named executive officer, whether through amendment, cancellation or replacement grants, or any other means ("repriced"), or other material modification of such awards, represents the incremental fair value, computed as of the repricing or modification date in accordance with FAS 123R, with respect to that repriced or modified award. No stock options were repriced or materially modified in the last fiscal year with respect to the identified executive officers. |
|
Footnotes: |
||
(1) |
Pursuant to the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, on April 2, 2007, such executive officer was granted restricted stock units and stock options to purchase U.S. Cellular Common Shares as indicated above. The FAS 123R expense of the restricted stock unit awards is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) and the FAS 123R expense of the stock option awards is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (f). |
|
(2) |
Includes the number of phantom stock units in U.S. Cellular Common Shares credited to such officer with respect to company match units related to deferred bonus compensation. Only Mr. Rooney deferred his bonus earned in 2007 (based upon 2006 performance). John E. Rooney participates in the U.S. Cellular 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan. This plan permits officers to defer all or a portion of their annual bonus to a deferred compensation account. The FAS 123R expense of the company match stock units is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) under "Stock Awards." U.S. Cellular does not currently pay dividends. Does not include the amount of the bonus earned that was invested in phantom stock because this is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (d) under "Bonus" whether or not deferred and deemed invested in phantom stock, rather than in column (e) as "Stock Awards". John E. Rooney deferred $525,000, representing 100% of the bonus earned by him in 2007, and was credited with 7,441 shares of phantom stock on March 15, 2007. |
54
Information Regarding Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End Table
The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at year end.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name (a) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: (#) Exercisable (b) |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options: (#) Unexercisable (c) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (d) |
Option Exercise Price (e) |
Option Expiration Date (f) |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (g) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (h) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (i) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (j) |
||||||||||||||
John E. Rooney | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Options: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Options(3) | 104,575 | $ | 45.63 | 3/31/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 Options(4) | 92,000 | $ | 38.65 | 3/31/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
2003 Options(5) | 105,250 | $ | 24.47 | 4/21/13 | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 Options(6) | 16,500 | $ | 41.00 | 3/31/12 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Awards: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonus Match in 2007(9) | 1,447 | $ | 121,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bonus Match in 2006(9) | 514 | $ | 43,227 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 318,325 | | 1,961 | $ | 164,920 | ||||||||||||||||||
Steven T. Campbell | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Options: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Options(1) | 17,200 | $ | 73.84 | 4/2/17 | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 Options(2) | 5,682 | $ | 59.43 | 4/3/16 | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 Options(3) | 2,563 | $ | 47.76 | 6/1/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Awards: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Restricted Stock Units(10) | 3,123 | $ | 262,644 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Restricted Stock Units(11) | 590 | $ | 49,619 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | | 25,445 | 3,713 | $ | 312,263 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jay M. Ellison | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Options: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Options(1) | 40,100 | $ | 73.84 | 4/2/17 | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 Options(2) | 27,957 | $ | 59.43 | 4/3/16 | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 Options(3) | 17,200 | $ | 45.63 | 3/31/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 Options(4) | 8,807 | $ | 38.65 | 3/31/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amended Initial Options(7) | 4,613 | $ | 75.00 | 9/1/10 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Awards: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Restricted Stock Units(10) | 7,281 | $ | 612,332 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Restricted Stock Units(11) | 3,873 | $ | 325,719 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Restricted Stock Units(12) | 13,897 | $ | 1,168,738 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 4,613 | 94,064 | 25,051 | $ | 2,106,789 | ||||||||||||||||||
55
Michael S. Irizarry | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Options: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Options(1) | 28,825 | $ | 73.84 | 4/2/17 | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 Options(2) | 17,738 | $ | 59.43 | 4/3/16 | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 Options(3) | 10,888 | $ | 45.63 | 3/31/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 Options(4) | 5,682 | $ | 38.65 | 3/31/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Awards: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Restricted Stock Units(10) | 5,233 | $ | 440,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Restricted Stock Units(11) | 2,458 | $ | 206,718 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Restricted Stock Units(12) | 8,798 | $ | 739,912 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | | 63,133 | 16,489 | $ | 1,386,725 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey J. Childs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Options: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Options(1) | 17,200 | $ | 73.84 | 4/2/17 | |||||||||||||||||||
2006 Options(2) | 5,225 | 15,675 | $ | 59.43 | 4/3/16 | ||||||||||||||||||
2005 Options(3) | 5,125 | 9,625 | $ | 45.63 | 3/31/15 | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 Initial Options(8) | 6,425 | $ | 43.20 | 2/17/14 | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock Awards: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2007 Restricted Stock Units(10) | 3,123 | $ | 262,644 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 Restricted Stock Units(11) | 2,172 | $ | 182,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 Restricted Stock Units(12) | 7,776 | $ | 653,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 10,350 | 48,925 | 13,071 | $ | 1,099,271 | ||||||||||||||||||
Explanation of Columns:
56
Footnotes:
The following provides additional information with respect to outstanding equity awards at year end. Number references correspond to numbers in the above table. The following discloses the date that stock options were scheduled to become exercisable and that restricted stock units were scheduled to become vested. However, due to the delay in SEC filings resulting from the restatement discussed above, U.S. Cellular suspended the exercise of stock options between March 17 and October 10, 2006. As a result, the stock options that were scheduled to become exercisable on March 31, 2006 did not become exercisable until October 10, 2006.
57
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name (a) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) (b) |
Value Realized Upon Exercise ($) (c) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) (d) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($) (e) |
|||||||||
John E. Rooney(1) | |||||||||||||
Options Exercises (Date of Exercise):(4)(5)(6) | |||||||||||||
2000 CEO Initial Options (5/14/07) | 55,000 | $ | 226,050 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (6/18/07) | 24,543 | $ | 773,596 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (7/16/07) | 23,556 | $ | 1,016,677 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (8/16/07) | 31,620 | $ | 857,850 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (9/17/07) | 25,912 | $ | 953,562 | ||||||||||
2007 Options (10/2/07) | 121,000 | $ | 3,407,360 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (10/16/07) | 26,015 | $ | 951,369 | ||||||||||
2001 CEO Options (11/16/07) | 20,000 | $ | 472,000 | ||||||||||
2005 Options (11/16/07) | 5,374 | $ | 200,826 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (11/16/07) | 6,354 | $ | 149,764 | ||||||||||
2005 Options (12/17/07) | 21,051 | $ | 854,039 | ||||||||||
Stock Awards Vested: | |||||||||||||
2007 Restricted Stock Units(1) | 5,027 | $ | 512,754 | ||||||||||
2007 Bonus Match Units(3) | 723 | $ | 60,804 | ||||||||||
2006 Bonus Match Units(3) | 514 | $ | 43,227 | ||||||||||
2005 Bonus Match Units(3) | 1,213 | $ | 102,013 | ||||||||||
Total | 360,425 | $ | 9,863,093 | 7,477 | $ | 718,798 | |||||||
Steven T. Campbell | |||||||||||||
Options Exercises (Date of Exercise):(5)(6) | |||||||||||||
2005 Options (5/25/07) | 1,281 | $ | 36,931 | ||||||||||
2005 Options (6/1/07) | 1,281 | $ | 44,527 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (6/12/07) | 1,893 | $ | 55,503 | ||||||||||
Stock Awards Vested: | | | |||||||||||
Total | 4,455 | $ | 136,961 | | | ||||||||
Jay M. Ellison | |||||||||||||
Options Exercises (Date of Exercise):(5)(6) | |||||||||||||
2003 Options (5/17/07) | 33,138 | $ | 1,677,446 | ||||||||||
2004 Options (5/17/07) | 17,612 | $ | 626,635 | ||||||||||
2001 Options (6/14/07) | 16,600 | $ | 420,146 | ||||||||||
2002 Options (6/14/07) | 6,557 | $ | 317,818 | ||||||||||
2005 Options (6/14/07) | 17,200 | $ | 754,048 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (6/14/07) | 9,318 | $ | 279,913 | ||||||||||
Stock Awards Vested: | |||||||||||||
2004 Restricted Stock Units(2) | 6,551 | $ | 490,670 | ||||||||||
Total | 100,425 | $ | 4,076,006 | 6,551 | $ | 490,670 | |||||||
Michael S. Irizarry | |||||||||||||
Options Exercises (Date of Exercise):(5)(6) | |||||||||||||
Amended Initial Options (5/16/07) | 10,800 | $ | 365,040 | ||||||||||
2002 Options (5/16/07) | 5,288 | $ | 178,734 | ||||||||||
2003 Options (5/16/07) | 20,863 | $ | 1,067,977 | ||||||||||
2004 Options (5/16/07) | 11,362 | $ | 410,736 | ||||||||||
2005 Options (5/16/07) | 10,887 | $ | 317,574 | ||||||||||
2006 Options (5/16/07) | 5,912 | $ | 90,867 | ||||||||||
Stock Awards Vested: | |||||||||||||
2004 Restricted Stock Units(2) | 4,225 | $ | 316,453 | ||||||||||
Total | 65,112 | $ | 2,430,928 | 4,225 | $ | 316,453 | |||||||
Jeffrey J. Childs | |||||||||||||
Options Exercises (Date of Exercise):(5)(6) | |||||||||||||
2004 Initial Options (5/15/07) | 10,000 | $ | 307,500 | ||||||||||
2004 Initial Options (5/31/07) | 9,275 | $ | 335,477 | ||||||||||
2005 Options (8/27/07) | 4,500 | $ | 241,110 | ||||||||||
Stock Awards Vested: | |||||||||||||
2004 Restricted Stock Units(2) | 3,798 | $ | 284,470 | ||||||||||
Total | 23,775 | $ | 884,087 | 3,798 | $ | 284,470 | |||||||
Explanation of Columns:
58
Footnotes:
The 2001 Options were scheduled to become exercisable in annual increments of 20% on March 31 of each year beginning in 2002 and ending in 2006, and are exercisable until May 8, 2011 at an exercise price of $64.16.
The 2001 CEO Options were scheduled to become exercisable in annual increments of 20% on March 31 of each year beginning in 2002 and ending in 2006, and are exercisable until May 29, 2011 at an exercise price of $59.40.
The 2000 CEO Initial Options became exercisable in annual increments of 20% on April 10 of each year beginning in 2001 and ending in 2005, and are exercisable until April 10, 2010 at an exercise price of $69.19.
The 2000 Options became exercisable in annual increments of 20% on March 31 of each year beginning in 2001 and ending in 2005, and are exercisable until March 31, 2010 at an exercise price of $71.00.
The Amended Initial Options for Mr. Irizarry were originally granted on February 18, 2002 and were scheduled to become exercisable in annual increments of 20% on February 18 of each year beginning in 2003 and ending in 2007, and were exercisable until February 18, 2012 at an exercise price of $37.19. Options with respect to 16,200 shares were exercised prior to December 26, 2006. The unexercised portion of this stock option was amended on December 26, 2006 to correct the exercise price of the stock option to the closing price of the underlying Common Shares as of the date of approval of the original stock option by the Stock Option Compensation Committee of $41.00 on March 31, 2002. In connection therewith, U.S. Cellular agreed to pay $41,148 to Mr. Irizarry, which was paid in 2007, representing the aggregate amount of a make-whole payment as a result of the increase in the exercise price of the original stock option. The amended stock option with respect to 10,800 shares is immediately exercisable with respect to 5,400 shares and became fully exercisable on February 18, 2007. Mr. Irizarry exercised the remainder of these stock options on May 16, 2007.
Information Regarding Pension Benefits
U.S. Cellular executive officers are covered by a "defined contribution" tax-deferred savings plan, a "defined contribution" pension plan and a related supplemental plan, as discussed above. The company contributions for each of the named executive officers under these plans is disclosed in column (i), "All
59
Other Compensation," of the Summary Compensation Table. However, U.S. Cellular does not have any "defined benefit" pension plans or pension plans (including supplemental plans). The named executive officers only participate in tax-qualified defined contribution plans and a non-qualified defined contribution plan. Both the TDS Tax-Deferred Savings Plan (TDSP) and the TDS Pension Plan are qualified defined contribution plans and the supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) is a non-qualified defined contribution plan. Accordingly, the Pension Benefits table provided by SEC rules is not applicable.
Information Regarding Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The following table shows, as to the executive officers who are named in the Summary Compensation Table, certain information regarding nonqualified deferred compensation.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
Name (a) |
Executive Contributions in Last FY ($) (b) |
Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($) (c) |
Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($) (d) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) (e) |
Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($) (f) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John E. Rooney | ||||||||||||||||
SERP(1) | $ | 34,425 | $ | 10,837 | $ | 227,598 | ||||||||||
Salary Deferral(2) | $ | 157,550 | $ | 65,365 | $ | 1,176,717 | ||||||||||
Bonus Deferral and Company Match(3) | ||||||||||||||||
Bonus Deferral 7,442 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 525,000 | ||||||||||||||
Company Match in U.S. Cellular Common Shares | ||||||||||||||||
723 shares2007 Company Match | $ | 60,804 | ||||||||||||||
514 shares2006 Company Match | $ | 43,227 | ||||||||||||||
1,213 shares2005 Company Match | $ | 102,013 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in value in 2007 | $ | 915,436 | ||||||||||||||
Ending Balance 66,030 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 5,553,123 | ||||||||||||||
Aggregate Totals(4) | $ | 682,550 | $ | 240,469 | $ | 991,638 | | $ | 6,957,438 | |||||||
Steven T. Campbell(5) |
||||||||||||||||
SERP(1) | $ | 14,504 | $ | 14,504 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 14,504 | | | $ | 14,504 | ||||||||||
Jay M. Ellison |
||||||||||||||||
SERP(1) | $ | 34,425 | $ | 7,753 | $ | 172,621 | ||||||||||
Salary Deferral(2) | $ | 19,620 | $ | 327,194 | ||||||||||||
Bonus Deferral and Company Match(3) | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in value in 2007 | $ | 43,591 | ||||||||||||||
Ending Balance 3,009 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 253,057 | ||||||||||||||
Aggregate Totals(4) | | $ | 34,425 | $ | 70,964 | | $ | 752,872 | ||||||||
Michael S. Irizarry |
||||||||||||||||
SERP(1) | $ | 28,565 | $ | 3,855 | $ | 97,278 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals(4) | | $ | 28,565 | $ | 3,855 | | $ | 97,278 | ||||||||
Jeffrey J. Childs |
||||||||||||||||
SERP(1) | $ | 18,834 | $ | 895 | $ | 34,786 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals(4) | | $ | 18,834 | $ | 895 | | $ | 34,786 | ||||||||
Explanation of Columns:
60
Footnotes:
See "Compensation Discusion and Analysis" for information relating to vesting and distribution of amounts under the SERP.
Messrs. Rooney and Ellison elected to receive distributions of their deferred salary balances as a lump sum payment upon their separation from the company.
61
such acceleration are disclosed in the "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" table below. The FAS 123R expense of the company match stock units is reported in the Summary Compensation Table in column (e) under "Stock Awards."
Subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, an officer will receive in shares an amount equal to his or her vested deferred compensation account balance at the date elected by the officer (either the officer's separation from service or a date specified by the officer). See the Compensation Disclosure and Analysis for information relating to vesting and distribution of deferred bonus and company match balances.
|
John E. Rooney |
Steven T. Campbell |
Jay M. Ellison |
Michael S. Irizarry |
Jeffrey J. Childs |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SERP Company Contribution | $ | 33,626 | $ | | $ | 25,432 | $ | 17,006 | $ | 12,823 | ||||||
Salary Deferral | 141,064 | | | | | |||||||||||
Salary Deferral Excess Interest | 3,335 | | 1,201 | | | |||||||||||
Bonus Deferral | 300,000 | | | | | |||||||||||
Company Match | 121,548 | | | | | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 599,573 | $ | | $ | 26,633 | $ | 17,006 | $ | 12,823 | ||||||
62
Potential Payments Upon Termination Or Change In Control
This section discusses, with respect to the executives identified in the Summary Compensation Table, each contract, agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for payments to such executive at, following, or in connection with any termination, including resignation, severance, retirement or constructive termination, or a change in control of U.S. Cellular or a change in the executive officer's responsibilities.
The Company does not have any agreements with any of the named executive officers or any plans or policies that provide for severance or other compensation or benefits to the named executive officers upon termination or a Change in Control other than the acceleration of stock awards upon certain events as discussed herein and as set forth in the Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control. The acceleration of awards is considered to be appropriate under certain qualified termination events or a Change in Control as discussed therein, but U.S. Cellular does not consider it appropriate to generally provide for other significant severance or similar benefits in such events or to permit the acceleration of awards as a general rule for other non-qualified termination events. The Company considers the fact that, unlike most of its peer companies, which are generally widely held, U.S. Cellular is controlled by TDS, which is controlled by the TDS Voting Trust. As a result, U.S. Cellular does not follow the practices of certain other companies that may provide for substantial benefits upon a termination or a Change in Control as a standard practice. Instead, potential payments upon termination or a Change in Control are designed primarily so that employees are neither harmed nor given a windfall in such circumstances. The acceleration of awards under certain circumstances is intended to motivate executive officers to act in the best long-term interests of U.S. Cellular.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, U.S. Cellular may enter into agreements or arrangements with officers that provide for severance or other compensation or benefits under circumstances that are negotiated with such officer in connection with the employment or termination of employment of an officer. Any such agreement or arrangement is based on the facts and circumstances at the time relating to the particular employment relationship. See for instance the employment agreement entered into with John E. Rooney as discussed below.
The foregoing approach to termination payments is consistent with U.S. Cellular's overall compensation objectives, as discussed above. These objectives assume that officers will be compensated primarily based on performance during their continued employment with U.S. Cellular and are designed to motivate executive officers to act in the best long-term interest of U.S. Cellular, recognizing that U.S. Cellular is a controlled company. As a result, these objectives do not contemplate providing significant benefits upon or provide incentives with respect to qualified termination events or a Change in Control or providing any benefits upon non-qualified termination events. Accordingly, the limited amounts of termination and Change in Control payments provided as discussed herein are taken into account with all other facts and circumstances, but otherwise do not significantly affect decisions relating to other elements of compensation, which are provided consistent with the foregoing compensation objectives assuming continued employment until normal retirement.
Arrangements with Specified Officers
U.S. Cellular does not have any agreements with any of the named executive officers providing for severance or other compensation or benefits upon termination or a change in control, provided that certain awards may accelerate upon termination or a change in control as discussed above under Compensation Disclosure and AnalysisOther Benefits and Plans Available to Identified Officers. U.S. Cellular has certain arrangements with John E. Rooney relating to acceleration of vesting of stock options and restricted stock units that are not related to termination or a change in control, as discussed in footnote (1) to the below table.
Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The following table summarizes the estimated payments to be made under each contract, agreement, plan or arrangement which provides for payments to a named executive officer at, following, or in connection with any termination of employment including by resignation, retirement, disability or a
63
constructive termination of a named executive officer, or a Change in Control or a change in the named executive officer's responsibilities. However, in accordance with SEC regulations, the following does not report any amount to be provided to a named executive officer under any arrangement that does not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our executive officers and which is available generally to all employees. Also, the following table does not repeat information disclosed above under the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table or the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table, except to the extent that the amount payable to the named executive officer would be enhanced or accelerated by the termination event.
The following table provides quantitative disclosure, assuming that the triggering event took place on December 31, 2007, the last business day of 2007 and, if applicable, that the price per share of the registrant's securities is the closing market price as of December 31, 2007. All of John E. Rooney's awards granted prior to 2008 other than bonus match awards have vested pursuant to his agreement with U.S. Cellular. See footnote (1) to the below table. The vesting of his bonus match units will accelerate in the event of a qualified disability, qualified retirement, death or, upon approval by the board of directors, a Change in Control. With respect to the other officers, the following represent additional payments that may become due as a result of the acceleration of the vesting of stock options and/or restricted stock units and/or bonus match units upon the following triggering events: (i) a qualified disability (for restricted stock units and bonus match units but not stock options), (ii) a qualified retirement, (iii) a Change in Control (as defined above) and (iv) death (for restricted stock units and bonus match units but not stock options) (collectively, "Triggering Events"). No such additional payments would be made in the event of any other termination of employment or service. In addition, the below table identifies all other payments that may be made pursuant to agreements, if any.
64
Table of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Name (a) |
Early Vesting of Options ($) (b) |
Early Vesting of Restricted Stock Units ($) (c) |
Early Vesting of Bonus Stock Match Units ($) (d) |
Other ($) (e) |
Total ($) (f) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John E. Rooney(1) | ||||||||||||||
Bonus Stock Match Units for 1,961 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 164,920 | $ | 164,920 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals | | | $ | 164,920 | | $ | 164,920 | |||||||
Steven T. Campbell | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options for 25,445 U.S. Cellular Common Shares(2) |
$ | 409,786 | $ | 409,786 | ||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units for 3,713 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 312,263 | $ | 312,263 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals | $ | 409,786 | $ | 312,263 | | | $ | 722,049 | ||||||
Jay M. Ellison | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options for 94,064 Common Shares(2) | $ | 2,163,087 | $ | 2,163,087 | ||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units for 25,051 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 2,106,789 | $ | 2,106,789 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals | $ | 2,163,087 | $ | 2,106,789 | | | $ | 4,269,876 | ||||||
Michael S. Irizarry | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options for 63,133 Common Shares(2) | $ | 1,410,451 | $ | 1,410,451 | ||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units for 16,489 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 1,386,725 | $ | 1,386,725 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals | $ | 1,410,451 | $ | 1,386,725 | | | $ | 2,797,176 | ||||||
Jeffrey J. Childs | ||||||||||||||
Stock Options for 48,925 Common Shares(2) | $ | 1,196,232 | $ | 1,196,232 | ||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units for 13,071 U.S. Cellular Common Shares |
$ | 1,099,271 | $ | 1,099,271 | ||||||||||
Aggregate Totals | $ | 1,196,232 | $ | 1,099,271 | | | $ | 2,295,503 | ||||||
Explanation of Columns:
65
Although U.S. Cellular has attempted to make a reasonable estimate (or a reasonable estimated range of amounts) applicable to the payment or benefit based on the disclosed material assumptions, the calculation of the foregoing represents forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be significantly different from the amounts expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include those set forth under "Risk Factors" in U.S. Cellular's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Perquisites and other personal benefits or property payable upon termination or change in control are excluded only if the aggregate amount of such compensation will be less than $10,000. A perquisite or personal benefit is specifically identified only if it exceeds the greater of $25,000 or 10% of the total amount of perquisites and personal benefits for an officer. Any perquisite or personal benefit is valued on the basis of the aggregate incremental cost of such perquisite or personal benefit to U.S. Cellular.